Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION \ffil~:: 4 \. rL ! z j:._,--,...."'""'''''---~_. ~-' "l i I" CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Department of Engineering -J December 14, 2001 Mr Mark Hansen Vice-President The Olen Company 1062 Coral Ridge Drive Coral Springs, FL 33071 RE Quantum lakes Drive Closure Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)/Traffic Control Plan Dear Mr Hansen, Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the traffic control plan for the closure of Quantum Lakes Drive Following are my comments regarding the proposal . Recommend Placing "Road Closed Ahead" signs for Quantum Boulevard southbound traffic . Recommend using painted directional arrows instead of tape This will be a long term set-up and paint will be more durable . Indicate, by note, that all signs are to be post mounted and will be placed in accordance with the applicable FDOT standards for offset and mounting height. . Only 2 (two) Type III barricades are shown at either end of the closure area Will this be adequate? Although not part of the MOT plan, you indicate placement of 2 (two) 10 foot gates at either end of the closure area I'm sure you intend to lock these gates Please be aware that you will need to address fire rescue access at the time of the temporary fence permit application America's Gateway to the Gulfstream 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6480 Fax: (56]) 742-6285 Mr Mark Hansen, Vice-President, The Glen Company Re Quantum Lakes Drive Closure, Maintenance of Traffic December 14, 2001 Page Two If you have any additional questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at 561-742-6482 Sincerely, LUck Xc: Jeff Livergood, P E , Director, Public Works H David Kelley, Jr , P E.lP S M , Utility Engineer Lusia Galav, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Plans Analyst (with attachments) Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst (with attachments) File (with attachments) c-,"\oly Documents\Quantum Lakes Drive Closure :\olOT Plan.doc DEe 13 '01 02 03PM THE ~LEN COMPAN~ P 1 i , I i ~, ! ..; w DEe, 4 20m , L -------~--.J L_-.~ fACSIMiLE TR.ANSMITTAL SHEET TO; FAX: Quantcm Lakes Dnve - Qosure (561) 742-6357 PAX: (561) 740-2429 (954) 7i6-7608 (561) 742-6259 D"'T~' December 13, 2001 TOT"L 1\0 OP P^GtiS INCLUDING COV~R; 'Three Ken Hall CC, TO%Il McGillicuddy James Droto6 Lusia Galav FROM: Matk Hansen RE: Origi"lal to follow by mail 1062 CCRAL RIDGE DRIVE - CORAL SPRINGS - FL 33071 PHOr-oE i954) .HO 490'1 - F :\X (9541 344 H08 DEe 13 'ei 02 03PM THE Q_EN COMPANY P 2 December 13,2001 Mr, Ken Hall City of Boynton Beach Engmeering Department 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach. FL 33425 RE Quantum Lakes Dr. - Closure Dear Ken, Please find enclosed traffic mamtenance plan for the closure of a portion of Qua..'ltum. Lakes Dnve prepared by Shah Drotos engineers. The plan shows the portion of Quantum Lakes Drive closed just northward of Quantum Blvd. and just southward of the median at Lot 61/62 property line, using type ill barriers, Additionally, we will be installing a construction chain link fence with gates at both ends for trucks and emergency vehicles. The temporary construction chain link fence will also continue along the lake bank, just outside the constrnctlon linuts of the additional buildings, in order to protect the existing vegetation. Quantum Lakes Drive 1S a Quantum Commumty Development Distnct roadway and was approved by the district for closure at the November district meeting. The closure will help facilitate the constmction of the apartment community, lessen the conflicts with vehicular traffic, and reduce the liabIlity to the district. The fence company will be applying to the city for a pemut on the temporary construction fence. Should you have any questlons regardmg the road closure, please can me at (954) 340-4904 S T QUANTUM LAKES, INC. Cc Tom McGillicuddy - QCDD James Orotos - Shah Drotos Lusia Galav - CIty of Boynton Beach V~\SHE1LA\COR.US\MH\QutJ\~lIm\Hl1ll21301.DOC 1062 Corel Ridge Drive · Cora Sp~ ng5 Flor de 3~071 (854) ~40 4904 . Fax (S54) 3'14 4608 p 3 Ii\ ~ .J '3: c:)t\P"~\'( 0' ;:'1'\ '" J\-IS -- - "'-P". e.: "'.:> e1 DS: 13 ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4:: e I,:) ..s: -~ ~ "0 a J ~ J 1,1) ~ ~ ('01 % ~ ~ .t "3 t'l 1 ~ ~ < e ~ .) .;} ~ ~ \ ". ~ 1i ~ ~.t. \>1\ '}, tOL ,I> ~ r ~e @ ..... ~ r ~ ~ <tC. .J" , J ~ o r/.- ~ t-I IU a. ..". 'r -------- ------~ --------------- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment December 13,2001 Ms. Stella ROSSI 625 WhIspenng Pmes Road Boynton Beach, Flonda 33435 RE ExplanatIOn of 'Reserved' relatIve to Lot 34-C Quantum Park PID Dear Ms. ROSSI ThIS letter IS m response to your request for the above-referenced mformatIOn, as conveyed at the November 6,2001 CIty CormmssIOn meetmg. For purposes of the Quantum Park PID Master Plan (NOPC #12), the category "Reserved" IS a non- development desIgnatIOn. The CondItIOns of Approval for NOPC #12, Ordmance 01-54, stIpulate that the CIty and applIcant wIll evaluate the need for open space m the PID Master Plan and also demonstrate that the development oftlus parcel WIll not mterfere wIth management ofthe adjacent preserve When a determmatIOn has been made regardmg the appropnate use of the "Reserved" parcel, the applIcant wIll submIt a NotIce of Proposed Change (NOPC) to obtam the appropnate master plan land use desIgnatIon. Smcerely, --(LLJ2.- MIchael W Rumpf, DIrector ofPlanmng & Zomng MR/jdc cc Kyrt Bressner, CIty Manager ';:'usIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner S \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park PID-Outdoor Storage\DefimtlOn of Reserve Lot 34C.doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O, Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us ~~ ctlm ';A $ ~'d. 04- ~D- ~'8 """ o ~ ~ ~ Sod) o~ ~~ 5~ """u- nO 4C) u-~ '.2.'"'" ~bl \l)u,.l a~ ~~ UlUJ &'"'" wG'. Ct(t D- c( o ~ 'i 'al .~ u G) "" 1t. ; e 00 - ~ e .sa r"'\ i \ 1) ~ o e .9 ca ~'D G):= "'" .~ ~::> tt i e % 1) ~ o ~ .c 2 ci6 ~ .... e e .!S 0. (0 5 (0 il .;l .. _ ~ ell ell ell ,2: J!l 9 ~ 'etaG) c~~ ei -- tt:e.~ o"'tG 0_ 00 a ~_ Vi""~ '" G) e. G) '" .!S "" ~ tG .... ~ 00 ~ ~ tG tG G) ~ G) 'io)( .., ,... oS ~ '" ;. "" .~ .s= 00 Q) .~ 00 ~ G) 0. e I ~ e .s= tG c: ..,:$ .... o tG ~,,",:$ ~i G) .e .s= 00 _ Q) - \W $J'" G) .... ... '" G) ~ ~ . Ct -5% ~eIl'i ~ ...I!l ~ 0 ,,,,_ g... ell ",,- fA ~ a g ,,'a ell ~ ... Iii - ... a..... ~ 0:$ ~ (l) -s s::. G) - :$ "" ~ .~ d" :$ 6- 0 .., s::. a ~ .e ~ ~oV; ."Iii ~... 'is~ ~ tG~ oo~s::.:) "" -5-";10 u-o.tGtG ~'e~~: ~e o ~ ~ .... <<. li;~ to ~ "i ~ II ~ ... ~ '4l >' " ell .. ell (11 0" "'... ,,~~ Iii~ 'a~ ell ... to ii\ ... .. i>. _ .,' " ~ ,. 0 -6 l-' W ell ~ ell 'ill ,,~ i'~- Do .I!l ~ e-"i ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ i 5 ~ t:'OtGg'eeVi""oo- e '" 'l... "5 to !,..g t 6 fA ~ e ~ g ~ U '" -5.'A 0. '" '" ~ . \oJ'" ~ V' 0 CS'.... '" .s= CS' G)'~! 0 u 9 .- 'g ~ ,% "'-;.;: % ~ '; ~ 1 ~ So !! ~ :'l! ... i; 1;, 'A'" "O.e ell ... ~ ~ 0 '4l .!! % % "',! ~ '\I .~ ~:s ~ % ':, " ~ ~ 'is. ~ 5 ell ~ 'i e 6''Gi t ~ ~~"YA&E~a"'a~.'Il&!l 'a Ii '4l ell ell 'ill ell ~ ell ell E .. to -C'4l~~:i~~~s~i%e! o ~:$:$ tt.""o e. e(,/')O'" u....- o to $J $J "'. ~ .... g"#s ~-5 fi.% v'1) G) ~ "" Q) -500 .-- ~~ - ~ "ie ta ?At: ~~ ~ Ci 'O"#s ~-5 e ._ e e"" tGg G) c: Eo G)O -500 G) """, ~ca -0 "" - G) ~ 'Q) ~Q)S tGoo~ .... e- ~tGG) ou-5 tt.:re tG rI\ .... _ 00 1'i....e ~O'tG (1)-- ~a :e ! .f! 00 0. ~~ '0 0 tG~ % ~ ::G) (,/') ~ tG s::. '" "" .., s:. e ~ e ~ .9 '" 0 'i, '" ooJ: $ "" G) G) !3ta ~ -5 e~ =- ""0 ~% 'E~d) (I)"" ;'e~ o 00 .~ 1 ee ~Q)o !3 tG e G) rI\ e '" .- $ ~ .., cu 'C e '" ~o ~0G) ~ S ~.... ~ \W... (l) ~ tG C\ '" "" .... 0. e~ E.... . '" E 0.0 ~i 0000 ~"" ~u tG !-5 ",,~g (I) ~ . 'a'O a u ._ cu L> ~ .~ e'O'(GO- tG~e~N.a e_9!.(I)"" 0 .... _ V' G) Vi -e tG...~ G) $J ~ o '" s::. ~ e ~-e~ ~~~ ~~~o:io .... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ t ~ t ~ Ct Ct Ct Ct (,/') (,/') ~ (,/') (,/') Ct Ct ';a~ ~ 'it 'it u.1 u.1 ~ u.1 u.1 'i 4.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0'0 '0 '0 z z ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ 4'. ~ cD Sou$oOa4 '1u ~ ~ ~ l~ (t" So ~~~~~~ 'j ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~u.1 ut::.~t::.~t::. cD ::> ::> '0 ~t::.~t::. ' ~ ~ ::> 0. , ~ ~ ~ \ao4 ~ 0. , ,S .,.. .,.. 0. , . > .,.. , ,~ ~ ,~ () o '0. ..... $ o ..... ..... '0 g ~ ~ Cl) '~ .. c. ~ c:: Cl) 2 ~ o e u. ~ l- ea u. ':a ~ to ~ g III Cl) \!. ~ c:: .. !. .s ~ .. o 0- E Cl) ~ 01 c: "-E III u: .. , , 2 $ co .... ~ 01 o.e ~ .s.~ -----.- .- ~ ~-- -------.-.,------- UlJ u:;' 01 10 "6a Clt~ Attorne'" S '" Of'f'ice 561-742-6054 T-355 P 02/02 F-1ZD P 1 ~ov-DZ-Dl iZ:08P1 From-COHE" NORRIS SCHERER WEiNBErGER 561-'42-4134 COHEN NORRIS ~CHERER WE\NBERGER & WOlMER ATTORNEYS AT LAW f'UOC. (XJli!.'l P.A.- _OORVR. COlEN llIWlARDA. txlNKQ. SLAIHIC.Ole.GiNSON 00l0INIC a UIEAI. RlCt'Il'lIlD J. ~ tllI\lIIO" NOfUUS, P..... 1IETIt\" 'My ~J.~P"'. ICVl.E '" lS!I.\ISUlII\Mw .IAMl!S8. 'fEl,J!fIIMN- MlPTM. ~R.".A.. BRliHf C \\OUIIII, ~.A.. "Of c:..- ---~ -eo.c CelII* __lolIgIUOr. 70ct~~ HtJM ?~ OFCOU~. ltlaWlO S. AAOWl.lIf. PA ~~8, RAQt..l~ _~ C-"""1\'mlIIIlII' November 1. 2001 James A. Chef off, City Attomey The City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach. Florida 33426 RE. Quantum - NOpe.., 2 Dear Jim. I write you to confirm our recent telephone conversation with regard to the above referenced matter Specifically, with respect to the requested new condition which condition would require :5 reatriotJon limiting the residential development relative to Lot 7 through 11 and lot 23 through 31 to fee simple units and not to Include rental apartments or congregate care liv"'9 facilities. As we discussed, provided such a restriction does not delay final approval at the next meetIng. our client is agreenble to the same. I believe the condition should be something along the fol!owing lines: Recordation of a lestlicuve COllfmant affecting Lots 7 through 11 end Lots 23 through 31 requiring 'hat any residential development of such lots be limited to fee simple units, specJficaDy fl)(cludlng rental aparlmenl complexes and congrsgate C8/e living facintJes. For purposes hemof, "rental apartment complex" $hall mean a muJti..unit project owned by one owner for purposes of rvntal to others, slmHsr in nature to the Villas At Quantum Lakes. If you should have any further questions. please do not hesitate to contact me. Also, 1 would appreciate it if you would have forwarded to me the final staff report5 for the next meeting. ^ PARTNERSHIP Of PWfES51ON"t ASSOC!AOONS n. U. S. HICti\NAVONE. Sl.llTf 400. P.O. BOX 13146. "'ORTH pAV;t 8fACH. FLORIDA ))408-710% tUEPHONe: [SO') 144-3600. F4CSlMILE: (561l84Hi04 cc:client FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 100 E Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO Jim Cherof, City Attorney FAX 954-771-4923 FROM Lusia Galav, Principal Planner DATE 10-24-01 NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) 1 RE Quantum NOPC #12 Conditions of Approval Jim, The following is my attempt to address the COA's as they relate to the approval of Mixed Use for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 1 The additional 500 residential units requested in the NOPC Amendment #12 are subject to the City Commission approval of the Mixed Use (MU) designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 2 The Mixed Use designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 is contingent upon restricting residential development to fee simple units not to include rental apartments or congregate care/living facilities Please note that I have left out any reference to the Excel team recommendation regarding fee simple unit with an appropriate price point. I was not present at the discussion regarding this item and have no idea what that means or how it could be enforced Please review and revise as necessary Fax or email your revisions to me Thank you CC Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director Document1 If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you HP Fax Series 900 Plain Paper Fax/Copier Fax History Report for Boynton Bch ENG 561 742 6285 Oct 24 2001 4.04pm Last Fax Date Time ~ Oct 24 4.03pm Sent Identification DuratIon ~ Result 91954771492369162 0.48 OK Result: OK - black and white fax 1 FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 100 E Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO Eugene Gerlica FAX. 561-740-2429 FROM Lusia Galav DATE October 12, 2001 NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) q RE Quantum Park DRI NOpel Master Plan Amendment #12 Per request enclosed is Addendum to 01-003 Letter from Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to Michael Rump Letter from Dept. of Engineering and Public Works at WPB Letter from Florida Dept. of Transportation Conditions of Approval The Agenda will be faxed to you as soon as it is received today -rf!;; f} i?JO U E l-rl::711 S fA; e IlE r A XE'P A (1 E Ai iJA E ^,Q.t..05E y 11('1 ~ A GEN)A loftY/OI KEQu c;5T (0 tCf'V1 If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you 1 I J TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOF-T TIME 10/12/2001 10 41 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613755259 TEL 5513755250 DATE. TIME FAx NO./NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 10/:'..2 10 35 97402429 00 05 14 11 01< STANDARD ECM 10/10/2001 15 04 -- --. - -.----.--.- 5E143415E3 F HiDER TROUTMAN PAGE 01 PIMDER TROaTMAN CoNSOLn"G, I "C. Transporbltion PIamers and Engineers Fax Transmittal Form DATE: October 10, 2001 TIME: 3.53 PM TO: Mr Eugene Gerlica COMPANY. Quantum FAX NUMBER: 740-2429 PHONE NUMBER: PROJECT NAME: Quantum Park NOPC 12 PROJECT NUMBER: #PTC01-102 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 8 Copies to: D W / Enclosures D D D o D Urgent ~ As Requested 0 For Review 0 Please Reply D Original Will Follow Message: Eugene, Here is the letter from Masoud and Kahart's fax to him. From the desk of Lisa D. Ramirez Administrative Assistant PlII4Ier TroatlllGn Comaltlng. IlK. 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 PTC 561-434-1644 Fax 561-434-1663 E-mail pindertroutman@msn.com 10/10/2001 15 04 5E14341553 PINDER TROUTMAt'-j PAGE 04 ~,-""""",'_-^",^,_~OO~OI:ltl>>>>:~~_~~ PinDER TROUTMAn ConSULTinG. Inc. TRANSPORTATION PLANNERS AND ENGINEERS Fax Transmittal Form To 71lculltt) 412 h Company' ?Gl__ ~N1- ~ Fax Number- 478- 577tJ Phone Number' bit Lf - 't tl ~ f) Project Name- (}MJI1NTIIM f/J't1IlJt, /lI'1J'C#"~ Project Number- PfC,O}-/()Z cc: 7l/Z- 'Z~, o Urgent ,. For Review 0 As Requested ~ Please Reply 0 Originals to Follow in Mail Message mo.~&tA ~ rftti7VJ..uJ IA/1L r'..tIl/~.L, J Val/j a.vv J Pm ?~ /I,w,.- Jn~ C-~/1./raj;m 1dc-b/~S 4;1ac-~~t -III ~CI J8 ~~ Ik /fP4 'Y/r//v~ tk~j WJ!J. iN /II,!!C 71')2- /a.-.j ?iU.S. ~ ~n$p;H /$ n/fJiJY'''') ~ ?;P-..L I'l-t I~s ~ Sl-t~$ t~~) d~III'(}' ~ d.t'/)fmi~~h""" S.'9s~U di.i/ iA. ~ ,.s ttJ)"'>>1~) ~ k of I~ ~ I';..t-I'.,("'S~ 1'7 41'rnAI Ir//?5, ~ Ub/.L S ~kw It d..u;,,~>~ 1;,/ -';'// $, .J4l1tlJ.~)5 h4 ~j ~13 C-hn/~JI"~ M.t /l/cY;?C ~ /t1 7"/'~~cI I~ J tl;~.s H-J~ "A/;.-'c '" /2- /~j USL5 ~ 'M),/~5 A~t:I ~ l.o!IV IJ... d ~C.Y'.lA-Sl I ~ "'-;''/J ~. V 1~}~ M/I I) 7ht sC}..,l/l ...,~~ hd t !.}.,WY\ M .III";?C HI/!, Z) NtJ pc, 'P- / / It,IA' ~ r (2./1'''' rot J h V,,,.y r.tviPW , ( ~ ., ",/",,~,#.j;..J, ~ IS IX. _.fl. J~? I"',n 't1.- 011 t.,., 'f A t 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H . West Palm Beach, FL 33406 7W (561) 434-1644 Fax 434.1663 · Email: pindertroutman@msn.com At l/ From J!A'lh4IZr 11N[)z;,2.. Number of Pages Including Cover" Date /I hI}) III I I 5 Time 10/10/2001 15 04 5514341E 53 PINDER TROUH1AN PAGE 05 Attachment 1A Quantum Park NOPe #12 Daily Trip Generation Comparison #PTCOl 1 02 1 0/10/01 tripgen copm ADA&NOPC1 2 01-102 10-9-01 Page 1 of 1 ADA Approved Land Use land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) T=7468(X)-101.921 31,142 Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In{T)=0.643ln(X) + 5.866 13,815 Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 9.14/1000 SF (5) 18,001 Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740 64,698 Proposed land Use land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF T=7 468(X)-101 921 12,594 Retail 820 427,962 SF In{T) = 0.643ln(X) + 5.866 17,361 Office 710 637,900 SF 9.14/1000 SF (5) 5,830 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4 96 11000 SF 113 Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7/Rm. 1,740 Park N Ride 90 633 HiRh School 530 2,500 Stds. 2,283 Auto Dealership 841 53,072 Sf 23/1000 SF 1,221 Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 ISeat (6) 1,720 Restaurant-HiEh Tumover 832 28,400 SF 130.34 11000 SF 3,702 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 89.95 11000 SF 6,229 Convenience Store/Gas 853 3,054 Sf 845.6 11000 SF 2,582 Ice Skatin2 Rink (7) 465 93,430 Sf 549.5 IRink 1,099 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 6.63 IDU 6,630 63,737 Net New External Tripsl (961)~ (1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE). Trip Generation. 6th Edition. (2) Based on 12,500 SF per Me for 334.7 Acres. (3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres. (4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164.9 Acres. (5) Based on trip rate for 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Equation.. (6) Palm Beach County Rate for Multi-Screen Theatre (7) 2 Rinks and 8,500 SF of Restaurant Trip generation from Palm Beach Gardens facility. 10/10/2001 15 04 5514J41553 FINDER TROUTMAN PAGE 05 Attachment 1 B Quantum Park NOPC #12 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison #PTC01 102 1 0/1 0/01 tripgen copm ADA&N0PC12 01 -102 10-9-01 Page 1 of 1 ADA ^ppmved land Use Total land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) 0.98/1,000 SF (12/88) 4,100 Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In (T) = O.660Ln (X) + 3.403 (48/52) 1,297 Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 2,935 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124 TUIALS 8,456 Prqposed land Use Total land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF 0.98 /1,000 SF (12/88) 1,666 Retail 820 427,962 SF In m = O.660ln (X)+3 403 (48/52) 1,639 Office 710 637,900 SF 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 950 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124 Park N Ride 90 14.00% of Daily (22/78) (5) 89 Hiw. School 530 2,500 Student 0.15/1,000 SF (40/60) 375 Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40/60) 149 Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560 Restaurant-HiWl Turnover 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1,000 SF (60/40) 308 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 749/1,000 SF (67/33) 519 Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37 /1,000 SF (50/50) 294 Ice Skating Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1 ,000 SF (45/55) 220 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 /DU (67/33) 620 ITOT AlS 7,525 Net New External TriPSI (931)1 (1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition. (2) Based on 12,500 SF per Ac.re for 334.7 Acres. (3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres. (4) Based on 15,000 SF per Iv:.re for 164.9 Acres. (5) Based on the Peak Hour to Daily Ratio from ITE 6th Edition. 10/10/2001 15 04 5514:::41553 PINDER TROUTHAN PAGE 07 Attachment 2A Quantum Park NOPC #12 Daily Trip Generation Comparison #PTOlll02 10/10/01 tripgen copm NOPC10&12 01-102 10-9-01 Pase1of1 NOpe # 10 Approved land Use land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 2,252,654 SF T=7.46800-101.921 16,721 Commerdal 820 427,962 SF lnm=0.643ln(Xl +5.866 17,361 Office 710 798,772 SF 9.14/1000 SF (2) 7,301 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96 11000 SF 113 Hotel 312 200 Rms 6,7/Rm. 1,740 Park N Ride 90 633 Auto Dealership 641 53,072 SF 23/1000 SF 1,221 Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 /Seat. (3) 1,720 Restaurant-Hilth Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34/1000 SF 3,702 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 69.95/1000 SF 6,229 ConvenienceStoreICas 853 3,054 SF 845.6 11000 SF 2,582 Ice SkatinSl. Rink (4) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 lRink 1,099 Residential 220 500 Ous 6.63 IOU 3,315 63,737 Proposed land Use land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF T - 7 466(Xl-101.921 12,594 Retail 620 427,962 SF lnm=0.643ln(Xl+5.866 17,361 Office 710 637,900 SF 914/1000 SF (2) 5,830 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96/1000 SF 113 Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740 Pari< N Ride 90 633 Hilth School 530 2,500 Students 2,283 Auto Dealership 641 53,072 SF 23 11000 SF 1,221 Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 lSeat (3) 1,720 Restaurant-Hil!t1 Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34 11000 SF 3,702 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 89.95/1000 SF 6,229 Convenience Store/Cas 853 3,054 SF 845.6 /1000 SF 2,582 tee Skatinll. Rink (4) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 lRink 1,099 Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 6.63 IDU 6,630 63,737 Net New External TriPSI (1) SoUIU!' I""titu~ of Transport;ltion EnsU-1S (ITE), Trip Generation, 6lh Edition. (2) &oed on lrip ra~ br 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Eqaglion.. (3) Palm Ileac:h County Rale klr Multi-Screen Theatre (4) 2 Rinks and 8,500 Sf of Restaurant TripgeneJation from Palm Beach Gardens facility. 10/10/2001 15 04 55143415E3 PINDER TROUH1AN PAGE 08 #PTCOl 102 1 011 0101 lri~ COpm NOPC1o&12 01 10210-9..01 ~ 1 of1 Attachment 28 Quantum Park NOPC # 12 PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison NOPC # 10 Approved Land Use Total land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 2,252,654 SF 0.98 /1 ,000 SF (12/88) 2,208 Retail 820 427,962 SF In (TJ - O.660Ln (X)+3.403 (48!52) 1,639 Office 710 798,772 SF 1 49/1,OOOSF (57/43) 1,190 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0,51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124 Park N Ride 90 14.00'lb of DaiJv(22178) (2) 89 Auto OealershiD 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40160) 149 Movie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560 Restauranl-HIS!tl Turnovel 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1.000 SF (60/40) 308 Restauranl-Qualitv 831 69,250 SF 749 /1,000 SF (67/33) 519 Convenience Store 845 3,054 SF 96.37/1,000 SF (50/50) 294 Ice Skatinll Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1,000 SF (45/55) 220 Residential Multi-Family 220 500 Dus 0,62 IOU (67/33) 310 TOTALS 7,622 Proposed land Use Total land Use Code Inlensily Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips Industrial 110 1 700.000 SF 0.98/1 000 SF (12/88) 1,666 Retail 820 427,962 SF Ln (TJ = O.6601..n (X)+3.403 (48/52) 1,639 Office 710 637,900 SF 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 950 Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12 Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124 Park N Ride 90 14.00'lb of Dally (22/76) (2) 89 Hil(h School 530 2,500 Students 0.15 /1,000 SF (40/60) 375 Auto Dealer.;hip 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40/60) 149 Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seal (53/47) 560 Restaurant-Hi'" Turnovet 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1,000 SF (60140) 308 Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 7.49/1,000 SF (67/33) 519 Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37/1,000 SF (50/50) 294 Ice SkalinR Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1 ,000 SF (45/55) 220 Residential Mulli-F amily 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 IOU (67/33) 620 TOTALS 7,525 I Net New External Trips (97)1 (1) Scuta!: InstiwlI! of Tl'ilI15fIOrtation Engineer.; (ITE), Trip Cenefation. 6th Edition. (2) Based on the Peak Hour liD Dally ratio from ITE 6th Edition. Department of Engineering and Public Works PO, Box 21229 West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgovcom . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Warren H. Newell. Chairman Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair Karen T Marcus Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Tony Masilotti Addie L. Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper --" I ,. i 0( I JL f OCT I 2 20Ul jL L___ ~Et-Mi~~"ENT C'~ rr'. ~ (' October 10, 2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE. Quantum Park - Amendment ~~ TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received on August 17, 2001) forthe project entitled; Quantum Park - Amendment #12. pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code The new proposed development plan for NOPC #12 is as follows: . Industrial Retail Office Warehouse Hotel High School Auto Dealership Movie Theater Restaurant - HT Restaurant - Quality Convenience Store/Gas Ice Skating Rink Multi Family Residential Park & Ride Facility 1,700000 SF 427,962 SF 637,900 SF 22,700 SF 200 Rooms 2500 Students 53,072 SF 4 000 Seats 28,400 SF 69,250 SF 3 054 SF 93 430 SF 1 000 Dwellings N/A Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the overall traffic generation associated with the newly proposed development plan listed above (NOPC #12), does not exceed the total trips vested for the Quantum Park development, in the previously approved NOPC #10 (April 18, 2000) Therefore, the proposed plan is approved. It is however suggested to the city of Boynton Beach. Require from the traffic consultant a table comparing the project vested trips (based on the most recent approval), versus trip generation of all land uses which have received development orders, to date This practice needs to continue with any future submissions. The intersection of Quantum Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard is forecasted to operate within .unacceptable" conditions, under Year 2006 scenarios, and upon full completion and occupation of the project. This location needs to be monitored for future improvements, which needs to be implemented by the developer Page 2 If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely OFFICE/OF THE ~~ E'INEER , / ) I;11 ~ Masoud Atefi, M-LE / Sr Engineer - T~~~sion cc: Pinder-Troutman Consulting Inc. MTP Group Inc. File: General TPS - Mun Traffic Study Review F'\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\010812.doc Department of Engineering and Public Works po. Box 21229 West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Warren H. Newell. Chairman Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair Karen T. Marcus Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Tony Masilotti Addie L. Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper 2cr October 9, 2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf Department of Planning & Zoning City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE. Quantum Park - Amendment #12 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVlEW Dear Michael The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received on August 17, 2001) for the project entitled Quantum Park - Amendment #12, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the approval can not be granted due to the following. The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 daily trips) should be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development traffic generation Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in Attachments 1 A, 1 Band 1 C, must reflect the values in the latest NOPC approval. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER /'y7 \ cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc. MTP Group Inc. File: General TPS - Mun Traffic Study Review F'\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Comments\010812F-p&z.wpd D 1211 OC'-12I8-2001 11 37 TREASURE COAST REGIONAL P~~ING COUNCIL 301 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD SUITE 300 STUART, FLORIDA 34994 PHONE: 561-221-4060 FAX: 561..221-4067 FAX TRANSMISSION Date" Ie 1 ~ lClI Fax Number: (s ~\) 7lp." G ~S"1 Number of Pages (includiug cover sbeet): 3 .Operator' To' l.v~l~ ~~erv .. From :J.~ ~~ttO~ Project: Qv~IA.~W\. {J(;lrt.. 0 RT-. Commeuts. .., ;,;",:~~~ ,~ .:~ ~:, ~ >" ~ .. ~~ ~ 1;'f!;rl:,.i'= T . ~~~ ~.~ ~ j' "IIi .L El -.... REA S3U cl ti ~ ~Sr.=- ~,~~ -", ~ P ~KN N I 1'1:(;--. '-.taO U N::~tt - ,,- a ~ !~ _ _ jI- '"' Id -'d. li' 'r- - ~ : -~- hi ;;;; jl"f~:- 1~D:l&Je1l't+~" :'~A\.~~~.\i -B~ACH~'-~~.-- j,~~-~~.::.= -; -'> '" " '~-7 _: Tc~~~=~]:L r :!. _~- --.;< ]- - fIII!I at 4- ,~ October 8, 2001 - 'i . f III 'u OCT I 0 2001 ! ~i I h'.J L.,_ _____._._ j - i [;- ~I ~,ENTOF -Cc -'::~'r-'T Mr Michael W Rumpf . ----__.::..:___'-' IV 'J I Planning and Zoning DIrector City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Subject. Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact NotIficatIon of Proposed Change Dear Mr Rumpf: In accordance WIth the requIrements of Section 380 06(19), Flonda Statutes (F S ), we have reVIewed the ''NotIficatIon of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOPC) for the Quantum Park DRI dated August 8, 2001 The NOPC proposes the followmg revlSlons to the master plan: 1) Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 land use deSIgnation IS to be changed from office/industnal to mixed use, wInch allows office, commercIal, and residenttal uses, 2) Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31 land use designatIon is to be changed from office to mixed use, wInch allows office, commercIal, and resIdenttal uses; 3) Lot 34C wInch is currently undesignated and part of the open space area IS changed to mdustnal, and 4) Quantum Lakes Dnve is proposed for elimmatIon from the mtersectIon WIth Quantum Boulevard to the eastern mtersectIon WIth Gateway Boulevard. The apphcant proposes to decrease office and industnal square footage to allow additional commercial square footage and dwelling umts. The proposed changes are presumed to create a substantIal deviatIon pursuant to SectIon 38006(19)(e)3 and 380 06(19)(e)5 c, Florida Statutes. Council has reVIewed the InformatIon and determined that the proposed changes will not create any additional regIOnal impacts. Council recognizes and apprecIates the apphcant's efforts to create a good InlX of land uses and prOVIde for a more sustamable form "Bringing Communities Together" · Est 1976 301 East Ocean Boulevard Suite 300 Stuart Florida 34994 Phone (561) 221 4060 SC 269 4060 Fax (561) 221 4067 E mail adminfii)tcrpc.or~ Mr Michael W Rumpf October 8, 2001 Page 2 of development for a portIon of the project. However, Council IS concerned With the desIgnatIon of Lot 34C to mdustnal. ThIs lot IS adjacent to the sand pine scrub preserve, CIty park and water retentIon area. The parcel was ongmally proposed for development but during an amendment to the project to address requIrements WithIn the development order this area was deSIgnated for preservation and later part of the water retentIon area. Over trrne the overall open space area of the project has decreased and desIgnatmg Lot 34C would be an addItional reductIon. Based on the location of the parcel and the further reduction m open space for the project, Staff does not recommend that the proposed change to mdustnal for Lot 34C proceed until. 1) the CIty evaluates the need for open space on the project and determmes that the reduction m open space created by thIs change IS consistent With City regulatIons; 2) It IS demonstrated that development of thIs parcel will not mterfere WIth management of the adjacent preserve area, and 3) It IS demonstrated that development of thIs SIte will not have a negatIve rrnpact on the establIshed dramage system Please call If you have any questIOns. Smcerely, b7sf:rJ DR! Coordmator cc Ken Metcalf, FDCA Eugene Gerlica, ApplIcant 10/01/2001 15 40 5514348815 PAGE 01/02 Phone: (561)434-8020 Facsimile Transmittal fax~ (561)434-8187 N2 of PClges s~nt Oncludlng Cover Page) 2 TO Mr Michael Rumpf, Plannin~ Director, Boy~ton Beach, FL 33435 FAX Nil (561) 742-6:357 DATE 10/01/01 FROM Jeanne lo'.J.lls, Senior Planner, Concurrency (AICP) COMMENTS Enclosed is a response to your request 1regair'ding Quantum Park DRIA Ol-OOl/MPMD 01-003 - ..- rl I , ~ '"1 f-- ,- r , , --' " L .--1 i (' I cc: Angela Usher Te rry Hes s H:\DATIt\WP51\00C\2 The City ofBoynl.[)n Beach OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard PO Box31O Boynton Beach, F/onda 33425-0310 City l'vlanagers Office. (561) 742-6010 FAX. (561) 742-6011 e-mail. cay. managerCaci. boynton-beach.fl. us www Cl.boynton-beachfl.us To From Date Subject ---- City CommIssIOn Kurt Bressner, CIty Manager l~/ September 17, 2001 Update on Quantum Park NOPC #12 As a follow-up to the request of the City CommIssIOn last week at our pre-agenda meetmg, I am enclosmg a copy of the staff recap of the master plan modIficatIOns for Quantum. ThIS report was wepared followmg a TechnIcal RevIew Committee (TRC) wIth the developer last week. The matter IS scheduled for the P&D meetmg on Wednesday, October loth The staff reVIew document may be augmented or supplemented based on mformatIOn provIded by the developer We WIll be meetmg with the developer next Monday to reVIew the TRC comments m more detaIl. JIm Cherof, Jeff LIvergood, Dale Sugerman and QUIntus Greene and I WIll be mvolved with that meetmg. In addItIon, I have asked Qumtus Greene to desIgnate a staff member m the Development department to serve as lIaIson for the Quantum Development. ChIef Gage has desIgnated Major John SmIth as the PolIce Department lIaIson on SIte secunty Issues, If you have any comments or questIOns on the mltlal staff renew, please let me know Cc James Cherof Wilfred Hawkms Dale Sugerman Qumtus Greene Marshall Gage Jeff LI vergood ......t REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Modification Project name' Quantum Park FIle number' MPMD 01-003 Reference 151 reVIew plans Identlfied as Master Plan ModIficatIOn. FIle 01-003 wIth an August 14.2001 Planmmr and Zoning- Department date stamp markIng-. DEP ARTMENTS PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. None PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments See attached memo from Jeff Livergood, PublIc Works Director dated August 29, 2001 UTILITIES , Comments. 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-007) to whIch we responded to In UtIlItIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that wIth the anginal DRl for the total park deSigned for CommercIal, Industnal, Office or a cOmbinatIOn of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industna1 and CommercIal, both the water and \vastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSigned and constructed for those anticIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft stations were configured to handle the wastewater generatIon antIcIpated In the 550 acre park. 2 As prevIOusly stated, the proposed reVISIOn to the land use to "MIxed Use (MU) to Include Office, CommercIal and ResidentIal uses could tax the utIlIty support facilItIes to theIr hrmts. A prov1S0 needs to be Incorporated Into each group of lot approvals process, that the desIgn engIneenng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utilIty system(s) capacIty IS avaIlable to support the proposed use, or they WIll provIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use Failure to do so could result In inSUffiCIent utilIty support to thiS park, affecting other current (eXIsting) users. ! 3 ApplIcant IS requesting that Lot 34-C be converted to Industna1 usage In heu that Lot 34-C was open space deSignated for dry retention (as an overflow from Tract J"), applIcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry retentIOn area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to whIch lot/tract dId the dry retentIOn reqUIrement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFW1tfD (unsigned) does not indicate that the dry retentIOn of Lot 34-C IS no longer requIred, nor has the "As-BUIlt Master Drainage Plan from the engIneer-of- record ROSSI and Malavasl Emnneers, Inc ever been submitted to the City INCUJDE REJECT MP\1D 1 ST REVIEW COM.\1ENTS 09/17/01 2 DEP i\R TMENTS NCLUDE REJECT It wIll be reqUIred to subrrut the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that I I the applIcant's request for land use converSIOn. 4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Mmer Road whIch has roadway dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dram age, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIvIded roadway sectIon. 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one- half of the dedIcated nlZht-of-wav will be reqUIred to be utilIty easement(s) No antIcIpated permanent "park amemtIes will be perrrutted on the utilIty easement(s), other than sodding and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department WIll reqUIre demonstratIOn that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIOn '~ resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" Subrrutted traffic analYSIS by the consultant does not meet DRl traffic performance standards. FIRE Comments 6 Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any construction above grade , POLICE Comments None , ENGINEERING DNISION I I Comments. I I i 7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will reqUIre replattmg of I that portIon of Quantum Park m accordance WIth the reqUIrements of the ' , LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg. 8 Lot 34C iliotlfication of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5 4) IS proposed to be \ changed from undesIgnated use to Industnal use How \vill thIS change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development? I i I , 9 PrOVIde venficatIon that Palm Beach County Engmeenng WIll permIt a I dnveway openmg onto Mmer Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress pomt \V1Il be pronded at the south end of the propert) for I emergency servIces. ! I : i i I 10 If approved. an envIronmental assessment of Tract 34C WIll be reqUIred as I I '1 MPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/17/01 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT part of any sIte subrmttal. 11 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property lme of Lot 61 The NotIficatIon of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, mdlcates access will be proVIded \la a smgle entrance pomt at the mtersectlon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. Elmllnatlon of that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the second access pomt WIll create an undeSIrably long tnp for the most northerly reSIdents of the proposed multI-farruly reSIdentIal development and would create a hazardous situatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. 12. Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a portIOn of it mto Lot 101 wIll create an undeSlfably long tnp for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous ", SItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. 13 ReconfiguratIOn of Lots 62 and 63 mto a smgle Lot 102 would create the , same SItuatIon described m the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. 14 The NotIfication of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5 5, paragraph 3, represents the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. ThIs mtersectlOn has preVIOusly been reVIewed and approved. Please prOVIde addItIOnal mformatIOn (aCCIdent data and standard drawmgs) supponmg thIS statement. I , I 15 If the areas MU101 and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an additIOnal recreatIOnal fee (or land m lIeu of fee) may be assessed based on , the ongInal calculatIOns for the CIty park. I 16 The creatIOn of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-desIgnatlon of Lot 34C from i undesIgnated to Industnal WIll ObVIOusly mcrease traffic volumes. The ' Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result m an increase m dally or peak hour volumes" Although the analysIs concludes that there are no mcreases m the approved daily and peak hour tnps due to Simultaneous mcreases and decreases m allowable development mtensltles, the analysIs needs to funher address local changes m traffic I volumes that would result from the proposed changes 17 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) aclmowledges that the I , i closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potentIal to Impact the I ! I regIonal roadway network. The analvsls further states that dIverted traffic i WIll cause the intersectIOn of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capaCIty dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes I changes m stnpmg and roadway \\o1denmg to address this WIthout provldmg I i a tImetable Please be more specIfic as to how and when thIS work WIll be I mcorporated into the plannm\! process to rmmrruze Impact to the travelIng i I MPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/17/01 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT pubhc. Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. 18 Identify the tract shmVl1 as MU101 as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's addItIOnal property due to the abandonment. Change MU I 00 to I MU102A. I I BUILDING DIVISION Comments None i I PARKS AND RECREATION I Comments I 19 The CIty ComrrussIOn dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUIrement, 272 umts of the 1,000 umts requIred m the most recent master plan reVISIOn. The developer dId pledge, however, to provIde appropnate pubhc recreatIOn faCIhtIes for these umts. (To be determmed m conjunction wIth the Parks DI\o1sIOn.) The total recreatIOn dedIcation reqUIrement will be calculated as follows 1,000 umts-272 umts=728 D U 728 DUx 015 =10 92 acres 12 credIt may be gIVen agamst the reqUIrement of land dedIcatIOn or payment of fees. Yz pnvate recreatIOn credIt WIll be calculated as follows 1092 acres / 2=546 acres An addItlOnal Y.; credIt may be g1Ven for natural resources agamst the reqUIrement of land dedIcation or payment of fees. Y.; credIt for natural resources \\111 be calculated as follows 10 92 acres/ 4 = 2 73 acres I The developer may want to consIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcatIOn and fee 20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the comrmssIOn, IS subtracted off the " :1 Recreatlon DedIcatlon ReqUIrement. j 21 Accordmg to Chapter I, ArtIcle V SectIOn 3 of the Land Development l RegulatIOn, the developer must proVIde 5 park elements m order to qualIfy for Y2 credIt for pnvate recreatlon provIded. j ! MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/17/01 5 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 22. If the property is not further platted, recreatlOn fees or dedIcatlOns for the 728 non-exempt dwellmg umts are due before the IssUIng of theIr resIdentIal buildIng pernuts. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments. 23 I am requestmg the applIcant as a condItIOn to the above Master Plan ModIficatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14,2001 (as dIrected by our CIty Manager) In reference to the Quantum Park-DRI Annual EnvIronmental Areas Status Report. 24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detentIOn (open space) area and IS contiguous to the 257 acres Sand Pme " Preserve, The land use change of lot 34-C from detentIon (open space) to mdustnal, could affect the envIronmental qualIty of the contIguous Sand PIne Preserve when the mdustnal tract IS developed by the owner 25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham lInk fence was mstalled around 1 ) lot 34-C (6.58acres) and 2.) Water Management Tract "J" (6.16 acres) and connected to the eXIstIng fence around the penmeter of the 3 ) Sand Pme Preserve (25 7 acres) ThIs was to protect the envIronmental qualIty of the total of38.44 acres In the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as open space / Sand Pme Preserve on the Quantum Master Plan. ThIS area should remam as open space / Sand PIne Preserve The project should contmue In the normal reVIew process. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. I 26 The Land Use Acreage Table IS Incorrect as ShO\\l1 on page 5 of the NOPC applIcatIOn. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac of (01) and 26.33 I ac of (OIC) Correct thIS Information on the applIcatlOn. 27 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the applIcatlOn and on the Master Plan drawIng show a decrease In the (OrC) category (2633 acres approved, 22 94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (0lC) deSIgnated lots. Please explam? I I 28 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applIcatlOn and on the NOPC Master Plan # 12 dra\o\o1ng IS mcorrect The eXIstIng (MU) lots add up to 6238 acres. The addItlOnal (MU) lots proposed In thIS amendment add up ; MP\ID 1ST REVIEW COMME1'<iS 09i17/0 1 6 DEP AR TMENTS 29 to 26 82 acres. Together they total 89.20 acres not 90 65 as shown on the Ii plan. Please correct. I I I I Lot 34-C IS shown as haVIng 6.58 acres m the applIcatIOn but 6.56 acres has been added to the Industnal category on the Master Plan. The development order and Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have IdentIfied thIS tract as haVIng 6.59 acres. To be conSIstent, use the 6.59-acre SIte area calculatIOn. 25 Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "DetentIOn" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detentIOn label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to I the deSIgnatIOn of thIS lot was proposed or approved In eIther amendment. ! This lot remams a DetentIOn lot WIth no development deSIgnatIOn assIgned. I Please IndIcate thIS In your applIcatIon and proVIde data and analYSIS to '\ support the elunmatIon of thIS area for detentIOn. 26 ProvIde SIte area acreage calculatIOns for proposed lots 100 and 101, 27 The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space Does thIS reflect the 6.59-acre DetentIOn lot (34-C) plus any open space assOCIated WIth the elImmatIon of the nght-of-way? Please clanfy 28 Lots 73-A through 76 should be hIghlIghted as commItted development. SHe Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 ThIS should also be reflected m the project traffic 2002 estImate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analYSIS 29 Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as cornnutted development (Onana Gramte) SIte Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 ThIS should be reflected m the project traffic 2001 estImate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analYSIS 30 The Master Plan mdIcates that the acreage for the Industnal category IS mcreasIng by 6.56 acres yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS category IS decreasmg by 375,354 square feet. Please c1anfy thIS mconsIstency 31 The Master Plan mdIcates the acreage for the Office categones (0, Or) IS decreasmg; yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS categorY IS mcreasmg by 72, 922 square feet. Please c1anfv thIS mconsIstencv i "'? .)_. The Master Plan mdIcates a proposed new access from MIner Road for Lot 34-C The traffic analYSIS must spec1ficallv address thIS access smce It IS not mtegrated Into the traffic CIrculatIOn system for the rest of the PID How i ! many tnps are allocated for thIS SHe and how WlllIt Impact Mmer Road? 33 The NOPC applIcatIon page 9 contams two converSIOn formulas for reSIdentIal umts. They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they ; proVIde two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ReSIdentIal I Umt. \-Vhat IS the purpose of these formulas? Please c1anfy thIS INCLUDE REJECT MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/17/01 7 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT inconsIstency or remove them from the applIcatIOn. 34 Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal deViatIon by the CIty ThIS IS based on the followmg sectIOns of the Flonda Statutes. a) Chapter 38006 (19) (b) 9 An mcrease m the number of dwellmg umts by five (5) percent of 50 umts, whIchever IS greater b) Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) 5 c, Not WIthstandmg any provlSlon m paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change conslstmg of sImultaneous mcrease I and decreases of at least two of the uses wlthm an authonzed multI-use development of regIOnal Impact WhICh was ongmally approved WIth more I than three uses specIfied m 380 0651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and resIdentIal use. i c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b Except for the types of uses lIsted m I I "\ subparagraph (b) 16., any change whIch would result m the development I of any area WhICh was specIfically set aSIde m the applIcatIOn for development approval or m the development order for preservatIOn, buffers, or specIal protectIOn, mcludmg habItat for plant and ammal speCIes, archeologIcal and hlstoncal SItes and other specIal areas The applIcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantIal deVIatIOn. ThIS presumption may be rebutted by clear and conVIncmg eVIdence, The I applIcant must provIde addItIonal mformatIOn before determmatIOn of no substantial deVIatIon IS made. The addItIOnal mformatIOn must mclude I A revIsed traffic analYSIS based on comments receIved from Palm Beach I - County and the CIty of Boynton Beach Techmcal ReVIew CommIttee - Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and Office/Industnal (Or) categones to the MU category IS conSIstent WIth I the ComprehensIve Plan. I - ProVIde an updated analYSIS of the master dramage plan for Quantum Park clearly mdlcatmg the Impacts that an mdustnal development on the I current DetentIOn Tract 34-C would have. I - Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space \VIll be I IDltIgated. I 35 Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development ! Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a I I traffic analysIS IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. The applIcant I submitted a traffic analYSIS. In lIeu of an mdependent traffic consultant, the I I I staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic DlVlsIOn WIll reVIew the traffic study I 36 The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon has reVIewed the traffic study and ; demed approval due to the followmg: I The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 dally tnps) should ! a. , be counted as vested tnps \VIthm the overall Quantum development traffic generatIons. I I b Dally and peak hour tnps related to "ADA Approvals" as presented In i Attachments IA. IB and IC must reflect the values of the latest NOPC I MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 09/17/01 8 , DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT approval. I (Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to MIchael Rumpf dated I I 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and reVIse the traffic study I accordingly I 37 The NOPC Master Plan submIttal dId not mclude a conceptual sIte plan or i JuStIficatIOn for the requested change. The CIty approved the MIxed-Use deSIgnatIOn when It adopted Amendment #10 m March 2000 To date, no I development has been proposed whIch combmes all the uses reqUIred by the Land Development RegulatIons m the defimtIOn of a Mixed Use Pod m a I Pill The only plans submItted and approved to date are for Villas at I Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay) I 38 The Villas at Quantum Lake site plan was approved WIth an access at the I north end of the sIte from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum , "I Lakes Dnve eventually leadmg out to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed Master Plan does not mdIcate thIS access. Please correct the Master Plan to I reflect the approved access for the reSIdentIal proJect. I 39 The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake project have contacted the CIty m I I I wntmg regardmg theIr concerns that any development on proposed lots 100 and 101, If not bUllt m coordmatIon WIth theIr proJect, may Impact theIr access, frontage, VIsibIlIty, setbacks, denSIty, open space and eXIstmg VIews. Has the applIcant contacted the adjacent property o\'mer to dISCUSS the Impacts of thIS NOPC proposal? It IS ImperatIve that the adjacent property , owners are appnsed of and be m agreement WIth thIS proposed change. I 40 The proposed abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the I creatIOn of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will reqUIre a replat of that portIon of the Pill plat. I 41 On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to DaVId, B Noms, Counsel for the applIcant requesting several reVISIons to the Annual Status Report for the Quantum Park Pill DR!, To date, those reVISIOns have not been made. Please reVIse the annual report accordmgly and prOVIde the reVISIOns at the September 11, 2001 TRC meetmg. I 42. ReVIse the SubstantIal DeviatIOn Chart in the applIcatIon for the Open I Spaces category The chart mdIcates N/C for the proposed change when the elImInatIon of the detentIon area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for the Industnal and Office categones, as they do not match the 'i"OPC Master Plan #12 dra\\1ng. I , I I MWlVsc S:\P!ann,ngISHARED\WPlPROJECTS\Quantum Pari< 2001 MPMD & DRIAIMPMD ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc ~ c r CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH PUBLIC \VORKS DEP ARThIENT ThlEROFflCEMffiMO~~UM TO Mike Rumpf, DIrector ofPlannmg and Zomng FROM. Jeffrey R. LIvergood, DIrector of PublIc Works DATE August 29,2001 SlJBJECT Quantum NOPC #12 I have reVIewed the proposed changes consIdered m NOPC #12 for Quantum Park. Quantum has requested that consIderatIOn be gIVen by the City to the closure of the eastern portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve at Gateway Boulevard. There are essentIally three traffic Issues that ment evaluatIOn and scrutmy "! Quantum Lakes Drive Closure Staff IS of the OpInIOn that Quantum Lakes Dnve can safely be closed at Gate\vay Boulevard. Frankly, It IS staffs opmIOn that there IS value m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnvewav smce thIS would effectIvely elmllnate a conflIct pomt on a busy artenal route (Gateway Boulevard) However, m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnve, we must be cogmzant of the revIsed access configuratIOns from Lots 100 and 102 Staff recommends that these two lots only be allowed to access Gateway Boulevard m a "nght In - nght out" manner Staff would oppose any smgle lot havmg full access onto Gateway smce the dnveways m questIOn are located on the mSIde of the curve on Gateway and SIght dIstance IS 1mllted. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard Staffs reVIew of the traffic Impact at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard IS more complex. As part of NO PC #11 submIttal, the traffic consultant, Pmdar Troutman, opmed that a traffic SIgnal IS warranted at tlus mtersectIon based on peak hour warrants, or Warrant 11 from the Manual on Umform Traffic Control Dev1ces With respect to NOPC #12, the consultant has changed the mtersectIOn lane-markmg configuratIOn by elImmatmg one of two through lanes both northbound and southbound and substItutmg dedIcated nght turn lanes ThIS actIOn was logIcal because the assumptIOn was made that there would be very mImmal north or southbound through movements at the mtersectIOn. UltImately, the cntIcal volume analYSIS that was utllIzed for level of servIce analYSIS could be reduced. Thus the mtersectIOn theoretIcally wIll have a lugher traffic capaCIty Ho\";"ever, whereas the cntIcal lane analYSIS proVIdes mformatIon related to overall mtersectIOn capaCIty, It does not lend Itself to warrant analYSIS for SIgnalIzatIon. ThIS analYSIS IS based on completely dIfferent cntena establIshed m the Manual m Umform Traffic Control DeVIces the same Manual utIlIzed by the consultant m NOPC #11 submIttal. The consultant has sho\'.m no changes m the traffic dIstnbutIOn. Thus, the warrant analYSIS conducted by Pmdar Troutman and summanzed m a report dated February 16,200115 stlll valId. In fact, as lots 7 through 11 and lots 23 through 31 develop as MIxed Use, they WIll most certamlv generate addItIOn:ll traffic th:lt - .. i if' ,~ " r It \L. will use the mtersectIOn of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. As such, the need for a traffic SIgnal at thIS mtersectIOn \vill be even more pronounced. Staff, therefore, recommends that the developer nnmedIately have mstalled -at traffic actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIon of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The developer should post a letter of credIt m an amoll!lt / commensurate WIth the cost of SIgnal constructIOn as a part of the approval of NO PC #12. C. Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The traffic consultant dId not evaluate traffic condItIOns as part of the submIttal packet for NOPC #12 However, evaluatIOn of traffic condItIOns at thIS mtersectIon IS equally as cntIcal. Agam, as part of the NOPC #11 subnuttal, Pmdar Troutman evaluated traffic SIgnal warrant cntena at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. In thIS analYSIS, Pmdar Troutman found that a traffic SIgnal was not presently warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on the peak hour warrant and noted that "there are other Warrants, No 2 - InterruptIOn ofContmuous Traffic and No 10 - Peak Hour Delay that may be satIsfied. The recommendatIOn IS that thIS mtersectIon be momtored m the future Appropnate tIme frames for momtonng would be at the buildout of Lots 32 through 38 and at the buildout of the NOPC 11 resIdentlal or non-reSIdentlalland uses, whIchever occurs first." Staff would note that a large portIon oflots 32 through 38 are now complete m the form of the Prenuer buildmg, .\ Furthermore, as part ofPmdarTroutman's traffic analysIs m February of2001, the consultant assumed a buIld out of Lots 23 to 31 as office space (0) and Lots 7 to 11 as Office/Industnal (Oil) However, the proposal IS to now change these land uses to Mixed Use (MU) The developer contmues to be bound by a maXImum number of daily tnps from the entIre DRI, yet subtle changes m land use can sIgmficantly Impact peak hour traffic flows WIthout unpactmg the daily tnp generatIOn rate. The consultant has not expressed an opmIOn on the changed traffic charactenstIcs as related to traffic SIgnal warrant analYSIS based on the changes to nuxed use. Staff belIeves that the developer should be reqUlred to post a letter of credIt as well for the mstallatIon of a traffic-actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Avenue It IS very likely that a SIgnal will be warranted upon build out of the proposed nuxed use land uses. If the CIty does not obtam surety for the mstallatIOn of a traffic SIgnal at thIS tIme, It will be VIrtually Impossible to assess the reqUlrement for traffic SIgnal constructIOn to each mdIvIdual that may purchase the nuxed use lots from Quantum and then subsequently develop them. The burden of traffic SIgnal constructIon should fall upon the developer of the whole rather than the mdIvIduals that choose to acqUlre and develop lots m the future Quantum could easily dIstribute the cost equally to future buyers whereas the CIty could not. ~~ QUANTUJV1 ~Ifi;. G R 0 U P 0 F COM PAN I E 5 September 10,2001 r Ii IIDJ ~ ~r ~J j SBJ_ f 11. --.J L.. [r6 IS r ;"7 !' r'l "J!sl. ,~,i' ----" " , Mr Michael W Rumpf CIty of Boynton Beach Department of Development Planmng & Zomng DIVISIOn 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 RE. Quantum Park - Amendment #12 Dear Mr Rumpf- Addressed below are the staff comments prOVIded on September 4, 2001 The comments are restated for convemence. Please note we have renumbered the comments, as the City staff comments duplicate comment numbers 25 thru 29, Inclusive. Listed below are the attached documents referenced In the responses. 1 Revised Master Development Plan, revIsed September 10,2001 a. Ten (10) copIes 24"x36" b. One (1) each, l1"x 1 7" and 8 W' x 11" 2. ReVIsed NOPC ApplIcatIOn Page 5, revIsed September 10,2001 3 ReVIsed Substantial DeViation Chart, dated September 10, 2001 4 PInder Troutman Consulting, Inc. letter dated September 7, 2001 5 Two-page letter from SFWMD, dated February 7, 1997 6 SFWMD no ObjectIOn letter, dated September 6, 2001 7 Olen letter, dated September 7,2001 8 Area Calculation Summary, dated September 6, 2001 Our responses are presented as follows. PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. None RESPONSE. Comment noted. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic . Comments See attached memo from Jeff Livergood, Public Works Director dated August 29, 2001 RESPONSE. See letter dated September 7, 2001, from Kahart Pinder, Pinder Troutman Inc. 2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve, Suite 101 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 (561) 740-2447 . Fax (561) 740-2429 e-mail: quantgrp@qgc.cc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 2 9/1 % I UTILITIES Comments. 1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-0007) to whIch we responded to m UtilItIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that with the origmal DR! for the total park designated for Commercial, Industnal, Office, or a combination of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and CommercIal, both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was designed and constructed for those antIcIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft statIOns were configured to handle the wastewater generatIOn antIcIpated m the 550-acre park. RESPONSE. Comment noted. This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment. 2. As prevIously stated, the propose reVIsion to the land use to "Mixed Use (MU)" to include Office, Commercial and ResIdentIal uses could tax the utilIty support facilIties to their lImIts. A proVISO needs to be mcorporated mto each group of lot approvals process, that the desIgn-engineenng consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utilIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or they will proVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure to so could result m insufficient utilIty support to thIS park, affecting other current (exIstmg) users. RESPONSE. Comment noted. This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment. 3 ApplIcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to Industnal usage. In lIeu that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIOn (as an overflow from Tract "J"), applIcant IS required to demonstrate that the dry retention requirement get transferred. The partial letter from SFWMD (unsIgned) does not indIcate that the dry retentIon of Lot 34-C is no longer reqUIred, nor has the "As-Built Master Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of-record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc., ever been submItted to the CIty It Will be reqUIred to submIt the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that the applIcant's request for land use converSIOn. RESPONSE. The following is the demonstration that Lot 34-C is not needed as a dry retention area and as being unnecessary was not transferred to any other lot or location. F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG091 001. doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 3 9/1 % I Prior to 1987 tile area known as Lot 34-C was shown on the Master Development Plan as a Detention Area and was part of the surface water management system included in the SFWMD Conceptual Approval. In 1987 tile SFWMD surface water management permit was modified. The modification eliminated tile Lot 34-C area as a detention or retention area, added a water management tract, combined three drainage basins into two and revised tile stage/storage assumptions among otller modifications. The master development plan continued to erroneously show the area of Lot 34-C as a detention area until Master Plan Amendment No.9, when the erroneous label was removed. On June 30, 1988 Quantum Park Plat No.3 was recorded in the official records of Palm Beach County following review and approval by the SFWMD, the L WDD and tile City of Boynton Beach. The plat created Lot 34-C unencumbered by any dedication or reservation as a detention or retention area. The modified Master Drainage Plan as approved by the LWDD is submitted in support of tile above demonstration. This drawing was recovered from the L WDD, as the City of Boynton Beacll Utility or Engineering Departments could not produce a single drainage record drawing wilen requested. Tile primary surface water management system was subsequently constructed along with tile roadways and lot areas. An engineer's completion statement was submitted to the SFWMD along with the requisite control structure record data after the completion of the construction of the primary surface water management system. Tile engineer states the system was constructed in substantial conformance with the approved construction drawings and the SFWMD permit. Tile project was field reviewed by the SFWMD field engineers and the letter submitted witlt the NOPC application was issued by tlte SFWMD acknowledging tile engineers' statement and tile completion oftlte construction. A copy of the signed two-page letter acknowledging tlte construction completion is attached for your record. Also attaclled is a letter dated September 6, 2001 from the SFWMD stating no objection to tile approval of the proposed cllanges. l" Lot 34-C was not par.t of the construction drawings or the permit as a detention area and tllus was not constructed as a detention area. Lot 34-C is not needed as a/ detention area now or in tile future. Please delete tllis comment. F IQuantum LimitedlnopcJ2EAG091001,doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 4 9/10/01 4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Miner Road, WhICh has roadway drainage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIvIded roadway sectIon. RESPONSE. The Development Order for Quantum Park only requires the dedication of Right-ol-Way for Miner Road along an alignment through the Quantum Park property as determined by Palm Beach County. This condition has been satisfied. Miner Road was designed and constructed by Palm Beach County. The Miner Road drainage system does not discharge to Lot 34-C, nor is it required or designed to disc/large to Lot 34-C. Drainage easements in favor of Palm Beach County or the City of Boynton Beach do not exist through Lot 34-C or any portion of the primary surface water management system north of Gateway Boulevard within Quantum Park. The drainage system for Miner Road is clearly shown on the construction drawing on record at the Palm Beach County Engineering Department titled "Drainage Map, Sheet 2 of 37, Miner Road", dated Dec'88. The drainage structure adjacent Lot 34-C is a manhole at a high point in the roadway. The Miner Road right-of-way is the only area included in the drainage area for the roadway. The drainage system discharges to The L WDD E-4 Canal, not Lot 34-C. Please delete this comment. 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contains both water and wastewater system segments, to which at least one-half of the dedIcated right-of-way WIll be reqUIred to be utilIty easement(s). No antIcipated permanent "park amemtles" will be permItted on the utIhty easement(s), other that soddmg and/or sidewalk. ThIS department wIll require demonstration that "neglIgible impacts on the traffic distributIOn resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" SubmItted traffic analysIs by the consultant does not meet DR! traffic performance standards. RESPONSE. The proposed preliminary plat will include utility easements for the existing utilities within the proposed lots 100, 101 and 102. The Master Development Plan is not required to show easements of any kind and none or shown, either existing qr proposed. Any proposed construction within the cre(lted lots will be reviewed during the site plan review process and subsequent construction permit process. Easements, both existing and proposed, will be addressed at that time. Given the scrutiny of the plat review process, the site planning review process and the construction permit process, this comment is inappropriate at this time. F IQuantum Limitedlnopc12EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 5 9/1 % 1 Witll regard to the traffic analysis, the DRI performance standard is a 15% increase in external traffic. The analysis determined that there is not a 15% increase in daily or peak hour traffic. In fact, there is a projected decrease in both the daily and peak hour traffic. The specific impact of the road closure is the redistribution of eastbound Quantum Lakes Drive traffic generated by the office buildings on Lots 52 and 58 to Quantum Boulevard. These two developments generate an average daily total of 1062 trips. Combine the office traffic with the 1904 average daily trips generated by tile 272 apartments within the Villas at Quantum Lake project and the resultant total average daily traffic projected to use the Quantum Boulevard link between Quantum lakes Drive and Gateway Boulevard is 2986 trips. Wllat demonstrates the negligible impact of the proposed roadway abandonment is the comparison of the 2986 average daily trips projected on tile roadway link at build out and tile 32,500 daily trip capacity of Quantum Boulevard. The impact is further diminished by the fact that nearly all of the 2986 trips would be using the Quantum Boulevard link to Gateway Boulevard anyway. Please delete this comment. FIRE Comments. 6 Roads and hydrants must be in place pnor to any construction above grade. RESPONSE. This is a site plan and site-specific development related comment. It is inappropriate as a condition for a Master Plan amendment. Please delete this comment. POLICE Comments. None RESPONSE, Comment noted. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments 7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve will reqmre replatting of that portIOn of Quantum Park III accordance WIth the requirements of the LDR, Chapter 5, Platting. F IQuantum Limited\nopcJ2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 6 9/10/0] RESPONSE. A proposed preliminary plat is being prepared and will be submitted by separate application to the City of Boynton Beach for review and approval pursuant to the plat review process. 8 Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 54) IS proposed to be changed from undesIgnated use to Industrial use. How will thIS change Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development? RESPONSE. It is important to note, the land area for Lot 34-C was previously accounted for as a detention area and not as an open space or recreational park area. Therefore, there is no impact to the open space or the recreational park areas relative to the development of Lot 34-C. A similar example of no impact is the Sand Pine Preserve areas adjacent the Industrial Development and Mixed Use Development in the southern portion of the park. Please delete this comment. 9 Provide verification that Palm Beach County Engineering will permIt a dnveway openmg onto Miner Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress point will be provIded at the south end of the property for emergency servIces. RESPONSE. It is inappropriate to request verification from Palm Beach County Engineering for a driveway opening onto Miner Road for Lot 34-C as a Master Plan amendment requirement or even as a verification for site plan approval. Verification has not been provided within the development at the Master Plan stage for any driveway connection to any adjacent roadway. Furthermore, the permitting of a driveway opening is a site plan related issue and should be considered at that time. A second ingress and egress will not be provided for Lot 34-C. This is consistent with other lots within the development that do not have secondary access which are larger developments or larger lot areas than could be proposed or constructed on Lot 34-C. These issues are site-planning issues and are inappropriate for the Master Plan consideration. Please delete this comment. 10 If approved, an envlfonmental assessment of Tract 34C will be reqmred as part of any site submittal. RESPONSE. We request that comment #10 be deleted on the basis that this again is a site plan related condition. Furthermore, the Development Order (DO) already requires an Environmental Assessment of each lot prior to development. Certainly, not prior to Master Plan approval, a land use designation or a change thereto. F IQuantum Limiledlnopc12EAG09lO01.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 7 9/1 % 1 Please delete tltis commellt. 11 Abandonment of a portion of Quantum Lake Dnve wIll Isolate the dedIcated roadway easement along the north property hne of Lot 61 The NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, indIcates access wIll be provIded Via a single entrance pomt at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard. EhmmatIOn of that portIOn of Quantum lakes Dnve and the second access pomt wIll create an undeSIrably long tnp for the most northerly residents of the proposed multI-family resIdential development and would create a hazardous sItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. RESPONSE. Prior to respolldillg to tlte comment it is important to correct two factual errors witltin tlte comment. Firstly, tlte identified "dedicated roadway easement along tlte nortlt property line of Lot 61" does not exist. Secondly, tlte application for tlte Nope in Section 5.5 was improperly restated. Tlte application states tltat tlte main access or entrance point at tlte intersection of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum Boulevard will be used by Lots 59, 60, and 61 In fact, a second access point is provided consistent witlt tlte approved site plan tltrouglt tlte property to tlte nortlt currently owned by Quantum Park and Village. Please refer to tlte letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen Developments. Tlte letter clearly indicates tlte intent to provide a secondary access. Please delete tltis comment. 12. Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and reconfigunng a portion of it mto Lot 101 will create an undesuably long trip for the most northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous situation for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same development. RESPONSE. Stated in comment #11 and #12 is a concern contending long and undesirable trips to tlte remote section of tlte existing and newly created lots. We strongly disagree witlt tltis contention and request botlt commellts be deleted, as many developments of over 500 acres Itave muclt longer distances to travel to exit tlte development. Furtltermore, tlte access alld travel routes of emergency vellicles are site- planning issues, IlOt master planning issues. Please refer to the letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen Developments. Tlte letter clearly illdicates the intent to provide a secondary access to northem portions of Lot 61 and Lot 101 Please delete this comment. F \Quantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09 J 00 J. doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 8 9/1 0/0 1 13 ReconfiguratIon of Lots 62 and 63 Into a smgle Lot 102 would create the same situatIOn described In the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of the proposed new lot. RESPONSE. Our responses for comments #11 and #12 also relate to comment #13 and we request this comment be removed. In this particular case, the newly created Lot 102 is part of the larger 23 acre mixed use area. These lands are under single ownership and are anticipated to be included into a single master plan for commercial, office and residential uses with proper emergency access and vehicular movements throughout the 23 acres with access from the Villas at Quantum Lake property (Lots 59, 60 and 61). Please delete this comment. 14 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, Section 5.5, paragraph 3, represents the Intersection of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and dangerous. ThIS IntersectIOn has prevIously been reviewed and approved. Please prOVIde addItional InfOrmatIOn (aCCIdent data and standard drawings) supporting thIS statement. RESPONSE. Without regard for the previous review and approval, it appears from the memo written by Mr Livergood P.E. (Public Works - Traffic Comments) the City staff supports our requestfor the elimination of the intersection and the abandonment of the roadway. Regarding the previous review and approval, the improvements within Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Drive were designed in 1986 and 1987 and constructed in 1988 and 1989 Many changes to the FDOT design standards and design criteria have occurred since that time. Palm Beach County has adopted an access management plan and has also adopted street landscaping criteria, "streetscape criteria" In previous incidents these criteria all have been applied to development plans (e.g. site plans and associated roadway improvements, etc.) presented to the City for review. The Palm Beach County streetscape standards and access management standards were adopted after the design and construction of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Drive. Of particular interest and concern is the "hot right" from Quantum Lakes Drive to eastbound Gateway Boulevard. A yield sign controls this turning movement. In effect traffic is allowed to flow from Quantum Lakes Drive and merge into the rigllt hand through lane of Gateway Boulevard with very little acceleration lane distance or adequate merging taper It is this hot right that wefeel is hazardous and believe is desirous to eliminate, particularly in light of the increased pedestrian traffic crossing this yielded intersection enroute to the new high school that did not exist when the roadway was designed. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 9 9/1 % 1 We look to the City of Boynton Beach to provide any accident data or record drawings of this intersection, if any additional information or respOllSe is desired from the applicant. No additional information or response in our judgment is necessary. Please delete this comment. 15 If the areas MU 10 1 and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an additIOnal recreatIOnal fee (or land in lieu of fee) may be assessed based on the origmal calculatIOns for the CIty Park. RESPONSE. The Park and Recreational Department address recreational fees and this comment in the Engineering section is inappropriate. Please delete this comment. 16 The creation of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-designation of Lot 34C from undesignated to Industrial will obviously increase traffic volumes. The Traffic Analysis (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result in an increase m dally or peak hour volumes" Although the analysis concludes that there are no increases and decreases in allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs to further address local changes m traffic volumes that would result from the proposed changes. RESPONSE. The proposed change does not increase the vested traffic generation of the Park. An increase of developable area does not necessarily increase development intensities particularly if intensity is measured by traffic generation. Land area does not generate traffic, the office, industrial and residential buildings do generate traffic. The proposed change increases the residential units allowable within the Park and decreases the threshold of allowable office and industrial building area, on a traffic generation equivalency basis. The traffic generation equivalency is demonstrated by the submitted traffic analysis and supplemented by the attached letter from Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Please delete this comment. 17 The Traffic Analysis (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Drive has the potential to impact the regional roadway network. The,analysis further states that dIverted traffic will cause ~he mtersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over capacity dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes m striping and roadway widening to address thIS Without providmg a timetable. Please be more speCIfic as to how and when thIS work Will be mcorporated into the planning process to minimIze Impact to the travehng public. Also please address the F lQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09IOOI.doc Me Michael W Rumpf Page 10 9/1 % 1 impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement. RESPONSE. This comment has inaccurately stated the conclusions of the traffic generation equivalence data, the intersection analyses and the concluding statements. A roadway widening is not proposed or required as a result of the abandonment of Quantum Lakes Drive. The analysis and standard practice is very clear, the roadway restriping associated with the traffic signal will occur when warranted, not before the signal is warranted and preferably not after it is warranted. The accurate conclusions are provided below after the following discussion about the BGI approval conditions. Regarding the traffic signal warrants and the surety thereof, the BGI site plan approval conditions are of importance. The BGI site plan approval was conditioned requiring them to construct the traffic signal at the Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard intersection. BGI subsequently abandoned their development plans and sold the land. The subsequent development, a 336,500 sq. ft. warehouse project known as Gateway Business Center, was not conditioned by the City to construct or even provide surety for the subject traffic signal. We believe this oversight should not be at the expense of this applicant especially now since it has been shown that it is the Gateway Business Center and the Villas at Quantum Lake developments that at build out will warrant the signal. The accurate conclusion is as follows, ti,e Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard intersection was previously determined to warrant a traffic signal with the existing developments within the Park and the build out of ti,e Villas at Quantum Lake and the 336,500 sq. ft. warehouse project (located at the northeast corner of the intersection). The analysis shows the traffic signal would be warranted prior to this proposed change. The analysis also concluded the existing roadway improvements are adequate at the time the traffic signal is warranted. The analysis also determined the intersection after the traffic signal is warranted will be over capacity during the PM peak hour only due to the projected increase in through traffic on Gateway Boulevard and NOT the traffic generated by Quantum Park or the diverted traffic caused by the roadway abandonment. This comment is further addressed in the attached letter dated, September 7, 2001 from Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Please delete this comment. . 18 Identify the tract shown as MUlOl as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's additional property due to the abandonment. Change MUI00 to MUI02A. RESPONSE. TIle Lot numbering strategy was discussed at a preliminary meeting with the City staff The revised Master Development Plan reflects those discussions. The F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EA G09 JOO J. doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 11 9/1 % 1 furtlter subdivision of Lot 101 into two lots is problematic as is tlte suggested "A" designation. The ''A'' designation is already used within the Park to identify lots totally encumbered by drainage easements and associated with developable lots with tlte same lot number We reject the suggestion. Please delete this comment. BUILDING DIVISION Comments. None RESPONSE. Comment noted. PARK AND RECREATION Comments 19 The CIty CommISSIon dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUIrement, 272 umts of the 1,000 umts reqUIred m the most recent master plan revision. The developer dId pledge, however, to proVIde appropriate publIc recreatIOn facilIties for these umts. (To be determmed m conjunction With the Parks DIVIsIon.) The total recreatIOn dedIcation requirement will be calculated as follows. 1,000 umts - 272 units = 723 D U 728 DUx 015 = 10.92 acres ~ credIt may be given against the requirements of land dedIcation or payment fees. ~ pnvate recreation credIt will be calculated as follows 10 92 acres / 2=5 46 acres An addItional '14 credit may be given for natural resources agamst the requirement of land dedication or payment of fees. '14 credit for natural resources will be calculated as follows 10 92 acres / 4=2 73 acres The developer may want to consIder dedicatIOn of the land, or a combmatIOn of dedIcatIOn and fee. RESPONSE. The pledge of tlte applicant (not the Developer) referenced above is clarified as follows. The applicant pledges to provide recreational facilities for the r.emaining 228 residential units and the proposed adpitional 500 residential units as amenities to tlte additional units, in tlte vicinity of the additional units and for the exclusive use of the residents of tlte additional units. Tlte developer of tlte residential projects pursuant to market demands will determine the facilities. These recreational facilities will be planned and constructed as part of the segment of the mixed-use F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JO01.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 12 9/1 % 1 development in much the same manner as the recreational facilities are being provided to the Villas of Quantum Lake. The discussion and expression of the intent of the City Commission was that Quantum Park in general should be exempt from the recreation dedication credit. The discussion by the Commission was that Quantum Park had provided more in the form of recreation and other benefits to the City to satisfy any potential recreation dedication requirement and therefore, no further requirement should be requested with respect thereto. This intent was further reinforced by the City Manager in recent discussions concerning the future planning and development of the Park. Please delete this comment. 20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIon, IS subtracted off the Recreation DedicatIOn ReqUIrement. RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment. 21 Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, Section 3, of the Land Development RegulatIOn, the developer must provide 5 park elements in order to qualify for 12 credIt for pnvate recreation provided. RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment. 22. If the property IS not further platted, recreatIOn fees or dedications for the 728 non-exempt dwellIng umts are due before the Issuing of theIr resIdentIal building permits. RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment. FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments. 23 I am requestmg the applIcant as a condItIon to the above Master Plan ModificatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14, 2001 (as directed by our CIty Manager) in reference to the Quantum Park-DRI Annual EnvIronmental Areas Status Report. RESPONSE. This request is inappropriate and should be deleted. The applicant is not responsible for addressing the requests of the City Forrester or any other agency or individual relating to lands owned by others, improvements or maintenance of F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 13 911 % I improvements upon lands owned by otllers, including tile Quantum Community Development District ("QCDD" in this case. Tile referenced letter requests a written status of various management aspects of tile sand pine preserve areas and tile wetland areas within Quantum Park. Tile letter also request documents that should be on file at the City as the administrator of the DRI for the Park. Neither status reports nor tile supply of documents are the responsibility of tile applicant. Tile letter has been forwarded to the QCDD and we are aware the QCDD is working with Dr Richardson to provide tile requested status reports and documents of record requested by the City. We firmly believe the QCDD will comply witll the request as they have with all other responsibilities within the Park. Please delete this comment. 24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detentIon (open spaces) area and IS contIguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pme Preserve. The land use change of Lot 34-C from detention (open space) to industnal, could affect the environmental qualIty of the contIguous Sand Pine Preserve when the owner develops the mdustnal tract. RESPONSE. Comment noted. As a site planning requirement, the impact to the sand pine preserve area to the west, tile water management tract to the south, the adjacent vacant land to the east and Miner Road to tile north (as discussed above) is required to be considered. The key here is tllese are site development related concerns and not Master Planning concerns. Lot 34-C is not encumbered by any existing or required drainage easement, plat dedication or plat reservation for use as a detention or retention area. Tile land use designation cllange is not a change from detention to industrial but a change described as follows. Lot 34-C is currently unrestricted by a "land use designation" as shown on tile Master Development Plan Amendment No. 10 for Quantum Park. Currently, the land could be developed as allowed within a PID zoning district. We are proposing a change to restrict tile use of Lot 34-C to industrial uses subject to all current zoning, site planning, land development and building req uirements. Tile Lot 34-C area (6.58 acres, as determined by survey) has been erroneously accounted for in tile "open space" area total and the detention area subtotal. Tllis proposed cllange application corrects that accounting Please delete tltis comment. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 14 9/1 010 1 25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham lInk fence was mstalled around a) Lot 34-C (6.58 acres) and b) Water Management Tract "J" (6 16 acres) and connected to the existing fence around the perImeter of the c) Sand Pme Preserve (257 acres). ThIS was to protect the envIronmental quality of the total of 38 44 acres m the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as open spaces / Sand Pme Preserve. The project should contmue m the normal reVIew process. RESPONSE. The assumptions, presumptions and implied conclusions as suggested in the above comment resulting from the fencing of the three identified areas are astoundingly inaccurate. To the best of our knowledge the acreage of Water Management Tract J is also stated inaccurately. The 6-foot high chain link fence as well as numerous "NO TRESPASSING" signs were installed by the QPPOA with the cooperation of the applicant to attempt to restrict the trespass of off the road vehicles and poachers illegally entering the properties and causing damage to the habitat and wildlife. Prior to this applicant's purchase of lands with in the Park, the illegal access and damage was occurring unrestricted. It was simply less expensive, less time consuming, provided better security and a better opportunity for monitoring the fence and access with the fence installed along the north and east boundary line of Lot 34-C. Furthermore, including Lot 34-C "behind the fence" also protected the Lot 34-C area habitat and wildlife from damage prior to the proper environmental assessment typically performed as part of the lot development process at the time a specific development is proposed. Please delete this comment. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments. 26 The Land Use Average Table IS mcorrect as shown on page 5 of the NOPC application. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac. of (01) and 26.33 ac. of (OIC). Correct thIS mformatIon on the applIcatIon. RESfONSE. The acreages reported for the 01 and 0](; land use designations are correctly reported in the application. The acreages reported in the comment above are incorrect. It appears something other tl,an the Master Development Plan of record for Amendment No 10, as revised pursuant to the City Commission approval is being referenced. F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 15 9/1 % 1 Please delete tltis comment. 27 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the apphcatIOn and on the Master Plan draWIng shown a decrease m the (OIC) category (26.33 acres approved, 22.94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (OIC) designated lot. Please explam? RESPONSE. A cltange is not proposed in tlte approved area designated for OIC development. Tlte comment above is based on tlte same inaccuracy apparent in Comment No. 26. Tlte application tabular data and tlte revised Master Development Plan clearly sltow no increase or decrease in tlte land area designatedfor OIC development. Please delete tltis comment. 28 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applicatIOn and on the NOPC Master Plan # 12 drawmg is mcorrect. The eXIstmg (MU) lots add up to 26 82 acres. Together they total 89.20 acres not 9065 as shown on the plan. Please correct. RESPONSE. Tlte total acreage proposed for Mixed Use (MU) development as a result of tltis application is 90.66 acres, tltis area is based upon surveys performed for tlte applicant. Attaclted to clarify tlte apparent area confusion is an ''Area Calculation Summary" Tlte Master Development Plan and tlte NOPC Application page Itave been revised to reflect ti,e totals sltown in tlte Summary. Please delete tltis comment. 29 Lot 34-C IS shown having 6.58 acres in the application but 6.56 acres has been added to the Industnal category on the Master Plan. The development order and Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have identified thIS tract as havmg 6.59 acres. To be consistent, use the 6 59-acre sIte area calculation. RESPONSE. Tlte acreage of Lot 34-C is 6.58 acres based upon a survey performedfor tlte applicant. Please reference tlte attaclted ''Area Calculation Summary" Please delete tltis comment. 30 (City's duplicate number 25) Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "Detention" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detention label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to the designatIOn of this lot was proposed or approved m either amendment. TIus lot remams a DetentIOn lot with no development desIgnatIOn F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JO01.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 16 9/1 OlD 1 assIgned. Please mdIcate thIS m your apphcatIOn and provIde data and analysIs to support the ehmmatIOn of this area for detentIOn. RESPONSE. The detention label was specifically removed from the Master Development Plan, Amendment No 9, as was other inaccurate information to produce as accurate a plan as possible based on information and data acquired during the purchase of over two hundred (200) with in the park by the applicant. It is important to note the Master Development Plan, Amendment No. 9 was approved by the City Commission with the removal of the detention label along with the removal and revision of other inaccuracies shown on Master Development Plan, Amendment No.8. We object to the contention that Lot 34-C exists as a detention area and agree the lot exists without a land use designation. We contend that without a development land use designation and without an encumbrance for use as a detention area, the lot may be developed as allowed within a PID zoning district subject to all current zoning, site planning, land development and building requirements. Indicated in our application and reflected on the proposed Master Development Plan is the change to the use of Lot 34-C from an undesignated use to an industrial use by providing a land use designation. The request for additional data, analysis and supporting information regarding drainage encumbrances upon Lot 34-C is more appropriately provided by the Engineering Department. It is interesting to note the Engineering Department has not requested additional data or information in this regard. It appears the Engineering Department is satisfied with the description of the proposed change and the supporting documents submitted with the application. It also appears the Utility Department comments provide requests regarding the drainage encumbrances upon Lot 34-C. We have responded to the Utilities Department comments on this issue. Please delete this comment. 31 (26) ProVIde SIte area acreage calculatIOns for proposed lots 100 and 101, RESPONSE. Attached is an "Area Calculation Summary" Please delete this comment. , 32. (27) The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space. Does thIS reflect the 6.59 acre Detention lot (34-C) plus any open space associated WIth the eliminatIOn of the fIght-of -way? Please clarify F IQuantum Limiledlnopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 17 9/10/01 RESPONSE. Attached is an "Area Calculation Summary" Please delete this comment. 33 (28) Lots 73-A through 76 should be highlIghted as committed development. SIte Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 This should also be reflected in the project traffic 2002 estimate In the Pinder Troutman traffic analYSIS. RESPONSE. The Master Development Plan has been revised as requested to show the committed development. The committed development upon these lots has been reflected as requested. The projected traffic from this recently approved project has not been included in the 2002 analysis. It is doubtful it will be constructed within tlte time period as the owner/developer currently has over 250,000 sq. ft. of similar space constructed and currently vacant. The projected traffic has been included in the 2006 intersection analysis. Please delete this comment. 34 (29) Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as commItted development (Onana GranIte) SIte Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 This should be reflected in the project traffic 2001 estlmate in the PInder Troutman traffic analysis. RESPONSE. The Master Development Plan has been revised as requested to show the committed development. The committed development upon these lots has been reflected as requested. It is doubtful lot 50-A will be developed as approved. The contract buyer did not complete the transaction to purchase the property. The current landowner (the applicant) does not desire to construct the project. Therefore it follows the traffic has not been included in either the 2001 or 2002 project traffic for the purposes of the analysis. Please delete this comment. 35 (30) The Master Plan IndIcates that the acreage for the Industrial category IS increasIpg by 6.56 acres yet the allowable Intensity for this cat~gory IS decreasing by 375,354 square feet. Please clarify thIS inconsistency RESPONSE. In applying the theory of "simultaneously increasing and decreasing intensities" using traffic generation formulas as the equivalency technique, no substantial regional impact results from the proposed change. In this particular case, F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09 JOOI.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 18 9/1 % I we are proposing the increase from 500 to ]000 residential units and simultaneously decreasing the allowable industrial square footage by 375,354 sq. ft. The apparent industrial area increase is addressed in the responses to other comments. Please delete this comment. 36. (31) The Master Plan IndIcates the acreage for the Office categories (0, 01) IS decreasing; yet the allowable intensIty for thIS category is Increasing by 72,922 square feet. Please clanfy thIs Inconsistency RESPONSE. The allowable threshold of office space is proposed to be decreased by 72,922 sq. ft. The comment statement above is inaccurate. Please delete this comment. 37 (32) The Master Plan IndIcates a proposed new access from Miner Road for Lot 34-C The traffic analysIs must specIfically address this access since it IS not integrated Into the traffic cIrculation system for the rest of the PID How many trips are allocated for this site and how will It impact Miner Road? RESPONSE. The traffic generated from an industrial use upon Lot 34-C is minor and insignificant when analyzing the traffic issues relevant to the proposed change. On a regional basis, it is the peak hour movements that are of interest. The impacted intersections have been analyzed. The traffic generated by ti,e entire development, which is not being increased, does not I,ave a significant impact on either ti,e Congress or High Ridge Road intersections with Miner Road. The traffic generation calculations for the overall development do not allocate trips to a specific lot. Each lot as it is developed is required to prepare a traffic statement identifying the traffic generated by ti,e specific plan. A distribution of the generated traffic is also provided as part of the statement. Miner Road is a Plan Collector as designated by Palm Beach County. Its right-ol-way is protected for a five-lOlle roadway section. It is constructed as a two-lane roadway expandable to the five-lane ultimate section. We anticipate the maximum traffic generatedfrom Lot 34-C to be 700 average trips per day (6.58 acres x 0.35 FAR x 6.97 trips/] 000 sq. ft.). The connection of 700 trips per day to Miner Road with an ultimate c.apacity of 32,500 trips per day is less than significa"t. The significance is further diminished by the fact the traffic generated by Quantum Park, including the 700 anticipated trips from Lot 34-C, are already vested and properly included in background traffic of the regional roadway network. Please delete this comment. F-\Quantllm Limitedlnopcl2EAG091001.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 19 9/1 % 1 38 (33) The NOPC apphcatIOn page 9 contams two conversion formulas for resIdentIal unItS. They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they provIde two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ResIdentIal Umt. What IS the purpose of these formulas? Please clarIfy tlus mconsistency or remove them from the apphcatIOn. RESPONSE. The formulas have been deleted from the application. Attached is the revised page. Please delete this comment. 39 (34) Approval of the Master Plan IS contingent upon a finding of no substantIal deviation by the CIty This IS based on the following sections of the Flonda Statutes. a) Chapter 380 06 (19) (b) 9 An increase m the number of dwelhng units by five (5) percent of 50 umts, whIchever is greater b) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) S.c. No WIthstandmg any proVIsIon m paragraph (b) to the contrary, a proposed change consIstmg of simultaneous mcrease and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized multI-use development of regIOnal Impact which was onginally approved WIth more than three uses speCIfied m 3800651 (3) (c), (d), (t) and g and resIdential use. c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b. Except for the types of uses hsted in subparagraph (b) 16., any change whIch would result in the development of any area wluch was specifically set aSIde in the apphcatIOn for development approval or m the development order for preservatIOn, buffers, or special protectIOn, mcludmg habItat for plant and anImal specIes, archeologIcal and historical SItes and other speCIal areas The applicatIon as presented is presumed to be a substantial deviation. ThIS presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincmg eVIdence. The applicant must provIde addItIonal informatIOn before determmatIOn of no substantIal deVIatIOn is made. The additIOnal informatIOn must include A reVIsed traffic analysis based on comments receIved from Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach Technical ReVIew CommIttee. Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and Offictl/Industrial (01) categones to the MU category is conSIstent with the ComprehensIve Plan. ProVIde an updated analysis of the master dramage plan for Quantum Park clearly mdICating the Impacts that an mdustnal development on the current DetentIOn Tract 34-C would have. F IQuantum Limited\nopcl2EA G09 100 I.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 20 9/1 % I Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space wIll be mitigated. RESPONSE. Clear and convincing evidence is provided within the responses to these staff comments, the additional statements provided by Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc., the Area Calculation Summary and other documents presentedfor review. The demonstration that the land use designation changes proposed are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan was provided and approved by the City Commission by virtue of Amendment N010 when the Mixed Use category including a residential component was added to the development. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is not an issue. The net loss of open space area is inaccurately stated above. As described in detail in other responses above, the land area of Lot 34-C (6.58 acres of ti,e 8.02 acres) was effectively available for development and was not an "open space" when ti,e plat was recorded and the SFWMD permit was modified. The remainder of the 8.02 acres relates to the portion of Tract Q, a Water Management Tract adjacent the link of Quantum Lakes Drive proposed for abandonment. This remainder area is incorporated into Lot 100 and Lot 101 We are not aware of any federal, state or local requirement to mitigate any loss of open space. Please delete this comment. 40 (35) Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development Order and Chapter 3, Article IV of the Land Development Regulations, a traffic analYSIS IS required for thIS Master Plan approval. The apphcant submitted a traffic analYSIS. In lieu of an independent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn WIll reVIeW the traffic study RESPONSE. Comment noted. Please delete this comment. 41 (36) The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn has reviewed the traffic study and demed approval due to the followmg: a. The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 daily tnps) should be counted as vested trips Wlthm the overall Quantum development traffic generatIOns. b. Daily and peak hour trIps related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in Attachments lA, IB and lC, must reflect the values of the latest NOPC approval. (Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated 8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and reVIse the traffic study accordmgly F \Quantum LimitedlnopcllEAG09JOOJ.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 21 9/1 % 1 RESPONSE. As a result of prior disputes and litigation, it has been previously agreed and determined that the trips generated by the high school would not count against future development within Quantum Park so as to resolve such disputes and litigation. A Settlement Agreement (as a result of the litigation) was entered into by the School Board of Palm Beach County and collectively with the QCDD, the QPPOA and the applicant. Confidentiality provisions of the agreement bind the applicant and the School District. However, a key element of the resolution of this litigation was that the City not count the traffic generated by the high school against future development witltin Quantum Park. The requested revisions to the Attachments listed above are not required for an analysis provided in support of a determination of no substantial deviation. The purpose of the NOPC traffic analysis is to determine if the proposed change results in a substantial deviation. Florida Statues Chapter 380.06 Section (19)(b)15 states that "A 15% increase in the number of external vehicle trips generated by the development above that which was projected during the original development-of-regional review" constitutes a substantial deviation. The data and analysis, as submitted with the application, demonstrates that the proposed plan represents a decrease in Daily, AM peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation from the original development-of- regional review. Therefore, the proposed change is not a substantial deviation and, intersection and roadway link analyses for existing and future conditions are not required. Please delete this comment. 42. (37) The NOpe Master Plan submittal dId not include a conceptual sIte plan or justIficatIOn for the requested change. The CIty approved the Mixed-Use designatIOn when it adopted Amendment #10 in March 2000 To date, no development has been proposed whIch combmes all the uses reqUIred by the Land Development Regulations if the defimtion of a Mixed Use Pod m a PID The only plans submItted and approved to date are for Villas at Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay) RESPONSE. Although we continue to {{conceptually plan" for the development of the existing and proposed mixed-use areas, we feel it inappropriate to require such plans or justifications be provided as part of the change application. The existing Mixed-Use area is not part of this proposed change and the status of its development is irrelevant to this application. In fact, in some cases we are prohibitfd from disclosing the conceptual plans until such site plan is submitted for approval. This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional information. Therefore, please delete tltis comment F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JO01.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 22 9/1 0/0 I 43 (38) The Villas at Quantum Lake sIte plan was approved wIth an access at the north end of the sIte from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum Lakes Drive eventually leadmg out to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed Master Plan does not mdICate thIs access. Please correct the Master Plan to reflect the approved access for the residentIal project. RESPONSE. The Master Development Plan has been revised to show the referenced access. Please delete this comment. 44 (39) The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake project have contacted the CIty m writing regarding theIr concerns that any development on proposed lots 100 and 101, If not bUIlt m coordmate on WIth their project, may Impact their access, frontage, visibilIty, setback, densIty, open space and existmg VIews. Has the applIcant contacted the adjacent property owner to dISCUSS the Impacts of this NOPC proposal? It IS Imperative that the adjacent property owners are appnsed of and be m agreement WIth thIS proposed change. RESPONSE. The adjacent property owners to Lots 100 and 101 are not only aware of the proposed change, but have acquisition agreements with the applicant regarding the lots. We are not aware of any objection to the proposed change. Please refer to the letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen Developments. The letter clearly indicates support for the proposed change and not an objection to the proposed abandonment, lot configuration or access arrangements. Please delete this comment. 45 (40) The proposed abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lakes Drive and the creatIOn of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will reqUIre a replat of that portIOn of the PID plat. RESPONSE. This is also an Engineering Department comment also. A response is provided thereto. Please delete this comment. 46 (41) On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to DaVId B NorrIS, Counsel for the applicant requesting several revisions to the Annual Stqtus Report for the Quantum Park PID DR!. To date, those reVISIOns have not been made. Please reVIse the annual report accordmgly and proVIde the revisions at the September 11,2001 TRC meetmg. RESPONSE. It is not the responsibility of this applicant to prepare, distribute or address comments relative to the Annual DRl Reportfor this project. The requirement F'\Quantum Limitedlnopc12EAG09l OOl.doc Mr Michael W Rumpf Page 23 9/l0101 to provide revisions to a document for which we are not responsible and to provide tlte revised document in less tltanfive (5) working days is absurd. Tlte City's comments on tlte Annual DR! Report are a separate matter and it is grossly inappropriate to impose such a requirement upon the applicant. Please delete tllis comment. 47 (42) Revise the SubstantIal DevIatIOn Chart m the applicatIOn for the Open Spaces category The chart mdICates N/C for the proposed change when the ehmmation of the detentIon area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for the IndustrIal and Office categorIes, as they do not match the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg. RESPONSE. A revised Substantial Deviation Cltart is attached reflecting the responses contained herein. Please delete tltis comment. If you should have any further questIOns, please feel free to contact me at any tIme. cc: David Norris, Esq Cohen, NorrIS, et. al. Kahart Pinder, Pmder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Doug MacDonald Tom McGillicuddy F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG091001.doc Land Use Acrea2e Table Proposed Acreage Land Use Desi2nation Amendment No. 12 Existing Acreage Amendment No. 10 CommercIal (COM) 13.53 Acres 13 53 Acres Industnal (IND) 107.83 Acres 101.25 Acres Oovernmental/InstitutlOnal (0&1) 55.90 Acres 55 90 Acres Office (0) 12.96 Acres 28.24 Acres Office/Industnal (01) 79 75 Acres 8774 Acres Office/Industrial/Commerclal (OIC) 22.94 Acres 22.94 Acres Office/IndustnallHotel (OIH) 378 Acres 378 Acres Mixed Use (MU) 90 66 Acres 62.38 Acres Wetlands 6 00 Acres 6.00 Acres Roads 37.58 Acres 41 13 Acres Sand Pme Reserve 40 00 Acres 40 00 Acres Open Space 82.20 Acres 90.25 Acres Total 553 13 Acres 553 14 Acres NOTE The Amendment 10 and Amendment 12 total areas dIffer due to the roundmg of the mdividual Land Use DeSIgnation to the nearest 001 acres. F'\Quantum Limited\Annual DRI\NotificationDRIrvl.doc 5 August 8, 2001 Revised September 10, 2001 to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts, to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units, and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; It IS requested the development order language be amended to mclude the followmg provIsIOns. 1 Master Plan Amendment No 12 to the Master SIte Development Plan for Quantum Park, dated July 2001, IS hereby approved. 2. Development of the followmg Land Use ClassificatIOns should not exceed the followmg intensIties wIthout further CIty approval. lndustnal 1,900,000 Square Feet CommercIal (includmg Hotel & Rest.) 728,768 Square Feet Office 885,850 Square Feet One Hotel Room =268 Square Feet of Gross Leasable Commercial Area One MOVIe Theatre Seat =40 Square Feet of Office Gross Floor Area One MOVIe Theatre Seat =60 Square Feet of lndustnal Gross Floor Area Residential 1,000 DwellIng Units f.\Quantum Limiled\Annual DRI\NotificationDRIrv I.doc 9 August 8, 2001 Revised September 10, 2001 09:10/~001 17 13 5514341553 F'INDER TROUH1AN FAGE 01 PIHDER TROUTMAN CONSULTIHG. IHC. Transportation Planners and Engmeers September 7,2001 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1H West Palm Beach, Fl 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 Email.pindertroutman@msn.com Ms. Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard PO. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 12 - #PTC01-1 02 Dear Ms. Galav. The following responds to the City comments on the traffic analysis for the above referenced project. Public Works-Traffic - Jeff Livergood memorandum of August 29,2001 Response Quantum Lakes Drive Closure A full median opening exists at this location today There has not been any acddent history at this location that would warrant closure. However, it is recommended that the left turn exit from Parcell 00 not be allowed Traffic Signalization - Quantum Orive and Gateway Boulevard The Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) was not provided as a substitute for the signal warrant analysis, The signal warrant analysis provided in the report dated February 16, 2001 is still valid. The applicant cannot install a signal until it is warranted and has been approved by Palm Beach County Therefore, it is recommended that monitoring of this intersection begin in peak season 2002 to determine if signalization is in fact warranted. This is a condition of the current Development Order (DO). Monitoring should continue every peak season until the signal is warranted Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The applicant would agree that monitoring of this intersection should begin at the buildout of Parcels 32 through 38. Monitoring should be conducted during the peak season and continue until the signal is warranted General The February 16, 2001 Intersection Analysis included proposed NOPe # 11 land uses. The original NOPC # 11 was for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Therefore, the traffic from both the residential and non- residential uses on lots 7 through 11 and 23 through 31 have been included. KMP/ldr LetterGalav01 1029-7-01 Di South Florida \Vater Management District 3301 Gun Cluh Road, West P~m Beach, ~orida 33406. (561) 686-8800. FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 CON 24-05 February 7, 1997 Quantum Associates 2455 East Sunrise Blvd, Suite 1106 Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33304 Dear Sir or Madam. Subject. Boynton Park of Commerce aka Quantum Park Phase Construction Completion/Construction Certification Application Nos. 08296-D & 11207-F, SWM Permit No. 50-01503-S Palm Beach County, SI6,17,20,211T45SIR43E This letter acknowledges receipt of an engineer's Construction Completion/Construction Certification, record drawmgs and an As-Built Master Dramage Plan from Santiago Malavasi, P E. of Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc. pertaining to the subject project's surface water management system. District staff have reviewed the submitted information and it has been incorporated into the permit file Per the referenced certification, our staff consider the Master Surface Water Management System (including 8-onsite interconnected lakes totalling 67.81 acres, 6.92 acre dry detection area and 3- discharge control structures serving the entire 578.3 acre industrial development) and the Surface Water Management System for the Backbone Roadways at the Quantum Park project constructed in conformance With the permit. This satisfies the requirement of the referenced surface water management permit With regard to construction of the surface water management system and statement of completion and certification by a Florida registered professional engineer for the phases included in the above referenced application numbers Furthermore, according to the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District, Rule 40E-l and 40E-4, Florida Administrative Code (40E-l 6107, Transfer of Environmental Resource, Surface Water Management or Water Use Permit; 40E-4 351, Transfer of Permits, 40E-4 61, Conversion from Construction Phase to Operation Phase, and 40E-4 81, General ConditiOns), upon construction completion and certification of the surface water management system, the permittee shall request transfer of the permit to the responsible operating entity Therefore, the subject phase of the Quantum Park project and the phase previously certified by engineer for construction completion (Quantum Park of Boynton Beach, Lots 12,13,14) shall be transferred to the entity responsible for operation and maintenance of the water management system. The required transfer should be made via the enclosed transfer form. This form should be fIlled out and submitted, along with a copy of the recorded deed restrictions (including amendments, if any), as well as a copy of all recorded plats (if not previously furnished) It will then be processed and included in the District's permit finalization process Please be aware that the permit fIle must contain documentation that applicable conditions to the permit have been satisfied. Go'vernzng Beard. \' ale~le Bc)\'d, ChaIrman Frank \ \ lillmsqn, Tr \ l:e Chal~mJn \\ llh.m' F Gdu:11 \VilLam Hammond Bets' ruanr RlChlrd ~. :.lachek Eugene K. Pettis 1\ athamel P Reed J\lmam Smger Samuel E. Poole III Exec,-,t1\'e DIrector l\llChael Siano". DeFun Exe~u,l\'e Dl~e~tor \ J n.~ D ..... n Quantum Associates February 7, 1997 Page 2 Please submit the above or notify District staff within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter Should you have any questions, please contact Ms Marissa Cruz, Staff Engineering Associate, at (561) 687- 6590, or the undersigned at (561) 687-6596. Sincerely, ! ~() f}!;!!/ ~r ~ /~ r;.fI:ld A. AZlzi Staff Engineer Field Engineering Division South Florida Water Management District AHA Enclosure c: Santiago Malavasi, P E., Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc. w/Enclosure Quantum Associates, Indianapolis, IN, w/Enclosure Catalfumo Management & Investment, Inc.. w IEnclosure Southern Design Group, Inc. City of Boynton Beach Engineer Palm Beach County Engineer FDEP EP.A. LWDD bc B Ratcliffe H Schloss/M Cruz Permit File t, SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT .. 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 FL WATS 1-800-432 2045 . TDD (561) 6972574 Mailing Address: POBox 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 www.sfwmd.gov LAN 01 r-""'.. n ........... \""I""""" ""''--'' ,~c- ~r-'~ ,-Jj!~~-I : '>~!~~ ~ September 6, 2001 SEP u 7 2001 Mr Jim Snyder, DRI Coordinator Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300 Stuart, FL 33416 Dear ~r' ! .<., .---' . ~_:dt_ "..... L .J Subject: Quantum Park, DRI No. 84-173 Notice of Proposed Change In response to your request, South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) staff has reviewed the August 8, 2001 Notification of A Proposed Change (NOPC) to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) submitted by Eugene Gerlica, P E., for the above-referenced project. The primary purpose of the NOPC is to amend the Master Development Plan tOJeflect changes in land use affecting various lots throughout the development and reconfiguration Quantum Lakes Drive to create two additional developable lots After review of the documentation submitted, SFWMD staff did not identify any potential adverse regional water resource-related impacts that could result from approval of the proposed changes Consequently, the SFWMD has no objections to approval of the proposed changes. However, a modification to the project's Conceptual Approval (Permit No 50-01503-S) may be required to address the proposed land use changes as they may impact the previously permitted acreage and land use assumptions If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 682-6862. Sincerely, ~ James J Golden, AICP Senior Planner Environmental Resource Regulation /jjg c' Roger Wilburn, DCA Eugene Gerlica, P E , Quantum Group GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE Trudi K. Williams, CJu1ir lennart E. Lindahl. Vice-Chair Pamela Brooks-Thomas Michael Collins Hugh M. English Gerardo B. Fernandez Patrick J. Gleason, Ph.D P.G. Nicolas J Gutierrez, Jr Esq Harkley R. Thornton Henry Dean, Executive Director SEP 07 '01 01 55PM THE OLEN COMPANY P 2 September 7 t 2001 I Ms, Lusia Galav. AICP City of Boynton 'Beach Planning and Zoning Division 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Phone 561-742-6262 Fax 561-742-6259 RE: Villas at Quantum Lake (272 Apartment Homes) Additional Units - Quantum Lakes Drive Dear Ms, Galav' As a follow up to Erik Bruenmgsen's letter of July lOt 2001. please fmd enolosed a conceptual drawing reflecting additional bldgs. (42 units) site planned for that portion of Quantum Lakes Drive to be vacated, We have developed a plan that would utilize the easternmost lanes of Quantum Lakes Drive for access to the additional units. thereby preserving the existing utilities (i. e, water, force main, FP&L. Bell South, Cable TV) as well as the existing trees on the easternmost side of Quantum Lakes Drive, An existing 8" gravity sewer line would have to be relocated to allow the additional development. The existing project (212 units) would proceed as designed scheduledt save for minor shifting of building no 4 (minor modification of existing site plan) We have located the top of bank an the significant trees along the lake bank in an attempt to preserve the environmental plantings and to avoid impact to those plantings Olen would acquire that portion of Quantum Lakes Drive adjacent to the existing project and would coordinate the site plan submittal for the additional 42 units with the vacation process, I anticipate having the jnformation for a site plan submittal to DRe by the end of this month. Our secondary access to Quantum Lakes Drive, will be modified by providing access to Quantum Lane along the sand pine preserve. The access will be provided through the easternmost portion of lot 62 and lot 66 connecting to Quantum Lane and High Ridge Road, This should resolve any issues relating to a secondary means of egress. The portion of Quantum Lakes Drive to be added to the Villas of Quantum Lakes would be platted by Quantum along with the balance of Quantum Lakes Drive and would reflect specific easements on the plat for the existing municipal utilities; addressing the location of the existing facilities. U:\SHEILA\CORRES\MH\Q\lantum\Galav09070 I ,doc 1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Spring5 Florida 83071 (954} 340-4804 . FaK (854} 344-4608 SEP 07 '01 01 55PM THE OLEN COt1PANY P 3 Page 2 of2 September 7, 2001 Ms. Lusia GaIav I Villas at Quantum Lake - Additional Units Once we have prepared a prelinunary plan and conceptual engmeering, we will sohedule a meeting with staff as appropriate. Should you have any questions or concerns in the meantime, please feel free to contact me \ ( Ce. Igor Olenicoff Doug McDonald U "\SHElL^\CORRES\MH\Qllantum\Galav09070 i.doc a \ ,c;; -' 1$ e \ \ i co (0' IU U '! !':: \'~\' ~ .!. \ 1 ,\ \ 1 ~ ~ J \1.0 i \;\ \ \ \ . , I, I \ ,~ ;: u' \ \ 11, \ .~~ \ :,~\ 1\ \ \~ I~ \ I \ \, ' i1':- :"1 '1 \ '\ \ 1\ \ \~ \ '(<)\10\\0 -.r -.ri-.r\' lcO'\ (<) 0\1011 'Ot i g.\o IU,;\ ' i.o\"! m NIt- m cO (<) 0 ~'O N ~ 'OI~'~'U \(<)\~O.o'\cO t- N ~INi'^'.~\OO'.~ \ ( :' I~\ \~ I~U> ,';'., ,.;~ .;'~ r ~ .,;,::: \ Ii!" \ 1 1 \ " \ \ 1.\ \ I I ; \ \ ; \ i ' \ , ii' \ \ \ \ \ ' Ii \ \ \ \~I\ \' \ \, \ \ 1 \ ~ , 1 ' 10. ,....I ,\ \ ' \0 \ \ \ ' \~\ \\1 1'->' \ II \t- , \ ' t; I :EuJ\ >-' I \ \ ~~~o\ I \ \~\ I->~I~, ! ~I:; <( <(<(<( quJc!, C), \ ~I '....I \1- t; t>rw <!)IOC\uI' _ \<(.....1:;1::>::> ::>11 \ ~ Cl. 0\ \ '6\<(..., OOOUl\(/)! \ill<(\ \ \' \~o 1 \ffi ,~' \~~ill lli \lli lli ',3 ~ \j [' \ fu I, :E,(/) ill 0\0 0 010 ~'O\O z '\ \z\ \ ,~a\6 [I[ [[\~'I~\~ ~ '5:, \ \1. ,t) >;10 000,01'" ;::1a:,CIl 9\ II ' '1" 1 I I 1 I II . 1\ \ \ \ \ \\ I i I ! ! I \ ' II II I I! \ ' \ I \ ,I i \ \ ; I \[N :'i\ o ~ ~ U c: ". IU' I -\ i i.- \ \ $I~ i\ 0'" .. ~\;; g ~-' N 1 \ \ , \ i ....- 1$ ~ ~ 0.... \~;; g . t-o- \ \ ~ \ 1 C'I -r->- ott z< t-~ z~ ~UJ:J ct~W <(OZ a..ZO ~UJ- :J~~ t-<(...1 ZZ:J <(<(0 :J...1...1 aa..<( ,,0 UJ<( t-UJ W" <(<( ~ \ S 1 )o\! '::l Ih CD ~'\ Iii I..... CD > ~ CD I c: ,~l \'IC '0 .. ,IUIUOIUU ::l ~ 0 IU ,0: 0:-: -\ \ \ \ , ..- 1~ ~\~ .~ ~ ~ Ie ~g\;l\.~ ~\ ~ \~ S ~ N en N c-; 0 ui\t-o 0 N ~ '~,...ID,~....N en ~'OtClC) ~ . ' , ; , it leo' \ \ \ ! 'N cO. \ \" N i~: .0 \ ___I ! or" ()) 01 tll 0- \ \ \ \ ", ' I II \ ~ , !~\ \ en\ m t::.. t-\ , I \ , ..- o to m u.i Cl. .~ -c ()) <!) u.i >- If).a ~-g ::>..... "tll co. co ~ ....10- --.----------- G=~~_~) r-'-- ,.- C:::~ ~ I ~ - - r-~ ~' a ~ i~ L_ ~ ~ U Z o ""'" E-4 < ~~M ~Q"" ~IO E-4~Z ~~E-4 Q<Z Z~~ 0:;:; """,~Q ~E-4Z <Z~ S:<~ ~~< ~O' ...:l < ""'" ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ 00 .-, C: <~ c; c..... r '...... ~ 00 riIil ~ ~ ~q~ ~~= ~ U ,.,J -< ~Zl ~-< S=: o ~ riIil~ oo~ Oz ~-< 0= ~U ~ ~oo O~ ~~ ~~ E-o..;l ~ ~ Z ~ U ~ o ~ E-o -< ~ ~ o ~ ~ Eo- -< U ~ ~ ~ U ~~ M."".' i I. .2 N >0 o I ~8 = ' a)-O a) .... to 00 ~ .~ :: - "3 0 ~Z ~i:: a) a) (1)~ o = o a) ~ S 0'< o a) o a) l"ltl) r-:X- ..s:::::..2 (,,) c.. ~ E ~ 8 ~ ~l m' I" I a) .;; o ~ 'i<i a) 00 o o o <:T .... ..g '" ~ a) 00 '" oo~ NC 00 ro -....... j~ O'~ 80fi C"l .... r- ::: .... -B~ ~ a) ~~ o o o ..; o u Z '" 'i<i a) 00 ...... o .... a) ~ Z '0 = ~ = = Q .sa .- ..... - c<S Cj ~ ~ "" ~ ~ <CI:::: 00 00 I C"l 00 o .-:l < z u Z = o .~ u o ....J a) - iZi 0\ 0\ 0\ ....... a) .;; o ~ 'i<i a) 00 o o o <:T .... ..g '" " a) 00 '" 00;:J ~~ - ....... 0:-;:: .-:l (,,) O'~ 8;s N~ .~ r- .... ..s:::::2 ~ ro <<l a) ~~ M ..s::::: ~ ~ "1 l"l l"l o u Z ~ ~ .... u < '" c.. '': f- a) Cj :.a a) > t;i ~ ...... o .....M <l)w ...oE- ~o ZZ a o o C"l = o r-:-"E~ ..s:::::Q);:J (,,) E ~ c.. '0 ~.2a "::;~.-:l >-'Q)a) o::lO'" -o....:::l Q)Q)-O ~ ~ I.U ..2Q)~ Q) ..s::::: .- OE-~ ~,~ .5 :::l~;S = ~'~ ,90-0 -.......Q) ~ ,~ .... 0 0 gZ:::: c.:::_ro --"c.Qoo s:::::Q)-oo .g ~ ~ N g=!Boo '"' a) u '" pEQ)- < < ~j o l"l r-~ o u Z -0-0 Q) C'~ ..c ,..t;; j;1i U U K' ro ro ~l ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ I ~~ fir .9.9 fJj ~ ~ h (,,) (,,) f~. r.;: r.;: ~- Of.ij or;; '" '" c<S ro DO <1.l Q) '" '" " :::l::J ,~ ]3 .... .... - - '" '" ::l ::l "0"0 = = .......- <1.l <1.l <1.l <1.l 0000 <:T W E- o Z <:T V) ....... M" r- V) V)r- .......l"l l"ll"l < z '" <1.l ....0 (,,}V) < r-" r- M '<1"00 tr\ ......." l"l<:T u Z o o MO' '0 <:TO\ ....... " C"l ....... '" c .g :0 = o U o o ,~ ~-- ?, C"l ....... :ft; u ~ o z....... o ~o tiJl"l ~r-:- ~~ = OJ) ro ;:I ::l< 0'-0 " a) at<i ~ ~" o '" .... >-. E-t;i ~~ -0 ,5~ ~q:;( <1.l ro ~~ l"l r- -.6 l"l <:T ....... ....... M r- oo o ..; ....... ,-.... <1.l OJ)'" ro c.. 'O.c oE- ~ Q) a)O ~ ,- ;:Iii cr> 00_ '" ro "'-0 2E- 0...... '-"0 a) OJ).....M ~.5 .8 w Q)::s! COl E- t.s SO <o::lZZ -; 'i: - II> ;:I '0 = - -0 "0 Q) Q) ..s::::: ..c g g ~t << ~~ ~ ~ 0000 = = o 0 .~.~ u (,,) S~ '" '" ~ ~ 00 a) Q) '" '" ;:J;:J Q) <1.l (,,) u SlE 00 Q) <1.l <1.l <1.l 0000 l"l <r- --.r- ZCIS 0\ r- '" Q) ....0 Uo <V) 0\0\ . \0 000\ l"l ~ ....... ....... l"l ....... :u: U ~ o z....... ~o tiJ~ ~ " E~ ;:I '" .... ;:l a OJ) ;:I ;:I 0'< ~-o aB g~ ::l r.n" 0'- .... '" E-.Q ~ ~ -0< .5 u ~~ <1.l ro ~~ ....... o M r-: ....... o o CIS ....... o <V) --.00 Z V)" C"l r- <:T M \0 -.6 ,-.... a) OJ)'" ro c.. g .~ ~ <1.l a)U .... .... ro..s::::: ;:I <1.l ~> ","'a "'-0 2E- 0...... '-" 0 Q) OJ)....M ~,8]w <1.l::s! COl E- .....- s::; 0 U ;:l ;:l <a:::lZZ <1.l Cj I:: ... o o o "t:! t N -0 <= l ..c: u <= o oi <= 'g " OJ Q <= .9 d .;: " Q .:;;; ~ Q -a ::;l <= :$ -0 ~ c;:g 23...J ~s 0'0.;::: -0 <= " .. '" ::;l .;: 0' " -- ~~ ~ < = u z o ~ ~ < ~~N ~~- ~ '0 ~~Z ~<~ ~~Z Z~~ 8;:J~ ~~Z <z~ ><~ ~;:J< ~o ~ < ~ ~ z < ~ 00. ~ ;:J 00. ,j ~ I; t.:::.. ~ :. i ~ I' ~0 !' 00 r-il ~ ~ o 'z s:q< ~~= ~ u ~ -< ~~I ~s: ~ r-ilr-il 000 ~ Z ~-< 0= g::U w ~oo 0;1 r-il~ ~<: Eo-;~ r-il e,:, Z ~ u ~ o r-il Eo-; <: ~ ~ o e,:, r-il Eo-; -< U r-il ~ Z ~ U -:> 0 o 0 ZZ I...:".....~.............. III I ,k I ".,- .... .... !:: !:: (1) (1) .@.@ !:: !:: (1) (1) a a ..(..( 00 00 00 NN r-:r-: ...c:...c: u u ta ta ::E::E .6~ .~ .~ ""'''"' .~ .~ .... .... "3"3 ::E::E ~f t I: I , t., ~ Ii; ~' ~\. b .~ 0,,", V"l ~ '':: ~ ~ "3Zo ::E Z r Q if ..(..( ozzo ( w ~, b 's <Il V"l ""'..(UJ o....---f- 8"3Zo ....:-::E Z t 1'-. t. it '." " \ 1< .' ell .... 'S tf) ;:>.<;:: Oil!:: .8 ;:> ::::::Oil ~:EtJ 3 0'Q)3 ~ .....~..... ..... 000 0 .........(1)..M ~O~Oil~UJ g~g~~b Zf-Z..(zz if I ] ...... c (1) ~ 'r;; (1) 0:: N - :tt: U 0... o :z- ~o ta~ 0... . ar: ;::I ell ...... ;::I a I:ll ;::I ;::I 0'..( 0"2 <Il~ .5"0 ;::I <Ii o .- .. ell f-b .. <Il (1) s:: "0..( .5 u o...s (1) <Il (1) .. rJ'Jf- V"l "1. M o o M \0 ..0 ell 0.. 'C f- (1) U :.a (1) > ;/ !r h. "0 (1) ...c: u <Il tl ..( ~ ~ ;::I rJ'J cO 0- .~ 0 ~~ .~ ;3 ~ a u"O (1) !:: ell (1) ~~ <Il . .- 0 eo (1)0 ~~ O...c: U u (1) ta ~::E 00 ..(\0..( --- - --- :z vi':z t- \0 o \00..( r...:o--- N o:z o M , I I , f' t r. 1::-:, w~ &\ ..(u..( zzz --. (1) I:ll ell ~ ,e- o .. o f- ""' (1) etl]~ <Il(1)...c: ;::I (1) (1) gs> eIlo..<<i ell a...... 8UJ~ c.:>.......... '-" 0 0 (1)gp~~M ~.- .D .D UJ (1)"Oaaf- b~ ;::I ;::I 0 ..(o::lZZZ - "; ...... (1) 0:: Q$ -; '" (1) (1) C.l "0 ";: ..c ~ :::~ o o --- 00 ~ N "0 (1) ~ "0 .. (1) tl (1) ....:l a a =:i o ~ .. (1) "0 ,8 0... (1) (1) rJ'J -.j" 0- - N M V"l - 00. M - u Z '1' ~. I l ~. u ~:!.', ." ~. If o o o N r-: ...c: u ta (1)::E u <Il . 0..0 rJ'J- - 0 .~ Z .. ...... (1) !:: ~ E 0"0 U ~ ..... a 0..( ""' . rJ'J ell (1) 00 ... \0 U N< 1100 at- OM o >. ~"a -0 o o -.j" ..( Zoo t- M o o -.j" ..(..( zz u Z ..(u zz ell ...... '2 :::> <<i ...... !:: ~ ..... o .. (1) 1 :z --. (1) I:ll ~ o o ""' (1) .. <Il ;::I 0" rJ'J ell ell 8 <<i c.:> ...... '-" 0 (1) f- U ..... <Il 0 o..(1)..M rJ'J I:ll (1) UJ ..~~f- g b a 0 ~..(zz ell 0.. 'C f- (1) U :.a (1) > Qj ...... o ~ --- Qj ...... o ::r: j I I t-~' ~. o -.j" t-. I i h, r~, ~ o -.j" t-. u Z f Hi Ii] r .( g n N ~ k. ~ i;.. ~ Ii' ; tV :r f L ffit t'J If J u o ""! E:: N "0 c: ~ .c: U c: o .~ c: .~ <I) ;) ::::. c: .2 ., .~ ~ ::::. OJ ;::l c: :$ "0 E o:~ ;:;-i ~ a 0-- ;::l "0;: <I) '" Vl ;::l .;;: 0' <I)~ iX~ iL, ~. !; j, ~: , ~ -< == u Z o ...,; E-- -< ~;M ~~~ ~ I 0 E--~Z ~-<E-- ~~Z Z~~ 9~~ E--E--Z <z~ >-<~ ~~< ~o ~ -< ...,; E-- Z -< E-- rJJ. ~ ~ rJJ. 'J:J ~ ~ o ~ 5: z ~o-< ~ .::t ~~u ~ -< S~I ~~ o~ ~ ~~ 'J:J~ Oz ~~ ~u ~ ~'J:J o~ ~~ ~< Eo-;~ ~ ~ z ~ u ~ o ~ Eo-; -< ~ ;>; ~ o ~ ~ E-- -< U ~ ~ z ~ u k I I' ," ) I I 5~ j(l D I I ~ II' l' 1 I ~; ~. I I ~ fe, \[ i{ IX fp h'f f , v " ~. Ii ~i I W w' r~l to t t. t; ~--< ~ ";j -- C ~ ~ c e .5:2 C- \.0 = ~; o '" ~.5 o ....... U p..., o z o ~ '" s:: ~ 0\ M en - o .....:l <I.) '" ;:3 U .s o - en <I.) en ~o <1.)0 00 ,S ("l <I.) r--" CO..s:: '" u ~ a -<:::E 0': V'l V'l ~o zo V'l ("l" o 00 U Z <:U ZZ <I.) ~ <I.) .... u <: ,--, ~ Zl t/} '" s:: c.. ~ QJO_ o '" .... oaE- ....(/}~ <I.) ___ U :l-.t tn-_ "'~..s:: ;:3 <I.) <I.) gS> t/}~ta en S- e~~ 0............ """"00 CO........M .S~~ ~ ;gSEOE- ;:3 ;:3 ;:3 COZZZ \0 ....... 0\ N o U Z ~M L. I pi' ~l! m Ai F" I tW! I H~ I I i'" ilk lffi ~y . I I !t. I B e: V'l00 ("l \0 M oocio 0\~V'l ("l0~ N 1.0 00 r-- I o.......U ("lo\--- N~Z 00 M I I <I.) '" u <I.) ~< (/) s:: s:: .9 <1.)- c..C o.s ~'" ~ ~ ~ C o -t: 0 <: '" ,;, -p...,<I.) ~ :>.~ 0,-:: .....:l E-U ~ : ~ t t' 'ii' &! r I ~i~- '" ~ Cj ~ c.. (/) C ~ c.. o it; ,\, i I HA ::1 I ~ h ill-' I I II it~: ~' w rli , I I I] ~ I. ww I ~ k ~< , ilf ~' &, R I.~. ./ ,: ii' ~ C .5:2 - Cj == ~ o 0 .- \.0 =5Q., ;.. - ~ ~ .! ~ "'!::: Cj ~ f:: = ~ 1.0 Q.,r:;Q(/}< o \0 ~ <: Z<::!O \0 0 ~ 00 V'l <: Zooo V'l U Z oS2S2 ZZZ <I.) CO '" <I.) .... u <: '" <I.) en o c.. o .... p..., - s:: <I.) <I.) > E .... c.. ~ o <I.) G) ~ ~ <II <I.) o '" .S .s~p..., ._ -= "'0 (/) <I.) ~ ~~(/) \ ~ I' .f. , f.~- M ....... ....... ~ V'l 1.0 ~ 00 ""! r-- M <I.) CO '" ~ u <: Wi /;it t '" "0 ~ o ~ ..., o o ""! c:: N "0 c: ~ ~ .c U c: o .~ c: o~ ,g o Ci c: o "i os: <U ~ Ci (;j :I C ~ "0 B o:g o...J ~E 0'. :I "OC 0> '" '" :::l 'S: 0- 0> ~ ::<:~ ~ u ~ """'" ~ Z~("t ~~.... ~\o r;iJ.it..Z ~.~~ ~~~ ~~~ """'"~z ~z~ joOO~~ ~? ~o ~ joOO ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ s ~ ~ :g :::: .~ g .~ ~ ~ ~ .~ t<i e ~ ~ "<) Q '0' .... p.. Q t: ~ ~ g .~ S Q .... ~ "d ~ l!l ~ 1:) ~ % ~ ~ % G"- o "? ~ ~ ~ ~ r- o "? g .:::, ~ 8 Q e ~ rf) ~ ~ ~ Q '% ~ ~ Q ~ rf) I'Q .~ rft ~';:) ':i-.g cQ .'6 ~~ gc$ o ~ rJ, ....."d p.. ~~ ~ 'E ~ ~ ta ~ 1:) .~ Q ~ ~ ~ .... ....0 ~ 'g ~ if> ~ ~ ~"d~ ';:.. ..... ... -- cQ O,.J ;;., '0 '::!... cQ ..... ~ '0 ~ Q Ell "d ~o e .;;, Q Q Q ~ $ ta 0,% ell '8. ~ Q . Co~ 'Co ';:) p.. ~ I:-' iJ \::l ~ cQ ~p..sg e u.r-....... 'cQ ~ .~ p ~ Q ~taQ~~ta '" ~ ';? ..%~ Q ~ ~ S Q '-a ~~O';>'O';:) '0 ,.J I:-' t<i ._ ..... ~ ~ "d '0 ~ .~ Q~~~p~ 61)\::lOQ:;("d <g 0 p.. 'Co .;;, .....;:: Q 0 Q Q '<?s ~;; got: ct. .-~<.... ~,):. ..g ~ '0 .~ '" ,... Q ~ ~ u t<i ~ C- .- ~ ~ ~ o 7- ;;, ~ % o ~ .(') .....('1 .... Q :A 5~ ~~ ~6 '0 0 "?7- II II -<9. 7.7- u ~ ,.... ~ :c \ ~ o oi s 'e ~ ca o .~ "t ~ o ea a ~ ~ '8 '0';3 ~% 0'-. ~ "'3'" .'.!l6 ~.:: ""I>- -<:ton ------ E-t ~ -< = u Z o - E-t -< ~saM ~~~ ~IO E-t~Z ~~E-t ~-<Z Z~~ O~~ -~~ E-tE-tZ -<Z~ S:-<~ ~~-< ~O ~ -< - E-t Z -< E-t 00 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ g E-~IJ ;Z:IJ~~ ~;z: a U-<O ~=~ ~UO =-- ~ ~ Z o - E-t -< U - ~ - 00 00 -< ...:l U ~ 00 ~ ...:l -< sa E-t 00 ~ ~ Z - rJ'J ;:J ~ 0 IJ - ~~~~ ZIJ=-- t3z~ ~-<O ~:c~ =--U~ ~ IJ -<-< ~E- IJ~O z-<O "'rJ'J~ ~rJ'J~ =O~ ;:J~-< =IJ;:J rJ'J ~ -< ~ Z ~ ~ E-~~ ZIJO::,=, tlz:;~ ~-<O ~=~ =--U~ rJ'J ;:J o ... IJ > -< ~ Eo-< ~ ~ Z~=--~ ~Z~ U<O ~=~ ~U~ < ~~ <~ ~~ ZU << ~ rJ'J ;:J E- -< E- rJ'J ~ ~ ~ o E- Z ~ :; =-- o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~\O\O 0000000t"'lt"'lv)...,f 0000000"7"71''';' ~ t"'l V) OOOOOOOt"'lOoO..o 0000000"70'7'7 OOOOOOOO~~~O V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V)V)V)0 t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t"'lt"'lt"'l0 ....It'''l^....l....l....l....l....l....l~^..,;v)o 00000000 000000000000 t-O ___..............1""""l1""""'l.......t"""t"--NO\ ..,; ~^ ..,; ..,; ..,; ..,; ..,; ..,; ('I N N .-: \0 ~oooooooooooot"'lt"'lt"'loo N~--=~--=--=-=oooo.nvi NNNNNNNNN........ I I I I I I I I I I I t- ~ ....0 NO\OOOOOf"!o .0 ~000000C?0~9 00000000t-t-....0 t-\Ot"'lt"'lt"'lt"'lt"'lt"'l\O\Ot-t"'l ~r...:o\o\o\o\o\o\NNv)...,f V) 0\ 0\0\ 0\0\ 0\0\0000"""" N-1""""'I__.......1""""'I_..-1""""'INN ,-... N ,-...c:td ~..-........-I- --Q)Q) BBoo ooZZ ZZQ)Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)Q)rJ'JrJ'J rJ'J rJ'J '-' '-' '-''-'ON ....Nt"'l~V)\Ot-ooO\........ 000 0 0 000 000 <ZZZZZZZZZZZ 0"'"""'.................................................................. < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t;j~~EE~EES~EE .5 l': l':"2"2 c:"2 "2 "2 c:"2"2 .~ E E E E E E E E E E E 0<<<<<<<<<<< s: o "0 !ii U o o ci' ~ bb aj '-' l': o .~ So 'C;; Q) o t;j ',5 '" ;::l "0 c: .... !ii 01) c: :.e ;::l u .5 '" c: .9 ~ u t;::: 'C;; '" ~ U <Ii ~ ~ ;::l ~ ~~ 01) V) c . ._ \0 :g II e<jU s..J. "Ot"'l ;go ._ ....J E ",^ B ~ .g~ EO\ ;::l~ .5 r;;; ~t; E g. e<j Q) "'.... .- .... ~~ o~ ~.3 Q)..... 01)0 e<j e<j ~ ~ ~ e<j ~~ t-<t-< '" <.) o ~ C: C'l "Cl C I ..c u c o .~ c 'g "" ., CI c o .~ .;; ~ CI 0; " c ~ "Cl B o:~ o...J ::::::5 Cf>~ 13 ~ '" " ";; CY ~~ en """~N E- O Z Eo- ~ -< == u Z o ~ Eo- -< as~N ~~~ ~ 10 Eo-~Z ~-<Eo- ~~Z Z~~ 9~~ Eo-Eo-Z -<Z~ >-<~ ~~-< ~o ~ -< ~ Eo- Z -< Eo- 00 ~ ~ 00 ...;l ~ -< ~ ~ -< ~ E-~:::::~ zc.:l....e:I r.:lzO U-<:; ~=o r.:lU~ i:l. r.. Z o ~ Eo- -< U ~ ~ ~ 00 00 -< ~ u ~ 00 ;;;J ~ u ~ ~ ~ o rJ'1 ;;:l r.:l 0 c.:l ... -< ~~ ~r.:lg:q r.:lc.:l:; UZo ~-<~ ~:tr.. U r.:l c.:l -<-< r.:lE- c.:l~O Z-<O "'rJ'1r.. QrJ'1r.:l =o~ ;;:l~-< =c.:l;;:l rJ'1 .J -< r.:l z; c.:l ... -< sa ~~~~ t3z:;~ ~-<o r.:l:t~ i:l.Ur.. rJ'1 ;:l r.:l 0 c.:l ... -< ~ E-r.:l~~ Zc.:li:l.~ ~ z:; C> ~-<o r.:l:t~ i:l.Ur.. -< ~~ -<~ ..J rJ'1 ;:l E- -< E- rJ'1 ~ r.:l Q ~ o E- Z r.:l :; i:l. o .J r.:l > r.:l Q """"l"'10 0000000"""""":,0 . ~-V)1I1 0000000 I I I I .". ..... 0000000""0l"'1"'! 0000000'70"1r-;- OOOOOOOONN OOOOOOOOr-r-NO ",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-r-~r-~r- V'l 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0-, 0\ V'l V'l r- 00 \0 \0\0 \0\0\0 \0 \000 00 e>O"') O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ \O~ \O~ V'l 00 ----------0\00 0000.....0 "'!r-r-r-r-r-r-OOo\""; l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1r-r-V'l\O l"'1V'l00000;0~"" ,...;OOOOOO\oO'9N 0\..... r-r-r-r-r-r-NN.......... oOl"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'100V'l0 Nl"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1NNO..... --------NNNN """'''""' Nl"'1 o'Clo'Cl ...-..,-... CJ'J Cf.:I --(1)(1) 88'0'0 ooZZ ZZ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~CIlCll CIl CIl '-" '-" '-"'-"ON -Nl"'1""V'l\Or-ooO\-- o 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 -<ZZZZZZZZZZZ O~.......,~............................................ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;~EE~~EEES~E .S J::"2"2 c: J:: "2"2 "2 "2 J::"2 ,ff 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 o<<<<~~~~<<~ ~ "0 J:: t<l U o o o oil Qj '-" J:: o .~ ~ '00 ~ Q ~ u !E o J:: t<l 01) J:: :a ::l U^'C' .s ~ ~ '" '" '" J:: .... .... .g g. g. t<l .4::i ~ c:= , .- . C"" ~ ~ rJ) ~oo u."."" ~ <<i @) ::l '" '" =tti~ t<l ~ ~ 01)"'''' J:: ~ ~ :.a 'S: os: "000 t<l S E >-'00 .000 "000 ~ .".~.".~ .@~: 8'4i'~ ~ ~ u ~<<-<!E :3 0 0 E 4::i c:= .x ci- ci- t<l '" '" S N 0 t<l::::~ .~ oQ an" ~O\N r- r- '-" '-" .,g II II '" c:= c:= ~ . 01)C"C" t<l '" '" b~~ t<lr-oo ~e>O"') ..c:V'l00 f-O\oo '0/:) u o "<l c:: N "0 C ~ ..c U c o .~ c .~ .s '" Cl c o "i ~ Cl 0; ::l C C ~ ~ ~ 'Ej ~:J ~ ~ 0'>_ -g;:j '" ::l ";;:0 ~ti: CIl '"-l_N<"l f- o Z ~ -< == u Z o ""'" E-- -< ~t:aM ~~-: ~ I 0 E--2Z ~-<E-- ~~z z~~ 9~~ E--E--Z <z~ S:-<~ ~~-< ~o ~ -< ""'" E-- Z -< E-- 00. ~ ~ 00. >- ~ -< ~ ~ ~ 00. Z o ""'" E-- -< Z \J ""'" 00. ~ ~ ~ 00. ~ ~ -< ""'" u ~ ~ ~ ~ o u ~ ~ e" < < z. E-<~G ~e"C2~ uZ.o~ ~~:; ~Uo ~ ~ rr., e" ;J < 0 E-<~> ze,,~~ ~z~q u<~ ~=:; ~Uo fi: ~ e" -< <E-< e,,~8 z~r.. -<~ Qrr.,~ t:3~-< ;J~~ =e" rr., ~ < ~ Z e" G < C2 ~~o ~e,,:;@ uZ.o ~~~ ~ur.- rr., ;J ~ 0 e" - < ~ E-<~~~ ~e,,~:::R az:;= ~<o ~=~ ~ur.- < ~~~ Q~ Zu <-< ~ rr., ;J E-< < E-< rr., ~ ~ Q ~ o E-< Z ~ :; ~ o ~ ~ ;> ~ Q (') M '<:t'<:t'<:tC'iC'i ~00~~~'<:t'<:t'<:t'<:t'<:t OOOOOONNN-- '<:t N ooooo~'<:to~orio OOOOOONOOO\O 00000000000000000 0000000000000\0\0 OOOOOOONNNr-r- 6666666f"i'f"i'f"i'00~oO OOOOOOOr-r-r-NN MMMMMMMMMMr-r- 00 N M MM. . o"!"!"!"!"!ooo;::::;:! -r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-NM M - N' \0 <"loooo .0000 . ~C";lOOOo~oo::~ \0 0\ ,,!'<:tr-r-r-r-r-000C'i0 r-oO\O\O\O\O\r-r-r-OM NMNNNNN'<:t'<:t'<:t-- -- NN Q(lQ(l -- .-...-.. en tI] --Q)(],) BBoo Oozz zz II) II) II) II) II) II) II)II)rr.,en rr., rr., '-' '-' '-''-'ON -NM'<:tV)\Or-ooO\-- 00000 0 0 0 0 0 0 <ZZZZZZZZZZZ O......,~.....~......,.....................,.............. < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --aaa~aE~aa~a~ .5 11 11 Q 11 11 Q 11 11 Q 11 Q ,~ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 SSE 0<<<<<<<<<<< s ~ "0 Q '" ::c: o u~ o i ~ o u on Q) '-' Q ,Q 1ij Q 0/} .00 II) Cl --a .u ..... II) a g E u g '" ..... ~t ._ c.. -g~ go- ,- '" "'00 Q\O ON .~ @) u !;:: '" .00 a '" 0 ~ 2 II)Q) ~o _.J:: (;;0 0/} 0 .5 ~ "0 II) "0 "0 '" ;j >.u .0 Q ~ 0; ~ ;> ._ 0 E~ ~ ~ "0 0 a-si ;j '" a II) .~ < a s '" 0 ",ii: .~ ~ ]cS '" 0/} ~.s ","0 Q):-::l ..... ;::l ~CQ II) II) .J::.J:: f-f- r- u o ~ - E:: N "0 C I ..c u c .9 0; c .~ ~ ... o c .9 t:5 .> ~ o <<i ::I C ~ "0 ~ :; :~ o...J ::::: 8::1 0\_ 1Sa '" ::I '> 0' u-:- ~I'J.< en ~-C'i f- o Z l> -:> ;f, Iil 1. ... all~ ~~ilil ~:!l~ ':J i \ i i \ w \i i \ i \ \ I 10 <t '5n 0- \~ zti ...., 01- tl i i ~~' \ \ ~J6 $. & r.: .... <D .... , .... 5 ~ III ll3'''''''''~ ~ ~ <<.w 7L~ - . ... u-% e.-. l~ocoooi.... 0 ~~~ll\l\ll\l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i . ~ $ ~ \ ~ ..; ~ ~ W- ~~! ,'~ Vi.i'ia \ ~ o z :::> o to -,t. ~ 0- ~ :::> ~ <( 3 ~ ~ \i \ !~~. . ~ _ "ii i Is ~\\\ i t !~~ ~__w e \ Vl!.llJ'lllili"'e ~ :: t\~;;;;-;;~ \ ~ j 1l_11'e'e;'es" J II n-n 1%3oa~~"\~ i\~\ ~ 'i i i ~ ! 1 , \~H~ ~t~~' i ~ i . -: \ ,. . '5 \ ,. I! ~ i a . '" ~; 8 \ 1 ~ \ . ~ ,. 4 ~ t t i ~ ~ 3Nt SS3~ONO:) \\ \ ~\ i l i __ \\\~\ l \\\ , ~\ 5 ~ \ \ ~\ ~\ \ \ ~ ~ t ~\ ~i · \ ~ ~ ~ \ ~\ b ~ e ~ ~ ~ ! ~ I~~\t!q~~i~ t~ ~. ~ \ \ \ \ \ l i ,\\\\~\~~~~\ \ ~ li . '" ~ s ~ 1 1 ~ ~ "" ... ",.."" 10/0'/'" ..t,--,,,,,"~""""'" ~ - -_._~,.- -~.-~--- PI"DER TROUTMA" .O"SULTI"G. I"c. September 7,2001 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663 Email pindertroutman@msn.com Transportation Planners and Engmeers Ms. Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard POBox 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 12 - #PTC01-1 02 Dear Ms. Galav. The following responds to the City comments on the traffic analysis for the above referenced project. Public Works-Traffic - Jeff Livergood memorandum of August 29,2001 Response Quantum Lakes Drive Closure A full median opening exists at this location today There has not been any accident history at this location that would warrant closure. However, it is recommended that the left turn exit from Parcell 00 not be allowed Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard The Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) was not provided as a substitute for the signal warrant analysis. The signal warrant analysis provided in the report dated February 16, 2001 is still valid The applicant cannot install a signal until it is warranted and has been approved by Palm Beach County Therefore, it is recommended that monitoring of this intersection begin in peak season 2002 to determine if signalization is in fact warranted This is a condition of the current Development Order (DO) Monitoring should continue every peak season until the signal is warranted Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue The applicant would agree that monitoring of this intersection should begin at the buildout of Parcels 32 through 38 Monitoring should be conducted during the peak season and continue until the signal is warranted General The February 16, 2001 Intersection Analysis included proposed NOPC # 11 land uses. The original NOPC # 11 was for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Therefore, the traffic from both the residential and non- residential uses on lots 7 through 11 and 23 through 31 have been included Pri KMP/ldr Letter Ca/av 07 7029-7-07 a. ,l) i D! ' \L~ SEP om -- ! I ~ l --- \ -~ r~ September 7, 2001 Ms LusIa Galav, AICP City of Boynton Beach Planmng and Zomng DIVISIon 100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Phone 561-742-6262 Fax 561-742-6259 RE Villas at Quantum Lake (272 Apartment Homes) Additional Units - Quantum Lakes Drive Dear Ms Galav' As a follow up to Erik BruenIngsen's letter of July 10, 2001, please find enclosed a conceptual draWIng reflectIng addItIOnal bldgs (42 umts) SIte planned for that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve to be vacated. We have developed a plan that would utihze the easternmost lanes of Quantum Lakes Dnve for access to the addItIOnal umts, thereby preservIng the eXIstIng utihtIes (i e water, force maIn, FP&L, Bell South, Cable TV) as well as the eXIstIng trees on the easternmost SIde of Quantum Lakes Dnve An eXIstmg 8" graVIty sewer lIne would have to be relocated to allow the addItIonal development. The eXIstIng project (272 umts) would proceed as deSIgned scheduled, save for mInor shIfhng of bUIldIng no 4 (mInor modIficatIon of eXIstIng SIte plan) We have located the top of bank an the sIgmficant trees along the lake bank In an attempt to preserve the envIronmental plantIngs and to aVOId Impact to those plantmgs Olen would acqUIre that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve adjacent to the eXIstmg project and would coordInate the SIte plan subrmttal for the addItIonal 42 umts WIth the vacatIOn process I antICIpate haVIng the InfOrmatIOn for a SIte plan submIttal to DRC by the end of thIS month. Our secondary access to Quantum Lakes Dnve, will be modIfied by proVIdIng access to Quantum Lane along the sand pIne preserve The access wIll be proVIded through the easternmost portIOn of lot 62 and lot 66 connectmg to Quantum Lane and High RIdge Road. ThIS should resolve any Issues relatmg to a secondary means of egress The portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve to be added to the Villas of Quantum Lakes would be platted by Quantum along WIth the balance of Quantum Lakes Dnve and would reflect speCIfic easements on the plat for the eXIstmg mumcIpal utihtIes, addressmg the locatIOn of the eXIstmg facihtIes U\SHEILA\CORRES\MlfIQuantum\Galav09070 I.doc 1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Springs Florida 33071 (954) 340 4904 . Fax (954) 344-4608 Page 2 of2 September 7,2001 Ms. Lusia Galav / Villas at Quantum Lake - Additional Units Once we have prepared a prehmmary plan and conceptual engmeenng, we will schedule a meetmg wIth staff as appropnate Should you have any questlOns or concerns m the meantime, please feel free to contact me Cc Igor Olemcoff Doug McDonald U \SHEILA\CORRES\MH\Quantum\Galav090701 doc ----- \ \' I _0 i \ j '. WI \ \(~ ~ '-1 ~ :J. ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ -? /' ) _J/ / , ,,^'--~,",/ / "{, ?' '-,'- '-, \ \~ \ \ ,", ;> 1 1 I I I I /--"\ I ' / ' ( \ I ~\ Jc J~ ~2 Q~ eN ~~ ,\ .<( ~" ,l~- ,;. .\.1) ~ \~\ \\ I-6y\ -- --- __I ~"5/ ' '( ,- - \ \ \ t' ,~ j 'I' ~ a: -' c0\ ~ 0- i a ,( ~ " ~' l~ L 1 - 3 3': ..) ,CJ Q. ~ > Q. en ,- '<. ~J 00 ~ ;$' <2 =' I r-;::( G -. -j I L~ Q .!?-' (c ",'t- -\\~ .L " ---\--~ ) ~/~ 2r::- ~I ~~ FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 31 0 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO .1 a~11JL 4h(!~ ~&(A ddav FAX. S-fo/- 1'f{J- :2 i:2 9 FROM 9 /~/Ol I ' NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) _3 DA TE. RE. ()~{/lJ L~ ckkcl- "1-/0/ -<Or.) I If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you TRANSMISSION VERIFICATIO~~ REPOPl J TIME 139/135/213131 16 33 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 56137562613 DATE,TIME FA!. NO. I~~AME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 09/135 15 31 97402429 013 01 33 03 OV ST At--lDARD EO., FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 31 0 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO ~J ~ ;/tfl;W,dt FAX. c?{Y/- <612 -~/04 FROM DA TE. 9/1/ a I OLLCt~ p(;L/'f{ NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) /; RE. fY7P/VJD 0/-003 ----" --- If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you TR.;:';NSMISSIOt~ JEPIFICATIOt~ REPORT DATE, TIME FAI HO INAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 0S 134 P 34 98424104 00 El5 55 11 OV ST At-lDARD ECM TIME 05/04/2001 17 41 NAME BOVNTOt'-l BEACH P 8, Z FAI 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD POBOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to Eugene GerlIca, P ,E fax # 561-740-2429 date: September 4, 2001 from LUSla Galav, Pnnclpal Planner re: 1 ST RevIew Comments for Quantum Park NOPC # 12 MPMD 01-003 Please find attached the first reVIew comments for your proJect. To stay on the current reVIew schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below, and bnng all documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday September 11, 2001 1 ReVIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments lIsted herem, mcludmg the addItion of notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 10 copIes to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally submItted), 2 SubmIt the addItional mformatIOn as requested wlthm the attached comments, ( 1.e. traffic analysIs, engmeenng certificatIOn, etc ) 3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) conslstmg of a lIst bnefly summanzmg how each comment has been addressed on the revIsed plans or wIth the supplemental mformatIOn mcludmg locatIOn on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItious 2nd reVieW by staff and your project representatives dunng the TRC meetmg ),and 4 SubmIt reductIOns (8 Y2 X 11) for the proposed SIte plans, elevations and landscapmg plan (thIS IS reqUIred for the final report and publIc presentatIOn) Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and copIed for staff reVIew If plans wIll not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC meetmg, contact LUSIa Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date, Projects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs, WhICh are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday pnor to the Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend, The remamder of the reVIew schedule wIll be adjusted accordmgly If you have questIons on the attached comments, please contact the respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatIves. If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC (2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to the Planmng and Development Board Meetmg that falls approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Planmng and Development board. Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report andlor confirmatIOn ofthe traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County dramage certIficatIOn by a lIcensed engmeer, sIgned "RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn" form and colored elevatIons of the proposed project. ThIS mformatIon IS necessary for the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note Engmeenng John GUIdry Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6285 BUIldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6357 Fire Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382 Roger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357 PolIce Department Marshall Gage Sgt. James Prestman 737-6167 742-6185 UtIlItIes John GUIdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285 PublIc Works-General Larry Qumn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285 PublIc W orks- Traffic Jeffery LIvergood 742-6201 742-6211 Parks & RecreatIon John Wildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233 Forester/EnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259 Plannmg & Zomng Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259 CHAIRMAN Revised 03/21/01 S\Planning\sHARED\WPIFORMS\ISt REV COMMEKTS FAX ORlG\lst Review comments FAX COVER-doc L I TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT -- TIME 09/04/2001 17 14 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 DATE,TIME FAX NO.!NAME DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 09/04 17 06 97402429 00 07 35 12 OK STANDARD ECM Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD PO BOX310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310 FAX. (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to Eugene GerlIca, P ,E. fax # 561-740-2429 date August 31, 2001 from. LUSla Galav, Pnnclpal Planner re 1 ST ReVIew Comments for Quantum Park NOPC #12 MPMD 01-003 Please find attached a draft of the first reVIew comments for your proJect. The utIlItIes comments WIll be faxed to you separately on Tuesday, September 5, 2001 To stay on the current reVIew schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below, and bnng all documents to the TRC meetmg scheduled for September 11, 2001 1 ReVIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments lIsted herem, mc1udmg the addItIOn of notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 10 copIes to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mc1udmg all pages ongmally submItted), 2 SubmIt the addltlonal mformatIOn as requested wlthm the attached comments, ( l.e. traffic analysIs, engmeenng certlficatIOn, etc) 3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) conslstmg of a lIst bnefly summanzmg how each comment has been addressed on the reVIsed plans or wIth the supplemental mformatIOn mc1udmg locatlon on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItIouS 2nd reVIew by staff and your project representatlves dunng the TRC meetmg ),and 4 SubmIt reductIOns (8 12 X 11) for the proposed SIte plans, elevatIOns and landscapmg plan (thIS IS reqUIred for the final report and publIc presentatlon) Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and copIed for staff reVIew If plans wIll not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC meetmg, contact LusIa Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date. Projects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs, WhICh are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday pnor to the Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend, The remamder of the reVIew schedule WIll be adjusted accordmgly If you have questIons on the attached comments, please contact the respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatIves, If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC (2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to the Planmng and Development Board Meetmg that falls approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg, An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Plannmg and Development board. Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report and/or confirmatIOn ofthe traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County dramage certIficatIOn by a lIcensed engmeer, SIgned "RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn" form and colored elevatIOns of the proposed proJect. ThIS mformatIOn IS necessary for the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note, Engmeenng John GUIdry Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6285 BUIldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6357 FIre Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382 Roger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357 PolIce Department Marshall Gage Sgt. James Prestman 737-6167 742-6185 UtIlItIes John GUIdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285 PublIc Works-General Larry Qumn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285 PublIc Works-Traffic Jeffery LIvergood 742-6201 742-6211 Parks & RecreatIOn John Wildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233 F oresterlEnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259 Plannmg & Zomng Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259 CHAIRMAN Revised 03/21/01 S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\FORMS\lst REV COMMENTS FAX ORlG\ISI Review conune.1s FAX COVER doc Department of Engineering and Public Works po. Box 21229 West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgovcom . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Warren H. Newell. Chairman Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair Karen T. Marcus Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Tony Masilotti Addie L. Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Action Employer" @ printed on recycled paper August 20 2001 Mr Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach POBox 310 Boynton Beach FL 34425-0310 RE. Quantum Park - Amendment #12 TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf' The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received on February 9, 2001) for the project entitled, Quantum Park - Amendment #11, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the approval can not be granted due to the following . The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 daily trips) should be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development traffic generation Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in Attachments 1A, 1B, and 1C must reflect the values in the latest NOPC approval If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030 Sincerely, Masoud Atefi, Sr Engineer- cc: Pinder-Troutman Consulting Inc. MTP Group Inc. '---,- -- r;l - ~ " ,I r.~ , U' . " I, I '\ I n I L L File: General TPS Mun TraffIC Study Review I n w rr~fn)1 Ii r: ! ~f1r, 22 2001 It: I i --..I F '\TRAFFIClma\Admin\Comments\01 0812.doc ,.' ,./ ."~' '~;--'.'Y',-.'."- "O-,'~"l!!. ;7 /.,:---... ~. ! l' '" -'",\ .1 ( ", \ \ 1 ' l' l~ ',' j'I. ',~ .I-~,~(J, ~.,. .....0~.: '",ON DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division . Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Ucenses . Community Redevelopment August 15, 2001 Mr Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works POBox 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re, Traffic Study. Quantum Park NOPC # 12 MPMD 01-003 Dear Mr Atefi: The enclosed traffic generation statement, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.,was received by Planning and Zoning recently for the above-referenced application. Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and I with your written response. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260 SinCerrly, ~ ~f) ~~~ ~cJav + Michael W Rumpf U Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/sc J:ISHRDAT AIPIanningISHARED\\'/P'PROJECrS,Quantum park kx 73a-76,Trailic letter to Palm Beach County,doc City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd" P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. POBox 31 0 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO :?/-{:r ne kca-- f f ;f~~ d~v FAX. ~W- ::tiC) .-;2t/J.1 FROM DATE. ()~ / /~/o I jlJ () (~ -# /2 .~ ~c&<u- NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) 2 RE. crl2f 't J1M1eL /?h11 r-cJp~d ~ 9 11//01 If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you 1 TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT TIME 08/16/2001 17 03 NAME BOVNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5613756260 I DATE TIME FAX t~O./NA~1E DURATION PAGE(S) RESULT 1\10DE 08/16 17 IB 9740242'3 00 00 47 02 OK ST Ai'~DARD ECM QUANTUM PARK OF BOYNTON BEACH DR! - NOPC AMENDMENT #12 SCHEDULE ADVERT P&D CC CC - PH (1) DATE MEETING 1ST READING 21'\D READING A Oct. 29, 2001 Oct. 10,2001 Oct. 16,2001 Nov 7, 2001 (1) PublIc Hearing The followmg dates have been denved pursuant to schedulmg reqUIrements outlmed m Chapter 38006 F S 1 DRI /NOPC ReceIved August 14,2001 2. 30-Day Marker * September 12, 2001 3 45-Day Marker * September 27,2001 (DCA Comments due 2/2/01) 4 90-Day Deadlme' November 10,2001 * The CIty IS reqUIred to gIve a 15 day notIce (no sooner than 30 days and no later than 45 days from the date the NOPC applIcatIOn was receIved) to DCA, Treasure Coast RPC and the applIcant of the scheduled date for the publIc heanng, 08/15/01 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division Memorandum PZ 01-169 TO FROM DATE RE Quintus Greene, Director of Development Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Directo/-KvZ- August 15, 2001 Quantum Park DRIA 01-001 NOpe Amendment #12 In response to your request for a summary of the above-referenced application, I am forwarding to you excerpts of the application that list the proposed changes, a map showing the subject lots and abbreviated notes describing the proposed changes, and a schedule for processing the application established in accordance with state requirements I understood you to also request a cursory analysis of the application with possible alternatives or issues, however, as the application was received less than one week ago, staff has not had time to conduct this review or review the master plan for accuracy (e g to confirm that all proposed amendments shown on the map are listed within the formal application) Please note that proposed changes include abandonment of that segment of Quantum Lakes Drive located north of Villas at Quantum Lake, and replacement with two new parcels designated with the mixed use land use option Furthermore, please also be informed that the application contains no description of the project or uses proposed within the new mixed-use pods, only information within the traffic analysis that reveals the plan for 500 dwelling units MR Attachments S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 MPMD & DRIA\Summary to Director.doc SPLA ~NING SHARECNVP'Pf"O';ECTS\QU,LI.NTUM PARK 2001 MPiv1D & DRIASUMMARY TO DIRECTORDOC ~ n i i 'OJ- t;~ ~ ~ a ~ i w 'Ii. ~ Cl U ~ a @ i ~ ~ ISo ~ ~ l!) 'OJ- 'so a. ~1jj ~z B zO;: "1-, QI? l! ~ ~ ~~ Ii I UN :if 0 ! ..J~ 0 N ---- r-: cD ~ i.ti,S Z 0 i= U w Ul ,W ]1"JS OUIdV.r.I oot. Slli ." '" . 7l. ~'I ~ ! i~ i ~~~ ! - "'~.J i ~ ig~ Q JJ~ -i~ ! ~~g ~-.-.~ ;..-!tnj~~Q ~ ~ s~mm ~ ~ ij ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 " 8 ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ . >- a:: <<: o z ::l o CD ~ a:: <<: a. :::;. ::l f- Z <<: ::l o h-n I ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ; ~ a . ; ; l j ~ 'Ii ~ ~ i: ~n' U% ~ - D o=.,oooo~.. ollJl _ Ii! ~ ~ . 0 ~~ ~ ~~ i ~ ~ ;~ i t: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~I : I ~ i i! i! Ii ~ f i I ! ;li!!~ ~ ~ I!I I!I & :~ ~~ Q I;; ~ ~ il~ H t:' t: ~ 2 f h !P I : : i iI : ~ !l!! ; j : l!! ! 1 , . , 2 3^ V SS3!JDNO:> ~ ~ ~ i I!I "' ~ i H ~ ~ ! I ~ ~ , 1t13:~ EUU i :' = I ~ ~ i ~ ! - ,; ~ t! o ' o ~ . I ~! 1 ~J} 1 1 ~ , ~ :l I r ~ ; ~ i ~l tl .1 U ~ 10) IW ..o:lt:tl 10/80/10 ....".."'"'~'6.p\'*"'-JIW\-1I..,\:)I ----- ~~ --~-------------------- ~ ~ i ~~ ~ ~ a ~ 'Ii. S E2 ~ I .. a 11 f ISo ~ ~ ~ 'SO n 'OJ- W Cl Z ~ l!) 'OJ- a. ~~ ~ zO;:i1 ogl! ~~ Ii UN o ..J~ o "i " cD ~ g i~ ~ u2 - Ii! Ii! ~ to:. ! - .~~ ~ 2 ~;~ g ; -~~ ~ ~~'Z ~--w ~~I~::niti~ I!I !i Umm ~ ~ ij ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >- a:: <<: o z ::l o CD ~ a:: <<: CL :::E ::l f- Z <<: ::J o I h-n ~ ~ ~ 0 a ~ 5 . ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ a:: .., ~ :: ..... z: ; t.\I z ~ ~ ~ I!I Ii! ~ h; U% ~ - 0 u_uoooo~.. 0'" ---- 6"S' z o i= U w Ul JllJ ]ly:)s OUkl....1f.I OOt litli Oli[ ", 0 7l. --,' I ~ . , 3~ ~ 2~ lj ~p ~ ;;iil t: ~~~ ~ ;1 U i n i a I: ~5 d I I :~!I I ~ ~ ~ . i ~~ h ~ I g g ~ ~ Il~ ~~ t:' t: ~ 2 ~ i. h : ~ ~ : ~ ~.~ : ~8~~ '~lIN""a" ~II!I ~iidl~ fi ~ !I !! ! lip 1I ! , 2 3M SS3!JDNO:> tal ftd ,o;lt:U 10/80/80 ...p.rl.."MIl\....\Ullfttl-IIIU\ ~11W\l)f ~ ~ ~ i I!I "' !l i H ~ ~ 3 ; . ~ , , ItlHZ E!h~ i :' J ~ II ~ ! ,; i 4i! o ' o ~ · f I 051 ~J 1 1 1 ~ i :l I ~ r 5 '" ~ II! ; g !ll ;~ ~ 2. Applicant: MFT Development, Inc., A Florida CorporatIOn as General Partner to Quantum Lmuted Partners, L. C 2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve SUite 101 Boynton Beach, FL 33426 Phone. (561) 740-2447 Fax: (561) 740-2429 3 Authorized Agent: Mr DaVId B Noms, Esq Cohen, Noms, Scherer, Wemberger & HarrIS 712 U S Highway One North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Phone: (561) 844-3600 Fax: (561) 842-4104 4. Location. Quantum Park DR!, CIty of Boynton Beach, County of Palm Beach, Townsmp 45 South, Range 43 East, Sections 16, 17,20 and 21 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the Plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. 5 1 The Master SIte Development Plan, Amendment No 12, has been reVised to reflect the changes descnbed below The ReVISed Master SIte Development Plan IS mcorporated mto tlus Notice of Proposed Change by reference and has been sublTIltted to the CIty of Boynton Beach for consIderation by the CIty Council for amendment and approval. 5.2 Lots 7.8.9. 10 and 11 (7.99 Acres). Lots 7,8,9, 10 and 11 were preViously deSIgnated as OfficelIndustnal (01) Land Use The Land Use has been revIsed to "Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land Use DeSIgnation mcludes office, commerCial and reSIdential uses. F \Quantum Limitcd\Annual DRI'u'lotificationDRI.doc 2 August 8, 200 I 5.3 Lots 23.24.25.26.27. 28.29.30 and 31 (15.28 Acres). The Land Use ofthese lots are currently designated as Office (0) Land Use. The Land Use has been reVISed to "Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land Use DesIgnation mcludes office, commercial, and resIdential uses. 5 4 Lot 34C (6.58 Acres). Lot 34-C IS proposed to be desIgnated for Industnal (IND) land use Lot 34-C currently IS undesIgnated and is mcluded m the Open Space area tabulation. Prior to the construction completion of the surface water management system, the area was shown on the conceptual water management plan on record at the South Florida Water Management DIStnct (SFWMD) as part ofthe proposed wet detention area. As the surface water management system was permItted for construction and the SFWMD Conceptual PermIt was modrlied, the area was not mcluded m the surface water management system and subsequently platted as Lot 34-C, unencumbered by any dramage easement, dedIcation or reservatIon. Tlus IS evidenced by the recorded plats and the ConstructIon Completion Acknowledgement by the SFWMD, dated February 7, 1997 The Acknowledgement Identrlies 6.92 acres, as Dry Retention Area. The only Dry Retention Area WIthm the development IS Tract J Tract J IS 6.92 acres. A copy of the letter IS attached as ExhibIt "A" 5 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve ReconfiguratIon. Proposed IS a reconfiguratIon of the current roadway and Lot layout m the area ofthe Project north and east of the Quantum Lakes Dnve mtersectIon With Quantum Boulevard, along Quantum Lakes Dnve to the eastern mtersectIon With Gateway Boulevard. The proposed reconfiguratIon e1unmates Quantum Lakes DrIve as a roadway lmk between Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The resultmg addItional developable land area that IS not needed as a roadway, will be further subdIVIded mto developable lots (Lots 100 and 101) and deSIgnated as Mixed Use (MU) for reSIdential, office or commerCial use. F'\Quantum Limited\Annual DRI\NotificationDRI.doc ... -' August 8, 200 I The proposed reconfiguratIon increases the Mixed Use (MU) land area. However, the office and commercial mtensItIes (buildmg area) are not proposed to be mcreased. The reconfiguratIon proVIdes for development adjacent the surface water amerutIes of the Park. The reconfiguration eliminates the unneeded roadway and It's mamtenance cost and also elmunates the substandard and dangerous mtersectIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. The eXlstmg Master Plan shows a drIveway from Quantum Lakes Dnve to Lots 60, 61 and 62. The 272 urnt multI-family resIdential development on Lots 59, 60 and 61 is encumbered by a Uruty of Title and uses the mtersectIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum Boulevard as It'S mam entrance ehmmatmg the need for access from these lots to Quantum Lakes Dnve. Lot 62 IS proposed to be combmed mto one lot With Lot 63 Veludes access will be proVIded from Gateway Boulevard to the combmed lot, Lot 102. The neghgible ID1pact on the traffic dIStnbutIOn resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn IS defined by the attached Traffic AnalySIS prepared by Pmder Troutman Consultmg, Inc., dated August 7, 2001 5 6 The attached Quantum Park Master SIte Development Plan, Amendment No 12, dated July 2001, Mock-Roos Drawing No 45-43-17-54, Sheet 1 of 1, mdIcates the proposed changes. 57 The Land Use Acreage Table shown on the Master SIte Development Plan has been revised to reflect the changes described above. LISted below IS the Amendment No 12 Proposed Land Uses as Acreages shown on the Master Plan for Amendment No 12 and the EXlStmg Land Uses and Acreages shown on the Master Plan for Amendment No 10 (Amendment No 11 was not approved by the CIty of Boynton Beach ConurusslOn.) F \Quantum Limited\Annual DRI\NotificationDRI.doc 4 August 8, 200 I ____ i d : ! U I 2 iUJ! U I , fllPAflIMt-N (\1- Of-VI::LOPMENT; II"", I 0 ! ----- i< lJU I '-- July 10, 2001 Mr H. DavId Kelly, Jr, City Engmeer Department CIty of Boynton Beach 100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425 RE Villas at Quantum Lake - 272 Apartment Units Dear DavId As you are aware, Olen ReSIdentIal Realty Corp IS proceedmg WIth the development of the Villas at Quantum Lake project as prevIously approved for 272 uruts on 15 16 acres Our arcmtectural and sIte CIvil plans should be proceedmg through the vanous approval processes, and we fully expect the pemnts any day and to begm constructIOn m August. There has been much dISCUSSIOn by the Quantum Comparues WIth regard to theIr deSIre to vacate Quantum Lakes Dnve and the mcorporatIOn of the adjacent water management tract mto a new development tract bordenng the approved Villas at Quantum Lake project. Presumably, thIS new tract would lead to the development of addItIonal apartment or condonnruum for sale uruts along the lake bank. As we reVIew tms proposal, we have several sIgruficant concerns regardmg the pernnt and approval process, development reqUirements, and potentIal Impacts to the overall park and our approved apartment project. Some of the Issues, wmch we have, are 1) Will the addItIOn and encroachment of the proposed buildmgs and lake bank mto the eXlstmg water management areas reqUire modIficatIOn and/or nntIgatIOn of the eXIstmg SFWMD and the LWDD pemnts, analYSIS of runoff and dIscharge, as well as the current DR! cntena and reqUirements related to water management. 2) Will the encroachment of the proposed buildmgs and lake bank mto the eXIstmg enVIronmental lIttoral and upland plantmgs reqUire modIficatIon and/or nntIgatIOn of the eXlstmg enVIronmental pernnts, and speCIfic DR! cntena and reqUirements related to enVIronmental plantmgs 3) Will the current and proposed mamtenance of the water management areas, lake bank and enVIronmental plantmgs, and the Impacts If the proposed lake bank and edge of water wItmn the new tract, reqUire a dedIcatIOn of a new lake mamtenance easement. 4) Will the Impact of the proposed development on the eXIstmg tree canopy and tree count reqUire an approved tree management plan. 1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Springs Florida 33071 (954) 340 4904 · Fax (954) 344 4608 Page 201'2 July 10 2001 Mr. David Kelly / Villas at Quantum -272 Apartment Uruts 5) The accurate locatIOn of the eXIstmg utilItIes should be determmed m order that the proposed relocatIOns, and the tUlling of saId relocatIOns, not Impact the adequate water and sewer servIce to our apartment project. I 6) Any such development proposal should address the Impact of the road closure on the access east to and west from the remammg nuxed-use property north of our apartment SIte, as well as the traffic volumes m front of the apartment SIte 7) The proposal should address the elInunatIOn of the northern egress from the current apartment SIte, and the reqUlrement for an easement and access dnve from our lot 61 to Gateway Boulevard 8) We are concerned about any proposed development, not built m coordmatIOn wIth our Villas project, Impactmg the access, frontage, vIsibilIty, setbacks, densIty, open space and eXIstmg VIews from our Villas project. 9) A proposed 90-day tIme frame has been put forth, for QCDD approval and concurrent applIcatIOns for the NOPC, Plat, Master Plan and SIte Plan. Our concern IS that thIS expedIted schedule proVIde the CIty adequate tIme to conSIder the Impacts of tills proposal on the remammg property We are contmumg to reVIew our optIOns WIth regard to the road closure and the possibilIty of mcorporatmg that property mto our current development, and would like to dISCUSS thIS WIth you III more detail, however we have been unable to find a SIte layout that works and does not negatIvely Impact the area. We would lIke to suggest that any abandonment or development approval be condItIoned upon a concurrent SIte and plantmg plan acceptable to the CIty and one that does not negatlvely Impact the neIghbors Thank you for your conSIderatIOn. nk Bruerun se DIrector ofPlanrung & .:0. EB sr CC LUSIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner, City Planrung and Zorung mSHEILA\CORRES\EB\QUANTIJM\Kelly071 00 1 doc OLEN RESIDENTIAL 1062 Coral Ridge Drive Coral Springs, FL 33071 Phone (954) 340-4904, Fax (954) 344-608 transmittal To Lucia Galav From Erik L. Brueningsen~ · July 25 2001 Office: City of Boynton Beach Date: Address. Planning and Zoning Division 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. PO Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Copy. Re Quantum Park I Quantum Lakes Drive I Water Management Tract Q As you know, Quantum is proposing the vacation and replat of Quantum Lakes Drive and a portion of the adjacent Water Management Tract Q for development. As an adjacent property owner we are concerned with the schedule and impact to the overall Quantum Park and our approved Apartment site I drafted this list of items and activities as a way to track the process through the various Agencies and Municipalities. This is my list of the items I thought necessary and it may not be complete, in fact if you see something else let me know Thanks. .lur 2 1 2n" PROPOSED ABANDONMENT, REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE TRACT 'E" AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT 'Q" Task Description Planning and Engineering / Processing, Approvals and Permits 1 Quantum Lakes Drive Roadway Abandonment and Removal (Tract E) a. Property sketch and descriptions for portion of Tract E (roadway) b. Tree and topography surveys c. Accurate location and survey of existing utilities (water and sewer) d. Replacement easements to City (water and sewer) , e Storm drainage easements to QCDD, FDOT f Easements to Utility Company's g. Easements to Quantum Park & Village (access to Gateway) h. Easements to Villas at Quantum Lake (access to Gateway) I. Fill requirements j. Tree removal, relocation and mitigation plan (conflicts only) k. QCDD approval to abandon roadway for development -~- .--- L QCDD property exchange, transfer of ownership m. City approval to abondon roadway tract for development n. Demolition and tree management plan processing o. QCDD approvals and permits p City approvals and Building Department permits 2. Transfer a Portion of Water Management Tract Q for Development a. Property sketch and descriptions for portion of Tract Q (lake area) b. Tree and topography surveys c. Engineering design and storm water management calculations d. Fill requirements e. Lake maintenance easement requirements (QCDD) f Irrigation design plans, irrigation mains and appurtances g. Irrigation plan approvals, QCDD and City building department permits h. Irrigation easements I. Other QCDD easements, if any j QCDD property exchange, transfer of ownership k. SFWMD conceptual permit modification, water management area L LWDD permit, water management area ; m. Environmental planting plan to modify/mitigate development order Environmental plan approvals and permits ! n. : o. Tree removal, relocation and mitigation plan (building footprint) I p QCDD approvals and permits I q. City approvals and Building Department permits 3. DRI Modification I a. NOPC - City and Treasure Coast review, process and approvals b. Traffic study and report c Environmental Audit d. Master Plan e. Master water and sewer plan f Master plan modification 4 Plat and Plat Processing a. Boundary survey and legal description of new the tract b. Plat preparation c. Plat Application d. Utility letters e. QCDD easements f City sewer easements g. City water easements h. Title I. City approval j. Recording 5. Site Plan Modification and Processing (additional apartment units) a. Tree survey (new development tract, a portion of tracts E and Q) 1 of 3 PROPOSED ABANDONMENT, REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE TRACT "E" AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT "Q" Task Description I b T opo survey (new development tract, a portion of tracts E and Q) c. Preliminary site plan layout d. Architectural building plans (3 additional buildings) e. Site plan development f Tree management plan g. Planting plan h. Irrigation plan I. Site lighting plan j. Photometric plan k. Traffic Statement I. Site Plan Application (major modification) m. QCDD approval and permit n. City approval 6 Gravity Sewer Line Relocation i a. Design in coordination with new site pl~n, paving and drainage plans b. Coordination with existing utilities (FPL, BST, CATV, all others) c. QCDD permit d. City plan approvals e. Health Department permit f City Building Department permit 7 Site Engineering Design, Permits and Approvals (additional apartments) a. Tree and topo surveys (for new tract, a portion of tracts E and Q) b. Accurate location of existing FPL, BST, CATV, all others c. Coordination with existing utilities (FPL, BST, CATV, all others) d. Engineering design with new tract, including lake bank modification e. Engineering redesign of the approved apartment plans : ew wa er an .. easemen s, s e c an escnp ons sewer u I g. SFWMD conceptual permit modification h. SFWMD construction permit modification I QCDD permit and approvals j. LWDD permit modification k. City approval new water and sewer plan I. City approval new paving and drainage plan i m. Health Department permit modification ! n. City Building Department permits I 8. Access Drive From Lot 61 to Gateway , a. Legal sketch and description for easement b. Easement grant - Quantum Park & Village c. Engineering design roadway and drainage plans d. Planting plans e. Irrigation plans f Lighting plans g. SFWMD permits h. LWDD permit I. Other permits and approvals j. City approvals and Building Department permits 9 City Building Department Permits (onsite) a. Site work for grading, water, sewer, drainage and paving b. Architectural building plans (3 additional buildings) c. Planting plans permit d. Irrigation plans permit e. Site lighting permit Construction Phase 10 Construction Management a. Project Scheduling and critical path, start and stop dates f N d t lity kth dd ti 2of3 PROPOSED ABANDONMENT, REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT OF QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE TRACT 'E" AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT 'Q" Task Description b. Construction contracts, schedule impacts and remobilization costs 11 Utility Relocations and Adjustments (surface and subsurface) a. FPL b. BellSouth c. CATV and Communications d. Street Lighting, and all others 12. Tree Relocations a. Water management tract Q - building pad conflicts only b. Vacated roadway tract E - conflict areas only c. Final acceptance and certification 13 Environmental Plantings and Mitigation Requirements a. Water management tract Q i I b. Final acceptance and certification '14Ouantum Lakes Drive Roadway and Gravity Sewer Removal , a. Remove asphalt and road base, curb, gutter and sidewalk b. Remove lighting, irrigation and service points c. Tree removal, relocation and mitigation (conflict areas only) d. Storm drainage removal, pipe and structures e. 8" gravity sewer grout in place f Remove gravity sewer structures g. Final acceptance and certification 15. Gravity Sewer Line Relocation and Service to Proposed Buildings a. Stake-out main and services to proposed buildings b. 8" gravity sewer main c. 8" gravity sewer services d. Final acceptance and certification 16. Existing POA Irrigation a. Irrigation relocations and adjustments, main distribution b. Irrigaiton relocations and adjustments, appurtenances c. Final acceptance and certification 17 Lake Bank Reconfiguration (Water Management Tract Q) a. Environmental plantings b. Tree relocations c. Irrigation relocations and aCljustments d. Sidewalk 18. Soil Tests a. Borings b. Environmental 0 ; ~ Foil, Grade and Compact a. Quantum Lakes Drive Tract E i b. Water Management Tract Q 20 Access Drive From Lot 61 to Gateway a. Roadway and drainage , b. Plantings c Irrigation i d. Lighting e. Final acceptance and certification Total 3of3