APPLICATION
Carter::Burgess
636'1 N \Iv 6 Way Suite 3011
Fad Louderdale, Florida rn',)'f
Phone. <15431.'),1001
Fox: '154315 104U
WWW,r-bC(J1lI
January 6,2003
Mr Hector Garcia
Southern Bay Colony
12900 SW 128th Street, Suite 100
Miami, Florida 33186
rn ~ ~.
o r-:--
~\I 7
Pt J
_.._"._LI.
Re: Coastal Bay Colony
Dear Mr. Garcia,
Per your request, Carter & Burgess, Inc, conducted a traffic study for the Coastal Bay
Colony project planned to be located on the southwest corner of Federal Highway and
SE 23rd Avenue in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, The location of the project is
illustrated in Figure I The study addresses the following:
o Daily trip generation analysis
o Trip generation comparison analysis
o Driveway analysis
Daily Trip Generation Analysis
Coastal Bay Colony is a proposed residential develo,fment planned to be located on the
west side of Federal Highway just south of SE 23 Avenue in southeast Palm Beach
County The project consists of 65 townhomes,
According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (6th
Edition), the most appropriate "land use" category is ITE's Land Use 230 -- Residential
Condominium/Townhouse, The fitted curve equation, given by the ITE manual, is:
Ln(T) = 0,850 Ln(X) + 2,564
Where T = average daily vehicle trip ends
X = number of dwelling units
Using the above equation, the proposed 65 townhomes are anticipated to generate
approximately 451 net trips per day Since the project is anticipated to generate less than
500 trips per day, a traffic impact analysis following the Municipal Implementation
Ordinance of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance is not
required,
I
COlier & Burges~, Ine Corter & Burgess Archlteds/Engineers. IrK r orler & Burge's Comultants, Inc <&B Architects/rnfJillePI' lilt,
C&B ArchltPds/Engineers Pc C.&P, Nevqda, Inr Nixon & laird Architects/En!=jineers, PC
~oo
J
Woolbright Road
Golf Road
I
I
I
'0'
(Ill
E!'
=1
(Il,
t:r:,
X'
(/),
0'
,
I
,
I
I
I
'0,
(Il,
E!,
"m I
t:r:'
I
0,
W,
11.,
I
,
SE 23 Ave
SITE
<D LO 'E >-
::J en ctl
c I ctl 3=
~ > ..c
~ ,Ql
<( ::J J:
0
1Il m ctl
1Il
~ ..... L..
1Il <D
C'l <D '0
c L.. <D
0 0 U-
N ctl
() <D
A en
Carter::Burgess
Site Location Map
IJobsI470062\Figure1.dgn 01/06/200308:10:50 AM
FIGURE 1
Coastal Bay Colony
Boynton Beach, Florida
Trip Generation Comparison Analysis
A trip generation comparison analysis between the parcel's current zoning and the
proposed zoning was conducted, The analysis was performed using the trip generation
equations published in the ITE Trip Generation Manual (6th Edition), The trip generation
comparison analysis was undertaken for daily, AM, and PM peak hour conditions, The
analysis was based on the following assumptions:
CURRENT ZONING
o Existing Zoning: C-2 & C-3 Community Commercial District (Commercial)
o FAR, 25 percent
o Size of Parcel: 4.34 acres (189,050 square feet)
o Potential Size of Building: 47,263 square feet (25% of 189,050 square feet)
o Land Use: Commercial
PROPOSED ZONING
o Proposed Zoning: Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD)
o Land Use: Townhomes
o Size: 65 dwelling units
Table 1 below documents the trip generation the current and proposed zoning, As
indicated in Table 1, the proposed zoning would result in a significant reduction in daily,
AM, and PM peak hour trips,
TABLE 1
Trip Generation Comparison Analysis
Coastal Bav Colonv
Number of Trios
Land Use Size Daily I AM Peak I PM Peak
CURRENT ZONING
Commercial I 47,263 Sq,ft, I 4,210 I 102 I 383
PROPOSED ZONING
Townhomes 65 units I 451 I 36 I 43
I Difference I n/a I -3,759
Source: ITE Trip Generation Manual (6th Edition)
-66
-340
Driveway Analysis
The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed residential
development were assigned to the two project driveways (a right-turn in/right-turn out
only driveway off of Federal Highway and an exit-only driveway on SE 23'd Avenue),
Based on the surrounding land uses and the transportation network located in the vicinity
3
of the proposed project, the following trip distribution was assumed for the Coastal Bay
Colony residential development:
o Forty percent (40%) on Federal Highway north of the SE 23rd Avenue
o Forty percent (40%) on Federal Highway south of the site
o Twenty percent (20%) on SE 23rd Avenue west of Federal Highway
Figure 2 depicts the AM and PM peak hour traffic assignments on the two project
driveways, Based on the peak hour turning movement volumes developed for each
driveway, the following driveway geometries are recommended for the subject project:
FEDERAL HIGHWAY DRIVEWAY
o One southbound shared through/right-turn lane (no improvements necessary on
Federal Highway)
o One right-turn only exit lane
SE 23rd AVENUE DRIVEWAY
o No inbound movements allowed (only emergency vehicles)
o One shared left-tum/right-turn exit lane
Please give me a call if you have any questions,
4
I I 400/0
148 SE 23rd Avenue
200/0 i i ---
I I
I <0 N I
........ ..-- 1
I ('I') ........
'-" I.() 1
'-"
........
1 Ol
N
1_- _____ _ _,_ '-"
<0
) I 303 1
(6) 12 -.
1
1
_____ ___________ _____ ___,_,_J
LEGEND >-
<11
~
12 AM Peak Hour Traffic .c
,Ql
(29) PM Peak Hour Traffic :::c
13031 ~
Daily Traffic Q)
'0
Q)
LL
40%) % Traffic Assignment
40%
N
A
FIGURE 2
Carter=:Burgess Driveway Traffic Assignment Coastal Bay Colony
Boynton Beach, Florida
\Jobs\470062\Figure2.dgn 01/06/200302:07:34 PM
ApPENDIX
Trip Generation Information
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers - Trip Generation Manual
~
Land Use: 230
Residential Condominiumrrownhouse
Description
Residential condominiums/townhouses are defined as single-family owners hiD units that have at
least one other single-family owned unit within the same building structure, Both condominiums
and townhouses are included in this land use. Studies that did not identify whether the
condominium/townhouse was a low-rise or a high-rise were included in this category
Additional Data
The peak hour of the generator typically coincides with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic,
The sites were surveyed from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s throughout the United States and
Canada,
The number of vehicles and the number of residents have a high correlation with average
weekday vehicle trip ends, The use of these variables is limited, however, because the number of
vehicles and residents is often difficult to obtain or predict. The number of dwelling units is
generally used as the independent variable of choice because ~ is usually readily available, easy
to project, and has a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip ends,
Source Numbers
4,92,94,95,97,100,105,106,114, 168, 186,204,237,253,293,319,320,321,390,412,418
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
360
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Residential CondominiumfTownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
Ona:
Dwelling Units
Weekday
Number of Studies:
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units:
Directional Distribution:
53
185
50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
5.86
Range of Rates
1.83 - 11,79
Standard Deviation
3,09
Data Plot and Equation
8,000
6,000
"
//,/'/'"
/
X
~/~,/
x
7,000
'"
'0
C
W
a. 5,000
'C
I-
a>
'0
:2
~ 4,000
a>
Ol
'"
~
a>
~ 3,000
II
I-
1,000
x
2,000
x
o
o
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900 1000 1100 1200 1300
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
____u Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.850 Ln(X) + 2,564
R2 = 0,83
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
361
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Residential CondominiumfTownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a,m.
Number of Studies: 56
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units: 202
Directional Distribution: 17% entering, 83% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
0.44
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0,15
1,61
O,69
Data Plot and Equation
600
100
-x
"",.-,,;-;
""""""""""""
,
,
.
J X
,
.
X ,,/'x
/
X ......<
;....";-.
-x '
XX /,,;
.X X ,,'
X' >x ,,---:
500
it
i
I
\
I
;,1
I-
,I
ri
II
<Il
"
c:
W
c.
~
"
13
:2
"
>
"
Ol
'"
:;;
>
<(
"
f-
300
400
200
x- x
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Filled Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0,790 Ln(X) + 0,298
A2 = 0.74
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
362
Institute of Transportation Engineers
~
Residential Condominiumrrownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 57
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units: 199
Directional Distribution: 67% entering, 33% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
0,76
0,54
0.18
1.24
Data Plot and Equation
'"
"0
<::
W
a.
~
"
<3
:E
"
>
"
OJ
f!!
"
~
"
I-
700
600
,
,
,-
,',
.
,
,
,
,,/,//-
,..'................,
x ,/,,"
,.,.'>5--"".
"
x'"
x /
,Xx X "./
>Yx-x/-x
%
500
x
400
300
200
x
100
x
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
FIUed Curve
------ Average Rate
R2 = 0,79
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(l) = 0,827 Ln(X) + 0.309
Trip Genera/ion, 6th Edition
363
Institute 0/ Transportation Engineers
-
Land Use: 820
Shopping Center
Description
A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned,
developed, owned, and managed as a unit. A shopping center's composition is related to its
market area in terms of size, location, and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site
parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands.
Over 650 shopping centers including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers,
and super regional centers were surveyed for this land use. Some of these centers contained
non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices,
banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (e.g" ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf
courses), The centers ranged in size from 1,700 to 2,200,000 square feet of gross leasable area
(GLA), The centers that were studied are located in suburban areas throughout the United States
and therefore represent average U.S, suburban conditions.
Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or
enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the
perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points). These buildings
are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices, Although the data
herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be
assumed that some of the data show their effect.
The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the GLA of the center In cases
of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as
the gross floor area of the building,
Separate equations have been developed for shopping centers during the Christmas shopping
season. Plots are included for the weekday peak hour of adjacent street traffic and the Saturday
peak hour of the generator
Information on hourly, monthly, and daily variation in shopping center traffic is shown in
Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, It should be noted, however, the information contained in these
tables is based on a limited sample size. Therefore, caution should be exercised when
applying the data, Also, some information provided in the tables may conflict with the
results obtained by applying the average rate or regression equations. When this occurs,
it is suggested that the results from the average rate or regression equations be used as
they are based on a larger number of studies.
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
1334
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 299
Average 1000 Sq, Feet GLA, 331
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
42,92
12,50 - 270,89
21.39
Data Plot and Equation
70,000
x
60,000
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
x ; 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T); 0,643 Ln(X) + 5,866
R2; 0,78
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
1337
Institute of Transportation Engineers
l........
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs:
Ona:
1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Number of Studies:
Average 1000 Sq, Feet GLA,
Directional Distribution:
96
292
61% entering, 39% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate
Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
1,03
0,10
9,05
1.40
Data Plot and Equation
1,600
1,500
1,400
1,300
1,200
iil 1,100
c:
ill
Q. 1,000
."
I-
'" 900
~
'"
~ 800
'"
Ol 700
!!1
'"
> 600
<(
II
I- 500
400
300
200
100
0
0
x
,
,
,
,
,
/'////
,::-",t .x
x
x
x
x.
,
,
,
,
,
~//...
///,//"(~ X
X /,;" , X'
.X/~///' x)( '"
- x X'
x-
x
x
-x
x
x
X" .x.
')X""
x
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
x = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
.i
I
I
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0,596 Ln(X) + 2,329
R2 = 0,51
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
1338
Institute of Transportation Engineers
---
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 401
Average 1000 Sq, Feet GLA, 383
Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
0,68 - 29,27
Standard Deviation
3,74
Data Plot and Equation
9,000
8,000
7,000
'"
"0 6,000
<::
W
0-
~
Q) 5,000
<3
:c
Q)
>
Q) 4,000
Cl
os
:u x
~
" 3,000
I-
2,000
1,000
0
0
X Actual Data Points
2,73
x
X
j(
x
x
%
,x X X
X
X X
X X
X ~
1000 2000
3000
x = 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln{l) = 0,660 Ln{X) + 3,403
R2 = 0.81
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
1339
Instrtute of Transportation Engineers
"
Carter==Burgess
6365 N VV 6 It/oy Suite 'jll(1
rort Lauderdale Flor1rln 311()<.!
phone 954.3151001
Fu~ 9'14.31') H1411
wwwr-h rOrTI
January 6,2003
Mr, Hector Garcia
Southern Bay Colony
12900 SW 128th Street, Suite 100
Miami, Florida 33186
,-, i,-' r '1,1 fr' m
I,:~--_~_L_~ n
: 'I JI'I
, i I~t~ ____:,___ l.'
Re:
Coastal Bay Colony
Dear Mr. Garcia:
Per your request, Carter & Burgess, Inc, conducted a queuing study for the Coastal Bay
Colony project planned to be located on the southwest comer of Federal Highway and
SE 23'd Avenue in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. The location of the project is
illustrated in Figure I The study addresses the following:
o Queuing Study for Inbound Vehicles
Trip Generation
Coastal Bay Colony is a proposed residential development planned to be located on the
west side of Federal Highway just south of SE 23' Avenue in southeast Palm Beach
County The project consists of65 townhomes,
According to the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (6th
Edition), the most appropriate "land use" category is ITE's Land Use 230 - Residential
Condominium/Townhouse, Table I below documents the trip generation for the
proposed residential project. As indicated in Table I, the proposed project is anticipated
to generate approximately 451 daily trips, 36 trips (6 inbound and 30 outbound) during
the morning peak hour, and 43 PM peak hour trips (29 inbound and 14 outbound),
TABLE 1
Trip Generation Comparison Analysis
CoastalBav Colonv
Number of Trips
Land Use Size Dailv AM Peak PM Peak
Townhomes 65 units 451 36 43
em -.
Source. ITE Trip GeneratIOn Manual (6 Ed.tIOn)
CCHter & BUlges' Inc Carter & Bur,w" A['chlic,b;/rllqineers, In, 1 (oli,-, & BLlle.J"" l_on5ultcmts, Inr- l &B Architect~,'l-l1uilw"I' IllL
C&B Architects/Engineer::. pr c&B Nevada, In( NI<on & laird Alchltech,'Engineer.. PL
Woolbright Road
Golf Road
I
I
I
-0'
(Ill
el
:=1
(Il,
0:::,
X'
(/),
(.),
,
,
,
I
I
,
-0 I
(Il,
e,
om t
0:::'
,
(.),
w,
U-,
,
,
SE 23 Ave
SITE
Q) LO "E >.
:J en III
c: I III :;:
~ > .c
..92 Cl
<( :J :c
0
11l CO ~
11l
~ -
11l Q)
Cl ~ -c
c: Q)
0 0 u.
t) N III
A Q)
en
Carten:Burgess
Site Location Map
IJobsl470062lFigure1.dgn 01/06/200302:58:53 PM
FIGURE I
Coastal Bay Colony
Boynton Beach, Florida
Queuing Analysis
The AM and PM peak hour traffic volumes generated by the proposed residential
development were assigned to the two project driveways (a right-turn in/right-turn out
only driveway off of Federal Highway and an exit-only driveway on SE 23rd Avenue),
Based on the surrounding land uses and the transportation network located in the vicinity
of the proposed project, the following trip distribution was assumed for the Coastal Bay
Colony residential development:
o Forty percent (40%) on Federal Highway north ofthe SE 23,d Avenue
o Forty percent (40%) on Federal Highway south ofthe site
o Twenty percent (20%) on SE 23rd Avenue west of Federal Highway
Figure 2 depicts the AM and PM peak hour traffic assignments on the two project
driveways, As illustrated in Figure 2, the maximum inbound vehicular flow occurs in the
afternoon peak hour (29 vehicles),
According to the site plan prepared by Keith & Ballbe, Inc, for the Coastal Bay Colony
project, the main project driveway provides a 20-foot wide inbound lane, Furthermore,
the available storage between the card reader/call box and the southbound travel lanes of
Federal Highway is approximately 75 feet, which is sufficient to accommodate a queue of
up to three vehicles,
Assuming a maximum waiting time of three minutes for visitors wishing to obtain access
to the residential homes, the average length of queue anticipated at the project entrance is
I 451-vehicles (say 2 vehicles), Furthermore, since the proposed ingress lane will have a
width of 20 feet, which is sufficient to accommodate two entering vehicles (side by side),
a resident can pass a stopped visitor in order to access the development without delay and
without joining the queue,
In summary, the 75 feet of throat length provided at the project's main entrance off of
Federal Highway should be sufficient to accommodate the maximum expected length of
queue without interfering with southbound traffic on Federal Highway
P ease give me a call if you have any questions,
number of entering vehicles (29) by the number of 3-minute periods in one hour
3
I I 400/0
148 SE 23rd Avenue
200/0 i i - --
I
<0 N I
........ T"" I
(") ........
---- LO I
----
........
I 0>
N
I _ _,___ _,___ ----
<0
.) I 303 I
(6) 12 --..
I
I
_______,_______,_,_____,_,___,_J
LEGEND >-
ltl
3:
12 AM Peak Hour Traffic .s:::.
,2>
(29) PM Peak Hour Traffic J:
ltl
13031 ....
Daily Traffic Q)
"'C
Q)
L1.
400/0 % Traffic Assignment
400/0
N
A
FIGURE 2
CarternBurgess Driveway Traffic Assignment Coastal Bay Colony
Boynton Beach, Florida
IJobsl4700621Figure2,dgn 01/06/200302:59:24 PM
ApPENDIX
Trip Generation Information
Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers - Trip Generation Manual
~
Land Use: 230
Residential Condominium/Townhouse
Description
Residential condominiumsllownhouses are defined as single-family ownershio units that have at
least one other single-family owned unit within the same building structure, Both condominiums
and townhouses are included In this land use. Studies that did not identify whether the
condominium/townhouse was a low-rise or a high-rise were included in this category
Additional Data
The peak hour of the generator typically coincides with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic,
The sites were surveyed from the mid-1970s to the mid-1990s throughout the United States and
Canada,
The number of vehicles and the number of residents have a high correlation with average
weekday vehicle trip ends, The use of these variables is limited. however, because the number of
vehicles and residents is often difficult to obtain or predict. The number of dwelling units is
generally used as the independent variable of choice because it is usually readily available, easy
to project, and has a high correlation with average weekday vehicle trip ends,
Source Numbers
4.92.94,95.97.100,105,106,114, 168, 186,204,237.253,293.319,320.321,390,412,418
Trip Generation. 6th Edition
360
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Residential CondominiumlTownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 53
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units: 185
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
Standard Deviation
3,09
5,86
1,83 - 11,79
Data Plot and Equation
8,000
..
'0
c:
W
a. 5,000
'C:
f-
"
13
:2
~ 4,000
"
Ol
'"
:0
~ 3,000
"
f-
7.000
,
,
////,/"
/,,///'"
X'
'x
~,~,///'
6,000
X
2,000
x
1,000
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
X Actual Data Points
x = Number of Dwelling Units
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0,850 Ln(X) + 2,564
R2 = 0,83
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
361
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Residential CondominiumlTownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a,m.
i
I
f
I,
I ~
q
hi
q
i
,
I
i
Number of Studies: 56
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units: 202
Directional Distribution: 17% entering, 83% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate
0,44
Range of Rates
0,15 1,61
Standard Deviation
0,69
,
'ji
.
,
.~
r
d
!if
J
~~
Data Plot and Equation
600
.x
,
x
X ,,/," x.
X ",,<
/"",,;;.<
.x ,
s::x,./
.X X ./'
x >5<...";
,
500
~
.)1
lit
u
II'
1f ~
j,I;"
IH
,Jl'
it~
i }~"
I';
~J .:
l . ~
I"
: ~li
i ~ "
! ~ 'Ii
I ~)! ~:
'I!:
;!',
!~
I:'
i' ~
i.l:t
I ~qi
I",
;f
Ul
'0
"
W
a.
~
'"
'0
:c
'"
>
'"
Ol
e!
'"
~
"
I-
300
400
200
100
x- )i(
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 BOO 900 1000 1100 1200
1300
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
------ AverageRate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.790 Ln(X) + 0.298
R2 = 0.74
,
i i
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
362
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Residential CondominiumlTownhouse
(230)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Dwelling Units
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 57
Avg, Number of Dwelling Units: 199
Directional Distribution: 67% entering, 33% exiting
Trip Generation per Dwelling Unit
Average Rate Range of Rates
0,54
0,18
1,24
Standard Deviation
0,76
Data Plot and Equation
700
600
500
'"
'0
C
W
a. X
~ x-
Q) 400
:Q
.r::
~
Q)
Ol 300
~
..
~
"
....
200
X
'"
100
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300
x = Number of Dwelling Units
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
-----~ Average Rate
Ailed Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.827 Ln(X) + 0,309
R2 = 0.79
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
363
Institute of Transportation Engineers
"---~- --"~~ .--
Land Use: 820
Shopping Center
Description
A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned,
developed, owned, and managed as a unit. A shopping center's composition is related to its
market area in terms of size, location, and type of store. A shopping center also provides on-site
parking facilities sufficient to serve its own parking demands.
Over 650 shopping centers including neighborhood centers, community centers, regional centers,
and super regional centers were surveyed for this land use, Some of these centers contained
non-merchandising facilities, such as office buildings, movie theaters, restaurants, post offices,
banks, health clubs, and recreational facilities (e,g" ice skating rinks or indoor miniature golf
courses). The centers ranged in size from 1,700 to 2,200,000 square feet of gross leasable area
(GLA), The centers that were studied are located in suburban areas throughout the United Slates
and therefore represent average U.S, SUburban conditions,
Many shopping centers, in addition to the integrated unit of shops in one building or
enclosed around a mall, include outparcels (peripheral buildings or pads located on the
perimeter of the center adjacent to the streets and major access points), These buildings
are typically drive-in banks, retail stores, restaurants, or small offices. Although the data
herein do not indicate which of the centers studied included peripheral buildings, it can be
assumed that some of the data show their effect,
The vehicle trips generated at a shopping center are based upon the GLA of the center In cases
of smaller centers without an enclosed mall or peripheral buildings, the GLA could be the same as
the gross floor area of the building,
Separate equations have been developed for shopping centers during the Christmas shopping
season, Plots are included for the weekday peak hour of adjacent street traffic and the Saturday
peak hour of the generator
Information on hourly, monthly, and daily variation in shopping center traffic is shown in
Tables 1, 2, 3, and 4, It should be noted, however, the information contained in these
tables is based on a limited sample size, Therefore, caution should be exercised when
applying the data. Also, some information provided in the tables may conflict with the
results obtained by applying the average rate or regression equations. When this occurs,
it is suggested that the results from the average rate or regression equations be used as
they are based on a larger number of studies.
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
1334
Institute of Transportation Engineers
I
\
!
!
I
:
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday
Number of Studies: 299
Average 1000 Sq, Feet GLA, 331
Directional Distribution: 50% entering, 50% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
42,92 12,50 . 270,89
Standard Deviation
21,39
Data Plot and Equation
70,000
60,000
.
.
.
'.
;"..,,-r
....:-...
""..-"",.-'
""",~.
..~......r
v "
X ~~>/'5" ~:
xX, ,,/" x
Y,l'
x , x
If x/x
)<^
x ,
)( "xX
x
~
'"
'0
c:
w
,9-
~
<D
'0
:c
~
'"
0>
l!!
'"
~
"
...
50,000
l'
x
40,000
><
x
x
x
-x '
30,000
*
20,000
~
-x
Xx
_x, <,x ,
x
'X
10,000
>:! X *
X
o
o 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
x = 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
X Actual Data Points
____h Average Rate
Fitted Curve
Filled Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0,643 Ln(X) + 5.866
R2 = 0,78
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
L
1337
Institute of Transportation Engineers
,
;~
,
: l~
ii
\u
II
~ n
~ 'I
,I
F
I,
,
Shopping Center
(820)
II
l
I
Ii
,t-
I~
i
~
!
it
~
~
1
:i
-i
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Number of Studies: 96
Average 1000 Sq, Feet GLA, 292
Directional Distribution: 61 % entering, 39% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
1,03
0,10
9,05
Standard Deviation
1.40
Data Plot and Equation
1,600
1,500
1,400
1,300
1,200
'" 1,100
'0
C
UJ
0. 1,000
'C
I-
Q) 900
13
:2
Q) 800
>
Q)
0> 700
'"
:;;
.i( 600
"
I- 500
400
300
200
100
0
0
x
x
x
x,
l<
:x ?<
,
//'//
/;,:,//,/
,,/,.,~
.-;",,,,,#'
~..../'
....;.... X
;//.,,//" x
,r";'--" x.
..~-;
.".///
..........,. .
x
:,.
I
! I
I I
Ii:
~
It
, t
I f1
" '~!"
liii,',
, ' ~'"
llj:
I,~~,
i M'
I ',I'
11;(1'
~ !'i'~',
aIr,:
:i~~~
I ~;
:~~.i
~H:
1'"
:Ii':
:jt~L
Jil,
li','i
Ir::
!,i1:
:,11."','-,,,
"~c.
':!'
'c',
x
x
-x
*
x
x-
x
5<" ,x-
><-
~""
x
100 200 300 400 SOO 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600
x = 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
X Actual Data Points
Fitted Curve
____u AverageRate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.596 Ln(X) + 2,329
R2 = 0,51
Trip Generation, 6th Edition
1338
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Shopping Center
(820)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p,m.
Number of Studies: 401
Average 1000 Sq, Feet GLA, 383
Directional Distribution: 48% entering, 52% exiting
Trip Generation per 1000 Sq. Feet Gross Leasable Area
Average Rate Range of Rates
3,74
0,68 - 29,27
Standard Deviation
2,73
Data Plot and Equation
9,000
8,000
7,000
..
." 6,000
"
W
c.
~
.. 5.000
U
:2
~
.. 4.000
Ol
<tl
~ X
>
..; X
II 3.000
f-
2,000
1.000
0
0
X Actual Data Points
x
X
'if.
X
X
X
X "
X
X X
X X
X ~
1000
2000
3000
x = 1000 Sq, Feet Gross Leasable Area
Fitted Curve
------ Average Rate
Fitted Curve Equation: Ln(T) = 0.660 Ln(X) + 3.403
R2 = 0,81
Trip Generation. 6th Edition
1339
Inslnule of Transportation Engineers
~
, 1"
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
~ITY CODES ON WEB ACCESSED
VIA CITY HOME PAGE
WWW_CLBOYNTON-BEACH_FL\JS
WWW_AMLEGALCOM/BOYNTON BEACH FL
Application Acceptance Date:
SITE PLAN REV~~~ APPLICATION ~ ~ @ ~ n rr ~ @_
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING'~ . .' -I j n
OFC - 4 2002 U
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT
Fee Paid
Receipt Number
Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting?
,Date
This application must be filled out compietely, accurately and submitted as an original to the Planning and Zoning
Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED sets of plans including
a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted with the application for the initial process of the Site Plan
Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED
Please print legibly (in ink) or type all information,
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
Project Name: COASTAL BAY COLONY
2. Applicant's name (person or business entity in whose name this application is made):
SOl1TI11'.RN HOMES OF PALM BEACH II. LLC - CARLOS BALLBE'
Address:
12900 S.W. 128TH STREET, SUITE 100, MIAMI, FL 33186
Phone: (305 )971-0102
Fax: (305)971-6662
(Zip Code)
3 Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant): CARLOS BALLBE'
KEITH & BALLBE', INC
Address:
1700 N,W, 64TH STREET, SUITE 300
FT, LAUDERDALE, FL 33309
Fax: (954)489-9802
(Zip Code)
Phone: (954 )489-9801
4 Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: SOUTHERN HOMES OF PALM BEACH II, LLC
Address: 1 ?gnn S W 128TH TREET. SUITE 100
MT AMT, Fl )',1 Rf>
(Zip Code)
Phone: (,Oo)g71-0102
Fax:
(305 )971-6662
5 Correspondence to be mailed to agent only; if no agent, then to applicant uniess a substitute
is specified below'*
N/A
*This is the one address to which all agendas, letters and other materials will be mailed
6 What is applicant's interest in the premises affected? (owner buyer iessee, build~r developer,
contract purchaser, etc_)
OWNER
II.
III.
The following information must be filled out below and must appear, where applicable, on all copies of the site
plan.
1
2.
3.
4
f
g.
7 Street address or location of site. SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
8.
Property Control #(PCN)
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A"
Legal description of site
SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "c"
g,
Intended use(s) of site:
TOWNHOME COMMUNITY (RESIDENTIAL)
10,
Developer or Builder'
SOUTHERN HOMES
11 Architect: BEHAR-FONT & PARTNERS, P. A .
12, Landscape Architect: BRADSHAW-GILL & ASSOCIATES
13. Site Planner' KEITH & BALLBE', INC.
14 Engineer' KEITH & BALLBE', INC
15 Surveyor' PULICE LAND SURVEYORS
16 Traffic Engineer' N! A
17 Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property?
$ln,nnn,nnn
18. Estimated construction costs of proposed improvements shown on this site plan.
SITE DATA
Land Use CateGory shown in the Comorehensive Plan
70ninG District C-2 AND C-3
Area of Site 4.34
Land Use -- AcreaGe Breakdown
COMMERCIAL
189,050
sq, ft.
acres
a_
Residential, including 2 16 acres 49 77 % of site
surrounding iot area
of grounds
Recreation Areas * 0.28 acres 6,45 % of site
(excluding water area)
Water Area 0 acres % of site
Commercial 0 acres % of site
Industrial 0 acres C:/o of site
Public/Institutional 0 acres % of site
b.
c.
d.
e
Public, Private and
Canal rights-of-way 1 90 acres 43 78 '/0 of site
h'
Other (specify)
acres
% of site
i.
Other (specify)
acres
% of site
j. Total area of site 4,34 acres 100 % of site
'including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and having a minimum dimension of 50 ft,
by 50 ft,
5, Surface Cover
a, Ground floor building 1 50 acres 34.50 % of site
area ("building footprint")
b
Water area
o
acres
o
% of site
c. Other impervious areas, including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts.
1 52 acres34. 94 % of site
d, Total impervious area h2L acres 34,94 % of site
e.
Landscaped area
1 33 acres 30 55 % of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq.ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7 5-35(g) of
Landscape Code).
f
Other landscaped areas,~ acres
% of site
g. Other pervious areas, including golf course, natural areas, yards, and swales, but excluding
water areas 0 acres % of site
h.
Total pervious areas 1 33 acres 30 55
% of site
i.
Total area of site
4 34 acres 100%
% of site
6. Floor Area
a. Residential 168,878 sq ft.
b. Commercial/Office 0 sq ft,
c. Industrial/Warehouse 0 sq. ft,
d. Recreational 2500 sq. ft.
e. Pubiic/lnstitutional 0 sq ft.
f Other (specify)
0 sq ft.
g. Other (specify)
0 sq ft.
h Total floor area 171,378 sq ft.
7 Number of Residential Dwellina Units
a.
Single-family detachl
o
sq, ft,
b
Duplex
o
sq, ft.
c, Multi-Family (3 + attached dwelling units)
(1) Efficiency dwelling units
(2) 1 Bedroom dwelling units
(3) 2 Bedroom 28 dwelling units
(4) 3+ Bedroom :3 7 dwelling units
d
Total multi-family
65 dwelling units
e,
Total number of dwelling units
6S
8. Gross Density 14,98 dwelling units per acre
9
Maximum heiqht of structures on site 41' -7"
feet
1
stories
10.
Required off-street oarkinq
a, Calculation of required
number of off-street
parking spaces
65x2= 130
b.
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
1')7
I"~ REC
N/A
Representative of the project must be present at all Technical Review Committee, Planning and
Development and City Commission meetings held to review this project.
III. CERTIFICATION
12/4/02
u~orized Agent Date
(I) (We) hereby d\slgnate the above signed person as Imy) (our) 3uthonzed agent In regard to thiS
appiication_ J
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted herewith become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We) hereby certify that the
above statement and any statements or showings in any papers or plans submitted herewith are
true to t t f ) (our) knowledge and beiief This aoplication will not be accepted unless
signed cc 0 t ~s below
12/4/0?
Date
IV AUTHORIZATION
12/4/02
Signature wner(s) or Trustee,
or Authorized rincipal if property is owned
by a corporatio or other business entity
Date
SPACE BELOW THIS LINE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY
Review Schedule:
Date Received
Technical Review Committee
Planning & Development Board
Community Appearance Board
City Commission
Date
Date
Date
Date
Stipulations of Final Approval:
Other Government Agencies/Persons to be contacted:
Additional Remarks:
A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TRC, P&D
AND CC MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT
RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION
The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that
all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering, and other data submitted with this application for review by the
City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by the various boards, commissions, staff personnel and other parties
designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall
rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and substantial.
The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering and other data which
may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, staff or designees shall be
constructed in strict compliance with the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall be
deemed material and shall place the applicant in violation of this application and all approvals and permits which
may be granted,
The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as provided for by the
applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance, and the
applicant shall indemnify, reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense, claim,
liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of th me
,2002
READ, ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED TO this 4 d
d~ -dJ 'f?LJdA10u1l
Witness Go.'i.fI>- T '<..0,1,,", ~ lIpplicant
witn{jl)~.,~_~~
t:> - () '7"J(!. '"Z-
PARCEL INFORMATION,
Property Control Number Location Address
08-43-45-33-06-000-0140 504 S,E, 23RD AVENUE
08-43-45-33-06-000-0160 510 S,E, 23RD AVENUE
08-43-45-33-06-000-0170 514 S,E, 23RD AVENUE
08-43-45-33-06-000-0180 520 S,E, 23RD AVENUE
08-43-45-33-00-000-5160 2421 S, FEDERAL HIGHWAY
08-43-45-33-00-000-5030 2505 S, FEDERAL HIGHWAY
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
PARCEL 1:
LOTS 14 AND 15 OF "ROBINSON'S I\DDITION TO BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA"
ACCORDING TO THE MI\P OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGE
14-4- OF THE PUBliC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA,
P A.~CEL 2:
BEGINNING AT A POINT 20778 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
NORTHEAST 1/4- OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4- OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH,
RANGE 43 EAST, THENCE EAST PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST
1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/464-707 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT
OF WAY LINE OF THE DIXIE HIGHWAY, THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID WESTERLY
RIGHT-OF-WA'r LINE TO A POINT 38556 FEET SOUTH OF THE SAID NORTH LINE OF
SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 TO A CONCRETE MONUMENT, THENCE
WEST 628,11 FEET, MORE OR LESS, AND P I\RALLEL TO THE SAID NORTH LINE OF
SAID NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID
NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4-, THENCE NORTH 177 78 FEET, MORE OR
LESS, TO THE POINT OF BEGiNNING. LESS THAT PORTION DEEDED TO THE STATE OF
FLORIDA, BY INSTRUMENT DATED JANUARY 24-, 1958, FILED JANUARY 27, 1958 AND
RECORDED IN O.R, BOOK 150, PAGE 370, PUBLIC RECORDS OF PALM BEACH
COUNTY, FLORIDA, FOR ROAD RiGHT OF WA Y PURPOSES_
PARCEL 3:
ALL THAT PART OF THE SOUTHEA.ST 1/4 OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 45 SOUTH,
RANGE 4-3 EAST, PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE P ARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS.
BEGINNING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT IN THE WEST LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF
U S, HIGHWAY NO 1, WHICH is 385_56 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 33, AND RUNNING THENCE SOUTH ALONG THE
WEST LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF SAID US. HIGHWAY NO 1, A DISTANCE OF
100 FEET, THENCE WEST ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID
SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 33, A DISTANCE OF 3500 FEET, THENCE NORTH
ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4- OF SAID
SECTION 33 TO A POINT WHICH IS 38556 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE
SOUTHEAST 1/4- OF SAID SECTION 33' THENCE EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE
SAID NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST 1/4- OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING, LESS THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR US, NO 1 (STATE ROAD NO 5)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOTS 16, 17 AND 18, "ROBINSON ADDITION" ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, AT PAGE 144 OF THE PUBLIC
RECORDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA.
r=:x 141 G1,\ " /311
COASTAL BAY COLONY
THREE STORY BUILDING FLOOR AREAS
UNIT A GROUND FLOOR 811.03 SQ FT
SECOND FLOOR 753.03 SQ FT
TERR. 58.00 SQ, FT
THIRD FLOOR 811.03 SQ FT
UNIT B GROUND FLOOR 823.33 SQ. FT
VERANDA. 79,33
SECOND FLOOR 765.33 SQ FT
TERR. 73.43 SQ, FT
BALCONY 79,33 SQ. FT
THIRD FLOOR 856,03 SQ, FT
BALCONY 87.29 SQ. FT
UNIT C GROUND FLOOR 953.50 SQ FT
SECOND FLOOR 897.32 SQ. FT
TERR.112.79SQ,FT
THIRD FLOOR 1604.54 SQ FT
BALCONY 13.60 SQ. FT
THREE STORY BUILDING FOOTPRINT
SQ,FT ACRES
3 UNITS (x 3 on site) 2,681.69 (x3) - 8,045.07 0.187 (x3) - 0.552
6 UNITS (x 3 on site) 5,33940 (x3) - 16,018,20 0.367 (x3) - 1.101
7 UNITS (x 2 on site) 6,14712 (x2) -12,294,24 0.14 (x2) - 0.28
TWO STORY BUILDING FLOOR AREAS
UNIT A GROUND FLOOR 1,180.47 SQ. FT
COVERED ENTRY 47.69 S_ F
SECOND FLOOR 1,226,79 SQ. FT
BALCONY 36,88 SQ. FT
UNIT B GROUND FLOOR 1,171.66 SQ. FT
BALCONY 27 48 SQ. FT
SECOND FLOOR 1,142.07 SQ, FT
BALCONY 39.88 SQ. FT
UNIT B-2 GROUND FLOOR 1,171.66 SQ FT
BALCONY 27 48 SQ, FT
SECOND FLOOR 1,142,07 SQ. FT
BALCONY 39,88 SQ. FT
TWO STORY BUILDING FOOTPRINT
SQ,FT. ACRES
4 UNITS (Ion site) 4,832_83 SQ, FT 0.1 10 ACRES
5 UNITS (l on site) 6,025.38 SQ, FT 0.138 ACRES
6 UNITS (Ion site) 7,217.94 SQ FT 0,165 ACRES
9 UNITS (l on site) 10,811.91 SQ. FT 0,248 ACRES
1
MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES ON SITE
THREE STORY BUILDING HEIGHT
3 UNITS 39'-8" FT
6 UNITS 4I'-I"FT
7 UNITS 41'-7"FT
TWO STORY BUILDING HEIGHT
4 UNITS
5 UNITS 30'-11" FT
6 UNITS
9 UNITS
NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELING UNITS
THREE STORY BUILDING
UNIT A TWO BEDROOM HOME
UNIT B TWO BEDROOM HOME
UNIT C THREE BEDROOM HOME
THREE STORY BUILDING
TOTAL ON SITE No. OF BEDROOMS
3 UNIT 3-3UNITS-9 6 - TWO BEDROOM HOMES &
3- THREE BEDROOM HOMES
6 UNIT 3 -6 UNITS -18 12 -TWO BEDROOM HOMES
& 6 - THREE BEDROOM
HOMES
7 UNIT 2 7 UNITS 14 10 -TWO BEDROOM HOMES
&14-THREEBEDROOM
HOMES
TOTAL ON SITE 41 UNITS 28 -TWO BEDROOM HOMES
& 13 - THREE BEDROOM
HOME
2
NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL DWELING UNITS (CONTINUED)
TWO STORY BUILDING
UNIT A THREE BEDROOM HOME
UNIT B THREE BEDROOM HOME
UNIT C THREE BEDROOM HOME
TWO STORY BUILDING
TOTAL ON SITE No. OF BEDROOMS
4 UNITS 1-4 UNITS FOUR - TREE BEDROOM
HOMES
5 UNIT 1 - 5 UNITS FIVE - THREE BEDROOM
HOMES
6 UNIT 1 - 6 UNITS SIX - THREE BEDROOM
HOMES
9 UNIT 1 - 9 UNITS NINE - THREE BEDROOM
HOMES
TOTAL ON SITE 24 UNITS 24 - THREE BEDROOM
HOMES
TOTAL UNITS ON SITE
No OF STORIES TOTAL UNITS TOTAL No, OF BEDROOMS
3 STORY BUILDING 41 UNITS 28 -TWO BEDROOM HOMES
&13-THREEBEDROOM
HOME
2 STORY BUILDING 24 UNITS 24 - THREE BEDROOM
HOMES
TOTAL 65 UNITS 28 -TWO BEDROOM HOMES
& 37 - THREE BEDROOM
HOME
3
~t!'ct'Z- - /t!e-~.b?, !.u-tefik't:"
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG
7 30
1'1.
t ~, ~., " frv....
/
PHONE. "l-P(-- f'l- 7'~1
NAJ'\1E OF APPLICANT/CONTACT
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
PROJECT ADDRESS,
7 J <f - #9 - / ~(J 2--
FAX:
PROPOSED TYPE OF USE/OCCUPA..7\fCY:
DATE SUBMITTAL RECEIVED DATE DENIED
COlY.lJY1ENTS
7~(
~-
,
, {J
ii'
~-~~
171
h"
J:\SHRDATA\P13nning\SH.-UtED\WP\PROJECTS\PRE APPUCATIOc-;S ~IEETL'G LOGS\Pre-Applic:ltion ~[cctin:;: log.doc
&-O"lbl':> g ,?bt,^c... C-Il""I
[K&B]' 3
INC
I
KEITR l ~~t~
(O~1i>>1 ~ I ,
'Ill? ~~ ~ ~ , IIJ
~d I !vJIA. ~A ~IfIAA ~
&~t'-'<-. - J~d,.t~? (U.Latk,.c,
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG
APPLICATIONS,
ZONING DISTRICT
PROJECT NAME:
" h,"" c..
ATTENDING S AFF E. ~..
ATTENDING AS APPLICANT
PHONE: 'IJ'1-- ftr- rEO!
NAJ\'IE OF APPLICANT/CONTACT
ADDRESS
PHONE:
PROJECT ADDRESS
I TIME '7 30
/.. r
C2 ~C-J
I
t 4, -.., .' hY-..
/
1,j <I - #'1- 'If"() 2-
FAX:
PROPOSED TYPE OF USE/OCCUPANCY:
DATE SUBMITTAL RECEIVED DATE DEi'I~ED'
COMj\1ENTS:
..s
~ ~-
,
JI
it1
~<~
7;t
11
/(~
J:\SHRDAT A\Pl:1nning\SH.-\.R.ED\WP\PROJECTS\.PRE -\PPLICATIO:'iS ~IEETL"'iG LOGS\P,e-Applk:aion ~[cc!in~ Log:.doc
&-f~q) @. ',L-btlAl' C.\l""I
(K&B)
INC ,
KEITH & BALLBE, INC.
Consulting Engineers 1
1700 N W 64th Street Carlos J. Ba\lb~, P f.
suiie 300 (954) 489-9801
Fort Lauderdale, FI 33309 FAX: (954) 489-9802
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
PLEASE PRINT
MEETING DATE:
TIME.
ATTEl'iDING FOR APPLICANT.
NOTICE The purpose of this conference shail be for the staff and applicant to discuss overail
community goals, objectives, policies and codes ass related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions express at the pre-application conference are not
binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual
Ians submitted for review,
City of Boynton Beach Attending for Applicant
Attendina Staff
r.--
--1 0 ~'\I'N7l7Yl
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
J:\SHRDATA\PLA..'1NL'iG\SHARED\WP\FOR.\IS\PRE-APPL MEETI:'iC-5rGN C'i SHEET.DOC
"
PROJEC T NAME: Coastal Bay Colony
LOCATION: SE 23 Ave. & S Federal Highway
PCN: Numerous (6)
I FILE NO.: NWSP 02-026 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: New Site Plan I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: Carlos OWNER: Southern Homes
BaUbe, Keith & BaUbe, Inc. of Palm Beach, LLC
PHONE: 954-489-9801 PHONE: 305-971-0102
FAX: 954-489-9802 FAX: 305-971-6662
ADDRESS: 1700 NW 64th Street ADDRESS: 12900 SW 128th Street
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33309 Miami, FL 33186
Date of submittal/Projected meetin!! dates:
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITT AL 12/4/02
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 12/20/02
PUBLIC NOTICE: N/A
TRC MEETING: 1/21/03
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS):
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD N/A
MEETING:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT 2/11/03
AGENCY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 2/18/03
COMMENTS:
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Southern Homes of Palm Beach\Coastal Bay Colony\NWSP 02-026 Coastal\2002 PROJECT TRACKING INFO.doc