Loading...
APPLICATION PROJECT NAME: Arb\.lata Townhomes LOCATION: East of Congress, South ofSW 35th Avenue PCN: 08-43-46-05-00~000-3030 I FILE NO.: SBMP 02-005 1/ TYPE OF APPLICATION: I AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: William H. Baker, Trustee William Wietsma, Architect PHONE: 800-849-2729 PHONE: 274-4863 FAX: 803-324-1116 FAX: 274-7636 ADDRESS: 555 Paddock Parkway ADDRESS: 25 Seabreeze Avenue Rock Hill, SC 29731 Suite 304 Delray Beach, FL 33483 Date of submittallProiected meetin2 dates: SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITTAL 10/2/02 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: 10/24/02 PUBLIC NOTICE: N/A TRC MEETING: 11119/02 PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A 2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A (SITE PLANS): PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 1/28/03 MEETING: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT N/A AGENCY BOARD CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 2/4/03 COMMENTS: S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Arbolata Townhomes\SBMP 02-005\2002 PROJECT TRACKING INFO.doc _ar.ft II. ClIIUJtCB, P.B. ~IIUWIIIG CIVIL _I.... lOSG 8. hdenl B1fbWa,. 81Ii t. U8 Del J:a)' Bea.. .1 33483 DO\.LJ- ... ......TftAL wn8U 'fO: //.z/~3 ;Cc#< ~ q... ~-..., / Pt!:-: laU: 4Ld ~ ~~-V' 07 i 47n4n -4a-d, I'ItClH : C G Cb~cL 'I'BB ~LLClfDIG DCJeII....~(.)/..~111..(8): IPE A r-4-rC'aCq- ~...-..k>>u-~ _J J.,...~,--4~d f,.~/:J-r....:...._~ AU DCU)Rft .POll !'OOJl: a..,i_ t' Ilequeat Appro".1 Info bco1:_ C _ 1l"-',"_ 00'1 ."6': 1. ~ DVII U1' QUau. COI~ZIlG ..18 ftWf..l'ft'AL, ItIJIDLY ........AO'f .. 87 ~ A'1' (SI1) 266-9520. '1'IIU1t YOU. ,~~d ~at.D I. C8ORClII. P.B. ... 2003 [~ JAM - 2 LlilJ ~ ill rn @ ~ U \)'] ~ f11lAPPlC 8IGN.UJZA.TIOl'f S'I'VDY -MIIOLATA TO.1JfIlOIJU PLANNING AND I Seooe of Servlees The City of Boynton Beach requested a Traffic Si(pla1ization Study fur the intersection of Congress A VCllue and S. W. 3~ Avet\le In IlOIIjundlan widl the ptopoe..d _Ittg ofdle lHere tnIet at lite 1OIlllIeat___ of the Inllll.o<lllon. At dlla location k is JIlopolled to dewlap a residential_WIlly. tIlr 172 TOWIIhcmes. The scope of servIees Is to detennlne lfthe wwranQ exist tbr a tfafftc signal at the intenec:tlon ofCongrcss A venue and S. W 35th Avenue. The Traffic Sianalimtion Study has been prepared in accordance with the ltandardlllld crit<<ia .. set filrtb in the Manual ofUnIfbnn 1'ratlk Control Dmces. Sec:tl0ll. 4C. The wart'Ints to be met lIl'e .. foIIOWlI: Warrant I-Minimum wbicuJac volume. Warrant 2-InterrupdOll. of cootInllOUS traftie. Warrant 3-Mlnlmum ~ Ian wIume Warrant 4-School crossing. Warrant 5-Ptogreaive mOYelllent. Warrant 6-Accidcnt experiencc. Warrant 7..systems. Warrant ll-Combination ofwart'lnts. Warrant9-Pcak Hour Volumes. Warrant Io-Peek Hour Delay. Warrant II.Peak Hour Volume. In order to meet the wmanta far ~ si&Jl8l, Palm BeadI County TraftI.c Division. requested that only Warrants 1 and 6 be analyzed. A schematic sketch oftbe intersection Is enclosed as Exhibit "A"; note that this Is a "Tee" typcl intersection. The property to the Wl:Sl bas been dc\'C1opcd, however the access driveway is north of the intersection IlDder study. WarraRt 1. Eieht-Hour Vehkular Volume This WIIlTlIIlt requires that one of thc following conditions exists tbr each of any 8 hours, the Minimum Vehicular Volume, Condition A. or die Interruptioo of Continuous Traffic, Coodition B. ofa typic:al24 hour period. Condition A requires 600 whlcles per hour on the major slJ'eet, boIh directions and 200 whlcles per hour on the minor street. hiahest direction. A traffic count was made at the minor street intersection on NOYeIIlber 26. 2002; see Exhibit "8". It was determined that the peak 8 hour ~ voIl8Jle occurred fi'cm 1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., see Exhibit "C" Sublequentlya traffic COUIIt was made at the lntllIee.:tion on 12104102; far all ~ mOYelllents from 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M.. during which the peak I-hour traffic occurred, see Exhibit "0" The peak hour trafflc 011 the mJlior street exceeded the standard. However the peak hour traffic OIl the minor street was 164 vehicles, which occurred from 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. The peak hour traffic generated by the JlI'OIIClIIed Arbolata TownhOllles development would be 95 vehicles, which occur during the P.M. peaIc hour. see Tableland 2, ~ ftom the Traffic Study tbr Arbolata Townhomes. There would be 63 trips entering and 32 trips exiting. The impact on the intersection would be the exiting ~ going 'MlIlt bound, a toCal of32lrips. 'I'Iwle&..e the total miner 8Ireet traffic would be 196 whicles, which is less than the standard 200 vehicles. Note that the P.M. existing peak hour traffic occurred from 6:30 P.M. to 7:30 P.M. Typically the peak hour traffic tbr the \'ClIklential development occurs bctwcl:In 4:00 P.M. and 6:00 P.M. The peak hour traffic on S.W. 35th Avenue during this period was ftom 5:00 P.M to 6:00 P.M., a total of91 YJlliC!es,1lCC Exhibit "8" On this b8ais the toCal miner sI1'eel ~ would be 123 vehicles. lIIIbstantialIyiis.tban the standard 200 wbiclt& 1 Condition B requires 900 vehicles per hour 01\ the major street, both directions and 100 vehicles per hour on the minor street fur thrOU&h and left turns, hiihest direction. As noted there is no thrOU&h traffic since it is a "Tee" Intcnec:tlco. A traffic count WlI8 made of the Intersectfun 01\ 12104/02; for a111raftlc movemeots fi'om 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., during which the peak 8-hour traffic occurred, see Exhibit "0" The vchicles durini the peak hour exceeded the requirement for the major street, hO\WVer the vebicles durini the peak hour 011 the minor street approach fur the left turns __ 25 vehicles, which oc:curred fi'om 2:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. The peak bour traftic aenented by the JlI'OIlOIIld ArboIata Townbomes development would be 95 veI1ides, which oe<:ur durin!! the P.M peak hour, see Table 2. There would be 63 trips entering and 32 trips exitinll. The lmpllCl 01\ the InterlleCltion WlJUId be the exiting traftic going WllSt bound, a tolll1 of32 trips. Based IIpOII a direaiooal split of SO% north bound and SO% SOIIlb bound, there would be ] 6 left turn movcmcnts during the peak hour. 'fbc;:rI;furc the toial minor s\rCI;;t traffic wou1d be 41 vchi4:lcs, which is leas than the standard 100 vehlcIes. Note a1so that the peak hours do not coincide. which would actually reduce the vcbiele COWlt f<If' left turn movemeoll at the inI<<secdoo. Warrant 6-A<:<:iden=imee Crash cqMlt'i_ is' when five Clt mCJl'C nported cresbes, of twes I1I8Cept1'b1e to cmectico by a traffic signal. have occurred within a 12 month period; and conditions A or B of Warrant 1 are 80"10 !lfti~ed; and COudlel.Y - 'l I_less t$rictlve than signRJi"".;OO have proven to be Ineft'ective In comcting such erashes. A review of Palm BeadI CClunty traffic 8I.lCident reports for the pIIBt 1211lODlhs, w-I no nported traffic 8I.lCidents at the Intcnec:tlon. Note that these reports are a COIIIpllatlon of all ""iQdar 8I.lCidcnts In the COIDIty, including loeaI City IICCidents. BllHIl apoll tile aJIIIl"" oCtile Trame Warrutl alMm, It lleoad1lded tIIat a tnftle efpal Is IIGt warranled at this time at the inteneetloa of Coqt'CA Awne &lid S. w. 35'" Avealle in BoyntAHl BeKh. Compiled by: Date: Revised: Gerald B. Church, P.E. o-nber 11,2002 o-nber 30, 2002 ./ ,,_c..: . ../'--1- ~...c_-c..--'--(';:.L //2/03 2 I TllAft'IC SIGNALIZATION STUDY -ARBOLATA TOWNHOMEI Seooe of Services The City ofBoyntoo BeadI requested a Traffic fllglutliftt100 Study fur the in~ ofCcagress Awnue and S. W. 35* AWllIIe in CClI\ltmdion with tho ~ I'""""hta of the 16-acre tract at the southeast ccmer of tho intersection. At this 10catlcn it is paopoeed toclew1op a nskIentiaI CllIDDIunity, fur 172 Townhomes. The scope ofservices is to determine if the warrants exist fur a ttaffic signal at the intersection of Congress AWllUO and S. W. 3S. AVCllue. The Traffic S....Ii...rioo Study bas ~ plOj>4Iod in ........dlulce with the standards and c:ritcria as SlIt furth in the Manual ofUnifurm Traffic Conttol Devices, Secticn4C. The warrants to be met are as fullows: Warrant I-Minlmwn whicular volume. Warrant 2-1ntemJptIon of llOIItinUOUS ttaftic. Warrant 3-Minimum pedestrian volume Warrant 4-Sdlool crossing. Warrant S-l'rogJessive movement Warrant 6-Aa:ident experience. Warrant 7-Systems. Warrant 8-Cornbination ofwarrants. Warrant 9-Peak Hour VoIwnes. Warrant Io-Peak Hour Delay. Warrant II-Peak Hour Volume. In order to meet the warrants fur ttaftic signal, Palm BeadI County Traffic Dlvisicn, requested !hit cnly Warrants I and 6 be analyzed. A schematic sketch of the intorsecticn is endosed as Exhibit "A"; note !hit this is a "l'eo" typo inbneetion. The property to the west bas ~ dovek1pod, howowr the access driveway is north of the in~ under study. Wammt 1. ElDt-Hour Vehicular VoInme This warrant requires !hit one of the fuIlowing conditicna me for oad1 of any S hours, the Minlmwn Vehicular Volume, Condition A, or tho Interruption of Continuous Traffic, ConditiOll B, ofa typlcal24 hour period. ConditlOll A requires 600 whicles per hour on the '"*" street, both dlroetiOlls and 200 vehicles per hour on the minor street, highest dil0c:ti0n. A U'IIftic IlOUIlt was made at the minor stroel iartoIMCtion on November 26, 2002; see Exhibit "8". It was cIelfnnined !hit the peak S hour traftlc volume occurred fi'om 1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., see Exhibit "C" The vehicles during tho peak hour on the minor street were 125 whicles, which 0CClI1'nICI1i'om 7:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. This was less than the required 200 wbicles per hour. Condition B requires 900 vehicles per hour on the m*", street, both directions and lOll vehicles per hour on tho minor aInlet fur throuah and left tuma, hiabest directicn. As noted there is DO throuah \nIffic since it is a "l'ee" intllrlleCliOll. A U'IIftic count was made of the inbneeti1lll1lll12104102; fur all ttaftic movements fi'om 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., during which tho peak &-hour ttaftic occurred. see ExIu'bit "D". The vehicles during the peak hour exceeded the requirement for the major street, however the vehicles during the peak hour l1li tho minor stroel applGlCh for the left lUmlI \\We 2S wblcles, which occurred fi'om 2:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. This _less than the required 100 vehldes per hour. Warne.6-Aeddeet Emerienee Crash experienco is satisfied when five or more repoI1Od crashes, of types suaceptlb1e to correction by a U'IIftic signal. haw 0CClI1'nICI within a 12 moath period; and b. conditions A or B of Warrant I arc 80".4 satisfied; and c. countermeuuresless..... R:tivethan signalization have proven to be ineffectiw in .....octinll such crashes. 1 A review of Palm Bead1 County traffic accident reports tor the put 12 mlXltbs, showed no reported traftic: accidents at the iDtcnec:tiOll. BIlled IIpOII the ...1yIIs of the TnfIIe WalTllJds above, It Is _hided tUt a traftle sipalls DOt WlII'I'Uad at CIIII.... at die laU.-A.. area.a._ A.._ ... SoW. 3S'" A_ la Boyacua B.dI. COlI1plled by: Date: Gerald B. Churcb, P.!. December 11,2002 2 EXHIBIT "A" I , ,tit' l~;? 1 1 , $.'41. I -. I , JI.} ij oS li. t , ~ k~,f:i(W,J~ b~~\)c.t" 4,2002- dtAWN bs..t\A~S l\o"';f\O "crt f>~9~~1 i uJ ~ EXHIBIT "B" Traffic Survey Specb.lbt.. Inc. 624 IJardenia Terrace Del~ay Beach, Plor1da 33444 Phone (5611 272-3255 Volwaa _ort wit.h 24 Hour TOea18 Page 1 ..**....**..**.....**.**.......**...****...................~*...***...*..**.**** Data File D1126001.PRN Station I 000000112501 Identification 000058410082 Interval 1S minute. Start date Nov 26. 02 Start t!.. I 00.00 Stop date Rov 26, 02 Stop time 24.00 City/Town : Boynton Beach. P1. COImt.y : Palm leach Locat:1on I SW 35th Avenue Juat "'t of Ccmgr... Av. ..........***.....***...................*****..........*....**.*...***....***.. lfoy 26 W..tbound Volume End Time -~-------------------.-------------------------------.-----.-.----------------- 15 30 45 00 Hr TOtal 00 o o o o o 01 o o o o ....- - . o 02 o o , . o 1 03 o o o 1 1 04 o o o o o OS 06 o 0 1 0 o 0 o ... 1 4 07 3 4 3 6 16 08 Ii 10 , .. 27 09 10 7 13 15 45 10 12 12 11 9 U 11 7 !5 8 13 33 -----------.------------------..-------..-------------------------------------- End Time 15 30 45 00 12 14 5 8 6 13 12 13 11 5 14. 7 10 1 8 1.5 10 8 7 6 16 10 4 8 8 11 18 14 15 41 21 19 37 65 16 7 20 11 51 24 11 21 7 5 10 1I 22 18 , ;.'I 5 23 1 o 1 1 Hr Total 33 41 32 31 30 45 91 125 97 31 31 3 --.----.-------------.-------------.------------------------------------------- <I" Hour Total : 762 AM peak hour begin. : 09:30 AM peak volume, 52 Peak hour factor: 0 87 PM peak hour beqins I 18:30 PM peak volulIle, 164 Peak hour factor: 0 63 .......................................**................*..*.*...**.......*... 5 15 12 13 57";<0"'; /"aR f 7'<p4/""-/<::;; .s;.:;::.N"'{~_~,--v'G,e~~__dl-'r ~~ fyt/ ,3> +VE r //A4L: - d/zC /az ~._.'-~ "0 <1l 7~= A;vj -ID 3' ~(:JPr,..'1 0- c .9 i;j 8 4- "5 0- E UJ 0 9' 5 ~U ~ '" 00'- .... OJ 10 6 '" OJ ()) .~ . 0> o C ZUJ II 7 @ a: /2. ~ 8' I ?,II-f 9' ~ .2 ~ /~ ~ r .3 /1 4- /2 5" I' 4/-1 6 2 7 3 8 1- WL':5 '/ ,00'-''''',0 TR,-dr.rr' '" V&L///(,/~ A 7' /,11 'rL'?s.~c.7i'o ;yJ 21/ 2e>6 .zC3'7 '2 &'7 3r3G 42>"5. 4' 4 2- - PL' Ak,& Iku,R .q~-:.. -I e. / 453 423 '378 .zcS8 /6"'" r II Uft a_ , ell I tll a_ ....... .... _If: ~. ~, I. ..."r, .. A-.... . .....ID TrlUtc kltlJ 1IIdI1Uu. lie. 1M .... ,... II1RJ .... J1GrftI 1M !H11 m-UH III INtI1ft-Ult AU'. MIM IIJPll_ ,_ _a_ Ir. .. fill... CI -..... .. IIortk 1 UJ 1 7 J , m . . m 1 ,.. 1 ) 1 , 1N 2 I III 5 lf1 , 5 I , III , . SIt flU 11 1t n 11 t 11ft 11 . 116' 11:11 J 237 . J t 2M 3 . m 111lS 5 2M ] . . lt1 I 0 tll 11:31 5 141 . ! , W 5 . m IOu l' no 11 11 1 1212 II I 22" 11:11 . US I I , I >>.'I . . S1l 11:11 , 24t . . ! . 123 1 . itl 11:31 5 '3S . I S . In , I "' IGer 21 t75 16 , 2! I uu 17 . 2'" 11:11 S 21' , I 11 . In , I 551 13:15 . 151 I ) 2 . HI 5 . Of 12:10 , IN 5 , 11 I 121 , . 06 .. J1 1M' 11 10 H . uat 2t 1 Jilt U:" 1 It, . 1 . 0 1M . . ill U;15 I lit 1 1 1 . 141 t I '" U:II 5 1" 1 , ) , 111 1 I Q1 .. II lU' 15 21 13 . USS n I .. 1':" 5 . 11' 7 I 0' 1':15 5 , )1' , I IN U;lI , t II' 1 I 73. 2 5 . . III 5 I eM s . . t H' ] I ", I ) 5 t .sf 12 . ,.. .. 15 l1st , 11 1t I 1151 n I EXHIBIT "0" ...,....1 lSllM lice eIIt I HlnUl tun lit.: l111t1l2 .... : 1 .__Io_"'~ __ MIeI. ""III .. II: 10. ......, .. ...., . .. -J I lit ., .__ fnrfUc .."., 1tHi11.1Jts. &c. ut tIdIII& timet IIIlt17 ...... n.d,. ""' 1N1127""" hi 1"11 m-Gl m 1IUCUI --- ; -- ... ... ... ... ........ frtIleIU ICIrt lI:H . m J J , , .If . 1 m 11:15 U 2" 5 , 7 . ..3 7 . '51 If,,. f 1.. 2 ! 11 , If. 1. 5 au .. 1<< U . U7I U . JIll 17:" . 2f. J J 12 . US . J 12. 17111 I 271, J I SI . sa I 1 H. 17,1' 11 m 11 J , . IN , 1 .15 .. Jl I'" 11 13 n . 110 n , 5515 Us" , u. s ) 11 . 1M I 1 712 lI:U 7 HI 1 3 5 . II' J . '" u:Jt 11 HI 1 J f . U7 . . ,,. IN, U I un It 1 211. D:" 17 11) 1 J J I 16 f . ..y D:U J JU 1 J 1 I 211 . . In Din I 1,U . 1 5 '( US J . JU II1II' 2f It )1 . 1ft .II . 11ft zt:" 3 151 . 2 f . 1" 2 . 321 HItS J 111 1 1 7 . 1.' 1 0 m "ti' . u. 3 1 , '1 1" 2 . m IDIr t If/ 5 . J1 . SN , lUi 21:0' . 111 . . 13 . m 3 . m UI15 . 113 . 1 , I U. . 0 HI U:Jt J n 2 1 . . ul . . ut II1II , J . tn 1'otI1 UI UI1. III 1M UJ , HU' l" 13 )Un 'lie. 1.1 tf" 1.2 J7.' IU H.S 1.1 , 1'1&. .., 3U f.5 U 1.f 11.1 t.' . I:J'I nUt. - .-..: -- litl c:adt : ....U 'tan ..., O/M/" htt : 2 1 ~ "I- \1 $ "I- ~\ ~ ",'" ....- cit ~ I ~ "l- I ~ "I- 1!~1 ? '$e a" <:it ~ ~ 8 <:i "I- al ~ ~ 8- ~~ ~~ ~ ? . '" \, s\\ ~ci ~~7i ~~ \l I ~ I G lf~ ~I I G i ~ rl ~ ! ~ l .. ~ ~ S ! If " ~\i ~~, ~\, l! ------------- - I TIlAI'JIC SlGNALlZATIONSTVDY -ARBOLATA TOWNHOMEB ~ ofServieel The City ofBoyntCll Be8dI requested a Traffic Signalization Study for the intersection of Ccngress Avenue and S. W. 35* Avenue in conjlDlction with the propclfIlld rezoning of the 16-acn tract at the southeast comer of the interseetim. At this locatiOll it is proposed to develop a realdeotlal commlDllty, for 172 Townbomes. The scope of services is 10 determine if the warrants exist for a traffic signal at the intersection of Congress Avenue and S. W 35. Avenue. The Traffic Signalizatim Study bas ~ prepered in accordanc:e with the standards and c:ritcria 85 set forth in the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, SectiOll 4C. The warrants to be met are 85 follows: Warrant I-Minlmwn vehicularwlume. Warrant 2-Interruptim of continuous traffic. Warrant 3-Mlnlmum pedestrian volume Warrant 4-Sdlool c:rossina. Warrant 5-f'rogtolSSlve movement Warrant 6-Accident experience. Warrant 7-Systems. Warrant 8-Combination ofwarranlS. Warrant 9-Peak Hour Volwnes. Warrant IO-Peak Hour Delay. Warrant II-Peak Hour Volume. ~ ~3u~rfm m PlANNING AND ZONING DEPT In ooler to meet the wmants for trat1ic signal, Palm Be8dI COIDIty Traffic Division, requested that OIIly Warrants I and 6 be analyzed. A schematic sketch of the intersectiOll is enclosed 85 Exhibit "A"; note that this is a "Tee" type intersection. The JlIop1Jrty to the west bas been developed. howewI' the access driveway Is north of the intersectim under study. Warn_t 1. Eldtt-Hoar V.blealar V- 'Ibis wmant requires that OIIC of the fullowina condltiona exilIls for each ofany 8 hours, the Minimwn Vehicu1ar Volume, Ccndltlon A, er the Interruption of Continuous Traffic, CcnditiOll B, oCa typical 24 hour period. Condition A requires 600 vehicles per hour on the map street, both dlrectlons and 200 vehicles per hour m the miner street, highest clheetioo. A trat1ic count W1IlI made 81 the miner street intersectiOll 00 November 26, 2002; _ Exhibit "B" It W1IlI determined that the peak 8 hour traffic wlume occurred fi'om 1:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M., _ Exhibit "C" The vehicles during the peak hour 011 the miner street were 125 vehicles, whic:h occurred ftom 7:00 P.M. to 8:00 P.M. This was less than the require4 200 vehicles per hour. Condition B requires 900 vehicles per hour on the majer street, both dil'llClions and 100 vehicles per hour 011 the miner street for through and left turns, highest directioo. As noled then is no through traffic since it is a "Tee" intersectim. A traffic count W1IlI made of the intersectim m 12104102; for all traffic movements ftom 9:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M., during whieh the peak 8-hour traffic occurred, _ Exhibit "D" The vehicles during the peak hour exceeded the requirement for the map street, however the vehicles during the peak hour 011 the minor street appI'(llIdI for the left turns were 25 vehicles, whldl occurred fi'om 2:00 P.M. to 3:00 P.M. This was less than the required 100 vehicles per hour. Warn.t 6-~_t Jt1Inerlellee Crash eKperienco is satisfied when five er mere npcrted crashes, of types susceptible to correetim by a traffic signal, have occurred within a 12 mOllth period; and b. conditiOlls A er B of Warrant I are 80% satisfied; and c. CllUlllermll8lUl'ClS less restrictive than signaJi:ratiOll have proven to be ineffilctive in 00.. C<t.ng such crashes. 1 A review of Palm Beed1 County traffic accident n:ports fur \be pBSt 12 mooths, shOWlld no reported tra1Iic accidents at \be lnt<<8eCtim. Baed lIpOII tile aualysls of"e Tnflle Warru. above, it is _eJadeel that a trafIIc slp.11s not Wlll'hllted at tills time at tile Iatenectioa of c-.. _ A_lie aad S. w. 3S'" A_lie Ia BoyatoD BeacJa. Compiled by: Date; Gerald B. Church. P.E. December I 1, 2002 ~u 64-.-4d / .:z./n /1> Z 2 ...:XHIBIT "A" , I ,'tl~ L=;~ 1 I ( ,'N. l .... oS t/. I I ~~ij t I ~ &e".FioviJC\ t>ce~Dt.r 4,2002.- d(AWN bs'.I\A;S &\0"';"0 t\OT f>~9,,~liuJ ~ EXHIBIT "B" Traffic Survey Speci.aliat., Inc. 624 G1aJ:denis Terrace Del~ay Beach, Florida 33444 Phone (561) 272-3255 VolUlU Report with 2" Hour Totala Palle 1 ..**....***.***....**..*......***.******..................****.*.***.....*.****. Data File Dl126C01.PRN Station I 000000112501 Iaentification 000058410082 Interval 15 minute. Start date Nov 26, 02 Start time ,00,00 Stop date Nov 26, 02 Stop time 24:00 City/TOwn : Boynton Beach, PL County : Palm Beach Location , 8W 35th Avenue "ust ...t of Congress Ave ..........*.....*****......**..**..**...**..........*..*....****.******.*.*.... Nav 26 Westbound. Volume -~-------------.------------------.._----------.-----------._------------------ End Time 00 01 02 03 04 OS 06 07 08 09 10 11 -------- ...-- 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 4l 10 12 7 30 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 " 10 7 12 5 "5 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 3 7 13 11 e . 00 0 0 0 1 0 0 " 6 .. is 9 13 ------..... Hr Toeal 0 0 1 1 0 1 " 16 27 45 "" 33 ----------~-._------.._-------..------~.._---.----------..--------------------- End Time 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2<1 23 -...------ ..-... 15 14 12 7 10 10 5 14 37 11 7 16 1 30 5 13 10 8 4 15 15 65 51 5 , 0 45 e 11 7 7 8 1:2 41 16 24 10 2 1 00 , 5 e , e 13 21 7 11 , 5 1 ...--...--- Hr Total 33 n 32 31 30 45 91 125 97 31 31 3 -..........------------...---------------.----------...-------------------------...- 24 Hour Total : 1'2 AM peak hour begins : 09: 30 AM peak volume: $:;1 Peak hour factor : 0.87 PM peak hour begins , 18: 30 PM peak volume, 164 Peak hour hctor : 0.63 .................**.................*.....*..............*....***........***.*. J 57LSOv' r.t:>R f 7.(>/';/""-r~ ":"y~,4L 7/ ;v? L - ///';:';;/02 ._--~ "0 rl". 7.c= /I 'vf -J~ .:1 . "" 'p"'"'1 c .Q 1!! 8 4- :J i Co E w 0 9 5 ~O ~ '" CX) -~ r-- <l> It') J!? '" <l> m.!i: .0> o c ZLU 1/ "7 @ D: g /2 63 1 ,,:;/"1 Cf w ~ 2 - Ii} A\ ..J /1 "1- /2 5" I .4. r-1 6 2 7 y a 1- EXHIBIT "e" /. '..- ~'" 'V c"::' ';;.-Jc"s ~ /f /.-..E c ,. W ,.3';;. rf-v'ii .?yL",5 7" ,,{:2,,;"';"'</"Vp 7:e'".4r.lt",,,";(.. V'C;L..,~'//\/c',4 7 //V7Z..<-'; ;,,-;:',,-_7/~i 1\../ 271 .::?b6 2':;'31 ;? ,J5'c; 3:56 4.26, "'1. "I .2.. - PEAk C; 10,,,1(> '7'8;ii. 4e/ -? 53 4..k. 3 .:> 7tff ze.c:; /"p ..,., -"---_.-._-- ~------ EXHIBIT "0" II Jlnl1lllll , III 1"1_ I'tdUc """ "1rI-1'''~. lie. 'H ~ feInat .. _I nl~ ........ .... II1rIr 1IIcIt, '** Uu, titl l:IIt I ,..HlU .. II: ~. ~. I. ......., . 15UI272-3155 ,. INti lJI.'m Star, lite: 12/N/U .. Nl'~'" . .'_Lt. .... : 1 ILL l1li_ fI ...- II JI'JI _ ClJl"'"lfll,.. _110m IreI .. .. ItI&k IteR 1 21) 2 1 US 2 J au . ..... 11 N' 11 n 11 . 11 I 11:" J 231 t , 3 . 2M 3 1 SlS 11.1S 5 2M ) 3 . . Ja1 , . .U II:JI ! ut J , , I J12 5 , m IOu II .10 I 12 n I 1H1 11 . UI1 11:" . 223 I 3 . 0 322 . . sn I1:U , Ht I , , . IU I . st. 11:11 . 235 . 1 , I JH I . SI' '.n 22 m 11 I 21 . uti 1f I HU 12:" 3 I , 11 ,n , , 10 12:11 . , 3 J 351 5 1 U7 12.lt 1 5 , 11 3U , 1 Uf lair J1 IN. 11 2G H un u 1 Jill u:.. 1 2U I ) . 0 HI . 0 01 12115 J IN 2 2 2 . '" . 0 os 12:11 5 191 J . J . m 2 I Q1 leu II m' 11 2t U 1 un u I 2SU , I 5 . m 7 I 07 . I 5 . nt 7 I nl J , , . 'N 1 . 7J1 n I 2111 " ot "' ". .. 15 11St I if . __ . tile., 11DI1 .... MICI. M11l __ .; .. nMIlIt. I. ...., . .. ~ 1 .~ In .....1_ .'1111'" htllhrtl tntfic hrfty ItIrillilu. lie. AIIItUI1& 'hmct OIlftJ ...... nlriU 3M44 (set) m.u" ha (Hll 2ft-4Jtl au tIItCUt --- . ...- .. lilt htI .... Iurt II1II1. 1'1" J an a a t . I" . 1 '" 11115 U m I , 7 . ..2 , . m 1':U , n. 2 5 11 . SA 10 ) 151 liar U 1151 It U JJ . 1m 11 I 1m 17:01 I U. 3 3 II . "5 I 5 nl U;lS I '" . J 5 Sf I 5" , 1 "' 11.11 11 m 11 2 , . 5" , 1 175 - J1 1115 11 13 sa I 1m 22 , Jill 11:" z 11. 1 1 11 . 411 , 1 '12 11:15 1 2" 1 ] 5 I 311 3 I 117 11:11 11 all 1 5 , t U7 t 0 ,to Ion II 1 31 I 1521 11 1 11,11 11 112 1 1 J , 141 , 0 41' 11:15 J UI 1 2 1 I 110 . . J7S 1':3t 1 IS' . S 5 t US 3 . . lIoII' at 110 2 II 21 'I "I 10 . lilt H:I. 1 1St I 2 t :\ u. 2 . m 21:lS 1 1lt 1 1 7 II' 1 , Z'l4 H:U I h' ] 1 I I, 112 2 . Z'll IIIr t 51' . . J1 . st) , . 1UC n:H I 101 . , U t 123 2 0 25t 2111S . 121 0 2 1 t UI , . 211 12:JI J " 2 1 . . I" . . 111 . . lair , m 2J 12 21 I I" 3 I '12 fotI1 m Utll lU 1M 323 t 11'" m u 303" , Jpr. 2.1 .1.4 1.2 37.' A.2 ".5 1.3 , 1lIt. 0.1 11.1 a.' u I.. 51.1 ., EXHIBIT "0" 1t14y ...: JII1llIII lit. CadI : IOOW" .tut _: U/"'.2 htI :1 ,......... ....~.....~ ~.u-.,JrB. I ..... I , ..., ~'\:;I' '-l ""'''''. n............... ..............~ ...8Cltllchn1ca1 A Corl8trUcIion Mat8riBls Englr!eerlng & testing. IlI8plICIion Envtronmental Slll'Vices Offices throughout the state of Florida www.nuttingenglneers.com.\nfoO.lll\tlngenllineElrs.com NovCl.1:lba-19,2002 ~ , William Wietsma Company: 25 Seabreezc Ave. Deltll.y Beaeb, Florida 33483 Attn: Mr. William Wietsma ~l~ (& ~ 'll-W-~.7} . , 9 axJ2 I~! I ! I'LANNING AND ONING OfPT Subject: Boring Log :esmittal Proposed Al' 13 Townhomes SE Comer of ngress Avenue & SW 3Sh Avenue Boynton Bcacp, Florida Dear Mr. Wietama: Nutting &gineers of Flori . Inc. performed a lOliminary subsurface explatation for the proposed. Arbolata TO\'llIlho to be located at 1b southeast COIJIm' of Congress Avenue and SW 3St1> Avenue in Do ton Beach, Florida. Four borings were performed to depths of 10 to IS feet fot' this project. Our prelirnin.lry uploration ikClded that the ~ consist of very loose to medium dense light brown to ~ brown ~ fine sand to a depth of IS feet below llUld swface. We note that the soils in the ~ five S were in a very loose to loose state lUId will IeqUire IlIldercutting and intonlc ~~on prior to c:oIIlltruction activities. Prior to finalizing the foundation design, addi . building specific borinp will be required in order to provide final foundation delli. recommenQa.tions. Should you have any questi . ,or if we can be of funher assistance, please feel fu:e to contact us. Sincerely, NUTTING ENGINEERS 0 ~ ~ II!';'~ Richard Wolllfarth, p,a #S08' 8 Director of Engineering Wietsma logsIRCW 1310 NEPTUNE Df'lYJ:. BOYNT SMCH. FLOItIDA 33428. (581) 7lI1 'IDO. Fax (511) 7I7-9ll75 Braward (854) 941--11700 f HlIl8bcxougtll813) 8668800. Mlami-Dad. (305) 567-3083 NOV 19 2002 ~ I , 9:03AM NUTTING ENGINEERS NUTTING ENGINEERS OP PLO_ JIIC, ....1tted1H1 NO.486 P 2 o.iaOI8Ghnical a ConQvc:ljon Materl." Hydrogeology Il MoIlitoring Wel1a l!ng'I18lIr!ng . In8PKtion . Telltlng Depth FIl8I TE T BORING REPORT I OesCl1plion or Mallals I Lt ~ qtl.rtzftne'SAND Dat1r. """"" cr-tztlne BANO- 15 TNt BoI1I1ll ~I".'" 811 relit.- o 10 20 . Penellallo" . N Velue 30 40 60 liD 70 -r I 80 1lO N .- S 8 Illowa S8lllpler Cl!Iilng 112 314 3/3 3/3 ZI2 2/Z 2/1. 11MB 51'1 1II'l1 7f7 8/10 13 1. 15 241 10MO 11M1 I , : I Client i WIlliam W/eaJ Co. Inc. PIt'IJ8d IName: piODi:ieBi:i'A;boiJita'roWithDm88 .- 'u . project ~n: _. __SE_ COI1!W '" ~a.~ !ov..!' ~ SW 36th Ave.. Boynton Beach Hole ~on: A~ NW =x:rtvcomer . Driller: I M rill ; DateSlarted:__i1.t!.~2_._ Elevetidn Reference: ____~rox. ..~ cl'OWI! Daie Completed: -Xl/1~2__.__ Casing:pi8lT1ebBr: ~~O'p_BX f'I..-h Couple Hammer wr _~_ Fall: _~.:~__ sampler:Oiametsr' Z"J;;IP x ~ ~ ~~_!1 Hammer wr i4Olll_ Fall: ~.!I.:'__. GrouncfiNalBr deplh:lmmedJate: 3' , """'~ w.u...~.CA/Oll"" "'''''''''1'$ UlL,..,.III81IWC'!"ll ~ ", , ' . 21 -I.~'._. Dreier.' _JI,!425.18 Iiole 11: 1 by: R.C. Wohlfarth, P.E. #50858 1310 1I0)111lDn .....h (&111 7 .. DIlw Paynlon /leech. Florida >>126 . Ponlpeno _I_I !l41-87lll1" FAX (5&11737'-75 """''' ~..J L.......uL- .J.~~' "...... ,~.''''' ......""'.....-......''"'" , ~ I I I NUTTING ENGINEERS OFf__ _ltbhh....1M' . ,'-".............. , ~ ..-tech"icaJ & Cona1fUetIon ......riala Hydro!ll aIogy & MonitoIfng Wet.. EI1gineerlnll.lnlIpec:tion . Testing iJeJIlIl Foe! OescripIIoo or Melerillls ..u.~quartz_'SAND TE, T BORING REPORT 'f'ell8lr8llon-NlIlllue _ o '0 2D 3D 4D 50 eo 70 80 90 N SlIIlIp/e, C"il1S ,- . , ' Client I.. W11111111l Co. InC. Older #: 84~...1{L. projectNiime:__..._.......n~rop_dAlbo iOWM_~_ _.' .-. Hole,. ~ project ~~; S~ CCtffl... of ~~ A'!8. & SW 36t11 Ave., ~ ~!=lI~__ Hole La . : __ Al!p"!.X S)'!f...P.r:oJl1trty.comer ._. . Driller: '. ... M. DraIn ~ .. Date started: 11/15102 EIeva~ Refer8flCll: Approx. . roadEIIIII Date Completed: _1.1.M~02 Casil'l9:pi,"neter 3ft 00 ax FJw!t _. !P.J.e__..h Hammerwr- _2~ Fall: _~~..__ Sampler-Diameter ~~OD .2' ~n Hammer WT; 140#_ Fall: 30"_ 3round~ber qepth:'mmeQfate: ~~ . ~WlI.~III!..._,~..D/lys_""llTl"'CT"o I ' c.t< lIIVwII """r1zfl"" BAND o _ fll8tBorlngt.rmInllM'.,0-. ! I ~ .. -- 111- z 1/2 6 313 , 3Ii ',. . . za .. . za a., . zrz ~ 4/lI 18 817 f--.. '1"4 i , I '--- . - - .. i ! . , .., I . ... -. . i , -.. .. . . I - _ _-v - --- l by: RC. WOhlfarth, P.E:#50858 1310 -1lrIw.1lclv.-, a-h, F\GIldII_ Bayn"'" BMcll/5lI11 _. """"_ a..cIJ I_I lI41-B1OO. FAX (5811737~D711 ,n....-........J"-~.... .J-"-'--'"" , '......' '''''l''U '-'~..u_'-"""" @ , , , : NUTTING ENGINEERS ..,~""" __1'" 11V"'~ J''''' ....OIlIthnica/ . ~lruc:lio" lIo18lerl.,. Hyd~ & MqnltDring Wetla Ell9ln_it,g 'lnspecllon . Twtlng TE~ ST BORING REPORT . Ptlf\eIr;olIDn - N Value SIOWE o 10 20 30 40 60 60 70 60 90 N Sompler Casill9 ccTIT I I Client t. Wdlhlm W Co. ll'Ie. Orcler it: 8425.18 Project Sme; _ pl'OiiONliAiio,-.,i TOWIIb~..__ Hole ,:_ _L_ __ _ Project ocaIlon: BE corner ot~~ ~V.. & SW 36th Ave~ B_o~n BoiIC!1_ _____ Hole l.cication: ._. _ ApPl'Ox SI! DI'O~ comer . . ___ Driller: I --......- M. DraIn _.. _ Date Started: _ _ ._1J/1~__ ~levatidn Reference: "FOX. @ road ~ Date Completed: 11/15102 casing:b~r: .__ 3" ODBXFI..... __~e_____ --- --. HammerWf. 28lJj11"Fall: 24" Sall\Piif-Dlamet.er r ()p It 2' Split S _~!!._ _ Hammer WT 140lL Fall; _~O" GroundWater depth:Jmmedlllte: 3' l~~""DII_lII"'''''Y8U1lW.S_Ul:T\iP Deplfl Feet I 0e1Cfill1lon at ~lIIelIaIli r: Lt..~~"'lIANP , I , I I ' I i , I i is Test BoI'lIlll_iiiiobi8. l' fMt. .. - 3 1/'1 213 1 3/3 3J3 . va - - 2IZ 6 212 313 I 43 316 - 7/8 - 24 6'10 14117 b 1I3 13/15 18111 -- . --. I f-.-- , .. - n., - -.-- T --.-.. --- I - - .'--..... ---- II L__ by: RO. WOh1i'iirtl1, P.E. #50858 1310 IJrhe, EkrInloIlIluch. Plotldol33421 &y....... _llilI1I 1IlIII' """'- _111&&' 941'-' FAX (511, 737.-7& '.............,J '-"-''"-'"- ,J-"""--"I"""l" ,""-'"....,,"" .......,.."....,u................ 1'tV -n;.JIJ , -' Ln- - Client t..--- Prujeetrcame: . /!!)al!v,r!f ~~I~"_~___. __. _ project~on: 8E com_at Cot- Ave. & SW 31th AVlt-,,-~~~J3_.~.cJ.!_ ~o:eler: jcatlo~:____ _______:~~ ~E_ PJ'O_ _ __ _~~~_____._____ Date started: 1111S1ll2 EIeYallclnReference: ApImllC.alQBd rown Date Completed: 1111~___ eaSjng=:lameter. 3" CD ax FIulIII-JCouIlle Hammer WT .. Fall: 24" Sam :Di1Imefar: ~ OD.J.l_2~.p.m_S~ Hammer wr- ]~_ Fall: )0" _ Grpu, r deplh:lmmedlatll: 3' _lljII.I..D~IIl"PA""UII.Hii~ ~ PepIh Feel I , , ; I - tLL IlhiWn ! I I 1 l TMi BOi1iii I ! NUTTING ENGINEERS OI'~ \IC. _'101 '-__""leal & Col18lr1/Ction Mntriats Hydrogeology a MonltGlillll w.tls Engi_rtng . h18peo1lon . THting TEST BORING REPORT . Penelnllian - III v."", B DncrIpIIon 01 MalerI811 0 10 20 :lCI 4D 50 I5ll 70 IllI 9Cl N Sllmpler ......- ~ -. . .---. - . - I ~ $ 1/2 313 -= ~ B 314 414 ... . 3IZ _. .. -. w , I . 313 314 "- 14 4M I Bl8 ~ -- -- -- __n_ 2.4 "'" 1311. """';'-.'1_ - 'H ____ , I u. . , I , .-..-..- ----.. , II -- - --- --- ---.- I -.... :J -" W!!!an! Wralllml .qo.In~. -.. _. Order #; ~_1!! lows c_a L_ Hotel: 4 by: R.C.VVohffiarth,P.E.I50858 13'0 Ii1<>!onlDol _Iat, prtoa, 8""""" ..-,PkIflda 334211 . '"""'-_ (9ll4IM1_'1WC IS') 7S1-l19711 Gerald B. Church, P.E. Consulting Civil Engineer 50S N.E. J" Street, Suite J Delray Beach, F133483 PhlFax (561) 266-9520 00 NOV I q 2002 w ~@~DW~ DRAINAGE STATEMENT ARBOLATA TOWNBOMES SOUTHEAST CORNER OF CONGRESS AVENUE & S.W. 35'" AVENUE BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PlANNiNG AND ZONING DEPl . The subject parcel is a vacant tract, approximately 16 acres in area. It is proposed to develop a residential community of 172 townhomes, fee simple title. The site is located in the boundaries oftbe Lake Worth Drainage District and South Florida Water Management District C-15 Drainage Basin. It is proposed that nmofffrom impervious areas be directed to dry retention areas and/or exfiltration trench by means of grass swales, inlets and storm sewers. Legal positive outfall is available to the site via the Lake Worth Drainage 1-29 Canal, adjacent to the property on the south side. The drainage design will provide for the following: I. Residential lots sbaJI have a finish grade not lower than the maximum water surfuce elevation produced by the 3-year, 24-hour rainfall event. 2. Minor street drainage sbaJI have a water surfuce elevation of swaJe flow not lower than the maximum water surface elevation produced by the 3-year, 24-hour rainfall event. 3 There will be no discharge of stromwater runoff resulting from a rainfall event of 25-year, 72- hour, except through an approved control structure. The allowable discharge sha1l be in accordance with the Lake Worth Drainage District and the South Florida Water Management District drainage criteria for the C-15 Basin. 4. The minimum building floor elevation sbaJI be at or above the 100-year, 72-hour event 5 WaterquaJity sha1l be based upon the first 1" ofrunotf. Prepared by' Date: Gerald B. Church, P.E. llll 8/02 t:lty Colles: Accessed Via Wchsitc ,\ ,\ W.hIJVl1hlll.h~ach.un! www.3mlcY31.convboynlon_bc<.Ich~n.us CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION FOR NEW SITE PLANS & MAJOR MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING SITE PLAN Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting? Yes ,Date 9/17/02 This application must be filled out completely, accurately and submilled as an original to the Planning and Zoning Division. TWELVE COMPLETE, sequentially numbered, ASSEMBLED AND STAPLED .et. of plen. Including a recent survey and appropriate fee shall be submitted YAth the application for the Initial process of the Site Plan Review procedure. AN INCOMPLETE SUBMITTAL WILL NOT BE PROCESSED Please print legibly (In ink) or type all Information. J I. GENERAL INFORMATION 1 Project Name Arrolata Town lbqes 2. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name: will iam H. Baker, Trustee " Phone: 555 Paddock Parkway, Rock Hill S.C. 29732 " (Zip Code) 800-849-2729 Fax: ll03-324-1ll6 Address: 3. Applicant's name (person or business enlllyln whose name this application is made): William wietsma Co., Inc. " AdClress: 25 Seabreeze Avenue, Delray Beach, Fl. 33483 Phone: 561-274-4863 (Zip Code) Fax: 562-274-7636 If contlact purchaser, please attach contract for sale and purchase. 4 Agent's Name (person, Ifany, representing applicant): william Wietsma Address: 25 Seabreeze Ave., suite 304, Phone. 561-274-4863 Delray Beach, Fl. 33483 (Zip Codel Fax: 562-274-7636 5. Correspondence to be mailed to agent only. If no agent, then to applicant unless a substitute Is specified below" 'This 15 the one address to w,lch all agendas; lellers and other materials wll be mailed. 6. What Is applicant's Interest In the premises ateeled? (owner, buyer, lessee, builder, de\ieloper, contract purchaser, etc.) Developer 7 Street address allocation of site: S,E. Corner of S. Congress & S.W. 35th Avenue 8. 08 43 46 05 00 000 3030 PropertyConlrol #(PCN) 9. Meets & Boun:is/8ee Draw:i.n;Js legal description of site: 10 172 Unit Town !kIne Project Intended use(s) of site: 11 William Wietsna Architect: 12. ThcIllas White landscape Architect: 13. Site Planner' william Wietsna 14 Engineer' Gerald Church 15. Surveyor' O'Brien, SUiter, O'Brien 16. Traffic Engineer' Gerald Church " " 17 Has a site plan been previously approved by the City Commission for this property? No II. SITE PLAN The following information must be filled out below and must appear, vA1ere applicable, on all caples of the site plan. 1 Land Use Category shown in the Cqmprehenslve Plan: tmustrial 2. Zoning District: M-1 In:'Iustrial 3. Area of Site 16.087 acres 100,751..J8 sq. ft. 4. land Use -- Acreage Breakdo\Ml: a. b. c. d. e. f g. 12.534 77.91 Residential, including surrounding lot area of grounds % of site acres Recreation Areas * 0.468 (tlxcJuding water area) Water Area 0 o 2.91 % of site acres Industrial o o o o % of site acres % of site Commercial acres % of site acres Public/Institutional o o % of site acres Public, Private and Canal rights-of-way 3.085 19.18 % of site acres 2 h. Other (specify) Other (specify) o o % of site acres o o % of site acres i. j. Total area of site 16.0B7 acres 100 % of site "including open space suitable for outdoor recreation, and hal.1ng a minimum dimension of 50 ft. by50 ft. 5. Surface Cover 6. 7 a. Ground floor building 5.375 acres 33.41 % of site area ("building footprint") 0 0 Water area acres % of site b. c. Other Impervtous areas, Including paved area of public & private streets, paved area of parking lots & driveways (excluding landscaped areas), and sidewalks, patios, decks, and athletic courts. 4.723 acres 29,36 % of site d. Total impervious area 10.099 62.,7B % of site acres e. Landscaped area 0 . 016 acres 0.10 % of site inside of parking lots (20 sq. ft. per interior parking space required - see Sec. 7.5-35(g) of Landscape Code). .... .... f. Other landscaped areas, 5.972 37.12 % of site acres g. h. Other pervious areas, includlP9 golf course, natural areas, ~rds, and swales, but excluding water areas acres 0 % of site Total pervious areas 5.9BB acres 37,22 % of site i. Total area of site 16.0B7 100 % of site acres Floor Area a. Residential 354,620.50 sq. ft, b. Commercial/Office 0 sq. ft_ c. IndustriallWarehouse 0 sq. ft. d. Recreational 0 sq. ft. e. Public/Institutional 0 sq. ft. f. Other (specify) 0 sq. ft. Other (specify) 0 sq. ft. g. h. Total floor area 354,620.50 sq. ft. Number of Residential DwellinQ Units a. Single-family detached 0 sq. fl. b. Duplex 0 sq. fl. 3 .~..._-- ~-~ c. (1) (2) (3) (4) Multi-Family (3 + attached d\M:!lIing units) Efficiency 0 1 Bedroom 0 2 Bedroom 0 3+ Bedroom if.!. dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units dwelling units d. Total multi-family 172 dwelling units e. Total number of dwelling units 172 8. Gross Density 10.7 dwelling units per acre 9 30 Maximum height of structures on site feet 2 stories 10 Required off-street parkinq a. Calculation of required # of off-street parking spaces. ~-' 2 Per Unit=344 Residential = Off-street parking spaces provided on site plan 220 Residential (Covererl) 344 Residential (Uncovererl) 22 Recreational = = b. Calculation of required # of handicap parking spaces Number of handicap spaces provided on site plan 2 Recreational ... = REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PROJECT MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. 4 III. CERTIFICATION (I) (We) understand that this application and all papers and plans submitted hereWth become a part of the permanent records of the Planning and Zoning Division (I) (We) hereby certify that the above statements and any statements or sho>Mngs in any papers or plans submitted herewth are true to the best of (my) (our) knowledge and belief. This application will not be accepted unless signed according to the instructions below. k/~<'~ ?;~ let Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, of Authorized Principal if property is owned by a corporation or other business entity. ?;/~:1- Date OR Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant) Date IV AUTHOR I ~q \ l 0 '"2- Date (I) (We) hereby designate the above-signed person as (my) (our) authorized agent in regard to this application. 47UL -r;:~~ 7;" Signature of Owner(s) or Trustee, or Authorized Principal if property is owned by a corporation or other business entity. tf~"2-- Date OR Signature of contract purchaser (if applicant) Date A REPRESENTATIVE MUST BE PRESENT AT ALL TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE, PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD OR COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (CRA) AND CITY COMMISSION MEETINGS HELD TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. 5 RIDER TO SITE PLAN APPLICATION The undersigned as applicant for Final Site Plan Approval does hereby acknowledge, represent and agree that all plans, specifications, drawings, engineering, and other data submitted wth this application for review by the City of Boynton Beach shall be reviewed by lhe various boards, commissions, staff personnel and other parties designated, appointed or employed by the City of Boynton Beach, and any such party reviewing the same shall rely upon the accuracy thereof, and any change in any item submitted shall be deemed material and substantial. The undersigned hereby agrees that all plans. specifications, drawings, engineering and other data which may be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, or its boards, commissions, stat or designees shall be constructed in strict compliance wth the form in which they are approved, and any change to the same shall be deemed material and shall place the applicant in \iolation of this application and all approvals and permits which may be granted. The applicant agrees to allow the City of Boynton Beach all rights and remedies as pro\ided for by the applicable codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach to bring any violation into compliance, and the applicant shall indemnifY, reimburse and save the City of Boynton Beach harmless from any cost, expense, claim, liability or any action which may arise due to their enforcement of the same. ~~NDAGREEDTO~;' ~ ~ss . Ap a t --- ) ,20~2 Witness 6 ---- Arbolata Townhomes Prepared for William Wietsma Co., Inc. by Thompson Consulting, Inc, (561) 659-6068 m J!"~ ~ 3U \VI ~ @ PLANNING AND ZONING OEPT December 2002 Table 0' Contents Introduction ................................................................. I Market Overview.... .. ... .. .. .. .. .... . .. .. ... ...... . ..... .... .. .. .... . .. .. . . . 2 Demand for Owner Units (For Sale) 2 Palm Beach County Affordable Housing Study 2 Reinhold Wolff Economic Research Housing Report 4 Target Market Area. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 For Sale Unit Demand 7 Selling Price and Affordability Criteria 10 For Sale Unit Supply 12 Existing Townhouse Developments 12 Planned/Approved Townhouse Developments 13 Supply/Demand Comparison 15 General Limiting Conditions .......................... ....... ...............16 ---- o Introduction The proposed Arbolata T ownhome community is located at the southeast corner of south Congress Avenue and Southwest 35'" Avenue, within the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida. (See Exhibit 1.) The subject] 6.087 acre tract is intended to accommodate 172 fee simple townhouses. The subject site is currently desigoated Industrial (I) on the City of Boynton Beach's Future Land Use Atlas (FLU A.) A High Density Residential (HDR) FLUA desigoation is being sought for the subject site. This supply/demand report is prepared in response to a comment in the staff report regarding the above referenced FLUA amendment request, for data and analysis which addresses the need for the additional housing being proposed for the subject site. Staff acknowledges that the nature of industrial uses has changed such that the previous methodologies used for detennining the demand for industrial property are not longer appropriate and that the City has seen a shift from detached single-family to attached single-family (townhouse) developments. However, staff requested that data and analysis addressing supply and demand considerations relating to the proposed townhome development be submitted. Those general factors affecting the existing and future market which would support single family for sate residential development of the subject site at the Land Use Plan amendment stage of the land development process, are examined in this report. The proposed townhouse community is intended to accommodate 48 ] -story, 1,945 square foot townhomes, inclusive of two car garages as well as 124 2-story, 2,] 10 square foot townhomes, inclusive of one car garages. The anticipated pricing for these townhouse units is likely to be $] 75,OOO:!: TABLE l-UNlTMIX Type (Bedrooms/Batbs) Number (Uuits) Approx. Size (sq. ft.) Three/two 48 1,945 Three/two 124 2,110 Total 172 - I Arbolata T.R Community Exbibit 1 - Site Location ~ 0 ,./ 0: "i '-' .... 0 ::; ~ ':> LANT ANA j '-' o ~ BOYNTO SI~..iS RD i\TL.ANTIC la HYPOLUXO LE CHALET o 0: LINTON BEACH BL VD o 0: I U Z <( 0: W 0: ;;: -' U PIPERS GLEN FLAVOR Pier -' W RD 0 0: W U Z W 0: -" <( -' GATEWAY BLVD WOOL RIGHr RD GOLF RD 0: .... >- "i .... ::; ':> LaWSON BL D BLVD 0: .... a::: ~ " '-' o ii MI ER RD /- "' ::> '" ~' 25 / ';;1 ;i/ U) V> U) W 0: '-' Z o u DCE AN '" OCEAN All SITE \ Arbolata T.H. Community ----- 1 Market Overview Demand For Owner Units (For Sale) Palm Beach County AfFordable Housing Study The Palm Beach County Affordable Housimz Studv (Thompson Consulting, Inc., 2000) identifies and quantifies housing needs in Palm Beach County, and is an update of the 1994 study, which was used as the basis for developing the County's Five-Year Consolidated Plan (as requirement of the Department of Housing and Urban DevelopmentIHUD), which identifies housing needs priorities in Palm Beach County The study was also used by the county as a basis to determine affordable housing needs in the Voluntary Density Bonus (VDB) programs. In the above referenced study, households on a countywide basis are characterized using Census data specially prepared by the Bureau of the Census (in conjunction with the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business and Shimberg Center), as follows: TABLE 2 - DISTRIBUTION OF HOUSEHOLDS BY TENURE AND INCOME GROUP Income Group. Renter Households Owner Households Total Households Very-Low 33,418 54,827 88,245 Low 23,771 48,933 72,704 Moderate 10,038 25,653 35,691 Moderate + 44,370 205,122 249,492 Total 111,597 334,535 446,132 * _ Very-Low Income = Oto 500/ctofMedian; Low Income = 51 to 80% of Median; Moderate Income = 81%to 95% of Median; and Moderate+ ~ 96% and more of Median 2 Arbolata T.R Community Definitions of very-low, low, moderate and moderate+ income households are established annually for Palm Beach County by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (DHUD). Current (2002) definitions are as follows: Very-Low' Low' Moderate+' $31,400 $50,240 $59,660+ From the table on the preceding page, the following countywide observations are made: . There was a total of334,535 owner households in Palm Beach County in 1999 . The 334,535 owner households represent 75.0% oftotal households in 1999 . Of the total owner households in 1999, 61.3% were moderate+ income households. Further, using the data from Table 2, it is concluded that, of the total 446,132 resident households in Palm Beach County, approximately 50.0% were moderate+ income owner households, which can afford market rate housing. If it is assumed this rate is maintained during the 2000-2005 period and within the planning time frame for which population growth projections are available for the City of Boynton Beach (planning horizon to the year 2025), growth in moderate+ household income groups will be substantial. The PBCAHS also addresses housing needs on a more localized basis throughout the county In order to accomplish this task, the county was divided into 17 Housing Sectors. Housing Sector boundaries are indicated in the Map Exhibit 2. The proposed townhouse community is located within Housing Sector P However, the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach fall within both Sectors P and K. This report addresses supply and demand considerations for "for sale" housing (inclusive of townhouses) within the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach. As such, any data derived for the City from the Palm Beach County Affordable Housinl! Studv and its TECHNICAL APPENDICES, assumes the weighted proportions calculated from Sectors P and K apply (e.g., to population, household and housing unit estimates and projections.) 3 Arbolata T.H. Community Exhibit 2 - Housing Seeton Palm Beach County Housing Sectors D ~.~ M..rtinC:O~ Palm Beach County I , I ,-' ~"i, Gf u \ !, .i' nF \ I! I I ~' ii-=tt i -~-+-~),~'!'\ I i " ,..-i, k-. I' ,--v \~ . \ I, 1 y-,.~-t._-- " ---r-H . I , , r---r- -n I !i-~-1\ "~E--' '- :: J --i-. .__~ , ' N W+E o S 6 ~~ Miles M .~...9' L ~ 1 ~ N .... . Source: Thompson Consukting, Inc. 8/412000 Palm Beacn eo"nty Broward COUl'lry I J . .~ ... L -0 ,.,....... Arbolata T.H. Community 3. Reinhold WolH Economic Research (P.B. County Report) Reinhold P W olffEconomic Research, Inc. (Wolff) performs an analysis of housing (rental and for sale) in Palm Beach County on a quarterly basis. * County housing submarkets defined by W oUf are different from those used in the PBCAHS. Wolff generally defines the Boynton Beach Area housing submarket as follows: NORTH: Hypoluxo Road; SOUTH: Lake Ida Road; EAST Intracoastal Waterway; WEST U.S. 441 and west. TheWolff single family for sale survey includes 39 active projects, with 857 units sold during the first quarter of2002, making the Boynton Beach Area housing submarket (BBA) the second highest in level of new home sales countywide. Only the Lake Worth/Lantana/WeIlington housing submarket exceeded the BBA, with 944 sales. The least sales activity was found in the East and Central Boca Raton housing submarket, with only five new homes sold during the first quarter of 2002. During the last quarter of 2002, 475 units were sold/deeded within the BBA. Although the geographic area encompassed by the Boynton Beach Area housing submarket is greater than that which is encompassed by the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach, a ", quarter 2002 average monthly sales rate of 286 units for single family, for sale housing is noteworthy, representative of a brisk and healthy residential growth rate. TABLE 3 -NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME SALES (palm Beach County and Selected Submarkets) Time Period Palm Beach Boynton Beach Lake Worth! East & Central (qtr.) County Lantana! Boca Raton WellinlJton 2"" Quarter2000 1,865 423 474 11 3'" Quarter 2000 2,063 574 494 13 4'" Quarter 2000 1,891 620 422 14 I" Quarter 2001 1,593 378 467 9 2"" Quarter 2001 1,643 572 347 4 3'" Quarter 200 1 1,375 415 327 4 4'" Quarter 2001 1,743 475 501 8 I" Quarter 2002 3,343 857 944 5 */Source: Palm Beach County Ouarterlv Housinll Reoort. Second Quarter 2002. 4 Arbolata T.H. CommWlity TABLE 4 -AVERAGE MONTHLY SALES RATES NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME DEVELOPMENTS (palm Beach County and Selected Suhmarkets) (I) Geographic Area Units Sold # of Active Projects Average Sales (3) (1/1-3/31 - 2002) (2) Palm Beach County 3,343 147 7.6 Boynton Beach 857 39 7.3 Lake WorthlLantanal 944 37 8.5 Wellington East & Central Boca 5 4 3.3 ------------------------~--------------------------------------------- TABLE 5 - NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOME SALES (FEE SIMPLE) (palm Beacb County and Selected Submarkets) (1) Price Range ($) Palm Beacb Boynton Beacb Lake Wortbl East & Central Co. LantanalWell. Boca Raton Under $75,000 1 0 0 0 $75,000-$99,999 19 0 10 3 $100,000-$124,999 99 3 84 I $125,000-$149,999 414 1I4 109 0 $150,000-$174,999 517 157 141 0 $175,000-$199,999 571 204 104 0 $200,000-$249,999 660 247 218 0 $250,000-$299,999 454 85 163 0 $300,000-$399,999 333 34 100 0 $400,000+ 275 13 15 1 Total 3,343 857 944 5 Median Price $203,825 $193,933 $204,504 $203,825 */Source: Palm Beach County Ouarterly Housimz Reoort. Second Quarter 2002. (1) Includes all housing sold in fee simple (2)An active project is one that has one or more completed units (3) Sales based on units closed (deeded) 5 Arbolata T.R. Community As evidenced by the statistics presented in Table 4, the Boynton Beach housing submarket is averaging 7.3 fee simple single family sales per month. This rate is generally comparable to that which is found countywide (7.6/month), lower than the Lake WorthlLantanafWellington housing submarket, while higher than the East & Central Boca housing submarket. As evidenced by the statistics presented in Table 5, the median sales price for fee simple single family units of$193,933 is lower than the median for the other two cited housing submarkets, as well as for Palm Beach County as a whole. However, as indicated earlier, the Boynton Beach housing submarket has the second highest level of hew homes sales countywide, behind the Lake WorthlLantanafWellington housing submarket. The above referenced statistics taken from the 2nd Ouarter Palm Beach County Ouarterlv Housing Reoort prepared by Reinhold P Wolff, are indicative of healthy demand for single family (fee simple) homes in the Boynton Beach housing submarket. 6 Arbolata T.H. Community 2 Target Market Area For purposes of the subject FLUA amendment, the supply/demand analysis defines the target market area (TMA) as the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach, as the data and analysis typically required to justify amendments to the Future Land Use Atlas is for the geographic jurisdiction within which the change is being proposed. For Sale Unit Demand Using population and household growth projections derived from the City of Boynton Beach,. projections of moderate and above income owner household and unit growth within the TMA are presented in Tables 6 and 7, assuming a weighted average percentage of total households and housing unit stock needed for moderate and above income owner groups, as estimated and projected in the Palm Beach County Affordable Housing Studv for Sectors P and K. The proposed townhouse community is located within Housing Sector P A weighted average of Sectors P and K was used as the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach fall within both Sectors P and K. This report addresses supply and demand considerations for "for sale" housing (inclusive oftownhouses) within the corporate limits ofthe City of Boynton Beach. As such, any data derived for the City from the Palm Beach County Affordable HousiDlz Studv and its TECHNICAL APPENDICES, assumes the weighted proportions calculated from Sectors P and K apply (e.g., to population, household and housing unit estimates and projections within the TMA - coincident with the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach.) From these tables, it is concluded that growth in demand for moderate and above income for sale units within the City during the near and long term projection time frames, will be substantial. Growth in demand is summarized on the following pages. · The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. Florid!!, City of Boynton Beach Department of Development (Division of Planning and Zoning) 7 Arbolata T.H. Community The following tables (6 & 7) estimate and project demand for single family (for sale fee simple) units within the corporate limits of the City of Boynton Beach. TABLE 6 - PROJECTIONS OF GROWTH OF MODERATE AND ABOVE INCOME OWNER HOUSEHOLDS City of Bovnton Beach: Year Population Total Households Moderate and (1) Above Income Owner Households. 2000 60,389 26,603 11,253 2002 62,564 27,561 11,658 2005 64,296 28,324 11,981 2010 66,952 29,494 12,475 2015 70,509 31,061 13,139 2020 72,918 32,122 13,587 2025 73,590 32,419 13,713 * 42.3% oftotaJ households (derived from weighted average ofmoderate+ income owner households and housing units estimated and projected in Housing Sectors P & K, as graphically depicted in Exhibit 2. 1) Based on 2.27 persons per household (owner-occupied average) per 2000 Census; The Develonment Atlas ofBovnton Beach. Florida. City of Boynton Beach; Thompson Consulting, Inc. 8 Arbolata T.H. Community TABLE 7 - PROJECTIONS OF GROWTH IN DEMAND FOR MODERATE AND ABOVE INCOME OWNER UNITS City of Bovnton Beach: Year Households Units. 2000 11,253 13,239 2002 11,658 13,715 2005 12,981 14,095 2010 12,475 14,676 2015 13,139 15,458 2020 13,587 15,984 2025 13,713 16,132 . Households/0.85:!: (based on proportion of occupied units of total units citywide per 2000 U.S. Census & Table 3, Page 41 of document entitled The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. May 2002) Period 2000-2005 2005-2010 2010-2015 2015-2020 2020-2025 Summary of Demand Projections. Total Demand Annual Demand 856 171 581 116 782 156 526 105 148 30 9 Arbolata T.H. Community Selling Price and Affordability Criteria The anticipated pricing of the Arbolata Townhome community is $175,000:t This pricing was determined based on the units being considered affordable to those households making 95%+ ofthe countywide median income, as established by the U.s. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), applying a standard percentage (i.e., 30%) of annual gross income for gross housing costs. Gross owner-occupied housing costs include PIT! (principal, interest, taxes and insurance) and any association fees, as applicable. The HUD 2002 median family income established for Palm Beach County is $62,800. 95% of $62,800 is $59,660. Those making 95% or more of the countywide median income are considered moderate+ income households as defined in Chapter 1 (Market Overview) Home selling prices affordable to moderate+ income groups are derived as follows, from the 2002 HUD established median income of $62,800: TABLE 8 - MAXIMUM INCOME/HOME SELLING PRICES BY INCOME GROUP (~\ Income Group Maximum Annual Maximum Home Price Income ($) ($)* Moderate (81-95% of median) 59,660 178,980 Moderate+ (96-120%+ of median) 75,360+ 226,080+ * - 3.0 times household income Key to the above procedure is the derivation ofthe factor (i.e., 3.0) which is applied to household income in order to determine maximum affordable selling prices. An example of the procedure used to justify the factor is presented in Exhibit 3. The example is based on a typical townhouse unit sale within New Haven at Abacoa in Jupiter, Florida. Conservative assumptions relative to interest rate and household income factor used to determine maximum affordable selling prices are made. A 6.5% interest rate on a fixed 30 year mortgage loan is assumed due to uncertainty as to what rates will be when Arbolata Townhomes are available for sale.) Based on information above, all the townhouse units within the Arbolata community will be considered affordable to households whose incomes are 95% or greater than the countywide median income (moderate+ income households.) 10 Arbolata T.H. Community Exhibit 3 Example Home Sale. Calculations A. Price Information B. Loan Data - Bank Rate MonitorlFreddie Mac Base Price: Lot Premium: Options: $208,500 $ 0 $ 0 Rate: 6.5% Term: 30 years Total Price: $208,500 Total Price: Down Payment: $208,500 $ 20.850 Loan Amount: $187,650 C. Monthly Payments Principal & Interest: Monthly Mortgage Ins.. Property Taxes: Association Fee: Homeowner's Ins.. $1,217 $ 120 $ 170 $ 138 l......12 Total Monthly Payment: $1,720 PITI: $1,632 D. Calculations I. $1.632 = $5,440 (minimum monthly income requirement) 0.30** 2. $5,440 x 12 = $65,280 (minimum yearly income requirement) 3 $208.500 (total selling price) = 3.19 $ 65,280 (minimum yearly income requirement) * Abacoa New Haven townhouse typical sale ** PITI should not exceed 30% of monthly income per U.S. HUD, Housing Elements of Comprehensive Plans, various affordable housing programs II Arbolata T.R Community For Sale Unit Supply Existing Townhouse Developments Townhouse projects located within the corporate limits of the City ofBoyoton Beach, which were approved and built out in the past few years, were identified from the Palm Beach County Property Appmiser data file, Meyers Real Estate Information, Inc., the City of Boyoton Beach (Table 7 Residential Development Projects Approved 1990-2001) in the document entitled The Development Atlas ofBovnton Beach. Flori!!!!, May 2002, and field survey research by Thompson Consulting, Inc. There were a number of townhouse/villa projects approved and built in the 1970s and 1980s, including The Meadows and Boyoton Lakes. In 1991, an additional townhouse development within Boyoton Lakes (Plat 5) was approved and sold out. In 1994, Quail Run Villas were built and sold out thereafter, and in 1996 Cedar Ridge Townhomes were approved, beginning construction/sales in 1999 This project sold out in 2001 In 1999, San Sovino (Melear PUD) was approved with construction/sales beginning in 2000 and selling out in 2001 Since that time, there have been additional townhouse developments approved (both fee simple/for sale and rentals), butthe only new townhouse product built (located in Quantum Park) is a rental project. The following summarizes those townhouse developments identified during our research efforts which are the most recently constructed and sold (within the corporate limits of the City ofBoyoton Beach): TABLE 9 - EXISTING TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENTS !RECENTLY SOLD OUT\ Project Total Price Size Size Avg. Close-out Units Range ($) Range Range Sales Date (s.C.) (br/ba) Rate (monthlv) Cedar Ridge 110 129,990- 1,528- 2/3-3/3 5.5 Dec. '01 Estates (t.h.) 204,900 2,878 San Sovino 130 95,900- 1,329- 2/3-4/3 7.1 (10.8 Jan. '02 (Melear-t.h.) 155,333 1,688 for I" 85%) There are other townhouse developments located in unincorporated Palm Beach County and Hypoluxo which are not included as the subject report focuses on the City of Boynton Beach. 12 Arbolata T.H. Community Planned/Approved Townhouse Developments There are a number of siogle family townhouse developments approved within the City of Boynton Beach which have not begun construction nor sales to date. * These are summarized below TABLE 10 - PLANNED/APPROVED TOWNHOUSE DEVELOPMENTS Project Name Location Status Number of Anticipated Units Pricing ($) Coastal Bay W side U.S. I, Approved/No 66 townhouses Unknown Colony south of Golf construction to Rd. date Hampton Court S. side Golf Rd., Approved/No 66 townhouses Unknown E. of Congress construction to Ave. date Dakota Lofts E. side U.S. I, Approved/No 19 townhouses Market High S.ofHypoluxo constr. (3 units (expect to begin ($380,000s - Rd. committed) constr. io 3/03) $500,000s) Kensington S. side 23"' Ave. Approved/No 17 townhouses Market Place (Golf Rd.), E. of construction to ($150,000s+) F.E.C.R.R. date tracks) The Harbors 2300 N. Federal Approved/No 54 townhouses Unknown Highway (E. construction to side U.s. 1, S. date of Gateway Blvd./Royal Palm Dr ) Merano Bay S.E. corner U.S. Approved/No 20 townhouses Unknown I and Shore Dr. construction to (S. of Gateway date Blvd.) Quantum E & N.W section of Approved/No 271 Unknown W (Contioental Quantum Park construction to Homes) (Lots 7-1 1& date 23-31 ) */Source: City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Division (New Residential Developments); Thompson Consulting. Inc. Note: Quantum Village (phase 2 & 3) are intended to be townhouse apartment rentals; Phase 1 (Quantum Lake Villas) is constructed and are currently in initial leasing with 293 - 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments. 13 Arbolata T .R. Community While the anticipated pricing of the above referenced townhouses is unknown with the exception of Kensington Place ($150,000s+) and Dakota Lofts ($380,000s - $500,000s), for purposes of this report, all the above referenced units are factored into the supply side of the analysis, making the net demand projections conservative. At present, all of the for sale, fee simple units approved and planned in Boynton Beach are townhouse units, totaling 513 In addition, the City of Boynton Beach's document entitled The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. Florida., May 2002, includes a list of vacant residential properties (larger than 2 acres) which exist throughout the City These are as follows: TABLE 11 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES AS OF MARCH 2002 I Property Name I Acrea2e I Density I Units Winchester/Klatt 109 7.28 791 High Ridge County Club 50 4.84 242 Palm Beach Groves 18 4.84 87 Knollwood Groves 31 4.84 150 Quantum Pill N/A N/A 415 Christian Villas 2 10.8 28 Palmland Villas 3.7 10.8 45 Total -- -- 1,758 The total number of units planned to be added to the City of Boynton Beach, based on current available vacant land designated to accommodate residential development, totals 1,758 units. The current housing stock within the City of Boynton Beach is comprised of 73% owner-occupied and 27% renter occupied units (Source: 2000 U.S. Census; The Develooment Atlas of Bovnton Beach. Florid!!, May 2002.) Assuming the same proportions of renter and owner occupied units in the future, approximately 1,283 ofthe total 1,758 units referenced above will become owner occupied. As such, these units (regardless of pricing, which could be affordable to household income groups making less than 95% of the countywide median), are factored into the supply side of this report. 14 Arbolllla T.H. Community Supply/Demand Comparison TABLE 12 - CALCULATION OF DEMAND VERSUS SUPPLY OF MODERATE AND ABOVE INCOME OWNER UNITS (2000-2025) Growth In Demand For Owner Units 2,893 (Moderate and Above) Less Planned Supply of Planned/Approved 1,796 Owner Units & Owner Units Available on Vacant Residential Properties Less Proposed Arbolata Townhome Units 172 Total Oversupply (Under supply) (1,968) Within the TMA (City of Boynton Beach), comparing future projected supply (approved unbuilt, residential development potential of vacant residential land and the units proposed for the subject site), to the year 2025 projected demand of 2,893 for sale units, indicates a supply deficit (under supply) of I ,968 units. Hence, the 172 townhouse units proposed for the Arbolata project are needed within the projection time frame (planning horizon for which population projections are available for the City of Boynton Beach/TMA.) In fact, with annual projected demand ofl71 units in the first five years of the projection time frame, the Arbolata Townhome project could conceivably be absorbed/sold out in one year. In addition, although the townhouse projects recently approved within the City of Boynton Beach have not begun construction/sales yet, with the exception of Dakota Lofts, two townhouse projects recently sold-out within the TMA indicate that the sales (absorption) rate at the Arbolata Townhome community will likely range from 5.0 to 7.0+ units/month. This absorption rate translates into sell- out within 24 - 34 month:!: Last, the Boynton Beach housing submarket defined by Wolff indicates healthy for sale housing demand, with an average per project sales rate of7.3 units/month, for a total of857 sales in the first quarter of 2002. 15 Arbolata TH. Community GENERAL LIMITING CONDITIONS Every effort has been made to insure this report contains the most accurate and timely information possible, which is believed to be reliable. However, no responsibility is assumed for inaccuracies in reporting by developer, developer's agents or any other sources. Contractual obligations do not include access to or ownership transfer of any electronic data processing files, programs or models completed directly for or as a by-product of this research effort. This report may not be used for any purpose other than for which it is prepared, except by owner/developer Possession of this report does not carry with it the right of publication and its contents shall not be disseminated to the public through advertising media, sales media, or any other public means of communication without prior written consent and approval of Thompson Consulting, Inc. 16 Arbolata T.H. Community