APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME Villas ~ Quantum Lakes
LOCATION Quantum Lakes Drive
COMPUTER ID
I FILE NO MSPM 01-002 I TYPE OF APPLICATION Major Site
Plan Modification
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON OWNER. Villas at Quantum Lake, Inc.
Mark Hansen PHONE (same as agent)
PHONE 954-340-4904 FAX.
FAX 954-344-4608 ADDRESS
ADDRESS 1062 Coral Ridge Drive
Coral Springs, FL. 33071 -
Date of submittal/Projected meetin~ dates.
SUBMITTAL 1 RESUBMITT AL 11/21/01
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE 12/11/01
PUBLIC NOTICE NIA
TRC MEETING 1/8/02
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE NIA
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE N/A
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS)
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 1/22/02
MEETING
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT N/A
AGENCY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION MEETING 2/5/02
COMMENTS
J \SHRDA T A \Planning\SHARED\ WP\FORMS\Blanks forms folder\2001 PROJECT TRACKTI\G INFO. doc
A... ~LICA TION SUBMITTAL CHECKLJ.ST
NEW SITE PLAN & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN
Project Name q~x. ckUU-e- [)r Submittal~.ate_--.::--:.,-- F'l
1/1 I/a ~ (i) r---~ 1 S . ~~ t ~ \ .
I 0 i ,.- . .-..------, I ;! . I
:. "Ii I
., II i I .
n I : '1 . A, :. i
Owner/Agent: JU, N'''! C. I ~ L..I
L ---"-
.. 0
-
~-~.
Submittal Included
Ongmal ApplIcation f.-/"
Twelve complete assembled & stapled sets of plans sIgned & sealed ~
. Current survey (sIgned & sealed) 2.-
SIte Plan - -
. -
./'
. Landscape Plan /'
. Elevations /'
. Pavmg,Gradmg & Dramage Plan /
. Floor Plans ./
./'
RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn y
Appropnate Fees ~
Owners of Record Consent Form
Warranty Deed (Last Recorded)
Copy of Purchase Contract
Agent AuthonzatIOn (mcludmg name & address) c:/
Traffic Study/Statement {/
Colored ElevatIOn Drawmg
S:\Planning\SHARED\ \VP\FORMS\Templates and forms\New Site Plan Submittal Checklist.doc
November 19, 2001
Ms. LusIa Galav, AICP
CIty of Boynton Beach
Planmng and Zomng DIVISIOn
100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE Villas at Quantum Lake (f.k.a. Grotto Bay)
Major Modification to Site Plan
Dear LUSIa.
Please find enclosed applIcatIOn for major modIficatIOn to the approved sIte plan for the Villas at
Quantum Lake The enclosed plans reflect the addItIOnal three bUIldmgs (buildmg type IV), a total of forty-
two (42) total umts added wIthm the vacated Quantum Lakes Dnve nght-of-way We are proposmg to use
the eXIstmg north bound lanes, twenty-four (24) feet m wIdth, for the mternal access dnve The eXIstmg
landscapmg will remam m place (wherever possible) mcludmg medIan trees.
Included hereWIth IS the traffic study for NOPC # 12 prepared by Pmder Troutman Consultmg, Inc
whIch addressed the closure of Quantum Lakes Dnve The project traffic analysIs for the Villas at Quantum
Lake was adjusted to reflect the vacated Quantum Lakes Dnve and the addItIOnal 42 umts.
Access to the SIte WIll be two (2) dnveways connectmg to Quantum Lakes Dr. / Quantum
Boulevard. A thIrd access pomt will be developed m the future to Quantum Lane and HIgh RIdge Rd. The
mam entrance remams the dIrect connectIon to Gateway Blvd. The addItIOnal 42 umts will generate an
addItIonal 294 tnps per day The total project traffic IS 2198 vehIcle tnps per day Quantum Lakes Dnve /
Quantum Blvd. has capacity m excess of20,000 vehIcle tnps per day
Please process the plans for reVIew and approval Should you have any questIOns, please feel free to
contact me
Ma seh
Vice 7sIdent
cc! Igor Olemcoff
Doug MacDonald
\\OLENFL\USERS\SHEILA\CORRES\MIDQuantum\GalavII1901.doc
1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Springs Florida 33071
(954) 340 4904 · Fax (954) 344-4608
City Codes Accessed Via Web site
wv.'W. bovnton-beach.org
www.amlega1.com/boynton_beach_f1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN
Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting? \f f?'S ,Date \ l / /4 /0 I
This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and
Zoning Division TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of plans
including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of
the Site Plan Review procedure AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED
Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information
GENERAL INFORMATION
1
Project Name
V I L-~A-S AI
QJA~M L-~
VI L-L-AJ AT (;)JANiUM L.AILES I rue
I
2
Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name
Phone
\ 06'2
CQ54 )
CQ2..AJ.. ~lD6E .:DRl vr; CQ2AL. SRZII\J6S 33011
. I
~4o -4ttt)4. Fax: (C1S4) (z~a1e24W8
Address
3 Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made)
~At-(C l\A ~ seN fc1L VIL--~A5 AT QV~1VM ~ fNC
I
Address \0" 2. C ~ {Z-l {l)E m~ (aLI><f ~f(4 ~ ') 3Q 7 J
(4: { ck ./ (Zip Cod~
Phone ~.s4-) ~O -4q 04 Fax: .J?1:S- 4) 344-~b()c5
If contract purchaser, please attach contract for sale and purchase
4 Agent's Name (person, if any representing applicant)
~"?
~ ,A.Bo \If:
/
/
~
Address
(Zip Code)
Phone
...-/
Fax:
/
/
5
Correspondence to be mailed to agent only' if no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute
is specified below'*
JAW\E" A5 AW;;y'C
*This is the one address to which all agendas letters and other materials will be mailed
6
What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner, buyer, lessee builder, developer
contract purchaser etc)
cw~~
7
Street address of location of site
2.1 CO
Q\J A~ L.-A:~BS :Dr.
8 Property Control #(PCN)
9 Legal description of site TI2AC'T 10 I 4:uANTUiH ~f2.~
AT "5DYt\1lnN t::t'P.C+i PLAT NO b
RGPl.-AT Nt) I J
10 Intended use(s) of site AVO(i'l"CtJ 10 \/ll-L-AS AT C;VMl1UM L-~
-Pfl.-DJ ec1 (A '00111 WAL -3 $t.,DbS - 4 Z UN Irs )
11 Architect: C ~/AtJ (3tt(LK ~ /~6G
12 Landscape Architect: pAJU( 9l YMwlflT[ D6fS(&\J 6(laJ~
13 Site Planner' ~~ YAp.jkJls/T& R~ l b,u 6ClCUP
14 Engineer' -sHAH- .D(l6(U ..5
15 Surveyor' 5r\AH D rzqJ S
16 Traffic Engineer' -Yt 1lvYt:'1- T(1~ CGJ~ C\11\.6 I~C faz. NDf'C :It /2..
17 Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property?
~
II SITE PLAN
The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of
the site plan
1 Land Use Category shown in the Comprehensive Plan.
2 Zoning District: 1'\.0-
3 Area of Site IS I~ t' ~) acres
4 Land Use -- Acreage Breakdow
I\(\..)(ED u~
1B1,1)..9
sq ft.
% of site
% of site
)
/
% of site
% of site
% of site
% of site
% of site
a
Residential, including lA .33 1'- tl 2~
surrounding lot area of grounds
acres
Qs4
b
Recreation Areas * 'B3 1-"
(excluding water area)
acres
c Water Area N/A- acres
I
d Commercial ~/,6. acres
,
e Industrial NIp... acres
I
f Public/lnstitutional ~/~ acres
.
g Public Private and Canal rights-of-way ~ / t;.c acres
2
h
% of site
Other (specify) Iv / j':>..
,
Other (specify) !\\ / p.--.
.
Total area of site I~ 01 acres le 7 11-~ % of site
*including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and havihg a minimum dimension of 50 ft.
by 50 ft.
acres
acres
% of site
5 Surface Cover
a
Ground floor building
area ("building footprint")
c:5 ?~
'2- 4 S-
% of site
acres
b
Water area
% of site
acres
c. Other impervious areas including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios decks, and athletic courts
I. ./ 8 acres ~1,s;- % of site
d
Total impervious area _l rz.- I \
~/.O
% of site
acres
e Landscaped area (') 'i59 acres tf '1 % of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec 7 5-35(g) of
Landscape Code)
f
?o7
Z-~l
% of site
Other landscaped areas,
acres
g Other pervious areas including golf course, natural areas yards and swales but excluding
water areas acres % of site
h Total pervious areas c:;:;; ~ ~ acres ?~. t> % of site
Total area of site
l~ DI
acres
% of site
6 Floor Area
Residential 3b 1, J..lh i ,=,2. ,30 +
Commercial/Office N / A
.
Industrial/Warehouse N / A
.
Recreational I'll A
.
Public/lnstitutional tf I A
.
Other (specify) N / A
.
Other (specify) N I A-.
Total floor area 42.4- ,'5'-0
7 Number of Residential Dwellinq Units
a
sq ft.
b
sq ft.
c.
sq ft.
d
sq ft.
e
sq ft.
)
f
sq ft.
g
sq ft.
h
sq ft.
a
Single-family detached
sq ft.
b
~/A-
I
sq ft.
Duplex
3
d
e
c.
(1 )
(2)
(3)
(4)
Multi-Family (3 + aho~hed dwelling units)
Efficiency (}J/ A
1 Bedroom . eo + 12.::: <12
2 Bedroom ~ + 30 -: I~
3+ Bedroom _ ~ ___
Total multi-family 27'}... T 4-'2
Total number of dwelling unitJ.12..-t4z.. -::
314-
dwelling units
dwelling units
dwelling units
dwelling units
dwelling units
8 Gross Density lJ . it. dwelling units per acre
z.
stories
9
Maximum height of structures on site J.-5
feet
10 Required off-street Darkinq
a
b
Calculation of required # of
off-street parking spaces
~12. e 115
6u~~/~5C ~1~50/o
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
=
41b
lA
']. f T 4- :: '2-~
=
=
Calculation of required #
of handicap parking spaces
2- % :: 12
Number of handicap
spaces provided on site plan
ll~
=
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (eRA) AND CITY
COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT
/
,
i
4
III CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We) hereby certify that the
above stat e ts and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith
are true to \e 'est f (my) (our) knowledge and belief This application will not be accepted
unless sig . ~ 'c 0 ding to the instructions below
I\/l~/ol
Date I
Signature 0 nerXs) or Trustee of
Authorized P ncipal if property is owned by
a corporatio or other business el1tity
"t{ AF-K )vi H HJ )~I V f
OR
Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant)
Date
IV AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT
Signature of Authorized Agent
Date
~y, e Ignate the above-signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to
. ioo1 v~
Signature of O.wne s) or Trustee,
or AuthorizecfPrinci al if property is owned
by a corpo.r9tion or ottler business entity
I'll A JL~ M ~ S@\.1 V P
OR
II) 11/0
Date I (
Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant)
Date
/
A REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO
REVIEW THIS PROJECT
5
RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION
The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that
all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering, and other data submitted with this application for review by the
City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by the various boards, commissions, staff personnel and other parties
designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall
rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and
substantial
The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans, specifications, drawings engineering and other data
which may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, staff or designees shall be
constructed in strict compliance with the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall be
deemed material and shall place the applicant in violation of this application and all approvals and permits
which may be granted
The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as provided for by the
applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance and the
applicant shall indemnify reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense
claim, liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of the same
\ q~aof
READ, ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO this
, 20.Qj
Witness
Applicant !
Witness
/
I
l
/
6
( NCURRENCY REQUIREME~ 5
NOTICE TO APPLICANTS FOR APPROVAL OF LAND DEVELOPMENT ORDERS OR PERMITS
Please be advised that all applications for the following land development orders and permits which are
submitted on or after.June 1, 1990 will be subject to the City's Concurrency Management Ordinance, and
cannot be approved unless public facilities (potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage solid waste recreation,
park, and road facilities) would be available to serve the project, consistent with the levels of service which are
adopted in the City's Comprehensive Plan
Building permit applications for the construction of improvements, which in and by themselves would
create demand for public facilities
Applications for site plan approval
Applications for conditional use approval
Applications for subdivision master plan approval
Applications for preliminary plat approval
Applications for final plat approval
Applications for rezoning to planned zoning districts
Applications for revisions to any of the applications listed above, which would increase the demand
for any public facility
Any other application, which in and by itself would establish the density or intensity of use of land, or
a maximum density or intensity of use of land
Applications for development orders and permits submitted after February 1 1990 and which
generate more than 500 net vehicle trips per day, must comply with the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance, unless exempt from that ordinance
Please be advised, however that the following applications will be exempt from the Concurrency Management
Ordinance, pending final approval of this ordinance by the City Commission
Applications for the development of property which was platted on or after January 13, 1978 and either
the final plat or the preliminary plat and Palm Beach County Health Department permit applications were
submitted or approved prior to June 1 1990, and the use of the property is consistent with the general
use which was intended for the property at the time of platting
Applications for the development of property, which was platted prior to January 13 1978, the area of
the platted lots does not exceed 2 acres and the proposed use would not generate more than 500 net
vehicle trips per day
Applications for building permit, if a site plan or conditional use application was submitted prior to June
1, 1990 and subsequently approved and the site plan or conditional use has not expired
/
Applications for the development of property within an approved Development of Regional Impact, and
which are consistent with the approved DRI
Applications for approval of final plats if the preliminary plat and application for Palm Beach county
Health Department permits for utilities have been submitted prior to June 1 1990
Applications for revisions to previously approved development orders or permits which do not increase
the demand for any public facility
7
'Please b~ advised that these exer - ion rules are tentative and will be sub to final approval by the City
Commission If you have any que~."ms concerning the proposed Boynton beach Concurrency Management
'Ordinance, please contact the Boynton Beach Planning &Zoning Division at (561) 742-6260
CHAPTER 4
SITE PLAN REVIEW
Section 7 Submission Requirements.
Each applicant shall submit to the Planning and Zoning Division the following plans and exhibits in the number
of copies specified by the Planning and Zoning Division, together with a Site Plan Review application and a fee
adopted by resolution by the City Commission
12 ASSEMBLED COPIES REQUIRED
A. ExistinQ site characteristics map. A sealed survey, not older than six months, showing all adjacent
streets, alleys and driveways, and also illustrating
1 Existing natural features, including but not limited to lakes, trees and other vegetation
and soils and topography
2 Existing buildings, building elevations, other structures, including use, height, dimensions
and setbacks
3 Existing utility lines and all easements
4 Existing elevations (corner, street and finished floor)
B. Site development plan.
1 A scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed buildings and other structures and any
existing buildings and structures, which are to be retained including use, height,
dimensions and setbacks
2 Proposed off-street parking spaces, driveways and sidewalks, including location,
dimensions and setbacks, traffic control markings and signage
3 Proposed fences and walls including location dimensions, setbacks, height and
material
4 Proposed location of lighting on site
5 Proposed dumpster location
C. Landscape plan.
1 A separate scaled drawing (at the same scale as the site development plan) prepared as
required by state law clearly illustrating proposed trees shrubs grass and
2. Proposed berms watercourses and other topographic features
3 A notation on method of irrigation
Architectural plan.
1 A scaled drawing clearly illustrating proposed building floor plan and elevations including
8
height, ext \r dimensions exterior color and mate .5
2 A colored elevation drawing (not mounted) showing all elevations of the building. (This
submittal can be waived by the Planning and Zoning Director when not applicable)
E. Tabular Summary ContaininQ.
1 Total gross project area by acreage and square footage and net buildable land area in
acres and square feet.
2 Total number of proposed residential units, including characteristics by number of
bedrooms and bathrooms and gross square footage of each typical unit.
3 Proposed nonresidential floor type of use and total gross square footage
4 Square footage and percentage distribution of the total project site, including areas
proposed for landscaped open space vehicular use areas, other paved areas and
building coverage and total coverage
5 Number and ratio of required and provided off-street parking spaces and number of
loading spaces
6 Water bodies in acres and square feet.
7 Height of buildings
F. DrainaQe plan.
1
2
A separate scaled drawing (at the same scale as the site development plan) showing
elevations flow arrows proposed drainage structures, proposed treatment facilities etc.
An engineer's certification in writing that drainage will conform with all rules, regulations,
codes, etc. including, but not limited to Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 of these Land
Development Regulations
Revised 10/26/01
/
J'\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\FORMSIAPPLlCATIONS\NWSP\Revised Site Plan with Pre-application date.doc
9
~
~/<S' '
~/~/
.. /.!:?;
v /
,;
J
I
I
\
~
.f(
?-- T 5
~
" 6'",
~^'~o~U'0
,..r.0
'<-
~
,,-
,",v
QS
,,'-)
.........:....
'>-,
V
",'
,"\,0'
~('~
/
LEGE"! 0
5 - .l.i'v1 PE,-\,< HOlR
?~CJECT TKAFF C
.:..~! ?:'v\ PbK HOLR
PRCljECT TR.l,FFiC
1334 CAlLY PROJECT TKAFrK
QUANTUM PARK
RESIDENTIAL - LOTS 59, 60 & 61
TRACT 101
PROJEG DRJVEWAY VO LUi\t1 ES
o
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
-< -<
::T ::T
'" '"
~..
it @
V> V>
'" '"
~~
U II
t:><-
""0
V> V>
." ."
SO
~~
E
:92:g~BE_
~![~[tJ
b~.a~[~;;j
?l"<~1r~~~
~d~[;r~Q.
P~gk"~g
- iC 15 ~ ~
~.~~,a:~
12.~~~g
~i?~~iQ'
g~~~:8
~~ gRl<
;i' ~ ~
]~ [[v>
c. 3
~ ll'
~. ~
~ a.
~ ~
n ~a
5 ~
"< 0
~ [
. ;0
:5
~
~
0;
~
i1.
-c
'Ii
o
.
~
g
:;< 0
f: 3J
~ ~ ~
R
[
.%
~
~
Co
~
8
Qo
'"
~
::>
E"
3
"'0
..
;<-
..
::>
0.
;5.
!
n
~
51'
'"
0.
r;;:
"
"'C
~
~
C
::>
"'"
::>
~
::>
'"
\0
~
() ....
2 ::;
! ~
.. '" '"
rn:g8iS;g~
QBQ;'~D
?r~rD~nr~
"'[~~~~
S' ~ ()
'" ~ 0
[~ g
~ 5' :-
r-[ ~
~o
:g~
'"
~
Qo
'"
'"
,'"
....
p
"
...,
'"
o
-<
::>
5'
::>
S
0.
g
~
'"
'"
..
~
n
g
"8
OJ
<=:
o
::>
'"
'"
'"
~
l>>Vt(.nVt
eCD(,.nt..J
3: "'03:
o~~::j
g;<'51'o
o c::: VI /'P
::; 3 ~ ~
n"'O~-
~ ~ ~ &
OJ Q ~ ~
8"@~-
::>
~
'"
'"
..
~ ~
;Ii ~~
a ~~
,I::...I;io."".&... .loo>
g;~);! t~
~-;;~ w.,?'
~aa tt:
,.... ~~~.c:..~w
g a~~!~E
(.nVl~ ~-o""D"W""'-l
o;;>~naaa~:;~~~
~~QQ~~:!!~;;?~g'O~
~ ;<. ~ ~ I~ 3: 9 ::> 3" 3 ~ => if
I:: ,.?" 0.["< Qo ~ %' '" 16' 6" B "'C
~;n5;~0"~~.~~~ ~a
:r~ >~;:, ~~!:r~ ~
)> ~ 0 or l~ - n - is
=1 Qo la' " I' g 3:::>. 3:
~,.... ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ l>>
Q'i;: [ ~~~ ~
::>;;' 0' n "~ ~
=,,::> ;r~ '" ~
m~ ~~:3
o.Er ",-
.gg. 2 ~
~~ a. ~
~ ~
-
...,
!-'
...
"''''
~~
s ~.
::> 0.
3:::f
,'l: ~
::> '"
~ 0
Ej' ~
,....0.
,......
n."
o
-<
Z
~~
",aa
.oOJ:
ii ~ ..
::> ~:~3
c ~
3 :; ::>
O~:;
=> bl ::>
~~ ~
.. 0 ::>
;~ ~
o
"
~
,....
~
:;-.0>
r3 ; ~
=' ::> n
SE":T
-< 3 ~
2..~~
,...."'"w
III
=' ,....
c:...~
5:='"
ro ,>I:>
v> Cl'
o
Ro
~
-
"'..
n3:
2.0
~5'
g Q..
Cj. ..
,....
~
'"
oooon 0 OOSO QQO~~~~Q~QQOO 00 00 000
tt~t~ ~ t~~t [[~~~~~[~[2t~ ~~ [~ t~t
~~~~n [ ~~~~ a~a~-~~a~~ aa [ [ ~a~o~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~ i ~.~. ~. ~'S~' ~'S~' ~-~. E ~ ~~~~.~
~-~- ~- - --- -~- -- -Q~~~~
323 E" 3 3 ::> ::> ::>
~ g' ~ g' ~~ ~
~ ~ ~_' ~ a~ ~
~_ 0
OBO~~~0::f~OO~0::f0~::>~::>~~::f~~""'8.00~00~00::f0"'J: ~
~~=>~~5'=>~~~~~~~~&&&&&~~~&~~~~~~&=>=>~=>~~_0
M~@z~a@-' ~~~~~"'~~~~~~~v>~"''''M::T~",~BB::T@'' ~
_ -. ov>~ - 0 ----~~o~- 0 - 0 ~ ~~
~. ~~~ ~~~. ~ ~ ~~~~--~8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [g
~ ~ - i-
Q, ". ::>
p ~ -
~
~ C) ;0-
~ (J:
~ ".
~. it
Z ::>
g 0 [
g- -i -i
~ 0 3: 0
-i -i
)> ~ )>
, ,.... ,....
~
bb
00
00
V> V>
." ~
Q..Q..
~
bo
00
00
v>v>Z
." ~ '"'
g,g,~
QQ",
~~~
'" ~ [
...."
'" ::>
~ -<.Q
O::T."
~~e
[~~
- '"
~~
5..5.
~ ~
EE
II II
"'~
"'e:>
0....
V>::T
.,,~
O~
;:,tt
n V>
'" '"
..
v:
~
V>
....
a
....
'"
:;;
V>
Cl'
""
.....
""
....
3
ex,
'"
.::
'"
'"
'"
."
IV
UI
c-
O>
N
....
"
...,
o
&
f-
....
o
c
-
is
<-
-
~
ex,
'" '" '"
o CD (",oJ 0
~ b:lJ:..f...J
1.0 N VJ 0
l.D 0) 0 0
...,
'" '"
U1WWNW
"i-.J 0 0:"" 0
CD""",W,J.W1
ON 0'\t>.J +;>.
<-
~~gO\_
.....O'JOO
~C3g~g8
'"
Nl,JI....."'''''1'o.) W
.....,O~~.,...NNO\O't
bg~g8~(...,~~
80"00080'"
~~8..~..,""~..~~A (")
~1Hl~~S~~~;~!
r
--
.... ,'"
","
.......
",IV
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~c~~~~~~~~~~~~~8
~ ~
v:
~ ~~ ~
VSVSV'ltnVl-nlnV"lV'lV'lV'l
-n..".."~-n~-n-n..,,..,.,"Tl
"tl
~
~ ~
S
'"
"'...'"
~..o~
.......tn.....
---
'"
'05' b
0","0
0_0
V'l~tn
." ."
'" "'..
i.ot..)j;..C;o
.......w.......CD
-.........--
~
b O-gO
00 0
00 0
ton VI V'l V':l
." .,., "TI -n
::0
-
::0
-
IV
"" ~
""-I we
UI '" '"
'" '" '"
""O\I.O~\O
$;..i.o~oo:""
"J.....,,,e>>......,
gbggg
08000
~~~~~
::0
-
::0
-
0\0\ Cf'0\ O'l A
i.oi.oi.oi.oi.oeo
"""'.....,.....,.....,......0)
...,
O\W\O\DAI.O\DO\\OIoOA\O~:" ~
~:~~g~~~~~~~~~ ~
____________:::Octl
-.L ......... ;:lQ ~ ::l
8oo'o08ooooo'o08iO~
08888088888883 g.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~
------
- -
0'00'088
888800
VI Con ~ c.n c.n f.,/')
"" "" ~..,., ~..,.,
::0
-
::0
~~
o
~
~ -<
~.
~ ..., '"
0\ t..,,(,,1tb~~~~{J1
\O(..JWt-..l Ow w 1.000 t-..l ""-JhJW
""-J(..J'I """l.JIWl./I"-J""'-Jl..tIt,OCXl
..., ...,
~~ .....-~WN-_ _~_ _~N~
~~8~~=e~~~~~~~~~~~N~~
Attachment 1
Quantum Park - Lots 59, 60 & 61
Trip Generation
#PTCOO-98
8/18/00
tripgen 00-98 8-21-00
Page 1 of 1
Daily
/
Land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Residential - Multi-Family 272 Dus 7/DU 1,904
TOTAL 272 Dus 1,904
AM Peak Hour
Total Tnps
land Use Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In Out Total
Residential - Multi-Family 272 Dus o 51 /DU(16/84) 22 117 139
TOTAL 272 Dus 22 117 139
PM Peak Hour
- Total Trips
land Use Intensity Tnp Generation Rate (2) In Out Total
Residential - Multi-Family 272 Dus 062 /DU(67/33) 113 56 169
TOTAL 272 Dus 113 56 169
(1) Source: Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County Unified land Development Code.
(21 Source' Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE1, Trip Generation. 6th Edition.
Q(JAttT(JM PARK ttOpc #12
TRAFFIC AttAL YSIS
!
Prepared for
Q(JANTOM LIMITED PARTNERS
Prepared by
PINDER TRO(JTMflN CONSOL TING. INC
2324 Soath Congress Avenae. Saite 1 H
West Palm BClCIch. FL 33406
(561) 434-1644
#PTC01-102
Aagast 7. 2001
a.
PlrtDER TROOTMfirt ...OrtSOLTlrtCi. Irte.
Transportation Planners and Engmeers
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
Email pindertroutman@msn.com
QUANTUM PARK NOPC #12
TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
The proposal under this Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) for Quantum Corporate Park DRI is to
amend the Master Plan to change the land used designations on various parcels and to close
Quantum Lakes Drive from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard These specific land use
designation changes, described in detail in Section 5 of the NOPC Application, represent proposed
increases and decreases in land use intensities as well as a reallocation of approved land use
designations and intensities. The purpose of this traffic analysis is to provide data and analyses of the
traffic impacts associated with the proposed change such that a determination of substantial
deviation can be made
LAND USE CHANGES
The most recent modification to the DRI was the approval of the Master Site Development Plan on
March 7, 2000 Prior to that date, the Master Site Development Plan was approved on May 20,
1997 that established thresholds of development (maximum square feet for each land use) that could
not be exceeded, as well as a maximum daily trip threshold that could not be exceeded As noted
on the Master Site Development Plan approved on May 20, 1997 and March 7, 2000 (NOPC #10),
the project is vested for 63,752 daily trips. ThiS then becomes the benchmark from which to
compare the trip generatlon- of the proposed land uses. NOPC #11 was never approved
The proposed Mixed Use (MU) land use designation on Parcels 7 thru 11 and Parcels 23 thru 31 will
allow up to 500 residential units. The proposed Industrial (IND) land use designation on Parcel 34-C,
which is not currently designated for any development, will not result in an increase in daily or peak
hour volumes.
Attachment 1 A provides a daily trip generation analysis of the proposed Quantum Park development
program It should be noted that the land use categories shown on this exhibit are more refined than
the broad categories shown on the approved Master Site Development Plan. Land uses shown on
Attachment 1 A reflect the developer's knowledge of specific uses that will be or are currently
constructed within Quantum Park. The proposed land uses at Quantum Park are estimated to
generate 63,751 daily trips, the maximum for which the project is vested Attachments 1 Band 1 C
provide a trip generation comparison of the AM peak hour and PM peak hour respectively
The proposed land use plan is projected to generate fewer trips than are currently vested for the site.
Therefore, the proposed amendment does not represent a substantial deviation
ROADWAY CLOSURE
The closure of Quantum Lakes Drive between Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard has the
potential to impact the regional roadway network. Existing and future volumes that would use this
position of Quantum Lakes Drive will have to utilize the short link of Gateway Boulevard between
the proposed closure and Quantum Boulevard Therefore, this link of Gateway Boulevard and the
intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard have been analyzed
Traffic Analysis 01 102 8-7-01
a.
Attachment 1 A
Quantum Park NOPC #12
Daily Trip Generation Companson
#PTC01 102
8/14/01
lripgen copm ADA&NOPC12 01 102 8-6-01
Page 1 of 1
ADA Approved
Land Use
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) T=7 468(X)-101 921 31,142
Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) Ln(T)=O 643Ln(X)+5 866 13,815
Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 9 14 /1000 SF (5) 18,001
Hote! 312 200 Rms 8 7 /Rm. 1,740
64,698
Proposed
Land Use
Land Use Code Intensity T rip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 1,900,000 SF T=7 468(X)-101 921 14,087
Retail H2O 427, %2 "F Ln(T)=O 643Ln(X)+5 866 17,161
Office 710 725,850 SF 914/1000 SF (5) 6,634
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 496 /1000 SF 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740
Park N Ride 90 633
Auto Dealership 841 53 072 SF 23 /1000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 043 /Seat (6) 1 7"ln
.,/LV
Restaurant-High Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34/1000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Quality [3"" 69,2':;0 SF [\9 % /1000 SF 6)29
;)1
ConvenienceStore/Gas 853 3,054 SF 845 6 /1000 SF 2,582
Ice Skdlmg RInk (7) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 IRlIlk 1,099
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 6.63 /DU 6,630
63,751
Net New External Tripsj
(947)i
(1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 12,500 SF per Acre for 334 7 Acres.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on trip rate for 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Equdtion..
(6) Palm Beach County Rate for Multi-Screen Theatre
(7) 2 Rinks and 8,500 SF of Restaurant. Trip generation from Palm Beach Gardens facility
/
Attachment 1 B
Quantum Park NOPC #12
AM Peak Hour Trip GeneratIon Comparison
#PTC01 102
B/1 4/01
tripgen copm ADA&NOPC12 01 102 8-6-01
Pal,'e 1 of 1
ADA Approved
Land Use Total
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) 0.92 /1,000 SF (88/12) 3,849
Retail 820 300;000 <;F(3) Ln (T) = O.596Ln (X)-+-').3J9 ((,1/"'\9) 307
Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 1.56 /1,000 SF (88/12) (5) 3,072
Hotf'1 112 200 Rooms o "iR !Room (Sgj41) 11 h
TOTALS 7,344
Proposed
Land Use Total
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
IndustrIal 110 1,900,000 SF o 92 /1,000 SF (88/12) 1,748
Rptail 820 427, %2 SF Ln (T) = O.596Ln (X)-+- J."'\J9 (61/39) 380
Office 710 725,850 SF 1.56 /1,000 SF (88/12) 1,132
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 045 /1,000 SF (82/18) 10
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.58 /Room (59/41) 116
Park N Ride 90 16 57% of Dai!y (80/20) (5) 106
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.21 /1,000 SF (73/27) 117
Mo'yie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 002 /Seat (51/49) (6) 80
Restaurant-High Turnover 832 28,400 SF 9.27 /1,000 SF (52/48) 263
Resiaurant-Quality o"'~ G9,250 SF 031 !1 ,000 SF (.s1!49) .sG
0':>1
Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 77 68 /1,000 SF (50/50) 237
Ice SkdlHlg Rink 465 93,430 SF 2 94 /1,000 SF (65/35) 275
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.51 /DU(16/84) 510
TOTALS 5,030
Net New External Tripsj
(L,314)i
(1) Source: Institute of Transportntion Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 12,500 SF per Acre for 334.7 Acres.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on the Peak Hour to Daily Ratio from ITE 6th Edition.
(6) Only One Observation
/
Attachment 1 C
Quantum Park NOPC #12
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison
#PTC01 102
8/14/01
tripgen copm ADA&NOPC12 01 102 8-6-01
Page 1 of 1
ADA Approved
Land Use Total
Land Use Code Intensity T rip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 4,183750 SF(2) o 98 /1,000 SF (12/88) 4,100
Retail H2O 300000 SF("~) Ln (T) = 0 660Ln (X)+3 403 (48/52) 1;2q7
Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 1 49 /1,000 SF (57/43) 2,935
Hotpl i12 200 Rooms o (,2 IRoom (60/40) 124
TOTALS 8,456
Proposed
Land Use Total
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 1,900,000 SF o 98 /1,000 SF (12/88) 1,862
Retail 820 427, %2 SF Ln IT) = 0 660Ln (X)+3 403 (48/52) 1,63Q
Office 710 725850 SF 1 49 /1,000 SF (57/43) 1,082
VVarehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms o 62 /Room (60/40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14 00% of Daily (22/73) (5) 89
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2 8 /1,000 SF (40/60) 149
Movie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 014 /Seat (53/47) 560
Restaurant-High Turnover 832 2B,400 SF 1086/1,000 SF (60/40) 30B
Restaurant-Quality n"'~ G9,2:10 SF 749/1,000 SF (G7/33) :119
JI
Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.3 7 /1,000 SF (50/50) 294
Ice Skdung Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1,000 SF (45/55) 220
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 062 /DU (67/33) 620
TOTALS 7,478
Net New Externai Tripsl
(978)'
(1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation. 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 1 2,500 SF per Acre for 334 7 Acres.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on the Peak Hour to Daily Ratio from ITE 6th Edition.
)
Attachment 2A
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Quantum Business Park
#PTC01-102
8/14101
OntmBIvd&Gateway '06 01-102 8-6-01
Pagel of 1
QUANTUM BOULEVARD & GATEWAY BLVD.
(Existing CROmetricsl
Growth Rate =
Peak Season =
YC'ar =
Year.; =
o .50')\'
1.00
200n
5
0%
0%
IT
Existinl( Volume (2/06/0 3
Peak Season Volume 3
I~~':~::t~aior Proi-J ~ I
Lois 32 38 "'-, 0
1~~~5;8A&B'69.7a&721 ~ I
Lot 3 0
I~c~~ 10 Rcsid. I ~4 I
NOPe 10 Non-Resid. 0
I ~g~ ~ ~ ~:;:Resid. I ~ I
Parcel 58 Reassij(n. 0
2
o
o
o
o
I I Y I
I ~ I
I ~ I
I 11~ I
.W Pea!( Hour
I I 75 I
I 11~1 I
I I ~ I
I I ~ I
~ I I
5{ I I
~6 I I
~ I I
RT
87
87
I ~ I
I 3~a I
I ~ I
I 20 I
29
o
rotal Major Proj<'C1s I 90 I 2 I 145 11~41 0 I 36 I 91 I 312 I ~2 I 138 I 389 I 99 I
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ;'04 0 0 1,:87 0
rntal <n 2 146 1 ~1 0 41 180 74 144 188
Crilic.al Volume Analysis
No. of tanes 1 I 2 I 0 1 I 2 I 0 1 I 2 I 1 1 I 2 I 1
:\ooroach Volume 241 192 1.858 1,819
Per tane Volume 93 I ~4 I nla 151 I 21 I nla 180 I 802 I 74 144 I 744 I 188
% Turns from excl. tane 39% I 1% I 0% 7% I 0% I 0% 10% J 86% I 4% 8% I 82% I 10%
UW [lfective WC i I I I I O.M i T 0.61 T
North.South Critical NB t T + sn TH - 114 SB LT + NI3 TI-I - - 225
Last-West Critical Ell L T + WB TI-I = '124 WB t T + EB TI-I - 946
Maximum Crilic.al Sum 225 + 946 - 1 171
STATUS? UNDER
PM Peak Hour
Southbound
LT Thru RT
Existinl( Volume (2/06/01 I I 82 I 1 81 I I I I
Peak Season Volume 12 82 1 81
Background 12 84 1 83
Approved Malor Project> 0 I I 0 I 0 0 0 I I 0
Lois 32 38 0 64 0 81 10 3
Lot52 60 0 0 0 0 0
rols bll/\&Il,b'!,7U&n U I U U U u I I U
Lot 3 0 41 0 25 4 11
School 0 0 0 0 0 0
rupc 1U K",jci. 41 I U 3 u u I I I u I
NOPC 10 Non-Resid. 0 0 0 0 0 0
NOPC 11 Resid. 0 49 0 12 25 100 J
I NOPe i i Non-Rpsid. \1 (j I 0 I Hj~ I (j 0 0 (j I (j I I 94 I
Parcel 58 Rpassij(n. 0 68 0 0 0 0 14 0
T olal Major Project, 0 191 3 118 39 449 92 152 208
0 G
Total 233
Crilk=<:!! V,._l!urrU::' A~al~js
.i...),J
10%
983 946
Sum + 983
Attachment 2B
INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET
Quantum Business Park
QUANTUM BOULEVARD & GATEWAY BLVD.
(proposed Geometries)
Critical Volume Analysis
No. of lanes 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 2 I 1 1 I 2 I 1
Approach Volume 241 192 1,B58 1.B19
Per lane Volume 93 I 2 I 146 151 I 0 I 41 130 I 802 I 74 144 I 744 I 1B3
% Turns from excl. lane 39% I 1% I 61% 79% I 0.' I 21% 10%1 B6% I 4~~ 3% I 32% I 10%
70
[jW Ufective WC I I I i I 0.64 I I 0.64 i
North-Soulh Critical NB L T + 5B TIi = 93 SB t T + NB TIi = - 153
~ast-West Critical fB IT +WBTIi- 924 WBU+HlTIi- 946
Maximum Critical Sum I 153 + 946 - 1,099 I
Growlh Rate =
Peak Season =
Y':9.r=
Years =
0.50%
1.00
ZOOfi
5
(J%
""
LT
lxistin~ Volume (2/06/0 3
Peak Season Volume 3
I~~~~~n~ajor Pro~ ~
lots 32 33 0
IlOl52 6
lots 68A&B,69,70& 72 0
lot3 0
~~~ 10 Resid. I ~4 I
NOPe 10 Non-Resid. 0
NOPe 11 Resin. I 0 I
NOPe 11 Non-Resid. 0
Parcel5B ReassiJ\n. 0
IT otill Major Projects I 900 I
Tolal 91
Thru
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
2
o
o
o
o
17 I
~
I ~ I
1 I ~ I
I 11~~ I
114J :~: I
2
o
2
A'0. Peak. Hour
o
I ~ I 75 I
~ 11~1 I
~ I ~ I
I 2~6 I ~ I
I :O~ 11:~
#PTC01-102
8/14101
OntmBIvd&Gateway '06 Imps. 01-102 a.6-01
Page 1 of 1
2
o
o
55
o
o
o
16
o
o
o
o
72
o
RT
37
1,071 37
l'0009B I ~
20
~ I 3~0
35~: I ~ I
~ I ~J I
1144113~:7119~8 I
I I
I I
I I
I I
74
STATUS?
UNDER
PM Peak Hour
:i'iter~c~;or; VG!um~ Dc.:e!opmen:
I Northbound Southbound I [asthound Westbound
I IT I rhru I RT I IT 1 hru I Rl I IT Thru RT I IT I Thru I RT
fxistinJ\ Volume (2/06/01 12 I 1 I 4 I 32 1 I 31 I 21 1105 0 I 3 I 1412 I 24
Peak Season Volume 12 1 4 32 1 31 21 1105 0 3 1412 24
Background 12 1 4 34 1 33 21 1133 0 3 1443 25
Approved Major projecl 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 0 0 I 0 I 0 I 0 I
Lots 32 33 0 0 0 64 0 31 10 6 0 0 0 3
Lot 52 60 0 62 0 0 0 0 0 12 13 0 0
-
I'. ot, b3^&Il,bY . [)&72
lot3
School
INOPL lU Res.d.
NOPe 10 Non-R'-'5id.
NOPe 11 Resid.
INope I i Non-Resin.
Parcel 58 Reassign.
1 otal Major Projects
[)
o
o
j
o
o
o
o
o
o
uu
o
o
o
o
92
I ~ I
11f
o
114
152
/
U
41
o
U
o
49
i01
Total
I ~ I ~ I
I ~ I ~ I
12 25
11t 13~9 I
No. or l.anes
A ,roach Volume
C !tir.:al V0h..!~ -^-n~!~i5-
% Turns from ...xci. Lan.
E!W Weetwe c
NQrth-Sa!Jt~ Critical
East-West Critical
Maximum Crilica Sum
~!A!U~ ?
933
+ 983
946
N~AK
[)
o
93
U
350
o
o
o
o
62
U
335
o
I ~1 I
11~ I
I ~4 I
203
G
233
10%
PINDER TROOTMfi.. CONSOLTING. INC.
September 7,2001
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
Email pindertroutman@msn.com
Transportation Planners and Engrneers
Ms. Lusia Galav
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
(
Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 12 - #PTC01-1 02
Dear Ms. Galav'
The following responds to the City comments on the traffic analysis for the above referenced project
Public Works-Traffic - Jeff Livergood memorandum of August 29,2001
Response
Quantum Lakes Drive Closure
A full median opening exists at this location today There has not been any accident history at this location
that would warrant closure. However, it IS recommended that the left turn eXit from Parcell 00 not be allowed
Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard
The Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) was not provided as a substitute for the signal warrant analysis. The
signal warrant analysis provided in the report dated February 16, 2001 IS still valid
The applicant cannof install a signal until it is warranted and has been approved by Palm Beach County
Therefore, It IS recommended that monltonng of this intersection begm 10 peak season 2002 to determine if
signalization IS 10 fact warranted This is a condition of the current Development Order (DO) MOnltonng
should continue every peak season until the signal is warranted.
Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue
The applicant would agree that mOnitoring of this mtersectlon should begin at the buildout of Parcels 32
through 38 Monitoring should be conducted during the peak season and continue until the signal IS
w2rranted
General
The February 16, 2001 Intersection Analysis included proposed NOPC # 11 land uses. The onglOal
NOPC # 11 was for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Therefore, the traffic from both the residential and non-
residential uses on lots 7 through 11 and 23 through 31 have been Included
KMP/ldr
LetterCa/av07 7029-7-07
~
PINDER TROUH1AN
ENGINEERING T~FCtC
10/10/2001 15 04 5514341553
HII lel/2€:l€ll 15 43 47857--
Deparoneftt of Bl\Ilnuril\f
aM "'bile WOcU
P.O. &ox lu;ml
Milt Palm IMach. Pl. 33416-12.2.9
(561) 684-4000
W\IlIw.p\)cllov,c:om
.
tal", Bea<:ll, County
aoard of C~
COtn......ion.tI
Warren K. HawaII. ChairmAn
Carol A. l\Dber'.s. Vtce Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Mary t-tcClrty
&urt Mltlnson
'lbny Mullom
Addie l. Greene
CotU\ty '\'Ch"l.!.t*Or
I'.Ob~rt 'WeIsman
'tift ~qual Oppornllliry
t\lJirtrrt:lri~~ AcrI~1I EmJ'lt;yu'
~ pl1/1/O<1 "" recyQ<<J p.".,
PAGE 02
PAGE 132
octobe" 1 0, 2001
Mr Michael W Rumpf
DireC10r of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
CltV of Boynton Beach
P.O Box310
Boynton Beach, Fl 3<<25--0310
RE: Quantum Park - Amandmlnt ., Z
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE 8T ANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr Rumpf'
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffio statement (received
on Augu5t 17,2001) for the proJectentl1led; Quantum park- Amendment 1112. pUl"$uant
to the Traffic Performanee standards In Article , 5 of the Palm Beach County Land
Development Code. The new propo$ed development plan for NOpe '12 15 IS folloWs:
Industrial
Retail
Office
Warehou$e
Hotel
High School
Auto D.aletship
Movie Theater
Restaurant - HT
Restaurant - Quality
Convenience Store/Gas
Ice Sk",U"Q Rink
Multi Family ResidenUal
Park & Ride Facility
1,700,000 SF
427.&e2 SF
e37,900 SF
22,700 SF _
200 Rooms
2500 Students
53,072 SF
4,000 Seats
28,400 SF
69.250 SF
3,05. SF
g3,'30 SF
1,000 Owemngs
NlA
Based on our review. the Traffic Division has detenninecl that the overall tramc
generation assooiated with the newlV proposed development plan listed above (NOpe
'12), does not exceed the total trips vested forthe Quantum Park development. in the
previousl)' approved NOpe ff10 (AprlI18. 2000). Therefore the proposed plan i$
approved. It 15 however, suggested to the city of Boynton Beach.
.
Require from the trafflc consultant a table comparing the project vested
trips (basad on the most recent approval), versus trip generation of all
land uses which have received development orders, to date. This
practice needs \0 continue with any future submissions,
The Intersection Df Quantum Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard is
forecasted to operate within .unacceptable- conditions. under Year
2006 scenarlos, and upon full completion and occupation of the project.
This loeation needs to be monitored for future improvements. which
n~ds to be implemented by the developer
)
.
,
""-.
10/10/2001 15 04
10/16/2001 15 43
5614341663
47B577..A
pIt-mER TROUH1Ali
ENGINEERING TRAF-fIC
Page 2
PAGE 03
PAGE 03
If you have any q~stions regarding this determination. p1el&e contact me at &84~030.
Sincerely,
OFFiCe OF THE COU
/0-
cc: Pinder-Troutmen COnIUlllng 1l'lC.
MTP Group Inc.
n.: GtMfII. TPS M.." - Trame Study Review
F"\TRAFFIC\n\Adrnin\Ap~1D10812.doc
)
\
.,
10/10/2001 15 04 5514341553
FINDER TROUTMAN
PAGE 04
~"-""""~""""''''.'',,^"''''-~_H.-t>>>>:-t.w.;,;,~~.r::r~~m;t~~m::m::m;:D.JN:r::m;"'iY.Jr~~:f.
PIHDER TROUTMAn COHSOLTIHG. Inc.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNERS AND ENGINEERS
Fax Transmittal Form
To 71las/JU) J(/h It
Company. 7t;)~ ~ul. ~
Fax Number" 47 ~ G"77 tJ
Phone Number. "If l.( - Lj tl ~ ()
Project Name GW4NTJiM p~ #tJl't:.IF,~ Project Number. (/fe,OJ-/()Z
cc: 7lfZ- 6zt;'t
o Urgent ~ For Review 0 As Requested ~ Please Reply 0 Originals to Follow in Mail
Message
m o.~~ tA J.
tf/tf?l"l-.vcl tV"- y''/'V/~.t- J Dally ~ j ?m ?~ /.Jwr j;r;~
C-~/1./raj;m 1A..tks,
I1ffi~J..~t .1# ~CI J8 ~~ /k #])4 'Y/.r'I/~
W.LS U/JIJ. tl.t NtJl'C ~ /2 Ia-.-. J tlS~s. ~ ~An5P7' 15
NfJfIY.lrd ~ ""';)fl-E I"lA //-5 ~ st-tbs rD-.~) rJlllf'P. ~ d.t'br"mi...~h"""
S.ks~U JJ-t./ltt~ IS tV>H.m?) k bt It I~ ~ Iht."'~~J~ I"
~/~r;-lIf/ Ir//?L ~ ~b/.LS :>kw It d.u~..at->c I~ -,;~ s.
J4 1!t:U..).hlhl ) 5 ~ ~):7/3 C/h1/A"'~ ~ /II t1P'C ;# /~
~/,p~j /If+. J tl;~5 H'/~ ,A/p~C' # I:J- /~j U5.L. $ ~ j;j,J~5 Aht:J
c;l.ow IJ... d~c..;".tA->l 111 ""-;I/J~'
'Y J~)~ Mil
I) Th.t ~c}..,(/l 'VC\~ .....d t. ~~~ M AltJ#C HIt?,
1.) NtJ Pc.. 1f- II wA.S i'1v r (2./'/"'1'.(.. J h
Y~~Y" r..tviPW 11 f ~ I~ '^f/pY'/CI'fAf;.,J, ~ IS tX.. ~..Il. 1Yl.? ,..vI n t1..t
C.'ty tv>> j fAt 2324 South Congress Avenue. Suite 1 H . West Palm Beach, FL 3340& ~w
{5G 1) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 · Email pindertroutman@msn.com At l/Q....-/
.~: .", '~~~~~''''''''''~...............n''
From J!//-'~r I3A1Pz:t2-
Number of Pages Including Cover.
Date II h () ) II
I ,
5
Time
,
~
10/10/2001 15 04
5514341553
pH-mER TRDUH1At-..J
PAGE 05
Attachment 1A
Quantum Park NOPC #12
Daily Trip Generation Comparison
#PTC01 102
10/1 0/01
tripgen wpm ADA&N0PC12 01-102 10-9-01
Page 1 o( 1
ADA Approved
Land Use
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2} T=7468(X)-101.921 31,142
Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In(T)=0.643LnOO+ 5.866 13,815
Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 9.14/1000 SF (5) 18,001
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740
64,698
Proposed
land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF T=7468(X)-101 921 12,594
Retail 820 427,962 SF In(T)= 0.643 In(X) +5.866 17,361
Office 710 637,900 SF 9.14/1000 SF (5) 5,830
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96/1000 SF 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740
Park N Ride 90 - 633
High School 530 2,500 Stds. 2,283
Auto Dealersnip 841 53,072 SF 23 /1000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 /Seat (6) 1,720
Restaurant-High Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34 11000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 89.95 /1000 SF 6,229
Convenience Store/Gas 853 3,054 SF 845.6 11000 SF 2,582
Ice Skatin~ Rink (7) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 IRink 1,099
Residential Multi-FamilY 220 1,000 Ous 6.63 IOU 6,630
63,737
Net New External Tripsl
(961 )l
(1) Source: Instilute ofTransportation Engineers (ITS, Trip Generation, 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 12,500 SF per Iv:.re (or 334.7 h;res.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per /v::re (or 30 Acres.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per h;re (or 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on trip rate (or 500,000 SF (rom 6th Edition Equation..
(6) Palm Beach County Rate for Multi-Screen Theatre
(7) 2 Rinks and 8,500 SF o( Restaurant Trip generation (rom Palm Beach Gardens (adlity
/
.,
10/10/2001 15 04
5514341553
pmDER TROUTMAI~
PAGE 05
Attachment 18
Quantum Park NOPC #12
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison
#PTC01 102
1 0/1 0/01
tripgen copm ADA&N0PC12 01-102 10-9-01
Page 1 of 1
ADA Approved
land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) 0.98/1,000 SF (12/88) 4,100
Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In (T) == O.660ln (X)+3.403 (48/52) 1,297
Offire 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 2,935
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
TUT AL5 8,456
Proposed
land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 1/700,000 SF 0.98/1,000 SF (12/88) 1,666
Retail 820 427,962 SF In m = O.660ln (X)+3.403 (48/52) 1,639
Office 710 637,900 SF 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 950
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14.00% of Daily (22/78) (5) 89
High School 530 2,500 Student 0.15 /1,000 SF (40/60) 375
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.8 /1,000 SF (40/60) 149
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560
Restaurant-High Turnover 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1,000 SF (60/40) 308
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 749/1,000 SF (67/33) 519
Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37 /1,000 SF (50/50) 294
Ice Skating Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1,000 SF (45/55) 220
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 /DU (67/33) 620
TOTALS 7,525
Net New External Tripsl (931)1
(1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation. 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 12,500 SF per Ac:re for 334.7 Aaes.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per kre for 30 Aaes.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on the Peak Hour to DaIly Ratio from ITE 6th Edition.
j
/
i
,
10/10/2001 15 04
5514341553
PI t-..lDER TROUH1At-..l
PAGE 07
#f>T0l1 102
10/10/01
lripgen copm NOPC10&12 01-102 10-9-01
Pase1or1
Attachment 2A
Quantum Park NOPC #12
Daily Trip Generation Comparison
NOPC # 10 Aporoved
land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trio Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 2,252,654 SF T=746800-101.921 16,721
Commerdal 820 427,962 SF lnm =0.643ln(X) +5.866 17,361
Office 710 798,772 SF 914/1000 SF (2) 7,301
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96 11000 SF 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 /Rm. 1,740
Park N Ride 90 633
Auto Dealership 641 53 072 SF 23/1000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 /Seat. (3) 1,720
Restaurant-HiRh Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34/1000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Qualitv 831 69,250 SF 89.95/1000 SF 6,229
ConvenienceStoreIGas 853 3,054 SF 845.6/1000 SF 2,582
Ice Skatin~ Rink (4) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 /Rink 1,099
Residential 220 500 Ous 6.63 /OU 3,315
63,737
Proposed
Land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 1,700,000 Sf T=7468(X)-101.921 12,594
Retail 820 427,962 Sf Lnm=0.643ln(X) +5.866 17,361
Office 710 637,900 Sf 9.14/1000 SF (2) 5,830
Warehouse 150 22,700 Sf 4.96 11000 Sf 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740
Park N Ride 90 633
Hi~ School 530 2,500 Students 2,283
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 23 11000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 ISeat (3) 1,720
Rest:aurant-Hil!h Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34 11000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Qualitv 831 69,250 Sf 89.95/1000 Sf 6,229
Convenience Stor&'Gas 853 3,054 SF 845.611000 SF 2,582
Ice SkatinlZ Rink (4) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 IRink 1,099
Residential Multi-family 220 1,000 Ous 6.63 IOU 6,630
63,737
j
Net New External TriPSI
(1) Souroe: Institute or T 13nsportltion Engineers (lTE), Trip Generalion, 6th Edition.
(2) &sed on trip rale for 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Equation..
(3) Palm Beach County Rate klr Multi-Screen Theatre
(4) 2 Rinks and 8,500 Sf or ReslauranL Trip generation from Palm Beach Gardens fadhty
.,
"'
10/10/2001 15 04
5514341553
pIt-mER TROUH1AI..J
PAGE 08
#PTC01 102
10110101
lripgen copm NOPClo&12 01 102 10-9{Jl
Pa~ 1 ofl
Attachment 28
Quantum Park NOrc /1 12
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison
NOPe 11 10 Approved
land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 2,252,654 SF 0.98 /1,000 SF (12188) 2,208
Retail 820 427,962 SF Ln m - O.660Ln 00+3.403 (48/52) 1,639
Office 710 798,772 SF 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 1,190
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 Sf (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (6(V40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14.00'lb of DaIM22/78) (2) 89
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40160) 149
Movie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560
Restaurant-Hj~ Turnovel 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1 000 SF (60/40) 308
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 749/1,000 SF (67/33) 519
Convenience Store 845 3,054 SF 96.37 /1,000 SF (50/50) 294
Ice Skatin~ Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36/1,000 SF (45/55) 220
Residential Multi-Family 220 500 Dus 0.62 IOU (67/33) 310
TOTAlS 7,622
Proposed
land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 1,700.000 SF 0.98/1.000 SF (12/88) 1,666
Retail 820 427,962 SF In m = O.660Ln (Xl+3.403 (48/52) 1,639
Office 710 637,900 SF 1 49 /1,000 SF (57/43) 950
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14.00'lb of Dally (22!76) (2) 89
High School 530 2,500 Students 0.15 /1,000 SF (40/60) 375
Auto Dealership 641 53,072 SF 2.8 /1,000 SF (40/60) 149
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560
Restaurant-High Tumovel 832 28,400 Sf 10.86 /1 ,000 SF (60140) 308
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 7.49/1,000 Sf (67/33) 519
Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37 /1 ,000 Sf(50/50) 294
Ice SkatinR Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1,000 Sf (45/55) 220
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 IOU (67/33) 620
TOTALS 7,525
r Net New External Trips (97)1
)
(1) Source: Institute ofTransporlation Engineer.; (ITEl. Trip Cenel'3oon. 6111 Edition.
(2) Based on the Peak Hour In Daily ratio from ITE 6th Edition.
,
DATE
YOUR NAME'
ApplIcant Name
~ 1
~ 2
D
-/ / //J.-
PRE-APPLICATION CONTACT QUESTIONS--/
C~~~
9100
In Ire. . ~~. . Phone # C} <)if .3 '(u- I..( <t ul/
__J-G_ t .~~ lAu",-L~
~ YE YOU SPOKEN TO ANY STAFF MEMBER ABOUT THE PROJECT?
Jf!'rES ;;it.~
(IF YES HAVE THOSE STAFF MEMBERS SCHEDULED FOR THE PRE-APP MEETING)
NAME
DNO
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (CROSS STREETS/INTERSECTIONS)
3 WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO DO? /) .-/j
D NEW PROJECT C5~ ~....,~
D BUILDING EXPANSION OR MODIFICATION
D CHANGE IN PRIOR USE?
o IS THE STRUCTURE CURRENTLY VACANT?
D VARIANCE TYPE~
D POOL OR SCREEN ENCLOSURE -
D COMMERCIAL PROPERTY?
D RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY?
D INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY?
D DO YOU KNOW THE ZONING CODE DESIGNATION?
~ 4 TIME AND DATE PREFERRED
~ 5 HOW MANY PEOPLE WILL BE AT THE PRE-APP MEETING?
NOTE TELL THE PERSON THAT SOMEONE FROM THE DEPARTMENT WILL CALL
THEM BACK TO CONFIRM MEETING
** PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS SHOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE
(1) HOUR TIME MODULE
** PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS SHOULD BE SCHEDULED NO LESS THAN TWO (2)
DAYS PRIOR TO DATE/TIME OF MEETING IF AN URGENCY IS SENSED, DISCUSS
WITH MIKE OR LUSIA.
** NO PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS SHOULD BE SCHEDULED FOR THE FRIDAY
BEFORE A SCHEDULED TRC AND P & D BOARD MEETING, MONDAY
MORNINGS, THURSDAY AFTER1"OO~S, ON FRIDAY, NO MEETINGS UNLESS
TOLD
** LUSIA IS NOT A V AILABLE FOR MEETINGS O~ TUESDAY MOR1~INGS, A~D MIKE
IS UNAVAILABLE MON"DAYS BET\VEEN 11.30 A.M. AND 2.30 P.M.
** UPDATED 10/19/01
J \SHRDA T A\PLA"'N~G'SHARED\WP'SPECPRor ,pRE.APPLlCATO~S LOG.I~ FOlDERCQ1';TACT QL"ESTIOr-;S FOR APPLlCA.""iT DOC
,J~~
/
7)L~
I
.-;-'
I~ 4~ //G~
i' ;L<--< (
\/ iliav cot Ci:2/I,-h~,U L2ke
jj~", Sdt. fJ2"". /I/J()d
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG
lVIEETING DAT
11
APPLICATION J){J. ~<:;;
ZONING DISTRICT ' 10
PROJECT Ni)t)ffi
V )/{l.? d:t fY~)d'}./;1 LaJeri
ATTENDING STAFF
ATTENDING AS APPLICANT
PHONE
NAME OF APPLICANT/CONTACT
ADDRESS
PHONE FAX.
TIME
q 'Du A~l
Pl}OJECT ADDRESS
/Vew ~ I Of) f I'D I
PROPOSED TYPE OF USE/OCCUPA.J.,\CY
DATE SUBlVlITTAL RECEIVED DATE DENIED
COMl\1ENTS - Ad~(;;' ~5 Wd ~ - t;JUv.J..; -./3/tb /)
~c+~ fwo J?6~ rel JailJ4 It ('lJ2.ttult h.b-
~
J'\SHRDA T A\Pl:1nning\5IL\RED\WP\PROJECfS'.PRE APPUCA TIO-'S :\lEETL'-G LOGS\Pre-Applic:ltion :\{eetin~ Lo~.doc
r
Im~ cd Cbz.n/V-Uj L0ke
. on.
--,Ai.. ,_.I:fP1
M2Je, /)ik flu'! )Joel
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
PLEASE PRINT
NOTICE The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall
community goals, objectives, policies and codes ass related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions express at the pre-application conference are not
binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual
lans submitted for review
City of Boynton Beach
Attendina Staff
V ')
cXl.A~~ d~u
l\1EETING DATE II J J Y la I
TIl\1E r 00,AA.1
ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT
E fZ- Iv (fO h }..)SO tJ
,
~.../dh..Jv
Attending for Applicant
,l{Ait..t
~I tlJ:rv~,J'
~r'2-) k::- D--Z-)0 ill .)(, --.;.6 1
J'\SHRDATA\PL\..."INu'iG\SHARED\WP\FOR.\fSiPRE-APPL i\IEETf.',G-SIG:"l L"'i SHEET.DOC