REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 02-251
FROM
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
Michael Rumpf \4\ ~
Planning and Zoning Director
TO
DATE
November 6, 2002
SUBJECT
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion Appeal (ADAP 02-001)
Appeal of administrative determination that site plan has expired
Project:
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
Location
2815 S Seacrest Boulevard (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Agent:
Kieran J Kilday, Kilday & Associates, Inc.
Req uest:
Notice of Appeal from the October 3, 2002 determination of the Development
Director that the subject site plan had expired and building permits cannot be
issued
BACKGROUND
Request for Buildinq Permits
On October 1, 2002 the general contractor for the above-referenced project attempted to file for
a building permit. At that time, staff determined that the subject site plan had expired as of
September 4 2002. Upon request for reconsideration from the agent, the Department Director,
on October 3, 2002, issued a written notice indicating that the site plan had expired and as a
consequence of the expiration, no building permits could be issued
Request for Appeal
Staff received the request for appeal on October 4, 2002, just one day following issuance of the
administrative determination According to the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 1,
Article VII, an appeal must be filed within fifteen (15) calendar days following the rendition of the
order (statement of administrative determination)
Administrative appeals are processed in accordance with procedures outlined in Chapter 1 5,
Article I, Sec. 4 1, E of the Land Development Regulations Under these procedures the
Planning and Development Board hears the appeal and renders a decision that must be ratified
by the City Commission
The subject appeal is based on the position of the applicant that the time clock for site plan
approval should not have started until after all conditions of approval had been satisfied,
particularly since they involved separate application processes Due to the proposed height of
the project exceeding the maximum allowed by code at the time of application, conditions of site
plan approval included completion of the code review process that would increase the
maximum height for the C-1 zoning district, and add "parapets" to the list of architectural
elements eligible for height exception Although site plan approval occurred on September 4,
2001, the code amendment and subsequent height exception where not approved until October
10, 2001 and November 6, 2001, respectively The documents referenced herein are attached
hereto and labeled as follows
Exhibit "B" - Request for reconsideration
Exhibit "c" - Administrative Determination
Exhibit "0" - Request for administrative appeal
ANAL YSIS/CONCLUSIONS
The Land Development Regulations, Chapter 4, Site Plan Review, Section 5 allows one (1)
year to secure a building permit from the date of site plan approval This section reads as
follows
"Upon approval of a site plan by the City Commission, the applicant shall have (1) year to
secure a building permit from the development department. If an applicant fails to secure a
building permit in that time, all previous approvals shall become null and void, and the applicant
will be required to submit a new site plan and application, provided however, a clearing permit
shall not constitute a building permit plan for site plan review purposes. At its discretion, the
City Commission may extend the approval of a site plan for a one-year period, provided a
request for extension is filed prior to the expiration of the one-year period. In granting such
conditions the City Commission may impose additional conditions to conform the site plan to
current development standards. "
The purposes of this time limitation are to maintain approved projects in accordance with
current development regulations, to free-up infrastructure capacity for active or new
development applications, and to expire projects that are not proceeding in good faith
Furthermore, the above-described code section refers to the date when the site plan is
approved, rather than the dates when the conditions of approval are satisfied With respect to
the prerequisite application processes, the applicant could have postponed the processing of
the site plan to coincide with the ultimate amendments to the code
The following is a summary of the points relevant to this case on which the ultimate
recommendation is based
1 There have been no amendments to the Land Development Regulations subsequent to
site plan approval which would warrant the reprocessing of a site plan application for the
proposed project;
2. There currently remains adequate capacity on the adjacent roadway network to
accommodate the projected impacts from the proposed project, and there are currently
no other pending projects within the same vicinity which would compete for trip
availability;
3 It appears that progress has been continuing on the proposed project since approval
was granted, as evidenced by the retaining of a development team, the designing of
engineering drawings, the permitting of right-of-way work by Palm Beach County, and
the ultimate action to request building permits (see Exhibit "E"), and
4 The subject project was supported by staff, the Planning & Development Board and the
City Commission, and the reprocessing of the project would therefore only delay the
ultimate construction of the project without benefit to project design
Staff holds to the current interpretation of the Land Development Regulations that define the
approval period as starting with the actual date the project is approved by the City, rather than
the date that all conditions are satisfied Based on this position, staff recommends that the
request for appeal be denied However, if the Board and City Commission does not support the
reprocessing of the subject site plan, based on the findings described above, staff recommends
that a retroactive time extension be granted thereby allowing the project to continue in the
permitting stage If granted, that time extension should not exceed 6 months (from the site plan
expiration date of September 9, 2002) within which time a building permit must be pulled Any
conditions placed on the approval of this request shall be included in Exhibit "F"
MR
Attachments
S:IPlanningISHARED\WPIPROJECTSIBoynton Beach Medical PavilionlADAP 02-002IAppeal staff report.doc
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
-F;1~
, I
I '
U
..~
-
C3 '
I
'j G-a-I
I.n j
,U ~
I ! -
, II U .7. ,I ~
I
-f 8
i
!
i i
400 80: FEET oe/,,/F
PU)JU'lIN 6 PEP" y
Kilday & Associal...,~
Landscape Architects / Planners
1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561) 689-5522 Fax (561) 689-2592
EMail info@kildayinc com
EXHIBIT "B"
Request for reconsideratior
October 2, 2002
Mr Quintus Green, Director of Development
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beacn, FL 33425
Re. Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
Dear Mr Green,
Based on our Conversation, on October 1, 2002 the Rendina Companies, attempted to
apply for building permits for the above-referenced project. The Building Department
denied the request citing that the Site Plan Approval had expired, because it was over a
year old. However it was assumed that based on a letter sent to our office from Mr
Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director, on September 17, 2001, that our client
could not proceed forward with the building permit process until after a text amendment,
relative to this project, was adopted. Since the text amendment was not ratified until
November 6, 2001, it is our understanding and that of our client, that the time table to
seek a building permit did not start until the November 6, 2001 adoption. Therefore, the
expiration date on the Site Plan Approval should be November 6, 2002.
Furthermore, the Site Plan Development Order does not clearly state, as to when the
one (1) year expiration of the approved Site Plan officially ends. That being the case, we
can only presume that the approved Site Plan is valid until November 6, 2002, when the
text amendment.
Therefore, we respectfully request that the interpretation of the time limit to pull building
permits be reconsidered to reflect November 6, 2002. This allows our clients to proceed
with applying for building permits for a project that the City has approved and strongly
supported. Attached to this letter are copies of the signed and dated Development
Orders and the above referenced letter from the Planning and Zoning Director
Please contact me should you have any questions regarding this information.
~IY:
Kier~t4~
Kilday & Associates, k.
Cc: Brian Mock, Rendina Companies
Larry Juran, Rendina Companies
'-'..... '--~~'-- .....-.! -......
to" ~::..I~':
,,~",_ ".c:'!\
( ~.i?, .,' ,"-::. \
- \'\(~lt~'~~ff?:;::- I,I
'"~''''~''''' 0
O."~>,;"" ~.:1~' \- ),
- -,' . "
I.';() ~(..,
----- --- ---- EXHIBIT"C"
Adm inistration determ inatio
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
.
. Building . PlannIng & Zoning . Occupational LiCfJll5e$ · Community RedovelopmCl1I
October 3, 2002
Mr Kienan Kilday
Kilday & Associates
1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Boynton Beach Medical Pavillion (File. NWSP 01-004)
Dear Mr Kilday'
This Jetter is in response to our conversation of October 1 2002, and your. s~bseque~t
letter requesting a reconsideration of the time limits required to pull a bUildIng permit
under the Development Order for the above referenced proJect.
Please be advised that I have investigated the circumstances involving the timIng and
conditions associated with the site plan approval of the project. A review of the project file
clearly indicates that the text amendment referenced in your letter and ratified on November
6, 2001 was a condition of approval of the site plan. As with all such conditions, the timing of
their completion has no bearing whatsoever on the actual approval date of the Development
Order for the site plan.
Moreover, Chapter 4, Section 5 of the City's Land Development regulations is clear in stating
that, "Upon approval of the site plan by the City Commission, the applicant shall have (1) year
to secure a building permit from the Development Department." This section of the code
further states that 1/ At its discretion, the City Commission may extend the approval of a slce
plan for a one year period, provided 8 request for extension is filed prior to the expiration of
the one year period. "
Inasmuch as the Development Order for site plan approval was granted on September 4,
2001, and given the fact that at no time during the subsequent year was a request for an
extension of the site plan ever made, I have no basis for any interpretation other than that
provided. by the City ~o.de. Therefore, the site plan for the above referenced project has. in
fact, expired and a building penn it cannot be issued.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Quintus Greene
Development Director
Cc: Mike Rumpf, Planning Director
Don Johnson, Building Official
City of Boynton Beach . 100 East Boynton B h BMf. P 0
eac ,. . Box 310 · Boynton Beach, Flortda 33425.0310
Dtv...... 1~1 \ 7....'.1:11:11 . '--.......~ L _
..."n..na=a..h IU'ft
(
\
EXHIBIT "0"
Request for Administrative Appeal
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects / Planners
1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561)689-5522 Fax (561) 689-2592
EMail info@kildayinc com
October 4,2002
W Jl (f{ r> n \,17 R r......-
I .0 u 'J !~ In1f
L I OCT - 4 aJal 7W
PL.4NIJING A '-;0 .J
ZO,'J:NG DfPT
Michael Rumpf
Planning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd
Boynton Beach, FL 33415
Re Appeal of Administrative Decision
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
Our File No 868 28
Dear Mike
This letter will serve as a request to appeal the Administrative Decision as laid out in Mr
Quintus Green's letters of October 3, 2002, to be heard by the City Commission at their
meeting on November 6, 2002 Attached you will find the requisite filing fee of $200 00
Also attached is a Justification Statement outlining pertinent information to be
considered as part of this appeal Here is a capsulized summary of what has transpired
in the last several days
On October 1, 2002, the general contractor for the Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
attempted to file for a building permit for the construction of the project. At that time,
City Staff made the determination that the Site Plan upon which the building permit was
requested had expired on September 4, 2002 The developer, our Client the Rendina
Company, who had diligently been pursuing all necessary plans and permits for this
project since last year's approval, contacted our office and we in turn contacted you
For the record, let me say that our Client has diligently pursued the process necessary
to obtain permits since the original Site Plan approval on September 4, 2001 and the
subsequent variance for a height exception approval of November 6, 2001 The
attached justification verifies our Client's efforts in that regard Obviously, had the issue
come to my office s attention prior to September 4, 2002, an extension request, as
permitted by code, would have been submitted and based on the facts, approved by the
City Unfortunately, that communication did not happen and as a result the issue just
arose this week.
I appreciate your department's efforts to find a useful solution to this matter and I
believe that this appeal definitely is the most timely approach As we discussed, the
only other solution would be to resubmit the exact same site plan that was approved last
year and go through the same approval process again, which would carry us into
January 2003 At the time the project was approved, both Staff and the Commission
EXHIBIT "0"
Request for Administrative Appeal
Michael Rumpf
October 4,2002
Page 2
supported it. This process will allow the City Commission to look at the specific facts
concerning this development and approve my request that an extension be granted post
to September 4, 2002 to allow my clients to obtain their building permit.
From my conversation with Quintus Green, I understand that this appeal will be
scheduled for the November 6, 2002 City Commission meeting
Please call if you need additional information
KJK.jj
Attachments
cc: Larry Juran I Brian Mock, Rendina Company
Quintus Green, City of Boynton Beach
h:lclient/868.28/correspondencelrumpC 100402
EXHIBIT "0"
Request for Administrative Appeal
Kilday & Associates
Landscape Architects / Planners
1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A
West Palm Beach, Florida 33401
(561) 689-5522 Fax (561) 689-2592
EMail info@kildayinc com
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
Administrative Appeal
Submitted October 4, 2002
The subject property is a 2 OS-acre parcel located along South Seacrest Boulevard, across
from the Bethesda Memorial Hospital The site was previously used as medical offices,
featuring a cluster of three (3) buildings constructed in 1978 On September 4, 2001, the
Boynton Beach City Commission approved a site plan for a new 29,173 sq ft. building to be
constructed on the subject site, subject to several conditions The conditions of approval
included code modifications regarding the minimum allotment of parking required for the site
and approval of height exception applications The proposed structure features a 44 foot, 4
inch (44'-4") high entrance feature that did not meet the maximum height regulations
established by code The last of the code modifications and exceptions were approved on
November 6, 2001 Attached are copies of the City's approval letters relative to the Approved
Site Plan, Code Modifications, and Exceptions
As mentioned in the cover letter, the Rendina Company, our client, applied for a building
permit for this project on October 1, 2002 The City's Building Department, subsequently
denied the request, citing the expiration of the approved site plan The City's Land Use
Regulations regarding Expiration of Site Plan (Ch 4 Sec.5) states
"Upon approval of a site plan by the City Commission, the applicant shall have (1) year to secure a
building permit from the development department. If an applicant fails to secure a building permit in
that time, all previous approvals shall become null and void, and the applicant will be required to
submit a new site plan and application, provided however, a clearing permit shall not constitute a
building permit plan for site plan review purposes. At its discretion, the City Commission may extend
the approval of a site plan for a one-year period, provided a request for extension is filed prior to the
expiration of the one-year period. In granting such conditions the City Commission may impose
additional conditions to conform the site plan to current development standards. "
Based on correspondence received from the Planning and Zoning Department on September
17,2001 (attached), it is our contention that our client had one (1) year from the approval of
the last Code Modification and Exception, which was on November 6, 2001 (attached) The
letter specifically states "Once the necessary zoning code text amendments are adopted,
this project may proceed to the permit process. Additionally, Conditions #25 - #27, listed in
the Conditions of Approval and listed below, further support the claim that approval of the
final site plan was reliant upon the ratification of the text amendments, which were finally
approved November 6,2001
Boynton Beach Boulevard Medical Office
Justification Statement
Page 1
EXHIBIT "0"
Request for Administrative Appeal
The Site Plan Approval Conditions state
Condition #25 Site Plan approval is contingent upon approval of a variance for a
reduction in required parking
Condition #26 Site Plan approval is contingent upon approval of a height exception for
the forty-four (44) foot high peak roof entrance feature, and the thirty-
one foot, eight in (31 8) parapet wall.
Condition #27 Applicant has applied for a code review to increase the height in a C-1
zoning district and to add parapets to the list of architectural elements
eligible for height exception Site Plan approval is contingent upon
approval and adoption of this requested code revision, and the ultimate
submittal and approval of a height exception for the parapet.
Therefore, based on the above conditions, it can be assumed that the one year period should
commence from the November 6, 2001 date The attempt to submit a building permit
application on October 1, 2002 was clearly within this time frame The site plan approval
ordinance did not include a commencement date, which they typically do, perhaps because it
was contingent on the additional approvals, which were approved afterwards
It should also be noted that our client has been actively pursuing the necessary steps to
commence development on this site As evidence, attached, is a copy of an eXilcuted Palm
Beach County Land Development Division Right-of Way Construction Permit. The permit
allows the applicant to modify the existing driveway, and construct an adjacent sidewalk
along Seacrest Boulevard Additionally, we have provided a series of correspondences
between DiFonte Consulting, Inc (DCi), the civil engineer for this project, the Rendina
Company, and Mr Don Johnson, with the Building Department of Boynton Beach These
letters and memorandums, illustrate the project's evolution throughout the past year
In response to the Rendina Company's denial for a building permit, our office contacted Mr
Quintus Greene, Director of Development for the City of Boynton Beach on October 2,2002
(attached) I to request an administrative determination based on the evidence provided in this
appeal It was Mr Greene's interpretation that the conditions of approval I and the timing of
their completion posed no bearing on the actual approval date of the Development Order for
the site plan However, Mr Greene suggested that he would be supportive of an
Administrative Appeal request by Kilday & Associates, Inc. regarding this matter, seeing as
though both Staff and the Commission were both supportive of this redevelopment project.
As a result, on behalf of the Rendina Company, our client, we respectfully request a time
extension be granted post the September 4, 2002 Site Plan expiration date, to allow the
Rendina Company to apply for the required building permits to commence development of
this attractive redevelopment project to provide needed medical office space for the City
Boynton Beach Boulevard Medical Office
Justification Statement
Page 2
SENT BY RENDINA CONSTRUCTION DEPT_
561 766 9048,
OCT 4..D2 13 31, PAGE 3/4
2089 .PPJ\.LOOSA TRAIL
WELLINGTON. FLORIDA 33414
TEL. 8: FAX.. (561) 792~7SS1
'NWW DIFONTE.COM
CERT OF AUTHORIZATION 8432
~CSD
DIFOl-.. fE
CONSULTING,
INC.
&~.
_ In
- In
LU~
: Ol
~~
Cija
- CI)
:cg
><~
LU'>
w
October 9,2001
Mr Don Johnson, Buildmg Official
City of Boynton Beach Building Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
~
project /.3.v. _._-'---- .-
File ~VII ~"W
Re.
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion
Boynton Beach. FIonda
Engineermg Plan SubrmttaI
DCIOI010
t~,'
4"
{_ Wl .; ~,iI"l
I ~ ,P..(,4,1U, ~ f
Dear M.r Jol:U1son:
Our firm has been engaged by the Rendma Companies to desIgn and pernut civil engineering elements
asSOCl3.ted with the referenced proJect. Bnefly. the project entails constructmg a new multIstory building and ancillary
facilities to replace several eXLSting single story medical offices. The proposed project is situated within a 2.05 acre
parcel along the east side of Sea crest Boulevard - at the southeast comer of the mtersectton with SE 271t1 Street. The
project SIte IS sItuated WIthin the corporate lirmts ofthe City of Boynton Beach, Florida.
We are pleased to submrt the following plans to commence the final engmeering plans review process for the
referenced project.
. Two (2) sets of complete construction plans (Sheets 1 to 9, dated October 8,2001).
Please call or adVISe US as soon as possible when you have had the opportumty to review the plans.
Very truly yours,
DIFONTE CONSULTING, INC.
(j V/$
EUg~le. P.E.
President
\.
cc: Mr Leonard Mass. RendIna Companies
.d\Pmjecu 01\01010 - 8GyaIan &c.Il M...s PwI^888I~wpd
,eNT BY RENDINA CONSTRUCTION DEPT, 561 766 9048, OCT 4 02 13 31,
DiFon"te Consul"tll"lg 561)792-7661 09/Z1/01 11 '-, p 002
2089 APPALOOSA TRAIL = ~
WKLUNGTON, FLORIDA 334 f 4 LU Q)
nL. Be FAX.. (562) 792-7551 = 0,
WWW.DIFONTILCOM ~ g
CERT OF AUT'HORIZATION 843fi5 '0
I~
><~
LU.>
w
~~D
DIFONTE
CONSULTING,
INC.
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 2 t, 2001
Mr Lconard Mass. Senior Vice President - Development
Rcndma Companies.. Jnc.
Eugene A, DiFontc, P E. €lJfZ
TO-
FROM
SUBJECT Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion, Boynton Beach. Flonda
Preliminary and Final Civil F..ngineering SeNices
Project Progress Update
DCIOlOOIO
PAGE 4/4
,,~' (,h-:J
"" vI?
17#1 -+0
~/1.r;:!;t/~;vd&i
1- ~. rdl'/V1iJt Irf:--
/- ~ Civil
Pursuant to your request, the following IS a bricf"'snapshot'" view OrlM stalUS 0 fthe civil engmeering portion
of lhe referenced project
Preliminary Site En2i.eerinl
~ Preliminary site engineenng scrvi~cs are estimated to be lOOOA>> complete.
final Site Eneineerinl!:
· Final SIte engineering services are e:tlunated LO be ~ubstantlally complete.
~ We have prepmed plan... for on-site paving, grading, drainage systems and on-site potable water. fire and
sanitary sewer utility services.
· We have coordinated our project with other consultants asSOCiated with offsiLc water, sewer and offidte
roadway work.
Final on-site engineering penniUing :tervices are estimated to be about 25% complete.
ERP Pennj( With SFWMD - Secured Wlth a "No Notice Pennit'"
f.. WDD - Not required.
PBC Land ~pmcDt permit - App1ic:d fOT on september 14,2001
CIty of Boynton .Beach Land Developmenl (On-site and Drainagc) - SubJn1ttcd plans informally for
preliminary review on September 3, 2001
Ciiy ofBoynton Beach Utilities (Water &. Scwer Utilitlcs) . Submrtted plans lor mformally prelimmaryrcview
on September 3. 2001
City of Boynton Beach Fire MarsbaJ - Submitted "lans Informally for review 01,l Scptember 3. 2001
Palm Beach County Health DcptJHRS (Water Utilities) - Pending approval from City ofBoyntoa Beach.
Palm Beach County Hcolth Dept.IHR.S(Sewer Utilities) - Pending approval n-om City of Boynton Beach.
On-site EnD~ecriae. PemlitdDI!
..
..
..
~
..
~
..
~
~
Site Construction Obsc",ation~ aDd Certification
~ PendIng permit approvals.
'~~\~~\'
C:\DdII'Nljea. O'IOIOIO-~"''''c'~IOI..
~~:~~:.:-.. ~
)~.
~~~tf' ~,~
,:,-~.
~.g;~i~'
~~:: .~.
-- ----~---~------~-------~------------------
9/215/02 23 OS
792 7661
(561)792-7661
561 766 9048, OCT 4 112 13 31 ,
> THE RENOIN' 'MPANIES
PAGE 2/4
~ENT BY RENDINA CONSTRUCTION DEP~.
e
Page 2
,n~~ Consul T I ng
- II)
- II)
UJe
= CI
o
DIFONTE CONSULTING, INC. !::~
2089 APPALOOSA TRAIL D WELLINGTON, FLORIDA 334 1 ~ ~
TEL. 8: FAX.. (561) 792-7551 0 WWW.DIFONTE.COM I g
CI!:RTlFlCATE OF AUTHORIZATION NUMBER 8432
~9/Z7/0Z 1. j7A P 002
[Q)~D
'>
W
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
September 27 ~ 2002
FROM
Mr Brlan Mock. Construction Manger
Rendina Compames. Inc.
Eugene A. DiFontc. P.E. ~
TO:
SUBJECT
Boynton Beach Medical Pavilion. Boynton Beac~ l=lorida
F"mal CM! Engineering Services
Project Progress Update J
DClOI0010
Pursuant to our di.~u.'C~iom;, the following is a bnef'.snapshot" view ofthc status of the Civil engineering
portJon of the referenced project:
Preliminary Site EnldnccrCn!!
~ Pre.lim.inary site cnginccnng sc::rviccs arc ) 00% complete.
Final Site En2iaeeriD2
~ Final site engineering services are t 00% complete.
On-site Entlinecrin2 Permlttbl.l!
.. ERP Permit with SFWMD - Secured with a "No Notice Permit"
.. L WOO - Not reqwred.
~ PBC Land D~lopment permit
~ Secured in December 2001 (At about the time a stop work order was ISSUed)
~ We have "picked up'" the pennie on Septcmber 26. 2002 and Will mail the originals for your signature.
.. City of Boynton Beach Land Development (On-SJtc and Drainage) -
.. The City is reVlcwing the project at thUi lime. We expect comments as earJy as next week.
· City of Boynton Beach UtilitIeS (Water &. Sewer Utilities)
~ The City has completed its initial review
· Re-submittnl to resolve comments expectod next week.
.. We will need a eheck in the amount of $2.106.72 prior to final appmval to reserve the 2" water
meter
,. .Pa1m Beach County Health Dept./HRS (Water Utilities)
.. Pending approvuJ iTQm City ofBo)'Dton acach. li"pect approval tlt <ktolxT 2002.
.. Palm Beacb County Health bcpt.II-IRS(ScwCl Utilities)
.. Pending approwl from City of Boynton Beach. Expect approval Ua October 2002.
We rruslmis briefslatus rt!pOlt is benetic::iaJ. Please call m, tfrou nave any qUc:.sllOns.
C~IJ<lI'I"Iq_ 0111110111 v..,...... ""-,, w..............,..,....._.al.'"1'd
.......... -..... ~)
~,...'o.J.... .-
----
~
'-~
f"ALM IIEACII COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMI~NT I>IVISION
RJemT-OJo-WAY CONSTRUCTION I'ERMIT
Pe:mitnot valid unless pink c:~ III
,lcned ilnd returned within 15 da)..
after pICk up ID:
I'lIlm Beech OxIntv
~nd DMbpmtat DMsfon
160 AuStrlllan A.., Room 203
West him ~, Fl33406
PERMIT NUMBF.R.
ISSUANCE DATI;.
EXP1RATION DATE,
Sll, T45, R 43
FEE. U23.' 5
RlW0237-1201
Dc:c:ember 20. 2001
December 20. 2002
PERMITrEE. Rendina Com panics
3801 PGA Boule":\rd, SuiLe: 555
T'alm Beach. FI 334) 0
REP' Eugc:nc ^. DiFon\c, P.li.
(561) 792-7551
LOCATION S1!:ACREST BOULEY AnD - MODIFY KXJSTINC DRIVF.W A" AND CONSTJUiCT
AD.1ACENT SIDEWAl.K AI'PROX1MATF.l Y 200 FEET SOUTH OF SI:. 27lh A VF.NtlJ::.
lU:.Fr:.RE!'lCI!D rLAN~ l'rojC:d No. DClll1010
DW:Il. 1-5 or 9
'Pemlit is hereby gran led for lhe work. within the right.ot:way as shown on the referenced plans, subject to the
applicable Condili"ns on ba.ck of this pennit. and the following conditions:
I) CODtad thr ConSlruction CoordinatioQ Divi~iun Ilt (561) 684-4180, 48 houri b~forc
COlnlllel":CDlellt of work. (See Condition NUlllb\:r 1 all the bad of this permit.)
2) The pernlhtcc or duly lIuthoraed agent for the permitlcc:, ......11 be n:lIponsiblc for notifying the
Municipal Adminislntor ur Clerk of City of Boynton Beach 48 hllun priur to eommell~ement oC
wurk.
3) The permittee shall submit to the Land DL.'VclopmeDt Divi8ioD a ~igned and scaled certification uf
cumph:tioD rUf tlu: "bove work Crom the ell~iDeer-o{.record. referencing the permit number aDd
iDdicatiR~ :tbc 'wol'le; Willi completed in substantial accordall\:l: witll the approved plaa._
4) The )lc:rmittce ahall be reJponsible fur sublnissilnt uf a tn.ffic contnl plan to Ed McClane with tIll:
Palm Belich COURt)' Traffic Division. lie can be contacted lit (561) 684-.4030. The plan ,hall be
llubnlillc:d a minimum of2 weeks before eOR8truelion amI the permitll:C shall ensure c:uordinlltion
lakes place f(lr the plnn to be ftpproved prior to ~on'truction.
This pcrmit shall bcdcllm: void irlhc pink copy of the permit is nor sib'llcd and rerurned to lbi$ office wirhin IS d.,ys aner
pickup; or, if~lurned, Condition Number I on the back orthis permit is not complied Wilh. If I Building Del'lIrtmc:nt j~
tisled as being copied bc:l(lw we are sending that Building Dc:panmenl a copy oflhi.'i pcnniL and requesting Lhe
CcrtifiCilu:-ot:.oceulluncy be wiLhheld UlIlit nOlili.:d by \he 1..3ml Dcvclupn1cnt Divisiolllhllllhis permil has received :I
11nal fl:view by \he f'alln Belleh COU1Uy Conslnler\OIl enol'din.li,," Division.
PERMITTl!F. SlGNATURJ:: (AUTHORlZ1::1)
SIGNATURE Ol( nULY AlJTITORJ7.ED AGENT):
YBE 7-CO"~~~' NC J
f' '. - Vi E \. r
"- S QNAT E
Cl~~~
K. S. Rogers. P.E., Director
und Devl:IQPIU~nt DiviSIon
Lawrence B, Juran, E~ecuLive Vice President
PLEASl PRINT OR TYPE-
KSR.LLR.llb
cc: ConstruclionCoordin",ioll Divlsioll w/pli&J1:i
I!d McCIlU1e Palm BC'~'\ch Co. 'rn&ffie Oivision
Eugc:ne A. DiFonte. P.E. DiFonte CURsullina. Incorporulc:d
Permittee w/plans
City ofBaynton Beach - Building Uc:panmcm
~r f'\~ILpa\llW",,",dtIiOOI\ ';!,ACIU!ST I\OUu;v...I\.D MlW023'J.110lltondllll CO_,ies,a""
"'~l
_ l/')
- l/')
LU~
: 01
t::~
0)'0
- CD
:cu
><~
"'0
LU'>
w
EXHIBIT "F"
CondItIons of Approval
Project name' Boynton Beach MedIcal Pavihon
File number ADAP 02-00 I
Reference' None
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments. None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments. None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
CondItions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
1 To be determmed.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments.
I 1 To be determmed. I I I
S:\Planning\SHARED\VVP\PROJECTS\Bo}flton Beach Medical Pavilion\ADAP 02-002\CO\ Boynton Beach Pavilion.doc