The URL can be used to link to this page

CORRESPONDENCE January 8, 2002 Lucia Galav, Principal Planner Department of Development Planning and Zoning Division 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 310 Boynton Beach, ~l 33425-0310 Dear Ms. Galav I would appreciate notification when there is a change pertaining to Quantum Park PID Master Plan (NOPC # 12) Ordinance 01-54 Lot 34-C, at present in Reserved catagory -- Stella Rossi 625 Whispering Pines Road Boynton Beach, ~l 33435 Tel 732-4786 ~ax. 561-374-9473 rn 00 ~ nD iW m 00 DEPARTMENT OF DI\IE1.OIIMPI1' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION _ Building - Planning & Zoning - Occupational Licenses - Community Redevelopment fILE COpy December 17,2001 Mr Eugene Gerlica, P E Quantum Group of Companies 2500 Quantum lakes Drive Suite 101 Boynton Beach, FL. 33426 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park-DRI-Amendment No 12 (Our Ref No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Gerlica On Friday, November 14, 2001 I faxed you a copy of the attached letter from The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) dated December 7, 2001 As the letter indicates, the FDOT is objecting to the Development Order for Quantum NOPC Amendment #12 based on a condition which they communicated to the Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council during the review process for Amendment #12 The City of Boynton Beach was not formally notified by the FDOT of this condition As you recall, you provided a copy of the letter to staff prior to the second reading of the adoption ordinance The Development Ordinance No 01-054 did not include the FDOT condition Staff discussed with Jim Cherof, the City Attorney how best to accommodate the FDOT condition Since the Quantum lakes Drive road closure is imminent Mr Cherof recommends that the FDOT condition be required as a condition of the road closure If you have any questions, please call me at (561) 742-6262. Sincer I UJ.~ diav lusia Galav, AICP Principal Planner Attachment CC Jim Cherof, City Attorney Michael Rumpf, Planing and Zoning Director laurinda logan Civil Engineer Jim Snyder, Treasure Coast RPC S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\ORIA 01-001\Gerlica FOOT Obj.LET doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., PO. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 · www.cLboynton-beach.f1.uSVi(l.4ol.JO I FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO Eugene Gerlica, Quantum Group of Co FAX 561-740-2429 FROM Lusia Galav, Principal Planner DATE 12/14/01 NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) 3 RE Quantum NOPC #12 Eugene, FYI Attached is a letter we received from FOOT regarding NOPC #12 Mike and I will discuss it with Jim Cherof early next week. If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you. WJ>>- ol-oof L 1 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 12/14/2001 11 00 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12/14 10 58 97402429 00 01 31 03 OK STANDARD ECM FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 100 E Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO !JIM ~ FAX. 9a-i- 1-1-/- '-I'lB ~J-'A ddavj /kn~ Jtf~ /).,/)'/ )6 I ':ou.:~ER OF PAGES (including '3 FROM DATE RE ~dv.IA Noft!.. iI: / 2 d-; A-1, Uc<wd.. ~ t:L ~. W-IL tZR.~ ~ F?OT Pft~9 f~jJt!- -#/2 .y/)k~ aMd~ ~UM- 1J<4 r./-o .q.u~ L0A'H- . ~lI..- lZPJaiLkrf, c><x ~M~w.L& r lfY\ph~ (tL ~(frJ Uf ~ ~-dI k ddel1tLcf YI.L I}tIlJY1e8M /lNId. tfl1 4#h~ I ~k~ wAA../ ~~ d.- IN ~ yeu 04- nM-1 AJ!tUB tUfdJ..- wid ~ne./- tuJ.i,~ h 1~ fhtJ1l~, 1 Jjrr/DI WflJti:.( ~- 11~ 1211yt J:\SHRDATA\Planning\Planning Templates\P&Z Fax\P & 0 Blank Fax.dot If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you J)Yl.IA 01-00 I L 1 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 12/14/2001 11 28 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 12/14 11 26 91954771492367529 00 01 44 03 OK STANDARD ECM ---- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment December 13, 2001 Ms Stella ROSSI 625 Whlspenng Pmes Road Boynton Beach, Flonda 33435 RE ExplanatIOn of 'Reserved' relatIve to Lot 34-C Quantum Park PID Dear Ms. ROSSI ThIS letter IS m response to your request for the above-referenced mformatIOn, as conveyed at the November 6,2001 CIty ComnllssIOn meetmg. For purposes of the Quantum Park PID Master Plan (NOPC #12), the category "Reserved" IS a non- development desIgnatIOn. The CondItIons of Approval for NOPC #12, Ordmance 01-54, stIpulate that the CIty and applIcant WIll evaluate the need for open space m the PID Master Plan and also demonstrate that the development OfthIS parcel wIll not mterfere WIth management of the adjacent preserve When a determmatIOn has been made regardmg the appropnate use of the "Reserved" parcel, the applIcant wIll submIt a NotIce of Proposed Change (NOPC) to obtam the appropnate master plan land use deSIgnatIOn. Smcerely, -- /l-U~- MIchael VV Rumpf, DIrector ofPlannmg & Zonmg MRlj de ee Kurt Bressner, CIty Manager Lusla Galav, Pnnelpal Planner S ,Planning\SHAREO\ WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park PID-Outdoor Storage\Definition of Reserve Lot 34C.doc City of Boynton Beach · 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., POBox 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Galav, Lusia From Sent: To Subject: Galav Lusia Monday December 10 2001 4 10 PM Rumpf Michael Quantum Park - Definition of "Reserve" Mike, This is the definition of "Reserve" For purposes of the Quantum Park PID Master Plan (NOPC #12) the category "Reserve" is a non-development designation The Conditions of Approval for NOPC #12, Ordinance 01-54 stipulate that the City and applicant will evaluate the need for open space in the PID Master Plan and also demonstrate that the development of this parcel will not interfere with management of the adjacent preserve When a determination has been made regarding the appropriate use of the "Reserve" parcel the applicant will submit a Notice of Proposed Change (NO PC) to obtain the appropriate master plan land use designation Lusia 1 ~ Flon.da Department of Transportatton JEB BUSH GOVERNOR OFFICE OF PLANNING AJ"ID ENVIRONMENTAL :\-IANAGEMENT - DISTRICT 4 3400 West Commercial Blvd., 3'd Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, FI 33309-3421 Telephone: (954) 777-4601 Fax: (954) 777-4671 Toll Free Number' 1-866-336-8435 THOMAS F BARRY JR. SECRETARY December 7,2001 Mr D Ray Eubanks Commumty Program AdmmIstrator Department of Commumty Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Dear Mr Eubanks. SUBJECT Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact (DRI) City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Amended Development Order (ADO) .112001 As requested m your letter dated May 18, 2001, the Department has revIewed the Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact (DRI) Amended Development Order (ADO). The Department objects the approval of the ADO The Quantum Park DRI is located north of the C-16 Canal, south of Hypoluxo Road, west of Interstate 95, and east of Congress Avenue m the CIty of Boynton Beach. The Quantum Park DRI was ongmally approved on December 18, 1984 as a mIxed-use development. Through amendments the development order now approves the followmg land uses commercIal, mdustnal, government/institutIOnal, office, recreatIOn and hotel ThIS ADO mcorporates the proposed changes of the prevIOUS NotIficatIOn of Proposed Change (NOPC) that mclude the modIficatIOn of uses on vanous parcels (FDOT letter to DCA - dated September 4, 2001) The changes are as follows . ModIfymg Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Office/lndustna1 to Mixed Use, whIch mcludes office, commercIal, and reSIdential uses. ThIS change decreases the Industnal Land Use from 2,275,354 square feet to 1,900,000 square feet. . ModIfymg Lots 23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30 and 31 from Office/Industnal to MIxed Use, whIch mcludes office, commercIal, and reSIdential uses. ThIS change decreases the Office Land Use from 798,772 square feet to 725,850 square feet. The combmatIOn of these changes results m an mcrease m ReSIdential Land Use from 500 www dot.state fl us (!) RECYCLED PAPER Ufl/It 01 -co f Mr D Ray Eubanks December 7, 2001 Page 2 dwellmg umts to 1,000 dwellIng umts. The reconfiguratIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve by closmg the segment from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard resultmg m addItIonal developable land to be subdIVIded mto Lots 100 and 101 The new lots are to be deSIgnated MIxed Use, whIch mcludes office, commerCIal, and reSIdentIal uses. As stated m the NOPC, the Department mamtams the followmg: · The reconfiguratIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve results m redIstributed traffic volumes to the mtersectIOn of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The mtersectIOn analysIs that was provIded WIth the NOPC mdIcates that the mcreased volumes will cause the mtersectIOn to fail unless the northbound and southbound approaches are re-stnped from a smgle left-turn lane WIth dual through lanes to a smgle left-turn, a smgle through lane, and a smgle nght-turn lane. After the re-stnpmg, the mtersectIOn operates below the cntIcal volume level. The applIcant should speCIfy the party responsible for the restnpmg Improvement to current acceptable standards and mcorporate the Improvement as CondItIOn m the Amended Development Order pnor to the closure of Quantum Lakes Dnve. Due to the lack of the reqUired condItIon to mItIgate the Impact of the proposed change for the Quantum Park DR!, the Department objects the approval oftlus ADO The applIcant should prOVIde a revIsed ADO to address the above Impact mItIgatIOn. If you have any questIOns, please contact us at (954) 777-4601 Smcerely, / ~t-1ti..,.clI ust 0 ~~:Idf,~.E. DIS ct Plannmg and EnVIronmental Engmeer GS al cc: Jim Snyder, TCRPC Michael Rumpf, CIty of Boynton Beach Gerry O'Reilly John Krane S,IPIANNING\D4DRJlQUAN11JMlADOI2A.DOC D~C-07-2001 09 34 001 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCILI I 301 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD SUITE 300 STUART, FLORIDA 34994 PHONE: 561-221-4060 FAX: 561-221-4067 FAX TRANSMISSION Date , '2 I 'i ! 01 I Fax Number: (~cci) ., c.(, - G, ,S- f i I I Number of Pages (including cover sbeet): -.3 Operator: , To LI.A.~(ti.. ~\~V , From' ::r; V"l'\.. <; t"\~ d'tv' Project: Ov~I('~~~'N\. {Jc,vk.. D~"!: Comments, Dr2xA -'01-00\ ~EC-07-2001 09 34 ~ Honda Department of Transportatwn p 02 I JEa BliSH GOVERNOR OfFICE OF PLANNING N'ib ~"'VIkON)ftNl' AI. MAl'iAGIMEl'oT - UCSTRlCT . 3400 WClft C<JJJmMII'Cia18ivcS.. )'" Floor, Et. lau4ercIa1c, P133309-]4~1 TtMphone: (9~4) 777-4601, fax: (9'4) 777-4671 THOMAS Y BMUtY, JR. SECRJl:TARY September 4,2001 I rI!t::~ "'-li "J~o ~fi:;a~, ~', C I SfP - 1 ?fOl l;i{~"'$o,i,'l ..CA:~ I FlfG/DNAL o,,l.I'Ij\ 'Iii"; .aUNCIL Me 0 Ray Eubanks Planning Manager Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee. fL 32399-2100 Dear Mr Eubanks. SUBJECT Quantum Park Development ofReJi'onal Impact (DR!) City of BO}"1lton Beach, Palm Beath County Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) As requested m the letter from Mr James Snyder of the Treasure Coast Regional Plannmg Cou~cil dated August 8,2001, the Department has revIewed the Quantum Park Development of Regtonal Impact (DR!) Kotification of Proposed Change (NOpe). I I The Quantum Park DR! was origlna11y approved on December 18, 1984 as a mixed-pse development. Through amendments the development order now approves the foHowing land ~es. commercial, mdustnal, governmentlinstttutJonal, office, recreatlOn and hotel . In thIS ~OPC (#12), the applicant proposes revIsIOns to the DR! Master Plan to create a mlxed~e de\lelopment that includes office, commercial, and residentIal uses. The applicant has proposed/the following changes to tne Master Plan. ! . Modifying Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Office/Industrial to Mixed Use, which Includes office, commercial, and residential uses. ThIs change decreases the Industnal Land Use from 2,275,354 square feet to 1,900,000 square feet. . i MOdtfying lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,28,29,30 and 31 from Otlke/Industria! to Mixed Use, which includes office, commercial, and residential uses. ThIS change decreases the Ofjfice Land Use from i9S 772 square teet to 725,850 square feet. The combmation of these changes results m an Increase in ResidentIal Land Use from!500 dwelling umts to 1,000 dwelling umts. . ~w.dot.state tl us I e FlECYC~EO PA"'''R DEC'-07--2001 89 35 P 03 Mr D Ray Eubanks September 4. 2001 Page 2 The reconfiguration of Quantum Lakes Drive by closing the segment from Quantub Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard resultIng In additional developable land to be sJlbdivid~ into Lots 100 and 101 The new lots are to be designated Mixed Use, which Includes offi~eJ commercIal, and resIdential uses The Department offers the followmg comments. . The change in residentlal development from 500 to 1,000 homes that was included in $e substantial deviatlon detemllnatlon chart was not described In the request for the NOPq The reconfiguratlon of Quantum Lakes Dnve results in redIstributed traffic volumes to the intersection of Quantum Boulevard and Gatewa}' Boulevard. Tbe intersection artalysis tllat was provided WIth the NOPC indicates that the mcreased volumes will cause the dltersectibn to fail unless the northbound and southbound approaches are Te-Striped ftom a singJe left-~ lane with dual through lanes to a single left-turn. a single through lane, and asingleright-t$n lane. After the re-stnping. the intersection operates below the cnticaJ volume level. '$e applicant should specify the party responsible for the restriping improvement to currch1t acceptable standards and incorporate the improvement as Condition in the Amended Development Order pr.or to the closure of Quantum Lakes Dnve. ! . Please indicate how Parcel MU6l will be accessed with the reconfigurationlclosure of Quantum Lakes Dnve. j ! I In summary, the Quantum Park DR! NOpe provided to the Department is sufficient pending ~e inclusion of the above comments lJ1to the NOPC and Amended Development Order Please feel ftee to contact this office at (954) 7i7-4601 should you have any questIons. i I GS:mm!al cc: Jtrn Snyder, TCRPC Bob Romig Gerry O'Reilly John Krane ~,,""'NJl1HClII)ODlto.QlJ>>r>JMIt<OK: lllo.DOC I TOTAL P 03 - Lusia Galav, AICP Principal Planner Planning and Zoning I ivil on /~..... ,., ~ t 1 ! 1 i d.; I \(~ I" r-' . CIty of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Off: (561) 742-6262 P.O Box 310 _ F . (-01) 747-6759 Bovnton Beach, Florida 3342:>-0310 ax.:> -- , Gala, L@ci.boynton-beach.fLus CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 PHONE (561) 742-6260 FAX (561) 742-6259 cr/2.QMu1'CL (lDcS! 13;y (J;W flu~ ~~ tfn~ 301-E C)Ce2'V1 &vel. -IJ.306 @U~/ct( 17- 349qtj PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To J 1>/'1 :;"lfdM /2/(:) "'/01 Lusia Galav, A/CP, Principal Planner Date From Re .2 Lj 1/ >t. 3 fo I' (j) tJ I+Tu 1iJ AA /Uoflt #12- AiPPf1j).lJrJ lY)aJie~ Y1crJ I I hie Lei)'Oj ~/.".(~'.'~. ..' i'.r~.c J/. . . '\, I I.' \ I . J:1: ,01 . ... ~.. 0.' o y, \~~ '" 0';.' ". . r 0 ," ~.. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division · Building Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment November 20,2001 Mr James Snyder Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301-E. Ocean Blvd #300 Stuart, Florida 34994 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Snyder. Please be advised that on November 6, 2001 the above referenced NOPC request was approved and adopted Attached is a certified copy of Ordinance No 01-54 and a copy of the City Commission minutes from the November 6, 2001 meeting If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Lusia Galav, Principal Planner at (561) 742-6262. Sincerely, ?JL Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director Attachments MRlLG CC. Jim Cherof, City Attorney Lusia Galav, Principal Planner Eugene A. Gerlica, P E. Quantum Group of Companies S:IPlanningISHAREDIWP\PROJECTSIQuantum Park 2001 Amen #12ITCRPC Approvalletler.doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., POBox 310 . Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www ci.boynton-beach.fl.us /:::- / 'E'.. C 0/7 ~ /(~~';("~~>~., .(r.J\ ~; o "" ~ ,v. /'v 1'0 N '0 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division · Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses Community Redevelopment November 20, 2001 Mr Bob Cambric Growth Management Administrator Florida Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Dr Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI- Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Cambric: Please be advised that on November 6, 2001 the above referenced NOPC request was approved and adopted Attached is a certified copy of Ordinance 01-054 and a copy of the City Commission minutes from the November 6, 2001 meeting If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Lusia Galav, Principal Planner at (561) 742-6262. Sincerely, ~L Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director Attachments MRlLG CC Jim Cherof, City Attorney Lusia Galav, Principal Planner Eugene A. GerJica, P E. Quantum Group of Companies S:\planningISHAREDIWP\PROJECTSIQuantum Pari< 2001 Amen #12IDRIA 01-0011DCA approvalletter.doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., POBox 310 . Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.cLboynton-beach.fl.us t:> l-e L- ~.P~ / '~~\-r~_~~~,\ / / \ \ : f. 1 '! . ~ :r i \~ . )~l \ J- './ <;", ,~ N_~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment November 20,2001 Mr Eugene Gerlica, P E. Quantum Group of Companies 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive Suite 101 Boynton Beach, FL. 33426 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park-DRI-Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Gerlica Please be advised that on November 6,2001 the above referenced NOPC request was approved and adopted Attached is a certified copy of Ordinance No 01-54 and a copy of the City Commission minutes from the November 6,2001 meeting If you have any questions regarding this information, please contact Lusia Galav, Principal Planner at (561) 742-6260 Sincerely, ?W2- Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director Attachments Mr/lg CC' Jim Cherof, City Attorney Lusia Galav, Principal Planner S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRIA OI-OOI\Eugene Gerlica, P.E. Approval Ltr .dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us /- I "--~_::- CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 1 00 E Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning FACSIMILE TO Jim Cherof, City Attorney FAX. 954-771-4923 FROM Lusia Galav, Principal Planner DATE 10-24-01 NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) 1 RE Quantum NOPC #12 Conditions of Approval Jim, The following is my attempt to address the COA's as they relate to the approval of Mixed Use for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 1 The additional 500 residential units requested in the NOPC Amendment #12 are subject to the City Commission approval of the Mixed Use (MU) designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 2 The Mixed Use designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 is contingent upon restricting residential development to fee simple units not to include rental apartments or congregate care/living facilities Please note that I have left out any reference to the Excel team recommendation regarding fee simple unit with an appropriate price point. I was not present at the discussion regarding this item and have no idea what that means or how it could be enforced Please review and revise as necessary Fax or email your revisions to me Thank you CC Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director Documenl1 If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you Galav, Lusia From Sent: To Subject: Galav Lusia Tuesday, October 23 2001 458 PM Rumpf Michael RE. Review of Agenda Items for 11/6/01 Mike I spoke with Jim Cherof this morning He suggested that we prepare a Condition of Approval regarding the restrictions for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 He informed me that he has contacted David Norris regarding this condition and that it would be required The following is my attempt to address the issue 1 The additional 500 residential units requested in the NOPC Amendment #12 are subject to the City Commission approval of the Mixed Use (MU) designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 2 The Mixed Use designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 is contingent upon restricting residential development to fee simple units not to include rental apartments or congregate care/living facilities The only problem I have is the interpretation of what a fee simple unit with an appropriate price point is Any clues? That statement was included in the Excel recommendation I have left it out of condition #2 because I don't understand it or how it could be enforced Jim wants me to email him the recommended comments when ready Please review and comment. Thanks Lusia -Original Message----- From" Rumpf Michael Sent: Monday October 22, 2001 5.38 PM To: Galav Lusia Subject: FW Review of Agenda Items for 11/6/01 Lusia. just look at item Legal A 1 (he didn't forget and appears and to be directing Jim accordingly) MR. -Original Message----- From: Bressner, Kurt Sent: Monday, October 22,20014 13 PM To: Glinski, Bonnie; Prainito, Janet Cc: Sugerman, Dale; Hawkins, Wilfred; Wildner, John, Reese, Diane; Cheraf, James; Greene, Quintus; Byrne, Nancy; Rumpf, Michael, Blasie,Scott; Gage, Marshall, Lee, Arthur; Costello, Joyce; Lamanna, Rosemarie; Livergood, Jeffrey; Wallace, Peter. Magazine, Chuck; Farace, Virginia; Bingham, William, Segal, Wayne Subject: Review of Agenda Items for 11/6/01 Thanks to everybody for getting the agenda items into the City Clerk's Office This helped my review since I will be out of town the end of this week. Items missing needing clarification or additions are Marina Project Is this on the 11/6/01 Agenda for an amendment to the Development Agreement or is this on for the 11/20/01 agenda??? (Jim C ) V Announcements B4 Presentation of Accreditation for PO -- Need an agenda coversheet w/letter of Accreditation excerpts from program (Marshall Gage) -- Bring the framed certificate to Meeting for official presentation by Mayor to Chief VI Consent Agenda B 4 -- One Year Contract for Real Estate Administrator Services -- Legal needs to review and sign off on draft 1 t.O'ltract, _egal needs to prepare I ~.:>olution B 5 -- This item needs clarification from Parks, Engineering and Finance. The Pence Park item is in Commission approved CIP at $30 000 I could not find the Galaxy project. While cover sheet for the agenda talks about using Parks Improvement Reserves the original estimate (for Pence at least) appears well under the bids In short, there needs to be better coordination between the budget and the bid Was the Galaxy project a 2000-01 project that did not go? I could not sign off on this one at this time C6 -- City/FOP Contract -- Needs Agenda Cover sheet prepared by Legal C7 -- Sprint Lease Amendment -- Needs sign off by PW C8 -- Maxim Health System -- Item is missing C-9 -- Fire Assessment Resolution -- This item is done, except for Agenda Cover Sheet which needs to be done by Legal Also GSG needs to clarify how the institutional uses will be charged -- ie Churches This will be a question at the meeting (Bill B Jim C) Also it would be great if we had a mock-up of the brochure to hand out at pre-agenda. (Wayne S Bill B ) VII City Manager's Report A. Storm water ERU Report -- This is still being worked on by Dale C Follow-up on Report on Mangrove Park HS -- Per CML T discussion last Friday Quintus should prepare an Agenda Cover Sheet summarizing 1 Who will be on the staff review team 2 What utility relocates need to be handled for the building -- I think this is a combination of electric service lines, telephone and data lines (Mike R, Chuck M and Peter W can assist) D Visions 20/20 Report -- Arthur L. needs to prepare agenda coversheet w/synopsis of staff report and recommendation(s) VIII Public Hearings B Gyms in M-1 District -- is this second read of the ordinance? If so this needs to be reflected on agenda. IX Future Agenda New Item G Discussion Regarding Non-Conforming (Unpermitted) Canopies (this was originally on the 11/6/01 agenda but the staff report needs refinement. New Item H Public Hearing -- 2002-03 Fire Assessment -- Proposal to Include in Uniform Collection System (via County tax bills) in lieu of local collection for 2002-03 XI A. Discussion regarding canopies (remove from agenda) XII Legal A 1 -- Quantum -- May be a good idea for staff to address the issue of fee simple restriction on housing in mixed use area. We should have a letter or other way to cover this item from developer (Jim C ) B2 -- Outdoor Illumination Standards -- Ok to leave on but I wonder if the 2000 lumens per lamp is realistic. This is a 100 watt incandescent bulb Scott B was doing some more research on this B4 -- Ordinance is done Legal to prepare agenda cover sheet. C1 -- Fire Assessment -- Move to Consent C2 (now C1) Needs Agenda Cover sheet prepared by Legal/Parks 2 SEP-11-2001 09 26 P 02 ~. fiLE i COpy Florida Department of Transportatl.on JEB BUSH GOVERNOR OFFICE OF PLANNING JlNl) E/'I'VIRONMENT AI.. MANAGEMENT - DISTRICT 4 3400 West Commercial Blvd.. 31<1 Floot. FL IAucknhlc:. F133309-3421 TclqHmnc: (954) 777-460 I Fax: (954) Tn-4671 THO"iAS F BAUY JR. SECRETARY September 4,2001 ,..., ~ ru;. ~ ~ "V ~~= D ~~ '''-eN ~ Jic .:l:e:. Sf? - 1 2001 Mr D Ray Eubanks Planning Manager Department of Community Affarrs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 TREJ\$uP" COAST REGIONAl. :P~NNII\IG CQIJNCrL Dear Mr Eubanks ~-~------~-- J. . ! n \ 12 I I}. I' II I~ \., -): 1-1 1<.,---'---'- I UU I OCT 'i 0 2llOI J I UU i ~' "iNO "0 ~~j:;=;:T , -.I SUBJECT Quantum Park Development of Regional Impact (DR!) City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) As requested ill the letter from Mr James Snyder ofthe Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council I dated August 8, 200 I, the Department has reVlewed the Quantum Park Development qf RegIonal Impact (DR!) Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC) The Quantum Park DR! was onginally approved on December 18, 1984 as a :mu(:ed-use development. Through amendments the development order now approves the following land uses. commercIal, industrial, government/instltutlOnal, office, recreation and hotel. I ! In this NOPC (#12), the applicant proposes reviSIOns to the DRI Master Plan to create a:mlxed-use development that mcludes office, commerCial, and residentIal uses. The appl1cant has p~oposed the followmg changes to the Master Plan. . Modlfymg Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 from Office/Industnal to Mixed Use, which includes office, commercIal, and resIdentlal uses. This change decreases the Industrial Larid Use from 2,275,354 square feet to 1,900,000 square feet. I . ModIfyIng Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 and 31 from Office/Industnal to MIXed Use, which mcIudes office, commercial, and residential uses. This change decrease~ the Office Land Use from 798,772 square feet to 725,850 square feet. . The combination of these chap.ges results m an Increase In Restdential Land Use from 500 dwellmg umts to 1,000 dwellIng umts W'NVV dot.state fl us o I'lecyc~eo PAPER . SEP-11-2001 09 26 P 03 Mr D Ray Eubanks September 4. 2001 Page 2 The reconfiguratlOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve by closing the segment from: Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard resultmg In addItIOnal developable land to be !?ubdlV1ded into Lots 100 and 101 The new lots are to be deslgnated MIxed Use, which inc1~des office, commercial, and resIdentIal uses. The Department offers the following comments . The change in resIdenttal development from 500 to 1,000 homes that was included in the substantIal deVlabon detem:unahon chart was not described in the request for thb NOPC. The reconfiguration of Quantum Lakes Dnve results in redistributed traffic volJmes to the mtersection of Quantmn Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The intersectIon arlalysis that was provided with the Nope mdicates that the Increased volumes will cause the futersectIon to fail unless the northbound and southbound approaches are re-striped from a sin~e left.tum lane with dual through lanes to a single left-turn, a smgle through lane, and a smgly righHum lane. After the re-striping, the intersect10n operates below the critical volume level. The applicant should speclfy the party responsible for the restnpmg improvementito current acceptable standards and mcorporate the improvement as Condition in the! Amended Development Order pnor to the closure of Quantum Lakes Dave. I . Please mdlcate how Parcel MU6l will be accessed WIth the reconfigurationAc1osure of Quantum Lakes Drive. In summary, the Quantum Park DR! NOPC proVlded to the Department is suffiCIent p~d1ng the inclusion of the above comments 111to the NOPC and Amended Development Order Please feel free to contact this office at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questions. ! Sincerely, ~L~' v~:="L~:.' ct PlaIUung and EnvironmentM Engmeer ! GS:mmJal cc: Jim Snyder, TCRPC Bob RomIg Gerry O'Reilly John Krane S~NNlNGID4tlJU\QUMmJ~II,~Orcl1A.lXlC ~--r.'~ TOTHL P 03 o - /D 01/01 1\ o<fjT\ o-~ I I' (W(j.JLJ-:VO d-- &tf1 J; ~ ~#1f fU-/Jo-J; ~ Qu~ fdtK- 'lJoft.- 1rfr.erdmeJ::- -if I') #fl Dflclunu1-u.. )fl 'iRRtJ ,";d + I&-+ ~u1I':.1~ ()cJob.u:. [1/ ')oD ( ~ Yu s;zw, '~o-o ve Mf j,tyIe '"J~J h~ -}r/ed c/o u;Jo of ~ I tyl CWi-bf 4 L.j DCA. lfL'l/L WI \f<.- f--I ~ ~ I h!J.,e )l/;" C zd /}>e- t2Rff do:) \ 'fYiJ~a. ~~ \ f hvo-e ~)o.J ~ f.#o.,J:J , C/i)/J/ fu t QlJ ~1'trNl Jl M-aster -plaU M-AS1'ER -PLAN J .1 J -----~-~---- .-- ........-.---...--------------------- Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax #" Date From Re James Snyder 561-221-4067 10/04/2001 Michael Rumpf Reschedule of Public Hearing Pages 2 mcludmg cover Planmng and Zomng DIvIsIOn CIty of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax 742-6259 J TRANSMISSION VERIFICATIOt-I REPOP' TIME 10/04/2001 15 21 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & : FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 I L DATE,TIME FAY NO /NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/04 15 20 91561221405703326 00 00 47 02 OV STANDARD EC~1 ~',.V'C"'..",'1-".'Y""""'.".,O,.J::- /' ,~ ""':'J':, ~,., Ul '," x o () ~ .' '<" "'7' . €>~ " ON ~,- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELCPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVIS ION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment October 4,2001 FILE .. Mr James Snyder Treasure Coast RegIonal Planmng Council 301-E Ocean Blvd. #300 Stuart, Flonda 34994 Re Notification of a Proposed Change-Reschedule of Public Hearing Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref. No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Snyder Please be advIsed that m accordance wIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a PublIc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change. The ongmal date for the heanng was Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 7'00 PM. However, due to thIS bemg a non-electIOn year for the CIty Of Boynton Beach, the PublIc Heanng WIll be held on the regularly scheduled CommISSIon meetmg date of Tuesday, November 6, 2001 at 7.00 PM m the CIty CommISSIon Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, /uL Michael Rumpf Planrung & Zonmg DIrector MR/lg CC Eugene A. Gerhca, P.E. Quantum Group ofCompames DaVId B Noms, Esq S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRIA 0 I-DOl \Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone' (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PlANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re Bob Cambric 850-488-3309 10104/2001 Michael Rumpf Reschedule of Public Hearing Pages 2 includmg cover Plannmg and Zonmg DIVIsIOn CIty of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax 742-6259 ., I I TRANSMISSION VEPIFICATION REPOR TIME 10/04/2001 15 27 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5513756259 TEL 5513756250 1 I ! r DATE TH1E F A.,'~ NO (HAME DURA TI ON PAGE(S) RESULT ~"'ODE 10/84 15.:5 c15504883309B3325 08 08 48 02 D~ S T A~mARD EC~1 L___ I ~.7(!?.)~ ~~~~ ,!, 0 N 0 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment FILE COpy October 4,2001 Mr Bob Cambnc Growth Management AdmInistrator State of Flonda Department of Community Affairs DivislOn of Community Planmng 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change-Reschedule of Public Hearing Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref. No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Cambnc Please be advised that In accordance With Chapter 38006 F S the City of Boynton Beach has scheduled a Pubhc HearIng regardIng the above referenced Notice of Proposed Change The ongInal date for the heanng was Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 700 PM. However, due to tills beIng a non-electlOn year for the City Of Boynton Beach, the Pubhc Heanng will be held on the regularly scheduled ConulllsslOn meetIng date of Tuesday, November 6, 2001 at 7 00 PM In the City ConulllsslOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. SIncerely, )Ll.JC Michael Rumpf Planmng & ZonIng Director MR/lg CC Eugene A. Gerhca, P.E Quantum Group of Companies David B Noms, Esq S '\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 200 I Amen # 12\DRIA 01-00 I \Growth Management Adminsistrator dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425.{)310 Phone. (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOU LEV ARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re Thomas McGillicuddy 740-2429 1 0/04/2001 Michael Rumpf Reschedule of Public Hearing Pages 2 including cover Plannmg and Zomng DIVISIOn CIty of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Flonda 33425 742-6260 Fax 742-6259 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOR" TIME 10/04/2001 15 23 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE, TIME FAX NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/04 15 22 97402429 00 00 48 02 OK STANDARD ECM .. ~..."....\...-r..,y,.....,.,. .0..,"'. . }. "\ f~... :/" ,c.o.... ., /- .-' ~'! )t ~""' ~.. "'01'1 €> DEP ARTMENT OF DEVELCPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVIS ION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment October 4,2001 {.L( CR Mr Thomas A. McGIllIcuddy MFT Development, Inc , a Flonda CorporatIon 2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve Ste # 101 Boynton Beach, Fl. 33426 Re' Notification of a Proposed Change-Reschedule of Public Hearing Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref. No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr McGIllIcuddy' Please be advIsed that m accordance WIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a PublIc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change. The ongmal date for the heanng was Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 7'00 PM. However, due to thIS bemg a non-electIOn year for the CIty Of Boynton Beach, the PublIc Heanng wIll be held on the regularly scheduled CommIssIOn meetmg date of Tuesday, November 6, 2001 at 7 00 PM m the CIty ComnnssIOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, 7~tL- Michael Rumpf Planmng & Zomng DIrector MR/lg CC Eugene A. GerlIca, P.E Quantum Group of Compames DaVId B Noms, Esq S'\Planning\sHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRlA 01-001\~lFT Development Inc a Florida Corporation. dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re Eugene Gerlica 740-2429 10/04/2001 Michael Rumpf Reschedule of Public Hearing Pages 2 includmg cover Plannmg and Zomng DIVISlOn CIty of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, FlorIda 33425 742-6260 Fax 742-6259 _I -I TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOR- TIME 10/04/2001 15 25 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE. TIME FAx NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/04 15 24 97402429 00 00 48 02 OK STANDARD ECM Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax # Date From Re Roger Wilburn 850-488-3309 1 0/04/2001 Michael Rumpf Reschedule of Public Hearing Pages 2 mcluding cover Planmng and Zonmg DIVISlOn CIty of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, FlorIda 33425 742-6260 Fax 742-6259 -I TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOR' TIME 10/04/2001 15 29 r~AME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5513756260 DATE,TIME FA:x. NO.INAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/04 15.28 91850488330903326 00 00 49 02 OK STANDARD EeM Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOU LEV ARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PlANNING AND ZONING DIVISION To Fax #. Date From Re David Norris 561-842-4104 10/04/2001 Michael Rumpf Reschedule of Public Hearing Pages 4 includmg cover Planmng and Zonmg DIVISIOn CIty of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, FlorIda 33425 742-6260 Fax 742-6259 _I -I TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPep' TIME 10/04/2001 15 32 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & z FAX 5513755259 TEL 5513755260 DATE,TIME FAX NO. IHAME DURATION PAGE(S' RESULT MODE 10/04 15 30 98424104 00 01 40 04 Of<' STANDARD ECM /~/"\~~~'~~' , " . . .\, 7- :,.>' ,\. Cl. .' . :r ~..J-. . .......... ~~ . '\- ~~.. " .?"ON ~.f ,>--.-.---",,"-. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION - Building - Planning & Zoning - Occupational Licenses - Community Redevelopment Septem15er 14,2001 FILE COpy Mr Bob Cambnc Growth Management AdmmIstrator State of Flonda Department ofCommumty AffaIrs DIvISIOn of Commumty Planmng 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref. No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Cambnc Please be advIsed that m accordance WIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a PublIc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for \Vednesday, November 7, 2001 at 7 00 PM. The PublIc Heanng WIll be held m the CIty CommIssIOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, 7tOZ Michael Rumpf Plannmg & Zomng DIrector MRJlg CC Eugene A. GerlIca, P.E Quantum Group of Compames DavId B Noms, Esq S:\Planning\SHARED\\\lP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRlA 01-001 \Growth Management Adminsistrator.dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone. (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us 7.~.C:,.~,~...:r"Y.........O., .'~'" 7 ..J..... ~ 1\1' .. .:r O~., ...0. '" .' ~' ',.,"'ON 0 ~, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Ucenses . Community Redevelopment fiLE COpy September 14, 2001 Mr James Snyder Treasure Coast RegIonal Plannmg CouncIl 301-E. Ocean Blvd. #300 Stuart, Flonda 34994 Re' Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DR! - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref. No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr Snyder Please be advIsed that m accordance wIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a PublIc Heanng regardmg the above referenced Notice of Proposed Change for Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 7 00 PM. The PublIc Heanng WIll be held m the City CommISSIOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, 7UJc MIchael Rumpf Plannmg & Zonmg DIrector MRIlg CC Eugene A. Gerhca, P.E. Quantum Group ofCompames DavId B Noms, Esq S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRlA OI-OOI\Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us ~/.,. '."f.. V......O ./:-... . ~<'--J. ." ~ ~ 1Sl ". . . (J O~. ~~ ..,~. ~.~~-~~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION - Bui/ding - Planning & Zoning - Occupational Licenses - Community Redevelopment September 14,2001 filE L~~Y Mr Thomas A. McGIllIcuddy MFT Development, Inc., a Flonda CorporatlOn 2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve Ste # 101 Boynton Beach, FI. 33426 Re Notification of a Proposed Change Quantum Park - DRI - Amendment No. 12 (Our Ref. No DRIA 01-001) Dear Mr McGIllIcuddy. Please be advIsed that m accordance WIth Chapter 38006 F S the CIty of Boynton Beach has scheduled a PublIc Heanng regardmg the above referenced NotIce of Proposed Change for Wednesday, November 7, 2001 at 7 00 PM. The PublIc Heanng WIll be held m the CIty CormmsslOn Chambers located at 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, Flonda. Smcerely, /UlZ Michael Rumpf Plannmg & Zorung DIrector MR/lg CC Eugene A. GerlIca, P.E Quantum Group ofComparues DaVId B Noms, Esq S:\PlanningISHARED\\VP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRlA OI-OOI\\1FT Development Inc. a Flonda COl1'oration.dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us y.~...../c~'.",\~,~',"".Y'...~.-.__O'...".~J::-"'" .... r" I' ." .\ f . " Q , )XJ , 0 (J} ~'V .:.:.~ ~<(i' '.?,ON ~ ..<l FILE COpy DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION _ Building - Planning & Zoning - Occupational Licenses - Community Redevelopment September 12,2001 Angela D Usher Plannmg SpecIalIst The School DIStnCt of Palm Beach County, Flonda Plannmg & Real Estate 3320 Forest Hill Boulevard, C-331 West Palm Beach, FL 33406-5813 RE Quantum Park - DRIA 01-001/MPMD 01-003 NotIce of Proposed Change - Master Plan Amendment #12 - Quantum Park Dear Ms. Usher, In accordance WIth ComprehensIve Plan PolIcy 8.22 1, the CIty IS to notIfy the Palm Beach County School DIstnct of all mcommg applIcatIOns for housmg developments that exceed 20 dwellmg umts. The CIty IS currently processmg an applIcatIon for an amendment to the Quantum Park DR! Development Order, wluch meets tlus cntenon. Quantum Park of Commerce IS located on the west SIde of 1-95, between Miner Road extended and the Boynton Canal (C-16) ThIS amendment proposes to change the approved uses on 14 lots totalmg 23.26 acres of the Quantum Park Master Plan, to allow for a "Mixed Use" deSIgnatIOn. Under the proposed change, the Mixed Use category mcludes an addItIon of 500 multI-famIly reSIdentIal dwellmg umts, WIth an estImate of 910 reSIdents. The current Master Plan allows for 500 dwellmg umts WhICh were approved WIth Amendment #10 last year We respectfully request a statement wluch WIll evaluate the Impact of the proposed amendment on the publIc school system and venfy that the educatIOnal needs of the potential school-aged children lIvmg m the project can be met through eXIstmg or planned faCIlIties. Please contact me at 561-742- 6261 If you have any questIOns. Smcerely, ~ MIchael W Rumpf DIrector ofPlannmg and Zomng w/ ,M1D.dwvl~M S:\PlanningISHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 Amen #12\DRIA 01-001 \Angela D Usher Letter.doc.dot City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us ~~ QUANTUN\ .::::iiI~ G R 0 U P 0 F COM PAN I E 5 September 10, 2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf CIty of Boynton Beach Department of Development Planmng & Zomng DIvISIon 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE Quantum Park - Amendment # 12 Dear Mr Rumpf: Addressed below are the staff comments provIded on September 4,2001 The comments are restated for convenience. Please note we have renumbered the comments, as the CIty staff comments duplicate comment numbers 25 thru 29, inclUSIve. LIsted below are the attached documents referenced m the responses 1 ReVIsed Master Development Plan, revised September 10, 2001 a. Ten (10) copIes 24"x36" bOne (1) each, 11 "xl7" and 8 W' x 11" 2. ReVIsed NOPC Application Page 5, revIsed September 10,2001 3 ReVIsed Substantial DeViatIOn Chart, dated September 10,2001 4 Pmder Troutman Consultmg, Inc letter dated September 7, 2001 5 Two-page letter from SFWMD, dated February 7, 1997 6 SFWMD no objection letter, dated September 6, 2001 7 Glen letter, dated September 7, 2001 8 Area Calculation Summary, dated September 6,2001 / l!; Our responses are presented as follows. l.t',. L -..-j I _ -_ J PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. None RESPONSE. Comment noted. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic . Comments See attached memo from Jeff LIvergood, Pubhc Works DIrector dated August 29, 2001 RESPONSE. See letter dated September 7, 2001, from Kahart Pinder, Pinder Troutman Illc. 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive. Suite 101 Boynton Beach. FL 33426 (561) 740-2447 Fax (561) 740-2429 e-mail: quantgrp@qgc.cc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 2 9/10/01 UTILITIES Comments. 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-0007) to whIch we responded to in Utihtles Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that With the onginal DR! for the total park deSIgnated for Commercial, Industnal, Office, or a combmatIOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and Commercial, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSIgned and constructed for those antlcIpated uses. Four (4) lift stations were configured to handle the wastewater generatIOn antlcIpated m the SSO-acre park. RESPONSE. Comment noted. This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment. 2. As preVIOusly stated, the propose reVISIon to the land use to "Mixed Use (MU)" to include Office, Commercial and ReSIdential uses could tax the utlhty support facihties to theIr hmIts. A proviso needs to be mcorporated into each group of lot approvals process, that the desIgn-engineenng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utlhty system( s) capacity IS avaIlable to support the proposed use, or they will provide the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to so could result m msufficIent utlhty support to this park, affectmg other current (exIsting) users. RESPONSE. Comment noted. This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment. 3 Apphcant is requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to Industnal usage. In heu that Lot 34-C was open space designated for dry retentIOn (as an overflow from Tract "J"), apphcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry retention requirement get transferred. The partlalletter from SFWMD (unSIgned) does not mdIcate that the dry retentlon of Lot 34-C IS no longer reqUIred, nor has the "As-Built Master Dramage Plan" from the engineer-of-record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc., ever been submItted to the City It WIll be reqUIred to submit the back -up documentatlon to substantlate that the apphcant's request for land use conversion. RESPONSE. The following is the demonstration that Lot 34-C is not needed as a dry retention area and as being unnecessary was not transferred to any other lot or location. F IQuantum Limitedlnopc12EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 3 9/1 % 1 Prior to 1987 tile area known as Lot 34-C was sllown on tile Master Development Plan as a Detention Area and was part of tile suiface water management system included in tile SFWMD Conceptual Approval. In 1987 tile SFWMD suiface water management permit was modified. Tile modification eliminated tile Lot 34-C area as a detention or retention area, added a water management tract, combined tllree drainage basins into two and revised tile stage/storage assumptions among otller modifications. Tile master development plan continued to erroneously sllow the area of Lot 34-C as a detention area until Master Plan Amendment No.9, wilen tile erroneous label was removed. On June 30, 1988 Quantum Park Plat No.3 was recorded in tile official records of Palm Beacll County following review and approval by tile SFWMD, tile LWDD and tile City of Boynton Beach. The plat created Lot 34-C unencumbered by any dedication or reservation as a detention or retention area. Tile modified Master Drainage Plan as approved by tile LWDD is submitted in support of tile above demonstration. TIlis drawing was recovered from tile L WDD, as tile City of Boynton Beach Utility or Engineering Departments could not produce a single drainage record drawing wilen requested. Tile primary suiface water management system was subsequently constructed along witll tile roadways and lot areas. An engineer's completion statement was submitted to tile SFWMD along witll tile requisite control structure record data after tile completion of tile construction of tile primary suiface water management system. Tile engineer states tile system was constructed in substantial conformance with the approved construction drawings and ti,e SFWMD permit. Tile project was field reviewed by the SFWMD field engineers and the letter submitted with the NOPC application was issued by the SFWMD ack!lowledging the engineers' statement and tile completion of tile construction. A copy of the signed two-page letter acknowledging the construction completion is attaclled for your record. Also attaclled is a letter dated September 6, 2001 from tile SFWMD stating no objection to tile approval of the proposed cllanges. Lot 34-C was not par.t of tile construction drawings or the permit as a detention area and tllUs was not constructed as a detention area. Lot 34-C is not needed as a detention area now or in tile future. Please delete this comment. F \Qllantllm Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOl.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 4 9/10/01 4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Miner Road, whIch has roadway drainage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat tills roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIVIded roadway sectIOn. RESPONSE. The Development Order for Quantum Park only requires the dedication of Right-of-Way for Miner Road along an alignment through the Quantum Park property as determined by Palm Beaclt County. This condition has been satisfied. Miner Road was designed and constructed by Palm Beach County. The Miner Road drainage system does not discharge to Lot 34-C, nor is it required or designed to discharge to Lot 34-C. Drainage easements in favor of Palm Beach County or the City of Boynton Beach do not exist through Lot 34-C or any portion of the primary surface water management system north of Gateway Boulevard wit/tin Quantum Park. The drainage system for Miner Road is clearly shown on the construction drawing on record at the Palm Beach County Engineering Department titled "Drainage Map, Sheet 2 of 37, Miner Road", dated Dec'88. The drainage structure adjacent Lot 34-C is a manhole at a high point in the roadway. The Miner Road right-of-way is the only area included in the drainage area for the roadway. The drainage system discharges to The L WDD E-4 Canal, not Lot 34-C. Please delete this comment. 5 Quantum Lakes Drive, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contains both water and wastewater system segments, to which at least one-half of the dedicated right-of-way will be reqUIred to be utIlity easement(s). No anticipated permanent "park ameruties" will be permItted on the utIlity easement(s), other that soddmg and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department WIll reqUIre demonstratIOn that "neglIgible impacts on the traffic dIstribution resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" SubmItted traffic analysIs by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards. RESPONSE. The proposed preliminary plat will include utility easements for the existing utilities wit/tin the proposed lots 100, 101 and 102. The Master Development Plan is not required to show easements of any kind and none or shown, either existing qr proposed. Any proposed construction within the cre(lted lots will be reviewed during the site plan review process and subsequent construction permit process. Easements, both existing and proposed, will be addressed at that time. Given the scrutiny of the plat review process, the site planning review process and the construction permit process, this comment is inappropriate at this time. F \Quantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 5 9/1 DID I Witlt regard to ti,e traffic analysis, tlte DRI performance standard is a 15% increase in external traffic. Tlte analysis determined tltat tltere is not a 15% increase in daily or peak Itour traffic. In fact, tltere is a projected decrease in botlt tlte daily and peak Itour traffic. Tlte specific impact of tlte road closure is tlte redistribution of eastbound Quantum Lakes Drive traffic generated by tlte office buildings on Lots 52 and 58 to Quantum Boulevard. Tltese two developments generate an average daily total of 1062 trips. Combine tlte office traffic witlt tlte 1904 average daily trips generated by tlte 272 apartments witllin tlte Villas at Quantum Lake project and tlte resultant total average daily traffic projected to use tlte Quantum Boulevard link between Quantum lakes Drive and Gateway Boulevard is 2986 trips. Wllat demonstrates tlte negligible impact of tlte proposed roadway abandonment is tlte comparison of tlte 2986 average daily trips projected on tlte roadway link at build out and tlte 32,500 daily trip capacity of Quantum Boulevard. Tlte impact is furtlter diminislted by tlte fact tltat nearly all of tlte 2986 trips would be using tlte Quantum Boulevard link to Gateway Boulevard anyway. Please delete tltis comment. FIRE Comments. 6. Roads and hydrants must be in place pnor to any constructIOn above grade. RESPONSE. Tltis is a site plan and site-specific development related comment. It is inappropriate as a condition for a Master Plan amendment. Please delete tltis comment. POLICE Comments None RESPONSE, Comment noted. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments. 7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Drive wIll require replatting of that portIOn of Quantum Park m accordance with the reqUIrements of the LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 6 9/1 % I RESPONSE. A proposed preliminary plat is being prepared and will be submitted by separate application to the City of Boynton Beach for review and approval pursuant to the plat review process. 8. Lot 34C (NotIficatIon of a Proposed Change, SectIon 54) is proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to Industnal use. How will this change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development? RESPONSE. It is important to note, the land area for Lot 34-C was previously accounted for as a detention area and not as an open space or recreational park area. Therefore, there is no impact to the open space or the recreational park areas relative to the development of Lot 34-C. A similar example of no impact is tlte Sand Pine Preserve areas adjacent tlte Industrial Development and Mixed Use Development in the soutltern portion of tlte park. Please delete this comment. 9 Provide venficatlOn that Palm Beach County Engineenng will permIt a dnveway opemng onto Miner Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress point will be proVIded at the south end of the property for emergency servIces. RESPONSE. It is inappropriate to request verification from Palm Beaclt County Engineering for a driveway opening onto Miner Road for Lot 34-C as a Master Plan amendment requirement or even as a verification for site plan approval. Verification Itas not been provided witltin tlte development at tlte Master Plan stage for any driveway connection to any adjacent roadway. Furtltermore, tlte permitting of a driveway opening is a site plan related issue and should be considered at tltat time. A second ingress and egress will not be provided for Lot 34-C. This is consistent witlt otlter lots witltin tlte development tit at do not have secondary access whiclt are larger developments or larger lot areas than could be proposed or constructed on Lot 34-C. These issues are site-planning issues and are inappropriate for tlte Master Plan consideration. Please delete this comment. 10 If approved, an environmental assessment of Tract 34C will be required as part of any site submIttal. RESPONSE. We request that comment #10 be deleted on tlte basis that this again is a site plan related condition. Furthermore, the Development Order (DO) already requires an Environmental Assessment of each lot prior to development. Certainly, not prior to Master Plan approval, a land use designation or a change thereto. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EA G09 100 1. doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 7 9/1 % 1 Please delete this comment. 11 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will Isolate the dedicated roadway easement along the north property line of Lot 61 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, mdicates access WIll be provIded Via a smgle entrance point at the mtersection of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. ElImmatIon of that portIOn of Quantum lakes Drive and the second access pomt will create an undesirably long trip for the most northerly residents of the proposed multi-family resIdential development and would create a hazardous SItuation for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portions of that same development. RESPONSE. Prior to responding to ti,e comment it is important to correct two factual errors within the comment. Firstly, the identified "dedicated roadway easement along ti,e north property line of Lot 61" does not exist. Secondly, the application for the NOpe in Section 5.5 was improperly restated. The application states that the main access or entrance point at the intersection of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum Boulevard will be used by Lots 59, 60, and 61 In fact, a second access point is provided consistent with the approved site plan through the property to the north currently owned by Quantum Park and Village. Please refer to ti,e letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen Developments. The letter clearly indicates the intent to provide a secondary access. Please delete this comment. 12. Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and reconfiguring a portion of it into Lot 101 will create an undeSIrably long trIp for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and WIll create a hazardous SItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. RESPONSE. Stated in comment #11 and #12 is a concern contending long and undesirable trips to the remote section of the existing and newly created lots. We strongly disagree with this contention and request both comments be deleted, as many developments of over 500 acres I,ave much longer distances to travel to exit ti,e development. Furthermore, the access and travel routes of emergency vehicles are site- planning issues, not master planning issues. Please refer to the letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen Developments. The letter clearly indicates tlte intent to provide a secondary access to northern portions of Lot 61 and Lot 101 Please delete this comment. F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 8 9/1 010 I 13 ReconfiguratIon of Lots 62 and 63 Into a sIngle Lot 102 would create the same sItuatIOn described In the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. RESPONSE. Our responses for comments #11 and #12 also relate to comment #13 and we request tltis comment be removed. In tltis particular case, tlte newly created Lot 102 is part of tlte larger 23 acre mixed use area. Tltese lands are under single ownersltip and are anticipated to be included into a single master plan for commercial, office and residential uses witlt proper emergency access and velticular movements tltrougllOut the 23 acres with access from the Villas at Quantum Lake property (Lots 59, 60 and 61). Please delete tltis comment. 14 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, Section 5.5, paragraph 3, represents the intersection of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. This IntersectIOn has preVIOusly been reViewed and approved. Please provide additional Information (accident data and standard drawings) supporting this statement. RESPONSE. WitllOut regardfor the previous review and approval, it appearsfrom the memo written by Mr Livergood P.E. (Public Works - Traffic Comments) the City staff supports our requestfor the elimination of the intersection and the abandonment of the roadway. Regarding tlte previous review and approval, the improvements within Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Drive were designed in 1986 and 1987 and constructed in 1988 and 1989. Many changes to tlte FDOT design standards and design criteria have occurred since that time. Palm Beaclt County has adopted an access management plan and has also adopted street landscaping criteria, "streetscape criteria" In previous incidents tltese criteria all have been applied to development plans (e.g. site plans and associated roadway improvements, etc.) presented to tlte City for review The Palm Beach County streetscape standards and access management standards were adopted after tI,e design and construction of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Drive. Of particular interest and concern is tlte "ltot right" from Quantum Lakes Drive to eastbound Gateway Boulevard. A yield sign controls tltis turning movement. In effect traffic is allowed to flow from Quantum Lakes Drive and merge into the riglzt hand through lane of Gateway Boulevard with very little acceleration lane distance or adequate merging taper It is this hot right that we feel is hazardous and believe is desirous to eliminate, particularly in light of the increased pedestrian traffic crossing tltis yielded intersection enroute to the new high school that did not exist when ti,e roadway was designed. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 9 9/10/01 We look to the City of Boynton Beach to provide any accident data or record drawings of this intersection, if any additional information or response is desired from the applicant. No additional information or response in our judgment is necessary. Please delete this comment. 15 If the areas MU101 and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an addItional recreatIOnal fee (or land m heu of fee) may be assessed based on the original calculatIOns for the CIty Park. RESPONSE. The Park and Recreational Department address recreational fees and this comment in the Engineering section is inappropriate. Please delete this comment. 16. The creatIOn of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-designatIOn of Lot 34C from undesIgnated to Industrial wIll obviously mcrease traffic volumes. The Traffic AnalysIs (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result in an increase in daily or peak hour volumes" Although the analYSIS concludes that there are no increases and decreases m allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes in traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes. RESPONSE. The proposed change does not increase the vested traffic generation of the Park. An increase of developable area does not necessarily increase development intensities particularly if intensity is measured by traffic generation. Land area does not generate traffic, the office, industrial and residential buildings do generate traffic. The proposed change increases the residential units allowable within the Park and decreases the threshold of allowable office and industrial building area, on a traffic generation equivalency basis. The traffic generation equivalency is demonstrated by the submitted traffic analysis and supplemented by the attached letter from Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Please delete this comment. 17 The Traffic Analysis (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dove has the potential to Impact the regional roadway network. The,analysis further states that diverted traffic will cause the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capacity during the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes m stopmg and roadway wIdemng to address thIS without provIdmg a timetable. Please be more specific as to how and when thIS work WIll be mcorporated mto the planning process to mmimize Impact to the travelIng publIc. Also please address the F IQuantum Limited\nopcl2EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 10 9/l 010 I Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehICles and law enforcement. RESPONSE. This comment has inaccurately stated the conclusions of tile traffic generation equivalence data, the intersection analyses and the concluding statements. A roadway widening is not proposed or required as a result of the abandonment of Quantum Lakes Drive. The analysis and standard practice is very clear, the roadway restriping associated with the traffic signal will occur when warranted, not before the signal is warranted and preferably not after it is warranted. The accurate conclusions are provided below after the following discussion about tile BGI approval cOllditions. Regarding the traffic signal warrants and tile surety thereof, the BGI site plan approval conditions are of importance. The BGI site plan approval was conditioned requiring them to construct the traffic signal at the Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard intersection. BGI subsequently abandoned their development plans and sold tile land. The subsequent development, a 336,500 sq. ft. warehouse project known as Gateway Business Center, was not conditioned by the City to construct or even provide surety for the subject traffic signal. We believe this oversigllt should not be at tile expense of tllis applicant especially now since it has been shown that it is tile Gateway Business Center and the Villas at Quantum Lake developments that at build out will warrant the signal. Tile accurate conclusion is as follows, the Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard intersection was previously determined to warrant a traffic signal with the existing developments within the Park and the build out of tile Villas at Quantum Lake and tile 336,500 sq. ft. warehouse project (located at the northeast corner of the intersection). Tile analysis shows the traffic signal would be warranted prior to this proposed change. The analysis also concluded the existing roadway improvements are adequate at the time the traffic signal is warranted. The analysis also determined the intersection after tile traffic signal is warrallted will be over capacity during the PM peak hour only due to the projected increase in through traffic on Gateway Boulevard and NOT the traffic generated by Quantum Park or the diverted traffic caused by the roadway abandonment. This comment is further addressed in the attached letter dated, September 7, 2001 from Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Please delete tllis comment. 18 Identify the tract shown as MU101 as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's addItIOnal property due to the abandonment. Change MUlOO to MU102A. RESPONSE. The Lot numbering strategy was discussed at a preliminary meeting with the City staff The revised Master Development Plan reflects those discussions. The F IQuantum LimitedlnopcJ 2EAG09l 00 l.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 11 9/10/01 furtlter subdivision of Lot 101 into two lots is problematic as is tlte suggested '~" designation. Tlte'~" designation is already used witltin tlte Park to identify lots totally encumbered by drainage easements and associated witlt developable lots witlt tlte same lot number We reject tlte suggestion. Please delete tltis comment. BUILDING DIVISION Comments. None RESPONSE. Comment noted. PARK AND RECREATION Comments. 19 The CIty CommIssion dId exempt, from the Recreation DedIcation Requirement, 272 units of the 1,000 unIts reqUIred in the most recent master plan reVIsion. The developer dId pledge, however, to provIde appropnate publIc recreatIOn facIlitIes for these umts. (To be determmed in conjunctIon with the Parks DiVISIon.) The total recreation dedicatIOn reqUIrement will be calculated as follows. 1,000 umts - 272 units = 723 D U 728 DUx 015 = 10 92 acres ~ credIt may be gIven agamst the reqUIrements of land dedication or payment fees. ~ pnvate recreatIOn credIt wIll be calculated as follows 10.92 acres /2=546 acres An additional v.. credIt may be gIven for natural resources agamst the requirement of land dedIcation or payment of fees. v.. credit for natural resources wIll be calculated as follows. 10 92 acres / 4=2 73 acres The developer may want to consider dedication of the land, or a combmatlOn of dedICatIOn and fee. RESPONSE. Tlte pledge of tlte applicant (not tlte Developer) referenced above is clarified as follows. Tlte applicant pledges to provide recreational facilities for tlte r,emaining 228 residential units and tlte proposed ad{litional 500 residential units as amenities to tlte additional units, in tlte vicinity of tlte additional units and for tlte exclusive use of tlte residents of tlte additional units. Tlte developer of tlte residential projects pursuant to market demands will determine the facilities. Tltese recreational facilities will be planned and constructed as part of the segment of the mixed-use F IQuantum LimitedlnopcJ2EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 12 911 % I development in mucll tile same manner as tlte recreational facilities are being provided to tile Villas of Quantum Lake. The discussion and expression of tile intent of tile City Commission was tllat Quantum Park in general should be exempt from tlte recreation dedication credit. Tile discussion by tile Commission was that Quantum Park II ad provided more in tile form of recreation and other benefits to tlte City to satisfy any potential recreation dedication requirement and tllerefore, no furtller requirement sltould be requested witlt respect tllereto. Tllis intent was further reinforced by the City Manager in recent discussions concerning the future planning and development of the Park. Please delete this comment. 20 Natural resource credit, If approved by the commissIOn, is subtracted off the RecreatIon DedIcatIon Reqmrement. RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment. 21 According to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, SectIOn 3, of the Land Development RegulatIon, the developer must provIde 5 park elements m order to quahfy for ~ credIt for private recreation provided. RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment. 22. If the property is not further platted, recreatIOn fees or dedIcations for the 728 non-exempt dwelhng umts are due before the issumg of theIr resIdentIal buildmg permIts. RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment. FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments 23 I am requesting the apphcant as a conditIOn to the above Master Plan ModIfication to respond to my letter of May 14, 2001 (as dIrected by our City Manager) m reference to the Quantum Park-DR! Annual Environmental Areas Status Report. RESPONSE. Tllis request is inappropriate and should be deleted. Tlte applicant is not responsible for addressing the requests of the City Forrester or any other agency or individual relating to lands owned by others, improvements or maintenance of F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 13 9/1 DID I improvements upon lands owned by otlrers, including tire Quantum Community Development District (HQCDD'? in tlris case. Tire referenced letter requests a written status of various management aspects of the sand pine preserve areas and the wetland areas wit/tin Quantum Park. The letter also request documents tlrat should be onfile at the City as the administrator of the DR/for the Park. Neither status reports nor the supply of documents are the responsibility of the applicant. The letter has been forwarded to the QCDD and we are aware the QCDD is working with Dr Richardson to provide the requested status reports and documents of record requested by the City. Wefirmly believe the QCDD will comply with the request as they have with all other responsibilities within the Park. Please delete this comment. 24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detentIOn (open spaces) area and IS contiguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pme Preserve. The land use change of Lot 34-C from detention (open space) to mdustrial, could affect the environmental qualIty of the contiguous Sand Pme Preserve when the owner develops the mdustnal tract. RESPONSE. Comment noted. As a site planning requirement, the impact to the sand pine preserve area to the west, the water management tract to the south, the adjacent vacant land to the east and Miner Road to the north (as discussed above) is required to be considered. The key here is these are site development related concerns and not Master Planning concerns. Lot 34-C is not encumbered by any existing or required drainage easement, plat dedication or plat reservation for use as a detention or retention area. The land use designation change is not a change from detention to industrial but a change described as follows Lot 34-C is currently unrestricted by a Hland use designation" as shown on the Master Development Plan Amendment No. 10 for Quantum Park. Currently, the land could be developed as allowed within a PID zoning district. We are proposing a change to restrict the use of Lot 34-C to industrial uses subject to all current zoning, site planning, land development and building requirements. . The Lot 34-C area (6.58 acres, as determined by survey) has been erroneously accounted for in the Hopen space" area total and the detention area subtotal. This proposed change application corrects that accounting. Please delete this comment. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09 J OOl.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page ]4 9/1 010] 25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham lInk fence was mstalled around a) Lot 34-C (6.58 acres) and b) Water Management Tract "J" (6 16 acres) and connected to the eXIstmg fence around the penmeter of the c) Sand Pine Preserve (25 7 acres) ThIS was to protect the envIronmental qualIty of the total of 3844 acres m the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as open spaces / Sand Pme Preserve. The project should contmue m the normal reVIew process. RESPONSE. The assumptions, presumptions and implied conclusions as suggested in the above comment resulting from the fencing of the three identified areas are astoundingly inaccurate. To the best of our knowledge the acreage of Water Management Tract J is also stated inaccurately. The 6-foot high chain link fence as well as numerous "NO TRESPASSING" signs were installed by the QPPOA with the cooperation of the applicant to attempt to restrict the trespass of off tlte road vehicles and poachers illegally entering the properties and causing damage to the habitat and wildlife. Prior to this applicant's purchase of lands with in the Park, the illegal access and damage was occurring unrestricted. It was simply less expensive, less time consuming, provided better security and a better opportunity for monitoring the fence and access with the fence installed along the north and east boundary line of Lot 34-C. Furthermore, including Lot 34-C "behind the fence" also protected the Lot 34-C area habitat and wildlife from damage prior to the proper environmental assessment typically performed as part of the lot development process at the time a specific development is proposed. Please delete this comment. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 26 The Land Use Average Table IS mcorrect as shown on page 5 of the NOPC application. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac. of (01) and 26.33 ac. of (OIC). Correct thIS mformation on the application. RESpONSE. The acreages reported for the 01 and OJ{; land use designations are correctly reported in the application. The acreages reported in the comment above are incorrect. It appears something other than the Master Development Plan of record for Amendment No 10, as revised pursuant to the City Commission approval is being referenced. F IQuantum Limitedlnopc12EAG091 00 I. doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 15 9/1 010 1 Please delete this comment. 27 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the applIcation and on the Master Plan drawmg shown a decrease m the (OIC) category (26.33 acres approved, 22.94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (OIC) designated lot. Please explam? RESPONSE. A change is not proposed in the approved area designated for OIC development. The comment above is based on the same inaccuracy apparent in Comment No. 26. The application tabular data and the revised Master Development Plan clearly show no increase or decrease in the land area designatedfor OIC development. Please delete this comment. 28 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applIcation and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg is mcorrect. The existing (MU) lots add up to 2682 acres. Together they total 89.20 acres not 9065 as shown on the plan. Please correct. RESPONSE. The total acreage proposed for Mixed Use (MU) development as a result of tlris application is 90.66 acres, this area is based upon surveys peiformed for the applicant. Attached to clarify the apparent area confusion is an "Area Calculation Summary" The Master Development Plan and the NOPC Application page have been revised to reflect the totals shown in the Summary. Please delete this comment. 29 Lot 34-C is shown havmg 6.58 acres m the applIcatIOn but 6.56 acres has been added to the Industrial category on the Master Plan. The development order and Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have identified thIS tract as havmg 6.59 acres. To be conSIstent, use the 6 59-acre SIte area calculatIOn. RESPONSE. The acreage of Lot 34-C is 6.58 acres based upon a survey peiformedfor the applicant. Please reference the attached '~rea Calculation Summary" Please delete this comment. 30 (CIty'S duplIcate number 25) Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "DetentIOn" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detention label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to the deSIgnatIOn of thIS lot was proposed or approved m eIther amendment. This lot remams a DetentIOn lot WIth no development designatIOn F IQuantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JO01.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 16 9/1 % I assIgned. Please IndIcate thIS In your applIcatIOn and provIde data and analysIs to support the elImInatIOn of thIS area for detentIOn. RESPONSE. The detention label was specifically removed from the Master Development Plan, Amendment No 9, as was otlter inaccurate information to produce as accurate a plan as possible based on information and data acquired during the purchase of over two Itundred (200) with in the park by tlte applicant. It is important to note the Master Development Plan, Amendment No. 9 was approved by tlte City Commission witlt tlte removal of tlte detention label along witlt tlte removal and revision of other inaccuracies shown on Master Development Plan, Amendment No.8. We object to tlte contention that Lot 34-C exists as a detention area and agree the lot exists witltout a land use designation. We contend tit at witltout a development land use designation and without an encumbrance for use as a detention area, the lot may be developed as allowed witltin a PID zoning district subject to all current zoning, site planning, land development and building requirements. Indicated in our application and reflected on tlte proposed Master Development Plan is the change to tlte use of Lot 34-C from an undesignated use to an industrial use by providing a land use designation. Tlte request for additional data, analysis and supporting information regarding drainage encumbrances upon Lot 34-C is more appropriately provided by tlte Engineering Department. It is interesting to note the Engineering Department has not requested additional data or information in tltis regard. It appears tlte Engineering Department is satisfied witlt the description of tlte proposed cltange and the supporting documents submitted with the application. It also appears tlte Utility Department comments provide requests regarding tlte drainage encumbrances upon Lot 34-C. We have responded to the Utilities Department comments on this issue. Please delete tltis comment. 31 (26) ProvIde SIte area acreage calculatIOns for proposed lots 100 and 101, RESPONSE. Attaclted is an ''Area Calculation Summary" Please delete this comment. , 32. (27) The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 draWIng shows a net loss of 8.02 acres of open space. Does thIS reflect the 6.59 acre Detention lot (34-C) plus any open space associated with the elImInatIOn of the nght-of -way? Please clarIfy F \Quantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOl.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 17 9/10/01 RESPONSE. Attaclted is an ''Area Calculation Summary" Please delete tltis comment. 33 (28) Lots 73-A through 76 should be hIghlIghted as comrmtted development. Site Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 ThIs should also be reflected m the project traffic 2002 estImate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analysIs. RESPONSE. Tlte Master Development Plan Itas been revised as requested to sltow tlte committed development. Tlte committed development upon tltese lots has been reflected as requested. Tlte projected traffic from this recently approved project has not been included in tlte 2002 analysis. It is doubtful it will be constructed within the time period as tlte owner/developer currently Itas over 250,000 sq. ft. of similar space constructed and currently vacant. The projected traffic Itas been included in the 2006 intersection analysis. Please delete this comment. 34 (29) Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as committed development (OrIana GranIte) Site Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 This should be reflected in the project traffic 2001 estImate m the Pinder Troutman traffic analysIs. RESPONSE. Tlte Master Development Plan has been revised as requested to show the committed development. The committed development upon tltese lots has been reflected as requested. It is doubtful lot 50-A will be developed as approved. Tlte contract buyer did not complete the transaction to purcltase tlte property. Tlte current landowner (tlte applicant) does not desire to construct tlte project. Therefore it follows the traffic has not been included in eitlter tlte 2001 or 2002 project traffic for tlte purposes of the analysis. Please delete tltis comment. 35 (30) The Master Plan mdIcates that the acreage for the IndustrIal category is mcreasipg by 6.56 acres yet the allowable mtensity for thIS catygory IS decreasmg by 375,354 square feet. Please clarIfy thIS mconsistency RESPONSE. In applying tlte theory of "simultaneously increasing and decreasing intensities" using traffic generation formulas as tlte equivalency tecltnique, no substantial regional impact results from the proposed change. In tltis particular case, F IQuantum Limitedlnopc 12EAG091 00 I.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 18 9/1 0/0 I we are proposing the increase from 500 to ]000 residential units and simultaneously decreasing the allowable industrial square footage by 375,354 sq. ft. The apparent industrial area increase is addressed in the responses to other comments. Please delete tlris comment. 36. (31) The Master Plan mdicates the acreage for the Office categories (0, 01) IS decreasmg; yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS category IS mcreasmg by 72,922 square feet. Please clarIfy thIS mconsIstency RESPONSE. The allowable threshold of office space is proposed to be decreased by 72,922 sq. ft. The comment statement above is inaccurate. Please delete this comment. 37 (32) The Master Plan indIcates a proposed new access from Miner Road for Lot 34-C The traffic analysIs must specIfically address thIS access since it is not mtegrated into the traffic cIrculation system for the rest of the PID How many tnps are allocated for this sIte and how will It Impact Miner Road? RESPONSE. The traffic generated from an industrial use upon Lot 34-C is minor and insignificant when analyzing the traffic issues relevant to the proposed change. On a regional basis, it is the peak hour movements that are of interest. The impacted intersections have been analyzed. The traffic generated by the entire development, which is not being increased, does not have a significant impact on either the Congress or High Ridge Road illtersections with Miner Road. The traffic generation calculations for the overall development do not allocate trips to a specific lot. Each lot as it is developed is required to prepare a traffic statement identifying the traffic generated by the specific plan. A distribution of the generated traffic is also provided as part of the statement. Miner Road is a Plan Collector as designated by Palm Beach County. Its right-of-way is protected for a five-lane roadway section. It is constructed as a two-lane roadway expandable to the five-lane ultimate section. We anticipate the maximum traffic generatedfrom Lot 34-C to be 700 average trips per day (6.58 acres x 0.35 FAR x 6.97 trips/] 000 sq. ft.). The connection of 700 trips per day to Miner Road with an ultimate c.apacity of 32,500 trips per day is less than significapt. The significance is further diminished by the fact the traffic generated by Quantum Park, including the 700 anticipated trips from Lot 34-C, are already vested and properly included in background traffic of the regional roadway network. Please delete tlris comment. F IQuantum Limited\nopc12EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 19 9/1 % I 38 (33) The NOPC applIcatIOn page 9 contams two converSIOn formulas for resIdentIal units. They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they provIde two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ResIdentIal Umt. What IS the purpose of these formulas? Please clarIfy thIS mconsIstency or remove them from the applIcatIOn. RESPONSE. The formulas have been deleted from the application. Attached is the revised page. Please delete this comment. 39 (34) Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal deVIatIOn by the City This IS based on the followmg sections of the Florida Statutes. a) Chapter 380 06 (19) (b) 9 An increase m the number of dwellIng umts by five (5) percent of 50 umts, whIchever IS greater b) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5.c. No wIthstandmg any provisIOn m paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consIstmg of sImultaneous mcrease and decreases of at least two of the uses wIthm an authorIzed multI-use development of regIOnal impact whIch was origmally approved with more than three uses speCIfied m 3800651 (3) (c), (d), (t) and g and reSIdentIal use. c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b. Except for the types of uses listed m subparagraph (b) 16., any change whIch would result m the development of any area WhICh was specifically set aSIde m the applIcation for development approval or m the development order for preservation, buffers, or specIal protectIon, includmg habItat for plant and ammal species, archeologICal and historical SItes and other speCIal areas The application as presented is presumed to be a substantIal deviatIOn. This presumptIOn may be rebutted by clear and convmcmg eVIdence. The applicant must provide addItIonal mformatIOn before determmation of no substantIal deVIatIOn is made. The addItIOnal information must mclude A revIsed traffic analYSIS based on comments receIved from Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach Techmcal ReVIew Committee. Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and Offic~lIndustrial (01) categorIes to the MU category is consistent With the Comprehensive Plan. Provide an updated analYSIS of the master drainage plan for Quantum Park clearly mdIcating the Impacts that an industrial development on the current DetentIOn Tract 34-C would have. F IQuantum Limitedlnopc12EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 20 9/1 % I Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space will be mItigated. RESPONSE. Clear and convincing evidence is provided within the responses to these staff comments, the additional statements provided by Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc., the Area Calculation Summary and other documents presented for review. Tile demonstration that the land use designation changes proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan was provided and approved by the City Commission by virtue of Amendment NolO when ti,e Mixed Use category including a residential component was added to the development. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is not an issue. Tile net loss of open space area is inaccurately stated above. As described in detail in other responses above, the land area of Lot 34-C (6.58 acres of the 8.02 acres) was effectively available for development and was not an "open space" when the plat was recorded and the SFWMD permit was modified. Tile remainder of the 8.02 acres relates to the portion of Tract Q, a Water Management Tract adjacent the link of Quantum Lakes Drive proposed for abandonment. This remainder area is incorporated into Lot 100 and Lot 101 We are not aware of any federal, state or local requirement to mitigate any loss of open space. Please delete this comment. 40 (35) Under the condItIOn of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, Article IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a traffic analYSIS IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. The apphcant submitted a traffic analYSIS. In heu of an independent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon will reVIew the traffic study RESPONSE. Comment noted. Please delete this comment. 41 (36) The Palm Beach County Traffic DivlSlon has reVIewed the traffic study and demed approval due to the followmg: a. The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 daily trips) should be counted as vested tnps wItmn the overall Quantum development traffic generations. b. Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented m Attachments lA, IB and IC, must reflect the values of the latest NOPC approval. (Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and revise the traffic study accordmgly F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 21 9/1 DID 1 RESPONSE. As a result of prior disputes and litigation, it has been previously agreed and determined that the trips generated by the high school would not count against future development within Quantum Park so as to resolve such disputes and litigation. A Settlement Agreement (as a result of the litigation) was entered into by the School Board of Palm Beach County and collectively with the QCDD, tile QPPOA and the applicant. Confidentiality provisions of the agreement bind the applicant and the School District. However, a key element of the resolution of this litigation was that the City not count the traffic generated by the high school against future development within Quantum Park. The requested revisions to the Attachments listed above are not required for an analysis provided in support of a determination of no substantial deviation. The purpose of the NOPC traffic analysis is to determine if the proposed change results in a substantial deviation. Florida Statues Chapter 380.06 Section (19)(b)15 states that ''A 15% increase in the number of external vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was projected during the original development-of-regional review" constitutes a substantial deviation. The data and analysis, as submitted with the application, demonstrates that the proposed plan represents a decrease in Daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation from the original development-of- regional review Therefore, the proposed change is not a substantial deviation and, intersection and roadway link analyses for existing and future conditions are not required. Please delete this comment. 42. (37) The NOpe Master Plan submIttal did not include a conceptual SIte plan or justification for the requested change. The CIty approved the Mixed-Use deSIgnation when It adopted Amendment #10 In March 2000 To date, no development has been proposed whIch combines all the uses reqUIred by the Land Development Regulations if the defimtlOn of a Mixed Use Pod in a PID The only plans submItted and approved to date are for Villas at Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay) RESPONSE. Although we continue to "conceptually plan" for the development of the existing and proposed mixed-use areas, we feel it inappropriate to require such plans or justifications be provided as part of the change application. The existing Mixed-Use area is not part of this proposed change and the status of its development is irrelevant to this application. In fact, in some cases we are prohibitfd from disclosing the conceptual plans until such site plan is submitted for approval. This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment F IQuantum Limitedlnopc12EA G09l OOl.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 22 9/l 010 I 43 (38) The VIllas at Quantum Lake sIte plan was approved With an access at the north end of the sIte from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum Lakes Drive eventually leadmg out to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed Master Plan does not indICate thIS access. Please correct the Master Plan to reflect the approved access for the residential project. RESPONSE. Tile Master Development Plan Ilas been revised to sllow the referenced access. Please delete this comment. 44 (39) The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake project have contacted the CIty m writmg regarding their concerns that any development on proposed lots 100 and 101, If not built m coordmate on With thelf project, may Impact theIr access, frontage, VIsibility, setback, densIty, open space and eXIsting VIews. Has the applIcant contacted the adjacent property owner to discuss the Impacts of this NOPC proposal? It IS Imperative that the adjacent property owners are appnsed of and be m agreement WIth thIS proposed change. RESPONSE. Tile adjacent property owners to Lots 100 and 101 are not only aware of the proposed cllange, but Ilave acquisition agreements with the applicant regarding the lots. We are not aware of any objection to the proposed change. Please refer to the letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen Developments. Tile letter clearly indicates supportfor the proposed change and not an objection to the proposed abandonment, lot configuration or access arrangements. Please delete this comment. 45 (40) The proposed abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the creation of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will require a replat ofthat portIOn ofthe PID plat. RESPONSE. This is also an Engineering Department comment also. A response is provided thereto. Please delete this comment. 46. (41) On June 25,2001, a letter was sent to David B. Noms, Counsel for the applicant requesting several revisions to the Annual St~tus Report for the Quantum Park PID DR!. To date, those reviSIOns have not been made. Please reVIse the annual report accordmgly and provIde the reVlSlons at the September 11,2001 TRC meetmg. RESPONSE. It is not the responsibility of this applicant to prepare, distribute or address comments relative to the Annual DRI Report for this project. The requirement F \Quantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 23 9/1 % 1 to provide revisions to a document for which we are not responsible and to provide the revised document in less than five (5) working days is absurd. The City's comments on the Annual DRI Report are a separate matter and it is grossly inappropriate to impose such a requirement upon the applicant. Please delete this comment. 47 (42) RevIse the Substantial Deviation Chart m the applIcation for the Open Spaces category The chart indIcates N/C for the proposed change when the elImmation of the detention area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for the Industnal and Office categones, as they do not match the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg. RESPONSE. A revised Substantial Deviation Chart is attached reflecting the responses contained herein. Please delete this comment. y further questIOns, please feel free to contact me at any time. cc David Noms, Esq Cohen, Norris, et. al. Kahart Pmder, Pmder Troutman Consultmg, Inc. Doug MacDonald Tom McGIllIcuddy F IQuantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Land Use Acreae;e Table Proposed Acreage Land Use Desie;nation Amendment No. 12 Existing Acreage Amendment No. 10 Commercial (COM) 13.53 Acres 13.53 Acres Industrial (IND) 107 83 Acres 101.25 Acres Governmental/InstItutIOnal (G&I) 55.90 Acres 55 90 Acres Office (0) 12.96 Acres 28.24 Acres Office/Industnal (01) 79 75 Acres 8774 Acres Office/Industnal/Commerclal (OIC) 22.94 Acres 22 94 Acres Office/Industnal/Hotel (OIH) 3 78 Acres 378 Acres Mixed Use (MU) 90 66 Acres 62.38 Acres Wetlands 6 00 Acres 6.00 Acres Roads 37.58 Acres 41 13 Acres Sand Pme Reserve 40 00 Acres 40 00 Acres Open Space 82.20 Acres 90.25 Acres Total 553 13 Acres 553 14 Acres NOTE The Amendment 10 and Amendment 12 total areas differ due to the roundmg of the mdividual Land Use DesignatIOn to the nearest 0 01 acres. f'\Quantum Limited\Annual DRJ\NotificationDRJrvl.doc 5 August 8, 200 I Revised September 10, 200 I to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts, to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; It IS requested the development order language be amended to mclude the followmg provIsIOns. 1 Master Plan Amendment No 12 to the Master SIte Development Plan for Quantum Park, dated July 2001, is hereby approved. 2. Development of the folloWIng Land Use Classifications should not exceed the folloWIng mtensltIes without further CIty approval. Industrial 1,900,000 Square Feet Commercial (includIng Hotel & Rest.) 728,768 Square Feet Office 885,850 Square Feet One Hotel Room =268 Square Feet of Gross Leasable Commercial Area One MOVIe Theatre Seat =40 Square Feet of Office Gross Floor Area One MOVIe Theatre Seat =60 Square Feet of IndustrIal Gross Floor Area ResIdential 1,000 Dwelling Umts f'\Quantum Limited\Annual DRl\NotificationDRIrvl.doc 9 August &, 2001 Revised September 10,2001 89/10/2001 17 13 551434166J F It'-mEF.. TROUH1At'j F AGE PH PIHDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING. INC. Transportation Planners and Engmeers September 7, 2001 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 Email pindertroutman@msn.com Ms. lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O Box 310 Boynton Beach, Fl 33425-0310 Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 12 - #PTC01-102 Dear Ms. Galav' The following responds to the City comments on the traffic analysis for the above referenced project. Public Works-Traffic - Jeff Livergood memorandum of August 29,2001 Response Quantum Lakes Drive Closure A full median opening exists at this location today There has not been any accident history at this location that would warrant closure. However, it is recommended that the left turn exit from Parcell 00 not be allowed Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard The Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) was not provided as a substitute for the signal warrant analysis. The signal warrant analysis provided in the report dated February 16, 2001 is still valid. The applicant cannot install a signal until it is warranted and has been approved by Palm Beach County Therefore, it is recommended that monitoring of this intersection begin in peak season 2002 to determine if signalization is in fact warranted. This is a condition of the current Development Order (DO). Monitoring should continue every peak season until the signal is warranted. Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The applicant would agree that monitoring of this intersection should begin at the build out of Parcels 32 through 38. Monitoring should be conducted during the peak season and continue until the signal is warranted. General The February 16, 2001 Intersection Analysis included proposed NOPe # 11 land uses. The original NOPC # 11 was for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Therefore, the traffic from both the residential and non- residential uses on lots 7 through 11 and 23 through 31 have been included. KMP/ldr LetterGalav01 1029-7-01 Pi South Florida \Vater Management District 3301 Gun Cluh Road, West P~m Beach, Florida 33406' (561) 686-8800' FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 February 7, 1997 Quantum Associates 2455 East Sunrise Blvd, Suite 1106 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33304 Dear Sir or Madam. Subject Boynton Park of Commerce aka Quantum Park Phase Construction Completion/Construction Certification Application Nos. 08296-D & 11207-F, SWM Permit No. 50-01503-S Palm Beach County, SI6,17,20,211T45SIR43E ThIS letter acknowledges receipt of an engineer's Construction Completion/Construction Certification, record drawings and an As-Built Master Drainage Plan from Santiago Malavasi, P E. of Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc. pertaining to the subject project's surface water management system. District staff have reviewed the submItted information and it has been incorporated into the permit file Per the referenced certification, our staff consider the Master Surface Water Management System (including 8-onsite interconnected lakes totalling 67.81 acres, 6.92 acre dry detection area and 3- discharge control structures serving the entire 578.3 acre industrial development) and the Surface Water Management System for the Backbone Roadways at the Quantum Park project constructed in conformance WIth the permit. This satisfies the requirement of the referenced surface water management permit with regard to construction of the surface water management system and statement of completIon and certification by a Florida registered professional engineer for the phases included ill the above referenced application numbers Furthermore, according to the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District, Rule 40E-1 and 40E-4, Florida Administrative Code (40E-1 6107, Transfer of Environmental Resource, Surface Water Management or Water Use Permit; 40E-4 351, Transfer of Permits, 40E-4 61, Conversion from Construction Phase to Operation Phase, and 40E-4 81, General ConditIOns), upon construction completion and certification of the surface water management system, the permittee shall request transfer of the permit to the responsible operating entity Therefore, the subject phase of the Quantum Park project and the phase prevIously certified by engineer for construction completion (Quantum Park of Boynton Beach, Lots 12,13,14) shall be transferred to the entity responsible for operation and maintenance of the water management system. The required transfer should be made via the enclosed transfer form. This form should be fIlled out and submitted, along with a copy of the recorded deed restrictions (including amendments, if any), as well as a copy of all recorded plats (if not previously furnished) It will then be processed and included in the District's permit finalization process Please be aware that the permit file must contain documentation that applicable conditions to the permit have been satisfied. Go'r.:ernrng BDard. Valene B,,,'d, Chairman Frank \\ liiuffi n Tr \ ice ChaIrm"n \ \'illian' G '- 11 \\'ilium Hammond Bets' Kranr RIchird -\. 1\lachek Eugene K. Pettis ......athamel P Reed \Imam Singer Samuel E. Poole III ExecL..[!\'e Director ;\lichael Slanun, Depun Exec'JtJ\'e DIrector , J ~ ,- u ..... ..., Quantum Associates February 7, 1997 Page 2 Please submit the above or notify District staff within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter Should you have any questions, please contact Ms Marissa Cruz, Staff Engineering Associate, at (561) 687- 6590, or the undersigned at (561) 687-6596. Sincerely, I ~J t1 ( l:J f)!!/' ~r ~ -7 ~fl:anG~ A. Azizi Staff Engineer Field Engineering Division South Florida Water Management District AHA Enclosure c Santiago Malavasi, P E., Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc. w/Enclosure Quantum Associates, Indianapolis, IN, w/Enclosure Catalfumo Management & Investment, Inc., w/Enclosure Southern Design Group, Inc. City of Boynton Beach Engineer Palm Beach County Engineer FDEP E.P A. L.W D D bc B Ratcliffe H Schloss/M Cruz Permit File .. 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 FL WATS 1-800-4322045 . TDD (561) 6972574 Mailing Address: POBox 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 www.sfwmd.gov SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT LAN 01 r"r'-" r'""""'-' f"'" September 6, 2001 SEP v 7 2001 Mr Jim Snyder, DRI Coordinator Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300 Stuart, FL 33416 Dear ~r' j Subject: Quantum Park, ORI No. 84-173 Notice of Proposed Change In response to your request, South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) staff has reviewed the August 8, 2001 Notification of A Proposed Change (NOPC) to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) submitted by Eugene Gerlica, P E., for the above-referenced project. The primary purpose of the NOPC is to amend the Master Development Plan to Jeflect changes in land use affecting various lots throughout the development and reconfiguration Quantum Lakes Drive to create two additional developable lots. After review of the documentation submitted, SFWMD staff did not identify any potential adverse regional water resource-related impacts that could result from approval of the proposed changes. Consequently, the SFWMD has no objections to approval of the proposed changes However, a modification to the project's Conceptual Approval (Permit No 50-01503-S) may be required to address the proposed land use changes as they may impact the previously permitted acreage and land use assumptions. If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 682-6862. Sincerely, ~ James J Golden, AICP Senior Planner Environmental Resource Regulation Ijjg c: Roger Wilburn, DCA Eugene Gerlica P E , Quantum Group GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE Trudi K. Williams, Cluzir Lennart E. Lindahl, Vice-Cluzir Pamela Brooks-Thomas Michael Collins Hugh M. English Gerardo B. Fernandez Patrick J. Gleason, Ph.D P.G. Nicolas J. Gutierrez, Jr., Esq. Harkley R. Thornton Henry Dean, Executive Director SEP 07 '01 01 55PM THE OLEN COt1PANY P 2 September 7,2001 ; Ms. Lusia Galav, AICP City of Boynton 'B each Planning and Zoning Division 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Phone 561-742-6262 Fax 561-742-6259 RE: Villas at Quantum Lake (272 Apartment Homes) Additional Units - Quantum Lakes Drive Dear Ms Galav. As a follow up to Erik Brueningsen's letter of July 10, 2001. please find enclosed a conceptual drawing reflecting additional bldgs. (42 units) site planned for that portion of Quantum Lakes Drive to be vacated. We have developed a plan that would utilize the easternmost lanes of Quantum Lakes Drive for access to the additional units, thereby preserving the existing utilities (i e. water, force main. FP&L, Bell South, Cable TV) as well as the existing trees on the easternmost side of Quantum Lakes Drive. An existing 8" gravity sewer line would have to be relocated to allow the additional development. The existing project (2':12 units) would proceed as designed scheduled, save for minor shifting of building no 4 (minor modification of existing site plan) We have located the top of bank an the significant trees along the lake bank in an attempt to preserve the environmental plantings and to avoid impact to those plantings Olen would acquire that portion of Quantum Lakes Drive adjacent to the existing project and would coordinate the site plan submittal for the additional 42 units with the vacation process. I anticipate having the information for a site plan submittal to DRC by the end of this month. Our secondary access to Quantum Lakes Drive, will be modified by providing access to Quantum Lane along the sand pine preserve. The access will be provided through the easternmost portion of lot 62 and lot 66 connecting to Quantum Lane and High Ridge Road. This should resolve any issues relating to a secondary means of egress. The portion of Quantum Lakes Drive to be added to the Villas of Quantum Lakes would be platted by Quantum along with the balance of Quantum Lakes Drive and would reflect specific easements on the plat for the existing municipal utilities; addressing the location of the existing facilities U;\SHEILA\CORRE8\MH\Quantum\Galav09070 I.doc 1062 Coral Ridge Orlve · Coral Springs Florida 88Q71 (954) 340-4804 · Fax (854) 344-4608 SEP 07 '01 01 55PM THE OLEN COMPANY P 3 Page 2 of2 September 7, 2001 Ms. Lusia Galav I Villas at Quantum Lake - Additional Units Once we have prepared a preliminary plan and conceptual engineering, we will schedule a meeting with staff as appropriate. Should you have any questions or concerns in the meantime, please feel free to contact me. \ ( Ce. Igor Olenicoff Doug McDonald U '\SHEILA\CORRES\MH\Quantum\Galav09070 i.doc N ~~ O~ 'Z~ \-~ ~m':) ,,~(/) .4.0% 0..%0 ~u.1- ':)~~ \-.4...J ~'Z':) ~.4.<3 ~..J.4. v 0.. 0 ffi.4. ~'& .4.4. ~ ~ (\) Ol ro 0- \' ......: U <<Ii 1/)' 19.;C'liCD e g.....'(O ~ ...... \ ',~ ~~o'U) 1.01\.\fQ\~IO ~\g ~ ~ 1.0 . (S) (S) r- 0\\'1'-\""': 0 . . . ~ vi ~ Ili ~ m ~Ivi.o u> ~ ~'~ 1.0 .... .... ,1.0 .... r- C'l, I(S) 1.0 l \ \ ~ -\ \ \.' \ $' 1(1:), i ,C'\ N' \.\.0 \ \Ci \ ' I,~ ~ \ \ .... ~lii ~\~ e': ~\~,~, ('1\ ....\ ....\lii. ~ ~ CD' \ o ...,..\ ~ -5' ~I \ r-......\ \ \ \ \ \ en\ I en . II'-I \ ~$\ r-J ,-'\ , \ \ i \ ... \ \ \ I $\ q", ~' --' alii "de <<I U i=~ \ \ ' , II \ I ! \ I \ \ to' q" ..... \ % I/) CD ~\lii\ ... ~ >' ~\CD\ ~tG"C <<lIt) ~ .J 0 o:~ a c:tl' \ \ -\ \ \ \ I \ \......' I ' 1\.0 \\.0" i \ I ,I \\.0 \\.0 : I \ \ 1'1 I \ It") \e\ \ i ; \ '-r ! \ \ \ \ ' " \, \"', I.! : '$ 1\.0.\ ' ~ 1\ ,to! ! 1 \ t ~'o \~ ~ '" '" :;\ 0' ~i :'~ 'eRa ~ \.0 . en N I'- "'. I'- . 0 . \~ , ~ ~ ';\\ ~ \;; ~ '" \\;l '" ~ 'il '&.~ \ \ ! ,\ \ \ \ ~ o to a; o : .'i\ ~e b~ ~.::- \ 1 %\~ ~ f; CI ". \IS \. '""i i \ ! \ \ I \ \ \ \ ' \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ %\ \ \ \ \ ~ \ . \ 0 \ \ U1 \ ~\ \ ~\ \ , \ \ \ I \ ...l ,4. \'0 h- , \ \ '\ ,\ \ \ \;t\ "Z 10 i;t \ \ 1m $3 \ ,? Ict.,: \~ \ ~\~I\ \ ....,1 ~ ,(/) \ ~ uJ.\ r. ~ \ 8 ~\ ~ u.I ~. ~ ...\ ::1 ::1\ lQ ~I~ <C. <(<:(.1.' ,I Ul:' ...\ .it. it. ct. ~ cJ) W ~ t;t;t; a'&ui ;i Z ??? . it.0-0 _ ;t Ul 00\0 Ul 1cJ) u.I <C. i~ it. ~ IE EI~ 3\~ ~if\ful Ul ~ ct. Ul Ul u.I U1 0 ~ 3'- 10- 'z 1 ~ 3 u.I 9. 9. 9. 9. u.I ~ ~ o\tu\ ~ 0'6 u. u. u..I't )(..\:!! 0 ~\p.. . 8 ~\c>\lQ lQ\lQIlQ ~I~ ct. cJ)~9' "\1 \ \ \' \ , \ \ \ i u c lJ ~ ~ /----- --------------- - - ?t~ ~~ 0 '=' t"> ~ ~~ "'!~ ~ "1 "1 - ~ ~ dt"1 6 '$. ~ fI1 ~ ~ ~ <J> t"> S. ~ ... dO ~a ~ ... 0 e..o ~ ~ '=' rJ1~ S;::' ~ ~ '=' r-e. Clo _.0 e."- ~ ~ %. z g " 0 ZZ ';l:- (/) ~ z~~~ ...... ~ 0% ~ g zzt;Jj';l:- o .......... 0 ($ b ~ ~ S% ~~ trl P: (\) (j trl~ ~ (\) ~ ~ e'~ (\) 0 .... Gi trl ~ e'~ ~ ...,.... ~ s, o' ...,....(JQ (\) 2., t"1 ~ ...,....(JQ (\) s,"3 e:: g' (/) s,"3 \:to .-'I (\) n .-'I.... 9- ~ ~ .-'I.... %~ 0 t, %. 9-g a ~ ~ rP -(/) -< t"1 ;::l -(/) ~ ~ <.P ~ Gi o. -<~ ~~ ~~ ...... ~ ?:. ......~ 0 ~ _.~ o (\) ~ \ o (\) ~-r1 ~ ~-r1 .-'I lo< .-'10 .... ..,0 .'6.% ,.a' ?i .... 0 ,-.g rP P. "O(JQ <flog ~ ~ rP~ .;.;..; ~ I"'" ....I-J ~~ ~ ~ a- -1 .... ~ - z z. z. .z .z ~~ ~z. .l>- '-O.l>- () () () ~~ ~~~ ~o o. () () 0"" .l>- 00- ~ ~o tJl';l:- ~rJ1 0 0 '3'.~~ ~ ~~~ ~O dC~ .l>-I-J ~~~ ..., f~ - ,....- :-' ~ tJl ~ ~ ~l"dd 00 ~ I-J .... .l>- 0 0 0 ~o '-000 - ~-1 ';l:- ~t1 a- . ~ ';l:- ~~~ 0 -.0'-0 ~j. ~ .- - ''$ ~ ~ 'Z ~ 0.... 0.... (\) 0\\ (\) rP '" ~ ~o \'.3 ~ .l>- ~e~ I-JI-J z - ~o ~?~ .... ~-1 -1 -1 a- ~~ U'. 0 ~ v- 0 ~ ~..., ~z ~-1 .-'I ~ 0 0 I-J tJl-1 t!l ~O - '-1- - '..., - 00 """'" -1';s:- .l>- 00 Gi' ~ ~ I-J tJl .l>- t"1 rJ1 ~~ ~ .-'I~ gi d ~ r'~ ~; ~ ..,r& (/)r& ..,r& (/)r& 9-(\) ~ 'g'~ ~o ~ ~ (\) .... (\) ~ (\) V> g.~ ~ ~g. g. Wtg. ~ ?\ (\) ~ >-Q 'a''a' ~P" t"1 ~~. 00 ~S' ~~sg. ~-1 s-> .... -1 ~-1 ~ Clog- i* ~ ~ ~ ~ ~B'< ~~ ~ <fl OO~(\)~ ~~ - ...... I-J (/)I-J ?;~ ..... 0 ...... I-J g-o (\) 0 ::tt:t 00 <<. '=' g-g ..0 g (\) ,....... ~- ..... '-0 0 (\) 0 B e..-'I Cc ~~ e.e. e. z ~ ~9 ..0 ~9 ')?9 <<..... '" '" <fl 0 Cc 0'0.... o r' %~ ~ ~.g (\) (\) _.~ ~. (\) or' ~9.. (jO- Y' S ~~ -~ ~~ ~g (\) 0...... '~s s>~ ~~ (j(j p.. 0 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ B(/) gp ~ <fl g ~ ~~ cOo (\) G ~. ..... ......0 c cOo ~~ p.t) ~~ p.t) <fl rP ~.~.~ rP 00 rP 00 ';l:-~ ","",- ..... (\) , .z~ ~~ !to ~. ';:!It:n (\) ~ rPg ~~ o 0 ~..,o rP '0' ? S. ~~ o 0 ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~~ c. ;:!. ...... 'g' ~ .l'> .l'> ~c. ~% (/)r.P gg ~ ~ ~ 0 0 o' p.g(\) 0 ' (/) ~~ -1>-Q 0 o~ ,;-l"1:l 'I-J ~ U c....p. 0 0 (/) .... (\) ~~ rPotP (/) ?-~ 0'F (\) ~-<. (\) (\) ;:'z ~~ ;:.Z r'(\)~ ?J,. ?J,. C>'$, ~ ~~ ~ ~O' ~ '$, '20 p. "0 ~ ~ 'f3 $. (j (j ~~ c~g. <:. (\) ~ ~ * (i.' ~. * g.~ .... rP~-1 .... (\) (\) I-J ~ 0 (\) ..... ~ I-J p.p. ~~ g t..;) p.p. 0 C> :;:> -------------------- ,?; ,0 $. c '" g; g. S"~ :; - r-'2 Ef S ~ ::l C e:- o ~ ~ a' o' ::l I S' ~ o' Pi I <> ::l e: tv :2 - g- o tv 1 ~ I t~ "''':{ p: ,~ ZZ:>"Tj o~no ...,3@0 tT1a-~"'\ (1) (JQ (/'J v.>",$1)'O o ~ ...., (1) ..., .--.. ~ 0 ~ "'\ - 0 III '" ~ ;- ~ o ~ <: (1) ::r n' (Q ..., "'\ -6' III Z ~ (1) "'\ o ...., ~ ::l - a C ::l ~: (/'J .0 C ~ n "Tj o o Pi' ~ '-" Z n ZZ n5> Z n - "-..) ~ o ZZ 5>5> - "-..) ~ o v.> ~z 5> 0- 2.6' '< 0 v.>:3 -..) 0011 >N n 0'\ ... 00 ~ (/'J " "Tj >0 :3 ...., (1) () ::l 0 ~g ::l (1) ... "'\ Z ~. o a _(/'J 0'0 . ~ ~g ~ g. "-..) t-J o o o &. i\ ZZZc:l> Os:::~cn t:l -. ... ...,;:> - (1) tT1 a- a- e: ~ v.>~~Jg(1) 00.--.. ""''''''0 ...,tT1... o :3 0 __ III ~ .... '" --(/'J <~ .0 g.(1)S::: _.~ ~ n (1) (Q '"rj ..., 0 "'\ 0 -. - '0 ~ '" (JQ ($ '-" Z n ~ o o ...- w "00 - Vt ~ o o , J "1 ~ ~~ ~g ;;. tr (1) '" ll:l F ~ (1) .... ~ ZZZ 5>n5> w Z8N ~-o -..) :>00- o v.> SJ - \C ~ 0'\ -..) Z Y' Z 5>c;5> 00 (/'J (\) (\) '"l:I :r 0. (1) ... ..., 8 g g t'"" (1) ::+ (1) ... 0. e; (1) 0. N N 00 23 o ~(/'J ~ g n () ::ro ~~ 0(1) 0'" on. " ~ ~c (\) '" ::l (1) o.() :3 ~ (1) Vl ::l ~. z~ o e; :.- o' o::l I Q ~ ~ ::r (1) 0. \i , i ~ I, , p ?; '" s: (1) ::l .... e!: ZZ:>Z:jZ O~~E'O~:3 -Ja-~&(1)a- tT1(1)(JQ (1)0 (1) v.>"'$1).......,.., o 000 ...., ....,~...., ..., t'""(1)O g. s.~~ \>) Vl::l (1) - (JQ == < S' (1) c(JQ ::r ::l - --. C n' (Q Vl e, - ..., III .., -6' III 0'\ '" v.> o o ....,(/'J ... ($ \>) (\) ER'"l:I n S' ~~ \>) ... -...., '< "'\ ~.o III s::: c.S ~g 0.- :>.0 ~ s::: ~~ ~:3 ;-l~ g~ -Z o '"l:I () '1:t:: - N Z ~:- Ozs:::o ...,~::;'O tI1 > -. 0 '"rj Vt ~, -< O~~O :>> v.> 1..> Vt Z ~ OzE.. @ 5> :;t. ~ Vt "Tj0 ~. -< ~~ E..E.. cr. ~. I I "Tj"Tj ~J, '7'7 ~~ ~ ~ n n ::r::r -..);-l NN 00 00 0.0 >> :3 S (1) (1) ::l ::l 0.0. S 3 (1) (1) ::l ::l ... - ZZ ? ? 00 \~ "'"3 >1'( ~;g dO oo~ t'!1 (") = ~ C'.l t'!1 (") ~ t.'!'j C'.l o ~ \9 ~ >0 Zlod C'.l0 ~~ t:;; o \lod e t'"~ ~z >- t'" 1(") lod =t;;~ >. < zo~ ~ 0 t'!1 0 00 ~ o >- "'"3 t'!1 o ~ (") ::c. >- z C'.l ~ 00 ~ ~ 00 l-3 ~ l-3 """"" > t'" >,0 ~ ~~< MZ""""" Zl-3~ ~e""""" ~~o M""O'Z z>t:::' l-3 ~.~ Z~l-3 Ol~ ....~~ N~Z ~ """"" o Z ("') == > ~ j 1 it IT1 0 ;,C) ~~ ';l>>r./'l1;:l~ ~~ ~~ '"'!"{; 'g ~"d~~ "d ~ ("> _(ll ~ .... ~ 0$. ~ ~ n. ~~ ~ a~ c:: '6 Po ~~'"'\" r./'l ....~ 00 ~p. '" "d 'C.g a~ ~O~ ~ ~ (ll fj')~ S",:;; '"'\ """l t:. n ~ ~ ~ o 0 (ll -.... ca ~ ? '" e s.... n ~ \ :;:-. 0 ;:) ~ e- O rO-'2 zzzW ~ ~ B r./'l~ifl ". ~~ ~ 0% %.... ~ ~ rl;:,-e:rO: (ll ~ l~~' (ll"t!- f>) (ll rrl (ll (ll a- ug ~. ... f>) be;~ l!? (ll ~~~ ug ...,......(JQ ~ o' 89 e' p. 0 ~~.... o 0 ~ ~ ....,""'0 (ll (l> '" (ll ~i rl~6 {""'} <. "t! (l) ~ P. (l) 9. '" ~ ~ .... c; ~O f>) >0 '" (ll "Cl -c;r./'l ;:-, ~ ; ~~ <-<. ~ ~ ~ l!? <. ~ o' ;:) (l) (l) o' (l) .... pJ{] e:.~ e; \ n - a> ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~r./'l.-n .g ~(l) rl ~ 0 ~ ~ .... Po 0 0 l""":~~ S" ?i '" "Cl ~ (JQ %. a> '" "'~ p. ~ .... ~ ...,00 It ~ .... % ..., z-~ z Zz Z -l zzz Z _-.otJ ?i); () ,od 0 i.J, ()_o ?i 00 ?i()0 ?i ~o ~C~ ~~ ~?i~ 0 z~~ f% dC'O -l 00 ~~z .l> v- v- el' tJ el' 000~ 00 .l>ON 0 00 0 ~G'J Z "'d d i.J, Ii ~~~ '" ". l \ ~ z~;..) O\~ , j~ ..%~ ~~~ <.Jl~-.o tJ tJ v- ~ ~ .l> ~-.o \~; z v- ~ .l> el' 0000 :.0 ~ .... <?el'z <::> i.,.>o--N - ~. < el' 0- - 00- oov- ". ..., ". G'J 0 ~ t!i 0 ~ fj') t~ d ~ ~ ~ (l) g..~ 't"1 """ -la> ~ tJ S' on 0.... ~ o~ ~ '" ~ 0 .... ~ p c,. ~ (l) t; tit ..., -.0 ~ P. ~ 0 Z 0 --0 () - ? ----.--..------------ "':I?; 15 ~. ~~ 'a':f? S'c, r.o s- t ~ %. \ ~. 'A t % %. '::l 'A o' , ~ e: ~ - ~ z7:.. O';\:>' II II Z,Z o 9- 9';\:>' ~'\ ugo ~ 0' So \J\.l>- N- v>. -~ ....';\:>'~- ,..,.;~~ 0;::::0 \>) G' ::T 0 .... ~. ~ 'e. (l) 0;+ ~ '0 ~ ~~ g.~ tug ~~O(l)Q:(l) -" 0 ,... p. ;>( e. C. e. ~ t'" ~ C~<9-~g. e,. ?O g. e. ~ (l) C; '6 '(;" <. _~~ !:?....~(l) "" (l) ~ ~~. e. g 5" 'd' ~ ~ Q:::l~~ ug >'d C ~. ...... (l)</:. "0 ..... -.:\.. <J> ;. ~. '0 !:? '1 g~. c:. ~ p..~ ~ ~ OM ... \>) ::l C. 0 '< t"'g ;;! ~ l~ ;; u, <J> ~ ::l ~ '0.... ~ ~ u,u, ~ US' S. g. ~ \>) ~ ~ y; ~~. 'd" p.."- <J> (5 . ~~ 0 z ~~ 0 ~'< ~ \>) ~~ C~ rJl C- (l)~ rJ) ~ p ~ <. 'G ~ ~ ~ ~ o S ~ ?; ~ ; e. o ~ e 'a .... <J> :r ~ g. (l) p.. ifJ (l) (l) a- (l) () g e: ~. g z ? ....J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fi ~ l""'I ~ Q~ ""-0< ~~l""'I ~'Z~ Z'2l""'1 d~~ ~~d ~~.~ 'Z~~ O\~ .-.~~ ~~'Z ~ o 'Z g ~ l"" a ~ ~ (l) % ~ ~ ~ c; ~ P- er '< .... ~ ~ c. g !:? (l) W> ~ ~ 8,. (l) $?. ~ ... ; e. ~" 'd ug ~ .... ~ g ~ .... 0;:::: r:1' (l) 0- '(),. a- ~ a- (l) ~ %- ~ ... Z ? -.0 :2~ z ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 C::::. 0 t"j '" '" WN_-3 -< ~ 8- . tTl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S' t"j So.So.o.So.So.o.o.l>> 2~ Vl S 3 3 S S 3 3 - ~ 3 - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > 0 r-S2 aaaaaaaaaaaO "tl -. <=> s.- 00\0-3 ZZZZZZZZZZZ> a: <> ooVl;:r o ? 0 ? ? ? 0 ? 0 0 ? ~ ~ Vloo~ __\Ooo-.lO\Vl.j::.WN- Z 'Oo"....!1>> NO,......,...... -i :> Vl-.l(") ,......,...... r/l r/l '" ONOl r/lr/l~~ 0 !:. u:> u:> I>> ~ ~ ~ ~ ::tl " .o.o(Jt:l ~~ZZ g ~ 0 ::Il::llu:> ZZOO t"j II II g- O 0 l"""f- l"""f- l"""f- t"""'f- ('t) ('t) ::tl ~ ('1)('1)..-..- ,......,......~ tIl tIl '-' '-' r/l a" -.I -.I N \0 - - 0-3 o' Vl 00 _. R?R? > :> ~ . u:> " 00-.11>> w N 0-3 a ~;:j3 '-' '-' ~ <> r/l 3 u:> u:> I>> S' .o.p ~. ~ a ::Il::ll3 ~ > o. . s:: NNNN""""""""""""""""""""..--...-- Z :> 003 _ONNWWWWWWWN 0 n SiSlo. OVloowwwwwwwoo 00 :::r ~nS2. __NN-.I-.I-.I-.I-.I-.I_\O > ~ ~ '-'~~ ::tl C::l +'+'3 t"j > 00 <> ,-....,-.... -. -3 :> .j::..j::.::l Q. . ~ ~ > N 000. "":I("'} "tl ::l OOer ::tl=:: t"j Z 00,< 0> ::tl -3 Q. 331>> NCr,OO\oooooow :S:z ("'} l-O 0 o 0 0. ~ <: < < 0. ~\oo~OOOOOv.w "tlC':l t"j 0 > (i). (i)" S' ::tlt"j Z t'" U:>U:>(Jt:I 0-3 ~ ~ ~ I>> t"j > ~ >,0 ~ ~~= -< C':l l-O .... ~ ~~-< u:> u:> s:: 0 t"j @ I>> u:> t'!'1 .... ~ c= t'!'1Zl-O .j::..j::.(") 'J'J ~ Z-3> 00j;) u:> u:> u:> O\Vl-.l-.lWWWWWWW "":I("'} "tl 00 ~~:j .o.p ~. t'!'1 ::Il~ ~\O~~-.I-.I-.I-.I-.I-.lW ::tl=:: ~ ~~O :=p. &l 0-0000 0> ::tl ~ t'!'1"'dZ a- ~""O =-. @ 3:z ("'} t'" ~ ~ 0 0C':l ~ > Z>~ .... .... ~ '2 -3~t'!'1 u:> u:> u:> c:=t"j 00 ~ g S' 0-3 00 Z -3 ~c.(") C':l > l-O OIt'!'1 '-'. - C':l ~ s:: .... 0. Z t"j l-O ~~~ S. > ~ (Jt:I ~ > N~Z I>> -3 ~ 'J'J 0 l-O > a c=C':lt:o 0 -3 00\0---...-..----..-- >::tlc= Z l-O (") ~~o,o,\o\o\o\o\o\o\o\o 0 ~ :::cO.... 0 . ~ 00000\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\ t"j'J'Jt"" Z 00-.1 Vl Vl \0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0 "":I'J'J~ ~ ~;:j"....!"....!v.v.v.v.v.v.v.v. ~ u:> ~. -.1-.100000000 0~C1 NNOOOOOOoo == ~ Ot"j > 0-3> c5" > ~ ~ C':l -3 ,...... ~ t"j ~ "":I("'}"tl ::tl=~ .0 o>::tl :s:Z("'} g ~J,.o~ooo~oo~ C':lt"j "tlt"jZ 0 o-.wo.j::.ooooooo ~ ::tl 0-3 - .j::. ~~ > n _ C':l ~ o t"j 0. ~ e 'J'J '-' "":I("'}"tl ::tl=~ O>::tl :S:z("'} ~ 0C':l~ I I I '0000000 ::tlt"jZ tJ\tJ\...-...- .". ". Vl_.j::..j::.OOOoooo .... 0-3 OW.j::..j::. C':l > - C':l Z > t"j ~ ;2~ z ~~~~~~~~~~~~ 0 .0 ::S. 0 t:".1 c: '" N_>-l <:: ~ 8- . tI1 = = = = = = = = = = = S' t:".1 2~ r/J sssssssssssa I:"'" s - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > 0 r-'2 gggggggggggo ""d -. 0 2. - >-l>-l zzzzzzzzzzz> ~ " ::r" ::r" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t:".1 f ~ ~ __...oOO-.JO\V\~WW\oooooo& Z o:J'" NO~~ -l c:: !:l ~ ~ r/J r/J c: =':G r/Jr/J~~ 0 E- o.'" ~ ~ ~ ~ :::0 0 -.(Jc; ~~zz ~ = ~ 0 (Jc; '" zzoo t:".1 C')::r" 00...... ~P"'I"t'tl~ :::0 .... 0 ~ ~ ~~ < ~ ~ 00 pi" '" -l o' ~ tn" RaRa > t, 0'" NN -l ~ Q S '-' '-' 0 3 >~ 00 s' a s' I:"'" a ~ > o' '" c:: --""'''''''''''NNNNNWN Z ::l ~S wO-..J-..J-..J\O\O\O\O\OO-..J t:; (") o 0. ~!'JOOO-..J-..J-..J-..J-..J""'O\ 00 ::r > ~ ~ ft \0 0\ :::0 e ~3 t:".1 ('") C::l > 00 <> o _. 0 --3 ::l <: = Q. ~ ~ ;3n""d a:: > N 0. :;! S' cr' 0:::t:t:".1 a:: Z Q. !::.'< ~>:::o --3 c:: '" N-OOVlOOOO~- t'!!'j 0 0. 0. ~ zn - <> ~ 0. -..J-oo!Xloooo'O ""d~t:".1 ~ > 0\ !Xl N w_ '" S' W :::Ot:".1z ('") t'" ""'(Jc; 8a t:".1 -l - >,0 ~ <:: > > 0"- - ~ t'" a::~< o c:: o t:".1 ... '" ~ ~ 0 e ~n t'!!'jZ- 00 00 Z--3> o - o ~ WN-..J-..J-..J-..J-..J-..J-..J-..J- ~n""d tlj ~e~ S ~, -..J-..Jooo' . . , . 0 :::o:::t:t:".1 ~ a:: a:: 0 '" ::n ""'_. . . 0\0\0\0\0\ 0>:::0 @n "Wl"NW .- t'!!'j ..... !:? N 00 @ zn t'!!'j"'CZ ~~~t:".1 00 N _. - Z>~ 0\0 Ot:".1Z ~ ooi;; :::0 -l --3~tlj '" _. ..... > Z Z --3 ..c = , n ~ ~ > Olt'!!'j ::p2" ..... t:".1 --3 . 0. Z -~~ "0 -. > - ~ = 0 ....(Jc; I:"'" N~Z .... '" Z o (') oo~= 00 > o 0 ? ~ 0:::00 e --3 -..J-..Jwwwwwwwwww >0- a:: - NN-..J-..J-..JOOOoooo :::0001:"'" 0 ~ oooowwwooooooo a:: .... ':....!':....!NNNOOOOOOO t:".1oog Z n a 0\0\0000000000000 ~>z > ('") 00000000000000000 O:::O~ ~ 0 0t:".1 == ~ ~ '" -l> > liQ' > ~ = !:? ~ o' t:".1 = ~ ~ :::0 ~ cicl On""C:l :i::::t:t:".1 (') O\OOONOOOOOO ""C:l>:::O 0 O~OO""'oooooo ~ :::OZn s:::: N "'" t:".1~t:".1 ~s:::: <::t:".1Z _ -l 0 o > - 2jj ~ .(') 0 - ~ ::r: ;:0 ~ On""d 0. :i:::ct:".1 s:::: ~ 0>:::0 C --NNNOOOOOO ;:oZQ '-' ""'''''''''''''''''''''000000 -~Z !'J!'J"",,,,,,,,,,, :Jt'I':I-l W'...) - > ~ ~ I:"'" t:".1 09~~4 2001 17 06 5613'56259 BOYNTON BEACH P & Z PAGE 01 I CITY ~ BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOU ,-EV ARD PO B X 310 BOYNrON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLAN~NG AND ZONING DliTISION I i .to: i Eugene Gerlica, P .E. fax #:! 561-740-2429 date: ; September 4, 2001 from. ! Lusia Galav, PrincIpal 1 re: ll:iT ReVIew Comments: 'larmer for Quantum Park NOPC # 12 MPMD 01-003 Pleas~ fmd attached the first reVlew comments for your proJect. To stay on the curre~t reVIew schedule, plea,e do the followmg steps listed below~ and bnng all I docu~ents to the TRC schedu1led for Tuesday September 11, 2001 1 eVlse your plans mcorpor:r ting all comments listed herem, including the addItIOn of otes on plans to confirm rl sponse to general statementsl comments, and bring 10 copies o the TRC review meeting, (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally subnutted), 4 2 ubmit the addItional Infou; nation as requested WIthin the attached comments; ( i.e. traffic ,analYSIs, engmeenng certifi;atlOn, ~tc.) , 3 repare a wntten response ,17 copies) consIstmg of a hst bnefly sununanzmg how each comment has been addresst, d on the revIsed plans or WIth the supplemental mformatIon includmg location on the pI IDS ( tIllS promotes an expedItIOus 2nd reVIew by staff and our project representatIve~; during the TRC meetmg );and 'Submit reductIons (8 ~ X 11) for the proposed Isite plans, elevations and la ldscaping plan (this " ' iIS requIred for the fInal rep(' rt and publIc rresentatlon). :J I I J :~ Planning and Zonmg DIvision City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 u~ U~ LUU~ ~ UO .JOJ...J ::lOL:::l':l nUYI'l1 UN tH::.I-1L:H t-' 6< L t-'1-1l:iE 02 I , I The apr:1 hcant should not attend a 1 RC (2Jld revIew) Wlt11 all documents have been revIsed and copIed or staff review If plans w 11 not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC meetm , contact Lusla Galav m th,5 office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date. Projects deviatmg from the ongma; schedule are elIgible for review at subsequent meetmgs, which are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale;:, by the Thwsday pnor to the Tuesday TRC meeting that you def Ire to attend. The remamder of the reVIew schedule w1l1 be adJuste~ accordingly If you have luestions on the attached comments, please contact the respect1ve reVIewer llSmg the attac led lIst ofTRC representatIves lIthe plans are reasonably complet:~ and all sIgnificant comments are addressed following TRC (2nd review), the prOject is forward,:d to the Plannmg and Development Board Meeting that falls approxilmately 2 to 3 weeks follow ng the TRC meetmg. An ""',, by any comment Identtfies a commert that must be addressed pI lor to movmg forward to the Planning and Development board. ! I Note. hems recognIzed by staff a1: typIcally outstandmg at tlus pomt Include a traffic report tmdlor confirmation of the t'affic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County dramage certIficatIOn by a I censed engineer, SIgned "Rider to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn" fonn and colored elevatlOm of the proposed proJect. ThIS mformation IS necessary for the project to proceed. IfYt u have submitted tlus mformabon, please dIsregard tlus note_ Engmeerng John c: ruidry Laurinda Logan 742~6482 742-6285 BUIldl]. Don J >hnson Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6357 Fire D artment Steve :iale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382 Roger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357 PolIce orartment Marsball Gage Sgt. James Prestman 737-6167 742-6185 Utllitle~J John hUldry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285 PublIc J.orks-General Larry ~umn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285 PublIc Works-Traffic Jeffer LIvergood 742-6201 742-6211 Parks & kecreation John'lildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233 Forester~nvIronmentahst KevIn Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259 PlanmnJ & Zonmg Micha:l Rumpf, LUSla Galav 742-6262 742-6259 i CIW' WAN Revised 03/h 1/0 1 i s:IP,.nlli,;g\sH1REDiWP\FORMS,hl REV COMMENTS FAX OR!" \1'1 R...i<w comments PAX COVEltdoc -I 09~~4(2001 17 05 551J'55259 BOYNTON BEACH P & Z PAGE 01 I i Fabsimile T SMITTAL l CITY ~ BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOU,-EVARD PO 8 X 310 BOYNlON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLAN~ING AND ZONING DI: iTISION I j Eugene Gerlica, P .E. 561-740-2429 : September 4, 2001 ' Lusia Galav, Principall'lanner 1 Review Comments : for Quantum Park NOPC # 12 MPMD 01-003 ; .to fax #:i date. from:' re: I Pleas~ find attached the first review comments for your proJect. To stay on the current reView schedule, plea,e do the followmg steps hsted below~ and bring all I documents to the TRC schedu1led for Tuesday September 11, 2001 ! 1 eVIse your plans mcorpor:, tmg all comments hsted herem, including the addition of otes on plans to confirm rl sponse to general statements/ comments, and bring 10 caples o the TRC reVIew meeting, (full sets mcluding all pages orIgmally submItted), 2 SubmIt the addItional infor;: nation as requested wltlun the attached comments; ( I.e. traffic lanalYSIs, engmeenng certlfi ;;ation, ~tc.) I 3 ! repare a wntten response '17 copies) consisting of a lIst bnefly summarizing how each comment has been addresst:d on the revised plans or wItb the supplemental mformatIOn includmg location on the pI IDS ( thIs promotes an expeditious 2nd revtew by staff and our project representative!; during the TRC meeting );and 4 ISubmIt reductions (8 ~ X I 1) for the proposed Isite plans, elevatIOns and 18 ldscaping plan (thIS iis required for the fInal repl.,rt and publIc rresentatIon) Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 U:J U'-f L()U..L uo -.JO..l-, ::)OL:J:j wU , I" I UN bt.Ht....H t-' ;5, L t-'i-iGE 02 , I The aP:IICant should not attend a 1 RC (2nd revIew) Wlhl all documents have been revIsed and copIed or staff review If plans w 11 not be fully reVIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC meetm , contact Lusla Galav m th 5 office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date. Projects deviatmg from the ongma; schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetings, whIch ~e held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday prior to the , . Tuesda~ TRC meetmg that you def Ire to attend. The remamder of the reVIew schedule wIll be adJ\lste~ accordingly If you have luestlOns on the attached comments, please contact the respective reVIewer uSJng the attac:! led 115t of TRC representatives. If the plans are reasonably complet~ and all sigmficant comments are addressed following TRC (2nd reJiew), the project is forward-.ld to the Plannmg and Development Board Meetmg that falls approxi!mately 2 to 3 weeks follow ng the TRC meetmg. An ">Ie" by any comment Idenllfies a commert that must be addressed pI lor to movmg forward to the Plannmg and Development board. I I Note. ttems recognIzed by staff a~: typIcally outstandIng at thIs pomt mclude a traffic report bd/or confirmatIon of the t 'aftic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County fuamage certificatIOn by a ] censed engmeer, SIgned "RIder to SIte Plan Appbeatlon" fonn and colored elevatlOm: of the proposed proJect. Thls mformation IS necessary for the project to proceed. IfYI' u have submitted tlus mformatIon, please dIsregard thIs note. Engmee ng John (: ,uidry Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6285 Buddm Don J, >hnson Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6357 Steve 3-ale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382 PublIc \i orks- Traffic Parks & ~ecreation Forester~nvironmentalist Kevin Hallahan PlanmnJ & Zonmg Revised oJ1/Ol I I s:IP,.nlliIlSISH1RED,WP\FOR.'1S,I.t REV COMMENTS FAX OlU' 11" R...i<w comments PAX COVER. doc '\ Pollee PublIc Marsb all Gage John (rUldry Larry ~umn Roger Kemmer Sgt. James Prestmari H DaVId Kelley Jr Ken Hall J effer LIvergood John'lildner Barbara Meacham KeVIn Hallahan Micha: ~l Rumpf, CHAIWAN LUSla Galav 742-6753 737-6167 742-6488 742-6283 742-6201 742-6227 742-6267 742-6262 742-6357 742-6185 742-6285 742-6285 742-6211 742-6233 742-6259 742-6259 UJ ~~ LUU~ ~ UU -..iO~-, ::JOL::J'j DEPARTkNTS ORKS - General uTILlT Commen s: 1---'--"'L~t5 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 tro total of 14 lots) were the sub (NtPMD 00-007) to wruch w ~orandum #01-012, dated. c ents, we stated that WIth tl fo Commercial, Industrial, 0 IntUStrial' and/or Office, Indust w stewater systems to support c structed for those anticIpa cdnfigured to handle the wastE: ade park. , i 2. As J:jrevtously stated, the propose( (MU)" to mclude Office, Comroe utility support facIlIties to theIr hI into reach group of lot approval cons ltant shall demonstrate that avaI ble to support the proposed upgr de(s) to allow for the propo~ insu ficient utihty support to tius user . 3 APp~icant 15 requesting that Lot 3 lIeu rthat Lot 34-C was open sp:' overflow from Tract "1"), applic31 ret~on area of thIS lot is no longf reteJition requirement get transk (unsJgned) does not mdicate that f' requ~red, nor has the "As-Built Ma: reco~d ROSSI and Malavasi EngIne, It '^' 11 be te ulted to submIt the b: OUYI'l1 UN bt.AI..,;H t-' 6, L I-'HGE 133 1st :F:EVIEW COMMENTS 1\1: aster Plan Modification File 01-003 WIth an Au~ust 14. 2001 INCLUDE REJECT f LlVergood, Public Works Duector dated : . U 31, located on QuantUm Boulevard (a : ect of Quantum Park Amendment #11 ,. responded to in Utilities Department ,muary II, 2001 To recapitulate those : e ongInal DRl for the total park designed . nee, or a combination of Office and : la1 and CommercIal, both the water and : these type of uses was deSigned and I ed uses. Four (4) bft statIOns were : ;yater generation antiCIpated In the 550 : revision to the land use to "Mixed Use i 'cial !l1!d Residential uses could tax the ,uts. A proviso needs to be incorporated .; process, that the deSIgn engineenng suffiCIent utility system(s) capacIty is . use, or they will prOVide the necessary . ~d use Failure to do so could result in . park, effectmg other current (exIstmg) ,.-c be converted to Industrial usage. In . ce designated for dry retentlon (as an . t 15 required to demonstrate that the dry r needed, or to which 10Vtract did the dry red. The partIal letter from SFWMD Ie dry retention of Lot 34-C is no longer ;ter Drainage Plan" from the engineer-of- rs, Inc., ever been submitted to the City ck-up documentatIOn to substantiate that UJ u'-t LUU.L uo .::JOol...; ::JOL:J=' OUYNIUN b~HCH ~ & Z Pi-1GE 04 I MPl'vID 1 SJ REVIEW COM.tv1ENTS i9/04/O 1 1 I DEP AR L the I licant's re uest for land us' 1bi110t 15 also at the low point ale drafuage structures and the discha: mdifate how he plans to trea. t thIS tworlane roadway section and the f sectton. lNCLUDE REJECT conversIOn. ng Miner Road whH:h has roadway ge mto Lot 34-C. The applicant does not 'oadway dram age, both for the current llhrnate four-lane d1vlded roadway ntum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, r system segments, to whIch at least QIler WIll be reqUIred to be utiIrtv easement(s). .neOlttes" will be permitted on the utihty and/or sIdewalk. TIus department will ~ble impacts on the traffic dIstributIon .guration" Submitted traffic analysis by 'affic performance standards. e pnor to any constructIon above grade. turn Lake Dnve will reqUIre replatting of ccordance with the requirements of the i Change, Section 5 4) IS proposed to be ) Industrial use. How wiIl thIS change Ifk areas within the development? ach County Engineering will permit a ad for Lot 34C. Show how a second rided at the south end of the property for }sment of Tract 34C will be reqUIred as 4 5 t\ml Lakes Drive, from QUI: con InS both water and wastewat-! al of the dedicated ri ht-o -wa NO~I ncipated pennanent "park a ease ent(s), other than soddmg req 're demonstration that "negh resu ting from the roadway recant '\ the qonsultant does not meet DRl t I FIRE 6. Roa 5 and hydrants must be m plat POLICE I Commend: None ENGINE$,rnG DMSION Commen s: / AbJdonment of a portIon of QUa!. that omon of Quantum Park m LD Cha ter 5 Plattin . 8 Lot 4C (Notification of a Propose~ chan ed from undeslgnated use t Impa t proposed open spaces and p; Pro de verification that Palm Bt' driVej Y opening onto Miner Rc: mgr~~s and egress point will be pre emergency semces. :1 If ap . roved, an enVIronmental aSSE art f an site submIttal. ~~ ~~/L~~L LI ~b :Jbl.:J :JbL:J':J HO "-lION BEACH P & Z PAGE 05 , i I MPMD lSJ REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/0 t I 3 ' DEP AR NTS Ab~donment of a portion of Qua roaqway easement along the nort! of aj Proposed Change, SectlOn 5 sm~e entrance pomt at the int QuXtum Boulevard. Elimination and ,the second access pomt will c no~erlY residents of the propo~ and would create a hazardous sit ace 55 northerl ortIOns of that sa Ab~donment of a portion of Q pottlon of it into Lot 101 will Cft nart erly tenants of the propose .\ S1tu tion for emergency SerYlces n, sam development. The!i reation of Lots 100 and 101 und 19nated to Industnal will c Traf IC Analysis (Quantum Park 1'1 In increase in daily or peak conciudes that there are no merea ~ i U).J tnps Idue to simultaneous increases: :)J.l (1 if, (t- v' InteriSlties, the analysis needs to ~'j~ \ \' voluJ!nes that would result from the The;,~raffiC Analysis (Quantum F clos e of a portlOn of Quantum U regi al roadway network. The ar: will ause the intersectIon of Gate~ to op,erate over capaClty dunng th changes in striping and roadway Wj a ti*table. Please be more speclfi inc<1'orated into the planmng pro, oublit;. Also olease address the iffi1 ,\ IJ.;/ tr-' , ~. ..." ~ ~ ~ V " ... IJ\I ~J: i.. ,j t. .(& (.~ "? ..,,' .1 ~ ~l. . ',:;ct ur ~'y...,,,, ,I Xl"'" ~ 1v 11(\ I v'{; '1 c'-<' ~t';'7 INCLUDE REJECT ! ltum Lake Dnve willlsolate the ded1cated , property line of Lot 61 The NotIficatlon ;, indicates access will be provided via a j :rsection of Quantum Lakes Drive and of that portion of Quantum Lakes DrIve : 'eate an undesirably long trip for the most 'ed multi~family l'eS1dential development . tatian for emergency services needing to : ne development. 'lantum Lake ])nve and reconfiguring a ; lte an undeslrably long tnp for the most ,i new lot and will create a hazardous ; ;eding to access northerly portlons of that ,I into a single Lot 102 would create the . )ve Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly ! ng-e. Section 5.5, paragraph 3, represents ':::es Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as i Itersectlon has previously been reVlewed l1txonal infonnation (accIdent data and ,tatement. , are new, developable parcels then an In heu of fee) may be assessed based on 1 park and the re-designation of Lot 34C from )viously increase traffic volumes. The OPC #12) states that" will not result hour volumes" Although the analys1s e5 m the approved daily and peak hour and decreases In allowable development :'urther address local changes in traffic proposed changes. irk NOPC # 12) aclmowledges that the kes Drive has the potentxal to impact the alysls further states that dlVerted traffic vay Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard PM peak hour The analysis proposes dening to address this without providing : as to how and when tills work will be :ess to minimize Impact to the travehng ,act these proposed chanll:es would have The ob ea' of a Pr osed Ch the ntersechon of Qumtum La subs andard and dangerous. This 1, and J'approved. Please provide ad: stan ard draWIngs) supporting this I If t; areas MU 10 I and Lot 34(' addi ional recreational fee (or land the 'gInal calculanons for the Cit' I U~ U4, LUUL L UO ::JtlL:i :JbL::d bU,NIUN BEHCH P & Z PHGE 85 ! MPMD IS . REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/01 4 1,000 units--272 units=72. 728 D U.x 015 =10.92 a INCLUDE REJECT nd law enforcement. fl as MU60A and MU61A to show each ; the abandorunent. Change MUlOO to from the Recreatlon DedtcatIOn [) wuts required In the most recent master edge, however, to provide appropriate unItS. (To be detennined m conjunction requlfement will be calculated as ~DU ;res ~ requirement of land dedIcation or 3.tion credit will be calculated as follows. :5 iven for natural resources against the Jr payment of fees. ~ credIt for natural ollows. 'es .ider dedicatIOn of the land, or a ee. by the commission, IS subtracted off the Sechon 3 of the Land Development ride 5 park elements in order to qualify 'ovided. recreation fees or dedlcations for the on I ccess by emergency vehicles Ide*tify the tract shown as MUll lot' . addItional property due t< t02A. Comme ts: None PARKS AND RECREATION Conune t8: 'I I 19 The!C1tyCommisslon dId exempt" Req~irement, 272 umts of the I,O( plan! revislOo. The developer did p public recreation facihties for thesl Wit~ the Parks DIvision.) IThe total recreation dedIcatiol follows: ! 20 I , ~Icredit may be given agamst fro payment of fees. !I;z pnvate reen' I r I 1 10.92 acres / 2=546 acr . addluonall/4 credit may be f r~qulrement of land dedIcatIon . rfsources \\<111 be calculated as I ~i 10.92 acres/4 = 273 a(' e developer may want to con I mbination of dedication and r NaJ.w resource credIt, if approvec: Recxtatlon Dedication Requuemen I Accqrding to Chapter 1, Article V . Regct,latIon, the developer must pro: for credIt for pnvate recreation p. If thJ is oot further latted, 'I I I ! 21 22. U~ U4 LUUL L UO ::JtlL..:i :JbL:J'::J bU NTON BEACH P & Z PHGE 07 ~ 24 ~t' 1\ ,(f ~, ~1 '"" '1./.1:".' l) I I MPMD 181 REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/01 I 5 ' DEP AR~MENTS INCLUDE REJECT 728 non- ; xempt dwellmg umts are due )efore the lssumg of their resIdential buildm enmts. FORESTkR/ENVlRONMENTALIST I I ComrneJl1ts: 23 I ani. requestmg the applicant as a ! :ondItlOn to the above Master Plan ~o~Ification to respond to my lett ~ of May 14, 2001 (as dIrected by our Ctt)l Manager) In reference to the r 2uantum Park-DRl Annual L En onmental Areas Status RepOl L ." .1 Lot 4-C IS shown on the Quantur./l Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detehtion (open space) area and is :ontlguous to the 257 acres Sand Pme presbrve. The land use change of 1, >t 34-C from detention (open spac9 md~stnal, could affect the envlron'nenta1 qualtty of the contIguous S nd Ptn~ Preserve when the mdustriall -act IS developed by the owner . c' l iv 25 In ecember 1998 a 6~foot hIgh cl: am hnk fence was installed arOlmd 1 ) I t 34-C (6.S8acres) and 2.) ater Management Tract ''Y' (r,..16 acres) and connected to the existing fenc around the penmeter of the 3) and Pine Preserve (25.7 acres I. TIu was to protect the enVIronmer tal quality of the total of 38.44 acres in the t, ee separate tracts, and sugge :t that the three tracts are aU one and sho~ as open space / Sand Pine F' -eserve on the Quantum Master Plan. ThIS area should remain as open sp ice I Sand Pine Preserve. The rOJect should continue III the lOrmal reVIew process. PL~G AND ZONING l i Comments: , 26. The land Use Acreage Table is in::orrect as shown on page 5 of the NOpe apPlt~atlOn. Amendment #10 was .pproved for 84.35 ac of(Ol) and 26.33 ac. or (OIC) Correct this mformah m on the apphcatIOn. 27 The iLand Use Acreage Tables O! 1 page 5 of the application and on the Mas~er Plan drawIng show a decI' ~ase in the (arC) category (26.33 acres appr ved, 22.94 acres proposed) Jut the amendment does not propose a ohan e to any (OlC) designated lot. Please explain? 28. The land Use Acreage Table on Pi: ge 5 of the appl1catlOn and on the NOPC Mas~ Plsn #12 drawing is inCOl,rect The eXtsting (MU) lots add up to 62.38 acres, The additional (MU ,ots ro osed In thIS amendment add u UJ U'-t ..::..utJ..L uo ::JoLJ ::JOL::J~ bU ,'<, UN bt:.HGH t-' <:(, L PHGE 138 I MPMD 1St REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/01 6 4'~ ~,q ~~ '1 ct Cf CC IS.~ ~1, L ~ qO,~5"' C,o?"36 - 'Z. ~- 2- f l c:;; 00 ) INCLUDE REJECT ! ,tl 89.20 acres not 9065 as shown on the ; acrss in the application but 6.56 acres has , Jry on the Master Plan. The development ! Its through NOPC #8 have tdenttfied thIS ~ consIstent, use the 6.59-acre Site area Master Plan as "Detenhon" up through ~8. For some reason, the detentton label ~lans #9 or #10 even though no change to :posed or approved m either amendment. ith no development deSignatIon assigned. cation and provide data and analysis to for detentIOn. as for proposed lots 100 and 101, ge 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 lcres of open space. Does tlus reflect the us any open space associated with the :ase clarify highlIghted as conmutted development. 8/7/01 TIllS should also be reflected in :he Pinder Troutman traffic analysts. ted as committed development (Oriana lUted on 6/6/00 This should be reflected n the Pinder Troutman traffic analysis. e acreage for the Industrial category is allowable intensity for this category is Please clarify this mconsistency :age for the Office categones (0, 01) IS ;ity for this category IS mcreasing by 72, , '1COnsIstency led new access from Miner Road for Lot :ifieally address tms access since it IS not m system for the rest of the PID How and how will It Impact Miner Road? contains two converSlOn formulas for :ar on the Master Plan. As shown they Jnnulas for the same use - Residential these formulas? Please clarify this ENTS 6 acres. Together they tot . Please correct. 29 Lot 34-C 1S shown as having 6.58 bee~ added to the Industrial cate~ order and Master Plan Amendme tract as having 6.59 acres. To t caZdu a . on. 25 Lot 134-C has been labeled on th NOrC Master Plan Amendment doe, not appear on NOPC Master the ! esignatIOn of this lot was prl Thi lot remams a Detention lot VI' Ple e indIcate this in your appl ort the elimmatIOn of thIS are~; .1 de s1te area acreage calculati{' 26. 27 I The Land use acreage Table on pi: dra . ing shows a net loss of 8 02 6.59 acre Detention lot (34-C) P eli nation of the right~f-way? P], 28 Lots 73-A through 76 should be Site Plan approval was granted or, the ~toject traffic 2002 estimate in Lot. O-A should also be highligJ; Gr de) Site Plan approval was gr in th project traffic 2001 estimate 29 30 The! Master Plan mdicates that tl. incr~s1ng by 6.56 acres yet the decr~asing by 375, 354 square feet. I The Master Plan indicates the acT' deer asing; yet the allowable inteni 922 quare feet Please clanfy this 31 32 The jMaster Plan mdicates a propo! 34-C~ The traffic analYSIS must spei inte~ated mto the traffic circulati manY, trips are allocated for this site The:1 NOpe apphcation page 9 resIdbthal units. They do not app' proae rn'o dIfferent conversion j' Unit.; What is the pumose of 33 gfJ ~Js- l 4-S;~ LV>>',) U~I U4, LUUL LI UO ::JtlLj :ltlL:J::I I I MPMD lS~ REVIEW CO~lENTS ~9/04/01 I DEPAR1 inc nsistency or remove them fror 34 A roval of the Master Plan IS C( dation by the City This is bas€ Stathtes: , a) Chapter 38006 (19) (b) 9 An bf five (5) percent of 50 units, , b) ~aPter 380 06 (19) (e) S.C. No. ) to the contrary, a proposed c . d decreases of at least two 0 d velopment of regional impact three uses specIfied m 380 use. '\ c) d18pter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b. s~'bparagraph (b) 16., any chan! oe any area which was speci. d$elopment approval or In f: b tIers, or specIal protection, s cies, archeological and histor The application as presented is pre!' presUlnption may be rebutted b) apPliC~. t must prOVIde additional sub~tial deVlation IS made. The aCi . ~revised traffic analYSIS based. unty and the CIty of Boynton - emonstrate how the propo~' IcclIndustrial (01) categork e Comprehensive Plan. ptoVlde an updated analysis O' i,' k clearly indIcating the impEi c rrent Detention Tract 34.C WI' D monstrate how a net loss . tigated. 35 Und~r the conditlOn of Amendmel Ord~ and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV (: traf~I analysis is required for thJ sub .tted a traffic analysis. In lieu staff and the Palm Beach COWlty stud~. ! 36, The falm Beach COlUlty Traffic Dl' deni~d approval due to the fol1ow11'~ a. ~ traffic generated by the higl: be, counted as vested tnps within ge. erations. b. D; 'ly and peak hour trIpS relate A achment5 lA. IB and Ie. ffil I bU,NIUN BEHCH P 6 Z PAGE 89 INCLUDE REJECT , '1 the applIcation. . ntingent upon a finding of no substantial i:i on the followmg sections of the Florida increase in the number of dwelling units 'hlchever is greater . withstandmg any proviSIOn in paragraph , l.B.11ge consisting of simultaneous Increase the uses within an authorized multi-use which was origina.lly approved with more )651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and residentlal Except for the types of uses listed In e which would result m the development ically set aside in the applIcation for le development order for preservation, including habitat for plant and annnal cal sites and other special areas umed to be a substantial deviation. This clear and convincing evidence. The nfonnation before determination of no ditional informatlon must mclude: on comments receIved from Palm Beach Beach Technical Review Committee. ~d change from the Office (0) and j to the MU category is consistent with the master drainage plan for Quantum :ts that an mdustrial development on the uld have. of 8 02 acres of open space will be t #8 to the Quantum Park Development f the Land Development Regulations, a s Master Plan approval. The applicant of an mdependent traffic consultant, the Traffic Division will review the traffic illSion has reviewed the traffic study and ~. ,,' school (about 2,283 daily trips) should the overall Quantum development traffic :l to "ADA Approvals" as presented in 5t reflect the values of the latest NOPC U~ U~ LUUL ~ UO ::JtlL,j :JtlL:J~ ~u NIUN b~H~H ~ & L PHGE 18 I I I MPMD 1St REVIEW COMMENTS 09/04/01 8 I I DEPARtMENTS INCLUDE REJECT a~provaL (Ref.iLetter from Masoud Atefi, Pa m Beach County to MIchael Rmnpf dated 8/2~%~) Please respond to these comments and revise the traffic study acco mgly I 37 Th~ NOPC Master Plan submittal did not include a conceptual SIte plan or JUS fication for the requested cl mge. The CIty approved the Mixed.Use destrtlOD when It adopted Amtn<lment #10 in March 2000 Tn date, no dev 10pment has been proposed w:uch combines all the uses required by the Lan Development Regulatlons 11 the defimtlOtl of a Mixed Use Pod in a pIb' The only plans subrmtted lOd approved to date are for Villas at Qm atum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay) , 38. The Villas at Quantum Lake site ::Ilan was approved with an access at the nort end of the site from Lot 61 llong an easement on lot 62 to Quantum 'I Lak s Dove eventually leadUlg O.lt to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed Mas ex- Plan does not mdicate this' access. Please correct the Master Plan to refle t the approved access for the 'esidential proJect. 39 The ~wners of the Villas at Quanu'm Lake proj ect have contacted the city in wnt regardmg their concerns th it any development on proposed lots 100 and 101 J if not bUIlt in coordinal: on WIth their project, may impact their acce s, frontage, VIsibility, setback'J density, open space and eXIstmg views. Has Jthe applicant contacted the IdJacent property owner to discuss the Imp 015 of this NOPC proposal? I' is imperatIve that the adjacent property own~rs are apprised of and be Ul af reement with this proposed change. I 40 The troposed abandonment of a J: nrtion of Quantum Lakes Drive and the crea . on of Lots 100, 101 and 103 N'ill reqUlre a replat of that portIon of the PID lat. 41 On !:une 25, 2001, a letter was Sf nt to David, B Norris, Counsel for the app=t requesting several revisi HIS to the Annual Status Report for the Qu tum Park Pro DR!. To dati;, those revisions have not been made. Plea e re\tise the annual report ace )rdmgly and provide the reVISIons at the Sent mber 11, 2001 TRC meetmg: 42. Rev se the Substantial Deviation Chart in the application for the Open Spacfs category The chart indicaks N/C for the proposed change when the ehmipatIOIl of the detention area H proposed. Also review the numbers for the !~stnal and Office categori", as they do not match the NOpe Master Plan 12 drawing. . , MWR/sc Ii :1 s:\PlsnningISHARE8IWPlPROJECTSIOuslltum Pan. 2001 MPMD & F ~IAIMPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS.cloc I i I II ~~ ~q, L~~l 1 ~b ~bl..:l :JbL:J'j BIJ'(NTON BEACH P & Z PHGE 11 ( 'ITV OF BOYNTON BEACH PU lLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT IN' 'EROFFlCE MEMORANDUM TOi Mike Rumpf) Dit ~ctor of Planning and Zonmg ...... 1"1 ....' <a::'-s. - / / t.' ";C"l" -f'-'Vv' '] { v.Q../ C-~l-r Cc,..~'\~"::,S" /~v' 4........ ~(VC Jeffrey R. LIverg. lod, DIrector of Pubhe Works August 29,2001 I ~hc I s 17~ ,"=^-s ~(c ? Quantum NOPC i 12 ~/ (' I~rrcr ~f)c....tl I <:.-y" /,1 ~w...........f "5 tl!<..i<< I ha 'e reVlewed the proposed chlU'ges considered in NOPC #12 for Quantum Park. Quantum has req~ested that consideratlOn be gh en by the CIty to the closure of the eastern portion of Quantum Lak s Drive at Gateway Boulevar l. There are essentially three traffic Issues that merit evaluaoon and crutmy 'I QuJntum Lakes Drive Closure i Sta is of the OpInIOn that Quantu: n Lakes Dnve can safely be closed at Gateway Boulevard, Fra y, it is staff s opinion that tIi ~re IS value in closing Quantum Lakes Dnveway since thiS wou d effectively elIminate a coni lct pOint On a busy artenal route (Gateway Boulevard). Ho ever, In closing Quantum Lal<: ~s Drive, we must be cognizant of the revised access con gurations from Lots 100 and 02. Staff recommends that these two lots only be allowed to acce s Gateway Boulevard in a "ri ~ht in - right out" maMer Staff would oppose any smgle lot havi g full access onto Gateway SJ1Ce the driveways in question are located on the inside oftbe curv on Gateway and sight distaD!:e is lImIted. Tra~c Signalization, Quantum Orive and Gateway Boulevard Staf~ s re'Vlew of the traffic impact a.t the mtersectlon of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard is m9re complex. As part of the Ni )PC #11 submittal, the traffic consultant, Pindar Troutman, opintd that a traffic signal IS wa:rra: lted at thiS intersectIon based on peak hour warrants, or Wantant 11 from the Manual on U, ifonn Traffic Control Devices. With respect to NOPC #12, the cpnsultant has changed the mte' 'sectIon lane-markmg configuration by eltmmatIng one of two tlrrOl~gh lanes, both northbound an~ southbound, and substituting dedicated right turn lanes. This actio~ was logical because the aSS1.i mption was made that there would be very minimal north or sout~bound through movements at the intersection. Ultimately, the critical volwne sum that was uti1i~ed for level of service analysi. could be reduced. Thus the intersection theoretically will have:a higher traffic capacity I Howbver, whereas the cntIcallane,analysis prOVides mfonnation related to overall intersectlon capatIty, it does not lend itself to v: arrant analYSIS for signahzation. This analysis IS based on comJ?letely dIfferent critena establ:l ;hed in the Manual In Uniform Traffic Control DeVlces, the sam~ Manual utilized by the consu: tant in NOPC #11 submittal. The consultant has shown no c:fani es In the traffic dIstribution. 'Oms, the warrant analysis conducted by Pmdar Troutman and s arized in a report dated Febn ary 16,2001 is still vahd. In fact, as lots 7 through 11 and lots ,3 through 31 develop as Mix! d Use, they will most certamiy generale addilIonal traffic that Ii .1 'I I, j ~~ ~4IL~~L LI ~b ~b13i:JbL:J':J BOYNTON BEHCH P & Z PAGE 12 I wil} use the Intersection of Quant 1m Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. As such, the need for a traffic slgnal at this intersection v' ill be even more pronounced. Staff, therefore, recommends that the !developer immedtately have 1: lstalled a traffic achIated sIgnal at the intersection of Quantum BOfevard and Gateway Bouleva:: d_ The developer should post a letter of credit in an amount co ensurate \'lith the cost OfS11 nal constructIOn as a part of the approval of NO PC #12. Tr ffie Signalization, Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue I Thei traffic consultant did not eva; late traffic conditions at this intersectIon as part of the SU;E' 'ttal packet for NOPC #12. fowever, evaluanon of traffic conditions at this intersectIon is eq lly as cntical. Again, as part Jfthe NOPC #ll submittal, Pindar Troutman evaluated traffic 51 al warrant cnteria at the inten ~ction of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. In tillS ana~ysIs, Pmdar Troutman fOUTld t lat a traffic signal was not presently warranted at this intet-section based on the peak hot r warrant and noted that "there are other Warrants, No.2 - Interruption of Continuous Traffic' and No 10 - Peak Hour Delay that may be satIsfied. The rec~mmendat10n 1S that thIS mters! ~ction be monitored in the future. Appropriate time frames for mo itoring would be at the buildo~lt of Lots 32 through 38 and at the buildout of the NOPC 11 resi ential or non-residential land lSes, wluchever occurs first." Staff would note that a large portion oflots 32 through 38 are U)W complete in the fonn of the Premier building. 'I Furt~ermore, as part of Pmdar Trc .ltman' s traffic analystS m February of 200 1, the consultant assumed a build out of Lots 23 to 1 as office space (0) and Lots 7 to 11 as Office/Industnal (all:> However, the proposal is t~ now change these land uses to Mixed Use (MU) The devdloper continues to be bound b I a maximum number of daily tnps from the entire DRI, yet subtle changes in land use can si81: ificantly Impact peak hour traffic flows without impacting the dail* trip generation rate. The cor; ;ultant has not expressed an opmion on the changed traffic charjictenstics as related to traffic :ignal warrant analysis based on the changes to mixed use. I Starl-beheves that the developer s}, ould be required to post a letter of credit as well for the in~llation of a traffic-actuated sig nal at the IntersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Avetue, It is very likely that a SIg, lal will be warranted upon build out of the proposed rmxed use land uses_ If the City does not obt~ in surety for the instaIlanon ofa traffic SIgnal at this time, it will e virtually Impossible to assc: ;5 the reqUIrement for traffic signal constructIon to each indi~dual that may purchase the n: ixed use lots from Quantum and then subsequently develop therr1. The burden of traffic SIgnaI' :lonstructjon should fall upon the developer of the whole rather tha~the mdIVIduals that choose to lcquire and develop lots in the future. Quantum could easily dis ,bUle the cost equally to 1\\lurt, buyers whereas the City could not ~~ QUAN ~-Utv\ .::iiI1fi. G R 0 U P 0 F COM PAN I E 5 COMP ANY ~ (. "FACSIMIL~ NOI ( 1...5 ~ k'VY'O ~ ~ {{ iJ.0t:fl 4~-\JO~3 TO' ~v~j FAX NUMBER. FROM. Eugene Gerhca 'I DATE ,os. mD( NUMBER OF PAGES J ~ With cover Remarks:, ~tS-t:;-o '\Y2-C ~.vt~ - , ~\d\E., ~ ~T(c:JJ.t dF ~ UTIUl\ UJMf1\~. . N.PTE AJ- Th~ (]g,l1~ -i:b's ~E: ~t;cJ)c 2500 Quantum Lakes Drive. Suite 101 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 740-2447 . Fax: (561) 740-2429 e-mail: quantgrp@qgc.cc