REVIEW COMMENTS
DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 01- 078
TO
Chairman and Members
Planmng and Devel , ment Board
FROM.
LUSIa Galav, AIC
PnncIpal Planner
DATE
April 23, 2000
SUBJECT
Boynton Masomc Lodge - COUS 01-001
COnditIOnal Use Approval -Accessory Daycare / Preschool
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
Contamed herem IS a descnptIOn of the subject proJect. The proposed daycare / preschool will be operated out
of the eXIstmg Boynton Masomc Lodge buildmg located on Lot 22 and Lot 22A m the Quantum Park P LD
The two lots compnse a 1 91-acre tnangular-shaped parcel and are located on the north SIde of Quantum
Boulevard, Just east of the L W.D.D E-4 Canal at 2701 Quantum Boulevard. On October 5, 1999, the City
CommIssIOn approved thIS tnangular-shaped lot for a 6,829 square-foot office / meetmg facilIty The
applIcant now IS seekmg condItIonal use approval to also use the buildmg for a 55-child capacIty daycare /
preschool operatIon when the lodge IS not m seSSIon. In addItIOn, the sIte plan proposes 4,125 square feet of
outsIde playmg area that IS reqUIred under State regulatIOns. The Quantum Park of Commerce lIst of
permItted uses allows nursery schools and daycare centers If approved as a CondItIOnal Use
ApplIcant/Agent: Boynton Masomc Lodge / Gentile, Holloway, O'Mahoney & AssocIates, Inc
Project name Boynton Masomc Lodge (The LIttle Blue Academy)
General descnptIOn. CondItIOnal use / mmor sIte plan modIficatIOn approval for an accessory daycare /
preschool use m conjUnctIOn wIth ItS reqUIred outsIde chIld play area.
Property SIze
Lot 22
Lot 22A.
Total
53,52664 square feet (1.23 acres)
29.516.31 square feet (0.68 acres)
83,04295 square feet (1 91 acres)
Land use
Office (0) DR! Master Plan land use
Current Zomng:
Planned Industnal Development (PID)
LocatIOn
Quantum Boulevard and the L W D.D E-4 Canal (Quantum Park)
BUIldmg area
(See ExhibIt "B" - Proposed SIte Plan)
EXIstmg Boynton Masomc Lodge bUIldmg
6,829 square feet
OutSide playmg area
4,125 square feet
~
Boynton Masonic Lodge (Little Blue Academy - COUS 01-001
Page 2
Memorandum No PZ 01 - 078
Surroundmg land uses/zomng:
North - Vacant Lot 23 desIgnated Office (0) DR! land use and zoned Planned Industnal DIstnct (PID),
farther northwest developed reSIdentIal (Dos Lagos PUD) wIth Low DenSIty ReSIdentIal (LDR) land
use,
East - RIght-of-way of Quantum Boulevard, farther east developed Umted Way Rotunda FoundatIon
complex, desIgnated Office (0) DR! land use and zoned Planned Industnal Development (PID),
South - RIght-of-way of Quantum Boulevard, farther southeast developed Umted Way Rotunda FoundatIOn
complex, desIgnated Office (0) DR! land use and zoned Planned Industnal Development (PID), and
West - RIght-of-way of Lake Worth Dramage DIstnct E-4 Canal, farther west vacant Lot 3 desIgnated
Industnal (I) DR! land use and zoned Planned Industnal Development (PID)
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND A1"fAL YSIS
SectIOn 11.2.D of the Land Development RegulatIOns contams the followmg standards to WhICh condItIonal
uses are reqUIred to conform. Followmg each of these standards IS the Planmng and Zomng DIvlSlon's
evaluatIOn of the apphcatIOn as It pertams to standards.
The Planmng and Development Board and CIty CommISSIon shall conSIder only such condItIOnal uses as are
authonzed under the terms of these zomng regulatIOns and, m connectIOn thereWIth, may grant condItIonal
uses absolutely or condItIoned upon the condItIons mcludmg, but not lImIted to, the dedIcatIon of property for
streets, alleys, recreatIOn space and SIdewalks, as shall be determmed necessary for the protectIOn of the
surroundmg area and the cItIzens' general welfare, or deny condItIOnal uses when not m harmony WIth the
intent and purpose of thIS sectIOn. In evaluating an apphcatIOn for condItional use approval, the Board and
CommISSIon shall conSIder the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the
commumty and make wntten findmgs certIfymg that satIsfactory provlSlons have been made concernmg the
followmg standards, where apphcable
1 Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, WIth partIcular reference to
automobile and pedestnan safety and convemence, traffic flow and control, and access m case of fire
or catastrophe
The subject property has two points of ingress/egress at Quantum Boulevard. The northern access is a
27-foot wide opening providing right turn in, right turn out only The southern driveway also at 27
feet wide, provides right/left turn in and right/left turn out
Located in front of the building, a 19-foot wide existing porte-cochere with 16 feet of clearance will
function as the child drop-off area. This porte-cochere provides unobstntcted ingress and egress to
the building The site s on-site traffic circulation system consist of two (2) two-way drive aisles 27-
feet wide that run along the parcel s front and west property lines The nva drive aisles provide access
to the proposed use and its respective parking areas The sidewalk is located on the opposite side of
Quantum Boulevard. A traffic statement .vas submitted and sent to the Palm Beach Counn' Traffic
Division for their review and approval The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined the
project met the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach Count}
~
Boynton Masonic Lodge (Little Blue Academy - COUS 01-001
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 078
2 Off-street parkmg and loadmg areas where reqUIred, wIth partIcular attentIOn to the Items m subsectIOn
1 above, and the economic, glare, nOIse, and odor effects the condItIOnal use will have on adjacent and
nearby propertIes, and the CIty as a whole
The required parkingfor the site had originally been tabulatedfor the office / meeting place uses The
ratios were based on one space for each 100 square feet of meeting area (4500 square feet) and one
space for each 300 square feet of office area (2329 square feet) When approved in 1999 the site was
required to have at least fifty-three (53) parking spaces In providing overflow parking, the developer
supplied twelve (12) excess parking spaces for a total of sixty-five (65) parking spaces. In order to
reduce the amount of pervious surface, the lodge was permitted to provide stabilized sod parking in
lieu of asphalt / concrete parking The lodge delineated thirty-two (32) spaces as grass parking Of
the total number of spaces, three (3) concrete spaces were allocated as handicapped accessible.
The parking required for the proposed daycare will be based on one space for each 300 square feet of
gross floor area. As stated in the above paragraph, the plan provided an excess of twelve (12) parking
spaces. However with the creation of the outside child play area required for the daycare, the plan
proposes to eliminate six (6) of the overflow parking spaces situated along the east side of the
building The proposed daycare inherently requires less parking than the lodge, therefore, the site still
contains enough parking to accommodate the outside play area in place of six (6) parking spaces. In
conclusion, the site still requires fifty-three (53) parking spaces because of the Lodge, which it does,
but the amount of excess or overflow parking has ultimately been reduced from twelve (12) parking
spaces to six (6) parking spaces
With regards to Quantum Park s economic expansion, the proposed daycare / preschool use will have
an overall positive effect on the immediate area because the Little Blue Academy will be the first of
such facility within Quantum Park and the Academy s curriculum will emphasize language, math &
science, art, and music.
3 Refuse and servIce areas, WIth partIcular reference to the Items m subsectIOn 1 and 2 above.
The dumpster enclosure is located at the northwest corner of the site. The loading zone is located in
the rear of the building along the north property line. Both the dumpster and loading zone share the
same access aisle. Both are located in an area that is unobtrusive to pedestrian and vehicular traffic
and are unnoticeable from Quantum Boulevard.
4 UtilItIes, wIth reference to locatIOns, availabilIty, and compatibilIty
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable water
and sanitary sewer are in place via construction of the original permitted lodge facility
5 Screemng, buffenng and landscapmg wIth reference to type, dImenSIOns, and character
With the completion of the Boynton Masonic Fraternal Lodge, the project perimeters include a 7-foot
wide landscape buffer strip along the front property line on Quantum Boulevard and a 5-foot wide
perimeter landscape buffer strip along the northern and western property lines The front landscape
buffer consists of Live Oak trees, Simpson Stopper hedges, Crinum Lil; plants, Florida Gama Grass
and Dwarf Yaupon Holly shrubs
~
Boynton Masonic Lodge (Little Blue Academy - COUS 01-001
Page 4
Memorandum No PZ 01 - 078
The side perimeter landscape buffers contain Live Oak trees, Myrsine, and Sabal Palm trees The
interior and parking areas contain a wide variety of plants, shrubs. and trees, most of which are
drought tolerant. The existing landscaping adjacent to the six (6) parking spaces will be relocated to
an appropriate area along the building foundation.
6 SIgnS, and proposed extenor hghtmg, wIth reference to glare, traffic safety, economIC effect, and
compatibihty and harmony wIth adjacent and nearby propertIes.
The approved Quantum Park signage plan allows one monument sign, per parcel. with a maximum
sign dimension of seven (7) feet high and fourteen (14) feet wide, for a sign face total of sixty-four (64)
square feet.
The site contains one free standing monument sign, 3 5 feet high and 12 feet wide, with 28 5 square
feet of sign face. The Masonic Lodge emblem is located on the front building far;ade visible to
Quantum Boulevard In the future, the onus is on the Boynton Masonic Lodge or The Little Blue
Academy to formally request a modification consistent with the current Quantum Park sign program
should they avail themselves the opportunity to increase the number of signs on-site or propose a new
wall or monument sign.
7 ReqUIred setbacks and other open spaces.
The building meets or exceeds all setback requirements required of the PID zoning district. The site
contains 22% or 18,481 square feet (22%) ofpervious area. The outside child area will encompass
only a small portion of the total pervious area. The property is buffered to the west in part by the
1. W.D D E-4 Canal
8 General compatibilIty wIth adjacent property and other property m the zonmg dIstnct.
In general, the proposed project is compatible with the existing office/ meeting facility use. There will
be minimal on-site impact and no adverse effects will occur because the proposed daycare use will be
disconnected from the lodge use and the hours of operation for each function .vill be staggered. There
will be little or no impact to the adjacent properties or to the general area.
9 HeIght of buildmg and structures, wIth reference to compatibilIty and harmony to adjacent and nearby
propertIes, and the CIty as a whole
The Boynton Masonic Lodge was originally designed as a one-story building with blue standing metal
roofing The maximum allowable height in the Planned Industrial District is four (4) stories or forty-
five (45) feet The existing building is approximately 27 feet in height at the peak of the roof The
building height will not change as a result of the proposed the daycare. The current building height is
compatible with neighboring properties
The existing building facade, as viewed from Quantum Boulevard, has been designed to be
architecturally compatible to this predominatelv industrial use area. The new structure has received
surface treatments and colors of off->thite painted stucco Halls accented with Hhite moldings
10 EconomIC effects on adjacent and nearby propertIes, and the CIty as a whole
As stated in the Section 2 above the dm care / preschool use will be the first such facilzty within the
~
Boynton Masonic Lodge (Little Blue Academy - COUS 01-001
Page 5
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 078
Quantum Park PID The proposed use will constitute additional convenience and choice for the
members of the Lodge, patrons of Quantum Park, and residents of the neighboring residential
subdivisions. It is anticipated that Quantum Park will continue to develop and intensify and a daycare
use in conjunction with the lodge would be appropriate uses for this site.
11 Conformance to the standards and reqUIrements WhICh apply to SIte plans, as set forth In Chapter 19,
ArtIcle II of the CIty of Boynton Beach Code of OrdInances (Part III Chapter 4 SIte Plan ReVIew)
With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project will comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of city code.
12. ComplIance WIth, and abatement of nUIsances and hazards In accordance WIth the performance
standards WIthIn SectIOn 4 of the zomng regulatIOns, also, conformance to the CIty of Boynton Beach
NOIse Control OrdInance.
With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed
daycare / preschool use would operate in a manner that is in compliance with the above-referenced
codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. In particular the applicant will have to apply for
and obtain all necessary approvals and licenses from all applicable governing bodies, including but
not limited to the Palm Beach County Health Department and Florida State Department of Health,
which are required for the daycare / preschool operation.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the dISCUSSIOns contamed herem, complIance WIth development regulatIOns, and the conSIstency
WIth the ComprehensIve Plan, staff recommends that thIS request be approved subject to satIsfyIng all
condIoons of approval as contaIned m ExhibIt "C"
MRlelJ
I:ISHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROIECTSIBOYNTON MASONIC LODGE VSAPIBoymon Masonic Lodge Daycare-PreschoollCOUS staff report,doc
~
\..OCA. "ON ~c ~:dge
Mason'
BOynton
- -NO"f
" \N
'-j C\-r~
I
i !
\
---
~
\
.-/ \\ '
~~~
~
........
II J1f(~}
,(J) l! ~d;";;
lJ ~ fI 4" '.
.. - i
' '-8 ,
- ~ ! ~
i M: \CADOI-0000\01-0302 BOYNiON MASONIC I '~(CONO USEl\CAQ02146-NEW dwg Fri Apr 27 09: ---~j 2001 JML
I
EXHIBIT"B"
\ ., .. Ii ----- -----::: ~=D E-4 CAN~~' T
,~ :~ ~e .. .. (~~....' U) I
\ .~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ,:. I
~ ,CS ~~ ~S~ ~ ~ "'..~_________---~~~::=-______~---::----!-__
\ I ~ 8 -./Di;:~i=;::7':--------i~---- '.~j'~e_..I}~~F.~~~-__'
\ !~ l 11 "-1I ~"rn)
\ l' "I'll 15 ":70" _:.:o'
\ \ \\ ~ 'M"f'W
" \ \ , \ ~
~\_~1. ~-~---1\"
\'" \ y" II
\ ~ \ II, ,.' __ --
\ i \ \ \\, '.
\; \ P \\ -t '''.,.--{
'i... \' \ ,,' ,
'\ \ .. \\ .. \: ", :. '
.. \ \\ ,. ~'f~."~';' ,
\ \, \ ...... \~a':, :~. - !(.Thl$ Cililc.;-,
\. \ \. \.,..0' \. f: . ~............ ~'. i I~
'\ \ '. '.
~~n;~ \\~ \\ 7 \~: l' \~, .-
!.~~:~~ ". \'~ \~, I ~ '
:i"~f h \' ~\--
ijl!!I ' \ \\~~' ~ " '~
ii;!l '1'\' \".;. '. \it .
11!ll . " c;l'\'.>. Uj ~ '
~~~~i ~ '" ~ A ~'"", "', . , . @}. d$) q
!l~lj en 0 it( 7 ..),~;, i. 'l[ If ~
!'i III · ~ l""~.r.l ''k. ~
~<<~~~<<<~<<l:l:r1:r<<r<J:< """. '''. ; lU ...' i '-t. I
~~li ~~I: N8~~ H~~~~~R~~~5~i]Pln'8;;illQf;1B ~~ t.. "'".-t I 'h~".f _.'. '. ! i ! i 1I
ifil B~i G~~~ ISIS~elniJI88!~~<:""'''''NN''-'''o'''B ~ ~ l .....'::t..' i<9 .~. ~~ j'~ . rQ~ "~f
il Ii! ili! 1!li~~i!~!llill~ln;I!.i ~ 'r<1~ ~!;J~~-"~<:' m ~l
~~ i~~ g~o ;J~" ;2h~~ i~ ~g~ll~ ~i ~ ~"'''''' ,........ v 1'-:-,'!. "- ~;8 ~l~
~~ ~d ~..~ i~ f e..~iIF!G~~O! ~~ ~ nr..........:..';.............' / "~":.:"~~~~':. . ~' ~i;
~I\l ~~~ ~~~ i> S ~ ~en ~~~ J: ;; :'".' ..!. ..... ' ill~l!
~~ ~ ~~~ > s ~ Iii r......;.., ......../.......~ ~~~
~a! ~o~ l!;J . ~ ~ ~ r ~llllh 1> i ~ ( .....(...::-- ~~........
I! Iii 1!!I!lliPlIII!!liI11 ~:::ii ~ ill Ii ~ ~ --- ___
II Iii I ~I! 11!!!!l!l! ~iiill P 'II Ii I
~ ~~~~~~;~;~~~~~~~~~~::~ ~~~~~; ~ 5i
4\. al~~ollto~~oajol; )o~ )o.~ ~~ ~g lllilo' ~
i~ ~~ )0)0 )o~)o~ ~ ' ~~ ad
z I 'l~~~.~~~~~~~.""........:'iI
o tJ OJ oooo!nooooooo_!n!n!n!nen"''''!n[l;
II C tlPi'1r> Pfli'1i'1i'1r>i'1 III
(p_
C! ~ ~ ~~~~u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
IS ;J! fii~~ln
J:>. ~'i ,:;~
IS Z '" ~
Eg~g5~~
en en
....
8
en
..
g
~
~
ii
'il
~
_0\ ~1 Q.ulfI\uIfI .d.,~ of =~_e.
I fHl i~ .~:I:~
f ;'i'~ -l ?O~
i :i'11 !i iffi'
I ~~; , -~'<
1 ~I l '<
I !
]!~1;;"i
~~iL
!. ~ i
'h
" ~(I
r fl! I' I P~H~
~ : i i\ill
I, ':! l~1 i I
1 nh~r
BOYNTON MASONIC LODGE
Clt~ of Bo~nton Beach
I
i
I
S-n
i~ l
'f
11.
~ ~
r.
.u
~=::.:.::::.:.:=- '
II
III ]
I
I I
I I i'
II '>l
II
I,
~-=-:=-.: .:_-=--=-.:-
oz.:;. '<:7'
-t
~tI
11"
;~i
i,,!
,~~
b~
5
]
a
~
I!.~
. m
~~
--.
I
I
I
I
I !
q
I
I
I
_.J
1
t
"
e;a.'-<>'
-IOdo-<;:7- _
~
EXHIBIT "B"
I~
i
....!
f::'.jJ'YNTori ~~K '")t--I' c L.-=,iDC~2
L.L Jr Co? GL,~Jtv1 p-'i_.... '.:.:......
~Yt-17:..>-J ?_E^_I'"~ r=Lr,+-J IL.1A
I roland e. borglund'
archJ.t.ct and planner ~ CMU 1U-12:u.
AU ---..& a.ut. .... <<"1.1 ,.....,.
""""tc. nod."'" U. -u. ~......-
_ .,,,,,- "____ '12111. __.I. OUo&l. ~... oc-u... __ ..... e- flU. --= I
~r~ .. ..
rr
.- J < J.
~ -, ~ ~
I
j(
jI
! :D ~
- \
;; Q
~ :J:
-l
CD
0
m
m
,...
m
<
> '\
-l
0 &ill
:z ~Is!
\,=
"t
.-
,
~I~ t
;I~
.; 8.
~ -, ~,
! i
'-
I .. f
I ~i~
! ,... .I~ P
.'~ ~
;; m I
." Ii il II i
~ -l I . lB
(J) I I
0 I
! :a
m
;; m "'~
m >
,... ~ :a
m
< m
> ,...
-l m
<
0 >
:z 'I"' -l
I~ , 0
:z
;tl.= 1 ~I~
il~ oj"
Ji~ i ~.
~~ '"' ~"'
..
BOYNTON MASONIC LODGE
oo_TV'"
LORIO...
EXHIBIT "B"
:I:~
i'
~:~
I
I
t t
~I'~ i il'~
-, I ~
I a .
I
i"1
! 'T1
_ :a
" 0
~ :z
-l
;{I -
'~l \:
, 'Iiil'
, , ,~ i!
,:~:~'
, -~
m
,...
m
<
>
-l
J
.~
o
:z
,:"2
~~Ii
~I~
ii,
~-'
',r
f.:f"" ~~ : . ./.
(
~ il
-I:).
p - ~I-
J:~ J:~
.. ..
--,
The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and
copIed for staff reVIew If plans will not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC
meetmg, contact LUSIa Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date
Projects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs,
WhICh are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Blythe WillIamson, by the Thursday pnor
to the Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend. The remamder of the reVIew schedule
wIll be adjusted accordmgly If you have questIOns on the attached comments, please contact the
respective reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatives.
Ifthe plans are reasonably complete and all sIglllficant comments are addressed followmg TRC
(2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to the Plannmg and Development Board Meetmg that falls
approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a
comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Planlllng and Development
board.
Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report
and/or confirmation of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
dramage certIficatIOn by a lIcensed engmeer, sIgned "Rider to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn"
form and colored elevatIOns of the proposed proJect. ThIS mformatIOn IS necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note
Engmeenng John GUIdry H. DavId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
BUIldmg Timothy Large Don Johnson 742-6352 742-6357
FIre Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Enc Wandell 742-6603 364-7382
PolIce Department Marshall Gage Officer John Huntmgton 737-3136 742-6185
UtilIties John GUIdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
PublIc Works-General Larry Qumn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285
PublIc W orks- Traffic Jeffery Livergood 742-6201 742-6211
Parks & Recreation John Wildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233
F orester/EnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Planlllng & ZOlllng Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 03/21/0 I
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDATAIPlanning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTS\BOYNTON MASONIC LODGE USAP\Bo}llton Masonic Lodge Daycare-Preschool\lst Re>;ew conunents to applican,faxuloc
1 ~t REVIEW COMMENTS
Conditional Use Site Plan
Project name' Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge DaycarelPreschool
File number COUS 01-001
Reference: 1 slreVlew plans identlfied as Conditlonal Use Site Plan. File # COUS 01-001 With a March 21. 2001
Plannmg and Zomng Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments. NONE
UTILITIES
Comments. NONE
FIRE
1 ReView NFP A 101 Life Safety Code Chapter 30, 1997 Editlon, and Boynton
Beach Fire Code 9-6
POLICE
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments. NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
2. On the floor plan drawmg, add a labeled symbol that identlfies the locatlon of
the handicap accessible entrance door to the buildmg. The locatlon of the
door shall match the locatlon of the accessible entrance doors that are
depicted on the site plan draWing. Flonda Accessibihty Code for Buildmg
Constructlon, SectiOn 4 1.2, 4.3
3 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan draWing that represents and dehneates
the path of travel for the accessible route that is reqUired between the
accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door to the buildmg.
The symbol shall start at the accessible parking spaces and tenmnate at the
accessible entrance door to the buildmg. The symbol shall represent the
locatiOn of the path of travel, not the 10catlon of the detectable warnmg or
other pavement markings that are reqUired to be mstalled along the path. The
locatiOn of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a
dnve/lane area that is located behmd parked vehicles. Identlfy of the plan the
Width of the accessible route. (Note. The mmimum Width reqUired bv the
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/20/01
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
code IS forty-four (44) Inches) Add text to the drawIng that would IndIcate
that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned In
compliance WIth SectIOn 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 46 (parkIng and
Passenger LoadIng Zones) of the Flonda AccessibilIty Code for BuildIng
ConstructIOn. Please note that at tIme of permIt reVIew, the applIcant shall
provIde detailed documentatIon on the plans that will venfy that the
accessible route IS In complIance WIth the regulatIons specIfied In the Flonda
AccessibilIty Code for BuildIng ConstructIon. ThIS documentatIon shall
Include, but not be lImIted to, proVIdIng finish grade elevatIons along the path
of travel.
4 IdentIfy WIthIn the SIte data the fimsh floor elevatIon (lowest floor elevatIOn)
that IS proposed for the buildIng. Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn IS In
complIance WIth regulatIOns of the code by addIng specIficatIons to the SIte
data that address the follOWIng Issues [SectIon 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the
Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edItIOn of the Standard BuildIng
Code]
a) The desIgn professIOnal-of-record for the project shall add the follOWIng text
to the SIte data. "The proposed fInIsh floor elevatIon__ NGVD IS
above the hIghest 100-year base flood elevatIon applIcable to the buildIng
SIte, as determIned by the South Flonda Water Management DistrIct's surface
water management constructIon development regulatIOns."
b) Where applIcable, speCIfy the base flood elevatIon. Ifthere IS no base flood
elevatIon, IndIcate that on the plans.
c) IdentIfy the floor elevatIon that the deSIgn profeSSIOnal has establIshed for the
buildIng WIthIn the footpnnt of the buildIng that IS shown on the draWIngs
tItled SIte plan, floor plan and paVIng/drainage (CIvil plans).
5 On the draWIng tItled SIte plan, IdentIfy and label the symbol that represents
the property lIne.
6 As reqUIred by Chapter 4, sectIon 7 of the Land Development RegulatIons,
submIt a current survey of the sublect property
7 As reqUIred by Chapter 4, sectIon 7 of the Land Development RegulatIons,
submIt a floor plan drawing. The buildIng plans are not beIng reVIewed for
complIance WIth the applIcable buildIng codes. Therefore, add the words
"Floor plan layout IS conceptual" below the drawIng tItled Floor Plan.
However, add to the floor plan draWIng a labeled symbol that IdentIfies the
locatIon of the handIcap accessible entrance door to the buildIng. The
locatIon of the door shall match the locatIon of the accessible entrance doors
that are depIcted on the SIte plan draWIng.
8 DImenSIon on the draWIng the overall heIght of the buildIng. The overall
heIght of a buildIng shall be measured from fimsh grade to the hIghest pOInt
of the roof or parapet wall. The overall height of the buildIng shall not
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/20/01
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
exceed the heIght lImItatIons of the Zomng Code.
9 Place a note on the elevatIon VIew draWIngs IndIcatIng that the wall opemngs
and wall constructIon comply WIth Table 600 ofthe 1997 edItIon of the
Standard BuildIng Code.
10 On all floor plan draWIngs, IndIcate WIthIn the footpnnt of the buildIng the
number of stones that are In the buildIng IncludIng, where applicable,
mezzamnes.
11 IndIcate on the SIte plan WIthIn the floor area of the new buildIng pnmary use
of the structure/facilIty
12 IdentIfy on the SIte plan draWIng the actual dIstance that the buildIng IS set
back from the north, east, south and west property lines. Please note that
overhangs, covered walkways, canopIes, awnIngs or other appurtenances that
are attached to the buildIng shall be conSIdered when IdentIfyIng building
setbacks. Therefore, IdentIfy the WIdth of the proposed overhangs, covered
walkways, canopIes, awnIngs, and/or other roofed areas that extend out
beyond the maIn walls of the buildIng. The buildIng setbacks shall comply
WIth setback regulatIons speCIfied In the Zomng Code.
13 At tIme ofperrmt reVIew, submIt sIgned and sealed workIng draWIngs of the
proposed constructIon.
14 Add to the submIttal a partIal elevatIon VIew draWIng of the proposed
penmeter fence. IdentIfy the type of the fence matenal that supports the
fence, IncludIng the typICal dIstance between supports. Also, proVIde a
typIcal sectIon VIew g of the fence that Includes the depth that the fence
supports are below finish grade and the heIght that the fence IS above fimsh
grade. The locatIon and heIght of the fence shall comply WIth the fence
regulatIons speCIfied In the Zomng Code.
15 At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt for reVIew an addreSSIng plan for the
project.
16 Add to all plan VIew draWIngs of the SIte a labeled symbol that represents the
locatIon and penmeter of the lImIts of constructIon proposed WIth the subject
request.
Comments.
P ARKS AND RECREATION
Comments.
17 SublTIlt detailed imgatIon plans for reqUIred nght-of-way landscape
Improvements dunng the construction document permIttIng stage, for reVIew
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/20/01
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
and approval by the Parks DIVISIon staff. Include on the plan locahon of any
eXlshng Imgahon m the nght-of-way
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments. NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
18 The number ofparkmg spaces has been reduced by SIX (6) spaces due to the
creahon of the outsIde children's play area. ThIS reduchon m the number of
parking spaces needs to be reflected m the tabular data on the sIte plan.
19 To be conSIstent, the proposed fence shall match the eXlstmg fence m color
(black) and matenal. The SIte plan mdlcates that the proposed fence will be a
green cham-hnk fence five (5) feet m heIght.
20 The children's outsIde play area shall encompass SIX (6) parkmg spaces. If
these former parkmg spaces are converted mto paved area, It shall be
delmeated as such on the SIte plan. In order to protect thIS area, conhnue the
curbmg around the former parkmg spaces. Staff recommends relocating the
shrubs from the mtenor of the playmg area to the outSIde of the proposed
fence.
21 PrOVIde a floor plan of the space to be used bv the davcare operatIOn.
22. PrOVIde a traffic statement for the proposed daycare.
MWR/blw
J:ISHRDATAIPLANNINGISHAREDlWPlPROJECTSIBOYNTON MASONIC LODGE USAPlBOYNTON MASONIC LODGE DAYCARE.PRESCHOOLI1ST REVIEW COMMENTS,DQC
cn -'- OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO Michael W Rumpf DATE 4/09/0 I
DIr of Planmng & Zomng
SUBJECT Lodge/Day School
FROM Off. John Huntmgton REFERENCES SIte Plan
PolIce Department
Cnme PreventIOn Umt
ENCLOSURES
FILE SOl-DOl
I have vIewed the above bUIldmg plans and have the followmg comments
There are no comments at thIS tIme.
FILE Copy
ill
~@~n\g~
A?R - 9 2001
PLflt'-.NING AND
Z0N NG OEPl
ill I
TO
'. sf "-......~....-!
I. i J '
'-I MAn ~,. /tt
(iL.-.r 21ktJII
::::~ :um~~:,l:l:n: :::::::::~~ "'J::!J
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 01-058
FROM.
DATE
March 28, 2001
RE
Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge Daycare/Preschool Conditional Use Approval
(COUS 01-001) - et review comments
We have revIewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
reVIew WIth the understandmg that all remammg comments WIll be shown m complIance on the
workmg drawmgs submItted for permIts.
Buildine: Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Lare:e (561) 742-6352
1 st reVIew comments
1 On the floor plan drawmg, add a labeled symbol that IdentIfies the locatIOn of the handIcap
accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg. The locatIOn of the door shall match the locatIOn of
the accessible entrance doors that are depIcted on the SIte plan drawmg. Flonda
AccessibIlIty Code for BUIldmg ConstructIOn, SectIOn 4 1.2, 4.3
2. Add a labeled symbol to the SIte plan drawmg that represents and delIneates the path of
travel for the accessible route that IS reqUIred between the accessible parkmg spaces and the
accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg. The symbol shall start at the accessible parkmg
spaces and termmate at the accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg. The symbol shall
represent the locatIOn of the path of travel, not the locatIOn of the detectable warnmg or
other pavement markmgs that are reqUIred to be mstalled along the path. The locatIOn of the
accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a dnve/lane area that IS located behmd
parked vehIcles. IdentIfy on the plan the WIdth ofthe accessible route. (Note The
mInImum WIdth reqUIred by the code IS forty-four (44) mches) Add text to the drawmg that
would mdlcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS desIgned m
complIance wIth SectIOn 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 46 (Parkmg and Passenger Loadmg
Zones) of the Flonda AccessibIlIty Code for BUIldmg ConstructIOn. Please note that at tIme
of permIt reVIew, the applIcant shall provIde detaIled documentatIOn on the plans that wIll
venfy that the accessible route IS m complIance wIth the regulatIOns specIfied m the Flonda
AccessibIlIty Code for BUIldmg ConstructIOn. ThIS documentatIOn shall mclude, but not be
lImIted to, provldmg finIsh grade elevatIOns along the path of travel.
3 IdentIfy wlthm the SIte data the finIsh floor elevatIOn (lowest floor elevatIOn) that IS
proposed for the bUIldmg. Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn IS m complIance wIth
regulatIons of the code by addmg specIficatIOns to the SIte data that address the followmg
Issues [SectIOn 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edItIOn
of the Standard BUIldmg Code]
Memo No 01-058 to MIchael Rumpf
March 28,2001
RE. Boynton Beach MasonIc Lodge Daycare/Preschool (CaDS 01-001) - 1 sl reView comments
Page 2
a) The deSIgn professlOnal-of-record for the project shall add the followmg text to the SIte
data. "The proposed fimsh floor elevatlOn _ _ NGVD IS above the hIghest I DO-year
base flood elevatlOn apphcable to the bmldmg SIte, as determmed by the South Flonda
Water Management DIstnct's surface water management constructlOn development
regulatlOns. "
b) Where apphcable, specIfy the base flood elevatlOn. If there IS no base flood elevatIon,
mdlcate that on the plans.
c) IdentIfy the floor elevatlOn that the deSIgn professlOnal has estabhshed for the bmldmg
wlthm the footpnnt of the bmldmg that IS shown on the drawmgs tItled SIte plan, floor
plan and pavmg! dramage (CIVIl plans)
4 On the drawmg tItled SIte plan, IdentIfy and label the symbol that represents the property
hne.
5 As reqmred by Chapter 4, sectlOn 7 of the Land Development RegulatlOns, submIt a current
survey ofthe subject property
6 As reqmred by Chapter 4, sectIon 7 of the Land Development RegulatlOns, submIt a floor
plan drawmg. The bmldmg plans are not bemg revIewed for comphance WIth the apphcable
bmldmg codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout IS conceptual" below the
drawmg tItled Floor Plan. However, add to the floor plan drawmg a labeled symbol that
IdentIfies the 10catlOn of the handIcap accessible entrance door to the bmldmg. The locatIon
of the door shall match the 10catlOn of the accessible entrance doors that are depIcted on the
SIte plan drawmg.
7 DlmenslOn on the drawmg the overall heIght of the bmldmg. The overall heIght of a
bmldmg shall be measured from fimsh grade to the hIghest pomt of the roof or parapet wall.
The overall heIght of the bmldmg shall not exceed the heIght hmltatlOns of the Zomng
Code
8 Place a note on the elevatlOn VIew drawmgs mdlcatmg that the wall opemngs and wall
constructIon comply WIth Table 600 of the 1997 edItIon of the Standard Bmldmg Code.
9 On all floor plan drawmgs, mdlcate wlthm the footpnnt of the bmldmg the number of stones
that are m the bmldmg mcIudmg, where apphcable, mezzamnes.
10 IndIcate on the SIte plan wlthm the floor area of the new bmldmg the pnmary use ofthe
structure/faclhty
11 IndIcate on the floor plan drawmg wlthm the footpnnt of the bmldmg the pnmary use of the
structure/faclhty
12 IdentIfy on the SIte plan drawmg the actual dIstance that the bmldmg IS set back from the
north, east, south and west property lmes. Please note that overhangs, covered walkways,
canopIes, awnmgs or other appurtenances that are attached to the bmldmg shall be
Memo No 01-058 to MIchael Rumpf
March 28, 2001
RE Boynton Beach Masomc Lodge Daycare/Preschool (CaDS 01-001) - 1 st reVIew comments
Page 3
consIdered when IdentIfymg bUIldmg setbacks. Therefore, IdentIfy the wIdth of the
proposed overhangs, covered walkways, canopIes, awmngs, and/or other roofed areas that
extend out beyond the mam walls of the bUIldmg. The bUIldmg setbacks shall comply WIth
setback regulatIOns specIfied m the Zomng Code.
13 At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt sIgned and sealed workmg drawmgs of the proposed
constructIOn.
14 Add to the submIttal a partIal elevatIon VIew drawmg of the proposed penmeter fence.
IdentIfy the type of the fence matenal and the type of matenal that supports the fence,
mcludmg the typIcal dIstance between supports. Also, provIde a typIcal sectIOn VIew
drawmg of the fence that mcludes the depth that the fence supports are below fimsh grade
and the heIght that the fence IS above fimsh grade. The locatIOn and heIght of the fence shall
comply WIth the fence regulatIOns specIfied m the Zonmg Code.
15 At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt for reVIew an addressmg plan for the project.
16 Add to all plan VIew drawmgs of the SIte a labeled symbol that represents the locatIOn and
penmeter of the lImIts of constructIOn proposed WIth the subject request.
TKL:rd
1'\SHRDA TA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\COUS 01-001 1st review Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge Daycare.doc
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
NO 01-052
TO
Michael W Rumpf, DIrector of Planmng and ZonIng
John A. GUIdry, Intenm DIrector of Engmeermg ~
H. DaVId Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, CIvll/UtIlIty Engmeer.&' --
THRU
FROM.
DATE
March 30, 2001
RE.
BOYNTON BEACH MASONIC LODGE DA YCAREIPRESCHOOL
COUS 01-001 (1st REVIEW)
ThIS department IS now aSSIstIng the Department of PublIc Works m the plan technIcal reVIew process.
Our engIneenng review will be preceded by our review on behalf of the Department of Public Works.
Therefore, we offer the followmg comments on the above noted project.
PUBLIC WORKS
A. No comment on the CondItIonal Use request on the eXIstIng SIte.
ENGINEERING
1 No ObjectIOn on the Conditional Use request on the eXIstmg SIte.
HDK/ck
C\My Documents\Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge DayCare, Engineering Comments 1st Review,doc
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
NO 01-068
TO
Michael W Rumpf, DIrector of Planmng and Zomng
John A. GUIdry, UtilItIes DIrecto~ '
H. DaVId Kelley, Jr , PE/PSM, UtilIty Engmee~
THRU
FROM.
DATE
March 30, 200 I
RE
BOYNTON BEACH MASONIC LODGE DA YCARE/PRESCHOOL
COUS 01-001 (1st REVIEW)
ThIS department has no objectIOn on the requested Conditional Use modIficatIOn to the eXIstmg SIte m
Quantum Park.
JAG:HDK/ck
Xc Georganne Barden, UtilItIes
Dept. FIle
C\My Documents\Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge DayCare, Utility 1st Review Comments.doc
FIRE & LIFE SAFETY DIVISION
Memorandum No 2001-28
n j
1 U Ii""
i ~ ~
TO
Mike Rumpf, Director
Planning & Zoning
MAl{ l 8
DATE
Steve Gale ~
Fire Marshal ,/ D
March 27, 2001
I t i
L . ._.~'.
,,J.
FROM
i
_~'. ~,,~...J
SUBJECT COUS 01-001
Dayca rejPreschool
Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge
2701 Quantum Boulevard
We have no comments at this time except that applicant should review
NFPA 101 Life Safety Code Chapter 30, 1997 Edition, and Boynton
Beach Fire Code 9-6
cc Email to Blythe Williamson
File
Plannin~ Memorandum. Forester I Environmentalist
To
LUSIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner
From.
Kevm J Hallahan, Forester I EnvIronmentalIst
Subject:
Boynton Beach MasonIc Lodge
Day Care I Preschool
CODS 01-001
1 st RevIew
"~V' \15 ('
. n ,1 il;;;. ,'C
1<'r.;';J
I :' < '
I . ~
IY
! n 11':"-1 to U
'I .
'Tr'
...:-.,.",
r-l -,
I ' '
,-: :l
'I "
Date' March 26,2001
I have no comments on the proposed condItIOnal use of the SIte. The project should contmue m
the normal reVIew process.
Kjh
Xc Blythe WillIamson thru E-maIl
file
S \Plannmg\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Beach MaSOnIC Lodge Daycare-
Preschool\F orester's comments.doc
TO
THRU
FROM
RE
Date
LEISURE SERVICES. PARKS MEMORANDUM #01-25
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
John Wildner, Parks Director ~
Barbara J Meacham, Parka Landscape Planner ~
Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge Daycare/Preschool
March 26, 2001
1
Submit detailed irrigation plans for required right-of-way landscape
improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for
review and approval by the Parks Division staff Include on the plan
location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way
DE:PARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 01-054
TO
TRC MEMBERS
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Huntington, Police Department
H David Kelley Jr , Utilities Department
Timothy K. Large, Building Division
Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General
Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic
Barbara Meacham, Parks Division
H David Kelley Jr , Engineering Department
Lusia Galav, Planning Division
FROM
. (J'/(;/fC.-
Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE
March 23,2001
RE
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 ST Review' Conditional Use Approval
Project: Boynton Beach Masonic Lodge Daycare/Preschool
Location 2701 Quantum Blvd, Quantum Park
Agent: Gentile Holloway O'Mahoney & Associates, Inc.
File No COUS 01-001
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments or e-mail to Blythe Williamson and I no
later than 5,00 P,M, on Aoril 09. 2001, When preparing your comments, please separate them
into two categories, code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that
you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval
1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by
the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself
3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents
4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
Page 2
other departmental improvements
5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name
of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified
6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that
they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the
project be forwarded through the approval process
All comments shall be typed addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Blythe Williamson and I for
distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this
memorandum or e-mail Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the
review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of
Technical Review Committee (TRC) members
MWR.blw
Attachment
XC. Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
John Guidry, Utilities Director and Interim Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Christine Roberts, Director of Public Works
Central File
J:ISHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIBoynton Beach Masonic Lodge Daycare-PreschoollTRC Memo for Plans Review Memo,doc