Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS APPLICATION TRACKING LOG PROJECT TITLE Kingdom Hall of jehovah's Witnesses FILE #: co US. CO~ ex, 2. PROJECT LOCATION 1512 Northeast 4th Street TYPE OF APPLICATION: New Site Plan PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED: (YIN) REVIEWER'S NAME AGENT ADDRESS: AGENT PHONE: FAX: DATE REC'D: AMOUNT RECEIPT NO 12 SETS OF PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITIED FOR REVIEW: 2 OF 12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 APPLlCATION/SUBMITIAL: DATE ACCEPTED: DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED o o o o o DATE DENIED: DATE OF LETIER TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING SUBMISSION DEFICIENCIES: 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 1/5/00 xcz.J Co I'f\~t\ +...s 1\IfJOQ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS RECEIVED MEMO# DATE MEMO# DATE OF LETIER SENT TO APPLICANT IDENTIFYING TRC REVIEW COMMENTS: 90.DAY CALENDAR DATE WHEN APPLICATION BECOMES NULL AND VOID: DATE 12 COMPLETE (ASSEMBLED) SETS OF AMENDED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR 2ND REVIEW .2/2-."1. PRE-ASSEMBLED PLANS SUBMITIED FOR REVIEW AMENDED APPLICATION 0 2 OF12 SETS SIGNED AND SEALED 0 SURVEY 0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 0 FLOOR PLAN 0 SITE PLAN WITH SITE DATA 0 2ND REVIEW MEMO: DATE SENT DRAINAGE PLAN ELEVATION VIEW DRAWINGS COLORED ELEVATIONS RECEIVED MATERIAL SAMPLES RECEIVED TRANSPARENCY RECEIVED PHOTOGRAPHS RECEIVED o o o o o o MEMO NO RETURN DATE: 2nd REVIEW COMMi=NTS RECEIVED PLANS MEMO# DATE PLAIU MEMO# DATE UTIL. 0 POLICE 0 PW 0 PLANNING 0 PARKS 0 BLDG/ENGR 0 FIRE 0 FORESTER [J '---1 BOARD MEETING DATE: BOARD: LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS PLACED AT THE PROPERTY DATE SENT I SIGNS INSTALLED: DATE: CITY COMMISSION: DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER RECEIVED FROM CITY CLERK: 0 DATE: DEVELOPMENT ORDER SENT TO APPLICANT 0 DATE: S:\FORMS\TRACKING LOG FORM - 3/98 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO 00-098 i ~ ,_<~.".~ G r D! \,,1 '-"'~ ~ i' t ~' ~ l DATE. LUSIa Galav, Semor Planner H, DavId Kelley, Jr" PE/PSM .r~ - Ken Hall. EngIneenng TechmcIan ~ June 15,2000 j;~ \ 6 TO , i ~.""tJL\: ~-; _ j} ZON~NG DLPI. THRU FROM. RE. KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES RECTIFIED SITE PLAN 1 RevIse the "exIstIng SIte Plan - PhaSIng Plan" and the "proposed new SIte Plan" and the CIvIl Plan to reflect the relocatIOn of the proposed exfiltratIOn system outsIde of the eXIstIng bmldIng footpnnt. ThIS may reqmre reVIsed pavement elevatIOns to dIrect stormwater to the relocated Inlets. 2, Reflect the above changes on all plan VIews where appropnate. 3 Show a "one-way" arrow SIgn on the north egress stop SIgn to dIrect traffic to the south entrance. 4 ProVIde documentatIOn venfyIng that the proposed mercury vapor hghts are as energy effiCIent as the metal hahde and the lngh pressure sodmm vapor hghts or replace WIth one of the latter c-\My Documents\Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses Rectified Site Plan.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOktDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO Michael W Rumpf DATE 6/14/00 Dir of Planmng & Zomng SUBJECT Kmgdom Hall FROM. Off. LOUIS J ZeItinger REFERENCES ReVISIOn 3 Off. John Huntmgton Pohce Department Cnme PreventIon Umt ENCLOSURES I have vIewed the above bUIldmg plans and have the followmg comments. 1 There should be a "DO NOT ENTER" sIgn placed at the north eXIt dnveway ~ " DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO PZ 00-168 TO FROM Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist H David Kelley Jr , Utilities Department John Huntington, Police Department Louie Zeitinger, Police Department Barbara Meacham, Parks Division H David Kelley Jr , Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department Michael W Rum~et: of Planning and Zoning DATE June 13, 2000 SUBJECT Rectified Plans for -Kingdom Hall Jehovah Witness (COUS 00-002) The amended plans for Kingdom Hall Jehovah Witness site plan/conditional use have been submitted for final sign-off by the Technical Review Committee Four (4) sets of plans, each requiring your unconditional signature are available for review in Planning and Zoning A copy of the originally reviewed plans, staff comments and development order are available for your use to perform the review Please review and sign-off each of the four- (4) sets of plans, NO LATER THAN 5:00 PM., June 23, 2000. If the plans are not in compliance with your staff comments or City regulations, do not sign the plans but only indicate the memorandum number where your comments are documented To facilitate the sign-off process, please resubmit written comments addressed to the Planning and Zoning Director, NO LATER THAN 5 00 P.M., June 30,2000. Thank you for your prompt response to this request. MWR.bw cc: Steve Gale, Deputy Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Chief John Guidry, Utilities Director John Wildner, Parks Department J'\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\KINGDOM HALL-JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES\Rectified Memo to TRC members.doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO PZ 00-107 TO Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board . ! !OK- MIchael Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning FROM DATE April 14, 2000 SUBJECT Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses - COUS 00-002 Conditional Use and Site Plan Approval - Church (Religious Gathering) PROPOSAL SUMMARY Contained herein is a description of the subject project. The proposed project will be situated on 1 002 acres of previously developed property, zoned R-1-A, Single Family Residential It is located on N E 4th Street, west of the F E C Rail Road On site is an existing 3,325+ square foot building and parking facility currently used by the Jehovah's Witnesses for religious gatherings Due to an increase in members, and the desire for an updated facility, the applicant has determined that a new building would better suite their needs Instead of investing in reconstruction, the applicant is proposing the removal of the existing facility and the construction of a new building and parking area. Due to the age of the development, there are no records in the City's Planning Department files showing that the current use was approved through the conditional use process The applicant has agreed with staff's recommendation to proceed with the conditional use approval process for constructmg a new 4,680 square foot church and a 53 space parkmg area. Applicant/Agent. Mark Montantes Project name Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses General description. Conditional use and site plan approval for a church (Replace 3 325 - square foot church with a 4,680 - square foot church, an mcrease of 1,355 square feet) Property size 43,6542 square feet (1 002 acres) Land use Low Density Residential (LDR) Current Zoning Single Family Residential (R-1-A) Proposed Zoning Single Family Residential (R-1-A) Location, East side of N E 4th Street, at the intersection of N E 14th Avenue (see Exhibit "A"- Location Map) Building area 4,680 square feet (See Exhibit "BOO - Proposed Site Plan) Kingdom Hall- CaDS 00-002 Page 2 Memorandum No PZ 00-099 Surrounding land uses/zoning North - Residential, Lot #38, zoned R-I-A East - Vacant lot, zoned C-3, and farther east is F E C Rail Road Row South - Residential, Lot #32, zoned R-I-A, and the C-16 Canal West - N E 4th Street, and farther west are four residential Lots #22-25, zoned R-I-A STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSIS Section 11 2 D of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which conditional uses are required to conform, Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning Division's evaluation of the apphcatlOn as It pertains to standards The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section, In evaluating an application for conditional use, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following standards where applicable 1 Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestnan safety and convemence, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe The subject property has four points of ingress/egress at N E 4h Street The three southern most entry drives service the current parking facility The proposed development will reduce the number of ingress/egress points to two One 32'-9" wide two way main entry at the building front, and one 12'-0" one-way egress lane at the north end of the property 2 Off-street parking and loading areas where reqUired, with particular attention to the items in subsection 1 above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole 3 The proposed parking facility will provide for one(1) loading space on the west side of the proposed building, nine (9), 10 foot by 25 foot parallel parking spaces along the east side of the parking area and forty four (44), 9 foot by 18foot, 45 degree angle parking spaces, including two(2) handicapped spaces near the building entry The proposed project will not increase the intensity of parking or promote additional glare, noise or odors that currently exist Parking spaces and related lighting will be reconfigured. Any current glare, noise or odors will be relocated from the south end of the site along with the north with the new parking area. 4 Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above Kingdom Hall- caus 00-002 Page 3 Memorandum No PZ 00-099 Roll out refuse containers will be provided by the city, and waste will be removed on a standard schedule 5 Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility With incorporation of Utility Department comments, utilities are available and to be provided consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations 6 Screening, buffering and landscaping WIth reference to type, dimensions, and character With incorporation of Planning and Zoning Division comments, screening and buffering of adjoining properties will meet code A perimeter landscape buffer is required and shall be designed, to meet the intent of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 7 5 7 Signs, and proposed exterior lighting with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties At the time of permitting, security lighting levels will be evaluated for excessive glare There will not be an increase in glare anticipated from the proposed lighting Proposed light poles located in the parking area will measure 24'-8 It is recommended that the light levels not exceed building code maximums It is further recommended that the light fixtures required to illuminate the entrance access aisle be directed away from any buildings located adjacent to the site A proposed wall sign has been submitted for review No freestanding signs are proposed. The proposed sign program meets the allowable requirements including sign face area and height dimensions as set forth in the Land Development Regulations Chapter 21 Section 2 8 ReqUIred setbacks and other open spaces The setbacks for a church in a R-1-A zoning district are 25 feet front, 10 feet side, and 25 feet rear The proposed building location meets or exceeds these minimum requirements Open space code requirements will be met when staff comments are incorporated into the plans 9 General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district. The proposed facility is compatible, both visually and by use with the adjacent neighborhood. The scale and architecture of the proposed facility is compatible with the surrounding one-story structures The church is minimally used during the week and the intensity of the use will remain. 10 HeIght of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties and the city as a whole The proposed structure is less than the maximum height allowed for a single family home -30 feet The peak of the roof structure is 24'-11 high. 11 Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole The proposed church is to be located in one of the city s residential cores The inherent nature of this type of use will generally create no more economical impacts than a typical residence Kingdom Hall - COUS 00-002 Page 4 Memorandum No PZ 00-099 12 Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19 Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review) With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project will comply with all requirements of applicable sections of city code 13 Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards within Section 4 of the zoning regulations, also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance With incorporation of all conditions contained herein, the use would operate in a manner that is in compliance with the above-referenced codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. RECOMMENDATION Based, in part, on the need for this new facility as represented by the efforts of the current petitioners, compliance with development regulations, and the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan which allows such uses within this land use classification contingent upon compatibility with neighborhood character, staff recommends that this request be recommended for approval conditioned upon satisfying all conditions of approval as contained in Exhibit "C" As a general requirement of Conditional Approvals, written confirmation from Palm Beach County's Traffic Division, stating that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards must be received Staff has submitted the required documentation for review, but has not received written confirmation of conformIty Written confirmation must be received prior to application for a building permit Furthermore, pursuant to Chapter 2 - Zonmg, Section 11 2 Conditional Uses, a time limit is to be set within which the proposed project is to be developed Staff recommends that a period of one (1) year be allowed to mitiate this project. As long as 25 % or more of the total cost of the improvements are completed within one (1) year this condition is met. MR/bw Attachments I ICHIMAINISHRDA T A IPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTSIKINGDOM HALL JAHOV AHS WITNESSESIStaff Report COUS OO-OO2.doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 00-084 .,....---.~-~_. -- -1 TO Michael Rumpf, Plannmg and Zonmg DIrector rD}~@~l\ iOO MAR l 1 LJI.J . II! ~ i~Y FROM, MIchael E Haag, BUIldmg Code AdmmIstrator IUNNING AND PT. DATE March 23, 2000 RE Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-025) 3rd review comments We have revIewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board reVIew WIth the understandmg that all remammg comments wIll be shown m comphance on the workmg drawmgs that are submItted for permIts, Buildim!: Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Michael E. Haae: (561) 742-6352 1 Comphance WIth the BUIldmg Codes WIll be evaluated at tIme of permIt reVIew The permIt fee, water and sewer facIhty fees, FIfe and LIfe Safety fees, County fees and State fees Will be determmed at tIme of permIt reVIew 2. PermIts are reqUIred to construct the Improvements that are shown on the approved SIte plan/condItIonal use documents, PermIt apphcatIOn forms are aVailable m the BUIldmg DIVISIOn of the Development Department. A permIt submIttal checkhst IS avaIlable m the BUIldmg DIVlSlon, The hst IdentIfies the baSIC documents that the Plans Analyst checks for when an apphcant submIts for permIt reVIew MEH bg C\WINDOWS\TEMP\NWSP 99-025 3rd review Kingdom Hall of Jehoval's Witnesses.doc LUe-lA · '"r c~~~o It-t~ fDLLOvJl i0G', l D~f2 ~Ae4 5((9~ C)~ ~e\Q.~ ~Kl -r J '2 :tZ~~-D f~\cA7U>rJ ~ {L{f~5 tJ 0 L-cbi: f9 iJ 3tfee\ L.- l . ~ t.f'lLAv2.G~ ~ {;>tJ~-'fU2 ~~ ~ 7~ ~M ~~ To t?'. rc~e L.:€LT M.t2 k~w If= A~1td-(~ €L-7~ Ne~o~ ~ eo AQ:)~. MA'4L M~~s t/~{fK) 'PiA. 8?'?-8~4o DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 00-084 TO MIchael Rumpf, Plannmg and Zomng DIrector I A C' I~o Michael E Haag, BUIldmg Code AdmmIstra~ March 23, 2000 (V Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-025) 3rd review comments FROM DATE RE We have revIewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board reVIew WIth the understandmg that all remaImng comments WIll be shown m complIance on the workmg drawmgs that are submItted for permIts Buildin~ Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Michael E. Haa~ (561) 742-6352 I ComplIance wIth the BUIldmg Codes WIll be evaluated at tIme of permIt reVIew The permIt fee, water and sewer faCIlIty fees, FIre and LIfe Safety fees, County fees and State fees WIll be determmed at tIme of permIt reVIew 2 PermIts are reqUIred to construct the Improvements that are shown on the approved SIte plan/condItIonal use documents. PermIt applIcatIOn forms are aVaIlable m the BUIldmg DIVIsIOn of the Development Department. A permIt submIttal checklIst IS avaIlable m the BUIldmg DIVISIon. The lIst IdentIfies the basIc documents that the Plans Analyst checks for when an applIcant submIts for permIt reVIew MEH,bg t' D ,.., \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99-025 3rd review Kingdom Hall of Jehoval's Witnesses,doc PrOject name' KINGDO~ ~ALL File number NWSP 99-025 3/20/00 Reply Statements: Utilities 1 A 5' utility easement eXISt along the East sIde of the property, see reVIse landscapmg plan. 2. Called the Health department and talked with Mr Dutch Holland and he SaId that our changes would not need a permIt. See letter from Health department. 3 At the tIme ofwntmg tlus Reply Statement, the fire department has not called us back to clanfY the necessIty of thIs requIrement. We are still pursumg the necessary informatIon. 4 The existmg meter will be used for the proposed smgle story building. ThIs IS a replacement on the existing buildmg on the site which will stay m use until the switch over IS made. 5 No easement IS needed. The eXIStmg water system will be used and a new 6" sewer for the proposed building will be tIed m as reflected on the sIte plan drawmg. 6. See the report subnntted for conformity to requirements for dramage. 7 See SIte Plan for the proposed fire hydrant locatIon and that It falls WIthIn 200 feet of the furthest part of the buildmg. 8 An appropnate backflow preventer will be mstalled as requIred, there will be no fire sprmkler system m the buildmg. 9 Pendmg City's approval for permIt. 10 See the report subnntted for confOrmIty to requirements for drainage and raInfall to be retamed on-sIte. FIRE u. r:C1dl~+ ht;) bee~ ~e 11 At the tIme ofwnting this Reply Statement, the fire department has not called us back to clarifY the necessIty oftlus requirement. We are still pursumg the necessary InformatIon. 12. See SIte Plan for the proposed fire hydrant locatIon and that it falls WIthIn 200 feet of the furthest part of the buildmg. 13 See the SIte Plan for the confOrmIty ofa 45' turnmg radius for road access 14 See the SIte Plan for the 12' minimum clearance in front of drop-off area. 15 The water mam IS a 6" and is reflected on the SIte, Dramage, and Landscape Plans. POLICE 16 Traffic control has been reVIsed to meet requirements, see sheet A-2 for revision. 17 SIte Plan reVIsed to show stop signs at eXIts, see sheet A-2 for reVISIon. ENGINEERING DIVISION 18 The requested General Note has been added to the Site Plan. See general notes on sheet A-2. 19 Engineer's Storm AnalYSIS was subnntted on previous reVIew If any further informatIon IS reqUIred please Inform. 20 Both notes concerrung "Stnpmg and SIgnage" and "Dramage System" were added to the SIte Plan (A-2) and the Dramage Plan (C-l). 21 Proposed elevatIons and flow arrows added to the Drainage Plan (C-l). 22. The curb landscaping islands on both SIde of the HandIcap ParkIng Stalls have been aligned with South express lane. See the SIte Plan (A-2). 23 Traffic control deVIces are shown on both the SIte Plan (A-2) and the Dramage Plan (C-l) as requested. 24 ReVIsed the Stop sign requIrements as requested. See the SIte Plan (A-2) 25 A Loadmg Zone was added and the entrance has been revised. See the SIte Plan (A-2). 26 The N W comer of the site parkIng arrangement as been reVISed to allow a 18' backup dIstance. 27 Handicap post and SI~} ..etail added to the SIte Plan (A-2). 28 The thIrd handIcap stall at the S.E. comer of the lot has been removed. 29 The sIdewalk thru the dnveway has been added and the 6" mIn. tInckness note has been added. BUILDING DIVISION 30 A HandIcap Symbol has been added to the SIte Plan (A-2) to indIcate the entrance into the building. 31 Witlnn the SIte Data and the footprint of the buildmg, all of the requested Information has been added. See City comment for indication of requested informatIon. 32. A Legend has been added to sheet A-2 "Proposed Site Plan" mdicating the symbol for the property hue. 33 The requested current survey IS bemg submitted WIth tIns review 34 The SIte Plan (A-2) has been reVISed to reflected the "5'Utility Easement" runrung along the East side of the property This IS the only easement that eXISt on the sIte, 35 Within the SIte Data(A-2) the overall heIght and, number of stones has been added. On the ElevatIon drawing, the heIght of the building was added. 36. On sheet A-3, "Floor Plan", CONCEPTUAL was added to the tItle. 37 10 sets of sIgned and sealed drawmg are subnntted. PARKS AND RECREATION 38 Not Comments FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST 39 On the Landscapmg Plan (L-l), the desrrable trees are note for keepmg and other trees noted for replacement. PLANNING AND ZONING 40 Entrances have been reVIsed to reflect only two entrances. 41 There are no Canopies, see Conceptual Floor Plan (A-3). 42. AlC symbol on the SE comer of the parking lot have been removed. See sheet A-2. 43 ReVIsed the tree layout along the street sIde of the property, however m trymg to save as many of the eXIsting trees as possible, the 40' center lme could not totally be kept. See the Landscapmg Plan. 44 The dImensIon for the entrance has been added to the SIte Plan (A-2) 45 The 43 total number of parking spaces requrred has been reVISed on the Site Plan (A-2). 46. See the signage indicated on sheet A-4 for the size and type. 47 The CondItIonal Use penmt has been subnntted, please Inform for any addItIonal InformatIon. 48. The SIte Plan (A-2) has been reVIsed to reflect the comments as requested. 49 A sIdewalk has been added to the Site Plan, however we would like to dISCUSS the possibilitIes of a WaIver m putting a sIdewalk m. 50 The InformatIon requested has been added to reflect the CIty'S comments. See the Landscapmg Plan (L-l ) 51 There are no other SIgns other than what IS shown on the building. See the ElevatIons. 52. Stop SIgns, handicap signs, parking stall lengths and a raised curb has been mdIcated on the East sIde parking lot has been added. 53 Vehicular circulation patterns have been reVISed. See the SIte Plan (A-2) 54 The 10 sets of drawmgs will be SIgned and sealed. Date and author will be added to the drawings. 55 The Traffic AnalYSIS was subnntted on March 17,2000 Any additional mformation required, please mform, Project name KINGD01 .tALL File number' NWSP 99-025 3/20/00 Reply Statements: Utilities 1 A 5' utility easement eXist along the East sIde of the property, see reVIse landscapmg plan. 2. Called the Health department and talked WIth Mr Dutch Holland and he said that our changes would not need a permit. See letter from Health department. 3 At the time ofwritmg tlus Reply Statement, the fire department has not called us back to clarIfy the necessIty of tins requirement. We are still pursumg the necessary mformatIon. 4 The eXIstmg meter will be used for the proposed smgle story buildmg. Tins IS a replacement on the existmg building on the sIte wluch will stay m use until the sWItch over IS made. 5 No easement IS needed. The eXISting water system will be used and a new 6" sewer for the proposed building will be tIed m as reflected on the site plan drawmg. 6. See the report subrrutted for confOrmIty to reqUIrements for drainage. 7 See Site Plan for the proposed fire hydrant location and that It falls within 200 feet ofthe furthest part of the buildmg. 8. An appropriate backflow preventer will be InStalled as required, there will be no fire sprinkler system m the buildmg. 9 Pendmg City's approval for permIt. 10 See the report subrrutted for conformity to requirements for dramage and ramfall to be retamed on-sIte. FIRE A ~\le.,..J. hl ~ pe eV/ W10k 11 At the tIme ofwntmg tins Reply Statemenl, the fire department has not called us back to clarify the necessIty of tins reqUIrement. We are still pursumg the necessary mformatIon. 12. See SIte Plan for the proposed fire hydrant locatIon and that It falls WIthIn 200 feet of the furthest part of the building. 13 See the SIte Plan for the confOrmIty of a 45' turning radius for road access 14 See the SIte Plan for the 12' mirumum clearance m front of drop-off area. 15 The water mam IS a 6" and IS reflected on the Site, Dramage, and Landscape Plans. POLICE 16. Traffic control has been reVISed to meet requIrements, see sheet A-2 for reVISIon. 17 Site Plan revised to show stop SIgns at eXits, see sheet A-2 for reVISIon. ENGINEERING DIVISION 18 The requested General Note has been added to the SIte Plan. See general notes on sheet A-2. 19 Engmeer's Storm Analysis was submitted on preVIOUS reVIew If any further informatIon IS required please mform. 20 Both notes concernmg "Stripmg and SIgnage" and "Dramage System" were added to the SIte Plan (A-2) and the Drainage Plan (C-l) 21 Proposed elevations and flow arrows added to the Dramage Plan (C-l) 22. The curb landscaping ISlands on both sIde of the Handicap ParkIng Stalls have been aligned with South express lane. See the SIte Plan (A-2) 23 Traffic control deVIces are shown on both the SIte Plan (A-2) and the Dramage Plan (C-1) as requested. 24 ReVISed the Stop SIgn requIrements as requested. See the SIte Plan (A-2) 25 A Loadmg Zone was added and the entrance has been reVIsed. See the SIte Plan (A-2). 26 The N W comer ofthe site parking arrangement as been revised to allow a 18' backup dIstance. 27 Handicap post and SIg~, ~etail added to the Site Plan (A-2). 28. The thrrd handicap stall at the S.E. comer of the lot has been removed. 29 The sIdewalk thru the dnveway has been added and the 6" mID. tlnckness note has been added. BUILDING DIVISION 30 A HandIcap Symbol has been added to the SIte Plan (A-2) to mdicate the entrance mto the buildmg. 31 Withm the Site Data and the footpnnt of the buildmg, all of the requested mformatIon has been added. See CIty comment for indIcation of requested mformation. 32. A Legend has been added to sheet A-2 "Proposed SIte Plan" mdIcatmg the symbol for the property line. 33 The requested current survey is being submitted with tIns reView 34 The SIte Plan (A-2) has been reVised to reflected the "5'Utility Easement" runnmg along the East SIde of the property TIns IS the only easement that eXlst on the SIte. 35 Within the SIte Data(A-2) the overall heIght and, number of stones has been added. On the ElevatIon drawing, the height of the buildmg was added. 36. On sheet A-3, "Floor Plan", CONCEPTUAL was added to the title. 37 10 sets of signed and sealed drawmg are subnntted. PARKS AND RECREATION 38 Not Comments FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST 39 On the Landscapmg Plan (L-l), the desrrable trees are note for keepmg and other trees noted for replacement. PLANNING AND WNING 40 Entrances have been reVISed to reflect only two entrances. 41 There are no CanopIes, see Conceptual Floor Plan (A-3). 42. AlC symbol on the SE comer ofthe parkmg lot have been removed. See sheet A-2. 43 Revised the tree layout along the street side of the property, however m trymg to save as many of the eXlstmg trees as possible, the 40' center line could not totally be kept. See the Landscapmg Plan. 44 The dimension for the entrance has been added to the Site Plan (A-2) 45 The 43 total number ofparkmg spaces requrred has been revised on the SIte Plan (A-2) 46 See the sIgnage mdIcated on sheet A-4 for the SIZe and type. 47 The ConditIonal Use pernnt has been subnntted, please mform for any addItIonal information. 48. The Site Plan (A-2) has been reVISed to reflect the comments as requested. 49 A SIdewalk has been added to the SIte Plan, however we would like to discuss the possibilities of a waIver m putting a sidewalk in. 50 The informatIon requested has been added to reflect the CIty'S comments. See the Landscapmg Plan (L-l). 51 There are no other SIgns other than what is shown on the buildmg. See the Elevations. 52. Stop SIgns, handIcap SIgns, parkmg stall lengths and a raIsed curb has been mdIcated on the East SIde parkmg lot has been added. 53 Vehicular circulatIon patterns have been revised. See the SIte Plan (A-2) 54 The 10 sets of drawmgs will be SIgned and sealed. Date and author will be added to the drawmgs. 55 The Traffic AnalysIS was submitted on March 17,2000 Any addItional informatIon requrred, please mform. Boynton Beach Kingdom Hall 1512 N E 4th Street Boynton Beach FL 33435 February 28, 2000 Project name Kingdom Hall F"8 number NWSP 99-025 Reference 1st Review, New SIte Plan File #NWSP 99-025 with a December 21,1999 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking The following are the In response to the 1 sl Review Comments UTILITIES 1 See Landscaping Plan for conformity 2 Under review and will be complete pnor to construction document submittal 3 Under review and will be complete pnor to construction document submittal 4 Pending city requirements 5 Existing site irrigation well and pump to be used for irrigation (See Landscaping Plan) 6 See Site Drainage Plan and report from engineer 7 See Site Drainage Plan and will be complete prior to construction document submittal 8 Will reuse existing water meter see Site Drainage Plan 9 See Site Drainage Plan for location of fire hydrant. 10 See Site Drainage Plan 11 Pending Cities approval 12 See SIte Drainage Plan and report from engineer FIRE 13 See Site Drainage Plan for location of fire hydrant POLICE 14 15 16 Meet requirements Traffic control reworked, see Site Plan Stop signs to be provided as required ENGINEERING DIVISION 17 Note added on SIte Plan 18 Plans signed and sealed 19 Revised survey submitted with set. 20 Handicap parking stalls relocated see Site Plan 21 See Site Dralnaqe Plan and report frnm em;"neer 22 Pa:,,-::)!b! oarki 19 S ,a:E;S revised ~~,::> c: te ~Ia 1 23 See SIte Plan and Site Drainage Plan and will be complete prior to construction document submittal 24 Revised handIcap stall locations, see SIte Plan 25 See Site Drainage Plan 26 Revised traffic flow, see Site Plan 2/28/2000 Contmued 27 Revised traffic flow, see Site Plan 28 Time constrain made it difficult to meet. BUILDING DIVISION 29 Revised, see Site Plan and Floor Plan 30 Revised, see Site Plan 31 Revised, see sheet A-2 Site Dramage Plan and report from engineer 32 Revised, see sheet E-1, Site Llghtmg Plan and report form light designer 33 See Survey, Site Plan for property line and a legend will be added to the construction documents 34 Current survey submitted 35 Revised, see Site Plan and Survey 36 Revised, see elevation views 37 Revised, see sheet Floor Plan 38 Signed and seal set provided PARKS AND RECREATION No comments FORESTERS/ENVIRONMENTALIST 39 See Landscapmg Plan PLANNING AND ZONING 40 Under review and will be complete prior to construction document submittal 41 Revised, see drawing set, engineers report for site drainage and will submit color elevation prior to P&D meeting -') 42 4' Sidewalk added, see Site Drainage Plan - n€t?ct -k. <;hot...u OYl ~ tUtA.) 43 Revised, see Landscaping Plan 44 Revised, see Site Plan 45 See Site Plan 46 Revised, see Site Plan 47 Revised, signed and seal set provided 48 Under review and will be complete prior to construction document submittal 2/28/2000 2 , r~ ~ 1'; \1 ' \ \' 1 ,j" ~ ~ .... .. II ~ Uf;~;~ H~~QZ tf~'B~~ ~ Cr:m'. ~:G'l~~ t.-~ m rn ~9.Z';l:l::l ~~G'lZ~ ?;,G'l;:: 2~';3 rT11e ;:: l ~ Kingdom I-Ia\\ 01 Jehovah'S WitneSses ~',1f\l,or\ ee;;;~h, flolld;,) PROPOSED ('fl(R\~)K (c(v/>.'IO"-S ~ ..t- H \\'~ , , \" ~~ , , ' ' , \ \\ . " CJl -z.. ~ 0 (TI ~ :os II "j: .... p:1 ~ ~ ~ 6 -z.. c..n~(,.f.)"'-'(') , " 0 ~\\\\~ s.~zzz~ ~2~~~';3 z~EEE~ ~~~~~.. m~CJl(l)CJl G'lC3~g~ \%~~~ 2~~~~ :t:rT12C~ ;;\~~~~ ~~~c:> '-I;o'tl?J; ~;~rT1 '6 2g ;0 ~s g '(j;rT1 ~ ......' ".........----...--""":..~ \ \ I \ iU \~l; ",!! ~;o.~ ~~~ \ I \ -" ,..---~ _po,cw<'"- ..... -~-~' --~-,------------------------- en m ~ )> fT1 U> ~ -I m " r- q m < )> -I 0 Z { It ~ '~ " ,,! .. ! ill 1Cl'.~. ,I. ~ ~- ~-l . '-l-, :--t : ~ ; \ ' i ~; J~rrr~J ; f! l~ ~f r f. I ~- [-} t! l; t' g~~ ~~~ ~~f ~.~ !~~ H r. I ! I I , I , I , I 1\ ~~ g I J ":1' II! . SCAl[: Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses 8:'f'!0f\ BeG::h, rlc:ida PROPOSED EXTER:()q ELEVATIONS U'I~WI"..J.......(") ~~i:nCncn:;? en:J::J::J::J:o ""'Ommmm:AJ ;;~~~~~ ~ZZZZI ~:;:~~~~ zFEEE? ~>~~~fT1 rn~CI>(I)C/) G'l1l()(')CD ~~~~~ >40::oZ Gl)>Cl-< ~?f:~~~ ~~~~~ m m Cw ~:ti~)> m-mw ;o3::;om ~ ~S Cl -0 8 ~m ;0 en .-.. _,..lo..c." en () )> r fT1 ~ q U> o C -I I m r- m < )> -I o Z ~.. '" " .. ! I , I , I , I lJt. Ii " il .'.2' ~~;r I~ ~~ j , { ; I!' . ~~ .~, ga ~&~ ~~f ~.& U~ I , I I ~Q I I I I A AS DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEN'I MEMORANDUM NO PZ 99-315 TO FROM TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Assistant Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan Forester/Environmentalist Lee Thompson, Police Chief Pete Mazzella, Utilities Department Michael Haag Building Division Ken Hall, Engineering Division Larry Quinn, Public Works Department John Wildner, Parks Division Jack Casler, Acting City Engineer Michael W Rumpf Jl ~ Director of Planning ancYZoning DATE December 23, 1999 RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses Location - 1512 Northeast 4th Street Agent Mark Montantes File No NWSP 99-025 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments or e-mail to JoAnn Alea and I no later than 5.00 P.M. on January 5. 2000. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories, code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval 1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Scott Barber, or myself 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents Page 2 4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental improvements 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum within the time frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to JoAnn Alea and I for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e- mail Scott Barber will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members MWR jma Attachment XC William Bingham, Fire Chief Marshall Gage, Police Department John Guidry, Utilities Director Don Johnson, Building Division Larry Roberts Public Works Director Central File JISHRDA T AIPLANNINGISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIKINGDOM HALLI1 STREVIEW,PLANS,DOC The City of Boynton Beach 3,., · / , 7. '_ ,t \ .' d J{l'" I. Boynton Beach Fire Rescue Fire & Life Safety Division 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard POBox 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6600 FAX. (561) 364-7382 -~ 2. _~/ I~~"~ S<;';~.8~" === J\ ~ . ~ ~, ~~ ~ ~~,~ .l..--- "L.- '} C - 009 OOV O~ ~~ __J - ~ ,~''0 ~,,~:-~. j , _ :~ ~ ~~.~ ~ I ...~ > n \ \\\\\J~~' ~ f+--:'I~i > ~c,~ ~- d \ ~ ~,' _ _.__ .J. ...J"; ~~ i~ .-li....-J.- ,......--~,' _ r--~1~"--'- .-: ~. .....--_~I i!l, _ ~ I L. \' ' I \ 3~\I. '~ -,-;4 ,,\--1 ~ .f==t.~ ~ ~'-IIF=-I _.--~~_ . , .\w-Jl-'I ,t:'K:- ~~; jj'; ~ ~ - , > ,-_.,.- , ~ - ~ - -\ ::::t~ r- '_' 1't~ "<~~ -'~ --.~ .-: i, .....--' ~_ ~ ~ ________. -~ ~. ~~ '~.---.....t > 1/ " _.----; ,...--- ~~ I' , L-' "-- >- - - ~ ~ , t- -r/ <--.- ~~ " -------"~-j! l' ., iI'.. " ' I _ r ;: -.., ~ ~ A-if" ~-r;;' -.;,;0 ." ~ - -- . ,~ c= _ L- ' , r, - ..;-" ~ ,L-.J _ . .~ 'l...I ~ --!'---' v) I ~=--....=::::::. ~ : \ ~ i -r;. -r11 ~ = , .. I I t..___,-l-- ~ c'-~"" '------~ i ~ \..\:,,\11 __ _ ....... t::::: i - t ,-",rJ____ ~~. .'3 c-, ... - : ..... . , ," .' , j"""' .., L... " h,,",'">d T "..: " ,c" :::::J IT] .~ '''c::''''"' .._,'"'' ,_,'_ ,Tl 1,li" ,,~,- " C' '1 ~ ~ '''l I ,ill,l cLUuI'ii,ITT" "; I ,I i ""cWL J, ' '" 'I' ' _---' .':'cw- _ _ T -.- '" __ cO " "I _ · r j.:. ~ i \ \' i \~ , r - ... t - - \ ~~I ,..-~- . - _,____"---'-"l. ' ' .-. ,( ~ .1" I _1'1 ~ ,<.: .Ll.::;--':,' , I i 0 "t ~L Ii ' ,- , '~.'" eo ',!' ~_ _ ,~_ , II il i' I -1'- ,'--1 n '. ~ Ii I L! ~....~_~ " ~___~;. '}t '] ~. .,", 1 ..f1 , , . -"" J 1'1 ii _" ,0 r ~;:-~ --'r ~~~' \: ':" nd ~ ~: ~ ~\ ~~~'.-~;, ~ f' -/'1;1 1 .,..,]-_ _...j ~i ;:-1--\ \ '1 . I --~ =' 1- i I:' I ' I _ .-1'1 ,_' I :, _lL...... --' --,----i =--_ - - ,',,' 1i I ,,', -- ,~-- "i l' II\~__ : III ' ..'_ _ _ ___- jl' __ - ~-- /11' ~_,:( I' __ ____-":::=:\t -- 1'\ 1,1 '\ r---- --1 -r-- __ _-~~ --I \ 1--,."... ~ nd . II ~liL_~lr '" -..::i" J. __' ~\\ j, _~0~-1 J 1/11 ~ . I ____ \ JA' -.~ ... -- "r - ~, - I , ~l It, ~3!.lS -" ,.;r'0.~ -- 'r~' -, ;j= 1';,: ._ ~....J-,=:::d E2 ,-=- ,-~ ~; --rrr =-~:- ~ ~~~.- -\.: ~l't a' \ ,c:;. I l'li I j _F~ '-- -'~' -~: --""" ,,~, ... , , '- jl/ll _ " ' _ --. ,-, ....J --0 ...:.J::::.J' " " ',,", f -' -If 7 ~h l- "'" 1/,' t--- " " "'::> If- 1L '\iP:Y~ .(':;G'" ~'" ~ .."v/J 1_:G=~4 ~. "g J I, .' "-------J / =.~ _-.17:. __~-- ,_ , , .. .{~: ! ~ ~ i\. x: l(\V ~- , r -' 'J r '1 ~ - f,ll! I..______',!.!...,. ~ ~ "_ 't" _-\ \ \ ~J " "111 ~ '1' ,~ ~ ~ .,~~_--r'r-.j' ....J ~ \.. ~ X r-- 1 , .- :' I 1 ____>-----1 " "r--1""-- ....,___..,.....-- ..~ r~ ----< ~, )A' ..... J 1 .c./ ~ I . , ,...___ ,_ :..............~L~ '---;;;" '---'~~:- l L~-F;'. r ~~_-_. - ILlj' ,{I ' , .\ ~_ _ _ . _ ' ~ ;...;.- r: 2- - , H - 1\::=1 \ ~ lEi;' - -, I . _ -J E;pJ::- __ _', '7" I r - it --- =-J~ tf; - .~ _ ~'t J r-=-; ~-: ; .:}..... . - Ii / i ;':/: r~ ' h ~ I ~ I ! "-: -,~. _ ~ -- _/ J t:d 1-,. L.....-J ~'-, IIi! ,I) ~~ ' l d __ j l..: _~~c_ L..::--=--l nC~ - - \ r\ \ ---.... /: /;'/! lif' ~r~ . ~ ~___ .J.' '. - -;::;~----. y\ _ f~'[ C"~" '\, .... 3 t:I ./ ! i / ,f.. ,r- '----' I . _~ c..~ . t:1.--jJ \ ~ "jll- " I S::r?- _ - ---,~~---lbt:"B ~. __ ~- ~ I,;'! il~/' 'f1/; 1Jr----"",~-.. __ " . - L-<~ :.... ,"J · 711 Ii I ,---:; ..------. T ~ : l ' \.----'1 I / j,a ll';r.:: k:> ~ l i\--= I ~ .-:. _ _~ - \ ~"r:..u --- " ,II ::.,_ _t;lI./r- ' r-\ r--- f ~~( -)l' l 1 !;::F.. --=--J, h --:. --:J ,';:: '.-': :':::: r--)) ~. )) ;- rr ----'1= f> ,; - - ~- ~ - ~ " ;"1L' Ii' i . ~...... J ,_ r r -' /)'." "Jt=--~, ~ t- - - , 'l - !.t- 'i I :lL..I . / y L.-' . Ir_-' :!I ~ ~~ ;:=2 0k 1 ~ :....::: r___ \ t= i l "~ If II Iilll -- 'Iii; -rr---' r-- 11, \ ..--1 c---~ L__ ~-l ,..., , t -: 1 ~ ~.... j ~ 'T I t '11 t. :" I' _ r ,11~--- .-., ~ ' I:::J,-. \ j 1 t i" I -- -,-- - ,-,- ,-,- to ,'_ "'----_I '____ >- I" ------- i/' ,,_~! l- r ':b:f:- C-I - 11'.:> -. '-" < ,- --" =--- l:::l : ';--:-';1 rL -- ~-~ l~ .'; ~~--'~f 1\ i -(I __; '-~~~=-1: ,--llniJrrrn;\------"1 ---- ~ ,I . ~.. \-_. ~ j ~ ~"' ----c:' I I .-- ~ ' . I \ ~"~S NI ' '.' ,--_ \'..J;;;;J~- ~ i - !' -~\--.,' l.i'.'1 I"~S aw"",",::=::::': ~. \' -- t 1;\ i . ~ \ (;/1 ' ~It--':"" L: --? ;:~ 1 ~~ ' L' ~ t I.J Fi~ t \\ t~, \ ,- --- ~.~ j_____ l.--, f" - t ~ ~ _ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ! I : t\ ~ .'~ -!.!ll,l ~ ,~ ir-~ 1 ~. . ~\r,- \~, J\ III ~ 1181 d;' ::J.fiQdLJ:' I ~ =__\: f 'If' dVV\I NOI fJ(} " ~" \\~\il ~\-- \; Lldl I \~\\:\'\ii ' -\ I, l i i fl. ' \ ,I 1 , " } ~"4 I ~ , i - I I 1-:;- I - ~:;" /~ \ ---- ..-' / __ v \~ --- '- HX3 ~. l'1Q( -----~._--------- ? 1) TO DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT r~ --. ~----........- BUILDING DIVISION j ,. '\ ffi IS -- MEMORANDUM NO 00-061 1\ u.( r= ~ II \ .I MIchael Rmnpf, Planmng and Zomng Drrector AC J1j,JL IIR - " (l,:~_ ~ ' MIchael E. Haag, BUIldmg Code Ad1mmstratDr <.- \ J l March 3, 2000 FROM DATE RE Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-025) 2nd review comments We have revIewed the subject plans and recommend that the request not be forwarded for Board, ThIS recommendatIOn IS based on the fact that the plan VIew drawmgs are not consIstent WIth respect to the configuratIOn of the sIte (see comment #3 below) (I" e~\) Buildine Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) 1 On the proposed sIte plan drawmg, place a labeled symbol that represents the locatIon of the reqUIred handIcap accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg. 2, Withm the site data found on sheet A-2, IdentIfy the proposed fimsh floor elevatIon of the bUIldmg (lowest floor elevatIon) Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn complIes wIth regulatIOns of the code by addmg speCIficatIons and notes to the site data that address the followmg Issues a) From the FEMA map, IdentIfy the tItle of the flood zone that the bUIldmg IS located wlthm. Where applIcable, speCIfy the base flood elevatIOn. If there IS no base flood elevatIOn, mdlcate that on the plans. b) The desIgn professIOnal-of-record for the project shall, state wlthm the SIte data that the proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn IS above the hIghest 1 OO-year base flood elevatIOn applIcable to the bUIldmg SIte, as detenmned by the South Flonda Water Management Dlstnct's surface water management constructIOn development regulatIOns. [SectIon 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edItIon of the Standard BUIldmg Code] c) IdentIfy the appropnate fimsh floor elevatIon wlthm the footpnnt of the bUIldmg that IS depIcted on the floor plan, SIte plan and CIvIl drawmg. 3 The configuratIon of the faCIlIty that IS shown on the SIte plan does not match the configuratIon that IS depIcted on the CIVIl plans. Correct all plans VIew drawmgs accordmgly '1 4 The proposed site plan drawmg, IdentIfy the symbol that represents the property lIne, Building DIvIsion Memo No. 00-061 Re: Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah s Witnesses-New Site Plan (NWSP 99-025)2od review comments March 3, 2000 Page Two (-) Q5 At time of3rd reVIew, submIt a current survey of the subject property ( -4 6 , Add to the drawmg titled proposed site plan all easements that are shown on the survey The locatIOn, type and SIze of the easement(s) shall be shown and IdentIfied on the SIte plan, Where applIcable, amend the plans so that structures do not encroach mto an easement. 7 Add to the site data the number of stones m the new bUIldmg. Also, mdIcate the overall heIght of the bUIldmg (fimsh grade to the hIghest pomt of the roof) The overall heIght of the bUIldmgs shall not exceed the heIght lImItatIOns of the Zonmg Code, On the elevatIOn VIew drawmgs of the bUIldmg, dImensIOn the overall heIght of the bUIldmg. j ,8 Below the drawmg titled Floor Plan that IS found on sheet A-3, add text that would mdIcate that the room layout shown on the floor plan IS conceptual. \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA TA\Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99-025 2nd review Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses,doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO 00-061 TO Michael Rumpf, Plannmg and Zonmg DIrector FROM. Michael E Haag, BUIldmg Code Admmlstrator DATE March 3, 2000 RE Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses - New Site Plan (NWSP 99-025) 2nd review comments We have revIewed the subject plans and recommend that the request not be forwarded for Board. ThIs recommendatIOn IS based on the fact that the plan VIew drawmgs are not conSIstent WIth respect to the configuratIOn of the sIte (see comment #4 below) Buildine Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) 1 On the proposed sIte plan drawmg, place a labeled symbol that represents the locatIOn of the reqUIred handIcap accessible entrance door to the bUIldmg, 2 Withm the site data found on sheet A-2, IdentIfy the proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn ofthe bUIldmg (lowest floor elevatIOn) Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn complIes WIth regulatIOns of the code by addmg speCIficatIOns and notes to the site data that address the followmg Issues a) From the FEMA map, IdentIfy the tItle of the flood zone that the bUIldmg IS located wlthm. Where applIcable, speCIfy the base flood elevatIOn, If there IS no base flood elevatIOn, mdlcate that on the plans. b) The deSIgn professIOnal-of-record for the project shall, state WIthm the SIte data that the proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn IS above the hIghest 100-year base flood elevatIOn applIcable to the bUIldmg SIte, as determmed by the South Flonda Water Management Dlstnct s surface water management constructIOn development regulatIOns. [SectIOn 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edItIon of the Standard BUIldmg Code] c) IdentIfy the appropnate fimsh floor elevatIOn wlthm the footpnnt of the bUIldmg that IS depIcted on the floor plan, SIte plan and CIvIl draWing. O\~~ c The configuratIOn of the faCIlIty that IS shown on the SIte plan does not match the configuratIOn that IS depIcted on the CIvIl plans. Correct all plans VIew draWings accordmgly 4 The proposed site plan drawmg, IdentIfy the symbol that represents the property lIne Building Division Memo No 00-061 Re: Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses-New Site Plan (NWSP 99-025)2nd review comments March 3, 2000 Page Two 5 At tIme of 3rd reVIew, submIt a current survey of the subject property 6 Add to the drawmg tItled proposed site plan all easements that are shown on the survey The locatIOn, type and SIze of the easement(s) shall be shown and IdentIfied on the sIte plan. Where applIcable, amend the plans so that structures do not encroach mto an easement. 7 Add to the site data the number of stones m the new bUIldmg. Also, mdIcate the overall heIght of the bUIldmg (fimsh grade to the hIghest pomt of the roof) The overall heIght of the bUIldmgs shall not exceed the heIght lImItatIOns of the Zomng Code On the elevatIOn VIew drawmgs of the bUIldmg, dImensIOn the overall heIght of the bUIldmg. 8 Below the drawmg tItled Floor Plan that IS found on sheet A-3, add text that would mdIcate that the room layout shown on the floor plan IS conceptual. \\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T A \Development\Building-6870\Documents\TRC\NWSP 99-025 2nd review Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses,doc q ~1i/ '/1 Aoo\ -ncw L.,.. Q...f-IY) rLGYlelAJ ~ik.~ i-Ji.. ..tI ;j1o~ c3.eu~olr,~ ..2}.e... fU?tvJkel. Q'~l ~~'- j~j &II~ ~b~lw1ii-: oLn~~, () Ii! ;:'i-il. It)M~ ~. f~. 11.. _. (I eb-litf ,,-~ ~ It ~ ~ ~ 3;- ~n;(J\4~~c., <;F~ I" <;;z~<}-f~ IeI-. i!1 ~!:~0.+r'CL~lfO Ji'le~fuJ.V81rud ?J"1;tJt:WC5+-. . . ~ ;l. ~ Tr~ ~rd ~ 3 r:n.L ('~o,CcI (~n +-5 A-oJJ4StJ~O IJ ~:: - Q-.. ~p~ ' 5 ,_j ~ dll,"'sl",6lI.,,~...t.- cUl~ ~ ~ ' , , L 1 ~ ~ :/ ,~" ,~~ ~ iofd ~~~.~kfu~h& jfta~f2~V/f,~<,j (~ 'Ij, ~~ i [ Cffl( ~ }1 ok en ~ f{~ ~/..a.i' A',. 2J, . ..,~ ~ r" -... ., _ "----" '-.r' " ojl ' "7 ,I' ~,.vdd.M,1 ~ ~i~ ~...hM~ 'V,y..., ~ ~c~ elk~ ; i ~,$i.:f,~ f'~~ ~,~J.w. A-_~. ,OM tAJ(JJJ. ~~ .~,~M.ttTd : al\d. SI1aJ.L la. Ch..t 'Wd,., Cl<Q- h<.Pf (I- lh) So:>...t -f<ut , : ~..,~;J~ -# .f.CtCM ~ l/) foo+ c9j- ~ bw~ ~ " __~/,.,..J;.e- ~ ~'~.K-II~ sif p.At- 1-!lH-. ~ i I - . ~~IIa, - (') ~ 1, 9 ~b 14 F:-lJ i1fp..L d.m~J/~ f- ~__,__, ~ sn s~~ &,-.. ~kJ.f A-,..'t, Ifl.c4C/l.k ~ SI2J2.) ~jU ~~ ((5-{lM- ~ ~?Y I~ · j ~ i j ',j j i ~ .I J I I, ' jll I, i :\ SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS FOR BOYNTON BEACH KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOV AD'S WITNESSES JANUARY 2000 February 28, 2000 CIty of Boynton Beach Re SIte Plan Approval Boynton Beach Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses To Whom It May Concern. The project name IS the Boynton Beach Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses, located at 1512 N.E 4th Street m Boynton Beach. EXISTING WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The eXIstmg property consIsts of approxImately 3,640 sfbmldmg and 39,920 sf of ImpervIOUS asphalt parkmg. There IS currently no legal posItive outfall for the sIte Three catchbasms provIdes water qualIty through an ex filtratIOn trench, The sIte IS graded to dram toward N.E. 4th street. PROPOSED WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The proposed proJ ect consIsts of a new Kmgdom Hall (4,665 sf) wIth new parkmg area (26,310 sf) and enlarged landscape area (12,632 sf) The eXIstmg water management system wIll be replaced wIth a system that wIll provIde water qualIty through approxImately 40 LF of exfiltratlon trench. Companng the pre-development vs. post-development hydrology shows a decrease m runoff as the sIte IS graded to be self-contamed and swales are used throughout the sIte CONCLUSION The new water management system IS mtended to not only provIde the reqUIred water treatment but also Improve the overall qualIty of the eXIstmg sIte As shown thIS IS done by utIlIzmg exfiltratlon treatment for the ImpervIous area dIscharge and mcorporatmg water qualIty measures such as PollutIOn Retardent Baffles and sumps m the catch basms to treat the water pnor to dIscharge mto the swale areas. There IS an overall Improvement to the storm system as the Pre development dIscharge IS decreased by 7%. D:\CAD,drawings\RBCIBoyton Beach\boynton.REPORT,doc SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS FOR Boynton Beach Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS I. Water Management CalculatIOn and Santa Barabara Flood Routmgs Summary 1 II. ProJ ect LocatIOn Map 2 ill, Project Land Use Summary 3 IV DeSIgn Ramfall Events 4 V SIte Gradmg & Surface Storage AssumptIOns 5-6 VI. SoIl Storage 7 VIT. Water QualIty CalculatIOns 8 Vill, ExfiltratIOn Trench ComputatIons 9-10 IX. Santa Barbara Flood Routmgs 5-Year, 24-Hour DeSIgn Storm Event la-Year, 24-HourDesIgn Storm Event 25- Year, 72-Hour DeSIgn Storm Event lOa-Year, 72-Hour DeSIgn Storm Event - Zero DIscharge 11 X, Pre-Development Hydrology a-I I. WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS AND FLOOD ROUTINGS SUMMARY Proiect Drainaee Area 1 001 Acres Total Proiect Drainaee Area LOOt Acres Minimum Buildine Floor Elevation 15.35 Ft., NGVD Minimum Road Crown Elevation 1440 Ft., NGVD 5-Year. 24-Hour Desien Storm Event Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 14.24 Ft., NGVD to-Year. 72-Hour Desien Storm Event Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 1440 Ft., NGVD 25-Year. 72-Hour Desien Storm Event Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 14 98 Ft., NGVD tOO-Year. 72-Hour Desien Storm Event - Zero Discharee Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 15.35 Ft., NGVD Page 1 III. PROJECT LAND USE SUMMARY Proiect Land Use - Impervious / Pervious Area Total Impervious Pervious Area Area Area Post-Development (Acres) % Impervious (Acres) (Acres) BUIldIng 0107 100% o 107 0000 ParkIng 0604 100% 0604 0000 BasIn 0031 0% 0031 0000 Green 0.259 0% 0.000 0.259 Sub- Total 1 001 0742 0.259 Total. tOOt 0742 0.259 Page 3 IV. DESIGN RAINFAl EVENTS Desien Storm 5-Year,24-Hour 1O-Year,24-Hour 25- Year, 72-Hour 1 DO-Year, 72-Hour Source: SFWMD Basis of Review 24-Hour Rainfall Depth (inches) 75" 8 7 " 105" 135 " Total Rainfall (inches) 75" 8 7 " 14.3 " 183 " Page 4 v. SITE GRADING ~ URF ACE STORAGE ASSUMPTIG_ j Proiect Area. Proposed-Development Total BuildIng BUIldIng Storage Area Area Area Area Storage Range Proiect Area (Acres ) (%) ( Acres) (Acres ) ~ From To BUIldIng 0107 100% 011 0000 V 1550 UP ParkIng 0604 0% 000 0604 L 13.5 149 Green 0.259 0% 000 0.259 L 120 14.5 BaSIn 0031 0% 000 0031 L 120 140 Sub- Total 1.001 Total 1.001 Page 5 Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Computation Type STAGE-STORAGE Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer1s Name hc Name Green Basin Parking Area 0 26 0 03 0 60 S Elev 12 00 12 00 13 50 E Elev 14 50 0 00 14 90 Stage Linear Vert Linear Total Feet Storage Storage Storage Storage NGVD ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft 12 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 12 50 0 01 0 02 0 00 0 03 13 00 0 05 0 03 0 00 0 08 13 50 0 12 0 05 0 00 0 16 14 00 0 21 0 06 0 05 0 32 14 50 0 32 0 08 0 22 0 62 15 00 0 45 0 09 0 48 1 03 15 50 0 58 0 11 0 79 1 48 16 00 0 71 0 12 1 09 1 92 16 50 0 84 0 14 1 39 2 37 17 00 0 97 0 16 1 69 2 82 17 50 1 10 0 17 1 99 3 26 18 00 1 23 0 19 2 30 3 71 18 50 1 36 0 20 2 60 4 16 19 00 1 49 0 22 2 90 4 61 19 50 1 62 0 23 3 20 5 05 20 00 1 75 0 25 3 50 5 50 VI. SOIL STORAGE Proiect Soil Storaee. Avg. Uncompacted Compacted FIlllshed SOli SOli SOli PervIOus Grade DTWT Storage Storage Storage * DescrIptIon Area (Ft. NGVD) (F eet) (Inches ) (Inches ) (Ac-Ft.) Green 0.29 130 70 90 68 o 16 TOTAL 0.29 0.16 EqUIvalent SoIl Storage (S) = 1 96" Curve Number = 1 OOO/(S + 10) = 836 * SOli Storage based on depth to water table and compactIon. Used flatwoods category See SFWMD BaSIS of RevIew Page 7 VII. WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS Given. I. A. Acreage 1 Lake= 2. Roofs= 3 Pavmg & others= 4 Green areas= 5 T otal= o 0107 o 6039 0.29 1001 III. II. Design Cntem A. Quahty - Dry Retention System--50% of Volume reqUired for Wet detention system. Computations A. Quality. 1 Compute the first inch of runoff from the entire drainage basin. 100 inch X 1.001 ac XI ftl12in 0.0834 ac-ft for the first inch of runoff. 2. Compute 2.5 m. times the percentage of imperviousness: a. Site area, for water quality pervious/impervIOus calculations only' = Drainage Basin (lake + roof) = 100lac (O.OOOac+ 0.107ac) =0.8939 ac. site area, for water quality pervious/impervious b. Impervious area, for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only' = (Drainage area for water quality pervious/impervious) pervious = 0.8939 ac 0.290 ac =0.6039...l!f. Impervious area, for water quality pervious/impervious. c. Percentage of imperviousness for water quality. =(ImpervlOus area for water quality / site area for water quality) X 100 % =0 6039 ac.! 0.8939 ac 100% =67.56% impervious d. For 2.5 in. time the percentage Impervious = 2.5 in. x 67.56% =1.69 in. to be treated e. =Compute volume required for quality detention. =inches to be treated x (total site lake) =1 69 in. X (1001 ac 00000 ac.) X I ft.!12 in, = 0.141 ac-ft required detention storage The first mch of runoff from the entire developed site= 2.5 m. times the percentage oflmperviousness= o 0834 ac-ft o 141 ac-ft 3 The volume of 0.141 ac-ft controls. 4 Compute credit for using a dry-detention system: Dry detention volume shall be provided equal to 50 percent of the wet detention volume: =0141 ac-ftX50% =00705 ac-ft of volume required for dry detention =3.071 cf of volume required for dry detention Page 8 VIII. EXFILTRATION TREh~H COMPUTATIONS FOR WATEk QUALITY. The ex filtratIon trench IS used to meet the water qualIty cntena of the South florIda Water Management DIstnct. EXFILTRATION TRENCH ASSUMPTIONS Length of Trench ProvIded. Top of Trench. Bottom of Trench. PIpe Invert. HydraulIc ConductIvIty' ExfiltratIOn Trench Width. AVaIlable SoIl Storage, SFWMD 45 00 ft. 12.30 NGVD 910 NGVD 10 10 NGVD 3 150E-04 cfs/ft.2 - ft. Head 7 00 ft. 197 m. EXFILTRATION TRENCH COMPUTATIONS. 1 Length= VI {Kx((HxW)+(2xHxDu)-(DuxDu)+(2xHxDs)) + (0 000139xWxDu) } for Du > Ds Length= VI {Kx((2xHxDu)-(DuxDu)+(2xHxDs)) + (0 000139xWxDu) } for Du < Ds Length= VI {C } Where (K) (cfs/ft.2 - ft. Head) HydraulIc ConductIvIty' (V) (Ac-m.) = Volume to be Treated. (H) (ft.) = Depth to Water Table (Average Ground ElevatIOn - Water Table) Unsaturated Trench Depth. Saturated Trench Depth. Trench Width. 7 00 ft. (Du) (ft.) = (Ds) (ft.) = (W) (ft.) = V=(Ac-m.) H = (ft.) Du = (ft.) Ds = (ft.) K=(2) 085 600 3.20 000 3 15E-04 2 ReqUIred and Proposed length of trench. L=( ft) L=(ft) Storage m Trench. C L = (ft.) (ReqUIred) (AvaIlable) V(tr). o 02521 3355 3355 4500 009 (2) The HydraulIc Conductivity (K) is referenced from the Ardaman & Associates Inc. report dated February 22,2000 Page 9 FROM REG Archit~cts PHONE l'lO 407 659+5546 ( Feb. 22 2000 01 04PM P3 ~ SFWMD USUAL OPEN-HOLE TEST OQ.OO-OI.OO Brown fin. und Oa.Oo-o&.DC Gray~ bro." fia'.. aaMI :Q I I -.-1' ..............i.,.............. .,....~.,.~. ~~.: .r;;;r.- ,...... r . 1 ;';':illE'It;II1:=lI~!i :-:II;-:r::::m::: I =-It'~ ==l11~t;;;I'-m!.:::..'ij'!1.:IT.:;.::<"""J.;.;IE3t I I r'- d 11~1 -" T' .....: 1I::i . ! , i I I I I I i I : i I I I ! Ii,' \ i ! I! I ~I II ; I : I I l~d~1 \ f . I \ \ ! I I \ i I t---------t II : I Os .~.pth (ft) ___...80U D..crlptlon t!IltIi. ......._ -' _t.wM. Kc= 4Q lfCl(2H:+4H,O..tta d) K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTI.VITY (CPS/FT2-FT HEAD1.__.. .3!1e. X Q = "STABILIZ!D" FLOW RAT!! (~prS) 9.29x10-' d = DIAMETER OF TEST HOLE {FEET} 0.5 H. = DEPTH TO WATER TABLe (FEET) IS+ D.1I SATURATED HOLE DEPTH (FEEn. 0 (.]: By groundwater -4 10__ .... ."- ._- ;i ~ l~ IXilL TltATIDN 'rUT ~ w.u. e. JIMl)Y"8 ~ ..,. In lIT" WT.lUQ!r 'O~N'I'OM 1lACtt. ",OIIDA r :t: -- ... , .0& SANTA BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 5-YEAR, 24-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer's Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 5 years Rainfall Duration 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall 7 5 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 0 03 o 00 3 13 00 0 08 o 00 4 13 50 0 16 o 00 5 14 00 o 32 o 00 6 14 50 0 62 o 00 7 15 00 1 03 0 00 8 15 50 1 48 o 00 9 16 00 1 92 o 00 10 16 50 2 37 0 00 11 17 00 2 82 o 00 12 17 50 3 26 o 00 13 18 00 3 71 o 00 14 18 50 4 16 0 00 15 19 00 4 61 0 00 16 19 50 5 05 o 00 17 20 00 5 50 o 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 34 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 1 03 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18 10 00 1 60 0 46 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 53 11 00 2 02 0 74 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 71 11 50 2 39 1 01 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 86 11 75 3 66 2 04 1 7 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05 12 00 4 92 3 16 3 5 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 39 12 50 5 47 3 66 1 7 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 80 13 00 5 75 3 93 0 7 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 95 14 00 6 14 4 28 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 04 16 00 6 60 4 72 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 20 00 7 14 5 23 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 19 24 00 7 50 5 57 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 Maximum Stage = 14 24 feet Maximum Discharge = 0 00 cfs SANTA BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 10- YEAR, 24-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer's Name he Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 10 years Rainfall Duration 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall 8 7 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 o 00 2 12 50 0 03 o 00 3 13 00 0 08 o 00 4 13 50 0 16 o 00 5 14 00 0 32 o 00 6 14 50 0 62 o 00 7 15 00 1 03 o 00 8 15 50 1 48 o 00 9 16 00 1 92 o 00 10 16 50 2 37 o 00 11 17 00 2 82 o 00 12 17 50 3 26 o 00 13 18 00 3 71 o 00 14 18 50 4 16 o 00 15 19 00 4 61 o 00 16 19 50 5 05 o 00 17 20 00 5 50 o 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 39 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 1 19 0 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 10 00 1 85 0 62 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 65 11 00 2 34 0 97 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 87 11 50 2 78 1 31 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 04 11 75 4 24 2 55 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 12 00 5 71 3 88 4 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 56 12 50 6 34 4 48 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 99 13 00 6 67 4 79 0 8 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 09 14 00 7 12 5 21 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 17 16 00 7 66 5 72 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 25 20 00 8 28 6 32 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 34 24 00 8 70 6 72 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 40 Maximum Stage = 14 40 feet Maximum Discharge = 0 00 cfs SANTA BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 25- YEAR, 72-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW.s Engineer's Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 25 years Rainfall Duration 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall 10 5 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 0 03 0 00 3 13 00 0 08 0 00 4 13 50 0 16 0 00 5 14 00 o 32 0 00 6 14 50 o 62 o 00 7 15 00 1 03 0 00 8 15 50 1 48 0 00 9 16 00 1 92 0 00 10 16 50 2 37 0 00 11 17 00 2 82 0 00 12 17 50 3 26 o 00 13 18 00 3 71 0 00 14 18 50 4 16 0 00 15 19 00 4 61 o 00 16 19 50 5 05 0 00 17 20 00 5 50 0 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 26 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 0 51 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 01 12 00 0 77 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 08 16 00 1 02 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 20 00 1 28 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 39 24 00 1 53 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 55 28 00 1 91 0 66 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 73 32 00 2 28 0 93 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 93 36 00 2 65 1- 21 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10 40 00 3 02 1 51 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 25 44 00 3 40 1 82 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 41 48 00 3 77 2 14 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 54 52 00 4 24 2 55 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 64 56 00 5 21 3 42 l j 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 85 58 00 6 01 4 16 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 02 59 00 6 59 4 71 0 6 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 09 59 50 7 12 5 21 0 9 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 59 75 8 89 6 90 2 9 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 21 60 00 10 66 8 62 5 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 36 60 50 11 42 9 37 2 6 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 62 61 00 11 82 9 76 1 1 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 70 62 00 12 36 10 28 0 5 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 77 64 00 13 01 10 92 0 3 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 84 68 00 13 77 11 66 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 92 72 00 14 27 12 16 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 98 Maximum Stage = 14 98 feet Maximum Discharge = o 00 cfs SANT A BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 100- YEAR, 72-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW.s Engineer.s Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 100 years Rainfall Duration 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall 13 5 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 0 03 0 00 3 13 00 o 08 0 00 4 13 50 0 16 0 00 5 14 00 o 32 0 00 6 14 50 0 62 0 00 7 15 00 1 03 o 00 8 15 50 1 48 0 00 9 16 00 1 92 0 00 10 16 50 2 37 0 00 11 17 00 2 82 0 00 12 17 50 3 26 0 00 13 18 00 3 71 0 00 14 18 50 4 16 0 00 15 19 00 4 61 0 00 16 19 50 5 05 0 00 17 20 00 5 50 0 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 33 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 0 66 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 04 12 00 0 99 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18 16 00 1 31 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 41 20 00 1 64 0 49 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 60 24 00 1 97 0 70 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 76 28 00 2 45 1 05 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 01 32 00 2 93 1 43 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 36 00 3 41 1 83 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 41 40 00 3 89 2 24 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 56 44 00 4 37 2 66 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 67 48 00 4 85 3 09 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 79 52 00 5 45 3 65 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 92 56 00 6 70 4 81 l- 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 58 00 7 72 5 78 0 6 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 59 00 8 48 6 51 0 8 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 33 59 50 9 15 7 16 1 2 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 40 59 75 11 43 9 37 3 8 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 49 60 00 13 70 11 60 7 3 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 63 60 50 14 69 12 57 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 92 61 00 15 20 13 08 1 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 02 62 00 15 89 13 76 0 7 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11 64 00 16 73 14 58 0 4 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 20 68 00 17 70 15 55 0 2 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 72 00 18 35 16 19 0 2 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 35 Maximum Stage = 15 35 feet Maximum Discharge = o 00 cfs Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc Boynton Beach Kingdom Hall of JW's-Pre-Development ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin B-BOY Node N-BOY Status On Site Type SCS Unit Hydr Group BASE Unit Hydrograph Rainfall File Rainfall Amount (in) Area(ac) Curve # DCIA(%) UH2 5 6 SFWMD72 14 3 1 001 98 6 95 Peak Factor Storm Duration(hrs) o 72 Concentration Time (min) Lag Time(hrs) 15 o Pre-Development Hydrology-Boynton Bch KH of JW's Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc [1] Pre-Development Hydrology 25yr-3day Boynton Beach KH of JW's ********** Basin Results Summary - S-BOY ******************* Basin Name Time Max (hrs) Flow Max (cfs) Runoff Volume (in) Runoff Volume (cf) ------------------------------------------------------------ B-BOY 60 03 5 54 14 19 51567 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc Post Development Hydrology -Boynton Bch KH of JW's 25 yr 3 day Hydrology ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin B-BOY Node N-BOY Status On Site Type SCS Unit Hydr Group BASE Unit Hydrograph Rainfall File Rainfall Amount (in) Area(ac) Curve # DCIA(%) UH256 SFWMD72 14 3 1 001 83 6 50 Peak Factor Storm Duration(hrs) Concentration Time(min) Lag Time (hrs) Boynton Beach KH of JW's Post Devlopment o 72 15 o Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc [1] Post Development Hydrology 25hr - 3 Day Boynton Beach KH of JW.s ********** Basin Results Summary - S-POST ****************** Basin Name Time Max (hrs) Flow Max (cfs) Runoff Volume (in) Runoff Volume (cf) B-BOY 60 03 5 44 13 19 47927 Parks Division Memorandum- TRC Subject Mike Rumpf, Director ofPlanmng and Zomng KevIn J Hallahan, Forester / EnvIronmentalIst 1< ~ % Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses New Site Plan -1st Review To From. Date January 6,2000 The follOWIng comments are m reference to the landscape plan reVIew of the above project. The applIcant should mdicate on the plans If there are any eXIstmg desirable trees, whIch WIll be preserved In place. relocated or removed and replaced on the Site ThIS InfOrmatiOn would be m addItIOn to the landscape plan mformatIon. The project should contInue m the normal reVIew process. KJh MEMORANDUM UTILITIES DEPT NO 00-01 TO. Mike Rumpf, Planning Director d John A. Guidry, Utilities Director \ A... January 4, 2000 0J ~ ~ I~l ,f' . r2(D) Uu'; - ~J l ~I> .... f1.- FROM. DATE. SUBJECT Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses 1st Review We offer the following comments on this project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) All utilities easements shall be shown on the rectified landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utihty easements Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future LD R Sec 7 5-18 1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way 2) Dept. of Health permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project. (Sec 26-12) 3) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1500 g p.m. as stated in LDR chap 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see Sec 26-16(a)) Please submit these calculations with your Health Department permit submittal. 4) Sec 26-34(E) of the City Code requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon my request for signature on the Health Dept. application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon fmal meter size, or expected demand. 5) Comp Plan policy 3C 3 4 requires the conservation of potable water City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available 6) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District. (LDR Chap 4, sec 7F) SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 1) Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in Sec 26-33(a) of the Code 2) This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the certificate of occupancy 3) LDR chap 6, Article IV, Sec 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants 4) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with Sec 26-207 5) A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this office has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to serve the project. (Sec 26-15) 6) Provide drainage calculations showmg the amount of rainfall to be retained on-site Please refer any questions on this matter to Peter Mazzella (742-6404) of this office JAG/PVM Xc Skip Milor Peter Mazzella File ,.. j' SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS FOR BOYNTON BEACH KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES JANUARY 2000 February 28, 2000 CIty of Boynton Beach Re SIte Plan Approval. Boynton Beach Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses To Whom It May Concern. The project name IS the Boynton Beach Kmgdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses, located at 1512 N E. 4th Street m Boynton Beach. EXISTING WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The eXIstmg property consIsts of approxImately 3,640 sfbUlldmg and 39,920 sf of ImpervIOus asphalt parkmg. There IS currently no legal posItIve outfall for the SIte. Three catchbasms provIdes water qualIty through an ex filtratIon trench. The SIte IS graded to dram toward N.E 4th street. PROPOSED WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM The proposed project consIsts of a new Kmgdom Hall (4,665 sf) wIth new parkmg area (26,310 sf) and enlarged landscape area (12,632 sf) The eXIstmg water management system WIll be replaced wIth a system that WIll prOVIde water qualIty through approxImately 40 LF of exfiltratIon trench. Companng the pre-development VS. post-development hydrology shows a decrease m runoff as the SIte IS graded to be self-contamed and swales are used throughout the SIte CONCLUSION The new water management system IS mtended to not only prOVIde the reqUIred water treatment but also Improve the overall qualIty of the eXIstmg SIte. As shown thIS IS done by utIlIzmg ex filtratIOn treatment for the ImpervIOUS area dIscharge and mcorporatmg water qualIty measures such as PollutIOn Retardent Baffles and sumps m the catch basms to treat the water pnor to dIscharge mto the swale areas. There IS an overall Improvement to the storm system as the Pre development dIscharge IS decreased by 7% Do\CAD-drawingsIRBClBoyton Beach\boynton-REPORT.doc SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS FOR Boynton Beach Kingdom Hall of Jehovah's Witnesses SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS I. Water Management CalculatIOn and Santa Barabara Flood Routmgs Summary 1 IT. Project LocatIOn Map 2 m. Project Land Use Summary 3 IV DesIgn Ramfall Events 4 V SIte Gradmg & Surface Storage AssumptIOns 5-6 VI. SoIl Storage 7 VIT. Water QualIty CalculatIons 8 vm. ExfiltratIOn Trench ComputatIOns 9-10 IX. Santa Barbara Flood Routmgs 5- Year, 24-Hour DesIgn Storm Event 1 0- Year, 24-Hour DesIgn Storm Event 25- Year, 72-Hour DesIgn Storm Event 100-Year, 72-Hour DesIgn Storm Event - Zero DIscharge 11 X. Pre-Development Hydrology a-I I, WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS AND FLOOD ROUTINGS SUMMARY Project Drainaee Area 1 001 Acres Total Project Drainaee Area 1.001 Acres Minimum Buildine Floor Elevation 1535 Ft., NGVD Minimum Road Crown Elevation 1440 Ft., NGVD 5-Year. 24-Hour DesieD Storm Event Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 14.24 Ft., NGVD 10-Year. 72-Hour DesieD Storm Event Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 1440 Ft., NGVD 25-Year. 72-Hour Desien Storm Event Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 1498 Ft., NGVD 100-Year. 72-Hour Desien Storm Event - Zero Discharee Peak Stage Ft.. NGVD. 15.35 Ft., NGVD Page 1 III. PROJECT LAND USE SUMMARY Proiect Land Use - Impervious I Pervious Area Total Impervious Pervious Area Area Area Post-Develooment (Acres) % Impervious (Acres) (Acres) BUIldmg o 107 100% o 107 0000 Parkmg 0604 100% 0604 0000 Basm 0031 0% 0031 0000 Green 0.259 0% 0.000 0.259 Sub- Total 1 001 0742 0.259 Total 1.001 0.742 0.259 Page 3 IV, DESIGN RAINFALL EVENTS Desien Storm 5-Year,24-Hour 10-Year,24-Hour 25-Year,72-Hour 1 DO-Year, 72-Hour Source: SFWMD Basis of Review 24-Hour Rainfall Depth (inches) 7.5 " 87" 105" 135 " Total Rainfall (inches) 75" 8 7 " 14.3 " 183 " Page 4 v. SITE GRADING & ..,URFACE STORAGE ASSUMPTIuu" Project Area. Proposed-Development Total BUIldmg BUIldmg Storage Area Area Area Area Storage Range Proiect Area (Acres ) (%) (Acres) ( Acres) ~ From To Bmldmg 0107 100% 011 0000 V 1550 UP Parkmg 0604 0% 000 0604 L 135 149 Green 0.259 0% 000 0.259 L 120 14.5 Basm 0031 0% 000 0031 L 120 140 Sub- Total. 1.001 Total 1.001 Page 5 Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Computation Type STAGE-STORAGE Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer.s Name hc Name Green Basin Parking Area 0 26 0 03 0 60 S Elev 12 00 12 00 13 50 E Elev 14 50 0 00 14 90 Stage Linear Vert Linear Total Feet Storage Storage Storage Storage NGVD ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft 12 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 12 50 0 01 0 02 0 00 0 03 13 00 0 05 0 03 0 00 0 08 13 50 0 12 0 05 0 00 0 16 14 00 0 21 0 06 0 05 0 32 14 50 0 32 0 08 0 22 0 62 15 00 0 45 0 09 0 48 1 03 15 50 0 58 0 11 0 79 1 48 16 00 0 71 0 12 1 09 1 92 16 50 0 84 0 14 1 39 2 37 17 00 0 97 0 16 1 69 2 82 17 50 1 10 0 17 1 99 3 26 18 00 1 23 0 19 2 30 3 71 18 50 1 36 0 20 2 60 4 16 19 00 1 49 0 22 2 90 4 61 19 50 1 62 0 23 3 20 5 05 20 00 1 75 0 25 3 50 5 50 VI. SOIL STORAGE Project Soil Storaee: Avg. Uncompacted Compacted FImshed SoIl SOli SoIl PervIOus Grade DTWT Storage Storage Storage * DeSCrIptIOn Area (Ft. NGVD) (F eet) (Inches ) (Inches ) (Ac-Ft.) Green 0.29 130 70 90 68 o 16 TOTAL 0.29 016 EqUIvalent SoIl Storage (S) = 1 96" Curve Number = 1000/(S + 10) = 836 * SoIl Storage based on depth to water table and compactIOn. Used flatwoods category See SFWMD BasIs of RevIew Page 7 VII. WATER QUALITY CALCULA TIO~S Given. I. A. Acreage 1 Lake= 2. Roofs= 3 Pavmg & others= 4 Green areas= 5 T otal= o 0107 o 6039 0.29 1001 III. II. Design Critem A. QualIty - Dry Retention System--50% of Volume reqUired for Wet detentIOn system. ComputatIons. A. Quality. 1 Compute the first inch of runoff from the entire drainage basin. I 00 inch X 1 001 ac X 1 ft/12in 0.0834 ac-ft for the first inch of runoff. 2. Compute 2.5 m. times the percentage of imperviousness: a. Site area, for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only' = Drainage Basm (lake + roof) = 100Iac-(OOOOac+ 0107ac) =0.8939 ac. site area, for water quality pervious/impervious b. Impervious area, for water quality pervious/impervious calculations only' = (Drainage area for water quality pervious/impervious) pervIOus = 0.8939 ac 0.290 ac =0.6039...l!f. Impervious area, for water quality pervious/impervious. c. Percentage of imperviousness for water quality. =(Impervious area for water quality / site area for water quality) X 100 % =0.6039 ac.l 0.8939 ac 100% =67.56% impervious d. For 2.5 in. time the percentage impervious = 2.5 in. x 67.56% =1.69 in. to be treated e. =Compute volume required for quality detention. =inches to be treated x (total site lake) =1.69 in. X (1 00 I ac 00000 ac.) X I ft./12 in, = 0.141 ac-ft required detentIOn storage The first inch of runoff from the entire developed site= 2.5 in. times the percentage oflmperviousness= 3 0.0834 ac ft 0141 ac-ft The volume of 0.141 ac-ft controls. 4 Compute credit for using a dry-detention system: Dry detention volume shall be provided equal to 50 percent of the wet detention volume: =0141 ac-ft X 50% =0 0705 ac ft of volume required for dry detention =3.071 cf of volume required for dry detention Page 8 VIII. EXFILTRATION TREl'lL.H COMPUTATIONS FOR WATEk ..)UALITY. The ex filtratIOn trench IS used to meet the water qualIty cntena of the South Flonda Water Management DIstnct. EXFIL TRA TION TRENCH ASSUMPTIONS Length of Trench ProvIded Top of Trench Bottom of Trench. PIpe Invert. HydraulIc ConductIvIty. ExfiltratIon Trench Width. AVaIlable SOli Storage, SFWMD 45 00 ft. 12.30 NGVD 9 10 NGVD 10 10 NGVD 3 150E-04 cfs/ft.2 - ft. Head 7 00 ft. 197 m. EXFILTRATION TRENCH COMPUTATIONS. 1 Length= VI { Kx((HxW)+(2xHxDu)-(DuxDu)+(2xHxDs)) + (0 000139xWxDu) } for Du > Ds Length= VI {Kx((2xHxDu)-(DuxDu)+(2xHxDs)) + (0 000139xWxDu) } for Du < Ds Length= VI {C } Where (K) (cfs/ft.2 - ft. Head) HydraulIc ConductIvIty' (V) (Ac-m.) = Volume to be Treated. (H) (ft.) = Depth to Water Table (Average Ground ElevatIOn - Water Table) Unsaturated Trench Depth. Saturated Trench Depth. Trench Width. 7 00 ft. (Du) (ft.) = (Ds) (ft.) = (W) (ft.) = V=(Ac-m.) H = (ft.) Du = (ft.) Ds = (ft.) K=(2) 085 600 3.20 000 3 15E-04 2 ReqUIred and Proposed length of trench. L=(ft) L=( ft) Storage in Trench. C L = (ft.) (ReqUIred) (AvaIlable) V(tr): o 02521 3355 3355 4500 009 (2) The Hydraulic Conductivity (K) is referenced from the Ardaman & Associates Inc. report dated February 22,2000 Page 9 FROM REG Archit~cts PHOt'IE t'-lO 407 659+5546 ( Fee 22 2000 01 04PM P3 SFWMD USUAL OPEN-HOLE TEST :Q I .!!epth (tt) ___. H SOli D..crlptJ~ I -T .r--J.......A.' ir.r~i~gl~n~~T2ir~ II FI\g1fSll=m'!:r~m~il5leIElI. . ! , ; : I \ I : i II : i \ i 1 ! \ ~ ! I I j I \ ~d-i \ ! i \ ! I I 1 ' , I I 1 i 11'-- ------t I! j! Ds i OO.OO-DI.OO Brown fine ..nd Oa.oo-o&.aO GrayiM brow" f.... aaI\CI : i i ~2 I IIISE ......._ --' _tM..... K II; 4Q lfC1C2H:+4H,O..tta d) K = HYDRAULIC CONDUCTI.VITY (CFS/FT2-FT HEAD) 3.16 X Q = "STABILIZ!D" FLOW RAT! (GII&) 9.21Ix."0.' d = DIAMETER OF TEST HOLE {FEET} 0.5 H.= DEPTH TO WATER TA8Le (FEET) -1..+ D.lI! SATURATED HOLE DEPTH (FEEn* --. -. .-. 0 (.): By groundwater 10-4 ..... .'-'" ....- w ~ & "~iaolat... !no. c.a1aeh/ll4lsl. blAr__.llfai .I'd litIol.,lOls ",...l'~nts :1 :,; ~. , aALTIlA TIOIIl 1UT . ~ aIId.L c. ~y,.. \ImIIUad ..,. .. JtT" WT~ _ IO'1N'1'OM 1lAC64. IILOlUDA :l - ~ :1: -- ... t SANT A BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 5-YEAR, 24-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer's Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 5 years Rainfall Duration 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall 7 5 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 o 03 o 00 3 13 00 0 08 0 00 4 13 50 o 16 0 00 5 14 00 o 32 0 00 6 14 50 o 62 0 00 7 15 00 1 03 0 00 8 15 50 1 48 o 00 9 16 00 1 92 o 00 10 16 50 2 37 0 00 11 17 00 2 82 0 00 12 17 50 3 26 0 00 13 18 00 3 71 0 00 14 18 50 4 16 0 00 15 19 00 4 61 0 00 16 19 50 5 05 0 00 17 20 00 5 50 0 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (at) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 34 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 1 03 0 16 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18 10 00 1 60 0 46 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 53 11 00 2 02 0 74 0 3 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 71 11 50 2 39 1 01 0 5 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 86 11 75 3 66 2 04 1 7 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 05 12 00 4 92 3 16 3 5 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 39 12 50 5 47 3 66 1 7 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 80 13 00 5 75 3 93 0 7 0 3 _0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 95 14 00 6 14 4 28 0 3 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 04 16 00 6 60 4 72 0 2 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 20 00 7 14 5 23 0 1 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 19 24 00 7 50 5 57 0 1 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 --- Maximum Stage = 14 24 teet Maximum Discharge = 0 00 cfs SANT A BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 10-YEAR, 24-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer's Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 10 years Rainfall Duration 1 -day 24-hr Rainfall 8 7 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 0 03 0 00 3 13 00 o 08 0 00 4 13 50 0 16 o 00 5 14 00 o 32 0 00 6 14 50 o 62 0 00 7 15 00 1 03 0 00 8 15 50 1 48 0 00 9 16 00 1 92 0 00 10 16 50 2 37 0 00 11 17 00 2 82 0 00 12 17 50 3 26 o 00 13 18 00 3 71 0 00 14 18 50 4 16 0 00 15 19 00 4 61 0 00 16 19 50 5 05 0 00 17 20 00 5 50 0 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 39 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 1 19 0 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 27 10 00 1 85 0 62 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 65 11 00 2 34 0 97 0 4 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 87 11 50 2 78 1 31 0 6 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 04 11 75 4 24 2 55 2 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 12 00 5 71 3 88 4 2 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 56 12 50 6 34 4 48 2 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 99 13 00 6 67 4 79 0 8 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 09 14 00 7 12 5 21 0 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 17 16 00 7 66 5 72 0 3 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 25 20 00 8 28 6 32 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 34 24 00 8 70 6 72 0 1 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 40 Maximum Stage = 14 40 teet Maximum Discharge = 0 00 cfs SANTA BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 25-YEAR, 72-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer's Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 25 years Rainfall Duration 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall 10 5 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 0 03 0 00 3 13 00 o 08 0 00 4 13 50 0 16 0 00 5 14 00 o 32 0 00 6 14 50 0 62 0 00 7 15 00 1 03 0 00 8 15 50 1 48 0 00 9 16 00 1 92 0 00 10 16 50 2 37 o 00 11 17 00 2 82 0 00 12 17 50 3 26 o 00 13 18 00 3 71 0 00 14 18 50 4 16 0 00 15 19 00 4 61 0 00 16 19 50 5 05 0 00 17 20 00 5 50 0 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 26 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 0 51 0 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 01 12 00 0 77 0 06 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 08 16 00 1 02 0 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 21 20 00 1 28 0 28 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 39 24 00 1 53 0 42 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 55 28 00 1 91 0 66 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 73 32 00 2 28 0 93 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 93 36 00 2 65 1 21 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 10 40 00 3 02 1 51 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 25 44 00 3 40 1 82 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 41 48 00 3 77 2 14 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 54 52 00 4 24 2 55 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 64 56 00 5 21 3 42 C 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 85 58 00 6 01 4 16 0 4 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 02 59 00 6 59 4 71 0 6 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 09 59 50 7 12 5 21 0 9 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 14 59 75 8 89 6 90 2 9 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 21 60 00 10 66 8 62 5 6 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 36 60 50 11 42 9 37 2 6 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 62 61 00 11 82 9 76 1 1 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 70 62 00 12 36 10 28 0 5 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 77 64 00 13 01 10 92 0 3 0 9 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 84 68 00 13 77 11 66 0 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 92 72 00 14 27 12 16 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 98 Maximum Stage = 14 98 feet Maximum Discharge = o 00 cfs SANT A BARBARA FLOOD ROUTING 100- YEAR, 72-HOUR DESIGN STORM EVENT Company Name Execution Date 02-27-2000 Program Name Santa Barbara (05/03/85) Project Name Boynton Beach KH of JW's Engineer's Name hc Project Area 1 001 acres Ground Storage 1 96 inches Termination Discharge 5 cfs Time of Concentration 25 hours Distribution Type SFWMD Return Frequency 100 years Rainfall Duration 3 -day 24-hr Rainfall 13 5 inches Reporting Sequence Standardized Point Stage Storage Discharge No (ft) (af) (cfs) 1 12 00 0 00 0 00 2 12 50 0 03 0 00 3 13 00 0 08 0 00 4 13 50 0 16 0 00 5 14 00 o 32 0 00 6 14 50 0 62 o 00 7 15 00 1 03 o 00 8 15 50 1 48 0 00 9 16 00 1 92 o 00 10 16 50 2 37 0 00 11 17 00 2 82 0 00 12 17 50 3 26 0 00 13 18 00 3 71 0 00 14 18 50 4 16 o 00 15 19 00 4 61 o 00 16 19 50 5 05 0 00 17 20 00 5 50 0 00 - - - - - RES E R V 0 I R - - - - - Rain Accum Basin Accum Accum Instant Average Time fall Runoff Dischge Inflow Volume Outflow Dischge Dischge Stage (hr) ( in) ( in) (cfs) (af) (af) (af) (cfs) (cfs) (ft) 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 4 00 0 33 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 00 8 00 0 66 0 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 04 12 00 0 99 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 18 16 00 1 31 0 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 41 20 00 1 64 0 49 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 60 24 00 1 97 0 70 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 76 28 00 2 45 1 05 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 01 32 00 2 93 1 43 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 21 36 00 - 3 41 1 83 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 41 40 00 3 89 2 24 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 56 44 00 4 37 2 66 0 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 67 48 00 4 85 3 09 0 1 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 79 52 00 5 45 3 65 0 2 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 13 92 56 00 6 70 4 81 ( 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 11 58 00 7 72 5 78 0 6 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 24 59 00 8 48 6 51 0 8 0 5 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 33 59 50 9 15 7 16 1 2 0 6 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 40 59 75 11 43 9 37 3 8 0 7 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 49 60 00 13 70 11 60 7 3 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 63 60 50 14 69 12 57 3 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 92 61 00 15 20 13 08 1 4 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 02 62 00 15 89 13 76 0 7 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 11 64 00 16 73 14 58 0 4 1 2 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 20 68 00 17 70 15 55 0 2 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 29 72 00 18 35 16 19 0 2 1 3 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 35 Maximum Stage = 15 35 feet Maximum Discharge = o 00 cfs Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPK Ver 2 11) [1] Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc Boynton Beach Kingdom Hall of JW's-Pre-Development ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin B-BOY Node N-BOY Status On Site Type SCS Unit Hydr Group BASE Unit Hydrograph Rainfall File Rainfall Amount (in) Area(ac) Curve # DCIA(%) UH2 5 6 SFWMD72 14 3 1 001 98 6 95 Peak Factor Storm Duration(hrs) concentration Time (min) Lag Time (hrs) Pre-Development Hydrology-Boynton Bch KH of JW's o 72 15 o Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc [1] Pre-Development Hydrology 25yr-3day Boynton Beach KH of JW.s ********** Basin Results Summary - S-BOY ******************* Basin Name Time Max (hrs) Flow Max (cfs) Runoff Volume (in) Runoff Volume (cf) ------------------------------------------------------------ B-BOY 60 03 5 54 14 19 51567 Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (IC~R Ver 2 11) [1] Copyright 1995 Streamline Technologies, Inc Post Development Hydrology -Boynton Bch KH of JW's 25 yr 3 day Hydrology ********** Input Report ******************************************************** --------Class Basin------------------------------------------------------------ Basin B-BOY Node N-BOY Status On Site Type SCS Unit Hydr Group BASE Unit Hydrograph Rainfall File Rainfall Amount (in) Area(ac) Curve # DCIA(%) UH256 SFWMD72 14 3 1 001 83 6 50 Peak Factor Storm Duration(hrs) Concentration Time(min) Lag Time(hrs) Boynton Beach KH of JW's Post Devlopment o 72 15 o Advanced Interconnected Channel & Pond Routing (ICPR Ver 2 11) Copyright 1995, Streamline Technologies, Inc [1] Post Development Hydrology 25hr - 3 Day Boynton Beach KH of JW's ********** Basin Results Summary - S-POST ****************** Basin Name Time Max (hrs) Flow Max (cfs) Runoff Volume (in) Runoff Volume (cf) ------------------------------------------------------------ B-BOY 60 03 5 44 13 19 47927