APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME: Arb\.lata Townhomes
LOCATION: East of Congress, South ofSW 35th Avenue
PCN: 08-43-46-05-00~000-3030
I FILE NO.: SBMP 02-005 1/ TYPE OF APPLICATION: I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: William H. Baker, Trustee
William Wietsma, Architect PHONE: 800-849-2729
PHONE: 274-4863 FAX: 803-324-1116
FAX: 274-7636 ADDRESS: 555 Paddock Parkway
ADDRESS: 25 Seabreeze Avenue Rock Hill, SC 29731
Suite 304 Delray Beach, FL 33483
Date of submittallProiected meetin2 dates:
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL 10/2/02
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 10/24/02
PUBLIC NOTICE: N/A
TRC MEETING: 11119/02
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS):
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 1/28/03
MEETING:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT N/A
AGENCY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 2/4/03
COMMENTS:
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Arbolata Townhomes\SBMP 02-005\2002 PROJECT TRACKING INFO.doc
_ar.ft II. ClIIUJtCB, P.B.
~IIUWIIIG CIVIL _I....
lOSG 8. hdenl B1fbWa,.
81Ii t. U8
Del J:a)' Bea.. .1 33483
DO\.LJ- ... ......TftAL wn8U
'fO:
//.z/~3
;Cc#< ~ q... ~-..., / Pt!:-:
laU:
4Ld ~ ~~-V'
07 i 47n4n -4a-d,
I'ItClH :
C G Cb~cL
'I'BB ~LLClfDIG DCJeII....~(.)/..~111..(8):
IPE A r-4-rC'aCq- ~...-..k>>u-~
_J J.,...~,--4~d f,.~/:J-r....:...._~
AU DCU)Rft .POll !'OOJl:
a..,i_ t'
Ilequeat
Appro".1
Info
bco1:_
C _ 1l"-',"_
00'1 ."6':
1. ~ DVII U1' QUau. COI~ZIlG ..18 ftWf..l'ft'AL, ItIJIDLY
........AO'f .. 87 ~ A'1' (SI1) 266-9520. '1'IIU1t YOU.
,~~d
~at.D I. C8ORClII. P.B.
... 2003
[~
JAM - 2 LlilJ
~
ill
rn @ ~ U \)'] ~
f11lAPPlC 8IGN.UJZA.TIOl'f S'I'VDY -MIIOLATA TO.1JfIlOIJU
PLANNING AND I
Seooe of Servlees
The City of Boynton Beach requested a Traffic Si(pla1ization Study fur the intersection of Congress A VCllue
and S. W. 3~ Avet\le In IlOIIjundlan widl the ptopoe..d _Ittg ofdle lHere tnIet at lite 1OIlllIeat___
of the Inllll.o<lllon. At dlla location k is JIlopolled to dewlap a residential_WIlly. tIlr 172 TOWIIhcmes.
The scope of servIees Is to detennlne lfthe wwranQ exist tbr a tfafftc signal at the intenec:tlon ofCongrcss
A venue and S. W 35th Avenue. The Traffic Sianalimtion Study has been prepared in accordance with the
ltandardlllld crit<<ia .. set filrtb in the Manual ofUnIfbnn 1'ratlk Control Dmces. Sec:tl0ll. 4C. The
wart'Ints to be met lIl'e .. foIIOWlI:
Warrant I-Minimum wbicuJac volume.
Warrant 2-InterrupdOll. of cootInllOUS traftie.
Warrant 3-Mlnlmum ~ Ian wIume
Warrant 4-School crossing.
Warrant 5-Ptogreaive mOYelllent.
Warrant 6-Accidcnt experiencc.
Warrant 7..systems.
Warrant ll-Combination ofwart'lnts.
Warrant9-Pcak Hour Volumes.
Warrant Io-Peek Hour Delay.
Warrant II.Peak Hour Volume.
In order to meet the wmanta far ~ si&Jl8l, Palm BeadI County TraftI.c Division. requested that only
Warrants 1 and 6 be analyzed.
A schematic sketch oftbe intersection Is enclosed as Exhibit "A"; note that this Is a "Tee" typcl intersection.
The property to the Wl:Sl bas been dc\'C1opcd, however the access driveway is north of the intersection
IlDder study.
WarraRt 1. Eieht-Hour Vehkular Volume
This WIIlTlIIlt requires that one of thc following conditions exists tbr each of any 8 hours, the Minimum
Vehicular Volume, Condition A. or die Interruptioo of Continuous Traffic, Coodition B. ofa typic:al24
hour period.
Condition A requires 600 whlcles per hour on the major slJ'eet, boIh directions and 200 whlcles per hour
on the minor street. hiahest direction. A traffic count was made at the minor street intersection on
NOYeIIlber 26. 2002; see Exhibit "8". It was determined that the peak 8 hour ~ voIl8Jle occurred fi'cm
1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., see Exhibit "C"
Sublequentlya traffic COUIIt was made at the lntllIee.:tion on 12104102; far all ~ mOYelllents from 9:00
A.M. to 10:00 P.M.. during which the peak I-hour traffic occurred, see Exhibit "0" The peak hour trafflc
011 the mJlior street exceeded the standard. However the peak hour traffic OIl the minor street was 164
vehicles, which occurred from 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M.
The peak hour traffic generated by the JlI'OIIClIIed Arbolata TownhOllles development would be 95 vehicles,
which occur during the P.M. peaIc hour. see Tableland 2, ~ ftom the Traffic Study tbr Arbolata
Townhomes. There would be 63 trips entering and 32 trips exiting. The impact on the intersection would be
the exiting ~ going 'MlIlt bound, a toCal of32lrips. 'I'Iwle&..e the total miner 8Ireet traffic would be 196
whicles, which is less than the standard 200 vehicles.
Note that the P.M. existing peak hour traffic occurred from 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. Typically the peak hour
traffic tbr the \'ClIklential development occurs bctwcl:In 4:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M. The peak hour traffic on
S.W. 35th Avenue during this period was ftom 5:00 P.M to 6:00 P.M., a total of91 YJlliC!es,1lCC Exhibit
"8" On this b8ais the toCal miner sI1'eel ~ would be 123 vehicles. lIIIbstantialIyiis.tban the standard
200 wbiclt&
1
Condition B requires 900 vehicles per hour 01\ the major street, both directions and 100 vehicles per hour
on the minor street fur thrOU&h and left turns, hiihest direction. As noted there is no thrOU&h traffic since it
is a "Tee" Intcnec:tlco. A traffic count WlI8 made of the Intersectfun 01\ 12104/02; for a111raftlc movemeots
fi'om 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., during which the peak 8-hour traffic occurred, see Exhibit "0" The
vchicles durini the peak hour exceeded the requirement for the major street, hO\WVer the vebicles durini
the peak hour 011 the minor street approach fur the left turns __ 25 vehicles, which oc:curred fi'om 2:00
P.M. to 3:00 P.M.
The peak bour traftic aenented by the JlI'OIlOIIld ArboIata Townbomes development would be 95 veI1ides,
which oe<:ur durin!! the P.M peak hour, see Table 2. There would be 63 trips entering and 32 trips exitinll.
The lmpllCl 01\ the InterlleCltion WlJUId be the exiting traftic going WllSt bound, a tolll1 of32 trips. Based IIpOII
a direaiooal split of SO% north bound and SO% SOIIlb bound, there would be ] 6 left turn movcmcnts during
the peak hour. 'fbc;:rI;furc the toial minor s\rCI;;t traffic wou1d be 41 vchi4:lcs, which is leas than the standard
100 vehlcIes.
Note a1so that the peak hours do not coincide. which would actually reduce the vcbiele COWlt f<If' left turn
movemeoll at the inI<<secdoo.
Warrant 6-A<:<:iden=imee
Crash cqMlt'i_ is' when five Clt mCJl'C nported cresbes, of twes I1I8Cept1'b1e to cmectico by a
traffic signal. have occurred within a 12 month period; and conditions A or B of Warrant 1 are 80"10
!lfti~ed; and COudlel.Y - 'l I_less t$rictlve than signRJi"".;OO have proven to be Ineft'ective In
comcting such erashes.
A review of Palm BeadI CClunty traffic 8I.lCident reports for the pIIBt 1211lODlhs, w-I no nported traffic
8I.lCidents at the Intcnec:tlon. Note that these reports are a COIIIpllatlon of all ""iQdar 8I.lCidcnts In the
COIDIty, including loeaI City IICCidents.
BllHIl apoll tile aJIIIl"" oCtile Trame Warrutl alMm, It lleoad1lded tIIat a tnftle efpal Is IIGt
warranled at this time at the inteneetloa of Coqt'CA Awne &lid S. w. 35'" Avealle in BoyntAHl
BeKh.
Compiled by:
Date:
Revised:
Gerald B. Church, P.E.
o-nber 11,2002
o-nber 30, 2002
./ ,,_c..: .
../'--1- ~...c_-c..--'--(';:.L
//2/03
2
I TllAft'IC SIGNALIZATION STUDY -ARBOLATA TOWNHOMEI
Seooe of Services
The City ofBoyntoo BeadI requested a Traffic fllglutliftt100 Study fur the in~ ofCcagress Awnue
and S. W. 35* AWllIIe in CClI\ltmdion with tho ~ I'""""hta of the 16-acre tract at the southeast ccmer
of tho intersection. At this 10catlcn it is paopoeed toclew1op a nskIentiaI CllIDDIunity, fur 172 Townhomes.
The scope ofservices is to determine if the warrants exist fur a ttaffic signal at the intersection of Congress
AWllUO and S. W. 3S. AVCllue. The Traffic S....Ii...rioo Study bas ~ plOj>4Iod in ........dlulce with the
standards and c:ritcria as SlIt furth in the Manual ofUnifurm Traffic Conttol Devices, Secticn4C. The
warrants to be met are as fullows:
Warrant I-Minlmwn whicular volume.
Warrant 2-1ntemJptIon of llOIItinUOUS ttaftic.
Warrant 3-Minimum pedestrian volume
Warrant 4-Sdlool crossing.
Warrant S-l'rogJessive movement
Warrant 6-Aa:ident experience.
Warrant 7-Systems.
Warrant 8-Cornbination ofwarrants.
Warrant 9-Peak Hour VoIwnes.
Warrant Io-Peak Hour Delay.
Warrant II-Peak Hour Volume.
In order to meet the warrants fur ttaftic signal, Palm BeadI County Traffic Dlvisicn, requested !hit cnly
Warrants I and 6 be analyzed.
A schematic sketch of the intorsecticn is endosed as Exhibit "A"; note !hit this is a "l'eo" typo inbneetion.
The property to the west bas ~ dovek1pod, howowr the access driveway is north of the in~
under study.
Wammt 1. ElDt-Hour Vehicular VoInme
This warrant requires !hit one of the fuIlowing conditicna me for oad1 of any S hours, the Minlmwn
Vehicular Volume, Condition A, or tho Interruption of Continuous Traffic, ConditiOll B, ofa typlcal24
hour period.
ConditlOll A requires 600 whicles per hour on the '"*" street, both dlroetiOlls and 200 vehicles per hour
on the minor street, highest dil0c:ti0n. A U'IIftic IlOUIlt was made at the minor stroel iartoIMCtion on
November 26, 2002; see Exhibit "8". It was cIelfnnined !hit the peak S hour traftlc volume occurred fi'om
1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., see Exhibit "C" The vehicles during tho peak hour on the minor street were 125
whicles, which 0CClI1'nICI1i'om 7:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. This was less than the required 200 wbicles per
hour.
Condition B requires 900 vehicles per hour on the m*", street, both directions and lOll vehicles per hour
on tho minor aInlet fur throuah and left tuma, hiabest directicn. As noted there is DO throuah \nIffic since it
is a "l'ee" intllrlleCliOll. A U'IIftic count was made of the inbneeti1lll1lll12104102; fur all ttaftic movements
fi'om 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., during which tho peak &-hour ttaftic occurred. see ExIu'bit "D". The
vehicles during the peak hour exceeded the requirement for the major street, however the vehicles during
the peak hour l1li tho minor stroel applGlCh for the left lUmlI \\We 2S wblcles, which occurred fi'om 2:00
P.M. to 3:00 P.M. This _less than the required 100 vehldes per hour.
Warne.6-Aeddeet Emerienee
Crash experienco is satisfied when five or more repoI1Od crashes, of types suaceptlb1e to correction by a
U'IIftic signal. haw 0CClI1'nICI within a 12 moath period; and
b. conditions A or B of Warrant I arc 80".4 satisfied; and
c. countermeuuresless..... R:tivethan signalization have proven to be ineffectiw in .....octinll
such crashes.
1
A review of Palm Bead1 County traffic accident reports tor the put 12 mlXltbs, showed no reported
traftic: accidents at the iDtcnec:tiOll.
BIlled IIpOII the ...1yIIs of the TnfIIe WalTllJds above, It Is _hided tUt a traftle sipalls DOt
WlII'I'Uad at CIIII.... at die laU.-A.. area.a._ A.._ ... SoW. 3S'" A_ la Boyacua
B.dI.
COlI1plled by:
Date:
Gerald B. Churcb, P.!.
December 11,2002
2
EXHIBIT "A"
I ,
,tit' l~;? 1
1 , $.'41.
I
-.
I ,
JI.} ij oS li.
t ,
~ k~,f:i(W,J~
b~~\)c.t" 4,2002-
dtAWN bs..t\A~S l\o"';f\O
"crt f>~9~~1 i uJ
~
EXHIBIT "B"
Traffic Survey Specb.lbt.. Inc. 624 IJardenia Terrace
Del~ay Beach, Plor1da 33444 Phone (5611 272-3255
Volwaa _ort wit.h 24 Hour TOea18 Page 1
..**....**..**.....**.**.......**...****...................~*...***...*..**.****
Data File D1126001.PRN
Station I 000000112501
Identification 000058410082 Interval 1S minute.
Start date Nov 26. 02 Start t!.. I 00.00
Stop date Rov 26, 02 Stop time 24.00
City/Town : Boynton Beach. P1. COImt.y : Palm leach
Locat:1on I SW 35th Avenue Juat "'t of Ccmgr... Av.
..........***.....***...................*****..........*....**.*...***....***..
lfoy 26 W..tbound Volume
End Time
-~-------------------.-------------------------------.-----.-.-----------------
15
30
45
00
Hr TOtal
00
o
o
o
o
o
01
o
o
o
o
....- - .
o
02
o
o
,
.
o
1
03
o
o
o
1
1
04
o
o
o
o
o
OS 06
o 0
1 0
o 0
o ...
1
4
07
3
4
3
6
16
08
Ii
10
,
..
27
09
10
7
13
15
45
10
12
12
11
9
U
11
7
!5
8
13
33
-----------.------------------..-------..--------------------------------------
End Time
15
30
45
00
12
14
5
8
6
13
12
13
11
5
14.
7
10
1
8
1.5
10
8
7
6
16
10
4
8
8
11
18
14
15
41
21
19
37
65
16
7
20
11
51
24
11
21
7
5
10
1I
22
18
,
;.'I
5
23
1
o
1
1
Hr Total 33 41 32 31 30 45 91 125 97 31 31 3
--.----.-------------.-------------.-------------------------------------------
<I" Hour Total : 762
AM peak hour begin. : 09:30 AM peak volume, 52 Peak hour factor: 0 87
PM peak hour beqins I 18:30 PM peak volulIle, 164 Peak hour factor: 0 63
.......................................**................*..*.*...**.......*...
5
15
12
13
57";<0"'; /"aR f
7'<p4/""-/<::;; .s;.:;::.N"'{~_~,--v'G,e~~__dl-'r ~~ fyt/ ,3> +VE
r
//A4L: - d/zC /az
~._.'-~
"0
<1l 7~= A;vj -ID 3' ~(:JPr,..'1
0-
c
.9
i;j 8 4-
"5
0-
E
UJ 0 9' 5
~U
~ '"
00'-
.... OJ 10 6
'" OJ
()) .~
. 0>
o C
ZUJ II 7
@
a: /2.
~ 8'
I ?,II-f 9'
~ .2 ~ /~
~
r .3 /1
4- /2
5" I' 4/-1
6 2
7 3
8 1-
WL':5 '/ ,00'-''''',0
TR,-dr.rr' '" V&L///(,/~ A 7' /,11 'rL'?s.~c.7i'o ;yJ
21/
2e>6
.zC3'7
'2 &'7
3r3G
42>"5.
4' 4 2- - PL' Ak,& Iku,R
.q~-:..
-I e. /
453
423
'378
.zcS8
/6"'"
r
II Uft a_ , ell I tll a_
....... ....
_If: ~. ~, I. ..."r,
.. A-.... . .....ID
TrlUtc kltlJ 1IIdI1Uu. lie.
1M .... ,...
II1RJ .... J1GrftI 1M
!H11 m-UH III INtI1ft-Ult
AU'. MIM
IIJPll_ ,_ _a_
Ir. .. fill...
CI -.....
.. IIortk
1 UJ 1 7 J , m . . m
1 ,.. 1 ) 1 , 1N 2 I III
5 lf1 , 5 I , III , . SIt
flU 11 1t n 11 t 11ft 11 . 116'
11:11 J 237 . J t 2M 3 . m
111lS 5 2M ] . . lt1 I 0 tll
11:31 5 141 . ! , W 5 . m
IOu l' no 11 11 1 1212 II I 22"
11:11 . US I I , I >>.'I . . S1l
11:11 , 24t . . ! . 123 1 . itl
11:31 5 '3S . I S . In , I "'
IGer 21 t75 16 , 2! I uu 17 . 2'"
11:11 S 21' , I 11 . In , I 551
13:15 . 151 I ) 2 . HI 5 . Of
12:10 , IN 5 , 11 I 121 , . 06
.. J1 1M' 11 10 H . uat 2t 1 Jilt
U:" 1 It, . 1 . 0 1M . . ill
U;15 I lit 1 1 1 . 141 t I '"
U:II 5 1" 1 , ) , 111 1 I Q1
.. II lU' 15 21 13 . USS n I ..
1':" 5 . 11' 7 I 0'
1':15 5 , )1' , I IN
U;lI , t II' 1 I 73.
2 5 . . III 5 I eM
s . . t H' ] I ",
I ) 5 t .sf 12 . ,..
.. 15 l1st , 11 1t I 1151 n I
EXHIBIT "0"
...,....1 lSllM
lice eIIt I HlnUl
tun lit.: l111t1l2
.... : 1
.__Io_"'~
__ MIeI. ""III
.. II: 10. ......, .. ...., .
.. -J I lit ., .__
fnrfUc .."., 1tHi11.1Jts. &c.
ut tIdIII& timet
IIIlt17 ...... n.d,. ""'
1N1127""" hi 1"11 m-Gl
m 1IUCUI
--- ; --
... ... ... ...
........
frtIleIU
ICIrt
lI:H . m J J , , .If . 1 m
11:15 U 2" 5 , 7 . ..3 7 . '51
If,,. f 1.. 2 ! 11 , If. 1. 5 au
.. 1<< U . U7I U . JIll
17:" . 2f. J J 12 . US . J 12.
17111 I 271, J I SI . sa I 1 H.
17,1' 11 m 11 J , . IN , 1 .15
.. Jl I'" 11 13 n . 110 n , 5515
Us" , u. s ) 11 . 1M I 1 712
lI:U 7 HI 1 3 5 . II' J . '"
u:Jt 11 HI 1 J f . U7 . . ,,.
IN, U I un It 1 211.
D:" 17 11) 1 J J I 16 f . ..y
D:U J JU 1 J 1 I 211 . . In
Din I 1,U . 1 5 '( US J . JU
II1II' 2f It )1 . 1ft .II . 11ft
zt:" 3 151 . 2 f . 1" 2 . 321
HItS J 111 1 1 7 . 1.' 1 0 m
"ti' . u. 3 1 , '1 1" 2 . m
IDIr t If/ 5 . J1 . SN , lUi
21:0' . 111 . . 13 . m 3 . m
UI15 . 113 . 1 , I U. . 0 HI
U:Jt J n 2 1 . . ul . . ut
II1II , J . tn
1'otI1 UI UI1. III 1M UJ , HU' l" 13 )Un
'lie. 1.1 tf" 1.2 J7.' IU H.S 1.1
, 1'1&. .., 3U f.5 U 1.f 11.1 t.' .
I:J'I nUt. -
.-..: --
litl c:adt : ....U
'tan ..., O/M/"
htt : 2
1 ~
"I-
\1 $
"I-
~\ ~
",'"
....-
cit
~
I ~
"l-
I ~
"I-
1!~1 ?
'$e
a" <:it
~
~ 8
<:i
"I-
al ~
~ 8-
~~
~~
~ ?
. '"
\,
s\\
~ci
~~7i
~~
\l
I ~
I G
lf~
~I
I G
i ~
rl ~
! ~
l ..
~ ~
S
! If
"
~\i
~~,
~\,
l!
------------- -
I TIlAI'JIC SlGNALlZATIONSTVDY -ARBOLATA TOWNHOMEB
~ ofServieel
The City ofBoyntCll Be8dI requested a Traffic Signalization Study for the intersection of Ccngress Avenue
and S. W. 35* Avenue in conjlDlction with the propclfIlld rezoning of the 16-acn tract at the southeast comer
of the interseetim. At this locatiOll it is proposed to develop a realdeotlal commlDllty, for 172 Townbomes.
The scope of services is 10 determine if the warrants exist for a traffic signal at the intersection of Congress
Avenue and S. W 35. Avenue. The Traffic Signalizatim Study bas ~ prepered in accordanc:e with the
standards and c:ritcria 85 set forth in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, SectiOll 4C. The
warrants to be met are 85 follows:
Warrant I-Minlmwn vehicularwlume.
Warrant 2-Interruptim of continuous traffic.
Warrant 3-Mlnlmum pedestrian volume
Warrant 4-Sdlool c:rossina.
Warrant 5-f'rogtolSSlve movement
Warrant 6-Accident experience.
Warrant 7-Systems.
Warrant 8-Combination ofwarranlS.
Warrant 9-Peak Hour Volwnes.
Warrant IO-Peak Hour Delay.
Warrant II-Peak Hour Volume.
~ ~3u~rfm
m
PlANNING AND
ZONING DEPT
In ooler to meet the wmants for trat1ic signal, Palm Be8dI COIDIty Traffic Division, requested that OIIly
Warrants I and 6 be analyzed.
A schematic sketch of the intersectiOll is enclosed 85 Exhibit "A"; note that this is a "Tee" type intersection.
The JlIop1Jrty to the west bas been developed. howewI' the access driveway Is north of the intersectim
under study.
Warn_t 1. Eldtt-Hoar V.blealar V-
'Ibis wmant requires that OIIC of the fullowina condltiona exilIls for each ofany 8 hours, the Minimwn
Vehicu1ar Volume, Ccndltlon A, er the Interruption of Continuous Traffic, CcnditiOll B, oCa typical 24
hour period.
Condition A requires 600 vehicles per hour on the map street, both dlrectlons and 200 vehicles per hour
m the miner street, highest clheetioo. A trat1ic count W1IlI made 81 the miner street intersectiOll 00
November 26, 2002; _ Exhibit "B" It W1IlI determined that the peak 8 hour traffic wlume occurred fi'om
1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., _ Exhibit "C" The vehicles during the peak hour 011 the miner street were 125
vehicles, whic:h occurred ftom 7:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. This was less than the require4 200 vehicles per
hour.
Condition B requires 900 vehicles per hour on the majer street, both dil'llClions and 100 vehicles per hour
011 the miner street for through and left turns, highest directioo. As noled then is no through traffic since it
is a "Tee" intersectim. A traffic count W1IlI made of the intersectim m 12104102; for all traffic movements
ftom 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., during whieh the peak 8-hour traffic occurred, _ Exhibit "D" The
vehicles during the peak hour exceeded the requirement for the map street, however the vehicles during
the peak hour 011 the minor street appI'(llIdI for the left turns were 25 vehicles, whldl occurred fi'om 2:00
P.M. to 3:00 P.M. This was less than the required 100 vehicles per hour.
Warn.t 6-~_t Jt1Inerlellee
Crash eKperienco is satisfied when five er mere npcrted crashes, of types susceptible to correetim by a
traffic signal, have occurred within a 12 mOllth period; and
b. conditiOlls A er B of Warrant I are 80% satisfied; and
c. CllUlllermll8lUl'ClS less restrictive than signaJi:ratiOll have proven to be ineffilctive in 00.. C<t.ng
such crashes.
1
A review of Palm Beed1 County traffic accident n:ports fur \be pBSt 12 mooths, shOWlld no reported
tra1Iic accidents at \be lnt<<8eCtim.
Baed lIpOII tile aualysls of"e Tnflle Warru. above, it is _eJadeel that a trafIIc slp.11s not
Wlll'hllted at tills time at tile Iatenectioa of c-.. _ A_lie aad S. w. 3S'" A_lie Ia BoyatoD
BeacJa.
Compiled by:
Date;
Gerald B. Church. P.E.
December I 1, 2002
~u 64-.-4d
/ .:z./n /1> Z
2
...:XHIBIT "A"
, I
,'tl~ L=;~ 1
I ( ,'N.
l
....
oS t/.
I I
~~ij
t I
~ &e".FioviJC\
t>ce~Dt.r 4,2002.-
d(AWN bs'.I\A;S &\0"';"0
t\OT f>~9,,~liuJ
~
EXHIBIT "B"
Traffic Survey Speci.aliat., Inc. 624 G1aJ:denis Terrace
Del~ay Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255
VolUlU Report with 2" Hour Totala Palle 1
..**....***.***....**..*......***.******..................****.*.***.....*.****.
Data File Dl126C01.PRN
Station I 000000112501
Iaentification 000058410082 Interval 15 minute.
Start date Nov 26, 02 Start time ,00,00
Stop date Nov 26, 02 Stop time 24:00
City/TOwn : Boynton Beach, PL County : Palm Beach
Location , 8W 35th Avenue "ust ...t of Congress Ave
..........*.....*****......**..**..**...**..........*..*....****.******.*.*....
Nav 26 Westbound. Volume
-~-------------.------------------.._----------.-----------._------------------
End Time 00 01 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 09 10 11
-------- ...--
15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4l 10 12 7
30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 " 10 7 12 5
"5 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 7 13 11 e
.
00 0 0 0 1 0 0 " 6 .. is 9 13
------.....
Hr Toeal 0 0 1 1 0 1 " 16 27 45 "" 33
----------~-._------.._-------..------~.._---.----------..---------------------
End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2<1 23
-...------ ..-...
15 14 12 7 10 10 5 14 37 11 7 16 1
30 5 13 10 8 4 15 15 65 51 5 , 0
45 e 11 7 7 8 1:2 41 16 24 10 2 1
00 , 5 e , e 13 21 7 11 , 5 1
...--...---
Hr Total 33 n 32 31 30 45 91 125 97 31 31 3
-..........------------...---------------.----------...-------------------------...-
24 Hour Total : 1'2
AM peak hour begins : 09: 30 AM peak volume: $:;1 Peak hour factor : 0.87
PM peak hour begins , 18: 30 PM peak volume, 164 Peak hour hctor : 0.63
.................**.................*.....*..............*....***........***.*.
J
57LSOv' r.t:>R f
7.(>/';/""-r~ ":"y~,4L
7/ ;v? L - ///';:';;/02
._--~
"0
rl". 7.c= /I 'vf -J~ .:1 . "" 'p"'"'1
c
.Q
1!! 8 4-
:J i
Co
E
w 0 9 5
~O
~ '"
CX) -~
r-- <l> It') J!?
'" <l>
m.!i:
.0>
o c
ZLU 1/ "7
@
D:
g /2 63
1 ,,:;/"1 Cf
w
~
2 - Ii}
A\
..J /1
"1- /2
5" I .4. r-1
6 2
7 y
a 1-
EXHIBIT "e"
/. '..-
~'" 'V c"::' ';;.-Jc"s ~ /f /.-..E c
,. W ,.3';;. rf-v'ii
.?yL",5 7" ,,{:2,,;"';"'</"Vp
7:e'".4r.lt",,,";(.. V'C;L..,~'//\/c',4 7 //V7Z..<-'; ;,,-;:',,-_7/~i 1\../
271
.::?b6
2':;'31
;? ,J5'c;
3:56
4.26,
"'1. "I .2.. - PEAk C; 10,,,1(>
'7'8;ii.
4e/
-? 53
4..k. 3
.:> 7tff
ze.c:;
/"p ..,.,
-"---_.-._-- ~------
EXHIBIT "0"
II Jlnl1lllll , III 1"1_ I'tdUc """ "1rI-1'''~. lie.
'H ~ feInat .. _I nl~
........ .... II1rIr 1IIcIt, '** Uu, titl l:IIt I ,..HlU
.. II: ~. ~. I. ......., . 15UI272-3155 ,. INti lJI.'m Star, lite: 12/N/U
.. Nl'~'" . .'_Lt. .... : 1
ILL l1li_
fI ...- II JI'JI _ ClJl"'"lfll,..
_110m IreI .. .. ItI&k
IteR
1 21) 2
1 US 2
J au .
..... 11 N' 11 n 11 . 11 I
11:" J 231 t , 3 . 2M 3 1 SlS
11.1S 5 2M ) 3 . . Ja1 , . .U
II:JI ! ut J , , I J12 5 , m
IOu II .10 I 12 n I 1H1 11 . UI1
11:" . 223 I 3 . 0 322 . . sn
I1:U , Ht I , , . IU I . st.
11:11 . 235 . 1 , I JH I . SI'
'.n 22 m 11 I 21 . uti 1f I HU
12:" 3 I , 11 ,n , , 10
12:11 . , 3 J 351 5 1 U7
12.lt 1 5 , 11 3U , 1 Uf
lair J1 IN. 11 2G H un u 1 Jill
u:.. 1 2U I ) . 0 HI . 0 01
12115 J IN 2 2 2 . '" . 0 os
12:11 5 191 J . J . m 2 I Q1
leu II m' 11 2t U 1 un u I 2SU
, I 5 . m 7 I 07
. I 5 . nt 7 I nl
J , , . 'N 1 . 7J1
n I 2111
"
ot
"'
".
.. 15 11St I if
. __ . tile., 11DI1
.... MICI. M11l
__ .; .. nMIlIt. I. ...., .
.. ~ 1 .~ In .....1_
.'1111'"
htllhrtl
tntfic hrfty ItIrillilu. lie.
AIIItUI1& 'hmct
OIlftJ ...... nlriU 3M44
(set) m.u" ha (Hll 2ft-4Jtl
au tIItCUt
--- . ...-
.. lilt htI ....
Iurt
II1II1.
1'1" J an a a t . I" . 1 '"
11115 U m I , 7 . ..2 , . m
1':U , n. 2 5 11 . SA 10 ) 151
liar U 1151 It U JJ . 1m 11 I 1m
17:01 I U. 3 3 II . "5 I 5 nl
U;lS I '" . J 5 Sf I 5" , 1 "'
11.11 11 m 11 2 , . 5" , 1 175
- J1 1115 11 13 sa I 1m 22 , Jill
11:" z 11. 1 1 11 . 411 , 1 '12
11:15 1 2" 1 ] 5 I 311 3 I 117
11:11 11 all 1 5 , t U7 t 0 ,to
Ion II 1 31 I 1521 11 1
11,11 11 112 1 1 J , 141 , 0 41'
11:15 J UI 1 2 1 I 110 . . J7S
1':3t 1 IS' . S 5 t US 3 . .
lIoII' at 110 2 II 21 'I "I 10 . lilt
H:I. 1 1St I 2 t :\ u. 2 . m
21:lS 1 1lt 1 1 7 II' 1 , Z'l4
H:U I h' ] 1 I I, 112 2 . Z'll
IIIr t 51' . . J1 . st) , . 1UC
n:H I 101 . , U t 123 2 0 25t
2111S . 121 0 2 1 t UI , . 211
12:JI J " 2 1 . . I" . . 111
.
.
lair , m 2J 12 21 I I" 3 I '12
fotI1 m Utll lU 1M 323 t 11'" m u 303"
, Jpr. 2.1 .1.4 1.2 37.' A.2 ".5 1.3
, 1lIt. 0.1 11.1 a.' u I.. 51.1 .,
EXHIBIT "0"
1t14y ...: JII1llIII
lit. CadI : IOOW"
.tut _: U/"'.2
htI :1
,......... ....~.....~ ~.u-.,JrB.
I ..... I , ..., ~'\:;I' '-l ""'''''. n...............
..............~
...8Cltllchn1ca1 A Corl8trUcIion Mat8riBls
Englr!eerlng & testing. IlI8plICIion
Envtronmental Slll'Vices
Offices throughout the state of Florida
www.nuttingenglneers.com.\nfoO.lll\tlngenllineElrs.com
NovCl.1:lba-19,2002
~
,
William Wietsma Company:
25 Seabreezc Ave.
Deltll.y Beaeb, Florida 33483
Attn: Mr. William Wietsma
~l~
(& ~ 'll-W-~.7}
. , 9 axJ2 I~!
I
!
I'LANNING AND
ONING OfPT
Subject:
Boring Log :esmittal
Proposed Al' 13 Townhomes
SE Comer of ngress Avenue & SW 3Sh Avenue
Boynton Bcacp, Florida
Dear Mr. Wietama:
Nutting &gineers of Flori . Inc. performed a lOliminary subsurface explatation for the
proposed. Arbolata TO\'llIlho to be located at 1b southeast COIJIm' of Congress Avenue
and SW 3St1> Avenue in Do ton Beach, Florida. Four borings were performed to depths
of 10 to IS feet fot' this project.
Our prelirnin.lry uploration ikClded that the ~ consist of very loose to medium dense
light brown to ~ brown ~ fine sand to a depth of IS feet below llUld swface. We
note that the soils in the ~ five S were in a very loose to loose state lUId will IeqUire
IlIldercutting and intonlc ~~on prior to c:oIIlltruction activities. Prior to finalizing
the foundation design, addi . building specific borinp will be required in order to
provide final foundation delli. recommenQa.tions.
Should you have any questi . ,or if we can be of funher assistance, please feel fu:e to
contact us.
Sincerely,
NUTTING ENGINEERS 0
~ ~ II!';'~
Richard Wolllfarth, p,a #S08' 8
Director of Engineering
Wietsma logsIRCW
1310 NEPTUNE Df'lYJ:. BOYNT SMCH. FLOItIDA 33428. (581) 7lI1 'IDO. Fax (511) 7I7-9ll75
Braward (854) 941--11700 f HlIl8bcxougtll813) 8668800. Mlami-Dad. (305) 567-3083
NOV 19 2002
~
I
,
9:03AM
NUTTING ENGINEERS
NUTTING
ENGINEERS
OP PLO_ JIIC,
....1tted1H1
NO.486 P 2
o.iaOI8Ghnical a ConQvc:ljon Materl."
Hydrogeology Il MoIlitoring Wel1a
l!ng'I18lIr!ng . In8PKtion . Telltlng
Depth
FIl8I
TE T BORING REPORT
I
OesCl1plion or Mallals
I Lt ~ qtl.rtzftne'SAND
Dat1r. """"" cr-tztlne BANO-
15
TNt BoI1I1ll ~I".'" 811 relit.-
o
10
20
. Penellallo" . N Velue
30 40 60 liD 70
-r
I
80
1lO N
.-
S
8
Illowa
S8lllpler Cl!Iilng
112
314
3/3
3/3
ZI2
2/Z
2/1.
11MB
51'1
1II'l1
7f7
8/10
13
1.
15
241
10MO
11M1
I ,
: I
Client i WIlliam W/eaJ Co. Inc.
PIt'IJ8d IName: piODi:ieBi:i'A;boiJita'roWithDm88 .- 'u .
project ~n: _. __SE_ COI1!W '" ~a.~ !ov..!' ~ SW 36th Ave.. Boynton Beach
Hole ~on: A~ NW =x:rtvcomer .
Driller: I M rill ; DateSlarted:__i1.t!.~2_._
Elevetidn Reference: ____~rox. ..~ cl'OWI! Daie Completed: -Xl/1~2__.__
Casing:pi8lT1ebBr: ~~O'p_BX f'I..-h Couple Hammer wr _~_ Fall: _~.:~__
sampler:Oiametsr' Z"J;;IP x ~ ~ ~~_!1 Hammer wr i4Olll_ Fall: ~.!I.:'__.
GrouncfiNalBr deplh:lmmedJate: 3' ,
"""'~ w.u...~.CA/Oll"" "'''''''''1'$ UlL,..,.III81IWC'!"ll ~ ",
, '
.
21
-I.~'._.
Dreier.' _JI,!425.18
Iiole 11: 1
by:
R.C. Wohlfarth, P.E. #50858
1310
1I0)111lDn .....h (&111 7
.. DIlw Paynlon /leech. Florida >>126
. Ponlpeno _I_I !l41-87lll1" FAX (5&11737'-75
"""''' ~..J L.......uL- .J.~~'
"...... ,~.''''' ......""'.....-......''"'"
,
~
I
I
I
NUTTING
ENGINEERS
OFf__
_ltbhh....1M'
. ,'-"..............
, ~
..-tech"icaJ & Cona1fUetIon ......riala
Hydro!ll aIogy & MonitoIfng Wet..
EI1gineerlnll.lnlIpec:tion . Testing
iJeJIlIl
Foe! OescripIIoo or Melerillls
..u.~quartz_'SAND
TE, T BORING REPORT
'f'ell8lr8llon-NlIlllue _
o '0 2D 3D 4D 50 eo 70 80 90 N SlIIlIp/e, C"il1S
,-
. , '
Client I.. W11111111l Co. InC. Older #: 84~...1{L.
projectNiime:__..._.......n~rop_dAlbo iOWM_~_ _.' .-. Hole,. ~
project ~~; S~ CCtffl... of ~~ A'!8. & SW 36t11 Ave., ~ ~!=lI~__
Hole La . : __ Al!p"!.X S)'!f...P.r:oJl1trty.comer ._. .
Driller: '. ... M. DraIn ~ .. Date started: 11/15102
EIeva~ Refer8flCll: Approx. . roadEIIIII Date Completed: _1.1.M~02
Casil'l9:pi,"neter 3ft 00 ax FJw!t _. !P.J.e__..h Hammerwr- _2~ Fall: _~~..__
Sampler-Diameter ~~OD .2' ~n Hammer WT; 140#_ Fall: 30"_
3round~ber qepth:'mmeQfate: ~~ .
~WlI.~III!..._,~..D/lys_""llTl"'CT"o
I '
c.t< lIIVwII """r1zfl"" BAND
o _ fll8tBorlngt.rmInllM'.,0-.
!
I
~ .. -- 111-
z
1/2
6 313
, 3Ii
',. . . za
.. .
za
a., . zrz
~ 4/lI
18 817
f--.. '1"4
i
, I
'--- . - - ..
i
!
. , ..,
I
. ... -. .
i
,
-.. .. . . I
- _ _-v - ---
l
by:
RC. WOhlfarth, P.E:#50858
1310 -1lrIw.1lclv.-, a-h, F\GIldII_
Bayn"'" BMcll/5lI11 _. """"_ a..cIJ I_I lI41-B1OO. FAX (5811737~D711
,n....-........J"-~.... .J-"-'--'"" ,
'......' '''''l''U '-'~..u_'-""""
@
,
,
,
:
NUTTING
ENGINEERS
..,~"""
__1'"
11V"'~ J'''''
....OIlIthnica/ . ~lruc:lio" lIo18lerl.,.
Hyd~ & MqnltDring Wetla
Ell9ln_it,g 'lnspecllon . Twtlng
TE~ ST BORING REPORT
. Ptlf\eIr;olIDn - N Value SIOWE
o 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 60 90 N Sompler Casill9
ccTIT
I
I
Client t. Wdlhlm W Co. ll'Ie. Orcler it: 8425.18
Project Sme; _ pl'OiiONliAiio,-.,i TOWIIb~..__ Hole ,:_ _L_ __ _
Project ocaIlon: BE corner ot~~ ~V.. & SW 36th Ave~ B_o~n BoiIC!1_ _____
Hole l.cication: ._. _ ApPl'Ox SI! DI'O~ comer . . ___
Driller: I --......- M. DraIn _.. _ Date Started: _ _ ._1J/1~__
~levatidn Reference: "FOX. @ road ~ Date Completed: 11/15102
casing:b~r: .__ 3" ODBXFI..... __~e_____ --- --. HammerWf. 28lJj11"Fall: 24"
Sall\Piif-Dlamet.er r ()p It 2' Split S _~!!._ _ Hammer WT 140lL Fall; _~O"
GroundWater depth:Jmmedlllte: 3'
l~~""DII_lII"'''''Y8U1lW.S_Ul:T\iP
Deplfl
Feet I 0e1Cfill1lon at ~lIIelIaIli
r: Lt..~~"'lIANP
, I
, I
I '
I
i
,
I
i
is Test BoI'lIlll_iiiiobi8. l' fMt.
.. -
3 1/'1
213
1 3/3
3J3
. va
- - 2IZ
6 212
313 I
43 316
- 7/8
-
24 6'10
14117
b 1I3 13/15
18111
-- . --.
I
f-.-- ,
.. - n., - -.--
T --.-.. ---
I
- -
.'--..... ---- II
L__
by:
RO. WOh1i'iirtl1, P.E. #50858
1310 IJrhe, EkrInloIlIluch. Plotldol33421
&y....... _llilI1I 1IlIII' """'- _111&&' 941'-' FAX (511, 737.-7&
'.............,J '-"-''"-'"- ,J-"""--"I"""l"
,""-'"....,,"" .......,.."....,u................
1'tV -n;.JIJ
, -'
Ln- -
Client t..---
Prujeetrcame: . /!!)al!v,r!f ~~I~"_~___. __. _
project~on: 8E com_at Cot- Ave. & SW 31th AVlt-,,-~~~J3_.~.cJ.!_
~o:eler: jcatlo~:____ _______:~~ ~E_ PJ'O_ _ __ _~~~_____._____ Date started: 1111S1ll2
EIeYallclnReference: ApImllC.alQBd rown Date Completed: 1111~___
eaSjng=:lameter. 3" CD ax FIulIII-JCouIlle Hammer WT .. Fall: 24"
Sam :Di1Imefar: ~ OD.J.l_2~.p.m_S~ Hammer wr- ]~_ Fall: )0" _
Grpu, r deplh:lmmedlatll: 3'
_lljII.I..D~IIl"PA""UII.Hii~
~
PepIh
Feel
I
,
,
;
I
- tLL IlhiWn
!
I
I
1 l TMi BOi1iii
I
!
NUTTING
ENGINEERS
OI'~ \IC.
_'101
'-__""leal & Col18lr1/Ction Mntriats
Hydrogeology a MonltGlillll w.tls
Engi_rtng . h18peo1lon . THting
TEST BORING REPORT
. Penelnllian - III v."", B
DncrIpIIon 01 MalerI811 0 10 20 :lCI 4D 50 I5ll 70 IllI 9Cl N Sllmpler
......- ~ -. . .---. - . - I
~ $ 1/2
313
-= ~ B 314
414
... . 3IZ
_. .. -.
w
, I . 313
314
"- 14 4M
I Bl8
~ -- -- -- __n_
2.4 "'"
1311.
"""';'-.'1_
- 'H ____
,
I
u. . ,
I
,
.-..-..- ----..
, II
-- - --- --- ---.-
I
-.... :J
-" W!!!an! Wralllml .qo.In~. -.. _. Order #; ~_1!!
lows
c_a
L_
Hotel:
4
by:
R.C.VVohffiarth,P.E.I50858
13'0
Ii1<>!onlDol _Iat,
prtoa, 8""""" ..-,PkIflda 334211
. '"""'-_ (9ll4IM1_'1WC IS') 7S1-l19711
Gerald B. Church, P.E.
Consulting Civil Engineer
50S N.E. J" Street, Suite J
Delray Beach, F133483
PhlFax (561) 266-9520
00
NOV I q 2002
w
~@~DW~
DRAINAGE STATEMENT
ARBOLATA TOWNBOMES
SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CONGRESS AVENUE & S.W. 35'" AVENUE
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PlANNiNG AND
ZONING DEPl
.
The subject parcel is a vacant tract, approximately 16 acres in area. It is proposed to develop a residential
community of 172 townhomes, fee simple title.
The site is located in the boundaries oftbe Lake Worth Drainage District and South Florida Water
Management District C-15 Drainage Basin. It is proposed that nmofffrom impervious areas be directed to
dry retention areas and/or exfiltration trench by means of grass swales, inlets and storm sewers. Legal
positive outfall is available to the site via the Lake Worth Drainage 1-29 Canal, adjacent to the property on
the south side.
The drainage design will provide for the following:
I. Residential lots sbaJI have a finish grade not lower than the maximum water surfuce elevation
produced by the 3-year, 24-hour rainfall event.
2. Minor street drainage sbaJI have a water surfuce elevation of swaJe flow not lower than the
maximum water surface elevation produced by the 3-year, 24-hour rainfall event.
3 There will be no discharge of stromwater runoff resulting from a rainfall event of 25-year, 72-
hour, except through an approved control structure. The allowable discharge sha1l be in
accordance with the Lake Worth Drainage District and the South Florida Water Management
District drainage criteria for the C-15 Basin.
4. The minimum building floor elevation sbaJI be at or above the 100-year, 72-hour event
5 WaterquaJity sha1l be based upon the first 1" ofrunotf.
Prepared by'
Date:
Gerald B. Church, P.E.
llll 8/02
t:lty Colles: Accessed Via Wchsitc
,\ ,\ W.hIJVl1hlll.h~ach.un!
www.3mlcY31.convboynlon_bc<.Ich~n.us
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR
NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN
Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting? Yes
,Date 9/17/02
This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submilled as an original to the Planning and
Zoning Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED .et. of plen.
Including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted YAth the application for the Initial process of
the Site Plan Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED
Please print legibly (In ink) or type all Information.
J
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1
Project Name
Arrolata Town lbqes
2. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
will iam H. Baker, Trustee
"
Phone:
555 Paddock Parkway, Rock Hill S.C. 29732 "
(Zip Code)
800-849-2729 Fax: ll03-324-1ll6
Address:
3. Applicant's name (person or business enlllyln whose name this application is made):
William wietsma Co., Inc.
"
AdClress: 25 Seabreeze Avenue, Delray Beach, Fl. 33483
Phone:
561-274-4863
(Zip Code)
Fax: 562-274-7636
If contlact purchaser, please attach contract for sale and purchase.
4 Agent's Name (person, Ifany, representing applicant):
william Wietsma
Address: 25 Seabreeze Ave., suite 304,
Phone.
561-274-4863
Delray Beach, Fl. 33483
(Zip Codel
Fax: 562-274-7636
5. Correspondence to be mailed to agent only. If no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute
Is specified below"
'This 15 the one address to w,lch all agendas; lellers and other materials wll be mailed.
6. What Is applicant's Interest In the premises ateeled? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, de\ieloper,
contract purchaser, etc.) Developer
7 Street address allocation of site:
S,E. Corner of S. Congress & S.W. 35th Avenue
8.
08 43 46 05 00 000 3030
PropertyConlrol #(PCN)
9.
Meets & Boun:is/8ee Draw:i.n;Js
legal description of site:
10
172 Unit Town !kIne Project
Intended use(s) of site:
11
William Wietsna
Architect:
12.
ThcIllas White
landscape Architect:
13. Site Planner' william Wietsna
14 Engineer' Gerald Church
15. Surveyor' O'Brien, SUiter, O'Brien
16.
Traffic Engineer' Gerald Church
"
"
17 Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property?
No
II. SITE PLAN
The following information must be filled out below and must appear, vA1ere applicable, on all caples of
the site plan.
1 Land Use Category shown in the Cqmprehenslve Plan: tmustrial
2. Zoning District: M-1 In:'Iustrial
3. Area of Site 16.087 acres 100,751..J8 sq. ft.
4. land Use -- Acreage Breakdo\Ml:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f
g.
12.534
77.91
Residential, including
surrounding lot area of grounds
% of site
acres
Recreation Areas * 0.468
(tlxcJuding water area)
Water Area 0
o
2.91
% of site
acres
Industrial
o
o
o
o
% of site
acres
% of site
Commercial
acres
% of site
acres
Public/Institutional
o
o
% of site
acres
Public, Private and Canal rights-of-way 3.085
19.18
% of site
acres
2
h.
Other (specify)
Other (specify)
o
o
% of site
acres
o
o
% of site
acres
i.
j.
Total area of site 16.0B7 acres 100 % of site
"including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and hal.1ng a minimum dimension of 50 ft.
by50 ft.
5. Surface Cover
6.
7
a.
Ground floor building 5.375 acres 33.41 % of site
area ("building footprint")
0 0
Water area acres % of site
b.
c. Other Impervtous areas, Including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking
lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts.
4.723 acres 29,36 % of site
d.
Total impervious area
10.099
62.,7B
% of site
acres
e.
Landscaped area 0 . 016 acres 0.10 % of site
inside of parking lots (20 sq. ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of
Landscape Code). ....
....
f.
Other landscaped areas, 5.972
37.12
% of site
acres
g.
h.
Other pervious areas, includlP9 golf course, natural areas, ~rds, and swales, but excluding
water areas acres 0 % of site
Total pervious areas 5.9BB acres 37,22 % of site
i.
Total area of site
16.0B7
100
% of site
acres
Floor Area
a. Residential 354,620.50 sq. ft,
b. Commercial/Office 0 sq. ft_
c. IndustriallWarehouse 0 sq. ft.
d. Recreational 0 sq. ft.
e. Public/Institutional 0 sq. ft.
f. Other (specify) 0 sq. ft.
Other (specify) 0 sq. ft.
g.
h. Total floor area 354,620.50 sq. ft.
Number of Residential DwellinQ Units
a. Single-family detached 0 sq. fl.
b. Duplex 0 sq. fl.
3
.~..._-- ~-~
c.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Multi-Family (3 + attached d\M:!lIing units)
Efficiency 0
1 Bedroom 0
2 Bedroom 0
3+ Bedroom if.!.
dwelling units
dwelling units
dwelling units
dwelling units
d.
Total multi-family
172
dwelling units
e.
Total number of dwelling units
172
8. Gross Density 10.7 dwelling units per acre
9
30
Maximum height of structures on site
feet
2
stories
10 Required off-street parkinq
a. Calculation of required # of
off-street parking spaces. ~-'
2 Per Unit=344 Residential
=
Off-street parking spaces
provided on site plan
220 Residential (Covererl)
344 Residential (Uncovererl)
22 Recreational
=
=
b.
Calculation of required #
of handicap parking spaces
Number of handicap
spaces provided on site plan
2 Recreational
...
=
REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY
COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT.
4
III. CERTIFICATION
(I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted hereWth become a
part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We) hereby certify that the
above statements and any statements or sho>Mngs in any papers or plans submitted herewth
are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted
unless signed according to the instructions below.
k/~<'~ ?;~ let
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, of
Authorized Principal if property is owned by
a corporation or other business entity.
?;/~:1-
Date
OR
Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant)
Date
IV AUTHOR I
~q \ l 0 '"2-
Date
(I) (We) hereby designate the above-signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to
this application.
47UL -r;:~~ 7;"
Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee,
or Authorized Principal if property is owned
by a corporation or other business entity.
tf~"2--
Date
OR
Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant)
Date
A REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW
COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO
REVIEW THIS PROJECT.
5
RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION
The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that
all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering, and other data submitted wth this application for review by the
City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by lhe various boards, commissions, staff personnel and other parties
designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall
rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and
substantial.
The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans. specifications, drawings, engineering and other data
which may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, stat or designees shall be
constructed in strict compliance wth the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall be
deemed material and shall place the applicant in \iolation of this application and all approvals and permits
which may be granted.
The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as pro\ided for by the
applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance, and the
applicant shall indemnifY, reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense,
claim, liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of the same.
~~NDAGREEDTO~;' ~
~ss . Ap a t ---
)
,20~2
Witness
6
----
Arbolata Townhomes
Prepared for
William Wietsma Co., Inc.
by
Thompson Consulting, Inc,
(561) 659-6068
m J!"~ ~ 3U \VI ~ @
PLANNING AND
ZONING OEPT
December 2002
Table 0' Contents
Introduction ................................................................. I
Market Overview.... .. ... .. .. .. .. .... . .. .. ... ...... . ..... .... .. .. .... . .. .. . . . 2
Demand for Owner Units (For Sale) 2
Palm Beach County Affordable Housing Study 2
Reinhold Wolff Economic Research Housing Report 4
Target Market Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
For Sale Unit Demand 7
Selling Price and Affordability Criteria 10
For Sale Unit Supply 12
Existing Townhouse Developments 12
Planned/Approved Townhouse Developments 13
Supply/Demand Comparison 15
General Limiting Conditions ..........................
.......
...............16
----
o
Introduction
The proposed Arbolata T ownhome community is located at the southeast corner of south Congress
Avenue and Southwest 35'" Avenue, within the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach,
Florida. (See Exhibit 1.) The subject] 6.087 acre tract is intended to accommodate 172 fee simple
townhouses. The subject site is currently desigoated Industrial (I) on the City of Boynton Beach's
Future Land Use Atlas (FLU A.) A High Density Residential (HDR) FLUA desigoation is being
sought for the subject site.
This supply/demand report is prepared in response to a comment in the staff report regarding the
above referenced FLUA amendment request, for data and analysis which addresses the need for the
additional housing being proposed for the subject site. Staff acknowledges that the nature of
industrial uses has changed such that the previous methodologies used for detennining the demand
for industrial property are not longer appropriate and that the City has seen a shift from detached
single-family to attached single-family (townhouse) developments. However, staff requested that
data and analysis addressing supply and demand considerations relating to the proposed townhome
development be submitted. Those general factors affecting the existing and future market which
would support single family for sate residential development of the subject site at the Land Use Plan
amendment stage of the land development process, are examined in this report.
The proposed townhouse community is intended to accommodate 48 ] -story, 1,945 square foot
townhomes, inclusive of two car garages as well as 124 2-story, 2,] 10 square foot townhomes,
inclusive of one car garages. The anticipated pricing for these townhouse units is likely to be
$] 75,OOO:!:
TABLE l-UNlTMIX
Type (Bedrooms/Batbs) Number (Uuits) Approx. Size (sq. ft.)
Three/two 48 1,945
Three/two 124 2,110
Total 172 -
I
Arbolata T.R Community
Exbibit 1 - Site Location
~
0 ,./
0: "i
'-' ....
0 ::;
~ ':>
LANT ANA
j
'-'
o
~
BOYNTO
SI~..iS RD
i\TL.ANTIC
la
HYPOLUXO
LE CHALET
o
0:
LINTON
BEACH BL VD
o
0:
I
U
Z
<(
0:
W
0:
;;:
-'
U
PIPERS
GLEN
FLAVOR
Pier
-'
W
RD
0
0:
W
U
Z
W
0:
-"
<(
-'
GATEWAY BLVD
WOOL RIGHr RD
GOLF RD
0:
....
>-
"i
....
::;
':>
LaWSON BL D
BLVD
0:
....
a::: ~
"
'-'
o
ii
MI ER RD
/-
"'
::>
'"
~'
25 /
';;1
;i/
U)
V>
U)
W
0:
'-'
Z
o
u
DCE AN '"
OCEAN All
SITE
\
Arbolata T.H. Community
-----
1
Market Overview
Demand For Owner Units (For Sale)
Palm Beach County AfFordable Housing Study
The Palm Beach County Affordable Housimz Studv (Thompson Consulting, Inc., 2000) identifies
and quantifies housing needs in Palm Beach County, and is an update of the 1994 study, which was
used as the basis for developing the County's Five-Year Consolidated Plan (as requirement of the
Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentIHUD), which identifies housing needs priorities
in Palm Beach County The study was also used by the county as a basis to determine affordable
housing needs in the Voluntary Density Bonus (VDB) programs.
In the above referenced study, households on a countywide basis are characterized using Census data
specially prepared by the Bureau of the Census (in conjunction with the University of Florida's
Bureau of Economic and Business and Shimberg Center), as follows:
TABLE 2 - DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE AND INCOME GROUP
Income Group. Renter Households Owner Households Total Households
Very-Low 33,418 54,827 88,245
Low 23,771 48,933 72,704
Moderate 10,038 25,653 35,691
Moderate + 44,370 205,122 249,492
Total 111,597 334,535 446,132
* _ Very-Low Income = Oto 500/ctofMedian; Low Income = 51 to 80% of Median; Moderate Income = 81%to 95% of
Median; and Moderate+ ~ 96% and more of Median
2
Arbolata T.R Community
Definitions of very-low, low, moderate and moderate+ income households are established annually
for Palm Beach County by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (DHUD).
Current (2002) definitions are as follows:
Very-Low'
Low'
Moderate+'
$31,400
$50,240
$59,660+
From the table on the preceding page, the following countywide observations are made:
. There was a total of334,535 owner households in Palm Beach County in 1999
. The 334,535 owner households represent 75.0% oftotal households in 1999
. Of the total owner households in 1999, 61.3% were moderate+ income households.
Further, using the data from Table 2, it is concluded that, of the total 446,132 resident households
in Palm Beach County, approximately 50.0% were moderate+ income owner households, which can
afford market rate housing. If it is assumed this rate is maintained during the 2000-2005 period and
within the planning time frame for which population growth projections are available for the City
of Boynton Beach (planning horizon to the year 2025), growth in moderate+ household income
groups will be substantial.
The PBCAHS also addresses housing needs on a more localized basis throughout the county In
order to accomplish this task, the county was divided into 17 Housing Sectors. Housing Sector
boundaries are indicated in the Map Exhibit 2.
The proposed townhouse community is located within Housing Sector P However, the corporate
limits of the City of Boynton Beach fall within both Sectors P and K. This report addresses supply
and demand considerations for "for sale" housing (inclusive of townhouses) within the corporate
limits of the City of Boynton Beach. As such, any data derived for the City from the Palm Beach
County Affordable Housinl! Studv and its TECHNICAL APPENDICES, assumes the weighted
proportions calculated from Sectors P and K apply (e.g., to population, household and housing unit
estimates and projections.)
3
Arbolata T.H. Community
Exhibit 2 - Housing Seeton
Palm Beach County Housing Sectors
D
~.~
M..rtinC:O~
Palm Beach County
I
,
I
,-'
~"i, Gf u \
!, .i' nF \
I! I I ~'
ii-=tt i -~-+-~),~'!'\ I
i " ,..-i, k-. I'
,--v \~ .
\ I, 1 y-,.~-t._--
" ---r-H .
I , ,
r---r- -n I
!i-~-1\
"~E--'
'- :: J
--i-. .__~
, '
N
W+E
o S 6
~~
Miles
M .~...9'
L
~ 1
~
N ....
.
Source: Thompson Consukting, Inc.
8/412000
Palm Beacn eo"nty
Broward COUl'lry
I
J
.
.~ ...
L
-0
,.,.......
Arbolata T.H. Community
3.
Reinhold WolH Economic Research (P.B. County Report)
Reinhold P W olffEconomic Research, Inc. (Wolff) performs an analysis of housing (rental and for
sale) in Palm Beach County on a quarterly basis. * County housing submarkets defined by W oUf are
different from those used in the PBCAHS. Wolff generally defines the Boynton Beach Area housing
submarket as follows: NORTH: Hypoluxo Road; SOUTH: Lake Ida Road; EAST Intracoastal
Waterway; WEST U.S. 441 and west.
TheWolff single family for sale survey includes 39 active projects, with 857 units sold during the
first quarter of2002, making the Boynton Beach Area housing submarket (BBA) the second highest
in level of new home sales countywide. Only the Lake Worth/Lantana/WeIlington housing
submarket exceeded the BBA, with 944 sales. The least sales activity was found in the East and
Central Boca Raton housing submarket, with only five new homes sold during the first quarter of
2002. During the last quarter of 2002, 475 units were sold/deeded within the BBA.
Although the geographic area encompassed by the Boynton Beach Area housing submarket is greater
than that which is encompassed by the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach, a ", quarter
2002 average monthly sales rate of 286 units for single family, for sale housing is noteworthy,
representative of a brisk and healthy residential growth rate.
TABLE 3 -NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME SALES
(palm Beach County and Selected Submarkets)
Time Period Palm Beach Boynton Beach Lake Worth! East & Central
(qtr.) County Lantana! Boca Raton
WellinlJton
2"" Quarter2000 1,865 423 474 11
3'" Quarter 2000 2,063 574 494 13
4'" Quarter 2000 1,891 620 422 14
I" Quarter 2001 1,593 378 467 9
2"" Quarter 2001 1,643 572 347 4
3'" Quarter 200 1 1,375 415 327 4
4'" Quarter 2001 1,743 475 501 8
I" Quarter 2002 3,343 857 944 5
*/Source: Palm Beach County Ouarterlv Housinll Reoort. Second Quarter 2002.
4
Arbolata T.H. CommWlity
TABLE 4 -AVERAGE MONTHLY SALES RATES
NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME DEVELOPMENTS
(palm Beach County and Selected Suhmarkets) (I)
Geographic Area Units Sold # of Active Projects Average Sales (3)
(1/1-3/31 - 2002) (2)
Palm Beach County 3,343 147 7.6
Boynton Beach 857 39 7.3
Lake WorthlLantanal 944 37 8.5
Wellington
East & Central Boca 5 4 3.3
------------------------~---------------------------------------------
TABLE 5 - NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME SALES (FEE SIMPLE)
(palm Beacb County and Selected Submarkets) (1)
Price Range ($) Palm Beacb Boynton Beacb Lake Wortbl East & Central
Co. LantanalWell. Boca Raton
Under $75,000 1 0 0 0
$75,000-$99,999 19 0 10 3
$100,000-$124,999 99 3 84 I
$125,000-$149,999 414 1I4 109 0
$150,000-$174,999 517 157 141 0
$175,000-$199,999 571 204 104 0
$200,000-$249,999 660 247 218 0
$250,000-$299,999 454 85 163 0
$300,000-$399,999 333 34 100 0
$400,000+ 275 13 15 1
Total 3,343 857 944 5
Median Price $203,825 $193,933 $204,504 $203,825
*/Source: Palm Beach County Ouarterly Housimz Reoort. Second Quarter 2002.
(1) Includes all housing sold in fee simple
(2)An active project is one that has one or more completed units
(3) Sales based on units closed (deeded)
5
Arbolata T.R. Community
As evidenced by the statistics presented in Table 4, the Boynton Beach housing submarket is
averaging 7.3 fee simple single family sales per month. This rate is generally comparable to that
which is found countywide (7.6/month), lower than the Lake WorthlLantanafWellington housing
submarket, while higher than the East & Central Boca housing submarket. As evidenced by the
statistics presented in Table 5, the median sales price for fee simple single family units of$193,933
is lower than the median for the other two cited housing submarkets, as well as for Palm Beach
County as a whole. However, as indicated earlier, the Boynton Beach housing submarket has the
second highest level of hew homes sales countywide, behind the Lake WorthlLantanafWellington
housing submarket.
The above referenced statistics taken from the 2nd Ouarter Palm Beach County Ouarterlv Housing
Reoort prepared by Reinhold P Wolff, are indicative of healthy demand for single family (fee
simple) homes in the Boynton Beach housing submarket.
6
Arbolata T.H. Community
2
Target Market Area
For purposes of the subject FLUA amendment, the supply/demand analysis defines the target market
area (TMA) as the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach, as the data and analysis typically
required to justify amendments to the Future Land Use Atlas is for the geographic jurisdiction within
which the change is being proposed.
For Sale Unit Demand
Using population and household growth projections derived from the City of Boynton Beach,.
projections of moderate and above income owner household and unit growth within the TMA are
presented in Tables 6 and 7, assuming a weighted average percentage of total households and
housing unit stock needed for moderate and above income owner groups, as estimated and projected
in the Palm Beach County Affordable Housing Studv for Sectors P and K. The proposed townhouse
community is located within Housing Sector P A weighted average of Sectors P and K was used
as the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach fall within both Sectors P and K. This report
addresses supply and demand considerations for "for sale" housing (inclusive oftownhouses) within
the corporate limits ofthe City of Boynton Beach. As such, any data derived for the City from the
Palm Beach County Affordable HousiDlz Studv and its TECHNICAL APPENDICES, assumes the
weighted proportions calculated from Sectors P and K apply (e.g., to population, household and
housing unit estimates and projections within the TMA - coincident with the corporate limits of the
City of Boynton Beach.)
From these tables, it is concluded that growth in demand for moderate and above income for sale
units within the City during the near and long term projection time frames, will be substantial.
Growth in demand is summarized on the following pages.
· The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. Florid!!, City of Boynton Beach Department of
Development (Division of Planning and Zoning)
7
Arbolata T.H. Community
The following tables (6 & 7) estimate and project demand for single family (for sale fee simple)
units within the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach.
TABLE 6 - PROJECTIONS OF GROWTH OF MODERATE AND ABOVE
INCOME OWNER HOUSEHOLDS
City of Bovnton Beach:
Year Population Total Households Moderate and
(1) Above Income
Owner Households.
2000 60,389 26,603 11,253
2002 62,564 27,561 11,658
2005 64,296 28,324 11,981
2010 66,952 29,494 12,475
2015 70,509 31,061 13,139
2020 72,918 32,122 13,587
2025 73,590 32,419 13,713
* 42.3% oftotaJ households (derived from weighted average ofmoderate+ income owner households and housing units
estimated and projected in Housing Sectors P & K, as graphically depicted in Exhibit 2.
1) Based on 2.27 persons per household (owner-occupied average) per 2000 Census; The Develonment Atlas ofBovnton
Beach. Florida. City of Boynton Beach; Thompson Consulting, Inc.
8
Arbolata T.H. Community
TABLE 7 - PROJECTIONS OF GROWTH IN DEMAND FOR
MODERATE AND ABOVE INCOME OWNER UNITS
City of Bovnton Beach:
Year Households Units.
2000 11,253 13,239
2002 11,658 13,715
2005 12,981 14,095
2010 12,475 14,676
2015 13,139 15,458
2020 13,587 15,984
2025 13,713 16,132
. Households/0.85:!: (based on proportion of occupied units of total units citywide per 2000 U.S.
Census & Table 3, Page 41 of document entitled The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. May
2002)
Period
2000-2005
2005-2010
2010-2015
2015-2020
2020-2025
Summary of Demand Projections.
Total Demand Annual Demand
856 171
581 116
782 156
526 105
148 30
9
Arbolata T.H. Community
Selling Price and Affordability Criteria
The anticipated pricing of the Arbolata Townhome community is $175,000:t This pricing was
determined based on the units being considered affordable to those households making 95%+ ofthe
countywide median income, as established by the U.s. Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), applying a standard percentage (i.e., 30%) of annual gross income for gross
housing costs. Gross owner-occupied housing costs include PIT! (principal, interest, taxes and
insurance) and any association fees, as applicable. The HUD 2002 median family income
established for Palm Beach County is $62,800. 95% of $62,800 is $59,660. Those making 95%
or more of the countywide median income are considered moderate+ income households as defined
in Chapter 1 (Market Overview)
Home selling prices affordable to moderate+ income groups are derived as follows, from the 2002
HUD established median income of $62,800:
TABLE 8 - MAXIMUM INCOME/HOME SELLING PRICES
BY INCOME GROUP (~\
Income Group Maximum Annual Maximum Home Price
Income ($) ($)*
Moderate (81-95% of median) 59,660 178,980
Moderate+ (96-120%+ of median) 75,360+ 226,080+
* - 3.0 times household income
Key to the above procedure is the derivation ofthe factor (i.e., 3.0) which is applied to household
income in order to determine maximum affordable selling prices. An example of the procedure used
to justify the factor is presented in Exhibit 3. The example is based on a typical townhouse unit sale
within New Haven at Abacoa in Jupiter, Florida. Conservative assumptions relative to interest rate
and household income factor used to determine maximum affordable selling prices are made. A
6.5% interest rate on a fixed 30 year mortgage loan is assumed due to uncertainty as to what rates
will be when Arbolata Townhomes are available for sale.)
Based on information above, all the townhouse units within the Arbolata community will be
considered affordable to households whose incomes are 95% or greater than the countywide median
income (moderate+ income households.)
10
Arbolata T.H. Community
Exhibit 3
Example Home Sale. Calculations
A. Price Information
B. Loan Data - Bank Rate MonitorlFreddie Mac
Base Price:
Lot Premium:
Options:
$208,500
$ 0
$ 0
Rate: 6.5%
Term: 30 years
Total Price:
$208,500
Total Price:
Down Payment:
$208,500
$ 20.850
Loan Amount:
$187,650
C. Monthly Payments
Principal & Interest:
Monthly Mortgage Ins..
Property Taxes:
Association Fee:
Homeowner's Ins..
$1,217
$ 120
$ 170
$ 138
l......12
Total Monthly Payment: $1,720
PITI: $1,632
D. Calculations
I. $1.632 = $5,440 (minimum monthly income requirement)
0.30**
2. $5,440 x 12 = $65,280 (minimum yearly income requirement)
3 $208.500 (total selling price) = 3.19
$ 65,280 (minimum yearly income requirement)
* Abacoa New Haven townhouse typical sale
** PITI should not exceed 30% of monthly income per U.S. HUD, Housing Elements of
Comprehensive Plans, various affordable housing programs
II
Arbolata T.R Community
For Sale Unit Supply
Existing Townhouse Developments
Townhouse projects located within the corporate limits of the City ofBoyoton Beach, which were
approved and built out in the past few years, were identified from the Palm Beach County Property
Appmiser data file, Meyers Real Estate Information, Inc., the City of Boyoton Beach (Table 7
Residential Development Projects Approved 1990-2001) in the document entitled The Development
Atlas ofBovnton Beach. Flori!!!!, May 2002, and field survey research by Thompson Consulting, Inc.
There were a number of townhouse/villa projects approved and built in the 1970s and 1980s,
including The Meadows and Boyoton Lakes. In 1991, an additional townhouse development within
Boyoton Lakes (Plat 5) was approved and sold out. In 1994, Quail Run Villas were built and sold
out thereafter, and in 1996 Cedar Ridge Townhomes were approved, beginning construction/sales
in 1999 This project sold out in 2001 In 1999, San Sovino (Melear PUD) was approved with
construction/sales beginning in 2000 and selling out in 2001 Since that time, there have been
additional townhouse developments approved (both fee simple/for sale and rentals), butthe only new
townhouse product built (located in Quantum Park) is a rental project.
The following summarizes those townhouse developments identified during our research efforts
which are the most recently constructed and sold (within the corporate limits of the City ofBoyoton
Beach):
TABLE 9 - EXISTING TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENTS !RECENTLY SOLD OUT\
Project Total Price Size Size Avg. Close-out
Units Range ($) Range Range Sales Date
(s.C.) (br/ba) Rate
(monthlv)
Cedar Ridge 110 129,990- 1,528- 2/3-3/3 5.5 Dec. '01
Estates (t.h.) 204,900 2,878
San Sovino 130 95,900- 1,329- 2/3-4/3 7.1 (10.8 Jan. '02
(Melear-t.h.) 155,333 1,688 for I"
85%)
There are other townhouse developments located in unincorporated Palm Beach County and
Hypoluxo which are not included as the subject report focuses on the City of Boynton Beach.
12
Arbolata T.H. Community
Planned/Approved Townhouse Developments
There are a number of siogle family townhouse developments approved within the City of Boynton
Beach which have not begun construction nor sales to date. * These are summarized below
TABLE 10 - PLANNED/APPROVED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENTS
Project Name Location Status Number of Anticipated
Units Pricing ($)
Coastal Bay W side U.S. I, Approved/No 66 townhouses Unknown
Colony south of Golf construction to
Rd. date
Hampton Court S. side Golf Rd., Approved/No 66 townhouses Unknown
E. of Congress construction to
Ave. date
Dakota Lofts E. side U.S. I, Approved/No 19 townhouses Market High
S.ofHypoluxo constr. (3 units (expect to begin ($380,000s -
Rd. committed) constr. io 3/03) $500,000s)
Kensington S. side 23"' Ave. Approved/No 17 townhouses Market
Place (Golf Rd.), E. of construction to ($150,000s+)
F.E.C.R.R. date
tracks)
The Harbors 2300 N. Federal Approved/No 54 townhouses Unknown
Highway (E. construction to
side U.s. 1, S. date
of Gateway
Blvd./Royal
Palm Dr )
Merano Bay S.E. corner U.S. Approved/No 20 townhouses Unknown
I and Shore Dr. construction to
(S. of Gateway date
Blvd.)
Quantum E & N.W section of Approved/No 271 Unknown
W (Contioental Quantum Park construction to
Homes) (Lots 7-1 1& date
23-31 )
*/Source: City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division (New Residential Developments); Thompson Consulting.
Inc.
Note: Quantum Village (phase 2 & 3) are intended to be townhouse apartment rentals; Phase 1 (Quantum Lake Villas) is
constructed and are currently in initial leasing with 293 - 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments.
13
Arbolata T .R. Community
While the anticipated pricing of the above referenced townhouses is unknown with the exception
of Kensington Place ($150,000s+) and Dakota Lofts ($380,000s - $500,000s), for purposes of this
report, all the above referenced units are factored into the supply side of the analysis, making the net
demand projections conservative.
At present, all of the for sale, fee simple units approved and planned in Boynton Beach are
townhouse units, totaling 513 In addition, the City of Boynton Beach's document entitled The
Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. Florida., May 2002, includes a list of vacant residential
properties (larger than 2 acres) which exist throughout the City These are as follows:
TABLE 11 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AS OF MARCH 2002
I Property Name
I Acrea2e
I Density
I Units
Winchester/Klatt 109 7.28 791
High Ridge County Club 50 4.84 242
Palm Beach Groves 18 4.84 87
Knollwood Groves 31 4.84 150
Quantum Pill N/A N/A 415
Christian Villas 2 10.8 28
Palmland Villas 3.7 10.8 45
Total -- -- 1,758
The total number of units planned to be added to the City of Boynton Beach, based on current
available vacant land designated to accommodate residential development, totals 1,758 units. The
current housing stock within the City of Boynton Beach is comprised of 73% owner-occupied and
27% renter occupied units (Source: 2000 U.S. Census; The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach.
Florid!!, May 2002.) Assuming the same proportions of renter and owner occupied units in the
future, approximately 1,283 ofthe total 1,758 units referenced above will become owner occupied.
As such, these units (regardless of pricing, which could be affordable to household income groups
making less than 95% of the countywide median), are factored into the supply side of this report.
14
Arbolllla T.H. Community
Supply/Demand Comparison
TABLE 12 - CALCULATION OF DEMAND VERSUS SUPPLY OF MODERATE
AND ABOVE INCOME OWNER UNITS
(2000-2025)
Growth In Demand For Owner Units 2,893
(Moderate and Above)
Less Planned Supply of Planned/Approved 1,796
Owner Units & Owner Units Available on
Vacant Residential Properties
Less Proposed Arbolata Townhome Units 172
Total Oversupply (Under supply) (1,968)
Within the TMA (City of Boynton Beach), comparing future projected supply (approved unbuilt,
residential development potential of vacant residential land and the units proposed for the subject
site), to the year 2025 projected demand of 2,893 for sale units, indicates a supply deficit (under
supply) of I ,968 units. Hence, the 172 townhouse units proposed for the Arbolata project are needed
within the projection time frame (planning horizon for which population projections are available
for the City of Boynton Beach/TMA.) In fact, with annual projected demand ofl71 units in the first
five years of the projection time frame, the Arbolata Townhome project could conceivably be
absorbed/sold out in one year.
In addition, although the townhouse projects recently approved within the City of Boynton Beach
have not begun construction/sales yet, with the exception of Dakota Lofts, two townhouse projects
recently sold-out within the TMA indicate that the sales (absorption) rate at the Arbolata Townhome
community will likely range from 5.0 to 7.0+ units/month. This absorption rate translates into sell-
out within 24 - 34 month:!:
Last, the Boynton Beach housing submarket defined by Wolff indicates healthy for sale housing
demand, with an average per project sales rate of7.3 units/month, for a total of857 sales in the first
quarter of 2002.
15
Arbolata TH. Community
GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS
Every effort has been made to insure this report contains the most accurate and
timely information possible, which is believed to be reliable. However, no
responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by developer, developer's
agents or any other sources.
Contractual obligations do not include access to or ownership transfer of any
electronic data processing files, programs or models completed directly for or as a
by-product of this research effort.
This report may not be used for any purpose other than for which it is prepared,
except by owner/developer Possession of this report does not carry with it the right
of publication and its contents shall not be disseminated to the public through
advertising media, sales media, or any other public means of communication
without prior written consent and approval of Thompson Consulting, Inc.
16
Arbolata T.H. Community