REVIEW COMMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 05-006
TO Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH Michael Rump;) t GG
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM Ed Breese ~
Principal Planner
DATE January 12, 2005
SUBJECT Quantum Park - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Master Plan Amendment #15
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce (a.k.a. Quantum Park PID) is a partially built-out Development of
Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 553 13 acres, zoned Planned Industrial Development
(PID) It is located on the west side of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton
Canal - (C-16) (See attached Exhibit "A" - Location Map) The applicant, MFT Development,
Inc. is requesting an amendment to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order (D 0 ) adopted
December 4, 1984 by Ordinance No 84-51 The original DO was subsequently amended 13
times by Ordinance Nos. 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-33, 96-65, 97-20 99-05, 00-02,
01-54, 02-54 and 04-77 The City Commission denied Amendment #11 on February 20,2001
The current Master Plan for Quantum Park is provided in Exhibit liB" - Existing Master Plan
Amendment #15 proposes amending the maximum number of dwelling units allowable within
the areas designated for "Mixed Use (MU)" from 1,000 to 1,105 dwelling units in the Master
Plan The requested change is depicted in Exhibit "C" - Proposed Master Plan and described as
follows
NOTE #2 Development of the following Land Use classifications should not exceed
the following intensities without further City approval
- Residential - 1,1 05 dwelling units
BACKGROUND
An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) is first and foremost governed by
Florida Statutes Chapter 380 06 (19) - Substantial Deviations The applicant has submitted a
Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) in accordance with the statutory requirements. The NOPC
is reviewed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council (RPC) and the City The DCA and the RPC are reviewing the
proposed NOPC and will provide comments following the procedures outlined in Chapter 380 06
(19)
Quantum Park - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Memorandum No PZ 05-006
The City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 1 5, Sec, 4 3A requires a preliminary review
by the Planning and Development Board of an amendment to a DRI Chapter 380 06 F S
requires that the local governing body hold a public hearing to review and approve the NOPC
The City Commission is required to determine whether the proposed change to the Quantum
Park DRI is or is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380 06 (19) If it is determined
that the requested change is a substantial deviation then further review will be required pursuant
to the statutory requirements. If the City Commission determines that the proposed change is
not a substantial deviation then they may take action to approve or deny the requested change
The original DRI Development Order adopted a Master Plan for Quantum Park. That Master
Plan has been amended over the years, the most recent change being approved on October 4,
2004 The proposed Amendment #15 amends the maximum number of dwelling units allowable
within the areas designated for "Mixed Use (MU)" in the Master Plan Therefore the review of
the DRI amendment also constitutes a review of the change to the Master Plan for Quantum
Park. In addition to the state statutes, staff has reviewed the Master Plan in accordance with
Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Section 7, Planned Industrial Development and
Chapter 3, Master Plan Approval First review comments were generated and the Technical
Review Committee (TRC) reviewed the Master Plan change on January 4, 2005
ANAL YSIS
Notice of Proposed Chanae (NOPC) - Substantial Deviation
The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantial deviation are outlined
in Chapter 380 06 (19) In reviewing the statute section staff determined that two (2) of the
criteria apply to the proposed change for Quantum Park DRI This criterion, which is applicable
for review of this proposed change is provided in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 , which states "The
following changes to an approved development of regional impact shall be presumed to create a
substantial deviation Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing
evidence"
1 Chapter 380 06(19)(b)9., An increase in the number of dwelling units by 5 percent
or 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater
The proposed change entails the addition of 105 residential dwelling units to the 1,000
currently approved, for a total of 1,105 dwelling units. The proposed change exceeds
this threshold However, the proposed change also eliminates the previously approved
4,000 seat movie theater In this case, the criterion outlined in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 c,
applies.
2. Chapter 380.06(19)(e)5.c., Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the
contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases
of at least two of the uses within an authorized multiuse development of regional
impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in
380 0651 (3)(c) , (d), (f) and (g) and residential use.
As part of the NOPC application the applicant is to complete a "Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart" The applicant has provided an updated chart. While Amendment
#15 does not involve changes to any land use categories, the addition of 105 dwelling
2
Quantum Park - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Memorandum No PZ 05-006
units on the Master Plan is linked to the removal from the Master Plan of the 4,000 seat
movie theater originally approved in NOPC #9 These changes are reflected in the
"Notes" section on the Master Plan The proposed increases and decreases are
presumed to maintain the vested traffic generation level of 63,752 average daily trips
(ADT) The traffic consultant for the applicant. Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc"
concludes that the simultaneous increases and decreases in allowable intensities
associated with NOPC #15 results in no increases in approved daily and peak hour trips
As of the release of this staff report, the City has not received a response from Palm
Beach County Traffic Engineering regarding the proposal's compliance with the Traffic
Performance Standards
Conclusion
The proposed changes delineated in Amendment #15 are determined not to be a substantial
deviation per Chapter 38006 (19) of the Florida Statutes The applicant has provided the
Substantial Deviation Table and a traffic study, to provide clear and convincing evidence of a
non-substantial deviation finding This determination is subject to satisfying Condition of
Approval #1 regarding Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Master Plan Modification
The proposal submitted for the NOPC modifies the approved Master Plan for the Quantum Park
DRI There is only one (1) change proposed The applicant provided the following descriptive
summary of this change
Request for Master Plan Modification approval to allow an increase in the maximum
number of dwelling units allowable within the areas designated for "Mixed Use (MU)"
from 1 ,000 to 1,105 dwelling units
The NOTES section of the Master Plan would be revised as follows
"Residential - 1,105 dwelling units" (changed from 1,000)
"One Movie Theater Seat - 40 square feet of office gross floor area" (eliminated)
"One Movie Theater Seat - 60 square feet of industrial gross floor area" (eliminated)
The elimination of the references to the Movie Theater, which was approved in NOPC #9, is
proposed to offset any potential traffic impacts associated with the addition of 105 dwelling units
to the Master Plan These proposed changes are presumed to maintain the vested traffic
generation level of 63,752 average daily trips (ADT) The traffic consultant for the applicant,
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc., concludes that the simultaneous addition of 105 dwelling
units and elimination of the 4,000 seat movie theater proposed in NOPC #15 results in no
increases in approved daily and peak hour trips.
All categories on the Land Use Acreage Table remain unchanged in Amendment #15 The
Quantum Park DRI acreage total of 553 13 also remains unchanged
The Quantum Park DRI has been amended 13 times over the years, which is not unusual for a
DRI of this type The Florida Statute governing the DRI process, Chapter 380 06(19), provides
for and anticipates amendments stating "There are a variety of reasons why a developer may
wish to propose changes to an approved development of regional impact, including changed
market conditions"
3
Quantum Park - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Memorandum No PZ 05-006
Originally, in the review of NOPC #10 back in the year 2000, staff was opposed to the
conversion of valuable industrial land to residential uses The City had considerable acreage for
residential purposes, but the amount of vacant industrial land, especially larger tracts that could
accommodate business and industry that creates jobs, generates substantial property taxes and
requires fewer City services, was in short supply The applicant indicated that they understood
the concerns of the City and that they would limit the amount of residential in an effort to assure
that staff's fears of loss of industrial land would be minimized The applicant has now submitted
NOPC #15 (the subject of this review) to add 105 dwelling units In this case however, the
applicant has committed those 105 dwelling units to parcels designated as "Mixed Use (MU)",
which does not entail any further conversion of industrial land Their request will likely only result
in the shifting of the mix of uses within a mixed use pod, preserving the valuable and scarce
industrial land
The proposed change to the Master Plan was analyzed from two perspectives. The first is the
potential for creating additional regional or local impacts The second is the consistency and
compatibility of the proposed changes with the regulations and policies adopted by the City
through the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Regulations and other applicable studies
such as the Visions 20/20 plan
Impacts
Reqional
A development has gone through the DRI process because the projected impacts are
considered regional in nature. Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine if
the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally
identified and mitigated In the case of the Quantum Park DRI the major issue is whether there
will be an increase in traffic resulting from the land use redistribution/re-designation.
A provision in Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park development order requires that" A traffic
study shall be submitted with any future application requesting a change in use designations on
any lot. A cursory review of the traffic study was conducted by staff during the Technical Review
Committee (TRC) process Additionally, the applicant has transmitted the traffic study to the
Palm Beach County Traffic Division for their customary review and approval
Based on the TRC review of the Master Plan, including the traffic study, no additional regional
impacts are evident. The vested number of trips, 63,752 is presumed to remain unchanged due
to the balancing of increases and decreases in the intensities of the proposed change in uses
The Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Division has not completed their review at this time,
The Department of Community Affairs (DCA) and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning
Council (TCRPC) focus their review of the amendment on regional issues exclusively Staff has
not yet received a formal written response from DCA, however TCRPC has responded that the
proposed changes will not create additional regional impacts.
Local
The focus of the substantial deviation determination is regional impacts. The development order
for the DRI is a local order and the approval of any requested change is within the jurisdiction of
the City As such, the City's main focus is local issues and impacts There were no significant
local issues identified by the TRC members at this time The Utilities Department has indicated
4
Quantum Park - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Memorandum No PZ 05-006
that any unforeseen impacts to the water and sewer systems and related levels of service will
be borne by the developer The updated Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the request for
amendment indicates that there will be no increase in the allowable intensities of development.
The traffic generation levels will remain within the limits for which the DRI is vested Turning
movements and signalization issues can be evaluated and addressed at the Technical Site Plan
stage Drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the Technical Site Plan approvals, and
must satisfy all requirements of the City and local drainage permitting authorities
Consistency and Compatibility with City Policies
The change proposed by the applicant does not present any issues that are contrary to City
policies The proposed change is discussed below'
On Lots Desianated "Mixed Use (MU) - Amendment #15 proposes amending the maximum
number of dwelling units allowable within the areas designated for "Mixed Use (MU)" from 1,000
to 1,105 dwelling units in the Master Plan The lots containing the "Mixed Use (MU)" designation
are noted as follows
Lots 7-11 & 23-31 These lots are located on Quantum Boulevard, north of Gateway Boulevard
and were approved for a townhouse development by DR Horton in 2002 known as Quantum
Townhomes East & West (now called Parkside) This project is nearly built-out.
Lots 59-61 & 101 These lots are located on Quantum Lakes Drive, south of Gateway Boulevard
and were approved for a rental apartment development by Olen Development in 2000 known as
Quantum Lakes Villas This project is complete
Lots 62-67 & 100' These lots are located on the south side of Gateway Boulevard, just west of
High Ridge Road and were approved for an office, retail and rental apartment development by
Olen Development in 2002 known as Quantum Park and Village South The rental apartment
component of this project is under construction
Lots 83-88 & 89-B These lots are located on the north side of Gateway Boulevard, just west of
High Ridge Road and were approved for an office, retail and townhouse development in 2002.
The townhouse project (now called Canterbury) is actually on both sides of High Ridge Road,
north of Gateway Boulevard and is currently under construction by Westbrooke Homes
The total acreage of the above-noted projects and designated for "Mixed Use (MU)" within
Quantum Park is 94 86 acres, which is approximately 17% of the total acreage of the DRI
(553 13 acres)
It would appear, at the present time, the only "Mixed Use (MU)" designated parcels that may be
able to take advantage of the additional 105 dwelling units would be either Quantum Park and
Village South or Quantum Park and Village North, since the office and retail components of
these projects has not begun construction The subdivision master plan for either of these sites
would require a formal modification and review in front of the Board and City Commission to
incorporate the additional units while reducing other approved uses on the site Based upon
discussions staff has had with Olen Development, they would intend to amend the plans for
Quantum Park and Village South to accommodate the additional dwelling units, while
redesigning the office and retail components
5
Quantum Park - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Memorandum No PZ 05-006
Lastly, the applicant also requested an increase in the building height allowed for "Mixed Use
(MU)" designated parcels, from the existing 45 feet to a maximum of 60 feet. Staff indicated that
height was not a characteristic of the DRI or Master Plan and that height limitations were
located within the Planned Industrial District (PID) regulations. Therefore, the height request will
not be addressed in the NOPC The applicant has been instructed that, should a change be
proposed to the height limitation, a Code Review (CDRV) request, justification and review fee
must be submitted to amend the PID regulations
Conclusion
As indicated herein, the impacts of the proposed DRI amendment on the utility systems,
roadways and public facilities are either within the existing capacities or additional provisions will
be required of the developer to ensure that levels of service standards are not compromised
The proposed amendment is consistent with City policies and appears compatible with
surrounding land uses
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) Substantial Deviations, the applicant has
demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed change is not a substantial
deviation requiring additional development of regional impact review Therefore, staff
recommends approval of DRIA 05-001 subject to the Conditions of Approval attached in Exhibit
"0"
Regarding the proposed modifications to the Quantum Park Master Plan staff recommends
approval of request for Master Plan Modification to allow an increase in the maximum number of
dwelling units allowable within the areas designated for "Mixed Use (MU)" from 1 ,000 to 1,105
dwelling units, subject to the Conditions of Approval attached in Exhibit "0"
S:IPLANNINGISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIQUANTUM PARK 2005 AMEND #15+ MPMDlDRIA 05-00 1 ISTAFF REPORT #15.DOC
6
.
I
Ilil
~!i~
~~~e
dJI
!~~~
~ g~
a
!IIII
, III
.
I I
!!!~ I
~
PI
~; :
EXHIBIT B
j "~~~II'I' .i III
I III, II II
I ill'fti ,; Ii
: 1!~iLI .1 I-
IIIII1II :i ;!
J III II II
I "'ll I ~i I
~ II I JI~.
, III! II~
&i, I III
,'~ I I
J ~
tIt-
------
. --------
I
I
I
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
CONGRESS AVENUE
------------------~
~I.
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~.
t.
~~ t;
i
'i'
i fo
II
~.i;
~
, nn 11,!:1ll00;11 I
1111
~I
! = ledtil;g~g
1 1111111111111
.. ~UR. 0;111
111111111111
: 'lllll .
I ..Ill
III'
@
1<
i
i
i
I. I I I!t
~! I ~ i~~
fi O!l
....
11111
...
i II
! i.
~.~
---~--------~-~---------------~-~_._._.._-~-- -----
~
i 1 ;; III ,~ i I: m
~ 9 ~ ~ I II ~ ~~
~ ! ~ P .G _ ~ 2 ~ 2~
~ . : ~ ~ ~ i I ~ Ii
: : i i I ill · I !I
[; ~ i I a ~ I ! i ~!
~ !I ~ a ~!J m .Ii ill!
2; I i ~ ~ II
II i 1 ~~.
.ii e l ~ f ~;
~ ~ . ~ ~
~ ~ I ~ ~ ::
~ l ~ i~
! j/ i 01
~
! ~
_.~-
lj ~ J' N,'7 0 -l
l---~--_~~ . ~'/~1
I -~---
?OOC, a3a i il III
" l. II
--;-1 ~i
~~.J
CONGRESS A VENUE
EXHI
IT C
~
~
i
; .
" .
..
~
~ ~g
-~g~
g-<ge
d~l::
~~i~
,!,~c~
t.x~o
....;J~;2
.....0;0;0
~~~;71
g~g?~
.:::.~~.fIl
~ ~a
I 0
'"
~
<D
~
o
o
I
;;;
~ "'DIWrtAGD.tOlT
! -,
I
"'51
~
'"
" .
; .
~nn
u~
~
8
~
2
"
~
g
z
o
>
'"
0(
~
! ~
i:",
~~I~: '"
g~~!;! ~
~ ~..... ai
~ii~~ =<
~ ;~
~
d g>~~~ ieiilirQQQQoc>zn I
~ ~~~~ 2 >?c~:J:n ~o~
:::J '" 'G ~5:~ z - I::
if z 0 0
>- '" '" ':it
...,
,., "
Llli1 "
,.,
111
"
~
'" '" P~~~P~~~N~~~
'"
t: '"
:.., 8~8m~Ojg:~~t6;e
... '"
>- >- )100>->>>.>>>>>>>
..., ..., !;l!;l!;l!;l!;l!;lfJ!J!;l!J!J!;l
" "
,., ,., ~ ~ CHri~~ rn ~ ~~CHri
'" '"
<DQ
~~~~Q o~~~2
_">l r
~
....
o
-<
z
C
J:
'"
,.,
"
~ t80~Z'"
~ ~~3~3 ~~~~~ J~
: ~~RR~ ~~ ~~~
~ ~~~~ ~~~~
cc ....
"''''z ~~
;;j;;jo ...."
~~5j ~a-
;;l 0=
~~~ z (/)
00 V)!2.
:J:O '::1::
o~ C!
a~ 5
" z
~ ~
....
p
~ ;
~ ~
~
~
~
~
EXHIBIT "D"
CondItIons of Approval
PrOject name Quantum Park NOPC # 15
File number DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Reference
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments. None
UTILITIES
Comments. None
FIRE
Comments. None
POLICE
Comments None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments. None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments, None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments. None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 Pursuant to Chapter 380 06 (l9)(e) 5,a, and (19)(e) 5 c. the application for a
proposed change IS presumed to be a substantIal deVIatIOn, ThIS
presumptIOn may be rebutted by clear and conVInCIng evidence
CondItions of Approval
2
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
2 ProvIde notIce of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards ReView) from
Palm Beach County Traffic Engmeenng.
3 Provide notIce of school concurrency from Palm Beach County School
Board for the addItional 105 resIdential dwelhng units being requested,
4 Amend the SubstantIal DeviatIOn DeterminatIOn Chart under "AttractIon
and Recreation" to reflect a "0" below the headmg of "Proposed Change"
mstead of N/C for the 4,000 seat mOVIe theater
5 HeIght IS not a characteristIc of the DR! or the Master Plan. Height lImItations
are located withm the Planned Industnal DIStrICt (PID). Therefore, the
heIght request will not be addressed m the NOPC If a change IS proposed to
the heIght limltatlOn, a Code Review (CDRV) request, JustIficatIon and
reVIew fee must be subtmtted to amend the PID regulatIOns.
6 The applicant is asked to acknowledge that the CIty IS currently m lItIgatIOn
regardmg heIghts exceedmg 45 feet
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments
1 To be determmed.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments.
I To be deterrmned,
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park NOPC #15-MPMD\COA.doc
IVl trs ~ C!;f .!:I
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
DRlAlMPMD
Project name: Quantum Park NOPC #15
File number DRIA 05-001/ MPMD 05-006
Reference: 1 slreview plans identified as a Development ofRelrional Impact Amendment and Master Plan
dfi ili b 1
Mo i cation wi a Decem er 1 2004 P annillll and Zoning Denartment date stamn marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments. NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments. NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments. NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments, NONE
FORESTERlENVlRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 Pursuant to Chapter 380 06 (19)(e) 5,a, and (19)(e) 5 c. ilie application for a
proposed change is presumed to be a substantial devianon. This ~ --
presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
12/21/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
2. Provide notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from ~
Palm Beach County Traffic Engmeering.
3 Provide notice of school concurrency from Palm Beach County School Board ~
for the additional 105 residentIal dwelling units being requested.
4 The Substantial Deviation DeterminatIon Chart (page 3) does not reflect the V
addition of Lots 81 & 82 to the G & I land use in NOPC #14 in October of
2004
5 Within the NOPC there are the follOWing dIscrepancies,
- Section 5.2. proposes an increase in dwelling units withm the
MU category from 1000 to 1105 V'
- SectIOn l3.a,2. proposes a total of 1080 dwelhng units,
- Section 5.3. proposes a maximum height in MU of 60 feet.
- Section l3.a.2 proposes a maximum heIght of 65 feet.
These conflicts need to be corrected.
6 Height is not a characteristic of the DR! or the Master Plan. Height limitations
are located withm the Planned Industrial DistrIct (PID). Therefore, the /
height request will not be addressed in the NOPC If a change is proposed to
the height limitation, a Code Review (CDRV) request, justification and
reView fee must be subIDltted to amend the PID regulations.
7 The applicant is asked to acknowledge that the City is currently in litigatIon v/
regarding heights exceeding 45 feet
MWR/sc
S;\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park NOPC #15-MPMD\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
J,
~~
l i
~
~
AIlE
-
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
DRIA/MPMD
Project name: Quantum Park NOPC #15
File number DRIA 05-001/ MPMD 05-006
Reference: 1 st review plans identified as a Development of Regional Impact Amendment and Master Plan
M clifi oth D b 1 2004 PI d Z 0 D d kin
0 cation WI a ecem er annmlZ an omnlZ enartment ate staron mar llZ.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments. NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
~f~&4'" t.;~ ~ ~4~~..kIO(,'r5; ~.-4 :t.
Comments. NONE
POLICE
'lit /II / ". J!I'. ~.
~.,
Comments. NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments. NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Commentso NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
1 Pursuant to Chapter 38006 (19)(e) 5,a. and (19)(e) 5.c. the application for a
proposed change is presumed to be a substantial deviation, This
presumption may be rebutted bv clear and convincing evidence
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
12/21/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
2. Provide notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from
Palm Beach County Traffic Engmeering.
3 Provide notIce of school concurrency from Palm Beach County School Board
for the additional 105 residential dwelling units being requested.
4 The Substantial DeViatIon DeterminatIon Chart (page 3) does not reflect the
additIon of Lots 81 & 82 to the G & I land use in NOPC #14 in October of
2004
5 Within the NOPC there are the followmg discrepancIes:
- SectIon 5.2. proposes an increase In dwellIng umts within the
MU category from 1000 to 1105
- Section 13.a.2. proposes a total of 1080 dwelling units.
- SectIOn 5,3, proposes a maximum heIght In MU of 60 feet.
- Section 13.a.2 proposes a maximum height of 65 feet.
These conflicts need to be corrected.
6 HeIght is not a charactenstic of the DR! or the Master Plan. Height hmitations
are located within the Planned Industrial District (Pill). Therefore, the
heIght request will not be addressed In the NOPC If a change IS proposed to
the heIght limitation, a Code Review (CDRV) request, justification and
reView fee must be subrmtted to amend the Pill regulations.
7 The applicant is asked to acknowledge that the City is currently in litigatIon
regarding heights exceedinl! 45 feet
MWRJsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park Nope #15-MPMD\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
,cr,.('.g(' . .....'\ .,",'.
(,> /
," "
l. '/~-:-} ~-~~-<:}"<.-'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 04-202
FROM.
Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning
Laurinda Logan, P E, Senior Engineer ~
DFC I 5 r:UU~
TO
DATE
December 10, 2004
RE
Review Comments
DRI Amendment/Major Site Plan Mo I
Quantum Park NOPC #15
File No. DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
The above referenced Site Plans, received on December 7, 2004, was reviewed for Public
Works, Engineering and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances We have no objection to the proposed amendment.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P E, Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H David Kelley, Jr , P E./ P S M , City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Quantum Park NOPC #15. DRI Amend.-Major Site Plan Mod. 1st Rev ,doc
/
PLANNING AND ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO
Shene Coale, Semor Office AssIstant
Ed Breese, PnncIpal Planner ~
December 20, 2004
FROM
DATE
SUBJECT
Quantum Park NOPC # 15 (DRIA 05-0011 MPMD 05-006)
Please mclude the followmg comments m the TRC reVIew of the above-mentIOned
proJect.
1 Pursuant to Chapter 38006 (19)(e) 5.a. and (19)(e) 5 c the applIcatIOn for a
proposed change IS presumed to be a substantial devIatIOn. ThIS presumptIOn may
be rebutted by clear and convmcmg eVIdence.
2 ProvIde notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards RevIew) from
Palm Beach County Traffic Engmeenng.
3 ProvIde notIce of school concurrency from Palm Beach County School Board for
the addItional 105 resIdential dwellIng umts bemg requested,
4 The Substantial DevIatIOn DetermmatIon Chart (page 3) does not reflect the
addItion of Lots 81 & 82 to the G & I land use m NOPC #14 m October of2004
5 Withm the NOPC there are the followmg dIscrepancIes
SectIOn 5.2. proposes an mcrease m dwellmg unItS wIthm the MU
category from 1000 to 1105
SectIOn 13,a.2. proposes a total of 1080 dwellIng umts.
SectIOn 5.3, proposes a maXImum heIght m MU of60 feet.
SectIon 13.a.2 proposes a maxImum heIght of 65 feet.
These conflIcts need to be corrected.
6 HeIght IS not a charactenstIc of the DRI or the Master Plan. HeIght lImItatIOns are
located wIthm the Planned Industnal DIstnct (Pill) Therefore, the heIght request
WIll not be addressed m the NOPC If a change IS proposed to the heIght
lImItation, a Code ReVIew (CDRV) request, JustIficatIOn and reVIew fee must be
submItted to amend the PID regulatIOns.
7 The applIcant IS asked to acknowledge that the City IS currently m lItigatIOn
regardmg heIghts exceedmg 45 feet.
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
~
Coale, Sherie
From Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Friday December 17 2004 2.05 PM
To Breese Ed
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: Quantum Park-NOPC #15 DRIA 05-001 I MPMD 05-006
Planning Memorandum. Forester / Environmentalist
To
Ed Breese, PnncIpal Planner
From.
Kevm J Hallahan, Forester / EnvIronmentalIst
Subject:
Quantum Park
NOPC #15 DRlA 05-001 / MPMD 05-006-1st RevIew
Date
December 17, 2004
I have no comments on the NOPC #15 requests.
Kjh
FIle
12/20/2004
L.l fY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORlOA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO Michael W Rumpf DATE. 12/15/04
DIr of Planning & ZOnIng
SUBJECT Quantum Park
FROM. Off John Huntmgton REFERENCES SIte Plan
Police Department
CPTED PractitIOner
ENCLOSURES
FILE. DRIA 05-001
MPMD 05-006
I have vIewed the above bUIldmg plans and have the following comments
No Comments
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 04-202
TO
Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning
FROM'
Laurinda Logan, P E., Senior Engineer
DATE.
December 10,2004
RE
Review Comments
DRI Amendment/Major Site Plan Modification _1st Review
Quantum Park NOPC #15
File No. DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
The above referenced Site Plans, received on December 7 2004, was reviewed for Public
Works, Engineering and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances We have no objection to the proposed amendment.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P E , Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr , P E./ P SM., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Quantum Park Nope #15, DRI Amend.-Major Site Plan Mod. 1st Rev .doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 04-276
TO
FROM
Ed Breese
Principal Planner ~
Timothy K, Large ~
TRC Member/Building Division
DATE
December 8, 2004
SUBJECT
Project - Quantum Park
File No - DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
The Building Division has no issues with this project.
tkl bf
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2005\Quantum Park
Page 1 of 1
/'
Rivers, Jody
To
Subject:
Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Site Plan Review - Quantum Park
Project:
Location
File No
Quantum Park
Gateway Blvd
DRIA 05-001/MPMD 05-006
Recreation and Parks has no comment at this time
Jody Rivers
1