The URL can be used to link to this page

APPLICATION AMENDED MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE JANUARY 21, 1986 Prepared by DEUTSCH/IRELAND PROPERTIES In Consultation with RICHARD L BOWEN & ASSOCIATES. Planners and Engineers THE ROY BARDEN PLANNING GROUP. Landscape Architect ROSSI & MALAVASI ENGINEERS. INC . Civil Group KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES. INC . Traffic Engineers GOODKIN RESEARCH CORPORATION. Economic & Marketing Analysis COGNETICS. INC. Marketing EXl+rft-:IT- lIlt" DEUTSCH IRELAND PROPERTIES IUPLY TO f'O"Y LAUOERDALE O""ICI January 21, 1986 Mr. Carmen Annunziato, City Planner City of Boynton Beach 120 N E Second Avenue P O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 RE Amended Master Site Development Plan Submission Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Carmen In accordance with our meeting last week, I am transmitting to you herewith, thirty copies of our Amended Master Site Development Plan Each of the copies is a package containing the report document, six large drawings as listed in the report document, and a letter indicating the required revision we are requesting to the Development Order We are also submitting, before the end of the week, eighteen additional copies to the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and six additional copies to Luann Rains at the State Depart- ment of Community Affairs It is our understanding that this submission fully meets the requirements identified under the State Legislation and City Code. If you have any question or there are further submittals required, please let us know as soon as possible Thank you. GZ ak Enclosures CC Mr Thomas K Ireland Mr Edward B Deutsch Jon C Moyle, Esquire / David Pressly, Esquire~ SUITE 1106-INTERNATIONAL BUILDING-2455 E. SUNRISE BOULEVARD-FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33304. (305) 564-5114 THE BUILDING' 1125 NORTHEAST 125 STREET NORTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 33161. (305) 891-6806 AFFIUATES. BROLEN REALTY & f -"'/.lENT CORP MITA CONSTRUCTION CORP AN AMENDMENT TO THE MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE Deutsch/Ireland Properties is pleased to submit herewith, this amendment to the Master Site Development Plan for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce. The amendment documents include this booklet of material which provides an explanation of the refinements made to the Master Site Development Plan, as well as backup analysis providing the justification for such refinements and six drawings as follow site plan, grading plan, drainage plan, mitigation plan, water plan and sewer plan, and the attached request for a proposed revision to the Development Order This request is being made in order to formalize a final Master Site Development Plan to be used as the basis for subdivision and public improvements engineering. We see the development of this Master Plan as a refinement, rather than a change, to what has been previously submitted to the State Department of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and the City of Boynton Beach This plan reflects a reduction in net development acreage from 411.2 acres to 361 1 acres, over what was approved in the ADA/DRI Our primary effort in arriving at this amendment was to finalize a plan that was illustrative of the original concept and which met the following goals 1 To refine the master plan; to incorporate requirements of the Development Order, specifically the set-aside of a 40- acre sand pine preserve and the incorporation of the City Park through a land exchange 2. To refine the master plan; to incorporate the requirements of a single phased construction plan consistent with our marketing plan 3 To refine the master plan; to reflect the outcome of our marketing research which has affected parcel sizes and orientations 4 To refine the master plan; to reflect changes in traffic due to a loss of 50 1 acres of developed land 5 To refine the master plan; to incorporate drainage changes consistent with the new South Florida Water Management District's regulations now in effect, plus the reduction of developed acreage and the increase of open space 6 To refine the master plan; to eliminate the rail-loading area and incorporate the potential for individual rail spurs at development sites THE MASTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN The colored plan on the following page illustrates the Master Site Development Plan in its amended form Following it is a copy of map H-l illustrating the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce as originally submitted in the DRI document In reviewing the documents for consistency, there are four areas of refine- ment that are discussed hereafter in detail 1 Land uses - Land uses have been adjusted to incorporate both the sand pine preserve and the City Park in a manner consistent with the requirements of the Development Order. 2 Road alignments - The road alignments have been refined to serve the reduced developed acreage, as well as the revised parcel sizes 3 Phasing - The revision of project phasing to accommodate a single, public-improvement construction phase, as well as single marketing phase 4 Parcel sizes - A refinement of parcel sizes and orientation to conform with the marketing research and proposed sales plan AMENDED LAND USE The Amended Master Site Development Plan is essentially unchanged from the ADA/DRI plan. It is still proposed to be developed as a nearly self-contained, planned comprehensive industrial/office park The mix of uses in the amended plan still contains those types of light industrial, office, hotel, retail and commercial trade activities as permitted by Section 7, Planned Industrial Development (PID), District of the Boynton Beach Zoning Code, as adopted June 3, 1975 A comparison of land use in the approved ADA/DRI and Amended Master Site Development Plan is shown in Table 1 The Amended Plan contains 30 4 acres of commercial use, of which 3 4 acres are recreational; l33 1 acres of office use; 197 6 acres of light industrial use, of which 53 3 acres are to be used for research and development industrial activity; l44 9 acres of open space, of which 50 3 acres are lakes, 6 acres are wetland preserve, 40 acres are sand pine preserve {in one parcel as agreed to by staff of the City of Boynton Beach and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in 1985)i and 33 9 acres of additional internal arterial roadways Arrangement of these proposed land uses within the Amended Master Development Plan are primarily the same as proposed in the approved ADA/DRI Plan Office uses are proposed along NW 22nd Avenue, around the proposed interchange at Interstate 95, and across from Motorola near Congress Avenue Commercial uses, including the club recrea- tional facility are also proposed to be located on NW 22nd Avenue and along one of the arterials south of 22nd -2- _o...:J.;} .. "'---J~ ___. . _. ,~-' -<:I ~~' n J' ,I 1/ ~ ~ ~ l' --- -- - --- \\-:o~'~'~~ \ \ ~ " 4 . i , r~ -~ -'"" ~_. =~u---;:3'" II \ dr ' r' \ \ ~r:f'l = ~\;--_.~~ " \ r- ------ · I (, "I " I\~~~~\ " r- ' \ ,',.1 I \ I \" " ' .., \\~ ~~,\ \, ',' ,. ------~ \\ ' IP-:'-=-.\ '\\\ \ '~\ ..L~ \,,' \~~.\\ \~\ MAS1ER S11E DEVEL~~~~l,:L! LEGE~D ~Sp.l' ,.. '.'" ..... I"~ ". 0--- ~~'" .- ....~' -:...--' ,.... ..... c...~.;....-c---::: 1".1 .c. oo'''' ~ ...> ~, . ." ......... ~..-... ,_ _ :::=;:::' ~.........._ .,,~' \j)11\0""""" ,\\VJ-""" ~ ,.......... ~ ..,- - .".. ,." . . \, ,-,~~.,~~L" ....._ ." ope..SpC'.-.......r--'04.. .-...-"- ~". ~.. ..... -~ ~ ~, ""el\."'- -- ",.-- ~. ~.- ..-= ,....~.. "...,,, ~ \\.\ ~;. ~ ~...cl' -----=.- n9.9 a' ~,....._ ..... 101 AL .....,. ..........'1 ,.~...... .... .......... ..... .---..- ..... ........ ..-.. - ..s."'- _.~-------- .- ..........~ ---------.--~.~-- p... / / / N ~ lI"alla..a "'AND u.. ....M.a~ u.. AC.... ... C 00.........0.,... .7.. ... a CNt.lGa ,.... .... I ""MY ....un...." ..... ."0. ..."W ..All.. .W......AN. .... .... " aDAD. .... ... ea... . aQ.D M'n.r Th. ',' i 'L~~~'::;~~ 1 j W l_ : CE~ ITIl r : ![J} .. j ~ -.,.... ...... ..17;'''' --l Th. D.. I.. ... ~"D BOVNTON .. Z w T~H E-~- - oJ w BEACH ~ 1!I Z D. ( U UI a z ( oJ ... z Q ~ > It w II m H W ..Ii ~ jj!j z MIl ~ .- 4 . . . . . c . U ....ca.ND ~ a -"AN. v.. ... AC".. --- ::::;:'~'l~y PARK It OF CCMME.RCE ~ ( By Rltoeca Develaprnent Carp. ~ MAP H-"1 00 o LJ"l N 00 o o 00 o r-- 0'1 .-i o o o .-i dP r-i LJ"l Or-- r-i N co 1.0 1.0 z ~ H III I I I I I I I I I Q ~O r-i MM r-i MOOI.O 0'1 0'1 ril Q M r-- M M~ .-i o 1.0 0 CO M 0'1 Z N M L() ~ 1.0 L() ~~ M M ril .-i .-i M L() ~ Z ril~ U)H ::>lll QH zP::; r-i 0'1 N N N 1.0 0 ~Q dP 0 .......... r-iH~ LJ"l M r-- 1.0 L() CO r-i Q N ~ r-- r-i ril~~ HO.......... I a:lZZ Lf) ~O~ I 8U)H Z Hill ~ P::;Q ~ril III lllQ H ~Z Oril P::; 01.0 0'1 or-- N ~COOO L() 0'1 CJ~ Q .......... r-- CO ~ r-i 1.0 L() 1.0 0'1 ~ N N If') .-i r-- '<3' M Q .-i N ~, L() ~ ril ~ Q) ~ U Q) ril ctj U P::; 0. ctj +JM CJ (J) 0. !:: ltl ~ (J) Q)..-I !:: Q) ~ H Q Q) :> H 0.+J rLl 0. H Q) ri o (J) Ai 0 Q)'c ctjM M ::l 0 .......... (J)+J !:: ctj Q)'O H (J) Q) 0 0-.-1 M:>!:: ril '0 H ..-1 U ctj Q)-.-I :> !:: 0..<<1 +JH ..-1 '0 ril I'll ctj Q) H +J Q ri Ul..!<: ~ ~ +J<<I,C +J (J) !:: H (J) tJl ~ Q) '0 -.-I ctj M U 0 ::l..c: -.-I 0 ~ !::0.D. ctj Q) 0 '"!jUri (J) ctj ril -.-I H !:: H H .......... Q) M "d :>1 U) U-H HctjH ~ (J)..!<:+J!::+J ::> H.QQ) Q) Q) Q) 8 Q) ctj Q) ctj-.-I U) Q)::l,C U +J (J),C 0 ..!<:H3:U)CJ (J) H Q ~ri+J -.-I ..c:Q)+J 8 ctj '0 ~ Z U 0 4-l tJlHO a:l H ctj 8 ~ 0 4-l -.-I ::> 0 0 H CJ 0 H Ul P::; 8 The location of commercial parcels along NW 22nd Avenue is a minor departure from the internal "Lakeside Center" complex originally contemplated that indicated only 800 feet of com- mercial frontage on NW 22nd Avenue The current plan, exclud- ing the Club, now provides for 2,800 feet of commercial frontage Based upon marketing requirements and the need to establish strong restaurant and service retail locations within the Park, the land-use has been specified accordingly From a traffic viewpoint, it is justified by the reduction in trip generation for the Park overall, as noted later in this report Hotel uses have been noted as alternate uses for office use par- cels located on both the eastern and western terminus of NW 22nd Avenue Three such parcels have been noted accordingly This concept is consistent with the approved ADA/DRI plan Light industrial uses, including research and development activi- ties, are to be located south of NW 22nd Avenue, along the Boynton Beach Canal (C-l6) and along High Ridge Road Light industrial uses are also proposed to be located south of the Boynton Distri- bution Center on High Ridge Road and south of the 40-acre sand pine preserve area Open space has increased substantially over the approved ADA/DRI Plan from 82 2 acres to l44 9 acres Lakes are proposed to be located in the low area of the Park Unlike the ADA/DRI approved plan, however, these lakes will be arranged as linear open space/ wetland/lake areas The result is to provide greater visual ex- posure to a far larger number of park sites The reduced acres of lakes (from 76 4 acres to 50 3 acres) is based upon new rules by the South Florida Water Management District adopted in June 1984, and the fact that the plan contemplated 50 1 fewer acres of developed land These new rules require less large size retention lakes in each project On-site ponding will be part of these rules Wetland preservation remains the same as approved in the ADA/DRI Plan, except for a slight increase in wetland acreage (from 5 8 acres to 6 0 acres) The mitigation plan, submitted herewith, identifies the locations of the lake-edge plantings as consistent with the approved ADA/DRI In addition, the preservations of upland habitat and native vege- tation is consistent with the approved ADA/DRI One large 40-acre parcel of sand pine scrub and existing proposed animal habitat area is proposed in the far northwest portion of the Amended Plan This location and parcel configuration was decided upon from several alternatives and following numerous meetings be- tween Riteco, environmental planning consultants, and City/Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council staff, during 1985 Preserved in- tact, the 40-acre site complies with requirements of the TCRPC Board and staff, the City staff, and the adopted Development Order Ample habitat land area exists to allow orderly and safe relocation of existing Gopher Tortoise and Florida Mice Existing Burrowing Owl sites all fall in northern portions of the preserve Fully consis- tent with the Development Order, this proposed "Sand Pine Preserve" will be regenerated in accordance with the Sand pine Preserve, Management Plan -6- A proposed City Park will be located adjacent to the 40-acre preserve This Park will provide a community level facility and serve the growing residential neighborhoods to the north and west Access for the Park and preserve area will be pro- vided by a new loop arterial which connects Congress Avenue (north of NW 22nd Avenue) with NW 22nd Avenue in the center of the Park Future construction of Miner Road will provide additional access ROADWAY ALIGNMENT AND TRIP GENERATION A network of major internal arterials (similar to the ADA/DRI Approved Plan) is proposed to serve the Amended Plan land uses, and avoid negative impact on the public transportation system outside of the Park Internal vehicular movement will be ac- commodated by arterials, each with divided four-lane landscaped boulevard roadways Northwest 22nd Avenue and High Ridge Road are similar in construction with a 100 foot right-of-way Miner Road has a right-of-way of 108 feet; and will be constructed by others, as adjacent sections of roadway and the canal crossing become available An internal system of pedestrian walkways and bikeways will be provided throughout the linear open space system, connected by grade-separated crossings as shown, at the arterial roadways PROJECT TRAFFIC PROJECTIONS In general, vehicle trip generation for the Amended Master Development Plan is similar to the ADA/DRI Approved Master Development Plan A comparison of the two is shown in Table Two The slight 5% reduction in total trip generation (from 44,321 in the ADA/DRI Plan to 42,957 in the Amended Plan) is the re- sult of an increase in the open space categories of land use and reduction of net developable land from 411 2 acres in the ADA/DRI to 36l 1 acres in the Amended Plan INTERNAL/EXTERNAL SPLITS There are also reductions in external trips A comparison of internal/external trip generations is shown in Table Three The lO% reduction in external trip generation is a result of reductions in net developable land acreages Traffic assignments of external trips to the impact area road- way network remain unchanged from the ADA/DRI Plan External peak-hour trips generated by the Park and their directional split are also unchanged from the ADA/DRI Plan -7- tf) Cl ~ >.0 >.0 0 >.0 ..:t p... ~ 0 ~ If) N r-l C') N N C') N '?< ~ ... <t t-' >.0 ..:t ,-l 0 N ,....;l N ,-l ..:t p... Q) f.fl Cl~ tiI,c Op... tf) '?< tiI ..:t r- ,-l >.0 ,-l tilQ) [5 C') ,-l ~~ 0 f.fl ~ <to <t C') S C') ~ >.0 ~ ,-l ,-l C') 0 0 ..:t tf) '-'" Cl '?< tiI C') '2p... C') 0 ..:t >.0 ~ 0 N ..:t ..:t t-'r-l ~ N >.0 C') ,-l O~ ... ... t-'t-' If) ..:t 0 C') ..:t ~~ .\.l N ,-l ..:t ? t-I,....;l 0 ~p... "0 ,-l I ~~ .,-1 tf) ($) ? tiI I O,?<O cO [5 ~tiI'?< (:f:) r- ~ ~ t-'c.::>tiI <t ,-l ~ N f.fl (:f:) ..:t tilp...<t S N If) ,....;It-l......... Q) ~ ,-l N cO~'?< f.fl <tt-'<t ~ 0 t-' ,....;l .c 0 Op... p... ..:t tiI tf) '-'" t-"'t-I Cl Up::. f.fl '?< tilO ~ tiI N 1""")......... ~ 0 0 0 N O<t Q) p... >.0 0 >.0 ~ ,-l ~Cl ?-- r-l ~ ,-l ~ ,-l 0 p...<t '?< ~ ... <to t-' C') N If) ..:t >.0 ,....;l-' -' p... r-l,-l ~ ClQ) tf) .........f.fl tiI <tCO 5 0 o.c N r- >.0 <tp... <t ,-l C') (:f:) f.fl S ~ ,-l co 0 .,-1 0 ~ ,-l N ~ co '-'" lJl tiI .,-1 ~ tf) u ~ ';::l ~ lJl Q) tf) Q) -' u ~ ,....;l Cl e Q) .,-1 <t '?< e ~ I.l-l %n t-' 4: 0 0 I.l-l .,-1 0 ,....;l U :::t: 0 ,....;l t-' --------- - -- -------------- ,-------- ----- ~ ',Z. ~ if' 0 .-l ...::t 0 C""l -.D .-l er- 0 B N r- -.D if' N ... ... ... ... N N -.D d:) 0 .-l C""l :2 ',Z. ~ ,-I 0 if' 0 -.D ...::t ...::t d:) -.D N f:--\ ,-I ...::t -.D r- 0 ',Z. ... ~ ...::t ,-I ...::t ,-I N ~ ,-I ,..J p.. (1) t.f) (/) 0 O~ ',Z. ~.c ,..J~ Op.. -.D 0 -.D ...::t -.D Z ~p.. r- 0 er- if' N ~(1) f:--\~ C""l N N C""l N ~~ oP:: ... ... ~O f:--\f:--\ -.D ...::t ,-I 0 N N ,-I ...::t ',Z. t.f)~ f:--\,..J ~p.. ,.....1 p..0 ~t.f)~ :2 I ~ ,..J 0 Cf' p:: ',Z. ',Z. \ :t:~~ ~ f:--\',Z.~ if' 0 C""l if' C""l ~~~ B C""l -.D r- C""l 0 if' r- 0 0 ...::t ,..Jf:--\',Z. ... ... ... (:O~~ ,-I N -.D ,-I ,-I ~~,..l ,-I ,-I C""l f:--\-p.. "Cl ,..J (1) ~~ ~ ~ ',Z.P:: .~ p::0 .D ',Z. ~- S ~ d:) 0 ,-I ,-I 0 f:--\~ 0 C""l ...::t if' ,-I ...::t ',Z.O U f:--\ ...::t ...::t if' C""l r- ~~ ',Z. ... ... ... ~ ...::t ,-I ...::t N N N ,-I c<l t.f) 0 ~,-I ',Z. p:: ~ 0(1) ~p.. C""l 0 ...::t -.D C""l -(/) r- 0 N ...::t ...::t ~~ f:--\~ er- N -.D C""l ,-I o.c op:: ... ... ... ~p.. f:--\f:--\ if' ...::t 0 C""l ...::t N ,-I ...::t 'cl .~ ,-I 13 ~ (/) ~ .~ .B t.f) 0 ~ ? \-4 (1) t.f) <ll ,-I 0 ~ ~ 0 S (1) .~ ~ ',Z. S ~ ~ f:--\ <C. 0 0 \.l-l .~ 0 ,..J U :t: 0 ,.....1 f:--\ -~-~~~..~~~~~~~-~-------------- ~, ",. ./' F ROADWAY :IMPROVEMENTS I Construction of the Amended Master Development P~an will result in a 5% reduction in total trip generation, a 1~% reduction of external trip generation, and a reduction of ttle level of impact on intersections and roadways within the project impact area. However, agreements reached between Riteco Incorporated, the City, the County and TCRPC, as stated in the approved ADA/DRI Development Order, will be honored by Deutsch/Ireland Properties without change. Therefore, no change in the Development Order is requested .. /' In support of the data presented herein concerning trip generation and splits, there is attached hereto a letter from Jim Zook at Kimley-Horn with his computation of the revised traffic numbers based upon this refined plan His letter supports the fact that there is no increase in traffic, despite the refinement of land uses illustrated in the Amended Master Site Development Plan PHASING The approved ADA/DRI speaks to an extended development period of up to thirty years. Development was proposed in two phases Our proposed plan is to proceed with development of the entire project in a single phase Immediately following below are excerpts from a marketing study prepared by Goodkin Research concerning the absorption rate for this project and other major projects in the area Based upon their conclusions and the marketing intents of Deutsch/Ireland Properties, it is believed that this entire develop- ment can be accomplished in an eight to twelve year time frame. On this basis, Deutsch/Ireland Properties has made the financial commitment to move ahead immediately with all roadway and public improvements construction Platting and subdivision will be sought immediately upon approval of this Amended Master Site Development Plan ABSORPTION RATE Based on the development's planned amenity mix and predicated on tha hypothesis that our marketing recommendations outlined above will be baslcaHy adhered to, the! average annual absorption rate is expected to vary trom at>"rolCimat~ly 45 to 75 acres per year (see Table 2). Given about 379 net acres o! land, the expected absorption period ranges trom 5.1 to 8.4 years, with !l 0.3 year p:-obable time span. These absorption rates are measured in terms of land sales to both u::ers &:ld other developers/builders, and also include acreage occupied by buildings constructed by the client/developer Goodkin[j~)(~J[?(s[}J -10- ABSORP110N RATES Absorption or industrial land can best be mcasured by the rate at which land is takcn off the market through land sales. This rate, however, docs not necessarny refiect the rllte of building improvements as economic conditions and purchascr goals have significant etteets. The annual absorption rate of the surveyed parks, as measured by available land, ranges from less than 1 Acre to 55 acres. The most common average annual absorption rate varies from about 2 to 5 acres in the parks Hurveyed. The larger and better planned and located parks tend to rcOcct the faster absorption rate while smallcr parks arc usually at the lowcr end of the range. Two other factors grcatly artecting the absorption rate are both the price and the Immediate availability of fully improved sites. Measured in terms of the amount ot land put to industrial use (which includes existing buildings and facilities under construction), Arvida's Park of Commerce has generated the most impressive Ilbsorption rate of approximately 38 acres per year. Goodkin~@)[[csOu -11- Kim/ey-Horn and Associates,/nc. 5800 Corporate Way. West Palm Beach. Fla. 33407 · (305l683-5500l Raleigh, West Palm Beach, Tampa, Orlando, Nashville, Dallas December 9, 1985 447906(07)jT06-22 i Mr George Zimmerman Deutsch-Ireland Properties Suite 1106, International Building 2455 East Sunrise Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33304 RE: Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Proposed Plan Revision Traffic Impact Dear George As requested, by you, we have completed a comparison of your proposed revised plan for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce (second revision) As indicated on the attached summary, the traffic impact of this plan is virtually the same as for the approved DRI plan Differences due to road alignment changes are noted on the summary Also enclosed is our billing through October, 1985 Billing includes Task I of our proposal and for a portion of work accomplished on Task II. The work on Task II was initiated to meet your initial "fast track" schedule Work was halted since we did not receive a signed proposal. Billing for the enclosed summary will be under our current agreement (4479 06) as requested We have enjoyed working with you on this task Please let us know if you have any questions regarding the enclosed summary or the billing Very truly yours, JRZjnan Attachments K~MLEY-HORN AND ASS!ATES. INC cc Mimi Howard -12- BOYNTON BEACH PARK OP COM.MBRCE UPDATE Prellmlnary Traffic Impact Assessment And Sire Plan Review Summary TRAPPIC IMPACT ASSBSSMBNT Proposed Plan A pproved Plan Total Trips External Trips 42.226 30.200 (72%) 44.143 31,403 (71%) Total External Peak Hour 5.130 5.331 DIFFERENCES Total Trips Proposed 42.226 = 096 = Approved 44.143 External Trips = Proposed 30,200 = 096 Approved 3 I .403 External Peak Hour Proposed 5,130 = o 96 = Approved 5.331 NOTE If 400 Room Hotel substltued for II-acre Offlce External Peak Hour = 5.190 Proposed 5,190 _ 0 97 Approved 5.331 - Generally projected 24-hour and peak hour assigned trafflc volumes are the same Traffic volumes Increase on Congress Avenue bet\\cen Miner Road and NW nnd Avenue due to no connection to Miner Road within the western half of the project There Is also some Increase In directional splits due to the higher percentage of office trips 12/10/85 4479 06(07)!T06-22 -13- PARCEL SIZES AND ORIENTATION The Amended Site Development Plan is based upon a green space network containing pedestrian ways and lakes This concept is a slight refinement from the ADA/DRI approved plan in that the lakes and green space have become the focus for each of the development parcels, rather than using the lakes and green space as buffers between the roadways and development parcels. In rearranging the plan in this fashion, we have been able to provide this pedestrian amenity to the vast majority of parcels within the development. In the process of reorienting the specific parcels, we have moved much further ahead towards the final definition of parcel size. The following paragraph excerpted from the original ADA/DRI documents indicates an intention of developing parcels from a minimum size of one and three quarter acres to a maximum size of nine acres. The Amended Master Site Development Plan is fully consistent with that intent. A collector street, with a right-ot-way ot 60 teet, may be con- structed between the Lakeside Center and adjoining ottlce/industrlal uses, it the market need tor small sites dic- tates its requirement. As shown on Map H, a typical industrial lot may be 600 teet x 660 teet. These 9 acre sites may be typically subdivided into 1.75, 2.25 or 4.5 acre tracts to meet the need tor smaller ottice or light industrial sites near the Lakeside Center. PAGE l2-7 Immediately following are excerpts fro~ reports prepared b~ our marketing and sales consultants, Goodk~n Research Corporat~on and Cognetics, Inc. The excerpts identify o~r pot7nt~al market and the sizes of facilities most likely requ~red w~th~n our Park Although this is not the exclusive rationale we have used.in determining our final subdivision plan, the results of th~s research provide the backbone for it. -14- 1-15 I~UUSTRIAL PARK DEVELOPMENT - CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Our analysis of the supply and demand determinants for warehouse and industrial space indicates that these uses constitute attractive real estate investment opportunities for the developer The demand for warehouse space is strong, and although several new industrial parks are competing in the marketplace, the subject property offers a close-in and highly visible location. Specific recommendations for this portion of the development follow: High Tech R & D Facilities In present day dollars, rental rates for high tech buildings should vary from about $7 00 to $7 50 per square foot, absolute net. Typically, these buildings will contain the following improvements: 18-24 foot clear ceiling heights 100 percent air-conditoned &nd fully sprinklered for fire protection 22,400 ampere, three-phase electrical service drive-up loading docks and drive-in doors 35,000 to 80,000 square foot buildings 2,500 to 5,000 square foot bays, or multiples thereof parking ratio of one space per 275 to 325 square feet Market segments typical of this fast-growing group include micro electronic telecommunications equipmentj medical electronics (e.g., electronic health monitoring systems); process control technology; electronic surveillance systems and other electronic components; computer systems; engineering, research and design; pharmaceutical/medical products and other related high tech groups. These users require well landscaped sites and attractively designed buildings. -15 _ ,("'4 ;hi ;~.l;JA ..~ g li'''b (f~\~1 72'IJ( ?[:l '~,J.. i., ..~< d.'~ ,<<~:: M 1":(:::;,., ~, C IU, 1 I .. _;J, ",,' ',,-" ,""".~.. ~ liO...... '-_...JL .-/' .:::.J '- 1-18 OPPICE DEVELOPMENT - RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the above statistics, it is clear that the supply of office space in Palm Beach County exceeds the demand In the face of this glut, in order to be successful, developers will be compelled to be more cautious, sophisticated and innovative in their planning, design, marketing and timing of new projects. While there is an imbalance in supply and demand, the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce subject property is nevertheless strategically positioned to enable it to compete in various segments of the office market. However, in order to generate acceptable absorption rates, it is recommended that a differentiated marketing strategy be adopted by offering three basic product lines: o Pure office space o Office/Service o Office/High tech buildings PW'e Office Space We feel that the subject property is suitably positioned to enable it to successfully capture a portion of the demand for luxury-type office space originating from such tenants as financial institutions, insurance companies, computer companies, regional headquarters, operations centers, and professionals seeking prestigious locations (e.g., major law firms and accounting firms) In Broward County, the Corporate Park at Cypress Creek has been very successful in attracting these relatively large companies. These farms are already well entrenched in the Boca Raton market -16- ;r~'i'.'fi ;r'<Lti",,(f; '1 / ~ ;~;;~<; [f' c;)(2 .;) ~'i [J:J1 ,.J~i j "< . .,.i. ,Ji ., /jj '''''' ':;"." "'.; ,'S' h v'" (v::.-:: ..-)\ L11 c.J ,'- J '.-.i:v~~ X~.... "*'~ ~:~ ~~ ~~ a ..:.;a.>> \......:::)L ,-----'\.......:.. .......J 1-19 Our analysis of the criteria aifecting the location decisions of corporate and regional/divisional headquarters shows that the availability of highway and air transportation are ranked as the two outstanding features, closely followed by the availability of professional/executive labor In this respect, the site ranks highly Pertaining to the luxury office market component of the development, the following recommendations are made: Rental Rates - In present-day dollars, the recommended base rent is $14 to $16 per square foot, absolute net. Size of Buildings - In order to be able to capture some of these larger tenants, buildings should be fairly large, varying in size from apr;roximately 65,000 to 110,000 square feet. Building Height - Building heights can vary from about one to six stories, with two to five floors probably being most common. Office/Service Space and Moderately Priced Office Space It is recommended that the developer adopt a penetration pricing strategy by also offering office/service space and moderately priced pure office space at highly competitive prices to the market segments indicated below These target groups are searching for excellent "value" at locations which offer good visibility, a convenient road trWlsportation network, and a nearby labor pool and local market. Our overall experience with office/service projects in South Florida clearly demonstrates the popularity of this concept when pl'ices are very competitive Those projects with relatively high rental rates have experienced difficulties leasing space even when site exposure is excellent. The subject property clearly offers an environment that is conducive to our recommended stmlegy, especially in light of current market condi lions. -17- ,~Ci (> {l!J L ~I :f~G]~'~)Ur, _ .] i _ I \ I. JI', I <-1' \.., ,r .. __ '-"...JLj ........_ J 1-23 COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT Interviews with representatives and employees of major organizations and various office and industrial parks in Florida, show strong preferences to work in self- contained developments that offer the necessary supporting commercial/retail and other personal services, includlllg such uses as: Restaurants Personal services (e.g. dry cleaner, hairdresser, beauty shop) Stationery/book store Gift/cigar shop Convenience store Pharmacy Full service print shop Travel agent Messenger/courier service Car rental agency Camera shop/developing Although these uses would cater chiefly to employees of the park and other surrounding commercial developments, some demand would also emanate from surrounding residential communities. It is important that the restaurants and other retail facilities be positioned in the subject park in a manner that maximizes exposure to passing traffic HOTEL DEVELOPMENT A t present, there is only one hotel chain fronting {-95 in Boynton Beach - an unattractive Holiday Inn at the intersection of 1-95 and Boynton Beach Road. Given -18- I- ) <~:> c> .,.;: n -'; ;'."" ',,-, ,--:1, -;, c;- ,J, . ') :.:1' \":;,- v \ \" V : ",' .~"~ ,:D( v)~)\ ~1(: f",li C I j .;;; ~;~J*~ ~lJ '0L '--'~-lLJ ~ J l 1-24 the impressive growth of industrial, cOllllnerciul, relail and residential developments in the surrounding area (especially as exemplified by Motorola and the Boynton Beach Mall), we feel that the property offers a good location for one or two quality hotel franchises that can be phased to support up to 500 rooms. A hotel would clearly complement the overall amenity mix of the development and derive most of its revenue from sllch patronage sources as business guests, meetings and small seminars, potential residents in the area, and, to a lesser degree, social/tourists requiring a short slop-over in a quali ty, easily accessible and highly visible location. The stralegy of adding hotel establishments during the later phases of major office/business park developments is fuirly common, as exemplified by such successful South Florida projects as Arvida Pttrk of Commerce, Corporate Park at Cypress Creek and Hillsboro Executive Cente." (~ '~. / .. [f/~-J' .:::.-- --'1 f l ~.' ;('t.. ~)\). v/r<lu.J. 'IJ I .., .., .<<.. l. ~ I\.. ..; .." C'.{. '..' >..;. L'L <- 11 '- '-, y _.~~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~ -19- ,;> ..,.;/' 1-25 LOT SIZES AND LAND PRICES According to the preliminary 1\1aster Plan of the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce, the park is divided into large 10~ acre lots. Our competitive survey shows that with the exception of Arvida Park of Commerce's 5~ acre tracts, most competitors offer one to two acre tracts, reflecting strong demand by relatively small users. While we feel there is a need for large tracts (and our projected absorption rates assume that the developer will be able to attract several large occupants), it is important that the developer is also able to satisfy the demand by potential occupants requiring minimum lot sizes of roughly 1 25 acres. In order to achieve the marketing flexibility required in a project of this size, it is strongly recommended that the land plan be amended to meet the needs of these market segments. It is advisable to plat relatively small and combine lots, as opposed to platting mainly large tracts as this could present more of a problem when trying to split In this respect, it is also important to realize that, in general, smaller parcels tend to generate higher prices per square foot than larger ones. Depending upon such factors as size of parcel, location within the park, financing, type of buyer/user, the recommended land price in present-day dollars varies from approximately $6 50 to $12 00 per square foot with an average of $8.25 per square foot. These prices are somewhat lower than those currently being quoted at Arvida Park of Commerce, and roughly in line with Ilillsboro Executive Center and Corporate Park at Cypress Creek. Given the outstanding amenity mix planned for the development (e.g, golf course, day cat'e center, meeting/conference facilities, health club, restaurants/retail services), we feel that these prices are realistic and offer potential occupants excellent "value" 1 1 If an interchange is built at 1-95 and N W 22nd Avenue, land prices at some of the parcels could increase by liS much us 10 to 20 percent. -20- 'j,'i"'-:; ..<.. ....t.' ~ '.. [f~0 ~c:::-'\[j] -:JC- " ."'."~'." .""".;" ",....'.. . ..f " )"" ( C? ) ':>,... I 'I . . ,',0.' .' .: .~; '.'; ,1.,,* ? .~ <:C ('. I 0 \ ~....,"" '....J' l,<'y'~<;l ;. ;i,il&'" ~ ~J~ ~\--,,-~ ,'::d] [, - I PRO P f R TIE S Palm Beach Co. SU~MARY OF GROWTH TkE~DS The Palm Reach Co. economy performed better than the U.S. economy during the 1970's ard early 1980's. ~ni Ie the US grew by 28 percent during the 1972-62 perioc as a whole, Palm Beach Co. grew 97 percent. Palm Beach Co. tended to reflect the general pattern of cycl ical change experienced nationwide: Compound Annual G ro wt h Rate Period U.S. Pain; Beach Co. Difference 1972-76 1.8 5.6 3.8 1976-80 4.5 9.7 5.2 1960-82 -.4 5.4 5.8 19~2-85 2.5 8.1 5.6 Palm Beach Co. did better than the U.S. as a .whole during the major growth period In 1976-80, and again during th~ 1980-82 recession. The biggest contributors to the Palm Beach Co. jOb base during the 1972-82 per iod were: .s~J;1.QL. ~~l_~~~_J.Q~~_tL.~Ql~~ Eating E Drinking Places Health Services Special Trade Contractors Business Services Rea I Estate Transportation Eqpt. General Contractors Electric E Electronic EQpt. Food Stores Misc. Retail Trade 11765 6993 6650 5987 4424 4250 3722 3582 3442 3331 -21- Economic Change The least effect! ve contr ibutors have been: S.~'1't. Heavy Construction Te'lCtlle !'tanufactur ing Stone,Clay,Glass Products Co~bin~d Investments 011 f. Coal Products "1fg. Forestry Tobacco Products Mfg. Pipel ines ~ai Iroads Coal f. Lignite Mining ~~l_~~~_J~Q~_'L~~lA~ -553 -150 -43 -34 -34 -25 o o o o S.QYt~~1_2l_~~1_J2~_~tQ~ln It is Important to know which kinds of companies, on balance, are creatlnq net new jobs. By "on balance" we mean the net of new startups and expansions and relocations into Palm beach Co. over the losses due to closings. layoffs, and out-moves. We determine the net change by examl nl ng the behav lor of each Indl vi dual tus Ines s In the area. nettl n9 the gains against the losses as we go. a:t_s.l~~ In Palm Beach Co., small companies were the greatest net Job creators during the period for which the most recent micro detail Is available (1960-64): Percent Net fm~l~:tm~!ll_~lZ~ tl~1_~~~1_'~i!~~ .J$2~__~.biLlg~ 0-19 19406 69.8 7- 20-99 6990 23.7 100-499 3260 15.9 500+ 9084 24.1 Unknown 1541 120.5 ---------------- ------------ TOT A l S 40304 34.5 -22- Economic Ctange a~_I~Qt_Q!_Q~Q~t~blQ Palm ~each Co. relies most heavi ly upon local Independents for its growth Q~o~!~blQ tl~l_l~~~_'t:al~g Percent Net l~~__'naQS~ Independent 22970 3&.4 i. Subsidiary 131 2.0 Local Headquarters 10313 &&.2 Branch (Laca I He) -2891 -37.0 Branch (Non-local HQ) 9790 40.9 TOTALS 40313 34.5 .a~_As~ Among establishments with an Identifiable age, young companies indicated the fastest rate of jOb gain: Percent Net Ass: ~~l_J~Q~_'L~al~~ 19,~__'baIlg~ 0-4 39b30 172.9 i- 5-8 -32&0 -17.9 9-11 -1542 -16.6 12+ -1414 -4.1 Unk n own &899 21.7 ---------------- ------------ TOTALS 1t0313 34.5 -23- Economic Change a~_~2L~2Lal~_!~1!~il~_~~~1ia9_~haQg~ The I a r g est SOU r ceo f jOb C rea t Ion (f r om a n act I v I t y s ta n d po I n t ) was startups ("births"). On the negative side, closures ("deaths") playerl the most signif icanl economic role. Looking at the net, we find the greatest level of imbalance between startups and closures, ana therefore the Mlghesl rate of employment gain: Percent Net Cba!lsu:_ft2'~11 ~~1_J2t1_'L~~1~~ J2~1_'L~Ql~~ Startup - Closure 1 qf; 28 46.7 % Expand - Contract 1 5 ~ 10 36.6 Inmove - Outmove 5115 12.7 ---------------- ------------ TOT A L S 40313 100.0 ~al~L~_~1_Ba~lg1~_~t~~lo9_k~m~ani~1 Net jOb creation figures tell us a great deal about where the economy is healthy, but they do not tell us which individual companies are growing. It could be that there are many healthy firms In an industry that is declining. It thus pays to look at the nature of growing companies ~~L 1~. What do we mean by "growing?" Is it absolute or is it percent growth? Absolute growth favors larger companies; percent growth favors smaller ones. We have avoiaed these biases by choosing a hybria mixtur~ of the two: absolute employment growth multipl ied by the percentage growth it represents (expressed in decimal terms). Thus a company that grew from 500 to 550 employees would have an absolute growth of ~O, a percent growth of 50/500 ~.l, and an index of 50 X .1 c 5. We have chosen to examine the characteristics of al I very rapialy growing establishments i.e., al I of those with a growth index of o v e r 20 -- k e e pin 9 t r a c k 0 f the ire h a r act e r 1st i c s, i nth e mea n t i me. -24- rconomic Change ~lz~ The greatest number of rapidly growing establishments are small: No. Rapidly Percent of ElT'ployment Growing Rapidly Crowing ~lz~______ f~.ta~ll~hm~!J.1~ .f~.ta~ll~h!!l:o.1~ 0-19 202 bl.8 7- 20-9Q b3 19.3 100-499 27 8.3 500+ 30 9.2 Unknown 5 1.5 -------------- ------------- TOTALS 327 100.0 Ca:o~J:.lbi~ In terms of ownership status, local largest number of high-growers Independents represent the No. Rapidly Percent of Crowing Rapidly Growing !ht!l:J:.~hl~ fl.1~tll1hm~n.1~ f.~l~~ll~hm:ol~ Independp.nt Fir m 222 67.9 7. Subsidiary 8 2.4 Headquarters of Firm bO 18.3 Branch of Local Firm 9 2.8 Branch of Non-local Firm 28 8.6 -------------- -------------- TOTALS 327 100.0 -25- F cO'lornl c Ch~nge !~~ The largest proportion of growing establiShments are young in age: No. Rapidly Percent of Growinq RapidlY Growing Ag~_11o_:!:i!.~1 ~~la1211~tlm~Ql~ E.~la~ll~tl!Jl~lll~ O-It 12,. 37.9 7- 5-8 76 23.2 9-11 Zb 8.0 12+ 64 19.6 Un\< n own 31 11.3 -------------- -------------- TOT A L S 327 100.0 -26- CONCLUSION We look forward to the expeditious approval of this Amended Master Site Development Plan. We feel it is the appropriate refinement of the document initially approved in the ADA/DRI and contemplated by the Development Order. Many of the revisions that have taken place have resulted from the incorp- oration of requirements expressed in the Development Order We look forward to the opportunity to present this project at the City Council Public Hearing and look forward to its successful completion. -27- - ... .,.. EXHIBIT "e" DEUTSCH I IRELAND PROPERTffiS -----_....--.-..~ -r-"I 'U~I,. T TO lOin LAUDl:lltDALE O",ICC - ---' ~ -- ......-.-- - ~,..,.. J......O February 28. 1986 F.~\. y ':...?T. ... Hr. Carmen Annunziato. Planning Director City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E 2nd Avenue P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33435 RE Response to questions of the TRB reviewed in our meeting on February 18. 1986 Dear Carmen In response to the questions raised In the attached memoranda. 1 am providing you herewith our responses for the record Memorandum #1 dated February 12. 1986. from Carmen Annunziato. Planning Director ITEM 1 The Proponent stil I wishes to proceed with consideration of the commercial sites as shown on their submitted Master Development Plan Although we recognize your concern. we maintain a great deal of concern ourselves that the parcels be able to support the highest cal iber of cOrmlerclal uses ITEM 2: The question. with respect to a central loading and unloading facility for rail service. the Proponent has reviewed such a proposal with a number of rail users and have found it to be inappropriate Al I potential users require direct siding access to their faci I ity ITEM 3 The Master Development Plan is presented in ful I accordance with the PIO Zoning Ordinance We intend to provide all of the required greenbelt buffers adjacent to properties having a different zoning classification. in complete campi iance with the Code ITEM 4 The rights-of-way for all interior roadways wi I I be 100 feet wide Since we will be proposing some variations on the basic sidewalk/bike path scheme. we will provide complete detail for review during the platting process Again. we expect to provide the City with pavement sections. landscaping and pedestrian amenities in excess of Code requirements The typical roadway section will have two twenty-four foot wide roadways with a sixteen foot wide landscaped median SUITE 1106-INTERNATlONAL BUILDING-2455 E. SUNRISE BOULEVARD-FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33304. (305) 504-5114 THE BUILDING. 1125 NORTHEAST 125 STREET NORTH MIAMI, FLuRIDA 33161. (305) 891-6806 .!J:'~" lATe<=: 00,",1 ~a.j at: ~I TV t ',1,"J .'\f-::CI C~'T ......""'00 I T^ r""""" .::'TC'H fl""'T'1""\1o r_f""'n ITEM 5: The schedule for the Environmental Impact Analysis phase of the Interchange construction has been presented at the meeting, and a copy is attached hereto for your further review We expect to execute the contract with Kimley-Horn, our consultant, on or about March 4. Memorandum #2 dated February 12, 1986, from Perry A. Cessna, Director of Ut i lit i es ITEM A is comentary on water distribution. ITEM 1: We hereby agree to loop the water mains as requested at the cul-de- sacs. ITEM 2: The relocation of the water main routing to the High Ridge Road right-of-way and the additional routing along the north side of the canal is agreed to Final plans will be prepared in accordance therewith ITEM 3: At this initial phase, we will agree to a 1,000 foot maximum distance between line valves; however, we expect to review this plan in more detail with the City during the platting phases. When 1,000 foot spacing will provide for fewer than four utility connections, we feel it is appropriate that the spacing be increased ITEM 4: We hereby agree to add an additional ten inch gate valve where requested ITEM 5: With respect to easements required for water and sewer, we hereby request that ten foot wide easements be approved where installation occurs outside of dedicated right-of-way In these instances, we will provide for a ten foot building setback from an easement, thereby providing for a thirty foot clear path at utility lines We also ask that the I imitation on landscaping be imposed only within the ten foot wide easement area. With respect to landscaping at the right-of-way and adjacent to such easement areas, we will endeavor to utilize the plant materials as recommended by the City Forester, Kevin J Hallahan, in his memorandum dated February 20, 1986 ITEM 6 With respect to fire flow, the Proponent hereby agrees that no building will be certified for occupancy without proper fire flow Since fire flow is a question of use, the Proponent agrees to work out an appropriate formula with the building department to establish required fire flow needs for projects at the time of permitting Since to the extent feasible, all publ ic improvements will be made at the same time, it is felt that the water loops will be connected prior to occupancy for the vast majority of situations ITEM B Sewage collection and transmission ITEM 1 Again, this item refers to easements being provided and the proponent agrees to provide such easements at a width of ten feet with a building setback requirement of an additional ten feet . ITEH 2: Parcels W2-0 through W5-0 will be served by a sewer along the north side of Northwest 22nd Avenue Parcels W19-0 and W20-0 respectively will be served by an extension of the two sewers shown to the north ITEM C Proponent will work with the City as required to insure that inspection of utility installation can be accomplished in a timely manner The funds necessary to accomplish this task will be exarnined and determined at a later date. Memorandum #3 from Charles C. Frederick, Director of Recreation and Park Department also dated February 12, 1986. ITEH I: Land exchange proposal: The Proponent wishes to keep this matter separate from discussions concerning the Haster Plan layout. The negotiations are continuing between Hr. Peter Cheney. the City Manager and the Proponent to work out the details of such a land exchange ITEH 2: Median and right-of-way maintenance The Proponent has determined at this time that the rights-of-way, other than Northwest 22nd Avenue and High Ridge Road, will be privately held Since dedication is not contemplated. maintenance of those areas will be taken care of by the Developer and the succeeding Property Owner's Association Maintenance of Northwest 22nd Avenue and High Ridge Road rights-of-way is also of concern to the Proponent, and the Proponent is eager to establish a means wherebY they can assume control and responsibility for such maintenance Memorandum from John Wildner, Park Superintendent dated February 12. 1986. This memorandum provides the backup for cost estimates concerning right-of-way maintenance I believe all of the questions raised therein have been addressed in the previous comentary The next memorandum is from Lieutenant McGarry of the Police Department dated February II. 1986 In order to provide further information to the Police Department in response to Lieutenant McGarry's questions, a meeting was held with Lieutenant Hammock. Chief Hillary and other members of the Boynton Beach Police Department and Jim Zook of Kimley-Horn and I In that meeting, detai Is of the proposed High Ridge Road relocation were discussed Peak hour traffic movements were identified at 1,300 cars per hour The interchange spacing between the proposed 1-95 Interchange and High Ridge Road would be in excess of 800 feet, center to center This distance more than adequately meets the DOT 660 foot separation criteria The Police Department felt adequately assured that an acceptable roadway and interchange design could be developed within these distance perimeters Final design and pavement layout will be accompl ished during the platting and roadway engineering phases scheduled to fol low immediately . With respect to the ability to obtain vacation of the DOT right-of-way for High Ridge Road. Jim Zook of Kimley-Horn met with Frank Gordon. Design Engineer of the Florida Department of Transportation on Thursday afternoon, February 27. During that meeting. Hr Gordon indicated that DOT would approach the vacation of High Ridge Road in accordance with their typical vacation procedure He indicated that it did not appear as if that portion of High Ridge Road was a part of the DOT network, and as such. there should not be any major difficulty in obtaining vacation. He did. however. reserve final Judgement on the roadway operations and easement vacation until such time as the roadway design was complete. I believe this responds to all areas of concern. If you have any further questions. please contact me. CC Mr. Thomas K. Ireland Hr. Edward B Deutsch Hr. Thomas P. Misuraca Hr Rick Rossi I1r James Zook I1s Mimi Howard David Pressly, Esquire Hr Richard Kerber GZ ak Attachments ---- "C ~~ ~ '" 0 )t ..... s ; ~l 0 ... ;i ~ \0 -III % \ \ .... \ \ a \ \ ~ \J ~. ~ = i\ ~.-c i~ 9.' I- ice ~rrt ~{ C\ t)<&, , !. I t' \C ~~ - 9.- ;; ~~ \~ ~ ~ C1\ i ~~ -y:rt ;~ \C .. ~ ";t - Z 0. a ~ rn '! a ~~ ~ ' !. · W -C\ ~ \ - - = ~ \C fI'J ~ tt ~ ~ . 0\ ~ t ~ ;:: n ~ = , :1- 0 = ------ --.~----- ------------ -_.~ " ., ,..J .. ,t 1 F.S. 1985 LAND AND WATER MANAGEMENT Ch. 380 permit agencies on the date specified in the develop- ment order If the annual report is not received, the re- gional planning agency or the state land planning agen- cy shall notify the local government. If the local govern- ment does not receive the annual report or receives noti- fication that the regional planning agency or the state land planning agency has not received the report, the local government shall request in writing that the devel- oper submit the report within 30 days. The failure to sub- mit the report after 30 days shall result in the temporary suspension of the development order by the local gov- ernment. (19) SUBSTANTIAL DEVIATIONS.- (a) An ro osed change to a previously a roved develo m nt f additional reqional imoact, or anv type of regional im- pact created by the chanqe not oreviCllIc::ly rl'!vil'!wpn hy the reqional planninq aqency, shall constitute a substal'l- bal deviation and shall cause the development to be subject to further development-of-regional-impact re- view (b) A proposed change to a previously approved de- velopment of regional impact or development order con- dition which meets or exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a substantial deviation and shall cause the development to be subject to further develop- ment-of-regional-impact review without the necessity for a finding of same by the local government: 1 An increase in the number of parking spaces at an attraction or recreational facility by 5 percent or 300 spaces whichever is greater or an increase in the num- ber of spectators that may be accommodated at such a facility by 5 percent or 1,000 spectators, whichever is greater 2. A new runway a new terminal facility a 10- percent expansion to an existing runway or a 20- percent increase in the floor area of an existing terminal 3 An increase in the number of hospital beds by 5 p~nt or 60 beds whichever is greater ~ An increase in industrial development area by 5 percent or 32 acres whichever is greater 5 An increase in the average annual acreage mined by 5 percent or 10 acres, whichever is greater or an in- crease in the average daily water consumption by a min- Ing operation by 5 percent or 300 000 gallons whichever is greater An increase in the size of the mine by 5 per c~ or 750 acres whichever is less ~ An increase in land area for office development by 5 percent or 6 acres, whichever is greater or an increase of gross floor area of office development by 5 percent or 60,000 gross square feet, whichever is greater 7 An increase in the storage capacity for chemical or petroleum storage facilities by 5 percent, 20,000 bar rels or 7 million pounds, whichever is greater 8 An increase of development at a waterport of wet storage for 20 watercraft, dry storage for 30 watercraft Or wet/dry storage for 60 watercraft in an area identified In the state marina siting plan as an appropriate site for additional waterport development or a 5-percent in- crease in watercraft storage capacity whichever is greater 9 An Increase in the number of dwelling units by 5 Percent or 50 dwelling units whichever is greater @ An increase in commercial developrlJent by 6 ~ acres of land area, or by 50,000 square feet of gross floor area, or of parking spaces provided for customers for 30~ars or 5 percent, whichever is greater 1 An increase in hotel or motel facility units by 5 pe ent or 75 units whichever is greater ~ .' ..... .a...-.. 12. An increase in a recreational vehicle park area by 5 ~cent or 100 vehicle spaces, whichever is less. 13 A decrease in the area set aside for open space ~ of percent or 20 acres, whichever is less 14 Net changes to two or more types of develop- ment which cumulatively meet or exceed 100 percent of th~riteria set forth herein . 15 A 15-percent increase in the number of external ..~ ve Icle trips generated by the development above that ~ ~;,q;: whi~h was projecte? during the original development-of- pL _____ \~ regional-Impact review :~';w 16. A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the -'<~~ acreage of an approved development of regional impact to a land use not previously approved in the develop- m~ order @ Any change which would result in development of any area which was specifically set aside in the appli- cation for development approval or in the development order for preservation, buffers, or special protection, in- cluding habitat for plant and animal species, ~rchaeo- logical and historical sites dunes, and other such spe- cial areas 18. A proposed change involving simultaneous in- creases and decreases of the uses set forth in subpara- graphs 4 6. 10 and 11 only if regional impacts of the change exceed the adverse regional impacts of the orig- inally authorized development or the project as changed creates regional impacts which were not reviewed by ~ional planning agency (c) An extension of the date of buildout of a develop- by 5 or more years shall be presumed to create a ~ substantial deviation subject to further development-of regional-impact review The presumption may be rebut ted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hear ing held by the local government. For the purpose of cal- culating when a buildout date has been exceeded, the time shall be tolled during the pendency of administra- tive or judicial proceedings relating to development per mits ~*~ *" ~ (d) 1 A proposed change which does not meet or ex ceed any of the criteria listed in paragraph (b) shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation subject to further development-of-regional-impact review The presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence at the public hearing held by the local govern- ment. 2. A change in the plan of development of an ap- proved development of regional impact resulting from requirements imposed by the Department of Environ- mental Regulation the Department of Natural Re- sources or any water management district created by s 373 069 or any of their successor agencies or by any appropriate federal regulatory agency shall be submit ted to the local government pursuant to this subsection. The change shall be presumed not to create a substan- tial deviation subject to further development-of-regional- impact review The presumption may be rebutted by 597 1 J.; ~. ,II I i U Iii 1 ~' I" ~ ,1 E "~I t-l -\ I. F -'II [,I I i-- J - j I L IJ" t- i (I ^ ~.1 1 t ),. ,[ t, I i'H fd F I 11 'i I i F r~ .J 1 (j II f,1 lj F ~, ! r- r I t, TIC. \'l ~ I() i 1,:\ 1',' F .A~' HIT i'I,; TN i I- i I d:f' ! !' C l' I 'II , j'li j iii, r I ij .i ~, L ~ It-III 11l)~ Ij J L i i " I L 1,_ f ), 1", \'If) H J 1 F ~'1 , , jJ r 1-' L J I, I I, N N (1 [\1 II _, I' [. r:. [ L If~_ ~ L f ," r t, d [ )ilj'.H 1ft 1 '( I ~n} ".! ,\ "N F, e; t, I r f Li'h N- Ii '(' E: f I"" [HI I \ Ii - H r II !1 _ [I L, J r I t, J , "'11 ill Il U I" ICE T ' V', N H 1. t, I-EFr'li ~,,(! I [I F I:.' r- c I I F. I I 11 ~ N r: _, C, I F r i I t, I U -1 -'- U! I J U 'i F ~ I I' L [i F L F ~. E. 1 I,! L r N ( .,.0' '-!~,~ ,j I' i' ! ,[. III i L 2[1,,11'1) T t. F /'.1 J T I I [ r~ rUT l ,\ f: I F r j ,_ i r r r!prJ" 11 'i l: t ~A r' I tL HL F!.' :::i-,) C He , ,'I ,1 L _ 1 ~-~~l_l i' r f) I, ,<, L'" t, 'ItltA r. i L i') r 1\1 _,\ '1 '.1'1 , :Ii , L i"" I , r '- T 'f; I Ul 't I t, i f- '-\ F I, r .II, r L \) [L t I (t [ If F r ~1 T I r ' I 1- F L L 11 -, h 1\'1 i\ I" .i I'~ F ~L U h F:. .f (-.( L' ~~ I I"" j, f.1 'I q J ~ j i fllf'1441!j t '-' \. r I I I' J 'r-! ] ,J I I 1 F 'I L I 1 ~- F !,,~ 1 I " L II T , I"~ F I ,". {- t-, L L I IN ,~ i.J. L Ii L i F' J 0. ~ L.J l_ L I L Lt t 11 'l .l b l i~ I- i' I! [i T.I [^ _ 1 ( r ~I r'll NL 'ii I L F H L f' T r.J 1 h! ~: r L L (, r' r r I L: t. , , H 11 f-J f'~ 1 ~ f i it' .1 1- 1 i t, 1",1 I In I I i l' Ii:. i. r i" 1 ,~ r~ I ~ " i I r L, 1-\ r (' L Il () U'r n,NUJ''Ll..E.Lon ,~___L i',j,,-,J'.J r t, r'A r-: J-A'}(J 1) ! i i t: !Hr! I:' i !II l.Jf..-Jr. t:: j:l ~ r:: [, I t rJ 1J1'1t E r " I. hI:" fc f'L.0fJ iJ f.) ,j 'I - 4 J t.: IV! I 'r1 II -.1 t [L, I:' t_ , 1 I I '1 t (j T t'l i: t I r,1 11 II CL j- L 1 ~ ~1 (\1,-, I Ie ,[ 14 i I 4 + .:.5 1 ') c {.; l~~ , i"1 I"!l L t.(JI, I. ~ l ( f I" ,_ I 1 ,~ ,i r' ,.~ 1 r L II U "F' , D 1\ i' r. t, L r E r~I!.'1LLi I l f r L '1,1 () Uj'_ L 1 1 r t '1 f'iL. ~ f ii H~i r) j- t C[I n 'I!l " i, L,d!' [- f- i 1\ i t' rl!lH [f .) r L 'I! t~, !.'~..J !t E L" r p 4 ') ! i.J. )!+ \1') ')>.+- (" { L N 1) , i!' ~I .) '... q i1 "1 _ 1 1 L~ i"! 1 , 1"1 (, !\,~ \n/ , ,-- I) u 1 (I r. 1 1-- ,.I 1 FE f f,q t~! i y I '\1 I'J (." r L N i (',.I 1--0 ! I Ii T (" I ! j I r~ iT_ii' '\[,' ! I - 11 (I '-I [', \"tJ H I ~H [,J Nt\~'j[ I i ,I [i J i I I I',J I Fer I il. t C,.fflhL,iJ,(! Fill N;1['J I N 11',1i F [' , "11. '!l' ill l\~ LI ~i '( l' .iJ1.11 , 1 I 1 I, t cd: F- I I 'II'J h 'i'~ f ,,' iJ" '1' ,~. 1-- HIT l:' i I'J 1. i l: F I ~ r I ! 6. (I L, !. L I r , L., I J.!. j' t. L t.~ M .\1 ,1 I r 11 f i- Cj. 1 1 Ii ~.. ~-1 f., h I. !'.'1 I "'I [, 1 " I. E ~ I I f , 'f UJ" r r ,11 r f' J u 'F t ''iN! ~ L'I,IF-! L' '\ I 'f) fr' I! I f l' tJ hI [I r r j (J I L. f h .J r J f'1 -'I 1 HI i f', ~iL' J 1 l: L " V J - Ii l: !J " L i-L.:.~,~U! II') l'iF L 'I' j l~ L.' 1 ~1 I:. N 1 1'>1 ~^: .11 4. 1111' U , , ELI'TFI' T I' r, ,'1'1 J P<4 L ,'. I !"i , F ~ 1-. r ;' .L ~ i ~ t .~ Lt ,i'.l L. h i " " i ! [' r: 11 F I il () I ' i' l: 1 J l: \,.J Ird:: I, L ~ LEi-, ,i', ~ },- L \. j II {- eN T I. II ill, I'J' I .1 ~ L [', f u n 4- , 'I', r1 ill f. f [,1 I t,! i h ,[ ,'J I ! "'['I J J (i )t,i"j r F r E r. r 1/ b. L' [ F i. )tH: f [, L 1 /' i I' ,t) '[ I F r T Ft.) /, tJ T t ~ I 1'1[:', t, Ie I ['.1 L , 1"L1 0 I f='1 I 'rll Fr, iEF IV l,n.lfF I ) ~ \ I I. G /::, r' J T F tJ' I N f. t II '( L ^ IJ f ~\ I, j. : 'l t f. [, FL.e>(J(J[[ IJ i ,- F E ~.1 L T r., -1E ') 7 r! ~. 1 L_ h '1 [ IN' , [, Lt. ! f: I ~'1 , (~ J i 'N l E:. A H 'f) fN"_ifoy I!L'L I I -IJN r I '-r~ Jr~',! [J i- LeT 'N J. N! I II L' ~ i l: L L"' r E (i II ~1 f ~.1 f" l. F I'~ r~ i 11,,1 ilT II~J 11 1'1 [I " t 11 t t. L}' LiJ"f~' ItJ' l~. .....! '. I I I , T II '-' .J 0 r.:, I J L!- ( 1. ~1 ~ f T IN II U n !'1 I I f L 1 _ [ I f, i t r'i- f' I [..:, I t f-' I. r~ I 1',1 [ l- i. ^ L. L' t / r '1 f: (! I ~1 "F. I-c y [, II! -j 1 i- E. L b i~ L l f 1 F E rc T ! t. L I '\i I Ell:. r r l F >- '" I ~'1 E:' ~\, H f.f, 11.ili_ If.tri T[;II Tli l:: it'h' i1 i I 'j ilL f\~ l ,oIL' 1 1 1"1 14 E ,H' '~f I 'e I~ ( r. 1"1 J I Uhi r1 ~!b;\ FLr It.,.; , 'y tT '_. t~ E- E. f.'1A _ ri F! ,'\'1 L: F f:, IlL E I f\'iLJ I"i! '1 "- '. , F l (~ '" iJ F, e 11 ~) h;) L 1 I r nL :HI / ! :,) "- L, I:) " !. L)..' t,[ J.!,I HJ r- t ~ IL"I') I ~II !..\, l\ " I 1 .)1 y,,- ANNUAL STATUS REPORT DEVELOPMENT JANUARY 1. 1985 to DECEMBER 31. 1985 BOYNTON BEACH PARK OF COMMERCE NAME OF DRI REPORT I NG PERIOD LOCATION BOYNTON BEACH CITY PALM BEACH COUNTY COUNTY DEVELOPER NAME ADDRESS DEUTSCH/IRELAND PROPERTIES 2455 E. SUNRISE BLVD. SUITE 1106 FT. LAUDERDALE. FLORIDA 33304 I ) Describe any changes made in the proposed plan of development. phasing, or in the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval since the Development of Regional Impact received approval Please note any actions (substantial determinations) taken by local government to address these changes Note: If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "A" a detailed description of each change and copies of the modified site plan drawings. Exhibit "A" should also address the following additional items if app I i cab I e a) Describe changes in the plan of development or phasing for the reporting year and for the subsequent years; b) State any known incremental DRI applications for development approval or request for a substantial deviation determination that were filed in the reporting year and to be filed during the next year; c) Attach a copy of any notice of the adoption of a development order or the subsequent modification of an adopted development order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 380 06 (14), F S Response: See Exhibit "A" 2) Has there been a change in local government juriSdiction for any portion of the development since the development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new Development of Regional Impact development order for the project? Please provide a copy of the order adopted by the annexing local government Response: There has been no change in local government jurisdiction 3) Provide copies of any revised master plans, incremental site plans, etc , not previously submitted Note If a response if to be more than one or two sentences, attach as Exhibit "B" Response A copy of the proposed revised Master Plan is attached with Exhibit "A" 4) Provide a summary comparision of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the reporting year Example Number of dwelling units constructed, site improvements, lots sold, acres mined, gross floor area constructed, barrels of storage capacity completed, permits obtained, etc Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "c" Response No development activity was proposed for, and no development was actually conducted during, the calendar year 1985 except for various engineering studies, marketing studies, and the preparation of site plans 5) Have any undeveloped tracts of land in the development (other than individual single-family lots) been sold to a separate entity or developer? If so, identify tract, its size, and the buyer Please provide maps which show the tracts involved Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "0". Response: No undeveloped tracts of land in the development have been sold 6) Describe any lands purchased or optioned adjacent to the original Development of Regional Impact site subsequent to issuance of the development order Identify such land, its size, and intended use on a site plan and map Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "E" Resr~nse No lands adjacent to the original DRI site have been purchased or optioned subsequent to the issuance of the Development Order 7) List any substantial local, state, and federal permits which have been obtained, applied for, or denied, during this reporting period Specify the agency, type of permit, and duty of each Note If a response is to be more than one sentence, attach as Exhibit "F" Response: The South Florida Water Management District issued a conceptual permit applicable to 17 acres of the Development, for the excavation of a 4 l/2 acre lake for purposes of drainage and discharge to the L-20 Canal system 8) Assess the development's and local government's continuing compliance with any conditions of approval contained in the DRI development order, and assess the developer's commitments, as contained in the application for development approval, which have been identified by the local government, the Regional Planning Councilor the Department of Community Affairs as being significant Note Attach as Exhibit "G" Response See Exhibit "G" 9) Provide any information that is specifically required by the Development Order to be included in the annual report Response Since there are no tenants in the Development, no additional information is required by the Development Order that is not already contained in this Annual Status Report 10) Provide a statement certifying that all persons have been sent copies of the annual report in conformance with Subsections 380 06 (l!)and (l~), F S Response The undersigned, on behalf of the Developer, certifies that all persons have been sent copies of this Annual Status Report, in conformance with Section 380 06(15) and (18), Fla Stats (15) Development Order Requirement 8 As part of the annual report required under Section 380.06 (l~, Florida Statutes, the developer shall provide a list of all industrial tenants, including a description of their activities and the four digit standard Industrial Classification Code applicable to the operation A copy of this list shall be provided to the Deparmtnet of Environmental Regulation, the South Florida Water Management District, the City of Boynton Beach, and the agency delegated the authority for maintaining, updating, and verifying the master files for hazardous waste generators in Palm Beach County Response See Exhibits "H-l" through "H-4" Person completing the questionaire J>avUI~1~ Title AGENT/ATTORNEY Representing: DEUTSCH-IRELAND PROPERTIES Original - City of Boynton Beach Copies - Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council State Land Planning Agency (Department of Community Affairs) EXHIBIT "All TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT 1. a. On January 21, 1986, the Developer filed an Application to revise a previously approved Development of Regional Impact. The Application contains a detailed description of the minor revisions in the proposed plan of development and a modified site plan, and is attached to this Annual Status Report as Exhibit No. "1". The City of Boynton Beach will schedule a public hearing regarding these minor revisions in accordance with Section 380.06(19), Fla. Stats. b. On May 2, 1985, a Notice of Adoption of Development Order was recorded in Official Records Book 4534, page 1728, in the Public Records of Palm Beach County, in accordance with Section 380.06(15)(f), Fla. Stats. A copy of the Notice is attached to this Annual Status Report as Exhibit No. "2". EXHIBIT "l" TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT \ " DEUTSCH IRELAND PROPERTIES REPLY TO rORT LAUDERDALE OF"nc[ January 21, 1986 Mr Peter Cheney, City Manager City of Boynton Beach 120 N E Second Avenue POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 RE Requested Development Order Amendments Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Mr Cheney As part of our submittal requesting approval of the Amended Master Site Development Plan for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce, Deutsch/Ireland Properties hereby requests an amendment to the above captioned Development Order, City Ordinance #84-51 passed December 18, 1984, as follows 1 Section #3 The Amendment application procedure and the subsequent proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provision of Florida Statutes, Chapter 380 2 Section #4 subsection (1) Paragraph (C) shall be added as follows (c) Boynton Beach Park of Commerce ADA, Amended Master Site Development Plan submitted 21st January, 1986 3. References throughout the Development Order shall be revised to conform to the Amended Master Site Development Plan, as approved Such revisions shall be made in the interest of consistency and clarity. For your use in reviewing this request, attached hereto is a copy of the proposed Amended Master Site Development Plan GZ ak CC Mr Thomas K. Ireland Mr Edward B. Deutsch Jon C Moyle, Esquire SUITE 110G-INTERNATIONAL BUILDING-2455 E. SUNRISE BOULEVARD-FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33304. (305) 564-5114 THE BUILDING' 1125 NORTHEAST 125 STREET NORTH MIAMI, FLORIDA 331Gl . (305) 891-6806 AFFILIATES: BROLEN REALTY & MANAGEMENT CORP MITA CONSTRUCTION CORP .JJ r ..0 co c- o U1 co en C' EXHIBIT "2" TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF DEVELOPMENT ORDER THIS Notice of the Adoption of a Development Order is hereby provided by RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION pursuant to Section 380 06(14)(d), Fla Stats (1984), this =~rl-day of April, 1985, as follows 1 A Development Order was adopted by the City of Boynton Beach (Ordinance No 84-51) pursuant to Chapter 380, Fla Stats (1984), covering that certain property located in Palm Beach County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof 2 The Development Order became effective upon final passage of said .li- -- Ordinance No 84-51 on the 18th day of December, 1984 :E c.. 3 The Development Order may be examined at the office of the City Clerk ~ of Boynton Beach, 120 E Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Florida , 4 The Development Order constitutes a land development regulation applicable ~ z: ~ e:! CIO N r- -I 0- ::t- P1 In :J- m to the subject property 5 The recording of this Notice shall not constitute a lien, cloud, or encumbrance on the subject property, nor actual or constructive notice of any such lien, cloud, or encumbrance IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Notice to be executed on the date aforesaid I~ BY ,- ... RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (2) r STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF PALM BEACH ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1J...~4f-. day of April, 1985, by Howard Wade Riley, III, Vice President of RITECO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Florida Corporation s Pic; ~) cot'c. - , I':' ,-:. I l't I ( \. 'R)TARY SEAL) J>atH:d j-~~ NOTARY PUBLIC , My CQJ1l~~J9n Expir.es ROTARY PUBLIC STArr or rloRtDA MY COM~ISSIOH EX~ OEe 14,19as BONDED THRU GENERAL INS UND j '<: Prepared by' DAVID S. PRESSLY, ESQ P.O Box 3888 West Palm Beach, FL 33402 Return to: DAVID S. PRESSLY, ESQ P.O Box 3888 West ~alm Beach, FI 33c1.0i EXHIBIT IIAII OVERALL BOUNDARY LEGAL DESCRIPTION ::t- ,., U'1 :I- m A Tract of land lying partially in Sections 16, 17, 20 and 21, Township 45 South, Range 43 East, Palm Beach County, Florida, said Tract being more particularly described as follows Commencing at the Southwest corner of said Section 17: thence North 1014'39" East, along the West line of Section 17, a distance of 1318.10 feet to a point in the intersection with the centerline of N W. 22nd Avenue, as recorded in O.R. Book 1738, Page 1686, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida: thence with a bearing of North 89004'3211 East, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue, a distance of 778.37 feet to the point of Beginning: thence North 1044'3911 East, a distance of 1247.06 feet to the South right of way line of L.W.D D. Lateral 21; thence North 89008'49" East, along the South right of way line of L.W.D.D. Lateral 21, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612, of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, a distance of 635.93 feet to the centerline of the L.W.D.D. Equalizing Canal E-4 Canal, as recorded in O.R. Book 1732, Page 612 of Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence along the centerline of the above described E-4 Canal with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 10032'5211 East, a radius of 750.00 feet, a central angle of 4004'1711,_and an arc length of 53.29 feet: thence continue along the centerline of the E-4 Canal, with a bearing of North 12035'00" East, a distance of 320.69 feet to a point of curve; thence with a curve, to the left having a radius of 6500.00, a central angle of 3028'30", and an arc length of 394.23 feet: thence North 9006'30" East, a distance of 1979.16 feet to a point on the North Line of Section 17: thence with a bearing of North 89016'39" East, along the North line of Section 17, a distance of 1964.50 feet: thence South 0002'11" East, a distance of 2625.18 feet; thence North 89008'4911 East, a distance of 368.96 feet to a point on the North right of way line or~.W. 22nd-Avenue$as recorded in O.R. Book 1738, Page 1686 of the Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida; thence South 19027'31" East, a distance of 50.00 feet to the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue: thence with a curve to the right having a chord bearing of North 75029'49" East, a radius of 1637.02 feet, a central angle of 9053'58", and an arc length of 282.85 feet to a point: thence North 12002'41" East, a distance of 915.72 feet: thence North 0031'11" East, a distance of 399.70 feet: thence North 89012'37" East, a distance of 413.21 feet; thence South 88022'56" East, a distance of 1349.70 feet to a point on the West right of way line of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad: thence South 0028'21" East, along the West right of way line of the Railroad, a distance of 1309.09 feet to a point on the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue: thence North 88027'31" west, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a distance of 672.97 feet; thence South 0033'53" East, a distance of 1306.69 feet: thence South 88045'31" East, a distance of 333.51 feet to a point on the West right of way of the Seaboard Coastline Railroad: thence with a bearing of South 14008'23" West, along the West right of way of the railroad, a distance of 1312.49 feet: thence South 0033'53" East, a distance of 26.69 feet: thence South 13015'22" West, a distance of 920.57 feet: thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 187.60 feet: thence with a bearing of North 0049'21" West, a distance of 200.00 feet: thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 218.00 feet: thence South 0049'21" East, a distance of 200 00 feet; thence North 88050'0411 West, a distance of 40.00 feet; thence South 0049'21" East, a distance of 556.84 feet: thence North 88050'04" West, a distance of 3617.26 feet to a point on the centerline of the above described centerline of the E-4 Canal: thence with a bearing of North 5018'14" West, a distance of 153.13 feet, thence with a curve to the right having a radius of 450.00 feet, a central angle of 15036'44", and an arc length of 122.62 feet; thence North 10018'30" East, a distance of 988.60 feet to a point of curve: thence with a curve to the left having a radius of 450.00 feet, a central angle of 18020'00", and an arc length of 143.99 feet: thence with a bearing of North 8001'30" West, a distance of 1255.14 feet to a point on the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue: thence with a bearing of South 89004'32" West, along the centerline of N.W. 22nd Avenue a distance of 817.85 feet more or less to the point of Beginning. containing 591.55 acres more or less and subject to easements and rights of way of record. --~ a- N .... -t 0- C~f~ , EXHIBITS "B" THROUGH "F" TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Not Applicable. EXHIBIT "G" TO ANNUAL STATUS REPORT Both the Developer and the City of Boynton Beach are in compliance with all conditions of approval contained in the Development Order for the calendar year 1985. There have been no items or matters that would be classified as a "Significant Deviation" under Chapter 380, Fla. Stats., nor have there been any matters or items of non-compliance. Commitments as indicated in the question were maintained and progress continued on all matters necessary to allow development to begin as quickly as possible. LAW OFFICES MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P A 9TH FLOOR, BARNETT CENTRE 625 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE ..JON C. MOYLE JOHN F FLANIGAN MARTIN V KATZ E. COLE FITZGERALD, ill THOMAS A SHEEHAN, ill DAVID S. PRESSLY DONNA H STINSON THOMAS M BEASON WILLIAM 8 KING MYRA GENDEL LISA MILLER LAYMAN MARK E. RAYMOND BRUCE R BRYAN ROBERT BRODY STEVEN A. MAYANS KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER PETER L. BRETDN RONALD K. KOLlNS JAMES PATRICK GARRITY ANDREW FULTON, ill POST OFFICE BOX 3888 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 TELEPHONE (305) 659 7500 TELECOPIER (305) 659 1789 TALLAHASSEE OFFICE SUITE 100, THE PERKINS HOUSE 118 NORTH GADSDEN STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 TELEPHONE (904) 681 3828 February 14, 1986 ADMITTED TO OHIO BAR ONLY Mr. Peter Cheney City Manager City of Boynton Beach 120 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Development Order Adopted By the City of Boynton Beach (12/18/84) for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Mr. Cheney: In accordance with the above-referenced Development you are hereby given notice that there were no industrial in the Park during the calendar year 1985. Order, tenants Sincerely, David S. Pressly DSP/pp cc: Edward B. Deutsch Thomas K. Ireland ~teven Deutsch, Esq. Ann Mandell EXHIBIT "H-l" LAW OFFICES MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P A. JON C. MOYLE JOHN F FLANIGAN MARTIN V KATZ E. COLE FITZGERALD. m THOMAS A. SHEEHAN. m DAVID S PRESSLY DONNA H STINSON THOMAS M BEASON WILLIAM B. KING MYRA GENDEL LISA MILLER LAYMAN MARK E. RAYMOND BRUCE R. BRYAN ROBERT BRODY STEVEN A. MAYANS KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER PETER L. BRETON RONALD K. KOLlNS JAMES PATRICK GARRITY ANDREW FULTON. m: 9TH FLOOR, BARNETT CENTRE 625 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE POST OFFICE BOX 3888 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 TELEPHONE (305) 659 7500 TELECOPIER (305) 659 1789 TALLAHASSEE OFFICE SUITE 100. THE PERKINS HOUSE liB NORTH GADSDEN STREET TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32301 TELEPHONE (904) 681 3828 February 14, 1986 ADMITTED TO OHIO eAR ONLY Ms. Sally Lockhart Planner, Resource Control Department South Florida Water Management District 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 RE: Development Order Adopted By the City of Boynton Beach (12/18/84) for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Ms. Lockhart: In accordance with the above-referenced Development you are hereby given notice that there were no industrial in the Park during the calendar year 1985. Order, tenants Sincerely, David S. Pressly DSP/pp cc: Edward B. Deutsch Thomas K. Ireland ~teven Deutsch, Esq. Ann Mandell EXHIBIT "H-2" LAW OFFICES MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P A. 9TH FLOOR, BARNETT CENTRE 625 NORTH FLAGLEP DRIVE ,JON C. MOYLE JOHN F FLANIGAN MARTIN V KATZ E. COLE FITZGERALD ill THOMAS A SH EEHAN, ill DAVID S. PRESSLY DONNA H STINSON THOMAS M BEASON WILLIAM B. KING MYRA GENDEL LISA MILLER LAYMAN MARK E. RAYMOND BRUCE R. SRYAN ROBERT SRODY STEVEN A. MAYANS KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER PETER L. BRETON RONALD K. KOLlNS JAMES PATRICK GARRITY ANDREw FULTON,ill POST OFFICE BOX 3888 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 TELEPHONE (305) 6S9 7500 TELECOPIER (305) 659 1789 TALLAHASSEE OFFICE SUITE 100, THE PERKINS HOUSE 118 NORTH GADSDEN STREET TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32301 TELEPHONE (904) 661 3626 ADMITTED TO OHIO BAR ONLY February 14, 1986 Mr. Alex Padva Assistant Manager Department of Environmental Regulation 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 RE: Development Order Adopted By the City of Boynton Beach (12/18/84) for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Mr. Padva: In accordance with the above-referenced Development you are hereby given notice that there were no industrial in the Park during the calendar year 1985. Order, tenants Sincerely, David S. Pressly DSP/pp cc: Edward B. Deutsch Thomas K. Ireland oteven Deutsch, Esq. Ann Mandell EXHIBIT lH_3" LAW OFFICES MOYLE, FLANIGAN, KATZ, FITZGERALD & SHEEHAN, P A. JON C. MOYLE JOHN F FLANIGAN MARTIN V KATZ E. COLE FITZGERALD III THOMAS A SHEEHAN. III DAVID S PRESSLY DONNA H STINSON THOMAS M BEASON WI LLlAM B KI NG MYRA GENDEL LISA MILLER LAYMAN MARK E. RAYMOND BRUCE R BRYAN ROBERT BRODY STEVEN A. MAYANS KAREN LEVIN ALEXANDER PETER L BRETON RONALD K. KOLlNS JAMES PATRICK GARRITY ANDREW FULTON. III 9TH FLOOR. BARNETT CENTRE 625 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE POST OFFICE BOX 3888 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 TELEPHONE (305) 659 7500 TELECOPIER (305) 659 1789 TALLAHASSEE OFFICE SUITE 100. THE PERKINS HOUSE liB NORTH GADSDEN STREET TALLAHASSEE. FLORIDA 32301 TELEPHONE (904) 681 3628 ADMITTED TO OHIO BAR ONLY February 14, 1986 Mr. Thomas R. Keith Director Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority 5114 Okeechobee Boulevard Suite 2C West Palm Beach, FL 33417 RE: Development Order Adopted By the City of Boynton Beach (12/18/84) for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Mr. Keith: In accordance with the above-referenced Development you are hereby given notice that there were no industrial in the Park during the calendar year 1985. Order, tenants Sincerely, David S. Pressly DSP/pp cc: Edward B. Deutsch Thomas K. Ireland ~teven Deutsch, Esq. Ann Mandell EXHIBIT IH-4" DEUTSCH IRELAND PROPERTIES REPLY TO rOAT LAUD~AD"'LE OF"YICE January 21, 1986 Mr Peter Cheney, City Manager City of Boynton Beach 120 N.E Second Avenue P O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 RE Requested Development Order Amendments Boynton Beach Park of Commerce Dear Mr Cheney As part of our submittal requesting approval of the Amended Master Site Development Plan for the Boynton Beach Park of Commerce, Deutsch/Ireland Properties hereby requests an amendment to the above captioned Development Order, City Ordinance #84-51 passed December 18, 1984, as follows 1 Section #3 The Amendment application procedure and the subsequent proceedings have been duly conducted pursuant to the provision of Florida Statutes, Chapter 380 2 Section #4 subsection (1) Paragraph (C) shall be added as follows (c) Boynton Beach Park of Commerce ADA, Amended Master Site Development Plan submitted 21st January, 1986 3 References throughout the Development Order shall be revised to conform to the Amended Master Site Development Plan, as approved Such revisions shall be made in the interest of consistency and clarity. For your use in reviewing this request, attached hereto is a copy of the proposed Amended Master Site Development Plan GZ ak CC Mr Thomas K Ireland Mr Edward B Deutsch Jon C Moyle, Esquire SUITE 1106-INTERNATIONAL BUILDING-2455 E. SUNRISE BOULEVARD-FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33304 · (305) 564-5114 THE BUILDING. 1125 NORTHEAST 125 STREET NORTIl MIAMI, FLORIDA 33161 · (305) 891-6806 AFFILIATES: BROLEN REALTY & MANAGEMENT CORP MITA CONSTRUCTION CORP