CORRESPONDENCE
ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
\ffil~:: 4
\. rL
! z
j:._,--,...."'""'''''---~_.
~-'
"l
i I"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Department of Engineering
-J
December 14, 2001
Mr Mark Hansen
Vice-President
The Olen Company
1062 Coral Ridge Drive
Coral Springs, FL 33071
RE Quantum lakes Drive Closure
Maintenance of Traffic (MOT)/Traffic Control Plan
Dear Mr Hansen,
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the traffic control plan for the
closure of Quantum Lakes Drive Following are my comments regarding the proposal
. Recommend Placing "Road Closed Ahead" signs for Quantum Boulevard
southbound traffic
. Recommend using painted directional arrows instead of tape This will be a long
term set-up and paint will be more durable
. Indicate, by note, that all signs are to be post mounted and will be placed in
accordance with the applicable FDOT standards for offset and mounting height.
. Only 2 (two) Type III barricades are shown at either end of the closure area Will this
be adequate?
Although not part of the MOT plan, you indicate placement of 2 (two) 10 foot gates at
either end of the closure area I'm sure you intend to lock these gates Please be aware
that you will need to address fire rescue access at the time of the temporary fence
permit application
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6480 Fax: (56]) 742-6285
Mr Mark Hansen, Vice-President, The Glen Company
Re Quantum Lakes Drive Closure, Maintenance of Traffic
December 14, 2001
Page Two
If you have any additional questions or need additional information, please feel free to
contact me at 561-742-6482
Sincerely,
LUck
Xc: Jeff Livergood, P E , Director, Public Works
H David Kelley, Jr , P E.lP S M , Utility Engineer
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning
Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Plans Analyst (with attachments)
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst (with attachments)
File (with attachments)
c-,"\oly Documents\Quantum Lakes Drive Closure :\olOT Plan.doc
DEe 13 '01 02 03PM THE ~LEN COMPAN~
P 1
i
, I
i ~,
! ..; w DEe, 4 20m
, L -------~--.J
L_-.~
fACSIMiLE TR.ANSMITTAL SHEET
TO;
FAX:
Quantcm Lakes Dnve - Qosure
(561) 742-6357
PAX:
(561) 740-2429
(954) 7i6-7608
(561) 742-6259
D"'T~'
December 13, 2001
TOT"L 1\0 OP P^GtiS INCLUDING COV~R;
'Three
Ken Hall
CC,
TO%Il McGillicuddy
James Droto6
Lusia Galav
FROM:
Matk Hansen
RE:
Origi"lal to follow by mail
1062 CCRAL RIDGE DRIVE - CORAL SPRINGS - FL 33071
PHOr-oE i954) .HO 490'1 - F :\X (9541 344 H08
DEe 13 'ei 02 03PM THE Q_EN COMPANY
P 2
December 13,2001
Mr, Ken Hall
City of Boynton Beach
Engmeering Department
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach. FL 33425
RE Quantum Lakes Dr. - Closure
Dear Ken,
Please find enclosed traffic mamtenance plan for the closure of a portion of Qua..'ltum. Lakes
Dnve prepared by Shah Drotos engineers. The plan shows the portion of Quantum Lakes Drive
closed just northward of Quantum Blvd. and just southward of the median at Lot 61/62 property
line, using type ill barriers, Additionally, we will be installing a construction chain link fence
with gates at both ends for trucks and emergency vehicles. The temporary construction chain link
fence will also continue along the lake bank, just outside the constrnctlon linuts of the additional
buildings, in order to protect the existing vegetation.
Quantum Lakes Drive 1S a Quantum Commumty Development Distnct roadway and was
approved by the district for closure at the November district meeting. The closure will help
facilitate the constmction of the apartment community, lessen the conflicts with vehicular traffic,
and reduce the liabIlity to the district.
The fence company will be applying to the city for a pemut on the temporary construction fence.
Should you have any questlons regardmg the road closure, please can me at (954) 340-4904
S T QUANTUM LAKES, INC.
Cc Tom McGillicuddy - QCDD
James Orotos - Shah Drotos
Lusia Galav - CIty of Boynton Beach
V~\SHE1LA\COR.US\MH\QutJ\~lIm\Hl1ll21301.DOC
1062 Corel Ridge Drive · Cora Sp~ ng5 Flor de 3~071
(854) ~40 4904 . Fax (S54) 3'14 4608
p 3
Ii\
~
.J '3:
c:)t\P"~\'(
0' ;:'1'\
'" J\-IS --
- "'-P".
e.: "'.:>
e1
DS: 13
~~
~~
~
~ ~
~ 4::
e I,:)
..s: -~
~ "0 a
J
~ J 1,1)
~ ~
('01 % ~ ~
.t
"3 t'l
1
~
~
<
e
~
.)
.;}
~
~
\
". ~
1i
~
~.t.
\>1\
'},
tOL
,I> ~
r
~e
@
.....
~
r
~
~
<tC.
.J"
,
J
~
o
r/.-
~
t-I
IU
a.
..".
'r
--------
------~
---------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
. Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment
December 13,2001
Ms. Stella ROSSI
625 WhIspenng Pmes Road
Boynton Beach, Flonda 33435
RE ExplanatIOn of 'Reserved' relatIve to Lot 34-C Quantum Park PID
Dear Ms. ROSSI
ThIS letter IS m response to your request for the above-referenced mformatIOn, as conveyed at the
November 6,2001 CIty CormmssIOn meetmg.
For purposes of the Quantum Park PID Master Plan (NOPC #12), the category "Reserved" IS a non-
development desIgnatIOn. The CondItIOns of Approval for NOPC #12, Ordmance 01-54, stIpulate that
the CIty and applIcant wIll evaluate the need for open space m the PID Master Plan and also
demonstrate that the development oftlus parcel WIll not mterfere wIth management ofthe adjacent
preserve When a determmatIOn has been made regardmg the appropnate use of the "Reserved"
parcel, the applIcant wIll submIt a NotIce of Proposed Change (NOPC) to obtam the appropnate master
plan land use desIgnatIon.
Smcerely,
--(LLJ2.-
MIchael W Rumpf,
DIrector ofPlanmng & Zomng
MR/jdc
cc Kyrt Bressner, CIty Manager
';:'usIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner
S \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park PID-Outdoor Storage\DefimtlOn of Reserve Lot 34C.doc
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O, Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
~~
ctlm
';A $
~'d.
04-
~D-
~'8
"""
o
~
~
~
Sod)
o~
~~
5~
"""u-
nO
4C)
u-~
'.2.'"'"
~bl
\l)u,.l
a~
~~
UlUJ
&'"'"
wG'.
Ct(t
D-
c(
o
~
'i
'al
.~
u
G)
""
1t.
;
e
00
-
~
e
.sa
r"'\
i
\
1)
~
o
e
.9 ca
~'D
G):=
"'" .~
~::>
tt
i
e
%
1)
~
o
~
.c
2
ci6
~
....
e
e
.!S
0.
(0
5
(0
il
.;l
.. _ ~ ell ell ell ,2: J!l 9 ~
'etaG) c~~ ei --
tt:e.~ o"'tG 0_ 00 a
~_ Vi""~ '" G) e.
G) '" .!S "" ~ tG .... ~ 00 ~
~ tG tG G) ~ G) 'io)(
.., ,... oS ~ '" ;. "" .~
.s= 00 Q) .~ 00 ~ G) 0. e
I ~ e .s= tG c: ..,:$ ....
o tG ~,,",:$ ~i G) .e
.s= 00 _ Q) - \W $J'"
G) .... ... '" G) ~ ~ . Ct
-5% ~eIl'i ~ ...I!l
~ 0 ,,,,_ g... ell ",,- fA ~ a
g ,,'a ell ~ ... Iii - ... a.....
~ 0:$ ~ (l) -s s::. G) - :$ ""
~ .~ d" :$ 6- 0 .., s::. a ~ .e
~ ~oV; ."Iii ~... 'is~ ~
tG~ oo~s::.:) "" -5-";10
u-o.tGtG ~'e~~: ~e
o ~ ~ .... <<. li;~ to ~ "i ~ II
~ ... ~ '4l >' " ell .. ell (11
0" "'... ,,~~ Iii~ 'a~ ell
... to ii\ ... .. i>. _ .,' " ~ ,. 0 -6
l-' W ell ~ ell 'ill ,,~ i'~-
Do .I!l ~ e-"i ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ i 5
~ t:'OtGg'eeVi""oo- e
'" 'l... "5 to !,..g t 6 fA ~ e ~ g
~ U '" -5.'A 0. '" '" ~ . \oJ'" ~
V' 0 CS'.... '" .s= CS' G)'~! 0 u 9 .-
'g ~ ,% "'-;.;: % ~ '; ~ 1 ~ So !! ~
:'l! ... i; 1;, 'A'" "O.e ell ... ~ ~ 0
'4l .!! % % "',! ~ '\I .~ ~:s ~ % ':,
" ~ ~ 'is. ~ 5 ell ~ 'i e 6''Gi t ~
~~"YA&E~a"'a~.'Il&!l
'a Ii '4l ell ell 'ill ell ~ ell ell E .. to
-C'4l~~:i~~~s~i%e!
o ~:$:$ tt.""o e. e(,/')O'" u....-
o to $J $J "'. ~ ....
g"#s
~-5
fi.%
v'1)
G) ~
"" Q)
-500
.--
~~
- ~
"ie
ta
?At:
~~
~ Ci
'O"#s
~-5
e
._ e
e""
tGg
G) c:
Eo
G)O
-500
G)
""",
~ca
-0 "" -
G) ~ 'Q)
~Q)S
tGoo~
.... e-
~tGG)
ou-5
tt.:re
tG rI\ ....
_ 00
1'i....e
~O'tG
(1)--
~a :e !
.f! 00 0.
~~ '0 0
tG~ % ~
::G) (,/') ~
tG s::. '"
"" .., s:. e
~ e ~ .9
'" 0 'i, '"
ooJ: $
"" G) G)
!3ta ~ -5
e~ =- ""0
~% 'E~d)
(I)"" ;'e~
o 00 .~ 1
ee ~Q)o
!3 tG e G) rI\
e '" .- $ ~
.., cu 'C e '"
~o ~0G)
~ S ~.... ~
\W... (l) ~ tG
C\ '" "" .... 0.
e~ E....
. '" E 0.0
~i 0000
~"" ~u tG
!-5 ",,~g
(I) ~ . 'a'O a
u ._ cu L> ~ .~
e'O'(GO-
tG~e~N.a
e_9!.(I)"" 0
.... _ V' G) Vi
-e tG...~ G) $J ~
o '" s::. ~ e
~-e~ ~~~
~~~o:io
....
~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0
0 ~ t
~ t
~ Ct Ct Ct Ct
(,/') (,/')
~ (,/') (,/') Ct Ct
';a~ ~ 'it 'it u.1 u.1
~ u.1 u.1 'i
4.~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0'0 '0 '0 z z ~ ~ ~
~~ ~ ~ 4'. ~ cD Sou$oOa4
'1u ~ ~ ~ l~ (t" So ~~~~~~
'j ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~u.1 ut::.~t::.~t::.
cD ::> ::> '0 ~t::.~t::. ' ~ ~
::> 0. , ~ ~ ~ \ao4 ~
0. , ,S .,.. .,..
0. , . > .,..
, ,~ ~
,~
()
o
'0.
.....
$
o
.....
.....
'0
g
~
~
Cl)
'~
..
c.
~
c::
Cl)
2
~
o
e
u.
~
l-
ea
u.
':a
~
to
~
g
III
Cl)
\!.
~
c::
..
!.
.s
~
..
o
0-
E
Cl)
~
01
c:
"-E
III
u:
..
,
,
2
$
co
....
~
01
o.e
~ .s.~
-----.-
.- ~ ~-- -------.-.,-------
UlJ u:;' 01 10 "6a
Clt~ Attorne'" S
'" Of'f'ice
561-742-6054
T-355 P 02/02 F-1ZD
P 1
~ov-DZ-Dl iZ:08P1
From-COHE" NORRIS SCHERER WEiNBErGER 561-'42-4134
COHEN NORRIS ~CHERER
WE\NBERGER & WOlMER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
f'UOC. (XJli!.'l P.A.-
_OORVR. COlEN
llIWlARDA. txlNKQ.
SLAIHIC.Ole.GiNSON
00l0INIC a UIEAI.
RlCt'Il'lIlD J. ~
tllI\lIIO" NOfUUS, P.....
1IETIt\" 'My
~J.~P"'.
ICVl.E '" lS!I.\ISUlII\Mw
.IAMl!S8. 'fEl,J!fIIMN-
MlPTM. ~R.".A..
BRliHf C \\OUIIII, ~.A..
"Of c:..-
---~
-eo.c CelII* __lolIgIUOr.
70ct~~
HtJM ?~
OFCOU~.
ltlaWlO S. AAOWl.lIf. PA
~~8, RAQt..l~
_~ C-"""1\'mlIIIlII'
November 1. 2001
James A. Chef off, City Attomey
The City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach. Florida 33426
RE. Quantum - NOpe.., 2
Dear Jim.
I write you to confirm our recent telephone conversation with regard to the above
referenced matter Specifically, with respect to the requested new condition which condition
would require :5 reatriotJon limiting the residential development relative to Lot 7 through 11 and
lot 23 through 31 to fee simple units and not to Include rental apartments or congregate care
liv"'9 facilities. As we discussed, provided such a restriction does not delay final approval at
the next meetIng. our client is agreenble to the same. I believe the condition should be
something along the fol!owing lines:
Recordation of a lestlicuve COllfmant affecting Lots 7 through 11 end Lots 23 through
31 requiring 'hat any residential development of such lots be limited to fee simple units,
specJficaDy fl)(cludlng rental aparlmenl complexes and congrsgate C8/e living facintJes. For
purposes hemof, "rental apartment complex" $hall mean a muJti..unit project owned by one
owner for purposes of rvntal to others, slmHsr in nature to the Villas At Quantum Lakes.
If you should have any further questions. please do not hesitate to contact me. Also, 1
would appreciate it if you would have forwarded to me the final staff report5 for the next
meeting.
^ PARTNERSHIP Of PWfES51ON"t ASSOC!AOONS
n. U. S. HICti\NAVONE. Sl.llTf 400. P.O. BOX 13146. "'ORTH pAV;t 8fACH. FLORIDA ))408-710%
tUEPHONe: [SO') 144-3600. F4CSlMILE: (561l84Hi04
cc:client
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E Boynton Beach Blvd
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO Jim Cherof, City Attorney
FAX 954-771-4923
FROM Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
DATE
10-24-01
NUMBER OF PAGES (including
cover)
1
RE Quantum NOPC #12 Conditions of Approval
Jim,
The following is my attempt to address the COA's as they relate to the approval of Mixed Use for Lots
7-11 and 23-31
1 The additional 500 residential units requested in the NOPC Amendment #12 are subject to the
City Commission approval of the Mixed Use (MU) designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31
2 The Mixed Use designation for Lots 7-11 and 23-31 is contingent upon restricting residential
development to fee simple units not to include rental apartments or congregate care/living
facilities
Please note that I have left out any reference to the Excel team recommendation regarding fee simple
unit with an appropriate price point. I was not present at the discussion regarding this item and
have no idea what that means or how it could be enforced Please review and revise as necessary
Fax or email your revisions to me
Thank you
CC Michael Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director
Document1
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you
HP Fax Series 900
Plain Paper Fax/Copier
Fax History Report for
Boynton Bch ENG
561 742 6285
Oct 24 2001 4.04pm
Last Fax
Date Time
~
Oct 24 4.03pm Sent
Identification
DuratIon ~ Result
91954771492369162
0.48
OK
Result:
OK - black and white fax
1
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E Boynton Beach Blvd
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO Eugene Gerlica
FAX. 561-740-2429
FROM Lusia Galav
DATE
October 12, 2001
NUMBER OF PAGES (including
cover)
q
RE Quantum Park DRI NOpel Master Plan Amendment #12
Per request enclosed is Addendum to 01-003
Letter from Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to Michael Rump
Letter from Dept. of Engineering and Public Works at WPB
Letter from Florida Dept. of Transportation
Conditions of Approval
The Agenda will be faxed to you as soon as it is received today
-rf!;; f} i?JO U E l-rl::711 S fA; e IlE r A XE'P
A (1 E Ai iJA E ^,Q.t..05E y 11('1 ~ A GEN)A
loftY/OI
KEQu c;5T (0 tCf'V1
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you
1
I
J
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPOF-T
TIME 10/12/2001 10 41
NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613755259
TEL 5513755250
DATE. TIME
FAx NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
10/:'..2 10 35
97402429
00 05 14
11
01<
STANDARD
ECM
10/10/2001 15 04
-- --. - -.----.--.-
5E143415E3
F HiDER TROUTMAN
PAGE 01
PIMDER TROaTMAN CoNSOLn"G, I "C.
Transporbltion PIamers and Engineers
Fax Transmittal Form
DATE: October 10, 2001
TIME: 3.53 PM
TO: Mr Eugene Gerlica
COMPANY. Quantum
FAX NUMBER: 740-2429
PHONE NUMBER:
PROJECT NAME: Quantum Park NOPC 12
PROJECT NUMBER: #PTC01-102
NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER: 8
Copies to:
D W / Enclosures
D
D
D
o
D Urgent ~ As Requested 0 For Review 0 Please Reply
D Original Will Follow
Message: Eugene,
Here is the letter from Masoud and Kahart's fax to him.
From the desk of
Lisa D. Ramirez
Administrative Assistant
PlII4Ier TroatlllGn Comaltlng. IlK.
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
PTC
561-434-1644
Fax 561-434-1663
E-mail pindertroutman@msn.com
10/10/2001 15 04 5E14341553
PINDER TROUTMAt'-j
PAGE 04
~,-""""",'_-^",^,_~OO~OI:ltl>>>>:~~_~~
PinDER TROUTMAn ConSULTinG. Inc.
TRANSPORTATION PLANNERS AND ENGINEERS
Fax Transmittal Form
To 71lculltt) 412 h
Company' ?Gl__ ~N1- ~
Fax Number- 478- 577tJ
Phone Number' bit Lf - 't tl ~ f)
Project Name- (}MJI1NTIIM f/J't1IlJt, /lI'1J'C#"~ Project Number- PfC,O}-/()Z
cc: 7l/Z- 'Z~,
o Urgent ,. For Review 0 As Requested ~ Please Reply 0 Originals to Follow in Mail
Message
mo.~&tA ~
rftti7VJ..uJ IA/1L r'..tIl/~.L, J Val/j a.vv J Pm ?~ /I,w,.- Jn~
C-~/1./raj;m 1dc-b/~S
4;1ac-~~t -III ~CI J8 ~~ Ik /fP4 'Y/r//v~
tk~j WJ!J. iN /II,!!C 71')2- /a.-.j ?iU.S. ~ ~n$p;H /$
n/fJiJY'''') ~ ?;P-..L I'l-t I~s ~ Sl-t~$ t~~) d~III'(}' ~ d.t'/)fmi~~h"""
S.'9s~U di.i/ iA. ~ ,.s ttJ)"'>>1~) ~ k of I~ ~ I';..t-I'.,("'S~ 1'7
41'rnAI Ir//?5, ~ Ub/.L S ~kw It d..u;,,~>~ 1;,/ -';'// $,
.J4l1tlJ.~)5 h4 ~j ~13 C-hn/~JI"~ M.t /l/cY;?C ~ /t1
7"/'~~cI I~ J tl;~.s H-J~ "A/;.-'c '" /2- /~j USL5 ~ 'M),/~5 A~t:I
~ l.o!IV IJ... d ~C.Y'.lA-Sl I ~ "'-;''/J ~.
V 1~}~ M/I
I) 7ht sC}..,l/l ...,~~ hd t !.}.,WY\ M .III";?C HI/!,
Z) NtJ pc, 'P- / / It,IA' ~ r (2./1'''' rot J h
V,,,.y r.tviPW , ( ~ ., ",/",,~,#.j;..J, ~ IS IX. _.fl. J~? I"',n 't1.-
011 t.,., 'f A t 2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H . West Palm Beach, FL 33406 7W
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434.1663 · Email: pindertroutman@msn.com At l/
From J!A'lh4IZr 11N[)z;,2..
Number of Pages Including Cover"
Date /I hI}) III
I I
5
Time
10/10/2001 15 04
5514341E 53
PINDER TROUH1AN
PAGE 05
Attachment 1A
Quantum Park NOPe #12
Daily Trip Generation Comparison
#PTCOl 1 02
1 0/10/01
tripgen copm ADA&NOPC1 2 01-102 10-9-01
Page 1 of 1
ADA Approved
Land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) T=7468(X)-101.921 31,142
Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In{T)=0.643ln(X) + 5.866 13,815
Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 9.14/1000 SF (5) 18,001
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740
64,698
Proposed
land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF T=7 468(X)-101 921 12,594
Retail 820 427,962 SF In{T) = 0.643ln(X) + 5.866 17,361
Office 710 637,900 SF 9.14/1000 SF (5) 5,830
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4 96 11000 SF 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7/Rm. 1,740
Park N Ride 90 633
HiRh School 530 2,500 Stds. 2,283
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 Sf 23/1000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 ISeat (6) 1,720
Restaurant-HiEh Tumover 832 28,400 SF 130.34 11000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 89.95 11000 SF 6,229
Convenience Store/Gas 853 3,054 Sf 845.6 11000 SF 2,582
Ice Skatin2 Rink (7) 465 93,430 Sf 549.5 IRink 1,099
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 6.63 IDU 6,630
63,737
Net New External Tripsl (961)~
(1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE). Trip Generation. 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 12,500 SF per Me for 334.7 Acres.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per Acre for 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on trip rate for 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Equation..
(6) Palm Beach County Rate for Multi-Screen Theatre
(7) 2 Rinks and 8,500 SF of Restaurant Trip generation from Palm Beach Gardens facility.
10/10/2001 15 04
5514J41553
FINDER TROUTMAN
PAGE 05
Attachment 1 B
Quantum Park NOPC #12
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison
#PTC01 102
1 0/1 0/01
tripgen copm ADA&N0PC12 01 -102 10-9-01
Page 1 of 1
ADA ^ppmved
land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 4,183,750 SF(2) 0.98/1,000 SF (12/88) 4,100
Retail 820 300,000 SF(3) In (T) = O.660Ln (X) + 3.403 (48/52) 1,297
Office 710 1,969,500 SF(4) 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 2,935
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
TUIALS 8,456
Prqposed
land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF 0.98 /1,000 SF (12/88) 1,666
Retail 820 427,962 SF In m = O.660ln (X)+3 403 (48/52) 1,639
Office 710 637,900 SF 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 950
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14.00% of Daily (22/78) (5) 89
Hiw. School 530 2,500 Student 0.15/1,000 SF (40/60) 375
Auto Dealership 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40/60) 149
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560
Restaurant-HiWl Turnover 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1,000 SF (60/40) 308
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 749/1,000 SF (67/33) 519
Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37 /1,000 SF (50/50) 294
Ice Skating Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1 ,000 SF (45/55) 220
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 /DU (67/33) 620
ITOT AlS 7,525
Net New External TriPSI (931)1
(1) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition.
(2) Based on 12,500 SF per Ac.re for 334.7 Acres.
(3) Based on 10,000 SF per Acre for 30 Acres.
(4) Based on 15,000 SF per Iv:.re for 164.9 Acres.
(5) Based on the Peak Hour to Daily Ratio from ITE 6th Edition.
10/10/2001 15 04
5514:::41553
PINDER TROUTHAN
PAGE 07
Attachment 2A
Quantum Park NOPC #12
Daily Trip Generation Comparison
#PTOlll02
10/10/01
tripgen copm NOPC10&12 01-102 10-9-01
Pase1of1
NOpe # 10 Approved
land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 2,252,654 SF T=7.46800-101.921 16,721
Commerdal 820 427,962 SF lnm=0.643ln(Xl +5.866 17,361
Office 710 798,772 SF 9.14/1000 SF (2) 7,301
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96 11000 SF 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 6,7/Rm. 1,740
Park N Ride 90 633
Auto Dealership 641 53,072 SF 23/1000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 /Seat. (3) 1,720
Restaurant-Hilth Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34/1000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 69.95/1000 SF 6,229
ConvenienceStoreICas 853 3,054 SF 845.6 11000 SF 2,582
Ice SkatinSl. Rink (4) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 lRink 1,099
Residential 220 500 Ous 6.63 IOU 3,315
63,737
Proposed
land Use
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Total Trips
Industrial 110 1,700,000 SF T - 7 466(Xl-101.921 12,594
Retail 620 427,962 SF lnm=0.643ln(Xl+5.866 17,361
Office 710 637,900 SF 914/1000 SF (2) 5,830
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 4.96/1000 SF 113
Hotel 312 200 Rms 8.7 IRm. 1,740
Pari< N Ride 90 633
Hilth School 530 2,500 Students 2,283
Auto Dealership 641 53,072 SF 23 11000 SF 1,221
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.43 lSeat (3) 1,720
Restaurant-Hil!t1 Turnover 832 28,400 SF 130.34 11000 SF 3,702
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 89.95/1000 SF 6,229
Convenience Store/Cas 853 3,054 SF 845.6 /1000 SF 2,582
tee Skatinll. Rink (4) 465 93,430 SF 549.5 lRink 1,099
Residential Multi-Family 220 1,000 Dus 6.63 IDU 6,630
63,737
Net New External TriPSI
(1) SoUIU!' I""titu~ of Transport;ltion EnsU-1S (ITE), Trip Generation, 6lh Edition.
(2) &oed on lrip ra~ br 500,000 SF from 6th Edition Eqaglion..
(3) Palm Ileac:h County Rale klr Multi-Screen Theatre
(4) 2 Rinks and 8,500 Sf of Restaurant TripgeneJation from Palm Beach Gardens facility.
10/10/2001 15 04
55143415E3
PINDER TROUH1AN
PAGE 08
#PTCOl 102
1 011 0101
lri~ COpm NOPC1o&12 01 10210-9..01
~ 1 of1
Attachment 28
Quantum Park NOPC # 12
PM Peak Hour Trip Generation Comparison
NOPC # 10 Approved
Land Use Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 2,252,654 SF 0.98 /1 ,000 SF (12/88) 2,208
Retail 820 427,962 SF In (TJ - O.660Ln (X)+3.403 (48!52) 1,639
Office 710 798,772 SF 1 49/1,OOOSF (57/43) 1,190
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0,51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14.00'lb of DaiJv(22178) (2) 89
Auto OealershiD 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40160) 149
Movie Theater 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seat (53/47) 560
Restauranl-HIS!tl Turnovel 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1.000 SF (60/40) 308
Restauranl-Qualitv 831 69,250 SF 749 /1,000 SF (67/33) 519
Convenience Store 845 3,054 SF 96.37/1,000 SF (50/50) 294
Ice Skatinll Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1,000 SF (45/55) 220
Residential Multi-Family 220 500 Dus 0,62 IOU (67/33) 310
TOTALS 7,622
Proposed
land Use Total
land Use Code Inlensily Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Industrial 110 1 700.000 SF 0.98/1 000 SF (12/88) 1,666
Retail 820 427,962 SF Ln (TJ = O.6601..n (X)+3.403 (48/52) 1,639
Office 710 637,900 SF 1 49/1,000 SF (57/43) 950
Warehouse 150 22,700 SF 0.51 /1,000 SF (24/76) 12
Hotel 312 200 Rooms 0.62 /Room (60/40) 124
Park N Ride 90 14.00'lb of Dally (22/76) (2) 89
Hil(h School 530 2,500 Students 0.15 /1,000 SF (40/60) 375
Auto Dealer.;hip 841 53,072 SF 2.8/1,000 SF (40/60) 149
Movie Theatre 444 4,000 Seats 0.14 /Seal (53/47) 560
Restaurant-Hi'" Turnovet 832 28,400 SF 10.86 /1,000 SF (60140) 308
Restaurant-Quality 831 69,250 SF 7.49/1,000 SF (67/33) 519
Convenience Store/Gas 845 3,054 SF 96.37/1,000 SF (50/50) 294
Ice SkalinR Rink 465 93,430 SF 2.36 /1 ,000 SF (45/55) 220
Residential Mulli-F amily 220 1,000 Dus 0.62 IOU (67/33) 620
TOTALS 7,525
I Net New External Trips (97)1
(1) Scuta!: InstiwlI! of Tl'ilI15fIOrtation Engineer.; (ITE), Trip Cenefation. 6th Edition.
(2) Based on the Peak Hour liD Dally ratio from ITE 6th Edition.
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
PO, Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgovcom
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. Newell. Chairman
Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
--"
I ,.
i 0(
I JL f OCT I 2 20Ul
jL L___
~Et-Mi~~"ENT C'~ rr'. ~ ('
October 10, 2001
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE.
Quantum Park - Amendment ~~
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr Rumpf.
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received
on August 17, 2001) forthe project entitled; Quantum Park - Amendment #12. pursuant
to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land
Development Code The new proposed development plan for NOPC #12 is as follows:
.
Industrial
Retail
Office
Warehouse
Hotel
High School
Auto Dealership
Movie Theater
Restaurant - HT
Restaurant - Quality
Convenience Store/Gas
Ice Skating Rink
Multi Family Residential
Park & Ride Facility
1,700000 SF
427,962 SF
637,900 SF
22,700 SF
200 Rooms
2500 Students
53,072 SF
4 000 Seats
28,400 SF
69,250 SF
3 054 SF
93 430 SF
1 000 Dwellings
N/A
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the overall traffic
generation associated with the newly proposed development plan listed above (NOPC
#12), does not exceed the total trips vested for the Quantum Park development, in the
previously approved NOPC #10 (April 18, 2000) Therefore, the proposed plan is
approved. It is however suggested to the city of Boynton Beach.
Require from the traffic consultant a table comparing the project vested
trips (based on the most recent approval), versus trip generation of all
land uses which have received development orders, to date This
practice needs to continue with any future submissions.
The intersection of Quantum Boulevard/Gateway Boulevard is
forecasted to operate within .unacceptable" conditions, under Year
2006 scenarios, and upon full completion and occupation of the project.
This location needs to be monitored for future improvements, which
needs to be implemented by the developer
Page 2
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030
Sincerely
OFFICE/OF THE ~~ E'INEER
, / ) I;11 ~
Masoud Atefi, M-LE /
Sr Engineer - T~~~sion
cc: Pinder-Troutman Consulting Inc.
MTP Group Inc.
File: General TPS - Mun Traffic Study Review
F'\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\010812.doc
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. Newell. Chairman
Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
2cr
October 9, 2001
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Department of Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE. Quantum Park - Amendment #12
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVlEW
Dear Michael
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received
on August 17, 2001) for the project entitled Quantum Park - Amendment #12, pursuant
to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land
Development Code
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the approval can not be
granted due to the following.
The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 daily trips) should
be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development
traffic generation
Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in
Attachments 1 A, 1 Band 1 C, must reflect the values in the latest
NOPC approval.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030
Sincerely
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
/'y7 \
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc.
MTP Group Inc.
File: General TPS - Mun Traffic Study Review
F'\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Comments\010812F-p&z.wpd
D 1211
OC'-12I8-2001 11 37
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL P~~ING COUNCIL
301 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD
SUITE 300
STUART, FLORIDA 34994
PHONE: 561-221-4060
FAX: 561..221-4067
FAX TRANSMISSION
Date" Ie 1 ~ lClI
Fax Number: (s ~\) 7lp." G ~S"1
Number of Pages (includiug cover sbeet): 3
.Operator'
To' l.v~l~ ~~erv
..
From :J.~ ~~ttO~
Project: Qv~IA.~W\. {J(;lrt.. 0 RT-.
Commeuts.
.., ;,;",:~~~ ,~ .:~ ~:, ~ >" ~ .. ~~ ~ 1;'f!;rl:,.i'=
T . ~~~ ~.~ ~ j' "IIi .L El -....
REA S3U cl ti ~ ~Sr.=- ~,~~ -", ~ P ~KN N I 1'1:(;--. '-.taO U N::~tt -
,,- a ~ !~ _ _ jI- '"' Id -'d. li' 'r- - ~ : -~- hi ;;;; jl"f~:-
1~D:l&Je1l't+~" :'~A\.~~~.\i -B~ACH~'-~~.-- j,~~-~~.::.=
-; -'> '" " '~-7 _: Tc~~~=~]:L r :!. _~-
--.;< ]- - fIII!I at 4- ,~
October 8, 2001
- 'i
. f III
'u OCT I 0 2001 ! ~i I
h'.J L.,_ _____._._ j - i
[;- ~I ~,ENTOF -Cc -'::~'r-'T
Mr Michael W Rumpf . ----__.::..:___'-' IV 'J I
Planning and Zoning DIrector
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
Subject. Quantum Park Development of RegIOnal Impact
NotIficatIon of Proposed Change
Dear Mr Rumpf:
In accordance WIth the requIrements of Section 380 06(19), Flonda Statutes (F S ), we have
reVIewed the ''NotIficatIon of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of
Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOPC) for the Quantum Park DRI dated August 8, 2001
The NOPC proposes the followmg revlSlons to the master plan:
1) Lots 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11 land use deSIgnation IS to be changed from office/industnal to
mixed use, wInch allows office, commercIal, and residenttal uses,
2) Lots 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31 land use designatIon is to be changed from
office to mixed use, wInch allows office, commercIal, and resIdenttal uses;
3) Lot 34C wInch is currently undesignated and part of the open space area IS changed to
mdustnal, and
4) Quantum Lakes Dnve is proposed for elimmatIon from the mtersectIon WIth Quantum
Boulevard to the eastern mtersectIon WIth Gateway Boulevard.
The apphcant proposes to decrease office and industnal square footage to allow additional
commercial square footage and dwelling umts. The proposed changes are presumed to create
a substantIal deviatIon pursuant to SectIon 38006(19)(e)3 and 380 06(19)(e)5 c, Florida
Statutes. Council has reVIewed the InformatIon and determined that the proposed changes
will not create any additional regIOnal impacts. Council recognizes and apprecIates the
apphcant's efforts to create a good InlX of land uses and prOVIde for a more sustamable form
"Bringing Communities Together" · Est 1976
301 East Ocean Boulevard Suite 300 Stuart Florida 34994
Phone (561) 221 4060 SC 269 4060 Fax (561) 221 4067 E mail adminfii)tcrpc.or~
Mr Michael W Rumpf
October 8, 2001
Page 2
of development for a portIon of the project. However, Council IS concerned With the
desIgnatIon of Lot 34C to mdustnal. ThIs lot IS adjacent to the sand pine scrub preserve, CIty
park and water retentIon area. The parcel was ongmally proposed for development but during
an amendment to the project to address requIrements WithIn the development order this area
was deSIgnated for preservation and later part of the water retentIon area. Over trrne the
overall open space area of the project has decreased and desIgnatmg Lot 34C would be an
addItional reductIon. Based on the location of the parcel and the further reduction m open
space for the project, Staff does not recommend that the proposed change to mdustnal for Lot
34C proceed until. 1) the CIty evaluates the need for open space on the project and
determmes that the reduction m open space created by thIs change IS consistent With City
regulatIons; 2) It IS demonstrated that development of thIs parcel will not mterfere WIth
management of the adjacent preserve area, and 3) It IS demonstrated that development of thIs
SIte will not have a negatIve rrnpact on the establIshed dramage system
Please call If you have any questIOns.
Smcerely,
b7sf:rJ
DR! Coordmator
cc Ken Metcalf, FDCA
Eugene Gerlica, ApplIcant
10/01/2001 15 40
5514348815
PAGE 01/02
Phone: (561)434-8020
Facsimile Transmittal
fax~ (561)434-8187
N2 of PClges s~nt Oncludlng Cover Page)
2
TO
Mr Michael Rumpf, Plannin~ Director, Boy~ton Beach, FL 33435
FAX Nil
(561) 742-6:357
DATE
10/01/01
FROM Jeanne lo'.J.lls, Senior Planner, Concurrency (AICP)
COMMENTS Enclosed is a response to your request 1regair'ding Quantum Park
DRIA Ol-OOl/MPMD 01-003
- ..-
rl I ,
~
'"1
f-- ,- r
,
, --'
" L .--1
i ('
I
cc:
Angela Usher
Te rry Hes s
H:\DATIt\WP51\00C\2
The City ofBoynl.[)n Beach
OFFICE OF THE CITY MANAGER
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
PO Box31O
Boynton Beach, F/onda 33425-0310
City l'vlanagers Office. (561) 742-6010
FAX. (561) 742-6011
e-mail. cay. managerCaci. boynton-beach.fl. us
www Cl.boynton-beachfl.us
To
From
Date
Subject
----
City CommIssIOn
Kurt Bressner, CIty Manager l~/
September 17, 2001
Update on Quantum Park NOPC #12
As a follow-up to the request of the City CommIssIOn last week at our pre-agenda meetmg, I am
enclosmg a copy of the staff recap of the master plan modIficatIOns for Quantum. ThIS report was
wepared followmg a TechnIcal RevIew Committee (TRC) wIth the developer last week. The matter
IS scheduled for the P&D meetmg on Wednesday, October loth The staff reVIew document may
be augmented or supplemented based on mformatIOn provIded by the developer
We WIll be meetmg with the developer next Monday to reVIew the TRC comments m more detaIl.
JIm Cherof, Jeff LIvergood, Dale Sugerman and QUIntus Greene and I WIll be mvolved with that
meetmg. In addItIon, I have asked Qumtus Greene to desIgnate a staff member m the Development
department to serve as lIaIson for the Quantum Development. ChIef Gage has desIgnated Major
John SmIth as the PolIce Department lIaIson on SIte secunty Issues,
If you have any comments or questIOns on the mltlal staff renew, please let me know
Cc James Cherof
Wilfred Hawkms
Dale Sugerman
Qumtus Greene
Marshall Gage
Jeff LI vergood
......t REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name' Quantum Park
FIle number' MPMD 01-003
Reference 151 reVIew plans Identlfied as Master Plan ModIficatIOn. FIle 01-003 wIth an August 14.2001
Planmmr and Zoning- Department date stamp markIng-.
DEP ARTMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments See attached memo from Jeff Livergood, PublIc Works Director dated
August 29, 2001
UTILITIES
,
Comments.
1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a
total of 14 lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11
(MPMD 00-007) to whIch we responded to In UtIlItIes Department
Memorandum #01-012, dated January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those
comments, we stated that wIth the anginal DRl for the total park deSigned
for CommercIal, Industnal, Office or a cOmbinatIOn of Office and
Industnal, and/or Office, Industna1 and CommercIal, both the water and
\vastewater systems to support these type of uses was deSigned and
constructed for those anticIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft stations were
configured to handle the wastewater generatIon antIcIpated In the 550
acre park.
2
As prevIOusly stated, the proposed reVISIOn to the land use to "MIxed Use
(MU) to Include Office, CommercIal and ResidentIal uses could tax the
utIlIty support facilItIes to theIr hrmts. A prov1S0 needs to be Incorporated
Into each group of lot approvals process, that the desIgn engIneenng
consultant shall demonstrate that suffiCIent utilIty system(s) capacIty IS
avaIlable to support the proposed use, or they WIll provIde the necessary
upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use Failure to do so could result In
inSUffiCIent utilIty support to thiS park, affecting other current (eXIsting)
users.
! 3
ApplIcant IS requesting that Lot 34-C be converted to Industna1 usage In
heu that Lot 34-C was open space deSignated for dry retention (as an
overflow from Tract J"), applIcant IS reqUIred to demonstrate that the dry
retentIOn area of thIS lot IS no longer needed, or to whIch lot/tract dId the dry
retentIOn reqUIrement get transferred. The partIal letter from SFW1tfD
(unsigned) does not indicate that the dry retentIOn of Lot 34-C IS no longer
requIred, nor has the "As-BUIlt Master Drainage Plan from the engIneer-of-
record ROSSI and Malavasl Emnneers, Inc ever been submitted to the City
INCUJDE
REJECT
MP\1D 1 ST REVIEW COM.\1ENTS
09/17/01
2
DEP i\R TMENTS NCLUDE REJECT
It wIll be reqUIred to subrrut the back-up documentatIOn to substantIate that I I
the applIcant's request for land use converSIOn.
4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Mmer Road whIch has roadway
dramage structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not
mdIcate how he plans to treat thIS roadway dram age, both for the current
two-lane roadway sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIvIded roadway
sectIon.
5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard,
contams both water and wastewater system segments, to whIch at least one-
half of the dedIcated nlZht-of-wav will be reqUIred to be utilIty easement(s)
No antIcIpated permanent "park amemtIes will be perrrutted on the utilIty
easement(s), other than sodding and/or SIdewalk. ThIS department WIll
reqUIre demonstratIOn that "neglIgible Impacts on the traffic dIstributIOn
'~ resultmg from the roadway reconfiguratIOn" Subrrutted traffic analYSIS by
the consultant does not meet DRl traffic performance standards.
FIRE
Comments
6 Roads and hydrants must be m place pnor to any construction above grade
,
POLICE
Comments None
,
ENGINEERING DNISION
I I
Comments. I
I i
7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will reqUIre replattmg of I
that portIon of Quantum Park m accordance WIth the reqUIrements of the ' ,
LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg.
8 Lot 34C iliotlfication of a Proposed Change, SectIon 5 4) IS proposed to be \
changed from undesIgnated use to Industnal use How \vill thIS change
Impact proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development? I i
I ,
9 PrOVIde venficatIon that Palm Beach County Engmeenng WIll permIt a I
dnveway openmg onto Mmer Road for Lot 34C Show how a second
mgress and egress pomt \V1Il be pronded at the south end of the propert) for I
emergency servIces. !
I :
i i
I 10 If approved. an envIronmental assessment of Tract 34C WIll be reqUIred as I I
'1
MPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/17/01
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
part of any sIte subrmttal.
11 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve will isolate the dedIcated
roadway easement along the north property lme of Lot 61 The NotIficatIon
of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, mdlcates access will be proVIded \la a
smgle entrance pomt at the mtersectlon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and
Quantum Boulevard. Elmllnatlon of that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve
and the second access pomt WIll create an undeSIrably long tnp for the most
northerly reSIdents of the proposed multI-farruly reSIdentIal development
and would create a hazardous situatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to
access northerly portIOns of that same development.
12. Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lake Dnve and reconfigunng a
portIOn of it mto Lot 101 wIll create an undeSlfably long tnp for the most
northerly tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous
", SItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that
same development.
13 ReconfiguratIOn of Lots 62 and 63 mto a smgle Lot 102 would create the ,
same SItuatIon described m the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly
tenants of the proposed new lot.
14 The NotIfication of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 5 5, paragraph 3, represents
the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as
substandard and dangerous. ThIs mtersectlOn has preVIOusly been reVIewed
and approved. Please prOVIde addItIOnal mformatIOn (aCCIdent data and
standard drawmgs) supponmg thIS statement. I ,
I
15 If the areas MU101 and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an
additIOnal recreatIOnal fee (or land m lIeu of fee) may be assessed based on ,
the ongInal calculatIOns for the CIty park.
I
16 The creatIOn of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-desIgnatlon of Lot 34C from i
undesIgnated to Industnal WIll ObVIOusly mcrease traffic volumes. The '
Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result
m an increase m dally or peak hour volumes" Although the analysIs
concludes that there are no mcreases m the approved daily and peak hour
tnps due to Simultaneous mcreases and decreases m allowable development
mtensltles, the analysIs needs to funher address local changes m traffic I
volumes that would result from the proposed changes
17 The Traffic AnalYSIS (Quantum Park NOPC #12) aclmowledges that the I ,
i
closure of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve has the potentIal to Impact the I
! I
regIonal roadway network. The analvsls further states that dIverted traffic i
WIll cause the intersectIOn of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard
to operate over capaCIty dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes I
changes m stnpmg and roadway \\o1denmg to address this WIthout provldmg I
i
a tImetable Please be more specIfic as to how and when thIS work WIll be I
mcorporated into the plannm\! process to rmmrruze Impact to the travelIng i I
MPMD 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/17/01
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
pubhc. Also please address the Impact these proposed changes would have
on access by emergency vehIcles and law enforcement.
18 Identify the tract shmVl1 as MU101 as MU60A and MU61A to show each
lot's addItIOnal property due to the abandonment. Change MU I 00 to I
MU102A. I
I
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments None i I
PARKS AND RECREATION I
Comments I
19 The CIty ComrrussIOn dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn
ReqUIrement, 272 umts of the 1,000 umts requIred m the most recent master
plan reVISIOn. The developer dId pledge, however, to provIde appropnate
pubhc recreatIOn faCIhtIes for these umts. (To be determmed m conjunction
wIth the Parks DI\o1sIOn.)
The total recreatIOn dedIcation reqUIrement will be calculated as
follows
1,000 umts-272 umts=728 D U
728 DUx 015 =10 92 acres
12 credIt may be gIVen agamst the reqUIrement of land dedIcatIOn or
payment of fees. Yz pnvate recreatIOn credIt WIll be calculated as follows
1092 acres / 2=546 acres
An addItlOnal Y.; credIt may be g1Ven for natural resources agamst the
reqUIrement of land dedIcation or payment of fees. Y.; credIt for natural
resources \\111 be calculated as follows
10 92 acres/ 4 = 2 73 acres
I The developer may want to consIder dedIcatIOn of the land, or a
combmatIOn of dedIcatIOn and fee
20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the comrmssIOn, IS subtracted off the "
:1
Recreatlon DedIcatlon ReqUIrement. j
21 Accordmg to Chapter I, ArtIcle V SectIOn 3 of the Land Development l
RegulatIOn, the developer must proVIde 5 park elements m order to qualIfy
for Y2 credIt for pnvate recreatlon provIded. j
!
MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/17/01
5
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
22. If the property is not further platted, recreatlOn fees or dedIcatlOns for the
728 non-exempt dwellmg umts are due before the IssUIng of theIr resIdentIal
buildIng pernuts.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments.
23 I am requestmg the applIcant as a condItIOn to the above Master Plan
ModIficatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14,2001 (as dIrected by our
CIty Manager) In reference to the Quantum Park-DRI Annual
EnvIronmental Areas Status Report.
24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres
detentIOn (open space) area and IS contiguous to the 257 acres Sand Pme
" Preserve, The land use change of lot 34-C from detentIon (open space) to
mdustnal, could affect the envIronmental qualIty of the contIguous Sand
PIne Preserve when the mdustnal tract IS developed by the owner
25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham lInk fence was mstalled around
1 ) lot 34-C (6.58acres) and
2.) Water Management Tract "J" (6.16 acres) and connected to the eXIstIng
fence around the penmeter of the
3 ) Sand Pme Preserve (25 7 acres)
ThIs was to protect the envIronmental qualIty of the total of38.44 acres In
the three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and
shown as open space / Sand Pme Preserve on the Quantum Master Plan.
ThIS area should remam as open space / Sand PIne Preserve
The project should contmue In the normal reVIew process.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
I
26 The Land Use Acreage Table IS Incorrect as ShO\\l1 on page 5 of the NOPC
applIcatIOn. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac of (01) and 26.33 I
ac of (OIC) Correct thIS Information on the applIcatlOn.
27 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the applIcatlOn and on the
Master Plan drawIng show a decrease In the (OrC) category (2633 acres
approved, 22 94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a
change to any (0lC) deSIgnated lots. Please explam? I
I
28 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applIcatlOn and on the NOPC
Master Plan # 12 dra\o\o1ng IS mcorrect The eXIstIng (MU) lots add up to
6238 acres. The addItlOnal (MU) lots proposed In thIS amendment add up ;
MP\ID 1ST REVIEW COMME1'<iS
09i17/0 1
6
DEP AR TMENTS
29
to 26 82 acres. Together they total 89.20 acres not 90 65 as shown on the Ii
plan. Please correct.
I
I
I
I
Lot 34-C IS shown as haVIng 6.58 acres m the applIcatIOn but 6.56 acres has
been added to the Industnal category on the Master Plan. The development
order and Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have IdentIfied thIS
tract as haVIng 6.59 acres. To be conSIstent, use the 6.59-acre SIte area
calculatIOn.
25
Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as "DetentIOn" up through
NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the detentIOn label
does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no change to I
the deSIgnatIOn of thIS lot was proposed or approved In eIther amendment. !
This lot remams a DetentIOn lot WIth no development deSIgnatIOn assIgned. I
Please IndIcate thIS In your applIcatIon and proVIde data and analYSIS to
'\ support the elunmatIon of thIS area for detentIOn.
26
ProvIde SIte area acreage calculatIOns for proposed lots 100 and 101,
27 The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12
drawmg shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space Does thIS reflect the
6.59-acre DetentIOn lot (34-C) plus any open space assOCIated WIth the
elImmatIon of the nght-of-way? Please clanfy
28 Lots 73-A through 76 should be hIghlIghted as commItted development.
SHe Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 ThIS should also be reflected m
the project traffic 2002 estImate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analYSIS
29 Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as cornnutted development (Onana
Gramte) SIte Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 ThIS should be reflected
m the project traffic 2001 estImate m the Pmder Troutman traffic analYSIS
30 The Master Plan mdIcates that the acreage for the Industnal category IS
mcreasIng by 6.56 acres yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS category IS
decreasmg by 375,354 square feet. Please c1anfy thIS mconsIstency
31
The Master Plan mdIcates the acreage for the Office categones (0, Or) IS
decreasmg; yet the allowable mtensIty for thIS categorY IS mcreasmg by 72,
922 square feet. Please c1anfv thIS mconsIstencv i
"'?
.)_.
The Master Plan mdIcates a proposed new access from MIner Road for Lot
34-C The traffic analYSIS must spec1ficallv address thIS access smce It IS not
mtegrated Into the traffic CIrculatIOn system for the rest of the PID How i
!
many tnps are allocated for thIS SHe and how WlllIt Impact Mmer Road?
33
The NOPC applIcatIon page 9 contams two converSIOn formulas for
reSIdentIal umts. They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they ;
proVIde two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ReSIdentIal I
Umt. \-Vhat IS the purpose of these formulas? Please c1anfy thIS
INCLUDE
REJECT
MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/17/01
7
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
inconsIstency or remove them from the applIcatIOn.
34 Approval of the Master Plan IS contmgent upon a findmg of no substantIal
deViatIon by the CIty ThIS IS based on the followmg sectIOns of the Flonda
Statutes.
a) Chapter 38006 (19) (b) 9 An mcrease m the number of dwellmg umts
by five (5) percent of 50 umts, whIchever IS greater
b) Chapter 380 06 (19) (e) 5 c, Not WIthstandmg any provlSlon m paragraph
(b) to the contrary, a proposed change conslstmg of sImultaneous mcrease I
and decreases of at least two of the uses wlthm an authonzed multI-use
development of regIOnal Impact WhICh was ongmally approved WIth more I
than three uses specIfied m 380 0651 (3) (c), (d), (f) and g and resIdentIal
use. i
c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b Except for the types of uses lIsted m I
I
"\ subparagraph (b) 16., any change whIch would result m the development I
of any area WhICh was specIfically set aSIde m the applIcatIOn for
development approval or m the development order for preservatIOn,
buffers, or specIal protectIOn, mcludmg habItat for plant and ammal
speCIes, archeologIcal and hlstoncal SItes and other specIal areas
The applIcatIOn as presented IS presumed to be a substantIal deVIatIOn. ThIS
presumption may be rebutted by clear and conVIncmg eVIdence, The I
applIcant must provIde addItIonal mformatIOn before determmatIOn of no
substantial deVIatIon IS made. The addItIOnal mformatIOn must mclude I
A revIsed traffic analYSIS based on comments receIved from Palm Beach I
-
County and the CIty of Boynton Beach Techmcal ReVIew CommIttee
- Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0) and
Office/Industnal (Or) categones to the MU category IS conSIstent WIth I
the ComprehensIve Plan. I
- ProVIde an updated analYSIS of the master dramage plan for Quantum
Park clearly mdlcatmg the Impacts that an mdustnal development on the I
current DetentIOn Tract 34-C would have. I
- Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space \VIll be I
IDltIgated.
I
35 Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development !
Order and Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV of the Land Development RegulatIOns, a I
I
traffic analysIS IS reqUIred for thIS Master Plan approval. The applIcant I
submitted a traffic analYSIS. In lIeu of an mdependent traffic consultant, the I
I I
staff and the Palm Beach County Traffic DlVlsIOn WIll reVIew the traffic
study
I
36 The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIon has reVIewed the traffic study and ;
demed approval due to the followmg: I
The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 dally tnps) should !
a. ,
be counted as vested tnps \VIthm the overall Quantum development traffic
generatIons. I
I b Dally and peak hour tnps related to "ADA Approvals" as presented In i
Attachments IA. IB and IC must reflect the values of the latest NOPC I
MPMD 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
09/17/01
8
,
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
approval. I
(Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to MIchael Rumpf dated I
I
8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and reVIse the traffic study I
accordingly I
37 The NOPC Master Plan submIttal dId not mclude a conceptual sIte plan or i
JuStIficatIOn for the requested change. The CIty approved the MIxed-Use
deSIgnatIOn when It adopted Amendment #10 m March 2000 To date, no I
development has been proposed whIch combmes all the uses reqUIred by the
Land Development RegulatIons m the defimtIOn of a Mixed Use Pod m a I
Pill The only plans submItted and approved to date are for Villas at I
Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay)
I
38 The Villas at Quantum Lake site plan was approved WIth an access at the
I
north end of the sIte from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum ,
"I Lakes Dnve eventually leadmg out to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed
Master Plan does not mdIcate thIS access. Please correct the Master Plan to I
reflect the approved access for the reSIdentIal proJect.
I
39 The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake project have contacted the CIty m I
I I
wntmg regardmg theIr concerns that any development on proposed lots 100
and 101, If not bUllt m coordmatIon WIth theIr proJect, may Impact theIr
access, frontage, VIsibIlIty, setbacks, denSIty, open space and eXIstmg VIews.
Has the applIcant contacted the adjacent property o\'mer to dISCUSS the
Impacts of thIS NOPC proposal? It IS ImperatIve that the adjacent property ,
owners are appnsed of and be m agreement WIth thIS proposed change. I
40 The proposed abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and the I
creatIOn of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will reqUIre a replat of that portIon of the
Pill plat. I
41 On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to DaVId, B Noms, Counsel for the
applIcant requesting several reVISIons to the Annual Status Report for the
Quantum Park Pill DR!, To date, those reVISIOns have not been made.
Please reVIse the annual report accordmgly and prOVIde the reVISIOns at the
September 11, 2001 TRC meetmg. I
42. ReVIse the SubstantIal DeviatIOn Chart in the applIcatIon for the Open I
Spaces category The chart mdIcates N/C for the proposed change when the
elImInatIon of the detentIon area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for
the Industnal and Office categones, as they do not match the 'i"OPC Master
Plan #12 dra\\1ng. I ,
I I
MWlVsc
S:\P!ann,ngISHARED\WPlPROJECTS\Quantum Pari< 2001 MPMD & DRIAIMPMD ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
~
c
r
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PUBLIC \VORKS DEP ARThIENT
ThlEROFflCEMffiMO~~UM
TO
Mike Rumpf, DIrector ofPlannmg and Zomng
FROM.
Jeffrey R. LIvergood, DIrector of PublIc Works
DATE
August 29,2001
SlJBJECT
Quantum NOPC #12
I have reVIewed the proposed changes consIdered m NOPC #12 for Quantum Park. Quantum has
requested that consIderatIOn be gIVen by the City to the closure of the eastern portIOn of Quantum
Lakes Dnve at Gateway Boulevard. There are essentIally three traffic Issues that ment evaluatIOn
and scrutmy
"!
Quantum Lakes Drive Closure
Staff IS of the OpInIOn that Quantum Lakes Dnve can safely be closed at Gate\vay Boulevard.
Frankly, It IS staffs opmIOn that there IS value m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnvewav smce thIS
would effectIvely elmllnate a conflIct pomt on a busy artenal route (Gateway Boulevard)
However, m closmg Quantum Lakes Dnve, we must be cogmzant of the revIsed access
configuratIOns from Lots 100 and 102 Staff recommends that these two lots only be allowed to
access Gateway Boulevard m a "nght In - nght out" manner Staff would oppose any smgle lot
havmg full access onto Gateway smce the dnveways m questIOn are located on the mSIde of the
curve on Gateway and SIght dIstance IS 1mllted.
Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard
Staffs reVIew of the traffic Impact at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard
IS more complex. As part of NO PC #11 submIttal, the traffic consultant, Pmdar Troutman,
opmed that a traffic SIgnal IS warranted at tlus mtersectIon based on peak hour warrants, or
Warrant 11 from the Manual on Umform Traffic Control Dev1ces With respect to NOPC #12,
the consultant has changed the mtersectIOn lane-markmg configuratIOn by elImmatmg one of two
through lanes both northbound and southbound and substItutmg dedIcated nght turn lanes ThIS
actIOn was logIcal because the assumptIOn was made that there would be very mImmal north or
southbound through movements at the mtersectIOn. UltImately, the cntIcal volume analYSIS that
was utllIzed for level of servIce analYSIS could be reduced. Thus the mtersectIOn theoretIcally
wIll have a lugher traffic capaCIty
Ho\";"ever, whereas the cntIcal lane analYSIS proVIdes mformatIon related to overall mtersectIOn
capaCIty, It does not lend Itself to warrant analYSIS for SIgnalIzatIon. ThIS analYSIS IS based on
completely dIfferent cntena establIshed m the Manual m Umform Traffic Control DeVIces the
same Manual utIlIzed by the consultant m NOPC #11 submIttal. The consultant has sho\'.m no
changes m the traffic dIstnbutIOn. Thus, the warrant analYSIS conducted by Pmdar Troutman and
summanzed m a report dated February 16,200115 stlll valId. In fact, as lots 7 through 11 and
lots 23 through 31 develop as MIxed Use, they WIll most certamlv generate addItIOn:ll traffic th:lt
- .. i
if'
,~
"
r
It
\L.
will use the mtersectIOn of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. As such, the need for a
traffic SIgnal at thIS mtersectIOn \vill be even more pronounced. Staff, therefore, recommends that
the developer nnmedIately have mstalled -at traffic actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIon of Quantum
Boulevard and Gateway Boulevard. The developer should post a letter of credIt m an amoll!lt /
commensurate WIth the cost of SIgnal constructIOn as a part of the approval of NO PC #12. C.
Traffic Signalization, Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue
The traffic consultant dId not evaluate traffic condItIOns as part of the submIttal packet for NOPC
#12 However, evaluatIOn of traffic condItIOns at thIS mtersectIon IS equally as cntIcal. Agam, as
part of the NOPC #11 subnuttal, Pmdar Troutman evaluated traffic SIgnal warrant cntena at the
mtersectIOn of Quantum Dnve and Gateway Boulevard. In thIS analYSIS, Pmdar Troutman found
that a traffic SIgnal was not presently warranted at thIS mtersectIOn based on the peak hour
warrant and noted that "there are other Warrants, No 2 - InterruptIOn ofContmuous Traffic and
No 10 - Peak Hour Delay that may be satIsfied. The recommendatIOn IS that thIS mtersectIon be
momtored m the future Appropnate tIme frames for momtonng would be at the buildout of Lots
32 through 38 and at the buildout of the NOPC 11 resIdentlal or non-reSIdentlalland uses,
whIchever occurs first." Staff would note that a large portIon oflots 32 through 38 are now
complete m the form of the Prenuer buildmg,
.\ Furthermore, as part ofPmdarTroutman's traffic analysIs m February of2001, the consultant
assumed a buIld out of Lots 23 to 31 as office space (0) and Lots 7 to 11 as Office/Industnal
(Oil) However, the proposal IS to now change these land uses to Mixed Use (MU) The
developer contmues to be bound by a maXImum number of daily tnps from the entIre DRI, yet
subtle changes m land use can sIgmficantly Impact peak hour traffic flows WIthout unpactmg the
daily tnp generatIOn rate. The consultant has not expressed an opmIOn on the changed traffic
charactenstIcs as related to traffic SIgnal warrant analYSIS based on the changes to nuxed use.
Staff belIeves that the developer should be reqUlred to post a letter of credIt as well for the
mstallatIon of a traffic-actuated SIgnal at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Boulevard and Gateway
Avenue It IS very likely that a SIgnal will be warranted upon build out of the proposed nuxed use
land uses. If the CIty does not obtam surety for the mstallatIOn of a traffic SIgnal at thIS tIme, It
will be VIrtually Impossible to assess the reqUlrement for traffic SIgnal constructIOn to each
mdIvIdual that may purchase the nuxed use lots from Quantum and then subsequently develop
them. The burden of traffic SIgnal constructIon should fall upon the developer of the whole rather
than the mdIvIduals that choose to acqUlre and develop lots m the future Quantum could easily
dIstribute the cost equally to future buyers whereas the CIty could not.
~~ QUANTUJV1
~Ifi;. G R 0 U P 0 F COM PAN I E 5
September 10,2001
r
Ii IIDJ ~
~r
~J j SBJ_ f 11. --.J
L..
[r6 IS r ;"7 !' r'l
"J!sl. ,~,i'
----"
"
,
Mr Michael W Rumpf
CIty of Boynton Beach
Department of Development
Planmng & Zomng DIVISIOn
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE. Quantum Park - Amendment #12
Dear Mr Rumpf-
Addressed below are the staff comments prOVIded on September 4, 2001 The comments
are restated for convemence. Please note we have renumbered the comments, as the City
staff comments duplicate comment numbers 25 thru 29, Inclusive.
Listed below are the attached documents referenced In the responses.
1 Revised Master Development Plan, revIsed September 10,2001
a. Ten (10) copIes 24"x36"
b. One (1) each, l1"x 1 7" and 8 W' x 11"
2. ReVIsed NOPC ApplIcatIOn Page 5, revIsed September 10,2001
3 ReVIsed Substantial DeViation Chart, dated September 10, 2001
4 PInder Troutman Consulting, Inc. letter dated September 7, 2001
5 Two-page letter from SFWMD, dated February 7, 1997
6 SFWMD no ObjectIOn letter, dated September 6, 2001
7 Olen letter, dated September 7,2001
8 Area Calculation Summary, dated September 6, 2001
Our responses are presented as follows.
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. None
RESPONSE. Comment noted.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic .
Comments See attached memo from Jeff Livergood, Public Works Director dated
August 29, 2001
RESPONSE. See letter dated September 7, 2001, from Kahart Pinder, Pinder
Troutman Inc.
2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve, Suite 101
Boynton Beach, FL 33426
(561) 740-2447 . Fax (561) 740-2429
e-mail: quantgrp@qgc.cc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 2
9/1 % I
UTILITIES
Comments.
1 Lots 7 thru 11, and Lots 23 thru 31, located on Quantum Boulevard (a total of 14
lots) were the subject of Quantum Park Amendment #11 (MPMD 00-0007) to
whIch we responded to m UtilItIes Department Memorandum #01-012, dated
January 11, 2001 To recapItulate those comments, we stated that with the
origmal DR! for the total park designated for Commercial, Industnal, Office, or a
combination of Office and Industnal, and/or Office, Industnal and CommercIal,
both the water and wastewater systems to support these type of uses was designed
and constructed for those antIcIpated uses. Four (4) 11ft statIOns were configured
to handle the wastewater generatIOn antIcIpated m the 550-acre park.
RESPONSE. Comment noted. This comment does not contain a specific question or
request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment.
2. As prevIously stated, the propose reVIsion to the land use to "Mixed Use (MU)" to
include Office, Commercial and ResIdentIal uses could tax the utilIty support
facilIties to their lImIts. A proVISO needs to be mcorporated mto each group of lot
approvals process, that the desIgn-engineenng consultant shall demonstrate that
suffiCIent utilIty system(s) capaCIty IS available to support the proposed use, or
they will proVIde the necessary upgrade(s) to allow for the proposed use. Failure
to so could result m insufficient utilIty support to thIS park, affecting other current
(exIstmg) users.
RESPONSE. Comment noted. This comment does not contain a specific question or
request any additional information. Therefore, please delete this comment.
3 ApplIcant IS requestmg that Lot 34-C be converted to Industnal usage. In lIeu
that Lot 34-C was open space deSIgnated for dry retentIOn (as an overflow from
Tract "J"), applIcant IS required to demonstrate that the dry retention requirement
get transferred. The partial letter from SFWMD (unsIgned) does not indIcate that
the dry retentIon of Lot 34-C is no longer reqUIred, nor has the "As-Built Master
Dramage Plan" from the engmeer-of-record ROSSI and MalavasI Engmeers, Inc.,
ever been submItted to the CIty It Will be reqUIred to submIt the back-up
documentatIOn to substantIate that the applIcant's request for land use converSIOn.
RESPONSE. The following is the demonstration that Lot 34-C is not needed as a dry
retention area and as being unnecessary was not transferred to any other lot or
location.
F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG091 001. doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 3
9/1 % I
Prior to 1987 tile area known as Lot 34-C was shown on the Master Development Plan
as a Detention Area and was part of the surface water management system included in
the SFWMD Conceptual Approval.
In 1987 tile SFWMD surface water management permit was modified. The
modification eliminated tile Lot 34-C area as a detention or retention area, added a
water management tract, combined three drainage basins into two and revised tile
stage/storage assumptions among otller modifications.
The master development plan continued to erroneously show the area of Lot 34-C as a
detention area until Master Plan Amendment No.9, when the erroneous label was
removed.
On June 30, 1988 Quantum Park Plat No.3 was recorded in the official records of
Palm Beach County following review and approval by the SFWMD, the L WDD and
tile City of Boynton Beach. The plat created Lot 34-C unencumbered by any
dedication or reservation as a detention or retention area.
The modified Master Drainage Plan as approved by the LWDD is submitted in support
of tile above demonstration. This drawing was recovered from the L WDD, as the City
of Boynton Beacll Utility or Engineering Departments could not produce a single
drainage record drawing wilen requested.
Tile primary surface water management system was subsequently constructed along
with tile roadways and lot areas.
An engineer's completion statement was submitted to the SFWMD along with the
requisite control structure record data after the completion of the construction of the
primary surface water management system. Tile engineer states the system was
constructed in substantial conformance with the approved construction drawings and
the SFWMD permit. Tile project was field reviewed by the SFWMD field engineers
and the letter submitted witlt the NOPC application was issued by tlte SFWMD
acknowledging tile engineers' statement and tile completion oftlte construction.
A copy of the signed two-page letter acknowledging tlte construction completion is
attached for your record. Also attaclled is a letter dated September 6, 2001 from the
SFWMD stating no objection to tile approval of the proposed cllanges.
l"
Lot 34-C was not par.t of the construction drawings or the permit as a detention area
and tllus was not constructed as a detention area. Lot 34-C is not needed as a/
detention area now or in tile future.
Please delete tllis comment.
F IQuantum LimitedlnopcJ2EAG091001,doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 4
9/10/01
4 ThIS lot IS also at the low pomt along Miner Road, WhICh has roadway drainage
structures and the dIscharge mto Lot 34-C The applIcant does not mdIcate how
he plans to treat thIS roadway dramage, both for the current two-lane roadway
sectIOn and the ultImate four-lane dIvIded roadway sectIon.
RESPONSE. The Development Order for Quantum Park only requires the dedication
of Right-ol-Way for Miner Road along an alignment through the Quantum Park
property as determined by Palm Beach County. This condition has been satisfied.
Miner Road was designed and constructed by Palm Beach County.
The Miner Road drainage system does not discharge to Lot 34-C, nor is it required or
designed to disc/large to Lot 34-C. Drainage easements in favor of Palm Beach County
or the City of Boynton Beach do not exist through Lot 34-C or any portion of the
primary surface water management system north of Gateway Boulevard within
Quantum Park.
The drainage system for Miner Road is clearly shown on the construction drawing on
record at the Palm Beach County Engineering Department titled "Drainage Map,
Sheet 2 of 37, Miner Road", dated Dec'88. The drainage structure adjacent Lot 34-C
is a manhole at a high point in the roadway. The Miner Road right-of-way is the only
area included in the drainage area for the roadway. The drainage system discharges to
The L WDD E-4 Canal, not Lot 34-C.
Please delete this comment.
5 Quantum Lakes Dnve, from Quantum Boulevard to Gateway Boulevard, contains
both water and wastewater system segments, to which at least one-half of the
dedIcated right-of-way WIll be reqUIred to be utilIty easement(s). No antIcipated
permanent "park amemtles" will be permItted on the utIhty easement(s), other that
soddmg and/or sidewalk. ThIS department wIll require demonstration that
"neglIgible impacts on the traffic distributIOn resultmg from the roadway
reconfiguratIOn" SubmItted traffic analysIs by the consultant does not meet DR!
traffic performance standards.
RESPONSE. The proposed preliminary plat will include utility easements for the
existing utilities within the proposed lots 100, 101 and 102. The Master Development
Plan is not required to show easements of any kind and none or shown, either existing
qr proposed. Any proposed construction within the cre(lted lots will be reviewed during
the site plan review process and subsequent construction permit process. Easements,
both existing and proposed, will be addressed at that time.
Given the scrutiny of the plat review process, the site planning review process and the
construction permit process, this comment is inappropriate at this time.
F IQuantum Limitedlnopc12EAG091001.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 5
9/1 % 1
Witll regard to the traffic analysis, the DRI performance standard is a 15% increase in
external traffic. The analysis determined that there is not a 15% increase in daily or
peak hour traffic. In fact, there is a projected decrease in both the daily and peak hour
traffic.
The specific impact of the road closure is the redistribution of eastbound Quantum
Lakes Drive traffic generated by the office buildings on Lots 52 and 58 to Quantum
Boulevard. These two developments generate an average daily total of 1062 trips.
Combine the office traffic with the 1904 average daily trips generated by tile 272
apartments within the Villas at Quantum Lake project and the resultant total average
daily traffic projected to use the Quantum Boulevard link between Quantum lakes
Drive and Gateway Boulevard is 2986 trips.
Wllat demonstrates the negligible impact of the proposed roadway abandonment is the
comparison of the 2986 average daily trips projected on tile roadway link at build out
and tile 32,500 daily trip capacity of Quantum Boulevard. The impact is further
diminished by the fact that nearly all of the 2986 trips would be using the Quantum
Boulevard link to Gateway Boulevard anyway.
Please delete this comment.
FIRE
Comments.
6 Roads and hydrants must be in place pnor to any construction above grade.
RESPONSE. This is a site plan and site-specific development related comment. It is
inappropriate as a condition for a Master Plan amendment.
Please delete this comment.
POLICE
Comments. None
RESPONSE, Comment noted.
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments
7 Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve will reqmre replatting of that
portIOn of Quantum Park III accordance WIth the requirements of the LDR,
Chapter 5, Platting.
F IQuantum Limited\nopcJ2EAG09JOOJ.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 6
9/10/0]
RESPONSE. A proposed preliminary plat is being prepared and will be submitted by
separate application to the City of Boynton Beach for review and approval pursuant to
the plat review process.
8 Lot 34C (NotIficatIOn of a Proposed Change, SectIOn 54) IS proposed to be
changed from undesIgnated use to Industrial use. How will thIS change Impact
proposed open spaces and park areas wIthm the development?
RESPONSE. It is important to note, the land area for Lot 34-C was previously
accounted for as a detention area and not as an open space or recreational park area.
Therefore, there is no impact to the open space or the recreational park areas relative
to the development of Lot 34-C. A similar example of no impact is the Sand Pine
Preserve areas adjacent the Industrial Development and Mixed Use Development in
the southern portion of the park.
Please delete this comment.
9 Provide verification that Palm Beach County Engineering will permIt a dnveway
openmg onto Miner Road for Lot 34C Show how a second mgress and egress
point will be provIded at the south end of the property for emergency servIces.
RESPONSE. It is inappropriate to request verification from Palm Beach County
Engineering for a driveway opening onto Miner Road for Lot 34-C as a Master Plan
amendment requirement or even as a verification for site plan approval. Verification
has not been provided within the development at the Master Plan stage for any
driveway connection to any adjacent roadway. Furthermore, the permitting of a
driveway opening is a site plan related issue and should be considered at that time.
A second ingress and egress will not be provided for Lot 34-C. This is consistent with
other lots within the development that do not have secondary access which are larger
developments or larger lot areas than could be proposed or constructed on Lot 34-C.
These issues are site-planning issues and are inappropriate for the Master Plan
consideration.
Please delete this comment.
10 If approved, an envlfonmental assessment of Tract 34C will be reqmred as part of
any site submittal.
RESPONSE. We request that comment #10 be deleted on the basis that this again is a
site plan related condition. Furthermore, the Development Order (DO) already
requires an Environmental Assessment of each lot prior to development. Certainly, not
prior to Master Plan approval, a land use designation or a change thereto.
F IQuantum Limiledlnopc12EAG09lO01.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 7
9/1 % 1
Please delete tltis commellt.
11 Abandonment of a portion of Quantum Lake Dnve wIll Isolate the dedIcated
roadway easement along the north property hne of Lot 61 The NotIficatIOn of a
Proposed Change, SectIOn 5.5, indIcates access wIll be provIded Via a single
entrance pomt at the mtersectIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Quantum
Boulevard. EhmmatIOn of that portIOn of Quantum lakes Dnve and the second
access pomt wIll create an undeSIrably long tnp for the most northerly residents of
the proposed multI-family resIdential development and would create a hazardous
sItuatIOn for emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same
development.
RESPONSE. Prior to respolldillg to tlte comment it is important to correct two factual
errors witltin tlte comment. Firstly, tlte identified "dedicated roadway easement along
tlte nortlt property line of Lot 61" does not exist. Secondly, tlte application for tlte
Nope in Section 5.5 was improperly restated. Tlte application states tltat tlte main
access or entrance point at tlte intersection of Quantum Lakes Drive and Quantum
Boulevard will be used by Lots 59, 60, and 61 In fact, a second access point is
provided consistent witlt tlte approved site plan tltrouglt tlte property to tlte nortlt
currently owned by Quantum Park and Village.
Please refer to tlte letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen
Developments. Tlte letter clearly indicates tlte intent to provide a secondary access.
Please delete tltis comment.
12. Abandonment of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve and reconfigunng a portion
of it mto Lot 101 will create an undesuably long trip for the most northerly
tenants of the proposed new lot and will create a hazardous situation for
emergency servIces needmg to access northerly portIOns of that same
development.
RESPONSE. Stated in comment #11 and #12 is a concern contending long and
undesirable trips to tlte remote section of tlte existing and newly created lots. We
strongly disagree witlt tltis contention and request botlt commellts be deleted, as many
developments of over 500 acres Itave muclt longer distances to travel to exit tlte
development. Furtltermore, tlte access alld travel routes of emergency vellicles are site-
planning issues, IlOt master planning issues.
Please refer to the letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen
Developments. Tlte letter clearly illdicates the intent to provide a secondary access to
northem portions of Lot 61 and Lot 101
Please delete this comment.
F \Quantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09 J 00 J. doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 8
9/1 0/0 1
13 ReconfiguratIon of Lots 62 and 63 Into a smgle Lot 102 would create the same
situatIOn described In the above Paragraphs 2 and 3 for the southerly tenants of
the proposed new lot.
RESPONSE. Our responses for comments #11 and #12 also relate to comment #13
and we request this comment be removed. In this particular case, the newly created
Lot 102 is part of the larger 23 acre mixed use area. These lands are under single
ownership and are anticipated to be included into a single master plan for commercial,
office and residential uses with proper emergency access and vehicular movements
throughout the 23 acres with access from the Villas at Quantum Lake property (Lots
59, 60 and 61).
Please delete this comment.
14 The NotificatIOn of a Proposed Change, Section 5.5, paragraph 3, represents the
Intersection of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway Boulevard as substandard and
dangerous. ThIS IntersectIOn has prevIously been reviewed and approved. Please
prOVIde addItional InfOrmatIOn (aCCIdent data and standard drawings) supporting
thIS statement.
RESPONSE. Without regard for the previous review and approval, it appears from the
memo written by Mr Livergood P.E. (Public Works - Traffic Comments) the City staff
supports our requestfor the elimination of the intersection and the abandonment of the
roadway.
Regarding the previous review and approval, the improvements within Gateway
Boulevard and Quantum Lakes Drive were designed in 1986 and 1987 and constructed
in 1988 and 1989 Many changes to the FDOT design standards and design criteria
have occurred since that time. Palm Beach County has adopted an access
management plan and has also adopted street landscaping criteria, "streetscape
criteria" In previous incidents these criteria all have been applied to development
plans (e.g. site plans and associated roadway improvements, etc.) presented to the City
for review. The Palm Beach County streetscape standards and access management
standards were adopted after the design and construction of Gateway Boulevard and
Quantum Lakes Drive. Of particular interest and concern is the "hot right" from
Quantum Lakes Drive to eastbound Gateway Boulevard. A yield sign controls this
turning movement. In effect traffic is allowed to flow from Quantum Lakes Drive and
merge into the rigllt hand through lane of Gateway Boulevard with very little
acceleration lane distance or adequate merging taper It is this hot right that wefeel is
hazardous and believe is desirous to eliminate, particularly in light of the increased
pedestrian traffic crossing this yielded intersection enroute to the new high school that
did not exist when the roadway was designed.
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 9
9/1 % 1
We look to the City of Boynton Beach to provide any accident data or record drawings
of this intersection, if any additional information or respOllSe is desired from the
applicant. No additional information or response in our judgment is necessary.
Please delete this comment.
15 If the areas MU 10 1 and Lot 34C are new, developable parcels then an additIOnal
recreatIOnal fee (or land in lieu of fee) may be assessed based on the origmal
calculatIOns for the CIty Park.
RESPONSE. The Park and Recreational Department address recreational fees and
this comment in the Engineering section is inappropriate.
Please delete this comment.
16 The creation of Lots 100 and 101 and the re-designation of Lot 34C from
undesignated to Industrial will obviously increase traffic volumes. The Traffic
Analysis (Quantum Park NOPC #12) states that" will not result in an increase
m dally or peak hour volumes" Although the analysis concludes that there are no
increases and decreases in allowable development mtensItIes, the analYSIS needs
to further address local changes m traffic volumes that would result from the
proposed changes.
RESPONSE. The proposed change does not increase the vested traffic generation of
the Park. An increase of developable area does not necessarily increase development
intensities particularly if intensity is measured by traffic generation. Land area does
not generate traffic, the office, industrial and residential buildings do generate traffic.
The proposed change increases the residential units allowable within the Park and
decreases the threshold of allowable office and industrial building area, on a traffic
generation equivalency basis.
The traffic generation equivalency is demonstrated by the submitted traffic analysis
and supplemented by the attached letter from Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
Please delete this comment.
17 The Traffic Analysis (Quantum Park NOPC #12) acknowledges that the closure
of a portIOn of Quantum Lakes Drive has the potential to impact the regional
roadway network. The,analysis further states that dIverted traffic will cause ~he
mtersection of Gateway Boulevard and Quantum Boulevard to operate over
capacity dunng the PM peak hour The analYSIS proposes changes m striping and
roadway widening to address thIS Without providmg a timetable. Please be more
speCIfic as to how and when thIS work Will be mcorporated into the planning
process to minimIze Impact to the travehng public. Also please address the
F lQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09IOOI.doc
Me Michael W Rumpf
Page 10
9/1 % 1
impact these proposed changes would have on access by emergency vehIcles and
law enforcement.
RESPONSE. This comment has inaccurately stated the conclusions of the traffic
generation equivalence data, the intersection analyses and the concluding statements.
A roadway widening is not proposed or required as a result of the abandonment of
Quantum Lakes Drive. The analysis and standard practice is very clear, the roadway
restriping associated with the traffic signal will occur when warranted, not before the
signal is warranted and preferably not after it is warranted. The accurate conclusions
are provided below after the following discussion about the BGI approval conditions.
Regarding the traffic signal warrants and the surety thereof, the BGI site plan
approval conditions are of importance. The BGI site plan approval was conditioned
requiring them to construct the traffic signal at the Gateway Boulevard and Quantum
Boulevard intersection. BGI subsequently abandoned their development plans and
sold the land. The subsequent development, a 336,500 sq. ft. warehouse project known
as Gateway Business Center, was not conditioned by the City to construct or even
provide surety for the subject traffic signal. We believe this oversight should not be at
the expense of this applicant especially now since it has been shown that it is the
Gateway Business Center and the Villas at Quantum Lake developments that at build
out will warrant the signal.
The accurate conclusion is as follows, ti,e Gateway Boulevard and Quantum
Boulevard intersection was previously determined to warrant a traffic signal with the
existing developments within the Park and the build out of ti,e Villas at Quantum Lake
and the 336,500 sq. ft. warehouse project (located at the northeast corner of the
intersection). The analysis shows the traffic signal would be warranted prior to this
proposed change. The analysis also concluded the existing roadway improvements are
adequate at the time the traffic signal is warranted. The analysis also determined the
intersection after the traffic signal is warranted will be over capacity during the PM
peak hour only due to the projected increase in through traffic on Gateway Boulevard
and NOT the traffic generated by Quantum Park or the diverted traffic caused by the
roadway abandonment.
This comment is further addressed in the attached letter dated, September 7, 2001 from
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
Please delete this comment.
.
18 Identify the tract shown as MUlOl as MU60A and MU61A to show each lot's
additional property due to the abandonment. Change MUI00 to MUI02A.
RESPONSE. TIle Lot numbering strategy was discussed at a preliminary meeting with
the City staff The revised Master Development Plan reflects those discussions. The
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EA G09 JOO J. doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 11
9/1 % 1
furtlter subdivision of Lot 101 into two lots is problematic as is tlte suggested "A"
designation. The ''A'' designation is already used within the Park to identify lots totally
encumbered by drainage easements and associated with developable lots with tlte same
lot number
We reject the suggestion. Please delete this comment.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments. None
RESPONSE. Comment noted.
PARK AND RECREATION
Comments
19 The CIty CommISSIon dId exempt, from the RecreatIOn DedIcatIOn ReqUIrement,
272 umts of the 1,000 umts reqUIred m the most recent master plan revision. The
developer dId pledge, however, to proVIde appropriate publIc recreatIOn facilIties
for these umts. (To be determmed m conjunction With the Parks DIVIsIon.)
The total recreatIOn dedIcation requirement will be calculated as follows.
1,000 umts - 272 units = 723 D U
728 DUx 015 = 10.92 acres
~ credIt may be given against the requirements of land dedIcation or
payment fees. ~ pnvate recreation credIt will be calculated as follows
10 92 acres / 2=5 46 acres
An addItional '14 credit may be given for natural resources agamst the
requirement of land dedication or payment of fees. '14 credit for natural
resources will be calculated as follows
10 92 acres / 4=2 73 acres
The developer may want to consIder dedicatIOn of the land, or a
combmatIOn of dedIcatIOn and fee.
RESPONSE. The pledge of tlte applicant (not the Developer) referenced above is
clarified as follows. The applicant pledges to provide recreational facilities for the
r.emaining 228 residential units and the proposed adpitional 500 residential units as
amenities to tlte additional units, in tlte vicinity of the additional units and for the
exclusive use of the residents of tlte additional units. Tlte developer of tlte residential
projects pursuant to market demands will determine the facilities. These recreational
facilities will be planned and constructed as part of the segment of the mixed-use
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JO01.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 12
9/1 % 1
development in much the same manner as the recreational facilities are being provided
to the Villas of Quantum Lake.
The discussion and expression of the intent of the City Commission was that Quantum
Park in general should be exempt from the recreation dedication credit. The
discussion by the Commission was that Quantum Park had provided more in the form
of recreation and other benefits to the City to satisfy any potential recreation dedication
requirement and therefore, no further requirement should be requested with respect
thereto.
This intent was further reinforced by the City Manager in recent discussions
concerning the future planning and development of the Park.
Please delete this comment.
20 Natural resource credIt, If approved by the commISSIon, IS subtracted off the
Recreation DedicatIOn ReqUIrement.
RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment.
21 Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, Section 3, of the Land Development
RegulatIOn, the developer must provide 5 park elements in order to qualify for 12
credIt for pnvate recreation provided.
RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment.
22. If the property IS not further platted, recreatIOn fees or dedications for the 728
non-exempt dwellIng umts are due before the Issuing of theIr resIdentIal building
permits.
RESPONSE. Comment noted, please delete this comment.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments.
23 I am requestmg the applIcant as a condItIon to the above Master Plan
ModificatIOn to respond to my letter of May 14, 2001 (as directed by our CIty
Manager) in reference to the Quantum Park-DRI Annual EnvIronmental Areas
Status Report.
RESPONSE. This request is inappropriate and should be deleted. The applicant is not
responsible for addressing the requests of the City Forrester or any other agency or
individual relating to lands owned by others, improvements or maintenance of
F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 13
911 % I
improvements upon lands owned by otllers, including tile Quantum Community
Development District ("QCDD" in this case.
Tile referenced letter requests a written status of various management aspects of tile
sand pine preserve areas and tile wetland areas within Quantum Park. Tile letter also
request documents that should be on file at the City as the administrator of the DRI for
the Park. Neither status reports nor tile supply of documents are the responsibility of
tile applicant.
Tile letter has been forwarded to the QCDD and we are aware the QCDD is working
with Dr Richardson to provide tile requested status reports and documents of record
requested by the City. We firmly believe the QCDD will comply witll the request as they
have with all other responsibilities within the Park.
Please delete this comment.
24 Lot 34-C IS shown on the Quantum Park Master Plan as a 6.58 acres detentIon
(open spaces) area and IS contIguous to the 25 7 acres Sand Pme Preserve. The
land use change of Lot 34-C from detention (open space) to industnal, could
affect the environmental qualIty of the contIguous Sand Pine Preserve when the
owner develops the mdustnal tract.
RESPONSE. Comment noted. As a site planning requirement, the impact to the sand
pine preserve area to the west, tile water management tract to the south, the adjacent
vacant land to the east and Miner Road to tile north (as discussed above) is required to
be considered. The key here is tllese are site development related concerns and not
Master Planning concerns.
Lot 34-C is not encumbered by any existing or required drainage easement, plat
dedication or plat reservation for use as a detention or retention area.
Tile land use designation cllange is not a change from detention to industrial but a
change described as follows. Lot 34-C is currently unrestricted by a "land use
designation" as shown on tile Master Development Plan Amendment No. 10 for
Quantum Park. Currently, the land could be developed as allowed within a PID
zoning district. We are proposing a change to restrict tile use of Lot 34-C to industrial
uses subject to all current zoning, site planning, land development and building
req uirements.
Tile Lot 34-C area (6.58 acres, as determined by survey) has been erroneously
accounted for in tile "open space" area total and the detention area subtotal. Tllis
proposed cllange application corrects that accounting
Please delete tltis comment.
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOJ.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 14
9/1 010 1
25 In December 1998 a 6-foot hIgh cham lInk fence was mstalled around
a) Lot 34-C (6.58 acres) and
b) Water Management Tract "J" (6 16 acres) and connected to the existing
fence around the perImeter of the
c) Sand Pme Preserve (257 acres).
ThIS was to protect the envIronmental quality of the total of 38 44 acres m the
three separate tracts, and suggest that the three tracts are all one and shown as
open spaces / Sand Pme Preserve.
The project should contmue m the normal reVIew process.
RESPONSE. The assumptions, presumptions and implied conclusions as suggested in
the above comment resulting from the fencing of the three identified areas are
astoundingly inaccurate. To the best of our knowledge the acreage of Water
Management Tract J is also stated inaccurately.
The 6-foot high chain link fence as well as numerous "NO TRESPASSING" signs
were installed by the QPPOA with the cooperation of the applicant to attempt to restrict
the trespass of off the road vehicles and poachers illegally entering the properties and
causing damage to the habitat and wildlife. Prior to this applicant's purchase of lands
with in the Park, the illegal access and damage was occurring unrestricted.
It was simply less expensive, less time consuming, provided better security and a better
opportunity for monitoring the fence and access with the fence installed along the
north and east boundary line of Lot 34-C. Furthermore, including Lot 34-C "behind
the fence" also protected the Lot 34-C area habitat and wildlife from damage prior to
the proper environmental assessment typically performed as part of the lot development
process at the time a specific development is proposed.
Please delete this comment.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
26 The Land Use Average Table IS mcorrect as shown on page 5 of the NOPC
application. Amendment #10 was approved for 84.35 ac. of (01) and 26.33 ac. of
(OIC). Correct thIS mformatIon on the applIcatIon.
RESfONSE. The acreages reported for the 01 and 0](; land use designations are
correctly reported in the application. The acreages reported in the comment above are
incorrect. It appears something other tl,an the Master Development Plan of record for
Amendment No 10, as revised pursuant to the City Commission approval is being
referenced.
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 15
9/1 % 1
Please delete tltis comment.
27 The Land Use Acreage Tables on page 5 of the apphcatIOn and on the Master
Plan draWIng shown a decrease m the (OIC) category (26.33 acres approved,
22.94 acres proposed) but the amendment does not propose a change to any (OIC)
designated lot. Please explam?
RESPONSE. A cltange is not proposed in tlte approved area designated for OIC
development. Tlte comment above is based on tlte same inaccuracy apparent in
Comment No. 26.
Tlte application tabular data and tlte revised Master Development Plan clearly sltow no
increase or decrease in tlte land area designatedfor OIC development.
Please delete tltis comment.
28 The Land Use Acreage Table on page 5 of the applicatIOn and on the NOPC
Master Plan # 12 drawmg is mcorrect. The eXIstmg (MU) lots add up to 26 82
acres. Together they total 89.20 acres not 9065 as shown on the plan. Please
correct.
RESPONSE. Tlte total acreage proposed for Mixed Use (MU) development as a result
of tltis application is 90.66 acres, tltis area is based upon surveys performed for tlte
applicant. Attaclted to clarify tlte apparent area confusion is an ''Area Calculation
Summary" Tlte Master Development Plan and tlte NOPC Application page Itave been
revised to reflect ti,e totals sltown in tlte Summary.
Please delete tltis comment.
29 Lot 34-C IS shown having 6.58 acres in the application but 6.56 acres has been
added to the Industnal category on the Master Plan. The development order and
Master Plan Amendments through NOPC #8 have identified thIS tract as havmg
6.59 acres. To be consistent, use the 6 59-acre sIte area calculation.
RESPONSE. Tlte acreage of Lot 34-C is 6.58 acres based upon a survey performedfor
tlte applicant. Please reference tlte attaclted ''Area Calculation Summary"
Please delete tltis comment.
30 (City's duplicate number 25) Lot 34-C has been labeled on the Master Plan as
"Detention" up through NOPC Master Plan Amendment #8 For some reason, the
detention label does not appear on NOPC Master Plans #9 or #10 even though no
change to the designatIOn of this lot was proposed or approved m either
amendment. TIus lot remams a DetentIOn lot with no development desIgnatIOn
F \Quantum Limited\nopcl2EAG09JO01.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 16
9/1 OlD 1
assIgned. Please mdIcate thIS m your apphcatIOn and provIde data and analysIs to
support the ehmmatIOn of this area for detentIOn.
RESPONSE. The detention label was specifically removed from the Master
Development Plan, Amendment No 9, as was other inaccurate information to produce
as accurate a plan as possible based on information and data acquired during the
purchase of over two hundred (200) with in the park by the applicant. It is important
to note the Master Development Plan, Amendment No. 9 was approved by the City
Commission with the removal of the detention label along with the removal and
revision of other inaccuracies shown on Master Development Plan, Amendment No.8.
We object to the contention that Lot 34-C exists as a detention area and agree the lot
exists without a land use designation. We contend that without a development land use
designation and without an encumbrance for use as a detention area, the lot may be
developed as allowed within a PID zoning district subject to all current zoning, site
planning, land development and building requirements.
Indicated in our application and reflected on the proposed Master Development Plan is
the change to the use of Lot 34-C from an undesignated use to an industrial use by
providing a land use designation.
The request for additional data, analysis and supporting information regarding
drainage encumbrances upon Lot 34-C is more appropriately provided by the
Engineering Department. It is interesting to note the Engineering Department has not
requested additional data or information in this regard. It appears the Engineering
Department is satisfied with the description of the proposed change and the supporting
documents submitted with the application.
It also appears the Utility Department comments provide requests regarding the
drainage encumbrances upon Lot 34-C. We have responded to the Utilities
Department comments on this issue.
Please delete this comment.
31 (26) ProVIde SIte area acreage calculatIOns for proposed lots 100 and 101,
RESPONSE. Attached is an "Area Calculation Summary"
Please delete this comment. ,
32. (27) The Land use acreage Table on page 5 and on the NOPC Master Plan #12
drawmg shows a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space. Does thIS reflect the 6.59
acre Detention lot (34-C) plus any open space associated WIth the eliminatIOn of
the fIght-of -way? Please clarify
F IQuantum Limiledlnopcl2EAG09JOOI.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 17
9/10/01
RESPONSE. Attached is an "Area Calculation Summary"
Please delete this comment.
33 (28) Lots 73-A through 76 should be highlIghted as committed development. SIte
Plan approval was granted on 8/7/01 This should also be reflected in the project
traffic 2002 estimate In the Pinder Troutman traffic analYSIS.
RESPONSE. The Master Development Plan has been revised as requested to show the
committed development. The committed development upon these lots has been
reflected as requested.
The projected traffic from this recently approved project has not been included in the
2002 analysis. It is doubtful it will be constructed within tlte time period as the
owner/developer currently has over 250,000 sq. ft. of similar space constructed and
currently vacant. The projected traffic has been included in the 2006 intersection
analysis.
Please delete this comment.
34 (29) Lot 50-A should also be hIghlIghted as commItted development (Onana
GranIte) SIte Plan approval was granted on 6/6/00 This should be reflected in the
project traffic 2001 estlmate in the PInder Troutman traffic analysis.
RESPONSE. The Master Development Plan has been revised as requested to show the
committed development. The committed development upon these lots has been
reflected as requested.
It is doubtful lot 50-A will be developed as approved. The contract buyer did not
complete the transaction to purchase the property. The current landowner (the
applicant) does not desire to construct the project. Therefore it follows the traffic has
not been included in either the 2001 or 2002 project traffic for the purposes of the
analysis.
Please delete this comment.
35 (30) The Master Plan IndIcates that the acreage for the Industrial category IS
increasIpg by 6.56 acres yet the allowable Intensity for this cat~gory IS decreasing
by 375,354 square feet. Please clarify thIS inconsistency
RESPONSE. In applying the theory of "simultaneously increasing and decreasing
intensities" using traffic generation formulas as the equivalency technique, no
substantial regional impact results from the proposed change. In this particular case,
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09 JOOI.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 18
9/1 % I
we are proposing the increase from 500 to ]000 residential units and simultaneously
decreasing the allowable industrial square footage by 375,354 sq. ft.
The apparent industrial area increase is addressed in the responses to other comments.
Please delete this comment.
36. (31) The Master Plan IndIcates the acreage for the Office categories (0, 01) IS
decreasing; yet the allowable intensIty for thIS category is Increasing by 72,922
square feet. Please clanfy thIs Inconsistency
RESPONSE. The allowable threshold of office space is proposed to be decreased by
72,922 sq. ft. The comment statement above is inaccurate.
Please delete this comment.
37 (32) The Master Plan IndIcates a proposed new access from Miner Road for Lot
34-C The traffic analysIs must specIfically address this access since it IS not
integrated Into the traffic cIrculation system for the rest of the PID How many
trips are allocated for this site and how will It impact Miner Road?
RESPONSE. The traffic generated from an industrial use upon Lot 34-C is minor and
insignificant when analyzing the traffic issues relevant to the proposed change. On a
regional basis, it is the peak hour movements that are of interest. The impacted
intersections have been analyzed. The traffic generated by ti,e entire development,
which is not being increased, does not I,ave a significant impact on either ti,e Congress
or High Ridge Road intersections with Miner Road.
The traffic generation calculations for the overall development do not allocate trips to
a specific lot. Each lot as it is developed is required to prepare a traffic statement
identifying the traffic generated by ti,e specific plan. A distribution of the generated
traffic is also provided as part of the statement.
Miner Road is a Plan Collector as designated by Palm Beach County. Its right-ol-way
is protected for a five-lOlle roadway section. It is constructed as a two-lane roadway
expandable to the five-lane ultimate section. We anticipate the maximum traffic
generatedfrom Lot 34-C to be 700 average trips per day (6.58 acres x 0.35 FAR x 6.97
trips/] 000 sq. ft.). The connection of 700 trips per day to Miner Road with an ultimate
c.apacity of 32,500 trips per day is less than significa"t. The significance is further
diminished by the fact the traffic generated by Quantum Park, including the 700
anticipated trips from Lot 34-C, are already vested and properly included in
background traffic of the regional roadway network.
Please delete this comment.
F-\Quantllm Limitedlnopcl2EAG091001.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 19
9/1 % 1
38 (33) The NOPC apphcatIOn page 9 contams two conversion formulas for
resIdentIal unItS. They do not appear on the Master Plan. As shown they provIde
two dIfferent converSIOn formulas for the same use - ResIdentIal Umt. What IS
the purpose of these formulas? Please clarIfy tlus mconsistency or remove them
from the apphcatIOn.
RESPONSE. The formulas have been deleted from the application. Attached is the
revised page.
Please delete this comment.
39 (34) Approval of the Master Plan IS contingent upon a finding of no substantIal
deviation by the CIty This IS based on the following sections of the Flonda
Statutes.
a) Chapter 380 06 (19) (b) 9 An increase m the number of dwelhng units by
five (5) percent of 50 umts, whIchever is greater
b) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) S.c. No WIthstandmg any proVIsIon m paragraph
(b) to the contrary, a proposed change consIstmg of simultaneous mcrease
and decreases of at least two of the uses within an authorized multI-use
development of regIOnal Impact which was onginally approved WIth more
than three uses speCIfied m 3800651 (3) (c), (d), (t) and g and resIdential
use.
c) Chapter 38006 (19) (e) 5 b. Except for the types of uses hsted in
subparagraph (b) 16., any change whIch would result in the development
of any area wluch was specifically set aSIde in the apphcatIOn for
development approval or m the development order for preservatIOn,
buffers, or special protectIOn, mcludmg habItat for plant and anImal
specIes, archeologIcal and historical SItes and other speCIal areas
The applicatIon as presented is presumed to be a substantial deviation. ThIS presumption
may be rebutted by clear and convincmg eVIdence. The applicant must provIde
addItIonal informatIOn before determmatIOn of no substantIal deVIatIOn is made. The
additIOnal informatIOn must include
A reVIsed traffic analysis based on comments receIved from
Palm Beach County and the City of Boynton Beach
Technical ReVIew CommIttee.
Demonstrate how the proposed change from the Office (0)
and Offictl/Industrial (01) categones to the MU category is
conSIstent with the ComprehensIve Plan.
ProVIde an updated analysis of the master dramage plan for
Quantum Park clearly mdICating the Impacts that an
mdustnal development on the current DetentIOn Tract 34-C
would have.
F IQuantum Limited\nopcl2EA G09 100 I.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 20
9/1 % I
Demonstrate how a net loss of 8 02 acres of open space wIll
be mitigated.
RESPONSE. Clear and convincing evidence is provided within the responses to these
staff comments, the additional statements provided by Pinder Troutman Consulting
Inc., the Area Calculation Summary and other documents presentedfor review.
The demonstration that the land use designation changes proposed are consistent with
the Comprehensive Plan was provided and approved by the City Commission by virtue
of Amendment N010 when the Mixed Use category including a residential component
was added to the development. Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan is not an
issue.
The net loss of open space area is inaccurately stated above. As described in detail in
other responses above, the land area of Lot 34-C (6.58 acres of ti,e 8.02 acres) was
effectively available for development and was not an "open space" when ti,e plat was
recorded and the SFWMD permit was modified. The remainder of the 8.02 acres
relates to the portion of Tract Q, a Water Management Tract adjacent the link of
Quantum Lakes Drive proposed for abandonment. This remainder area is
incorporated into Lot 100 and Lot 101 We are not aware of any federal, state or local
requirement to mitigate any loss of open space.
Please delete this comment.
40 (35) Under the condItIon of Amendment #8 to the Quantum Park Development
Order and Chapter 3, Article IV of the Land Development Regulations, a traffic
analYSIS IS required for thIS Master Plan approval. The apphcant submitted a
traffic analYSIS. In lieu of an independent traffic consultant, the staff and the Palm
Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn WIll reVIeW the traffic study
RESPONSE. Comment noted. Please delete this comment.
41 (36) The Palm Beach County Traffic DIVISIOn has reviewed the traffic study and
demed approval due to the followmg:
a. The traffic generated by the hIgh school (about 2,283 daily tnps) should
be counted as vested trips Wlthm the overall Quantum development traffic
generatIOns.
b. Daily and peak hour trIps related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in
Attachments lA, IB and lC, must reflect the values of the latest NOPC approval.
(Ref. Letter from Masoud Atefi, Palm Beach County to Michael Rumpf dated
8/20/01) Please respond to these comments and reVIse the traffic study
accordmgly
F \Quantum LimitedlnopcllEAG09JOOJ.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 21
9/1 % 1
RESPONSE. As a result of prior disputes and litigation, it has been previously agreed
and determined that the trips generated by the high school would not count against
future development within Quantum Park so as to resolve such disputes and litigation.
A Settlement Agreement (as a result of the litigation) was entered into by the School
Board of Palm Beach County and collectively with the QCDD, the QPPOA and the
applicant. Confidentiality provisions of the agreement bind the applicant and the
School District. However, a key element of the resolution of this litigation was that the
City not count the traffic generated by the high school against future development
witltin Quantum Park.
The requested revisions to the Attachments listed above are not required for an
analysis provided in support of a determination of no substantial deviation. The
purpose of the NOPC traffic analysis is to determine if the proposed change results in a
substantial deviation. Florida Statues Chapter 380.06 Section (19)(b)15 states that "A
15% increase in the number of external vehicle trips generated by the development
above that which was projected during the original development-of-regional review"
constitutes a substantial deviation. The data and analysis, as submitted with the
application, demonstrates that the proposed plan represents a decrease in Daily, AM
peak hour and PM peak hour trip generation from the original development-of-
regional review. Therefore, the proposed change is not a substantial deviation and,
intersection and roadway link analyses for existing and future conditions are not
required.
Please delete this comment.
42. (37) The NOpe Master Plan submittal dId not include a conceptual sIte plan or
justIficatIOn for the requested change. The CIty approved the Mixed-Use designatIOn
when it adopted Amendment #10 in March 2000 To date, no development has been
proposed whIch combmes all the uses reqUIred by the Land Development Regulations
if the defimtion of a Mixed Use Pod m a PID The only plans submItted and
approved to date are for Villas at Quantum Lake (a.k.a. Grotto Bay)
RESPONSE. Although we continue to {{conceptually plan" for the development of the
existing and proposed mixed-use areas, we feel it inappropriate to require such plans
or justifications be provided as part of the change application. The existing Mixed-Use
area is not part of this proposed change and the status of its development is irrelevant
to this application. In fact, in some cases we are prohibitfd from disclosing the
conceptual plans until such site plan is submitted for approval.
This comment does not contain a specific question or request any additional
information. Therefore, please delete tltis comment
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG09JO01.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 22
9/1 0/0 I
43 (38) The Villas at Quantum Lake sIte plan was approved wIth an access at the north
end of the sIte from Lot 61 along an easement on lot 62 to Quantum Lakes Drive
eventually leadmg out to Gateway Boulevard. The proposed Master Plan does not
mdICate thIs access. Please correct the Master Plan to reflect the approved access for
the residentIal project.
RESPONSE. The Master Development Plan has been revised to show the referenced
access.
Please delete this comment.
44 (39) The owners of the Villas at Quantum Lake project have contacted the CIty m
writing regarding theIr concerns that any development on proposed lots 100 and 101,
If not bUIlt m coordmate on WIth their project, may Impact their access, frontage,
visibilIty, setback, densIty, open space and existmg VIews. Has the applIcant
contacted the adjacent property owner to dISCUSS the Impacts of this NOPC proposal?
It IS Imperative that the adjacent property owners are appnsed of and be m agreement
WIth thIS proposed change.
RESPONSE. The adjacent property owners to Lots 100 and 101 are not only aware of
the proposed change, but have acquisition agreements with the applicant regarding the
lots. We are not aware of any objection to the proposed change.
Please refer to the letter dated September 7, 2001 from Mr Mark Hansen, Olen
Developments. The letter clearly indicates support for the proposed change and not an
objection to the proposed abandonment, lot configuration or access arrangements.
Please delete this comment.
45 (40) The proposed abandonment of a portIon of Quantum Lakes Drive and the
creatIOn of Lots 100, 101 and 103 will reqUIre a replat of that portIOn of the PID plat.
RESPONSE. This is also an Engineering Department comment also. A response is
provided thereto.
Please delete this comment.
46 (41) On June 25, 2001, a letter was sent to DaVId B NorrIS, Counsel for the applicant
requesting several revisions to the Annual Stqtus Report for the Quantum Park PID
DR!. To date, those reVISIOns have not been made. Please reVIse the annual report
accordmgly and proVIde the revisions at the September 11,2001 TRC meetmg.
RESPONSE. It is not the responsibility of this applicant to prepare, distribute or
address comments relative to the Annual DRl Reportfor this project. The requirement
F'\Quantum Limitedlnopc12EAG09l OOl.doc
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Page 23
9/l0101
to provide revisions to a document for which we are not responsible and to provide tlte
revised document in less tltanfive (5) working days is absurd. Tlte City's comments on
tlte Annual DR! Report are a separate matter and it is grossly inappropriate to impose
such a requirement upon the applicant.
Please delete tllis comment.
47 (42) Revise the SubstantIal DevIatIOn Chart m the applicatIOn for the Open Spaces
category The chart mdICates N/C for the proposed change when the ehmmation of
the detentIon area IS proposed. Also reVIew the numbers for the IndustrIal and Office
categorIes, as they do not match the NOPC Master Plan #12 drawmg.
RESPONSE. A revised Substantial Deviation Cltart is attached reflecting the
responses contained herein.
Please delete tltis comment.
If you should have any further questIOns, please feel free to contact me at any tIme.
cc: David Norris, Esq Cohen, NorrIS, et. al.
Kahart Pinder, Pmder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
Doug MacDonald
Tom McGillicuddy
F IQuantum Limitedlnopcl2EAG091001.doc
Land Use Acrea2e Table
Proposed Acreage
Land Use Desi2nation Amendment No. 12
Existing Acreage
Amendment No. 10
CommercIal (COM) 13.53 Acres
13 53 Acres
Industnal (IND) 107.83 Acres
101.25 Acres
Oovernmental/InstitutlOnal (0&1) 55.90 Acres
55 90 Acres
Office (0) 12.96 Acres
28.24 Acres
Office/Industnal (01) 79 75 Acres
8774 Acres
Office/Industrial/Commerclal (OIC) 22.94 Acres
22.94 Acres
Office/IndustnallHotel (OIH) 378 Acres
378 Acres
Mixed Use (MU) 90 66 Acres
62.38 Acres
Wetlands 6 00 Acres
6.00 Acres
Roads 37.58 Acres
41 13 Acres
Sand Pme Reserve 40 00 Acres
40 00 Acres
Open Space 82.20 Acres
90.25 Acres
Total 553 13 Acres
553 14 Acres
NOTE The Amendment 10 and Amendment 12 total areas dIffer due to the roundmg of
the mdividual Land Use DeSIgnation to the nearest 001 acres.
F'\Quantum Limited\Annual DRI\NotificationDRIrvl.doc 5
August 8, 2001
Revised September 10, 2001
to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change
of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts, to
structures or to other improvements including locations,
square footage, number of units, and other major
characteristics or components of the proposed change;
It IS requested the development order language be amended to
mclude the followmg provIsIOns.
1 Master Plan Amendment No 12 to the Master SIte
Development Plan for Quantum Park, dated July 2001, IS
hereby approved.
2. Development of the followmg Land Use ClassificatIOns
should not exceed the followmg intensIties wIthout further
CIty approval.
lndustnal
1,900,000 Square Feet
CommercIal (includmg Hotel & Rest.)
728,768 Square Feet
Office
885,850 Square Feet
One Hotel Room
=268 Square Feet
of Gross Leasable
Commercial Area
One MOVIe Theatre Seat
=40 Square Feet
of Office Gross
Floor Area
One MOVIe Theatre Seat
=60 Square Feet
of lndustnal Gross
Floor Area
Residential
1,000 DwellIng Units
f.\Quantum Limiled\Annual DRI\NotificationDRIrv I.doc 9
August 8, 2001
Revised September 10, 2001
09:10/~001 17 13
5514341553
F'INDER TROUH1AN
FAGE 01
PIHDER TROUTMAN CONSULTIHG. IHC.
Transportation Planners and Engmeers
September 7,2001
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1H
West Palm Beach, Fl 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
Email.pindertroutman@msn.com
Ms. Lusia Galav
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
PO. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 12 - #PTC01-1 02
Dear Ms. Galav.
The following responds to the City comments on the traffic analysis for the above referenced project.
Public Works-Traffic - Jeff Livergood memorandum of August 29,2001
Response
Quantum Lakes Drive Closure
A full median opening exists at this location today There has not been any acddent history at this location
that would warrant closure. However, it is recommended that the left turn exit from Parcell 00 not be allowed
Traffic Signalization - Quantum Orive and Gateway Boulevard
The Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) was not provided as a substitute for the signal warrant analysis, The
signal warrant analysis provided in the report dated February 16, 2001 is still valid.
The applicant cannot install a signal until it is warranted and has been approved by Palm Beach County
Therefore, it is recommended that monitoring of this intersection begin in peak season 2002 to determine if
signalization is in fact warranted. This is a condition of the current Development Order (DO). Monitoring
should continue every peak season until the signal is warranted
Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue
The applicant would agree that monitoring of this intersection should begin at the buildout of Parcels 32
through 38. Monitoring should be conducted during the peak season and continue until the signal is
warranted
General
The February 16, 2001 Intersection Analysis included proposed NOPe # 11 land uses. The original
NOPC # 11 was for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Therefore, the traffic from both the residential and non-
residential uses on lots 7 through 11 and 23 through 31 have been included.
KMP/ldr
LetterGalav01 1029-7-01
Di
South Florida \Vater Management District
3301 Gun Cluh Road, West P~m Beach, ~orida 33406. (561) 686-8800. FL WATS 1-800-432-2045
CON 24-05
February 7, 1997
Quantum Associates
2455 East Sunrise Blvd, Suite 1106
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33304
Dear Sir or Madam.
Subject.
Boynton Park of Commerce aka Quantum Park
Phase Construction Completion/Construction Certification
Application Nos. 08296-D & 11207-F, SWM Permit No. 50-01503-S
Palm Beach County, SI6,17,20,211T45SIR43E
This letter acknowledges receipt of an engineer's Construction Completion/Construction Certification,
record drawmgs and an As-Built Master Dramage Plan from Santiago Malavasi, P E. of Rossi and
Malavasi Engineers, Inc. pertaining to the subject project's surface water management system. District
staff have reviewed the submitted information and it has been incorporated into the permit file
Per the referenced certification, our staff consider the Master Surface Water Management System
(including 8-onsite interconnected lakes totalling 67.81 acres, 6.92 acre dry detection area and 3-
discharge control structures serving the entire 578.3 acre industrial development) and the Surface
Water Management System for the Backbone Roadways at the Quantum Park project constructed
in conformance With the permit. This satisfies the requirement of the referenced surface water
management permit With regard to construction of the surface water management system and statement
of completion and certification by a Florida registered professional engineer for the phases included
in the above referenced application numbers
Furthermore, according to the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District, Rule 40E-l and
40E-4, Florida Administrative Code (40E-l 6107, Transfer of Environmental Resource, Surface
Water Management or Water Use Permit; 40E-4 351, Transfer of Permits, 40E-4 61, Conversion from
Construction Phase to Operation Phase, and 40E-4 81, General ConditiOns), upon construction
completion and certification of the surface water management system, the permittee shall request
transfer of the permit to the responsible operating entity Therefore, the subject phase of the Quantum
Park project and the phase previously certified by engineer for construction completion (Quantum Park
of Boynton Beach, Lots 12,13,14) shall be transferred to the entity responsible for operation and
maintenance of the water management system.
The required transfer should be made via the enclosed transfer form. This form should be fIlled out
and submitted, along with a copy of the recorded deed restrictions (including amendments, if any), as
well as a copy of all recorded plats (if not previously furnished) It will then be processed and
included in the District's permit finalization process Please be aware that the permit fIle must contain
documentation that applicable conditions to the permit have been satisfied.
Go'vernzng Beard.
\' ale~le Bc)\'d, ChaIrman
Frank \ \ lillmsqn, Tr \ l:e Chal~mJn
\\ llh.m' F Gdu:11
\VilLam Hammond
Bets' ruanr
RlChlrd ~. :.lachek
Eugene K. Pettis
1\ athamel P Reed
J\lmam Smger
Samuel E. Poole III Exec,-,t1\'e DIrector
l\llChael Siano". DeFun Exe~u,l\'e Dl~e~tor
\ J
n.~ D .....
n
Quantum Associates
February 7, 1997
Page 2
Please submit the above or notify District staff within thirty (30) days of the date of this letter Should
you have any questions, please contact Ms Marissa Cruz, Staff Engineering Associate, at (561) 687-
6590, or the undersigned at (561) 687-6596.
Sincerely, !
~() f}!;!!/
~r ~
/~
r;.fI:ld A. AZlzi
Staff Engineer
Field Engineering Division
South Florida Water Management District
AHA
Enclosure
c: Santiago Malavasi, P E., Rossi and Malavasi Engineers, Inc. w/Enclosure
Quantum Associates, Indianapolis, IN, w/Enclosure
Catalfumo Management & Investment, Inc.. w IEnclosure
Southern Design Group, Inc.
City of Boynton Beach Engineer
Palm Beach County Engineer
FDEP
EP.A.
LWDD
bc B Ratcliffe
H Schloss/M Cruz
Permit File
t,
SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
.. 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 FL WATS 1-800-432 2045 . TDD (561) 6972574
Mailing Address: POBox 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 www.sfwmd.gov
LAN 01
r-""'.. n ........... \""I""""" ""''--'' ,~c-
~r-'~ ,-Jj!~~-I : '>~!~~ ~
September 6, 2001
SEP u 7 2001
Mr Jim Snyder, DRI Coordinator
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300
Stuart, FL 33416
Dear ~r'
! .<., .---' .
~_:dt_ "..... L
.J
Subject:
Quantum Park, DRI No. 84-173
Notice of Proposed Change
In response to your request, South Florida Water Management (SFWMD) staff has
reviewed the August 8, 2001 Notification of A Proposed Change (NOPC) to a Previously
Approved Development of Regional Impact (DRI) submitted by Eugene Gerlica, P E., for
the above-referenced project. The primary purpose of the NOPC is to amend the Master
Development Plan tOJeflect changes in land use affecting various lots throughout the
development and reconfiguration Quantum Lakes Drive to create two additional
developable lots
After review of the documentation submitted, SFWMD staff did not identify any potential
adverse regional water resource-related impacts that could result from approval of the
proposed changes Consequently, the SFWMD has no objections to approval of the
proposed changes. However, a modification to the project's Conceptual Approval (Permit
No 50-01503-S) may be required to address the proposed land use changes as they may
impact the previously permitted acreage and land use assumptions
If I can be of further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 682-6862.
Sincerely,
~
James J Golden, AICP
Senior Planner
Environmental Resource Regulation
/jjg
c' Roger Wilburn, DCA
Eugene Gerlica, P E , Quantum Group
GOVERNING BOARD
EXECUTIVE OFFICE
Trudi K. Williams, CJu1ir
lennart E. Lindahl. Vice-Chair
Pamela Brooks-Thomas
Michael Collins
Hugh M. English
Gerardo B. Fernandez
Patrick J. Gleason, Ph.D P.G.
Nicolas J Gutierrez, Jr Esq
Harkley R. Thornton
Henry Dean, Executive Director
SEP 07 '01 01 55PM THE OLEN COMPANY
P 2
September 7 t 2001
I
Ms, Lusia Galav. AICP
City of Boynton 'Beach
Planning and Zoning Division
100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Phone 561-742-6262
Fax 561-742-6259
RE: Villas at Quantum Lake (272 Apartment Homes)
Additional Units - Quantum Lakes Drive
Dear Ms, Galav'
As a follow up to Erik Bruenmgsen's letter of July lOt 2001. please fmd enolosed a
conceptual drawing reflecting additional bldgs. (42 units) site planned for that portion of Quantum
Lakes Drive to be vacated, We have developed a plan that would utilize the easternmost lanes of
Quantum Lakes Drive for access to the additional units. thereby preserving the existing utilities (i. e,
water, force main, FP&L. Bell South, Cable TV) as well as the existing trees on the easternmost side
of Quantum Lakes Drive, An existing 8" gravity sewer line would have to be relocated to allow the
additional development. The existing project (212 units) would proceed as designed scheduledt save
for minor shifting of building no 4 (minor modification of existing site plan) We have located the
top of bank an the significant trees along the lake bank in an attempt to preserve the environmental
plantings and to avoid impact to those plantings
Olen would acquire that portion of Quantum Lakes Drive adjacent to the existing project and
would coordinate the site plan submittal for the additional 42 units with the vacation process, I
anticipate having the jnformation for a site plan submittal to DRe by the end of this month.
Our secondary access to Quantum Lakes Drive, will be modified by providing access to
Quantum Lane along the sand pine preserve. The access will be provided through the easternmost
portion of lot 62 and lot 66 connecting to Quantum Lane and High Ridge Road, This should resolve
any issues relating to a secondary means of egress.
The portion of Quantum Lakes Drive to be added to the Villas of Quantum Lakes would be
platted by Quantum along with the balance of Quantum Lakes Drive and would reflect specific
easements on the plat for the existing municipal utilities; addressing the location of the existing
facilities.
U:\SHEILA\CORRES\MH\Q\lantum\Galav09070 I ,doc
1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Spring5 Florida 83071
(954} 340-4804 . FaK (854} 344-4608
SEP 07 '01 01 55PM THE OLEN COt1PANY
P 3
Page 2 of2
September 7, 2001
Ms. Lusia GaIav I Villas at Quantum Lake - Additional Units
Once we have prepared a prelinunary plan and conceptual engmeering, we will sohedule a
meeting with staff as appropriate. Should you have any questions or concerns in the meantime, please
feel free to contact me
\
(
Ce. Igor Olenicoff
Doug McDonald
U "\SHElL^\CORRES\MH\Qllantum\Galav09070 i.doc
a \
,c;; -'
1$ e \ \ i co (0'
IU U '! !':: \'~\'
~ .!. \ 1 ,\
\ 1 ~ ~ J \1.0 i \;\ \
\ \ . , I, I \ ,~ ;:
u' \ \ 11, \
.~~ \ :,~\ 1\ \ \~
I~ \ I \ \, '
i1':- :"1 '1 \ '\
\ 1\ \ \~ \ '(<)\10\\0 -.r -.ri-.r\' lcO'\ (<) 0\1011 'Ot
i g.\o IU,;\ ' i.o\"! m NIt- m cO (<) 0 ~'O N ~
'OI~'~'U \(<)\~O.o'\cO t- N ~INi'^'.~\OO'.~
\ ( :' I~\ \~ I~U> ,';'., ,.;~ .;'~ r ~ .,;,:::
\ Ii!" \ 1 1 \ " \
\ 1.\ \ I I ; \ \ ; \
i ' \
, ii' \ \ \ \
\ ' Ii \ \ \ \~I\ \' \ \, \ \ 1 \ ~
, 1 ' 10. ,....I ,\ \ ' \0
\ \ \ ' \~\ \\1 1'->' \ II \t-
, \ ' t; I :EuJ\ >-'
I \ \ ~~~o\ I \ \~\ I->~I~, ! ~I:;
<( <(<(<( quJc!,
C),
\ ~I '....I \1- t; t>rw <!)IOC\uI'
_ \<(.....1:;1::>::> ::>11 \ ~ Cl. 0\
\ '6\<(..., OOOUl\(/)! \ill<(\
\ \' \~o 1 \ffi ,~' \~~ill lli \lli lli ',3 ~ \j [' \ fu
I, :E,(/) ill 0\0 0 010 ~'O\O z
'\ \z\ \ ,~a\6 [I[ [[\~'I~\~ ~ '5:,
\ \1. ,t) >;10 000,01'" ;::1a:,CIl 9\
II ' '1" 1 I I 1 I II
. 1\ \ \ \ \ \\ I i I ! ! I \ ' II II I I! \ '
\ I \ ,I i \ \ ; I
\[N :'i\
o ~ ~ U
c: ". IU'
I -\
i i.- \
\ $I~ i\
0'" ..
~\;; g
~-'
N
1
\
\
,
\ i
....-
1$ ~ ~
0....
\~;; g
. t-o-
\ \ ~
\ 1
C'I
-r->-
ott
z<
t-~
z~
~UJ:J
ct~W
<(OZ
a..ZO
~UJ-
:J~~
t-<(...1
ZZ:J
<(<(0
:J...1...1
aa..<(
,,0
UJ<(
t-UJ
W"
<(<(
~
\ S 1 )o\!
'::l Ih CD ~'\ Iii
I..... CD > ~ CD
I c: ,~l \'IC '0 ..
,IUIUOIUU
::l ~ 0 IU
,0: 0:-:
-\
\
\ \
,
..-
1~ ~\~ .~ ~ ~ Ie ~g\;l\.~ ~\ ~
\~ S ~ N en N c-; 0 ui\t-o 0 N ~
'~,...ID,~....N en ~'OtClC) ~
. '
, ;
, it
leo' \ \ \
! 'N cO.
\ \" N
i~: .0
\ ___I ! or"
())
01
tll
0-
\
\ \ \ ", ' I
II
\ ~
, !~\ \
en\
m
t::.. t-\ ,
I
\
,
..-
o
to
m
u.i
Cl.
.~
-c
())
<!)
u.i
>-
If).a
~-g
::>.....
"tll
co.
co ~
....10-
--.-----------
G=~~_~)
r-'-- ,.-
C:::~
~ I
~
-
-
r-~
~'
a
~
i~
L_
~
~
U
Z
o
""'"
E-4
<
~~M
~Q""
~IO
E-4~Z
~~E-4
Q<Z
Z~~
0:;:;
""",~Q
~E-4Z
<Z~
S:<~
~~<
~O'
...:l
<
""'"
~
~
~
00
~
~
00
.-,
C:
<~
c;
c..... r '...... ~
00 riIil
~ ~
~q~
~~=
~ U
,.,J
-<
~Zl
~-<
S=:
o
~
riIil~
oo~
Oz
~-<
0=
~U
~
~oo
O~
~~
~~
E-o..;l
~
~
Z
~
U
~
o
~
E-o
-<
~
~
o
~
~
Eo-
-<
U
~
~
~
U
~~
M."".'
i
I.
.2 N
>0
o I
~8
= '
a)-O
a) ....
to
00 ~
.~ ::
-
"3 0
~Z
~i::
a) a)
(1)~
o =
o a)
~ S
0'<
o a)
o a)
l"ltl)
r-:X-
..s:::::..2
(,,) c..
~ E
~ 8
~
~l
m'
I"
I
a)
.;;
o
~
'i<i
a)
00
o
o
o
<:T
....
..g '"
~ a)
00 '"
oo~
NC
00 ro
-.......
j~
O'~
80fi
C"l ....
r- :::
....
-B~
~ a)
~~
o
o
o
..;
o
u
Z
'"
'i<i
a)
00
......
o
....
a)
~
Z
'0
=
~
= =
Q .sa
.- .....
- c<S
Cj ~
~ ""
~ ~
<CI::::
00
00
I
C"l
00
o
.-:l
<
z
u
Z
=
o
.~
u
o
....J
a)
-
iZi
0\
0\
0\
.......
a)
.;;
o
~
'i<i
a)
00
o
o
o
<:T
....
..g '"
" a)
00 '"
00;:J
~~
- .......
0:-;::
.-:l (,,)
O'~
8;s
N~ .~
r- ....
..s:::::2
~ ro
<<l a)
~~
M
..s:::::
~
~
"1
l"l
l"l
o
u
Z
~
~
....
u
<
'"
c..
'':
f-
a)
Cj
:.a
a)
>
t;i
~
......
o
.....M
<l)w
...oE-
~o
ZZ
a
o
o
C"l
=
o
r-:-"E~
..s:::::Q);:J
(,,) E
~ c.. '0
~.2a
"::;~.-:l
>-'Q)a)
o::lO'"
-o....:::l
Q)Q)-O
~ ~ I.U
..2Q)~
Q) ..s::::: .-
OE-~
~,~ .5
:::l~;S
= ~'~
,90-0
-.......Q)
~ ,~
.... 0 0
gZ::::
c.:::_ro
--"c.Qoo
s:::::Q)-oo
.g ~ ~ N
g=!Boo
'"' a) u '"
pEQ)-
< < ~j
o
l"l
r-~
o
u
Z
-0-0
Q) C'~
..c ,..t;;
j;1i U U
K' ro ro
~l ~ ~
~ ~~
~ ~~
I ~~
fir .9.9
fJj ~ ~
h (,,) (,,)
f~. r.;: r.;:
~- Of.ij or;;
'" '"
c<S ro
DO
<1.l Q)
'" '"
" :::l::J
,~
]3
.... ....
- -
'" '"
::l ::l
"0"0
= =
.......-
<1.l <1.l
<1.l <1.l
0000
<:T
W
E-
o
Z
<:T
V)
....... M"
r- V)
V)r-
.......l"l
l"ll"l
<
z
'"
<1.l
....0
(,,}V)
< r-"
r- M
'<1"00
tr\ ......."
l"l<:T
u
Z
o
o
MO'
'0
<:TO\
....... "
C"l .......
'"
c
.g
:0
=
o
U
o
o
,~
~--
?,
C"l
.......
:ft;
u
~
o
z.......
o
~o
tiJl"l
~r-:-
~~
= OJ)
ro ;:I
::l<
0'-0
" a)
at<i
~ ~"
o '"
.... >-.
E-t;i
~~
-0
,5~
~q:;(
<1.l ro
~~
l"l
r-
-.6
l"l
<:T
.......
.......
M
r-
oo
o
..;
.......
,-....
<1.l
OJ)'"
ro c..
'O.c
oE-
~ Q)
a)O
~ ,-
;:Iii
cr>
00_
'" ro
"'-0
2E-
0......
'-"0
a) OJ).....M
~.5 .8 w
Q)::s! COl E-
t.s SO
<o::lZZ
-;
'i:
-
II>
;:I
'0
=
-
-0 "0
Q) Q)
..s::::: ..c
g g
~t
<<
~~
~ ~
0000
= =
o 0
.~.~
u (,,)
S~
'" '"
~ ~
00
a) Q)
'" '"
;:J;:J
Q) <1.l
(,,) u
SlE
00
Q) <1.l
<1.l <1.l
0000
l"l
<r-
--.r-
ZCIS
0\
r-
'"
Q)
....0
Uo
<V)
0\0\
. \0
000\
l"l ~
....... .......
l"l
.......
:u:
U
~
o
z.......
~o
tiJ~
~ "
E~
;:I '"
.... ;:l
a OJ)
;:I ;:I
0'<
~-o
aB
g~
::l r.n"
0'-
.... '"
E-.Q
~ ~
-0<
.5 u
~~
<1.l ro
~~
.......
o
M
r-:
.......
o
o
CIS
.......
o
<V)
--.00
Z V)"
C"l
r-
<:T
M
\0
-.6
,-....
a)
OJ)'"
ro c..
g .~
~ <1.l
a)U
.... ....
ro..s:::::
;:I <1.l
~>
","'a
"'-0
2E-
0......
'-" 0
Q) OJ)....M
~,8]w
<1.l::s! COl E-
.....- s::; 0
U ;:l ;:l
<a:::lZZ
<1.l
Cj
I::
...
o
o
o
"t:!
t
N
-0
<=
l
..c:
u
<=
o
oi
<=
'g
"
OJ
Q
<=
.9
d
.;:
"
Q
.:;;;
~
Q
-a
::;l
<=
:$
-0
~
c;:g
23...J
~s
0'0.;:::
-0 <=
" ..
'" ::;l
.;: 0'
" --
~~
~
<
=
u
z
o
~
~
<
~~N
~~-
~ '0
~~Z
~<~
~~Z
Z~~
8;:J~
~~Z
<z~
><~
~;:J<
~o
~
<
~
~
z
<
~
00.
~
;:J
00.
,j
~
I;
t.:::..
~ :.
i
~
I'
~0
!'
00 r-il
~ ~
o 'z
s:q<
~~=
~ u
~
-<
~~I
~s:
~
r-ilr-il
000 ~
Z
~-<
0=
g::U
w
~oo
0;1
r-il~
~<:
Eo-;~
r-il
e,:,
Z
~
u
~
o
r-il
Eo-;
<:
~
~
o
e,:,
r-il
Eo-;
-<
U
r-il
~
Z
~
U
-:> 0
o 0
ZZ
I...:".....~..............
III
I
,k
I
".,-
.... ....
!:: !::
(1) (1)
.@.@
!:: !::
(1) (1)
a a
..(..(
00
00
00
NN
r-:r-:
...c:...c:
u u
ta ta
::E::E
.6~
.~ .~
""'''"'
.~ .~
.... ....
"3"3
::E::E
~f
t
I:
I
,
t.,
~
Ii;
~'
~\.
b
.~
0,,", V"l
~ '':: ~ ~
"3Zo
::E Z
r
Q
if
..(..(
ozzo
(
w
~,
b
's
<Il V"l
""'..(UJ
o....---f-
8"3Zo
....:-::E Z
t
1'-.
t.
it
'."
"
\
1<
.'
ell
....
'S tf)
;:>.<;::
Oil!::
.8 ;:>
::::::Oil
~:EtJ 3
0'Q)3 ~
.....~..... .....
000 0
.........(1)..M
~O~Oil~UJ
g~g~~b
Zf-Z..(zz
if
I
]
......
c
(1)
~
'r;;
(1)
0::
N
-
:tt:
U
0...
o
:z-
~o
ta~
0... .
ar:
;::I ell
...... ;::I
a I:ll
;::I ;::I
0'..(
0"2
<Il~
.5"0
;::I <Ii
o .-
.. ell
f-b
.. <Il
(1) s::
"0..(
.5 u
o...s
(1) <Il
(1) ..
rJ'Jf-
V"l
"1.
M
o
o
M
\0
..0
ell
0..
'C
f-
(1)
U
:.a
(1)
>
;/
!r
h.
"0
(1)
...c:
u
<Il
tl
..(
~
~
;::I
rJ'J
cO
0-
.~ 0
~~
.~ ;3
~ a
u"O
(1) !::
ell (1)
~~
<Il .
.- 0
eo
(1)0
~~
O...c:
U u
(1) ta
~::E
00
..(\0..(
--- - ---
:z vi':z
t-
\0
o
\00..(
r...:o---
N o:z
o
M
,
I
I
,
f'
t
r.
1::-:,
w~
&\
..(u..(
zzz
--.
(1)
I:ll ell
~ ,e-
o ..
o f-
""' (1)
etl]~
<Il(1)...c:
;::I (1) (1)
gs>
eIlo..<<i
ell a......
8UJ~
c.:>..........
'-" 0 0
(1)gp~~M
~.- .D .D UJ
(1)"Oaaf-
b~ ;::I ;::I 0
..(o::lZZZ
-
";
......
(1)
0::
Q$
-;
'" (1)
(1) C.l
"0 ";:
..c ~
:::~
o
o
---
00
~
N
"0
(1)
~
"0
..
(1)
tl
(1)
....:l
a
a
=:i
o
~
..
(1)
"0
,8
0...
(1)
(1)
rJ'J
-.j"
0-
-
N
M
V"l
-
00.
M
-
u
Z
'1'
~.
I
l
~.
u
~:!.',
."
~.
If
o
o
o
N
r-:
...c:
u
ta
(1)::E
u
<Il .
0..0
rJ'J-
- 0
.~ Z
.. ......
(1) !::
~ E
0"0
U ~
..... a
0..(
""' .
rJ'J ell
(1)
00 ...
\0 U
N<
1100
at-
OM
o >.
~"a
-0
o
o
-.j"
..(
Zoo
t-
M
o
o
-.j"
..(..(
zz
u
Z
..(u
zz
ell
......
'2
:::>
<<i
......
!::
~
.....
o
..
(1)
1
:z
--.
(1)
I:ll
~
o
o
""'
(1)
..
<Il
;::I
0"
rJ'J
ell
ell
8 <<i
c.:> ......
'-" 0
(1) f-
U .....
<Il 0
o..(1)..M
rJ'J I:ll (1) UJ
..~~f-
g b a 0
~..(zz
ell
0..
'C
f-
(1)
U
:.a
(1)
>
Qj
......
o
~
---
Qj
......
o
::r:
j
I
I
t-~'
~.
o
-.j"
t-.
I
i
h,
r~,
~
o
-.j"
t-.
u
Z
f
Hi
Ii]
r
.(
g
n
N
~
k.
~
i;..
~
Ii'
;
tV
:r
f
L
ffit
t'J
If
J
u
o
""!
E::
N
"0
c:
~
.c:
U
c:
o
.~
c:
.~
<I)
;)
::::.
c:
.2
.,
.~
~
::::.
OJ
;::l
c:
:$
"0
E
o:~
;:;-i
~ a
0-- ;::l
"0;:
<I) '"
Vl ;::l
.;;: 0'
<I)~
iX~
iL,
~.
!;
j,
~:
,
~
-<
==
u
Z
o
...,;
E--
-<
~;M
~~~
~ I 0
E--~Z
~-<E--
~~Z
Z~~
9~~
E--E--Z
<z~
>-<~
~~<
~o
~
-<
...,;
E--
Z
-<
E--
rJJ.
~
~
rJJ.
'J:J
~ ~
o ~
5: z
~o-<
~ .::t
~~u
~
-<
S~I
~~
o~
~
~~
'J:J~
Oz
~~
~u
~
~'J:J
o~
~~
~<
Eo-;~
~
~
z
~
u
~
o
~
Eo-;
-<
~
;>;
~
o
~
~
E--
-<
U
~
~
z
~
u
k
I
I' ,"
)
I
I
5~
j(l
D
I
I
~
II'
l'
1
I
~;
~.
I
I
~
fe,
\[
i{
IX
fp
h'f
f
,
v
"
~.
Ii
~i
I
W
w'
r~l
to
t
t.
t;
~--<
~
";j
--
C ~
~ c
e .5:2
C-
\.0 =
~;
o '"
~.5
o
.......
U
p...,
o
z
o
~
'"
s::
~
0\
M
en
-
o
.....:l
<I.)
'"
;:3
U
.s
o
-
en
<I.)
en
~o
<1.)0
00
,S ("l
<I.) r--"
CO..s::
'" u
~ a
-<:::E
0':
V'l
V'l
~o
zo
V'l
("l"
o
00
U
Z
<:U
ZZ
<I.)
~
<I.)
....
u
<:
,--,
~ Zl t/}
'" s:: c..
~ QJO_
o '" ....
oaE-
....(/}~
<I.) ___ U
:l-.t tn-_
"'~..s::
;:3 <I.) <I.)
gS>
t/}~ta
en S-
e~~
0............
""""00
CO........M
.S~~ ~
;gSEOE-
;:3 ;:3 ;:3
COZZZ
\0
.......
0\
N
o
U
Z
~M
L.
I
pi'
~l!
m
Ai
F"
I
tW!
I
H~
I
I
i'"
ilk
lffi
~y
.
I
I
!t.
I
B
e:
V'l00
("l \0 M
oocio
0\~V'l
("l0~
N 1.0
00 r--
I
o.......U
("lo\---
N~Z
00 M
I
I
<I.) '"
u <I.)
~<
(/) s::
s:: .9
<1.)-
c..C
o.s
~'" ~
~ ~ C
o -t: 0
<: '" ,;,
-p...,<I.)
~ :>.~
0,-:: .....:l
E-U
~ :
~
t
t'
'ii'
&!
r
I
~i~-
'"
~
Cj
~
c..
(/)
C
~
c..
o
it;
,\,
i
I
HA
::1
I
~
h
ill-'
I
I
II
it~:
~'
w
rli
,
I
I
I]
~
I.
ww
I
~
k
~<
,
ilf
~'
&,
R
I.~.
./
,:
ii'
~
C
.5:2
-
Cj
== ~
o 0
.- \.0
=5Q.,
;.. -
~ ~ .! ~
"'!::: Cj ~
f:: = ~ 1.0
Q.,r:;Q(/}<
o
\0
~
<:
Z<::!O
\0 0
~
00
V'l
<:
Zooo
V'l
U
Z
oS2S2
ZZZ
<I.)
CO
'"
<I.)
....
u
<:
'"
<I.)
en
o
c..
o
....
p...,
-
s:: <I.)
<I.) >
E ....
c.. ~
o <I.)
G) ~
~ <II <I.)
o '" .S
.s~p...,
._ -= "'0
(/) <I.) ~
~~(/)
\
~
I'
.f.
,
f.~-
M
.......
.......
~
V'l
1.0
~
00
""!
r--
M
<I.)
CO
'"
~
u
<:
Wi
/;it
t
'"
"0
~
o
~
...,
o
o
""!
c::
N
"0
c:
~
~
.c
U
c:
o
.~
c:
o~
,g
o
Ci
c:
o
"i
os:
<U
~
Ci
(;j
:I
C
~
"0
B
o:g
o...J
~E
0'. :I
"OC
0> '"
'" :::l
'S: 0-
0> ~
::<:~
~
u
~
"""'"
~
Z~("t
~~....
~\o
r;iJ.it..Z
~.~~
~~~
~~~
"""'"~z
~z~
joOO~~
~?
~o
~
joOO
~
~
~
~
~
.....
~
s
~
~
:g
::::
.~
g
.~
~
~
~
.~
t<i
e
~
~
"<)
Q
'0'
....
p..
Q
t:
~
~
g
.~
S
Q
....
~
"d
~
l!l
~
1:)
~
%
~
~
%
G"-
o
"?
~
~
~
~
r-
o
"?
g
.:::,
~
8
Q
e
~
rf)
~
~
~
Q
'%
~
~
Q
~
rf) I'Q
.~ rft
~';:)
':i-.g
cQ .'6
~~
gc$
o ~
rJ, ....."d
p.. ~~
~ 'E ~ ~
ta ~ 1:) .~
Q ~ ~ ~
.... ....0
~ 'g ~ if>
~ ~ ~"d~
';:.. ..... ...
-- cQ O,.J
;;., '0 '::!...
cQ ..... ~ '0
~ Q Ell "d
~o e .;;, Q
Q Q ~
$ ta 0,%
ell '8. ~ Q
. Co~ 'Co ';:) p..
~ I:-' iJ \::l ~
cQ ~p..sg
e u.r-.......
'cQ ~ .~ p ~ Q
~taQ~~ta
'" ~ ';? ..%~ Q ~
~ S Q '-a
~~O';>'O';:)
'0 ,.J I:-' t<i ._ .....
~ ~ "d '0 ~ .~
Q~~~p~
61)\::lOQ:;("d
<g 0 p.. 'Co .;;,
.....;:: Q 0 Q Q
'<?s ~;; got: ct.
.-~<....
~,):.
..g
~
'0
.~
'"
,...
Q
~
~
u
t<i
~
C-
.-
~
~
~
o
7-
;;,
~
%
o
~
.(')
.....('1
....
Q
:A
5~
~~
~6
'0 0
"?7-
II II
-<9.
7.7-
u
~
,....
~
:c
\
~
o
oi
s
'e
~
ca
o
.~
"t
~
o
ea
a
~
~
'8
'0';3
~%
0'-. ~
"'3'"
.'.!l6
~.::
""I>-
-<:ton
------
E-t
~
-<
=
u
Z
o
-
E-t
-<
~saM
~~~
~IO
E-t~Z
~~E-t
~-<Z
Z~~
O~~
-~~
E-tE-tZ
-<Z~
S:-<~
~~-<
~O
~
-<
-
E-t
Z
-<
E-t
00
~
~
00
~ ~
~ g
E-~IJ
;Z:IJ~~
~;z: a
U-<O
~=~
~UO
=-- ~
~
Z
o
-
E-t
-<
U
-
~
-
00
00
-<
...:l
U
~
00
~
...:l
-<
sa
E-t
00
~
~
Z
-
rJ'J
;:J
~ 0
IJ -
~~~~
ZIJ=--
t3z~
~-<O
~:c~
=--U~
~
IJ
-<-<
~E-
IJ~O
z-<O
"'rJ'J~
~rJ'J~
=O~
;:J~-<
=IJ;:J
rJ'J
~
-<
~ Z
~ ~
E-~~
ZIJO::,=,
tlz:;~
~-<O
~=~
=--U~
rJ'J
;:J
o
...
IJ >
-< ~
Eo-< ~ ~
Z~=--~
~Z~
U<O
~=~
~U~
<
~~
<~
~~
ZU
<<
~
rJ'J
;:J
E-
-<
E-
rJ'J
~
~
~
o
E-
Z
~
:;
=--
o
~
~
~
~
~
~~\O\O
0000000t"'lt"'lv)...,f
0000000"7"71''';'
~ t"'l V)
OOOOOOOt"'lOoO..o
0000000"70'7'7
OOOOOOOO~~~O
V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V)V)V)0
t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t-t"'lt"'lt"'l0
....It'''l^....l....l....l....l....l....l~^..,;v)o
00000000 000000000000 t-O
___..............1""""l1""""'l.......t"""t"--NO\
..,; ~^ ..,; ..,; ..,; ..,; ..,; ..,; ('I N N .-:
\0
~oooooooooooot"'lt"'lt"'loo
N~--=~--=--=-=oooo.nvi
NNNNNNNNN........
I I I I I I I I I I I
t-
~ ....0
NO\OOOOOf"!o .0
~000000C?0~9
00000000t-t-....0
t-\Ot"'lt"'lt"'lt"'lt"'lt"'l\O\Ot-t"'l
~r...:o\o\o\o\o\o\NNv)...,f
V) 0\ 0\0\ 0\0\ 0\0\0000""""
N-1""""'I__.......1""""'I_..-1""""'INN
,-...
N
,-...c:td
~..-........-I-
--Q)Q)
BBoo
ooZZ
ZZQ)Q)
Q) Q) Q) Q)
Q)Q)rJ'JrJ'J
rJ'J rJ'J '-' '-'
'-''-'ON
....Nt"'l~V)\Ot-ooO\........
000 0 0 000 000
<ZZZZZZZZZZZ
0"'"""'..................................................................
< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t;j~~EE~EES~EE
.5 l': l':"2"2 c:"2 "2 "2 c:"2"2
.~ E E E E E E E E E E E
0<<<<<<<<<<<
s:
o
"0
!ii
U
o
o
ci'
~
bb
aj
'-'
l':
o
.~
So
'C;;
Q)
o
t;j
',5
'"
;::l
"0
c:
....
!ii
01)
c:
:.e
;::l
u
.5
'"
c:
.9
~
u
t;:::
'C;;
'"
~
U <Ii
~ ~
;::l ~
~~
01) V)
c .
._ \0
:g II
e<jU
s..J.
"Ot"'l
;go
._ ....J
E ",^
B ~
.g~
EO\
;::l~
.5 r;;;
~t;
E g.
e<j Q)
"'....
.- ....
~~
o~
~.3
Q).....
01)0
e<j e<j
~ ~
~ e<j
~~
t-<t-<
'"
<.)
o
~
C:
C'l
"Cl
C
I
..c
u
c
o
.~
c
'g
""
.,
CI
c
o
.~
.;;
~
CI
0;
"
c
~
"Cl
B
o:~
o...J
::::::5
Cf>~
13 ~
'" "
";; CY
~~
en
"""~N
E-
O
Z
Eo-
~
-<
==
u
Z
o
~
Eo-
-<
as~N
~~~
~ 10
Eo-~Z
~-<Eo-
~~Z
Z~~
9~~
Eo-Eo-Z
-<Z~
>-<~
~~-<
~o
~
-<
~
Eo-
Z
-<
Eo-
00
~
~
00
...;l
~ -<
~ ~
-< ~
E-~:::::~
zc.:l....e:I
r.:lzO
U-<:;
~=o
r.:lU~
i:l. r..
Z
o
~
Eo-
-<
U
~
~
~
00
00
-<
~
u
~
00
;;;J
~
u
~
~
~
o
rJ'1
;;:l
r.:l 0
c.:l ...
-< ~~
~r.:lg:q
r.:lc.:l:;
UZo
~-<~
~:tr..
U r.:l
c.:l
-<-<
r.:lE-
c.:l~O
Z-<O
"'rJ'1r..
QrJ'1r.:l
=o~
;;:l~-<
=c.:l;;:l
rJ'1
.J
-<
r.:l z;
c.:l ...
-< sa
~~~~
t3z:;~
~-<o
r.:l:t~
i:l.Ur..
rJ'1
;:l
r.:l 0
c.:l ...
-< ~
E-r.:l~~
Zc.:li:l.~
~ z:; C>
~-<o
r.:l:t~
i:l.Ur..
-<
~~
-<~
..J
rJ'1
;:l
E-
-<
E-
rJ'1
~
r.:l
Q
~
o
E-
Z
r.:l
:;
i:l.
o
.J
r.:l
>
r.:l
Q
""""l"'10
0000000"""""":,0
. ~-V)1I1
0000000 I I I I
.". .....
0000000""0l"'1"'!
0000000'70"1r-;-
OOOOOOOONN
OOOOOOOOr-r-NO
",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-",!-r-~r-~r- V'l
0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0-, 0\ V'l V'l r- 00
\0 \0\0 \0\0\0 \0 \000 00 e>O"')
O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ O\~ \O~ \O~ V'l 00
----------0\00
0000.....0
"'!r-r-r-r-r-r-OOo\"";
l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1r-r-V'l\O
l"'1V'l00000;0~""
,...;OOOOOO\oO'9N
0\..... r-r-r-r-r-r-NN..........
oOl"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'100V'l0
Nl"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1l"'1NNO.....
--------NNNN
"""'''""'
Nl"'1
o'Clo'Cl
...-..,-... CJ'J Cf.:I
--(1)(1)
88'0'0
ooZZ
ZZ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
~~CIlCll
CIl CIl '-" '-"
'-"'-"ON
-Nl"'1""V'l\Or-ooO\--
o 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0
-<ZZZZZZZZZZZ
O~.......,~............................................
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
;;~EE~~EEES~E
.S J::"2"2 c: J:: "2"2 "2 "2 J::"2
,ff 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
o<<<<~~~~<<~
~
"0
J::
t<l
U
o
o
o
oil
Qj
'-"
J::
o
.~
~
'00
~
Q
~
u
!E
o
J::
t<l
01)
J::
:a
::l
U^'C'
.s ~ ~
'" '" '"
J:: .... ....
.g g. g.
t<l .4::i
~ c:= ,
.- . C""
~ ~ rJ)
~oo
u.".""
~ <<i @)
::l '" '"
=tti~
t<l ~ ~
01)"''''
J:: ~ ~
:.a 'S: os:
"000
t<l S E
>-'00
.000
"000
~ .".~.".~
.@~:
8'4i'~
~ ~ u
~<<-<!E
:3 0 0
E 4::i c:=
.x ci- ci-
t<l '" '"
S N 0
t<l::::~
.~ oQ an"
~O\N
r- r-
'-" '-"
.,g II II
'" c:= c:=
~ .
01)C"C"
t<l '" '"
b~~
t<lr-oo
~e>O"')
..c:V'l00
f-O\oo
'0/:)
u
o
"<l
c::
N
"0
C
~
..c
U
c
o
.~
c
.~
.s
'"
Cl
c
o
"i
~
Cl
0;
::l
C
C
~
~
~ 'Ej
~:J
~ ~
0'>_
-g;:j
'" ::l
";;:0
~ti:
CIl
'"-l_N<"l
f-
o
Z
~
-<
==
u
Z
o
""'"
E--
-<
~t:aM
~~-:
~ I 0
E--2Z
~-<E--
~~z
z~~
9~~
E--E--Z
<z~
S:-<~
~~-<
~o
~
-<
""'"
E--
Z
-<
E--
00.
~
~
00.
>-
~
-<
~
~
~
00.
Z
o
""'"
E--
-<
Z
\J
""'"
00.
~
~
~
00.
~
~
-<
""'"
u
~
~
~
~
o
u
~ ~
e" <
< z.
E-<~G
~e"C2~
uZ.o~
~~:;
~Uo
~
~ rr.,
e" ;J
< 0
E-<~>
ze,,~~
~z~q
u<~
~=:;
~Uo
fi:
~
e"
-<
<E-<
e,,~8
z~r..
-<~
Qrr.,~
t:3~-<
;J~~
=e"
rr.,
~
<
~ Z
e" G
< C2
~~o
~e,,:;@
uZ.o
~~~
~ur.-
rr.,
;J
~ 0
e" -
< ~
E-<~~~
~e,,~:::R
az:;=
~<o
~=~
~ur.-
<
~~~
Q~
Zu
<-<
~
rr.,
;J
E-<
<
E-<
rr.,
~
~
Q
~
o
E-<
Z
~
:;
~
o
~
~
;>
~
Q
(') M
'<:t'<:t'<:tC'iC'i
~00~~~'<:t'<:t'<:t'<:t'<:t
OOOOOONNN--
'<:t N
ooooo~'<:to~orio
OOOOOONOOO\O
00000000000000000
0000000000000\0\0
OOOOOOONNNr-r-
6666666f"i'f"i'f"i'00~oO
OOOOOOOr-r-r-NN
MMMMMMMMMMr-r-
00 N
M MM. .
o"!"!"!"!"!ooo;::::;:!
-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-r-NM
M
- N' \0
<"loooo .0000 .
~C";lOOOo~oo::~
\0 0\
,,!'<:tr-r-r-r-r-000C'i0
r-oO\O\O\O\O\r-r-r-OM
NMNNNNN'<:t'<:t'<:t--
--
NN
Q(lQ(l
--
.-...-.. en tI]
--Q)(],)
BBoo
Oozz
zz II) II)
II) II) II) II)
II)II)rr.,en
rr., rr., '-' '-'
'-''-'ON
-NM'<:tV)\Or-ooO\--
00000 0 0 0 0 0 0
<ZZZZZZZZZZZ
O......,~.....~......,.....................,..............
< ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
--aaa~aE~aa~a~
.5 11 11 Q 11 11 Q 11 11 Q 11 Q
,~ 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 SSE
0<<<<<<<<<<<
s
~
"0
Q
'"
::c:
o
u~
o
i
~
o
u
on
Q)
'-'
Q
,Q
1ij
Q
0/}
.00
II)
Cl
--a
.u
.....
II)
a
g E
u g
'" .....
~t
._ c..
-g~
go-
,- '"
"'00
Q\O
ON
.~ @)
u
!;:: '"
.00 a
'" 0
~ 2
II)Q)
~o
_.J::
(;;0
0/} 0
.5 ~
"0 II)
"0 "0
'" ;j
>.u
.0 Q
~ 0;
~ ;>
._ 0
E~
~ ~
"0 0
a-si
;j '"
a II)
.~ <
a s
'" 0
",ii:
.~ ~
]cS
'" 0/}
~.s
","0
Q):-::l
..... ;::l
~CQ
II) II)
.J::.J::
f-f-
r-
u
o
~
-
E::
N
"0
C
I
..c
u
c
.9
0;
c
.~
~
...
o
c
.9
t:5
.>
~
o
<<i
::I
C
~
"0
~
:; :~
o...J
::::: 8::1
0\_
1Sa
'" ::I
'> 0'
u-:-
~I'J.<
en
~-C'i
f-
o
Z
l> -:> ;f,
Iil 1. ...
all~
~~ilil
~:!l~
':J
i \ i i \ w
\i i
\ i \ \
I 10
<t
'5n 0-
\~
zti
...., 01- tl
i i ~~'
\ \ ~J6
$. &
r.:
....
<D
....
, .... 5
~
III
ll3'''''''''~
~ ~ <<.w
7L~
- .
... u-% e.-.
l~ocoooi.... 0
~~~ll\l\ll\l
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i . ~ $ ~
\
~
..;
~
~
W-
~~!
,'~
Vi.i'ia
\
~
o
z
:::>
o
to
-,t.
~
0-
~
:::>
~
<(
3
~
~ \i
\ !~~. . ~
_ "ii i Is
~\\\ i t
!~~ ~__w e
\ Vl!.llJ'lllili"'e ~ ::
t\~;;;;-;;~ \ ~ j
1l_11'e'e;'es" J II
n-n
1%3oa~~"\~ i\~\ ~
'i i i ~
!
1
,
\~H~
~t~~'
i
~
i
.
-:
\
,.
.
'5
\
,.
I!
~
i
a
. '"
~;
8 \
1
~ \
. ~
,.
4
~
t
t
i
~
~
3Nt SS3~ONO:)
\\ \
~\ i l i
__ \\\~\ l \\\ ,
~\ 5 ~ \ \
~\ ~\ \ \ ~ ~ t
~\ ~i · \ ~ ~ ~ \
~\ b ~ e ~ ~ ~ ! ~
I~~\t!q~~i~
t~ ~. ~ \ \ \ \ \ l i
,\\\\~\~~~~\ \
~
li
. '"
~
s
~
1 1
~ ~
"" ... ",.."" 10/0'/'" ..t,--,,,,,"~""""'"
~ - -_._~,.- -~.-~---
PI"DER TROUTMA" .O"SULTI"G. I"c.
September 7,2001
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
Email pindertroutman@msn.com
Transportation Planners and Engmeers
Ms. Lusia Galav
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
POBox 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Quantum Park NOPC # 12 - #PTC01-1 02
Dear Ms. Galav.
The following responds to the City comments on the traffic analysis for the above referenced project.
Public Works-Traffic - Jeff Livergood memorandum of August 29,2001
Response
Quantum Lakes Drive Closure
A full median opening exists at this location today There has not been any accident history at this location
that would warrant closure. However, it is recommended that the left turn exit from Parcell 00 not be allowed
Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Gateway Boulevard
The Critical Movement Analysis (CMA) was not provided as a substitute for the signal warrant analysis. The
signal warrant analysis provided in the report dated February 16, 2001 is still valid
The applicant cannot install a signal until it is warranted and has been approved by Palm Beach County
Therefore, it is recommended that monitoring of this intersection begin in peak season 2002 to determine if
signalization is in fact warranted This is a condition of the current Development Order (DO) Monitoring
should continue every peak season until the signal is warranted
Traffic Signalization - Quantum Drive and Congress Avenue
The applicant would agree that monitoring of this intersection should begin at the buildout of Parcels 32
through 38 Monitoring should be conducted during the peak season and continue until the signal is
warranted
General
The February 16, 2001 Intersection Analysis included proposed NOPC # 11 land uses. The original
NOPC # 11 was for the Mixed Use (MU) designation. Therefore, the traffic from both the residential and non-
residential uses on lots 7 through 11 and 23 through 31 have been included
Pri
KMP/ldr
Letter Ca/av 07 7029-7-07
a.
,l)
i D! '
\L~ SEP
om
--
!
I
~
l ---
\
-~
r~
September 7, 2001
Ms LusIa Galav, AICP
City of Boynton Beach
Planmng and Zomng DIVISIon
100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Phone 561-742-6262
Fax 561-742-6259
RE Villas at Quantum Lake (272 Apartment Homes)
Additional Units - Quantum Lakes Drive
Dear Ms Galav'
As a follow up to Erik BruenIngsen's letter of July 10, 2001, please find enclosed a
conceptual draWIng reflectIng addItIOnal bldgs (42 umts) SIte planned for that portIOn of Quantum
Lakes Dnve to be vacated. We have developed a plan that would utihze the easternmost lanes of
Quantum Lakes Dnve for access to the addItIOnal umts, thereby preservIng the eXIstIng utihtIes (i e
water, force maIn, FP&L, Bell South, Cable TV) as well as the eXIstIng trees on the easternmost SIde
of Quantum Lakes Dnve An eXIstmg 8" graVIty sewer lIne would have to be relocated to allow the
addItIonal development. The eXIstIng project (272 umts) would proceed as deSIgned scheduled, save
for mInor shIfhng of bUIldIng no 4 (mInor modIficatIon of eXIstIng SIte plan) We have located the
top of bank an the sIgmficant trees along the lake bank In an attempt to preserve the envIronmental
plantIngs and to aVOId Impact to those plantmgs
Olen would acqUIre that portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve adjacent to the eXIstmg project and
would coordInate the SIte plan subrmttal for the addItIonal 42 umts WIth the vacatIOn process I
antICIpate haVIng the InfOrmatIOn for a SIte plan submIttal to DRC by the end of thIS month.
Our secondary access to Quantum Lakes Dnve, will be modIfied by proVIdIng access to
Quantum Lane along the sand pIne preserve The access wIll be proVIded through the easternmost
portIOn of lot 62 and lot 66 connectmg to Quantum Lane and High RIdge Road. ThIS should resolve
any Issues relatmg to a secondary means of egress
The portIOn of Quantum Lakes Dnve to be added to the Villas of Quantum Lakes would be
platted by Quantum along WIth the balance of Quantum Lakes Dnve and would reflect speCIfic
easements on the plat for the eXIstmg mumcIpal utihtIes, addressmg the locatIOn of the eXIstmg
facihtIes
U\SHEILA\CORRES\MlfIQuantum\Galav09070 I.doc
1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Springs Florida 33071
(954) 340 4904 . Fax (954) 344-4608
Page 2 of2
September 7,2001
Ms. Lusia Galav / Villas at Quantum Lake - Additional Units
Once we have prepared a prehmmary plan and conceptual engmeenng, we will schedule a
meetmg wIth staff as appropnate Should you have any questlOns or concerns m the meantime, please
feel free to contact me
Cc Igor Olemcoff
Doug McDonald
U \SHEILA\CORRES\MH\Quantum\Galav090701 doc
-----
\ \'
I
_0 i \
j
'.
WI \ \(~
~ '-1
~
:J.
~
~ I
~
~
~
-?
/'
) _J/ /
, ,,^'--~,",/ /
"{, ?'
'-,'-
'-,
\
\~
\
\
,",
;>
1
1
I
I
I
I
/--"\
I '
/ '
( \
I
~\
Jc
J~
~2
Q~
eN
~~
,\ .<(
~"
,l~-
,;. .\.1) ~
\~\ \\ I-6y\ -- ---
__I ~"5/ '
'( ,-
- \
\ \
t' ,~
j
'I'
~
a:
-'
c0\ ~
0-
i
a
,( ~
"
~'
l~ L 1 - 3
3': ..)
,CJ Q. ~
>
Q.
en ,-
'<.
~J
00
~
;$'
<2
='
I
r-;::(
G
-. -j
I
L~
Q
.!?-'
(c
",'t-
-\\~
.L
"
---\--~
)
~/~
2r::-
~I
~~
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd
POBox 31 0
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO
.1
a~11JL 4h(!~
~&(A ddav
FAX. S-fo/- 1'f{J- :2 i:2 9
FROM
9 /~/Ol
I '
NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover) _3
DA TE.
RE. ()~{/lJ L~ ckkcl- "1-/0/ -<Or.) I
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATIO~~ REPOPl
J
TIME 139/135/213131 16 33
NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613756259
TEL 56137562613
DATE,TIME
FA!. NO. I~~AME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
09/135 15 31
97402429
013 01 33
03
OV
ST At--lDARD
EO.,
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd
POBox 31 0
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO ~J ~ ;/tfl;W,dt
FAX. c?{Y/- <612 -~/04
FROM
DA TE.
9/1/ a I
OLLCt~ p(;L/'f{
NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover)
/;
RE.
fY7P/VJD 0/-003
----"
---
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you
TR.;:';NSMISSIOt~ JEPIFICATIOt~ REPORT
DATE, TIME
FAI HO INAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
0S 134 P 34
98424104
00 El5 55
11
OV
ST At-lDARD
ECM
TIME 05/04/2001 17 41
NAME BOVNTOt'-l BEACH P 8, Z
FAI 5613756259
TEL 5613756260
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
POBOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX. (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to Eugene GerlIca, P ,E
fax # 561-740-2429
date: September 4, 2001
from LUSla Galav, Pnnclpal Planner
re: 1 ST RevIew Comments for Quantum Park NOPC # 12 MPMD 01-003
Please find attached the first reVIew comments for your proJect. To stay on the
current reVIew schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below, and bnng all
documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday September 11, 2001
1 ReVIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments lIsted herem, mcludmg the addItion of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 10 copIes
to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally submItted),
2 SubmIt the addItional mformatIOn as requested wlthm the attached comments, ( 1.e. traffic
analysIs, engmeenng certificatIOn, etc )
3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) conslstmg of a lIst bnefly summanzmg how each
comment has been addressed on the revIsed plans or wIth the supplemental mformatIOn
mcludmg locatIOn on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItious 2nd reVieW by staff and
your project representatives dunng the TRC meetmg ),and
4
SubmIt reductIOns (8 Y2 X 11) for the proposed
SIte plans, elevations and landscapmg plan (thIS
IS reqUIred for the final report and publIc
presentatIOn)
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and
copIed for staff reVIew If plans wIll not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC
meetmg, contact LUSIa Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date,
Projects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs,
WhICh are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday pnor to the
Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend, The remamder of the reVIew schedule wIll be
adjusted accordmgly If you have questIons on the attached comments, please contact the
respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatIves.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC
(2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to the Planmng and Development Board Meetmg that falls
approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a
comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Planmng and Development
board.
Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report
andlor confirmatIOn ofthe traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
dramage certIficatIOn by a lIcensed engmeer, sIgned "RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn"
form and colored elevatIons of the proposed project. ThIS mformatIon IS necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note
Engmeenng John GUIdry Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6285
BUIldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6357
Fire Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Roger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
PolIce Department Marshall Gage Sgt. James Prestman 737-6167 742-6185
UtIlItIes John GUIdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
PublIc Works-General Larry Qumn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285
PublIc W orks- Traffic Jeffery LIvergood 742-6201 742-6211
Parks & RecreatIon John Wildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233
Forester/EnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Plannmg & Zomng Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 03/21/01
S\Planning\sHARED\WPIFORMS\ISt REV COMMEKTS FAX ORlG\lst Review comments FAX COVER-doc
L I
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT --
TIME 09/04/2001 17 14
NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613756259
TEL 5613756260
DATE,TIME
FAX NO.!NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
09/04 17 06
97402429
00 07 35
12
OK
STANDARD
ECM
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
PO BOX310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX. (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to Eugene GerlIca, P ,E.
fax # 561-740-2429
date August 31, 2001
from. LUSla Galav, Pnnclpal Planner
re 1 ST ReVIew Comments for Quantum Park NOPC #12 MPMD 01-003
Please find attached a draft of the first reVIew comments for your proJect. The
utIlItIes comments WIll be faxed to you separately on Tuesday, September 5, 2001
To stay on the current reVIew schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below,
and bnng all documents to the TRC meetmg scheduled for September 11, 2001
1 ReVIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments lIsted herem, mc1udmg the addItIOn of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 10 copIes
to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mc1udmg all pages ongmally submItted),
2 SubmIt the addltlonal mformatIOn as requested wlthm the attached comments, ( l.e. traffic
analysIs, engmeenng certlficatIOn, etc)
3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) conslstmg of a lIst bnefly summanzmg how each
comment has been addressed on the reVIsed plans or wIth the supplemental mformatIOn
mc1udmg locatlon on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItIouS 2nd reVIew by staff and
your project representatlves dunng the TRC meetmg ),and
4
SubmIt reductIOns (8 12 X 11) for the proposed
SIte plans, elevatIOns and landscapmg plan (thIS
IS reqUIred for the final report and publIc
presentatlon)
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and
copIed for staff reVIew If plans wIll not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC
meetmg, contact LusIa Galav m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date.
Projects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs,
WhICh are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday pnor to the
Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend, The remamder of the reVIew schedule WIll be
adjusted accordmgly If you have questIons on the attached comments, please contact the
respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatIves,
If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC
(2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to the Planmng and Development Board Meetmg that falls
approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg, An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a
comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Plannmg and Development
board.
Note Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report
and/or confirmatIOn ofthe traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
dramage certIficatIOn by a lIcensed engmeer, SIgned "RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn"
form and colored elevatIOns of the proposed proJect. ThIS mformatIOn IS necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note,
Engmeenng John GUIdry Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6285
BUIldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6357
FIre Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Roger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
PolIce Department Marshall Gage Sgt. James Prestman 737-6167 742-6185
UtIlItIes John GUIdry H. DaVId Kelley Jr 742-6488 742-6285
PublIc Works-General Larry Qumn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285
PublIc Works-Traffic Jeffery LIvergood 742-6201 742-6211
Parks & RecreatIOn John Wildner Barbara Meacham 742-6227 742-6233
F oresterlEnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Plannmg & Zomng Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 03/21/01
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\FORMS\lst REV COMMENTS FAX ORlG\ISI Review conune.1s FAX COVER doc
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgovcom
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. Newell. Chairman
Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
August 20 2001
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach FL 34425-0310
RE.
Quantum Park - Amendment #12
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr Rumpf'
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement (received
on February 9, 2001) for the project entitled, Quantum Park - Amendment #11,
pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County
Land Development Code
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the approval can not be
granted due to the following
.
The traffic generated by the high school (about 2,283 daily trips) should
be counted as vested trips within the overall Quantum development
traffic generation
Daily and peak hour trips related to "ADA Approvals" as presented in
Attachments 1A, 1B, and 1C must reflect the values in the latest
NOPC approval
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030
Sincerely,
Masoud Atefi,
Sr Engineer-
cc: Pinder-Troutman Consulting Inc.
MTP Group Inc.
'---,- --
r;l - ~
" ,I r.~
, U' .
" I,
I '\
I n I
L L
File: General TPS Mun TraffIC Study Review
I n w rr~fn)1
Ii r: !
~f1r, 22 2001 It: I
i --..I
F '\TRAFFIClma\Admin\Comments\01 0812.doc
,.' ,./ ."~' '~;--'.'Y',-.'."- "O-,'~"l!!.
;7 /.,:---... ~.
! l' '" -'",\
.1 ( ", \ \
1 ' l'
l~ ',' j'I.
',~ .I-~,~(J,
~.,. .....0~.:
'",ON
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Ucenses . Community Redevelopment
August 15, 2001
Mr Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
POBox 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re, Traffic Study. Quantum Park NOPC # 12
MPMD 01-003
Dear Mr Atefi:
The enclosed traffic generation statement, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.,was
received by Planning and Zoning recently for the above-referenced application. Please
review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and I with your
written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260
SinCerrly,
~ ~f)
~~~ ~cJav +
Michael W Rumpf U
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/sc
J:ISHRDAT AIPIanningISHARED\\'/P'PROJECrS,Quantum park kx 73a-76,Trailic letter to Palm Beach County,doc
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd" P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6350 . www.cLboynton-beach.f1.us
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
POBox 31 0
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO
:?/-{:r ne kca-- f f
;f~~ d~v
FAX. ~W- ::tiC) .-;2t/J.1
FROM
DATE.
()~ / /~/o I
jlJ () (~ -# /2 .~ ~c&<u-
NUMBER OF PAGES (including cover)
2
RE.
crl2f 't J1M1eL /?h11 r-cJp~d ~ 9 11//01
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260 Thank you
1
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 08/16/2001 17 03
NAME BOVNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613756259
TEL 5613756260
I
DATE TIME
FAX t~O./NA~1E
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
1\10DE
08/16 17 IB
9740242'3
00 00 47
02
OK
ST Ai'~DARD
ECM
QUANTUM PARK OF BOYNTON BEACH
DR! - NOPC AMENDMENT #12
SCHEDULE
ADVERT P&D CC CC - PH (1)
DATE MEETING 1ST READING 21'\D READING
A Oct. 29, 2001 Oct. 10,2001 Oct. 16,2001 Nov 7, 2001
(1) PublIc Hearing
The followmg dates have been denved pursuant to schedulmg reqUIrements outlmed m
Chapter 38006 F S
1 DRI /NOPC ReceIved
August 14,2001
2. 30-Day Marker *
September 12, 2001
3 45-Day Marker *
September 27,2001 (DCA Comments due 2/2/01)
4 90-Day Deadlme'
November 10,2001
* The CIty IS reqUIred to gIve a 15 day notIce (no sooner than 30 days and no later than
45 days from the date the NOPC applIcatIOn was receIved) to DCA, Treasure Coast RPC
and the applIcant of the scheduled date for the publIc heanng,
08/15/01
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
Memorandum
PZ 01-169
TO
FROM
DATE
RE
Quintus Greene, Director of Development
Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Directo/-KvZ-
August 15, 2001
Quantum Park DRIA 01-001
NOpe Amendment #12
In response to your request for a summary of the above-referenced application, I am forwarding to you
excerpts of the application that list the proposed changes, a map showing the subject lots and abbreviated
notes describing the proposed changes, and a schedule for processing the application established in
accordance with state requirements I understood you to also request a cursory analysis of the application with
possible alternatives or issues, however, as the application was received less than one week ago, staff has not
had time to conduct this review or review the master plan for accuracy (e g to confirm that all proposed
amendments shown on the map are listed within the formal application)
Please note that proposed changes include abandonment of that segment of Quantum Lakes Drive located
north of Villas at Quantum Lake, and replacement with two new parcels designated with the mixed use land
use option Furthermore, please also be informed that the application contains no description of the project or
uses proposed within the new mixed-use pods, only information within the traffic analysis that reveals the plan
for 500 dwelling units
MR
Attachments
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Quantum Park 2001 MPMD & DRIA\Summary to Director.doc
SPLA ~NING SHARECNVP'Pf"O';ECTS\QU,LI.NTUM PARK 2001 MPiv1D & DRIASUMMARY TO DIRECTORDOC
~ n
i i 'OJ-
t;~ ~ ~ a ~ i w
'Ii. ~ Cl
U ~ a @ i ~ ~
ISo ~
~ l!)
'OJ-
'so a.
~1jj
~z B
zO;:
"1-, QI? l!
~ ~ ~~ Ii
I UN
:if 0
! ..J~
0
N
---- r-:
cD
~
i.ti,S Z
0
i=
U
w
Ul
,W ]1"JS OUIdV.r.I
oot. Slli ." '" .
7l. ~'I
~
! i~
i ~~~ !
- "'~.J i
~ ig~ Q
JJ~ -i~ !
~~g ~-.-.~
;..-!tnj~~Q ~ ~
s~mm ~ ~
ij ~ ~ ~ ~
0 " 8 ~
~ N
~ ~ ~ .
>-
a::
<<:
o
z
::l
o
CD
~
a::
<<:
a.
:::;.
::l
f-
Z
<<:
::l
o
h-n
I
~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ; ~
a . ; ; l j ~
'Ii ~ ~
i:
~n' U% ~ - D
o=.,oooo~.. ollJl _
Ii!
~
~
. 0
~~ ~
~~ i ~ ~
;~ i t: ~ ~ ~ ~
~: ~I : I ~ i i!
i! Ii ~ f i I !
;li!!~ ~ ~ I!I I!I &
:~ ~~ Q I;; ~ ~
il~ H t:' t: ~ 2 f
h !P I : : i iI :
~ !l!! ; j : l!! ! 1
, .
, 2
3^ V SS3!JDNO:>
~ ~
~ i
I!I
"' ~ i H
~ ~ ! I
~
~
,
1t13:~
EUU
i
:' =
I
~ ~
i
~
! -
,;
~
t!
o '
o ~
. I
~! 1
~J}
1
1
~
,
~
:l
I
r
~
;
~
i
~l
tl .1
U ~
10) IW ..o:lt:tl 10/80/10 ....".."'"'~'6.p\'*"'-JIW\-1I..,\:)I
----- ~~ --~--------------------
~ ~ i
~~ ~ ~ a ~
'Ii. S E2 ~ I
.. a 11 f
ISo ~ ~
~
'SO
n
'OJ-
W
Cl
Z
~
l!)
'OJ-
a.
~~ ~
zO;:i1
ogl!
~~ Ii
UN
o
..J~
o
"i
"
cD
~
g i~
~ u2
- Ii! Ii!
~ to:. !
- .~~ ~
2 ~;~ g
; -~~ ~
~~'Z ~--w
~~I~::niti~ I!I !i
Umm ~ ~
ij
~
~
8
~
~
~
~
~ ~
>-
a::
<<:
o
z
::l
o
CD
~
a::
<<:
CL
:::E
::l
f-
Z
<<:
::J
o
I
h-n
~ ~ ~ 0 a ~ 5 . ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~
~ a:: .., ~ :: ..... z:
; t.\I z ~
~ ~ I!I
Ii!
~
h; U% ~ - 0
u_uoooo~.. 0'"
----
6"S'
z
o
i=
U
w
Ul
JllJ ]ly:)s OUkl....1f.I
OOt litli Oli[ ", 0
7l. --,' I
~
. ,
3~ ~
2~ lj
~p ~
;;iil t: ~~~ ~
;1 U i n i a
I: ~5 d I I
:~!I I ~ ~ ~ . i
~~ h ~ I g g ~ ~
Il~ ~~ t:' t: ~ 2 ~
i. h : ~ ~ : ~ ~.~ :
~8~~ '~lIN""a"
~II!I ~iidl~ fi
~ !I !! ! lip 1I !
, 2
3M SS3!JDNO:>
tal ftd ,o;lt:U 10/80/80 ...p.rl.."MIl\....\Ullfttl-IIIU\ ~11W\l)f
~ ~
~ i
I!I
"' !l i H
~ ~ 3 ;
.
~
,
,
ItlHZ
E!h~
i
:'
J
~
II
~
!
,;
i
4i!
o '
o ~
· f
I
051
~J 1
1
1
~
i
:l
I
~
r
5
'"
~
II!
;
g
!ll
;~ ~
2. Applicant:
MFT Development, Inc., A Florida CorporatIOn
as General Partner to Quantum Lmuted Partners, L. C
2500 Quantum Lakes Dnve
SUite 101
Boynton Beach, FL 33426
Phone. (561) 740-2447
Fax: (561) 740-2429
3 Authorized Agent:
Mr DaVId B Noms, Esq
Cohen, Noms, Scherer, Wemberger & HarrIS
712 U S Highway One
North Palm Beach, FL 33408
Phone: (561) 844-3600
Fax: (561) 842-4104
4. Location.
Quantum Park DR!, CIty of Boynton Beach, County of Palm Beach,
Townsmp 45 South, Range 43 East, Sections 16, 17,20 and 21
5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any
proposed changes to the Plan of development, phasing, additional lands,
commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and
requirements or to the representations contained in either the
development order or the Application for Development Approval.
5 1 The Master SIte Development Plan, Amendment No 12, has been
reVised to reflect the changes descnbed below The ReVISed
Master SIte Development Plan IS mcorporated mto tlus Notice of
Proposed Change by reference and has been sublTIltted to the CIty
of Boynton Beach for consIderation by the CIty Council for
amendment and approval.
5.2 Lots 7.8.9. 10 and 11 (7.99 Acres).
Lots 7,8,9, 10 and 11 were preViously deSIgnated as
OfficelIndustnal (01) Land Use The Land Use has been revIsed
to "Mixed Use (MU)" The proposed Mixed Use Land Use
DeSIgnation mcludes office, commerCial and reSIdential uses.
F \Quantum Limitcd\Annual DRI'u'lotificationDRI.doc
2
August 8, 200 I
5.3 Lots 23.24.25.26.27. 28.29.30 and 31 (15.28 Acres).
The Land Use ofthese lots are currently designated as Office (0)
Land Use. The Land Use has been reVISed to "Mixed Use (MU)"
The proposed Mixed Use Land Use DesIgnation mcludes office,
commercial, and resIdential uses.
5 4 Lot 34C (6.58 Acres).
Lot 34-C IS proposed to be desIgnated for Industnal (IND) land
use Lot 34-C currently IS undesIgnated and is mcluded m the
Open Space area tabulation. Prior to the construction completion
of the surface water management system, the area was shown on
the conceptual water management plan on record at the South
Florida Water Management DIStnct (SFWMD) as part ofthe
proposed wet detention area.
As the surface water management system was permItted for
construction and the SFWMD Conceptual PermIt was modrlied,
the area was not mcluded m the surface water management system
and subsequently platted as Lot 34-C, unencumbered by any
dramage easement, dedIcation or reservatIon. Tlus IS evidenced by
the recorded plats and the ConstructIon Completion
Acknowledgement by the SFWMD, dated February 7, 1997 The
Acknowledgement Identrlies 6.92 acres, as Dry Retention Area.
The only Dry Retention Area WIthm the development IS Tract J
Tract J IS 6.92 acres. A copy of the letter IS attached as ExhibIt
"A"
5 5 Quantum Lakes Dnve ReconfiguratIon.
Proposed IS a reconfiguratIon of the current roadway and Lot
layout m the area ofthe Project north and east of the Quantum
Lakes Dnve mtersectIon With Quantum Boulevard, along Quantum
Lakes Dnve to the eastern mtersectIon With Gateway Boulevard.
The proposed reconfiguratIon e1unmates Quantum Lakes DrIve as
a roadway lmk between Quantum Boulevard and Gateway
Boulevard. The resultmg addItional developable land area that IS
not needed as a roadway, will be further subdIVIded mto
developable lots (Lots 100 and 101) and deSIgnated as Mixed Use
(MU) for reSIdential, office or commerCial use.
F'\Quantum Limited\Annual DRI\NotificationDRI.doc
...
-'
August 8, 200 I
The proposed reconfiguratIon increases the Mixed Use (MU) land
area. However, the office and commercial mtensItIes (buildmg
area) are not proposed to be mcreased. The reconfiguratIon
proVIdes for development adjacent the surface water amerutIes of
the Park. The reconfiguration eliminates the unneeded roadway
and It's mamtenance cost and also elmunates the substandard and
dangerous mtersectIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and Gateway
Boulevard.
The eXlstmg Master Plan shows a drIveway from Quantum Lakes
Dnve to Lots 60, 61 and 62. The 272 urnt multI-family resIdential
development on Lots 59, 60 and 61 is encumbered by a Uruty of
Title and uses the mtersectIon of Quantum Lakes Dnve and
Quantum Boulevard as It'S mam entrance ehmmatmg the need for
access from these lots to Quantum Lakes Dnve. Lot 62 IS
proposed to be combmed mto one lot With Lot 63 Veludes access
will be proVIded from Gateway Boulevard to the combmed lot, Lot
102.
The neghgible ID1pact on the traffic dIStnbutIOn resultmg from the
roadway reconfiguratIOn IS defined by the attached Traffic
AnalySIS prepared by Pmder Troutman Consultmg, Inc., dated
August 7, 2001
5 6 The attached Quantum Park Master SIte Development Plan,
Amendment No 12, dated July 2001, Mock-Roos Drawing No
45-43-17-54, Sheet 1 of 1, mdIcates the proposed changes.
57 The Land Use Acreage Table shown on the Master SIte
Development Plan has been revised to reflect the changes
described above. LISted below IS the Amendment No 12 Proposed
Land Uses as Acreages shown on the Master Plan for Amendment
No 12 and the EXlStmg Land Uses and Acreages shown on the
Master Plan for Amendment No 10 (Amendment No 11 was not
approved by the CIty of Boynton Beach ConurusslOn.)
F \Quantum Limited\Annual DRI\NotificationDRI.doc
4
August 8, 200 I
____ i
d :
! U I
2 iUJ! U
I ,
fllPAflIMt-N (\1- Of-VI::LOPMENT;
II"",
I 0 ! -----
i<
lJU I
'--
July 10, 2001
Mr H. DavId Kelly, Jr, City Engmeer Department
CIty of Boynton Beach
100 E Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Fl. 33425
RE Villas at Quantum Lake - 272 Apartment Units
Dear DavId
As you are aware, Olen ReSIdentIal Realty Corp IS proceedmg WIth the development of the Villas
at Quantum Lake project as prevIously approved for 272 uruts on 15 16 acres Our arcmtectural
and sIte CIvil plans should be proceedmg through the vanous approval processes, and we fully
expect the pemnts any day and to begm constructIOn m August. There has been much dISCUSSIOn
by the Quantum Comparues WIth regard to theIr deSIre to vacate Quantum Lakes Dnve and the
mcorporatIOn of the adjacent water management tract mto a new development tract bordenng the
approved Villas at Quantum Lake project. Presumably, thIS new tract would lead to the
development of addItIonal apartment or condonnruum for sale uruts along the lake bank.
As we reVIew tms proposal, we have several sIgruficant concerns regardmg the pernnt and
approval process, development reqUirements, and potentIal Impacts to the overall park and our
approved apartment project. Some of the Issues, wmch we have, are
1) Will the addItIOn and encroachment of the proposed buildmgs and lake bank mto the
eXlstmg water management areas reqUire modIficatIOn and/or nntIgatIOn of the eXIstmg
SFWMD and the LWDD pemnts, analYSIS of runoff and dIscharge, as well as the current
DR! cntena and reqUirements related to water management.
2) Will the encroachment of the proposed buildmgs and lake bank mto the eXIstmg
enVIronmental lIttoral and upland plantmgs reqUire modIficatIon and/or nntIgatIOn of the
eXlstmg enVIronmental pernnts, and speCIfic DR! cntena and reqUirements related to
enVIronmental plantmgs
3) Will the current and proposed mamtenance of the water management areas, lake bank and
enVIronmental plantmgs, and the Impacts If the proposed lake bank and edge of water
wItmn the new tract, reqUire a dedIcatIOn of a new lake mamtenance easement.
4) Will the Impact of the proposed development on the eXIstmg tree canopy and tree count
reqUire an approved tree management plan.
1062 Coral Ridge Drive · Coral Springs Florida 33071
(954) 340 4904 · Fax (954) 344 4608
Page 201'2
July 10 2001
Mr. David Kelly / Villas at Quantum -272 Apartment Uruts
5) The accurate locatIOn of the eXIstmg utilItIes should be determmed m order that the
proposed relocatIOns, and the tUlling of saId relocatIOns, not Impact the adequate water
and sewer servIce to our apartment project.
I
6) Any such development proposal should address the Impact of the road closure on the
access east to and west from the remammg nuxed-use property north of our apartment
SIte, as well as the traffic volumes m front of the apartment SIte
7) The proposal should address the elInunatIOn of the northern egress from the current
apartment SIte, and the reqUlrement for an easement and access dnve from our lot 61 to
Gateway Boulevard
8) We are concerned about any proposed development, not built m coordmatIOn wIth our
Villas project, Impactmg the access, frontage, vIsibilIty, setbacks, densIty, open space and
eXIstmg VIews from our Villas project.
9) A proposed 90-day tIme frame has been put forth, for QCDD approval and concurrent
applIcatIOns for the NOPC, Plat, Master Plan and SIte Plan. Our concern IS that thIS
expedIted schedule proVIde the CIty adequate tIme to conSIder the Impacts of tills proposal
on the remammg property
We are contmumg to reVIew our optIOns WIth regard to the road closure and the possibilIty of
mcorporatmg that property mto our current development, and would like to dISCUSS thIS WIth you
III more detail, however we have been unable to find a SIte layout that works and does not
negatIvely Impact the area. We would lIke to suggest that any abandonment or development
approval be condItIoned upon a concurrent SIte and plantmg plan acceptable to the CIty and one
that does not negatlvely Impact the neIghbors Thank you for your conSIderatIOn.
nk Bruerun se
DIrector ofPlanrung &
.:0.
EB sr
CC LUSIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner, City Planrung and Zorung
mSHEILA\CORRES\EB\QUANTIJM\Kelly071 00 1 doc
OLEN RESIDENTIAL
1062 Coral Ridge Drive
Coral Springs, FL 33071
Phone (954) 340-4904, Fax (954) 344-608
transmittal
To
Lucia Galav
From
Erik L. Brueningsen~ ·
July 25 2001
Office:
City of Boynton Beach
Date:
Address. Planning and Zoning Division
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
PO Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Copy.
Re Quantum Park I Quantum Lakes Drive I Water Management Tract Q
As you know, Quantum is proposing the vacation and replat of Quantum Lakes Drive and a
portion of the adjacent Water Management Tract Q for development. As an adjacent property
owner we are concerned with the schedule and impact to the overall Quantum Park and our
approved Apartment site
I drafted this list of items and activities as a way to track the process through the various
Agencies and Municipalities. This is my list of the items I thought necessary and it may not be
complete, in fact if you see something else let me know Thanks.
.lur 2 1 2n"
PROPOSED ABANDONMENT, REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT OF
QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE TRACT 'E" AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT 'Q"
Task Description
Planning and Engineering / Processing, Approvals and Permits
1 Quantum Lakes Drive Roadway Abandonment and Removal (Tract E)
a. Property sketch and descriptions for portion of Tract E (roadway)
b. Tree and topography surveys
c. Accurate location and survey of existing utilities (water and sewer)
d. Replacement easements to City (water and sewer) ,
e Storm drainage easements to QCDD, FDOT
f Easements to Utility Company's
g. Easements to Quantum Park & Village (access to Gateway)
h. Easements to Villas at Quantum Lake (access to Gateway)
I. Fill requirements
j. Tree removal, relocation and mitigation plan (conflicts only)
k. QCDD approval to abandon roadway for development
-~- .---
L QCDD property exchange, transfer of ownership
m. City approval to abondon roadway tract for development
n. Demolition and tree management plan processing
o. QCDD approvals and permits
p City approvals and Building Department permits
2. Transfer a Portion of Water Management Tract Q for Development
a. Property sketch and descriptions for portion of Tract Q (lake area)
b. Tree and topography surveys
c. Engineering design and storm water management calculations
d. Fill requirements
e. Lake maintenance easement requirements (QCDD)
f Irrigation design plans, irrigation mains and appurtances
g. Irrigation plan approvals, QCDD and City building department permits
h. Irrigation easements
I. Other QCDD easements, if any
j QCDD property exchange, transfer of ownership
k. SFWMD conceptual permit modification, water management area
L LWDD permit, water management area ;
m. Environmental planting plan to modify/mitigate development order
Environmental plan approvals and permits !
n. :
o. Tree removal, relocation and mitigation plan (building footprint) I
p QCDD approvals and permits I
q. City approvals and Building Department permits
3. DRI Modification I
a. NOPC - City and Treasure Coast review, process and approvals
b. Traffic study and report
c Environmental Audit
d. Master Plan
e. Master water and sewer plan
f Master plan modification
4 Plat and Plat Processing
a. Boundary survey and legal description of new the tract
b. Plat preparation
c. Plat Application
d. Utility letters
e. QCDD easements
f City sewer easements
g. City water easements
h. Title
I. City approval
j. Recording
5. Site Plan Modification and Processing (additional apartment units)
a. Tree survey (new development tract, a portion of tracts E and Q)
1 of 3
PROPOSED ABANDONMENT, REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT OF
QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE TRACT "E" AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT "Q"
Task Description I
b T opo survey (new development tract, a portion of tracts E and Q)
c. Preliminary site plan layout
d. Architectural building plans (3 additional buildings)
e. Site plan development
f Tree management plan
g. Planting plan
h. Irrigation plan
I. Site lighting plan
j. Photometric plan
k. Traffic Statement
I. Site Plan Application (major modification)
m. QCDD approval and permit
n. City approval
6 Gravity Sewer Line Relocation i
a. Design in coordination with new site pl~n, paving and drainage plans
b. Coordination with existing utilities (FPL, BST, CATV, all others)
c. QCDD permit
d. City plan approvals
e. Health Department permit
f City Building Department permit
7 Site Engineering Design, Permits and Approvals (additional apartments)
a. Tree and topo surveys (for new tract, a portion of tracts E and Q)
b. Accurate location of existing FPL, BST, CATV, all others
c. Coordination with existing utilities (FPL, BST, CATV, all others)
d. Engineering design with new tract, including lake bank modification
e. Engineering redesign of the approved apartment plans :
ew wa er an .. easemen s, s e c an escnp ons
sewer u I
g. SFWMD conceptual permit modification
h. SFWMD construction permit modification
I QCDD permit and approvals
j. LWDD permit modification
k. City approval new water and sewer plan
I. City approval new paving and drainage plan i
m. Health Department permit modification !
n. City Building Department permits I
8. Access Drive From Lot 61 to Gateway ,
a. Legal sketch and description for easement
b. Easement grant - Quantum Park & Village
c. Engineering design roadway and drainage plans
d. Planting plans
e. Irrigation plans
f Lighting plans
g. SFWMD permits
h. LWDD permit
I. Other permits and approvals
j. City approvals and Building Department permits
9 City Building Department Permits (onsite)
a. Site work for grading, water, sewer, drainage and paving
b. Architectural building plans (3 additional buildings)
c. Planting plans permit
d. Irrigation plans permit
e. Site lighting permit
Construction Phase
10 Construction Management
a. Project Scheduling and critical path, start and stop dates
f N
d
t lity
kth dd
ti
2of3
PROPOSED ABANDONMENT, REPLAT AND DEVELOPMENT OF
QUANTUM LAKES DRIVE TRACT 'E" AND WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT 'Q"
Task Description
b. Construction contracts, schedule impacts and remobilization costs
11 Utility Relocations and Adjustments (surface and subsurface)
a. FPL
b. BellSouth
c. CATV and Communications
d. Street Lighting, and all others
12. Tree Relocations
a. Water management tract Q - building pad conflicts only
b. Vacated roadway tract E - conflict areas only
c. Final acceptance and certification
13 Environmental Plantings and Mitigation Requirements
a. Water management tract Q i
I
b. Final acceptance and certification
'14Ouantum Lakes Drive Roadway and Gravity Sewer Removal ,
a. Remove asphalt and road base, curb, gutter and sidewalk
b. Remove lighting, irrigation and service points
c. Tree removal, relocation and mitigation (conflict areas only)
d. Storm drainage removal, pipe and structures
e. 8" gravity sewer grout in place
f Remove gravity sewer structures
g. Final acceptance and certification
15. Gravity Sewer Line Relocation and Service to Proposed Buildings
a. Stake-out main and services to proposed buildings
b. 8" gravity sewer main
c. 8" gravity sewer services
d. Final acceptance and certification
16. Existing POA Irrigation
a. Irrigation relocations and adjustments, main distribution
b. Irrigaiton relocations and adjustments, appurtenances
c. Final acceptance and certification
17 Lake Bank Reconfiguration (Water Management Tract Q)
a. Environmental plantings
b. Tree relocations
c. Irrigation relocations and aCljustments
d. Sidewalk
18. Soil Tests
a. Borings
b. Environmental
0 ;
~ Foil, Grade and Compact
a. Quantum Lakes Drive Tract E i
b. Water Management Tract Q
20 Access Drive From Lot 61 to Gateway
a. Roadway and drainage ,
b. Plantings
c Irrigation i
d. Lighting
e. Final acceptance and certification
Total
3of3