REVIEW COMMENTS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 02-188
TO' Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
'\Y'\~~
THROUGH Michael Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
FROM Lusia Galav, AICP p~
Principal Planner ~
DATE. September 11 , 2002
SUBJECT Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Master Plan Amendment #13
NATURE OF REQUEST
Quantum Park of Commerce (a.k.a. Quantum Park PID) is a partially built-out Development of
Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 553 13 acres, zoned Planned Industrial Development
(PID) It is located on the west side of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton
Canal - (C-16) (See attached Exhibit "A" - Location Map) The applicant, MFT Development,
Inc. is requesting an amendment to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order (D 0 ) adopted
December 4, 1984 by Ordinance No 84-51 The original DO was subsequently amended 11
times by Ordinance Nos. 86-11, 86-37, 88-3, 94-10, 94-51, 96-33, 96-65, 97-20, 99-05,00-02
and 01-54 The City Commission denied Amendment #11 on February 20, 2001 The current
Master Plan for Quantum Park is provided in Exhibit "B" - Existing Master Plan
Amendment #13 proposes three changes including amending the existing use designation on
Lot 89B in the Master Plan to the "Mixed Use" designation All requested changes are depicted
in Exhibit "C" - Proposed Master Plan and described as follows.
1) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 89B from Office/lndustrial (01) land use to
Mixed Use (MU) The proposed Mixed Use designation includes office, commercial and
residential uses;
2) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 3 from Industrial (I) land use to
Office/Industrial (01), and
3) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lot 34-C from "Reserved" to Open Space/
Detention
BACKGROUND
An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) is first and foremost governed by
Florida Statutes Chapter 38006 (19) - Substantial Deviations. The applicant has submitted a
Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) in accordance with the statutory requirements. The NOPC
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
is reviewed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Treasure Coast
Regional Planning Council (RPC) and the City The DCA and the RPC are reviewing the
proposed NOPC and will provide comments following the procedures outlined in Chapter 380 06
(19)
The City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 1 5, Sec. 4 3A requires a preliminary review
by the Planning and Development Board of an amendment to a DRI Chapter 380 06 F S
requires that the local governing body hold a public hearing to review and approve the NOPC
The City Commission is required to determine whether the proposed change to the Quantum
Park DRI is or is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380 06 (19) If it is determined
that the requested change is a substantial deviation then further review will be required pursuant
to the statutory requirements. If the City Commission determines that the proposed change is
not a substantial deviation then they may take action to approve or deny the requested change
The original DRI Development Order adopted a Master Plan for Quantum Park. That Master
Plan has been amended over the years, the latest change being approved on November 6,
2001 The proposed Amendment #13 alters the approved land uses for that Master Plan
Therefore the review of the DRI amendment also constitutes a review of the changes to the
Master Plan for Quantum Park. In addition to the state statutes, staff has reviewed the Master
Plan in accordance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Section 7, Planned
Industrial Development and Chapter 3, Master Plan Approval First review comments were
generated and the Technical Review Committee (TRC) reviewed the Master Plan changes on
September 3, 2002.
ANAL VSIS
Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) - Substantial Deviation
The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantial deviation are outlined
in Chapter 38006 (19) In reviewing the statute section staff determined that only one of the
criteria applies to the proposed changes for Quantum Park DRI This criterion, which is
applicable for review of this proposed change is provided in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 , which
states. "The following changes to an approved development of regional impact shall be
presumed to create a substantial deviation Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and
convincing evidence"
4 Chapter 380.06(19)(e)5.c., Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the
contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases
of at least two of the uses within a authorized multiuse development of regional
impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in
380.0651 (3)(c), (d), (f) and (g) and residential use.
As part of the NOPC application the applicant is to complete a "Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart" The applicant has provided an updated chart. Amendment #13
involves changes to five land use categories. Industrial, Office/lndustrial, Mixed Use
(includes Residential), Reserved and Open Space There is a loss of Industrial acreage,
but the allowable square footage thresholds would not change on the Master Plan Also,
the proposed Mixed Use designation for Lot 89B would not add residential units to the
Master Plan These changes are reflected in the "Notes" section on the Master Plan
2
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
The proposed increase and decreases are presumed to maintain the vested traffic
generation level of 63,752 average daily trips (ADT)
Conclusion
The proposed changes delineated in Amendment #13 are determined not to be a substantial
deviation per Chapter 38006 (19) of the Florida Statutes. The applicant has provided the
Substantial Deviation Table and a traffic study, to provide clear and convincing evidence of a
non-substantial deviation finding This determination is subject to satisfying Condition of
Approval #4 regarding Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards.
Master Plan Modification
The proposal submitted for the NOPC modifies the approved Master Plan for the Quantum Park
DRI There are three major changes proposed The applicant provided the following descriptive
summary of these changes.
Lot 89B (4.00 Acres)
Lot 89B was previously designated as Office/industrial (01) Land Use The Land Use has been
revised to "Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land use designation includes office,
commercial and residential uses.
Lot 3 (4.07 Acres)
The Land Use of this lot is currently designated as Industrial (IND) Land Use The Land Use has
been revised to "Office/lndustrial (01)" This lot previously was designated as Office/Industrial
(01) and revised to the current Industrial (IND) designation by Amendment No 10
Lot 34-C (6.58 Acres)
The Lot 34-C Land Use is currently designated as Reserved The "Reserved" Land Use
designation was approved as part of the Master Plan amendment No 12 approval The
conditions of approval for Amendment No 12 acknowledged the need for the City to address
the Open Space requirements for the entire development prior to a developable Land Use
designation for Lot 34-C
The Land Use designation for Lot 34-C is proposed to be removed from the "Reserved"
designation and included, as it was previously, in the Open Space/Detention designation The
reason for this request is described below
Subsequent to the approval of Amendment No 12, Quantum Community Development District
(QCDD) had acquired Lot 34-C The QCDD is the public entity responsible for the maintenance
of the Sand Pine Preserves, the Primary Water Management System, the Roadways and the
Secondary Drainage Systems within the development. The acquisition of Lot 34-C by the QCDD
removes the land from the available developable acreage The QCDD purchased the property
to address the preserve and open space requirements of the Development Order, to address
security issues relative to the sand pine preserves and to provide additional land area for
drainage purposes as necessary to accommodate the vested future development.
3
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02-188
Table 1 provides the proposed acreage changes to the DRI Master Plan
TABLE 1 DRI MASTER PLAN LAND USE ACREAGE CHANGES
Larld Use Designation Proposed AcreageDRIA ExlstlJlgAcreage Change
#13
Industrial (IND) 9718 101.25 (407)
Office/Industrial (01) 79.82 79.75 0.07
Mixed Use 94.86 90.86 4.0
Open Space 88.78 82.20 6.58
Reserved 0 6.58 (6.58)
All other categories on the Land Use Acreage Table remain the same as approved in
Amendment #12. The Quantum Park DRI acreage total of 553 13 remains unchanged
The Quantum Park DRI has been amended 11 times over the years, which is not unusual for a
DRI of this type The Florida Statute governing the DRI process, Chapter 38006(19), provides
for and anticipates amendments stating "There are a variety of reasons why a developer may
wish to propose changes to an approved development of regional impact, including changed
market conditions"
These proposed changes to the Master Plan were analyzed from two perspectives The first is
the potential for creating additional regional or local impacts. The second is the consistency and
compatibility of the proposed changes with the regulations and policies adopted by the City
through the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Regulations and other applicable studies
such as the Visions 20/20 plan
Impacts
ReQional
A development has gone through the DRI process because the projected impacts are
considered regional in nature. Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine if
the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally
identified and mitigated. In the case of the Quantum Park DRI the major issue is whether there
will be an increase in traffic resulting from the land use redistribution/redesignation
A provision in Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park development order requires that" A traffic
study shall be submitted with any future application requesting a change in use designations on
any lot. The City shall hire, at the applicant's expense, an independent traffic consultant to
review the study" In lieu of an independent traffic consultant, the city's Public Works
Department Director, a designated TRC member, conducted the review of the traffic study The
applicant has also transmitted the traffic study to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for
their customary review and approval
Based on the TRC review of the Master Plan, including the traffic study, no additional regional
impacts are evident. The vested number of trips, 63,752 is presumed to remain unchanged due
to the balancing of increases and decreases in the intensities of the proposed changes to the
land use designations The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has not released the results of
their review at this time
4
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02-188
The Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council focus
their review of the amendment on regional issues exclusively Staff has not yet received a
formal written response from these agencies. It is anticipated that the city will receive comments
from both agencies before review by the City Commission
Local
The focus of the substantial deviation determination is regional impacts. The development order
for the DRI is a local order and the approval of any requested changes is within the jurisdiction
of the city As such, the city's main focus is local issues and impacts There were no significant
local issues identified by the TRC members at this time The Utilities Department has indicated
that any unforeseen impacts to the water and sewer systems and related levels of service will
be borne by the developer The updated Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the request for
amendment indicates that there will be no increase in the allowable intensities of development.
The traffic generation levels will remain within the limits for which the DRI is vested Turning
movements and signalization issues can be evaluated and addressed at the Master and
Technical Site Plan stage Drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the Master and
Technical site plan approvals, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage
permitting authorities.
Consistency and Compatibility with City Policies
Of the three changes proposed by the applicant only Lot 89B presents issues that are contrary
to city policies. The three proposed changes are discussed below
Lot 3 - This lot was inadvertently changed from Office/Industrial (01) to Industrial (I) in NOPC
#10 The site has an active site plan approval which requires the 01 designation to allow the
permitted development of an office/warehouse with office use comprising more than 20% of the
square footage permitted under an "Industrial" only designation The applicant is proposing the
change to rectify this situation
Lot 34-C - This lot was designated as "Reserved" in the last DRI Master Plan amendment #12.
The "Reserve" category is a non-development designation This lot was never designated for
development and has been included in the Open Space category until Amendment #12 The
applicant wanted to place an "Industrial" designation on the lot. Staff objected and the
compromise "Reserved" category was initiated until the city and developer could determine the
most appropriate use for the site Subsequently, the developer sold the parcel to the Quantum
Community Development District (QCDD) for detention/retention and open space This is
consistent with the intended use of the site in the original DRI approval
Lot 89B - Lot 8gB is a four (4) acre lot located in the northeast corner of the Quantum Park PID
The current Master Plan designation is Office/ Industrial (01) It is an irregularly-shaped lot
located east of High Ridge Road The applicant has provided the following justification for
changing the lot to Mixed Use (MU)
Lot 898 is adjacent to Lots 83 through 88. Lots 83 through 88 are designated as Mixed
Use. It has been determined that to enhance the Mixed Use concept, as well as the
residential component to that concept, the addition of Lot 898 is necessary and
appropriate. The inclusion of lot 898 as Mixed Use will enhance the proposed
development of Lots 83-88, which will benefit the entire Quantum Park as well as the
5
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02-188
City There really is no down side to this change, as this property has been sitting vacant
for many, many years, and as such, apparently is not desirable in the market for
development as Office or Industrial
First, Lot 89B is not "adjacent" to Lots 83 -88. It is across High Ridge Road which is a four lane
divided local collector Second, there is existing and proposed office, industrial and commercial
development surrounding Lot 89B as described further below
North - Lot 89-A designated Office/Industrial (01) and occupied by Ed Carey Design,
(Design, manufacturing, storage and distribution of decor elements) and developed land,
outside of Quantum Park, with an industrial land use designation and zoned M-1,
South - Right-of-way for High Ridge Road and Lot 90(portion) designated
Office/Industrial (01) developed as Gateway Professional Building,
East - Lot 90(portion) designated Office/Industrial (01) developed as Gateway
Professional Building and Lot 90(portion) designated Government/Institutional (G&I))
developed as the TriRail public transportation station,
West - Lot 89-A designated Office/industrial (01) and occupied by Ed Carey design and
right-of-way for High Ridge Road
Farther south in this northeast portion of Quantum Park is Lot 91 designated
OfficellndustriallCommercial on the Quantum Park Master Plan It is located on the northeast
corner of High Ridge Road and Gateway Boulevard. The northern border is an access drive for
the TriRail station This parcel was originally approved for an ice skating rink but the site plan
expired Now it is the subject of an Use Approval application for a gas station/truck
stop/convenience store and a Conditional Use/Site Plan application for a fast food restaurant
with a drive-through facility The applicant's argument that Lot 89B is not suitable for office or
industrial is not consistent with the nature of development occurring around it.
Simultaneously with this NOPC application, Quantum is requesting Master Site Plan approval
for Lots 83-88 designated Mixed Use on the Master Plan These lots were the first to be
designated Mixed Use with the approval of Quantum Park DRI Master Plan Amendment #10
This proposed Master Site Plan provides for commercial development along Gateway
Boulevard and 136 fee simple town homes on the balance of the site An additional six (6) rental
units are proposed to be located in the commercial portion of the site integrated with office use
Also submitted is a Master Site Plan for Lot 89B that continues the town home portion of the
development with 39 units proposed If these two Master Site Plans were approved they would
use the balance of residential units permitted for Quantum Park.
Mixed Use, including residential, commercial and office is permitted on lots 83-88. These lots
are the last available designated for this type of development in Quantum Park. The city's
original intent in approving the "Mixed Use" designation was to allow the development of neo-
traditional and new urbanism design concepts. This has not occurred, nor is it evident in the
two Master Site Plans submitted. Considering the intent of the mixed use designation it would
be more appropriate to incorporate the remaining 39 units into the site plan for lots 83-88.
The location of lot 89B is not conducive to residential development as it is surrounded by non-
residential uses. The future residents will be homeowners who may object to specific industrial
uses located adjacent to them. This incompatible situation is contrary to the intent and purpose
6
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02-188
of a planned industrial park. Also, the argument by the applicant that 89B will enhance the
development of the mixed use on Lots 83-88 located to the west, is flawed There is no logical
connection between Lot 89B and the lots to the west. The applications for the Master Site Plans
indicate that the recreation area will be located on the residential portion of Lots 83-88 to the
west and will be used by the residents in 89B Automobiles as well as pedestrians must cross
High Ridge Road, a four-lane divided roadway to access the principal project. This is not a
signalized intersection nor is it proposed to be one Safety and access are major concerns since
this portion of High Ridge Road is located on a curve and carries a significant amount of truck
traffic from the industrial area to the north.
Additional arguments against the change for 89B to mixed use are provided in the City's
Comprehensive Plan policies.
Policy 1 19.2 of the Land Use Element addresses the provision of lands for Industrial
development and reads as follows
"The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrial acreage which can
accommodate the approximate industrial employment which has been projected in the
Future Land Use Element, and prohibit conversion of land designated "Industrial" on the
currently adopted Future Land Use Map unless such conversion would generate a range
of employment choices for current and future residents, provide goods and services of
regional importance, and retain regional fiscal and economic significance"
Policy 1 19 4 states "the city shall continue to encourage and enforce the development of
Industrial land as industrial parks or concentrated industrial areas in order to maximize the
linkage between complementary industries"
The 1989 Comprehensive Plan contains policies dealing with the general incompatibilities
between "Industrial" and "Residential" land uses and recommends physical separation and
buffering to ameliorate those effects. The proposed location for the 39 townhome units on Lot
89B is adjacent to properties developed for industrial and office uses.
There is no adequate justification provided by the applicant to convert lands earmarked for
development as an employment center to residential development. If one of the goals of the
City is to maintain a jobs/housing balance, as lands designated for employment-based
development are reduced, a corresponding need for housing diminishes. Otherwise, the City
becomes merely a bedroom community for other, more successful, employment centers in the
County
Conclusion
As indicated herein, the impacts of the proposed DRI amendments on the utility systems,
roadways and public facilities are either within the existing capacities or additional provisions will
be required of the developer to ensure that levels of service standards are not compromised
Regarding the conversion of Lot 89B from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use (MU), there has been
no justification presented by the applicant that would refute the findings contained herein, nor
specifically justify its conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or its disadvantages regarding
location If it is the intent of the applicant to develop all of the allotted 1000 residential units,
they can be located on the existing mixed use designated lots. This can be accomplished by
using a new urbanism design that integrates the residential units with office or commercial in
7
Quantum Park - DRIA 02-001/MPMD 02-002
Memorandum No PZ 02 188
one building as originally proposed and used by the applicant to justify a previous NOPC
application
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 38006(19) Substantial Deviations, the applicant has
demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed change is not a substantial
deviation requiring additional development of regional impact review
Regarding the proposed modifications to the Quantum Park Master Plan staff recommends
approval of designating Lot 3, Office/Industrial (01) and designating Lot 34-C, Open
Space/Detention
Based on the analysis presented above, staff recommends denial of the request to designate
Lot 89B "Mixed Use" If the request for Lot 89B is approved staff recommends that Lot 89B, if
developed exclusively as residential, at a minimum be buffered from adjacent non-residential
uses in accordance with the requirements of the Quantum Park Buffer Plan and the PID buffer
requirements in the Land Development regulations No waivers should be granted from these
buffer requirements (see conditions of approval Exhibit "D")
S:\PLANNING\SHAREDlWPlPROJECTS\QUANTUM PARK 2002 AMEND #13 + MPMDlDRIA 02-001\STAFF REPORT #13.DOC
8
j\l-~9AT10N"MAP
~' II Sn1lTiiW!'1!oOUANTUMPARK
_ . .~~r --.-., ..' ...
-. ~.
{i: 1 ~~,~~~T~ ,J! 'J N~T T
:b '" :.-r~' \-=1:11 /\ . ( CITY
~j !:i.,' - n:d ^W :g \ --
TV' ~ ~ 8 ~,l ..~~,lui1~ ~ . -
i ~r~.:~i1f!1 I~V\--IR'I^^-~:
~ ~/A' ,:&~ . ~ , 1 if I
~ _ _ <vn 1" V
~ ~3 :,;,; j/f I ~~.{
L:J- _ ,_ · . ".r- .:.::.....' , 1 ,/;~)
~ -"" ~ - ~ .
. .:. r ~ -"
. ...J i I I /' ~ ~ .,r;
r; r~; ~l!\ .' ... - )Jf'~'~~1 ~ b~
cr '&1 I'"~ - : \ /,(-17i ~
: _ '~bYNT).,-<<~~~H
. .WIWK OF c-Ci"AAiVi E R"
..Ioo.u 1-' ~
_ _ ...-~. ANTUIVI PARK)
-......
.... . ....... _ 1: )
\. ~:: i: :~i l.i~~lJaR"" . : .~ ~...
I ~ -~--- ~ ~
,I: t: \ · R ..... ..... =
.~ ~ \ E \ - -.... .- -'
I. ,~LI :: ~t:::1
'Y'- ,-' ~ ~~
. '1'1["10. .'C.... :; I ~ ~
. ~w~- ~ - ~'01\11 1/,8
"j lJffi'TfD~" QJI I 1
~~1JI\-O 400 800 FEET
~
~:::[
~~
:=:
6::::::
f~
~_r
~~L'
~
.;
!""
~
t~
"IV1CTDRCLA.:V ~
-
ij . .
~
i..:3
PIP
-.A It. laD':;!!
I I
-
~ -
....
.., ........-. ....
rn
-c \I
:)
~~
~
"t
R AA
'TI~
EXHIBIT ~A.\
~ ~ ~..;~ - i"t" ,,-~.~ -
,._ .E..:f-a-... ~.-:~_~~:':i~'fi.
I
- ~
;
i
t~~ - i
~'f1t[J:~
i lTl: ~~
l!i . l
T~
I
...
;'\ -
~l
/.
~
--
LJ -' rl
'I
t
-
I
r
-!J~-
7J
,
Ii
~
.1 ~
rll
J
, I
'If
" 111
.' \ >- I J "I'
\. . jpf 7/~
Flfjr. '
. oc::: ....,
: . -W;6 I ~.I1l HlTl
~..i nlll
...
MILESV' ~
,
-
-
I"" _,,.ro
- ----------
EXHIBIT "B"
EXISTING MASTER PLAN
~ , i i i E \ ~ ~\ ~ a ~
~- ~ ~ 1 is ~ ~ j \d\
oSlo ! in h \ q~
~Q::: i I i u; I \~ ;i
~!Hl ~ ~~~~ ili
$ t :t :a ~
~~ l ~ ; ; I ~ ~ ii ~
H ~ nil lid;
~; i P s~ i~
r 1: ~ \ \d t CONGRESS AVE
~J ~ ~ i ~ ;; ,.
~,,& ~ ~ i t i ~~ o ~
Slo ~ \
.0 t t ~ h
g
a ~~
s:
~ e "'T,,,...~\olE.tH
% tNoel wI
~
~
i
\
i
.
j
.
i
.
~
.
~
\
1
\1
" 0
! 0
! V>
~ .
. .
i
;;
a
.
h
a'
X'
-t> 7l..
o 11~ J5a 5t5, 700
",,~nIG.~,IoU.~
& ~ ~
~ 8 ~ g ~ : ': ;: & ~ ~
~.~.. ~ U ~ p
~ ~ n ~ ~
<iI <iI<iI <iI
'\
D
C III
... IT!
Z ~
-i
C (;
;: Z
-0
o ..g ~ !i~~C;ii ~ ?
^ -J
~ CD ;."
i i tmmu 0 0
c
z ~5
s ~ ~ oA!'IAAi;~ 0
~ i ~U~ ~~~ ~ l':!~
-<
~ ;.a . ~ 60 "
i ~
\ ~>. ! a ::eZ
~ ..., ~ ~~
H s
~t j -0
~ ... ~
Ol
~ ,
Q
IT!
.po
...
"
un~
lHll
~ ~
i e
~ ~ ~
%r' ~ ~;
~ d!l dHd~ o~d
LLL\
! i i
a
~ a
i "
u:u ~ I
; I ~'
i L ~'
a Ii : ~
~ ~ ~ fI
I i ~ ~ ~,
~ i i t
"
IE
~ ,
------.----------
1,,--'
Q.
i
I'
~
t ~g
~~~~
~ j....
VI C
~ I:
::;!f C
SlIlEOI:
'/';c;;j
:"'''0
...~!il"U
O'~~~
~ ~I"'Z
U;"'l!!~
';t~sn
......~-~
S go
, .
'"
...
'"
<D
· II
~!2"!Z!~
~~~~g ~
:)r"'~j!I tD
~~~~i ~
~ 0; i
:{\: ~~. ~~ ~~ ~~
~~~~ / ~~
.~~",,;
>0 '0 .~>c. '>J"",o! ~y.,!
,0 I'r~- '-"--::~~,;;~
.~=....._,:>___.,,~_~i,_~, ~~.'\' r _
.... ~~ \/. .=~::::o . --T~.
I < ~o ..----.---;- ,0 ,o~, ~~df7r
I, ~ ! ~ l '. ,......!,.,..........~~. ..---- . n
," ,. I L;;" \v~~~
!il; . ,.~; r .Z ~~~.. \
,;ll ~~/J/""". ,. .. _ ;-'
' '7/ '" - ,,~ -o~
,~~ .dif j ,< "'\~~i:~ .-~ ,-' ,;;~: oii':.';';" ....
q.,:'1'~S;0' ~ ~ ~ '\~,,\,:~
-~~~'" - ~ ~ :< '
<,.. ~
'<',
o~~, ~!
'"
~--~Tic",--.. ,
~ I! Ii ~. ,
' ~ ,. I rill'. "
lit ._~~t~~!
W,~~.. ' . i "
~ ~~~
~ E ~ ~~ ' ~
~ i 0 ~
" - ~
~ii~~i~ ~,~ ~ 1;
I::r~~ ~~ ~~
~ i!~~~!~ i~ ~.
I!!il!l :! !l
~m -~"'~
o
~~~
~q...,
~~~ 8
'~ ~
00
'<
C',;;
-
g~~
ffi" ----
~ , --
-.; :'.
CONGRESS A~~E
~
I.
!I I,!'
I "TEl> ME,,,T 1::1.
I~-~ii;
. .
~ ~~
.
~
l~D E:-~ CAN~
tllP
" I
~~r:"
if:~
------- /,/ ~~
. .o'il;;r _~
. ~~~~ 3
: I :~ ~ ~
"'2 l~!
'0
!r
o
o
~I
10
.~
~
i
i~ ! ~~~'~I;
~~ .:~II
~ -:-^1ri
~il~iiii'
'::"~l"._{
I ~:i
:I!
lS~
~~~
.
~ "
..........------------ .
~~"
~! C1
"~ I .~ ';.,'
'........ . -:' :',
~~ ~--.--t ~ e~
'! ~ji" :, r
" ," .... " 'I~---~,
. , ! ----~ g. 4, i ~~
--------.--~'\', '-~~.':'... . - . .,,- / ~..,".
' .' .. --, " , '''',
lQ:(t~,~;~~~.: >.~"- - ~", - "--. ~.-;~~" , ~~, IF " :'J% .:"
. .. -~~" ,,~:.. .' ;. '.' :'1 ~ . A ".
,. , -~~~""'O~_~ ~"
~O"~ ~ ~_~I~
~-::. .. ,I ,I ,I ., ., ,,~~.;
. ! ~
.~
~~
~~~.
,
1-9:5
~:;~lt.~ ~~;
~ ~ # -;;
Q<DO~~ ~
.. '. ~
~
~
2
EO
i
g
z
~
-<
,I ~
I ~
,~
- i * g
,..,
~~~g ~~
-c-c.z,.1ii
- ;o,;:"'i='I'o::'21i
!, 'li!'ll!
~~~
I ~
----Ll_ ~
: i~;~i~m~~
~~
~
.
EXHIBIT ' ~~LAN
PROPOSED MAST
------~
:1
I
r,
~
.;
~".
~ ~
~
'I
!;l
~
~
~~
~~
- i!
I
--- ~
-- ~
~~~
-~~
EXHIBIT "D"
CondItIons of Approval
Project name. Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
File number MPMD 02-002
Reference. 2nd reVIew plans IdentIfied wIth a September 3, 2002 Planmng and Zomng Department date stamp
k1
mar ng.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments.
1 With respect to the re-desIgnatIOn of Lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall
provIde a Traffic Impact AnalysIs (TIA) as noted m Staffs reVIews of
Quantum Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B), dated August
5, 2002, (provIded under separate cover) whIch, at a mmImum, evaluates the
Impact of traffic (turnmg movements) and need for sIgnahzatIOn. Of
partIcular concern IS traffic congestIOn at the proposed mtersectIOn of HIgh
RIdge Road and the proposed Quantum Villages North and Quantum Villages
East (Lot 89B) The TIA must be prOVIded at tIme of Master SIte Plan
submIttal for Lot 89B and Quantum Village-North.
UTILITIES
Comments.
2 The apphcant (through hIS deSIgn engmeenng consultant) needs to
demonstrate that: a.) suffiCIent utihty system capaCIty IS avaIlable to support
the proposed modIficatIons to the preVIOusly approved land uses to the north
of Gateway Boulevard, or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(s)
Will be proVIded to allow for the proposed use(s) at tIme of TechnIcal SIte
Plan ReVIew
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments. None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
3 All resIdentIal development planned for thIS area will be subject to the Park
and RecreatIon FacilItIes Impact Fee
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments. None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
4 Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development
Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIons, a
traffic analYSIS IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. In lIeu of an
mdependent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic
DIVISIOn will reVIew the traffic study The project must meet the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards.
5 If Lot 89B IS developed as reSIdentIal, It must meet the buffer reqUIrements of
the Quantum Park Penphenal Landscape Buffer Plan and the Pill buffer
reqUIrements m the Land Development RegulatIons. No waIvers are allowed.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
1 To be determmed.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1 To be determmed.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Q.Jantum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMD\CO\.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
)J~
c---
PrOject name. Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
FIle number MPMD 02-002 S?# ~. :2co2
Reference' reVIew lans IdentIfied wIth a .
markmg. l'l
artment date starn
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
Q:ith respect to the re-deslgnatIOn of Lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall
proVIde a Traffic Impact Analysls~1t't1IOted m Staffs reVIews of Quantum
Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B), dated August 5, 2002,
(proVIded under separate cover) whIch, at a mlmmum, evaluates the Impact of
traffic ( turnmg movements) and need for slgnahzatIOn. Of partICular concern
IS traffic congestIOn at the proposed mtersectIOn of HIgh RIdge Road and the
proposed Quantum Villages North and Quantum Vill es East (Lot 89"R) ~o I A rYlLM- be
m 0..5~ r S, -e :7J (.(/\1 d v fY\J..kI.a.1 ~
With respect to global traffic Issues m NOPC 13, the developer shall provIde
a traffic study WhICh details total tnp generatIOn from the slte(s) as a result of
the amended land uses. Total traffic generated shall be conSIstent With the
total number of trIpS vested m the DRI.
UTILITIES
Comments.
Rl for the total park was deSIgnated pnmarily as 01
(0 !Indus Oal), or m combmatIOn WIth CommercIal The water and
./ waste er ystems were deSIgned and constructed to support that type of
: \). antlclpat use. Four (4) 11ft statIOns were configured to handle the
waste~ ter g eratIon antICIpated on the 550 acre park. LIft StatIon No 2
(loc d at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard)
pro des wastewater collectIOn for Lots 83 through Lots 91 (all located on the
north SIde of Gateway Boulevard.
Because the configuratIOn of the DRI has changed SIgnIficantly smce the
conSlt n of the util1ty infrastructure, Staff has very senous concerns
regar. 1 the capablhty of the eXlstmg utIhty systems to accommodate the
DRI 0 lficatIOns as proposed by the Developer m thIS Amendment #13
The 1 has preVIously allowed the converSIOn of three lots (Lots #59
through 61) from Office and IndustrIal Use to MIxed Use (MU), WhICh
mcluded some 272 apartment umts; the balance of 187 apartment umts have
recently been mcorporated unto Lots 62 through 67, plus 42 new apartment
umts on new Lot 101, Ius two (2) new restaurants, Ius a new commercIal
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
2
DEP ART:\-IENTS
retail plaza to be located on Lots 63, 64 65-A and 65-B, all bemg served by
thIS hft statIOn. ThIS eXIstmg hft statIOn IS now taxed to ItS hrmt and cannot
handle any addItIonalloadmg.
INCLUDE
REJECT
e applIcant (through hIS desIgn engmeenng consultant) needs to
demonstrate that: a.) suffiCIent utIlIty system capacIty IS avaIlable to support
the proposed modIficatIOns to the prevIOusly approved land uses to the north
of Gateway Boulevard, or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(st eo
will be provIded to allow for the proposed use(s) ct* +"vY€ ~ T8:AYU.u ~ rl?v . Vle.:0
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments. None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
The Parks Department has revIewed NOPC Amendment # 13 for Quantum
Park. Our mam concern WIth thIS amendment has to do WIth the contmued
mcrease m reSIdentIal development m what was once a Planned IndustrIal
Development. As a result of the mcreased reSIdentIal development mdIcated
by thIS request the City should senously consIder seekmg fundmg alternatIves
for actIve recreatIOn m the North West sectIOn of the commumty
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
3
DEPARTMENTS
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments.
NOPC Item #5.4
Lot 34C (6,58 acres)
Para!!raph One
--
--
8 The City of Boynton Beach should keep this land parcel deSignated as
"reserved" as approved uDder the Master Plan Amendment # 12 This is
consistent with the neeJi of the City to address the Open space'reqUlrements
ofthe Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI).
I
I
The applIcant shou~ indicate how they have met the Open S.pace
reqUirements ofthe\DRI, detaihng the speCific lots that compile the required
acreage. \
\
Para!!raph Three:
/
I
I
9 The Quantum Communi Development District (QCDD) being responsible
for the maintenance of the and PIne Preserves (40 ar~es)
i
I
ow they have met tbe DRI reqUirement to set
10 The QCDD being responsible for the
Water Management System.
11 The QCDD being responsible to address the security Issues relat
Sand PIne Preserves - SR.p~ ?1'~ .
The applicant should indicate how they have made proVISIOns to su ment
mUnIcipal pohce protection 'Yith a pnvate, centrally located and housed. on
site secuntv force (1984 DRI' OrdInance # 84-51 document page 15 Item
#40 )
12 NOPC Item #5,6
Land Use Acreage Table
INCLUDE
REJECT
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08122/02
4
DEPARTMENTS
Land Use DeSIgnatIon
EXIstmg Acreage
Amendment # 12
Request to the Apphcant
Wetlands
6 00 Acres
IndIcate the lots that
compnse these acres.
IndIcate the lots that
compnse these acres.
IndIcate the lots that
compnse these acres.
Lot 34-C IS the lot that
compnses thIS acreage
Sand Pme Reserve
40 00 Acres
Open Space
82.20 Acres
Reserved
6.58 Acres
PL~NG A~H) ZO~1:l'G
~;
Co;nments.
V Correct SectlOn 5 3 of the NOPC apphcatlOn to read" by Amendment No.
1\ 10"
~ ProVldeJusttficatlOn for changmg lot 89B (4ac) to MIxed Use
~"')Tnder the condItlOn of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development
~der and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIons, a
traffic analysIs IS reqUlred for thIS Master Plan approval. In heu of an
mdependent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic
DIVlsIon will reVlew the traffic study The project must meet the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards.
I ~
1~ ReVIse response to NOPC QuestlOn 7 to change "Eleventh" to Twelfth" on
7\ the last lme.
,
: 'N Clanfy. acreage number shown under the "office" category on page 1 of the
, I\. SubstantIal DeVlatlOn DetermmatIon Chart. There should be number for
"PreVlOUS DO change."
~ Include shadmg for commItted development on the Master Plan.
~ Label Lot 34-C as open space" on the Master Plan.
M Include the roadway markIngs and access pomts as sho\vn on preVlOUS Master
7\ Plan drawmgs.
~
Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal
devIatIon by the CIty ThIS IS based on the followmg sectIon of the Flonda
Statutes.
a) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 c Not WIthstandmg any provlSlon m paragraph (b)
to the contrary, a proposed change consIstmg of SImultaneous mcrease and
decreases of at least two of the uses WIthm an authonzed multI-use
INCLUDE REJECT I
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
development of regIOnal Impact whIch was ongmally approved wIth ~ ,
.
that three uses specIfied m 380 0651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and resIdential use.
The apphcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantIal devIatIOn. The
presumptIOn may be rebutted by clear and convmcmg eVIdence.
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPlPROJECTSIQuantum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMDl1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
Public:- \-Jc.rr~'3 / E:-~I~In:J /
- Uh lit-f r:h
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
PrOject name' Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
File number MPMD 02-002
Reference 151 reVIew plans IdentIfied wIth a July 18. 2002 Planmng and Zomng Department date stamp
markmg.
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE
REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
~
1
With respect to the re-desIgnatIOn of Lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall
provIde a Traffic Impact AnalysIs as noted m Staffs reVIews of Quantum
Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B), dated August 5,2002,
(provIded under separate cover) WhICh, at a mmImum, evaluates the Impact of
traffic (turnmg movements) and need for SIgnalIzatIOn. Of partIcular concern
IS traffic congestIon at the proposed mtersectIOn of High RIdge Road and the
proposed uantum Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B
" \.;1' ::,>rk.- Ian "1ubI'Y\littll "" "LtcV-.
~
With respect to global traffic Issues m NOPC 13 the developer shall provIde
a traffic study whIch details total trIp generatIOn from the sIte(s) as a result of
the amended land uses. Total traffic generated shall be conSIstent WIth the
total number oftnps vested m the DRI.Pn:wlA<- at- -nVYX- of k.c..flnt .
liD.
. ~/~02
)
2
.' )
UTILITIES
Comments.
I,
, f r"
~/ ,) /.....-
I. ':.../ I
J '" I~ -
"-
'"
""
3
The onginal DR! for the total park was deSIgnated pnmarilv as or
(OfticeiIndustrIal), or m combmatIOn WIth CommerCIal. Tue water and
wastewater systems were deSIgned and constructed to support that type of
antIcIpated use. Four (4) lIft statIOns were configured to handle the
wastewater generatIon antICIpated on the 550 acre park. LIft StatIOn No 2
(located at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard)
provIdes wastewater collectIon for lpts 83 through Lots 91 (alllocate,d on the
north SIde of Gateway Boulevard. _, "v l,l- -H I( \1 (c It; J i 'I (' f
!
Because the configuratIOn of the DRI has changed SIgnIficantly smce the
constructIon of the utilIty mfrastructure, Staff has very senous concerns
regardmg the capabilIty of the eXIstmg utilIty systems to accommodate the
DRI modIficatIOns as proposed by the Developer m thIS Amendment #13
The CIty has preVIously allowed the converSIOn of three lots (Lots #59
through 61) from Office and Industnal Use to MIxed Use (MU), whIch
mcluded some 272 apartment umts; the balance of 187 apartment umts have
recently been mcorporated unto Lots 62 through 67, plus 42 new apartment
umts on new Lot 101, Ius two (2) new restaurants, Ius a new commerCIal
~/~ I I'
.:t:t: ,
f
"'{
j
,,'
'{ --::\1 l \
4
.. -TJ'" ',~,; ,(
.. , . .'
J .~
\.r \r ...~..
;;:""
I~
/ 2-,1
.f,-,>
~
.
-......
"-'
"-..
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08i22/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ~
i
retail plaza to be located on Lots 63 64 65-A and 65-B, all bemg served by I
thIS 11ft statIon. ThIS eXIstmg 11ft statIOn IS now taxed to ItS IIrmt and cannot I
handle any addItIonalloadmg. i
5 The applIcant (through hIS deSIgn engmeenng consultant) needs to ~
demonstrate that: a.) suffiCIent utilIty system capacIty IS avmlable to support " -.J '
, "
the proposed modIficatIOns to the prevIOusly approved land uses to the north \.)
of Gateway Boulevard, or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(s)
~l! 1e provId\d to allow for th~ pr~posed use(s) \ !- .+ \ ,\, (( i
i
.. \, ( \." " .
,
FIRE
Comments: None ,
POLICE ,
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None ,
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None I
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: j
I i
6 The Parks Department has revIewed NOPC Amendment # 13 for Quantum
i'
Pafk. Our mam concern WIth thIS amendment has to do WIth the contmued
mcrease m reSIdentIal development m what was once a Planned IndustrIal
Development. As a result of the mcreased reSIdentIal development mdIcated
by thIS request the CIty should senously consIder seekIng fundmg alternatIves
for actIve recreatIOn m the North West sectIon of the commumty
,
7 All reSIdentIal development planned for thIS area will be subject to the Park
and RecreatIon FaCIlItIes Impact Fee. Our understandmg of thIS Amendment !
Request mdIcates that up to 1,000 addItIonal reSIdentIal umts could be built
WIthm the Quantum Park Pill ThIS would mcrease the pnonty for the
development of the Quantum Park Future Park SIte to serve the recreatIOn
needs of these future reSIdents. The Impact fees antIcIpated from these future
developments will be madequate to construct the recreatIon facilItIes needed
at the future park.
I
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
2
DEPARTMENTS
retail plaza to be located on Lots 63, 64, 65-A and 65-B, all bemg served by
thIS hft statIon. ThIS eXIstmg hft statIon IS now taxed to ItS lIrmt and cannot
handle any addItIonalloadmg.
5 The apphcant (through hIS desIgn engmeenng consultant) needs to
demonstrate that: a.) suffiCIent utilIty system capacIty IS avaIlable to support
the proposed modIficatIOns to the prevIOusly approved land uses to the north
of Gateway Boulevard, or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(s)
will be provIded to allow for the proposed use(s)
FIRE
Comments. None
POLICE
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
6 The Parks Department has revIewed NOPC Amendment # 13 for Quantum
Park. Our mam concern WIth thIS amendment has to do WIth the contInued
Increase In reSIdentIal development In what was once a Planned IndustrIal
Development. As a result of the Increased reSIdentIal development IndIcated
by thIS request the CIty should senously consIder seekIng fundIng alternatIves
for actIve recreation In the North West sectIOn of the commumty
INCLUDE
/
REJECT
/
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
PrOject name' Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
File number MPMD 02-002
Reference 1 S(reVlew plans Identified wIth a July 18, 2002 Planmng and Zomng Department date stamp
markIng.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1 With respect to the re-desIgnatIOn of Lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall
provIde a Traffic Impact AnalysIs as noted m Staffs reVIews of Quantum
Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B), dated August 5,2002,
(provIded under separate cover) whIch, at a mmImum, evaluates the Impact of
traffic (turnmg movements) and need for SIgnalIzation. Of partIcular concern
IS traffic congestion at the proposed mtersectIOn of HIgh RIdge Road and the
proposed Quantum Villages North and Quantum Villages East (Lot 89B)
2 With respect to global traffic Issues m NOPC 13, the developer shall provIde
a traffic study whIch details total trIp generatIOn from the sIte(s) as a result of
the amended land uses. Total traffic generated shall be conSIstent With the
total number of trIpS vested m the DR!.
UTILITIES
Comments.
3 The ongInal DR! for the total park was deSIgnated pnmarily as 01
(OfficelIndustrIal), or m combmatIon With CommercIal. The water and
wastewater systems were deSIgned and constructed to support that type of
antICIpated use. Four (4) lIft stations were configured to handle the
wastewater generatIOn antICIpated on the 550 acre park. LIft StatIOn No 2
(located at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard)
proVldes wastewater collectIOn for Lots 83 through Lots 91 (all located on the
north SIde of Gateway Boulevard.
4 Because the configuratIOn of the DR! has changed SIgnIficantly smce the
constructIOn of the utilIty mfrastructure, Staff has very senous concerns
regardmg the capabilIty of the eXIstmg utilIty systems to accommodate the
DR! modIficatIOns as proposed by the Developer m thIS Amendment #13
The CIty has preVIOusly allowed the converSIOn of three lots (Lots #59
through 61) from Office and IndustrIal Use to MIxed Use (MU), whIch
mcluded some 272 apartment umts; the balance of 187 apartment umts have
recently been mcorporated unto Lots 62 through 67, plus 42 new apartment
umts on new Lot 101, plus two (2) new restaurants, mus a new commerCial
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
2
. II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
retail plaza to be located on Lots 63, 64, 65-A and 65-B, all bemg served by
thIS 11ft statIon. ThIS eXIstmg 11ft statIon IS now taxed to ItS l1lmt and cannot
handle any addItIOnalloadmg.
5 The applIcant (through hIS deSIgn engmeenng consultant) needs to
demonstrate that: a.) sufficIent utilIty system capacity IS available to support
the proposed modIficatIons to the prevIOusly approved land uses to the north
of Gateway Boulevard, or b) that the necessary upgrade(s) to the system(s)
will be prOVIded to allow for the proposed use(s)
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments.
6 The Parks Department has revIewed NOPC Amendment # 13 for Quantum
Park. Our mam concern With thIS amendment has to do With the contmued
mcrease m resIdentIal development m what was once a Planned IndustrIal
Development. As a result of the mcreased reSIdentIal development mdIcated
by thIS request the CIty should senously conSIder seekmg fundmg alternatIves
for actIve recreatIOn m the North West sectIOn of the communIty
7 All reSIdentIal development planned for thIS area will be subject to the Park
and RecreatIOn FacilItIes Impact Fee. Our understandmg of thIS Amendment
Request mdIcates that up to 1,000 addItIOnal reSIdentIal umts could be built
wIthm the Quantum Park PID ThIS would mcrease the pnonty for the
development of the Quantum Park Future Park SIte to serve the recreatIOn
needs of these future reSIdents. The Impact fees antIcIpated from these future
developments will be madequate to construct the recreatIOn facilItIes needed
at the future park.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments.
NOPC Item #5.4
Lot 34C (6.58 acres)
Para2raph One
8 The CIty of Boynton Beach should keep this land parcel designated as
"reserved" as approved under the Master Plan Amendment # 12 This is
consIstent with the need of the City to address the Open space requirements
of the Development of Regional Impact (DR!).
The applicant should indicate how they have met the Open Space
requirements of the DR!, detailmg the specific lots that compile the reqUIred
acreage.
Para2raph Three:
9 The Quantum Community Development District (QCDD) being responsible
for the maintenance of the Sand Pine Preserves (40 acres)
The applicant should indicate how they have met the DR! requirement to set
::Il;;ine ::Inn . . the 40 ::IC'.Tel;; of S::Inc Pme
10 The QCDD being responsible for the maintenance of the PrImary (Surface)
Water Management System.
The applicant should indicate how they have met the DR! reqUIrements to
establish a vegetated littoral zone of hardwood swamp/freshwater marsh
habitat comprising a total of no less than 11 acres as part of the surface water
management system. Provide and maintain a buffer zone of native upland
edge vegetation around wetland and deepwater habitats. which are preserved
or constructed on SIte ( 1984 DR! Ordinance #84-51 documents page 5,6,
item #9a-c, # 1 0 )
11 The QCDD being responsible to address the securIty Issues relative to the
Sand Pine Preserves
The applicant should indIcate how they have made provisions to supplement
municipal police protection with a private. centrally located and housed. on
site security force (1984 DR! Ordinance # 84-51 document page 15 item
#40 )
12. NOPC Item #5,6 Land Use Acreage Table
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Land Use DesIgnatIOn EXIStIng Acreage Request to the ApplIcant
Amendment # 12
Wetlands 6 00 Acres IndIcate the lots that
comprIse these acres.
Sand PIne Reserve 40 00 Acres IndIcate the lots that
comprIse these acres.
Open Space 82.20 Acres IndIcate the lots that
comprIse these acres.
Reserved 6.58 Acres Lot 34-C IS the lot that
comprIses thIS acreage
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
13 Correct SectIOn 5 3 of the NOPC applIcatIon to read" by Amendment No.
10 "
14 ProvIde JustIficatIOn for changIng lot 89B (4ac.) to MIXed Use.
15 Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development
Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a
traffic analYSIS IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. In lIeu of an
Independent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic
DIVIsIOn will reVIew the traffic study The project must meet the Palm Beach
County Traffic Performance Standards.
16 ReVIse response to NOPC QuestIon 7 to change "Eleventh" to Twelfth" on
the last lIne.
17 ClarIfy acreage number shown under the "office" category on page 1 of the
SubstantIal DeVIatIon DetenmnatIon Chart. There should be number for
"PreVIOUS DO change."
18 Include shadIng for commItted development on the Master Plan.
19 Label Lot 34-C as "open space" on the Master Plan.
20 Include the roadway markIngs and access pOInts as shown on preVIOUS Master
Plan drawIngs.
21 Approval of the Master Plan IS contIngent upon a findIng of no substantIal
deVIatIon by the CIty ThIS IS based on the follOWIng sectIOn of the FlorIda
Statutes.
a) Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) 5.c Not WIthstandIng any prOVISIOn In paragraph (b)
to the contrary, a proposed change conSIstIng of sImultaneous Increase and
decreases of at least two of the uses WIthIn an authOrIzed multI-use
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
08/22/02
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
development of regIOnal Impact whIch was ongmally approved With more
that three uses specIfied m 380 0651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and resIdentIal use.
The applIcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantIal devIatIOn. The
presumptIOn may be rebutted by clear and convmcmg eVIdence.
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIQuanlum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMDl1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
/'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 02-168
TO Michael W Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM
Laurinda Logan, P E , Senior Engineer
~
"" - )
DATE
August 6, 2002
RE
Review Comments
Quantum Park NOPC
Amendment #13 - 1 st Review
File No DRIA 02-001
The above referenced Notice of Proposed Change, received on July 24, 2002, were reviewed
against the Master Plan requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances
(available on-line at www.cLbovnton-beach.fl.us) Following are the comments with the
appropriate Code and land Development Regulations (lDR) referenced
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
No comments at this time
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
1 With respect to the re-designation of lots 89B and 3 the Developer shall provide a Traffic
Impact Analysis as noted in Staff's reviews of Quantum Villages North and Quantum Villages
East (Lot 89B), dated August 5, 2002, (provided under separate cover) which, at a minimum,
evaluates the impact of traffic (turning movements) and need for signalization Of particular
concern is traffic congestion at the proposed intersection of High Ridge Road and the
proposed Quantum Villages North and Quantum Villages East (lot 89B)
2 With respect to global traffic issues in NOPC 13, the developer shall provide a traffic study
which details total trip generation from the site(s) as a result of the amended land uses Total
traffic generated shall be consistent with the total number of trips vested in the DRI
ENGINEERING
No comments at this time
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, Memo No 02-168
Re Quantum Park NOPC, Amendment #13 - !st Review
Page Two
UTILITIES
1 The original DRI for the total park was designated primarily as 01 (Office/Industrial), or in
combination with Commercial The water and wastewater systems were designed and
constructed to support that type of anticipated use Four (4) lift stations were configured to
handle the wastewater generation anticipated on the 550 acre park. Lift Station No 2
(located at the intersection of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum Boulevard) provides
wastewater collection for lots 83 through lots 91 (all located on the north side of Gateway
Boulevard
Because the configuration of the DRI has changed significantly since the construction of the
utility infrastructure, Staff has very serious concerns regarding the capability of the existing
utility systems to accommodate the DRI modifications as proposed by the Developer in this
Amendment #13 The City has previously allowed the conversion of three lots (Lots #59
through 61) from Office and Industrial Use to Mixed Use (MU), which included some 272
apartment units, the balance of 187 apartment units have recently been incorporated unto
Lots 62 through 67, plus 41 new apartment units on new Lots 100 and 101, plus two (2) new
restaurants, plus a new commercial retail plaza to be located on lots 63, 64, 65-A and 65-B,
all being served by this lift station This existing lift station is now taxed to its limit and cannot
handle any additional loading
The applicant (through his design engineering consultant) needs to demonstrate that: a )
sufficient utility system capacity is available to support the proposed modifications to the
previously approved land uses to the north of Gateway Boulevard, or b ) that the necessary
upgrade(s) to the system(s) will be provided to allow for the proposed use(s)
LUck
Cc. Jeff Livergood, P E , Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities
H David Kelley, Jr , P E.I P S M , Utility Engineer, Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Engineering (via e-mail)
File
e:\My Documents\Quantum Park NOPC, Amend. #13 1st Rev .doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 02-164
TO Michael W Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM Timothy K. large, Building Code Administr~~
DATE July 25,2002
SUBJECT Project - Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
File No - DRIA 02-001
~/
The Building Division has no issues at this time
S./Development/Building Code Administrator/TRC/02lQuantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
Page 1 of 1
-------
(.,1 fV OF BOVNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO'
MIchael W Rumpf DATE.
Dlr of Plannmg & Zomng
8/1/02
FILE. DRIA 02-001
FROM
Off John Huntington
Pollce Department
CPTED PractItioner
SUBJECT
REFERENCES
Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
Sit Plan
ENCLOSURES
I have viewed the above bUIldmg plans and have the followmg comments
No Comment.
.~
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Fire and Life Safety Division
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of"
DRIA 02-001 1st review-fire
Project Name/Address
Quantum Park
Reviewed by'
Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Examiner/Fire
Inspector *4r
Fire and Life Safety
Department:
Phone
(561) 742-6753
Comments to
Sherie Coale by email on 7/30102
CODE REQUIREMENTS
No comments
cc Steve Gale
Bob Borden
/
PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #02-56
FROM
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
John Wildner, Parks Director r
Barbara J Meacham, Parks & landscape Planner
TO
CC
RE
Quantum Park NOPC Amendement #13
Date
August 7, 2002
The Parks Department has reviewed NOPC Amendment # 13 for Quantum Park.
Our main concern with this amendment has to do with the continued increase in
residential development in what was once a Planned Industrial Development.
All residential development planned for this area will be subject to the Park and
Recreation Facilities Impact Fee Our understanding of this Amendment Request
indicates that up to 1,000 additional residential units could be built within the
Quantum Park PID This would increase the priority for the development of the
Quantum Park Future Park Site to serve the recreation needs of these future
residents The impact fees anticipated from these future developments will be
inadequate to construct the recreation facilities needed at the future park.
As a result of the increased residential development indicated by this request the
City should seriously consider seeking funding alternatives for active recreation
in the North West section of the community
AUG - 8 200,
PlanniDl! Memorandum. Forester / Environmentalist
To
LusIa Galav, Pnnclpal Planner
From.
Kevm J Hallahan, Forester / EnvIronmentahst
Subject:
Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
Development of ReglOnal Impact (DR!) Master Plan, 1 st RevIew
DRIA 02-001
Date
August 20, 2002
Letter of July 16, 2002, to
Mr Bob Cambnc
Growth Management AdmmIstrator
DIvIsIon of Commumty Plannmg
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Flonda 32399-2100
Item #5.4.
Lot 34C ( 6.58 acres)
Paragraph One.
I recommend the CIty of Boynton Beach keep thIS land parcel desIgnated as "reserved" as
approved under the Master Plan Amendment #12. ThIS IS conSIstent wIth the need of the CIty to
address the Open space reqUIrements of the Development ofReglOnal Impact (DR!)
1 The apphcant should mdlcate how they have met the Open Space requIrements of the
DRI, detaIlmg the specIfic lots that compIle the reqUIred acreage.
Paragraph Three.
The Quantum Commumty Development Dlstnct (QCDD) bemg responsible for the mamtenance
of the Sand Pme Preserves (40 acres)
1 The apphcant should mdIcate how they have met the DR! reqUIrement to set aSIde and
mamtam the 40 acres of Sand Pme Preserves.
The QCDD bemg responsible for the mamtenance of the Pnmary (Surface) Water Management
System
1 The apphcant should mdlcate how they have met the DRI reqUIrements to estabhsh a
vegetated httoral zone of hardwood swamp/freshwater marsh habItat compnsmg a total
of no less than 11 acres as part of the surface water mana2ement system. ProvIde and
mamtam a buffer zone of native upland edge vegetatlOn around wetland and deepwater
habItats, whIch are preserved or constructed on sIte. ( 1984 DR! Ordmance # 84-51
documents page 5,6, Item #9a-c, #10)
Paragraph Three. (contmued)
The QCDD bemg responsible to address the secunty Issues relative to the Sand Pme Preserves
1 The apphcant should mdlcate how they have made prOVlSlons to supplement munIcIpal
pohce protection WIth a pnvate. centrally located and housed. on sIte secunty force (1984
DRI Ordmance # 84-51 document page 15 Item #40)
Item #5.6.
Land Use Acreage Table
Land Use DeSlgnatlOn
EXlstmg Acreage
Amendment No. 12
Request to the Applicant.
Wetlands
6 00 Acres
Indicate the lots that comprise these
acres.
Sand Pme Reserve
40 00 Acres
Indicate the lots that comprise these
acres.
Open Space
82.20 Acres
Indicate the lots that comprise these
acres.
Reserved
658 Acres
Lot 34-C IS the lot that compnses thIS
acreage
Xc Enc Johnson, Planner
Kjh
FIle
TO
FROM
DATE
RE
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENl
MEMORANDUM NO PZ 02-152
TRC MEMBERS
RuJ!:jtlr Kemmer, Filt~ PlaA ne'view Analy;:)t -
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
JoA.AJ::I.1Intington. pnliC9 Dgpartmonh
H. D~vid Kelley .Jr , Utilities DSfJi:u1menr
Til"othy 1<, Lar~ Division..-
!{en Hall, (Engineering) Public Work€) Celltlral-
'deffroy Livergood, Public Works nin:'!r.tor- Traffic
John 'NileJnsl, rarl~ nivision ,
---battr ir Ida Logar I, [n!}ingering DSjJClrLrllent
-I::t:rsla Gala"" PlaRI,ir l!:j DeJ.lClI tffiGnt
Michael W RumpJ~ ~
Director of Plannin9~nd ~oning
July 24, 2002
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 ST Review - Development of Regional Impact (DRI) Master Plan
Project
Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #13
Location
Quantum Park
Agent
David B Norris, Esq Cohen, Norris,Scherer, Weinberger & Wolmer
File No
DRIA 02-001
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be made available
via e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on August 6. 2002. When preparing your
comments, please separate them into two categories, code deficiencies with code sections
referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval
1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments
2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents
4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
other departmental improvements
Page 2
5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified
6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they
do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project
be forwarded through the approval process
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-
mail Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project.
First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee
(TRC) members
MWR.lg
Attachment
XC Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
John Guidry, Utilities Director
To Be Determined,Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Central File
S \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2002 Amend #13\TRC Memo for 1 st Plans Review doc
Revised 1/14/02
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
POBOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX. (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to DavId Noms, Esq
fax # 561-842-4104
date: August 23, 2002
from LUSla Galav, Pnnc1pal Planner
re: 1 ~I REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Quantum Park NOPC #13 Master Plan
ModificatIOn
Please find attached the first reVIew comments for your proJect. To stay on the
current reVIew schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below, and bnng all
documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday, September 3, 2002
1 RevIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments hsted herem, mcludmg the addItIon of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 10 copIes
to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally submItted),
2 SubmIt the addItIonal mformatIOn as requested w1thm the attached comments, ( 1.e. traffic
analysIs, engmeenng certIficatIOn, etc)
3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) consIstmg of a hst bnefly summanzmg how each
comment has been addressed on the reVIsed plans or wIth the supplemental mformatIon
mcludmg locatIOn on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItIous 2nd reVIew by staff and
your project representatIves dunng the TRC meetmg ),and
4
SubmIt reductIOns (8 Yz X 11) for the proposed
SIte plans, elevatIons and landscapmg plan (thIS
IS reqmred for the final report and pubhc
presentatIOn)
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIeW) untIl all documents have been revIsed and
copIed for staff reVIew If plans wIll not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC
meetmg, contact LUSla Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date.
Projects dev1atmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs,
whIch are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday pnor to the
Tuesday TRC meetmg that you deSIre to attend. The remamder of the reVIew schedule wIll be
adjusted accordmgly If you have questlOns on the attached comments, please contact the
respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst ofTRC representatIves.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all slgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC
(2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to the Plannmg and Development Board Meetmg that falls
approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a
comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Planmng and Development
board.
Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report
and/or confirmatIon of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
dramage cert1ficatlOn by a lIcensed engmeer, SIgned "RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIon"
form and colored elevatIons of the proposed proJect. ThIS mformatlOn IS necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIon, please dIsregard thIS note.
Engmeenng John Gmdry Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6285
Bmldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6357
FIre Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Rodger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
PolIce Department Marshall Gage John Huntmgton 737-6167
UtIlItIes John Gmdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
PublIc Works-General Larry Qmnn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285
Parks & RecreatlOn John Wildner 742-6227 742-6233
Forester/EnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Plannmg & Zonmg MIchael Rumpf, LUS1a Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 01/14/02
S,\Planning\SHARED\WPIPROJECTSIQuantum Park 2002 Amend #13 + MPMD\lst Review comments FAX COVER doc
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOF
TIME 08/23/2002 13 52
NAME BOVNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613756259
TEL 5613756260
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
08/23 13 48
98424104
00 03 51
07
or
STANDARD
ECM