Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE Architectural Review Committee Quantum Park Property Owners' Association, Inc. 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive, Suite 100 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 September 24, 2002 Mrs. Sara Lockhart Calvin, Giocdano & Associates, Inc. 560 Village Boulevard Suite 340 West Palm Beach, FL 33409 RE. Westbrooke Homes, Lot 89B --- Dear Mrs. Lockhart, The Architectural Review Committee received and reviewed the documents listed below and hereby approves the Master Site Plan application for consideration by the City's Planning and Development Board. Please be reminded that each Technical Site Plan will also need the review and approval of the Architectural Review Committee prior to building permit. . 1 Overall Site Plan, SP-l, drawn on 7/8/02, revised on 8/28/02 . I Fence and Mailbox Details, SP-2, drawn on 7/8/02, revised on 8/28/02 . I Overall Planting Plan, L-l, drawn on 7/8/02, revised on 8/28/02 Be advised that Quantum Community Development District (QCDD) has facilities and easements within the proposed project area and the proposed project will inevitably require connection to QCDD facilities. The QCDD has a permit process and a review and approval process of which the applicant must comply Be advised there is in place an approved sign program for all of Quantum Park. Any proposed monument or building signage must be consistent with that sign program. Enclosed please find said signage program requirements. If you should have any further questions, please feel free to contact me at any time at 561-740-2447 Sincerely, ~ Ju?~ Julie Finch Architectural Review Committee CC. Doug MacDonald, Quantum Limited Partners, Ltd. michael Rumpf, City of Boynton Beach C:Julie/POAI ARCApprovalLtr/SaraLockhartWestbrooke89B DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment September 4, 2002 Mr Masoud Atefi MSCE, Semor Traffic EngIneer Palm Beach County Traffic DIvISIon Department of Engmeenng and Pubhc Works POBox 21229 West Palm Beach, Flonda 33416 Re. Traffic Study' Quantum Village at Quantum Park - Lot 89B SBMP 02-003 Dear Mr Atefi The enclosed traffic generatIOn statement, prepared by Calvm, GIOrdano & Associates, Inc , was receIved by Planmng and Zomng recently for the above-referenced apphcatlon. Please reVIew the enclosed mformatIOn for conformance WIth the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordmance, and prOVIde TIm Large, Buildmg Code AdmmIstrator and I WIth your wntten response If you have questIOns regardmg thIS matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260 Smcerely, ~-'~ dduv ~ MIchael W Rumpf /; DIrector of Planmng and Zomng MWR/jdc Enclosure S IPlanning\SHARED\\VP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park & Village\SBMP 02-003 lot 89\Traffic Study to PSC.dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742~350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.or ,. i9\ ~ o 1800 Eller Drive Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33316 (954) 911-7781 (954) 921-8807 fax Ii 560 V.u. Boulevard (' Suite 340 West Palm Bea.:h. Florida 33409 (560 684~16I (561) 6M~}60 fax Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners August 28, 2002 SEP3m Mr Michael Rumpf Director of Planmng and Zoning Planmng and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425 RE: (blantum Village at Qnanhlm Park I.of 89R~ Response to August 13th Comments from Public Works Department - Traffic CGA Project No.. 02-2544 Dear Mr Rumpf' 1be following addresses the AUgUst 13th comments regarding the proposed development of Quantum Village at Quantum Park Lot 89B recently received from the City's Public Works Department regarding outstanding traffic issues. In an effort to clarify these issues, Calvin, Giordano & Associates will address each of the traffic e.ngmeenng comments individually under this separate cover-letter This method should proVIde you WIth the necessary information requested in a clear and conCIse manner 1be August 13. 2002 comments are restated below in bold, with our response italiCIzed. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits the Developer shall evaluate the impact of traffic (turning IOOvements) on High Ridge Road, particularly at the entrance to the Tri-Rail Station (unnamed road), at Gateway Boulevard and at the proposed entrances into the residential portions of the project (east and west from IDgh Ridge Road), based on full build-out of the residential and commercial properties for traffic signals. If signals are found to be warranted, the Developer shall post a Letter of Credit in the amount of 110% of the estimated cost of signal installation against construction of the signal. If signals are not warranted the Developer shall post a Letter of Credit in the amount of 50% of the estimated cost of signal installation against future construction of the signal based upon future development and full build-out of the properties along the west side of IDgh Ridge Road north and south of this proposed project. Posting of the Letters of Credit shall be required prior to issuance of any building permits. The Letter of Credit shall expire three (3) years from its date of issue if the other off-site improvements/developments do not proceed as anticipated. Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 2 of6 Signal Warrant AnalysiS for High Ridge Road at Gateway Boulevard The intersection of HIgh Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard IS currently signalized. Therefore, a signal warrant analysis was not peifonned. Signal Warrant Analysis/or High .Ridge Road at Project's Driveway Quantum Village East (Lot 89B) is proposed to include 39 multi-family dwelling units, while the development to the West will include 136 multi-family dwelling units. Based upon trip generation Cmalysis for this intensity, as summarized in Table 1, a total of 89 AM peak hour trips and 108 PM peak hour trips will be generated by both residential developments. The trips for each development were then distributed based upon the proximity of Gateway Boulevard and 1- '95, assuming a significant majority of the trips generated by these residential developments will be oriented towards Gateway Boulevard. Figure 1 graphically depicts the proposed peak hour turning movement volumes for the two developments. ~ Comments from City staff.have indicated the need to assess whether or not a traffic signal is warranted ai the intersection .serving both Quantum East (Lot 89B) and' Quantum Weston High Ridge Road. Traffic signals must meet implementation "warrants" as outlined in the Manual on Unifonn Traffic Control Devices, Millennium Edition (MUTCD 2()()())~ based upon minimum vehicular volumes for the major street (High Ridge Road) and the minor street (driveway connection to Quantum East and Quantum West). Warrant #1 (Eight-hour vehicular Volume) provides minimum hourly thresholds over an eight- hour period that must be met by both the major and minor street to implement a traffic signal. Assuming that High Ridge Road includes two lanes in the northbound and southbound direction while the minor street. has only one lane, traffic volumes per hour on the higher-volume approach for the minor street must exceed 100 vehicles for eight (8) hours during an average day Based on the attached trip generation analysis, the approach serving Quantum West (136 dwelling units which represents the largest approach volume) will only generate 58 trips during the AM peak hour This volume will decrease dramatically during off-peak hours. Th.p.rpfnrp., Warrant HI will not hp. mp.t hy huildnut rifthp. prnjp.r.t Warrant #3 (Peak Hour) is intendedfor intersections where the peak hour volume is sufficient to cause significant traffic delays to the minor street for a minimum of one (1) hour during an average day ThIs warrant is based upon corresponding minimum vehicular volume thresholds for both the minor and major street. For example, as the amount of hourly volume increases on the major street, the amount of minor street volume necessary to meet the warrant is decreased. Given the number of lanes provided on High Ridge Road and the minor street approach with the highest hourly volume, a minimum thre$hold of 100 vehicles during anyone (1) hour of an average day must be present on the minor street approach (assuming that a hourly volume on High Ridge Road exceeds 1,700 vehicles per hour does not occur). Sinre thp. maximum hnurly vnlur11p. tn hp. genernted hy thp. ...ite ('iR AM [leak hnur tri.[H:) i.. Ie.... than thp. minimum thrp...hnld Tp.gardles<i nf the maJnr ..trp.et vnlume., Warrant H1 is nnt satrified and a traffic signal i... not Mr Michael Rumpf August 28. 2002 Page 3 of6 warranted at the intersection qf High Ri4ge Road and the driveway connection to Quantum Vil.I4ge RQ.f.t and Quantum Vill~fe West Signal WalTant Analysis for High Ridge Road at Tri-Rail Station Driveway Pursuant to the Inventory of Land Uses and Vested trips for Quantum Park, the Tri-Rail Station, which is served by a single access driveway that intersects with High Ridge Road, is estimated to generate 633 daily trips. Located approximately 500 feet south of the driveway proposed to serve the residential development of Quantum Village East and Quantum Village West, the number of trips using the Tri-Rail Station driveway is approximately one-half that expected to use the residential driveway. Sinr.e the Tri-Rail.Statinn dne..; nnte generate mnre peak Mur trip.; or more tinily trip.; thnn Quantum Village F.nst ann Quantum VilI-W We..;t, and a tm/fie ..;ignnl i..; nnt warranted at that Inr.atinn it-r.an be concluded that a trqJJic signnl i.; ab:o not warranted at the intersection qf HigJI RUte Road and the Tri-RaiI .Wationdrivewqy connection 4. As is being done with the Quantum Park and Villages South, the City will help facilitate it "Recapture" agreement. The Oty will instigate new traflk studies as development condoues on the north side of Gateway Blvd. and work to have the developers reimbursed' based on the percent benefit each acquires from sign.QJi7~tion. Noted. s. If a signal is not found to be required at this time, re-evaluate stopping sight distances for the southbound lanes of High Ridge Road approaching the north commerciai entrance. It will be necessary to eliminate landscaping, concrete walls and provide additional signage to provide adequate advance notice for traffic approaching this driveway. Since the intersection of High Ridge Road and the North Commercial driveway.entrance does not meet warrants for signalization, stopping sight distances were evaluated at this intersection to detennine the potential impact re~ulting from the development of the adjacent residential parcel immediately to the north. Based upon a design speed of 35 miles per hour (although the posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour), approximately 360 feet of sight distance must be provided at the North Commercial driveway connection to High Ridge Road, per Palm Beach County and City of Boynton Beach design standards. A review of the proposed site plan indicates that sufficient sight distance will be provided at the North Commercial driveway connection, provided landscaping and other visual obstructions are eliminated from the line of sight. Based upon design standards, vegetation located in the sight distance area immediately north of the commercraZ driveway will hI'. hel.nw :w inr.hP.... in height (prpferahly P.vP.n Ie...s) nrgrP.fltp.r than eight (R) fP.P.t in hpight (prpfemhly even mnrP.) to emure thot no driver visihility is ohstmr.tr.fl This mcludes canopy limbs that may inadvertently extend into the required visibility area. Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 4 0/6 6. A Permit to Construct within the Public Right-of-Way, issued by the Engineering Division of Public Works, will be required for work on Gateway Boulevard. Permits may also be required from Palm 'Beach County and the Quantum Park POA for work on High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. Noted. 7 . Relocate the "transition" (three to two-lane northbound) on High Ridge Road (adjacent to Lot 89B) north, so that the three-lane section extends to the north property line of Lot 89B. This is to prevent turning ,~vement and stacking conflicts for traffic entering the east and west residential developments. Show proposed off-site roadway improvements (signing, striping, curb, curb & gutter, pavement, etc.) for High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. The "transition" section of .High Ridge Road. where the northbound outside through lane is merged with the northbound inside through lane, corresponds with the approximate location of the residential driveway that wiU serve Lot 898. -Instead of extending the merge section further to the north, we propose to utilize the northbound outside through lane, which is being dropped, as a northbound right.,.tum lane serving the res~ntial community. This will better define the flow of traffic in the vicinity of the site by removing the' northbound trips .oriented to Lot 89B from the northbound through movement, thereby reducing vehicular conflicts and weaving maneuvers. Improved signing and pavement marking will also improve the traffic operation in the merge section of T19rthbound High ~idge Road by providi"g motorists with the requisite infonnation to align their vehicles in the proper lane. No off-site roadway improvements are proposed for the intersection of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. 8. Extend the medians on High Ridge Road and, as necessary, on Gateway Boulevard, in accordance with FOOT specifications to guide traffic into the proposed ingress lanes. To assess whether or not the amount of vehicular storage is adequate to accommodate the northbound left-turn movement into the residential development of Quantum Village West, the anticipated queue during the peak hour must be detennined. Based upon Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology and the projected northbound left-turn movement volumes and opposing southbound through traffic on High Ridge Road, thP. numhP.r nf vp.hidp.~ in qUp.uP. awaiting ta r.amplp.tP. thP. l('it turn during thp. pp.nk haur i~ p.rpp.rtp.d ta hp. anp. (1) ar Ip..H, with n r.anfidp.nrp. lp.vp.l of 9'; pp.rrp.nt Sin<;:e the available storage provided for the exclusive northbound left-turn lane on High Ridge Road (75 feet) exceeds the anticipated maximum queue length (estimated to be one (1) vehicle with a length of 25 feet), thP. turn lanp. i~ of .mjfir/{'.nt lP.ngth fa pravidp. amplp. .<;tarngP. far thP. narthhaunfl lp.ft turn at thp. Quantum Villagp. Wp.st and ~ . J Quantum Villagp. F.a~f drivp.wny withaut thp. qUP.lJP. p.rtP.nding inta thp. narthhaund thmugh lanp.~. Therefore, zt is not necessary to extend the median on High Ridge Road to guide traffic mto the ingress lane. Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 50f6 However, the current median openmg to be utilized by both residential developments is approximately 115 feet wide, which is substantially wider than the typical opening for this type of development. Thertifor~ to better d(/ine the tuminr movement poth.~ within thl! intersection, we belil!ve that both I!ntJ. no.~I!~~ qf the ml!dinn .~hould be extl!nded qpprorlmately 20 feet to narrow the Qpeninr This would result in an opening approximately 75 feet wide, which would still provide sufficient turning radii for Single Unit truck design vehicles (identified as SU in MSlITO). This improvement would also have the ancillary benefit of increasing the storage length available for the northbound left turn. It is not-necessary to modify any medians or turn lanes on Gateway Boulevard. In addition to.the comments received fromthe Public Works departmen4 the following comment provided by the Planning and Zoning Department involves a component of traffic engineering and is addressed herein. 77. It is anticipated that there will be higher pedestrian 1rafl'ic as .a -result of ttm project (residential development on bOth sides of High Ridge Road), in part, due to its close proximity with the Tri-Rail Station. This higher pedestrian traffic is encouraged. However, truck and other vehicUIar traffic on High Ridge RoadcouId compromise pedestrian connectivity and safety between the two (2) residential lots located on each side of the roadway. Staff .recommends incorporating aesthetically pleasing traffic calming devices (subject to Engineering approval) on/near High Ridge g.oad .that will help reduce vehicular speeds while protecting pedestrians traversing the roadway Traffic lights and lower speed limits alone will not -accomplish this objective. , We generally concur that pedestrian activity to/from the two residential developments from/to the Tri-Rail Station should be encouraged in an effort to increase mass transit use. To that end, the safe crossing of High Ridge Road for residents of the proposed community west of High Ridge Road is critical. An evaluation of available sight distance was performed at the proposed residential driveway connection to High Ridge Road. It was determined that sufficient stopping sight distance is provided for drivers traveling on High Ridge Road, given the landscaping within the median is either below 30 inches in height (preferably even less) or greater than eight (8) feet in height (preferably even more) to ensure that driver visibility is not obstructed. Therefore, pedestrians may safely cross High Ridge Road and dnvers traveling on High Ridge Road will have ample d,stance to safely stop if a pedestrian is in the travel path. Recent research has indicated that the presence of a raised median (or raised crossing island) to provide a refuge for pedestrians was associated with a significantly lower crash rate at multi-lane sites, given traffic conditions similar to that on High Ridge Road near the residential developments. Since a raised median island currently exists, the inclusion of a marked crosswalk Mr Mic1uzel Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 6 of6 in combinatzon wlth Pedestrian Crossing signs (WII-2, MUTCD 2(00) and Downward Arrow signs (W16-7p, MUTCD 2(00) indicating the locatzon of the crosswalk is proposed to delineate the crossmg area while providing a safe refuge for pedestrians. In addition, advanced wammg signs (Wll-2. MUTCD 2(00) would be placed further upstream on High Ridge Road to glve motonsts infonnationthat a pedestrian crosswalk is ahead. We believe that these proposed improvements would provide a pedestrian crossing that is safe, provides connectivity between the two residential developments and the Tn-Rail Station, and if designed properly. is aesthetically pleasing We trust that the responses included thoroughly address your comments and concerns. Should you have any questions regarding the information contained in this submittal, please do not heSitate to contact me at (561) 684-6161 Very truly yours, CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, 1Ne. ~p~ Enc S Penfield, P.E. Senior TransportatIon Engineer Cc.. Sara Lockhart, Calvin, GiOrdano & Associates, Inc. Scott S Brunner, P.E., Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. Attachments S:\Land\02 2544 Quantum Village at Boynton Beach\Traffic Analysis\ltr response to conunents 08_27 _02.doc C'I C> C> C'I o ~ C> .... <n .~ ll) (I)~ ~c(3 $: ..... < ~ -$:~ o ll) "J:: ~ e= ll) "_ ~> C$ e 0.::1 'C ..... f-4 ~ ::I CI ll) ~ f-< ;; 00 00 '0 0 N ..., ~ g If If If '" If C M M ..., U M M ..., V ~ "0 0( oS ~ '" ~ .... on 0 g :I: lit lit If ~ If .... .... "- It '" '" '0 ~ .E .. ~ is ~ 00 ~ !:: 00 ~ on "- U 1l lit lit lit lit '" .. .. ~ 15 00 00 i ~ ~ '0 .s ... ::: ! ~ lit lit lit It lit ~ ~ ~ ~ .f! ~ .... ~ ... '" b-.. ... ... .... oa Co ~ ..... .... oj5 .... .... .... g ... .. i b 8: 8 g 0 0 u ,...: ,...: '5 . . .. ... ... Il!I 1i ~ :l .. ?;> 'a '13 '2 ~ ~ !I oS .... '" M ::l 3! ~ ~ ~~ ... ... :l .. oa 'S '" ~ ~ e:: ... ... e: J3 ~ i "ii Ill: u ~ ~ ::i 0 0 3 01 01 I.J ~ .~ .~ :i: 5 c:: U ~ ~ ~ U U la , '" '" >. ~ ~ ] 'E ~ ~ .;. ~ :; :; ::0 ::0 ~ 80::0 ~6 ~lIt .5:;: ~.9 =-lIt s:<fO ~~ ;:;8 0... . 'C! ",0 . .. g'" B .r:: g e '" ~.r:: 0 8.~ '::I ~8. e g lil. ~ Co .g~~ Ii ~ :2...... .;; -s!;~ "0 "0 \0. ~ ":; !l c:: U U g- o .. .. .~ g g "0 e~1l .. >. 8 ~ ~ 000 ...... Co_ _ .r:: is'~ og .. l;l ~uu " U :2:2 ~ lXl .5 COUU .9'" '" III If ::; 0 c ~ .. ~ ~ -= .... ~o~ ~& *'~ of! " .# ,," "'\ '0')\ t;.<-,rv '.: '\/ ~ (]~ ,,~ ~ --- .... U) ~ .~ ~:5 rfobO (IS s::1 - .- -- :>~ eo ~~ ::10\ 0'Cf"l '-' ~6:; v ~ ./ <./ 0 '/:; ~/' /' "-Jf > > <: ~~ C' ~ Q ~~ <':~ Ltr ./ ./ ~ \..~ '\ 01 \.. ~ '\ ~~ v .- ~:5 v bO bOs::1 (IS .- -- -- ._ v :> ?; eO ~~ ::1\0 0'Cf"l - '-' ~I ~ (1)(1) CD CD E E :J :J ;g;g ... ... :J :J CD o 0 E :I::I::J ..lll::~- m m >0 CD CD Q. Q. >- :E:E= ~Q.~ I I I - ~~~ -...... ..; '" ~ t '" c: .- c: ~.!l! :::"- <C '" U!) ~ 0>- c: !l:! '" L "J:l L Vl .2 ~ '" . t .~ .~ d ..... l!! => .2' :::> (II "0 ~ <<I C <<I CI) .2 CD It: E ~ ~ ....c -(I)g g ~t8 ....;>5 c:-cc CD s:: ~ EmID CD ... Gii > (I) Q) o m ~ :: w5 mCDe c: Cl => _ CD 'E c:=<<I ...-=> ::s>o """ I- E ~ Gl....:J~ ...0...(\1 :J .!!!. s:: ~ 010(0<: __ ... :J <<l l.L a. 0 &j rage 1 or L TWO-W A Y STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information Analyst ESP Intersection High Ridge at Quantum \Qencv/Co. CGA EastlWes urisdiction Boynton Beach ate Performed 8/21/2002 alvsis Year Buildout of res. dev nalvsis Time Period PM Peak Hour Proiect Description 02-2544 Quantum Village East and West EasVW est Street: Quantum EastlWest orthlSouth Street: High Ridge Road Intersection Orientation: East-West tudv Period (hrs): 0.25 ~ehicle Volumes and Adjustments Malor Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 1 24 7 1 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 1 26 7 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 - - 5 -- - Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 IConfiguration LTR LTR Upstream SiQnal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R !Volume 53 185 15 1 185 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 205 16 1 205 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 COnfiguration L T TR LT TR Delay, Queue LenQtl , and Level of ServIce Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR L T TR LT m v (vph) 4 7 58 102 118 103 105 C (m) (vph) 1601 1568 604 781 810 768 n6 r-J/c 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.14 195% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.32 0.45 0.51 0.46 0.47 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 116 10.3 10.2 10.4 10.4 LOS A A B B B B B Approach Delay -- -- 10.5 104 A.<{~ l-OS c.s !3 file.l/C \Documents and Settings\epenfield\Local Settmgs\Temp\u2k16 tmp 8/21/2002 ~ Reply to: o 1800 Eller Drive Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954) 921 7i81 (954) 921-8807 fax ri 560 Village Boulevard (- Suite 340 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 (561) 684-6161 (561) 684-6360 fax Calvin, Giordano & Associates. Inc. Engineers Surveyors Planners August 28, 2002 SEP3m Mr Michael Rumpf DIrector of PlannIng and ZOnIng PlannIng and ZOnIng DIVISIOn CIty of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425 RE. Quantum Village at Quantum Park T .ot R9R. Response to August 13th Comments from Public Works Department - Traffic CGA Project No. 02-2544 Dear Mr Rumpf The followmg addresses the August 13th comments regardmg the proposed development of Quantum Village at Quantum Park Lot 89B recently receIved from the CIty's PublIc Works Department regardmg outstanding traffic Issues. In an effort to clanfy these Issues, Calvm, GIOrdano & AssocIates WIll address each of the traffic engmeenng comments mdIvIdually under thIS separate cover letter ThIS method should provIde you WIth the necessary mformatIon requested m a clear and conCIse manner The August 13 2002 comments are restated below m bold, WIth our response ItalICIzed. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permits the Developer shall evaluate the impact of traffic (turning movements) on High Ridge Road, particularly at the entrance to the Tri-Rail Station (unnamed road), at Gateway Boulevard and at the proposed entrances into the residential portions of the project (east and west from High Ridge Road), based on full build-out of the residential and commercial properties for traffic signals. If signals are found to be warranted, the Developer shall post a Letter of Credit in the amount of 110% of the estimated cost of signal installation against construction of the signal. If signals are not warranted the Developer shall post a Letter of Credit in the amount of 50% of the estimated cost of signal installation against future construction of the signal based upon future development and full build-out of the properties along the west side of High Ridge Road north and south of this proposed project. Posting of the Letters of Credit shall be required prior to issuance of any building permits. The Letter of Credit shall expire three (3) years from its date of issue if the other ofT-site improvements/developments do not proceed as anticipated. Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 2 of6 Signal Warrant Analysis for High Ridge Road at Gateway Boulevard The mtersectzon of HIgh RIdge Road and Gateway Boulevard IS currently signalized. Therefore, a sIgnal warrant analysis was not performed. Signal Warrant Analysis for High Ridge Road at Project's Driveway Quantum Village East (Lot 89B) is proposed to include 39 multI-famIly dwelling umts, while the development to the West will include 136 multi-family dwelling umts. Based upon tnp generatzon analysIs for this intensIty as summarized m Table 1, a total of 89 AM peak hour trlpS and 108 PM peak hour tnps will be generated by both resIdentzal developments. The trips for each development were then distributed based upon the proXImIty of Gateway Boulevard and 1- 95 assuming a SIgnificant majority of the tnps generated by these resIdentzal developments will be onented towards Gateway Boulevard. Figure 1 graphically depIcts the proposed peak hour tummg movement volumes for the two developments Comments from Czty staff have indIcated the need to assess whether or not a traffic sIgnal is warranted at the mtersectzon servmg both Quantum East (Lot 89B) and Quantum West on High RIdge Road. Traffic signals must meet Implementatzon warrants as outlmed in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, Millenmum Edition (MUTCD 2000), based upon mmimum vehicular volumes for the major street (HIgh Ridge Road) and the mmor street (dnveway connection to Quantum East and Quantum West). Warrant #1 (EIght-hour vehicular Volume) provides mimmum hourly thresholds over an eight- hour penod that must be met by both the major and mmor street to Implement a traffic slgnal. Assuming that High Ridge Road mcludes two lanes m the northbound and southbound directzon whIle the mmor street has only one lane, traffic volumes per hour on the higher-volume approach for the minor street must exceed 100 vehicles for eight (8) hours during an average day Based on the attached tnp generatzon analysis, the approach servmg Quantum West (136 dwellmg umts whlch represents the largest approach volume) will only generate 58 trips durmg the AM peak hour ThIS volume will decrease dramatically dunng off-peak hours. ThPrf'!ore, Warrant #1 will not he mpt hy huildollt a/the pmfprt Warrant #3 (Peak Hour) lS intendedfor mtersections where the peak hour volume is sufficient to cause significant traffic delays to the mmor street for a minimum of one (1) hour dunng an average day Thls warrant lS based upon correspondmg mimmum vehicular volume thresholds for both the mmor and major street. For example, as the amount of hourly volume increases on the major street, the amount of mmor street volume necessary to meet the warrant is decreased. Given the number of lanes provided on Hlgh Rldge Road and the minor street approach with the hlghest hourly volume, a mimmum threshold of 100 vehicles during anyone (1) hour of an average day must be present on the mmor street approach (assummg that a hourly volume on Hlgh RIdge Road exceeds 1,700 vehlcles per hour does not occur). Sinrp the maximum hourly vo1ump to hI' generated hy thp ..ifp ('iR AM ,"pak hour tnp") 1'\ Ie,'\'> than the mmimum threshold rpgardlp,\,> of thp maJOr ..trept volump Warrant #1 1'\ not '\Otzifipd and a trfl/fic .flignal i.fl not v J Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 3 of6 warranted at the intersection qf Hif,h Rid,ge Road and the drivewa.y connection to Quantum Village Ra,~t and Quantum Village W e,~t. Signal Warrant Analysis for High Ridge Road at Tri-Rail Station Driveway Pursuant to the Inventory of Land Uses and Vested trzps for Quantum Park, the Tri-Rail Station, whzch zs served by a single access dnveway that zntersects wzth Hzgh Rzdge Road, zs estzmated to generate 633 daily tnps. Located approxzmately 500 feet south of the driveway proposed to serve the residential development of Quantum Village East and Quantum Village West, the number of trzps using the Tri-Rail Statzon drzveway is approxzmately one-half that expected to use the reszdentzal drzveway Sinrp thp Tri-Rml StatTnn dnp,> nntp gpnpratP mnrp ppak hnur trip'> nr mnrp daily trip'> than Quantum Villagp Ea,>t and Quantum Villagp WP,>t, and a trajfir '>ignall'> nnt warrantpd at that lnratinn it can be concluded that a traffic signal i,~ aI.w not warranted at the inter.~ection of Hirh Ridx-e Road and the Tri-Rail Station drivewav connection. 4. As is being done with the Quantum Park and Villages South, the City will help facilitate a "Recapture" agreement. The City will instigate new traffic studies as development continues on the north side of Gateway Blvd. and work to have the developers reimbursed based on the percent benefit each acquires from signalization. Noted. 5. If a signal is not found to be required at this time, re-evaluate stopping sight distances for the southbound lanes of High Ridge Road approaching the north commercial entrance. It will be necessary to eliminate landscaping, concrete walls and provide additional signage to provide adequate advance notice for traffic approaching this driveway Sznce the zntersectzon of High Ridge Road and the North Commerczal drzvewayentrance does not meet warrants for szgnalzzatzon, stoppzng szght distances were evaluated at this intersection to determzne the potentzal impact resultzng from the development of the adjacent reszdential parcel zmmedzately to the north. Based upon a design speed of 35 miles per hour (although the posted speed limit is 30 miles per hour), approxzmately 360 feet of szght dzstance must be provzded at the North Commercial drzveway connectzon to High Ridge Road, per Palm Beach County and CIty of Boynton Beach design standards. A revzew of the proposed szte plan zndzcates that sufficzent sight dzstance will be provided at the North Commerczal driveway connection, provided landscaping and other visual obstructzons are elimznated from the lzne of szght. Based upon design standards, vegetation located in the szght dzstance area immediately north of the commerczal drzveway will hp hdnw 1() mrhp,> m hplght (prpfPrahly pvpn lp,>s) nr grpatPr than pight (R)fppt in hpight (nrpfPrahly pvpn mnrp) tn pnwrp that nn drzvPr vlsihility is nhstmrtpd. This includes canopy limbs that may znadvertently extend into the requzred vzsibzlzty area. Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 4 of6 6. A Permit to Construct within the Public Right-of-Way, issued by the Engineering Division of Public Works, will be required for work on Gateway Boulevard. Permits may also be required from Palm Beach County and the Quantum Park POA for work on High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. Noted. 7 Relocate the ''transition'' (three to two-lane northbound) on High Ridge Road (adjacent to Lot 89B) north, so that the three-lane section extends to the north property line of Lot 89B. This is to prevent turning movement and stacking conflicts for traffic entering the east and west residential developments. Show proposed off-site roadway improvements (signing, striping, curb, curb & gutter, pavement, etc.) for High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. The "transztlOn" sectlOn of Hzgh Rzdge Road, where the northbound outszde through lane is merged wzth the northbound znszde through lane, corresponds with the approximate locatlOn of the residential driveway that will serve Lot 89B Instead of extending the merge section further to the north, we propose to utilzze the northbound outszde through lane, whzch zs being dropped, as a northbound nght-tum lane servzng the reszdentzal communzty Thzs will better define the flow of traffic zn the vicinzty of the szte by removzng the northbound trips oriented to Lot 89B from the northbound through movement, thereby reducing vehicular conflicts and weaving maneuvers. Improved signing and pavement markzng wzll also zmprove the traffic operation zn the merge sectlOn of northbound Hzgh Rzdge Road by provzdzng motonsts wzth the reqUlszte znformatlOn to alzgn their vehzcles zn the proper lane. No off-site roadway improvements are proposed for the intersection of Hzgh Rzdge Road and Gateway Boulevard. 8. Extend the medians on High Ridge Road and, as necessary, on Gateway Boulevard, in accordance with FDOT specifications to guide traffic into the proposed ingress lanes. To assess whether or not the amount of vehzcular storage zs adequate to accommodate the northbound left-turn movement znto the reszdentzal development of Quantum Village West, the anticzpated queue during the peak hour must be determined. Based upon Highway Capacity Manual 2000 methodology and the projected northbound left-turn movement volumes and opposing southbound through traffic on High Ridge Road, thp numhpr of vphzrlp<; In qupuP awmting to ramplPtP thp lpft turn dllrl11g thp ppak hour i<; pxpprtpd to hp anp (I) or lPH wzth a ranfidpnrP lpvpl of 9') pPTrPnt. Sznce the available storage provzded for the excluszve northbound left-turn lane on Hzgh Rzdge Road (75 feet) exceeds the antzczpated maxzmum queue length (estzmated to be one (1) vehzcle wzth a length of 25 feet), thp turn lmzp i <; of mffirzpnt lpngth to ,nravzdp n1nplp <;taragp for thp narthhmmd lpft turn at thp Quantum Villagp WP<;t and Quantum Villagp Ea<;t dnvpway without thp qupuP pxtpndIng Into thp narthhmmd through lanp<;_ Therefore, it zs not necessary to extend the medzan on Hzgh Rzdge Road to guzde traffic into the zngress lane Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 5 of6 However, the current medzan openzng to be utilzzed by both resIdentzal developments is approxzmately 115 feet wzde, which is substantially wider than the typzcal opening for thzs type of development. Therf/ore. to better define the turning movement path,1i within the intersection. we believe that both end nO.lie.1i Qj the median ,lihould be extended qpproximate{y 20 feet to narrow the Q]Jening. ThIS would result zn an openzng approxzmately 75 feet wzde, whzch would stzll provzde sufficIent turnzng radllfor Szngle Unzt truck design vehzcles (Identified as SU zn AASHTO). ThIS Improvement would also have the ancillary benefit of increasing the storage length available for the northbound left turn. It IS not necessary to modify any medIans or turn lanes on Gateway Boulevard. In addItIOn to the comments receIved from the PublIc Works department, the followmg comment provIded by the Planmng and Zomng Department mvolves a component of traffic engmeenng and IS addressed herem. 77 It is anticipated that there will be higher pedestrian traffic as a result of this project (residential development on both sides of High Ridge Road), in part, due to its close proximity with the Tri-Rail Station. This higher pedestrian traffic is encouraged. However, truck and other vehicular traffic on High Ridge Road could compromise pedestrian connectivity and safety between the two (2) residential lots located on each side of the roadway Staff recommends incorporating aesthetically pleasing traffic calming devices (subject to Engineering approval) on/near High Ridge Road that will help reduce vehicular speeds while protecting pedestrians traversing the roadway Traffic lights and lower speed limits alone will not accomplish this objective. We generally concur that pedestnan activity to/from the two residentzal developments from/to the Tri-Rail StatlOn should be encouraged in an effort to zncrease mass tranSIt use. To that end, the safe crosszng of HIgh Ridge Road for reSIdents of the proposed communzty west of High Rzdge Road IS cntzcal. An evaluation of available szght distance was performed at the proposed residential driveway connection to High Ridge Road. It was determzned that sufficient stoppzng SIght dzstance IS proVIded for dnvers travelzng on HIgh Rzdge Road, gzven the landscapzng WIthin the median IS either below 30 inches in hezght (preferably even less) or greater than eIght (8) feet zn height (preferably even more) to ensure that dnver vIsibilzty is not obstructed. Therefore, pedestnans may safely cross Hzgh RIdge Road and drIvers traveling on High Rzdge Road will have ample distance to safely stop if a pedestrian is in the travel path. Recent research has zndIcated that the presence of a raIsed median (or razsed crosszng Island) to proVIde a refuge for pedestrIans was associated WIth a szgnificantly lower crash rate at multi-lane sItes, gzven traffic conditions szmilar to that on HIgh Rzdge Road near the residentIal developments. Sznce a raIsed medzan Island currently eXIsts, the zncluslOn of a marked crosswalk Mr Michael Rumpf August 28, 2002 Page 6 of6 in combmatlOn wlth Pedestnan Crossing signs (Wll-2, MUTCD 2000) and Downward Arrow signs (WI6-7p, MUTCD 2000) mdlcatmg the locatlOn of the crosswalk is proposed to delmeate the crossmg area while providing a safe refuge for pedestnans. In addltlOn, advanced warnmg slgns (WII-2, MUTCD 2000) would be placed further upstream on Hlgh Rldge Road to glve motorists informatlOn that a pedestnan crosswalk lS ahead. We beZzeve that these proposed improvements would provide a pedestnan crossmg that is safe, provldes connectlvlty between the two residentlal developments and the Tn-Rail StatlOn, and if deslgned properly is aesthetlcally pleasmg We trust that the responses mcluded thoroughly address your comments and concerns. Should you have any questIOns regardmg the mformatIon contamed m thIS sublTIlttal, please do not heSItate to contact me at (561) 684-6161 Very truly yours, CALVIN, GIORDANO & ASSOCIATES, INC. c::- p~- Enc S Penfield, P.E. Semor TransportatIOn Engmeer Cc Sara Lockhart, Calvm, GIOrdano & ASSOCIates, Inc Scott S Brunner, P.E., Calvm, GIOrdano & Associates, Inc. Attachments S:\Land\02 2544 Quantum Village at Boynton Beach\Traffic Analysis\1tr response to comments OS_27 _02.doc C\I o o ~ C\I 00 o ...... ..... en en Q) '00 ~ ;>.. ~<>Cl I:: ..... -< ~ I::~ o Q) .~ ~ E= Q) .- ~> o S 0..3 .1: c E-< ~ 0' Q) ~ E-< ;:; 00 oc '0 0 '" "" " !l ll' ell ll' CIl "" i5 '" '" "" " '" '" "" <J '" :0- < oS '" '" ~ ... - '" 0 g :t ll' ell "" ~ ll' r- r- ..... '" '" '0 ~ ::1: Q. .~ .,. .,. ~ '" 00 E- :3 !::: 00 ~ '" " g ell ll' ell "" CIl .,. .,. .... i5 00 00 "" <J 1;1 :0- < - ::!: ... oS .... 0 - g :t ~ ell ll' ell ~ ell ~ '" ~ ::1: < ~ 0. 0 c:- o, is '" '" "" ~ - ." Q. '" '" '" '" r- '" ~ c :1: '" c:- ,... c: 0 .'" '" " ~ g g >> g 0 0 0 ,...: ,...: U .c: II II <J E- E- '" " CQ E ;; Q. ~ ~ ~ '2 E 'i!J ::> -' ] c:- '" '" '" '0 " j8 ~ ~ ~~ '" '" ~ ~ '2 '2 '" ::> ::> 2:i .., .., e: c: oS ;:l ll:: ~ " " ~ ~ :5 CI CI '0 ;; ';l u j iii .'" .'" t:i: c: il c:- ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ " " ~ S <>: <>: >> ~f ~ ] til .z; ~.z; 2 ''':' E .'" ~ " :; .a :; i5 ::1: ~ ::1: fo. '" I~ e ;:; O~ ell " .,.0 ooll' .9:;::: "" c '" - ::'ll' ~ r- X'" ~- ",X- ci;::; II '" E-o II E- u; ~ ~ a .'" ~ II a 0. '5 ~ '" '0 '0 ~ 0. .g '" >> i5 g U 3 ,g g ~.c 8-~ ::1: 8- <::1: Q. .g ~~ ~~~ -,,!::E- ., ~- ~~:; c: " <J o ~ <I) 0-3 5 5 fi'€'€ ,~ ~ ~ '-'E-E- C>._ - E= .~ .~ LIJ " <J t::~~ ..," <J .S <>: :ox: :5 ~ )( ~ III o c: ~ ~ u '" " <C E ;; Q. 13 o~ i9~ ~0 ~~ +~ p,"\ ,~ ~ "\ ~' ~~ ~ ", -b '" ~ ,~ < ~ "'""' en .... .... en ._ ro s:: ~~ Q) en ens:: ro ._ -- -- -- -- .- Q) > ~ EO a~ ~~ ::10\ O'e /'. 6'c/ ./ ~ ~..J ./ .,g o /"'v'f /~ > \ Jt"'\.~ rf' ~~ (.~ ~ ~ ~ -/ c> ~ ~ :\ c)~ \.% :\ ,,}c \. "'""' .... ~ en ._ Q) s:: ~~ Q) en ens:: - .- .'" -- -- -- -- Q) .- ~ >0 ~~ ro\O ::I('f') 0'_ '-' ) '" '" CD CD E E ::s ::s -0 ~> .... .... CD ::s ::s E o ~ ::s :E: _ ~~o mm> CD CD > D.D._ == == '(ij <CD.C I I I -- ><><~ ><~...... ~I ~ ~: ~ .~ f6 ~'S:: ~ <i ~ U!).I ~ g ~ -EI~ .2' en l.:) .... ... . ... <: <: '> ';;;, t;j <: Uw a ~ ~ ::::I 01 ~ .~ a; c: ltl u '" :E CD ~ E :E ::S-U - '" :1l o CD al >3::s --c'E C C ~ CD m al E _ a; CD '" CD > m ~ o w= == CD ~ C) C).a c.!!lij '2 =8 ....>'OJ' ::s E 'OJ' I- ~ .... - .a c\l ~ g c~ ::s "- m <: o ::s ltl C)....,,? i! D. _ (/) Two-Way Stop Control Page 1 of 2 TWO-WAY STOP CONTROL SUMMARY General Information Site Information ~nalyst ESP Intersection High Ridge at Quantum East/Wes ~gency/Co. CGA lurisdiction Bovnton Beach Date Performed 8/21/2002 I^nalvsis Year BuHdoutofres. dev ~nalvsis Time Period PM Peak Hour Project Description 02-2544 Quantum Village East and West East/W est Street: Quantum East/West North/South Street: High Ridge Road Intersection Orientation. East-West Study Period (hrs) 0.25 Vehicle Volumes and Adjustments Maior Street Eastbound Westbound Movement 1 2 3 4 5 6 L T R L T R Volume 4 1 24 7 1 1 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 4 1 26 7 1 1 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 -- -- 5 -- -- Median Type Raised curb RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 Configuration LTR LTR Upstream Signal 0 0 Minor Street Northbound Southbound Movement 7 8 9 10 11 12 L T R L T R Volume 53 185 15 1 185 3 Peak-Hour Factor, PHF 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.90 Hourly Flow Rate, HFR 58 205 16 1 205 3 Percent Heavy Vehicles 5 5 5 5 5 5 Percent Grade (%) 0 0 Flared Approach N N Storage 0 0 RT Channelized 0 0 Lanes 1 2 0 0 2 0 Configuration L T TR LT TR Delay, Queue length, and level of Service Approach EB WB Northbound Southbound Movement 1 4 7 8 9 10 11 12 Lane Configuration LTR LTR L T TR LT TR v (vph) 4 7 58 102 118 103 105 C (m) (vph) 1601 1568 604 781 810 768 776 v/c 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.13 0.15 0.13 0.14 95% queue length 0.01 0.01 0.32 0.45 0.51 0.46 0.47 Control Delay 7.3 7.3 116 10.3 10.2 10.4 10.4 LOS A A B B B B B Approach Delay -- -- 10.5 10.4 A?~ {.,~ C3 g file.//C \Documents and Settmgs\epenfield\Local Settmgs\Temp\u2k16 tmp 8/21/2002 ~ ReDlv to: o 1800 Eller Drive Suite 600 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316 (954) 921 ii81 (954) 921-880i fax ~o Village Boulevard Suite 340 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 (56!) 684-6161 (561) 684.6360 fax Calvin. Giordano & Associates. Inc. Engmeers Surveyors Planners August 27, 2002 Mr Michael W Rumpf, Director City of Boynton Beach Department of Development Planmng and Zonmg DIVISion 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL. 33425 RE Response to City's 1st REVIEW COMMENTS - For Quantum Village at Quantum Park - Lot 89B - Conceptual Master Plan Approval - File number' SBMP 02-~~ Dear Mr R!mpf SEP 3 m2 Addressed below are the staff comments Issued on August 13, 2002 for Quantum Village at Quantum Park - Lot 89B F or ease of reference, the attached documents are provided 10 response to the 1 st Review comments. 1 ReVised Survey, Master Site Plan, Landscape Plan, and Architectural Elevations. a. Ten (10) copies, 24" x 36" sheets. bOne (1) each, 8 1Iz x 11 reductions 2 Traffic Report, prepared by Calvm, GIOrdano and ASSOCiates, Inc , dated August 28, 2002. 3 Dra10age statement, prepared by CalVIn, GIOrdano and AssocIates, Inc., dated July 15,2002 (submItted WIth ong1Oal apphcatIon) 4 Seven (7) copIes of Department ReVIew Comments Chart show1Og questIons/issues and response ImmedIately follow1Og. 5 Envelopes and labels for property owners wtthm 400 feet ofParcel89B We appreCIate the tIme and effort staff have put 1Oto the review on our behalf and look forward to completIon of thIS exclt10g project. If you have any questIons, please call me. Sara Lockhart, AICP Planmng Admlmstrator Department of Engineering and Public Works PO. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgovcom . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Warren H. Newell. Chairman Carol A.. RobertS. Vice Chair Karen T. Marcus Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Tony Masilotti Addie L. Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman An Equal Opporrunicy '>'ffirmanvt: ,>,cnon Employer- @ prinled on recycled paper August 19 2002 Mr Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE Qualltum Pc1fk - Vi!lage North TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf' The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (Received for the previously approved project. pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code The project is summarized as follows Location Quantum Park - North of Gateway Boulevard west of High Ridge Road Boynton Beach 136 MF Residential Units and 102,235 SF General Retail 4756 n/a Municipality" Proposed Uses. New Daily Trips Build-out Year' Based on our review the Traffic Division has determined that the previously approved project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County However please be aware that the total traffic generation approved for the DRI so far is 59 457 new daily trips (without Internalization or pass-by) out of a total 63 737 vested for the DRI It is also suggested that the City of Boynton Beach to review potential traffic cIrculation and safety issues relating to left-turns in and out of the west-most project access driveway on GatewaY"Boulevard during the PM Peak hours. If you have any questions regarding this determination please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER /YJ~ Masoud Atefi, MSCE / Sr Engineer - Tratfi.cy()ivlsion cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc. ('I"-? "002 l ,_, _ - ~ File. General TPS Mun Trafic Study Review F \TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\020805 doc ~ ~.."....~-r....Y......~,.~ . ' . .,.\ lllo."'."J... .....~ J.. ,- 'i" "'7"0~ 0v DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning DIVISion . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Ucenses · Community Redevelopment July 22, 2002 Mr Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works POBox 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Reo Traffic Study' Quantum Park & Village North SBMP 02-002 Dear Mr Atefio The enclosed traffic generation statement, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc. was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-referenced application Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and I with your written response If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260 Sincerely d~A lIdav Ix- Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWRlsc 5:\PIln'1ing\SHAREDIWP\PROJECTSlViIIas at Qua-1Ium Lakes aka Grotto BaylSBMP 02.oo21Traffc Iett...IO Palm Beach COlI1tY.OOC City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425~310 Phone: (561) 742~350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us 07/_1.'3/20QZ, 15 53 5614341l::q PINDER TROUTM~N - PClGE Ell PinDER TROCITMflN CoftSULTlNCi. I "c. TrarDpUlt.dlu.. PIImen and [nfrte en Fax Transmittal Form DATE: July 19, 2002 TIME: 4.40 PM TO: Ms. Lulia Galav COMPANY: City of Boynton Beach FAX NUMBER: 742-6259 PHONE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: Quantum Park & Village North PROJECT NUMBER: #PTC02-116 --~ -~-- I; " -'J -~- if '/ ,,-' )e "J <5" r. ~:rJI NUMBER Of PACES INCLUDING COVER: S Copies to: o W / Endo.ures o o o o o Urgent 0 As Requested 0 For Review 0 Please Reply 0 Original Will Foilow Message: From the desk of Kahart M. Pinder, Alep Principal PI.. TIcNIbI_ COIIsaItI... _. 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beacn, Fl 33406 PTC 561-434-1644 Fax 561-434-1663 E-mail -ptc@pindertroutman.com ____~~~!j,~002 15 53 5614341f.':'3 P:NDER TROUTMAN PAGE tJ~ PinDER TItOaTM"n CO"SaLTI"Q. I"c. Transportation Planners and Engmeers 2324 South Congr~s AvenUl::. SUIte 1 H Wp,st Pillm Beach FL 3340h (5& 1) 434-1644 FdX 434-1663 www.pinderlrodm.m.com July 19, 2002 Ms. Lusia Calav Planning and Zoning ~ivision City of Boynton Beach '00 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310 Ie: Q\W1tum Park and Village North . #PTC02-116 Dear Ms. Galav' It is pr~ to develop 136 multi family residential um3 and 102,235 SF of Retail use generally located on Lots 83-88 of Quantum Park In the City of Boynton 8eadl. The site is located north of Gateway Boulevard and west of High Ridge Road. Access to the sIte wiU be via three (3) driveway connectlons to Gateway Boulevard and two (2j driveway connections to High Ridge Road. The proposed development is projected to generate 4,756 new daily tnps, 151 new A.'VI peak hour trips and 436 new PM peak "our trips as shown on Attachment 1 Projected driveway volumes are shown on Attachment '1 The Quantum Park ORI is an approved project:.. and is considered a Previous ApprQval under Artlde 1 5, Traffic Performance Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified land Development Code (UlOQ. The proposed land use and intensity are witl1in the limits of the original approval of the Quantum Park OR!. as shown on Attachment 3, therefore. the proposed project is not subject to the T raffle Performance SL1ndards. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this letter, do not hesitate to contact this office sincere# ~J!Z~--- .A:::J;:M. T~'4. 7'/9/ Pnfdent 7r I VPZ- AMT /Idr Attachments cc- Masoud Aleft Eugene Certica Mark Hanson L.,tItIr GIbv 03- 116 T 19-0Z Pi ~7/13!2002 15 53 ~j~~ ~E:i t: ... .r. .. ;: S .t >- ~ z & .!! ~ ~ "' = .- ~.g -~.. = .. ~ ~ ! 15'El.;l ~ g :1 .e. . -< C:~ 55143Glf.;;3 I'~ .... 0'\ 041 .,., eft ." oQ GO .... z~ ..... ~' =-- ~ ~ ~;: 0 N .';Ir Of' ~ .! GO GO Q.~ - ... ,~ en N M I .1 ,.... ..... ~ VI ;0 .... ., .0 ~~ .Ii .....~ ~ ~ ~ l~ .... 0 - .- '^ .... C"I ~ ~ en ... li t"I ~ >.D VI - .0 en C7l ., ~~ .e ....' ~ C oq S or. + 8 ! :> c: Q ....J I ~ ..... ~ ~ 0 " .! E ~ c: ... .,. .i ::) ~ .... 0 VI c >.D on on cp <"'l ..., <"'l 1 '"" N ....' a ~ - ~ 'i i .... .. :;I ;s ! ~ 1 ~ 1 1 lK: P:NDER TROUTf'.1AN - I 1 N 0'1 ... ..0 GO '" .- ~ '" .~ ....... o.&J ~ d "" ,.., GO I ..., (;) on ..0 .s ... '" ~ 'it cO .s-S .... 0 .... i .=- ~ :s Q.,= .Q ! "'I 11"\ "- ..0 "'" .- .- N f l- N 0 "'"' 1 ; '" o,D ... 0 .- $! .,., Vl .... en 0 .5 ... a ~ I~ 1~ .., ..,; 0 ..; .- .... ,.... ... ~~ ... ~ $ ..... - ~ .... .- .... I VI I- .i; ., M ... ~ ~ of) ~ N ) .- - ~ 0 - .- .s ,... en a S j ~ S C'l ..., .... ~ -+ I::: 8 J ... e oJ .,., \0 0 en '^ 0 .! II ~ E c ... .,. .~ :;) .... .... a VI VI '" o.Q '" '" ! ... .... M ... ... N oS N C"; 0 0 .- 1 !it ~ ::)"'5 1 ~ i ... .,. VI rI J ~ ... J s ! oD 0 >.D .... .." M ,., Of' ~ ~ '!I '^ .... N N llQ ... t 0 ... N Z - ..., ... = "" .... N N ~ ~ kc .... 0 .... * .~ 0\ $ A.':: ..0 ..... N 1 \0 0- '" .... ~ <:I ..... L~ ;0- j - 11'\ ..... N ~ ..... .... lI'I 0 ..., M .- N M .!! on ~ .... ,.., ~ lft. lft. In "'! "'~ 0 .., .... ... I;: - GO ., .0 ... ! ~ .... ;:;; ..., .." ..... .. .c 10 ,... 0'1 ~ ~ N ...., ..., ..., .... 1 ~ .Q \0 II'! 0 N .s <"'l <0 ..., a $ ;:; ~ ! ! ~ ....; ! ... 8 'j N t: ~ ~ ~ :; .~ 0 1 l- E c: .1 ~ ... .... 0 VI <1'1 II \0 "" on .! .., <"'I ..... - '" '"" oS N S 0 .- .- t St .... ~ j ~ 1 ~ .J VI ! oJ r.t 'I < ~ Qf! Qf! S i ~l PAGE 03 g ~ 2 ~ l ! '0 c: ~ ~ <=. 5 _ t .1 s! i~ ~~ .~ ]g i~ E i _ c r ] c 2! 'j :!l .ii WI .... i 00 ~ c::i "5 i s :> .~ -*- ~ ~ " " ~.K !:~ O'!13/~e02 15 53 5514341f..-S3 P : NDEP TROUn"t\I'j _ PAGE 04 A~tJ QuaftCUm ...,~ ;and "ilia. ~ In_nlo4'y of land Uses .rfC02.n8. 71,WlJ2 ~OM1. -'9-1)2 ,.,,,,, ~uw~ =.:: .......... (;qe floor T,;pQ_...... .. ,," 0l0IMt - .. " "'" - _I '6'_ 1.27/_ , ,11) , _1(............ "-cIM_ I~/l . ..... - . 710 11' ~U6 I ,liiiI W 9117 J~~ laC) 0lI0r/Indulu1lll ~ 21.))0 SJ 9.47 1',000 Sfl1l n, 2J no Sf .... /,.-.51' ". .s \.III....,WlvItt.JOoMldeTOTN 0M0r 0IlIclf 16 fAj Sf 11..711000" 1 '~6 6_~llC Of8ooI........ioI 0IIae US6 ~ 9.47/',000$1(11 " ~.. 27 7lZ 'Sf 6.97 11 ana 51 '9) ''''un ~.-. ""-' u.e --- 102 DVt ' JI:AJ ;'14 .~ a t4 ~. Ofkc .)fta 'OIl lIlO ~ 9.4' 11"""51 " 947 15 ~oniG CllllaJ~ 0Ma :Kun 51' 9." II,OOOSl' (,. ,In ".2.0 ,. u' 111n. SF 74 zo SlIla .1 0II.ltIl~ ~ ""2 sf fJ..,-T,JlMSJ ('I '56 2' l4Z, c--v 8hd. Qfta,1__ Oflk" H 579 " 9A771.mnSFOI 166 ~2 Iayo-. ~ lJod!Io ~ l"" )~ 51 11_6/..000 Sf (61 12S OIvC-C'_ (NIIca n-"(-af" J_ 51 79~ /1000 Sf 18~ Z)." ~t_ Mioe<ll/ll ll~ ," 1.)1/. 1 IOU , ,,,,, 32 )J J.....3411 JJ )a JIU7. I --~-... 0lIl<<~ ~ JjlJ)SO 51 697 1.me5l' Z J42 ..4, ., 4J .. 45 515. ..... IndI :-..- 5douul lie-' e.:--~ t.... 5dIooI 2_~1O 22'" 46AlPlfll Sun 5tntMI <:*t.eIl....t1.. ~. ~2 /00 5f .". /1 ClOO Sf 1" i6NPort,lA7'11rMl .7tC....., no-........ I~ .......... 2.. 000 $1 6,97/' 000 Sf \l17 .7NPMl.47114,_IPIM &~ 1tldI""'"' ""...... )2 000 SF ..97 It 000 Sf J6Z .... ..7Ilhnl.7C :\oil-1Oftt, ktduIOW IfoduoIrioI ,...a24 SF 6.97 11 lIOO Sf 'OJ 49 a.. o...~ ~ .....q, SOlDl " 6.'7/'_51 ).49 - c_ .......... c::llllu~ -- ''',178 Sf .... /1/1. Sf n (JIlMow 2 641 Sf' ....7 It _Sf III 25 S'A Cult .. IOi< 0M<r.~ -.. 27nm 51 6." /'_51 1. ~11 ~""I'Dweo. l- ~ ... ,...-.. lar nD ~ Noo1Il.-n- '-odqr1~" ~ ca. .,000 Sf Ul 1'.000 Sf \11 :II -~ "000 $> 4."" lJlIII5I Z9 S2 "lJ1' ~ 0lR<I0 6075J Sf !JAl 1''- Sf II )7~ 5S l'IIblia -. MIlt. -*'"' ~aI ':10.000 " .." IM(lOSf '1.'nl sa loOI Oftl-tncluIU1ol 0M0e ~1 &70 Sf ....7 1.000 Sf It) 487 laQ " dO .. III c,.- - Mbood lIOl' ~ 212 ov. 7 DO I fJU4 6HI7 ~,.... Md..... 500ldI -.c:t '-M ~ 21" DUf 7 IOU ',1\.11 IWAII 81.260 51 In m - O.64'lft ell).. 5.a.6 'D12 0.-" QIIm )2,010 Sf U7/,.-Sf(1) )0) 1IeMw- 15000 Sf ..5, "-Sf 1 .... lO)4IIPIwU MoloII 011 ~ QIli../IndutUI~ ("... SUIioR ,IT..., ..... 2.795 C- 3kn ) os. Sf '53' 6&I\IolI,M.70,72 ...,...,.. IoIduo4IW ....... eae,or.... W--'- 211"A2 5/' 4."1 '.000 Sf 1,OJ) Ofb '.1.DS6 51 '.47 "000 Sf (1) ~2 n....n.,7., 75.,6 ~AIOIt,,~ ..- 0fbI~ ~ "','. sr .... ".000 51 767 ~ 3'.2'7 $I '.47 11.000 Sf 111 J72 1711 79 eo ("~Mooc ~~ NI/D Or.......... u..on sr 2J l'l.llllll Sf 121' l,-". &2 ~(:-t ~ocjoI IeuII 71"" Sf In (Tl -lJ-'25ln 1l0"',"" ',020 .......-F. J,llIIO Y 63V2/',OOO'" 3.1l11 ...,..--- J ooa 51' 203.:11/ I 000 Sf 1011 COMooI Itoc. of ......... :; Sf '.97 1'-- Sf J7 ,0 l.a.n ~....... PllIll.... OJ) to r__ ........... ()Iliar ~ Ollar '0_ 'Sf 9.&' 11.J111OSf t1 97 91 ....$bIi..F- 1(1191 .--0.1 Im-r~ 9'430 Sf &1 5'9.$ J .... m 1099 LIll 1110 C-.... Mbed 1_ ........... "2 DlJ\ , f[)U 194 l)n._ pe,C_"" fiIool(~ 0III0t 3. VI Sf 9.'7/100051'(1, 361 TOTAl. 2,2-"99 Sf (l, UI '11041 6nd ~ N:tnlI uw ......... "'"* ..... "6 Ill-' lClZ 35 51 7 In I - o.-:lb (lQ H,_ 952 1191. ~D tott.l.l 2,)91,'34 Sf ".907' I=~ YnTfOTIW5I 6.''.1521 N()P(: r.......~ ~ 1,000 Sf 0/ 0I\'iQr ~ 2S ~ 5ftIII 1,000 Sf 01 Ollar " 1.5.40 Sf ~" VlSl(O U5U COMMrl rw vsu 0IIklt ."._Sf .....5)5 lit ~ 128,76lJ Sf IZI _,2" 5f l~ -- 1.122,7'01151' 1,401.215 ~ ........ 10e0 ~l.Wb n1 0V'l ~11MWt 40105ae 0 rorAl. Z JItl OJ. Sf 31 1,000 Sf 01_ ~ 16 n.uo._ 1,000 Sf of"""" - PD5I'C.llllcle 111_"'111"" _...-.... ~._Sl_, m ,....__ __J.." __._~. _C_ond 1""~rlCll,,,,_ 11loa._,,,.j,..""'. fP\_""" T....... (01_ 1~"'..d ',5110" _.. "._' lrlp~"""'aI_"""'''''''_lI~ ~",,,, ond - .....__--.....---- ,"_oIquoI", ___...~ _,..__~.." 1_.01 -<<lSf~ , 11M_ s.... . tl 51 ...-... 07/13'2882 15 5J 56143415.53 PINDER TROUTr-iAN_ J u 857 ~ 1210 3070 ~ ~ ~ .;j ~. t 1;'U~~1. ~ -' _oj t;.lO J.lQ.21 27 Jl81J 11..Q3Lt LEGEND 9 -AM PEAK HOUR (30) .PM PEAK HOUR I 1210 -AADT tJAGE 05 o ""\ ,,J\ I--' N.T.S. ~ GATEWA,yeOULEVARD o < o ~ ..... \) o QC J: ~ J: QUANTUM PARK & VILLAGE NORTH ATTACHMENT 2 PROJECT DRIVEWAY VOLUMES 07/19/0'2 ~