The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS 7.B.l CASTANEDA MEDICAL BUILDING SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01-187 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION September 18, 2001 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name/No.. Castaneda Medical Building/NWSP 01-009 Property Owner' Dr Jose Castaneda, High Point LLC Applicant/Agent: Kres Mihelich Location: 250 SE 23rd Avenue Land Use/Zoning: Local Retail CommerciallC-2 (Neighborhood Commercial District) Type of Use: Medical offices Project size: Site Area: 0.52 acres (22,919 square eet) Building Area: 4,992 square feet Adjacent Uses: (see Exhibit "An - Location Map) North - S.E. 23rd Avenue, and farther north Circle K, con>enience store building, zoned C-2; East S.E. 24th Avenue, and farther south a duplex residential development, zoned R-2; S.E. 2nd Street, and farther east the Florida East Coast RailWlY and a vacant undeveloped parcel, zoned C-2; and South - West - Southwest is a single-family residential development, zoned R1-AA, and to the Northv.est, a single-family residential dwelling, zoned C-1 Site Characteristics: The site is a vacant, fiat, triangular-shaped lot, overgrown with grasses but containing no other vegetation of any significance. Proposal: The developer proposes to construct a one (1) story, 4,992 square foot medical office building located on a 0.52-acre lot (see Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan). The proposed building height is sixteen feet (16'-0"), which is below the 25-foot maximum allowed in the C-2 zoning district. Concurrency' a, Traffic- A traffic statement for this project was submitted and sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for their review and approval. Staff has received confirmation from Palm Beach County's Traffic Division regarding standards compliance. b, Drainage- Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review The City's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit Page 2 Castaneda Medical Buildin9 - Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum No. PZ 01-187 Driveways: Parking Facility: Landscaping: Building and Site: review, when more complete engineering documenls are required. On-site traffic circulation will consist of two (2), new driveway entrances providing ingress and egress from S.E. 2nd Street and S.E. 23rd Avenue. The first entrance along S.E. 23rd Avenue is 26 feet wide and provides access to the parking area located to the north of the building. This northern driveway is proposed at approximately 50 feet from an intersection. As this driveway is proposed along a roadway classified greater than a local street, it must be separated from an intersection by not less than 180 feet. Therefore, the comments require the relocation or elimination of the driveway The second entrance is 20 feet wide and is located along the eastern property line (S.E. 2nd Street). A two-way drive aisle provides access to proposed parking areas at the southern portion of the site. A total of 24 spaces are required for the proposed use based on 4,800 gross square feet of office using the ratio of one (1) space per 200 square feet of medical office use. The number of parking spaces provided equals 24 including one (1) space designated for handicap use. Twenty (20) of the proposed parking spaces are located at the southern portion of the site. The remaining four (4) are adjacent to S.E. 23rd Avenue. All spaces, except handicap spaces will be dimensioned nine feet by eighteen feet (9' x 18'). The landscaping of the site will fully meet code requirements when staff comments are incorporated. The foundation plantings around the building are extensive, exceed code requirements and further enhance the site. The development will be provided with the required amount of perimeter and internal landscaping as required in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 7.5 Article II. However, the applicant will provide the required six (6) foot masonry wall at the southwest portion of the site to separate the office use from the adjacent single-family zoning district. Building and site regulations will be fully met when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawngs. Community Design: The proposed Castaneda Medical Building is a simple, contemporary style, rectangular-shaped, one-story structure. The building surface will have stucco walls and will be painted "Champagne" with white doors and recessed windows. The surrounding structures offer a variety of colors ranging from light earth tones to yellow and light shade of gray However, the architectural design will contrast the predominantly single-family architectural character of the area with the following two (2) exceptions: the flat roof and absence of louvered storm shutters. The proposed front fayade will have a single door entry with a covered porch facing S.E. 2nd Street and the building height, as proposed, is below the maximum requirement of25 feet for the C-1 district. Signage: The applicant is proposing to have one (1), four (4) foot high, twelve foot and five inches (12'-5") wide monument sign. The sign dimensions conform to the sign code regulations for commercial nonresidential districts. The monument sign will receive color and texture treatments similar to those ofthe building, with cast aluminum lettering. Page 3 Castaneda Medical Building - Site Plan Review Staff Report Memorandum No. PZ 01-187 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this site plan request be approved, subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for buiiding permit. xc: Central File S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Castaneda Medical Building\NWSP\Staff report NW$P-01-Q09.doc ,- T II :~ \\ \\l~ :~ _ -~~; :L0--\i1~- \" It ~~i' T " !sr'- " ". --='" : ,'" 't-- \.---\ !lI.... ~.~ ., -,lI L.- , i i L'\- \ l!~L.~.,-='r; !: : ' .sa ' ,i"'! ~' ' ':0 __I ~:I ,~ ,m P :... .~ '\1 ; : : ~ .,; ;:. " , ,~ .' ..c"" T' TT " , ,,---" "," .... . , ' . " " .~ -l~~~""ffo.' ~;~ ~ ~~., -- t: ~. ~ .--,- ~ 011"_ m " ~', ' .-1f'JJJ ' " ' ' .. , ; oi", ,: l;;!dI .. e, : !,' , '" .. .. . in"',\, &it .' :...' ..' "'- ~r~_~~J= e -1 ' ~ ,1' ~\\f\i~i~~ ~ :.;;llI; $. / ..: ,- , "1"l'." ' .' ." ~ . 7 ,j ~ e. ,,\t'.. .' " " ~'$" ~lE n.. .," J' -' Il'i c::.,.'" I ::--.." ~. lIT' ! '" \l..~" -l~ ___ H~ :~!'~t~ ~ ...; T ........,. / loli Or 1.-- ~ \ 0::" ~ II T , IT ~ cr? ~2 ~; .t>.-\'''' 'r.., ",,'/ 1 liT ~.". ' ~ ;;0 ,~l ~ "" ~/f\ ,[fIr II 1 1"~li:5 3 ...ec :' r "'3" ,'- l~ III u ~~"'~" :, .... %. 1 r"~ ~r'''''~ ~ .' h, '1::'":'- ~~ T ", .e..-J -1+' .: /:' I---~). T/'" ~ .CJ I' ,. - · ,~, .' ~(' ..' . 7;;:;. ~f' -M-' ~ ,~.:,:'.1- t:f- I r' _ J ~"" - (1-." " 7/ ';J'= "f - rrt. ", 1/. I \ I f:{ '" T . ~~,." or 1 !. ~'I . t' ~ ~ '-J' c ". -- ; . ~~ ~ ~~' T1~i 0 1/6 Ml:ES ' Y)f ~'" ~ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ "-- , ~: tto 400 BOO fE-E-1 ,I ,,,.1,+11 I'.' FU'-"-' -- \..OCA 1,oN MAP castaneda Med\ca\ aund\ng EXH\6\T ..~' 1\ T iI\::'lIml1iTm1T:\\ \' 11 lL 11 'f\--H \n rITlII \ ,\ \ 11--\1 'IT Mil' . -n'1-;' n " ., ._--A pU~ Flec ~ - d 1..---= - -- lI'....- ~- ----- ~- -- REC - ------------------- \ ..... a:l ~~ ~ I E1nN3^V' ~E~ '3'9 ~ ~. < - ~"; .... - I- ~;I I 1'-' ~U ' 1III - ! a:l III , ~ 8J~ I~ hlil :. , - , [I I WlI ! >< II!!~ :~ , ,. , W I , I , ! J~ ~l I 1i~ J; ! i ;ru fj I ! , ~ 9 . , !f , i .~ ! 5 ~ r: 'I "" a I I HI; I ". ,:z '. I I ~ / ~ "' I, I I L ~ ~ ! . I , l1. ~ . ~ ~ -; !I -4-L~ , il ~ ~H l) ! !.. l C , 1 f ~ ~ . ~g~ , , ,; I i Ii , ~ . ~ ~ " r , . "iO I iri ~ ~ .. J l i ~~ hi I .1 , III , , If U, ! ~~ =.~ (,,_s~ ~~i li ~~ ~ ~"a-l.@ ," , I ~~ ~~~~~~~ r B (_ , I ! ! 'Ill "I ii:m! Il 1--' I Ii - ----=~~-:Jt;;=~---~:=i- ---- ! ,i ~ . .... ~! " I;; 5 i I ~l -. "IJ ~i ! 2 : ~ ~~ -------------'11---- '--...., I I <I)' .I ~ - f'. a III { I I R! ~ i 2 ~I ii it il ~~ < I i;. ! I liE I 11 iii! ~ ,I iI~UIU~11 ih! ~ Ii <l)r t ii , ,. ! ~ ~ ! ~ :a; . nlllluiii II ~~ 1 1 , , , ! I I . ,. I, ! I l I i "II I !illl i v I !iiI! . l . j~ 11M Ii ~. I ~ ! ~Iil .. , I i i ~I~f , I"' ~ ~ I ~bl'! . ~. I ! , III ~ ! li~M ! I , iil ! ==::1 0 < Ilpi ! I II ..J , u hl,!11 1IllIl II , - Z } w M Il ]~d~'111 'l~" ~! II w .. ~ .., 11111 il'! ~ II Ii! ... J.E1~9 HJ.Y~ '3'9'" ,!II ; ~; 0 ! i 11!!!~l_. 1,1 ~II 1!I,m~~~ ~---_._---~~- ---,..~ - en - I- - en - I >< W , , 1 , , 1 1-' /u' /!/ 11)' '2/ "', ::1/ , 1 , , 1 " ; I dlil !III Ihl! UIoI ~~ I Q" ' NT , 1 , , 1 , 'f. E11lN3^V' ~e:~ 03"9 't , , - . 1 .~~: I hW !U .. J.E1:Rll9 HJ.t'~ -3"9'\ \ I, 1 o~,' ~n '\/ ~~h : 1 , , 1 , , 1 , , 1 t f t ! I J i t ! 1 .t ~~ I ~ ~ , q ; ~ e rf I I i Id ,~ " . ~ ~ ~ ~ 1m! ~[' ~ ! ~gl , ~. ~ W.o I' p.,ll.~ :w - i ~ Ll: ~i ~ I ~i ~~~ ~ I n !.;;;-h .@~ I ~~ i~~~~!~ 'I; ;I~ ~ , I mm! ; i f~ ,. ~ ~ 3~ I ~ ~ ~ \>\> ~ - ~.. ~ ~ . M ii U l ~~ ~ ! ililllUiiqi J ; :!; ~ nnih~id I~ Ii Id II ~ i ~ Mli! .' ==. lli i~h ... ~ "~l' , . "I 8 ; nil I !'I ; ;1 .... I ..:l , IIII ~ 'J~ j~ P'!l li-5.. -t J, fll! -. [ lJi'1 I:! 'I :1 :l ~ I III I i- 1.1 I ~J I I I ! I I,! II '-1111 if !ljll'lil dJ Ii ii I!hl~~.. - - CD - - I- - CD - I X W ;';'~-:'::':".. ~-;;~.::;;.;:: 'W-' J __ -_ ....."--. ,_ H' ~I..p 6!ltwtld ..IIi:;lr\"p" 1;lelJLp~11-.aW ".1)1 .: t- r- I I ~~r.CJ r oJ(J 'XlJ I>>~Jd ~ 1:1H3r3&' NOJN),OIl '37a4Y 011&& n1 on II _.1M: .. .hRII ~ i ...:-<<; ~ ~ ." 0 g f de! >> ~ Z ~~ ~~ .,.Z: Z <:[ J , @E ~ ~ 20'" ~~ ~~ <" ~ ~i ~ , UE 2 3 U l~ .Z "' f Q::! i~ ~H . ~I ~~~ ~ ~.I ~~! ~ II U! j~ B .. H U H " --------, 41012: -- . """"',,~ -_fllll...",.. --- 0 0 I " I B I E B B E B 0 ! 0 I EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Castaneda Medical Building File number NWSP 01-009 R Ii N S' PI 'h d f e erence: ew lte ans WIt a ate stamp 0 AUl!Ust 28, 200 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS Comments: None UTILITIES Comments: I No utility plan was included with this submittal; therefore the Utilities Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However, since this proposal is located where utility support is available, we are providing only a cursory review on the plan submittal. It is normally required that utility services be shown in order to assure that potential conflict with other utilities and/or landscaping are avoided. Provide the service locations to the respective buildings. 2. Fire flow calculation will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement imposed by the insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a)). The Fire Department flow test indicates that only 714 g.p.m. is available to the site. It will be required to add another fire hydrant on the six-inch line to get close to the 1,500 g.p.m. requirement. This can be coordinated with the Utilities Department upon submittal of the detailed utilities plants). FIRE Comments: None POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 3 Add a note to the Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). 4 Applicant to add note" plug or remove any existing pipe attached to catch basin to be removed." Conditions of Approval 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DNISION Comments: 5 At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City unity of title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions of each property that is being unified will be required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 6. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: None PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 7 Submit colored elevations of all sides of the building and sign prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting. (ChA, Sec.7, Par.D.2.). 8. Submit a color sample of all major exterior finishes. Each color sample shall be labeled by name, color code and manufacturer. 9 The site plan must contain the designated Official Land Use of the adjacent properties. 10. Correct site plan label for the road to the south to N.E. 24th Ave. II The parking lot driveway entrance along the northern property line shall be constructed at least one hundred eight (180) feet from an intersection along collector streets or those of a higher classification. (LDR Chapter 23, Art. II H.3). Move driveway to meet minimum separation requirement, request and receive a variance for the minimum relief necessary to maintain driveway on north side of property, or remove the driveway and related parking spaces (removing parking spaces would either require increasing parking spaces in the rear of proiect or reduction in building size to offset DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT parking reduction). ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 1 To be determined. ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 1 To be determined. S:IPlanning\SHAREDWIII'\PROJECTSICaslaneda Med. Bldg,. High Point LLCICondition ofApproval.doc DEVELOPME~- ORDER OF THE CITY COMMISS'-'Il OF THE cn I OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA. PROJECT NAME. Castaneda Medical Building/NWSP 01-009 APPLICANT'S AGENT Kres Mihelich APPLICANT'S ADDRESS. 232 Sandal Lane DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: October 2,2001 TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT Request approval to construcl a 4,800 square-fool medical office on a o 52-acre parcel. LOCATION OF PROPERTY 250 SE 23rd Avenue DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "A", "B", and "C" ATTACHED HERETO THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows: OR THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and the public finds as follows: 1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. 2. The Applicant HAS HAS NOT established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested. 3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included" 4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby _ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof. DENIED 5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk. 6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of this order 7 Other DATED' City Clerk S:\Planning\SHAREDlWPIPROJECTS\Castaneda Med. Bldg" High Point LLC\Develop.OrderCastaneda Medical Bldg,NWSP 01,009.doc : KRES MIHELICh ARCHITECT + Architecture + hanning +Design Date August 22,2001 To: City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division Lusia Galav, Principal Planner reo Castaneda Medical Office Building Site Plan NWSP 01-009 Response to T R.C, 1st Review Comments Utilities 1 Detailed civil engineering construction documents for site water and sewer will be provided with building permit application. 2. All utility easements (there is one easement) are shown on the submitted site plan and landscaping plan. No trees are indicated in the existing utility easement. No trees currently exist nor are trees proposed for the future in the existing utility easement. 3 Acknowledged. 4 Acknowledged. 5 Acknowledged 6 Irrigation system will utilize its own water well. 7 All points of the building are less than 200' from the existing fire hydrant located at SE 2nd Ave. shown on the site plan submitted for review Farthest point is 180' from existing hydrant. 8 Backflow preventers will be provided on the office water service to the building The building will not be sprinklered. Detailed civil engineering construction documents for site water will be provided with building permit application. Fire 9 Acknowledged ~7--"'.'" ~ 1 i' ! ~ 001 '~2; I ' -_.~.. ''''-''1 ~ !f" '''-'.-1' ,'," ': I 'I Il~il , KRES MIHELICH ARCHITECT. AR 10560 . Architecture. Planning. Design 232 Sandal Lane Palm Beach Shores, FL 33404-5727 Page2of5 10 All points of the building are less than 200' from the existing fire hydrant located at SE 2nd Ave This hydrant is shown on the site plan submitted for review Farthest point of building is 180' from existing hydrant. 11 All points of the building are less than 200' from the existing fire hydrant located at SE 2nd Ave This hydrant is shown on the site plan submitted for review No additional hydrants are required to satisfy fire protection for this project. 12. Existing main is 6" diameter 13 Flow test is provided Flow is 3500 g.p.m at 20 p.s.i. 14 Flow test is provided. 15 Existing fire hydrant located at SE 2nd Ave This hydrant is shown on the site plan submitted for review It is located within the existing street right-of-way and has 5' clear zone. 16 All roads and hydrants are currently existing and shown on the site plan submitted for review Engineering 17 Drawings revised per comment. 18 Drawings revised per comment. 19 Certification is attached. 20 Certification is attached Detailed civil engineering construction documents for site drainage will be provided with building permit application and will contain the required engineer's certification. 21 Detailed civil engineering construction documents for site drainage will be provided with building permit application and will contain the required typical swale section. 22. Drawings revised per comment. 23 Drawings revised per comment. 24 Drawings revised per comment. 25 Drawings revised per comment. 26. Drawings revised per comment. 27 A detailed photometric plan is provided 28 A detailed photometric plan is provided 29 Site data revised, information provided on drawings. 30 The accessible route on the submitted site plan has been further indicated with an additional note. No change to the design 31 Drawings revised per comment. Page30f5 32. Drawings revised per comment. 33 Drawings revised per comment. 34 Site Plan and Civil drawings revised per comment. 35 Paving & Drainage plan revised per comment. 36 Note added to Site Plan dumpster (see dumpster enclosure detail) 37 Site Plan revised per comment. 38 Site Plan and Paving & Drainage Plan revised per comment. 39 Spelling corrected 40 Orientation corrected 41 Catch basin is abandoned, note indicates removal. 42. No imported fill is required 43 Dumpster relocated; good suggestion. Building 44 The use of both halves of the building will be medical office. No change to parking requirement has been made 45 The accessible route on the submitted site plan has been further indicated with an additional note identifying the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to the building No change to the design. 46 The accessible main entrance door route on the submitted floor plan has been further indicated with an additional note identifying it as a handicap accessible entrance door No change to the design Main entrance door on the submitted floor plan corresponds with main entrance door in the submitted site plan. 47 Accessible route from accessible parking space to accessible front door is indicated with an accessibility symbol. Note is added to the Site Plan. There are 24 parking stalls total (23 perpendicular + 1 parallel) 48 Note is added to the Site Plan. 49 Note is added to the Site Plan. 50 51 Accessible entrance doors are indicated in submitted Floor Plan. "Conceptual Floor Plan" note is added. Elevation views are included in the submitted drawings. Overall height from finish grade to highest point of parapet wall is included in the submitted drawings. Note added per comment. Note added to floor plan drawing. Dimensions added to Site Plan per comment. 52. 53 54 . Page4of5 55 Acknowledged. 56 Acknowledged 57 Extent of work is within property lines except driveways and required construction of sidewalk in R.O W Parks & Recreation 58 No right-of-way landscape improvements are required There is no existing irrigation in right-of-way Forester I Environmentalist 59 There are no existing trees on the site. Planning & Zoning 60 Site Plan revised per comment. 61 Acknowledged 62. Acknowledged 63 A 6000 square foot restaurant formerly existing on the site will be replaced by a 4800 square foot medical office building, resulting in a net reduction of traffic generated by the project. A statement from Palm Beach County Traffic Division will be provided. 64 Medical office use does not require the "receipt or distribution by vehicle of materials or merchandise" (LDR Chap 2 Section II.J ) therefore there is no requirement for a loading area. Note is added to site plan. 65 Details are provided on revised Parking and Drainage drawing. 66 Parking stall numbers added to Site Plan per comment. 67 See East Elevation. Sign is incorporated into landscape wall. 68 Sight triangle is indicated on Site Plan per comment. 69 Note is added to Landscape Plan per comment. 70 Stall cannot be moved south, since it would encroach into the required 7'-0" landscape buffer Stop signs are provided 71 The handicapped accessible parking stall is labeled on our drawings using a standard graphic symbol. The symbol is not a literal depiction of a painted sign and therefore not necessarily drawn to scale. Rather it is a representational symbol indicating that all the parking space markers, including sign stenciled on pavement, post- or wall-mounted sign, blue colored striping and any other indications that may be necessary according to code to fully identify the handicapped parking space as such. Caution. do not scale symbols. No change to drawings. , . Page5of5 72. 73. 74 75 76 Landscape plan is corrected. Data are corrected Note is added to landscape drawings. Landscape drawings are corrected. Adjacent property land use is added. Kres Mihelich, Architect AR10560 KM:tt. \21Q16 O~partmel\t of Engineering and PubU~ Works PO. 80x :1..9 West Palm aeach, PL 33416.1 Z:!9 (56\) 684 -4000 w\VW.Fbc~ov.ccm . ?alm Beach county Board of County Commis. ioners Wat'te'!"l H. :-:e.wdl, Chalrman Carol A. RobertS, Vice ChaIr Kar~n T. Marcus Mary McCarty iI'_ " ~_ r Burt ~ar'Jnson Tony i\.t2511nrti Addle t. :reene Couney Administrator Roten: \\dsma" ~Arl Equal IJ}"P",(umty ~//frrt1(Jrf'lft ol,com~ El'I1p!ov/?r ENGINEERlN', TR",F"~.' F'HGE 0._; e~ I August22,2001 ,I -I Mr Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach PO. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE: 23rd Avenue Medical Offices TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr Rumpf: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for this project, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Pair;: Beach County Land Development Code. This project is summarizec as fOllcws, Location: Municipality: Existing Uses: Proposed Uses: New Daily Trips: Bulld-out Year: 250 SE 23rd Avenue Boynton Beach None 4,800 SF Medical Offices 156 @ 5% Pass-by 2002 Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the prOject meets ine Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County If you have any questions regarding this determination, piease con:act me at 684-4030. ..' Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER cc: Kr.. Mihelich Architect Fil", General- TPS ' Mun ' Traffic Study Review F.\TRAFFIClmalAdmin'ApprovaIsI010814.doe . ~~F~R~ FLOW TEST Request Date: 8/16/01 Company' Kres Mihelich Architect Requested From: Kres Mihelich 232 Sandal Lane Telephone Number' 561-845-6303 Palm Bch Shores, FL 33404 Facsimile Number' 561-842-3857 Location SE 23rd Avenue & SE 2nd Street * DIAGRAM * (Include direction, street names, hydrant locations, intersections and main sizes) i SE 23rd AVENUE S E H#6 2nd N S T R E E T H#O 26th AVENUE Hydrant 1 Hydrant 2: Static Reading Flow Reading: 52 psi 18 psi = 714 gpm Residual Reading' 50 psi Assign Date. 8/18/01 Test Date: 8/18/01 Tested By' FF III Woznick Time Tested. 09:30 hours AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL. 3,200 gpm . KRES MIHELICH, INC. Architecture. Planning. Design LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL 10 C/1'C( v; 00t(~1J ~t+ __~-\..ll,J I tJb f wbl-JAJf~ Id.V. DATE ~ 1..8 / wI JOB NO. '2-1 a ((p ATTENTION ~,f; i~ b~ P f'(hJ~ RE ~~ M-fi)\l"A'T / ~(D<';; -N WSp 01 -~ WE ARE SENDING YOU K Attoched ~ Vio ~D DeL.'IJ~ D Shop drawings D Copy of letter f Prints D Change order D Originol drawings D Samples D Specifica~ons D CVS 10 10 (0 D THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below, D For opproval o For your use )< As requested o For review and comment D Returned for corrections o Resubmit ~ copies for review D Submit _ copies for distribution D Return _ corrected prints D For your signature D D FOR BIDS DUE D COPYlD ~ D SIGNED, p~ ' 232 Sandal Lane the following items DATE NO. DESCRIPTION I , . , ,1L-0 ~(,{~ eo,py ~ "5 ~ REMARKS 19 D PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US If enclasures are not as noted, kindly notify us at once. Palm Beach Shores FL 33404-5727 ' ,.... . Singer Island, FL . 33404-4720 . (581) 845-8303 . Fax (581) 842.3857 From: Sent: To: Subject: Livergood, Jeffrey Friday, August 03, 2001 4:51 PM Galav, Lusia Lots of stuff /' ,/ot.lk :frl;' <Iv- !Jvle:u- {Jumrw& OMk(l.PjrA- Galav, Lusia Lusia, I was swamped this week. I will not be at TRC next Tuesday I have to take a few days to do the last family thin9s before school starts. I did not get a chance to send a formal response to Castaneda plans. Suffice it to say I have no traffic related comments. Please know I looked at the plans but don't have time to formalize my review Also, I looked at the second review plan for the new grade school. Although they did not address all my comments, they did improve the plans somewhat. I would still prefer that the crosswalk at Hypoluxo be moved south. Jeff Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E. Director of Public Works City of 6cynton Beach 1 DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES MEMORANDUM NO. 01-181 TO' Michael W Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning John A. Guidry, Utilities Directo~ ' H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, Utility Engineer&"# THRU FROM. DATE. July 30, 2001 RE. CASTANEDA MEDICAL BUILDING NWSP 01-009 _1st REVIEW We offer the following comments on the above noted project: NO PLAN SUBMITTAL COMMENT 1) No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore the Utilities Department considers this plan incomplete as submitted. However, since this proposal is located where utility support is available, we are providing only a cursory review on the plan submittal. GENERAL COMMENTS 2) All utility easements shall be shown on the rectified site plan and landscaping drawings so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 give public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way 3) Palm Beach County Health Department permits mav be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE Sec. 26-12). 4) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. at stated in LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by the insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a)). 5) CODE Sec. 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 6) Comprehensive Plan Policy 3 C.3 4 requires the conservation of potable water City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 7) LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. 8) Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the office water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with CODE Sec. 26-207 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. PO Box310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS For review of' NWSP 01-009 1st review-fire Project Name or Address: Castaneda Medical Bldg. 250 SE 23 Avenue Reviewed by' //. ?-- Rodaer Kemmer. Fire Plans Examiner/Fire ~ Insoector Department: Fire and Life Safetv Trade: Fire Deoartment Phone. (561) 742-6753 Comments to: Sherie Coale bv email on 7/24/01 CODE REQUIREMENTS Compliance with NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, and city ordinances is required. 1) Maximum distance allowed between hydrants is three hundred feet (300'). (LOR Chapter 6 section 16) 2) No part of the structure may be more than two hundred feet (200') from a hydrant. (LOR Chapter 6 section 16) 3) Six-inch (6") minimum main size is required and must be shown. (LOR Chapter 6 section 16) 4) 1,500 GPM fire flow is required (LOR Chapter 6 section 16). 5) A fire flow test is required prior to construction. (City Ord. 9-3F) 6) Five-foot (5') clear zone required around a hydrant. (City Ord. 9-23 A) 7) Roads and hydrants must be in place prior to any construction above grade. (NFPA 241 (1966) Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, sections 5-4.3 and 6-7.2.2. cc: S Gale, Fire Marshal B. Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 01-141 TO' Michael W Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning FROM. Laurinda Logan, P.E., Civil Engineer DATE. July 31, 2001 RE. Castaneda Medical Building New Site Plan Review Comments - Ist Review File No. NWSP 01-009 I have reviewed the above referenced Site Plans, forwarded to me on July 23,2001, against the Site Plan Review requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are my comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced: Code and Land Development Regulation Requirements 1 Show all existing utilities on Site Characteristics Map (Survey) and Site Development plan (LDR, Chapter 4, Section A.3). Catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.f). 2. Show holes and metal sleeves set in pavement for securing gates in the open and closed positions for dumpster enclosure area (City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawing A-88007). 3 Provide an engineer's certification attached to the front of the plans and on the Drainage Plan as specified in the LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 4 Provide a statement on the plans showing that the containment capacity of the drainage system shall contain the first 2\1, inches of storm water on the site per LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section F 5 Provide a typical swale section in conformance with City Standard Drawing B-98002. 6. Correct the dumpster detail to shown a clear, unobstructed interior width of 10 foot for the dumpster enclosure (per City Standard Drawing A-88007). 7 Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P). J:\SHRDA T A\Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Castaneda Medical Building.doc Page I 00 8. Add a note to the Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Indicate sight triangles graphically on Landscape plan. Sight triangle requirements must be met at all points of ingress and egress, as well at all intersections (only sight triangle shown on Sheet L-I is at the intersection of SE 23rd Ave. with SE 2nd Street). 9 On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. All markings, signage and striping shall conform to City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 10. Provide lighting information as specified in the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.I.a. II Provide lighting for front and rear sidewalks between parking lot and building (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.l.b). 12. Provide flood zone elevations, finish floor elevations, and certifications as specified in the LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.D I and Chapter 20, Article VII, Section 2.C. 13 Provide an accessible route from the public sidewalk to the front entrance per the Florida Accessibility Code. Align, if possible, with the 5 foot handicap accessible path. Recommendations/Corrections I Indicate what standards are to be used for asphalt and concrete work. Also indicate, if used, which edition of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they incorporate both English and Metric units. 2. Please provide details for sidewalk, curb & gutter, curb stops, etc. 3 Indicate, by note, what type curb & gutter is being used around the perimeter of the parking area. Indicate, by note, to what standards and specifications curb & gutter is being constructed to. 4 At the Handicap Stall (on Site and Paving & Drainage plans) show the sidewalk at the same elevation as the five foot accessible path. If necessary provide a I 12 ramp to sidewalk (FL Accessibility Code 4.6.3). 5 Handicap pavement symbol (per City Standard Drawings B-9800 I) should be 5' x 5', not 7' x 7' (as scaled from Sheet PD-I). 6. By note, indicate that trash enclosure and stucco wall on west side of building will match building finish. J :\SHRDA T A\Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Castaneda Medical Building.doc Page 2of3 7 Indicate parking stall dimensions on the north side of the building and the west side of the south parking lot. 8. Add curb stops at west parking spaces in north parking area. 9 Correct spelling of "Length" on notes for Delta, radius, tangent and arc length dimensions. 10. Correct reversed note on Sheet SL-l ("New Light Pole Typ." west side of parking lot). 11 The survey indicates a 3 foot diameter catch basin 23 feet north of the south property line. What is the disposition of this structure? 12. If fill is imported, an excavation/fill permit will be required through the Building Division. 13 Consider relocating the dumpster to the south end of the parking lot to allow the truck to back up within the parking lot for turn around purposes and not into the ingress driveway 14 Since the use of one half of the building is unknown and it may be used for medical purposes, it is recommended that a second handicap stall be incorporated in the plan. Site parking requires only one handicap space for the required 24 spaces; however, if 25 spaces are required, two handicap spaces would be required. J :\SHRDA T A \Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Castaneda Medical Building.doc Page 3 of3 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO, 01-163 TO' Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director FROM. Timothy K. Large, Building Code Administrator DATE. July 31, 2001 RE: Castaneda Medical Building (NWSP 01-009) - 1 st review comments We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits. Buildinl! Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larl!e (561) 742-6352 1 Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to the building. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4 1.2, 4.3 2. On the floor plan drawing, add a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to the building. The location of the door shall match the location of the accessible entrance door that is depicted on the site plan drawing. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4 1.2, 4.3 3 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance door to the building. The symbol shall start at the accessible parking space and terminate at the accessible entrance door to the building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings that are required to be installed along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. Sheet A-I, Site Data calls out twenty-four parking spaces to be provided and only twenty-three are shown on the plan. The number ofrequired accessible parking spaces shall comply with Section 41.2 (5) (d) (i) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Memo to Michael Rumpf July 31,2001 RE. Castaneda Medical Building (NWSP 01-009) - 1st review comments Page 2 of 3 Pages 4 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues [Section 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code] a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _ _ NGVD is above the highest 1 OO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations." b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings floor plan. 5 On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the property line. 6. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 ofthe Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheets A-2. However, add to the floor plan drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance door to the building. The location of the door shall match the location of the accessible entrance door that is depicted on the site plan drawing. 7 As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit elevation view drawings of the building. Dimension on the drawing the overall height of the building. The overall height of a building shall be measured from finish grade to the highest point of the roof or parapet wall. The overall height of the building shall not exceed the height limitations of the Zoning Code. 8. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the wall openings and wall construction comply with Table 600 of the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code. 9 On all floor plan drawings, indicate within the footprint of the building the number of stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines. 10 Identify on the site plan drawing the actual distance that the building is set back from the north, east, south and west property lines. Please note that overhangs, covered walkways, canopies, awnings or other appurtenances that are attached to the building shall be considered when identifying building setbacks. Therefore, identify the width of the proposed overhangs, covered walkways, canopies, awnings, and/or other roofed areas that extend out beyond the main walls of the building. The building setbacks shall Memo to Michael Rumpf July 31, 2001 RE. Castaneda Medical Building (NWSP 01-009) - I st review comments Page 3 of3 Pages comply with setback regulations specified in the Zoning Code. II At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City unity of title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions of each property that is being unified is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 12. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 13 Add to all plan view drawings ofthe site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. rs J:\SHRDA TA\Development\Building Div\Documents\TRC\NWSP 01~OO9 1st review Castaneda Medical Bldg.doc LEISURE SERVICES: PARKS MEMORANDUM #01-76 TO' Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning THRU' John Wildner, Parks Director Barbara J. Meacham, Land pe Architectt9Jz1 RE, Castaneda Medical Bldg. FROM: Date July 27,2001 1 Submit detailed irrigation plans for required right-of-way landscape improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for review and approval by the Parks Division staff Include on the plan location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To. Lusia Galav, Principal Planner From: Kevin J Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Castaneda Medical Building NWSP # 01-009 I st Review Date: August 1,2001 The applicant should indicate on the landscape plans ifthere are any existing desirable trees that will be; 1 preserved, 2. relocated on site or 3 removed and replaced on the site. The project should continue in the normal review process. Kjh File "-~ Castaneda Medical Building Planning & Zoning 1 sl Review Comments On the site plan please provide a location map showing the geographical area of the propose project. Submit colored elevations of all sides of the building and sign prior to the Planning and Development Board meeting. (Ch.4, Sec.7, Par.D.2.). Submit color samples of all major exterior finish. Each color sample shall be label by name, color code and manufacturer. Provide written confirmation from Palm Beach County's Traffic Division that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards. Identify and label the off-street loading area on the site plan. (LDR Chap. 2 Section 1l.J) Provide a standard parking space detail showing all dimensions in accordance with drawing No. B-90012. On the site plan label the number of parking stalls in the parking lot. Provide details of freestanding project sign showing height, sign face dimensions, proposed colors and materials. (Ch. 21, Signs) Indicate 10 foot site triangles at both entranceways (Chap. 7.5, Art. II, Sec. s.H.1 ). On the landscape plan, provide a note stating that mulch other than cypress shall be used for landscaping purposes. Staff recommends that the parking stall adjacent to the entrance on SE 2nd Street could create a traffic conflict, please shift the stall further south and place a stop sign to alleviate any confusion in the vehicular area. Please label and identify appropriately the parking stall adjacent to the entrance on SE 2nd Street. On the landscape plan, correct the "5-SP" symbol so that it reads "3-SP" in order to match the tabular data. The tabular data on the Landscape Plan regarding the Red Tip Cocoplum does not match the graphic. Correct this discrepancy between the two so that they match. DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO, PZ 01-153 TO' TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist James Predtinari, Police Department H. David Kelley Jr , Utilities Department Timothy K. Large, Building Division Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic Barbara Meacham, Parks Division Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department FROM: Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning DATE. July23, 2001 SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES RE. 1 ST Review - New Site Plan Project - Castaneda Medical Bldg. Location - 250 SE 23 Avenue Agent Kres Mihelich File No. NWSP 01-009 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments or e-mail to Sherie Coale no later than 5:00 P,M. on. Auaust 1. 2001, When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental impro...ements. Page 2 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible 1br the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e- mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. MWR:lg Attachment xc: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Department John Guidry, Utilities Director and Interim Director of Engineering Don Johnson, Building Division Central File S:\PlanningISHARED\WP\PROJECTSICastaneda Med. Bldg., High Poinl LlCITRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc Revised 5-22-01