REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-164
TO:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
Michael W Rump(l0f---
Planning and Zoning Director
THRU:
FROM:
Eric Lee Johnson
Planner
~
DATE: August 8, 2002
SUBJECT: M&L Roofing (MSMP 02-003 )
Review Status Following Tabling of Project
This memorandum serves to summarize the status of the review of the above-referenced project,
following the last tabling of the review by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board. This
memorandum is to supplement the attached staff report (Memorandum No. PZ 02-105) and
Conditions of Approval which still apply to the review of this project.
This project has been tabled twice by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board. At the last
Board meeting, the applicant and Board members discussed various design issues. By a 6 to I vote,
the project was tabled to return to the CRA on August 13, 2002. The issues discussed at the July 9,
2002 CRA meeting are outlined as follows:
1 Eliminate condition # 11, which read "prior to the issuance of a building permit, the project must
receive approval from the Palm Beach County Traffic Division that it meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County",
2. The Board recommends further analysis of the placement of the "parking space" dedicated to
emergency vehicle turnaround. If endorsed by the City Fire Department, the Board recommends
relocating the emergency vehicle turnaround area eastward to the end of the row of parking
spaces (to be located at the space currently labeled #22).
3. The Board requests that the applicant provide a color chip to staff of the Planning & Zoning
Division for the proposed building paint color and, if possible, a visual representation (color
rendering) of the color that matches the paint chip.
4 The Board requests that the applicant provide a mansard roof on the north elevation and to the
west elevation (of the building addition) to match the existing building.
For a complete analysis of the major site plan modification request, see the attached staff report
(Memorandum PZ No. 02-105). The analysis below is a summary of staff's findings regarding
the Board's recommendations.
Page 2
Development Department Memorandum No. PZ 02-164
MSPM 02-003
Analvsis of Board's Recommendations:
The project meets the traffic performance standards of Palm Beach County and therefore; the
original Condition of Approval #11 is eliminated. As directed, staff reviewed the placement of
the "parking space" dedicated to emergency vehicle turnaround. Staff determined that the current
location of the emergency vehicle turnaround area is currently proposed in its optimum location.
The Fire Department would not support relocating the turnaround area to the parking space
currently labeled as #22. Regarding project colors and roof design changes, at the time when this
memorandum was written, the applicant neither submitted revised elevations showing a mansard
roof nor provided color swatches that accurately reflect the true proposed and existing building
colors.
Since the space dedicated to emergency vehicle turnaround area is located in its optimal location,
and since the plan meets all other applicable code requirements, staff recommends approval of
this modification request, subject to satisfying all Conditions of Approval, including submitting
evidence of the actual building colors, and revised elevation drawings for the Board's review
However, staff would support further tabling of this item if, at the August 13th hearing, the
applicant fails to present the requested revised elevations and colored rendering and swatches.
xc: Central File
S:\Plunning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSIM&L Roofing\StaffReport2.DOC
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-105
SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSION
May 30. 2002
JESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
?roject Name/No.. M&L Roofing / MSPM 02-003
'roperty Owner' Mel Lowe
~gent: Riza N. Altan, P.E./ Turquoise Incorporated
_ocation: 630 Industrial Avenue
_and Use: Industrial (I)
~oning: Light Industrial (M-1)
'roject size:
~djacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
'roposal:
Site Area:
Lot Coverage.
Existing building:
Proposed buildinq:
Total building area:
27,930 square feet (0.64 acres)
10,558 square feet (37.8%)
2,275 square feet
8.283 square feet
10,558 square feet
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Developed property (Ridgeway Plumbing) with a Industrial (I) land use designation and
zoned Light Industrial (M-1);
Developed property (Migano Landscaping) with a Industrial (I) land use designation and
zoned Light Industrial (M-1);
C.S.X. Railroad right-of-way, farther east is Interstate 95 right-of-way;
Industrial Avenue right-of-way, farther west is developed property (V'larehouse) with a
Industrial (I) land use designation and zoned Light Industrial (I).
Mel Lowe proposes to construct a one-story 8,283 square foot addition to an existing
2,275 square foot one-story warehouse building for a total of 10,558 square feet. The
new addition will be used for warehouse area. Warehouses are permitted uses in the M-
1 zoning district.
me Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped lot located on the east side of Industrial
Avenue. Currently, the western third (1/3) of the subject lot is developed with a building
and its respective parking area. The original building is 2,275 square feet in area and
was built in 1984 According to City records, the business is currently licensed as a
contractor The eastern two-third (213) of the lot is undeveloped and contains overgrown
vegetation. The ex1erior portions of the property are used for the storage of large
amounts of mechanical equipment (strewn across the lot), work trucks, and
miscellaneous debris. According to the survey, the highest elevation is 17.2 feet above
sea level, located towards the rear (east) of the vacant portion of the lot.
;oncurrency'
a. Traffic-
A traffic impact study for this project was submitted and sent to the Palm Beach
Page 2
M&L Roofing - Major Site Plan Modification Staff Report
vlemorandum No. PZ 02-105
County Traffic Division for their review and approval. The Palm Beach County
Traffic Division has not yet determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County This determination will be
required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the addition (see Exhibit "C"
- Conditions of Approval)
b. Drainage - Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review The plan wiil
inoorporate the use of a French Drain system. The City's concurrency ordinance
requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering
Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be
deferred until time of permit review, when more complete engineering documents
are required.
Driveways: This project will use the existing main access point off of Industrial Avenue. This point of
ingress / egress will remain intact at 25 feet in width. Also, all existing landscape material
will remain in its current condition. Where necessary, all landscape material located
within the safe-sight triangles will be cleared, removed, or trimmed according to City
standards so that the triangles provide unobstructed cross-visibility Any additional or
required signage or striping (stop bar / arrows) at this entranceway will be prepared
according to code requirements.
Parking Facility.
.andscaping:
According to the plan, seven (7) parking spaces currently exist at the western portion of
the property near Industrial Avenue. Parking required for the projec1 is based on a ratio
of one (1) parking space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, which is the minimum
required for manufacturing uses. Since 10,558 square feet are proposed (2,275 square
feet of existing space plus the 8,283 square foot building addition), a total of 22 parking
spaces are required. Of the 22 parking spaces that will be provided, one (1) space is
designated for handicap use. All existing and proposed parking spaces will be 90
degrees. They will be dimensioned nine (9) feet in width by 18 feet in length, except for
the handicap spaces, which will be 12 feet in width (with 5 feet of striping) by 18 feet in
length. Since the project is within the Community Redevelopment Agency (eRA)
boundaries, the backup distance for the new parking spaces may be reduced from 27
feet to 24 feet in width (over 41 feet will be provided). The plan could have provided
more spaces but instead, proposes two (2) more interior landscaped islands, in part,
because Public Works determined that no dumpster would be required for the project as
proposed. However, a space within the proposed row of parking has been designated as
reserved for the fire vehicle turn-around area. This element of the plan has been
endorsed and approved by the City Fire Department. This space was not included in the
proposed number of parking spaces. A chain link fence runs along the perimeter of the
property A security chain link gate is proposed at the front entrance. This gate will have
an electronic key pad. The key pad will have 4 or 5 numbers only and the entry code wiil
be approved in advance by the Fire Marshall. If the power fails, the gates will
automatically open and remain open. The rolling chain link gate and fence shall comply
with Chapter 2, Section 4.J. of the Land Development Reguations.
The width of the existing west landscape buffer adjacent to the Industrial Road right-of-
way complies with current landscape code. This landscape buffer currently contains
mature trees and overgrown hedges. The Mahogany trees will count toward meeting the
minimum number of trees on-site. As previously stated, the landscape material in this
buffer will be undisturbed unless the proposed improvements require its alteration.
::lage 3
\I1&L Roofing - Major Site Plan Modification Staff Report
Jlemorandum No. PZ 02-105
The north landscape buffer (abutting industrial zoned property) will be two (2) feet - six
(6) inches in width. This buffer will contain the existing shrubs at the western portion of
the property but proposes Redtip Cocoplum hedges immediately where the
improvements begin. Two (2) Oahoon Holly trees are proposed in the interior landscape
islands and a cluster of Sabal palm trees are proposed just north of the westernmost part
of the building expansion. The M-1 zoning distriot has no side setback. The existing
building is currently two (2) feet from the side (southern) property line. The proposed
building expansion will extend from the existing building at the same setback along the
southern property line. No landscape buffer is proposed along the southern property
line, which is not required where there is no vehicular use area. The east buffer (rear)
property line will contain only a row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges as it is not wide enough
to accommodate shade trees.
Building / Site: Similar to the existing building, the proposed addition will be one-story high. The
maximum height allowed for new buildings or additions in the M-1 zoning district is 45
feet or 4 stories. The top of the wall for the proposed addition will be 19 feet - six (6)
inches in height, which will match the existing building height. The north side of the
building addition will have six (6) overhead bay doors. At this time, the intent of the
project is to construct the building addition as a shell with no provision for subdividing into
condominiums or leasing out to individual tenants. The appiicant understands that
converting the building to this type of facility (individual tenants) wouid necessitate
another site plan review During that review process, the site would need to be upgraded
in order to comply with all applicable codes (Land Development Regulations, Florida
Building Code, American with Disabilities Act, etc.), such as requiring a trash
enclosure(s), the installation of firewalls, designation of appropriate easements, and
possibly replatting.
:ommunity Design: The existing building and proposed addition will appear like typical warehouse buildings
with a simple design and little architectural enhancement features. The color and
surface of the ex1erior walls of the building addition will match the existing building.
According to the elevations, the walls will be painted "soft cranberry" (Benjamin Moore
#2094-40) on the stucco finish. The majority of new overhead bay doors will face north
and not the Industrial Avenue right-of-way
3ignage:
No monument sign or new wall signs are proposed.
'lECOMMENDATION.
3taff recommends that this site plan request be approved subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" -
~onditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified
1 this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit.
(c: Central File
\Planning\SHAREO\WP\PROJECTS\M&L Roofing\Staff Report.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-105
SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND CITY COMMISSION
May 30, 2002
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
Project NamelNo.. M&L Roofing / MSPM 02-003
Property Owner: Mel Lowe
Agent: Riza N. Altan, P .E. / Turquoise Incorporated
Location: 630 Industrial Avenue
Land Use: Industrial (I)
Zoning: Light Industrial (M-1)
Project size:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Proposal:
Site Area:
Lot Coverage:
Existing building:
Proposed buildinq:
Total building area:
27,930 square feet (0.64 acres)
10,558 square feet (37.8%)
2,275 square feet
8.283 square feet
10,558 square feet
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Developed property (Ridgeway Plumbing) with a Industrial (I) land use designa1ion and
zoned Light Industrial (M-1);
Developed property (Migano Landscaping) with a Industrial (I) land use designation and
zoned Light Industrial (M-1);
C.S.X. Railroad righ1-of-way, farther east is Interstate 95 right-of-way;
Industrial Avenue right-of-way, farther west is developed property (Warehouse) with a
Indus1rial (I) land use designation and zoned Ught Industrial (I).
Mel Lowe proposes to construc1 a one-story 8,283 square foot addition to an existing
2,275 square foot one-story warehouse building for a total of 10,558 square feet. The
new addition will be used for warehouse area. Warehouses are permitted uses in the M-
1 zoning dis1rict.
Site Characteristics: The subject property is a rectangular shaped lot located on the eas1 side of Industrial
Avenue. Currently, the western third (1/3) of the subject lot is developed with a building
and its respec1ive parking area. The original building is 2,275 square feet in area and
was built in 1984 According 10 City records, the business is currently licensed as a
contractor The eastern two-third (2/3) of 1he lot is undeveloped and con1ains overgrown
vegetation. The exterior portions of the property are used for the storage of large
amounts of mechanical equipmen1 (strewn across the 101), work 1rucks, and
miscellaneous debris. According to the survey, the highest elevation is 17.2 feet above
sea level, located towards the rear (east) of 1he vacant portion of the lot.
Concurrency.
a. Traffic-
A 1raffic impact study for this project was submitted and sent to the Palm Beach
Page 2
M&L Roofing - Major Site Plan Modification Staff Report
Memorandum No. PZ 02-105
County Traffic Division for their review and approval. The Palm Beach County
Traffic Division has not yet determined that the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County This determination will be
required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the addition (see Exhibit "C"
- Conditions of Approval).
b. Drainage - Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The plan will
incorporate the use of a French Drain system. The City's concurrency ordinance
requires drainage certifica1ion at time of site plan approval. The Engineering
Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be
deferred until time of permit review, when more complete engineering documents
are required.
Driveways: This project will use the existing main access point off of Industrial Avenue. This point of
ingress / egress will remain in1act at 25 feet in width. Also, all existing landscape material
will remain in its current condition. Where necessary, all landscape material loca1ed
within the safe-sight triangles will be cleared, removed, or trimmed according to City
standards so that the triangles provide unobstructed cross-visibility Any additional or
required signage or s1riping (stop bar / arrows) at this entranceway will be prepared
according to code requirements.
Parking Facility: According to the plan, seven (7) parking spaces currently exist at the wes1ern portion of
the property near Industrial Avenue. Parking required for 1he project is based on a ratio
of one (1) parking space per 500 square feet of gross floor area, which is the minimum
required for manufacturing uses. Since 10,558 square fee1 are proposed (2,275 square
feet of existing space plus the 8,283 square fo01 building addition), a total of 22 parking
spaces are required. Of the 22 parking spaces that will be provided, one (1) space is
designated for handicap use. All existing and proposed parking spaces will be 90
degrees. They will be dimensioned nine (9) feet in width by 18 feet in length, except for
the handicap spaces, which will be 12 feet in wid1h (with 5 feet of striping) by 18 feet in
length. Since the projec1 is within the Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)
boundaries, the backup distance for the new parking spaces may be reduced from 27
feet to 24 feet in width (over 41 feet will be provided). The plan could have provided
more spaces but instead, proposes two (2) more interior landscaped islands, in part,
because Public Works determined tha1 no dumpster would be required for the project as
proposed. However, a space within the proposed row of parking has been designated as
reserved for 1he fire vehicle turn-around area. This element of the plan has been
endorsed and approved by the City Fire Department. This space was not included in the
proposed number of parking spaces. A chain link fence runs along the perimeter of the
property A securi1y chain link gate is proposed at the front entrance. This gate will have
an electronic key pad. The key pad will have 4 or 5 numbers only and the en1ry code will
be approved in advance by the Fire Marshall. If the power fails, the gates will
automatically open and remain open. The rolling chain link gate and fence shall comply
with Chap1er 2, Section 4.J. of the Land Development Reguations.
Landscaping: The width of the existing west landscape buffer adjacen1 to 1he Industrial Road right-of-
way complies with current landscape code. This landscape buffer currently contains
mature trees and overgrown hedges. The Mahogany trees will coun1 toward meeting the
minimum number of trees on-si1e. As previously sta1ed, the landscape material in this
buffer will be undisturbed unless the proposed improvements require its alteration.
Page 3
M&L Roofing - Major Site Plan Modification Staff Report
Memorandum No. PZ 02-105
The north landscape buffer (abutting industrial zoned property) will be two (2) feet - six
(6) inches in width. This buffer will contain 1he existing shrubs at the western portion of
the property but proposes Redtip Cocoplum hedges immediately where 1he
improvements begin. Two (2) Dahoon Holly trees are proposed in the in1erior landscape
islands and a cluster of Saba I palm trees are proposed just north of the westernmost part
of the building expansion. The M-1 zoning distric1 has no side setback. The existing
building is currently two (2) leet from the side (southern) property line. The proposed
building expansion will extend from the existing building at 1he same setback along the
southern property line. No landscape buffer is proposed along 1he southern property
line, which is not required where there is no vehicular use area. The east buffer (rear)
property line will contain only a row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges as it is not wide enough
to accommodate shade trees.
Building / Site: Similar to the exis1ing building, the proposed addition will be one-story high. The
maximum height allowed for new buildings or additions in the M-1 zoning dis1rict is 45
feet or 4 stories. The top 01 the wall for the proposed addition will be 19 feet - six (6)
inches in heigh1, which will ma1ch the existing building height. The north side of the
building addition will have six (6) overhead bay doors. At this time, the intent 01 the
project is to construct the building addition as a shell with no provision for subdividing into
condominiums or leasing out to individual tenants. The applicant understands that
converting the building to this type of facili1y (individual tenants) would necessitate
another site plan review During that review process, the site would need to be upgraded
in order to comply with all applicable codes (Land Development Regulations, Florida
Building Code, American with Disabilities Ac1, etc.), such as requiring a 1rash
enclosure(s), the installation of lirewalls, designa1ion of appropriate easements, and
possibly replatting.
Community Design: The existing building and proposed addition will appear like typical warehouse buildings
with a simple design and little architectural enhancement features. The color and
surface of the exterior walls of the building addition will ma1ch 1he existing building.
According to the elevations, the walls will be painted "soft cranberry" (Benjamin Moore
#2094-40) on the s1ucco finish. The majority of new overhead bay doors will face north
and not the Industrial Avenue right-ol-way
Sign8ge:
No monument sign or new wall signs are proposed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that this site plan request be approved subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" -
Conditions of Approval. The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deliciencies identified
in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit.
xc: Central File
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\M&L Roofing\Staff Report.doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-064
FROM:
TRCMEMBERS ~/VicV/I/ ~ /'
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal r.~(f- ~ Vl/
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
John Huntington, Police Department ~
H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department ....-/"
Timothy K. Large, Building Division ----
Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General /
Je#fe) Li\'8~g,,"'-l, Pl.lbli(' Works Director- Tr"ff;"
John Wildner, Parks Division
Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department /'
Lusia Galav, Planning Department /'
Michael W Rumpf' ~ "b.v
Director of Planni~d toning
);~~i?~~
- ;~(:"-':-I/j/,,~
TO'
1 ST Review - Major Site Plan Modification
-o!aart.f4c7UtJt
~. ....,
c /~" !f'-'fqf
Ie,;
C#?cJ
DATE.
RE.
March 27, 2002
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
Project - M & L Roofing
Location - 630 W Industrial Avenue
Agent Riza N. Altan, P.E.
File No. MSPM 02-003
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be made available
via e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on ADril16. 2002. When preparing your
comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections
referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
other departmental improl.ements.
Page 2
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they
do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project
be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-
mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project.
First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee
(TRC) members.
MWRlg
Attachment
XC. Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
John Guidry, Utilities Director
To Be Determined,Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Central File
S:\P1anning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\M&L Roofing\TRC Memo for 1st Plans ReView ,doc
Revised 1/14/02
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to: Riza N Altan, P.E.
fax #: 804-9907
date: April 22, 2002
from: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
re: l' I REVIEW COMMENTS FOR M& L Roofing
Please find attached the first review comments for your project. To stay on the
current review schedule, please do the following steps listed below, and bring all
documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday April 30, 2002.
1 Revise your plans incorporating all comments listed herein, including the addition of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statemen1s/ comments, and bring 10 copies
to the TRC review meeting (full sets including all pages originally submitted);
2. Submit the additional information as requested within the attached comments; ( i.e. traffic
analysis, engineering certification, etc.)
3 Prepare a written response (7 copies) consisting of a list briefly summarizing how each
comment has been addressed on the revised plans or with the supplemental information
including location on the plans ( this promotes an expeditious 2nd review by staff and
your project representatives during the TRC meeting );and
4
Submit reductions (8 Yz X 11) for the proposed
site plans, elevations and landscaping plan (this
is required for the final report and public
presentation).
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
The applicant should not attend a TRC (2nd review) until all documents have been revised and
copied for staff review If plans will n01 be fully revised and brought to the scheduled TRC
meeting, contact Lusia Galav in this office by the Thursday prior to the scheduled meeting da1e.
Projects deviating from 1he original schedule are eligible for review at subsequent meetings,
which are held every Tuesday To reschedule, contact Sherie Coale, by the Thursday prior to the
Tuesday TRC meeting that you desire to attend. The remainder of1he review schedule will be
adjusted accordingly If you have questions on the attached comments, please con1ac1 the
respective reviewer using the attached list ofTRC representatives.
If the plans are reasonably complete and all significan1 comments are addressed following TRC
(2nd review), the project is forwarded to 1he Planning and Developmen1 Board Meeting that falls
approximately 2 to 3 weeks following the TRC meeting. An "*,, by any comment identifies a
comment that must be addressed prior to moving forward to the Planning and Developmen1
board.
Note: Items recognized by staff as 1ypically outstanding at this point include a traffic report
and/or confirmation of1he traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
drainage certification by a licensed engineer, signed "Rider to Site Plan Application"
form and colored elevations of1he proposed project. This information is necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submitted this information, please disregard this note.
Engineering John Guidry Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6285
Building Don Johnson Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6357
Fire Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Rodger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
Police Department Marshall Gage John Huntington 737-6167
Utilities John Guidry H. David Kelley Jr. 742-6488 742-6285
Public Works-General Larry Quinn Ken Hall 742-6283 742-6285
Parks & Recreation John Wildner 742-6227 742-6233
Forester/Environmentalist Kevin Hallahan Kevin Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Planning & Zoning Michael Rumpf, Lusia Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 01/14/02
S\PlanningI$HARED\WPIPROJECTSIM&L Roofingllst Review comments FAX COVER doc
Coale, Sherie
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wildner, John
Friday. April 19, 2002 4'11 PM
Coale, Sherie
RE. M & L Roofing
No Comments. Thanks.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Coale,Sherie
Sent: Friday. April 19. 2002 3:46 PM
To: Wildner, John
Subject: M & L Roofing
John,
Do you have any comments regarding this project?
Sherie
1
Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To
Lusia Galav, Senior Planner
From:
Kevin J Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
M & L Roofing
MSPM 02-003, 1 st Review
Date:
Aprill5,2002
Existinl! trees
The applican1 has addressed all ofthe existing trees on the si1e.
Landscape Plan
The landscape plan meets the 50 % native tree species requiremen1s.
The additional 72 Ficus benjamina hedges are no longer permitted to be planted and should be
changed to a native species (e.g. Florida privet, Cocoplum) to meet 1he 50 % native shrub species
requirements.
The project should continue in the normal review process.
Xc; Eric Johnson, Planner
Kjh
file
st''',
'.............. .
. -'" '
, . "
: / \
i \
j 1
',)' , i
,\ ~ /
.! '~.".",.. . _./~~ '-
. f:') ,
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WO
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 02-078
IfDJ f:,-
Wj;I'
L.,
--
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P E., Civil Engineer
rL
lU;lIIV:;
-'.J
f '"'\
r;j
,~
-J
TO'
Michael W Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE.
April 12, 2001
RE.
Major Site Plan Modification -1st Revie
M & L Roofing
File No. MSPM 02-003
I have reviewed the above referenced Site Plans, forwarded to me on 3/27/02, against the Major
Site Plan Modifications and Site Plan Review requirements outlined in the City of Boynton
Beach Code of Ordinances (available on-line at www.cLbovnton-beach.f1.us). Following are my
comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS ~/
Code Requirements
1 City Ordinance (CODE, Chapter 10) requires that arrangements be made with the Public
Works Department for any waste disposal associated with this site plan. Please contact the
Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse.
2. The site dumpster enclosure is to be constructed in accordance with City Standard A-8807
Provide details on the plans or reference the noted City Standard for construction on the
plans.
3. The required gates for the dumpster shall contain long steel rods to drop into the pavement
in order to secure the gates in the open and closed positions (indicate by note). Drilled holes
(for concrete) or metal sleeves (for asphalt) shall be provided for the locking rods.
4~
5.l for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a minimum of 6 ft high and
shall be CBS construction with a finish matching that of the adjacent building(s). Accent
shrubs shall be provided along the screen wall(s) (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J,
Section 5.J and Article III, Section 9A9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10 C.3)
Recommendations
1 The proposed location of the dumpster will not allow access for pickup. It is recommended
that the dumpster pad be moved to a location closer to the entrance (across from the first
new unit) to allow sufficient space for maneuvering.
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo #02-078
Re: M & L Roofing
April 12, 2002
Page 2
ENGINEERING
Code Requirements
1 Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet
the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not
limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation.
Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth
Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm
Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department
(PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
2. Provide the "Rider to Site Plan Application" with the next submittal as specified in the LDR,
Chapter 4, Section 7 G.
3. Show all existing utilities on Site Characteristics Map (Survey) and Site Development plan
(LDR, Chapter 4, Section A.3).
4 A Lighting Plan including photometrics, pole wind loading, and pole details in conformance
with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 11, Chapter 23, Article I, Section 5.B.7 and
Chapter 23, Article II, Section A will be required at the time of permitting. If possible please
provide this information as part of your TRC plan submittals - it is much easier to identify
and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit!
5 Replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future
shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.b).
6. Landscaped areas shall be protected from vehicular encroachment by a continuous, raised
curb (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5A and Chapter 22, Article II, Section E.).
~7
Per the Landscape Code (LDR, Chapter 75, Article II, Section 5.C.2) Ficus is not an
allowable species for landscaping.
8. Provide existing and proposed grades on the Drainage Plan, including inlet rim elevations,
building finish floor elevations, and elevations around the site exterior so an evaluation of the
proposed drainage can be made (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F )
9 Provide, at a minimum, preliminary calculations showing that the proposed drainage system
will meet the City's criteria as outlined in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo #02-078
Re: M & L Roofing
April 12, 2002
Page 3
10 Provide an engineer's certification with the next submittal as specified in the LDR, Chapter 4,
Section 7 F.2.
11 Catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section
5.A.2.f).
12. Show sight triangles graphically on the Site and Landscape Plan. Add a note to the
Landscape Plan that, within the sight triangles, there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility
at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.H.).
~3 Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section C.2. Ficus is not an allowable species for
landscaping.
14 On the Site plan, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars,
stop signs, double yellow lane separators (at the driveway), striping, directional arrows and
"Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable -
LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J) to include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No
Parking - Loading Zone" See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 for striping
details.
15. Where the number of required spaces as computed includes a fraction, the number of
required parking spaces shall be the computed number rounded to the next highest whole
number (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.H.14). The correct number of spaces required for this
site is 22.
Recommendations/Corrections
1 Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FDOT Standard
Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000
Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units.
2. Provide graphic scale with written scale.
3. Proposed building square footage is calculated incorrectly, should be 8295 S.F This affects
the calculations for parking spaces.
4 Indicate handicap parking space on the plan and provide details for striping and signing at
that space (City Standard Drawings B-98001).
5. Provide details for proposed curbing and surfacing section.
Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo #02-078
Re: M & L Roofing
April 12, 2002
Page 4
6 Specify inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all
structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments. Provide details for proposed inlets and
indicate, by note, that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter
6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.f).
7 Correct leaders to the sidewalk (currently pointing to grass swale).
8. Correct spelling of "coarse" (reads "course" rock) in the French Drain detail.
UTILITIES 1..-
Code Requirements
1 Water and sewer systems exist to service this property expansion.
2. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500
g.p.m. at stated in the LDR Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by
insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE Section 26-16(a)). In addition, the
LDR Chapter 6, Article. IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building (or in this
case, the building addition) will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant.
Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants.
3. Show proposed water and sewer main and services to each of the new tenant spaces.
Water and sewer shall be designed and constructed in accordance with all standards and
specifications of the City of Boynton Beach.
4 Water and sewer mains to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility
easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a
minimum width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the
City as stated in CODE Section 26-33(a).
LLlkd
xc: Jeff Livergood, P E., Director, Public Works
Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr , P.E.I P.S.M., Utility Engineer, Engineering
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Engineering
File
S:IEngineeringIPoslaIIENGINEERINGlM & L Roofing Memo#02-078.doc
---
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO 02-070
\
TO' Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM. Timothy K. Large ~~
TRC Member/Building Div~~ ~
DATE April 11, 2002
SUBJECT Project - M&L Roofing
File No. - MSPM 02-003 1st Review
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for
Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in
compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits.
BuildinQ Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. LarQe (561)
742-6352
1 Add to the buildings that are depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled
symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to
each tenant space. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section
4 1.2,43
2. On the floor plan drawings, add a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible entrance doors to each tenant space. The location of the
doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted
on the site plan drawing. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction,
Section 4 1.2, 4.3
3. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be
consistent with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for
Building Construction. The accessible parking spaces that serve a use shall be
located on the shortest safely accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an
accessible entrance The Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction
states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall have accessible
parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrance. Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4 1.2(5), 4.3, 4 6
Page 1 of3
4 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the
path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible
parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each tenant space The
symbol that is required to be installed along the path shall start at the accessible
parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to the building. The
symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the
detectable warning or other pavement markings. The location of the accessible
path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind
parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route. (Note: The
minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text to the
drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and
the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 46
(Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for
Building Construction. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall
provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible
route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility
Code for Building Construction. This documentation shall include, but not be
limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
5 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is
proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with
regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the
following issues [Section 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 Florida Building Code]:
a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to
the site data. 'The proposed finish floor elevation _ _ NGVD is above the
highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as
determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water
management construction development regulations."
b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the
building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If
there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans.
c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the
building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled
site plan, floor plan and paving/ drainage (civil plans).
6. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the
property line.
7 As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit
a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with
the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is
conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet 2 of 3. However,
add to the floor plan drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible entrance doors to the tenant spaces. The location of the
doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted
on the site plan drawing.
Page 2 of 3
8. Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the wall openings and
wall construction comply with Table 600 of the 2001 Florida Building Code
9 Considering that the occupancy classification of the existing building will be
changing, indicate on the floor plan drawing the floor load capacity of the existing
floors. Specify on the plan the existing and proposed occupancy classification as
defined in the 2001 Florida Building Code. Also, indicate the floor load capacity
that is required for the new occupancy classification. Changing the occupancy
classification of a building will require that the building comply with Chapter 34 of
the 2001 Florida Building Code. The change of occupancy requires that an
engineer certify that the floor loads will comply with specifications of the new
occupancy classification. Certification of the floor loads and compliance with
Chapter 34 of the 2001 Florida Building Code will be required at time of permit
review
10 Indicate on the site plan within the floor area of the new and existing building the
primary use of the structure/facility
11 Identify on the site plan drawing the actual distance that the building is set back
from the north, east, south and west property lines. Please note that overhangs,
covered walkways, canopies, awnings or other appurtenances that are attached to
the building shall be considered when identifying building setbacks. Therefore,
identify the width of the proposed overhangs, covered walkways, canopies,
awnings, and/or other roofed areas that extend out beyond the main walls of the
building. The building setbacks shall comply with setback regulations specified in
the Zoning Code
12. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
13. At time of permit review, submit for review an addressing plan for the project.
14 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
15. On sheet 2 of 3, Garage Buck notes 110 mph wind load and note on plan states
140 mph. Wind load shall comply with Chapter 16 of the 2001 Florida Building
Code.
bf
S/Development/Building Code Administrator/TRC/02/M&L Roofing MSPM 02-003 1" review
Page 3 of 3
-----
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO' Michael W Rumpf DATE. 4/11102
Dir of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT M&L Roofing
FROM. Off. John Huntington REFERENCES Site Plan
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
ENCLOSURES.
FILE. MSPM 02-003
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comments
~
M & L ROOFING
MSPM 02-003
1st Review Planning
April 9, 2002
Provide a location map.
A sliding gate was discussed at the pre-application meeting. If a gate or fence is proposed (currently or in
the future), show the location of it on the site plan. In addition, provide a detail of the gate / fence,
including its material, color, and dimensions.
On the site plan tabular data, the proposed building addition (8.078 square feet) plus the existing building
(Z,275 square feet) do not equal 10,535. The existing area plus the proposed addition equals 10,353 square
feet. Please correct.
On the site plan tabular data, the total proposed building area (10,353 square feet) @ 1/500 equals Zl
spaces. Please remove the "Z1.07 spaces" from the tabular data because this figure is incorrect. The
correct figure would be "ZO.7 spaces" or ZI spaces.
The designated Future Land Use is Industrial (I) and zoning district for the subject property is Light
Industrial (M-l) and should be indicated as such in the site plan tabular data.
The survey (or site plan) must identify the Official Zoning District and Future Land Use designation for the
adjacent properties (Chapter 4, Section A.3.).
The site plan tabular data must indicate the proposed and required building setbacks, maximum lot
coverage. and building height for the M-l zoning district and subject project.
On the site plan, show the site triangles.
On the site plan, dimension the width of the driveway openings.
Provide a detail of proposed outdoor lighting structure(s), including the dimensions, color, and material.
Provide east and south elevations.
Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D.Z.).
Submit a color sample / swatch of all major exterior finishes. Each sample and / or elevation shall include
the manufacturer's name and color code. On the elevations, identify where each color will go as it relates
to a paint color schedule (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.I.). Also, place a note on the elevations indicating that
the texture / color of the proposed building addition will match the existing building.
The elevations should show signage, if any, at the time of site plan review On the elevations, indicate the
total wall signage area, and if applicable, for each bay (Chapter Zl, Article IV, Section Z.C.). In addition,
indicate the anticipated wall sign type and colors.
The roots of the Ficus species can cause damage to public roadways or other public works. Substitute the
Ficus hedge with alternative hedge material subject to City Forester / Environmentalist approval (Chapter
7.5. Article II, Section C.Z.).
The landscape plan must contain a tabular summary of proposed I required trees and shrubs.
A total of ten (10) trees will be required on-site, however. only four (4) have been provided on the
landscape plan. Add at least six (6) additional trees. Staffrecommends planting two (2) of the six (6) trees
in the front landscape buffer.
All required trees shall be at minimum 12 feet overall height and 3 caliper inches when planted (Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.).
Place a note on the landscape plan indicating that mulch other than Cypress shall be used and maintained
for landscape purposes (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.S.).
At least fifty (50) percent of the site landscape material must be native species and verified as such in the
tabular data of the landscape plan (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P).
The dumpster enclosure shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the principal
buildings and shall be integrated with other site elements (Chapter 9, Section lO.E.3). On the site plan,
place a note indicating this requirement.
Accent shrubs shall be required along three (3) sides of the dumpster enclosure (Chapter 7.5 Article II,
Section 5.J ).
All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes, meters, and transformers, shall be
visually screened (Chapter 9, Section lO.CA.). Equipment placed on the walls of the building shall be
painted to match the building color.
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDA T AIPlanninglSHARED\ WPIPROJECTSIM&L Rooling\lst review Planning doc
---
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Fire and Life Safety Division
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
PO Box310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of:
MSPM 02-003 1st review-fire
Project Name and Address:
M&L Roofina
630 W. Industrial Ave.
Reviewed by'
Rodaer Kem(.;er. Fire Plans Examiner/Fire
Inspector ;.ty
Department:
Fire and Life Safetv
Phone:
(561) 742-6753
Comments to:
Sherie Coale bv email on 4/9/02
CODE REQUIREMENTS
Provide hydrant flow test results that demonstrate a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm
at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, in addition to domestic requirements.
LDR Chapter 6, Section 16.
Pursuant to City Ordinance 9-3F, the Fire Marshal has developed an
Administrative Order dated May 9, 2001, which provides the minimum
performance for all security gates and emergency access. See attached.
Provide turnaround for fire apparatus in accordance with the Florida Fire
Prevention Code, Section 3-5.2. See attached.
cc: Steve Gale
Bob Borden
The City of
Boynton Beach
Boynlon Beach Fire Rescue
Fire & Life Safely VW1SIO/I
100 E. BOUllloll Bencll UOll!e/lllnl
Po. Bux 310
nOljn/unBendl, Floncl(/ JJ425-031O
Phone; (56J) 7'12.(jGOO
FAX (561) 36'1 7382
May 9, 2001
RE. Security Gates and Emergency Access
To Whom It May Concern:
Boynton Beach Fire Rescue continues to maintain the position that security gates are
potentially detrimental to fire and rescue operations. The proliferation of security gated
communities has resulted in many problems for responding emergency apparatus Irying to gain
entry
The minimum performance for all security gates shall be as follows.
1 All security/entrance gates must have an electronic key number pad.
2. The keypad will allow entrance by the simple act of pushing four (4) or five (5) buttons.
3 All gates must have a security entry code approved in advance by the Fire Marsllal.
4 Gates rnay be operable by telephone from our dispatch office. A phone call from our
dispatchers will open the gate and a second call will be required to close the gate.
5 In case of power failure, the gate shall open automatically and remain open.
6 An exception will be where a 24-hour security guard is stationed at the gate
7 A back-up device such as an authorized security box or key switch is required to operate the
gate in the event the number pad entry does not work.
8 A key box shall be installed for such areas or buildings when the Fire Marshal delermines
that access is necessary for all life-saving or fire-fighting purposes. The type and location of
the key box shall be approved by the Fire Marshal and shall contain.
. Keys to locked points of egress, whether in common areas or on the interior or exterior
of such buildings;
. Keys to locked mechanical equipment rooms;
. Keys to locked electrical rooms;
. Keys to elevator controls.
9 No other code numbers. operating methods, or key systems will be kept on file by the Fire
Rescue Department.
10 In the event that our units are unable to gain rapid entry with tile above methods, it will
require the use of rapid forcible entry methods to gain entry The City of Boynton Beach
and/or the Fire Rescue Department shall not be responsible for, or incur any costs as a
result of gaining access to a specinc area.
11 Information on where authorized key security boxes can be purchased is available from
Boynton Beach Fire Rescue, Fire and Life Safely Division by calling (561) 742-6600 during
normal business hours.
Failure to comply will result in the violation of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances Section 9-3F
and Section 9-15. The liability of delayed Fire Rescue response to an emergency in your
community should be a serious concern.
,'9- ~
Steve Gale
Fire Marshal
America's nafp1lJnl/ to the (;r,lrc:trr>rpn
DEAD END LENGTH
o - 150'
Over 150'
or bldgs over 30'
in height and set
back over 50'
WIDTH
20'
20'
TURN AROUND FEATURE
None
100' cuI de sac or
100' hammer head or
100' wye or
50' Shunt
Road surface designed to accomodate a minimum weight of 32 Tons
Vertical clearance of 13'6"
---50'--- ---50'---
, ~
- 20'- - 20'-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
100' ctJL.DE SAC
I"
-20'--
I
100' WVE
100' HA.MMER HEAD
.
.
.
.
---50'- --:
,
-20'-
50'
SHUNT
O'/O,/UbL
tJP-{'f'J I
-{
-\ "1
::> "'-
'i.
t'--
'.Il
~
"
"
".
"
-----------
---
"
"
'\
" \/
I
/
,
\'
,
/
I
/
\
)0
----~------ .-----....------.----------