AGENDA DOCUMENTS
~\.,.~.~'
fr.'
f \
~ ;
~\- )~
~ /<,'"
"V,.. ~<,
ON
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk s Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
0 August 6. 2002 July 17 2002 (5.00 p.m.) 0 October I 2002 September 16. 2002 (Noon)
0 August 20. 2002 August 5. 2002 (Noon) ~ October 15.2002 September 30, 2002 (Noon)
0 September 3 2002 August 19 2002 (Noon) 0 November 6. 2002 October 14 2002 (Noon)
0 September 17 2002 September 3 2002 (8:00 a.m.) 0 November 19 2002 November 5 2002 (Noon)
0 Admmistrative 0 Development Plans
NATURE OF 0 Consent Agenda 0 New Business
AGENDA ITEM ~ Public Hearing ~ Legal
0 Bids 0 UnfInished Busmess
0 Announcement 0 Presentation
0 City Manager's Report
RECOMMENDATION Please place this request on the October 15,2002 City Commission Agenda under PublIc
Hearing and Legal, Ordmance - Second Reading. The City Commission approved this request on First Reading with a 4 to 1
vote, subject to all staff comments except #5, thereby allowing the buffer to be reduced to meet project design characteristics.
For further information, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No, PZ 02-188
EXPLANATION
PROJECT
QUANTUM PARK DRI NOPC/MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT #13
(DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002)
David B Norris, Esq., Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer
Quantum Limited Partners, LLC
Quantum Park DRI
Request to amend the Quantum Park DRI/Master Plan to change the permitted use on Lot
89B from 'OffIce Industrial" (01) to 'Mixed Use" (MU); Lot 3 from Industrial (IND) to
"OffIce Industrial (01), and Lot 34-C from 'Reserved" to "Open Space/DetentIon"
AGENT
OWNER.
LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
PROGRAM IMPACT
FISCAL IMPACT
ALTERNATIVES
Develo
City Manager's Signature
~~t.)7~a
Planning and Zonm~rector
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMD\Agenda Item Request Quantum Pk DRI-Master Plan Mod 2nd
reading I 0- I 5-02.dot
S:\BULLETlr'<'\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM. DOC
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 02-188
TO Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
"\fIW~
THROUGH Michael Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM Lusia Galav AICP X
Principal Planner ~
/
DATE September 11 2002
SUBJECT Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Master Plan Amendment #13
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce (a.k.a. Quantum Park PID) is a partially built-out Development of
Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 553 13 acres zoned Planned Industrial Development
(PID) It is located on the west side of 1-95 between ~Jliner Road extended and the Boynton
Canal - (C-16) (See attached Exhibit A" - Location Map) The applicant, MFT Development,
Inc IS requesting an amendment to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order (0 0 ) adopted
December 4, 1984 by Ordinance No 84-51 The original 00 was subsequently amended 11
times by Ordinance Nos 86-11, 86-37, 88-3 94-10, 94-51, 96-33, 96-65 97-20 99-05 00-02
and 01 54 The City Commission denied Amendment #11 on February 20, 2001 The current
Master Plan for Quantum Park is provided in EX~lblt "8" - Existing Master Plan
Amendment #13 proposes three changes including amending the existing use designation on
Lot 89B in the Master Plan to the "Mixed Use" designation All requested changes are depicted
in Exhibit "C" - Proposed Master Plan and described as follows
1) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 89B from Office/Industrial (01) land use to
Mixed Use (MU) The proposed Mixed Use designation includes office commercial and
residential uses,
2) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 3 from Industrial (I) land use to
Office/Industrial (01), and
3) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 34-C from Reserved" to Open Space/
Detention
BACKGROUND
An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) IS first and foremost governed by
Florida Statutes Chapter 380 06 (19) - Substantial Deviations The applicant has submitted a
Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) in accordance with the statutory requirements The NOPC
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
IS reviewed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council (RPC) and the City The DCA and the RPC are reviewing the
proposed NOPC and will provide comments following the procedures outlined In Chapter 380 06
(19)
The City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 1 5 Sec 4 3A requires a preliminary review
by the Planning and Development Board of an amendment to a DRI Chapter 380 06 F S
requires that the local governing body hold a public heanng to review and approve the NOPC
The City Commission is required to determine whether the proposed change to the Quantum
Park DRI is or is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380 06 (19) If It is determined
that the requested change is a substantial deviation then further review will be required pursuant
to the statutory requirements If the City Commission determines that the proposed change IS
not a substantial deviation then they may take action to approve or deny the requested change
The original DRI Development Order adopted a Master Plan for Quantum Park That Master
Plan has been amended over the years, the latest change being approved on November 6
2001 The proposed Amendment #13 alters the approved land uses for that Master Plan
Therefore the review of the DRI amendment also constitutes a review of the changes to the
Master Plan for Quantum Park. In addition to the state statutes, staff has reviewed the Master
Plan in accordance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Section 7, Planned
Industrial Development and Chapter 3, Master Plan Approval First review comments were
generated and the Technical Review Committee (TRC) reviewed the Master Plan changes on
September 3, 2002.
ANAL YSIS
Notice of Proposed ChanQe (NO PC) - Substantial Deviation
The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantial deviation are outlined
in Chapter 38006 (19) In reviewing the statute section staff determined that only one of the
criteria applies to the proposed changes for Quantum Park DRI ThiS criterion, which is
applicable for review of this proposed change is provided in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 , which
states "The following changes to an approved development of regional impact shall be
presumed to create a substantial deviation Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and
convincing evidence"
4 Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5.c., Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the
contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases
of at least two of the uses within a authorized multiuse development of regional
impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in
3800651 (3)(c), (d), (f) and (g) and residential use
As part of the NOPC application the applicant is to complete a 'Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart" The applicant has provided an updated chart Amendment #13
involves changes to five land Lse categones Industnal Off;ce/lndustnal Mixed Use
(includes Residential), Reserved and Open Space There is a loss of Industrial acreage
but the allowable square footage thresholds would not change on the Master Plan Also,
the proposed Mixed Use designation for Lot 89B would not add residential units to the
Master Plan These changes are reflected in the 'Notes" section on the Master Plan
..,
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
The proposed increase and decreases are presumed to maintain the vested traffic
generation level of 63,752 average daily tripS (AOT)
Conclusion
The proposed changes delineated in Amendment #13 are determined not to be a substantial
deviation per Chapter 380 06 (19) of the FlOrida Statutes The applicant has provided the
Substantial Deviation Table and a traffic study to provide clear and convincing eVidence of a
non-substantial deviation finding This determination is subject to satisfYing Condition of
Approval #4 regarding Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Master Plan Modification
The proposal submitted for the NOPC modifies the approved Master Plan for the Quantum Park
ORI There are three major changes proposed The applicant provided the following descriptive
summary of these changes
Lot 89B (4.00 Acres)
Lot 89B was previously designated as Office/industrial (01) Land Use The Land Use has been
revised to "Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land use designation includes office,
commercial and residential uses
Lot 3 (4 07 Acres)
The Land Use of this lot is currently designated as Industrial (INO) Land Use The Land Use has
been revised to 'Office/lndustrial (01) This lot previously was designated as Office/lndustrial
(01) and revised to the current Industrial (INO) designation by Amendment No 10
Lot 34-C (6 58 Acres)
The Lot 34-C Land Use is currently designated as Reserved The "Reserved" Land Use
designation was approved as part of the 1\:1aster Plan amendment No 12 approval The
conditions of approval for Amendment No 12 acknowledged the need for the City to address
the Open Space requirements for the entire development prior to a developable Land Use
designation for Lot 34-C
The Land Use designation for Lot 34-C is proposed to be removed from the "Re~erved"
designation and included, as it was previously in the Open SpacelDetention designation The
reason for this request is described below
Subsequent to the approval of Amendment No 12, Quantum Community Development District
(OCOD) had acquired Lot 34-C The OCDD is the public entity responsible for the maintenance
of tr::; Sand Pi~e Preserves the Frimary Water Management Sj3[erTi ne Road',vajs and the
Secondary Drainage Systems within the development. The acquiSition of Lot 34-C by the QCDD
removes the land from the available developable acreage The QCDO purchased the property
to address the preserve and open space requirements of the Development Order, to address
security issues relative to the sand pine preserves and to provide additional land area for
drainage purposes as necessary to accommodate the vested future development.
.3
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
Table 1 provides the proposed acreage changes to the DRI Master Plan
TABLE 1 DRI MASTER PLAN LAND USE ACREAGE CHANGES
land Use Designation Proposed Acreage DRIA i Existing Acreage I Change I
#13 I
Industrial (IND) 9718 I 101.25 ! (407)
Officeilndustriat (all i 7982 I 7975 i 007 i
Mixed Use 9486 ; 9086 I 40 !
Ooen Soace 8878 , 82.20 I 6.58 I
,
Reserved 0 ! 558 .058)
All other categories on the Land Use Acreage Table remain the same as approved In
Amendment #12 The Quantum Park DRI acreage total of 553 13 remains unchanged
The Quantum Park DRI has been amended 11 times over the years, which IS not unusual for a
DRI of this type The Florida Statute governing the DRI process Chapter 38006(19) provides
for and anticipates amendments stating "There are a variety of reasons why a developer may
wish to propose changes to an approved development of regional impact including changed
market conditions"
These proposed changes to the Master Plan were analyzed from two perspectives The first is
the potential for creating additional regional or local Impacts The second is the consistency and
compatibility of the proposed changes with the regulations and policies adopted by the City
through the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Regulations and other applicable studies
such as the Visions 20/20 plan
Impacts
Reqional
A development has gone through the DRI process because the projected impacts are
considered regional in nature Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine If
the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally
identified and mitigated In the case of the Quantum Park DRI the major issue is whether there
will be an increase in traffic resulting from the land use redistribution/redeslgnatlon
A provision in Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park development order requires that" A traffic
study shall be submitted with any future application requesting a change in use designations on
any lot. The City shall hire a+ the app :::;n"'2 2C'5-5::: 3.'"' i-:!~;::=.-je~ "-'O'f~iS ::;ns~!tant to
review the study" In lieu of an indE;:endert tra"~'c ccnsul:ant, 're city's Pubilc \^'/orks
Department Director, a designated TRC member conducted the review of the traffic study The
applicant has also transmitted the traffic study to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for
their customary review and approval
Based on the TRC review of the Master Plan including the traffic study, no additional regional
impacts are evident. The vested number of trips 63 752 is presumed to remain unchanged due
to the balancing of increases and decreases in the intensities of the proposed changes to the
land use designations The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has not released the results of
their review at this time
..j.
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
The Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council focus
their review of the amendment on regional issues exclusively Staff has not yet received a
formal written response from these agencies It is anticipated that the city will receive comments
from both agencies before review by the City Commission
Local
The focus of the substantial deviation determination IS regional impacts The development order
for the DRI is a local order and the approval of any requested changes IS within the jurisdiction
of the city As such, the city's main focus is local issues and impacts There were no significant
local issues Identified by the TRC members at this time The Utilities Department has indicated
that any unforeseen impacts to the water and sewer systems and related levels of service will
be borne by the developer The updated Traffic Impact AnalysIs submitted with the request for
amendment indicates that there Will be no Increase In the allowable Intensities of development.
The traffic generation levels will remain within the limits for which the DRI IS vested Turning
movements and signalization issues can be evaluated and addressed at the Master and
Technical Site Plan stage Drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the Master and
Technical site plan approvals, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage
permitting authorities
Consistency and Compatibility with City Policies
Of the three changes proposed by the applicant only Lot 89B presents issues that are contrary
to city policies The three proposed changes are discussed below
Lot 3 - This lot was inadvertently changed from Office/Industrial (01) to Industrial (I) in NOPC
#10 The site has an active site plan approval which requires the 01 designation to allow the
permitted development of an office/warehouse with office use comprising more than 20o~ of the
square rootage permitted under an Indusllia: oni; oesignalion The applicant is proposing the
change to rectify this situation
Lot 34-C - This lot was designated as "Reserved" in the last DRI Master Plan amendment #12
The "Reserve" category is a non-development designation This lot was never designated for
development and has been included in the Open Space category until Amendment #12 The
applicant wanted to place an "Industrial" designation on the lot Staff objected and the
compromise "Reserved" category was initiated until the city and developer could determine the
most appropriate use for the site Subsequently the developer sold the parcel to the Q,uantum
Community Development District (QCDD) for detention/retention and open space This is
consistent with the intended use of the site in the original ORI a~prO'i2.!
Lot 89B - Lot 89B is a four (4) acre lot located in the northeast corner of the Quantum Park PID
The current Master Plan designation is Office/ Industrial (01) It is an irregularly shaped lot
located east of High Ridge Road The applicant has provided the following justification for
changing the lot to Mixed Use (MU)
Lot 898 is adjacent to Lots 83 through 88 Lots 83 through 88 are designated as Mixed
Use It has been deterrn:ned that to enhance the Mixed Use concept as well as the
residential component to that concept, the addition of Lot 898 is necessary and
appropriate The inclusion of lot 898 as Mixed Use will enhance the proposed
development of Lots 83-88 which will benefit the entire Quantum Park as well as the
5
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
City There really IS no down side to this change as this property has been slttmg vacant
for many, many years, and as such apparently is not desirable in the market for
development as Office or Industrial
First, Lot 89B is not "adjacent" to Lots 83 -88 It is across High Ridge Road which IS a four lane
divided local collector Second, there IS existing and proposed office Industrial and commercial
development surrounding Lot 89B as described further below
North - Lot 89-A designated Office/Industrial (01) and occupied by Ed Carey Design
(DeSign manufacturing storage and distribution of decor elements) and developed land
outside of Quantum Park, with an industrial land use designation and zoned M-1
South - Right-of-way for High Ridge Road and Lot 90(portlon) designated
Office/lndustrial (01) developed as Gateway Professional Building
East - Lot 90(portion) designated Office/Industrial (01) developed as Gateway
Professional Building and Lot 90(portion) designated Government/Institutional (G&I))
developed as the TriRail public transportation station,
West - Lot 89-A designated Office/industrial (01) and occupied by Ed Carey design and
right-of-way for High Ridge Road
Farther south in this northeast portion of Quantum Park IS Lot 91 designated
Office/lndustrial/Commercial on the Quantum Park Master Plan It is located on the northeast
corner of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard The northern border is an access drive for
the TriRail station This parcel was originally approved for an ice skating rink but the site plan
expired Now it is the subject of an Use Approval application for a gas station/truck
stop/convenience store and a Conditional Use/Site Plan application for a fast food restaurant
with a drive-through facility The applicant's argument that Lot 89B is not suitable for office or
industrial is not consistent with the nature of development occurring around it.
Simultaneously with thiS NOPC application, Quantum is requesting Master Site Plan approval
for Lots 83-88 designated Mixed Use on the Master Plan These lots were the first to be
designated Mixed Use with the approval of Quantum Park DRI Master Plan Amendment #10
This proposed Master Site Plan provides for commercial development along Gateway
Boulevard and 136 fee simple townhomes on the balance of the site An additional six (6) rental
units are proposed to be located in the commercial portion of the site integrated with office use
Also submitted is a Master Site Plan for Lot 89B that continues the town home portiol") of the
development with 39 units proposed If these two Master Site Plans were approved they would
use the balance of residential units permitted for Quantum Park.
Mixed Use, including residential, commercial and office is permitted on lots 83-88 These lots
are the last available designated for this type of development in Quantum Park. The city's
original intent in approving the 'Mixed Use designation was to allow the development of neo-
traditional and new urbanism design concepts This has not occurred nor is it evident in the
two Master Site Plans submitted Considering the intent of the mixed use designation it would
be more appropriate to incorporate the remaining 39 units into the site plan for lots 83-88
The location of lot 89B is not conducive to residential development as it is surrounded by non-
residential uses. The future residents will be homeowners who may object to specific industrial
uses located adjacent to them This incompatible situation is contrary to the Intent and purpose
6
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
of a planned industrial park Also, the argument by the applicant that 89B will enhance the
development of the mixed use on Lots 83-88 located to the west, is flawed There IS no logical
connection between Lot 89B and the lots to the west The applications for the Master Site Plans
mdicate that the recreation area will be located on the residential portion of Lots 83-88 to the
west and will be used by the residents In 89B Automobiles as well as pedestrians must cross
High Ridge Road, a four-lane divided roadway to access the prinCipal proJect. This is not a
signalized intersection nor is it proposed to be one Safety and access are major concerns since
this portion of High Ridge Road is located on a curve and carries a significant amount of truck
traffic from the industrial area to the north
Additional arguments against the change for 898 to mixed use are provided In the City's
Comprehensive Plan policies
Policy 1 192 of the Land Use Element addresses the provision of lands for Industrial
development and reads as follows
"The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrial acreage which can
accommodate the approximate industrial employment which has been projected in the
Future Land Use Element, and prohibit conversion of land designated Industrial" on the
currently adopted Future Land Use Map unless such conversion would generate a range
of employment choices for current and future residents, provide goods and services of
regional importance and retain regional fiscal and economic significance
Policy 1 19 4 states "the city shall continue to encourage and enforce the development of
Industrial land as industrial parks or concentrated industrial areas in order to maximize the
linkage between complementary industries
The 1989 Comprehensive Plan contains policies dealing with the general incompatibilities
between "Industrial" and "Residential" land uses and recommends physical separation and
buffering to ameliorate those effects The proposed location for the 39 town home units on Lot
898 is adjacent to properties developed for industrial and office uses
There is no adequate justification provided by the applicant to convert lands earmarked for
development as an employment center to residential development. If one of the goals of the
City is to maintain a jobs/housing balance, as lands designated for employment-based
development are reduced, a corresponding need for housing diminishes Otherwise, the City
becomes merely a bedroom community for other more successful, employment centers in the
County
Conclusion
As indicated herein the impacts of the proposed DRI amendments on the utility systems,
roadways and public facilities are either within the existing capacities or additional provisions Will
be required of the developer to ensure that levels of service standards are not compromised
Regarding the conversion of Lot 89B from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use (MU) there has been
no justification presented by the applicant that would refute the findings contained herein, nor
specifically justify its conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or its disadvantages regarding
location If it is the intent of the applicant to develop all of the allotted 1000 residential units,
they can be located on the existing mixed use designated lots This can be accomplished by
using a new urbanism design that integrates the residential units with office or commercial in
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
one bUilding as originally proposed and used by the applicant to justify a previous NOPC
application
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Florida Statutes Chapter 38006(19) Substantial Deviations the applicant has
demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed change is not a substantial
deviation requiring additional development of regional impact review
Regarding the proposed modifications to the Ouantum Park Master Plan staff recommends
approval of designating Lot 3, Office/Industrial (01) and designating Lot 34-C Open
Space/Detention
Based on the analysis presented above, staff recommends denial of the request to designate
Lot 89B "Mixed Use" If the request for Lot 89B is approved staff recommends that Lot 89B, if
developed exclusively as residential, at a minimum be buffered from adjacent non-residential
uses in accordance with the requirements of the Ouantum Park Buffer Plan and the PID buffer
requirements in the Land Development regulations No waivers should be granted from these
buffer requirements (see conditions of approval Exhibit '0")
S:IPLAN,'iING\SHAREDIWPIPROJECTS\QUANTUM PARK 2002 AMEND .13 + I.1P\1D'.DR!A 02-001\STAFF REPORT #13.DOC
8
)t~~J~AT1GN~MAP -
.QUANTUM r)AR-e;-K-
J IIl:::::m II iii I f II .\ IlTTTTTTTJ II _'l? -,- n . _ _ r 1"\
_ _ YA "-r.. :I
_ ..t"_
_ 1~! Ger.) l~}~ I
~ · ir9}e ,~B1- ,.
"l. r::.,. :I t;J. t- ""H
f 'g ~.~ f;'1 ~ Dlli g I
~ .~( ~I (~.1,~ gj
r ~ ~ ~ CD};1J J
~ ~r ~';SJ.' :Sf J
~ rr~ ;N~{ -:' /
~wrll (1 I
~ t' .... ~I
)) fo 1 ~
> ~ ~ ~
~ @3 :\
,-
I-
~ ~
(,p
~
: 1. :JIi.'..-1 I ~ 4.,' .
~~ ,;,"LJ- -_ : '
~ .........- _. ~ .
. ~ :. r ~ ~ -. - '
" _: ,,,' \ _ : \ $' iT '7 I)
/ . : aYNT~~:Jd~H
... --...K OF C.CMMER
~ _ . "r~UANTUM PARK]'"
~\J I
nMOTOROLA!j/ ~ J' l I ,I;~ /:Jj :
~ _......... .. ~ !'.: .~~7-=( " I P.: _~.cv \ ~ I.~ ~1Ir:~
\ \;:~ 1_;;u::~i~~~_iiIIJ:"~"'" ""'. Tr-, I . '
. .........l: iR--"~ f-C =' a1fIJlllT
;~~!1iI:~: ::: --, ,"=":;" ~. j~~~fT~
. .~~'~':.. : ~~ 0, j 11/1t MllESV I " j
R A A '1; ;l::I~1:' -;; ~" '0 4 I I ~
_ _ . 'I _, 00 800 FEET -- ~
:J
-
-
\
).
-J
;[
.....
--
-
--
......
......
.....
PIP
1fi
--
L.
-~
~
r~
I 141
-=-:.,
-"t
EXHIBIT !~A~I
-: '" ~'~-j,1---#-:::.'" --. :;::
('\
~
,,>..;',""
---- . .
11 I
(. ~ NOT
IN
- CITY
i--
-
- -
f
,"'.-1 ~..
- ~ 7t..!!1 '/
,_ L:rDZ I
ITr: .r-
I t1.. -~ :::r
<. ~ I
III ~'t^^_y
.
~
.....~ (
I
~\
i"
-
--- ,
-
-
t ---1
,
~~
~1Ii
It ~
i
I
Cl
) I
B"
"
r:vH\B\1 ER PLAN
r:." MAS1
E~\S1\NG
,~~..-,...... ~~_., ,..,
- ~
o p~ \~ ~
, P i ~ a \ l U %\
.. 0 \ \ ~ l ~ 'o~'
~}11\i~3~1~
; ~ ~ ~ \ ! ~? H
) ~.. '. ~ \~ %.
'l1~~s..~, ~~~
1 '& ' ~4 & ';
I 'i G S ~ .. i" ,0
);. ~ '; \ ;:; 1 ~
<J. ~~:;; ~ ....~,~
~~! ~<., <t'
· 1 ~ . \~ \;;. "\'
i F i \. ~. H
\;~ ; \ ~
, 1 ~ ~ ~l
~ ~~ .~
~ 9. ~
o _ \
~\ \
~ \
\
<t
,i'
j L------
,~~<lCl:!.~
~ -~" ~
"~~~~U ~
~ '.\~\i~~~\~1
i a_.!..
~ \~\ ~
i ~~! ;.
\ \ HC ~
~l 1
c~
,
\
9
~
~
'"
5:>
1<
!)1
~
<5
:z
f\
\..-:
li~' ~ d ~ \
\L:\ ~U~E" . ~
>.';!:>.! ~~t'
~j:; \ ~": '$.~
LLL\. __.:_ .~~~
= P~-"l'1.~..
. -% "ill.. <:\
'$\ ..ii'1....
~;\ l~..;.<:\
! '..
~
~
co
S
^
\
\
\
\
- .
;.~..
.
~
-----
-----
~
.
f
" ..,0
~ 8~
~~22
=o~3:
"4z2C
....lJ]I::J:
~~C~
"'J:Si:o
~~Cl."
..,o~~
<1~.....
~. fi
~t~~
-.... -4~
-"',.,
'" -
-'-<
~ ~o
,
"
"
D
-<, ;:
<. E
~
Ol
~;
~..~~ Q
~~gs i
~~~~
<::~
~ ~
~
+- - - - -- -
EXHIBIT I
POSED MAST
PRO
CCtiGRESS A~~E
;,
-7
If
i
!
\ i
~ "----J
I ------'I I
-- ,
! I ,---T ~~____~_________________
i' ______< , '''" ,_, ~'"
~
--------------. l~N~~
I
L
I .
r-:=:
i I
, -=:=:
" /-i
~ I -, ::~I
~ I
~
~2\,
I _____
I -
I
--t-
-----rr--
.1
----------. \
~
--~- ~ ~ ,
;i~-- __ __~_ _ ___ _ _ --rr-
~~-:---- , -~- - ,,- - - - - ','J
-:;~~=-;- = -.! j H',
." --7 I = f';'--j
> - - ~0', ",. ",,;-,,_, I
~~~~ '^'<: - ,; ,- ,. ~ ~ ----
--~ """ ~~ i -'-" - ~--'I
'., ~ ""~ ~ ; . I
. ~ - ,.).-
,~ ~~ " ei, 1::_ g'~
~- ,
~ -,=.
c/=~
.-./
, .
~~-:=:..'-.:---~
..~
.2
;"
-----------==-------
~
2 .
-; ~
"
;.g -:~H
i~t,~~)~E~
~
;
-:-
, ,
~
--------
;;i!
~l~~ g
~m ~
;.. ,
~~i:
~2
~""-
~~=-~ / 5
Oo.~~
8lA..t.E...~;::. ':.-
---~~ -------
~ --.-
I .-
-11
. \
" \
\ \
\
-== ~
.;;::g: ~ \..----
~
- - ~------- ---------- ---------- -
~
z
~
-~-------
,
---~
-'=/-~\.~~~.~.
<; ~~
,
0"
.,
I::
Z
,.,
'"
'"
o
>-
o
./
-- ~.,~::/
;:~
~~
~~
----- .~.
~
; .
5l~
"':;C:..E"
~ ~.. UN
.
----- ---- ~....
;;
-'.
"
.:1;::1.
~~
"-
).1'-"'-. ~
'------
s;
:0"9-:1""'0
1-95
-~\
E
~
'"
<:
~
8
z
~
!i~ -_~
; ::l~--=~
~~--'S-
r
~
~~:-.
~
I ~
'"
.
.
~:'I
----
ConditIOns of Approval
2
DEP ART:VIE~TS DiCLUDE REJECT
Comments. None ""-
BUILDING DIVISIO~
Comments. None '(
PARKS AND RECREATIO~
Comments
3 All resIdentIal development planned for thIS area \vill be subject to the Park '(
and RecreatIOn FacilItIes Impact Fee.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None X
PLANNIl\G Al\-n ZONING
Comments.
4 Under the condItIOn of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development ""-
Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a
traffic analYS1S IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. In heu of an
mdependent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic
DIvlsIOn WIll reVIew the traffic study The project must meet the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards.
5 If Lot 89B IS developed as reSIdentIal, It must meet the buffer reqUIrements of
the Quantum Park Penphenal Landscape Buffer Plan and the Pill buffer X
reqUIrements m the Land Development RegulatIOns. No \VaIvers are allowed.
ADDITIO~AL PLAN~ING & DEVELOPME~T BOARD CO"l)ITIONS
Comments.
I OmIt Comment #5 allowmg buffer plan to be reduced and project setbacks as X
proposed or adjusted.
ADDITIONAL CITY COM:vnSSION CO~ITIONS
Comments.
I 1 To be deternuned. I I I
S"\Planning\SHARED\V\IP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMD\CCA.doc
EXHIBIT "D"
ConditIOns of Approval
PrOject name Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
F de number' MPMD 02-002
Reference 2nd reVIew plans IdentIfied WIth a September 3 2002 Planmng and Zonmg Department date stamp
markmg.
I DEP ART\lENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I'
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments. None X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments.
i
I WIth respect to the re-desIgnatiOn of Lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall X
provIde a Traffic Impact AnalYSIS (TIA) as noted m Staffs reVIews of
Quantum Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B) dated August
5, 2002, (prOVIded under separate cover) whIch, at a mmImum, evaluates the
Impact of traffic (turnmg movements) and need for SIgnalIzatiOn. Of
particular concern IS traffic congestiOn at the proposed mtersectiOn of HIgh
Ridge Road and the proposed Quantum Villages '\ionh and Quantum Villages
East (Lot 89B) The TIA must be proVIded at tIme of Master SIte Plan
submIttal for Lot 89B and Quantum VIllage-North.
UTILITIES
Comments.
2 The applIcant ( through hIS deSIgn engmeerIng consultant) needs to X
demonstrate that: a.) suffiCIent utIlIty system capaCIty IS available to support
the proposed modIficatiOns to the preViOusly approved land uses to the north
of Gateway Boulevard, or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(s)
will be prOVIded to allow for the proposed use(s) at tIme of TechnIcal Site
Plan ReVIew
FIRE
I II
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST
This completed cover sheet must accompany all agenda item requests Please place check marks
in the boxes as indicated Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form Submit
original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of aC)enda reauest (with back UD) to the
City Clerk's office Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below Incomplete or
late items will be returned to originating department.
Requested City Deadline for Submittal to City I P & D/CRA Requests Deadline
Commission Meeting Clerk's Office ,
Dates
DAu ust 20, 2002
DSe tember 3, 2002
DSe tember 17, 2002
DOctober 1 2002
[2]October 15, 2002
DNovember 6, 2002 October 14, 2002
*Due to holiday on September 2nd
Departments are responsible for securing the following
si natures on attached A enda Re uest Form
De artment Head
Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services
Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds
I
i
D
D
D
[2]
[2]
All back u material is attached
All exhibits are attached & marked e , Exhibit "A'
""'IrvlGJ 7-
Department Head's initials I
Quantum Park DRI NOPC/Master Plan Amendment #13 CDRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002)
Please do not write in the shaded area below
legal Department signature D
City Manager's signature
D
ITEM RETURNED FOR THE FOllOWING REASON(S)
Signature(s) missing D
Incomplete submittal D
Missed deadline D
Other D
Reason
Person contacted to pick up rejected request
by
(Date)
on
bg 7/19/02
S \Planning\Planning Templates\AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET CHECKLIST.doc
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST
This completed cover sheet mYB accompany all agenda item requests. Please place check marks
in the boxes as indicated Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form Submit
original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of aaenda request (with back UD) to the
City Clerk's office Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below Incomplete or
late items will be returned to originating department.
Requested City Deadline for Submittal to City P a. D/CRA Requests Deadline
Commission Meeting Clerk's Office
Dates
Au ust 20 2002
Se tember 3, 2002
Se tember 17 2002
October 1 2002
October 15 2002
November 6 2002 October 14
*Due to holiday on September 2nd
Departments are responsible for securing the following
si natures on attached A enda Ruest Form
De artment Head
Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services
Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds
All back u material is attached
All exhibits are attached & marked e Exhibit "A'
Department Head's initials. \,,\v'\.Z-"..16-
Quantum Park DR! NOPC/Master Plan Amendment #13 CORIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002)
Please do not write in the shaded area below
Legal Department signature D
City Manager's signature
D
ITEM RETURNED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S)
Signature(s) missing D
Incomplete submittal 0
Missed deadline D
Other 0
Reason
(Date)
Person contacted to pick up rejected request
by
on
bg 7/19/02
S.\Planning\Planning Templates\AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET CHECKUST.doc
~(~"~ O~1.x..
0\ '_ J U
J-. ~<-"
'V 1"0 N~<-
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meetinl! Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
D August 6. 2002 July 17 2002 (5'00 p.m.) [gJ October 1 2002 September 16, 2002 (Noon)
D August 20 2002 August 5, 2002 (Noon) D October 15, 2002 September 30, 2002 (Noon)
D September 3. 2002 August 19 2002 (Noon) D November 6, 2002 October 14 2002 (Noon)
D September 17 2002 September 3 2002 (8:00 a.m.) D November 19 2002 November 5 2002 (Noon)
D AdmimstratlVe D Development Plans
NATURE OF D Consent Agenda D New Business
AGENDA ITEM D Public Hearing [gJ Legal
D Bids D Unftmshed Busmess
D Announcement D Presentation
D City Manager's Report
RECOMMENDATION Please place tlus request on the October 1 2002 City ComrmsslOn Agenda under
Legal, Ordinance - First Reading. The Plannmg and Development Board unanunously recommends that this request be
approved, subject to all staff comments except #5, thereby allOWIng the buffer to be reduced to meet project design
characteristics. For further mfonnation, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 02-188
EXPLANATION
PROJECT
QUANTUM PARK DRI NOPC/MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT #13
(DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002)
David B. Norris, Esq Cohen, Norris, Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer
Quantum Limited Partners, LLC
Quantum Park DRI
Request to amend the Quantum Park DRI/Master Plan to change the penmtted use on Lot
89B from 'Office Industnal" (01) to 'Mixed Use (MU); Lot 3 from Industrial (I1'."D) to
'Office Industrial (01) and Lot 34-C from "Reserved" to "Open SpaceJDetention
AGENT
OWNER.
LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
Please note that First Reading of the ordmance has been scheduled m advance of the
pubhc heanng and 2nd reading of this ordinance in order to meet Florida Statutes,
Chapter 380 DRI/NOPC processing requirements. This same processmg methodology
has been used in scheduling preViOUS NOPC applicatIons.
PROGRAM IMPACT
FISCAL IMPACT
ALTERN IVES.
N/A
N/A
N/A
City Manager's Signature
City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
S \PlanningISHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMD\Agenda Item Request Quantum Pk DRI-Master Plan Mod 10-1-02.dot
S'\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
DEPARTMEi'r CF DE\ ELOPI\1ENT
MEMORANOU~Jl 040 FZ 02 188
~'""'
IG'
Cra r'T1an and iv1errbers
Planning and Development Boare
r;
'Yl~~
Michael Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
THROUGH
FROM
/ "
Lusia Galav, AICP ')(
Principal Planner ,r-<-}
/
DATE
September 11 2002
SUBJECT
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-00 HP'V1D 02-002
Master Plan Amendment #13
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce (a.k a Quantum Park PID) :s a partially built-out Development of
Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 553 13 acres zoned Planned Industnal Deve!opment
(PID) It is located on the west side of 1-95 between JV1Jner Road extended and the Boynton
Canal (C-16) (See attached Exhibit A - Location Map) The applicant, MFT Development,
Inc is requesting an amendment to the Quantum Park DRI Deve:opme'lt Order (0 0 ) adopted
December 4 1984 by Ordinance No 84-51 The onginal 0 0 was subsequently amended 11
times by Ordinance Nos 86-11 86-37, 88-3 94-10 94-51, 96-33 96-65 97-20 99-05 00-02
ard 01-54 The City Commission denied Amendmen #11 on February 20 2001 The current
rvlaster Plan for Quantum Park is provided in EX;-'iCit B" - EXisting Master Plan
Amendment #13 proposes three changes Inc!uding amending the existing use designation on
Lot 89B In the Master Plan to the "Mixed Use designation All requested changes are depicted
In Exhibit 'C" - Proposed Master Plan and descnoed as foilows
1) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 89B from Office/Industrial (01) land use to
Mixed Use (MU) The proposed Mixed Use des gnation inc udes circe cOrT'merc,,~i ard
residential uses,
2) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 3 frem Industrial (! J land l.se to
Office/Industrial (01), and
3) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 3~-C rom Reserved" to Open Space!
Detention
BACKGROUND
An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) :s first and foremost governed by
Flonda Statutes Chapter 38006 (19) - Substantial Deviations The applicant has submitted a
Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) in accordarce I,lith tre s,atutory reqUirements The NOPC
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/ivlP~,,1D 02-002
1\1emorandum No PZ 02 188
IS re'/lewed by the Flcrida Department cf CCrT~Un1 j A.Halrs (JCAj he I' eas"re Ccas
Regional Planning Councli (RPC) and the C ty iile DCA ant the RPC are reviewing the
propcsed NOPC and Will provide comments follc"'/I;g tre prccedu es cu! nee In Ci"ap er 38006
( 9\
The City's Land Development Regulations Chaater 5 Sec 4 3A ieqlJlres a preilrTlnary review
by the Planning and Development Board of an amend'Tient to a DRI Chapter 380 06 F S
reqUires that the local governing body hold a pubi:c heanng to review and aporov8 the j\JOPC
The City Commission is required to determlre 'tkether .he proposed change to the Quantum
Park DRI is or IS not a substantial deviation as defined In Chapter 380 06 (19) If It is determined
that the requested change is a substantial ce'Jla o~ ther furt~,e re J'ew lJ' f De required pursuar
to the statutory requirements If the City Commission determines that the prcposed change IS
not a substantial deviation then they may take actlcn 0 acprove or deny the reqJested change
The onglnal DRI Development Order adopted a ivlaste Plan for Quantl..rl Park That Mas'er
Plan has been amended over the years the latest change being approved cn j\Jovember 6
2001 The proposed Amendment #13 alters the approved land uses for that Master Pian
Therefore the review of the DRI amendment also constitutes a review of the changes to he
Master Plan for Quantum Park. In addition to the state statutes, staff has reviewed the Master
Plan in accordance with Land Development Regulations Chaoter 2 Section 7 Planned
Industrial Development and Chapter 3 Master Pla,1 Approval Firs' review comments were
generated and the Technical ReView Committee (iRC) reviewed the Master Plan changes on
September 3 2002
ANAL YSIS
Notice of Proposed ChanQe (NO PC) - Substantial Deviation
The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantIal deviation are outlmed
in Chapter 38006 (19) In reviewing the statute section staff determined that only one of the
criteria applIes to the proposed changes for Quantum Park DRI ThiS critenon which is
applicable for review of this proposed change is prOVided In Chapter 38006(19)(e)5 't/hlch
states "The following changes to an approved development of regional Impact shall be
presumed to create a substantial deviation Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and
convincing evidence"
4 Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 c, Notwithstanding any provIsion of paragraph (b) to the
contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases
of at least two of the uses within a authorized multiuse development of regional
impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in
3800651 (3)(c), (d) (f) and (9) and residential use
As part of the NOPC application the appl cant IS to complete a Substantial DeVIation
Determination Chart" The applicant has provided an updated chart. Amendment #13
involves changes to five land Lse categories Indus~rJa! Off;ce/lndustrial Mixed Use
(includes Residential) Reserved and Open Space There is a loss of Industrial acreage
but the allowable square footage thresholds wculd not change on the Master Plan Also
the proposed Mixed Use designation for Lot 89B would not add residential units to the
Master Plan These changes are reflected In the 'Notes section on the Master Plan
Quantum Park - ORIA 02-001 MPlVlO 02 002
r>.lemorandum No PZ 02 188
The proposed Increase and decreases a e ~resui'ed ,0 r'"'e: :'Ie:, re Jested
generation level of 63 752 average dailY r'es ADT)
,~
~ I~
ConcluSion
The proposed changes delineated In Amencmen, :;13 are determined no to be a substantia!
deViation per Chapter 38006 (19) of the Fonda Sta utes The appi can has provided the
Substantial Deviation Table and a traffic stud;, to provide clear and conv:nclng eVidence of a
non-substantial deviation finding ThiS deterrlnatlon IS subject to satisfYing Condi' on of
Approval #4 regarding Palm Beach County Traffic Per'or"ance Standards
Master Plan Modification
The proposal submitted for the NOPC modifies tre 2.oproved i'vlaster Piar for the Quantum Park
DRI There are three major changes proposed The a;Jpllcant provided the fol/owlng deSCriptive
summary of these changes
Lot 89B (400 Acres)
Lot 89B was previously designated as Office/industrial (01) Land Use The Land Use has been
revised to 'Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land use designation Includes office
commercial and residential uses
Lot 3 (407 Acres)
The Land Use of this lot is currently deSignated as Industrial (IND) Land Use T'le Land Use has
been revised to "Office/Industrial (01)" ThiS lot previously was deSignated as Office/Industrial
(01) and revised to the current Industrial (IND) designation by Amendment No 10
Lot 34-C (6 58 Acresl
The Lot 34-C Land Use is currently designated as Reserved The Reserved" Land Use
deSignation was approved as part of the 1\12ster Plan amendment No 12 approval The
conditions of approval for Amendment No 12 acknov'lledged the need for the City to address
the Open Space requirements for the entire development prior to a developable Land Use
designation for Lot 34-C
The Land Use designation for Lot 34-C is proposed to be removed from the 'Re~erved"
designation and included as it was previously n the Open Space/Detention designation The
reason for this request is described below
Subsequent to the approval of Amendment f'Jo 12 Quantum Community Development District
(QCDD) had acquired Lot 34-C The OCDO IS 'he OL.;bilC entitv rescons ble for the maintenance
cf l,~2 Sar;c F~ 1--:2 Cr23e~'es "ie F marj 1J"a..~G i icra;srTJen ~j.3 cr-'" -2 nC2:: ,3.}3 ard tre
Seoondary Drainage Systems within the deve!oprrent The acquisition of Lot 34-C by the OCDD
removes the land from the available developable acreage The OCOO purchased the property
to address the preserve and open space requirements of the Development Order to address
security issues relative to the sand pine preserves and to provide additional land area for
drainage purposes as necessary to accommocate the vested future development.
QuantUrl Park - DRIA 02-00 'MF- "nO 02-CC2
Memorandum i'Jo PZ 02 88
Tabie 1 provides the proposed acreage changes te tre DRI ~"last9r Pian
TABLE 1 DRI MASTER PLAN LAND USE ACREAGE CHANGES
Land Use Designation
I Proposed Acreage DRIA
i #13
! 9713
I 7982
Existing Acreage
Change
Ir.dustrlal (I~JD)
Office/Industrial (all
M;xed Use
aDen S~ace
Peser/ec
i 9.:. sa
1(~ 25
'737S
9C 3-3
.J. C-
i 0
-3 ::0
o C--'
~O
I :3 53
'352
! 8878
32.20
All other categories on the Land Use Acreage Tae e remain the same as approved In
Amendment #12 The Quantum Park DRI ac 82ge to.e.! of 553 13 remains unchangec
The Quantum Park DRI has been amended 11 times over the years vVhlC~ IS net L.r:usual for a
DRI of this type The Florida Statute governing the DRI process Chapter 380 06(19) pro'/ldes
for and anticipates amendments stating There are a vanety of reasons why a deve eper may
wish to propose changes to an approved development of regional impac' including changed
market conditions
These proposed changes to the Master Plan were analyzed from two perspectives The firs, s
the potential for creating additional regional or local Impacts The second IS the consistency and
compatibility of the proposed changes with the regulations and policies adopted by the City
threugh the Comprehensive Plan Land Development Regulatlcns and other applicable stucies
such as the Visions 20/20 plan
Impacts
Reqional
A development has gone through the DRI precess because the projected Impacts are
considered regional in nature Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine If
the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally
identified and mitigated In the case of the Quantum Park DRI the major issue is whether there
will be an increase in traffic resulting from the land -1se redistribution/redeslgnatlon
A provision in Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park development order requires that A traffic
study shall be submitted with any future application requesting a change In use deSignations on
any lot. The C ty shall r.re, a the app -~, ~ ~ :0-:::"'" 3.-: ,:j~.:?-,::::-- --='" C; c:'"'sJ!tant '0
review the study" In i eu of an inde;::::rc:?: r2'- C ccrs.... .2rt ~~,... S P-1C IC \\jor~s
Department Director a deSignated TRC member conducted the review of the traffic studj The
applicant has also transmitted the traffic studv 0 the Palm Beach Ccun ! Traffic DI'/iSlcr for
their customary re'/iew and approval
Based on the TRC re'/Iew of the Master Plan Inc udlng :he traffic study no additional reglenal
impacts are evident The vested number of trips 63 ~52 s presumed te rerTlaln unchanged due
to the balancing of increases and decreases in the intenSities of the proposed changes to the
land use designations The Palm Beach County Traffic DiVISion has net re!eased the results of
their review at thiS time
4
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-C01/Mr- v1D 02 002
Merr.orandum No PZ 02 188
The Department of Community Affairs and ti"'e Treasure Coast Reglora! ? ennlng Council ocus
their review of the amendment on reglonel SSL.es eAc,us/vely Staff has not yet received e
formal wntten response from these agenc es It s an clpetec thet the:: j /!IJ resel '8 s::r-:r:ents
from both agencies before review by the City CCrTlrllSSICn
Local
The focus of the substantial deviation determinetion is regional Impacts The de'lelopment order
for the DRI IS a local order and the approval of any requested changes IS within the Junsdlctlon
of the city As such the city's main focus is loce! Issues and Impacts There Nere no significant
locel Issues Identified by the TRC members 2t th s rr.e The Ut:lities Depar'lrrent has Irdlcated
that any unforeseen Impacts to the water ard sewer systems and related levels of service will
be borne by the developer The updated Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the request for
amendment indicates that there 'NIII be no Increase In the allowable In,enslties of development
The traffic generation levels will rema n v'llthln re i1mlts for V' hlch the DR is Jested Turning
movements and signalization issues can be evaluated and addressed at the Mester and
Technical Site Plan stage Drainage will also be reviewed In detail as par'l of tre l\;las,er and
Technical site plan approvals and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage
permitting authonties
Consistency and Compatibility with City PoliCies
Of the three changes proposed by the applicant oniy Let 89B presents issues that are contrary
to city policies The three proposed changes are discussed below
Lot 3 - This lot was inadvertently changed from Office/lndustnal (01) to Industnal (I) In NOPC
#10 The site has an active site plan approval which requires the 01 designation to allow the
permitted development of an office/warehouse with office use conprising more than 200'0 of the
square footage periTlitl:ea under an indus~ria; Cnij cssrgrallon Tile app ieant IS proposing the
change to rectify this situation
Lot 34-C - This lot was designated as "Reserved" In the last DRI Master Plan amendment #12
The "Reserve category is a non-development designation This lot was never designated for
development and has been included In the Open Space category until Amendment #12 The
applicant wanted to place an "Industrial" deSignation on the lot Staff objected and the
compromise "Reserved" category was initiated until the cIty and developer could determine the
most appropriate use for the site Subsequently the developer sold the parcel to the OJ..1antum
Community Development District (OCDD) for detention/retention and open space This IS
CO'lsls+ent with the Intenced use of the Site Ir t~e c r; '121 'J9/ ":.~src'/?'
Lot 89B - Lot 89B IS a four (4) acre lot located In the northeast corner of the Ouantum Park PID
The current Master Plan designation is Office, Industnal (01) It is an irregularly shaped lot
located east of High Ridge Road The applicant has proVided the fe/iov Irlg justification for
changing the lot to Mixed Use (MU)
Lot 898 is adjacent to Lots 83 through 88 Lots 83 through 88 are designated as Mixed
Use It has been detenT nee! that to enhance the Mixed Use concept as well as the
residential component to that concept the addition of Lot 89B IS necessary and
appropriate The inclUSion of lot 89B as Mixed Use will enhance the proposed
development of Lots 83-88 which ~"IIJI benefit the entire Ouantum Park as well as the
'i
QL..antum Park - DRIA 02-001 '1V1F- JIO 02-002
~Jlemorandum [\Jo PZ 02 88
City There really IS no down side to ;., s change as this property ras teen sitting /acai~t
for many many years, and as such apparent!y IS not ceslraoie In the marf...et fer
development as Office or Industrial
First LGt 89B IS not adjacent" to Lots 83 -88 It IS across High Ridge Read Nnlch IS a feur lane
divided local collector Seeond there is eXls ng and proposed office Industrial and commercial
development surrounding Lot 89B as descr:bes fur-her below
I'Jorth - Lot 89-A designated Office/Industrial (01) and occupied by Ed Carey DeSign
(DeSign manufacturing storage and distribution of decor elements) and developed land
outside of Quantum Park, with an Industrial land use deSignation ard zoned i\t1-1
South - Right-of-way for High Ridge Road and Lot 90(portlcn) deSignated
Office/Industrial (01) developed as Gatewaj Professional BUilding
East - Lot 90(portion) designated Office/Industrial (01) de/eloped as Gateway
Professional Building and Lot 90(portion) deSignated Government/lns~ltutlonal (G&I))
developed as the TriRail public transportation station
West - Lot 89-A designated Office/industrial (01) and occupied by Ed Carey design and
right-of-way for High Ridge Road
Farther south in this northeast portion of Quantum Park IS L.ot 91 desigilated
Office/Industrial/Commercial on the Quantum Park Master Plan It is located on the northeast
corner of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard The northern border is an access drive for
the TrlRa11 station This parcel was originally approved for an ice skating rink but the site plan
expired Now it is the subject of an Use Approval application for a gas station/truck
stop/convenience store and a Conditional Use/Site Plan application for a fast food restaurant
with a drive-through facility The applicant's argument that Lot 89B is not suitable for office or
industrial is not consistent with the nature of development occurring around it.
Simultaneously with this NOPC application Quantum is requesting Masi:er Site Plan approval
for Lots 83-88 designated Mixed Use on the Master Plan These lots were the first to be
deSignated Mixed Use with the approval of OL.a'ltum Park DRl Master Plan Amendment #10
This proposed Master Site Plan provides for commercial de'/elopment along Gateway
Boulevard and 136 fee simple townhomes on the balance of the site An additional six (6) rental
units are proposed to be located in the commercial portion of the site integrated with office use
Also submitted is a Master Site Plan for Lot 89B that continues the townhome portior) of the
development with 39 units proposed If these tv'/O Master Site Plans were approved they would
use the balance of residential units permitted for Quantum Park
Mixed Use including residential commercial and office IS permitted on lots 83-88 These lots
are the last available deSignated for thiS tyoe of deve!oorr.ent in QI..~antum Park The citv s
original iment in approving the !Vllxed Use ceslgna Ion /vas [Q allow the cC' e cpment of nec-
traditional and new urbanism design concepts ThiS has not occurred nor is it evident in the
two Master Site Plans submitted Considering the intent of the mixed use designation it would
be more appropriate to incorporate the remaining 39 units nto the site plan for lots 83-88
The location of lot 89B is not conducive to residential development as It IS surrounded by non-
residential uses, The future reSidents will be homeowners who may object to specific industrial
uses located adjacent to them This incompatible situation IS contrary to the intent and purpose
I'
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001!rvlPlvlD 02-002
Memorandum t'Jo PZ 02 188
of a planned industrial park Also the argl.r,~n, OJ the af:plican the. 898 v I. enhance tre
development of the mixed use on Lots 83 88 located to -he west IS fla ded Trere IS no log cal
connection between Lot 89B and the lots to tr8 "Jest Tile applicatlens fer tre PJlaster Site Plans
Indicate that the recreation area will be 'ecc"ed cr the reslcental .ccrcr: cf L.:ts 83-88 te the
west and will be used by the residents In 896 Automobiles as well as ;::edestilans must cress
High Ridge Road a four-lane divided roac"'Jaj to access the principal proJec' This IS not a
signalized intersection nor is it proposed to be ene Safety and access are major concerns since
this portion of High Ridge Road is located en 2. c:Jrve and carnes a significant amount of truck
traffic from the industrial area to the north
Additional arguments against the change for 89B to mixed use are provided in the City's
Comprehensive Plan poliCies
Policy 1 19 2 of the Land Use Element addresses the provision cf lands for Industrial
development and reads as follows
'The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrral acreage which can
accommodate the approximate Industrial employment which has been projected In the
Future Land Use Element, and prohibit conversion of land designated Industrial" on the
currently adopted Future Land Use Map unless such conversion would generate a range
of employment choices for current and future residents provide goods and services of
regional Importance and retain regienal fiscal and economic Significance
Policy 1 194 states "the city shall continue to encourage and enforce the development of
Industrial land as industrial parks or concentrated industrial areas In order to maximize the
linkage between complementary industries
The 1989 Comprehensive Plan contains policies dealing with the general incompatibilities
between "Industrial" and "Residential" land uses and recommends physical separation and
buffering to ameliorate those effects The prooosed lecation for the 39 town home units on Lot
89B is adjacent to properties developed for industrial and office uses
There is no adequate justification provided by the applicant to convert lands earmarked for
development as an employment center to residential development If one of the goals of the
City is to maintain a jobs/housing balance as lands designated for employment-based
development are reduced, a corresponding need for housing diminishes Otherwise, the City
becomes merely a bedroom community for other more successful employment centers in the
County
Conclusion
As indicated herein the impacts of the proposed DRI amendments on the ut:lity systems
roadways and public fac Ilties are either within the existing capacities or adcitional provisions will
be required of the developer to ensure that lelJels of service standards are not compromised
Regarding the conversion of Lot 89B from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use (MU) there has been
no justification presented by the applicant that would refute the findings contained herein nor
speCifically justify its conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or ItS disadvantages regarding
location If it IS the intent of the applicant to develop all of the allotted 1000 residential units
they can be located on the existing mixed use designated lots This can be accomplished by
using a new urbanism design that Integrates the residential units with office or commercial In
QuantL;m Park - DRIA 02-C01 'Mrl'l1O 02-C02
~,lemorancum No PZ 02 188
ore bUilding as ongwaily proposed and used OJ "e 2;:0leart '" !L.S
application
~ prsv'cL.S NOPC
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Flonda Statutes, Chapter 380 06(19) SubstantIal De'/Iations the applicant has
demonstrated by clear and convincing eVidence tha the proposed charge IS not a substantial
deviation requlnng accitional development of regional impact review
Regarding the proposed modifications to the Ouantum Park Master Plan staff recommends
approval of designating Lot 3 Office/Industrial (01) and designating Lot 34-C Open
Space/Detention
Based on the analysIs presented above staff recommends denial of tre request to designate
Lot 89B Mixed Use If the request for Lot 89B IS approved staff recommends that Lot 89B if
developed exclusively as residential at a m nlmum be buffered from ad acent non-residential
uses in accordance with the requirements of the Ouantum Park Buffer Plan and the PID buffer
requirements in the Land Development regulations No waivers should be granted frcm -hese
buffer requirements (see conditions of approval Exhibit 0 ')
S ,PLANNING\SHAREJ\WP'PROJECTS',CUANTUM PARK 2002 ;"ME~C 13.. \1p.~1C'-OF!I'; C2.QC1 5i.J.F;= ?E?C?T ;:t13.:CC
s
)t~~GATIGN .MAP -
1/11 "'I "iiiri; 1fiID'~ TTTTTTTTTlllIlll..7P,-~ J\~ I~_MFA R K
"t.-;.,-';'-"-'- . -~
<I.
\ ~ iLJ'l ~-1~1 i
! . , r!k~I.' "'O!II--~
'i ,~ tl 'I ~'
1 ~ '-- . -....:J-
]~ G1- ~.~~- ,j
: ~ B' i..1 ~ t:j 1
.. LJ ...... ~
~ ~rTIJ ilV ~;,.!;J
~ G: ;' 'if?? ~, I
k.; (jl~ ~O ~ E~
_ ~~ 1"-'
"-' -,. A I""
1: ~
.\~ ~
EXHIBIT i~A~
... ~......l_:-...~::._-- ._
f
7'1}
Lr--i
I
~ NI~T
(I CITY
l---
i
.! 1 . I
'. . .. . '=' ~ L:....:.. I
.. 1~ITi~ I)- .1
. . I
- - ~ ~ llii:. - :r-
I !'< '"=r~
R'l.n^~~ / I
_-a ~
~~ 1,
r\ ' II
l~ _ (
1 - l-' - ~I
j-
f.
r
~..,.T-'.lrl
~\J
~<~
H,-
. . ~ J' ..
. - .
1
..,
..---
-
? 0
/,~3
. . I
~
". ~\Pj A? C I
:,1 ,: ~ I ~ \
TC' -.-.- . -- . ~~ .
~ ........:T - -="". "
. I "&.:
- ~ -
'" ~ I \ _ ~~'" /, ~ J
:' ~ -_--~[J: - ,.~ KU~--.o ~ ,':~1j
.: ./ :' f ~ IH~ ~ ~~~~I In 'f)
, \ c::.J. ,A" 'I
, .: bYNTm..;.;.~dt: H 'i 'j
\~ ~~;:lKU OF c'CJlVlMEFi::'", - {'~. If, -!
PIO ~.. -~. ANTUM PARK' /1 ~ 'II
l- ~ L 'l.--n J~ r
"'l If \ ..
.... .... . . ;. .~nV~ ,~. ." I .. "J PU
~. \t:\~ ::::::i~i~~_". . : liI:III::.... ""'~~r\' 'J -
~ E 8: -~I R---=l' .... r IJ.!!' ~ : j J 111111 n
\'W~~-;_: "~I '=-D .: '(/ - II. T ~
. ~ ~T"T_ ~. _ -+- ~ 'i
<~~~ -- _ ~I: 9 1/8 MILES l !I
~ ~ U -1 U..."I - ...., 1111 I,
t, (" n Trr,., 'oJ-/jJJlT1 ~
. 8~TII ...5'10 400 800 FEET J ~
~
I il
I
"
-
l
.....J
-
-
\
).
-J
-
-
I
.
1
-
J
..J
~
.:
-
-
-
- ~
~
- ~
141
- ::..
- "I:
i
- ---
~ AA
i
::.::::LL.-
::~:~I !
.~I
,,~,~i j !
~~~: I
~,ol , I
'::1':1 I f
~~:! I I
~~~~I i I
~'I~:i I
1 ... ~~ .
;.~i~l ; 1
~i~, III
I: I
.F:
{Jig
I ·
" 0
p~
~
i
~Ii!~i~'e
,-I:I~I
. ,;I>.~
6\ II !
I ,
"
?;;
~
8l!~
~'~!
ii!!_
ii~~
~
'I ;I\"\Q
"! 3 i ..
.\ ! .~
I ,J I <
! ~:~
EXHIBIT "B"
EXiSTING MASTER PU\;--J
j
;j
:
piqU' ~I~
HU-1J~ 3p'
, ~.3 I ~,~~
~ ~ ... !
~ ~.;f r
:J.'j~-;
6.~S~:,I;~
"',~Ir
~1 ~"~~li
'.1; ~ ':' ;; ~ ~ ...
~ ~ ~ ~ l~}'
i~: ~ ~~:~
:i ~ l ~~ I
:l"~ 11 d
,~~ 'gq
~ i ! G
.! . i ~
_ ! a~
~
;.!...
"
5.5 A
.;,;
r .
::;. ~
18
l .:
;;>1
~
!!
B
I
----
----j
I
I
I~ I
.:>1
i=i
I'"
I~
I~
i~
I
, ,
r-- '
....:("...,...C{loOl I
" X'(.., 1001 \
. -
,
..
. - 77
I
Q
~
r.;
"
, ~
i
;:
"'J
>
;:)
'"
;:;
z
I
'----"
.5~
'"
;::;~i!.~",
-= ! .......(
'<'!:: I I ~.i ~ .
~ ~ ~ : ~ ~~ ~ 1 :" ~
r ,:t ~ I
: ~~ ~ ' I i r ,.,! \
~~~I \j ~ ~
:; 1l I ' ,! I '~.' I J !
-;) -", [ ~
'"
~,
1 ~
- ~ -
! ~ j
~
~
~
~ ;
i ~
.
f"
~ ~~l~.~~~._: ~
~
, : 5 ~ ~
m
~
"-
------
UlJ
I
=
~ !
! ~ !
<l
HH~~H
<l <l
U'
H
,
~
~
,..,
~
!l
i ~
I
I~
"l>
~
- ~\ '~C"
E)(\-\\B SI R PLAN
PROPOSED MI< \
\
\
\
-+
~
~~
,l~
~
\..,. ~"
\------- :
\ ------
\ .--/----- \
~-- ----
\
".-:~c:.P.ES~;' ::~ ~ - - .-
~---
- - -,-", - "
- -- . '.
1:' _----- i ,\
"t'- \ \
\
i.:~O ~ -" ...J.N~L
~
/
\ i
--\
. \
\
~---
=----
--~~: ~ . ~-;; -~ ~--:::-:
~..;.... ':I~Ll:,\:>'::'
~----
,
\
\
~~ ----
~\~
';~ ~ /
, /
~-
.
/----
~\
~
--..-L
~-\
-~
/'
/
/
;~~
i!! .............~"" ;/
;.
\
'\
\
\
\~
\ -=~
I-
I
" _ /~~'"'- ~'-F2::;;;:;:?j:Y'
~o
-8~
< -
~~~
; -;;
1~~
,,~
%~
"'""
''i~
l~i
..,
~::J
;::(/'1
;;;.
'A' :=;L,
t \ .
,,\,~
~ r- '
~ \ 5)
~\
\---.
y
."
~'o
-----~--~ \
___ -4~- - -
, -----:~
\. ~~ ~;; ________- -__ __ _,~---:.-' _ n..
___ ____. ~ _ _ <:;; _ :s- ::}' ~.,:. \
~< \ -' - - - --;;-.-;-' . ,-;:--' -~. --'
\ // . _ _ _'" ~: ,~ ... 11 \
'- ~ ~~ i-"" ~~,~ ~ ;r~;:~"//"--__ \
l.~~::..~~~-=;'~ >".., . ~-.~n_____-
-~. .::= .-~,=,~~,
\ =--=-=~~ ~ \
r:''' ~ iA \
== i - "'~ ,\
~
-~.--~
i
;
~
s~
..:-.
;'
~
-,
~
~
"
"
..,
i
"
'2
;.
~
\
\
\
\
. \
" ~ \. ~~
".. \
,. I .-
I oi. \ ~ '
" -
\
\
\
l-i~
~ ~ ~ \
,- ~ .,
;.-.... \
\ .;.~~~
\\~,
--- ~
.- ~~
~-~ ~~ :t. ~
!~ ~:!:!~
~ :f,--" .
~ 'lI
~ ;;\
~
G~-\
\
...--
-.-------------
.-.---.-------
Conditions of Approval
?
-
I DEPART\'IE:\"TS I c-..CLUDE I REJECT I
I
Comments None \. I i
BL1LDING DI\-lSIOi\ I I
I
I I
Comments i';one \.
I
P ARKS A~1) RECREA TIOi\ ,
;
Comments I I
i
I ,
3 All resIdentIal development planned for thIS area \vIll be subject to the Park \:
and RecreatIOn FacIhtIes Impact Fee.
I I
FORESTERfEN"lRON~IENTALIST I
Comments. None I \. I I
PLA~~li\G A.'m ZONING I
Comments. I
I
I
4 Under the condItIOn of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development \.
Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a
traffic analYS1S IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. In heu of an
mdependent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic I
DIVISIOn WIll revIew the traffic study The project must meet the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards. :
5 If Lot 89B IS developed as reSIdentIal, It must meet the buffer reqUIrements of
the Quantum Park Penphenal Landscape Buffer Plan and the PID buffer X I
reqUIrements m the Land Development RegulatIOns. No waIvers are allowed.
ADDITIO'lAL PLA1"~I~G & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COl\1)ITIO"'S
I
Comments:
!
I OmIt Comment #5 allO\\1ng buffer plan to be reduced and project setbacks as \. I i
I I
proposed or adjusted. i I
ADDITIONAL CITY COvIMISSIO'l CO~1)ITIO'lS I
i
I
Comments. I I
I
1 To be deterrruned.
S.\Planning\SHARED\\M'\PROJECTS\CAJanlum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPI'v1D\CQl...doc
EXHIBIT "D"
C OndltlOnS of Appro\ al
Project name Quantum ParI-. '\JOPC Amendment ;::13
FIle number. \IP'vfD 02-002
Reference 2"d revIew plans Identified wIth a September 3 2002 PlannIng and ZonIng Department date stamp
markIng.
~
I DEPART\IE:'iTS I INCLLDE I REJECT I
I I i
PL"BLIC WORKS- General
I i !
Comments None I X I i
PL"BLIC \VORKS- Traffic ! , I
I !
Comments. I I I
1 \'llth respect to the re-deslgnatlOn of Lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall '- I
provIde a Traffic Impact AnalYSIS (TIA) as noted m Staffs revIews of
Quantum VIllages North and Quantum VIllages East (Lot 89B) dated August
5, 2002. (prOVIded under separate cover) whIch, at a mInImUm, evaluates the
Impact of traffic (turnmg movements) and need for SIgnalIZatIOn. Of
partIcular concern IS traffic congestIOn at the proposed Intersection of HIgh
R!dge Road and the proposed Quantum Villages l\orth and Quantum \ Illages
East (Lot 89B) The TIA must be provIded at tIme of Master SIte Plan
submIttal for Lot 89B and Quantum Village-North.
VTILITIES
, !
Comments. I
2 The applIcant (through hIS deSIgn engmeenng consultant) needs to X
demonstrate that: a.) suffiCIent utIlIty system capaCIty IS avaIlable to support
the proposed modIficatIOns to the preVIOusly approved land uses to the north
of Gateway Boulevard. or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(s)
will be prOVIded to allow for the proposed use(s) at tIme of Techmcal SIte
Plan ReVIew I
I
i
FIRE I
, I i
Comments. None X II
POLICE I
Comments. None X
J
I
E:'iGI~ERING DlVISIOl'l I
I
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST
This completed cover sheet must accompany all agenda item requests. Please place check marks
in the boxes as indicated Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form Submit
original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of aQenda request (with back UD) to the
City Clerk's office Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below Incomplete or
late items will be returned to originating department.
Requested City Deadline for Submittal to City P & D/CRA Requests Deadline
Commission Meeting Clerk's Office
Dates
Au ust 20, 2002
Se tember 3, 2002
Se tember 17, 2002
October 1 2002
October 15 2002
November 6, 2002 October 14
*Due to holiday on September 2nd
Departments are responsible for securing the following
si natures on attached A enda Ruest Form
De artment Head
Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services
Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds
All back u material is attached
All exhibits are attached & marked e. Exhibit "A'
Department Head's initials. \,\V~ Jl:L
Quantum Park DR! NOPC/Master Plan Amendment #13 CORIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002)
Please do not write in the shaded area below
Legal Department signature 0
City Manager's signature
D
ITEM RETURNED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S)
Signature(s) missing 0
Incomplete submittal D
Missed deadline D
Other D
Reason
(Date)
Person contacted to pick up rejected request
by
on
bg 7/19/02
S. \Planning\Planning Templates\AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET CHECKUST.doc