REVIEW COMMENTS
7.E.I
MOTOROLA PID (MPMD 02-004)
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-024
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
FROM: Eric Lee Johnson, AICP
Planner
DATE: January 22,2003
SUBJECT: Motorola PID - File No. MPMD 02-004
Master Plan Modification
PROJECT NAME:
Motorola PID - MPMD 02-004
LOCATION:
Southeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue
LAND USE/ZONING:
Industrial (I) / Planned Industrial Development (PID)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Motorola is a partially built-out Development of Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 87.4-acres, zoned
Planned Industrial Development (PID). It is located on the southeast corner of Gateway Boulevard and
Congress Avenue. (See attached Exhibit "A" - Location Map). R. Duke Woodson, agent for the land owners,
is requesting to modify the Master Plan for Motorola PID to show the new boundaries and points of access
along Congress Avenue.
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The original DRI development order, in 1979, established a three-phase master plan, which was subsequently
followed by a corresponding rezoning to accommodate the DRI on the zoning map. Major changes in
Motorola's operation has led to the reduction of on-site activity and sale of the property to Maury L. Carter &
Associates, Inc. of Orlando. The new owners, as part of a plan to maximize use of the property, amended the
DRI in December of last year to convert 825,000 square feet of industrial and office land use entitlements for
the property to 500 multi-family residential units, 63,500 square feet of commercial space, 450,000 square feet
of office space and 128,000 square feet of warehouse space. There are no changes proposed to the DRI
phasing, commencement date or the build-out date of 2010. As a PID of this size is not permitted to include
commercial and residential uses, the undeveloped portions of the DRI/master plan, totaling 48.1 acres, are
proposed to be removed from the existing PID and rezoned to C-3 Community Commercial. The remainder of
the PID would total 39.3 acres. That portion to be rezoned to commercial would also include the +/- l.4-acre
parcel occupied by the day care business located at the north side of the DRI. This master plan modification
is now required as a condition of the amendment of the DRI, and recent rezoning of both portions of the DRI,
to reflect the new boundaries of the PID. Although the master plan will reflect the approval of approximately
578,000 square feet of office/ industrial space, the ultimate development thresholds are delineated by the DRI
as described above. That portion to be removed from the PID, 33 acres concentrated at the southern end of
Motorola PID Staff Report, MPMD 02-004
Memorandum No. PZ 03-024
Page 2
the DRI, will be the site of the residential component (up to 500 dwelling units), and retail use will be proposed
along the Congress Avenue side (west) wrapping around the corner along a short segment of Gateway
Boulevard. Two additional access points are proposed along Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "B"). The site
planning of the removed property has not been completed at this time.
No new uses for the PID are proposed at this time; however, staff is currently reviewing the request for use
approval that would establish a list of approved uses for the PID. A list of approved uses was not considered
when originally rezoned to PID likely due to it being devoted to a single industrial use. The request for use
approval is currently scheduled for review by the Planning & Development Board on February 25, 2003.
RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this master plan modification request. Staff
recommends approval, contingent upon the comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any
additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be placed in the Conditions of
Approval.
MR/ej
Xc: Central File
S:\Planning\SharedIWpIProjects\Motorola DRI\MPMD 02-004\Staff Report.doc
Location Map
MOTOROLA P.I.O.
EXHIBIT "A"
I
,
,
BOO
~.
, i I i il 11// // ~
::>-J I ;' I I , i i .. ! ! / ~
-" I, ""-'---' i / '-c~_J I ' / i /.~'/ /
,,1'\', //;^'"'./(f\/, ili __ /
\'// h! 1\ --1 \ /---;//
-~/ / I L---\~~- \\\ ////
~~ ['" \ \ \" //./ /
,,\ . ',11,,\ ./ ,- -', \ \.-,>,./ ,/ /
,-\\ "", ",I /f""" / )Y. ( \
I \\ 1'\\1 ~-I J-----'''''~--,,_/\ //n",-_,-~
\\, -'" \, I\_-"I'/(--r I_f-I - \ -"<~:~" /<~:/ I\'-<~:/ ""v//'
\"[----1 ",', \ "y//'> /1 \ "." .'-, /./
I I ',',',\ I \ /// / '. ',:::._>/
I: . '''I'", I . \ ~~--------:r / \ "\-/':
) I "'fu ,..1.~,I.",,~\/ \ ( /. / '
1-----,' I'_~__L I _~~ ~" ''-____________,// /~.< ,,' ,
----'- -, ' " , ". / /
\, 'I, 'I __-::=--=::::::_;:\/
',0", ,
--1 / !
-<1r-- !
~ l_~-
~ .1
QUP\NTUld PARK
',-121,. 1
' /
,\ /
DD E-4 CANAL \; " I ~-==-_~
/~ ~-/,a
---t-' :'I-:
YNT L - 'I '1"III'i~L-
RBo1 AA f' \~I,'; h~~ qe ~.LU 11 Ul~ ' .
',I;:> T 'lc..:.r'~.,..c,TFh -1-1=11
'",j',r-, "'- l\f{jri--lII-=~I[:.1-J1
"',f~"',f-' ", I" .-~ tH f,-T:111::J'i:.-=dlf
'13\\ L' :::jll--;:-=h.i-lll-~IIH---i\r
\;::\~~~ _11EEjl,I:i1It::1li-rlr
'BO:'. 1600 Feet W~E
s
\
l
11111111.L"":
",U I I
1.;J.1IL...I
, ----1
- \ - - I
-- I __ _ -, __
, I I lJ
-'1' N I
I _~.
(------- z
"', '''''1
\ \:\\ I "
'\ I'
\ \- "
\, 1,1" .i/
I \1 "i,'
il i;' il:I'
'. Ii l\ /
'~. ./
' . --
'''.'' '"-.::_~-----
.{,
"_"/f'l",
I\!. !',
>l=;oiV!:
!\]
U .'
1:-
II C3
'L
I ~ U ~ffib . c,_ L ,
I - ., ~\-Lr-I\ C3 II
' t---- - "I I
,"-----. \~"\
l,I'T l~~=' - -l(f;li ~'r:"
\jlll' II T~ _lj'~
~I I lJl _~___ _ _)
I'll 1- z. _-=' _.1-_
-I L__ ___ ____~-
I'll ' ~ - ---~ _ _
'I liC31~r II
J _I _ II
:11 I i-- \I'I--~-~ I, I,
II
o
rn
~~Pkltan.
'-'-, 1::::/::1
Ilit;jh Oroo'ly Ra.ldcnllol IIIII1
Zor1Inor1' PUP 11111 II I
1""111
,"1111
--1 'II' II
mI
.-.
ear...11""c..t.orFlat2
LO"ldLJo..l..D<albtal\C<:>rr"w>1"",'oI
Z""'InorI,C-:!I
I: ji
II :: I
',', '"
ij i::I:::!/!
ii
j ill:
" Ii
! ::
! "I
ii i:,:,!'I'
I::!:: ,,'
i,i,' ^
_",';' r>
ml
(_....
CatallnoCen1oorPIal.1
LO"ldU_'l.o<<>)blaIlCon-lm..-.:lal
Zor'IInQ.C_3
" "
" "
:: "I
i! !, j
iii
::'
Iii
'"
",
III
,,'
i,l, ii!
::,::,,
ii Ii
:: ::
Ii Ii
ij ii
,
I
,
,
I
,
==1
,
,
-u-J
,
,
I
EXHIBIT "B
~
It> _ 2_ <IoN>
SCALE, I'. 400'
LM~lott.ed(51)oppa<>F~Se<><h) I Q,J-....., l'<rI<alBoyntor>a.a.ohPlal. ' \ \ \
LO"ldU...,l.o<oIRoolall~'al Wrdtlool,lnd..tr-loI
Zoning, C-3 I Zor1/r1g' PID I
, ,
~l_u_uLu__J.+-______L - __u_
- -----------------------
~---~ - -- --- ------
~
o -_=-=c;.m",.-,.aa.....<rd--::=--
-----------------------
--- -----
------------ ----- -----------
-----------------------
~~.-+.~_..
;:/
-,...;;;;///
~..~-:::.
.
,
,
\
~ \
\ \
\ \
, \
\ \
: \
\ \
\ \
: \
\ \
~::=~'::::~~}~~~~~~~)
I ,
'~ .,
:: r..-.....i !
:,: I
...~;..~~~~\ __..--.J :
';':=-_~ ~20' ACCESS EASlOMENT I
~"....""'=::-"..='" I
i
.
i
,
t'Iol<rOl<>DI<.I-..............i
I'ropon;y L.... 7
,
i
,
,
--------~
'ii~'i r-Uf-- __-;;-"
':: :: I _--- lJ'-
La./~~\ll~,a1 1:1 I: 1-----
,,~:-:-;.//i i; !.1 I .... ... ./
4- ,,:::: ./'
I \ I,': ,': I ..-
-------\ I" II I .......
"'1I1~~ P~TWl'l'fi. ~HT "" ~ //
"" ,/
I I 'II II -"
Ii! ,I: -" >JII'
\ "'GR~.LT "'"
\ 1./ r: Ii '
___ I" "I ^
, f/ II II ~ t->
'....----/ :::::=:
.
,
~&I.lInoP<r~O>Qfleld~
I
.
t
'.
)
.
.
I
,
I
Planned Industrial
Development (PIP)
3"l.3:t Ac,
EXI5TINl>- STRUCTURE
TO REMAIN
,-~
,
,
Lu_n___
,
,
I
BOnlT<lN UJ<,O.l. '~I.
--I \
~-
laldU...,~o.n"'ty_,o.nUal
Z""ing, RIM
0\_6.
~ PROPOSED ZONING;
PI.....-...dl....ou.trl'"
"'" < Develcpt"r'et"lt (1"10) 3<l.:HOG_
1
! I III El(lSTING;5oG;W,UZ.P'I<TERSECTION
,
! 0 ""''''TINGf'1JLLACCESSPO'NT
IT! . PR0P05EDl'ULLAC<::=~NT
COENERAl.- l..OCATION
EXISTING
STRUCTURE
,
,
\
,
,
\
,
\
,
\
,
\
,
\
,
\
r--
,
j
,
i
,
,
I
.
i
.
i
,
i
,
i
.
i
.
l___
GI.a1tumP<rkal
IlayrItor1 lloooeh Plat "II ~
laldU...,lnd..trial
zoning, PIP
~
~
1
Q.ooit"",Pa-lcat
Boynta1 Ilooo:;h Plat. 10
L.crdU..,I.-.du<>tr...
zoning. PIP
r
,
I Skyl.-'*"Plat~
~-,
I Low ~~ :".....--.t00l
THE MOTOROLA DRI NOpe
PROPOSED ZONING
Boynton Beach, Palm Beach CoU'"lty I Florida
Applh::<r1t. Dayl M. CaMer
Moory L. C<rter ~ Assoc., Inc:.
LGI"d PlaY1e,. Javier E. Om<3'"l<l
CPt.! Engineer., I"c.
IS-""'bo.-.=
CAl.....JooI""'.. re201
"-rMd...w-y2OO!l
,,-,_.~.w-y2OO!l
..~~ JBJT 1\ B 1/
JD.
IJAJ.LLy-rU1 I.,I'(ln . .11_. -
JAN-23-03 11,02 FROM'
01/23/2883 18:32 ~ ',5-8963
II
II
III
I 'I
"
J II
II
t II . ~ ,
.' .
II .
'I t :
/1'1
.
.
o
1
-_ ill.'~
~ III .... -----
-___ l!1 ____~~ ~
-=....... ...:~~ ~
==-_ ....;:1--
-
.
I I
III
II
+q
I I
!
.
..
..
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Motorola
File number: MPMD 02-004
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a January 9. 2003 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. This proposed master plan modification is located where utility support is
available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the master plan as
submitted at this time. Additional comments will be required after a utility
plan has been submitted.
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
2. All exterior elements shall comply with the Florida Building Code for
handicap accessibility.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
COA
01/23/03
2
, II
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
3. On master plan sheet, correct the identification of Interstate 95 on the General
Location man.
4. Identify the Community Commercial (C-3) zoning districts.
5. Annlv for cross access easements at the time of site nlan review.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS:
Comments;
6. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS:
Comments:
7. To be determined.
MWRlelj
S:\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\Motorola DR1\MPMD 02-004\COA.doc
1st REVIEW COMMENTS 'JV~
Master Plan Modification
Project name; Motorola
File number: MPMD 02-004
Reference: I "review plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a November 14.2002 Planning and
Zonin" Denartment date stamo marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
I. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided t/
regarding the oroposed modification to determine ootential traffic imoacts.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities 1/
Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However this
proposed master plan modification is located where utility support is
available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the master plan as
submitted at this time. Additional comments will be required after a utility
plan has been submitted.
3. Contemplated uses as previously submitted in their NOPC #1, indicate
offices, retail, commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential. The
Utilities Department has previously indicated that the anticipated total water /
demand of almost 300,000 gallons per day far exceeds their currently
approved demand of 60 - 70,000 gallons per day. In view that the South
Florida Water Management District's current reluctance to increase new
water uses, several questions come to mind:
a. Is the proposed density suitable for the location? This is an increase of
300% over and above the existing approved use.
b. Is the timing for this proposed re-development near-term or far-term?
This has a significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
c. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our
utilities master plan, in order to evaluate the adequacy of the service main
network in the area. Is the applicant willing to pay for this as required by
Chapter 26 of the LDC?
FIRE
Comments: NONE
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
12/10102
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
POLICE
Comments: NONE
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided ~
regarding the proposed modification to determine potential engineering
impacts.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
5. All exterior elements shall comply with the Florida Building Code for /'
handicap accessibility.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
6. The plans indicate that there will be no residential units in this portion of the
development. If there are residential units in future phases they will be
subject to the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee.
7. Concurrent with future phases of this development the City would be
interested in developing a GreenwaylBikeway area along the canals to the
south and west of this nrooertv.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
~ Provide a survey at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
~ Provide a plot plan at 24 inches by 36 inches in size. A , ^^~ t
~ ~'~~ ~,.
Indicate the width of all access points to ensure their compliance with -
Chapter 23, Article II.H. Also, show the access points to collector and
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
12/1 0/02
3
DEPARTMENTS
arterial streets showing their compliance to the access requirements
(Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.K.).
V. Indicate the location, names and elevations of adjacent subdivisions, if any
(Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.E.).
12.
13. Submit a traffic impact analysis not more than six (6) months old, prepared
by a professional engineer (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.S.).
MWRlsc
S:IPlanningISHAREDI'M"IPROJECTSIMotorola DRIIMPMD 02-00411 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS.doc
- tud ~~ ~ 1ncMt
INCLUDE REJECT
o!L-
I (rD/?;3
rn ~ J:N ~ : 1'~' ~ ~
RESPONSE TO 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project Name: Motorola
File Number: MPMD 02-004
P',~"'1,;:'\'!~ ,~,~i:'i
" ,., "(, ~ ~\:1
..-----,!.::..."...-- .~ _.__.,_.~
1. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided regarding the
proposed modification to determine potential traffic impacts.
No response necessary.
2. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities Department
considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However this proposed master plan
modification is located where utility support is available. We are providing only a
cursory review ofthe master plan as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be
required after a utility plan has been submitted.
The Master Plan modification deletes the undeveloped portions of
the Motorola Property. The proposed Master Plan is only for the
existing facility using existing utilities.
3. Contemplated uses as previously submitted in their NOPC # 1, indicate offices, retail,
commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential. The Utilities Department has
previously indicated that the anticipated total water demand of almost 300,000 gallons
per day far exceeds their currently approved demand of 60 - 70,000 gallons per day. In
view that the South Florida Water Management District's current reluctance to increase
new water uses, several questions come to mind:
a. Is the proposed density suitable for the location? This is an increase 0000%
over and above the existing approved use.
b. Is the timing for this proposed re-development near-term or far-term? This
has a significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
c. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our utilities
master plan, in order to evaluate the adequacy ofthe service main network in the area. Is
the applicant willing to pay for this as required by Chapter 26 ofthe LDC?
The Master Plan modification deletes the undeveloped portions of
the Motorola Property. The proposed Master Plan is only for the
existing facility using existing utilities.
4. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided regarding the
proposed modification to determine potential engineering impacts.
The Master Plan modification deletes the undeveloped portions of
the Motorola Property. The proposed Master Plan is only for the
existing facility using existing utilities.
006.280911.1
5. All exterior elements shall comply with the Florida Building code for handicap
accessibility.
No response necessary.
6. The plans indicate that there will be no residential units in this portion of the
development. Ifthere are residential units in future phases they will be subject to the
Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee.
There are no residential units in this portion of the development.
7. Concurrent with future phases ofthis development the City would be interested in
developing a Greenway/Bikeway area along the canals to the south and west of this
property.
The applicant has initiated discussions with staff concerning a
Greenway/Bikeway area along the canals to the south and west of
the property.
8. Provide a survey at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
The survey is attached.
9. Provide a plot plan at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
The plot plan is attached.
10. Indicate the width of all access points to ensure their compliance with Chapter 23, Article
II.H. Also, show the access points to collector and arterial streets showing their
compliance to the access requirements (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.K.).
See attached plan.
11. Indicate the location, names and elevations of adjacent subdivisions, if any (Chapter 3,
Article IV, section 3.E.).
See attached plan.
12. Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate
agencies (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.P.)
This statement has previously been provided.
13. Submit a traffic impact analysis not more than six (6) months old, prepared by a
professional engineer (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.S.).
Traffic impact analysis has previously been provided.
2
006.280911.1
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
12/10/02
2
B::,L-Pb
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
POLICE
Comments: NONE
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided
regarding the proposed modification to determine potential engineering
imnacts.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
~,II- 1',7
5. All exterior elements shall comply with the Florida Building Code for '1
handican accessibility. I~ _ Mr<' '1
PARKS AND RECREA nON
Comments:
6. The plans indicate that there will be no residential units in this portion of the
development. If there are residential units in future phases they will be
subject to the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee.
7. Concurrent with future phases of this development the City would be
interested in developing a GreenwaylBikeway area along the canals to the
south and west of this property.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
8. Provide a survey at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
9. Provide a plot plan at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
10. Indicate the width of all access points to ensure their compliance with
Chanter 23, Article II.H. Also, show the access noints to collector and
L/!JjOV">
1107 (03
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Motorola
File number: MPMD 02-004
Reference: I"reviewolans identified as Master Plan Modification with a November 14.2002 Planning and
Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking
, .
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
.-
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided ( ~~[ O'[IJ">
regarding the proposed modification to detennine potential traffic imoacts.
~J
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities
Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However this
proposed master plan modification is located where utility support is
available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the master plan as
submitted at this time. Additional comments will be required after a utility
plan has been submitted.
3. Contemplated uses as previously submitted in their NOpe #1, indicate
offices, retail, commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential. The
Utilities Department has previously indicated that the anticipated total water
demand of almost 300,000 gallons per day far exceeds their currently
approved demand of 60 - 70,000 gallons per day. In view that the South
Florida Water Management District's current reluctance to increase new
water uses, several questions come to mind:
a. Is the proposed density suitable for the location? This is an increase of
300% over and above the existing approved use.
b. Is the timing for this proposed re-development near-term or far-term?
This has a significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
c. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our
utilities master plan, in order to evaluate the adequacy of the service main
network in the area. Is the applicant willing to pay for this as required by
Chapter 26 of the LDC?
FIRE
Comments: NONE
---------~~---~. --~-_.._----_.-
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
12/10/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
POLICE
Comments: NONE
,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
4. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided ,
~\'I03
regarding the proposed modification to determine potential engineering
impacts.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
5. All exterior elements shall comply with the Florida Building Code for
handicap accessibilitv.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
6. The plans indicate that there will be no residential units in this portion of the
development. If there are residential units in future phases they will be
subject to the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee.
7. Concurrent with future phases of this development the City would be
interested in developing a GreenwaylBikeway area along the canals to the
south and west of this pronertv.
FORESTER/ENVlRONMENTALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
8. Provide a survey at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
9. Provide a plot plan at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
10. Indicate the width of all access points to ensure their compliance with
Chapter 23, Article II.H. Also, show the access points to collector and
15t REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
".-
?
f'~tl<l0.~/
Project name: Motorola
File number: MPMD 02.{)04
Reference: I "review olans identified as Master Plan Modification with a November
14. 2002 Planning and
ZoninO" Denartment date stamn markin".
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided
regardin" the orooosed modification to determine ootential traffic imoacts.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities
Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However this
proposed master plan modification is located where utility support is
available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the master plan as
submitted at this time. Additional comments will be required after a utility
plan has been submitted.
3. Contemplated uses as previously submitted in their NOPC #1, indicate
offices, retail, commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential. The
Utilities Department has previously indicated that the anticipated total water
demand of almost 300,000 gallons per day far exceeds their currently
approved demand of 60 - 70,000 gallons per day. In view that the South
Florida Water Management District's current reluctance to increase new
water uses, several questions come to mind:
a. Is the proposed density suitable for the location? This is an increase of
300% over and above the existing approved use.
b. Is the timing for this proposed re-development near-term or far-term?
This has a significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
c. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our
utilities master plan, in order to evaluate the adequacy of the service main
network in the area. Is the applicant willing to pay for this as required by
Chapter 26 of the LDC?
FIRE
Comments: NONE i.
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
'. -1..\.
/)<~.
/ ,\ /
" "V
.I
/--{_.
\:r
Project name: Motorola
File number: MPMD 02-D04
Reference: l"review plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a November 14.2002 Planning and
Zonina Denartment date stamn markina.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided
regarding the proposed modification to determine potential traffic impacts.
UTILITIES
Comments:
2. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities !\.
Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However this
proposed master plan modification is located where utility support is /
I _.~
available. Weare providing only a cursory review of the master plan as f.
._-.~--
submitted at this time. Additional comments will be required after a utility r _'
f../
plan has been submitted.
3. Contemplated uses as previously submitted in their NOpe #1, indicate
offices, retail, commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential. The lv,
Utilities Department has previously indicated that the anticipated total water
demand of almost 300,000 gallons per day far exceeds their currently
approved demand of 60 - 70,000 gallons per day. In view that the South
Florida Water Management District's current reluctance to increase new
water uses, several questions come to mind: l.>
,
a. Is the proposed density suitable for the location? This is an increase of '>i.::....-..
r
300% over and above the existing approved use.
b. Is the timing for this proposed re-development near-term or far-term?
This has a significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
c. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our
utilities master plan, in order to evaluate the adequacy of the service main
network in the area. Is the applicant willing to pay for this as required by
Chapter 26 of the LDC?
FIRE
Comments: NONE
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to: R. Duke Woodson
fax#: 407-648-1743
date: December 10, 2002
from: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
re: 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Motorola PID Master Plan Modification
Please find attached the first review comments for your project. To stay on the
current review schedule, please do the following steps listed below, and bring all
documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday, January 7, 2002.
1. Revise your plans incorporating all comments listed herein, including the addition of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statementsl comments, and bring 10 copies
to the TRC review meeting (full sets including all pages originally submitted);
2. Submit the additional information as requested within the attached comments; ( i.e. traffic
analysis, engineering certification, etc.)
3. Prepare a written response (7 copies) consisting of a list briefly summarizing how each
comment has been addressed on the revised plans or with the supplemental information
including location on the plans ( this promotes an expeditious 2nd review by staff and
your project representatives during the TRC meeting );and
4.
Submit reductions (8 y, X 11) for the proposed
site plans, elevations and landscaping plan (this
is required for the final report and public
presentation).
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applicant should not attend a TRC (2nd review) until all documents have been revised and
copied for staff review. If plans will not be fully revised and brought to the scheduled TRC
meeting, contact Lusia Galav in this office by the Thursday prior to the scheduled meeting date.
Projects deviating from the original schedule are eligible for review at subsequent meetings,
which are held every Tuesday. To reschedule, contact Sherie Coale, by the Thursday prior to the
Tuesday TRC meeting that you desire to attend. The remainder of the review schedule will be
adjusted accordingly. If you have questions on the attached comments, please contact the
respective reviewer using the attached list ofTRC representatives.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all significant comments are addressed following TRC
(2nd review), the project is forwarded to the Planning and Development Board Meeting that falls
approximately 2 to 3 weeks following the TRC meeting. An "*,, by any comment identifies a
comment that must be addressed prior to moving forward to the Planning and Development
board.
Note: Items recognized by staff as typically outstanding at this point include a traffic report
and/or confirmation of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
drainage certification by a licensed engineer, signed "Rider to Site Plan Application"
form and colored elevations ofthe proposed project. This information is necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submitted this information, please disregard this note.
DEPARTMENT REPRESENT A TIVE REPRESENT A TIVES' PHONE FAX
DESIGNEE
Engineering John Guidry Laurinda Logan 742-6201 742-6482
Building Don Johnson Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6352
Fire Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Rodger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
Police Department Marshall Gage John Huntington 737-6167 737-3136
Utilities Pete Mazzella H. David Kelley Jr. 742-6401 742-6488
Public Works-General Larry Quinn Laurinda Logan 742-6206 742-6482
Public W orks- Traffic Jeffrey Livergood Laurinda Logan 742-6201 742-6482
Parks & Recreation John Wildner 742-6227 742-6233
Forester/Environmentalist Kevin Hallahan Kevin Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Planning & Zoning Michael Rumpf, Lusia Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 01/14/02
S:\Planning\SHAREDIWP\PROJECTSIMolorola DRl\MPMD 02-004\lst Review comments FAX COVER.doc
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 12/10/2002 1&:29
NAME
FAX
TEL
SER.K BROE2J409484
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
12/10 1&:27
91407&4817430332&
00:02:10
05
OK
STANDARD
ECM
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
Coale, Sherie
=-==--='---'=-=-====
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 200211:13 AM
To: Coale, Sherie
Cc: Galav, Lusia
Subject: 02-Plan.doc
PJ3nnjll-i.Memorandum: Forester! EnvimIlmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Motorola PID
Master Plan Modification- 151 Review
MPMD 02-004
Date:
December 10, 2002
I have no comment on the Master Plan Modification application for this site.
Kjh
File
12/10/2002
MOTOROLA DRI
MPMD 02-004
1st Review Planning
December 10, 2002
Provide a survey at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
Provide a plot plan at 24 inches by 36 inches in size.
Indicate the width of all access points to ensure their compliance with Chapter 23, Article II.H. Also, show
the access points to collector and arterial streets showing their compliance to the access requirements
(Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.K.).
Indicate the location, names and elevations of adjacent subdivisions, if any (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section
3.E.).
Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies (Chapter 3,
Article IV, Section 3.P.).
Submit a traffic impact analysis not more than six (6) months old, prepared by a professional engineer
(Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.S.).
S:\Planning\Sharcd\Wp\Projecls\Motorola DRI\MPMD 02_004\Planning 1 st review.doc
~.. .
':. .""""'- "
'.
...
,
,
h
,( , /.
) '>,,,,~ ".--<,,': '
I'i()"j
/'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 02-240
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE:
RE:
December 3, 2002
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Civil Engineer
Review Comments
Motorola PID
Master Plan Modification - 1 st Review
File No. MPMD 02-004
The above referenced Site Plans, received on November 20, 2002, were reviewed by
representatives from Public Works, Engineering and Utilities against the Master Plan
requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are the
comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS. GENERAL
No comments at this time.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided regarding the proposed
modification to determine potential traffic impacts.
ENGINEERING
No comments at this time. Insufficient information has been provided regarding the proposed
modification to determine potential engineering impacts.
UTILITIES
1. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities Department
considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However this proposed master plan
modification is located where utility support is available. We are providing only a cursory
review of the master plan as submitted at this time. Additional comments will be required
after a utility plan has been submitted.
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memorandum No. 02-240
Re: Motorola PID, Master Plan Modification _1st Review
December 3, 2002
Page Two
2. Contemplated uses as previously submitted in their NOPC #1, indicate offices, retail,
commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential. The Utilities Department has
previously indicated that the anticipated total water demand of almost 300,000 gallons per
day far exceeds their currently approved demand of 60 - 70,000 gallons per day. In view
that the South Florida Water Management District's current reluctance to increase new
water uses, several questions come to mind:
a. Is the proposed density suitable for the location? This is an increase of 300% over
and above the existing approved use.
b. Is the timing for this proposed re-development near-term or far-term? This has a
significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
c. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our utilities master
plan, in order to evaluate the adequacy of the service main network in the area. Is the
applicant willing to pay for this as required by Chapter 26 of the LDC?
LUck
Xc: Jeff Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineerlng\Kribs\Motorola PID, Master Plan Mod. 1st Review.doc
,~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 02-279
TO:
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
Timothy K. Large ~
TRC Member/Building Divi . h V P\
DATE:
November 22,2002
SUBJECT:
Project - MOTOROLA PID
File No. - MPMD 02-004
The Building Division has no issues with this site plan modification. All exterior
elements shall comply with the Florida Building Code for handicap accessibility.
TKL:rs
S/Oevelopment/Building Code Administrator/TRC/02/Motorola PIO Page 1 of 1
~~.
PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #02-87
TO:
FROM:
Mike Rumph, Planning and Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Director W
Barbara Meacham. Parks aiLandscape Planner
cc:
RE:
Motorola PID
DEe - 2 ?rr;
'--u,/:.
Date: December 2, 2002
The Parks Department has reviewed the plans for the Motorola PID. The
following comments are submitted:
1. The plans indicate that there will be no residential units in this portion of
the development. If there are residential units in future phases they will be
subject to the Park and Recreation Facilities Impact Fee.
2. Concurrent with future phases of this development the City would be
interested in developing a Greenway/Bikeway area along the canals to the
south and west of this property.
JW
CiTY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
~
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
12/01/02
FILE: MPMD 02-004
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT:
REFERENCES:
Motorola Pill
Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comments
~
ill
II
II
I llil,'ij',"il111Iiiiii".iil
i~ I 1.1: j,.IUUfIIl,"lfIill
! '1Iljilll....I~'I,il..'1
~ I ilj'lllil,.1111 11'11.!li!
~ II !11i!li.II'ii,iliiiiilii!I'
IIM,11 l'lli"ij'j!
i illlljl,I,li,i'il"lil!l!iiilll,'r!!
, ill' 1" I ,1.1" II,
II illlll!I~I'lllillll~ll, !
I II ,i!flllli;iil!!!I'lilliilij' " I
I il l'II,I".!!llll!.!!li!l!l! I '
II Ii I 1111111111111111111 I
III nr
I
i I
if !
1;+
It i
I .
I
I I
i
--------
:<
,.,
j:!-
ill
~
~
~
~~
~~
~~ I
d~
I h I
! '1111
I 'II ,I!
! p ;1,
1111 III Ill'
I i 'i
Ii 1111'1 Iii
II. i dh "i
111,11111111
!!I II ! !Iil !II
,linn..,
.......-
~=-I-4 ~ __
:::::::::::::::::=:::::::::::::::::::::::::---- i! --. -----
.
..-...--
---.
--
. <
<
.
L
DID I
--
---- --- =-=-======~
l
-~- -!1. -- .
JnIfJAJ"'W;'"i'l\O"O::l .....-..r.1__~
.-. I
'.......
.~ !
;
;
~
I.' ItI 4 .....il.
Iff iij ~i.
!I~ '1, ,
.,1 Ill.,!.. '
1<1 .~~ j"
~f mw:.
~ fJ 'J:,"
;l.! IE'i.B ~IJ
,Et' hi ~
"lit ',,"
IUf;~};"' "
II I I
li~J,G. fu
.,liIlIIil351riiilll
g..ol.lj"nllodls...
-'III
~
i!l
:4 ,I ~
_.~. .
r:.J .
i~.
;;1
-~"it
c!ll.!im
~
~ ~
.- f
~i
~.
~~
;~ I
~
.
<
L II:
Ii :11
II IS!
,
,
. ,
,
, .
, .
'I &
! I
I
I
!
-- ----:.":.- "':....
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02.270
TO:
TRC MEMBERS
~odger Kemmer, Fi, ~ rrotecli(jfl E;Rgin8sr
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
~hn Huntinoton Delie.v E)eparummt
......,. Ddvid Kellt:y JI., Utilities D0~Q.rtmint _
Timothy K. LargE'! 1'1, lileliflg Divi"i6A-
I<eflllall, (Cfl@iAeeriA€l) Pl,Isli" wQrk. G'i'Aeral
Jfiffre) Liv"ryuud, F"ubllc worKs LJlrector- Iraffic
Jot:ln \NildFlsr, p~rk~ Divisinn__'----
biPlriRa8 Logo.., Ellyillt:t:liIlY Dt:JJculIllent
Lusia Galav, Planning Department
Michael W. Rump.1{Jr
Director of Planni~rfu Zoning
FROM:
DATE:
November 19, 2002
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 ST Review - Master Plan Modification
Project - Motorola PID
Location - 1500 W. Gateway Boulevard
Agent R. Duke Woodson - Foley & Lardner
File No. MPMD 02-004
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced proje.ct. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. CQmment ade available
via e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on fruesda December 2002. When
preparing your comments, please separate them into two catego . e eficiencies with code
sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
other departmental impro-..ements.
Page 2
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate mc Member that is responsible for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they
do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project
be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-
mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project.
First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee
(TRC) members.
MWR:lg
Attachment
XC: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
Pete Mazzella, Assistant Dir. Of Utilities
To Be Determined,Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Central File
S:\Planning\SHAREOIWP\PROJECTS\Motorola DRI\MPMD 02-004\TRC Memo br 1st Plans Review.doc
Revised 1/14/02