CORRESPONDENCE
.\1"~ OJ:-.
- -----
. __ . ___u.....
",;C.-: ,~-=:=u .,.
\JoI --- ---.---- 4
o .. (J
).. u__ _- ~
", u ,C-' ~
"'ON ~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
. Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment
June 26, 2001
filE COpy
Mr Winston Lee, ASLA, AICP
Winston Lee & Associates
1532 Old Okeechobee Road, Suite 106
West Palm Beach, FL 33409-5270
Re Quantum Park Lots 73-A, 73-8, 74, 75, & 76
Dear Mr Lee.
Please be advised that in accord with the Land Development Regulations Chapter 21
Parking Lots, Article 1/ H I have reviewed the driveway for the above referenced project that
has been proposed at a width in excess of the maximum 32 feet, and find it acceptable. This
is based on the need to accommodate the anticipated truck traffic at the radius necessary to
enter the project.
Sincerely,
pflJJu{
Quintus Greene
Development Director
Xc: Mike Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., POBox 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Phone (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us
I r?f:;:~e~, Inc.
I, _'-"... \ I illf
nl! I L\ili il
! ::[ ( t j
June 26, 2001
Mr MlC-hael W Rumpf
CIty of Boynton Beach
Dept. of Development
Planmng & Zomng DIVISIOn
100 E Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE Quantum Park (Lots 73A - 75)
File Number NWSP 01-003
Our FIle No 98010 24
Dear Mr Rumpf,
Attached please find 10 sets of plans for the above referenced proJect, revIsed pursuant to the TRC
comments I have addressed each mdIvIdual comment as follows
PUBLIC \VORKS
No comments.
UTILITIES
Comment: All utilItIes easements shall be shown on the rectIfied SIte plan and landscape
drawmgs so that \ve may determme WhICh trees may mterfere WIth utIlItIes. In general,
palm trees wIll be the only tree specIes allowed wIthm utilIty easements. Canopy trees may
be planted outsIde of the easement so that roots and branches \vill not Impact those utihtIes
wIthm the easement m the foreseeable future LDR Sec 75-18 1 gIves publIc utilItIes the
authonty to remove any trees that Interfere WIth utilIty servIces, eIther In utilIty easements
of publIc nghts-of-way
t', ~11 I (lh \\~,r Palm Beach. FL 33409-'i27()
,,' ,,~ "'lJ mati Wln,-roD\\ lall aol com
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26,2001
Page 2
Response: All utihty easements are mdIcated on the plantmg plans. All new plantmgs as
a part of thIS proposal comply WIth the comment reqUIrement.
2 Comment: Palm Beach County Health Dept. permIts will be reqUired for the water system
servmg thIS proJect. (CODE Sec 26-12)
Response: An applIcatIon for the HRS permIt shall be submItted.
3 Comment: CODE Sec. 26-34 (E) reqUires that a capacIty reservatIon fee be paId for thIS
project eIther upon the request for the Department's SIgnature on the Health Department
applIcation forms or WIthm 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee
WIll be determmed based upon final meter SIze, or expected demand.
Response: The appropnate capacity reservatIon fee will be paid WIthm the specified tIme
lImits.
4 Comment: ComprehenSive Plan Pohcy 3 C 3 4 reqUires the conservatIon of potable water
CIty water may not, therefore, be used for ImgatIOn where other sources are readIly
available.
Response: There IS no other source of 1m gat !On readIly avaIlable to thiS site. However, the
applIcant will provide a well for ImgatlOn purposes. The locatIon of the well will be
provIded as part of the buildIng permIt documents.
5 Comment: This office will not reqUire surety for mstallatIon of the water and sewer utIlItIes,
on condItIons that the systems be fully completed, and given to the CIty UtilItIes Department
before the first permanent meter IS set. Note that settmg of a permanent water meter IS a
prereqUISite to obtaInmg the CertIficate of Occupancy
Response: The property owner will coordInate to assure the systems are complete and
dedicated to the CIty before the first permanent meter IS set, as reqUired.
6 Comment: UtIlIty constructIOn details as shown on the CIvil EngIneenng (CE) sheets C-7
& C-8 will not be revIewed for constructIOn acceptabilIty at thiS tIme. All constructIon
detaIls shall be m accordance With the UtIhtIes Department s "UtilItles Engmeenng DeSIgn
Handbook and ConstructIOn Standards" manual they will be revIewed at the tIme of
constructIon permIt applIcatIOn.
Response: Construction details will be m accordance WIth the UtilIties Department's
'UtilItIes EngIneenng DeSIgn Handbook and ConstructIOn Standards" at tIme of permIt
review
7 Comment: LikeWIse, pavmg and dramage detads as shown on the CE sheet C-4 will be
reViewed for constructabihty at the tIme of constructIOn permIt apphcatIOn.
Response: Comment IS hereby acknowledged.
Mr MIchael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 3
IIRE
8 Comment: FacilIty must comply WIth NFPA 101 (1997), LIfe Safety Code, Chapter 28,
IndustrIal OccupancIes
Response: FacilIty does comply WIth NFPA, LIfe Safety Code for IndustrIal OccupanCIes.
Once tenants occupy space, tenant build-outs will comply as well, yet at thIS pomt there are
no tenants deSIgnated for thIS buIldmg. PermIt draWIngs will be for a shell permIt only
9 Comment: ThIS buIldmg wIll requIre a separate fire spnnkler nser for each 52,000 sq. ft.
of lIght or ordmary hazard, or for each 40,000 sq. ft. for other hazard claSSIficatIons. See
NFP A 13 (1999), Standard for the InstallatIon of Spnnkler Systems. sectIOn 5-2/
Response: Fire spnnkler drawmgs will be submItted at tIme of shell permIt drawmgs
submIttal and Will comply WIth all NFP A codes.
10 Comment: A complete fire alarm system IS reqUIred by NFP A 101 (1997), LIfe Safety Code,
sectIOn 28-3 4
Response: Bmldmg ",ill be eqUIpped WIth a complete fire alarm system. FIfe alarm system
drawmgs will be submitted at tIme of shell permit draWIngs submittal and will comply WIth
all NFP A codes.
11 Comment: If the "pump room" shown on the draWIng IS to house a fire pump, the
mstallatlon must meet the reqmrements of NFP A 20, Standard for the InstallatIon of
Centnfugal Pumps.
Response: Fire pump drawmgs will be submItted at time of shell permIt draWIngs submittal
and will comply WIth all NFP A codes.
12. Comment: Underground mam WIth hydrants must be m servIce before constructIOn begIns
per NFP A 241 (1996), Standard for Safeguardmg Construction, AlteratIOn, and DemolItIOn
OperatIOns.
Response: Apphcant confirms that the underground mam and hydrants will be m servIce
pnor to construction.
13 Comment: ProVide blue road reflectors mdIcatmg hydrant locatIOns per City ordmance 098-
45, ArtIcle II, SectIon 9-23 "B"
Response: Road reflectors are not mdIcated on SIte plan Sheets A-I and A-2
14 Comment: SIte address shall be placed consPIcuously on the front of the structure, so the
numbers can be seen plamly from the street. Numbers used for reSIdences shall be no less
than four mches m heIght and shall be made of a durable and VIsible matenal. Numbers used
for commercial and mdustnal bmldings shall not be less than SIX Inches In heIght. (CIty
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 4
Ordmance Chapter 20 Sectlon 16 )
Response: SIte address has been placed on front of the structure and IS vIsible from the
street. Refer to elevatIon Sheet A-6
15 Comment: HV AC duct detectors shall be connected to the fire alarm system and ImtIate as
a SUpervISOry only (vIsually or audibly), m a normally occupIed area and IdentIfied as an
duct detector trouble
Response: HV AC duct detectors shall be connected to fire alarm system. FIre alarm system
drawmgs will be submItted wIth shell permIt draWings. Duct detectors shall be mcluded m
tenant build-out permIt drawmgs.
16 Comment: ProVIde properly IdentIfied fire lane per CIty OrdInance 9-21
Response: SIte plan and CIvil plans have been reVIsed to IdentIfy fire lane per 9-21
17 Comment: Key box requued for Fue- Rescue emergency access per CIty OrdInance 9-15
Response: Key/Knox-box IS now mdIcated at pump room door~ refer to archItectural floor
plan Sheet A-5
POLICE
18 Comment: On the SIte plan, show the eXIstmg and proposed traffic SIgnS, l.e., stop SIgn ad
stop bars, nght tune only SIgnS, and one way SIgnS.
Response: All eXIstmg and proposed traffic SIgns are not mdIcated on archItectural SIte plan~
refer to Sheets A-I and A-2.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
19 Comment: On the SIte Plan, add a general note that all plans submItted for speCIfic permIts
shall meet the CIty'S Code reqUirements at tIme ofapphcatIOn. These permIts mclude, but
are lImIted to, the follOWing: paVIng, draInage, curbIng, SIte lIghtmg, landscapIng, and
ungatIOn. PermIts requIred from other permIttmg agenCIes such as FDOT, SFWMD, L WDD,
FDEP, BCHD, PBCHD, PBCDERM and any others, shall be mcluded WIth the permIt
request.
Response: Note has been added to the Site Data table on the SIte plan, refer to Sheets A-I
and A-2 All reqUired permIts from outSIde agenCIes shall be mcluded With the permIt
request.
DEPARTMENTS
20 Comment: ProVIde topography of the SIte and adjacent lands and depIct the fimshed grades
(LDR, Chapter 4 SectIon 7.A.).
Mr MIchael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 5
Response: SIte plan (Sheets A-I and A-2) and cIvIl plans have been revIsed to mclude
topography of the sIte and adjacent lands and to depIct fimshed grades.
21 Comment: ProVIde an EnVIronmental Impact Statement as reqUIred under LDR, Chapter
7 85, ArtIcle IV, SectIon
Response: An envIronmental report addressmg thIS sectIon reqUIrements, prepared by
Blythe EnVIronmental was submItted as part of the apphcatIon package
22 Comment: On the SIte and Landscape Plans, IdentIfy the clear SIght tnangular areas on both
SIdes of the dnveway(s) and adjust the landscapmg accordmgly (LDR, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle
II, SectIOn 5.H.I Add a note to the Landscape Plan that Wlthm the SIght mangles, there shall
be an unobstructed cross- VIsibilIty as a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement. Use
FDOT Standard mdex 546 for the SIght tnangles along all collector and artenal roadways.
Response: SIte tnangles are already shmVll on SIte plans.
23 Comment: SIdewalks shall be reqUIred for all new developments and shall be five (5) feet
WIde along the roadways (LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn lOT, and Chapter 22, ArtIcle
I, Sec 5)
Response: The Quantum Park DRI was approved utilIzmg an eIght foot (8') bicycle
path/SIdewalk on one SIde of the nght of way along High RIdge Road. ThIS bIcycle
path/sIdewalk IS prOVIded on the oppoSIte SIde of the nght of way at thIS locatIOn. There IS
not SIdewalk reqUIred for thIS area.
24 Comment: PollutIon retardant baffies shall be reqUIred for all dramage structures that
outfall to exfiltratlon trenches. Dramage structures must be large enough to accommodate
the baffies and allow penodIc silt removal. ProVIde a sump for all truck well Inlets to reduce
contamInants and pollutants from entenng any exfiltratIon trenches.
Response: PollutIOn retardent baffles shall be used for all dramage structures that outfall to
exfiltratIOn trenches - see Sheet C-4 for detail. Sump pumps have been added for the truck
well Inlets.
25 Comment: Add to dramage plan an engmeer's certificatIOn as speCIfied In LDR, Chapter
4, SectIon 7.F Add the followmg note that "the draInage system shall conform to the UtilIty
Department's 'UtIlItIes Engmeenng DeSIgn Handbook and Construction Standard s, and the
CIty Standard Drawmg b-91007" Reflect on the DraInage Plan the proposed elevatIons are
dramage flow arrows.
Response: The note has been added to the notes on Sheet C-4 and the dramage plans
Indicate the elevatIOns and draInage flow arrows.
26 Comment: A maXImum oftwo drIveways are allowed on each street per LDR. Chapter 23
ArtIcle II.H.7
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26 2001
Page 6
Response: Each lot IS allowed an access pomt and we are below the maXImum allowed for
the total lots combmed.
27 Comment: Per the LDR, Chapter 4 SectIon, B, on the SIte and CIvil plans, show all
necessary traffic control deVIces such as stop bars, stop SIgnS, double yellow lane separators
stnpmg, dIrectIOnal arrows and "Do Not Enter slgnage, etc Delmeate and stnpe the
"Loadmg Area" (where apphcable)' mclude a pavement message m yellow mdIcatmg " No
Parkmg - Loadmg Zone The color of stnpmg on concrete parkmg areas shall be black, per
City Standard Drawmgs B-98001 and B-90013
Response: SIte (Sheets A-I and A-2) and Civil plans mdIcate the traffic control deVIces and
loadmg area sIgnage and stnpmg.
28 Comment: The fire lane sIgnage and markmgs shall conform to LDR Chapter 23, ArtIcle
II, Sections B & M. the 3- foot hIgh "FIre Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and
staggered.
Response: The CIvil plans have been revIsed as requested.
29 Comment: ProvIde a typical detail showmg all post- mounted sIgnage (mcludmg HlC
sIgnage) mstalled and grouted per City Standard Drawmg B- 98001
Response: TypIcal detaIl for post-mounted sIgnage IS depIcted on Sheet A-3
30 Comment: Show on the Site and CivIl plans the proposed SIte hghtmg (LDR, Chapter 4,
SectIon 7.B 4). On the LIghtmg Plan, SpeCIfy that the hght poles shall WIthstand a 110 MPH
wmd load. Add a note that the fixtures shall be operated by photo-electncal control and to
remam on untIl 2 '00 a.m. (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II). Add a note that the hghtmg deSIgn
shall proVIde a mImmum average of one foot-candle lumen at ground level ArtIfiCIal
hghtmg used to illummate any property shall be dJrected away from all reSIdentIal dIstncts.
LIghtmg shall not be used as a form of advertlSlng (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIon 4.N 7 and
Chapter 9, Section 1O.F 5). Replace any large canopy trees adJacent to hght fixtures to
ehmmate future shadOWIng on the parkmg surface.
Response: The proposed SIte hghtmg and notes have been added to the plans as requested.
and the photometnc site plan IS now mcluded m submittal package Shght ShIftS m locatIOns
to some hght poles where made to the landscape plan to accommodate the landscape deSign.
All plans will be consIstent when submItted for buildmg permIts.
31 Comment: No person shall begm work m or upon any area of pubhc or pnvate nghts-of-way
m the City WIthout first obtammg a permit (LDR, Chapter 22, ArtIcle II, Section 7). No one
shall engage m land cleanng, filhng or removal m the CIty WIthout first obtammg the
necessary permIt (LDR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5.B). Apphcant shall apply for an
excavation and fill permIt m accordance With LDR, Chapter 8
Response: All reqUIred permIts WIll be obtamed from the CIty pnor to any work on the
Mr MIchael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 7
project bemg commenced.
32. Comment: The "TypIcal Parkmg Stall" detail on Sheet A-I mdlcates wheel stops, but the
sIte plan mdlcates a contmuous curb actmg as the wheel stop for allI6-foot parkmg spaces.
Please clanfY
Response: Sheet A-3 shows two dIfferent parkmg stall detaIls. One IS for the typIcal 16'-0"
long stalls WIth a 2'-0" overhang and contmuous curb The second detaIl depIcts the (30)
stalls located at the south end of the property WhICh are typIcal 18'-0" long stalls WIth wheel
stops.
33 Comment: The sIte plan (Sheet A-I) shows all handIcap parkIng stalls adjacent to the
buildmg. The CIVil plans (Sheet C-2) mdJcates an addItIonal two handJcap parkmg stalls
on eIther SIde of the proposed SIdewalk to High RIdge Road. Please clarIfy
Response: The CIvil plans have been revIsed to be conSIstent WIth the SIte plan.
34 Comment: Show a 12 mch dIameter weep hole for Catch Basm Type "CA" (CIty of
Boynton Beach Std. Dwg. B-91007).
Response: The weep hole has been mdIcated on Sheet C-4
35 Comment: Show a 12 Inch dIameter weep hole for Catch Basm Type 'CA" (CIty of
Boynton Beach Std. Dwg. B-91007).
Response: The above comment was repeated.
36 Comment: In the Dumpster Wall SectIOn reflect the 2-foot 3-mch landscape area shown m
the Dumpster Enclosure plan.
Response: The landscape Island has been added to the dumpster wan sectIon on Sheet A-3
37 Comment: IndIcate sleeved holes m the pavement for the open poSItIon for the dumpster
gate panels.
Response: Sleeve holes have been added to dumpster enclosure detail on Sheet A-3
BUILDING DIVISION
38 Comment: On the floor plan draWIngs, add a labeled symbol that Identifies the location of
the handJcap accessible entrance doors to the buildmg. The locatIOn of the doors shall
match the locatIon of the accessible entrance doors that are depIcted on the SIte plan
drawmg. Flonda AccessibilIty Code for Buildmg ConstructIon, SectIon 4 1 2, 4 3
Response: GraphIC symbol IdentIfymg handIcap accessible doors have been added to
archItectural tloor plans, refer to Sheets A-4 and A-5
39 Comment: Add a labeled symbol to the SIte plan draWIng that represents and delIneates the
Mr MIChael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 8
path of travel for the accessible route that IS requIred between the accessible parkmg spaces
and the accessible entrance doors to the buildmgs. The symbol shall start at the accessible
parkmg spaces and term mate at the accessible entrance doors to the buildmg. The symbol
shall represent the locatIon 0 the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warnmg
or other pavement markmgs that are requIred to be mstalled along the path. The locatIOn
of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a dnve/lane areas that IS located
behmd parkmg vehIcles IdentIfy on the plan the Width ofthe accessible route. (Note' The
mImmum Width reqUIred by the code IS forty-four (44) mches.) Add text to the draw1ng that
would mdIcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned In
compliance WIth SectIon 4 3 (Accessible Route) and 4 6 (Parkmg and Passenger Loadmg
Zones) ofthe FlOrIda AccessibilIty Code for Buildmg Construction. Please note that at tIme
of permIt reVIew the applIcant shall provIde detailed documentatIOn on the plans that will
venfy that the accessible route IS m complIance With the regulatIOns speCIfied m the Flonda
AccessibilIty Code for Buildmg ConstructIOn. ThiS documentatIOn shall mclude, but not be
lImIted to, provIdmg fimsh grade elevations along the path of travel.
Response: GraphIC symbol delIneatmg path of travel for the accessible route IS now
mdlcated on archItectural site plan Sheets A-I and A-2 Width of path of travel IS also now
mdIcated on site plan sheets.
40 Comment: IdentIfy WIthm the SIte data the fimsh floor elevatIon (lowest floor elevatIOn) that
IS proposed for the buildmg. Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn IS m complIance With
regulatIOns of the code by addmg specIficatIOns to the SIte data that address the follO\vmg
Issues [SectIon 3107 I 2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edItIOn
of the Standard Buildmg Code]
I The deSIgn profeSSIOnal of record for the project shall add the follOWIng text to the
SIte data. ""The proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn 23 5 NGVD IS above the hIghest 100-
year base flood elevatIon apphcable to the buildmg Site, as determmed by the South
Flonda Water Management Dlstnct's surface water management constructIOn
development regulations." Response: ThIS note was omitted from the Civil plans,
but WIll be mcluded With the plans submItted for buildmg permIt reVIew The note
IS shown m the Site Data Table on architectural SIte plan.
2. Identlfy the floor elevatIOn that the desJgn professJOnal has estabhshed for the
buildmg wlthm the footpnnt of the bUlldmg that IS shown on the drawmgs tItled site
plan, floor plan and pavmg/dramage (cIvil plans) Response: Elevations have been
added to the plans as requested.
41 Comment: As reqUIred by Chapter 4, Section 7 of the LDR's, submit a floor plan draWing.
The buildmg plans are not bemg revJewed for complIance WIth the applIcable buildmg
codes. Therefore, add the words <<Floor plan layout IS conceptual" below the draWing titled
Floor Plan found on sheet( s) _ However, add to the floor plan draWing a labeled symbol
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 9
that Identifies the locatIOn of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the buildmg. The
locatIOn of the doors shall match the locatIOn of the accessible entrance doors that are
depicted on the site plan drawmg.
Response: Floor plan titles have been revIsed to read as "Conceptual
42 Comment: Place a note on the elevatIOn VIew drawmgs mdlcatmg that the wall opemngs
and wall construction comply \\1th Table 600 of the 1997 edItIon of the Standard Buildmg
Code
Response: Note has been added to elevatIons mdIcatmg wall openings shall comply WIth
Table 600 of S.B C , refer to Sheets A-6 and A-7
43 Comment: On all floor plan drawmgs, mdIcate wlthm the footprmt of the bUlldmg the
number of stones that are m the buildmg mcludmg, where applIcable, mezzamnes.
Response: Number of stones IS now mdIcated WIthm the bUlIdmg's footpnnt on Sheets A-4
and A-5
44 Comment: ConsJdenng that the occupancy classlficatJOns of the eXJstmg buildmg wIll be
changing, mdIcate on the floor plan drawing the floor load capaCIty of the existing floors.
SpeCIfy on the plan the eXJstmg and proposed occupancy claSsIficatJOn as defined m the
1997 edItIon of the Standard BUlldmg Code mcludmg the Boynton Beach Amendments to
the buildmg code (Ordmance #99-16) Also, mdIcate the floor load capacIty that IS reqUIred
for the new occupancy claSSificatIon. Changmg the occupancy claSSIficatIOn of a buildmg
will reqUIre that the buildmgs comply WIth Chapter 34 of the Standard Buildmg Code The
change m occupancy reqUIres that an engmeer certIfy that the floor loads will comply WIth
speCIficatIons of the new occupancy classIticatJOn. CertIficatIOn of the floor loads and
complIance WIth Chapter 34 of the Standard Buildmg Code will be reqUIred at time of
permIt reVIew
Response: There IS no eXIstmg buildmg on SIte or change of occupancy Floor load
capaCIty for proposed slab on grade shall be 150 P s. f Floor load capaCIty for proposed
occupancy IS 125 p.s.f Proposed occupancy IS Factory-IndustrIal, Group F All mformatIon
IS noted on archItectural floor plans, refer to Sheets A-4 and A-5 The plans will comply
With floor load certIficatIOn and Chapter 34 at time of permit reVIew
45 Comment: IndIcate on the floor plan draWIng wIthm the footpnnt of the buildmg the
prImary use of the structure faCIlIty
Response: PrImary use of buildmg IS warehouse-dIstributIon and IS now stated wlthm
bUIldmg's footpnnt on architectural floor plans, refer to Sheets A-4 and A-5
46 Comment: IdentIfy on the site plan draWIngs the actual distance that the buildmg IS set back
from the north, east, south, and west property hnes. Please note that overhangs, covered
walkways, canopies, awmngs or other appurtenances that are attached to the bUIldmg shall
Mr MIchael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 10
be considered when IdentIfy10g bUIld10g setbacks Therefore IdentIfy the width of the
proposed covered walkways, canopies, awn10gs and/or other roofed areas that extend out
beyond the mam walls of the build1Og. The build10g setback shall comply WIth setback
regulatIons speCified 10 the Zon1Og Code.
Response: Setbacks from the nearest structure, measured from overhang, are shown on the
ArchItectural SIte plan Sheets A-I and A-2
47 Comment: To venfy that the proposed build10g IS m complIance WIth the applIcable
build10g setbacks, show and dImenSIOn on the site plan the WIdth of the build10g overhang.
Also, IdentIfy the size or Width of the covered walkways, awn1Ogs. canopIes, and/or other
roofed areas that extend out beyond the maIn walls of the buildIng.
Response: All buIld10g overhang dimenSIOns are now 10dlcated on architectural site plan
A-4 and A-5
48 Comment: At the tIme of permIt revIew, proVIde a completed and executed CIty UnIty of
tItle form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts comb1Oed as one lot. A copy
of the recorded deed WIth legal descnptIOns of each property that IS bemg unIfied IS reqUIred
to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identIfied on each deed shall
match.
Response: The applIcant shall submIt an executed CIty UnIty of TItle form at the tIme of
permit re\lleW
49 Comment: At the tIme of permIt reVIew, submit Signed and sealed work1Og draWIngs of the
proposed constructIOn.
Response: All plans submitted for bUIld10g permits will be SIgned and sealed by the
applIcable profeSSIonal.
50 Comment: Add to the submIttal a partIal elevation VIew draWIng of the proposed pen meter
fence IdentIfy the type of fence matenal and the type of matenal that supports the fence,
IncludIng the typIcal dIstance between supports. Also. pro\l1de a typtcal sectIOn VIew
drawmg of the fence that Includes the depth that the fence supports are below fimsh grade
The location and heIght of the fence shall comply WIth the fence regulatIOns speCified m the
ZonIng Code
Response: Fence m questIOns are eXIstIng off site and shown for mformatIOnal purposed
only
51 Comment: At tIme of permit reView, submit for review an address10g plan for the project.
Response: An addressmg plans will be submItted at time of permit reVIew
52 Comment: Add to all plan view draw10gs of the SIte a labeled symbol that represents the
locatIOn and penmeter of the lImits of constructIon proposed WIth the subject request.
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26,2001
Page II
Response: LImits of constructIon IS represented by the property hne except for the northern
property hne where the lImits of constructIon IS represented by the railroad easement, refer
to archItectural site plan Sheets A-I and A-2.
PARKS AND RECREATION
53 Comment: Submit detailed lTngatIOn plans for reqUired nght of way landscape
Improvements dunng the construction document permIttmg stage for reVIew and approval
by the Parks DIVISIon staff. Include on the plan locatIon of any eXIstmg IrngatIOn m the
nght-of-way
Response: IrngatIon plans will be submItted at tIme of permit review
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
54 Comment: The boundary survey sheet I of 1 mdIcates SIX (6) eXlstmg Sabal Palms on the
mdIvIduals SItes. These palms should be noted on the landscape plan to be relocated to one
of the green spaces.
Response: The palms have been noted as such on the landscape plan.
55 Comment: The removed trees In the High Ridge Road nght-of-way should also be replaced
m accordance WIth Quantum Park Roadway Plantmg Plan document as (yet to be) submItted
to the CIty of Boynton Beach. The ongmal nght-of-way plantmg plan for thIS sectIOn of
roadway was submItted by Bradshaw, Gill, Fuster & ASSOCIates, Inc (reVIsed August 15,
1989)
Response: Any trees removed from the nght-of-way have been replaced as mdIcated on the
landscape plans.
PLANNING & ZONING
56 Comment: Submit a color rendenng pnor to the Plannmg & Development Board meetmg.
Response: A colored elevatIOn IS submItted hereWIth.
57 Comment: The follOWIng mformatlon must be mdlcated m the tabular data on sheet A2
1 ProVIde the offiCIal Future Land Use deSIgnatIon of the subject property as
"IndustrIal"
2 ProVide the correct offiCial zomng dIstnct of the subJect property as "Pill" rather
than "M-I II
Response: InformatIOn IS now mdIcated on Site Data Table on Sheets A-I and A-2
58 Comment: IndIcate the offiCIal Future Land Use deSignatIOn and zomng dIstnct of the
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 12
adjacent properties.
Response: Future land use desIgnations and zomng dIStrIctS of the adJacent propertIes are
now mdlcated on the architectural site plan, refer to Sheets A-I and A-2.
59 Comment: The configuratIon of the parkmg lot and the total number of parkmg spaces must
match between all plans. Currently, the parkmg lot on the SchematIc Pavmg, Gradmg and
Dramage plan does not match the SIte plan or landscape plan.
Response: The SIte plan and CIVIl plans are now conSIstent m regard to the parkmg layout.
60 Comment: On the site plan, mdIcate the buildmg setbacks for the Pill zomng dIstnct for the
front, rear and SIdes of the bUIldIng.
Response: Buildmg setbacks for the Pill zomng dlstnct for the front, rear and Sides of
bUIldmg are now mdlcated on the Site Data Table on Sheets A-I and A-2
61 Comment: An admmIstrative waiver will be requIred for the dnveways shown at the north
and south ends of the SIte. They are depicted as 40 feet m Width, which exceeds the 32 foot
allowable WIdth as reqUIred by Code.
Response: A letter requestmg thIS waiver has been proVided to the DIrector of Development
as the code dIrects. No ObjectIOns to thIS WaIver request have been received to date from the
DIrector and staffhas mdIcated that thIS waIver will be granted as part of the development
order approval.
62. Comment: ProVIde a typIcal draWIng that mcludes the heIght of all proposed freestandmg
outdoor lIghtmg poles.
Response: Refer to Photometnc Site Plan, Sheet EO 1 for height of proposed lIght pole
fixtures.
63 Comment: The site plan shall mclude the area and dImenSions of each mdlvlduallot and
IdentIfy eXIstmg platted lots/tracts wlthm the subject property
Response: EXIstmg lot lInes WIthm the subject property are now shown on archItectural SIte
plan, Sheets A-I and A-2
64 Comment: On the floor plan, mdlcate the area expressed m square feet that IS allocated to
the "office" use smce all parkmg reqUIrements have been based upon two separate uses,
namely office and warehouse
Response: Proposed office area IS now mdIcated on archItectural floor plans, Sheets A-4 and
A-5
65 Comment: The foundatIOn landscapmg on the north and south Side of the buildmg shall be
increased to not less than five (5) feet in WIdth (Chapter 7 5, SectIOn 5.M).
Response: FoundatIOn landscapmg on the north and south SIdes of the bUIldmg already
Mr Michael Rumpf
June 26, 200 I
Page 13
exceed five feet m wIdth, refer to Sheets A-I and A-2
66 Comment: The landscape plan's tabular data mdlcates SIX hundred mnety-elght (698)
Jasmme volubIle (Wax Jasmme) plants but graphically shows eight hundred fOrty-eIght
(848) plants. ThIS dIscrepancy between the two must be corrected so that they match.
Response: The tabular data has been revised to show 848 plants.
67 Comment: The landscape s tabular data mdIcates SIX hundred seventy-two (672) Schefflera
arboricola (DwarfScheftlera) plans but graphically shows seven hundred two (702) plants.
ThiS dIscrepancy between the two must be corrected so that they match.
Response: The tabular data has been reVIsed to show 702 plants.
68 Comment: The landscape plan's tabular data mdlcates two thousand two hundred thIrty
(2,230) Lmope muscan (Lmope Evergreen GIant) plants but only graphtcally shows two
thousand one hundred seventy (2,170) plants. ThiS discrepancy between the two must be
corrected so that they match.
Response: The tabular data has been revJsed to show 2,170 plants.
69 Comment: The landscape plan's tabular data does not mdlcate or give dimenSIOns of the
eleven ( 11) 'SP" Please clanfy thIS mconsIstency
Response: SpeCIficatIons for SP have been added to the landscape plan.
70 Comment: Correct the total SIte area on the cover sheet so that It matches the total SIte area
on the survey
Response: Total site area on architectural cover sheet has been revised to match the totals
shown on the survey
71 Comment: No vehicle encroachment IS permitted wlthm the landscape area.
Response: The 2' car overhang does not encroach mto the reqUired landscape buffer
72 Comment: The landscape plan shall mclude the followmg notes, "FDOT Type D or F curb
shall be proVided along the pen meter of all landscape, dramage and grassed areas adjacent
to paved vehIcular use areas, except where wheel stops are provIded"
Response: The note has been added to the landscape plan.
73 Comment: The proposed Chrysobalanus Icaco (Redtlp Cocoplum) WhICh form a contmuous
hedge along the front landscape buffer shall be Installed at 24 mches In heIght but
mamtamed at no less than four (4) feet nor greater than SIX (6) feet m heIght. In addItIon,
It shall be Installed With 24 mches m spread and planted WIth tip to tip spacIng Immediately
after plantmg to adequately cover the planted areas on the (Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn
5.E) The landscape plan IS not m complIance WIth thIS reqUIrement because the plant lIst
Mr MIchael Rumpf
June 26, 2001
Page 14
IndIcates that all proposed Redtlp Cocoplum WIll be planted 24 Inches m heIght wIth 18 mch
spread.
Response: The number of plants have been mcreased to allow the plantIng at 18"0 c The
plants WIll be tIp to tIp upon mstallatlOn.
74 Comment: On the elevatIons, staff recommends changIng the IdentIficatIOn of the front
facade as "PartIal West ElevatIon" mstead of "PartIal East ElevatIOn" In order to easIly
dIfferentIate between the front and rear of the buildmg.
Response: Front facade elevatIOn tItle has been reVIsed to PartIal West ElevatIOn.
I beheve these responses and the correspondIng reVISIons to the plans address the T echmcal ReVIew
com ents. We respectfully request to be scheduled for the July 24 200 I Planmng & Development
Boar meetmg.
~
Wmston Lee, ASLA, AlCP
PreSIdent
cc Bob Motcbkavltz, P.E.
JamIe Mayo, Corrales Group
Graham Ernest-Jones, Rhon Ernest-Jones
RIchard Carlson, Esq.
Ted KleIn, Esq
Robert Curran, VP Boynton IndustrIal Realty Corp
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
POBOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX. (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
1& yA"(e'C> {VtIC-~"'~1 Covefi- J
to. Winston Lee
fax # (561) 689-5559
date June 11,2001
from: LUSIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner
reo I ST REVIEW COMMENTS FOR
Quantum Park Lots 73A-76
Please find attached the first reVIew comments for your proJect. To stay on the
current reVIew schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below, and bnng all
documents to the TRC scheduled for June 26, 2001
I ReVIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments lIsted herem, mcludmg the addItIOn of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 10 copIes
to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally submItted),
2 SubmIt the addItIonal mformatIon as requested wIthm the attached comments, (1.e traffic
analYSIS, engmeenng certIficatIOn, etc )
3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) consIstmg of a lIst bnefly summarIzmg how each
comment has been addressed on the reVIsed plans or WIth the supplemental mformatIOn
mcludmg locatIOn on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItIous 2nd reVIew by staff and
your proJect representatIves dunng the TRC meetmg ),and
4
SubmIt reductIOns (8 Yi X 11) for the proposed
SIte plans, elevatIons and landscapmg plan (thIS
IS reqUIred for the final report and publIc
presentatIon)
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and
copIed for staff reVIew If plans WIll not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC
meetmg, contact LUSIa Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date
ProJects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs,
whIch are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact ElIzabeth Cabrera, by the Thursday pnor
to the Tuesday TRC meetmg that you deSIre to attend. The remamder of the reVIew schedule
WIll be adJusted accordmgly If you have questIOns on the attached comments, please contact the
respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatIves.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC
(2nd reVIew), the proJect IS forwarded to the Plannmg and Development Board Meetmg that falls
approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*" by any comment IdentIfies a
comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Plannmg and Development
board.
Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report
and/or confirmatIOn of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
dramage certIficatIon by a lIcensed engmeer, SIgned "Rider to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn"
form and colored elevatIOns of the proposed proJect. ThIS mformatIOn IS necessary for
the proJect to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note.
Engmeenng John GUIdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
BUIldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6357
FIre Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Roger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
PolIce Department Marshall Gage Officer John Huntmgton 737-3136 742-6185
UtIlItIes John GUIdry H. DavId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
PublIc Works-General Larry QUInn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285
PublIc W orks- Traffic Jeffery LIvergood 742-6201 742-6211
Parks & RecreatIOn John Wildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233
Forester/EnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Plannmg & Zomng Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 03/2 \10 1
\iCHIMAD/ISHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\\'IP\PROJECTSIQuantum park lot 73a-76ilst Review comments FAX.doc
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
Po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H, Newell. Chairman
Carol A, Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer-
@ printed on recycled paper
May 30 2001
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE.
Quantum Park - Lots 73 - 76
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr Rumpf
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (dated May
15 2001) for this previously approved project, pursuant to the Traffic Performance
Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The
project is summarized as follows:
Location
Municipality.
Proposed Uses.
New Daily Trips.
Build-out Year'
Quantum Park - east side of High Ridge Road south of Car-Max
Boynton Beach
157 189 SF Warehouse and 39,297 SF Office
1 387 @ 5% Pass-by
nfa
Based on our review the Traffic Division has determined that the previously approved
project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County
If you have any questions regarding this determination please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
/n /1-7--/
, r/
Masoud Atefi, MSC~
Sr Engineer - Traffic Division
cc: Pinder-Troutman Consulting Inc.
jLiN - I 2001
File' General TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F'\TRAFFIC\malAdmin\Approvals\010507 doc
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
POBox 31 0
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO. Masoud Atefi, Sr Taffice Eng'
FAX. 561-478-5770
FROM Eric Johnson
DA TE.
May 24, 2001
NUMBER OF PAGES. (including cover)
5
RE. Quantum Park Lot 73A-76
Please find enclosed a copy of the traffic report from Pinder Troutman Consulting dated May 15, 2001
from Andrea M Troutman, P E., President, along with a copy of the letter sent on May 23, 2001 to
you from Mr Michael w Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning. If you have any questions please do
not hesitate to call 742-6256
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you
"RAt"-lSMISSION VEF'-IFICATION REPORT
TIME OS/24/2001 13 22
NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613756259
TEL 5613756260
DATE TIME
FAX NO. lNAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
OS/24 13 16
94785770
~5.~
OK 5
STANDARD
ECM
. ~ ""T'---
~\}..~\.l..........
,'~G;' I,Y: - o~
r: ( JI
I III : 'I (J
c: .',,::' ~
.K::. ~~
I"',.. c, : ~
U II
, "
~,/
'-
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Ucenses . Community Redevelopment
May 23, 2001
Mr Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
POBox 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re. Traffic Study' Quantum Park Lot 73A-76
NWSP 01-003
Dear Mr Atefi:
The enclosed traffic generation statement, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.,was
received by Planning and Zoning recently for the above-referenced application. Please
review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and I with your
written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260
Sincerely,
-" _ .r--?
/~Jc.---
Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/ec
J:\SHRDA T A \P1anning'SHARED\V.1"PROJECTS,Quantum pari< lot 73a-76\Traffic letter to Palm Beach County,doc
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
. ~
Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cl.boynton-beach.f1.us