REVIEW COMMENTS
6.A.l
MOTOROLA (DRIA 02-002)
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL
IMP ACT AMENDMENT
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-244
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
Michael Rumpf ",t,')p
Planning and Zoning Director
,
Lusia Galav, AICP) J
Principal Plannefji)
October 31, 2002
THROUGH:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Motorola - DRIA 02-002/MPMD 02-003
NOPC Amendment #1
NATURE OF REQUEST
Motorola is a partially buill-out Development of Regional Impact (DRI) comprised of 87.4
acres, zoned Planned I ndustrial Development (PID). I t is located on the southeast corner of
Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. (See attached Exhibit "A" - Location Map). The
applicant, Maury L. Carter & Associates, Inc. is requesting an amendment to the Motorola DRI
Development Order (D.O.) adopted January 7, 1980 by Ordinance No. 79-36.
Amendment #1 proposes to change the Motorola DRI by the conversion of the 825,000 square
feet of industrial and office land use entitlements for the property to 500 multi-family residential
units, 63,500 square feet of commercial space, 450,000 square feet of office space and 128,000
square feet of warehouse space. There are no changes proposed to the DRI phasing,
commencement date or build-out date of 2010, and no lands are proposed to be added to the
DRI boundaries (see attached Exhibit "B" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart).
BACKGROUND
An amendment to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) is first and foremost governed by
Florida Statutes Chapter 380.06 (19) - Substantial Deviations. The applicant has submitted a
Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) in accordance with the statutory requirements. The Florida
Department of Community Affairs (DCA), the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
(TCRPC) and the City review the NOPC. The DCA and the TCRPC review the proposed NOPC
and provide comments following the procedures outlined in Chapter 380.06 (19).
The Regional Planning Council has responded to the NOPC request in a letter dated November
4, 2002 (see attached Exhibit "F"). They expressed several concerns regarding inconsistent
data and the traffic methodology. A letter from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT)
was also included delineating their concerns with the traffic methodology. These issues are
discussed below in the section entitled "Regional Impacts". No response has been received
from the DCA.
Motorola - DRIA 02-002/MPMD u2-003
Memorandum No. PZ 02-244
The City's Land Development Regulations Chapter 1.5, Sec. 4.3A requires a preliminary review
by the Planning and Development Board of an amendment to a DRI. Chapter 380.06 F.S.
requires that the local governing body hold a public hearing to review and approve the NOPC.
The City Commission is required to determine whether the proposed change to the Quantum
Park DRI is or is not a substantial deviation as defined in Chapter 380.06 (19). If it is determined
that the requested change is a substantial deviation then further review will be required pursuant
to the statutory requirements. If the City Commission determines that the proposed change is
not a substantial deviation then they may take action to approve or deny the requested change.
The original DRI Development Order adopted a Three-Phase Master Plan (see Exhibit "C" -
Motorola Conceptual Master Plan ADA 1979). The review of the DRI amendment also
constitutes a review of the changes to the Master Plan for Motorola. In addition to the state
statutes, staff has reviewed the Master Plan in accordance with Land Development Regulations
Chapter 2, Section 7, Planned Industrial Development and Chapter 3, Master Plan Approval.
First review comments were generated and the Technical Review Committee (TRC) reviewed
the Master Plan changes on October 22, 2002.
ANALYSIS
Notice of Proposed Chanae (NOPCI - Substantial Deviation
The criteria for determining if a proposed change to a DRI is a substantial deviation are outlined
in Chapter 380.06 (19). In reviewing the statute section staff determined that two of the criteria
apply to the proposed changes to the Motorola D RI. These criteria, which are applicable for
review of the proposed changes is provided in Chapter 380.06(19)(e)5., which states: "The
following changes to an approved development of regional impact shall be presumed to create a
substantial deviation. Such presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing
evidence" .
1. Chapter 380.06(19)(e)5.a., A change proposed for 15 percent or more of the
acreage to a land use not previously approved in the development order. Changes
of less than 15 percent shall be presumed not to create a substantial deviation.
The requested change involves 48.1 acres, which is 55 percent of the 84.4 total acreage
of the Motorola DRI.
2. Chapter 380.06(19)(e)5.c., Notwithstanding any provision of paragraph (b) to the
contrary, a proposed change consisting of simultaneous increases and decreases
of at least two of the uses within a authorized multiuse development of regional
impact which was originally approved with more than three uses specified in
380.0651(3)(c), (d), (f) and (g) and residential use.
As part of the NOpe application the applicant is to complete a "Substantial Deviation
Determination Chart". T he applicant has provided an updated chart (see Exhibit" B").
Amendment #1 involves changes to the three original use categories: office,
manufacturing and warehouse (storage & distribution). The proposal will eliminate
manufacturing while adding residential and commercial uses. The proposed increases
and decreases are presumed to maintain the vested traffic generation level of 13,020
average daily trips (ADT).
2
Motorola - DRIA 02-002/MPMD u2-003
Memorandum No. PZ 02-244
Conclusion
The proposed changes delineated in Amendment #1 are presumed to be a substantial deviation
per Chapter 380.06 (19) of the Florida Statutes. The applicant has provided the Substantial
Deviation Determination Chart and a traffic study for review. A final determination regarding the
substantial deviation determination cannot be made until the traffic issues are resolved.
Master Plan Modification
This is the first amendment proposed for the Motorola DRI adopted in early 1980. The Florida
Statute governing the DRI process, Chapter 380.06(19), provides for and anticipates
amendments stating "There are a variety of reasons why a developer may wish to propose
changes to an approved development of regional impact, including changed market conditions".
These changing market conditions are evident in the history of this DRI that was planned and
developed by Motorola for their exclusive use. Motorola began scaling back its operations at the
existing facility in 2001. In October of 2002, Motorola sold the property to the current applicant.
The 87.4-acre Motorola site is zoned Planned Industrial Development (PI D). The applicant
proposes to keep 39.3 acres in the PID zoning category including the existing Motorola building.
The balance of the site, 48.1 acres, proposed for commercial and residential development,
would be rezoned to eommunity Commercial (C-3). The 1.4+/- acre daycare parcel would also
be rezoned to e-3. The residential use is proposed for the 33-acre parcel south of the existing
Motorola building. Retail development is proposed along the Congress Avenue side (west)
wrapping around the corner along a short segment of Gateway Boulevard. Two additional
access points are proposed along Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "D" - Motorola DRI NOPC
Master Development Plan).
In their letter, the T eRPC supports and encourages mixed-use development. Regarding the
proposed Motorola NOPC #1 Master Plan, the letter states: "The DRI master plan inCluded with
the proposed amendment materials does not incorporate all the best components of mixed-use
development". They have offered their services to assist the applicant in preparing a plan that
achieves the mixed-use objectives. The city supports the mixed-use concept and will work with
the TCRPC and developer to obtain an acceptable site plan.
Impacts
The proposed changes to the Master Plan were analyzed from two perspectives. The first is the
potential for creating additional regional or local impacts. The second is the consistency and
compatibility of the proposed changes with the regulations and policies adopted by the eity
through the Comprehensive Plan, Land Development Regulations and other applicable studies
such as the Visions 20/20 plan.
Reqional
A development has gone through the DRI process because the projected impacts are
considered regional in nature. Any change to that development must be analyzed to determine if
the changes proposed create additional impacts above and beyond what was originally
identified and mitigated. In the case of the Motorola DRI the major issue is whether there will be
an increase in traffic beyond what was originally approved (13,020 trips) resulting from the
requested land use changes.
3
Motorola - DRIA 02-002/MPMD u2-003
Memorandum No. PZ 02-244
The applicant prepared a traffic study that was transmitted to the Palm Beach County Traffic
Division for their customary review and approval regarding concurrency. The eounty has not
formally responded to the study, but has verbally expressed objections to the methodology used
for trip generation and the calculation of "vested" trips. Discussions are ongoing between the
applicant and the County regarding this issue. Approval from Palm Beach County is required
prior to the adoption of the development order.
As mentioned earlier, The TCRPC and FDOT have also objected to the traffic methodology. A
meeting was held on November 14, 2002 with all parties to discuss this issue. The applicant
prepared a revised traffic study that was distributed at the meeting. All agencies will review the
new information and provide comments as soon as possible.
Local
The focus of the substantial deviation determination is regional impacts. The development order
for the DRI is a local order and the approval of any requested changes is within the jurisdiction
of the city. As such, the city's main focus is local issues and impacts. There were six areas
identified by the TRC members for review regarding potential local impacts. Each area is
discussed below.
Traffic - The traffic study methodology is a local concern as well. An acceptable
methodology must be agreed upon by the TCRPC, FDOT, Palm Beach County and the City
to determine if there are additional local and regional impacts. The Master Plan proposes
two additional entrances on Congress Avenue. Permits from Palm Beach County are
required for these entrances. Turning movements and signalization issues can be evaluated
and addressed at the site plan stage.
Utilities - Based on the original Motorola Application for Development Approval the DRI is
vested for 127,000 gallons per day (gpd) for both water and sewer. The city's projected
demand for the proposed development is 294,215 gpd for water and 255,865 gpd for sewer.
This calculation is based on the formula in Chapter 26 of the Code of Ordinances. Due to
the magnitude of the increase above the prior approval, the Utilities Department is requiring
that an evaluation of the off-site water and sewer service be conducted by the city at the
applicant's expense. Any required improvements to the water and sewer systems and
related levels of service will be borne by the developer. This recommendation is addressed
in Exhibit "E" - eonditions of Approval.
Drainaqe - Drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the site plan approvals, and
must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities. The
applicant submitted a copy of the current South Florida Water Management permit for the
existing site. This permit will require modification based on the proposed development plan
for the site.
Environmental - The city's Forester/Environmentalist has indicated that there are existing
active Burrowing Owl nests located on the Motorola property in the area of the proposed
change. The applicant has submitted a Migratory Bird Nest Removal Application with the
State of Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission as required. A copy of the
application was submitted to the Planning and Zoning Division.
4
Motorola - DRJA 02-002/MPMD 02-003
Memorandum No. PZ 02-244
School Concurrency - The NOPC includes a request for 500 dwelling units. This requires
concurrency approval from the School District of Palm Beach County. The applicant
submitted a concurrency application to the School District and was approved for
concurrency. A copy of the approval form was submitted to the Planning and Zoning
Division.
Parks and Recreation - Residential units are also subject to the city's park and recreation
impact fee. The fee will be calculated based on the type of units constructed and will be due
at the time the first building permit is issued for the residential portion of the proposed
development (see Exhibit "E" - Conditions of Approval). Also, the city is requesting that the
applicant provide a greenway/pathway easement along the LWDD E-4 Canal to the east
and the Boynton eanal C-16 to the south.
Consistency and Compatibility with City Policies
In order for the proposed development to go forward the land use and zoning must be changed
on a portion of the site to accommodate the commercial and residential uses. The applicant
proposes to change the land use from Industrial to Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and change
the zoning from Planned Industrial District (PID) to C-3 Community Commercial.
The applicable eomprehensive Plan policy is Policy 1.19.2 that states:
Policy 1.19.2
The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrial acreage;,
however. that land desianated "Industrial" on the currentlv adopted
Future Land Use Map may be converted to commercial or residential
desianations if the conversion (n would .....RicR EaR accolTllTlodatc tRE
approxilTlatE industrial ClTlpIOYITlE:Rt wRich Ras !'lCCR J'lrojcctc€l iR tRE: Futurc
Land USE: ElcITlCRt, aRe! J'lroRibit cOfwcrsioR of laAd e!esigRatcd "IRdustrial" OR
tRe currcAtly adoptcd Futl:lrc LaRd Use t1ap uAlcss sueR cORvcrsioA would
generate a range of employment choices for current and future residents,
provide goods and services of regional importance, and r-ctaiA rcgioRal fiscal
aRe! eeoAolTlic sigRificaRcc. or would provide opportunities for the City
to meet its lona-ranae housina aoals; and (in is based upon
adeauate data includina market analvsis. (This language reflects policy
amendment as currently proposed in amendment cycle 1-2002.)
The requested land use change is consistent with this policy. The proposed commercial and
residential development together with the continued use of industrial and office will provide a
compatible mix of uses. Given the improbability of finding another single tenant business user
for the existing site, the proposed mix of uses is a viable alternative.
The requested C -3 Commercial zoning is t he most appropriate designation to accommodate
both the residential and commercial uses. This district permits multi-family residential at a
maximum density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre as well as providing a wide range of
retail/commercial uses. A more detailed discussion of the land use and rezoning is in the staff
report for that application (LUAR 02-007) being processed concurrently.
The adoption of Motorola NOpe Amendment #1, is conditioned upon the approval of the land
use amendment and rezoning request (see Exhibit "E" - Conditions of Approval).
5
Motorola - DRIA 02-002/MPMD 02-003
Memorandum No. PZ 02-244
In addition, the developer has submitted an application to amend the Motorola PID Master Plan
to eliminate the proposed C-3 zoned area from the PID boundaries. A PID permitted use list will
be approved with the Master Plan modification as well.
eonclusion
The only regional issue of significance is traffic. It is a significant issue on which both the
Substantial Deviation determination and concurrency approval are based. Local impacts will be
addressed in the Conditions of Approval for the NOPC #1.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 380.06(19) Substantial Deviations. the applicant has not
demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence that the proposed change is not a substantial
deviation requiring additional development of regional impact review. Resolution of the traffic
issue will be required before a determination of no substantial deviation can be made.
Regarding the proposed modifications to the Motorola Master Plan staff recommends approval
subject to the Conditions of Approval attached in Exhibit "E".
S:\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSIMOTOROLA DRI\DRI\STAFF REPORT DRIA 02-Q02.DOC
6
MOTOROLA (DRIA 02-002)
Location Map
EXHIBIT "A"
-- _.~ -\-- -
-- ,.,-f-j
,
I PUD
I
1'"","1,,\,,
"
C3
_-.~'\,,\\C:I' I'.]..
, "" -r I
I ',',':\ I '
"""\"":\' I I
I ',' I L..,.
'~-~WAY.ll/cItQ. , "
--~-~_.- -
'.!
\1\'
I'
. c - NW-22NP--AVlO
-~
I
. --I,
-, I ,\
, I I'
#
I I I I
, ,
.l
125 I
(/)
w
'"
'-5
-r~
, z
z r
. " .'
>
._<C
(/)
~
C3
\"\"\"
\-i,\
"~""
.J'\J,
;!l',
Q',
\\1'"
~ I
,
Q\JANTU~ PARK
, \_ -e.~D
I
I
i '-:] --
]JI1
_-J~~~~: I
ji I
.
,I,
" 'Nw-1:n~ A-Vg.' : 1=:[1 TiT ,I; I [-
"", ], ~ri'TC ,';- ;11 "I';.~I I
w~,
..----'.. I
,I
'I
II
L
nr.T-~'-~? '4,4~ FROM,
Tn,4~7F;4FL'74~
PAr:P.
~/7
EXHIBIT "B"
U<
.r-<
0<
,0
0+
'"
::>Ul
OC;l
....z
~~
p,.,U
~
.
~
;S
~
"
"
'"
z
:s u.
'"
...
....l 0
1:: ~
e:s S
.:::I
U Q2
;:l 0
.S
.... Z
e:s
= ~
.~
s ~
a:l
~ &l ,...,
0 '" '"
-
= ~
0
o:l ~
e:s ~ ~
-e j:l.,
Q '0 ~
'i s " 00'"
= ~ =O! ao
'::l >- " a .- Q} l;f) '"
~3-gS.!3< =
= 8 '" 5.- A~ .
is " "i!:: fg -,,'" ~ ~~
00 '" ::Jgpg~E-
'" =aoa;l"
..Q ~ "',::: ~ .9 ..- 0" a:s'- ~ .:u 0 ell .
= ~ ..<::;;; . <.l - ...d ~...= .. ....-l .~ =~ '"
~ (.) ~.~ ~ ~ :2~"'..., ":i-So! "'.el .- = "
< '" ~ .E 0 13 .~ ol-> ~_b() ~=~ -g " g
U 0.", " gp., 8 '" ~o ".9., U E
<Zl ... 5g~>'=i!! "b~5 !:H~;>'= ~ ~
Ul ao.8 ':l .- ~ '0 eOO... ~"'CII-l = '"
0 ,:::~ ~.,..,. @fr ~~'-< - =fr ..... m b.O
~ ~ _5 g t: t ~ 8 ... " ., ,:::
z J2nf'ioo.o~~ M ao .-
'" .-"1
< J-I~~_C>t~.... .< ~~E-o -.< 2 ~ ~
5 &: ~ Jl B ~ .; &'l q 0 5i 5 " ~ -~ -e &:i q 0 {.\ 0 0.
""""""1J.i<-e",,o< ~Q::E-Cn<'O""O< <~""
Ul
~ =
.sa
0 i
z t;
:s "
~ :3
u. -a ~
0 .- .I'.l "
~ ~ ... ~
0
... .~
>- ::l
r-< < -< 0
_3\-0~ \4,40 FFO>> ,
10'40764"",743
E.~\-\\~\ \
-
\.:l
.~ . . . . . .
qCl ~ ~ ~ :S: ~ 1:0 1:0 VI:O~~
V 1:01:01:0 . . ~ ~ '" ...
A+ ~ ~ ~ ... .';:l ~ ..w::.~-~'~
~-,:.....-- :B~:S1
if). .';;J .- .:0 .""" -$ ,s :S
p~ a. oS .~ B. .~ ~ ~ ~t:lJ,~\.:l
gz i .~~""~
~~ \.:lc:l&iCl & & ~~~~
p..~ ~ ~~~~
z
~
~
~
~
9.
~
~
s:
~
if).
o
~
~
~
o
\b)
g
.,.;
~
~
\b) ~ g
~. <" ~ ,
6 .....
'.B .... .... .-.
,
~
~
5
~
~
?j
1
~ ~.~ %
-=s. ~ 0 ~.a
'1: ~~~~
~ ~.~~~
O~~>~t)
\-'.t;O -d'
:, ~.~ 1 5 e-
~.s(5~o:,..t
:a g.- ~ . ~
~lS~~o.A
1:0"""""",0<
~
p
Cl
~
~
'5
~
~
r;-
a
~
r.-- .;
l ~
~ .$. ~
., rl." ......
"'&l:e%~ '"
g.a~.~ ~
~"'.i5:a~:~~~
~<a,_~Q;l~o.<;:
p. ~ ~ ~ % .,-:~ %
rn ~.g'- ~"'; ~ ~
~'<!l5.;.,l;:8iS'
~{,a~!~~ .~
c!lp..~~'i)O~o.Cl
"",""l:Ocn<~""p~
~A ~
~ 'R $.
_~ ~O) ~",,,,
.. . ., ~
... <) 0) 011..... ~
~t) ~ e%l:: 0
oIl.:;l .,.:,
:%~~g' ~ ~~~
:;l~"'ft, ~-;;;~g"
ilvli:~~<;;~"~~
.~~ .g;E]'\\ g t
*~_:.a%6-"" .""
~ 0 ~~ u ~ ~ ~ o. Cl
~12.""~""Vif).",,Cl""
~
~
.,.,
l3;'
~
~
l:l
~
~
.-....~--_.- -~-~---------------------
T_3\-~2 \4,40 FRO~'
\0,4076461743
.~ . ~ ~ s; .
0.0- re ~ Urerere
0-1- . :e :: ~ ~
.<;\ !:l .....~...-.:........
<n .-............ --
'8~ 8 8 ~ll~
~ ~
~~ (l::l
re5 ~ ~ g~<,)g
rn <n ~<n
~
s:
~
~
~
o
~
i
g
(f)
%
~
~
o
~
<-
U
1(5
~
5
~%
~.a :j
-,$?
'(;1- <> ~
., ~.9 ~ !Ls.
;>-.sa..,~"" ~
';J'_'Q)~i-;; .51
p."'~ .'<:;'fl,,-,S
~~g~~~g~
,:a~~g~ \ ~:;! ~
S:<;:l';:;.' ..~o.
<,)~~!l. .,0"
6D l+""...... l--:< 00 ~
"''<lo~-~ ..(,
~t:i~,,,,~'030.A
~~~~tii...o.(,
IbJ
~
g
~
IbJ
~ ~
o 0
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
.~ % ~ ~,~ ~
w. :::I "" <l> '.0
.~~~~ {i!1~~
"'4)~W ..-!:t;o~
~eo.~",\1~':e%
.e. ~ ~ 6h ~ .g .. ~ ~
&, _.s~:Sg68,",
~~:e;,,%-~ ..(,
lJO~:g~~to.o
.(,~"",re'll<tfl""o'<
EX\-\\B\ \ v
A
..-<
,
~
.,
B.
~ ~
~ l ~ .,
'", % <l> ~ ~.~
~. \. :;~i
.a ~ ~ {I) ~ ~Q .~
~Qo~ ~"C!.;1
_s~~",S"';::
u V' in ~ (J:I 0
.~'i%1Oll "_'.f:l~
<>.,ccll~1l5C:::
~~~:% t'e's ~
t)o~:a .,~.~ <>
.o:,Q:: ""c:ll""u rn"*'
~
';)
~
...:
~
I><
o
~
~
....
8 ".:
~
~ .::
lOll,S '0 -~
c!O U <> <1
;l ~......
.a l ~ ';i\S
~o 0 'Ore
.--~-----~-- .--
-'-~.._._.. ------~
....._-~._. - ------
OCT-31-~2 14:41 FROM~
1=l
.<
~O
0+
;g ",
05
S:Z
~~
t:l.oU
z
~
....l
<
Z
(3
~
~
o
Z
~
@
'"
2
~
t:l.o
~
8
~
-<:
U
~
Z
-<:
ti
I:Q
;g
Cl
Z
-<:
....J
u..
o
~
~
~
C
tn -~
15 !'1
".::1 ~
"~ <>
'g ....
8 ~
"-<:
~o
~<
u
~
......
'"
.... .
..-. B 0.01;
tn ~ = Cl)
'43 :l:'T:j S '" R
t:: .2 ~ ~ ~ _~ ~
e ~.~ ~j~ .~
.B -> ~ ~ o.~ g ~~
~ ~C\fo";j'5'.;l~
~~oeo::a>;s~
co u,I ~ C.) '.;:J. _ ;::I' S-o
U "" <> .. ill" .. '" c fr
eo:: f;!,~~g tu....
roO.s_=_~ .<
.9 :g S!l 'Q 'iH! ~::2 0
<n..OIJ.<'1jrn""......-<:
B
<>
<>
""
'"
~
i~
'05:
,i::l~
~U
10=407848.3743
B
<>
.;
"""' is
--' <>
~~~5~B. '"
~ ~ ~~~ ~ gf'S 5
~ ~ = 0 = ~ ~ ~ ~
BSJeeg:i-5~~g
o Q'2 - 0 ....., 0 ~ ~ 0 \1)
t) ~iE t:; ~~ 5 ~:13 e
:l:'6o(l a:l .:.::l~'E <>.
..3.... ill '" e 8 <>
D ~ ~~ ~ ~ g ~ ~
Ol",,=,p ",-8"-<:
o o v..t::l't:'-Q,)><Or\
.oJ::J1-.~oe.-=~ ,;-I
""""0 r>.. t:l.o",,,,,,,,o-<:
j
";::
..
6
'"
1::
o
r>..
PAGE 8/7
EXHIBIT "B"
. . .
tIlCQtIl
IS: :: ::
- ~....
............ .-
.c>.o.c>
~~~
~>'I~
l:I 8 8
"'<nrn
.el
"2
::l
o
.!!l
'S
::3
o
[;=;
u
'"
~
....
....
,
....
-
o
ill
""
'"
..
'" "-
- os
.~ ....
e""
= ""
.!!l :gp.S
_-<._ "0
d =3 ;;
o~"
~"C .S
.- Clo-f (l.)
1jo~
~ ill ill
~j::t3
""<-<-<:
z.
-- .-
~ e
1"!a:
<> ,
"0 -.:::I
.~ -
~~
'"
,.;
"'
1;3
'"
N
g
<>
OCT-~1-~2 14.41 FROM:
III
.~
qo
0+
tIl
::>Ul
00
s:z
~5
z
<(
~
..J
<(
Z
"
i52
o
z
~
S
tIl
2
o
8:
>-
~
o
liS
E-<
c:s
~
z
-0(
a
1;]
;l
o
z
:i
...
o
Ul
~
>-
E-<
~ ~ :\ $I
UP<P<P<
;: ;: :!: ::
__ ....,. ,...J ........
._._...... -......
"""""",c
--......""" .....
~~~~
UlUlUlUl
Il) Il) Il) .,
C1.) Q) 11) aJ
tf,ltlltlltll
. ., '"
" <> i:l.
as ~ -j; g
q) co: Q.) ''::;:
-ii<l~g
5~:ao~
5 6 ~:~ ~
(1)._ -;; 'g ~
gj~C::8fr
- g lJ ...
~'ii:lq~
~e:;=;""o-o(
Il)
<>j)
i'l-~ <> 0'3 a
.=.t;~gf'E ~
::: bO ur ~ Q.) .~
bt3s::..........=_ ~
'" =.- S::"" "'..
.";::..... "t:l ~ --;::: l;;l
3~E! cOl'5_Sl <>
~C)4Ua:>.~~
01)_ ~ ""._ ~ "CI j....j
::: ~.- <Xl - '" = i:l.
-- .... <> <> (3 s:: 0 .,.
=000 -o"-lt)S-;
~Cl,)~~-8 .<
... 0,""0 V ><00
"';>>" - <> .
",,~-o(~e:;=;'Il>Q<(
,2;>
-- .-
- a
.2 OJ
5~
:s!~
~~
ID,407848J743
. - -
p<ui'r:i
1$ :: ::
- -..
......""" .-
,coD""
.""" -...........
..<::.c::""
~~~
v Il) v
Il) v <>
tIltf,ltf,l
~
s:: Il)
'" 1;1
iio.
'"
-
OJ =
8 8-
-;:: 0
~g'O
"'- Il)
~ 0-
" Il) ~
<~~
:-is gj
. ~ e
s:: <><<
o tf,l =
.=
~ ~.9
1: ... U
~~B
a,}. ::s Q
~o:l~
PAGE 7/7
EXHIBIT "B"
. .
o:lo:l
~ ::
.-:::: .-:::
,C,c
~~
v .,
Il) V
tIltf,l
.,j.
......
.
'"
:::
o
.;::
i"JE
.g ~
~~
<.> ...
.<
qo
Q<
N
.0
~
.,
'"
.0
g
~:,oo
w_
-
'00
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
PHASE I
LEGEND
,~ I'loml.l,...n<l\J....
~ Co~.rClu.III".lIo".L.v.111
@
:1
'I
I
!
>
..
.
~
~ "I
8 i
I
I
I
I @
L
N. W. 22 AVenJ8
- - -
_ ~ ~ ~~I~~~t~~~~~ ~~
l@l
~(W9
@
MOTOROLA
'3O'ITON 3EACH ?'L:-.l8EACl-' '::::iUNTV ""_O~IC)'
,
,iD-I'L
; Yard
I i
L.-CI
"
LLD.O. BO'inton Canat
EXHIBIT "e"
ON EPTUAL
MASTER PLAN-ADA 1979
Ir--
!,\ \
\\ \
'I \
I,
II
'I
I'
"~'I
!:
'\
'\
\\
"
11\ '1
\)'"
..
I G
'\ ~
:/5
11/ "
; ,ff
<:i
ci
! .
1=
parking
@
Re<;reatlonaj I
Area
I
_J
@
MAP H-1
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
,.E:PY'" HE:.<:lY
.OC""f"'"".""'"....
;lOST, 9UCKL.=Y. SCI-!UH d. JE,';NIGAN
OIG;~tA-N..S..?EL~CY;.'M'e;~."1
..Q..;~~.....,."...
SHEET 11-13
~"~
"V,_
,~
,~
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
PHASE II
LEGEND
r---.......F\~.Lano\,l.."
---.J c,,,,,... Cl....'I".UO... $y.t..... ~..y" II
N.. W. 22 AvenJ8
C
i@
.,
s
>
<
'I l~
F~ ~
." ,..'-' Ji
, ,
. I
, ,
i !
i
i P8rtc:1n9
i@
,
.
~
~
o
u
,I
L
@
L
~ 1--
@
MOTOROLA
aovTON 9EACH PA,L\l SEACH caUl'lry '::1~OAIO,l,
I
Cock
Yard ,
-Cl: .
~
L1-O.D. Boynton Canal
EXHIBIT "e"
MOTOROLA CONCEPTUAL
MASTER PLAN-ADA 197
"
Parking
@
1,\
\\
\\
, ,
\,
"
,\1
. \"\
I, \ .
. ,
1'1 ~
. .
I) ,
\ u
I
/ i
,II ..
:/ li:j
1<,.
Q
I j
I
J
Recreational
Area
@
MAP H-2
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
1-f;;;:R'r' a HEE?'!'
.""....~.,. ....,,~....
:>()ST, =l..ICXL:'t. 'SCHUH l.;SRNI(l,.l.,N
.....'<. ...... ~.~.Q'~.~' :~..""..,
::,GIULLA,N 5?O:LLACY, ~ )..l~eR
,,~,'=""c".'"
SHEET 11-14
~o,,~
\-1)_
,~
~oo
,
CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN
PHASE III
LEGEND
,---\ ~lOrla.. ....,,<lu.. ..
______ C~ut CI.....'llc..Uon, L.~.l U
N. W. 22 AVenJe
Ir-=- __::-"=_c:: -'1,\\
.)11' @ :~=:":'""i'il..:~~=~ :-1\11\
. =_=-c-=-::~=~=-~= I
E.:.wL...wmg' \
.1," '; 0_, \
: i 1 '
:L.. ~~ '\1
ri- 1\
PlIt'klng:
; @ .
: I I Doek, ) U
~ " Yard II ,I ~
rr=;~1 021.. '//1
I // Y II '-~ I.;
~,;'kin9~ll/ 0 _; .~ I
@)4" "'. t1le~ Fae"'y ==-== - I
~ ~ ~~===:= RecreatloMI,
C "~D -==~=~~- ;;;J
-I"
LLD.D. Boynton CanaJ
@
DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT
MOTOROLA
HE::;:!V \ HE:::RY
.......",c-.,."""~l\..
"OST. aUCKLEY. SC"UH ! JE::'NiGAN
....00' .......~.~"""...~f':C".~".",..,
C,GiULI,.I,N, SPELUCY \ MEYER
..~~c".~.""'"
SQYTON SE,l.CH "''''LM 6EAC__ CCUNf'I ,::'LCAIC,l.
EXHIBIT "e"
MOTOROLA eONeEPTU L
MASTER PLAN-ADA 19
MAP H-3
SHEET 11-15
IT]
LAND USES
Retail 15.\::t 0'.
Industrial IO.3:t 00.
Office 2'1.0:t 00.
Multi Family 33.01: 0'.
Total B7.4:t =.
000
M EXISTING SIGNALIZED INTER5ECTION
D EXISTING FULL ACCESS POINT
. PROPOSED fULL ACCESS POINT
... PROPOSED RIGHT IN/RIGHT OUT
Building progran
Multi Fanlty 500 Du's
Retail '-3,500 ""1ft.
Office 450,000 sqft.
Industrial (wo:rerou",", ,",pace) 128,000 ",qft.
DRI vested doily trips 13,020
~
" _ 2_ _
SeA!..!;: I'. 400'
EXHIBIT "0"
~llllllll=-__~~-=-~~:.,,:OY _BOU1~~-f+_~'-=-_~_____ \ \ :::-:=
" -- mI -- __--- _ - ----= 0 - ---=- == --: mI =- :::::;:;;::::--:::~---
'l Ji.._n_n-.._n_n-.._n_. .._n_.._.._n_"_"_" .._.._.._n_.."
III' I' " ~ --.J \
Retail
11111 54H, Retail \
'III Ii I.' 1.3. A,. \
III Ii \ ;:
_J II ill \ ~
=--==__ . \ 9.-
---111,1, III Ind~~c~~'/~~fioe \". t
EXISTI~G; STRUCTURE:
~ II' II TO ,,"A" \
~ i
u i
~~ .i
Q) +1
OCN .i
<i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
\
n_.._.._n_n_n_.._.._.._n_.._.._.._.._n_..-"~
II
Ii!
'\
h
,.J
v
:a 4:
t+1
OCN
<i
Multi-family
33.0t Ac.
'"
(.
BOYNTON CANAL C-l"-
~E)(15TING;
STRUCTURE
TO REMAIN
(11,250oqFt.)
\
\
\
\
\
)
I
1
-----.------
--I r
EXI-JIBIT liD"
TI-JE MOTOROLA DRI NOPC
MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Ftorida
It. October, 2002
CPI4 Project No.. 03201
EXHIBIT "E"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Motorola
File number: DRIA 02-002
Reference: Revised 2nd review identified as Development of Regional Impact Amendment Master Plan with a
November 5, 2002 Planning & Zoning Denartrnent date stamn marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: To be determined.
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. The Developer has agreed to furnish their own fire flow protection from an
on-site source for all fire-flows above the City requirement of 1500 gpm (@
20 psi residual) demand. In the event the on-site source cannot be approved
by the City or other regulatory agencies, an engineering evaluation of the
additional impacts on the potable water system (as outlined in the next
condition dealing with sanitary sewer demand/capacity) will be required for
the demand/capacity of the potable water system as well. The on-site fire
protection system from this private source may therefore not be
interconnected with the City's potable water system.
2. The City recognizes prior vesting (for planning purposes) in the site of
127,000 gallons per day (gpd) each for potable water and sanitary sewer
demand. In consideration of the condition stated above, the developer shall
fund an analysis, to be conducted by the City's engineers, evaluating the
ability of the City's sanitary sewer conveyance system to properly
accommodate the flows exceeding 127,000 gpd from this site. Funding of
this study shall be escrowed with the City upon request and the furnishing
of a written "not-to-exceed" cost estimate to the developer. Upon receipt of
the requested amount, the City shall endeavor to complete the analysis
within 120 days. In the event the analysis indicates that improvements are
required to the City's conveyance system, the developer shall commence the
design of said improvements upon requesting a total sewer commitment
exceeding 102,000 gpd (i.e. 80% of the vested amount). The developer shall
subsequently begin construction of the improvements after receiving City
approval of the design, (or furnish sufficient funding for the City to
construct said improvements, at the City's option). The commencement of
construction shall occur no later than the developer's request for a total
sewer commitment exceeding 114,300 gpd (90% of the vested amount). The
developer shall not be penalized or delayed by the City from constructing
additional phases to the proiect if he satisfies all conditions of the above
Conditions of Approval
2
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
deadlines in a timely manner.
3. The developer shall be responsible for reserving purchasing all additional
water and sewer capacity, based upon the requirements as stated in the
City's code, not heretofore purchased by the prior owners of the property.
FIRE
Comments:
4. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFPA I, Fire
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000
edition. (these codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire
Prevention Code)
5. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6,
Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in
commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest
part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant.
Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition
to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire
flow of at least 1500 wm is required.
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
6. The notice mentions 500 residential units to be added to the development.
These units would be subject to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee based
on the type of units involved.
Single Family, detached = $940 ea
Single Family, attached = $771 ea
Multi-family = $656 ea
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7. The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit.
8. At time of site plan approval for any portion of the site included in the
NOPC Amendment #1 request, the applicant wiIl work with the Parks &
Recreation Department to provide a greenway I bikeway easement along the
east and/or south sides of this proPerty especiallv along the E-4 canal.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
9. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (I9)(e) 5.a. and (I9)(e) S.C. the application for a
proposed change is presumed to be a substantial deviation. This
presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
10. The traffic study was submitted to Palm Beach County traffic engineering
for approval. Approval is required prior to the Chapter 380 F.S. Public
Hearing for the NOPC Amendment #1.
II. Applicant must submit an Annual Report for the Motorola DR! by January
1,2003.
12. The approval of NOPC #1 is contingent upon the approval of the Land Use
Amendment from Industrial to Local Retail Commercial and the Rezoning
from Planned Industrial District (PID) to Community Commercial (C -3) for
the 49.685 acre portion of the DR!.
13. A replat may be required to develop the site. This will be determined at time
of site plan approval.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
I. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
I. To be determined.
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJ ECTSIMotorola DRIIDRIICQI\.doc
EXHIBIT "F"
T REASUR'E-:;C d=Xi's'T--ki1 G I bN Ai '.PLAN N I NG Co UNCI L
:' :' · " . ~-'; ,.~ ..~. ,- I) , r.' :.
INDIAN;-RIVER ,,-'-l.i"'A:R'TIN - PKLM BE-ACH"~ ST. LUCIE-
November 4, 2002
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
~jl!
Subject: Motorola Development of Regional Impact
Notification of Proposed Change
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
In accordance with the requirements of Section 38006(19), Florida Statutes (F S.), we have
reviewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of
Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOPC) for the Motorola DRI dated September 17,2002.
The NOPC proposes to change the existing plan of development to allow development of 500
multi-family residential units, 450,000 square feet of office space, 63,500 square feet ofretail
space including shops and restaurants, and 128,000 square feet of self storage space. The
applicant has submitted additional information on October 23, 2002 requesting the inclusion
of a conversion matrix to allow changes in the plan of development to occur without the need
to amend the development order. Council has the following concerns with the proposed
changes:
1) The existing Motorola DRI is approved for 625,000 square feet of industrial uses and
200,000 square feet of office use, which totals 825,000 square feet of entitlements
not 850,000 square feet.
2) Exhibit E, Substantial Deviation Determination Chart, needs to be revised to rfflect
the original plan of development and the proposed changes under each appli!;able
land use (i.e. office, industrial, retail, residential and industrial)
3) The applicant did not provide data and analysis to justify the conversion matrix. The
calculations to determine the conversion rates and what factor (i.e. water, sfwer,
traffic, or affordable housing) is the more restrictive for each of the prollosed
conversions have not been provided by the applicant. Also, the applicant has not
ItBringing Communities Together" . Est. 1976
301 East Ocean Boulc~ard - Suite 300 ~ Stuart, Florida 34994
Phone (561) 221-"060 _ SC 269-4060 - Fax (.;61) 221-"067 - E-mail - 'ldmin(.v(crnc.orp"
EXHIBIT "F"
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
November 4, 2002
Page 2
fiJ
provided the proposed minimum or maximum levels of development for each of the
land uses.in the conversion matrix.
4) The change in land use from non-residential to residential may change traffic patterns
for the project creating additional impacts to the regional roadway network. The
traffic analysis should be revised to include information on the present and proposed
distribution of traffic on the regional roadways in the area. A meeting with the
review agencies and local government should be set to discuss the proposed
distribution of traffic and its potential impacts.
5) The last annual report for the Motorola DR! was submitted on January 1985
Therefore, the project is in violation of the City's development order. An annual
report for the project should be submitted each year. If a conversion matrix is
approved, the development order should be revised to require the applicant to report
use ofthe conversion matrix in the annual report.
6) The Florida Department of Transportation has concerns with the traffic analysis
submitted with the proposed change (see attached letter). These concerns need to be
addressed.
The applicant has submitted additional information to address some of these concerns.
However, the information was not received to allow sufficient time for the review agencies to
comment. Until the above concerns are fully addressed, Council objects to the proposed
change.
The Strategic Regional Policy Plan for the Treasure Coast Region encourages the formation
of sustainable neighborhoods and communities. Sustainable communities should include a
compatible mix of land uses, well designed and maintained public spaces, buildings and
infrastructure, and a network of interconnected streets designed for various transportation
modes. Council strongly encourages continued efforts to provide for mixed-use development
in the City. However, it is equally important that mixed-use development is done correctly.
There must be a true integration and appropriate mix of uses, not simply more than one use on
the property There should be not only a fully integrated mix of uses but also a network of
streets, sidewalks, and bicycle paths and an accommodation for present or future use of
transit. There should be both a vertical and horizontal integration of land uses, and the land
uses should be of a type and nature that are appropriate and complementary to the area to be
served. The DR! master plan included with the proposed amendment materials does not
incorporate all the best components of mixed-use development. Council is available to assist
the City in working with the developer of the property to ensure that the proposed
development contains all the important components of good mixed-use development.
JEll BUSH
GOVERNOR
~
Florida Department of Transportation
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ENVIROi'i:\IENTAL MANAGEMENT - DISTRICT 4
3400 West Commercial Blvd., J'd Floor, Fe Lauderdale, FI 33309-3421
Telephone: (954) 777..4601, Fax: (954) 777A67!
Toll Free Number: 1-866-336-8435
EXHIBIT "F"
THOMAS F. BARRY, JR.
SECRETARY
October 21, 2002
~-<>_.
Mr. James T. Snyder
DRI Coordinator
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300
Stuart, Florida 34994
:..' ~"'-R
'H: ;
t J~ t.U~/
_,0",;
Dear Mr. Snyder:
SUBJECT;
Motorola Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County
Notification of Proposed Change (NOPC)
This is in response to your letter dated August 7, 2002 (received September 25,2002) regarding the Notification
of Proposed Change (NOPC) for the Motorola Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The Department has
completed its review as summarized below.
The Motorola DRI is located north of Boynton Beach Boulevard, south of Gateway Boulevard, east of Congress
A venue and west oflnterstate 95 in the City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. The MotorolaDRI
was originally approved on January 7, 1980, with an expiration date of30 years from the date of its rendition.
The original DRI development, however. was projected to be complete in Year 2000, as evidenced by the
completion year of Phase ill ofthe DRI. The development phases and intensity from the original DRI are listed in
the following table:
Phase Completion Year Development Square Feet
[ 1981 Industrial Use/Offices 240,000
II 1990 Industrial Use/Offices 385,000
ill 2000 Offices 200,000
TOTAL 825,000
In this NOPC, the applicant proposes the following change to the DRl;
. Convert the remaining 250. 000 squarefeet of industrial land-use entitlementsfor the property to 500
multi-family residential units and 40.000 square feet of commercial space.
The Department offers the following comments regarding this NOPC and the accompanying traffic analysis:
I. There are inconsistencies related to the proposed land-use plan denoted in Attachment 2 - Trip
Generation Comparison, Exhibit "E" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart, and Question No.5
of the NOPC. More specifically, Attachment 2 denotes 450,000 square feet of Office use while there is
no Office use shown in Exhibit E. Further, Exhibit E denotes 600,000 square feet of Industrial use, and
Attachment 2 shows none. Lastly, in NOPC Question No.5 and Exhibit "E" 40,000 square feet of
Commercial space is proposed; however, in Attachment 2, 63,500 square feet of Commercial space is
denoted. These discrepancies should be explained.
www.dot.state.fl.us
@ RECYCLED PAPER
EXHIBIT "F"
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
November 4, 2002
Page 3.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
J.
/ i
-rJ .1 .',
yv.,-v'...ej.. if . /l;6i\.... J
t James T. Snyder
DR! Coordinator
cc: Ken Metcalf, FDCA
R. Duke Woodson, Applicant
EXHIBIT "F"
Mr. James T. Snyder
October 21, 2002
Page 2
2. The calculation of the internal trips in Attachment 2 is incorrect. The applicant should use the procedure
outlined in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (Chapter 7) to document how internal capture was
calculated for this analysis. The internal capture summary sheets (matrix or "bubble diagrams") should
be included as an appendix. The analysis should be revised, accordingly.
3. The pass-by trips should not exceed 10% of adjacent street background traffic during the peak hour or
25% of the project's external retail trips, whichever yields the lower number of pass-by trips. The
applicant did not demonstrate that these criteria have been met. Based on our review, the number of
pass-by trips proposed in this analysis exceeds 25% of the project's external retail trips, and is therefore
unacceptable. Further, the applicant has incorrectly applied the pass-by rates to the Office and Self-
Storage land uses. Pass-by credit may only be used for retail trips. The analysis should be revised,
accordingly.
In conclusion, the Motorola DR! NOPC provided to the Department is not sufficient. The Department requests
that the applicant address our comments so that we can complete our review of the NOPC. Please feel free to
contact this office at (954) 777-4601 should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~~
~i Schmidt, .E.
Distri~t Planning and Environmental Engineer
/
GS:kai/cw
cc: Paul Darst - DCA
Bob Romig
Gerry O'Reilly
John Krane
S\OPEM\Chon W\04Dn\Molorola\NOPClb doc
<!l
z
'"
"'
x
w
....
w
w
~
w
'"
'"
=>
c
oo
o
'<(8
...Jg
0'"
0::6
e~
om
:is;]
<:
o
j::
;::
ffi
'"
UJ
0:
~
u:
"
Q
UJ
'"
~
o
!5
a.
>-
...J
0::'"
"'5
t-s;
<(UJ
:=0:
"'a.
"J>-
Ill!::
<(0
t-;;:
o~
11.0
>:
~
."
Z"'oo
08.55 g
U)1Il"":.o
zs;:oot-
WE
><"ii
w.9
>:
~
."
~
C.
'"
c
E
;; 0
E!~
f/)
...
Z
::>
u.
o
c:i
Z
....
~
WI
~ ~
a: a:
a5~
00
~~
i!)<!l
'" 0
N ~
oo
w
w
~
o
...~
-~
Z"
::>w
w
Wff
f/)~
::>0
.
ro
E
iii
. .
ro .
~"c:
.. "
. "5
. .
.~ 6
" a
...J
;::
o
0:
a.
a.
~
i<
Q
>-
<Il
Q
~
(I)
'!i
>-
...J
(I)
::>
o
s;
UJ
0:
a.
~
<3
;;:
<3
...J
~
g
;~I
III ~ li5 ~
j\~H
o
o
o
~-
~
c
Q
ro
.0
0.
~
ro
ii'
o
E
g
w
u
c
w
~
:c
6
;;
Z
"''"
"'-
- ~
a5~
"'0
_N
00
00
0,"
lli"":
~'"
."
C
'"
E
w
o
'0
~
2
e
a.
"''"
0-
_N
M..t
~o
NN
~
"
Iil
!5
"
u:
<:
o
o
ll!
0:
~
Iil
;;;
~
UJ
0:
~
UJ
<Il
>-
I-
<3
;;:
~
o
...J
~
o
I-
"''''
ww
"'oo
=>=>
~~
~~
""
.
ro
E
12
. ro
.... E
~~
;;:-'"
5€
""
<:
o
j::
;::
~
ll!
:0
!!;
Ii:
"
Iil
(I)
~
o
!5
a.
>-
...
o::~
"'0
:=s
"'IU
"'0:
>0.
o::~
<(-
t-o
-~
Zo.
<(~
<no
Zoo
Ogg
meN
Z~'"
w
\<
w
u.",
Ol-g
'z\l)
~:JM
-'
0.
"
I!!
C>
~
<!l
o
N
'"
w
w
~
...9
-0.
<:"
::>w
w
"
~ff
::>0
J'!
.
."
2il
ro ._
.E 1:
mJ2
_tIJ ~
38
...
;::
o
0:
a.
a.
'"
i<
'"
>-
<Il
Q
~
(I)
'!i
>-
...J
'"
::>
o
s;
UJ
0:
a.
>-
I-
<3
;;:
<3
...J
~
o
I-
o
o
o
,.:
~
c
o
~
"
0.
~
ro
ii'
C>
E
o
~
'"'"
"''''
-'"
oui
~~
gg
'"0
NO
"'~
:g:g
"''"'
NuS
0,"
NN
~I
iil
!5
"
u:
<:
o
o
~
~
Q
~
~
~
"
~
<Il
>-
I-
<3
;;:
<3
...
~
g
oooo
ww
oooo
=>=>
~ ~
~~
"'''
.
ro
E
~z
. ro
.... E
~~
,
- .
a~
a"
TOTALS DUE FOR WATER AND SEWER
Consultant's estimate
City's estimate
$596,046.27
$741,571.72
OCT-11-2002 16:36
~
Comparison of Estimated Sewage Flows
Pre..development vs. Post development
Motorola Site
Exlsdng
From Oavid Derek. Senior Project Manager, Jones-lang-Lasalle at Motorola;
When factory was operating at full capacity, there were 3500 employees spread
over 3 shifts to cover 24 hours/day, 7 dayslweek.
For a factory. use 25 gpd per employee per a hour shil\..
Assume each O(thB 3500 employees wOrked one a heur shift: per day. 5 days per week
3500 X STI X 25 gpd =
625llO gpd
~timated Exi~ting Sewage Flow (AOF)
Prcp05ad
Offica - 450,00Cf+/- sJ
Use 15 gpd per 100 s.t. of noor space-
450,000/100 X 15 SPd = 67500 gpd
Residential -100 onlt-bedroom unJts. 250 2-bedroom units and 150 3.bedroom units
Use 100 gpd for 1-bedroom units.
100X 100 gpd' 100eo gpd
Use 200 gpd for 2-bedrQom "enS'
2S0 X 200 gpd =
50000 gpd
Use 300 gpd for 3-bedroom unirs*
150X 300 gpd=
45000 gpd
Restaurant. Quafity - 10,000 s.t. - .ll:!';l:;oma 280 seats
Use 40 spell""at-
260 X 40 gpd = 11200 gpd
Restaurant - High Turnover ~ 5,000 sJ.- assume 170 seats
Use 40 gpdJseat.
170 X 40 gpd = 6600 gpd
Restaurant ~ Fast Food. 8,000 s.t. & assume 225 seats
Use 40 gpdJ:seal*
225 X 40 gpd = 0000 gpd
Retail- 20,000+/- s.f.
Use 0.1 gpd per s.f. of troor spacaw
20,000 X 0.1 gpd . 2000 gpd
Bilnk . Drive In & 4,500+/. sJ,
Use 15 gpd per 100 s.t. of floor s!:laea*
4500/100 X 15gpd' 675 gpd
Self Storage -128,000+/- $.t, - assume 370 units
Use 1 gpd per unit..
370 X 1 gpd = 370 gpd
Office space & assume an sao sJ. omes
Use 15 gpd per 100 sJ. of office space'
800/100 X 15 gpd = 120 gpd
Toral
Es1ima1e<l Proposed Sewage Flow (ADF)
202665 gpd
.AII values assigned per unit are from Table 1. Departl"T'!ent of Health Chapter 64E..6.0a8 for System Siz!t Oetarminations
e:/dougidougmololflowcalo.xlS
9/17102
P.02/04
.4 '!--(.;
Al065.CO AMS
OCT-11-2002 16:36
P.03/04
~
Comparison of Estimated Water Demand
Pre-development vs. Post development
Motorola Site
Exlsllng
Estimated Sewage Flow shown on previous table:
62500 gpd
For every 250 gpd of sewage produced, assume 300 gpd ofwaler is used:
300/250 X 62500 gpd .
75000 gpd
Esllmated Exl~ng \'Vater ~.nd (ADF]
Proposed
Estimaled Sewage Flow shown on previous table:
202665 gpd
For every 250 gpd of sewage produced, assume 300 9pd o( water is used:
:300/250 X 202665 gpd =
243198 gpd
f;$timated Proposed WatBf DBmand (AOf=)
e:/dougldougmotolflowcalc.xls
9/17102
A21165.00 AMS
OCT-11-2002 16:37
P.04/04
" . '::..
Comparison of Estimated Sewage Flows
for Select Proposed Land Uses at the Motorola Site
For every 1000 s.f. of office space:
Use 15 gpd per 100 sJ. of floor space.
1000 sJ. {100 X 15 gpd = 150 gpd
For every 1000 sJ. of retail;
Use 0.1 gpd per sJ. of floor space'
1000 sJ. X 0.1 gpd = 100 gpd
For every 1 bedroom residential unit;
Use 100 gpd per unft" 100 gpd
For every 2 bedroom residential unit;
Use 200 gpd per unit" 200 gpd
For every 3 bedroom residential unit;
Use 300 gpd per unil" 300 gpd
For every 1000 sJ. of industrial:
Use 25 gpd per employee per 8 hour shift"
If you assume there is one employee
utilizing every 150 sJ. of space;
1000 s.I {15O s.f. X 25 gpd ~ 167 gpd per shift
"An values assigned per unit are from Table 1, Department of Health Chapler 64E-6.008 for System Size Determinations.
No peaking fadOrs have been applied.
FOr estimation Of Water Demand for the same land uses. assume 300 gpd of waler is consumed for every 250 gpd of
sewage produced, and multiply the estimated sewage flow value by 1.2.
e;ldougldougmotolflowcalc.XIS
9/26102
A2065.oo AMS
TOTRL P.04
.
.
CITY of
BOYNTON BEACH
~
-;.
P. O. BOX 310
120 H.E. 2ND AVENUE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33435
1:S05) 732-8111
Office of the City Manager
October ~, ~979
-,
~.r. John ,B. . Gesbocker, AIA
Heez,y &. Heery,' Architects & Engineers, Inc.
880 West Peachtree Street, N. W.
Atlanta, Georgia 30309
OCT
3 12-:'')
Re: Motorola nevelopment
Dear Mr. Gesbocker:
I have received requests for information reati ve to Motorola's potential
developinent in Boynton Beach and their DR! application. The infonnation
requested in your letter to me included the areas of water supply and solid
waste. 'I .have also received a copy of the letter you wrote to Mr. Paul
,StartZlllan of the South County Regional Wastewater Treatment and Disposal
Board; and a separate request for information from our Fbl1ce Department..
, " ,---
..In regard'to the matters of water supply, solid waste and sanitary sewer,
it is appropriate to consider the City's current Comprehensive Plan and its
statements concerning the City' s development.
The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach was adopted by the City
Counci~ on August 21, 1979. Two of the required elements of the plan are
Future Land Use and Master Sewer and Water Facilities. In the very early
stages of p~an preparation, estimates of development were provided for use
in determining the grid system of water distribution lines and sewage co~lec-
tion force mains and pumping stations necessary to serve the proposed land
,development. The resulting grid system is graphically presented in the two
p~ates accompanying this letter. Additionally, improvements to the system
have been programmed in and are compiled in the capital needs list of the
Comprehensive Plan.
A. Water and Sanitary Sewer:
The City presently has adequate capacity to serve Motorola Development, as we
,J?" ,', have a Master Plan for water treatment, water transmission and sewerage collec-
~:~frl;'" tion facilities. These fac1li ties have been designed _to adequately meet all
<~:::;\',,'" ,..the re9-uirements of the entire service area, which Boynton :Beach is comm1tted
. ~:f$"'.,t;~~; to se.rve under the original Water Qua.lity Management Plan. This plan was con-
n !i~,'1,~~,'ce1yed{imd originally based on the densities higher than is now being allowed
.;~~~O~.~:;~~~~P:~~':'-;; :} . r. . ": ,-
".,..,!~t",_.. , , , <
~~;i:n",,~';"}hl0,;....,,:
""',1"" -:K~'", "
,;~~ :';;~;.r~~~'rf~t~,"~: ;.::.
1::..." ~~ ~
REVISED 10-11-79
.
.
Page 2
Mr. John B. Gesbocker, AIA, Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Re: Motorola Development October 1, 1979
in the area of service. The program includes major transmission lines,
addi tional wells, added storage capacity, and ultimately, another water
treatment plant and well field. All of this .is set up on an orderly basis
to meet anticipated growth. as it develops in the area.
There is a major transmission line presently at Congress Avenue and SR 804,
which is projected to be extended northward past Motorola property, with
adequate capacity to serve Motorola and all the areas along its route.
The major pumping stations under Phase 1 have been EPA funded and are nearing
completion, with anticipated operational date or approximately December 1., 1.979,
and certainly berore January 1, 1980. These lines are also adequately designed
to take care of all anticipated waste flows. Further, there is a master pump-
ing station and pressure line, whose route is down Congress Avenue, to carry
sewage to the Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The City of Boynton Beach is on a priority list for funding from EPA for this
project sometime after October 1, 1979. This will provide adequate capacity-
to handle not only Motorola's requirements, but also all the areas along Congress
Avenue and the nothern portion of our service area.
At the present time, the City has an excess average water capacity of approximate-
lyTwo MGD. With plans for continually increasing the City's well field capacity
and the recent increase in plant capacity to Sixteen MOO in the last twelve months,
the -City anticipates no problem in having adequate water ror all the people and
uses in the service area. (There have been no firm cOllllllitments of capacity of
our water supply -- it is on a first-come, first-serve basis.)
, The "City does have the ability to provide service for both water distribution
. and collection during and after development, because or its logical prior planning
- and the fact that, financially, City bonds carry an "A" rating. Further, the City
maintains' Ii: qualified staff, well-trained in meeting State requirements, both at
the Wat~r_ Plant and other facilities of the utility operations.
.1,..'....' ,.,. -.- -
Pressu~e in our system in our lowest pressure areas is in the range of 50 lbs.
mininium, and flows throughout the City exceed maximum fire flow requirements.
With projected lines, it is anticipated that a similar situation would be main-
tained in t~e.area of Motorola development.
B. Solid Waste
,
-
Solid waste collection within the City or Boynton Beach is provided by the
Sanitation Di.vision of the Public Works Department. Currently, solid waste
collected within the City is transferred to the 235 acre Lantana Road Landfill
which is oPE!rated by Palm Beach County.
."
The Lantana randfill has a life expectancy to the year 1988 based solely on
volumetric capacity~- However, short term mitigating actions to control leachates
and the possible-addition of.solid waste conversion techniques may substantially
modify this life expectancy. -. Furthermore, as noted in the adopted Comprehensive
. :/~~;'-I~'.iIr';.o"
>'.;~.i,.,:"
- - "
....:r. -_
.
.
Page 3
'C ~;,
.&." .
,.
Mr. John B. Gesbocker, AIA, Heery & Heery, Architects & Engineers, Inc.
Re: l-lotorola Development October 1, 1979
Plan for the City, Boynton Beach encourages the implementation of the Palm
Beach County Solid Waste Management Plan which supports initiating measures
to insure the short and long term availability of adequate solid waste disposal
capacity.
C. Police Services
Attached is a letter from Boynton Beach Police Chief Noah Huddleston which
indicates the capability of the City in responding to the impact and needs
of a development such as Motorola wi. thin the City of Boynton Beach.
'.
I hope I have included all the necessary inf'ormation for your completion of
the DR! application. Please let me know if there is more information needed
and I will be glad to furnish it for you. We look forward to working with you
and Motorola in the Coming months as you proceed through DR! procedures. I can
assure you the City will cooperate with you in the process in every possible w~.
Sincerely,
v~~
Peter L. O1eney
City Manager
PLC :mh
Att. Plans: Wastewater Master Force Main and Lift Station System
Water Treatment Plant, Raw Water Wells, Storage Facilities
Letter from Police Chief Noah Huddleston
.'
ec:' Mr. Paul. Startzman, Interim Director, SCRWTD Board
Police Chief Noah Huddleston
Mr. Camen Annunziato, City Planner
Mr. Perry Cessna, Director of utilities
Central Files
, s.~
~ . ~ .'1 - ;".
~'1?~'!~~I\b~~l. ....
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NO. 02-173
TO:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner, Planning Department
B---
Peter Mazzella, Deputy Director, Utilities Department
FROM:
DATE:
November 4, 2002
NOY - 5 2lXe
SUBJECT: Motorola Expansion Project
DRIA 02-002
We have reviewed the information submitted on projected water and sewer flows in
conjunction with the subject DRI amendment, and at this time we offer the following
comments:
I. The application for development approval submitted prior to development of the
Motorola site specified an anticipated total water and sewer demand for the site at
127,000 gallons per day (each) at the completion of final build out. This number
will therefore be used as the baseline value in evaluating the potential impacts on
the City's water and wastewater delivery systems.
2. The projected flows for water and sewer provided by the applicant are 243,198
gpd, and 202,665 gpd respectively. The water flow does not include fire
protection demand.
3. The City's projected demand for the total site, based upon chapter 26 of the code,
are 294,215 gpd for water, and 255,865 gpd for sewer. Once again, the water flow
does not include fire protection.
4. Due to the magnitude of the increase above the prior approval, an engineering
evaluation of the off-site water and sewer systems will have to be conducted by the
City's engineer's, at the applicant's expense, in order to assure that the off site
systems can adequately serve the expanded demands of this site. Flows of this
magnitude from the Motorola site were not anticipated during development of the
Water and Sewer Master Plan, and must therefore be evaluated at this time in
accordance with sections 26-16 and 26-28 of the City code. Fire flow demands
which have neither been provided nor reviewed at this time, will also have to be
factored into the evaluation if they exceed the City requirement of 1500 gallons per
minute.
The following additional information is therefore requested in order to complete the
evaluation of this application:
A. Provide the rated fire flow demand for the existing and proposed buildings on this
site.
B. Provide a conceptual layout of the proposed on-site water main and sewer main
extensions.
C. Provide an engineering evaluation of the adequacy for the on-site sewage
pumping station. This on-site evaluation may be conducted by the applicant's
engineer, and shall result in a final recommendation towards accommodating the
additional sewage flow from the site, in view of current design standards.
D. Provide a schedule for the proposed expansion plans, including completion dates
for each phase and its anticipated demand.
E. Escrow sufficient funds to pay for the City's evaluation of the off-site water and
sewer delivery systems. This amount will be determined after the information
requested in items A- D is furnished. Any construction costs for necessary off-site
improvements will also be borne by the applicant/developer of the Motorola site.
Please feel free to contact me directly with any questions on this matter.
PVM
Xc:
Peter Mazzella
Dale Sugerman
John Guidry
File
Galav, Lusia
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Livergood, Jeffrey
Tuesday, November 05,2002 10:09 AM
Galav, Lusla
Motorola DRI
Lusia,
, have reviewed traffic impact study for NOPC #1 for the Motorola DRllocated on the southeast corner of Congress
Avenue and Gateway Boulevard. This study was prepared by the consulting firm of Pindar Troutman.
The DRI is vested with two primary traffic parameters that can not be exceeded. First, the total daily traffic generated by
the DRI can not exceed 13,020 trips. Secondly, the peak hour traffic generated by the DRI can not exceed 1,634 trips.
Pindar Troutman has opined that the proposed mixed use development will not exceed the vested trips.
In order to conclude that the total vested trips of the DRI will not exceed allowed thresholds, Pindar Troutman has made
two very critical assumptions. Pindar Troutman is assuming that there will be 1 ,534 daily internal trips. In other words, the
mixed used features will share trips. For example, there may be a trip tallied when a homeowner leaves their residential
property and travels to the fast food restaurant in the DRI. Because both land uses are included in the mixed use
development, the trips can be considered internal and not traffic that is generated by the development and placing traffic
on the surrounding roadway network. Furthermore, Pindar Troutman has assumed that there will be 3,934 pass by trips.,
Pass by trips includes traffic that Is already on the arterial road network anyway and is not traveling on a particuiar road
segment solely for the purpose of traveling to a destination in the DRI. An example of this, again using the fast food
restaurant, would be a resident living in the far western areas of Boynton Beach that has traveied eastbound along
Gateway for many years. If a new fast food restaurant is built in the DRI that attracts this motorist that is "passing by", then
this is not technically considered a new trip on the arterial road network.
Aithough Pindar Troutman is including 1,534 internal trips and 3,934 pass by trips, they have not provided satisfactory data
or analysis that 'ustifies their assumptions. Staff recognizes that reductions in traffic generations associated with internal
an pass by trips is com r, uiiher analysis is desirable to verify the consultant's assumptions.
With respect to the proposed new driveways on Congress, staff believes that it will be necessary to evaluate site access
as the property develops. However, the developer shouid be prepared to provide all necessary traffic studies, traffic
signals, and other off site geometric roadway improvements necessary to support the traffic generated by the DRI.
County approval of traffic analysis is critical.
- ~--_._'
Jeffrey R. Livergood, P. E.
Director of Public Works
City of Boynton Beach, FL
1
~st REVIEW COMMENTS ~
Development of RemonaJ Imnact
t5Cut-rHJ'CBC-Ji-.\0/
~ln LI T1 c""_~ /
PUP.;>ut.:-l\Jol2-ii-0
Project name: Motorola
File Dumber: DRIA 02.{102
Reference: I"review plans identified as Develooment ofRelrional Irnnact Amendment with a Semtember 18.
2002 PI dZon' D d lei
"on, m.. J""srtment ate stamn mar nil.
DEP ARTM.F.:NTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. In the Traffic Impact Anal}'llis (TIA) provided with the DR! ap'plication the elL
introduction does not address the planned land use re-designation of a I'~()/ZL rz-
portion of the DRl from Industrial to Residential. Accordingly the TIA
shall be revised which properly addcesses all of the propo.sed land use
changes_
2. The TIA provided has been forwarded to Palm Beach eounty Traffic oIL :
Enlrincerinl! for review. No response has been received at this time. kt"\lo7 Ll-ffl
lJTILITIES ( '\
'-- )
Comments:
3. Water and wastewater service are available to the site. Future specific uses oIL
as set forth in Exhibit "D" (to be refined) for service to the retail and multi- 1...<
family designated areas will have to be analyzed on all area by area basis. ( " 10/1.<-
\
"-_/
FlRE
Comments:
4. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of
the Code of Ordinances of thc City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFP A l, Fire
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFl' A 101, Life Safety Code, 2000
edition. (these codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire
Prevention Code)
S. Design documents shaH demonstrate compliance with WR Chapter 6,
Section 16, which provides requirement. for hydrants. Hydrants in
commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest
part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant.
Connections shall be to mains DO less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition
to domestic 1'C<!uirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a flt'C
flow of at least 1500 gpm is required.
ce....
"
,
J
-)
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/08102
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
6. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be
provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code,
(2000) Section 29-2.3.2.
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DMSION
Comments:
7. No comments at this time - future specific u.qes as set forth in Exhibit ''0" OiL
I..",.
(to be refined) for the retail and multi.family designated areas will be / \(0 (zZl l.--
ana1vzed on a case bv case basis
BUILDING DMSION \.-->
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
8, The notice mentions 500 residential units to be added to the development.
These units would be subject to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee based
on the type of units involved.
Single Family. detached ~ $940 ea
Single Family, attached = $771 ea
Multi-family ~ $656 ea
9. The fee is duc at the time of the fust applicable building permit.
10. Our department would be interested in exploring the possibility of a
greenway I bikeway easement along the east and south sides of this property
especially along thl< E-4 canal.
FORESTERlENVlRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
It. EXHIBIT uD"
.
.
~
1ST REVIEW coMMENTS
10/08102
3
~*:'1.1.' 0'--
\
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Th.. are cxistinll active Burrowing Owl nc:st:;; on the: two areas shown on the
above exhibit ''OM noted u:
1. Industrial (Offil:e / Warebouse / MSl'Iufacturing. 40.09 acres) /'
2. Multi-Family / Retail (34.00 8CI'C8) V
The applicant must have an environmental assessment of these two areas and
obtain a BllITOwing Owl permit throogh the Florida Wildlife COIl'I.llIission
(FWC). This information should be included with the DR! notice of
oronosed cban.... arrolication.
PLANNING AND ZONING
eomments:
12. Provide: a legal descriptiOIl of the property to be =..oned from PID to e-3.
B. The Master Plan shows 40.09 aCTeS of Industrial (Office, Warehouse &
Manufacturing). Traffic study does not address warehouse or manufacturing
uses. Revise accordingly.
14. Provide the Master Plan at 24"x36" size. Include the amount of vested trips
for the DR! in a note on the plan.
15. eorrect the Substantial Deviation Chart for Industrial Land Use. The
acreage figure is 40.09 not 49 .09 as shown.
16. Provide a letter from the South Florida Watc\' ManagCO'leot District
regarding impacts to ground and surface water as a result of the proposed
change.
17. Provide a revised projection of average daily potable and non-potable water
demands for the proposed change.
18. Provid" in the traffic study an analysis of traffic distribution for the site that
takes into accOlmt the two new proposed driveways on Congress Avenue.
19. Project must address sehool eOIleurrency. Submit school concurrency
application to Palm Beach County School Board for annroval.
20. What will be the target market for the residential development?
21. Provide infOl:1Tlation regarding the availability or projected availability of
adequate housing and employment opportunities reasonably aeClOS.ible to
the development site.
22. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (19)(c) 5.a. and (l9)(c) 5.c. the application for a
proposed change is presumed to be a substantial deviation. This
nresumntion may be rebutted by clear and convincitll! evidence:.
MWRIsc
S:\PlanningISHAREDIW'\PRCUECTSlMo_la DRflOR/\1ST REVIEWGOMMJ:NTS.doc
Project name: Motorola 0 ,
File number: DRIA 02-002 ~&k~ 'n' 'q;J2)
Reference: 1 "review nlans identitied as Develonment of Re"ionallmnact Amendment with a e m e~A f"ti
2002 Planning and Zoninl' Denartment date stamn markinI'. t:( -I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
I
PUBLIC WORKS - General
,
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Tramc
Comments:
L In the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) provided with the DRI application the
introduction does not address the planned land use re-designation of a
portion of the DR! from Industria] to Residential. Accordingly the TIA
shall be revised which properly addresses all of the proposed land use
changes.
2. The TIA provided has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering for review. No response has been received at this time.
UTILITIES
Comments:
3. Water and wastewater service are available to the site. Future specific uses
as set forth in ExhibIt "0" (to be refined) for service to the retail and multi-
family designated areas will have to be analyzed on an area by area basis.
I FIRE
I
Comments:
4. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFP A ], Fire I
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFP A 10], Life SafeZv Code. 2000 I
edition. (these codes, as amended are identitied as the Florida Fire I
Prevention Code)
5. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6,
I Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in
I commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest
i part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant.
I Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition
to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire
! flow of at least 1500 gpm is required.
1 st REVIEW COMMENT~ !/L.L- ~.AI
D",'opm'n,"m"iooalImp~~.-fJt ~ -,
.
..
~st REVIEW COMMENTS -)
Development of Rel!ional Impact
00r!~v
~ 11-1-'1
)"
Project name: Motorola
File number: DRIA 02.Q02
Reference: I "review plans identified as Develooment of Regional Imoact Amendment with a Scotember 18,
2002 Plannin" and Zeninl . t date StamD marIOn...
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffie
Comments:
1. In the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) provided with the DR! application the
introduction does not a~s the planned land use re-designation of a
portion of the DR! from Industrial to Residential. Accordingly the TIA
shall be revised which properly addTesses all of the proposed land use
changes.
2. The TIA provided has been forwarded to Palm Beach eounty Traffic
Elllrincering foc review. No resDonse has been received at this time.
lJTILmES
Comments:
3. Water and wastewater service are available to the site. Future specific uses
as set fanh in Exhibit "0" (to be refined) for service to the retail and multi-
family designated Il1"'8S will have to be analyzed on an area by area basis.
FIRE
Comt\lmts:
4. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire ,/
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFP AI, Fire
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Sofety Code, 2000 "'6""'" /....
edition. (these codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire i!V. fa,,,,~'-
Prevention Code)
5. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with !DR Chapter 6,
Scetion 16, which provides l'Cl:juirements for hydrants. Hydrants in -/
commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apan and the remotest
part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant. A/J'-~u:, j,'"
Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition ~1't~JS(
to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fIre
flow of at least 1500 gpm is required.
"
C'
v
)
~ 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/08/02
2
--.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE RFJECf
6. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants arc to be /
provided. must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed. and in
service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code. ~.....,...>,.J
(2000) Sectioo29-2.3.2. i2-sr___.tL.-
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DJVJSION
Comments:
7. No eonnnents at this time - future specific Ulles as set forth in Exhibit "I)"
(to be refined) fOl' the retail and multi-filmily designated areas will be
analvzed on a case by case basis
BUILDING DJVJSION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
8. The notice mentions 500 residential units to be added to the development.
These units would be subject to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee based
on the type of units involved.
Single Family. detached ~ $940 ea
Single Family, attached = $771 ea
Multi-family - $656 ca
9. The fee is duc at the time of tile first applicable building permit.
10. 0\11" department would be interested in exploring the possibility of a
grcenway I bikeway easement along the east and south .ides of this property
especially along the E4 canal.
FOlmS'l'ERlENVlRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
11. EXHIBIT nD"
15t REVIEW COMMENT~
Development of Rel!ional Impact
Project name: Motorola
File number: DRIA 02-002
Reference: 1" review plans identified as Development of Regional Impact Amendment with a September 18.
2002 Planning and Zoning Department date stamn marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
1. In the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) provided with the DR! application the
introduction does not address the planned land use re-designation of a
portion of the DR! from Industrial to Residential. Accordingly the TIA
shall be revised which properly addresses all of the proposed land use
changes.
2. The TIA provided has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic
Engineering for review. No response has been received at this time.
UTILITIES
Comments:
3. Water and wastewater service are available to the site. Future specific uses
as set forth in Exhibit "D" (to be refined) for service to the retail and multi-
family designated areas will have to be analyzed on an area by area basis.
FIRE
Comments:
4. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000
edition. (these codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire
Prevention Code)
5. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6,
Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in
commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest
part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant.
Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition
to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire
flow of at least 1500 gpm is required.
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/08/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
6. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be
provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in
service prior to construction work per the F/orida Fire Prevention Code,
(2000) Section 29-2.3.2.
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
7. No comments at this time - future specific uses as set forth in Exhibit "D"
(to be refined) for the retail and multi-family designated areas will be
analyZed on a case bv case basis
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
8. The notice mentions 500 residential units to be added to the development.
These units would be subject to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee based
on the type of units involved.
Single Family, detached = $940 ea
Single Family, attached = $771 ea
Multi-family - $656 ea
9. The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit.
10. Our department would be interested in exploring the possibility of a
greenway / bikeway easement along the east and south sides of this property
especially along the E-4 canal.
FORESTERfENVIRONMENTALlST
Comments:
11. EXHIBIT "D"
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
10/08/02
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
The are existing active Burrowing Owl nests on the two areas shown on the
above exhibit "D" noted as:
1. Industrial (Office / Warehouse / Manufacturing, 40.09 acres)
2. Multi-Family I Retail (34.00 acres)
The applicant must have an environmental assessment of these two areas and
obtain a Burrowing Owl permit through the Florida Wildlife Commission
(FWC). This information should be included with the DR! notice of
orooosed change application.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
12. Provide a legal description of the property to be rezoned from PID to C-3.
13. The Master Plan shows 40.09 acres of Industrial (Office, Warehouse &
Manufacturing). Traffic study does not address warehouse or manufacturing
uses. Revise accordingly.
14. Provide the Master Plan at 24"x36" size. Include the amount of vested trips
for the DR! in a note on the plan.
15. Correct the Substantial Deviation Chart for Industrial Land Use. The
acreage figure is 40.09 not 49.09 as shown.
16. Provide a letter from the South Florida Water Management District
regarding impacts to ground and surface water as a result of the proposed
change.
17. Provide a revised projection of average daily potable and non-potable water
demands for the proposed change.
18. Provide in the traffic study an analysis of traffic distribution for the site that
takes into account the two new proposed driveways on Congress Avenue.
19. Project must address school concurrency. Submit school concurrency
application to Palm Beach County School Board for approval.
20. What will be the target market for the residential development?
21. Provide information regarding the availability or projected availability of
adequate housing and employment opportunities reasonably accessible to
the development site.
22. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (19)(e) 5.a. and (19)(e) S.c. the application for a
proposed change is presumed to be a substantial deviation. This
oresumotion may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
MWRlsc
S:\Planning\SHARED\'M'IPROJECTS\Matarala DRIIDRI11 ST REVIEWCOMMENTS.dac
~,.."'..',
{. '\
I'
, '
>I'\,r,J,
<~ /:.'
I. ./' \.
\.. -~,,'"
! C;'1 \}
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 02-198
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
I~f;r~"
,I,!,.. n
f "/ JeT '3
,~f \
',-
I':]"
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
''''''""
DATE:
October 3, 2002
RE:
Review Comments
Motorola DRI
Amendment #1 -1st Review
File No. DRIA 02-002
The above referenced Notice of Proposed Change, received on September 24, 2002, were reviewed
against the Master Plan requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances
(available on-line at www.cLbovnton-beach.fl.us). Following are the comments with the appropriate Code
and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
No comments at this time.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
In the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) provided with the DRI application the introduction does not address
the planned land use re-designation of a portion of the DRI from Industrial to Residential. Accordingly
the TIA shall be revised which properly addresses all of the proposed land use changes.
The TIA provided has been forwarded to Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering for review. No
response has been received at this time.
ENGINEERING
No comments at this time - future specific uses as set forth in Exhibit "D" (to be refined) for the retail and
multi-family designated areas will be analyzed on a case by case basis.
UTILITIES
No Comment - water and wastewater service are available to the site. Future specific uses as set forth
in Exhibit "0" (to be refined) for service to the retail and multi-family designated areas will have to be
analyzed on an area by area basis.
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 02-198
RE: Motorola DRI Amendment #1 - 1 st Review, DRIA 02-002
October 3, 2002
Page 2
ec: Jeff Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.I P.S.M., Utility Engineer, Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Engineering (via e-mail)
File
C:\My Documents\Motorola DRI, Amendment #1 - 1st review.doc
/'
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Fire and Life Safety Division
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of:
DRIA 02-002 1st review-fire
Project Name or Address:
Motorola
1500 Gatewav Boulevard
Reviewed by:
Rodqer KemJer. Fire Plans Examiner/Fire
Inspector ~.
Department:
Fire and Life Safety
Phone:
(561) 742-6753
Comments to:
Sherie Coale bv email on 10/01/02
CODE REQUIREMENTS
The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter
9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFPA 1, Fire
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000
edition. (these codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire
Prevention Code)
Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6,
Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in
commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the
remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a
hydrant. Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter.
In addition to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less
than 20 psi, a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm is required.
Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to
be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and
in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code,
(2000) Section 29-2.3.2.
cc: Steve Gale
Bob Borden
UTY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIuA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
/
TO:
10/02/02
FILE: DRIA 02-002
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
FROM:
SUBJECT: Motorola DRI
REFERENCES: Site Plan
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comments
----
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 02-210
TO: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM: Timothy K. Large q---~
TRC Member/Building Divisio~ I~
DATE: October 1, 2002
SUBJECT: Project - Motorola DRI
File No. - DRIA 02-002 - 15t Review
The Building Division has no issues with the NOPC to the previously approved
development of regional impact.
bf
S/Development/Building Code Administrator/TRC/02/Motorola DRI
Page 10f1
~
PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #02-75
FROM:
Mike Rumpf, Planning and Zoning Director
John Wildner, Parks Director ~
Barbara Meacham, Parks an~andscape Planner
TO:
cc:
RE:
Motorola DRI - Notice of Proposed Change
Date:
October 3, 2002
The Parks Department has reviewed the Notice of Proposed Change for the
Motorola DRI. The following comments are submitted:
1. The notice mentions 500 residential units to be added to the development.
These units would be subject to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee
based on the type of units involved.
Single Family, detached = $940 ea
Single Family, attached = $771 ea
Multi-family = $656 ea
2. The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit.
3. Our department would be interested in exploring the possibility of a
greenway I bikeway easement along the east and south sides of this
property especially along the E-4 canal.
JW
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
Galav, Lusia
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Coale, Sherie
Cc: Galav, Lusia
Subject: 02-Planbill.doc
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Motorola DR!
Development of Regional Impact- Notice of Proposed change
1st Review
Date:
October 1, 2002
EXHIBIT "D"
The are existing active Burrowing Owl nests on the two areas shown on the above exhibit "D" noted
as:
1. Industrial (Office / Warehouse / Manufacturing, 40.09 acres)
2. Multi-Family / Retail (34.00 acres)
The applicant must have an environmental assessment of these two areas and obtain a Burrowing Owl
permit through the Florida Wildlife Commission (FWC). This information should be included with the
DR! notice of proposed change application.
Kjh
File
10/01/2002
J0. bzv.
-- Wv)9 JnCHr:v I~ ii-u ~ If ~ V~ 01 S-- ~ cJ<- S2J ~
{\O 'C'-J /0. ~ tv': Iu 2~cJf ~l1h-'CvdJ ()
/q 6) 3'<7-." {AT f'~d ~ /s-~ if-. ~ J;-- f!-u.
(f,mzr ~ 12v~ fJ{))-- rei/l',,* 2/'/VVL.(d.
( fr 53~ CfJ2ro1?-)
t1 ..J,f is fl'l r...O.J,- -v-a..JL.
,,/
~ j{" ~ '" CI'i*- gyo. iJ ic u"Jee) c:: "-. . ond. (I~) (e)S: C
, ~ ~Cd7c"'- /::;, t)-, [?ay'DJ-PtX 0~'J/ -'-" f)Y~I//1,.h~_..,{,
,,/?~, _ 6..[ t<...- J1{b S h..j7tJJ 'hV{ 2.l1~, 0...0 ff'..esV1}1.,yd1c/ill-
-f1"~ fVi~ ~ f'Ubut-k>af hy ~2/"'2A--d C/YJI)/nc.trJ xtJlcliJ/lU .
~ f}zQI/1& a. ~ ~ ~ S6v)'k. W~d.... w~ WPn~
r '~hd /V~ ~#ch o.Jv r~2--oZ
~v ,~ d:-o t!- /2Mc&:I 0/... ~ ('raYe! cJo-.
~ -~
,. trov,~ ,:\,1,,, ,,,,i ,:.." "'-' Arrd,~ 0/- ~""'7
ciULy IGMlJd '?J'"l0. t-1ofJ- fDQh/.e ~ey
c:k Mv~ ~t' ~ fJo/cY..R J- C It 7 .
/,,; ~ ~ s...J..<-<.J.y ,
!~'2cV/~' c?-fJ &0:~ ~ ++ dio+nbu-Tli'-'~ M
~ lh1: ~~: :;r::::;.pJ- clVl~~ 0Y1 t{lf7~ /Jw2,
n.e,/J
V fr'1j~ ~ 2dd~ s~ _L/4-1 " ~~n.:I-
, .' Sc.AD<YI i.'0Y\~1r '0tp.LMfu':' -/-0 t~/Y/A &ek. c~ &/<rei- r f:((f..&
Y 'jJnaA ;:!:;./::J_!f' -I< '1N M2<Aa.t-- ~ ~ ,,,,dM.:fl
y
~ frbVldL I~~~ I?J?,~~ 4.e. 2v~~ (/IL... r:/?)~c.kc:l
4!f!7' ?>u"AlcUJ;, Pl L~ip~di-, !i()vVYJ<j cN:L ~/~ot/~ ff1tIM~1;
--..-..".. ~ ---~_._---
Comparison of Estimated Sewage FI0W!8
Pre-1lovelopment va. Post development
Motorola Site
ElCir.ting
From David Derek, Senior prgject Manager. Jones-Lans-Las.lle at Motorola:
When factory was operating at full e;lpactty. there were 3500 emplovees spread
over 3 shifts te cover24 hours/day, 7 dayslweek.
For al1lclory, use 25 gp(l per employee per 8 hour.hilt"
Assume .a~h of the 3500 employee5 worKed one 8 hour shift per day, 5 days p.r week
3500 X 517 X 25 gpd =
52500 gpd
Iiotimatad Existing Sowogo Flow (ADF)
Propased
Ofllca - 450,000<1-..1
Use 1S gpd pel' 100 ..1. ofCoorsp.",,-
450.0001100 X 15 gpd = 67500 gpd
Residential- 100 one-bedroom units, 250 2-bedroom units and 150 3--bedroom units
Use 100 gpd for '-b1odroom unils'
100 X 100 gpd = 10000 gpd
Use 200 gpd for 2-bedroom unils"
250 X 200 gpd =
50000 gpd
USIl 300 gpd for 3-bedrOQM uoils"
150X3QOgpd=
45000 gpd
Restaurant - Quality - 10.000 ..f. - ...ume 280 seats
Use 40 gpdlsaat"
280 X 40 gpd = 11200 gpd
IleSllurant - High TUMover - 8,000 s.f.< a..umel10 .eats
Usa 40 gpd/s..l"
170 X 40 gpd = 5800 gild
Restal,lrant- Fast Food - 8,000 $,f. "lISSume 225 seats
Use 40 gpdJ.e.t"
225 X 40 gpd = 9000 gpd
Retail. 20,000+1- s.l.
Use 0.1 gpd per s.l. of80Drop.ce"
20,000 X 0.1 gpd = 2000 gpd
aank - Drive In. 4.500+/- $.f.
Use '5gpd per 100 5.1 of floor spa",,'
45QO/1oo X 15 gpd = 575 gpd
Self Storage -128,000+'. sJ. - aB&Un'\e 370 units
Use 1 gpd per unir"
370 X 1 gpd . 370 gpd
Office space - assume an 800 sJ_ offICe
Use 15 gpd per 100 S.f. of offICe space"
800/100 X 15 god' 120 gpd
Total
202565 gpd
Estlmoted Proposed _98 Flow (AIlF)
'All valll.. ...Ign'" per ""II a'" from Table 1. Department of Heelth CIIap\8r 64E-ll.008 Ill! System SIZe Determinations
e:JdougJdoUQm_c..1s
9/17102
A2065.00AMS
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-200
FROM:
TRC MEMBERS
Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plan Review Analyst
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Huntington, Police Department
H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department
Timothy K. Large, Building Division
Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General
Jeffrey Livergood, Public Works Director- Traffic
John Wildner, Parks Division
Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department
Lusia Galav, Planning Department
~
Michael W. Rumpf'
Director of Plannin an onin9
TO:
DATE:
September 24, 2002
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1ST Review - Development of Regional Impact-Notice of Proposed ehange
Project - Motorola DRI
Location - 1500 Gateway Boulevard
Agent R. Duke Woodson, Ellen Avery-Smith of Maury L.earter & Associates, Inc.
File No. DRIA 02-002
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be made available
via e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on Wednesday. October 2. 2002. When
preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code
sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
other departmental imprm.ements.
Page 2
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRe Member that is responsible for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they
do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project
be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie eoale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-
mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project.
First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee
(TRC) members.
MWR:lg
Attachment
xc: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
John Guidry, Utilities Director
To Be Determined,Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Central File
S:\PlanningISHARED\WPIPROJECTSIMolorola DRI\DRI\TRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc
Revised 1/14/02
,)
,
J?OO/60 0 -PXI,-hflfj
L'IO ODO
I
600 I DOO sr. -f !Lv..)., ~
SO 0 11-+ U iV,-*5"
YDJooo 5D, C01M.~~
-;'0 v i
//10'> 'I5'.1S"'
31-00
~
JfY0 ,53~ ch2nf-G
-" -:- fr~ ?- .df ~ ,
r f "f?2. ,. " 1~-<~~ :t/p-!"1;1v ""'
k
~. _;\'jjt+I'./~ Jh~ L/4.d'fercv> 8j- J.-h~ (~/
, NaAUo7A.R f A/~"~) 7)-.~- J-k-J.j c(~
nDt; ~ddr6.-0 (;.;a~/0()4Q M- /IYlf271.JadvK;y, ~.
" _..', I~L>-e acc~' 7/ rr
IYlI'vIA' fk -#~ !JA-- d- ,It/1-36 Sf,u .
" . J^ c2.,tW.. n~ Cl/t fr:17f/t. ~-' ~ r 0 J;JL-j::./Il' ~
~ -:(bllfd: ~ JU&~J~iz:/;'m.- CAa-d- 1'- .Jr,~-CJ
)~ t'/aP. ~ a~ 'tr ~ 1-fCJ. Or 1'>0+
'/1 0 f {0 &AtvJioJ, .
I G::, Lf~J 000
ThffiL. L bDD duj
3~aC-.
_.---'- -.-.-----..-