The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE (i . f- .. From: Bressner, Kurt Sent: Monday, August 14, 2006 6:14 PM To: Taylor, Jerry; McKoy, Carl; Ferguson, Mike; McCray, Mack; 'EnslerB@aol.com' Cc: Cherof, James; Livergood, Jeffrey; Greene, Quintus Subject: Quantum NOPC #16 Follow-up Items Issue #1 Traffic Signals at Quantum Blvd/Gateway and Quantum Blvd/Congress At the last meeting, it was suggested that I review the NOPC #12 file to obtain information on traffic signal warrants and requirements for Quantum. If you will recall at the meeting, Mr. Gerlica suggested that I review the file. I did. NOPC #12 was approved by the City Commission on October 16, 2001. The NOPC was a major change from office and industrial land uses on the Quantum pro to 'mixed use" that would allow the construction of residential. The previous cap of 500 dwelling units of 500 units was raised to 1,000 units. The traffic signal issue in 2001 was called out under condition #1 _ When warranted the developer and the existing occupants of Quantum Park will be responsible for the cost of construction of traffic-actuated signals and the intersections of Quantum Boulevard with Gateway and Congress Avenue. See attached memo from Jeff Livergood, Public Works Director, dated August 29, 2001/revised October 4, 2001 located in Exhibit G." The recommendation from page 3 of the October 4, 2001 memo from Jeff Livergood was as follows: Recommendation It is very clear that traffic signals are either currently warranted, or will be warranted in the future at both Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. These signals will be necessary entirely because of development in Quantum Park. Thus staff believes that the cost of constructing these signals should be borne by future builders as well as by those tenants of the industrial park that are presently generating traffic. It would not be appropriate to have the City of Boynton Beach pay for the traffic signals when other capital improvements are either more important or have been delayed in prior years awaiting funding. If the City does not obtain surety for the installation of a traffic signal at this time, it will be virtually impossible to assess the requirement for traffic signal construction to each individual that may purchase mixed use lots from Quantum then subsequently develop them. The burden of traffic signal construction should fall upon the developer of the whole rather than the individuals that choose to acquire and develop lots in the future. Quantum could easily distribute the cost equally to future buyers whereas the City could not. Likewise Quantum has significant control over the property owners association and has the ability to initiate a special assessment of existing properties for their share of the traffic signal construction. Staff recommends that the developer and the existing occupants of Quantum Park be held responsible for the cost of construction of traffic actuated signals at the intersections of Boulevard with Gateway and Congress. m r ~ [; ~ n Vi ./.r..)\,:-: I il'! I' 'AlJG , :; ;! ! i' ! : ~_. I I DEPARTMENT OJ: DE V[ I ;If"" Based on the above, I recommend that the City Commission include the following basic condition for NOPC #16 for traffic signals per my earlier memo dated July 31, 2006 to the City Commission: I was pleased to see that the Planning and Development Board took note of the traffic signal situation at Quantum Boulevard/Gateway and Quantum Boulevard/Congress. I recommend that if the City Commission is going to favorably consider the application for the additional 800 dwelling units on the Quantum parcels that MFT Development, Inc. be responsible for posting a letter of credit in the amount of $440, 000 for a five-year period in a form approved by the City. This translates into $220,000 for each signal. In the event that traffic warrants are not met in the five year period (tested annually), the letter of credit can be released. If the warrants are met, the traffic signals should be installed and paid by MFT Development, Inc. If they wish to assign this obligation to successors in interest, this can be accommodated if the transfer of the financial obligation is approved by the City Commission. I believe the City Commission should include the requirement for a letter of credit posted by MFT Development, Inc. as outlined above as a surety for the two traffic signals. Staff observed this In 2001, and the situation has not changed. Issue #2 -Inclusion of the Transit Oriented Development Housing In NOPC #16 The developer has requested 800 additional dwelling units to the Quantum area. The developer indicated at the last City Commission meeting that they would "allocate" or otherwise identify 400 units to the Tri-Rail parcel for a future Transit Oriented Oevelopment there. The petitioner, MFT Oevelopment, Inc. does not own property at the Tri-Rail station. They must negotiate the development with Tri-Rail and the RTA. What MFT does effectively control is the process by which amendments to the Quantum PIO would be handled. In the past, these have been in the form of NOPC's or notices of proposed changes. We are now up to #16. Because the legal notice for NOPC #16 did not include the Tri-Rail parcel there must be a subsequent request. The placement of 400 units potentially at the Tri-Rail site by the NOPC #16 allows MFT to be the developer of choice as they have the units accounted for by approval of the City. They can do so because the vested traffic counts for the development have been met. Unless Tri-Rail or the County grant's a traffic concurrency exception area for the Tri-Rail site, the vested traffic counts attributed to Quantum have value. At present, there is no official statement by Tri-Rail, Treasure Coast Regional Planning or the County as to whether they will be considering extending a traffic currency exemption area to transit oriented development (TOO) sites. If they do, the Quantum vested traffic counts won't be of value to them. However, the main issue is the process by which future NOPC's are processed. I believe that MFT Oevelopment Inc. effectively controls any future NOPC applications for the Tri-Rail parcel even though they don't own it. For the, City's part, any consideration for a TOO at this location should include a guarantee of a supply of affordable housing in a manner that preserves these units in the future and shields them from real estate speculation. So, the answer this question is that the TOO is officially not part of the NOPC #16. MFT, I believe, effectively controls the future process for another NOPC/ORI amendment specifically for the Tri-Rail site. The 400 non-Quantum new units proposed are available for the TOO but cannot be specifically assigned to the TOO until there is a valid petition to convert the Tri-Rai/ site to a TOO. Commission will need to condition approval of the NOpe to a maximum of 400 new units on the balance of Quantum and understand that the other 400 units are effectively not allocated at this time. The second set of 400 units is essentially unallocated units with nowhere to go unless a TOO is approved at the Tri-Rail site later. I believe Section 3 8 of the draft ordinance effectively handles this by the following language: "Of the 800 additional units approved pursuant to this Ordinance, 400 units shall be placed on Lots 17, 52, 58, 102 and 103. II (Page 4 of draft ordinance in packet). Thank you, Kurt Bressner City Manager PS: Quintus Greene - Please share this e-mail with MFT. Thank you. EXH~BJT "G"- . CITY-OF BOYNTON:JiEACH -J.lQB~J~;~Wqtu<S-~EP}.\R~NT INTEROF~(:;EI~tEMO~\IM TO: FllOM: Mike RU111P-f, I)~ector of.Plimnhi.SJ4nd Zomng Jefli'ey R. Liverg()od~ Director_of'PubHc Works ,,::;',. ., DATE: August29,. 2001':Revised Octob~r4;i2:001_-' Quantum NOpe #12 SUBJECT: I have reviewed-the propo~e~changes _qonsidcrcg ~- Nope #12 for~antum P~k Quantum has requested thatoonsideration be given by the City to the closure of the casteIl;l pQrtion,ofQuantum Lakes Drive at Gateway Boulevard. There are essClltiaily t;hreet:raf,fic-issues- tfult ~t evaluation and scrutiny. ~antiftn-Lakes'-Dn..v.t C1osu~~ - - Staff'is of the opinion that Quantum Lakes Drive ~an safely ~ clos~ at Gateway Boulevard. Frankly, it is _statrs opiiUon th1tt there-is value: in closing Q1,Ulilttirn- Lakes tmvcWaY since this would effectively eliminate a conflict p~int.o~ a busY a:i1eriill route (GllteWaY Boulevard). HfJW~_ver, incl~sing_:Qum.t~, Lalc~ -Dfiv~ :We m~,t. be cOgn~t of the ~vi$ed -acceSs- - cQM~tioJ1$':frqm ~ts -lQ(ran~ )Q2. ;S~tt~Q~~ds tlmt:these: two-lots only-be allowed to access qateway:Boulevard in- Ii 'right" ih- fight ~ue tnamie~;: -:Stat1 would,oppose any-single lot hav,ingl:tUJlae~sS.onto ~y ~mce:the drivewaYS-'lA question ,areilocat~d on the insiqe of the cutve dm: 'GatewaYaQ.d--sigllt distance -i's:Uimted.- - - '-- ~c Sfgli.allz~1ion, Quantu~ ]~rf've and .Ga~ew~:y -BoD:levard Staff'.s reyiew of the nffic impact ..tthe intersection of Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard is more comple~. ~_part of the NOPC #11_~ubmittJI. the traffic co~~~ ~dar Trplltman, opined that a t:qrllic signal-is warranted-,at ~-:~tCts~tion based on peak-hour w'ammts. or Wlirrant n from the-Manual on-Uniform Traffic Control DeVices. _Witb:re~t to;NQPC #12, thc-consultantbas changed the intersection lane.maddng configUiatio~_byeli:Qiinating one of two through lanes, both northbound ~dsouthbO~d; and suhstituUn~_ciedic!'-ted righttuin:~es. This action was logi9all:Jecause the ,assumption was- made thatthere'-W'ouldbe_ vexy. ~-north or southbound through movements at the interSeCtion. :U1tinUitely,the #iticaf volUme. sum that was utiiized for level of service analysis coOld be icduced~ Thus tp~ '!mc:t$cctiQn-the.9repcaUy will have a highedraffic capacity. - _ .. - - - - _ ,. - - ~ . ~ ~'.., I '" . However, whereas the criticall~ne analysis-provides infotmation re.late~ to--ov~llintersection capacity, it does ,not lCJ:!.d itself io wamitlt:analysis: for:signaI~tidi1.(rqil5_iliul1ysis ~ based on completely ditl'erenfcriteriaestablished- in the Manual in umronn T~ffic Control l;>evices; the same Manuall,ltillzed by the consultant in NOPC #11 submittal ~c;cOnSu1tant_ba:S shown no' changes in the traffic distribution. ThUs. the wBrrant analysis,cond~c_ted hy Pindat Troutman -ahd s~rized in a r~ort dated Febrwu:y 16, 200 l-is _still valid~ In tacit, -~ lots '1: tProl.lgh-l1 and lots 23 through 31 develop -:as MiXed Use, they will most certainly gCIl~ra:te add,itional traffic that ~. .",.. , ': ..... ': !;2t~,i:';i:' 'r .~. , . . ~." . "- -... ......~ ..~ ~ EXHfBIT "G" . will. use. th,~intersectionQfQuaptu~ Boul<:vard and:$teway,Boolevard,..A~ :$.uch, the ,'need fur a . ~c~fgIial.at this intersection will be even more PrQnounced. . . . ... : . . . .: . . Traftt(: Slgn~tio.n, Quantuni..Drive. and CQngre.s Avenue '. ! i . The. ~ffic cons4lt~ntdi4 Dot evaluate ~tlic c::oncliti . .. . at this. inter$ect;ion .as part of the mbi;1\ittil p.ac~~tbr NOPC#12.. HoweveJ;" evalQatio ,of~c c.onaiti6ns at this.intersection is equaily ~s cri*a,: . .A.stUt. as part ofit1e l'ipPq #J,1.s., .mfttal; Pin.<i8r Trouttnait..evaluated traffic sip~ .~t:-croCri~ at the ih~rsecticm ofQ1ijmtumj . 'vc!&nd. Ga~way.Boi.llevard. In'this ari81i~~:J;>>indar;rrp~~ found,tfjat.a ~c $igmtl .. nOt:pres~~y ~ted at this ~t#i;~Cln:b~~.o~:thep~~~out~t .~~ ~otC! tha{'~ JU'c'othet W~1No, 2 ~ IiitequPtJon 0~;C9ntinuoUs,Tra:fflc an4 N~ 10;- P_ .. our. J;>.elaythat. maybe..satisfied~ The,. ~~datio~ ,Is. ~ thiSin,~~~~cti,ii b~: mQpitorid. in ~:dUture:. ~PPI"<>Priate timejhunes for' mo~~oiin$ w~u1~ be; At:the. bt.iildjjut 9fLO~.3?1 ~. '3 8! ahd .~t t1u~ .huildQut of the NOPe .11 ~~dpma1 or.n~residentiallan.d.use~i w$c~~rO,b. .&$t"Sta~wq~d note that a large pOrtion,~lots 321hrOugp 38 is now:coInp(ete in the;, : ~'p(~~ ~mrer. ~~Iding. .:.; . ' .... .;: . ~ I . . ~', _. .:. Furthmnore, as part ofPjndar Troutman's.'traffic ana . is:~:F~p~ .ofZoOr, the cOlisultant a~sl1Iiled a build.Qut qfLots 23=. ID..3I as o~ce .~ace (, ) :an~ l.ots ..1: t9 lIas .omcei'Industrial (OII):: Howev~. the pi'CiPO$aI~to now c~geft4eS~,. uS~ fO ~~cdYse:~; The deve~opet con~ues..t() bebO~ by a ina,;ltUDUJlI: n. . ' 9f (i;rilf tijp~ from the. entire DRI; yet $~?tl~ ~hanges .iJ;lI~ci:.~ecan~~~&~~l*;~~ft~ .,' . .b~~:~~:p.p.~t~tl1~;~~cting the daily~p'$en~tio~'.~~"<$i.e'!F9~~~ ~.Mt;e " '. ~ ~';~.~ith~ ~~~.traffic c4~~cs ~[rel~q.tG.~~si~L~f:: . .....'. .is ~~l1:~~~~~~tO~ed Use. . rt'is.V;~ likelt~ a..$~$riai .~p~c.'~~ed!~Well!. . .~ $~~~(J'and Q.a~way AVenl,1e upon .build out 0(tbe ptoposed nUXed:use .. . uses;. .. . . ! RecoDlfilendatlon. ! j , " l' It is:vety clear that traffic signals are either:CUl11ently. ted, or will be wammted'.in,the future, at both .Gateway BouleY.ard and COQ~SS A . These si~ Will:be necessary - entirely. because ofdevelopmeiit in Quantum p~ Th . ~ffbefie~s thaHhe cost of. constructin~ ~ese ,signals ShouJd be bqme \,>>y ~ b .ld~ as.well ~ by thOse tenm1ts' of;the iIi~l park that are presently gen~ting trafjfil;. ~ oQlc;l not bd. ~priate to have the City ofBoyQton Beach pay for the ~c signal.. when 6th; capit'al imp~t$ are either 1l'l9fe' important or have been delayed in prior years awaitiJi~ fundin~. .. . ,....' .., _ '.' If the City~does not obb$1 sm-ety.for ~ inStaIl~tion of traffic signal at this. time, it will be. '. virtually impoSsible. to ~sess the.recp;t~entfor.~ ~pl cP~ctiof.1 to ~ch.;individ!J81 that may mm:ha.sethe mixed use lots .from.QuantUm .. d theh sub~ently. develOp thenI, The btJrden.ofiramc sign~ cpnstruotion shouldc.fall upoq.. e dev~l~ 9tthe wh91.e 1iltber:tban the individuals thatc,hoose t~ acquif'e and 4e\ieiop iOt:$ m .. e future. Qua:htum could.~sily distribute the cost ;Cqually to ~ buyerS wh~ the City cou' not. Likewis~; Quantum has significant control oVer the.P.ro~ own~ assoc~tion and has : ,ability to ini~ate a special assessment of existing ptoperties for their s~ in .th.e cost of traffic :~ gnal constJ:uction.. . . . St8:ffrecommendS that the developCf lU1d the.exist;ing <<>PUPiUlts of Quantum P~k be held reSponsible ~ortl1e cost of c~nstnJction ;QfttatHc .aCittia~ d Signals at the.intersections ofQuantwn Boulevard WIth Gateway and Congress; . . . I .1 ~~~ :1...__.. .. .,.. .....'-...r..n~~~... ; ~-~......- }'. ~. ...~., -..-...... ......"='='=~~Jo. ''1''-- ~..J.. :..- '1 rr::T~'T-.-" ... +._"-_._-~-----rr"""'-. -.---.-...-. -- -...... ....- ~.- .- EXIDBIT "In Reyised . Condition's. ofApofovallOll 0/01 Project ~: Q~tQ.m. Park NOPC AmeIldint$t #12 File number: MPMD Ol-003/DRlA:OI-OOl . Refer.ence:.2nd reyiew p!ans identified. as NlI$ter Plan with a September 1.1, 2qo 1 Pl~ng. and Zoning D'...... : '. n. t .:J_:....__..:.-... ';:;1':_; . 'l;il",~. .,~o..~UlatJW1K. , .... ,.~ ~ 'DE1f.*~~(,:.; :..~>i':. .~." ",' ;,:'P~:... r':~";' -," .~';". .~ PUBLtt ;Wib~~~~~eki: '. I. :,r' ';,.,. ..' "~.._~...': :L.,,;;..:::. ~:}i!~~Ji;,.. ,iL'~CT . i .~ .:' 4.h ; " .~ . ~. ~( " : .... ~.; . .~tr ;:1';::.: ,..... I ~.,,'t':..:.~...~ .j~. ,~".l'. ";;:~.~r t~::L~'.. :1. ..;:;. C()~ts~~QNE ...'i'X.,... .'.< Pl}BtIG..W~..T~c.; .. . .,.f" ,!':.:; Cotnm"i1.tS: :';; : ,. .. ~ ~ '. ; .,' 1.. ~:~tl;( the..de.~ejoP~an4 tl;1~ eJQsnn8:occup~tS :~fQuantlJIil Pa,rk:. ' ~. >Vi.l~~~l~)1S11?l~'~bi. ihe..cO~0r:co.ri.stN9ti,on:q(~c-aqtu~te4!si~11s at,.' . :the;~~:F~:c?r ~tuW:;a'olllev.aro. with: Qa:t~y~ou1~4Bp,d .. .;"!;' ,.c;~#.~!f\V~t!Of .Se~.~~~d inemo,~ 1~.~~.~iver.gOo<J,,~ubij9 Wodes. ,. :;D.,~_~~r't~d~1l~;~9, 2001jI~.~Yfse~.Octi:>Der4! ~OQl.lqcate4 it) .. : :a~~~t'f~Q~!.:.. .... . . ' .; '. .x, .. ".,;. $ "I ~ ~ I.tf .j .!' . ;;'>', . ~ " 's. trrnirrJ::ts t ;' 'j .:i .t Comments: : ! 2. As previQ~lystated, the proposed revision to the land use to "MiXed Use (MU)';' . to: ~cl1.l:de Office, Commercial ,and Residenti~ ~~. e0u14 taX,Jh.e ,p " '.' .,. . '., . . .... . . ., . i,itjJjty!support taCilities to their limits. ,A prOvis<i.n~ds to be incorPorated into. ~c)ij: ,grt?up.. of lot. ap~~ Process, that" the desigq~~eenng . COJiSul_ .shall demonstrate 'that Sv.fticictit Utitit1system(s) .capacity. is . avjilable::to 8UppQrtthe proposed. .use,or they Will provide the necessary . .f ' . . ~. upgrade(~) to aU~w for the proposed. use.. ~ailure to Qo. so could rpsult in ~i1fticient utility support to this park, affecting other CU1TCJ1t (existing) users. x ; FIRE Comments: NONE x : POLICE ...... Comments: NONE .)(;... ENGINEERING DMSION Comments: NONE x . - ~ ) . r.'p " . . .. J ,P .~ . ... ." The City of Boynton Beach OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Oty Manager's Office: (561) 742-6010 FAX: (561) 742-6011 e-mail: bressnerk@ci.boynton-beach.f1.us www.boynton-beach.org To: Mayor Taylor Vice-Mayor McKoy Commissioner Ferguson Commissioner McCray Commissioner Ensler From: Kurt Bressner,City Manager Date: July 31, 2006 Subject: Quantum Park NOPC #16 I was surprised to see this item on the agenda for August 1 st instead of August 15th, hence this short memo. The reason the item is on the agenda for August 1 st is the need to have the documents transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) by mid-August. Otherwise, our customary application review period would have been deployed. We have a situation where the P&D Board did not concur with a staff recommendation to deny the applicant's petition. In essence, staff felt the conversion of non-residential land to residential land an 800 additional dwelling units in the 553 acre Quantum Development was not appropriate. The developer has pointed out, without specifics, that their intent is to make a portion of these units "affordable." In my opinion, this needs to be specified as part of any City approval of any additional conversion of land to residential. This should include the number of units to be designated affordable and the price point of the units. Here is a summary breakdown of the land use changes proposed by NOPC 16. (see next page) Quantum DRI/NOPC #16 Land Use Acreage Compararison Current Proposed Change Addl Dwelling Land Use NOPC16 Residential Unitsl Acres Acres Acres Units Acre Commercial 13.53 13.53 0.00 Industrial 97.18 97.18 0.00 Governmental and Institutional 65.29 65.29 0.00 Office 12.96 12.96 0.00 Office and Industrial 68.97 64.04 -4.93 Office, Industrial and Commercial 13.55 13.55 0.00 Office, Industrial and Hotel 3.78 3.78 0.00 Office, Industrial and Industrial w/Retail S~ 10.85 3.05 -7.80 Mixed Use 94.86 113.44 18.58 800 43.06 Wetlands 6.00 6.00 0.00 Roads 37.38 32.64 -4.74 Sand Pine Preserve 40.00 40.00 0.00 Open Space 88.78 87.67 -1.11 Total 553.13 553.13 0.00 At this point, the proposal of a "Transit Oriented Development" for up to 500 residential units is in the planning stages. MFT Development Inc., the applicant in this petition has approached the RT A and Tri-Rail to see if there is interest in partnering on a development using the air rights over the Tri- Rail property. If there is progress on this proposal, it would take the form of another NOPC in the future. As I understand it, MFT Development has vested development rights for related to traffic concurrency, which would make them developer of choice should an agreement between MFT and Tri-Rail and the RT A be negotiated. MFT could then either develop the units or transfer that right to another developer. The main issue I see is the construction of a supply of affordable housing at this location. In concept, it is a great idea that I support, however this proposal has nothing to do with the current petition. I was pleased to see that the Planning and Development Board took note of the traffic signal situation at Quantum Boulevard/Gateway and Quantum Boulevard/Congress. I recommend that if the City Commission is going to favorably consider the application for the additional 800 dwelling units on the Quantum parcels that MFT Development, Inc. be responsible for posting a letter of credit in the amount of $440,000 for a five-year period in a form approved by the City. This translates into $220,000 for each signal. In the event that traffic warrants are not met in the five year period (tested annually), the letter of credit can be released. If the warrants are met, the traffic signals should be installed and paid by MFT Development, Inc. If they wish to assign this obligation to successors in interest, this can be accommodated if the transfer of the fmancial obligation is approved by the City Commission. Cc: James Cheraf, City Attorney Wilfred Hawkins, Assistant City Manager Carisse LeJeune, Assistant to City Manager Quintus Greene, Development Director Jeff Livergood, Public Works Director 2 ._. PINDEit TItOOTMfn.. CONSOLTING. INC. Transportation Planners and Engineers July 24, 2006 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 www.pindertroutman.com Mr Masoud Atefi, MSCE Palm Beach County Traffic Division 2300 North Jog Road, 3rd Floor West Palm Beach, FL 33411-3745 JUL 2 6 LUU0 Re: Quantum Park - NOPC #16 - #PTC05-038S County #060537 I L--------~-< I \ r TO'-C"''''lCW.,\Etlj In: J>-RT~"LN ~~~- . '-------- Dear Mr Atefi The purpose of this letter is to respond to comments dated June 13, 2006 regarding the above referenced project. Comments are outlined below with the response following. 1 Comment. Response 2 Comment: Response 3 Comment. Response Built and Unbuilt Uses. An inventory of uses by lot from the developer is attached Daily Trips. Because Palm Beach County and FDOT level of service standards are based on peak hour, the peak hour trip generation comparison was provided However, for impact fee calculation purposes, the daily trip generation for the proposed uses is attached, as requested Intersection Analyses. Because the proposed NOPC does not create any additional peak hour trips, intersection analyses are not required for Traffic Performance Standards. However, at site plan application, operational analyses of impacted intersections will be addressed AMT/ldr Attachments cc: Eugene Cerlica Michael Rumpf West Palm Beach (561) 434-1644 · Stuart (772) 463-0277 Di Letter Atefi 05-0385 724-06 712512006 Qu.ntum InvenloryEagRvl-2006J~14 Reduced.leI. Quantum Park Inventory of Land Uses Land Use Data Master Plan Actual Gross Floor Lot Owner Designation Develooment Area l(ruort HamDlon Inn OllfC Hotel 161 Rooms l(ruort Orininal Pancake House OllfC Restaurant 4710 SF 3 Quantum OIIiceJWarehouse Ofl OIIice 23,330 SF Warehouse 23330 SF 45 United Way Rotunda FDTN 0 OIIice 16863 SF 45 United Way Addibon 0 Office 5000 SF 6 Stanton Magnebcs LLC 011 OIIice 5,356 SF Industrial 27 732 SF 7thru 11 Conbnental Homes MU Residenbal-Mulb 102 DU's 121314 Motorola 0 OIIice 100 000 SF 15,16 Quantum Corporate Center 011 OIIice 48,999 SF Warehouse o SF 18& 19 1325 Gateway, LLC 011 Charier School 625 students OIIice 5,538 SF Industrial 12 923 SF 20 Stiles PrOD. Man. Allstate 011 OIIice 16442 SF 21 Olen DeveloDment 011 OIIice 28 266 SF 22 Boynton Masonic Lodge 0 Lodge 3,229 SF Dav Care Center DavGare 3 600 SF 23-31 Conbnental Homes MU Residenbal-Multi 169 DU's 32 33 34A 34B 35 Thru 38 Premier Asset Manaaement Ofl Industrial 336050 SF 39 40 414243 44 4lj 53 54 PBCSB Gfln. Hinh School 2 50ll Students 48A1part Sun Senbnel Ofl Warehouse 22 700 SF 4IiA/Par!\ 47 AlPart 47R1Part Flowers Bakerv I Industrial 24000 SF 47A1Part 47R1Part PJM & Associates I Industrial 52 000 SF 46B 47R1Part\ 47C Safelv Kleen I Industrial 14824 SF 48A B&C Watershed I Rehab. Genter 344 Beds 49 Canada Drv DistJibution I Industrial 50 000 SF 50B Davco Electric 011 Warehouse 14,728 SF OIIice 2641 SF 51A Curt B. JOA 011 Industrial 27000 SF 51B F P & L Substabon 011 Industrial 510 Gevas North America Ofl OIIice 4,000 SF Warehouse 6000 SF 55 Publix SUDer Market I Industrial 420 000 SF 58 Quantum Park OIIice Ofl OIIice 51 470 SF 5960 & 61 Grotto Bav MU Residenbal-Multi 272 DU's 62-67 and 101 Quantum Park and Village S. MU Residenbal-Multi 363 DUs Retail 35,767 SF OIIice 27,068 SF Restaurant 21 50ll SF 65B(Part) Mobil Oil Corporation OflfC Gas Station 16 Fuel Pas. Conv. Store 3054 SF 68A&B,69,70,72 Boynton Industrial Realty COIll 011 Warehouse 212,142 SF OIIice 53036 SF 73A, 736, 74,75&76 Premier Asset Management OflfC Warehouse 129,650 SF OIIice 32,412 SF Retail 34493 SF 77 78 79 80 CarMax C Auto Dealershio 53 072 SF 81 &82 Gateway Center OflfC Retail 77,375 SF Restaurant-Fast 5,000 SF Restaurant-Hioh 5000 SF 83-88 Quantum Park and Village N. MU Residenbal-Multi 119 DUs Retail 102 235 SF 89A SlISIems Control Inc. Ofl Industrial 5280 SF 896 Westbrook MU Residential-Multi 36 DLJs 90 TriRail Gfln. Park N Ride 90 Gatewav Professional OIIice 011 OIIice 10200 SF 91 Childrens Services Council Ofl OIIice 100 000 SF 100 Grotto Bav MU Residential-Multi 42 DU's TOTAL 2,301,163 SF (2) (3) I VESTED USES COMMITTED USES OIIice 637,900 SF 537450 SF Commercial 728,768 SF (2) 385,354 SF (2) Industrial 1,722,700 SF 1,378,359 SF Resid~ntial 1105 Dwelling Units 1103 DU's TOTAl 2,301,163 SFi31 o OffICe I Industrial C Commercial G GOIIemmental In. Institutional MU Mixed Use (1) Ba.ed on ITE 6lh Edition equ.tion fOl 500.000 SF office. (2) Include. hoIel rooms at 2611 SF per room, AJ.I.0 Oealel5l1ip, Reol.u-anl5 and C stOle. (3) Does noIlnclude hi!#> _, charter .chooI, FPl Sla>5laIion and TriR.~. (4) 40% of quaily _....nIlrip generation rate per diocus.ion. wilh County oI.ff. EXHIBIT B-1 - Revised July 17, 2006 #PTC05-038S 7/25/2006 tripgen Daily NOPC#16 05-0385 717-06.xls Page 1 of 1 Quantum Park NOPC #16 Daily Trip Generation Proposed #16 Land Use Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF T=7.5(X)-101921 12,648 Retail 820 457,240 SF Lnm=0.65Ln(X)+5.83 18,240 Office 710 637,900 SF 9.21 /1000 SF (2) 5,875 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 496 /1000 SF 113 Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.92 /Rm 1,784 Park N Ride 90 633 High School 530 2,500 Students 0.913 /Student (3) 2,283 Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 23 /1000 SF (4) 1,221 Restaurant-High Turnover 932 28,400 SF 130.34 /1000 SF 3,702 Restaurant-Quality 931 69,250 SF 8995 /1000 SF 6,229 ConvenienceStore/Gas 853 3,054 SF 845.6 /1000 SF 2,582 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,905 Dus 7 /DU (5) 13,335 Fire Station 5,500 SF 107 /Station (5) 107 Police Station 150 Employee 4 /Employee (5) 600 2,977,116 SF 69,352 (1) Source Institute ofT ransportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 7th Edition. (2) Based on trip rate for 500,000 SF from 7th Edition Equation. (3) From Approved School T raffle Study (4) Approved rate for CarMax. (5) Palm Beach County Breese, Ed From Sent: To Cc. Subject: Bressner Kurt Friday July 21 2006 9:34 AM Breese, Ed Greene, Quintus, Rumpf Michael Cherof, James, Livergood, Jeffrey RE. Quantum agenda item Ed, As a follow-up to my e-mail last night, I still feel the staff report (page 11) condition #2 needs to reflect traffic studies to be part of the re-submitted NOPC rather than tie this to the ROW abandonment. This only defers the issue of traffic signalization to another party instead of the beneficiaries of the NOPC change Also are the Treasure Coast and FOOT letters attachments to the staff report? Thanks, Kurt From Breese, Ed Sent: Thursday, July 20, 20064 16 PM To: Bressner, Kurt Cc: Greene, Quintus, Rumpf, Michael Subject: Quantum agenda item Kurt, Attached hereto is the staff report for the P&O Board meeting We are looking to release the packets first thing in the morning. Please let us know if you have any thoughts/comments Thank you Ed<< File QP ORIA staff report NOPC # 16doc>> 1 ~pf, Michael If the City Commission supports and approves this NOPC request, staff recommends that the approval exclude the dwelling units intended for a potential TRI-Rail/TOO project (conceptualized as 500 units) be removed from this application and combined with the subsequent NOPC request required as a prequesite to a TOO project on this parcel 1 Breese, Ed Subject: Livergood Jeffrey Friday July 21 200610'08 AM Breese, Ed Bressner Kurt; Cherof James, Logan, Laurinda; Kelley Oavid Rumpf Michael, Greene Quintus NOPC16 From Sent: To Cc: Ed, The following our my final comments on NOPC 16 I would like this text, although not a condition, to be incorporated into the staff report or conditions Jeff Clty Engmeenng Staff agrees WIth the concurrency reqUIrements of the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn. Furthermore, the request by the Flonda Department of TransportatIOn shares components WIth County reqUIrements. Therefore, Staff recommends that the apphcant comply WIth the requests of both the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon m ItS letter dated June 13,2006 to Mike Rumpf and of the Flonda Department of TransportatIon m a letter dated June 26, 2006 to Eugene Gerhca, apphcant. The apphcant must IdentIfy a strategy to mItIgate any IdentIfied traffic problems, and provIde surety to the CIty for any necessary Improvements at the mtersectIOns of Quantum Boulevard WIth Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard WIth Congress Avenue, pnor to CIty approval of NO PC #16 The apphcant has chosen to not provIde the mformatIOn necessary to enable staff to make a quahfied statement regardmg dISpOSItIOn of NOPC #16 Therefore, the Engmeenng staff recommends demal of NO PC #16 Jeffrey R. Livergood P E. Oirector of Public Works City of Boynton Beach 1 Tucker, Patricia From Sent: To Subject: Rumpf, Michael Thursday July 20 2006 1 44 PM Tucker Patricia, Breese Ed Re Quantum for sure can the traffic comment be simplified and include a summary of the traffic condition It references it as uherein" The conditions should include the specific requirement it's being held to Are we still recommending denial? Have they supplied clear evidence to refute substantial change? If so, do we need that first condition from P and Z? Mike Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld -----Original Message----- From Tucker, patricia <TuckerP@ci boynton-beach fl us> To Rumpf, Michael <RumpfM@ci boynton-beach fl us> Sent Thu Jul 20 13 21 54 2006 Subject Quantum for sure EXHIBIT "D" Conditions of Approval Project name File number Reference Quantum Park NOPC #16 DRIA 06-001/MPMD 06-003 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS- General Comments None PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic Comments 1 Provide a notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering 2 City Engineering Staff agrees with the concurrency requirements of the Palm Beach County Traffic Division Furthermore, the request by the Florida Department of Transportation shares components with County requirements Therefore, Staff recommends that the applicant comply with the City requirements referenced herein and with the requests of both the Palm Beach County Traffic Division in its letter dated June 13, 2006 to Mike Rumpf and of the Florida Department of Transportation in a letter dated June 26, 2006 to Eugene Gerlica, applicant The applicant must identify a strategy to mitigate any identified traffic problems and provide surety to the City for any necessary improvements, prior to City approval of NOPC #16 Absent approval by the County and State, it is Staff's recommendation to deny City approval of NOPC #16 at this time 1 Page 1 of 4 Greene, Quintus From: Livergood, Jeffrey Sent: Monday, July 17, 200610:51 AM To: Bressner, Kurt Cc: Greene, Quintus; Rumpf, Michael; Costello, Joyce; Cherof, Subject: FW: Quantum NOPC 16 Conditions of Approval Kurt, This has been discussed with Eugene. He is planning to provide the study at Congress and Quantum Boulevard by the end of this year. The study at Quantum Boulevard and Gateway is the topic of ongoing discussion as part of NOPC 16 as you will see below. The issue I have is that Quantum Ltd Partners is willing to study this but makes no commitment to act on the results of the study. It is their opinion that they are merely acting as the declarent and not the developer. I found it interesting that Eugene is going to have the Quantum Park Property Owners Association fund the traffic study at Congress and Quantum that the FOOT is requesting as part of the ORI modifications. What role does the POA have with ORI administration? I have advised Eugene that I am unable to meet with him until Wednesday afternoon. Jeff Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Boynton Beach -----Original Message----- From: Eugene Gerlica [mailto:gerlicape@adelphia.net] Sent: Monday, July 17, 20066:10 AM To: Livergood, Jeffrey; 'Eugene'; Logan, Laurinda Cc: Breese, Ed; 'Rebecca Mulcahy'; 'David Norris'; 'Fior Bresolin'; 'Dan Weisberg (E-mail)'; Cherot, James Subject: RE: Quantum NOPC 16 Conditions ot Approval Jeff, I've reviewed your email and initially respond as follows. The QPPOA intends to contract with Pinder Troutman to perform the traffic signal warrant analysis upon the Congress Avenue and Quantum Boulevard intersection, as requested by FOOT. The analysis will be performed this fall, as recommended by Pinder Troutman, and the report completed prior to the end of the year. This should be a none issue. Please draft a substitute Condition of Approval as you outlined in the "alternate" below. If I understand the three (3) goals you have listed correctly, they are appropriate and agreeable to the NOPC 16 applicant. Finally, I would like to meet with you again to discuss each issue, confirm my understanding and review the revised Condition. I'm available any time after 2:00 pm Monday, July 17, Please advise when you would like to meet. 7/17/2006 Page 2 of 4 Eugene A. Gerlica, P.E. 772-971-9491 From: Livergood, Jeffrey [mailto:LivergoodJ@cLboynton-beach.fl.us] Sent: Friday, July 14, 20063:56 PM To: Eugene; Logan, Laurinda Cc: Breese, Ed; Rebecca Mulcahy; David Norris; Fior Bresolin; Eugene Gerlica PE; Dan Weisberg (E-mail); Cherof, James Subject: RE: Quantum NOPC 16 Conditions of Approval Eugene, Thank you for your suggested modification to our Condition of Approval relating to traffic. As I discussed at our meeting this morning, I am certainly open to any modification of this condition that is acceptable to you and meets our City goals. As I noted, I believe that it is entirely appropriate to evaluate any changes to access conditions onto Gateway Boulevard, a City public street, as part of NOPC 16. This NOPC contemplates the removal of Quantum Lakes Drive from the street network in the master development. Therefore, we must address modified traffic access conditions onto Gateway Boulevard from the perspective of capacity and safety. If the request to delete Quantum Lakes Drive, or any other platted roadway, from the master plan and substitute same with mixed use development is withdrawn, and conditions remain as currently platted, then our traffic concerns have no correlation to NOPC 16 and the referenced condition of approval would be deleted. I am willing to alter our Condition of Approval if you agree to provide a traffic study of the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard. This study should consider the existing traffic volumes plus the potential traffic volumes that could be generated from all vacant parcels that are the subject of your current application plus you should take into consideration the revised traffic patterns from those parcels that are already improved. As part of this study, you will provide a signal warrant analysis for the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard. As you are aware, the City has requested that the County conduct a warrant analysis at this intersection to determine whether or not a Letter of Credit (LOC) held by the City on behalf of DR Horton to ensure construction of a traffic signal at this location should be drawn upon or returned. You have the option of waiting for this analysis to be completed by the County or contracting for this work on your own, depending upon when you desire approval of NOPC 16. Should the County analysis find that a traffic signal is currently warranted at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard, then you would not be required by the City to further consider traffic signalization at this intersection as a condition of approval of NOPC 16. The City will cause the signal to be constructed using the surety posted by DR Horton. However, because your proposed deletion of Quantum Lakes Drive would place more demand on the eastbound to southbound right turn movement on Gateway Boulevard at Quantum Boulevard, I would ask that you evaluate the need for an eastbound right turn lane on Gateway Boulevard at Quantum Boulevard, assuming that the existing right turn lane will become a future third through lane. If this turn lane is warranted, then I would like for you to comment on how you would intend to comply with this requirement. Should the County traffic analysis determine that current conditions do not require the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Drive, then the City must return the LOC to DR Horton and the requirement for DR Horton to 7/17/2006 Page 3 of 4 construct the signal is removed. However, in this scenario, you must still conduct a separate traffic analysis and consider the added traffic on Quantum Boulevard that will be generated/relocated as a result of the elimination of Quantum Lakes Drive and development of remaining parcels. This data should then be used to determine if a signal is warranted. If so warranted, then I would appreciate your comments on how you intend to guarantee to the City that the signal will be constructed. Furthermore, you must also consider the impact of the eastbound to southbound turning movement as referenced in the paragraph above. As an alternative.... I am willing to NOT require the above referenced items as a Condition of Approval of NOPC 16 if you would consider the following: 1. All traffic studies and comments referenced above will be incorporated, in some fashion, as text into the Conditions of Approval of NOPC 16. 2. City approval of NOPC 16 will not be conditioned upon completion of these text items at this time. 3. You, as applicant for NOPC 16, acknowledge as a Condition of Approval that these text items shall constitute the minimum actions and responsibility on your part, or the part of a future applicant, necessary to proceed with of any roadway abandonment(s) for Quantum Lakes Drive and/or Quantum Boulevard that may occur in the future as a result of City approval of NOPC 16. Should you desire to proceed with this alternative, or some other variation of this concept, then I will draft a Condition of Approval that incorporates these suggestions for your review. On a separate note, the City Manager has requested that I ensure that you address the issues raised to you in a letter dated June 26, 2006 from the Florida Department of Transportation. This letter noted that you must submit to the State the traffic signal warrant studies for the above referenced intersection and for the intersection of Quantum Boulevard and Congress Avenue. This is a State requirement as part of the annual report for the Quantum Park ORI that you must file. It appears that you have not complied with this requirement in the previous two annual reports. Separate from this NOPC request, I would like to know how you intend to address the State's requests in the referenced letter, particularly for the intersection of Congress Avenue and Quantum Boulevard. In summary, I am more than willing to modify our condition of approval to something that may be less onerous to you. However, to do so, I need your thoughts on the suggestions I have raised. I would be pleased to meet again if you so desire. Jeff Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E. Director of Public Works City of Boynton Beach -----Original Message----- From: Eugene [mailto:eugene@qgc.cc] Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 11:45 AM To: Logan, Laurinda Cc: Livergood, Jeffrey; Breese, Ed; Rebecca Mulcahy; David Norris; 'Fior Bresolin'; Eugene Gerlica PE Subject: Quantum NOPC 16 Conditions of Approval 7/1712006 Page 4 of 4 Lorinda, Attached is my proposed substitute language for the Public Works Traffic Condition of Approval, Condition NO.2. When warranted, traffic signals shall be constructed at the intersections of Quantum Boulevard with Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. A traffic signal warrant study for the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard has been requested by the City of Boynton Beach to be provided by Palm Beach County. A traffic signal warrant study for the intersection of Quantum Boulevard and Congress Avenue has been requested by the FOOT to be provided by the Quantum Park POA, pursuant to existing development order conditions. Both traffic signal warrant studies shall be completed prior to December 31,2006 or submitted concurrent with an application to the City of Boynton Beach for Technical Site Plan Review within Quantum Park, whichever shall first occur. eugene A. Gerlica, P.E. 772-971-9491 Cc: Douglas B. Macdonald, Quantum Limited Partners, L TO 7/1712006 r:-I L f Greene, Quintus From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Bressner, Kurt Monday, July 17, 200610:41 AM Greene, Quintus; Livergood, Jeffrey; Rumpf, Michael Cherof, James; Costello, Joyce Treasure CoasUFOOT review of Quantum NOPC Please review the attached letter from Treasure Coast and FOOT regarding the latest NOPC. The comments will need to be incorporated into the staff report to Commission. Of particular note is the FOOT call for possible traffic signalization needs. I believe that the developer needs to be tasked for a schedule and cost program Finally, the Treasure Coast letter references a TOO at the Tri-Rail station. I had meetings with Eugene G. and County Commissioner Koons and County Commissioner Newell on this topic. The Commission is also supportive of this project. Please give me a status report in two weeks as to how staff will be responding to the NOPC issues. When does this come back to the Commission? Quintus needs to take the lead on this response. I know that Jeff has already had some discussions with Quantum on the traffic signal issue. Kurt Follow-up -- 7/31 From: Welsh, Pam Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:33 AM To: Bressner, Kurt Subject: POF File Kurt, Here is the POF file you requested. m Quantum Pk 'oposed Change No. Pam 1 Breath fresheners to kISS N.J goodbye, relocate to Boynton PaJmBeachPost~com Breath fresheners to kiss N.J. goodbye, relocate to Boynton By Jeff OStrOWSkI Palm Beach Post StaffWnter Fnday, July 14,2006 The company that has sold a bIlhon bottles of breath drops IS movmg to Boynton Beach. Health- Tech Inc , maker of the Sweet Breath brand, will brew up and package ItS breath drops, stnps and mIsts here. Page 1 of2 (!~ PRINTTH IS It bnngs mne employees from ItS former headquarters m Totowa, N.J , and plans to hIre 50 local workers at wages of$8 to $12 an hour, founder and owner Jeff HIrschman saId Thursday More busmess news · Latest news. columnIsts · Local stocks · Market tools · Mortgage rates · Gas pnces The 30-year-old company, whose sales are $10 mIlhon a year, announced ItS move at a meetmg of the Busmess Development Board of Palm Beach County Health- Tech's products sell for between 59 cents and $3 50 at retaIlers such as Wal-Mart, CVS and Eckerd. HIrschman saId the company has sold more than a bIlhon bottles of ItS breath drops m the past three decades. And that total doesn't mclude sales of the breath StrIpS It has added m recent years. WhIle many Palm Beach County busmess owners gnpe about the nsmg costs of domg busmess here, Hirschman IS unfazed. He has leased nearly 30,000 square feet at Quantum Park m Boynton Beach and has found busmess costs here reasonable compared wIth those m hIS former home. "Space IS very expenSIve m New Jersey," he Said. And there were other costs, such as the $30,000 he paId to clear hIS parkmg lot after a major snowstorm http.l/palmbeachpost.pnntthIs.chckabIhty com/pt/cpt?actlOn=cpt&tItle=Breath+fresheners. 7/1712006 Breath fresheners to kISS N.J !!oodbye, relocate to Boynton Page 2 of2 hIt the Newark area. As for humcanes, Hirschman saId hIS warehouse there was swamped m 1999 when Humcane Floyd hIt the Northeast. "We moved to Flonda because of the quahty ofhfe," Said Hirschman, a boater and angler Hirschman saId he already has managed to hIre 40 people despIte Palm Beach County's record-low unemployment. "It was not dIfficult findmg people," he saId. As for soanng home pnces, Hirschman saId Palm Beach County still compares favorably WIth northern New Jersey The mne employees who followed the company here have been pleased by the chOIces they see m the housmg market, Said DaVId Hirschman, VIce presIdent and son of the founder "They're thnlled WIth what they've been able to afford, espeCIally compared to home pnces up north," DaVId HIrschman saId. Health-Tech plans to begm makmg ItS breath fresheners here by the end of the month. Health- Tech Isn't the only company expandmg here The Busmess Development Board also Said Thursday that General DynamICS A VlatIOn ServIces plans to add 70 employees to ItS 90-person facIhty at Palm Beach InternatIOnal AIrport over the next two years. It WIll receIve a $141,435 trammg grant from Workforce Flonda. Find this article at: http://wwwpalmbeachpost.com/search/content/business/epaper/2006/07/14/a1d_sweetbreath_0714.html r Check the box to include the list of links referenced in the article. http.ffpalmbeachpost.pnntthIs.chckabIhty .com/ptf cpt?actIon=cpt&tItle=Breath+fresheners. 7/1 7/2006 87/87/2006 09 17 77222140r~ -- TC REGICJW.. PLAN 3 PAGE IU TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL 301 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD SUITE 311 STUART, FLORIDA 34~ PHONE: 772-221-4060 FAX: 772-221-4167 FAX TRANSMISSION Date: \\. - 1\ '" C)~ Fa Number. S\o \ '\ '-\ ').. - ~ ~ S q N8IIlber of Pages (mdadiDg cover sheet): S Operator: Te: ~ d ~\E?~SL F'ronI: \Y'- \ ~~G.... ~ \ CS ,^-S '"' ~ Project: ~,^~~n- ?C\.~\<:... 1) tG:. NOPe... \\.0 CoaIDleats: 07/07/2006 09 17 7722214P"'" TC REGICl'W... PlAN G PAEiE 02 -. :;.. "..:.....,._~; .~~ .... .'~~r ,~,. ~ .;1' - , -:'-~; 'VT :. ~ M"'~~i ., --l..~. ..~ ~,.:.. ;:,>;"'" ,-,., . 1!\. - .' ~~ . ~~,.i.'1IIIi ,. - ~ . ~ -~. "":"0 ::~. . ".~~ "':'~_:' .{ .,....l .:I!:i.., ... ~:'::::::I .~ ':~.': ~_. ~ . . . T'RE.~ife.; a~t.:.- .' .~: . -~U~-!i~l~(;-~<:a.:u RI.. .:' . . ... -..tt' S ~" ,ft;lo.,; _ _ .___ ----.,., ..11 - ..,,- . .-. , .. . ... _____~ .bl ' "".,... - ''''If.... r I ...~'. -::. ,-=l': - .~.. ,:"'- 0 .,. fl. 51 -.:ii . '1M ~ ~ _....8 ~-""- 'I' I.. 0 .~ t::!.. . :r-- ,or'" ""-.. -.- -. ::'L' _,...-!'. ~.. -j..~ ~ i2~. ~;.:;;. ,!f' !!.:i.,.;.; '~t - (I o~ .", ":....--.- ._ J.~~Elt. ~ V.l~'!.::N~ ~ o. . .>B'ti C H "",'- " '.~'e.~~~..,~~ ..:: ..;.~.:.':":'~'-=- JItf;;;:;'-: :' !.;J. :;~._ ~"'7: ': ,-~_.~. ..;.-=:,"~~. f-1~~: ~~..;.:: '::;. .:&..:... ~~~~.... ~..l ~;::- ~ ";;- ..... ''''"It 't :":' - 1 '~"" I '...::r....:... -~. ~.A.a . . !;..~~ -:...=_. - -~~.. _,'.": _~: :....~ ~.slP~:-~ :.. ::1 - .-;.' July 6 2006 Mr. Michael Rumpf, Director Plamrlng and Zoning City of Boynton Be8ch POBox310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 Subject: Quantum Park Development of Regional hnpect Notice of Proposed Change No. 16 Chy of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Deer Mr. Rumpf; In accordance with the requirements of Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. Council_ reviewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a ~ously Approved Developmem of Regional Impact (DRI)" for the Quantum Park DRl dated May 17, 2006. The proposed changes include: 1) revising the master site development plan; 2) increasing residential units from 1,105 to 1,905, 3) designation ofland uses in loti 17. 52- 58, and 103 to Mixed Use; 4) revisions of notes 3 and 4 in the Master Site Development Plan; and 5) elimination of parts of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum Boulevard. Council has reviewed the information provided by the applicant and has detmmiDed the proposed changes will not create additional regional impacts on regional resources 81'J.d facilities in the area. At the same time, the City should be mindful of the trend of conversion of its industrial/workplace land use base to residential use. Over the last several years workplace land uses in the Southwest Congress Avenue corridor aad Quantum. Park have been converted to residential, c-.bangblg the character of this area aod reducing potential sites for workplace in the City At some point in the near future, perhaps during the review of the City's comprehensive plan as part of the required EAR process I the City should evaluate and come to some conclusion about its overall workplace land use needs for the future. As indicated above~ the proposed change would increase the number of residential units allowed by 800 or 72 percent. By itself this change would constitute a substantial deviation under Section 380.06(19)(b)9. F10rida Statutes. This finding would cause the ~lopment to be subject to further DR! review -Brira,i.g C01l'l.""ttll.itits Togttbtr" to Est 1176 ..01 E..l 0".... 8oulc:v..d Suit," 30ft StUIl.t 'Plo.ldlL 34..4 Pb.n. (772) 221.40U SC;; 2., 4.GO - Jill. (172) :t:tI.Un .. ifill I .dllLloll.ll..,.....u. 07/07/2006 09 17 77222148r-'> TC REGIONAL PLAN! 3 PAGE 03 Mr. Michael Rumpf, Director July 6, 2006 Page Two After: discussing the matter with the Department of Community Affairs, another option for the City and the developer would be to consider the change as falling under Section 38006(19Xe)S.c. Florida Statutes. The Council and the Florida Depert:meDt of Tmnsportation ba:ve not identified any Dew or additional regional impacts resulting from the change and have no objections. If the City concludes the same, it could cert.Cnly make a :finding under this section of the statute tba1 would allow the proposed change to proceed without further DRI review On another matter, Council has been working with the City, the County, the developer end the SFRT A on creating a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) opportunity by establishing the appropriate mix and quantity of land uses on the Tri-Rail station site. Approximately 500 residential units and a mix of Donresidential uses would be required fOT a successful TOO on this site. As part of this proposed change. the City is encouraged to provide for the uses that are needed for the TOO, 01' receive some assurances from the developer that he will support and authorize the City and SFRTA to make the necessary changes to the development order at some point in the near future. The Florida Dcparlment of Transportation has also made comments that should be addressed as a condition of the City authorizing tbe proposed change (see attached letter dated June 26, 2006). If Council can be of any assistance in addressing the conteDts of this letter, please call. Please transmit a certified copy of any development order amendment adopted pursuant to this notice of change. Michael J Bus~ AICP Executive Director MIB.lg Attaclunent cc: Roger Wilburn. DCA Lorenzo Aghemo. PBC Dan Weisberg. PBC Randy Whitfield, PBC MPO Jack SteVens., SfRTA Kurt Bressner, BoyntOn Beach Ed Breese. Boynton Beach Gustavo Schmidt, FOOT Douglas MacDonald, Quantum Group Eugene A. Gerlica, Qu8ntum Group 07/07/2006 09 17 77222140P TC REGIONAL PLAI'F '3 PAGE 04 lEB BUSH GOVERNOR , Florida Depa:rtme.nt of Transportation PlANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAl MANAG!MENT DISTRICT 4 ~oo WfIfIt Commerc:ia1 Blvd., Ft. l..aucIerUa~, III 333094421 Tel~ (9S4) 777-.4601 Fax (95.4) 777.1.671 Toll Free Number: 1 -866-336-8A35 DEl\IVD I. BIVI"LD. m. ~ June 26. 2006 RECt!IVED JUH ? R 1006 Mr. Michael J. Busha, AlCP Executive Directot Treaurc Coast R.cgiooal p~ Council 301 Bast Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300 StolDt, FL 34994 Dear Mr. Busha: nili.c.iURt COAST ~DNAl. PlAI\NIMG COUNCIL Qua... Park DeveIopln.t ofRePul '-pm: (DR!) CIty orao,.. BacIa, Pabn BeaU Couty NotUkatiOll of Proposed Cbaagc (NOPe) No. 16 As requc:staI in your letter dated May 25, 2006, the Dep8rtment bas reviewed 1be Quamum Park DRINOPC No. 16. SUBJECT The Quaotum Park DR! is ~ north of the C-16 Canal, south ofHypoJuxo Road, wcstofIn&astlte 95, ..d east of Conpess Avenue in 1he Ci1y of Boynton Beach. The DR! 'WaS originaJ1y approved on December 18, 1984.8- mixed-use development. The current buildout date for the DR! is December 18, 2014 The foJknriDg table SUIJ1.l'II8rize the DRrs appn.lved land uses and intensities to dat=: Approved Devc- t Land Use Original DO As ofJ 5th Amended DO (1984) (2115/2005) Industrial 4.183.750 sf 1,700.000 sf Retail 300,000 sf 469.450 sf Office 1.969,500 sf 797.900 sf Hotel 200 rooms 200 I'OO1tlS Multi Familv Residential NA 1.105 du W~ NA 22. 700 sf High School NA 2.SOO students Auto - . NA 53.072 sf Movie 1bc8ter NA 4.000 seats Restaw_d- Hisrh Turover NA 28.400 sf Resbl\nllt - . NA 69.250 sf Convenience Store/Oas NA 3.054 sf Ice - . Rink NA 93.430 sf www.dot.st8te.fl.us . ADaID...... 07/07/2006 09 17 77222140P TC REGIONAL ~ 3 PAGE 05 Mr. MichaeJ.] Busha Jane 26. 2006 Pqc2 In this NOPC, the applicant proposes the following changes: 1 Increase the maximum number of residential units within the Mixed Use area from the cum:ntly approved 1,10S units to 1,905 units, an increase of 800 dwelling units. 2. Re-designate lots 17, 52, S8, and 103 from their cum::ntly approved land uses to Mixed Use. Loa 17 and 52 arc currently approved for OfficelIndustrial w/Retail Sales. Lot 58 is ~ ~gTIl1tM as OfticelJndustrial. No description was provided for Lot 103. 3 Revise Notes on the Masta' Site Devdopmc:nt Plan by removin& Notes 3 and 4, all shown in tbe prerious Development Order (DO) N1mlbcr 15 Note 3 addressed the Total Vested Trips for the DRL Note 4 stDd that the building height for Mixed Use areas was not to exceed 60 feet. Note 3 was ~ to have inC01TeCtIy stated the Total Vested trips as 63,752 AD! The trip tbn:8hold calculated in support of Amendment No. 15, OIl December 1,2005, was stated to be 65,069 AUf 4 Abandon the remaining portions of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum Bo\llevard roadways located!OUth of Gateway Boule\laI'd, and convert them. to Lots 102 and 103 Change the land use designation of Lots 102 and 103 to Mixed Use. The applicant baa included a trip generation comparison analysis between the origiDal (ADA) and PLvpuwgdlmd uses for the Quantum Park DRL The results ofa trip generation comparison indicmd that the proposed deYdopma1t plan would generate 1,138 fewer AM peak-hour trips and 856 fewer PM peak-hour trips than the original developmalt plan. In conclusion, we have no objection to this NOPC. However, a review of the 200512006 Annual Report ~ that the applicant bas not submitted 1raffi.c signal warrmt :studies for the intersections of Qumtum. Boulevard with Gateway Boulevard and Congress A value. as required by Ordinance No. 01-54. We recommend that 1he eppHcGt comply with this Devclopm.cnt Order condition. Please feel free to contact this of.fice at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questions.. Sincerely, -4 GS:mmlcw cc: D Ray Eubanks - Community Program Administrator, FDeA Bob Romig - Director, Office of Policy Planning, FDOT Gerry O'Reilly - Director of Transportati.on Development, FOOT J'ohn Knrne - Transport.mon P1anoing Engineer, FDOT Chon Woog - Senior Transportation Specialist, FOOT S~~ANrtJMIloIOIlC1'''JXI(: .... t ..:-.~_:{'~~ ,~-~ - ~ h- ,,--- __~ _ ~-T~"'- =7- . -<L:-7- . ~ -~..c~1'___.",:"::'~ ~~~~::-=. T REA sitfirac j1~~ ~ .-:~~- ~ri: . ~ P- L.A~N N-I Nd-' ~O U \t~~ c .. .!.r., lJ It'i'::!' --..... ,-, ~ or- ~ ~'if;--- -~ -;;~i.I--~~, _ 'd ~ .~-: J;; -i -_ i ). 1: _~ ~ ~. ~~~;;: ~~___~tI:~~;r-- I N--D--l~N:,~~l:.+E.... ~ ~ii~IN~ !~-B E:-A C H<t'~ fctrct'J~;;;;;'~ '"~ __ _~~....,_' _..; _ _ _",,-C---:-. ,. ~ ---...-:-__ .:.:. - -- ~..... ~ ..::.......; , jj rnj(" , ........~ ::.,;- -~ _w July 6 2006 Mr Michael Rumpf, DIrector Plannmg and Zomng CIty of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boyntoil Beach, FL 34425-0310 Subject. Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact NotIce of Proposed Change No 16 City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Dear Mr Rumpf' In accordance WIth the reqUIrements of SectIOn 380 06(19), Flonda Statutes, CouncIl has revIewed the "NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change to a PrevIOusly Approved Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI)" for the Quantum Park DRI dated May 17 2006 The proposed changes mclude 1) revlSlng the master sIte development plan, 2) mcreasmg resIdentlal umts from 1 105 to 1,905, 3) deSIgnatIOn of land uses m lots 17 52, 58, and 103 to Mixed Use, 4) reVlSlons of notes 3 and 4 m the Master SIte Development Plan, and 5) ehmmatIOn of parts of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. CouncIl has revIewed the mformatIOn provIded by the apphcant and has determmed the proposed changes WIll not create addItlonal regIOnal Impacts on regIOnal resources and facIhtIes m the area. At the same tlme, the CIty should be mmdful of the trend of converSIOn of ItS mdustnal/workplace land use base to resIdentlal use Over the last several years workplace land uses m the Southwest Congress Avenue comdor and Quantum Park have been converted to reSIdentIal, changmg the character of thIS area and reducmg potentIal SItes for workplace m the CIty At some pomt III the near future, perhaps dunng the reVIew of the CIty'S comprehensIve plan as part of the reqUIred EAR process, the CIty should evaluate and come to some conclUSIOn about its overall workplace land use needs for the future. As mdIcated above, the proposed change would mcrease the number of reSIdential umts allowed by 800 or 72 percent. By Itself thIS change would constItute a substantIal deViatIOn under SectIOn 380 06(19)(b)9, Flonda Statutes. ThIS findmg would cause the development to be subject to further DRI reVIew 301 East Ocean Suite 300 Florida rDll ~ @ ~ 0 Wi ~ rn 19 '60(' I'll Xi JQ ! 0 2006 J I "Bringing Communities Together" · Est Boulevard S t u art 349 Phone (772) 221 4060 SC 269 4060 Fax (772) 221 4067 E mail ,or Mr Michael Rumpf, DIrector July 6, 2006 Page Two After dIscussmg the matter wIth the Department of Commumty AffaIrs, another optIOn for the CIty and the developer would be to consIder the change as fallmg under SectIOn 380 06(19)( e)5 c Flonda Statutes. The CouncIl and the Flonda Department of TransportatIOn have not Identified any new or addItIOnal regIOnal Impacts resultmg from the change and have no obJectIOns. If the CIty concludes the same, It could certamly make a findmg under thIS sectIOn of the statute that would allow the proposed change to proceed WIthout further DRI reVIew On another matter, CounCIl has been workmg WIth the CIty, the County, the developer and the SFRTA on creating a Tian:i1t Oriented Dt:\teiopment (TOD) opponunIty by establIshmg the appropnate mIX and quantlty of land uses on the Tn-Rail statIOn SIte. ApprOXImately 500 resIdentlal unItS and a mIX of nonreSIdentIal uses would be reqUIred for a successful TOD on thIS SIte As part of thIS proposed change, the CIty IS encouraged to prOVIde for the uses that are needed for the TOD, or receIve some assurances from the developer that he WIll support and authOrIze the CIty and SFRTA to make the necessary changes to the development order at some pomt m the near future The Flonda Department of TransportatIOn has also made comments that should be addressed as a condItlon of the CIty authorIzmg the proposed change (see attached letter dated June 26, 2006) If CouncIl can be of any aSSIstance m addressmg the contents of thIS letter, please call. Please transmit a certIfied copy of any development order amendment adopted pursuant to thIS notIce of change. MIchael J Busha, AICP ExecutIve DIrector MJB .1g Attachment cc Roger Wilburn, DCA Lorenzo Aghemo, PBC Dan Weisberg, PBC Randy Whitfield, PBC MPO Jack Stevens, SFRTA Kurt Bressner, Boynton Beach Ed Breese, Boynton Beach Gustavo Schmidt, FDOT Douglas MacDonald, Quantum Group Eugene A. Gerhca, Quantum Group CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Attorney's Office MEMORANDUM CC Ed Breese, PnncIpal Planner Michael Rumpf, DIrector of Planmng and Zonmg ./ TO' FROM. DaVId N Tokes, AssIstant CIty Attorney 1YJt7 DATE July 5, 2006 RE City of Boynton Beach ("City") / Quantum Park DRI NOPC #16- SubstantIal DevIatIOn DetermmatIOn Pursuant to your request, we have revIewed the above referenced Notlce of Proposed Change ("NOPC") for the Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact ("DRI") The apphcant IS proposmg the addItIon of 800 dwellmg umts to the 1,105 umts currently allowed m the DRI. Pursuant to SectIOn 38006 (19)(b)(9), Flonda Statutes, an mcrease m the number of dwellmg umts by 5% or 50 dwellmg umts, whIchever IS greater, constItutes a substantlal deViatIOn, and shall cause the development to be subject to further development of regIOnal Impact reVIew without the neceSSIty for a findmg of a substantlal deVIatIOn by the local government. Pursuant to the relevant statutory provlSlons, the apphcant must proceed WIth further development of regIOnal Impact reVIew due to the fact that the addItIOn of the 800 dwellmg umts to the ongmally approved 1,105 dwellmg umts IS a substantlal devIatlon as proVIded m SectIOn 38006(19)(b)(9), Flonda Statutes. Our office would be wIllmg to reVIew any addItlonal mformatIOn that the apphcant deSIres to submIt m order to demonstrate that thIS proposed mcrease m resIdentlal dwelhng umts IS not a substantlal deVIatIOn. Based upon the mformatIOn submItted so far, however, the addItIonal dwellmg umts does result m a substantIal deVIatIOn and does reqUIre addItlonal development of regIOnal Impact reVIew without the CIty CommISSIon makmg such a findmg. If you have any further questIOns or concerns, please do not heSItate to contact our office. DNT:Js H:\] 990\900] 82.BB\MEMO 2006\Breese (Quantum Park).doc ~.... ((( .:\ . 'C '.1 \' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEN/1lE COpy PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment filE COpy June 30, 2006 Mr MIchael Busha, ExecutIve DIrector Treasure Coast RegIOnal Planmng CouncIl 301-E Ocean Boulevard #300 Stuart, Fl 34994 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No.16 (Our Ref. No DRIA 06-001) Dear Mr Busha, Please be adVIsed that III accordance WIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 7'00 PM. The Pubhc Heanng WIll be held m CIty CommISSIOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, )tjG Michael Rumpf Plannmg and Zomng DIrector cc. Eugene A. Gerhca, P .E. Quantum LImIted Partners, LLC Jim Cherof, CIty Attorney S:\PlanningISHAREDlWPlPROJECTSIQuantum Park 2006 Amend #16 + MPMDIDRIA 06-0011LTR-Michael Bushadot City of Boynton Beach . 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 3342~310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cl.boynton-beach.or FilE COpy DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment June 30, 2006 Ms. Valene Hubbard, DIrector Growth Management AdmImstrator State ofFIonda Department of CommunIty AffaIrs DIVIsIon of CommUnIty Plannmg 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No.16 (Our Ref. No DRIA 06-001) Dear Ms. Hubbard, Please be adVIsed that m accordance WIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for Tuesday, August 15,2006 at 7'00 PM. The Pubhc Heanng WIll be held m CIty CommISSIon Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, 2dZ- Michael Rumpf Planmng and Zomng DIrector cc. Eugene A. Gerhca, P.E. Quantum LImIted Partners, LLC Jim Cherof, CIty Attorney S:lPlanningISHARED\WPlPROJECTSlQuantum Park 2006 Amend #16 + MPMDIDRlA 06-00I\LTR-Valerie Hubbard.dot City of Boynton Beach . 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cl.boynton-beach.or (?~', ~.. , c.; I DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENi ILE COpy PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment June 30, 2006 Quantum LImIted Partners, LLC c/o Mr DavId B Noms, Esq Cohen, Noms, Scherer, Wemberger & Hams 712 U S Highway One North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Re' Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No.16 (Our Ref. No DRIA 06-001) Dear Mr Noms, Please be advlsed that ill accordance wIth Chapter 38006 F S the City of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for Tuesday, August 15, 2006 at 7.00 PM. The Pubhc Heanng will be held m City CommIsSIon Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, ~ Michael Rumpf Planning and Zomng DIrector cc Eugene A. Gerhca, P.E. Quantum LImIted Partners, LLC Jim Cherof, CIty Attorney S:lPlanningISHAREDlWP\PROJEcrS\Quantum Parle 2006 Amend #16 + MPMDIDRIA 06-OO1ILTR-David Noms.dot City of Boynton Beach . 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.c1.boynton-beach.or JEB BUSH GOVERNOR ~ Florida Department of Transportation PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 4 3400 West Commercial Blvd., Ft. lauderdale, Fl 33309-3421 Telephone (954) 777-4601 Fax (954) 777-4671 Toll Free Number' 1-866-336-8435 DENVER J. STUTLER, JR. SECRETARY ~eCE~ fer~ June 26, 2006 oHiol .,. Q ")'Hi;:: Jun; ; j, , t!!h. Mr Michael J Busha, AICP Executive Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301 East Ocean Boulevard, SUIte 300 Stuart, FL 34994 ,L-.::L 'Il ~AS- REGh..li\IAi t?L..l.!\;NING COUNCi; Dear Mr Busha. SUBJECT Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI) City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) No. 16 As requested in your letter dated May 25,2006, the Department has reviewed the Quantum Park DRI NOPC No. 16. The Quantum Park DRI is located north of the C-16 Canal, south ofHypoluxo Road, west of Interstate 95, and east of Congress Avenue in the CIty of Boynton Beach. The DRI was ongmally approved on December 18, 1984 as a mixed-use development. The current buildout date for the DRI IS December 18, 2014 The followmg table summarizes the DRI's approved land uses and intensities to date: Approved Development Land Use Original DO As of 15th Amended DO (1984) (2/15/2005) Industrial 4,183,750 sf 1,700,000 sf Retail 300,000 sf 469,450 sf Office 1,969,500 sf 797,900 sf Hotel 200 rooms 200 rooms Multi Family Residential NA 1,105 du Warehouse NA 22,700 sf High School NA 2,500 students Auto Dealership NA 53,072 sf Movie Theater NA 4,000 seats Restaurant- High Turover NA 28,400 sf Restaurant - Quality NA 69,250 sf Convenience Store/Gas NA 3,054 sf Ice Skating Rink NA 93,430 sf www.dot.stateJl.us * RECYCLED PAPER Mr Michael J Busha June 26, 2006 Page 2 In fins NOPC, the applicant proposes the followmg changes: 1 Increase the maXlIDum number ofresIdentlal umts wIthm the Mixed Use area from the currently approved 1,105 umts to 1,905 units, an mcrease of 800 dwellmg umts. 2. Re-desIgnate lots 17,52,58, and 103 from theIr currently approved land uses to Mixed Use. Lots 17 and 52 are currently approved for Office/Industrial w/Retail Sales. Lot 58 is currently designated as Office/IndustrIal. No descriptIOn was prOVIded for Lot 103 3 ReVIse Notes on the Master Site Development Plan by removmg Notes 3 and 4, as shown m the prevIous Development Order (DO) Number 15 Note 3 addressed the Total Vested Tnps for the DR!. Note 4 stated that the buildmg heIght for Mixed Use areas was not to exceed 60 feet. Note 3 was reported to have incorrectly stated the Total Vested trips as 63,752 ADT The tnp threshold calculated in support of Amendment No 15, on December 1,2005, was stated to be 65,069 ADT 4 Abandon the remaining portions of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum Boulevard roadways located south of Gateway Boulevard, and convert them to Lots 102 and 103 Change the land use designatIon of Lots 102 and 103 to Mixed Use. The applIcant has mcluded a tnp generatIOn comparIson analYSIS between the origmal (ADA) and proposed land uses for the Quantum Park DR!. The results of a trIp generatIon comparIson mmcated that the proposed development plan would generate 1,138 fewer AM peak-hour trIpS and 856 fewer PM peak-hour trips than the ongmal development plan. In conclUSIOn, we have no objection to thIS NOPC However, a reVIew of the 2005/2006 Annual Report reveals that the applIcant has not subnntted traffic sIgnal warrant studIes for the intersectIons of Quantum Boulevard WIth Gateway Boulevard and Congress A venue, as required by Ordmance No 01-54 We recommend that the applicant comply WIth this Development Order conditIOn. Please feel free to contact thIS office at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questIons. Smcerely, / ~i>>dek~ stavo chmidt, P .Ii. DIStrIct lannmg and EnVIronmental Engineer - GS:mmlcw cC' D Ray Eubanks - CommunIty Program AdmmIstrator, FDCA Bob RomIg - DIrector, Office of PolIcy Plannmg, FDOT Gerry 0 'Reilly - DIrector of TransportatIOn Development, FDOT John Krane - TransportatIon Planning Engineer, FDOT Chon Wong - Semor Transportation SpeCIalIst, FDOT S:IOPEMlSYSTEMS PLANNING\D4DRI\QUANTUM-NOPC16B.DOC ! RECEIVED JUN 2 9 2006 BY ~ ida Department of Transportation PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 4 3400 West Commercial Blvd., Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309-3421 Telephone (954) 777-4601 Fax (954) 777-4671 Toll Free Number: 1-866-336-8435 JEB BUSH GOVERNOR June 26, 2006 Mr Eugene Gerlica, P.E. Quantum. Park Property Owners Association, Inc. 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive, Suite 101 Boynton beach, FL 33426 Dear Mr Gerlica. ~ ,~qIOb ^ me.. * Q..c. V.en'" ~ ~""" Q... , I/J.'l d4 DENVER J. STU'IUR, JR. P c/. SECRETARY 1 -)' \,..".... .30 ~ " ri 1,)<"" \ C"\~....-J. .. SUBJECT Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI) City of Boynton Beach - Palm Beach County 200512006 Ananal Report As requested in yoUr letter dated February 22, 2006, the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) has reviewed the 2005/2006 Annual Report for the Quantum Park DR! for the reporting period from July 1,2005 to February 15,2006 The Quantum Park DR! is located north of the C-16 Canal, south of Hypoluxo Road, west of Interstate 95, and east of Congress Avenue in the City of Boynton Beach. The DR! was originally approved on December 18, 1984 as a mixed-use development. The buildout date for the DR! is December 18,2014 The following table summarizes the DR!'s approved land uses and intensIties to date. Approved Development Land Use Original 00 As of 15th Amended (1984) 00 (2/15/2005) Industrial 4,183,750 sf 1,700,000 sf Retail 300,000 sf 469,450 sf Office 1,969,500 sf 797,900 sf Hotel 200 rooms 200. rooms Multi Family Residenmil NA 1,105 du Warehouse NA 22,700 sf High School NA 2,500 students Auto Dealershio NA 53,072 sf Movie Theater NA 4,000 seats Restaurant- High Turover NA 28,400 sf Restaurant - vuaritv NA 69,250 sf Convenience Store/Gas NA 3,054 sf Ice Skating Rink NA 93 430 sf RECEIVED ----l ~UN 28 2006 J CllY MANAGER'S OFFICE U\I\^I\A' ....n+- ~+-o~a -A ,- ~ Mr Eugene Gerlica June 26, 2006 Page 2 Upon review of the Annual Report, the Department has the following comment: 1 Ordinance No. 01-54, Exhibit "e" (Revised Conditions of Approval 11/06/01), requires the developer and existing occupants of Quantum Park to be responsible for the cost of construction of traffic-actuated signals, when warranted, at the intersections of Quantum Boulevard with Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. Presently, neither intersection is signalized. To date~ no traffic signal warrant studies for the intersections of Quantum Boulevard with Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue have been submitted for review We recommend that the applicant submit traffic signal warrant studies for these intersections. It should be noted that the Department made the same comment for the 2004-2005 Annual Report, requesting the developer to submit traffic warrant studies for the two subject intersections. However, we have not received response to our previous comments. Please feel free to contact this office at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questions. GS:mm/cw cc: D. Ray Eubanks, Community Program Administrator, FDCA Bob Romig, Director, Office of Policy planning. FOOT Gerry O'Reilly~ Director of Transportation Development, FOOT John Krane, Transportation Planning Engineer~ FOOT Chon Wong, Senior Transportation Specialist. FOOT .Kurt Bressner, City Manager, City of Boynton Beach S:\OPBM\SYST1!MS Pl..ANNlNG\l)4JANTUM\ANNUAL ~2OOli.DOC Department of Engineering and Public WOrks Po. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Tony Masilotti, Chairman Addie L. Greene, Vice Chairperson Karen T. Marcus Jeff Koons Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson County Administrator Robert Weisman An Equal Opportunity Affinnarive Acrion Employer" @ printed on rscycl9d paper June 13, 2006 Mr Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Oevelopment City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach FL 34425-0310 RE Quantum Park - NOPC #16 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the Notification of Proposed Changes to the previously approved project entitled Quantum Park, pursuant to the Traffic Periormclnce Standards ir. Article 12 of (he Palm BeaCh County Land Development Code The project is summarized as follows. Quantum Park - North of Gateway Boulevard west of High Ridge Road Boynton Beach Location Municipality" Approved . Industrial . Retail . Office . Hotel Latest Approval - NOPC 15 Industrial Retail Office Warehouse Hotel High School Auto Oealership Restaurant - HT Restauran. - Quality Convenience Store/Gas Multi Family Residential Fire Station Police Station Park & Ride Facility Latest Approval - NOPC 15 Industrial Retail Office Warehouse Hotel High School Auto Oealership Restaurant - HT Restaurant - Quality 4183750 SF 300 000 SF 1 969 500 SF 200 Rooms 1 700000 SF 457,240 SF 637 900 SF 22,700 SF 200 Rooms 2500 Students 53 072 SF 28 400 SF 69 ?"O SF 3 054 SF 1 1 05 Dwellings 5 500 SF 150 Employees 1 700 000 SF 457,240 SF 637 900 SF 22 700 SF 200 Rooms 2500 Students 53 072 SF 28 400 SF 69 250 SF ~~ ~f & [€ II rq if (rI) , ; JI4 r 6 'lMtt lJ/! I J (lU) i I J ~ , b..-./ '-~ ___ ~,NT OF OEVElOP'v11 I I __-I Ii Page - 2 Convenience Store/Gas Multi Family Residential Fire Station Police Station Park & Ride Facility 3 054 SF 1 905 Owellings (800 Additional Units) 5 500 SF 150 Employees New Daily Trips New AM PH Trips New PM PH Trips. N/A - Trip Reduction from Original Approval 5 809 - Trip Reduction from Original Approval 7,202 - Trip Reduction from Original Approval Based on our review the Traffic Oivision has the following comments: . Provide a copy of the latest version of the spreadsheet illustrating all portions of the project which have been built a.,d in place . Provide a comparison of Oaily trip generations under the 'proposed NOPC #16" and Previously Approved" scenarios. . Provide and AM and PM peak hour analysis for the following project access intersections, identify problems and introduce mitigations. o Gateway Boulevard / High Ridge Road o Gateway Boulevard / Quantum Boulevard o Gateway Boulevard / Park Ridge Boulevard o Gateway Boulevard / Congress Avenue o Quantum Boulevard I Congress Avenue If you have any questions regarding this determination please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER /n Masoud Atefi, M E Project Reviewerl- Tr l cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc. File General - TPS - Mun Traffic Study Review F \TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Comments\060537 doc Page lof2 Rumpf, Michael From Breese Ed Sent: Wednesday May 31 2006759 AM To Rumpf Michael Cc. Byrne Nancy Subject: RE. Economic Development Opportunity- Information Request Mike The 3 lots involved in NOPC #16 are 17 52 & 58 Lot 58 has an existing building, is designated Oil and is approximately 4 9 acres Lots 17 & 52 are vacant, designated Oil & Ind/R. Lot 17 is approximately 3.3 acres and Lot 52 approximately 4 5 acres -----Original Message----- From Rumpf, Michael Sent: Tuesday, May 30,20065 33 PM To: Breese, Ed Cc: Byrne, Nancy Subject: FW Economic Development Opportunity- Information Request Ed, please confirm for me that the acreages for Quantum Park PIO lots #17 #52 and #57 are each close to this size category (I think between 3 and 4 or 4 1/2 acres), and that they are the subject of the current NOPC application Mike From. Byrne, Nancy Sent: Tuesday, May 30, 2006441 PM To: Rumpf, Michael Subject: FW Economic Oevelopment Opportunity- Information Request Mike This is good backup for your Quantum Item! Nancy ext 6374 From Julie Hamilton [mailto'jhamilton@bdb.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Duffell Sent: Tuesday, May 30,2006426 PM Subject: Economic Oevelopment Opportunity- Information Request Dear EconomIC Development Partner, The Business Development Board is eXCited to announce it received an inqUIry from a prospect interested i~~alm Beach County The company is in the food serVIce industry and IS m~or--- . "~5 to 3 acres of land . Light mdustrIal zoning . The ability to construct a 30,000 ft2 bUIlding f,5 / C b" tJi. JP} if.YC If ~1"-,y, ~#c-~,,( ~t{-v '( CF "" (_a /f-C' · ~~'\i ~_ (e ~{- fl' ~ ~r- 7/19/2006 Page 2 of2 The bUIldmg would be used to prepare food products for dIstribution to retail stores This project would immedIately create 50-75 Jobs, WIth the prospect of addItional jobs over the long term. If you know of any properties that fit the above requirements, please respond VIa e-maIl to Andrew Duffell by 5 p.m. on Friday, June 2 at aduffell@bdb org and reference Denver Project in the SubJect Ime. Thank you m advance for your assIstance. Regards, Andrew Duffell Sr Vice PresIdent, Development 7/19/2006 ~~_,~ =_ ~- ~-~7_.r L:~~;~~, ~-~-~~--~~~-~~ :--~~j~C~- T R.E~ ~\iftt~ ;!C ,~~--'l{:4.i!$~ . :; P L.A?N N I N G_-~CO U N~'~ - _.~______ ~ ~ _~ ~,~. _ ~~ - 7=-~~ .~~. J-- _____~---h- ___ -:;.. _~' - .' - OJ -, " l-- ,;:;-:: :i --~ :tJ 'll ~;'~'1i .... ---.. - I *&l ^"N~"'-I~i E "R< .,;; ~i~~l-iN~'-~ P ~-B&:-A C H Q- - \-ic :f~U-CI"Jf-!'~'~~;: < ~ - _. ~..; ~._~ -"- W"""'" .- -' Ui :r ~~" :.Ni . May 25, 2006 Mr Michael Rumpf, Director Plannmg and Zoning City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Subject: Notice of Proposed Change to Master Plan Amendment No. 16 Quantum Park Dear Mr Rumpf' You should have receIved a copy of the "NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI) for the Quantum Park DRI dated May 17,2006. Please provIde comments on this project by June 26, 2006 Comments should be sent dIrectly to Treasure Coast RegIOnal Plannmg CouncIl staff WIth a copy to the Flonda Department of Commumty AffaIrs. If you have any questions please call. Smcerely, ~O MIchael J Busha, AICP Executive Director MJB.lg Enclosure fJDJ ~ IE U W ~ fiil IJI]! MAY 2 6. ~ I cc Roger Wilburn, DCA . OU'...RTMENT OF DEVElOPMf:NT "Bringing Communities Together" · Est 1976 301 East Ocean Boulevard Suite 300 Stuart Florida 34994 Phone (772) 221 4060 SC 269 4060 Fax (772) 221 4067 E mail adminlQ;tcrpc.or!1 ~p.'il ob _ = -- .kJf- -_.'~. . _i";;''';u_",,~ ._ j -_ r-:=n_ T REA s~~1; iC ti~>>joi:~p LA'N NI N~;~O t~~;t-~ __j~_u_.;_ ""( .~ _ ~. J!. ~ ~ ~. " -2- r~ 1lt .~""-==~ ,r--"_= :ii -~jf f-~- I~D-.I k-N1-:a- liE .. ~.;;. VX:il:' l--~N~.p i~~-~ B &-A C H ~ '.p Etrc t E=4~-~:-- ~~-- c;ri1.'o,"! '" -, -' May 25, 2006 Qv'"Y'\:> ~ ~ 1-.,.J. Mr Kurt Bressner City Manager City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 Subject: Notice of Proposed Change to Master Plan Amendment No 16 Quantum Park Dear Mr Bressner You should have receIved a copy of the "NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change to a PrevIOusly Approved Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI) for the Quantum Park DRI dated May 17, 2006 Please provide comments on thIS project by June 26, 2006 Comments should be sent dIrectly to Treasure Coast Regional Planning CouncIl staff wIth a copy to the Flonda Department of Commumty Affalrs. If you have any questions please call. Michael J Busha, AICP ExecutI ve DIrector ['\1 r:: ~ i2 n t'{ r-' 'I. "\ [ Ll Ii" l .. 1 ' Jr - " Ii i i p. '. j! ~~u IN 7 2006 i ! i !, ~ d I; vU t I 'I lIW;. I l.._'. I RECEIVED MJB.lg Enclosure MAY 2 6 2006 cc Roger Wilburn, DCA I CITY M t\NAGER'S OFFICE DEPARTMENT 01' DFVEI np~ "Bringing Communities Together" · Est 1976 301 East Ocean Boulevard Suite 300 Stuart Florida 34994 Phone (772) 221 4060 SC 269 4060 Fax (772) 221 4067 E mail adminfa:tcrpc.org The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEl. 561 742-6260 FAX. 561 742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org May 22, 2006 Mr Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works POBox 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re Traffic Analysis Quantum Park NOpe # 16 Dear Mr Atefi The enclosed traffic analysis, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc , dated May 18, 2006 was received by Planning and Zoning for the above-referenced application Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and me with your written response If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742- 6260 Sincerely, ~c~ ~ I??<<PZ Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/sc Attachments