REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-237
TO
Chair and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM
Michael Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP W
Planner (J
THRU
DATE
October 5, 2004
PROJECT
Gateway Shell (fka Gateway Texaco) / COUS 3-007 (revised)
REQUEST
Conditional Use approval for a 681 square foot addition to an existing
gasoline dispensing establishment
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner' SUAU Enterprises, Incorporated
Applicant/Agent: Mr Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location 2360 North Federal Highway (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning Local Retail Commercial (LRC) / Community Commercial (C-3)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning No change proposed
Proposed Use 681 square foot addition to an existing gasoline dispensing establishment
Acreage 0 48 acres (20,830 square feet)
Adjacent Uses
North
A multi-family residential property zoned Community Commercial (C-3),
South
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Road, and farther south are single-family
attached townhouses (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit Development
(IPUD),
East:
Vacant commercial lot, zoned Community Commercial (C-3), and farther
east is a single-family residential dwelling (part of Las Palmas development),
zoned Single-family residential (R-1AA), and
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 2
Memorandum No PZ 03-228
West:
Rights-of-way of U,S, 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and
zoned C-2 Neighborhood Commercial
PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION
Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject conditional use were mailed a notice of this request
and its respective hearing dates, The applicant certifies that they posted signage and mailed notices in
accordance with Ordinance No 04-007
BACKGROUND
Mr Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises, Incorporated
is requesting conditional use / major site plan modification approval in order to construct a 681 square
foot building addition to an existing gasoline dispensing establishment. The applicant is also proposing
new parking spaces, new landscaping, and a general "make-over" of the exterior facades of the existing
building and canopy However, the number of gasoline pump islands and fueling positions would remain
unaltered
The proposed building expansion is being considered for conditional use approval because gasoline
dispensing establishments are only allowed as conditional uses in the C-3 zoning district, Also, it should
be noted that this particular gas station is a legal non-conforming use because it is currently licensed as
a fully functional, operating gas station, but does not meet the location criteria for gas stations as
outlined by Chapter 2, Section 11 L.3,a (2) of the Land Development Regulations, The aforementioned
code requires gas stations to be located only on parcels at intersections "consisting of roads of four (4)
lanes or wider", Las Palmas is only two (2) lanes wide
In 2002, Mr Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition (for storage) to the existing gas station building, in part, to satisfy outstanding code
enforcement violations. At the time, a drive aisle (direct access) was proposed between the subject lot
and the lot directly to the east, which was previously earmarked for a mechanical car wash The direct
access was proposed in order to minimize vehicular traffic spilling onto Las Palmas Avenue Mr Kruger's
inquiries were based on the presumption that the proposed 681 square foot expansion would be
permitted (by right) and that direct access to the abutting lot (to the east) would only require site plan
review However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the building addition would not be
permitted (by-right) because it would represent an unlawful expansion of a legal non-conforming use (a
gasoline dispensing establishment) Furthermore, in response to Mr Kruger's inquiries, on July 16,
2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an administrative determination letter that basically
prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas station building because by doing so, would
constitute a violation of Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land Development Regulations,
Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the proposed driveway
connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east would be permitted subsequent to site
plan review However, the direct access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a
legally binding cross-access agreement between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east.
On July 31, 2002, Mr Kruger submitted a formal appeal of the staff's aforementioned administrative
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 3
Memorandum No PZ 03-228
determination According to the applicant, "in summary, the appeal justifies the proposed expansion by
the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the non-conforming aspect-
gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent of the gasoline sales
element of the business" Again, staff disagreed with the applicant's position However, the City
Commission approved the applicant's appeal with the condition that the expansion would be limited to
600 square feet.
On June 17, 2003, Mr Kruger submitted a request for conditional use / major site plan modification
approval and its accompanying nine (9) variances for the construction of the building addition Both
staff and the CRA reviewed the site plan and the variances and recommended approval contingent upon
43 conditions of approval, one of which, limited the building addition to 600 square feet. On October 21,
2003, the City Commission approved their request for conditional use / major site plan modification and
the accompanying variances, However, on November 18, 2003, the City Commission rescinded their
previous approvals. Therefore, this submittal for major site plan modification and accompanying nine
(9) variance requests represent the applicant's continuing effort to construct the building addition Staff
provides both an analysis and recommendation for each variance request in their respective staff report,
If approved, the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fa<;ade improvements would occur in one
(1) phase. It should be noted that the difference between this submittal and the original submittal as
described above, is that the proposed car wash on the abutting lot (to the east) has been abandoned
As such, the drive aisle that was to connect to the lot to the east has also been eliminated from the
design The existing building in conjunction with the proposed expansion would equal 2,319 square feet
(1,719 square feet plus 600 square feet)
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDmONAL USES AND ANALYSIS
Section 11.2.D of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which
conditional uses are required to conform Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to standards.
The Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses
as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant
conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the
dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined
necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny
conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section In evaluating an
application for conditional use approval, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings
certifying that satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following standards, where
applicable
1 Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access
in case of fire or catastrophe.
No driveway openings are being altered as a result of this major site plan modification. The site plan
(sheet 1 of 4) shows that there are two existing (2) "curb drops" on North Federal Highway
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 4
Memorandum No PZ 03-228
According to Chapter 2, Section 11.L.3.d. (1), driveway openings for gas-stations are required to be
located at least 120 feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines along streets of higher
classification (North Federal Highway). According to the site plan, the northern ''curb-drop'' is
located 102 feet from the intersection of North Federal Highway and Las Palmas Avenue. The
southern "curb-drop" on North Federal Highway is located only 23 feet from the intersection of U.S.
1 and Las Palmas A venue. The proposed building addition is a major site plan modification and
therefore, the entire site would have to comply with today's code. However, the applicant is not
proposing to alter the driveway opening and is requesting a 97-foot variance (ZNCV 03-010) from
the 120-foot requirement (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). This single variance request
would be applied to both non-conforming driveway openings. Staff supports this variance request
(see Staff Report ZNCV 03-010). According to Chapter 2, Section 11. L.3.d. (3) of the Land
Development Regulations, driveway openings shall not be located less than 30 feet from any interior
property line. The northern driveway on North Federal Highway does not comply with this
requirement because it is located only 21 feet away from the interior north side property line.
Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 10-foot variance from this restriction (ZNCV 03-011). Staff
supports this variance request (see Staff Report ZNCV 03-011). Also, the supplemental regulations
for gas stations limit the number of driveway openings to one (1) per street frontage. The subject
site has two (2) driveway openings on North Federal Highway The applicant is requesting a
variance (ZNCV 03-012) from Chapter 2, Section 11.3.d(4) to allow for these two driveway openings.
The Engineering Division reviewed the site plan and recommended that no closures should occur to
any of the openings due to the proposed on-site traffic circulation and the completion of the Harbors
townhouse project. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of this variance request to allow two
(2) driveway openings (see Staff Report ZNCV 03-012). In any event, all three variance requests
regarding the existing driveways would require review and approval by the City Commission.
The site plan (sheet 1 of 4) shows an existing driveway opening is located on Las Palmas Avenue.
This opening is currently located 32 feet from the intersection of the right-of-way lines and complies
with the Land Development Regulations. No change is proposed to this opening.
The survey shows that there is no sidewalk along Las Palmas Avenue. However, according to
Chapter 6, Article Iv, Section 10. T of the Land Development Regulations, a sidewalk is required
within this right-of-way A sidewalk would also be required within the right-of-way (of Las Palmas
Avenue) in front of the abutting property to the east where the car wash is proposed (NWSP 03-
011). The site plan (sheet 1 of 4) shows the sidewalk but the civil engineering drawing does not. At
the time of permitting, the civil engineering plan shall show the sidewalk so that it matches the site
plan (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval).
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in
subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on
adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole
The required parking has been tabulated based on a gasoline dispensing establishment use. The
ratio utilized is one (1) space for each 250 square feet of the gross floor area. Based on this
methodology, the proposed expansion, coupled with the floor area of the existing building would
require 10 parking spaces. The required number of parking spaces needs to be accurately shown on
the site plan (sheet 1 of 4) tabular data (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The site plan
Gateway Texaco COUS 03-007
Page 5
Memorandum No. PZ 03-228
shows that 12 parking spaces would be provided. The applicant intends to re-stripe the existing
spaces and create three (3) more spaces at the northeast corner of the property The backup
distance behind the newly created parking spaces would adhere to current dimension standards.
However, one (1) of the existing parking spaces would encroach into the required 10-foot wide
perimeter landscape buffer along the north property line and would therefore, require the approval
of the accompanying variance request (ZNCV 03-017).
3 Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above
The survey shows that the dumpster is currently located one foot from the south property line at the
southeast corner of the property The site plan (sheet 1 of 4) shows that the dumpster would be
moved five (5) feet away from the south property line and one (1) foot - eight (8) inches from the
east property line. It would be located within a dumpster enclosure as per code. It should be noted
that staff would prefer to have the location of the dumpster enclosure be away from highly visible
areas such as near adjacent rights-of-way However, staff acknowledges that the current site layout
(i.e. building, parking space, driveway openings) limits the number of choices for its relocation. The
present location facilitates the efficient removal of trash and that this efficiency could be jeopardized
if located elsewhere on the site.
4 Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable water
and sanitary sewer are available for this project.
5 Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character
The subject site had been previously developed as a gas station with related parking areas under
former, less stringent standards for gas stations. Therefore, the existing landscape buffer areas are
non-compliant. According to Chapter 2, Section 11.3.f(l) of the Land Development Regulations, a
ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer is required along both North Federal Highway and Las Palmas
A venue. The buffer is required to contain a tree every 30 feet. A continuous row of hedges and
flowering groundcover are also required. The intent is to screen the vehicular use areas from the
public rights-of-way The landscape plan (sheet L-l) shows that no change is proposed to the
driveways or parking areas. Basically, there is no landscape buffer along North Federal Highway
Since 10-foot wide landscape buffers are required along rights-of-way, the applicant is requesting a
variance (ZNCV 03-016) from the code to have no landscape buffer along North Federal Highway and
a five (5) foot wide landscape buffer along Las Palmas Avenue (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of
Approval). As in the case with the driveway openings, since both landscape buffers are less than 10
feet in width, one (1) variance request would apply to both buffers. The justification lies in the fact
that if a 10-foot variance were approved to allow for a zero (0) foot wide landscape buffer, then that
same variance approval would nullify the need for a five (5) foot wide buffer Staff is recommending
approval of the variance request due to the unavoidable site constraints (see Staff Report ZNCV 03-
016). However, staff is recommending approval with the stipulation that in the southern landscape
buffer (along Las Palmas Avenue), the proposed row of Ixora 'Nora Grant' shrubs be 36 inches in
height at the time of installation. Also, staff is recommending, where possible, additional screening
be provided (i.e. planters) along North Federal Highway (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval).
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 6
Memorandum No PZ 03-228
As always, the variance request would have to be reviewed and approved by the City Commission in
order to allow for a deviation from the Land Development Regulations.
According to Chapter 2, Section 11.L.3.f (2), a landscape buffer 10 feet in width is required on along
all interior property lines. The landscape plan (L-l) shows existing landscape buffers along the north
and east property lines. However, the existing landscape buffer along the north property line is
approximately one (1) feet - six (6) inches in width at its narrowest point (due to the existing
parking spaces) and does not comply with the 10-foot wide buffer requirement. Therefore, the
applicant is requesting a variance (ZNCV 03-017) from the aforementioned Land Development
Regulations to reduce the landscape buffer by eight (8) feet - six (6) inches in order to allow a one
(1) foot - six (6) inch wide landscape buffer in lieu of the required 10-foot wide landscape buffer
The variances justification and analysis is provided in the respective staff report. Staff supports this
encroachment into the required north landscape buffer, in part, because the parking lot already
exists. However, staff opposes allowing any new spaces / areas of vehicular encroachment. Again,
the variance request would have to be reviewed and approved by the City Commission
The north landscape buffer would contain Silver Buttonwood shade trees and Cabbage (booted)
palm trees. Also, a row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges would be installed at the base of the trees. The
east landscape buffer would contain Green Buttonwood and Pigeon Plum shade trees and Cabbage
palm trees. Again, a row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges at the base and on the inside of the existing
six (6) foot high concrete wall
6 Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and
compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
This conditional use application proposes wall signs on multiple facades. The elevation pages
(sheets 3 and 4 of 4) show the existing wall signs with the proposed wall signage. The maximum
allowable wall signage area would be based on the length of the front building fa~ade facing North
Federal Highway According to Chapter 21, Article Iv, Section 2.C of the Land Development
Regulations, the maximum area for all wall signs shall be one and one half (1 0) square feet of sign
area for each one (1) foot of linear building frontage. The elevations do not indicate the proposed
cumulative wall signage area. As proposed, it appears that the wall signage area would not comply
with the maximum allowable signage area. Staff's goal is not to regulate the content of the sign but
rather to ensure compliance with code and to maximize sign aesthetics thereby preventing project
signage from degrading the developments appearance. In order to reduce the wall sign area and
upgrade the overall appearance, staff recommends eliminating all non-word depictions (Shells
corporate logo which is a yellow and red seashell) that do not directly correspond with wording (see
Exhibit "e" - Conditions of Approval).
Chapter 21, Article III, Section 5 requires all freestanding signs to be located at least 10 feet from
the property lines. Also, in this location, the freestanding sign is limited to eight (8) feet in height.
The existing pylon sign, which is no longer allowed by code, is currently located only five (5) feet
from the property line and stands over 33 feet tall. Its on-site location is shown on the survey and
site plan and its elevation is shown on the attached 8 0 by ll-inch sheet. The applicant is
proposing to change the sign copy area to this non-conforming structure. The pole sign is non-
conforming because it is not a ''monument'' style, it exceeds the height limitation and does not meet
minimum setback requirements. The structure must be setback at least 10 feet from the property
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 7
Memorandum No PZ 03-228
line(s). However, no existing sign area is shown on the attached sheet. Therefore, it is unclear if
the proposed signage area would comply with Chapter 21, Article Iv, Section 2.B of the Land
Development Regulations. The code allows for a maximum of 64 square feet of sign area (see
Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Since the structure is non-conforming due to it currently being
located within the required setbacks, the applicant is requesting a five (5) foot variance (ZNCV 03-
023) to allow the sign to be located five (5) feet from the property line rather than 10 feet as
normally required by code. In this instance, staff is recommending denial of the applicants variance
request (see Staff Report ZNCV 03-023). The structure can be removed, reduced in height, and
relocated on the property so that it would still be highly visible from the rights-of-way while
complying with todays setback, height, and cross-visibility restrictions (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions
of Approval). This improvement could be made without interfering with the operation of the
business. The variance request would require City Commission review and approval
7 Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The existing building meets the setback requirements of the C-3 zoning district. However, the
proposed building addition would not meet the rear setback requirements. The required rear setback
is 20 feet. The proposed building addition would encroach into the setback by 10 feet. Therefore,
the applicant is requesting a 10-foot variance (ZNCV 03-013) from Chapter 2, Section 11.L.3.e.(3) to
allow the addition to encroach into the required 20-foot rear setback. As previously mentioned in the
Background section of this staff report, the City Commission approved the applicants Administrative
Appeal (ADAP 03-001) to allow a 600 square foot addition. The size of the proposed building
addition (681 square feet) is not consistent with the previous City Commission approval (600 square
feet). Staff is recommending denial of this variance request (see Staff Report ZNCV 03-013). The
proposed addition should be configured or reduced to meet the setback requirements of the C-3
zoning district and therefore, avoid the need for a variance.
Since this is a major site plan modification, all structures (including the canopy and fueling pumps)
are required to meet setback requirements. The existing canopy over the gas pump islands does not
meet the 20-foot setback requirement. The existing pump islands do not meet the 30-foot setback
requirement. The applicant is not proposing any changes to the canopy structure other than
cosmetic enhancements. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a 10-0 foot variance (ZNCV 03-14)
to allow the existing canopy to be located nine and one-half (9 - 0) feet from the west property line
instead of 20 feet as required by code (see Staff Report ZNCV 03-014). Also, the existing pump
islands are located only 19 feet - 10 inches from the west property line. Therefore, the applicant is
requesting a variance (ZNCV 03-015) to also allow the gas pump islands to be located closer to the
west property line rather than the 30 feet required by code (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of
Approval) Again, staff is recommending approval of both variance requests. As always, they would
require City Commission review and approval
8 General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district,
The proposed use is a conditional use in the C- 3 zoning district. Although auto-intensive in nature,
the use is generally compatible with the use of the abutting property to the north. The property
directly to the east is vacant and zoned C- 3 This vacant lot was previously earmarked for a
mechanical car wash (also originally rescinded similar to the subject request) The property south of
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 8
Memorandum No PZ 03-228
Las Palmas Avenue was previously zoned C-3, the same as the subject property However, it was
rezoned from C-3 to Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) for the construction of over 50 fee-
simple townhouses. Unless properly buffered, a gas station use could be incompatible with a
residential use. Buffering would include extra landscaping or a buffer wall. Las Palmas A venue and
a proposed five (5) foot wide landscape buffer separate the existing gas station from the Harbors
townhouse project. A gas station is a compatible use with other uses in the C-3 zoning district. The
proposed building expansion (for extra storage area) would be compatible with both commercial and
residential uses.
The proposed building colors would be compatible with the existing and proposed buildings within
the immediate area. The elevations indicate the proposed colors to be dark green (Benjamin Moore
- Chrome Green), white (Benjamin Moore - Brilliant White), and gray (Benjamin Moore - San
Antonio Gray) These are the corporate colors and are recognized nationwide.
9 Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and
nearby properties, and the city as a whole
The maximum allowable height for the C-3 zoning district is 45 feet. The existing building was
designed as a one (1)-story structure. The top of the existing canopy is 16 feet - nine (9) inches in
height. The elevations show that a "custom clad metal framed decorative element" is proposed at 20
feet - six (6) inches in height. The building and canopy are well below the maximum height
limitation and are compatible with the surrounding properties. However, the non-conforming
freestanding pole sign would be incompatible with all signs in the C-3 zoning district and neighboring
properties.
10 Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole,
The existing gas station represents one (1) of three (3) licensed Shell stations throughout the City Of
Boynton Beach. The ''Shell Branded Store" is located at 301 North Congress Avenue and the other
Shell is located at 111 East Woolbright Road. The nearest gas station to the subject property would
either be the Mobil gas station, located on the southwest corner of Gateway Boulevard and High
Ridge Road or the Citgo gas station, located at the southwest corner of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Federal Highway Therefore, the subject gas station represents additional convenience and
choice for the City residents, which is not offered elsewhere in this area of the city The applicant
states that "there are no detrimental economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties and the
city as a whole"
11 Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter
19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review)
The existing use and site is non-conforming in many ways. If all requested variances are approved
and all staff comments are addressed, the proposed project would comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of the city code. However, staff is recommending denial of two (2) of the nine
(9) requested variances and that these aspects of the site be retrofitted to comply with city
regulations.
Gateway Texaco - COUS 03-007
Page 9
Memorandum No. PZ 03-228
12 Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance
standards within Section 4 N of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, also, conformance to
the City of Boynton Beach noise Control Ordinance
With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed
storage addition to the existing gas-station would operate in a manner that is in compliance with the
above-referenced codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach.
RECOMMENDATION
The City Commission approved the applicant's Administrative Appeal (ADAP 03-001) to allow a 600
square foot storage addition to the existing gas station The existing use (gas sales) and site is non-
conforming The building addition represents a major site plan modification, which requires that the
entire site be brought into compliance with current code However, the applicant is only proposing to
expand the building area to accommodate the extra storage area and has no intention of improving the
remaining portion of the site to bring it into compliance with today's standards, which would also be cost
prohibitive or even impossible due to site constraints, To remedy the situation, the applicant is
requesting 9 variances that address the non-conforming aspects of the subject site
However, the proposed area of the addition is not consistent with the area that was conceptually
approved by the City Commission Furthermore, the proposed expansion itself does not comply with the
setback requirements of the C-3 zoning district, This is a situation where staff concurs with the
applicant's justification for seven (7) of the nine (9) variances requested that are directly related to
existing non-conforming aspects of the site. However, staff is recommending denial of two (2) of the
nine (9) requested variances that specifically pertain to the new or proposed improvements (i.e. building
addition, new sign area) that could, in staffs' opinion, be built to comply with the current code. Also,
staff is recommending specific conditions be applied to two (2) of the other variance requests that
specifically regard buffering the subject site from the adjacent properties (i e potted plants, if possible,
along North Federal Highway)
Therefore, based on the discussion herein, staff recommends approval of the project contingent upon
satisfying all the conditions of approval Any additional conditions by the Community Redevelopment
Agency or the City Commission would be placed in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval Pursuant to
Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11.2 Conditional Uses, a time limit would be required for project
development. Staff recommends a period of one (1) year be allowed to obtain a building permit
(excluding permits for land clearing)
EU
S,IPlanning\SHAREDlWPIPROJECTS\Gatew.y Shell tk. TexacolNew Shell\COUS 03-007 (revised 2004)\St.ffRepon.doc
Location Map EXHIBIT "Af~ I
I
Gateway Shell I
~ ~i dH I ll~
0
0,
0, I
~ -
(j) I I ~
Cl
"5 I I
: SITE ~ I
, 911 I_I _J I
l;~ ~~ ~ l .----\
I W31/ ~/
J
\
,--..,
rr ""1 ~ I'PUD \
J · -- I ) I
R3 I .
~
~
~Go ~ REC
tV
~~ 4
.. I
I I ~ ~~~~@~ ~;I
I I
,.. ...,. ~ ;~
I ........... L_ ~~_ A"'"
~...,. I I
~ I J
,..~. ~ R3 I I I / I
REC
J I I
n ...,.
~~.,. \ I I I
~..,. \ , J II J I" r
I
~ I t)S7 }LJ
I ~ /'-. /1
t;..V
. ~.,
cS'
---- ~ --
0..
I::-
S:;?1~&
... ~ t> ~
.::. .... ~ ~
t:)l}tl
'"~'
~~
~~
~~'"
.:s ~
~
EXHIBIT
"B"
~:",.:""Pv___ 4.........~.......
---
~
tN'~
~ ~t.
~ ~~ ~
~f'i'
~c..~~
~ & ~
t~
t~
c.....,; D,.,. ~
~ . z, G,. , """"/" ~~ "-~
, l't '~~~~:-7.":;':r~~ .... ,~~~"" -X~ ~
I' "--;~. r?~~~=~;!':;::' "<".. - ~-.I';~ -4 "'..-...' -'-.:. .: ~
~ I " c~"!- 1<. "t ~.;:; f"- '. , .
J"r-:.f-:- ~ i r.;:y..~1~ ............ ~'--_~
c-. . ,-,. '" r --:~I ~~? I '. _ "'~ ),
}l.;,'" ~ I -1' I.. 1(.- / ,~~ := 1I_. ! ~~ ~~
~~I -:>- ~ J" J. 7' ,i' ~ ~~. ""::--.-_. ~ J '''''+ "t~t
:t ~ ~ i, I, , _ l ,..,." __ . ~~ ~. ,,'
~ .!J- J---i-I: -=----?: ..R..... Je ~ ~/ ... ~ :' ....~- ~':a ~,,().
/ {;' ., r1-., "[1] ::. J -:L-.::- "" I l,:l>''l' {f 'l.'~
f ~ i !l. 'I, -;- "> ".t ~I - - I"" 1; ~
"",;', ~ .'/' ~; ,'~~---_. ~~..- .~
~. ; -; " =, ~
!. . I~,~ ~ ~, ' ,:z 1_ - - _ _ I '"
'1'. ."" .. h. I ... .. ". .. ---. J ~
r ~ ~ 10, I (' '" f},." r> It
i . 'l~ "I"'f~"/, .' , i
. 'i.," , fa 1 O.-:~t~ ',..":...---~--:.-:.~J~I...--
~: r=J~ --~-~d-/-.---- -.. ~ I E-H': i " jr '; il>r~ ~
I! li/' ~ ~ 'ol.", . I
;~.. ~ 'q. ~I,: " ~C-----.- / 1
~. ~ I t\~ '-'.~ /, I
. ,~f ~ "~'~'h.._ If ~~
~~.f .~ .. =~ --L-~)~-J~' I j j ;
.. 'k -' . ~..<"' .' 0 .... .
;: - "7'" - ~ 7J;; ---""..:....,.. "'.". ~.... ~ 0 "'~~
. ". , ~ _" ... 0 ~,
I -;. "" "'" 1\ L ~"'~'='
4?'; _:-~o~___ 1 -- ~ -~i ~ 1 8 ~ ~
-- -. ~ .: ~~, ~ ;-::-i'i
:: ';' ~ to!"
I~ ~ ~i~:h
~~ i ~i~ ; ~~~
1--..0 -'" ..~.. 1lI
~ i t t-e
! ! ~ '\
;1 I'ioo ~~I ~~ '
. Jto~ ......
~.... ~ 1100. IV:i
~I; :l \ ~ ~!~n;in;i~~lu
~I' ~.'~ '"f,' ~ i 's,~~,~'E~.8 .~
- 'j."" 11~. ! ~-aii~~..~~~. ii~ I
~- . ~ i ~.~ ~~~~>>8wE~i
~I ,5.1 ~ ~ g~~~.!~5~~g~~=-~
~ 'i~~"~ij~~~.~Ei~ j
.ro:;~:_ .~ ~ 1!~~~.iiRUliss!~= I
, ~f ! ~~i!~~i!~;:~~~ij~l
~~ [ ~~ 5 ~i!'~ii~!i!"nh~<!
{.;, '~~ ii~~U~!i~U~~!~li!
!} '1 ~~5~;~;~~~~~~~1-~~1
, ~~~~!l~~'~:i!H~~ iE'1
- ~!-!!~~~R.~g;g eE,
a~~~~~~8~!~!~iii~it
~~~r~~~i~-t~~~sP~li
.~a~'~~'~~~~i~~ .
!~r'h~~!~a~~~~
~~.h!'a~aii~..!
~~~~~~."~~.~~
!at~.!a~.~w~<
~.~"i:.~."H~o~~
gi~!~s~~=!~;=~
~i.!8:i!~~Q~t~~~
~;~~~~~~~ii~~~-
~...~::..~:..~~. ~~~..;:
J
1
II::
il
'l>? 'P
.~
<s:.........__s
u oS /:>'/~h'w,qy /\/c, /
~gf
i'il t
,~ .J:.f
. 1~
.rr a......6
6...."""r......
~
>:!o<
=
~
~
iI'
:o.'f.
.,
1~
.
(\";"
v-'
'"
:!-",
....,
~~
...l:'o '"
t~ ~ I
~t
ii ~ ~ I k-I ..
l_!~_,,-4-_
'" I
~ .
"" u.!,..... "I,
~1i'91 ~ ~~ ''l;:
~~ i ~ I W?~ '..;
"II ~ '.l' e~ I
Ii ~"',
~ 1
-::::-. I,. [s::.:" ~
I "<" ~ ,. '" '''' I.,
..~....... r I ~ .... : '. ~oe...
~ k" f~ .~ ~.
I,. '_-"l.t -'+! tr- -, --Ii:.
I I [> '1/ j>' 'I .
"i~ FI~;i t1~1 '" , ""
~ i C\ I ! I 1 a- I "'- ,.-
'IV} ''',,, , 9! : ",.,_
"'[ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ -"I 1'''
~!t~ I r- . -'-"'~> --~k q P
'I. f> I ;':. ~ ,_ ~'-''L- ~_~_
I I ~,{;--7 FD .s-s~~~.o~.~
.... . 7 2t::" l_~ ./, /S-$ t:./ ~...:.r=.r:..
II .~ ~o H ~ _. / 'J:J-- ,0=/-"" .._:' _
<'~
I i-;'", \ ~ I .1
~\ \, ~~ ~t
1.".1\ n.
10\ ~~.
','\0'\".. \ _
.-\ (r
i\\;(
~"'~'- "-
,,~ ~I
" \:<. '\'}" fITr
~o;::," '('... ~ / ~ ~,~
\ :;, ) / ;;.r. ~ . ~---L:c>,?.c;'ek",w...'/.7
,f~:.. _
.,\ '. "'!I er.._.> 1, I I _
i'1ff-i~'~ i ;"iiiii ~ \ ~t.,:,.. ,. ~ / _~. '. m 5 "'"" <:d -if ~ '" /;....tr_ (p, 0
"'dh~~h~.m ~!!1~9 "",\ ~o"" \ --,../ ltn--nn-tn---n--n--;.-
,;WUU~l it, ~ ~5h~ "\. f \' - - - ~.:- - - - '" u~'/;i~ E~s."".~~/ L-; I s ...L",,, ~
ih.:;L, ..~~!~~ \( "^"" .\ .., us A/,.,. ""~_I ~z' 0.:1 ;;
11!~h~O H~lh \,w, \ ~," - . a~~B~~~~~:~~~~~~~~; i~~ ~~~ ~
ti_ , -~'." \~ ~ ii~ ~~~~i~~;~"Q~~ ;;~i h5 ..
','!I!" !' 'I \, i' ~ j' ,'l';;jmiil.. III .,. .
I.h.. t iI"l". "I""". "j'l .' _"" "j ~
~'. I "Mi' 1 . ;, ii~Hn~niihlu ~~i jh ~
'11~iil,'!J- i~.! I h=I"!l"'.mil ". ,1
~I~i.~ ~llli ",0 i!<~.il~i ~;;iil~~"iiii~ ~iiii .iI
hi~!!g~'l j.hl , . !!~Im!!!!!l!!il ill II
!I if 3h.~ . ~- ~ '^, ~~~~~:;~::-!;il!j:;~mi"!il ~~~ ~~
".J i~ 8i!~-1 ~~ ~i ~~ s n~ ~ii~~hii!ii~~.~~~!i~ ~'~~ ~~
. ~ ~g R iN 2~_" !' t - ~.~. N~~"_" %~ ._ >_~ _<
01' " - .il -<'. , . · · '''''''''..,,,_., I', '.
":.,,1,, I'., ,~:; I, 'j " mhi'!Illi:lm '!I !I
~in~ ~~ ~u~ -.l:'-.l:' f '~-I h ~ !n~~.dii:il~~~~U~ ~i; s~
i~ii~ ~' ~~~i hi:' ~ ;! ~a!6:1S~!!~~a~i~i ~; ~E
Il,il.... I!ll '0..- " ,. , iMlg'lill"i': II Ii
i~~I!~!\ - ~,~a,':~ j!I ~~;~!ii~g"".~..~_a..a~ . ~
H~j~ '_ ~h~ .tt
'\
"~
~r
1
(
"
0:
t
'"'
~l~~----~-:-
o. 0 0
!j
/'~
z. :-:!~ ~
....r
....
t
'"
l
/' ..::r>t,(~:; ~... s'""",.....&'..,
S#or~~)
...-;..."......... ..../_;- ?~ ~s
'"
-~I/- ",
.Ii'~,r,.
'!~i',
I.
,.
Ie,
~i" 1l\~l:;\
l ~~~
~ ::t~
~ .~
- ,.
'K ~!
~ ~
, ~
I'
q~
~'
~ ~
i t\,
q'l
-n
, ,
.
~~
'-t
~
<;;
%
:;...>..
-"'...
........
......",
'"
/~
<..
..
~~...
~ ~~"':o-:..
,~ ",".
i! <=6
j' ~
~
......
......
I.~~
m
i'l i
I _
tiff I
.n i k
m ~
~-<: "-
~!t
II::'
I
,
I
I
'"
..
,
i
::; \0,t>.
~ ~..
t~~
~i":
,'" '>
~ \-.u.
}..~:l
~~
....
, '"
-t~
'"
~~
',."
",0f-
t ~
{k
'"
. a
~ ~
!:'-
...
...
,
1\
<=
.. ~
! ~~~~
., k tl~~ :iZ \1-
, ... .
1.1
~~
[ 'cS).
l~. . -".
r'
I i
i
r pnlsm31~ I
~ l'II;'d~~11
'" ~i!~!; 1,1~.8
!l! I.~I: Ihll
\; g hijl ~iH: I
~ I~PS;"II
~lli~~!!
.
;;IIIII;il ~~~j~jiil iil" I
~~~Iii~il. i~i~i~~ ~i. 0 i
~e~~i~~i~ =~~ S~ !~~. ~
~~::~i;l~ ~~i 5~ ~~~ ~ m ~
~11~~~~~i ~~E ~~ igi i ~<
~ii.i~ ~~~ ~ ~ I .!~ ~
o~!o~ @.o ~~. ~= ~
3~~~m ~i1~ j!' I mij_
~o~~~ g~; ~ ~ I !~
i~~~~ ~~D I! ~~
~~~i:: ~~~ ~ l~
~~li~ m~~ < ~ I ~!
!h=~ ~e~ 1j < ~~
di~~ ;I~ ~ j ~~~. !~-.
~~5~~ ~;<! .!! ~ ~~ ~_
2 ~i ~~l i ~m
" ~: i d
~
!i
? ~. E
... II
liU I Ii
..u z
li~i N I ~
ji~~ 1 I
m i ~ ~
~ ~ ~i ~
!~i n ~
IIi ~I ~o~
".~ ~~ m
&Dii!1! '.
i ~ ~B ~
.
~
"
q
~~~~
~ij;l!i
<1Ii~l!
:~8
N~li
~c~
e~
~ ~ ~
~
...- 0
~ g ~
m "
B
s~
I
~ I
~
~ it
i 1
~
".,
o
:>>
o
Q
--i
o
Z
-l EXHIBIT "B"
-<
-0 ui ~ 11;-
0
:>> 3 Il'l!
, iii
-0 ~ ~ I~~
:>>
;0 ~ ~
^ . t j I ~
z ' E . '"l
C) m , . li~
~ s . .q
-0 ~I
,
:>>
~
II
~
I
"D
:>>
,1
;:::
:>>
I
U"l!
I
:>>~
<'"
".,
:ll~! ;
I~"
I ::l
I I
I Ii
I ! I
I I
: i I
I !
I
: I 8
..
I"
z
c'
".,!
I
JI
\
"'t~SlCWl'~
~c~w~~Z ~
~S~~~h
q~~~ g!
hi ~
~~~ ~
~~~
~~~
nili
7<tO.W~~
-i.-
il~ I!!i~~i~;;ill Ii ~~!~;ii~~I;!;i~il ~~~ il~i
~~ iIl6~ Ill!:: N ~~l~' !!l~~I;%iili ~~ ~~~ i~
ii~ Iii i I~~i~ I ~.I~. :;~i~~i!I=:!;~ii!!!~~!~~ i:~ i~1
i -!I I @ ~~~g~;.~~;~ig!I~!i~~~~~~~I~~ ~ii ~~
s ~, " g -~i~~s ~~~i~~~~~i~~~~~~~ ~~ ~i~~ ii
~ ~ ~~ i ~~~~"~.>~'ii~ ~~~~~~ ~i ~.
~. ~ . ~. ~m~=~s~~i~~~~~~~%;i.~! ~5
~ iR ~R~~' ;~~I_m~m~~ m ~~
· ~. ~~i9~~~~i ~ij~i~~~ ~~ ~5
~ ~~~~~~~~j.i~~:; ~i ~-
1!lllllillllllli I! Ii
~~~l~Sii~~~gi~~i ji ;g
I~t~~;~~i~~ i~~ ~~ c~
~~j~~~!~~!~i~i~. ~. ~~
~.<~on~~~ i~ ~ ~~
.
I
~~.~O" 888~m
g~~m ::::~
g~~. ~i:~t;~ ii;~
2~:::Zl~~ ;~;:;
~;,; = &
j;~ ~ ~
~ ~!~ ~
~~fiI;!I
> 01<
,.
,
......,U
!_'::':~L~
_.-J_."'IIIOl_"_____
PROPOSED ADDITION AND ALTERATION TO:
GATEWAY SHELL
(FORMERlY KNOWN M GA.TEWAY TEXACO)
2360 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435
l;ii~~lils~~j~;B~lil
IIII~!~B iai~iill~1
~~~Iiiil ~llljll~~I'
il;~~~i~ ~~!~ilai
ijilli~1 1!~ili~l~i
11,;i~ill !.I~ li!IJli
Ii M ~~ ~ ~i~I~;~
i~ I~ ~~ i~i i~.
~e5il ~i ~,~ ~~~
~ !!~~~ i~ M~ii~~i
i! ~I ~j ~~ 911~
~ ~ ~ i. ~~~
~
~/gC
~~~
~ ! 0" . } -~
.coN ~~~i
! o. e
~~- ~~
o .:;
.... ~G')
..,....
0'"
X
"'''"
- ~8
~~
:2~ 1'T1<
~R 8~
~ s:~
. ""
g~
>> g~
~ =<~
'"
'"
o
c:
:z
o
~n..,
Ox
=<-
2!p:! :s:~
~li:; ~~
.,,~ "'-;
2 -~~
'liS 0,,"
:on
""0
m~
~~
~~
~g
;:;-
('. !~ ~m~~
;;" ~....O.."
,'- >-%)O
...... ~:""C"l."'-<'"
~~ ~(nlT1~n~
PlPI ;rIU'I::tlI'T'li:;:p
~~ r -80-lVi~
~: ~ /Tl
:;~ .., 1.'
i; ,:
~~. ~
o~ I i ~
l~! I
I :.....
. !
I ~
I, ~
EXHIBIT "B"
l
1<;\
J
1
==;
"I
i
i~
z
o
~n~
~ ;:~!6
(ij" 0
:z:"'",
""." >bl'Tl
~_: ~ ~~
~:Z:I~ lil~ffl
~~ g:::C(1)
o ;8b
::D -< 3:::0
~ -<
!l::
.e
[
..
I
I~~
~
I I I I. ~
, , ~~~ , i I I
, ~ ~ 'I I
~~~ J
L-=l C I ; I Li ~~~ ~~~~~
/. I I I ;;g", \i~~~
'V~/ I I ~~i ~d~
(/~_,4 ~~'" ~..~
t -- ;~~ ;::~~
~;ll~ m~~
~~i !'!;;;~
~~~ ~E~
~~~ P3~~
~~~ ~~~
s~ ~~~
~i8 ~~~
~~ ool5
ri'lal "T'I""CUI
~3 ;~~
:zJ2 ~25~
~m -l~(")
g~ \:~
2~ '"
~ i ~I ~, i un
~ ~! . j~ ~ ~1I~~
~ ~. t2' . - ;'. ~ ~~li
. , . ~ - ~l~~
; i ~ J~ . ~ ~ i~=
~ mi. ~ ~i~
... ~ . _ C'>~..
~ U/;: Ii . 2., 30" ." i,,=
I 0 . 2' . 1J!!~
L 60'.'
~
;':
;0'" .
~.. =
~~
~
i!i
PROPOSED ADOmoN AND ALTERATION TO:
GATEWAY SHELL
{FORMERLY KNOWN M GATE'NA.Y TEXACO}
2360 NORTH FEDERAl HIGHWAY
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435
~_.2::'AL:~L~
-~_.",I'I$_. ._
~~o
~-----
----
....---
--~
"
15-..
~
o
i
~
!
l::
~
~i ~li ~~ i ~ ~~
i~ ~Si II S I ~~
~i S~! ~~ ~ g I!
~~ ~i~ ~I I i I~
i ~~~ 'i ! ! ~~
i i.~i h ; 0 ~;
~ ~~o i i ~ 0
1+
e
,H"
:eX
0-
-0'"
0-1
"'Z
"1("
0..
>",
0",
0-1
-I'"
O:e
z!<
PO",
~~ >
~~
~og
-IZ
- ~~
~
,~ po. I ;~I
!/I I I I i I ~II
~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ I~
, r I ~ p! ;~
lo~' P -
5 a !=l ~
~-
~
~ lie
~inUi
~~ ~! ~~ ~
ll~ .~ ;;;~ '
~~ "0 n~ ~
li ~~ ~~ ~
S i! ~~ ~
~i ~ ~~ I
o~ ~ i
~
i~~R i8 8~~ ~~~~~
~~~~ ~i ES~ ~g~i~
~m~~ ~z o'liS ;<~~
OSfiE:m o~...~ ::Ell!:"'
~~~i !~ ~i! ' o~
2~~~ 211: 8~~ ~s;:~
~~~~ ~~ ;j~ =i"
l'1g~~ ~~ s~~ ~~i
iii~ ~~ i~! ~~~
n~m~ o~ ~m~ m55
i<00'l! i<S;: ;;;~::: ozz
in~~ Q ~o~ >>~~
~~~~ ~~ p~~ ~~g
",sO) till 0> tIIm~
Cl/'f1"D ~ ;;::;S i""
<::l;~ 5 no ..!'l
~:!;~ is ~;ll S;:ii
~;~ : ~~ "bi~
j?l<ili " ~!E hI'
l''''l!! ~ mm ~~
~E!; III ~~ 'l!i
i!i ~ <
EXHIBIT "B"
'"
X
Ui
-I
Z
'"
..
,...,
'"
--I
,...,
:e
r
-<
,...,
r
,...,
~
-I
i5
~z
I
\ riff ,
i <-==J ,
I #
II '"
I '"
2l
I @l
I .-------.
I ~wl
I
I i Ii'I
~/
I
Ii' - I I
I ~I
i
I
l
~ e oil ! ~ ~ ~g8~~~ PROPOSED ADDmON AND At TERATlON TO: .......u ih-=-W:=--= I " i
I GATEWAY SHELL ~ M. snET SEMKD ~niE: ~
A '" ~::t;S;:;;';O:: -~- --~
VJ ~ ~ ?:jP~~iJII ---------
~ fA (FORIlERLY KNOWN AS GATEWAYTEXA.CO) RIZA ~AN. ".E. ~zt=" ~
. "' ~ ~.g.~~ 2360 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY ...... -- ---
II a, - --
~ BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435 07___111"'___"'-- :=--- 1lI!:1::: Er"-""""'" ~
_e-r._._"'I_' ....-- -~
I
~
i
, I
t
~i II P UI
~i .! II ~I!!
i. .. I~ ~h
li~ i~ S~ ~~i
I~ I qh
d i h!i
~ I i ~~D
~~~ ~~n~
dl!!i ~~...~5;l
li1:iS ;t...!;;l
~i~ ~id'
!~~ ~~~
~~i :i~
;~~ ~n
~~~ ~~~
~> ~~~
gl i~~
;Ii li1!il",
'" "!l!~
~i i!f:'
ll\'" -~8
gi ~!ti
z~ <
t
,.,,""
"'x
c-
."u>
c....
~z
0"'
>g:
oc:
0....
~ffi
c",
20'-
.,.-<
>P
.- ""
....<
)>
"'....
~~
=::z~
!
~
I
~
i
e II I ~ ~
.b-b~~~~
! e
>>"fOfVfP\3:
~~~~~E~
g:5i;~j
~ ;-<..:<
~li ~ ~i
Ii li ~i
~~ ~ ~!
;;Ii ... ~~
"i ~ ~~
i~ ~ ~,
~~ i I!!
~i I ~i
i D
.,,""
",x
c-
."u>
co:!
u>z
",,",
a""
,>'"
au>
a....
i3~
~!:<
""""
,...-
.-""
....;:;
""....
~5
....20
i5~
z-
t
t
t
~ql
~~ ~
.D ~
iHl
~~ c;i
In~
A ~S ,
~~ .~i n,; t
\ I
1
~
."
C
u>
""
c
;..
c
a
I g
20
t
~
\~J
II + ' I
I !
~ 1
... ~ -I~ -,~
'"I~ '" ij '"IQ
~. ~. OK:
~I ~I it"
I\,
~~'Q
;~
~
L
i i i i i i II ill
~ i Ii! I !1i .
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~i
~ ", I ~ ~! i~
~ h;, · Ii
. ~l;
~~~~ U~
o~-i o~
~~Is j-a
~~-rl ~~
2ril~rn 20
~~~~ ~i
!~~~ ~:i!
~~~; ~i
!a~i !;
~~~... ili1
fPmi~ ~~
(l)SCtJ CD
~~~ 6
~;:~ ~
t1li ~
~~! ~
~"'2 Hi
ll! z
,.,
PROPOSED ADDITION AND ALTERATION TO:
GATEWAY SHELL
(F'ORWERI.. y KNCNVN AS GATEW'lY TEXACO)
2360 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA 33435
~ m'~~PL
..n__._"'a.____"--
_~ ......-0_.._
EXHIBIT "B"
I
t
T
I
"
'"
C
."
o
u>
""
c
,..
a
a
:::;
i5
z
J
Inl
~D .
~p
Id~
In~
~ns
n E~
) ~~. ~
% .
D
r
~ ~~~ ~li ~ ~~
.~ ~<i! ~~ 8 h
ii ~~! l!~ ~~!
I! d' ~~ ~ ~~
S~ ~i~ h ! ~~
~ !!ih ,~ · ~l
~ glii~ ~~ I F
II~i ~i ri
.,,""
",x
c-
."u>
~o=:!
~~
az
)>c
a'"
a....
-:r
....""
0",
z!:( n
""""
>.-
!:;""
"";:;
"'....
~~
:;i~~
~~
~g
~~
~~
~~
U
"~
~i
in
.~
Ii
,f
I
\~
I
I '
\ I
I
m I
it
\ I
\
i
\
\
I
\
I
I
I
-I
"'- .DFWEY 5011(0
---
-----
---
~
I
!f
EXHIBIT "8"
~
~~, J/!'ll
=;> - hl!H !I~
NOR T H 8 0 UNO co=:> !~I;i~ hI
us. H ~ ~llali!
, G H WAY N 0 1 ~!l!a ; ii~
Iii I !Ii
1!li~ I~I
~~!Jf @~~
d ~j !i~~
I :
-+---
ii II
---
.
. - u"~"D"E"
Ul
"
:>>
I~ ~f
:>>
Ul J
:>>
<
I""'l
Z
C
I""'l
I
\
3 -"" i~
a; ...= n ~ ~i
(Q 0 m ~i!i
~ ~ ~
g a ~
~ *
<1i!l'il';; f.~
~n ~~
. .j.g>
i: 3.
~
~~~~
~~~~
UH
l
c,
J taW t
;[ ~ z.. ~
Ii i- f 'Q
! '1' ii I~II
! i~ ::)
I~~ ;
i I :
~I~'
,~~I/l~
I/ll/l
5.?
II
uc) IP r r riil~
,.,.""l ..~ a"''''~
o:r: ~ III
-
'"
Q
;;-
!~Io<' I I ~
1:1 ~ ~
::s ~
......
;!I'll t""'" ~
- ,.
i! ~ "-l ~ ~
......
li
.,,3 ~
~m
8
,~[ ~
II ~
i-l-
-~
, ,
Oi_~
I
ADDITION AND AL TERA T10NS TO:
SIIG(., "
U~IU ~Ii! .. 9~
ii!iii ~HI i_l~ f!
'Ih~ li!~ ~ .~ g ~
= (1} s:
2360 NORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY
BOYTON BEACH, FcORIDA 33435
Landscape Plan
EXHBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
PrOject name" Gateway Shell (fka Gateway Texaco)
File number caus 03-007
Reference 5th review plans IdentIfied as a ConditIOnal Use With a September 21. 2004 Planmng and Zomng
Deoartment date stamo marking
, ,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments. None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments. None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments
1 Full dramage plans, includmg dramage calculatIOns, m accordance With the
LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, Section 5 will be required at the tIme of
permItting.
2 Paving, Dramage and SIte details will not be reViewed for constructIOn
acceptabilIty at this tIme. All engineenng construction details shall be in
accordance wIth the applIcable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawmgs
and the "Engineenng DesIgn Handbook and Construction Standards" and
WIll be reViewed at the tIme of constructIOn permIt applIcation.
UTILITIES
Comments.
3 UtilIty construction details will not be reviewed for constructIon acceptabilIty
at thIS time. All utilIty construction details shall be m accordance with the
UtilItIes Department's "UtilItIes Engmeenng DesIgn Handbook and
ConstructIOn Standards" manual (includmg any updates), they will be
reViewed at the time of construction permit applicatIOn.
FIRE
Comments. None
POLICE
COA
09/30/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments. None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments.
4 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to wIthstand the
rmnimum wmd loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be detemuned by the provisIOns of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
proviSIOns of 2001 FBC, SectIOn 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
SIgned and sealed by a deSIgn profeSSIOnal registered m the state of Flonda
shall be submitted for reVIew at the time of permit apphcatIon.
5 At time of permit reVIew, subrmt SIgned and sealed workmg draWings of the
proposed construction.
6 A water-use pemut from SFWMD IS required for an irrigation system that
utihzes water from a well or body of water as ItS source. A copy of the permIt
shall be subrmtted at the tIme of permIt application, F.S 373.216
7 If capItal facility fees (water and sewer) are paId m advance to the CIty of
Boynton Beach UtihtIes Department, the followmg mformation shall be
prOVIded at the tIme ofbuildmg permit apphcatIOn.
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved SIte plan.
b The total amount paId and Itermzed into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, ArtIcle II, Sections 26-34)
8 At time of permit reVIew, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of settmg up property and ownershIp m the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at tlme of permIt reVIew
9 Pursuant to approval by the CIty ComnussIOn and all other outside agencIes,
the plans for this project must be subrmtted to the Buildmg DiVISIon for
reVIew at the tIme of permIt apphcation subrmttal. The plans must mcorporate
all the condItIons of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the CIty ComnussIOn.
10 The full address of the project shall be subrmtted WIth the constructIon
documents at the time of pemut applicatIOn submittal. If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the partIcular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as It appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permIt applicatIOn at the time of apphcatIOn submittal.
COA
09/30/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments. None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments.
11 This project reqUIres condItional use approval. If approved, pursuant to
Chapter 2 - Zomng, SectIOnl1.2 ConditIOnal Uses, staff recommends a one
(1 ) year tIme lImit for project development.
12. If approved, the proposed bUIldIng addItIon would be lirmted to 600 square
feet In order to be consIstent WIth the preVIOUS City Conumssion approval of
the AdmInIstrative Appeal (ADAP 03-001).
13 A traffic impact statement was sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic
DIVISIon to ensure that the buildIng addition meets the Traffic Performance
Standards of Palm Beach County The Traffic Division must approve the
statement pnor to the Issuance of any buildIng permIts.
14 No dnveway shall be located less than 120 feet from the IntersectIng nght-of-
way lInes of publIc streets (Chapter 2, SectIOn 11.L.3 d.(1). Driveway shall
be located no less than 30 feet from any Intenor property lIne from the
IntersectIOn of the nght-of-way lInes along local streets and 180 feet along
streets of hIgher classIfication such aU S. 1 (Chapter 23, ArtIcle II.H.3). The
eXIsting dnveway openIng on U S 1 IS 23 feet from the intersectIOn of right-
of-way lInes and therefore, a vanance of 97 feet would be reqUIred. Approval
of the proposed buildIng addition IS contingent upon the grantIng of the
requested dnveway variance (ZNCY 03-010). If approved, thIS variance must
be Indicated In the sIte plan's tabular data.
15 Dnveways shall be located no less than 30 feet from the any intenor property
lIne (Chapter 2, SectIOn 11.L.3.d(3)). The sIte plan shows the existIng
dnveway openIng is 20 feet from the north property line. Therefore, a
vanance of 10 feet would be reqUIred. In summary, approval of the proposed
bUIldIng addItIon is contIngent upon the granting of the requested driveway
variance (ZNCY 03-011) If approved, thIS vanance must be IndIcated in the
sIte plan's tabular data.
COA
09/30/04
4
DEPARTMENTS
16 Only one (1) dnveway IS allowed per street frontage (Chapter 2, Section
l1.L3 d.(4)). The site plan shows that there are two (2) existmg dnveway
openmgs on U S 1 Therefore, a vanance would be requIred to allow two (2)
dnveways along the street frontage for an eXIstmg gas statIon busmess.
Approval of the proposed buildmg addItIon is contmgent upon the grantmg of
the requested driveway vanance (ZNCV 03-012). If approved, this vanance
must be mdicated m the site plan's tabular data.
17 The proposed buildmg addItIon encroaches 10 feet mto the required 20-foot
rear setback. Therefore, a variance of 10 feet would be reqUIred for an
addition to an eXIstmg gas station. Approval of the proposed buildmg
addItIon is contmgent upon the grantmg of the requested buildmg setback
vanance (ZNCV 03-013). If approved, this vanance must be mdIcated in the
site plan's tabular data.
18 Canopies for gas stations reqUIre a 20-foot setback. The site plan shows the
eXIstmg canopy IS mne (9) feet - six (6) inches from the west property line.
Therefore, a vanance of 10 feet - SIX (6) mches IS reqUIred for the eXIstmg
canopy of the gas statIOn. Approval of the proposed building additIOn is
contmgent upon the grantmg of the requested canopy setback vanance
(ZNCV 03-014). If approved, thIS note must be mdIcated in the SIte plan's
tabular data.
19 Gasoline pump islands shall be setback 30 feet from the property line. The
site plan shows an eXIsting gas pump island is located 19 8 feet from the west
property hne. Therefore, a vanance of 10.2 feet is reqUIred for the gasohne
pump Island to an existing gas statIon. Approval of the proposed building
addItIon is contingent upon the granting of the requested canopy setback
vanance (ZNCV 03-015). If approved, thIS note must be mdIcated m the SIte
plan's tabular data.
20 Gas statIOns reqUIre a lO-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer adjacent to
nghts-of-way (Chapter 2, SectIOn l1.L3.f.(1)). The SIte plan shows that no
landscape buffer at the northwest comer of the property of the eXIsting
parkmg lot. Therefore, a vanance of 10 feet is reqUIred for the parking lot of
the eXIstmg gas statIOn. Approval of the proposed building addItIon IS
contingent upon the granting of the requested buffer vanance (ZNCV 03-
016). If approved, thIS note must be mdicated m the SIte plan's tabular data.
Also, staff recommends that the Ixora "Nora Grant" shrubs be 36 mches in
height at the time of mstallation WIthin the landscape buffer along Las Palmas
Avenue and where possible, addItIonal screenmg (such as planter pots or box
planters) shall be prOVIded along North Federal Highway
21 Gas statIons reqUIre a lO-foot wide landscape buffer along interior property
lines. The site plan shows a landscape buffer of one (1) foot - SIX (6) mches
along the north property line. Therefore, a variance of eight (8) feet - SIX (6)
INCLUDE REJECT
COA
09/30/04
5
. "
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
mches is required for the parking lot of an existmg gas statIon. Approval of
the proposed building additIOn is contingent upon the grantmg of the
requested buffer variance (ZNCV 03-017). If approved, thIS note must be
indIcated in the site plan's tabular data.
22. The survey shows the eXIstmg monument sign IS setback only five (5) feet
from the west property line. All outdoor freestandmg monument signs must
be setback at least 10 feet from the property lme. Therefore, a variance of
five (5) feet IS reqUIred for the pylon SIgn of an eXIstmg gas statIon. Approval
of the proposed buildmg addItIOn is contingent upon the grantmg of the
requested sign vanance (ZNCV 03-023). If approved, thIS variance must be
indIcated in the site plan's tabular data.
23 At the tIme of permittmg, show the sIdewalk on the civil engineering plans so
that It matches the SIte plan.
24 The detail of the monument sign should indIcate the extenor fimsh, slgnage
area (expressed m square feet), and colors (Chapter 21, Article IV, Section
2.B ). The code allows for a maxImum of 64 square feet of SIgn area.
25 All project signage is subject to reVlew and approval of the Commumty
Redevelopment Agency and CIty CommissIOn. As proposed, it appears that
the wall signage area would not comply with the maXImum allowable signage
area pursuant to Chapter 21, ArtIcle 4, SectIOn C.3 In order to reduce the
wall sign area and upgrade the overall appearance, staff recommends
elImmating all non-word depICtIOnS (Shell's corporate logo which IS a yellow
/ red seashell) on the wall signs that do not dIrectly correspond with wordmg.
Non-word depictIOns on SIgnS shall be lirmted to 20% of the area of the SIgn
erected. Color limItatIOn shall not apply to non-word depictIons on SIgnS
(Chapter 9, Section 10.1.4 ).
26 ThIS project reqUIres a total of 10 parkIng spaces (1,719 square feet + 681
square feet @ 1/250 = 10 spaces) and should be mdicated as such on the site
plan tabular data.
27 The eXIsting wall must be refurbished (in those areas of ItS decay) and
repamted to match the color( s) of the Gatewav Shell buildmg.
28 Provide paint swatches for the elevations (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7.D).
29 Ensure that all the proposed plant quantities correspond between what is
shown on the graphic illustratIOn and ItS correspondmg plan list on sheet "L-l
30 Fifty percent (50%) of SIte landscape matenals must be natIve speCIes.
Indicate the amount of native matenal in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5.P). Please indIcate by asterisk, the native
COA
09/30/04
6
..
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
species and ensure that at least 50% of landscape matenal is natIve. The
categones shall be as follows. Shade trees, palm trees, shrubs &
groundcover
31 The base of the eXIsting pylon sign must be enhanced WIth colorful
groundcover plans and a rmmmum of two (2) shrub species all selected for
entrance compatibilIty (Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 50).
32. Rooftops will be treated as part of the buildIng elevatIOn. All rooftop
eqUIpment must be completely screened from VIew at a mimmum distance of
600 feet (Chapter 9, SectIOn l1.E.).
33 On the elevatIOns (sheet 3 of 4), elirmnate the Benjarmn Moore color "RubIno
Red" because It will not be used on the building or signs. Also, substItute
"Chrome Green Lt" WIth "Kunnebunkport Green" and correctly IdentIfy
"Chrome Green Dk" as "Chrome Green" FInally, ehrmnate "Chrome Yellow
Brt" and proVIde a color swatch of Shell's vellow color
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMMENTS.
Comments.
34 To be determIned.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMMISSION COMMENTS.
Comments.
35 To be determIned.
MWR/elj
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Shell fka Texaco\New Shell\COUS 03-007 (revised 2004)\COA.doc
SEP-30-2004 08 08 FROM TO O-::~17426259 P 004"004
S 0 0 0:> 0 i~ 't!n'l:1
U1 \11 \11 U1 I'!;l.....~
I I I I ~~
~ 0:> .... .... 0:> 1:lI~
0 IN CD 0 i~e
co IN .... III ... ~co
\D OC> 0 N 1."1
~ '" ..J ... ... I1ltl
Ii ~'"
I .... ....
.... I-' I1lrtW
5::~ ~ -.J t"'Oo
... \D N .. :3....
iU3 .... \1l -.J IN 0
IN 0\ "" III t" Ill'"
11)-
wCO III
....tI:I"i 1J:l0l~ (}
\11v)~, ><c,.. ::rill
H )o~ )0 ;to~ )o~ IJ:lwn
0 ;ton ~ w
Z ~(I)W 00
1-3t-3
i~ ww 0
I-'
004
wll:l IDID IDID IDIO '1)10 i~H
NCO
;~~ ......... .......... .......... .......... ~ta
1,.)1-' 1,.).... WN WI<.) .....~~
01,.) 0,,", 0.... OlD
....In ........ .......... .......... .......... ~~o
\11~ 00 00:> 00 00
0:>....:0=: Ill"" \11'" 1./1'" 1/1'" tI
o~i t'.I
ocn ~
n G:I ..
I7.l i ~ ~
In co t"
~ ..... w
t-3 c
:a ~ :a ~
I7.l I:lI 't1
n ;
~ ~ I:lI
... H
0 0 0 0:> n 't1 ~
.... g 0 0 0 * r-3 ~~6
. n
~! Oln~
~Ol
G:I H/.'iI
otd n ~
00 \""
'(l W
..."" ........ ....1-' I:lI
"".... ...... ...... :2l !nO
0:>0 00 00:> t1 ~~
OH
0000 0000 0000 ooco lii!
0:>000 00:><:10 0000:> 0000
Ol
(I)
"i'
~11l1-'::C ~lll""~ _blNtD -Illl-'(/) ~ ~i
~~ l110Ulg l,II00\8 UlQW= U101-'1:lI
r:\~N O\~o:> Q\~O\tI;I r:\~"':r;o fD 101
I-' o~ ... 1-'1:" .... 0:>1;4 !::~I:lI~ H.O
0\ ....... ...... IXl ~ t" Z Il: ...
0:>'1:1 ~eo~ w:a -.J~Z~ ~ :&:~:l
:so -.J H -.J~ ... -.J *C/,)
0:>,.. W "JQ W "oJQ .... "J IN 01-3 W Hog
00 ~ll:!t'.IlI:l ~~~~ 0:>l:l1c:gr-3 ....tIl0 I ~~~
'~Ot-3 '~Otd II:lII:"W
111 tI:l l,II)otll o 17.l~ I-')obl= H
Nn~~ O:>O~'ll O\n~)o wOXlI7.l ~ ~
w:z: I ..,= ~ g:z; j,( IOlI:lHt" I:lI
\D l;) W t" en \D Qt"
:~~ '"J ~ IJ;l '"lll:l It'
t"~t" :~ t"'t-3 ~
wO<I:lI t:~ H
~ IN ~ ~ w ~I!
... ... ....
W IN . W W
111 l,II l,II UI
't1 "" ,
~ !i!: 'W
0 :6
10I 1:0
olil: lbil
OQ I
,
01..... 011-' tJI~ llll-'~
0111 ~~ ~~ 01-'
S~ ~:~
oeo l2:z t'.Ic/')
% 2:~ l2:
~ ....
tIl~ tIlbil llllJ;l 1Xl111H ~
5: ~~ ~~ ~~ ~:im
g~ ~~ il
"i ~ I7.l
co
0 'IJ "oJ '>;It" 00
oc::: t"~ toil t":x: l:" ,
Ol.l!l ,
wo< w,,< ~~ W I
IN IN W I
.... .... .. .. I
IN W W W I
VI VI 111 \1l 1 :g
,
, ii
,
I
1
I
1
, N
TO :36J74262S9 P 1211211/1211214
SEP-3121-21211214 1218 1218 FROM
I \ ~ 0 0 0 it"I'tln""
.,. .. .... ,..., ;.:1....-:0
I I 1 (")'~tI\l
0 ... ... 11;11 'tl
t' w 0'\ ".. tI\l~l~ ~
I Ct,I N 0 .... :v 00 1 0
..... ..... 111 t<J: i-tI~
~ \/I 0 ~
~ 'gg'
, i8 ~~
~~ .... ..... ~ \11rtw
w 1/1 ... tI'l t"oo
~~ N I\J 0 l:tJ ::s......
aoo 01 ... .. ;0:10 Q
aI ..J lTI t' Ill....
fJloo (I)'
11;1"'1 SII
c.>Ct,I)i itl'l~ Cl
"i C::H ::rm
H N N N fJlO
/ 0 :r>'Z :r>'Z )>'Z "..
2: 'tlfJloo 0
~~ ~~ toJ"i"'l
fJlCl') w
t N
/2/ g~ ....
00 ION \DlD 100\ ~ ~Uri
(") ............ ............ ............
:vO wc.> c.>1\J c.>.... ""00
~ 8i 0.... 010 OCO .........11::
............ ........... ............ "'I:O~
00 00 00 ~~O
""c.> ....c.> .".. tI
o~:;: to:!
OCt,l2: ~
0 C'l ..
t<J ~ ~ ~
In In t'
~ ..... {fl
2 "'I 0
~ :0 IJI
td l>j !
~ n
t" l>j
'"" H !:r>'6
0 c 0 () 'tI
0 0 0 ~ "'I
0
S~ oo~~
Gl HI1;l
otd 0031:"
00 I
1 it1~
I 'tl ~
....... 1-'..... .....1-' : ~'ll HtoJ
lTIlTI ........ 111\/1 {fJ~H
COal 00 .. II :<::
'~""~O ~lIP
coco OOOQ 0000 I 2:H~
0000 0000 0000 1 G'JOI:l fJllJ.lllll
It.IO<
In
-b:lN;;J _ll:lAtIl --1Ilc.>1n "iln
~ III ~ 5:
\/10\0 \110-.1..,) 11100:1: c::
lTIgNH O\~IOO O\~"",I;I;I 00 H~OO
"""'I ... I-' ... ....'tl .... t" H o It.I
lTI - :E ~ozt" gj 2: ~
N;g OIDO 0=2:
-.1= ..,~ lTIZ wzglll ~ij
Ol'-i W ". (")(1)
01:) mb:lP:lC;;l I(llJ:l&1~ fDl~i
111;f0 'g,! .0 !:il: .,.
0)lll>j1'-4 -.l O'tl \D~l'll ~ g ~
~Q~~ ""'Ql'll (II(')~td
(II I1;f OI:z:Ct,ltI
co l":I c (I) c.> 00 ~ ~ ~~
'1:l Ct,I IJ;lCt,l .., (I)
~~I I:" I:">~
~~ t:~~
~ ... . ~ ~~.~\ ~
"i w Ct,I N N
111 0\ 0\ (I) td ~
Itl H Ct,I~ ~
~ ~
()
H ~ "L
g~ td -
I t
I
I \\-
I
lllN Ill".. ~.....)lI ~: \ -
OlD O-.l ON~ i" ,
~~ ~: C::-.I I'-il
(l)C t'1
~~i HI ~l.-
QCt,I 2:' ~
~ Z lOl'
IJ;l !~ <ell/"
1II~ ~:a ~
~ ~td ~~ i
Q~ 0" -.llI:lCt,l
:J:11;f ~O IJI
{f) o:aXl fJl
~ "'l 'llCt,l 0108 fJl
t"i! ~> ""'as:
w..; w<: :z:
w c.>l>:I ;IS:
".. .... 0
W I\J :VI-"
111 01 c.> ~
N
l':I
...
-,'\--".
4TH REVIEW COMMENTS
Conditional Use
M~
Project name: Gateway Shell
File number COUS 03-007
Reference: 4th review plans identified as a Conditional Use with a Planning and Zoning Deoartment date
kin
stamn mar ill.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1 Prior to pennit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- /
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II,
Section 10-26 (a).
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance /
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering, If it was
approved with the original submittal, then provide a copy of the Traffic
Division's approval letter. What is the build-out date?
ENGINEERING DMSION
Comments:
3 All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be /
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
4 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional J
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review
5 Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter /
4, Section 7.B.4 ) Please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan
submittals.
6. It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light ~
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter
23, Article II, Section A,1.b).
7 Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, V
Section 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles
along all collector and arterial roadways, including the intersection of Las "
Palmas and Federal Hi2hway /
V
8 Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
~.
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
2
9 Place a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk along Las Palmas Ave. (LDR,
Cha ter 6, Article IV, Section 10.T, and Cha ter 22, Article I, Section 5 .
10 Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be six (6) inches thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article
II, Section P .
11 Staff recommends that the Landscape Architect consider the use of
"Cathedral" or "Highrise" Live Oak cultivars due to the limited space in
which they are proposed. Another variety that might be used is Green
Buttonwood
12, Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR,
Cha ter 4, Section 7.F ,2.
13 Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
ermittin .
14 Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction ermit lication.
UTILITIES
Comments:
15 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p,m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with
20 p.s.i, residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
eater CODE, Section 26-16
16. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be
reviewed at the time of construction . t a lication.
FIRE
Comments: None
INCLUDE REJECT
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
17 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall t/
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600.
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2001 FBC, Table 600 /
18. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with /
approved 0 . protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705 1 1.2.
19 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the /
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be detennined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads), Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
20 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the ./
proposed construction. /"
21 As required by LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The 1/
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable
building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing. However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol
that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the
building. The location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible
entrance doors that are depicted on the site plan drawing.
22, A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that /
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source, A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F,S. 373,216.
23 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of V
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application,
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan,
b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer.
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of oermit review
25 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
bv the City Commission.
26, The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal, If the project is multi-
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of annlication submittal
27 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR,
Chapter 4, Section 7,B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your
TRC Dlan submittals.
28. Indicate on the plan the type of materials to be stored in the structure.
Additional code requirements may apply depending on the type of materials
to be stored.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
~ This project requires conditional use approval. If approved, pursuant to V
Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 1 1.2 Conditional Uses, staff recommends a one
(1) year time limit for project development.
~ ~e existing site characteristics map (survey) shall be not older than six ~
months (Chapter 4, Section 7.A). Also, exclude the 9,908 square foot lot (to
the east) because it is not a component of this project. Staff recommends
placin2 a note on the survey that indicates, ''not included"
V Provide an architectural plan (buildin2 elevations) that clearly illustrate V
\
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
5
DEPARTMENTS
the height, exterior dimensions, exterior color(s) and materials (Chapter
4, Section 7,D 1). Also, the elevations should show all proposed wall
signage,
32. Provide an affidavit regarding the applicant's responsibly for public noticing,
consistent with Ordinance No. 04-007
K All elevations (sheet 4 of 4) must indicate the proposed colors, including the
aint manufacturer's name and color code Cha ter 4, Section 7,D. .
approved, the proposed building addition would be limited to 600 square
feet in order to be consistent with the previous City Commission approval of
the Administrative A eal ADAP 03-001 .
o driveway shall be located less than 120 feet from the intersecting right-of-
way lines of public streets (Chapter 2, Section 11.L.3,d,(I). Driveway shall
be located no less than 30 feet from any interior property line from the
intersection of the right-of-way lines along local streets and 180 feet along
streets of higher classification such a U.S. 1 (Chapter 23, Article n.H,3), The
existing driveway opening on U.S, 1 is 23 feet from the intersection of right-
of-way lines and therefore, a variance of 97 feet would be required. Approval
of the proposed building addition is contingent upon the granting of the
requested driveway variance (ZNCV 03-010), If approved, this variance must
be indicated in the site lan's tabular data.
.veways shall be located no less than 30 feet from the any interior property
line (Chapter 2, Section 11.L.3.d(3)). The site plan shows the existing
driveway opening is 21 feet from the north property line. Therefore, a
variance of nine (9) feet would be required. In summary, approval of the
proposed building addition is contingent upon the granting of the requested
driveway variance (ZNCV 03-011). Please note that the variance
application requests a variance of 10 feet. Revise your variance
application so that It requests a variance of nine (9) feet instead of 10
feet. If approved, this variance must be indicated in the site plan's tabular
data.
ly one (1) driveway is allowed per street frontage (Chapter 2, Section
l.L3,d,(4)). The site plan shows that there are two (2) existing driveway
openings on U,S. 1 Therefore, a variance would be required to allow two (2)
driveways along the street frontage for an existing gas station business.
Approval of the proposed building addition is contingent upon the granting of
the requested driveway variance (ZNCV 03-012). If approved, this variance
must be indicated in the site lan's tabular data.
38. e proposed building addition encroaches 10 feet into the required 20-foot
rear setback. Therefore, a variance of 10 feet would be required for an
addition to an existing gas station. Approval of the proposed building
addition is contin ent u on the tin of the re uested buildin setback
INCLUDE REJECT
./
/'
~
t/
\.....,//
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
6
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
variance (ZNCV 03-013). If approved, this variance must be indicated in the
site lan's tabular data.
Canopies for gas stations require a 20-foot setback. The site plan shows the
existing canopy is nine (9) feet - six (6) inches from the west property line,
Therefore, a variance of 10 feet - six (6) inches is required for the existing
canopy of the gas station. Approval of the proposed building addition is
contingent upon the granting of the requested canopy setback variance
(ZNCY 03-014). If approved, this note must be indicated in the site plan's
tabular data.
Gasoline pump islands shall be setback 30 feet from the property line, The
site plan shows an existing gas pump island is located 19 feet - 10 inches
from the west property line. Therefore, a variance of 10 feet - 2 inches is
required for the gasoline pump island to an existing gas station. Approval of
the proposed building addition is contingent upon the granting of the
requested canopy setback variance (ZNCV 03-015). If approved, this note
must be indicated in the site lan's tabular data.
stations require a 10-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer adjacent to
rights-of-way (Chapter 2, Section I1.L3.f.(I)), The site plan shows that no
landscape buffer at the northwest comer of the property of the existing
parking lot. Therefore, a variance of 10 feet is required for the parking lot of
the existing gas station. Approval of the proposed building addition is
contingent upon the granting of the requested buffer variance (ZNCY 03-
016). If approved, this note must be indicated in the site plan's tabular data,
Also, staff recommends that the Ixora "Nora Grant" shrubs be 36 inches in
height at the time of installation within the landscape buffer along Las Palmas
Avenue and where possible, additional screening shall be provided (i.e.
lanters alon North Federal Hi wa
42. Gas stations require a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along interior property
lines. The site plan shows a landscape buffer of one (1) foot - six (6) inches
along the north property line. Therefore, a variance of eight (8) feet - six (6)
inches is required for the parking lot of an existing gas station. Please note
that the variance application requests a variance of five (5) feet. Revise
your variance application so that it requests a variance of eight (8) feet -
six (6) inches instead of five (5) feet. Approval of the proposed building
addition is contingent upon the granting of the requested buffer variance
(ZNCY 03-017). If approved, this note must be indicated in the site plan's
tabular data.
All outdoor freestanding monument signs must be setback at least 10 feet
from the property line. The site plan shows the existing monument sign is
setback only five (5) feet from the west property line. Therefore, a variance
of five (5) feet is required for the pylon sign of an existing gas station,
Approval of the proposed building addition is contingent upon the granting of
the requested sign variance (ZNCV 03-023). If approved, this variance must
be indicated in the site lan's tabular data.
/
v
v
v
1/
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
7
DEPARTMENTS
ovide a detail of the monument sign, including the exterior finish, colors,
si ,and dimensions Cha ter 21, Article N Section 2.B. .
45, All project signage is subject to review and approval of the Community
Redevelopment Agency and City Commission. On the elevations, indicate
the cumulative area of all wall signage to ensure that it complies with Chapter
21, Article 4, Section C,). In addition, indicate the letter colors and sign
material.
46, on-word depictions on signs shall be limited to 20% of the area of the sign
erected. Color limitation shall not apply to non-word depictions on signs
Cha ter 9, Section 10.1.4 ,
47. This project requires a total of 10 parking spaces (1,719 square feet + 681
square feet @ 1/250 = 10 spaces) and should be indicated as such on the site
Ian tabular data.
~;\The existing wall must be refurbished (in those areas of its decay) and
Or ainted to match the color s of the Gatewa Shell buildin .
. VThe backup distance for the new parking spaces must be reviewed and
~, roved b the En . eerin Division.
nsure that all the proposed plant quantities correspond between what is
shown on the hic illustration and its corre ndin Ian list on sheet "L-l
V The removal I relocation of landscape material is subject to review and
-\ a roval of the Ci Forester I Environmentalist.
signature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchina Granulso1a, or
ouganvillea) is required at both sides of each project entrance I exit. The
signature trees must have eight (8) feet of clear trunk if placed within the
safe-sight triangle (Chapter 7,5, Article 2, Section 5.N). Alternative plant
material may be substituted if the above referenced plant material is not
available or undesired. Any substitution of plant material (for the signature
tree requirement) will be subject to the City Forester / Environmentalist
review and a roval.
Z 54 Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Chapter 7.5, Article IT, Section 5,P). Please indicate by asterisk, the native
species and ensure that at least 50% of landscape material is native. The
cate ories shall be as follows: Shade trees, aIm trees, shrubs & oundcover
"7
55
INCLUDE REJECT
/
/
/
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
8
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
entrance compatibility (Chapter 7.5, Article n, Section 50).
V The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and
P'\. materials, the design of the principal buildings and shall be integrated with
other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 10.E.3), On the site plan, place a
note indicatin this re uirement. Provide a detail of the d ster enclosure.
Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapter 9, Section 10 C.4). Place a note on the elevations
indicatin this re uirement.
58. Rooftops will be treated as part of the building elevation. All rooftop
equipment must be completely screened from view at a minimum distance of
600 feet Cha ter 9, Section l1.E. ,
MWR/sc
S:\Plannlng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Shell fka Texaco\New Shell\COUS 03-007 4th review (revlsed)\4th Review Comments.doc
G rrili .MMY trot oJ2 fAAS ~ ~ ~ Djy ~ ) Iv
(,IVI/ ~ ~{, 7~ ~ 1k .Mk Fw
(i) 1'rt tMv' t7p ~ I ~ ~ h" p~ ~
(})
- 5/AXtfvhe5
- R~~ w({{l S12,<<P ~
- {Yl~~~
- RevwJ ~{tdl:vn
- ~ s~t O~ ~ \rAMS
l f\l' aACt \ 2,'tV
~ rTL\-~Y -
..~
Project name: Gateway Shell
4TH REVIEW COMMENTS
Conditional Use ~ ' Af'FeP
~\11-\ l..\~ ~17~ON"7
File number COUS 03-007 }ilif ~
Reference: 4th review nlans identified as a Conditional Use with a Planninll and Zoninll Deoartm dat ~
stamn markiml. cr--t
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1 Prior to pennit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article n,
Section 10-26 (a).
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Perfonnance
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. If it was
approved with the original submittal, then provide a copy of the Traffic
Division's approval letter What is the build-out date?
ENGINEERING DMSION
Comments:
3 All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
4 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review
5 Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter
4, Section 7.B.4) Please provide photometries as part of your TRC plan
submittals.
6 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter
23, Article n, Section A.I b).
7 Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7,5, Article II,
Section 5.H.), Reference FOOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles
along all collector and arterial roadways, including the intersection of Las
Palmas and Federal Hi2hway
8. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2,5' and 8' above
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DMSION
Comments:
17 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall
openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600 ~ ~
Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openin2S J>e1l11itted per 2001 FBC, Table 600.
18. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with ~
approved 0~~1~ protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 70511.2,
19 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph, Wind forces on every building or structure /
shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the
provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are
signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida
shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
20 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the /
proposed construction.
21 As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing. The
building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable V
building codes, Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing, However, add to the floor space drawing a labeled symbol
that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the
building. The location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible
entrance doors that are depicted on the site plan drawin2.
22, A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that /
utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit
shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F,S, 373.216.
23 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be /
provided at the time of building permit application:
a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan.
b, The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer
(CBBCO Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
~-
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
24 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, /
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review
25 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies,
the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for V
review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate
all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved
by the City Commission.
26. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction
documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi- 1/
family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted.
The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be
noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
27 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LDR,
Chapter 4, Section 7.B.4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your /
TRC plan submittals.
28, Indicate on the plan the type of materials to be stored in the structure. V
Additional code requirements may apply depending on the type of materials
to be stored.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments,
29 This project requires conditional use approval. If approved, pursuant to
Chapter 2 - Zoning, Sectionl1.2 Conditional Uses, staff recommends a one
(1 ) year time limit for project development.
30 The existing site characteristics map (survey) shall be not older than six
months (Chapter 4, Section 7,A). Also, exclude the 9,908 square foot lot (to
the east) because it is not a component of this project. Staff recommends
placing a note on the survey that indicates, "not included"
31 Provide an architectural plan (building elevations) that clearly illustrate
4m REVIEW COMMENTS
Conditional Use
E~6
Project name: Gateway Shell
File number COUS 03-007
Reference: 4th review plans identified as a Conditional Use with a PlanninlZ and Zoning Department date
stamn markinu,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1........4
I Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- VI:7 -\ Cj/ z
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, ~
Section 10-26 (a). \
"-
.J
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
~, 4~
2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance \.'C Q~IJ.
Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering. If it w~ I-
approved with the original submittal, then provide a copy of the TrafI\c ) \
Division's approval letter What is the build-out date? ", ~
,J
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments.
3 All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be ~Zl 10
reflected on all appropriate sheets. t-
Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional\. ,
4 "
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ~
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review
I
5 Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter \~h
4, Section 7,B.4 ) Please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan (
submittals.
~, ,
!
6 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light
fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter
23, Article II, Section A.I b).
7 Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Section 5 .H,), Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles
along all collector and arterial roadways, including the intersection of Las
Palrnas and Federal Highway
8 Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there ~~
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above
ID4-
0.4.-
4-
4th Review Comments
08/31/04
2
DEPARTMENTS
INCLUDE REJECT
A-
9 Place a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk along Las Palmas Ave. (LDR,
Cha ter 6, Article N, Section 10 T, and Cha ter 22, Article I, Section 5 .
10 Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be six (6) inches thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article
II, Section P .
11 Staff recommends that the Landscape Architect consider the use of
"Cathedral" or "Highrise" Live Oak cultivars due to the limited space in
which they are proposed. Another variety that might be used is Green
Buttonwood.
12. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR,
Cha ter4, Section 7.F,2.
14 Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction
acceptability at this time, All engineering construction details shall be in
accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings
and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and
will be reviewed at the time of construction ermit a lication.
13 Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR~ ~hapter 6, Article N, Section 5 will be required at the time of
enmttm , \
UTILITIES
Comments:
15 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g,p,m, (500 g.p,m. some residential developments) with
20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
eater CODE, Section 26-16
~{.\fZ\
\.,
""-
'-1
a1-
16. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability
at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the
Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and
Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will e
reviewed at the time of construction ermit a lication,
FIRE
Comments: None
GATEWAY SHELL
4TII TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
GATEWAY SHELL
ANSWERS TO TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
September 21, 2004
File No COUS 03-007
RESPONSE TO FOURTH COMMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS - General
1 Comment noted Existing use, handling refuse per code
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
2 To be submitted
ENGINEERING DIVISION
3 Done
4 Noted
5 Noted
6 Noted
7 Done
8 Done
9 Leave as a Condition of Approval by Commission
10 Noted
11 Noted
1 2 Done
1 3 Noted
14 Noted
UTILITIES
1 5 Have been done on last 3 reviews
16 Noted
POLICE
BUILDING DIVISION
1 7 Done
18 Noted
1 9 Noted
20 Noted
21 Done
22 Noted
23 Noted
24 Noted
25 Noted
26 Noted
27 Done
28 Noted
GATEWAY SHELL
4111 TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
PARKS & RECREATION
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALlST
PLANNING AND ZONING
29 Noted
30 Done
31 Noted
32 Done
33 Done
34 Noted
35 Noted
36 Done
37 Noted
38 Noted
39 Noted
40 Noted
41 Noted
42 Done
43 Noted
44 Working on
45 Done
46 Noted
47 We want to keep the 11 parking spaces as they are needed
48 Noted
49 Noted
50 Done
51 Noted
52 Noted
53 Noted
54 Done
55 Done
56 Noted
57 Noted
58 Noted
IrriQation Plan
74 Noted
75 Comment and noted
PLANNING & ZONING
76 Done
77 Variance Filed
78 Variance Filed
79 Variance Filed
80 Variance Filed
81 Variance Filed
82 Variance Filed
83 Done
84 Comment Noted
85 Done
86 Comment Noted
87 Done
88 Done
89 Done
90 Done
91 Removed from Plan
92 Done
93 Done
94 Comment Noted
95 Comment Noted
96 Done
97 Done
98 Done
99 Done
100 Done
101 Done
102 Comment Noted
103 Done
104 Done
105 Comment Noted
106 Variance Filed
107 Comment Noted
CAR WASH TEXACO
ANSWER TO TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
September 16 2003
CAR WASH TEXACO
ANSWER TO TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
September 16. 2003
File No COUS 03-007
RESPONSE TO FIRST COMMENTS
PUBLIC WORKS
1 Comment Noted
2 Done on site plan
Public Works - Traffic
3 Traffic done by Civil Engineer, Burt Smith
4 Done on site plan
5 Done on site plan
6 Done on site plan
7 Done on both Civil and Site Plans
8 Done on site plan
9 Copy of 13-foot ingress-egress easement enclosed
UTILITIES
1 0 Done on site plan
11 Done on site plan
1 2 Done on plan
1 3 Complied
1 4 Done
1 5 Noted on Plan
1 6 Comment Noted
17 Comment Noted
ENGINEERING
1 8 Comment Noted
1 9 Comment Noted
20 Comment Noted
21 Comment Noted
22 Done
23 Done on Plan
24 Comment Noted
25 Done on Plan
26 Done on Plan
27 Done on Plan
28 13' Easement Information is attached
29 Sidewalk Waiver submitted
30 Noted on Plan
31 Done in Photometric Plan
32 Comment Noted
33 Noted on Plan
34 Noted on Plan
35 Noted on Plan
CAR WASH TEXACO
ANSWER TO TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
September 16 2003
36 Comment Noted
37 Noted on Plan
38 Comment Noted
39 Noted on Plan
40 Comment Noted
41 Noted on Plan
42 Noted on Plan
43 Comment Noted
44 Noted on Plan
45 Noted on Plan
46 Noted on Plan
47 Noted on Plan
48 Noted on Plan
49 Comment Noted
50 Comment Noted
51 Noted on Plan
FIRE
52 Comment noted on site plan
53 Comment for info
BUILDING DIVISION
54 Done on site plan
55 Done on site plan
56 Comment Noted
57 Done
58 Done
59 Done
60 Done
61 Done
62 Comment Noted
63 No Unity of Title Separate Ownership
64 Comment Noted
65 Done
66 Done on Plan
67 Comment Noted
68 Bollards Added to Plan
69 Done on Plan
70 See #63
FORRESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Landscape Plan
71 Corrected on LIS plan
72 On LIS plan
73 Removed from Plan
IrnQation Plan
74 Noted
75 Comment and noted
PLANNING & ZONING
76 Done
77 Variance Filed
78 Variance Filed
79 Variance Filed
80 Variance Filed
81 Variance Filed
8 2 Variance Filed
83 Done
84 Comment Noted
85 Done
86 Comment Noted
87 Done
88 Done
89 Done
90 Done
91 Removed from Plan
92 Done
93 Done
94 Comment Noted
95 Comment Noted
96 Done
97 Done
98 Done
99 Done
100 Done
101 Done
102 Comment Noted
103 Done
104 Done
105 Comment Noted
106 Variance Filed
107 Comment Noted
CAR WASH TEXACO
ANSWER TO TECH REVIEW COMMENTS
September 16 2003
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
po. Box 21229
,'est Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Tony Masilotti. Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
An Equal Opportunity
AffirrTUJtive Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled pape,
September 8 2003
Mr Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
POBox 310
Boynton Beach FL 34425-0310
RE. Marouf's Car Wash - Build-out Extension
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr Rumpf"
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
previously approved project entitled, Marouf's Car Wash - Build-out Extension
pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County
Land Development Code This project is summarized as follows.
Location
Municipality'
Existing Uses
Proposed Uses.
New Daily Trips
New PH Trips
Build-out Year"
East side of Federal Highway North of Gateway Boulevard
Boynton Beach
None
One Stall of Automatic Car Wash
108
6 - PM Peak Hour
2004
Based on our review the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed build-out
extension meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030
Sincerely
}/'Y)
/ , r
.(
Masoud Atefi, M CE
Sr Engineer - Tr
cc: H. Burton Smith, PE., Consulting Engineers
File. General TPS Mun Traffic Study Review
F '\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals'D30904 .doc
DeCeMber 20 ~OC1 11 34 AM From: 8erii ~JUger _Fa) Number 2554611 Page 2 0' 'l
Llt~/iU~~ .d ~b bb jb4 jL
~Uy~ U~ Mt~~ f 1~~
- - -
'"A(;i:;. ~:t
~~F4Ite~
FLOW TEST
ReQuest Date:
12/11101
Company. Beril Kruger P & Z Consuitant
9 NE 16~ Street
De:ray Beach, FL 33444
Requested From Beril Kruger
Telephone Number' 561 ~65-4983
Facsimile Number- 561.265-4611
Location. L.. Palm.. & US 1 North
· DIAGRAM *
(Include lIiroction. .trHt namel, hydrtlnt locations, intereectiona III"ld main sizes)
i N ~..
u
N S HM
HW uoel AVENUe H LAS PALMAS
W
I y ~
H_
I 1
I
Hydrant 1
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading 84 psi
Flow Reading 28 PSI- 890 gpm
Residual Reading 52 psi
Assign Date: 12/13/01
Tested By' FF ill Woznick
Test Date: 12/19101
Time Tested 14'00 hours
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL. 1,794 gpm
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
POBOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX. (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to Benl Kruger
fax #: 265 -4611
date: September I, 2004
from: Shene Coale
reo I ST REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Gateway Shell
Please find attached the first reView comments for your proJect. To stay on the
current reView schedule, please do the followmg steps lIsted below, and bnng all
documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday, September 14,2004
1 ReVIse your plans mcorporatmg all comments lIsted herem, mcludmg the addItion of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bnng 12 copies
to the TRC reVIew meetmg (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally submItted),
2. SubmIt the addItional mformatIOn as requested wIthm the attached comments, ( 1.e. traffic
analysIs, engmeenng certification, etc )
3 Prepare a wntten response (7 copIes) consIstmg of a lIst bnefly summanzmg how each
comment has been addressed on the revIsed plans or WIth the supplemental mformatIOn
mcludmg location on the plans ( this promotes an expedItious 2nd reVIew by staff and
your project representatives dunng the TRC meetmg ),and
4 Submit reductions (8 ~ X 11) and in digital format (JPEG) for the proposed SIte
plans, elevatIOns and landscapmg plan (thIS IS
reqUIred for the final report and publIc Planmng and Zoning DIviSIOn
presentatIOn) City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax 742-6259
The applIcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIew) untIl all documents have been revIsed and
copIed for staff reVIew If plans will not be fully revIsed and brought to the scheduled TRC
meetmg, contact Ed Breese m thIS office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meetmg date.
Projects devIatmg from the ongmal schedule are elIgible for reVIew at subsequent meetmgs,
WhICh are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Shene Coale, by the Thursday pnor to the
Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend. The remamder of the reVIew schedule wIll be
adjusted accordmgly If you have questIons on the attached comments, please contact the
respectIve reVIewer usmg the attached lIst of TRC representatIves.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgmficant comments are addressed followmg TRC
(2nd reVIew), the project IS forwarded to CommunIty Redevelopment Agency Board that falls
approxImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*,, by any comment IdentIfies a
comment that must be addressed pnor to movmg forward to the Planning and Development
board.
Note: Items recogmzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS pomt mclude a traffic report
and/or confirmatIon ofthe traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
dramage certIficatIon by a lIcensed engmeer, sIgned "RIder to SIte Plan ApplIcatIOn"
form and colored elevatIons of the proposed project. ThIS mformatIon IS necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submItted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note.
DEPARTMENT REPRESENTATIVE REPRESENTATIVES' PHONE FAX
DESIGNEE
Engmeenng Dave Kelley Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
BUIldmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6352
Fire Department Rodger Kemmer RIck Lee 742-6753 742-6357
PolIce Department Marshall Gage John Huntmgton 737-6167 737-3136
UtIlItIes Pete Mazzella H. DavId Kelley Jr 742-6401 742-6485
PublIc Works-General Larry QUInn Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
PublIc W orks- Traffic Jeffrey LIvergood Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Parks & RecreatIon John Wildner 742-6227 742-6233
F oresterlEnvIronmentalIst Kevm Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Planmng & Zomng Michael Rumpf, Ed Breese 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 01/14/02
s: IPlanninglSHARED\ WPlPROJECTSlRenaissance Connnons\ I sl Review comments FAX COVER.doc
Coale, Sherie
From
Sent:
To
Cc:
Subject:
Lee, Rick
Tuesday, August 31, 20048'39 AM
Coale, Sherie
Kemmer, Rodger
RE. Gateway Shell COUS 03-007 revised
-Original Message-----
From: Coale, Sherie
Sent: Monday, August 30,20049:34 AM
To: Lee, Rick
Subject: Gateway Shell COUS 03-007 revised
Rick,
Do you have any comments for this plan? Sherie
THE FIRE DEPARTMENT HAS NO OBJECTIONS AT THIS TIME.
1
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
~
TO MIchael W Rumpf
FROM ~~::~:n::nmg
,__,~,~t:ebepartment
CPTED PractItioner
DATE.
August 19,2004
FILE. CaDS 03-007
SUBJECT
REFERENCES
Gateway Shell
SIte Plan
ENCLOSURES
I have viewed the above bUilding plans and have the followmg comments
No Comments.
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
Coale, Sherie
From Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, August 24 2004 10.48 AM
To Breese Ed
Cc. Coale, Sherie
Subject: Gateway Shell (fka Gateway Texaco)
Planning Memorandum. Forester I Environmentalist
To
Ed Breese, PnncIpal Planner
From.
Kevm J Hallahan, Forester I EnvIronmentalIst
Subject:
Gateway Shell (fka Gateway Texaco)
CondItIOnal Use- 4th RevIew
caus 03-007
Date'
August 24, 2004
No comment. The applIcant has met my eXIstmg trees comments on the landscape plans.
Kjh
FIle
8/24/2004
~
ct
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 04-150
TO
Michael W Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P E., Senior Engineer
DATE.
August20,2004
RE
Review Comments
Conditional Use - 4th Review
Gateway Shell
File No. COUS 03-007
The above referenced revised Site Plans, received on August 17, 2004, was reviewed for
Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of
Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances and against comments made on previous reviews
Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LDR) referenced
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
1 Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200)
regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Article II, Section 10-26 (a).
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
2. Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards
Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering
ENGINEERING
3 All comments requiring changes andlor corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all
appropriate sheets
4 Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional
comments Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that
additional comments may not be generated by the Commission and at permit review
5 Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, Section
7 B 4) If possible please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittals - it
is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on
a permit!
6 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to
eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section
A.1 b)
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No 04-150
RE. Gateway Shell, Conditional Use - 4th Review, COUS 03-007
August 20, 2004
Page 2
7 Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 75, Article II, Section
5 H) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along all collector and
arterial roadways, including the intersection of Las Palmas and Federal Highway
8 Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an
unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement (LDR,
Chapter 75, Article II, Section 5 H )
9 Place a minimum four (4) foot wide sidewalk along Las Palmas Ave (LDR, Chapter 6,
Article IV, Section 10 T, and Chapter 22, Article I, Section 5 )
10 Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be
6 in thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P )
11 Staff recommends that the Landscape Architect consider the use of "Cathedral" or
"Highrise" Live Oak cultivars due to the limited space in which they are proposed
Another variety that might be used is Green Buttonwood
12. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4,
Section 7 F 2.
13 Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR,
Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting
14 Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at
this time All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable
City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook
and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit
application
UTILITIES
15 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500
g P m (500 g P m. some residential developments) with 20 psi residual pressure as
stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
16 Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time
All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's
"Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual
(including any updates), they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit
application
LL:jam
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director Utilities
H. David Kelley Jr P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Office Associates File\Logan\04-150 Gateway Shell.doc
/
SUBJECT
Project - Gateway Shell
File No - CO US 03-007 - 15t review
List of Acronvms/Abbreviations.
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
eBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F S - Florida Statutes
LOR - Land Development Regulations
NEe - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 04-204
FROM
Ed Breese
Principal Planner
Timothy K. Large~
TRC Member/Building Division
TO
DATE
August 24, 2004
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352
1 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and
exterior wall construction comply with 2001 FBC, Table 600 Submit calculations that
clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per
2001 FBC, Table 600
2 Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with approved
opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705 1 1.2
3 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind
loads of 140 mph Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the
provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind
Loads) Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the
state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application
4 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction
5 As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing The building plans
are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes Therefore, add
the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing However, add to the floor
space drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible
entrance doors to the building The location of the doors shall match the location of the
accessible entrance doors that are depicted on the site plan drawing
S. \Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2004\Gateway Shell Page 1 of 2
6 A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that utilizes water from
a well or body of water as its source A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of
permit application, F S 373.216
7 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application
a The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan
b The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer
(CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
8 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For purposes
of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded
deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit
review
9 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for
this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit
application submittal The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in
the development order and approved by the City Commission
10 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the
time of permit application submittal If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the
particular building type shall be submitted The name of the project as it appears on the
Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of
application submittal
11 Show the proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans. (LRD, Chapter 4, Section
7 B 4) If possible, provide photo metrics as part of your TRC plan submittals
12 Indicate on the plan the type of materials to be stored in the structure Additional code
requirements may apply depending on the type of materials to be stored
bf
S:\Development\Building\ TRC\ TRC 2004\Gateway Shell
Page 20f2
GATEWAY SHELL
COUS 03-007
4th Review Planning
August 30, 2004
ThIS project reqUIres condItIonal use approval. If approved, pursuant to Chapter 2 - Zomng,
SectIon11.2 CondItional Uses, staff recommends a one (1) year tIme hmIt for project
development.
The eXIstIng sIte charactenstics map (survey) shall be not older than six months (Chapter 4,
SectIOn 7.A). Also, exclude the 9,908 square foot lot (to the east) because It IS not a component
of thIS project. Staff recommends placIng a note on the survey that Indicates, "not Included"
ProvIde an arcmtectural plan (buildIng elevations) that clearly illustrate the height, extenor
dImensions, extenor color(s) and matenals (Chapter 4, SectIon 7.D 1) Also, the elevatIons
should show all proposed wall sIgnage.
ProVIde an affidaVIt regardIng the apphcant's responsibly for public notIcing, consistent WIth
OrdInance No 04-007
All elevatIons (sheet 4 of 4) must IndIcate the proposed colors, Including the paInt manufacturer's
name and color code (Chapter 4, SectIon 7.D).
If approved, the proposed buildIng addition would be hmIted to 600 square feet In order to be
consIstent WIth the preVIOUS CIty CommISSIon approval of the AdmImstratIve Appeal (ADAP 03-
001).
No dnveway shall be located less than 120 feet from the IntersectIng nght-of-way hnes ofpubhc
streets (Chapter 2, SectIon 11.L.3.d.(1). Driveway shall be located no less than 30 feet from any
Intenor property hne from the Intersection of the nght-of-way hnes along local streets and 180
feet along streets of hIgher classIficatIOn such a U.S 1 (Chapter 23, ArtIcle II.H.3). The eXIstIng
dnveway opemng on U.S 1 IS 23 feet from the IntersectIon of nght-of-way lInes and therefore, a
vanance of 97 feet would be reqUITed. Approval of the proposed building addItIon IS contIngent
upon the granting of the requested dnveway vanance (ZNCV 03-010). If approved, thIS vanance
must be IndIcated In the site plan's tabular data.
Dnveways shall be located no less than 30 feet from the any Intenor property lIne (Chapter 2,
SectIon 11.L.3.d(3)) The SIte plan shows the eXIstIng dnveway opening IS 21 feet from the north
property lIne. Therefore, a vanance of mne (9) feet would be required. In summary, approval of
the proposed buildIng addItion IS contIngent upon the granting of the requested dnveway vanance
(ZNCV 03-011) Please note that the variance application requests a variance of 10 feet.
Revise your variance application so that it requests a variance of nine (9) feet instead of 10
feet. If approved, thIS vanance must be indIcated in the site plan's tabular data.
Only one (1) dnveway IS allowed per street frontage (Chapter 2, SectIOn 11.L3.d.(4)) The SIte
plan shows that there are two (2) eXIstIng dnveway opemngs on U.S 1 Therefore, a variance
would be reqUIred to allow two (2) dnveways along the street frontage for an eXIstIng gas statIon
business. Approval of the proposed buildIng addition IS contIngent upon the grantIng of the
requested dnveway vanance (ZNCV 03-012). If approved, thIS vanance must be IndIcated In the
SIte plan's tabular data.
The proposed building addItlon encroaches 10 feet mto the reqUIred 20-foot rear setback.
Therefore, a vanance of 10 feet would be reqUIred for an addItlon to an existlng gas statlon.
Approval of the proposed building addItIOn is contlngent upon the grantmg of the requested
buildmg setback vanance (ZNCV 03-013) If approved, tills vanance must be mdIcated m the
sIte plan's tabular data.
CanopIes for gas statIOns reqUIre a 20-foot setback. The sIte plan shows the eXIstmg canopy IS
mne (9) feet - SIX (6) mches from the west property lme. Therefore, a variance of 10 feet - six
(6) mches IS reqUIred for the eXIstlng canopy of the gas statIOn. Approval of the proposed
buildmg addItion IS contlngent upon the grantmg of the requested canopy setback vanance
(ZNCV 03-014) If approved, thIS note must be mdIcated m the SIte plan's tabular data.
Gasohne pump Islands shall be setback 30 feet from the property lme The SIte plan shows an
eXIstmg gas pump Island IS located 19 feet - 10 inches from the west property Ime. Therefore, a
variance of 10 feet - 2 mches IS reqUIred for the gasohne pump Island to an eXIstmg gas statlon.
Approval of the proposed buildmg addItlon IS contmgent upon the grantlng of the requested
canopy setback vanance (ZNCV 03-015) If approved, thIS note must be mdIcated m the site
plan's tabular data.
Gas statlons reqUIre a lO-foot wide perimeter landscape buffer adjacent to nghts-of-way (Chapter
2, Sectlon 11.L3.f.(1)) The SIte plan shows that no landscape buffer at the northwest comer of
the property of the eXIsting parking lot. Therefore, a vanance of 10 feet IS reqUIred for the
parkmg lot of the eXIstmg gas statlon. Approval of the proposed buildmg addition is contingent
upon the granting of the requested buffer variance (ZNCV 03-016) If approved, thIS note must
be mdIcated m the SIte plan's tabular data. Also, staff recommends that the Ixora "Nora Grant"
shrubs be 36 inches in heIght at the tlme of installatIOn WIthin the landscape buffer along Las
Palmas Avenue and where possible, addItlonal screemng shall be prOVided (I.e. planters) along
North Federal Highway
Gas statIOns require a 10-foot WIde landscape buffer along mtenor property lines. The SIte plan
shows a landscape buffer of one (1) foot - SIX (6) mches along the north property Ime. Therefore,
a variance of eIght (8) feet - SIX (6) mches IS reqUIred for the parkmg lot of an eXIstmg gas
statlon. Please note that the variance application requests a variance of five (5) feet. Revise
your variance application so that it requests a variance of eight (8) feet - six (6) inches
instead of five (5) feet. Approval of the proposed buildmg addItIon IS contmgent upon the
grantmg of the requested buffer vanance (ZNCV 03-017). If approved, thIS note must be
mdIcated m the SIte plan's tabular data.
All outdoor freestanding monument SIgnS must be setback at least 10 feet from the property Ime.
The SIte plan shows the existmg monument SIgn IS setback only five (5) feet from the west
property Ime. Therefore, a vanance of five (5) feet is reqUIred for the pylon SIgn of an eXIsting
gas statlon. Approval of the proposed buildmg addItlon IS contmgent upon the grantmg of the
requested SIgn variance (ZNCV 03-023) If approved, thIS vanance must be mdicated m the SIte
plan's tabular data.
All sIgnage IS subject to the Commumty Redevelopment Agency and City CommISSIon reVIew
and approval.
PrOVide a detail of the monument SIgn, mcludmg the exterior fimsh, colors, SIgn type, and
dImensIOns (Chapter 21, Artlcle IV, SectIOn 2.B ).
All project signage IS subject to reVIew and approval of the CommunIty Redevelopment Agency
and CIty CommIssion. On the elevatIOns, mdICate the cumulatlve area of all wall sIgnage to
ensure that It comphes WIth Chapter 21, ArtIcle 4, Sectlon C.). In addItIOn, mdlcate the letter
colors and SIgn matenal.
Non-word depICtlons on SIgnS shall be hnnted to 20% of the area of the SIgn erected. Color
hmltatIOn shall not apply to non-word depictions on signs (Chapter 9, Sectlon 10.1.4 )
ThIs project requIres a total of 10 parkIng spaces (1,719 square feet + 681 square feet @ 1/250 =
10 spaces) and should be mdlcated as such on the site plan tabular data.
The eXlstmg wall must be refurbIshed (in those areas of ItS decay) and repainted to match the
color(s) of the Gateway Shell buildmg.
The backup dIstance for the new parkIng spaces must be reVIewed and approved by the
Engmeenng DiVIsion.
The SIte plan should show the hnnts of the east-west mgress I egress easement.
A dramage statement IS reqUIred pnor to the TechnIcal ReVIew Comnnttee meetmg (Chapter 4,
SectIOn 7.F.2.).
A traffic Impact statement IS reqUIred pnor to the TechnIcal ReVIew CommIttee meetlng (Chapter
4 SectIOn 8.F)
PrOVIde pamt swatches for the elevatIOns (Chapter 4, Sectlon 7.D )
Ensure that all the proposed plant quantItIes correspond between what IS shown on the grapmc
illustratIOn and ItS correspondmg plan hst on sheet "L-l"
The removal I relocation of landscape material is subject to reVIew and approval of the CIty
Forester I Envlronmentahst.
A SIgnature tree (such as a Yellow Elder, Tibouchma Granulsola, or Bouganvillea) IS reqUIred at
both SIdes of each project entrance I eXIt. The SIgnature trees must have eight (8) feet of clear
trunk If placed wlthm the safe-SIght tnangle (Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle 2, Sectlon 5.N) Alternatlve
plant matenal may be substltuted If the above referenced plant material is not available or
undeSIred. Any SubstItution of plant material (for the SIgnature tree reqUIrement) will be subject
to the CIty Forester I EnVIronmentahst reVIew and approval.
FIfty percent (50%) of site landscape matenals must be natlve speCIes. IndIcate the amount of
native matenal in the plant hst of the landscape plan (Chapter 7.5, Article II, SectIon 5.P). Please
indIcate by astensk, the native species and ensure that at least 50% of landscape matenal is
native. The categories shall be as follows. Shade trees, palm trees, shrubs & groundcover
The base of the monument SIgn must be enhanced WIth colorful groundcover plans and a
mlmmum of two (2) shrub speCIes all selected for entrance compatibihty (Chapter 7.5, Article II,
Sectlon 5 0 ).
The dumpster enclosure shall resemble wIth respect to the color and matenals, the desIgn of the
princIpal buildIngs and shall be Integrated wIth other sIte elements (Chapter 9, Sectlon IO.E.3 )
On the sIte plan, place a note IndIcatIng thIS requIrement. ProVIde a detail of the dumpster
enclosure
EqUIpment placed on the walls of the buildIngs shall be paInted to match the buildIng color
(Chapter 9, Sectlon 10 C 4). Place a note on the elevatlons IndIcating this reqUIrement.
Rooftops will be treated as part of the buildIng elevatIOn. All rooftop equipment must be
completely screened from view at a mInimum dIstance of 600 feet (Chapter 9, SectIon II.E.)
Page 1 of 1
Coale, Sherie
From Wildner, John
Sent: Monday, August 30,20044.50 PM
To Coale, Sherie
Subject: Seaview Park Club
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the new site plan for the Seaview Park Club The following
comments are submitted
Recreation Facilities Impact Fee - based on the formula the fee is computed as follows
72 multi-family units X $656 ea. = $47,232
Private Recreation Facilities Provided - Swimming pool with Cabana, Barbeque Areas, Exercise Rooms.
John
8/30/2004
.
The \. ly of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. IloyntDn Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FlorIda 33425-0310
TEl: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
July 1, 2004
Mr Beril Kruger
Plannin~ & Zoning Consultants
9 NE 16 Street
Delray Beach, FL 33444
Re: Maroufs Gateway Shell (fka Texaco)
Revised Comments
Dear Mr Kruger.
In reviewing the application for the above-referenced project, there have been several
deficiencies noted in what would become the updated documents. These deficiencies
are as follows:
~ No elevation drawings and in particular, representing the project with existing or
proposed exterior finishes and signage:
~ No survey for the project;
~ No current listings, labels and postage for purposes of notifying adjacent property
owners within 400 feet; and
A notation reflecting the deed restriction was identified on the site plan for the subject site,
however it will be confirmed with the city attorney that this will be acceptable in lieu of it
being shown on the adjacent parcel. At minimum for the submittal include the lot number of
the adjacent parcel with which this note corresponds.
Although the city is allowing for submittal of excerpts to update this application, please
realize that the applications still contain original signatures, dates and representation as a
"Texaco" station inconsistent with the plans which are titled "Gateway Shell" Please
arrange a time to review the file for completeness and accuracy and if acceptable, provide
newly dated signature pages as well as your initials and dates to existing pages you wish
to be retained. As for the plan set, the extra copies of the site plan were discarded
following original approval. TherefoJ:e aloftg ..ith the 12 eepios of the jJlclIl ~t:L 5ublllitted-to
date. you must submit 1? <>dl:litieftal eopies of the survey, and paving, grading and drainage
plans (and revised elevation drawings), In retrospect, this issue may not have been
anticipated and therefore not clearly communicated to you, partially the resultofthis unique
situation, however, I apologize for the additional inconvenience.
. P !
July 1, 2004
Please contact this office should you have any questions or would like to arrange a time to
review and finalize the application.
Sincerely,
We
Michael W Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
Cc: Quintus Greene-Development Director
Joyce Costello - Administrative Assistant to City Manager
Please record the date and time spent working with this project.
The smallest increment would be ~ hour
Time
Gateway Shell
EB
v,0 DeS
EJ
MR
sc 1.0 15
PT
IC
Conditional Use
Variances
~f, Michael
From
Sent:
To
Cc:
Subject:
Bressner, Kurt
Thursday, January 29, 2004 4:27 PM
McCray, Mack
Cherof James, Rumpf Michael; Gage, Marshall
Follow-up on Meeting with Residents Texaco
Commissioner McCray,
Last night Jim Cherof Mike Rumpf and I met with eight residents (5 from Las Palmas and 3 from Lakeside Harbor Dr) to
discuss the Texaco station We had a good discussion The summary of the meeting results were as follows
1 The residents did not seem to have an objection to the 600 sq ft. extension onto the existing gas station building
2 The residents remain opposed to any commercial development of the lot to the east of the gas station The do not wish
to purchase the property however
3 The residents might be supportive of a residential use on the vacant lot east of the gas station provided there was
buffering between the residential and commercial uses. (By this, I believe they meant buffering between the gas station
property on Federal and the vacant lot that would be converted to residential) There was no closure on whether the
residents would support multi-family on the vacant lot (may be too small for anything other than a duplex anyway)
A considerable amount of time was spent talking about the "environment" of the gas station and the area. Several points
were raised that may require staff follow-up
1 Incidence of drug dealing and prostitution from the gas station property The residents were careful to note the activity
was observed on the right of way of Federal Highway and no so much on the gas station property The residents
requested that the Police Department take special note of the area. (Chief Gage)
2 Remove the pay phone at the NW corner of the Texaco property This was perceived by the residents as being a
conduit for illicit activities. I need to defer to the PD on this issue if a pay phone can be removed if it is shown it contributes
to crime That said there are a number of other pay phones in the area but most seem to be attached to buildings rather
as a free standing (and remote) phone Maybe the phone can just be moved under the lights of the station?? (Chief
Gage)
3 Sight Distance issue at the driveway from the station (SW corner) for cars leaving and going NB onto Federal. Mixed
bag here as some residents said it was a problem and others said it was not. Maybe the owner can trim back the bushes
4 Use of the vacant lot for construction worker parking We advised the residents that no special permit was required It
is a private matter between the owner and the workers or the owner and the construction company building the Harbors.
One resident said that the drainage configuration of the parcel was altered with the cars parked
5 Flooding -- Several residents said there was flooding problems on the street but only one house was reported to have
taken water recently The owner of that house was not at the meeting. Maybe a review of the storm drainage system (or
lack thereof) is warranted Several residents mentioned that the City should buy the vacant lot to the east for stormwater
storage Absent a specific, documented problem I cannot support this
That's it from my notes I'll put a copy of the sign up sheet in your mail
Kurt
1