The URL can be used to link to this page

AGENDA DOCUMENTS CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office 0 July 17 2001 July 5 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 September 19 200 I September 5, 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 August 7 200 I July 18,2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 October 2,2001 September 20,2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 August 21 200 I August 8, 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 October 16, 200 I October 3,2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 September 4 2001 August 22, 2001 (5:00 p.m.) [gJ November 6, 200 I October 17 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 AdminIstrative 0 Development Plans NATURE OF 0 Consent Agenda 0 New Business AGENDA ITEM [gJ Public Hearing [gJ Legal 0 Bids 0 UnfInished Business 0 Announcement 0 Presentation 0 City Manager's Report RECOMMENDATION Please place this request on the November 6, 2001 City Commission Agenda under Public Hearing, and under Legal, Ordmances - Second Readmg. The Planning and Development Board voted separately on each of the three (3) elements of this NOPC/master plan modifIcation applicahon, as outlined in the staff report under RECOMMENDATIONS. The Board voted 6-2 to support the conversion of Lots 7-11 and 23-31 to "Mixed Use", and voted unanimously to recommend the approval to remove the acreage of Lot 34-C from the open space category and place it in a newly created category called "Reserved", and to reconfigure Quantum Lakes Drive. For further details pertaining to this request see attached Department of Development Memorandum No PZ 01-214, and the attached addendum to the staff report (Memorandum No PZ 01-220). EXPLAL"IATION PROJECT NAL'vIE. AGENT OWNER. LOCATION DESCRlPTION ;-- QUAL"I,fTUM PARK DR! NOPC/lVlaster Plan Amendment #12 Eugene Gerhca, P .E. MFT Development Inc. Quantum Park, P .LD Request to amend the Quantum Park DRI/Master Plan to change the pemutted use on lots 7-11 from "OffIce Industrial" (01) to "Mixed Use" (MU) and lots 23- 31 from "OffIce (0) to "Mixed Use" (MU); to increase maxnnum residenhal umts from 500 units to 1,000 units; to partially close Quantum Lakes Drive and create two (2) new tracts of "Mixed Use (MU), and to change the permItted use on tract 34-C from "Detention to 'Reserve PROGRAL'\1 IMP ACT FISCAL IMPACT AL TERNAT S. N/A N/A N/A k DevelopmenYr~pal ~ 7L <- PI~g & Zoning DIrector CIty Attorney / Finance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\ \VP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 200 I Amen #12\DRlA 01-00 I \Agenda Item Request Quantum Pk DRl NOPC 10-16-0 l.dot City Manager's SIgnature S"\BULLETf.\I\FOR.."1S\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR..\;t.DOC CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office 0 July 17 2001 July 5, 2001 (5'00 p.m.) 0 September 19 2001 September 5 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 August 7 2001 July 18.2001 (5'00 p.m.) 0 October 2, 2001 September 20,2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 August 21 200 I August 8, 2001 (5:00 p.m.) cg] October 16, 2001 October 3,2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 September 4 2001 August 22, 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 November 6, 2001 October 17 2001 (5:00 p.m.) 0 Adnumstratlve 0 Development Plans NATURE OF 0 Consent Agenda 0 New BUSIness AGENDA ITEM 0 Public Hearing cg] Legal 0 Bids 0 UnfInished Business 0 Announcement 0 PresentatIOn 0 City Manager's Report RECOMMENDATION Please place dus request on the October 16,2001 City Comnussion Agenda under Legal, OrdInances - First Reading. The Planning and Development Board voted separately on each of the three (3) elements ofdus NOPC/master plan modIfIcation application, as outlmed in the staff report under RECOMMENDATIONS. The Board voted 6-2 to support the converSIOn of Lots 7-11 and 23-31 to "Mixed Use, and voted unanimously to recommend the approval to remove the acreage of Lot 34-C from the open space category and place it m a newly created category called 'Reserved", and to reconfigure Quantum Lakes Dnve F or further details pertammg to thIS request see attached Department of Development Memorandum No PZ 01-214 and the attached addendum to the staff report (Memorandum No PZ 01-220). EXPLANATION PROJECT NAME AGENT O\VNER. LOCATION DESCRIPTION QUANTUM PARK DR! ~OPC/Master Plan Amendment #12 Eugene GerIica, P.E. MFT Development Inc. Quantum Park, P .LD Request to amend the Quantum Park DRIIMaster Plan to change the permitted use on lots 7-11 from "OffIce Industnal" (01) to "Mixed Use" (;\till) and lots 23- 31 from "OffIce (0) to "MIxed Use (MU) to increase maXImum reSIdential unIts from 500 umts to 1,000 units, to partially close Quantum Lakes Drive and create two (2) new tracts of "Mixed Use (MU) and to change the perrmtted use on tract 34-C from 'Detention to 'Industnal" (INTI) PROGRAM IMP ACT FISCAL IMP ACT ALTERN~IVES. \.. ,A. a 'J1 c'~r~ Vl " ( Develop ent D1partment Duector ( I J -.-/. , I V\* 'L (J U Planning & Zo Duector City Attorney / FInance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRL\ OI-OOI\Agenda Item Request Quantum Pk DR! NOPC 10-16-01.dot N/A N/A N/A City ~Ianager's SIgnature S'\BULLETr.-.l\FOR..\-lS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FOR..\-1.DOC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO PZ 01-214 TO Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board THROUGH Michael Rumpf fY1L.;K..., Planning and Zoning irector FROM Lusia Galav, AICP Principal Planner DATE October 4, 2001 SUBJECT Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Master Plan Amendment #12 NATURE OF REQUEST Quantum Park of Commerce is a partially built-out Development of Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 553 13 acres, zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID) It is located on the west side of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton Canal - (C-16) (See attached Exhibit I;A" - Location Map) The applicant, MFT Development, Inc. is requesting an amendment to the Quantum Park DRI Development Order (0 0 ) adopted December 4, 1984 by Ordinance No 84-51 The original DO was subsequently amended 10 times by Ordinance Nos 86-11, 86-37, 88-3 94-10 94-51, 96-33, 96-65, 97-20, 99-05 and 00-02. The City Commission denied Amendment #11 on February 20 2001 The current Master Plan for Quantum Park is provided in Exhibit 'B - Existing Master Plan Amendment #12 proposes several changes including amending the existing use designations on 14 lots in the Master Plan to the "Mixed Use designation This proposed change to the Master Plan would potentially represent the second Mixed Use Pod within the PID All requested changes are depicted in Exhibit "C" - Proposed Master Plan and described as follows 1) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 7, 8 9, 10 and 11 from Office/Industrial (01) land use to Mixed Use (MU) The proposed Mixed Use designation includes office commercial and residential uses, 2) Change in the Master Plan designation of Lots 23 24, 25, 26 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31 from Office (0) land use to Mixed Use (MU) The proposed Mixed Use designation includes office commercial and residential uses, and 3) Increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted from 500 to 1000 4) Designate lot 34-C as Industrial (IND) land use on the Master Plan 5) Reconfiguration of the current roadway and lot layout in the area of the PID north and east of the Quantum Lakes Drive intersection with Quantum Boulevard along Quantum Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 Lakes Drive to the eastern intersection with Gateway Boulevard This would result in two (2) new Mixed Use lots totaling 5 21 acres and combining lots 62 and 63 to create one lot labeled 102 totaling 6 145 acres BACKGROUND An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) is first and foremost governed by Florida Statutes Chapter 380 06 (19) - Substantial Deviations The applicant has submitted a Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) in accordance with the statutory requirements The NOPC is reviewed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (RPC) and the City The DCA and the RPC are reviewing the proposed NOPC and will provide comments following the procedures outlined in Chapter 380 06 (19) The City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 1 5 Sec. 4 3A requires a preliminary review by the Planning and Development Board of an amendment to a DRI Chapter 380 06 F S requires that the local governing body hold a public hearing to review and approve the NOPC The City Commission is required to determine whether the proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI is or is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380 06 (19) If it is determined that the requested change is a substantial deviation then further review will be required pursuant to the statutory requirements If the City Commission determines that the proposed change is not a substantial deviation then they may take action to approve or deny the requested change The original DRI Development Order adopted a Master Plan for Quantum Park. That Master Plan has been amended over the years, the latest change being approved on March 7, 2000 The proposed Amendment #12 alters the approved land uses for that Master Plan Therefore the review of the DRI amendment also constitutes a review of the changes to the Master Plan for Quantum Park. In addition to the state statutes, staff has reviewed the Master Plan in accordance with Land Development Regulations Chapter 2, Section 7 Planned Industrial Development and Chapter 3, Master Plan Approval First review comments were generated and the Technical Review Committee (TRC) reviewed the Master Plan changes on September 11, 2001 ANAL YSIS Notice of Proposed ChanQe (NOPC) - Substantial Deviation The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantial deviation are outlined in Chapter 380 06 (19) In reviewing the statute section staff determined that four of the criteria apply to the proposed changes for Quantum Park DRI The first two criteria fall under subsection U(b) which reads as follows Any proposed change to a previously approved development of regional impact or development order condition which either individually or cumulatively with other changes, exceeds any of the following criteria shall constitute a substantial deviation and cause the development to be subject to further development-of- regional-impact review without the necessity for a finding of same by the local government. " 1 Chapter 380 06(19)(b)9 , An increase in the number of dwelling units by 5 percent or 50 dwelling units, whichever is greater 2 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 The proposed change includes an addition of 500 residential dwelling units to the 500 currently permitted for a total of 1000 dwelling units The proposed change exceeds this threshold However, the proposed change also decreases the permitted industrial and office square footage totals In this case, the criterion outlined in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 c. applies That criterion is discussed below and would over ride the determination above 2 Chapter 380 06(19) (b) 13 A decrease in the area set aside for open space of 5 percent or twenty acres, whichever is less The proposed change regarding lot 34-C falls under this criterion This lot has never had a development designation attached to it. The 6 58 acres is included in the open space tabulation on the current master plan effective with Amendment #10 Eliminating this area results in a 7 3 percent reduction in the Open Space category Lot 34-C was labeled as detention in Master Plans associated with amendments #6 through #8 to the DRI The Master Plan for amendment # 9 and the current Master Plan #10 label this lot as 34-C, with no detention designation It is the applicant's contention that this lot is no longer needed to satisfy the drainage requirements for the park Engineering Department staff has concurred with this assumption based on documentation received from the South Florida Water Management District, the regional permitting authority for drainage in this development. The SFWMD issued a letter dated September 6, 2001, attached as Exhibit "0", indicating that they had no objection to the approval of the proposed changes citing no adverse regional water resource impacts Staff has determined that the elimination of tract 34-C from Open Space would not constitute a substantial deviation However, staff has serious concerns regarding applying a development designation to this lot. These concerns are outlined below under consistency with the Comprehensive Plan The third criterion for review of this NOPC relates to a change not specified in the statute 3 Chapter 380 06(19) (e) 3., Except for the change authorized by sub-paragraph 2 f., any addition of land not previously reviewed or any change not specified in paragraph (b) or paragraph (c) shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation This presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence The changes related to conversion of Office and Office/Industrial designations to Mixed Use do not fall into any category specified in the statutory criteria either assuming a substantial deviation or indicating that it is not a substantial deviation The burden is on the applicant to provide clear and convincing evidence that it is not a substantial deviation and subject to further development-of-regional-impact review The information provided by the applicant, including the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart and the traffic study present evidence that the increases proposed for residential use allowed in the Mixed Use designation is offset by the decreases in the permitted Industrial and Office square footage totals The fourth criterion, which is applicable for review of this proposed change is provided in Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5 which states 'The following changes to an approved development of regional impact shall be presumed to create a substantial deviation Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence" 3 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 4. Chapter 380 06(19)(e)5.c., Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases of at least two of the uses within a authorized multiuse development of regional impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in 380 0651 (3)(c), (d), (f) and (g) and residential use. As part of the NOPC application the applicant is to complete a "Substantial Deviation Determination Chart" The applicant has provided an updated chart. Amendment #12 involves changes to six land use categories Industrial, Office, Office/Industrial, Mixed Use (includes Residential) Roads and Open Space As stated above, the number of residential dwelling units is proposed to increase by 500 units The permitted Industrial use is proposed to decrease in intensity by 375,354 square feet and office use is proposed to decrease by 72,922 square feet. The Open Space category decreases by 805 acres, These changes are reflected in the "Notes section on the Master Plan The proposed increase and decreases are presumed to maintain the vested traffic generation level of 63,752 average daily trips (ADT) Conclusion The proposed changes delineated in Amendment #12 are determined not to be a substantial deviation per Chapter 380 06 (19) of the Florida Statutes The applicant has provided the Substantial Deviation Table, drainage information and a traffic study, to provide clear and convincing evidence of a non-substantial deviation finding This determination is subject to satisfying Condition of Approval #12 regarding Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Master Plan Modification The proposal submitted for the NOPC modifies the approved Master Plan for the Quantum Park DRI There are three major changes proposed The first change relates to the development of a second Mixed Use Pod in the northwest corner of Quantum Corporate Park. This Mixed Use Pod encompasses 14 lots for a total of 2327 acres The lots are currently vacant. A descriptive summary of these changes is provided below Lots 7. 8. 9.10. and 11 These lots were previously designated as Office/lndustrial (01) Land Use The Land Use has been revised to Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land Use Designation includes office, commercial and residential uses Lots 23.24.25.26.27.28.29.30 and 31 The Land Use of these lots was previously designated as Office (0) Land Use The Land Use has been revised to Mixed Use (MU) The proposed Mixed Use Land Use Designation includes office commercial and residential uses In conjunction with the change described above the applicant proposes to add 500 dwelling units to the 500 currently permitted for a total of 1000 multi-family residential units 4 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 The second .major change involves lot 34-C The applicant proposes to designate this lot Industrial (IND) Lot 34-C is currently undesignated and is included in the Open Space tabulation Finally, the applicant proposes to reconfigure Quantum Lakes drive in the area north and east of the Quantum Lakes Drive intersection with Quantum Boulevard, along Quantum Lakes Drive to the eastern intersection with Gateway Boulevard This reconfiguration will create two new Mixed Use lots totaling 5.21 acres, consolidate lots 62 and 63 into one lot labeled 102, decrease road right-of way by 3 75 acres and further decrease the open space category due to the loss of lake area The Land Use Acreage Table provided on the Master Plan will be changed as shown below Land Use AcreaQe Land Use DesiQnation Proposed AcreaQe ExistinQ AcreaQe ChanQe Industrial 107 83 101 25 + 6 58 Office (0) 12.96 2824 (15.28) Office/Industrial (01) 7975 8774 (7 99) Mixed Use (MU) 8564 6238 + 23.26 Roads 3758 41 13 ( 3 52) Open Space 8220 9025 (8 05) All other categories on the Land Use Acreage Table remain the same as approved in Amendment #10 The Quantum Park DRI acreage total of 553 13 remains unchanged (Refer to Exhibit "E" Area Calculation Chart) The Quantum Park DRI has been amended 10 times over the years, which is not unusual for a DRI of this type The Florida Statute governing the DRI process Chapter 38006(19), provides for and anticipates amendments stating that "There are a variety of reasons why a developer may wish to propose changes to an approved development of regional impact, including changed market conditions" This proposed changes to the Master Plan were analyzed from two perspectives The first is the potential for creating additional regional or local impacts The second is the consistency and compatibility of the proposed changes with the regulations and policies adopted by the City through the Comprehensive Plan Land Development Regulations and other applicable studies such as the Visions 20/20 plan Impacts Reqional A development has gone through the DRI process because the projected impacts are considered regional in nature Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine if 5 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally identified and mitigated In the case of the Quantum Park DRI the major issues are whether there will be an increase in traffic resulting from the land use redistribution/redesignation and reconfiguration of Quantum lakes Drive Also of concern are the impacts related to drainage if lot 34-C receives a development designation of Industrial (IND) A provision in Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park development order requires that" A traffic study shall be submitted with any future application requesting a change in use designations on any lot. The City shall hire, at the applicant's expense, an independent traffic consultant to review the study" In lieu of an independent traffic consultant, the city's Public Works Department Director, a designated TRC member, conducted the review of the traffic study The cost of the review will be charged back to the applicant as part of the DRI review fee The applicant has also transmitted the traffic study to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for their customary review and approval ~ased on the TRC review of the Master Plan, including the traffic study, no additional regional impacts are evident. The vested number of trips, 63,752 is presumed to remain unchanged due to the balancing of increases and decreases in the intensities of the proposed changes to the land use designations The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement provided by the applicant and has not granted approval The letter is attached as Exhibit "F The substantial deviation determination is contingent upon the applicant rectifying the discrepancies cited by the County in order to assure that the vested trips are not exceeded The Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council focus their review of the amendment on regional issues exclusively Staff has not yet received a formal written response from these agencies It is anticipated that the city will receive comments from both agencies before the application goes to the City Commission for approval Local The focus of the substantial deviation determination is regional impacts The development order for the DRI is a local order and the approval of any requested changes is within the jurisdiction of the city As such the city's main focus is local issues and impacts Besides compatibility with the Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations, to be described later, three local issues were identified during the review process The first issue relates to local traffic concerns Jeff Livergood, Public Works Director, reviewed the Applicant's traffic report, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc. Mr Livergood focused his analysis on the Quantum Lakes Drive road closure and traffic signalization His analysis is attached as Exhibit "G" of this report. Staff is of the opinion that Quantum Lakes Drive can be safely closed at Gateway Boulevard The reconfiguration as proposed will require that the affected area be replatted Internal connections to the reconfigured lots will be addressed at the plat and site plan level Regarding signalization staff has determined that traffic signals are currently or will be warranted It will be the responsibility of the developer and occupants of Quantum Park to pay for the cost of construction when traffic signals at the intersections of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue are warranted Adequate utilitv service is the second local issue of concern regarding the proposed change to the Quantum Park DRI The Utilities Department expressed this concern in first review TRC 6 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 comments, Tbe fact is that the original DRI for the total park was designed for commercial industrial and office uses Both the water and wastewater systems were designed to support these types of uses Four (4) lift stations were configured to handle the wastewater generation for the 553 13 acre park. Residential uses were not calculated into the design and may tax the existing facilities to their limits The conditions of approval include a requirement that any upgrade to the water and wastewater system within Quantum Park, due to the intensification of land use proposed with this application, must be performed at the applicant's expense The third local issue is related to school facilities In accordance with Comprehensive Plan Policy 8,22.1 a copy of the Quantum DRI Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) was sent to the School District of Palm Beach County This policy requires the city to notify the School Board of any residential development over 20 units The School Board reviewed the NOPC and provided their response in a letter attached as Exhibit 'H The letter indicates that a concurrency determination shall not be required at this time C;onsistency and Compatibility with City Policies Comprehensive Plan The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in Article 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C Comprehensive Plan Amendments. Rezonings These criteria are required to be part of a staff analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map Although the subject application does not include an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Maps Staff has applied these criteria to the review of the aspects of the subject application that involve significant changes in land use options a Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk manager The planning department shall also recommend limitations or requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan According to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Support Document, under the Discussion of Supply and Demand for Commercial Land" the following is recommended "The Future Land Use Plan which is proposed for the City and area to be annexed by the City will accommodate all of the anticipated demand for commercial land through build-out. Therefore the City should not change the land use to commercial categories beyond that which is shown on the proposed Future land Use Plan except for minor boundary adjustments small infill parcels or commercial uses of a highly specialized nature, which have special location or site requirements and therefore cannot be easily accommodated on already designated commercial areas Policy 1 19 6 of the Land Use Element restates this recommendation "The City shall not allow commercial acreage which is greater than the demand which has been projected unless it can be demonstrated that the additional commercial acreage would not require the proportion of commercial acreage on the City's Future 7 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 land l)se Map to exceed the proportion of commercial acreage on the Palm Beach County Future land Use Map The City shall not allow commercial unless a particular property is unsuitable for other uses, or a geographic need exists which cannot be fulfilled by existing commercially-zoned property, and the commercial use would comply with all other applicable comprehensive plan policies" Policy 1 19.2 of the land Use Element addresses the provision of lands for Industrial development and reads as follows "The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrial acreage which can accommodate the approximate industrial employment which has been projected in the Future land Use Element, and prohibit conversion of land designated "Industrial" on the currently adopted Future land Use Map unless such conversion would generate a range of employment choices for current and future residents, provide goods and services of regional importance, and retain regional fiscal and economic significance At the time of adoption of the 1989 City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan, approximate acreage for each of the various land use designations included 269 acres for Office Commercial, 695 acres for local Retail Commercial and 745 acres for Industrial Quantum's contribution to these totaled 133 acres for Office Commercial, 30 acres for local Retail and 199 acres for Industrial The DRI Amendment allowing the developers to combine the use categories and permit Mixed Use (Commercial/Office/Multi-family) provides the developers with a great deal of flexibility with the ultimate, likely reduction in land available for industrial uses b Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare The proposed rezoning could create an isolated district that would not relate to the adjacent lands, given the range of uses that could be developed on these parcels However, since designations for these parcels remain nebulous, any synergism is difficult to determine The previously approved Mixed Use Pod is located adjacent to roads that are a part of the City's Thoroughfare System and are provided with easy access from 1-95 and is within a five-minute walk of the local Tri-Rail station The area for which the additional mixed use designation is now being requested is isolated from all of these components of the transportation network. With respect to the change to lot 34-C, industrial use on this parcel would allow for the creation of an isolated use incompatible with the surrounding existing uses, which may detrimentally impact, through "edge effect", the preserve Although the parcel abuts adjacent property (unincorporated) with future industrial use potential this parcel also contains lands that may be preserved and contribute to the greater preserve area within Quantum Park. Additional industrial lands along Miner Road would contrast with the predominately residential land use character particularly once the lands surrounding the High Ridge Country Club are developed along with the City Park. c Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable 8 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 The applicant -has provided no indication that there are changing conditions that make the proposed change desirable Furthermore the applicant has made no progress in the development of the first mixed-use project, which remains vacant, and there also exists lots with the "Industrial" use option that remain undeveloped Although staff has not supported previous conversions of industrially-classified parcels, staff does not support the conversion of subject open space to industrial lands, and recommends that existing industrial lands be developed prior to suggesting that open space be sacrificed for land conversion d Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities. The Utilities Department has indicated that any unforeseen impacts to the water and sewer systems and related levels of service will be borne by the developer The updated Traffic Impact Analysis submitted with the request for amendment indicates that the traffic generated will be within the limits for which the DRI is vested With respect to solid waste, the Solid Waste Al!thority has stated, within a letter dated January 8, 2001, that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the 10-year planning period Drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the site plan approvals, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities Lastly the Parks and Recreation Department has detailed the requirements that must be met at the site plan stage in order for its levels of service standards to be maintained e Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent or nearby properties. The 1989 Comprehensive Plan contains policies dealing with the general incompatibilities between "Industrial" and "Residential" land uses and recommends physical separation and buffering to ameliorate those effects The proposed location for the additional multi-family units is adjacent to properties developed for industrial and office uses and is bisected by Quantum Boulevard On the east the property is buffered from existing development by a water management tract and on the west by the E-4 Canal The development of an additional 500 multi-family units in this portion of the DRI will likely hinder the use of adjacent lands for their originally intended purpose and therefore further change the overall nature of the entire development. Residential uses could lead to further roadway alterations and the combination of incompatible vehicle traffic and pressures Recent studies, both within Florida and at the national level comparing government revenues to expenses for various land uses, indicate that residential development creates deficits while commercial and industrial development creates surpluses An increase in residential uses and the attendant increase in demands on services without accompanying increases in revenues from other sources i e employment-based development, can create operating deficits for local government. Also see criteria "b" above regarding lot 34-C f Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning On February 29 2000 a representative of the Quantum development stated to the City Commission that the property could be sold and developed for industrial uses There is no 9 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 indication that conditions have changed to the extent that the same would not be true only one year later g Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole As discussed above, there is no justification provided by the applicant to convert lands earmarked for development as an employment center to residential development. If one of the goals of the City is to maintain a jobs/housing balance, as lands designated for employment- based development are reduced, a corresponding need for housing diminishes Otherwise the City becomes merely a bedroom community for other, more successful, employment centers in the County h Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed With the recent approval of apartment developments, there are now many approved but unoccupied multi-family housing units within the City Five hundred of those are approved for development in the Quantum DRI, and future approvals should be located in the downtown area to promote redevelopment efforts At the time of their approval, the developers of Quantum agreed to a limitation of 500 total residential units within the development. The addition of another 500 units seems highly unnecessary without some understanding of the rate at which the market will absorb the approved units and only following the successful progress toward developing the first mixed use pod Land Development Requlations The Quantum Park DRI is zoned Planned Industrial Development (PI D) Coincident with the approval of Quantum Amendment #10 the PID district regulations were amended per Ordinance No 000-03 to allow. "mixed use residential/commercial uses in PID's totaling a minimum of 500 acres" Subsequent to the adoption of Quantum Amendment #10 the land Development regulations were amended to allow mixed use pods of commercial, retail multi- family residential and office/professional use in a PID This Ordinance No 000-52 also provided for design guidelines submission requirements, review and waiver provisions related to a Mixed Use Pod Master Plan As provided in the ordinance, the definition of a Mixed Use Pod is as follows "Ch 2, Sec. 7 P1.A. - For the purpose of this subsection, a Mixed Use Pod is defined as a development project located entirely within a previously approved PID which when complete will have all the following uses 1 multi-family residential 2 commercial/retail 3 office and professional The residential component of the Mixed Use Pod may include fee simple and rental dwelling units A Mixed Use Pod is the aggregate of all land within the PID consolidated and designated for mixed uses The NOPC for amendment #12 as proposed will create a second Mixed Use Pod as defined above If approved the second Mixed Use Pod would be regulated consistent with the requirements as adopted in Ordinance No 000-52 described above 10 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 The other chaRges proposed in this application are consistent with current Land Development Regulations Conclusion As indicated herein, the impacts of the proposed development on the utility systems, roadways and public facilities are either within the existing capacities or additional provisions will be required of the developer to ensure that levels of service standards are not compromised Regarding the conversion of 2327 acres from Industrial and Industrial/Office to Mixed Use, the physical location of the proposed change could be buffered to lessen the impacts of the development on existing and future surrounding development. However, there has been no justification presented by the applicant that would refute the findings contained herein, nor specifically justify its conflict with the Comprehensive Plan or its disadvantages regarding location and fiscal impact. The same is also true of the conversion of lot 34-C to Industrial The change proposed to Quantum Lakes Drive will have minimal impact and is supported by sl;lfficient data RECOMMENDATIONS Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 380 06(19) Substantial Deviations the applicant has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed change is not a substantial deviation requiring additional development of regional impact review Regarding the proposed modifications to the Quantum Park Master Plan staff recommendations are provided below 1 Addition of 23.27 Acres of Mixed Use (Lots 7-11 and 23-31) Staff does not support the request to change the current Office/Industrial (01) and Office (a) land use designations on lots 7-11 and 23-31 respectively to Mixed Use to facilitate further residential development in the Quantum PID The staff position is based on the following considerations First, the Quantum PID was established in order to diversify the city's tax base and provide a master planned community suitable for attracting and retaining technology, office, industrial and distribution uses Staff is concerned about whether it is in the city's interest to forfeit the long range economic and land use policies that led to the creation of the Quantum PID Second, those who developed the existing off, industrial and distribution facilities in the Quantum PID did so with the expectation that they were investing in a city sanctioned planned industrial park. Staff is concerned that changing the land use designation on lots 7-11 and 23 - 31 to Mixed Use which would permit additional residential development, without consulting these property owners, could further erode the city's credibility and adversely affect its ability to attract and retain other industrial and distribution uses These concerns notwithstanding staff recognizes that there may be other overriding considerations related to current economic and market conditions Accordingly, should the Commission decide to grant the land use designations on lots 7-11 and 23-31 to Mixed Use which includes residential development, staff would recommend that apartments or congregate care/living facilities be prohibited and that any residential development be restricted to fee 11 Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Memorandum No PZ 01-214 simple with an appropriate price point. Also, the additional 500 dwelling units requested by the applicant are contingent upon Commission approval of Mixed Use for lots 7-11 and 23-31 2 Lot 34C Staff acknowledges that lot 34-C is no longer part of the required drainage system for the DRI, however, staff does not support the replacement of this open space with development. This position is based on the following a) the subject property was never planned for development but for open space, b) the site may have originally been included with the proposed 40 acre tract intended to meet preservation requirements, c) the parcel is separated from the other developable parcels and the Master Plan roadway network; d) development of the parcel will negatively impact through "edge effect" the adjacent preserve area, e) the subject parcel is surrounded by existing preserve and an unincorporated parcel to the east which has the potential of generating future preserve dedication or acquisition which would increase the consolidated preserve in this area, Although staff has opposed previous amendments that reduced land available for industrial uses, there currently exists vacant land that is developable for industrial uses Staff does not support the increase in industrial land at the expense of open space 3 Quantum Lakes Drive Reconfiguration Staff recommends approval of the reconfiguration of Quantum Lakes Drive as proposed on the Master Plan Drawing for Amendment #12 This includes the creation of two (2) new Mixed Use designated lots labeled 100 and 101 totaling 5 21 acres and the combining of lots 62 and 63 into one new lot labeled 102 The reconfiguration is subject to all applicable Conditions of Approval in Exhibit "I " including replatting of the affected parcels S.IPLANNINGISHAREDIWPIPROJECTSIQUANTUM PARK 2001 AMEN #12'DRIA 01-C01ISTAFF REPORT #12.DOC 12 J14G~AT:ION ~MAP =: :~~UANTUIY1 PARK _ 10' I ~ 11-~. 'j.1- liTD' - - ~~-~ ~ (jj,~kr€L,~~t:f: -r; r -. . ~r:" - ~f::1 ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ -~- h~~;~"~ \\ ~ ,. .. :-.. tllJl!1 y' -:' ~ L .1Jjfl ~\l / ~ ~Il \]) /7'~} ~~.J I.. if" ;<~ ~I ~ ~ ~ (.J "\~. /::7 ~ . \ I .~ . . V -- . ~ h.l;.r o ffi4> ~G I~ ~., - ~II ~ ~ J I \ @:3:\ 1; ~ ~ - I ~., : 1 F 1 _ _ r- : :'l!" .. .' .. _ . ~ f$ , " :;' '~l r -- '\~ . <. ~ . _..) \'.. I ._- ;:,JE '., '.. . .... {li-.. "J!- ~~ . \:I.... w t~ \':,' -'":..,7 ~ / : ~ _ \ L~ \ ~(>.. . .~~ s / .~ " .,," j /'''''' ~: c!l.~lUl'\ 'l. I // K " :' _.' Ilr" _ .: ~~v..:y , I I I " \\ ~" . . . . . CYNT :'~~t:H ;-:;"r K OF C-CMMER~ .. rr .UANTUM PARKJ ;;;. - - - r-- \ J, ----' ~ ~--... 1- ;---0 ........ - --. r ~ ~ - IL - - L\J ~ ---1:~ ::... -~ 1 . - I --- --- - 71 NOT IN CITY EXHIBIT "A" "!.. .:~..,...s.;;"7 - _::. . I .! J'Vl11 ~intrT'(- _~ I .!-J- /nn ;'- '--17' '. l!L T..;.::.J"' t=I ^^-~~ r \~r-l li~ r'- Ll.-- I 1 I 1 l !~Z /; /1/~'~ II rj 'I ~ ./ ! ,/, J....l.l1 ',01 /1[" \, , J I PU ~~ , , ~=J'~f I J II ~ -J It J II ..J 1 IT T MILES(/ ~ J; rm ~ .1. PIC "'t ~ ~ .~ nMOTOROLA I' i. i...:l , - ~ ....... ,~ . IttQj t: , R AA --A V '-.,. A' I I \1 ,i i ',:i i'j I j','nf" '--"J"TJ' ,-- .. ~.., ..' , Ii- r- '" I . ,t; lill ~ '~I- I I I I I I L.... 1-,....... ~ t I ::.. : '1- ;-~--- - ~1- =. -.loo ~~ = \ - "R . I ,- I I I ',.... I . I- .t:=l :.J J J.r'~~~! E : -~-- =E , Y.-l..' ~r-i . : . . '~.l.~.lbIo""" - -'- ...... -- -- \~'t".A -I~ =... 0 1/8 ..~.~') ~ == III I .."W .......; -, - - " ~'" I I " In '"::: I'frii 1 I I EJ~TJr '0 400 800 - f - J I FEET I -- . is < i J .,. ..J ..., ~ s Is ~ a s ; I e ~ i EXHIBIT "B" 'In In .... a.. ~~ ;~4 Q~1l !<-V UN o ...J~ o N ...: ,rj ~ & Je ~ .i =tH ! .~~ q~~ t-H 5~'i !--w ~~1~~:i:i! b 5 Hmm l ~ ~ ~ f ~ f f ~ : '; ~ ! 9 ~ ITm~P P ~n i d ~ >- '" ...: o Z ~ o CD '" a:: <( a.. ~ : a ~ r-m Ll ~~~oo*~i ~ .q < >. z o ~ <.> w 111 ::. ~ >- z <( ~ o U\J .. "..,. ~M4't1n tlOt ;t~ QI;( O:U Q ~ ~'I . : o Cl '" '" w Z ::! I ~~ ", ;5 ," ~ V.I v; rg ,: l~ I i ! -L; ;-&; /\1 :;J(j:~.CJ =ji I . U', W ~ ~ I ,; ~ 1,1 I ~ ~ a.. >- ZO ~-~ a:ci~ gza. w>-_ GlZ"'" o~g ~~~ Vi~O a:: < 'u >- V1 :;; "" I , I' [I-I. ~ , ~ ' .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~1~lr ~ i!. I ~ i:;} ~, V) 2 ~ 0: O..~ ..d't~j ~&:~j g') I ::2 s ' -' " z " '-' ~ I '-' II I L f I I I I I~ .: ,- ~i I; ! , i~ij!.. . /-,.,- iiiili: ii,'! I -'--0_._._._ ! !~,-;--i : I'! -, I : \.ci :. , /-:- ~-!-:-I I ,-, -I I I I I I i -E-}(H I Bfr-JJ.e'L- ~ PROPOSED MASTER PLAN: I ~ P'l i i ... S S S .... uS h I I Cl ! ~ I ~ .'" i I ~ It) ... --. '''' n. ~i I .... ~~ II Ii ~ ~N I r Ii ~ ~ I I ! i 0 I ...J~ Z ::l ~ 0 0 '" CD ,..: ~ vi 0:: <( - n. '... z ::l: 0 ~ {3 .... <( III ::l 0 1DJ"'~~ GO( Ilf 0<<' tll' 0 7l. " ~ ~ ! I~ ~ ii . i !~~ .!i - ~~:;t ; ~ g 1== ~ ~ ~~i;K g ~ ~=I~;lili~ ~ ~ nmm ~! ~ ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ i ::;::~:~:~:8=8~ :~:= ::.;li';~i: h-n p~";;nn nn ~ ~.; ~:~!i_ . ~ ~ Ii L !S!. u< ~ - D. 8_ucooo;i.. o. i ~ . . . 0 o <5 '" ~ 'i I~ i ..,.., ! LIOU:)........ 1lJJ.... 3 ~ . . i~ ~ ~n ~ ;:t ~~~ ~ ;.~ ~q~ ~ ~ i ~ ~q~ n I ~S ~ i i ~ . ~i ~3 ~ ~ 0 0 -~~: ~ i ~ H ~~i~td t~i. ~~ t~ S:5 S or; ~ ~.~~~< ~--* hi l~ ~! "~~ ~ o~ 0" ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~~ - i1 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~i ~ H n n ~ 3^,( SS3~~NO;) I ~iJ,,~ '.~{I'_"_\C_ol\~"""-"_\-""'\ - IO! ~ ~ t:; ;l ~ !! :l: ; ~ I~d till ! ;;; tiH~ &a~ ~ ~ . ~ j ! ~ 5 ! .. ~ <5 "'I! o . o .1~ -L..~JjJ "'l'~~!1~ uiH O' f "" i . .c;-J t 1 5 '" z . i j j ~ "- II> I " :!; e~ ~~ ~ 1i ~ ~l :~ ~ ~. .. EXHIBIT "0" > ,. .,}j. SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT .~) 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 (561) 686-8800 FL WATS 1-800-4322045 . TDD (561) 6972574 ~ Mailing Address: POBox 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 www.sfwmd.gov LAN 01 r:'\ n ,r-< l"":'~ - r: ~-'. -,- September 6, 2001 SEP V 7 2001 .J .-.., ~ C Mr Jim Snyder, DRI Coordinator Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300 Stuart, FL 33416 Dear ~r' Subject: Quantum Park, DRI No. 84.173 Notice of Proposed Change In response to your request, South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) staff has reviewed the August 8, 2001 Notification of A Proposed Change (NO PC) to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) submitted by Eugene Gerlica, P E., for the above-referenced project. The primary purpose of the NOPC is to amend the Master Development Plan tOJeflect changes in land use affecting various lots throughout the development and reconfiguration Quantum Lakes Drive to create two additional developable lots After review of the documentation submitted, SFWMD staff did not identify any potential adverse regional water resource-related impacts that could result from approval of the proposed changes Consequently, the SFWMD has no objections to approval of the proposed changes However, a modification to the project's Conceptual Approval (Permit No 50-01503-S) may be required to address the proposed land use changes as they may impact the previously permitted acreage and land use assumptions If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 682-6862. Sincerely, ~ James J Golden, AICP Senior Planner Environmental Resource Regulation /jjg c Roger Wilburn, DCA Eugene Gerlica P E, Quantum Group GOv'ER.'JfNG BO.-\RD EXECUTIVE OFFICE Trodi K. Williams, ClUlir Lennart E. Lindahl. Vice'C!'Jir Pameb Brooks.Thomas Michael Collins Hugh ~l English Gerardo B Fern,\r.dez Patrick J Gleason. Ph.D P G. '<'icolas J Gutierrez. Jr Ese; \-!arklev R. Thornton H~nry Dean, Ex<.;...:,!i~'1! Directcr N ~>- O~ z<C I-~ z:5 ~W:;:) ~:E(/) <CZ o..ZO :EW- :J:E~ ....<C..J Zz=> ~:5~ ao..<C ~u W<C r-W tJ)C::: << :E :: ::: :J I ''"" ' !~i21'f! Ic.c Ui ,.,J _. III ! 1""'1- ; 10,;1 i ','_llUl I I . I i CJ I ..., I I fal to) I, '....Ill. ' I~:~ I i I ': I~_LJ EI ' >-I I I 11\-' .al~ ~I~ 1/)1 c:,~ ._,'''0, e II ca ....llliU' =,-1 C1' 0' III I 0' 1 :O::!- Frl- I I I : ! I I ,I Ii - (,J 1 III en ,o..,N flfl 10!"- <lu 121 I~I ill . 1:;;1-' I~I~ s, : M l..!!-J , N' ! ,0_ l~i!1 1~llJ; 10 Ill: ..J:-I ! : ' ; I ~ I i '.-\ l(..'l: I III I en !Do. oi.u:o:.l i :~i'r"II<I~i ' I' - I . : I i I r ; i I I . I , I I , i ! =-;~cr~~_ I I>! I~ o .C) IWI ;)- : < (..'l 'W (J) = c :z :5 ;~'M:oi~i", ~i 1~1 i=lolcln I~mi~:~ '" .I~l~ ~~I~I~'= = 0 MIOINI~ ~ Nlrol~ ~ IMI!::. ui!N'ai NI~'OI.~I~'Ic:iI'N' rri 0 C")1lX) ~ .~ ".. == 4t).".. "".,N '-'I<1l,- M v co ,ft - C"~!N W,.- . ,-- -<J ~l"" I ., I . 1 ;! I I , I I I! i : ,~ I " I I . ','::r Oi-INj'" I' I CI) 010,01- . COl. .1. I 'ro : , I : '" ::!:: I :: I frl 1::'>1 . I C'\!:', !; I' I~ jjj/.3il%: I~' i~I;', I' I i "i<( 13 ~. I l-gi i Ii: I . ! i I ! 0 " +tTTTtI : ~ . Oi'i ! IOJ ! i i .1' I' ~ I ~i 1m! (1;' ! t 0 !~! 11::::.::r-: ! I . . ~ 'I ~I !.' i '! C ~I 1 I IF ] ~ 'ITl~ '< :$ i! i~l. . '<r . "" i~1 I I I T .co ,v !~, I . , , I ! i -+-"-- I I i ~ I ! I ' I I , I I : , I I I '1.0 It--. ' .MI ~__ I ! I I !-I .~' I~l !-i ! . I ' I i I j~' co: I~i I~' i 1 I ~I i I ! I i ! ' I ' I !! ! I ' ", ' ' nil!) o'~ ~ '<3'1_ co' f""lio,\O't""/ .", "!:e>.,C'1 r'- en o;s "",01.... o!~ ....: !Mi~)1.O ~1~iN ~ N ~i....lo!o~1 .~!~!I.O:N!COiN M ~1~11~1~IQi~1 I _. i! I : ~ I I I' ->-- I , I I I . . I I ! : !, ' I , I i ! ! i~, , I I ! . ';2 , ,Z .' i I 0 I~ Ci5 ~i! ~: 0::1! i= I IW -J no, .::2: ,W' 1,>-, I UJ :21....1 <I ;:i '00' '$. ,,,,I I 01 i 10::C ....... :z -t!::J,::J ,ii. > -. < ~ ~1~1 10 :1:.,<, ,"':'I~'~I ~ i I,a:: ,0:: 0::: .:1: ,,~ W ;::: )-,.....f-, I,,, ..... . r- (f) (J) I(/) i I ,-..; a::: u.TI < -J as I:::>:::>!:::>' , 1C2I:Lju! i5<~ OIOOW'U)....W< ~ ~ Z ~,~ ~'~IO,~ z ~ I~ ~ ~ W,~W~'~IZISI~:U)i !:2 ~ wiuio:o U Q'~ 0' IZ ..... -- ':.'- _1_ - LlJ1'-1< 0 LlJ 2. - , lJ.. U. :J.. 'lJ..>< r- Z ~ o ~O ~ u..~Iu..i-l~ 01'<(10/. 10 ......"'.010 0 '~ :2 ::: C::(f) 1= , : I 1 ..J :<t il- IO! 'I-' i I , I i ! I 1-;;- l1l, I , i5. ii, ' I&! ("")'N O'l'.... ::g ',. S o,~ l~ 110 'M ~t>~.~''"'l'It--.~ 'l'tU \. j:"") ~ 1("1") "-r- E: i I ::r " . ~') I j' I . v: . I n:l NIMI_I_ ~ .!!1 <01",,0'0'" 1< - -,.... .- Q. Cl .3..3~ ~ ~I : ~ I ~ a 0' . '" ' 10101-1' 1,- , o'Oj- ~ ! I.....I~, g 1'0 I ~ ,!31:g1 : ~ -.---..3!.3 1; I I E I ! .S.5 0; IE ! -g '2 e = :-g]~: cr. 1_ - _ I 19 g cU I :";; .~ f! : '~ ~I':: o 0, ~ c... ~' 0 I- o ll.J 13 'UI ro ~' ~ .;= I i _-= ~-Cr---::;: T 3.; I-J.-J: .....::~~ _~_ ,Jt:= EXHIBIT "E" lil 0) CQ a. ...... o ..... N 23 - u.i Cl. ~ ~ Q Ci L.:J >- t'? .J:J (!)~ U1 Q.) ~ (Tj ~o.. c (!) 11l '- -JC- ":" tt~; -- le/05/2e01 16 ae Department of Bngineoring 1UUIl'ubIlc Work, PO. Box j229 We~: Palm ol!'ach. '!.33416-1229 (561 i 684 .4000 WWW.pbcs)v.carr . Palm Beach County Boant of (.ounty <<;:ommlui oner, lil..urer. P.. t'oewe,i. Cl1a!nnan Carol 1'. Robem. \.c~ Cl1air !<..:en T ~.l..reus ~!..:y ~1C' .ar:y Bur' ...U: ,"ser Tony:v.a;l:ottl ,~,ccje \... Greene County A.dm~nlstl'8.tor f>Lbert Weisman An J!.qua: Op:"orC"..tl':.!:'": "J,f/iTJ'f"':,:-rJI/ ,.l.c."-" 1 ~mp[c)'S"P" @~ orln~d on f8.:IC'OIJ p~o9r 4785778 HJG:::~jEERlhG TRA~r~~ P~GE 82 EXHIBIT "F" October 5, 2001 Mr Michael W Rtlpf Department of Planning & Zoning City of Boynton Beacn POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE: Quantum Park. Amendment #12 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Michael The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received on August 17 2001) for the project entitled; Quantum Park - Amendment #12, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards In Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. Based on our review the Traffic Division has determi'led that the approval can not be I granted due to the following The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 dally trips) should be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development traffic generation Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals. as presented in Attechments 1A. 18, and 1C, must reflect the values in the latest NOpe approval If you have sny questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely OF~!CE OF THE COUNTY E~GINEER f1/? v cc: Pinottr Troutman Consu!linglnc. MTP GrQ\lP lnc FilS: General TPS Mun Traffic Stwdl Rc"iew ~.\TFVF~C\ma\Admin\Comm8nls.C1 0812F-p&zwpd EXHIBIT "G" CITY OF BOThTON BEACH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Mike Rumpf, DIrector of Plannmg and Zomng FROM Jeffrey R. LIvergood, DIrector ofPubhc Works DATE August 29, 2001-RevIsed October 4 2001 SUBJECT Quantum NOPC #12 I have revlewed the proposed changes conSIdered m NOPC #12 for Quantum Park. Quantum has requested that conslderatIOn be gIVen by the CIty to the closure of the eastern portIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve at Gateway Boulevard. There are essentIally three traffic lssues that ment evaluatIOn and scrutmy Quantum Lakes Drive Closure Staffls of the opmIOn that Quantum Lakes Dnve can safely be closed at Gateway Boulevard. Frankly, It IS staffs opmIOn that there IS value m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnveway smce thIS would effectIvely ehmmate a conflIct pomt on a busy artenal route (Gateway Boulevard) However, m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnve, we must be cognIzant of the revIsed access configuratIons from Lots 100 and 102 Staff recommends that these two lots only be allowed to access Gateway Boulevard m a "nght m - nght out" manner Staff would oppose any smgle lot havmg full access onto Gateway smce the dnveways m questIOn are located on the mSIde of the curve on Gateway and SIght dIstance IS hmIted. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard Staffs reVIew of the traffic Impact at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gate\vay Boulevard IS more complex. As part of the NOPC #11 submIttal, the traffic consultant, Pmdar Troutman, opmed that a traffic slgnalIs warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on peak hour warrants, or Warrant 11 from the Manual on Umform Traffic Control DeVices Wlth respect to NOPC #12, the consultant has changed the mtersectIOn lane markmg configuratIOn by ehmmatmg one of two through lanes, both northbound and southbound, and SubstItutmg dedIcated nght turn lanes ThIS actIOn was logIcal because the assumptIOn was made that there would be very mImmal north or southbound through movements at the mtersectIOn. UltImately, the cntIcal volume sum that \vas utihzed for level of servIce analysIs could be reduced. Thus the mtersectIOn theoretIcally wIll have a hIgher traffic capaCIty However, whereas the cntIca1lane analYSIS prondes mformatIOn related to overall mtersectIOn capaCIty, It does not lend Itself to warrant analvsIs for sIgnahzatIOn. ThIS analYSIS IS based on completely dIfferent cnterIa establIshed m the vlanual m umform Traffic Control DeVIces, the same Manual utihzed bv the consultant m "'.OPC #11 submIttal. The consultant has shown no changes m the traffic dIstributIon. Thus, the warrant analvsIs conducted by Pmdar Troutman and summarIzed m a report dated February 16, 2001 IS still vahd. In fact, as lots 7 through 11 and lots 23 through 31 develop as l\!Ixed Lse, they WIll most certamlv generate addItIOnal traffic that EXHIBIT "G" will use the-intersection of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. As such, the need for a traffic sIgnal at th1s mtersectIOn will be even more pronounced. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The traffic consultant dId not evaluate traffic condItIOns at thIS mtersectIon as part of the submIttal packet for NOpe #12 However, evaluatIon of traffic condItIons at thIS mtersectIOn IS equally as cntIcal. Agam, as part of the NOPC #11 submIttal, Pmdar Troutman evaluated traffic SIgnal warrant cntena at the mtersection of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. In thIS analYSIS, Pmdar Troutman found that a traffic SIgnal was not presently warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on the peak hour warrant and noted that "there are other \Varrants, No 2- InterruptIOn of Contmuous Traffic and No 10 - Peak Hour Delay that may be satisfied. The recommendation IS that tlus mtersectIOn be mOnItored m the future Appropnate time frames for mOnItormg would be at the buildout of Lots 32 through 38 and at the buildout of the NOPC 11 reSIdential or non-res1dentialland uses, whIchever occurs first." Staff would note that a large portIOn oflots 32 through 38 1S now complete m the form ofthe PremIer buildmg. Furthermore, as part ofPmdar Troutman's traffic analYSIS m February of2001, the consultant assumed a build out of Lots 23 to 31 as office space (0) and Lots 7 to 11 as Office/Industnal (OII) However, the proposal IS to now change these land uses to M1xed Use OvID) The developer contmues to be bound by a maXImum number of dally tnps from the entIre DRI, yet subtle changes m land use can sIgmficantly Impact peak hour traffic flows WIthout Impactmg the daily trIp generation rate The consultant has not expressed an OpInIOn on the changed traffic charactenstIcs as related to traffic slgnal warrant analYSIS based on the changes to mIxed use It IS very likely that a SIgnal will be warranted as well at Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Avenue upon bUIld out of the proposed mIxed use land uses Recommendation It IS very clear that traffic SIgnals are eIther currently warranted, or WIll be warranted m the future, at both Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue These SIgnals will be necessary entIrely because of development m Quantum Park. Thus, staff belIeves that the cost of constructmg these SIgnals should be borne by future builders as well as by those tenants of the mdustnal park that are presently generatmg traffic It would not be appropnate to have the CIty of Boynton Beach pay for the traffic SIgnals when other capItal Improvements are eIther more 1mportant or have been delayed m pnor years awa1tIng fundmg. If the C1ty does not obtam surety for the mstallatIOn of a traffic SIgnal at thIS tIme, It \vill be VIrtually Impossible to assess the reqmrement for traffic SIgnal constructIOn to each mdIvIdual that may purchase the mIxed use lots from Quantum and then subsequently develop them. The burden of traffic SIgnal constructIOn should fall upon the developer of the whole rather than the mdlvIduals that choose to acqmre and develop lots m the future Quantum could easlly dIstribute the cost equally to future buyers whereas the CIty could not. LikeWIse, Quantum has SIgnIficant control over the property owners aSSOCIatIOn and has the abilIty to mItIate a speCial assessment of eXIstmg propertIes for theIr share m the cost of traffic SIgnal constructIOn. Staff recommends that the developer and the eXIstmg occupants of Quantum Park be held responsible for the cost of constructIOn of traffic actuated Signals at the mtersectIOns of Quantum Boulevard WIth Gateway and Congress. _ _Hl/01/2001 15 40 56143488- THE SCHOOL D1STR1CT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CHIeF OPERATING OFFICER 3340 FOREST HILL BOULEVARD. C-316 W~ST PALM SEACH, FL 33406-5B69 (561)434-B510 FAX (561) 3S7 7585 ARTHUR C. JOHNSON, Ph.D. SU~ER1....N:>ENT PAGE 02/02 EXHIBIT "H" WILLIAM F MAl.QNE CHI~F OPERATINCl Ql'F1CEn October 1,2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf, Plannmg Director Planning Pepartment City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE. Quantum Park DlUA Ol-OOllMP~fD 01-003 Notice of proposed change Amendment 12 Dear Mr Rumpf: The School Plstrict staff has reviewed your request through the Quantum Park "mixed use" Master Plan Amendment to the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan It is anticipated that there will be suffic1ent capacity for the students generated by the project. The projected addition of 500 multi-family residential Units will add an estImated 25 elementary, 80 mlddJe and 80 high school students, Thls project is located In Concurrency Service Area CSA 17 This project will be exempt from a school concurrency determinatIOn if a complete applicatlOu is received by the City at the tlme concurrency takes effect. If there are any questions, please call me at (561) 434-8028 ,) )l~L/ ne Mills, AICP enior Planner, COnCtUTency cc Angela Usher, AICP, 1t1.anager, Intergovernmental Relations, Planning Department, PBSCD Terry Hess, Treasure Coast RegiOnal Plaumng Council R\DA T ,\ \ \VP51 \DOC\CONCRNCY\REGRE\ "\LUA \ LETTER5\BO'\:"iTh'\0I3J615 H \DA TA \CONCRNC2\REVDRC\REG~:\(~ ~'~\.NOQUANT DOC DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO PZ 01-220 FROM Mayor Jerry Broening and City commi~SiO Lusia Galav, AIG Principal Planner October 11, 2001 TO DATE SUBJECT Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 Master Plan Amendment #12 - Quantum Park and Village Addendum ADDENDUM This report is the addendum to the Department of Development Memorandum No PZ 01-214 to the Planning and Development Board dated October 4 2001 Updated information is provided regarding the above referenced project. Final Recommendations Regarding the modifications to the Quantum Park Master Plan, staff has revised the recommendation regarding Lot 34-C based on a compromise reached with the applicant. Staff does not object to revising the NOPC to allow the 6 58 acres in lot 34-C to be placed in a separate category labeled "reserved" until this site is evaluated to determine its appropriate use This recommendation is contingent upon satisfying revised condition #4 in the Conditions of Approval, Exhibit I attached Conditions of Approval - Exhibit "I" In addition, the Conditions of Approval Exhibit "I" has been revised to reflect additional information received subsequent to the release of the staff report. At this time the Department of Community Affairs has yet to provide any formal comments Attachments 1 Letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated October 8 2001 2 Letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division dated October 10 2001 3 Letter from Florida Department of Transportation dated September 4 2001 P 02 .aC7-08-2~01 11 38 -:; ~ ......~: t. ~. 'i:.}C =;' r~1~-.':";";~;..~~7),~ -.;.7" .- - . ~.;~=~t. -.. _. '.-.-i--'~ . -''''J-''~ .,.';.. _ ~-=-"~~ ~'~g'~~'.- -' -... :-. ..1 .,...~.~~.~........-.- '._.1 ?~.,__.r .-...3. .... . 3J.--;'~ .... ..,~-"-~'f ~"T'-":""":.-r"" .--;~.:~~~....:.... _.. '_1, --~.- J _.....::..~I.~ -=......;, -' T ~=~ ..;=. -:---''iZ7' .~.~--~~. .:...1.. ~<::->, ~, ..., W":. r---;--;]' ",,,.., "~'~'-::S-. "---- RKA SThr,R it ~~~3liG:gr:D.ci;A"'ir P.t.cK'N i-n we: ,J-/"hu N~fi "' '-;r;--~"il; "":; - ifl J';e;! ~ :~., -'r" I ~.'; ,- .~ -:':::::=5'" .:,~ :.:::;-.. .~.;..... ~~ ~...- ~-=::. ~.'. ,~-=' --=... _J....,~.,!.i1.~:~.~.:!-;;.s..~c.f-~l ir~"~I.-a::;.,-=-t..~;,_.. " ~YL~ ~~ ~::?~I }:-Io.... T'\.'" '~-N"""~ ~ ,. ~ . .~...., ~. ;;" I ..''':I;;;r I I L~ \ .- ~ ~ lti. -. ~ ,. ,,,.....,... -- ;-4~:'1..#~ no' . '7""'"~"'~V E 'R"'~: '._ .;J ~~"'+-~-_--=tp :~,f.-=-n f~" C =...... :~ - ,:...,.,-L y:..O."........~ ..~. ,~~._-c:..,. -,==-'..;7".,., .......:0 .'" ..:.~}.~ '.K:~.I:-.~:7":".:.:: ..~ ~ 1-0'....:. ~ ~Jl. ~ - ",:'.;J:. . -t"A.iU' \;.; .I: ~~ .. .::;;.. ;: : ~ $ .;~ r"~~-"n:~-""'~'i1kr:::-..;::)''''''-'1':''~ .>. -.=.s--..t :. -"'-+~ .:.:.'"----.--.~, - '~'J I. ...---...,.---..J--:.;r.-' ...- .. -..;.. .~. . .~, ; ~~~r---=~ ~..;_ ' - - .-:- ;.~--J~;~\ ._~~.~~~~. ~ .~~~,~ i~_q:J _ \o_~'i~J ."- October 8, 200 1 rn ~ ~ ~ P ';'''7 p ---., i p, ~i u ,j ~ CI:1' .. u: LJ 1 r.c: '.jf) ~-_..- ...--- Mr lv1icb.ae1 W Rumpf Planrung and Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach., Flonda 33435 Subject. Quantum Park Development of Reglonal Impact Notification of Proposed Change Dear Mr Rumpf; In accordance ",ith the reqw.rements ofSectlon 38006(19), FlOrIda Statutes (F.S), we have reviewed the "Notmcatlon of a Proposed Change to a PreV10usly Approved Development of R.eglOnaI Impact (DRl)" (NOpe) tor the Quantum Park DRI dated August 8 2001 The NOpe proposes the followmg reVlsions to the master plan. 1) Lots 7, 8. 9, 10, and 11 land use designatlon is to be changed from office/industr'..a! to mIXed use, w!llch allows office, commerclaJ, and residentIal uses, J l . 2) Lots 23. 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. 29 30. and 31 lane use desigJ'l.atlOn is to be changed from office to rruxed use, wmch allows ofEce, commercIal, and resIdentIal uses; 3) Lot 34C which is currenLly undeslgnared and pa.""t of the open space area lS char-g~d to industnal; and 4) Quantti.-rn La1{es Drive 15 proposed tor elirmnatlOn frem the mtersection ~jth Quantum Boulevard to the eastern mtersection Wlth Gatewa" Bo ulevard The applica."1t proposes to decrease office a..'"1d mdustr,al square footage to allow addltLOnal comrnerc1al square footage and dwelling uruts, The proposed d.....anges are presumed to create a substantlaI dev12,tior: purSU3..r..t to Section 380 06i 19)(~)3 acd 380 06(19)(e)5 C, Flonda Statutes. Council has reYl.ewed che t:1.forrnatlor. and determmed that t!re proposed. changes will not create any ad6tlonal regIonal unpa_ts Co:.u:d recognizes <md appreC1<ltes the :lontcant's efforts to cr~a.tt: a crood nux of land uses and oro\1de fOi: a mOre sustaJ.l1able rorm .. . '" - <I,BJ'Jnging COJIlmunirJcs Tage ber" . Ese 1976 JOt Ea" Ocell:l 8Qu\~ .rd !;'llQ~. (Sol) 221 ~J40 3C Z6' JO~O S .... i. t" ). i Q ).t'.lart f"ttJridA )"'?-' 1'- " (~4o l) :.1 .. 0 0 E:c. a \ :....:1 ~ ' ... "T : ~, ~ ," ~~. " OCT-08-2001 11 38 P03 Ivfr Michael W Rumpf October 8, 2001 Page 2 of devt:lopment for a portlOn of the proJect. However, Council is concerned. With the desIgnation of Lot 34C to industnal. This lot is adjacent to the sand plIle scrub preserve, city park and water retention area. The pared was orlgmaUy proposed for development but dunng an amendment to the project to address reqUlrements WIthin the development order tlus area was deSIgnated for preservation and later part of the water retention area. Over time the overall open space ar~a of the project has decreas~d and designating Lot 34C would be an additional reduction. Based on the locatIon of the parcel and the further reductzqn m open space for the project, Staff does not recomrn.end that th~ proposed change to mdustnal for Lot 34C proceed until. 1) the City evaluates the need for open space on the project and detemunes that the reductIon in open space created by tius change is consistent W1th City regulations, 2) It is demonstrated that development of tlus parcel will not interfere 1,1(1th management of the adjacent preserve area, and 3) it is demonstrated that development ofthts site Wl.1! not have a negatIve impact on the eS""..abushed dramage system. Please call if you have anY questlO!l5, Smcerely, bs7sdrJ DR] Coordmator : i.... ." cc Ken Metcalf, FDC A Eugene GerIica. Apphcant TTf-,L P 83 ---1~L10/~Q01 15 04 561434166? .. PIt'IDER TROUH1AN ENGlNESRING TRAFFI~ PAGE 82 PAGE 02 10;le/2001 15 43 4785770 DepatOIlent of ~1\uriJ\f aM hbllc: WOrkt 1'.0. &ox Zl;l." Wut Pllrn Beach. Ft. 33416-1229 {Ml) 68i-4000 www.p\lc;ov.com . t.lm ka('~ CO..nty ~nl. or CooMCy ComrnJ..ion'tlI Wamo K. NEwall. Chl.lrmUl Car:>l A.. l\Dber'.j, Vice Chair KAren 'f. M:lrcu:I M l:Y MCCll'ty Sun fo.arclUon Thny MullOCt! .a.d::1ial. Grune ~\lIIq ,\d.,..lJslau.tor ~b~ rt \"'~lsman .,.t. 8fJIlf OJ:port'~niO' -'lUirmari.. ACffO" EMlIoyrr' ~ pr1n~ ,'" tor-P<<1 pep.r Oc1ober 10, 2001 ill t; r , I - \ It.'., L' , o I .-=-.:.~-~_.. t lET I 0 200l I P' U :WG f,'iD ........, If" ~-~T L Jl ,....:... i.... I , j Mr Miehlel W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Oepartment of Development Cltv of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach. FL 3<<25.0310 RE: Quantum Park -Amendment "2 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf' The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffle statement (received on August 17,200 1) forthe projec1 entltled; Quantum flaM<. Amendment #12. pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards In Article 15 of the P~lm Beach County Land Development Code. The new proposed development plan for NOpe #12 Is .s fol/ows: Industrial Retail Offl~ Warehouse Hotel High School Auto Dealership Movl. Theater Restaurant HT Restaurant. Quality Convenience Store/Gas Ice SkatioQ Rink Mul\i Family R&sidMtial Pari< & Ride FaCillty 1 700,000 SF 427,;e2 SF e:n.900 SF 22.700 SF 200 Rooms 2500 Students S3,072 SF .4 000 Seats 2e,.OO SF 69,250 SF 3.054 SF Q3,.30 SF , ,000 Dwellings N1A Based on our review, the Traffic Divisicn flas determined that the overall traffic generation associated with the newly proposed development plan Iis!ed above (NOpe II' 2), does net ex~e<l the total trIps vested for the Quantum ParK development, in the previously approved NOpe _10 (April 18. 2000) Therafore the proposed plan is approved II Is however, suggeste<1 to the city of Boynton Beach ReQuire from the traffic consultant a table comparing the project vested trips (based on the most recent approval), versus trip generation of all land uses whIch have received development orders to date Ttlis practIce need!> to continue with any future submissions The Intersection of Quantum Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard Is forecasted to operate within .unacceptable" conditions, under Year 2006 !>Galianos, !lid upon full completion and occupation of the project. Tl1ls location needs to be monitored fer future improvements, which nei!ds to be Implemented by the developer 10110/2081 15 04 18/1e/2081 15 43 5614341663 4785770 P H,mER TROUH1AN ENGINEERING TRAFFIC PAGE 03 FAGE 02 Page 2 If you have any qUf3stions regarding this determination. please contact me at 158"~"030, Sincerely, INEER cc: P~-Trcutmln ~1\1nO IfIC. MTP Grtrup lno. Fil.: ~l TPS M~ TraMe Study Revlc\ll F'\ TRAFF IC\lra\Admin.....~~..'D1C612.doc ,. _f . - .. SEP-11-2001 09 26 P 02 ~ Florida Department of Transportahon JEB BUSH GOVERNOR. OFfICE OF' PLANNING JlND El''-VIRONMENTAL MANACEMENT - DISTRICT 4 3400 Wl:$f. Commercia.1 Blvd., 3~ Floor. FL l..au~c:. F133309.3421 Telephone: (954) 777-4601 Fax: (954) m-4671 THO~iAS F B,\AAY JR. SECRETA1tY September 4,2001 R~r~o;.-l~ G:l~D ~ "C"- ~.... 'v !tMIII Sf? - 1 2001 Mr D Ray Eubanks Planning Manager Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 TRE~~up.;: CO~ST REGlONAt !PU.N"iING COUNCIL r---------) .- :n ~ r i} II ~~~ ~~~t~-----...:c- UU !lX:Tl, 0 2lIOI r p~ liNG ;:1W I L" W:: :;=;:T i .j Dear Mr Eubanks; SUBJECT Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact (DR!) City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) As requested ill the letter from Mr James Snyder of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated August 8, 200 I, the Department has reVlewed the Quantum Park Development df Regional Impact (DR!) NotificatIon of Proposed Change (NOpe). The Quantum Park DR! was originally approved on December 18, 1984 as a :mixed-use development. Through amendments the development order now approves the follo\Vlng land uses corrnnercial, mdustnal, governmenUinstlUltlonal, office, recreation and hotel. I ! In thIS Nope (#12), the applicant proposes reVISIons to the DRI Master Plan to create a:mlxed.use development that includes office, commercial, and residentIal uses. The applIcant has p~oposed the following changes to the Master Plan. . Moddymg Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Office/Industnal to Mixed Use, willcn includes office, commerCIal, and resIdentIal uses. This change decreases the Industrial Ladd Use from 2,275,354 square feet to 1,900,000 square feet. I . Modifymg Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,28,29,30 and 31 from Office/lndustnal to Mixed Use, whIch includes office, commercial, and residential uses. This change decrease~ the Office Land Use from 798,772 square feet to 725,850 square feet. . The combmatlOn of these chapges results in an increase In Residential Land Use from 500 dwellmg umts to 1,000 dwellIng umts "",<WII dOLstate fl us o "ecyc~eo PAPE:rt ~,~ '. SEP-11-2001 09 26 P 03 Mr D Ray Eubanks September 4, 2001 Page 2 The reconfiguratlon of Quantum Lakes Drive by closing the segment from: Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulev~d resultmg in addItional developable land to be ~ubdlvided into Lots 100 and 101 The new lots are to be desIgnated Mixed Use, whIch inc1~des office, commerctaI, and residentIal uses. The Department offers the followmg comments The change in res1dentlal development from 500 to 1,000 homes that was inc1Jded m the substantial deViation determination chart was not described in the request for th~ NOPC. The reconfiguration of Quantum Lakes Dnve results m redIstributed traffic vol-dmes to the mtersection of Quantmn Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The intersectIon arlalYSls that was provided With the Nope mdicates that the Increased volumes will cause the tbtersecnon to fail unless the northbound and southbound approaches are re-stnped from a sin~e left-turn lane WIth dual through lanes to a single left-turn, a smgle through lane, and a smgly nght-turn lane. After the re-stnpmg, the intersectIon operates below the critical volume level. The apphcant should speClfy the party responsible for the restnpmg improvement i to current acceptable standards and mcorporate the improvement as ConditIon in the! Amended Development Order pnor to the closure of Quantum Lakes Dnve, : . . Please ind1cate how Parcel MU61 will be accessed WIth the reconfigurationfc1osure of Quantum Lakes Drive. In summary, the Quantum Park DR! NOPC provided to the Department is sufficient p~d1ng the mclUSlOn of the above comments mto the NOPC and Amended Development Order. Please feel free I to contact this office at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questions. . Sincerely, MLy..~ voWI::1fr~E, ct Planmng and EnvrronmentM Engmeer ! GS:mm/al cc: Jim Snyder, TCRPC Bob Romtg Gerry O'Reilly J olm Krane $~'NINC-o<:JaMlJ .v.ou.r.-OI'(11.>-J>OC _'f':\ TiJT:='L P .~-' EXHIBIT "I" ReVIsed CondItIons of Approval 10/1 % 1 PrOject name' Quantum Park NOPC Amendment #12 File number' MPMD 01-003/DRIA 01-001 Reference' 2nd reVIew plans identified as Master Plan wIth a September 11, 2001 Planmng and Zomng d Department ate stamp markIng. I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS-General Comments. NONE X PUBLIC WORKS-Traffic Comments 1 When warranted the developer and the eXIstIng occupants of Quantum Park X will be responsible for the cost of constructIOn of traffic-actuated SIgnals at the Intersections of Quantum Boulevard wIth Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue See attached memo from Jeff LIvergood, PublIc Works DIrector, dated August 29 2001/ Re'v'lsed October 4, 2001 located In ExhibIt "G UTILITIES Comments 2. As prevIOusly stated, the proposed reVISIOn to the land use to 'MIxed Use X (Nlli)" to Include Office, Commerc1al and ReSIdentIal uses could tax the utihty support facilItIes to theIr lIrmts. A prOVISO needs to be incorporated Into each group of lot approvals process, that the desIgn-engmeering consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utlhty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they WIll prOVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use Failure to do so could result In InsuffiCIent utIlIty support to thIS park, affectmg other current (exIstIng) users. FIRE Comments NONE X POLICE Comments NONE X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments NONE I A I I 2 10/11/2001 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DNISION Comments, NONE X PARKS AND RECREATION Comments 3 The CIty CommISSIOn dId exempt from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIon X Requirement of 272 umts of the first 500 umts reqmred m NOPC # 10 Apphcabihty or amount of RecreatIOn Fees or DedIcatIOns will be considered at subsequent sIte plan stage, FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments 4 The proposed Master SIte Development Plan shall be modIfied to remove X the Industnal use deSIgnatIOn for Lot 34-C The land area of Lot 34-C, 6 58 acres, shall be deducted from the Industnal des1gnatIon and mcluded as a separate lme 1tem tItled "Reserved" m the area tabulatIOn sho\VIl on the master plan. Development shall not occur until a) the CIty and apphcant evaluates the need for open space "m the Pill master plan" and determmes that the reductIOn m open space created by thIS change 1S conSIstent WIth the City regulatIOns, b) it 1S demonstrated that the development of thIS parcel will not mterfere w1th management of the adjacent preserve area. These two(2) condItIons are reIterated above and contamed wlthm a letter dated October 8, 2001 from the Treasure Coast RegIonal Plannmg Council (TRRPC) It is acknowledged that Lot 34-C 1S not encumbered by any easement, reservation, dediCatIOn or permlt reqmrement by the City, any regulatory agency or speCIal dlstnct mcludmg the Quantum Commumty Development Dlstnct regardmg the use of Lot 34-C for dramage purposes, except the dramage reqmrements assocIated With the development of Lot 34-C PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 5 At the tIme of sIte plan approval apphcant WIll work. WIth the CIty to X maXImIze emergency access for lots 59 through 61 and new lots 100 through 102. 6 Apphcant has submItted a reVised area ca1culatlOn summary Please reVIse X the Master Plan drawmg to reflect the correct acreage ca1culatlOns proposed for the MIxed Use and Road Rlght-ofWay categones. ! 3 10/11/2001 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments. NONE X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments, S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen # 12\rv1PMD 0 1-003\cond. of approval 2001 form.doc ;7 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH i AGENDA REGULAR CITY COMMISSION MEETING OCTOBER 16, 2001 B Ordinances - 1st Reading 1 Proposed Ordinance No. 01-50 Re Amending Part III, Land Development Regulations, Chapter 1 and Chapter 21, regarding "Banners" (TABLED TO NOVEMBER 20, 2001 A T THE REQUEST OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT) 2 Proposed Ordinance No. 01-54 Re Amending the Quantum Park DRljMaster Plan to change the permitted use on lots 7-11 from "Office Industrial" (01) to "Mixed Use" (MU) and lots 23-31 from "Office" (0) to "Mixed Use" (MU), to increase maximum residential units from 500 units to 1,000 units, to partially close Quantum Lakes Drive and create two (2) new tracts of "Mixed Use" (MU), and to change the permitted use on tract 34-C from "Detention" to "Reserve" C. Resolutions None D Other XIII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS XIV ADJOURNMENT NOTICE IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE CITY COMMISSION WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE/SHE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND, FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE/SHE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDING IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. (F.S, 286 0105) THE CITY SHALL FURNISH APPROPRIATE AUXIUARY AIDS AND SERVICES WHERE NECESSARY TO AFFORD AN INDIVIDUAL WITH A DISABIUTY AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN AND ENJOY THE BENEFITS OF A SERVICE, PROGRAM, OR AcrIVITY CONDUCTED BY THE CITY PLEASE CONTACT JOYCE COSTELLO, (561) 742-6013 AT LEAST 1WENTY-FOUR HOURS PRIOR TO THE PROGRAM OR AcrIVITY IN ORDER FOR THE CITY TO REASONABLY ACCOMMODATE YOUR REQUEST FINAL AGENDA 10/15/20014:59 PM J'\SHRDATA\CC\WP\CCAGENDA\AGENDAS\YEAR 2001\1 01601.DOC bg 7