AGENDA DOCUMENTS
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
o November 21, 2000
o December 5, 2000
o December 19,2000
o January 2, 2001
NATURE OF
AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to Citv Clerk's Office
Requested City Commission
Meeting Dates
Date Final Form Must be Turned
in to City Clerk's Office
November 9,2000 (5'00 p,m)
o January 16,2001
o February 6, 2001
[8J February 20, 2001
o March 6, 2001
February 21, 2001 (5'00 p,m,)
January 3, 2001 (5'00 p.m,)
November 22, 2000 (5'00 p.m.)
January 17,2001 (5'00 p,m)
December 6, 2000 (5'00 p,m,)
February 7, 2001 (5'00 p,m)
December 20,2000 (5'00 p,m)
o AdmmIstratIve
[8J Consent Agenda
o PublIc Heanng
o BIds
o Announcement
o Development Plans
o New Busmess
o Legal
o Unfimshed Busmess
o PresentatIon
RECOMMENDATION: Please place thIS request on the February 20,2001 CIty CommIssion Agenda under Consent
Agenda. The Plannmg and Development Board with a 6-1 vote recommended that the subject request be approved. For
further details pertammg to thIS request see attached Department of Development Memorandum PZ 01-014
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT NAME
AGENT
OWNER,
LOCATION
DESCRIPTION
GOLFVIEW HARBOUR (Guth Vanance)
Fred Guth
Fred and Evelyn Guth
1185 S W 27th Avenue
Request for a vanance from City of Boynton Beach Land Development RegulatIOns, Chapter 2 _
Zoning, Section 5 C2.a, to place a screen enclosure at 5 feet from the property lme m lIeu of the
7.5 feet required by code for a single-family buildmg m a R-I-AA zomng dIstrict.
PROGRAM IMP ACT: N/ A
FISCAL IMPACT: N/A
ALTERNATIVES: N/A
:e(J,~~//
lannmg and Zoning ector
City Manager's Signature
Development Department Drrector
CIty Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
IICH\MAIN\SHRDATAIPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGolfview Harbour Variance GuthlAgenda Item Request Feb, 20, 200l.dot
S'\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC
DEVELOPMEN)t..dRDER OF THE CITY COMMISSIOl'f OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME
FRED & EVELYN GUTH
APPLICANT'S AGENT Fred & Evelyn Guth
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS. 1185 SW 27th AVENUE
DATE OF CITY COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING February 20,2001
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT. Side yard setback from property line
LOCATION OF PROPERTY 1185 SW 27th AVENUE
DRAWING(S) SEE EXHIBIT "C" ATTACHED HERETO
X THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows
1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations
2. The Applicant
-2L HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested
3 The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "0" with notation "Included".
4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
~ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof
DENIED
5 This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6 All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order
7 Other
DATED.
S:IPLANNINGISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGOLFVIEW HARBOUR VARIANCE\DEV ORDER SIDE SETBACK,QOC
EXHIBIT "C"
CondItIons of Approval
PrOject name. Fred & Evelyn Guth
FIle number: ZNCV-OI-OOl (sIde yard setback)
fi Z C d V 1 d d
Re erence omnl! o e anance Ann IcatIon ate Januarv 3 2001.
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
PUBLIC WORKS
Comments None X
UTILITIES
Comments None X
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments None X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments None X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments None X
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
2 To be determmed.
S:IPLANNINGISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGOLFVIEW HARBOUR VARIANCEICOND OF APPR P&D SIDE SETBACK,DOC
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM #01-014
Staff Report for
Planning and Development Board
and
City Commission
Meeting
Date:
February 13, 2001
File No:
ZNCV 01-001 Side setback from property line
Location:
1185 SW 27th Avenue (Lot #7, Block 13, Golfview Harbour 2nd Section)
Owner:
Fred and Evelyn Guth
Project:
Pool screen enclosure addition to a single-family house zoned R-1-AA
Request:
Request for a variance from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5,C.2 a , to allow a two and one-half (2 5) foot reduction from
the minimum of seven and one-half (7 5) foot side setback resulting in a five (5) foot side
yard setback.
BACKGROUND
The subject property and neighborhood are currently zoned R-1-AA, single-family residential The
property is located on the south side of SW 27th Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - location map) The applicant
has requested relief from the above-referenced code requirements to allow for the continued existence
of a pool screen enclosure addition in the rear yard The desired improvement along with the pool was
built in 1998, resulting in the location of the enclosure at five (5) feet from the east property line instead
of the minimum seven and one-half (7~) feet required in the R-1-AA zoning district (see Exhibit "B" _
pool plan)
A permit and the corresponding inspection were approved for the pool and deck; the enclosure permit
was applied for but never secured Due to the outstanding permit, the owner was contacted by the
City's Building Division. In response to the contact, the applicant submitted the building permit plans in
hopes of obtaining the necessary permits and rectifying the code violation Through this review process
the non-conformity was identified, which is the reason for this application.
Staff surveyed the area and it was observed that no other screen enclosure in this neighborhood appear
to be encroaching into the current side setback of seven and one-half (7~) feet. Furthermore, City
records show no other similar variances have been approved within this neighborhood
ANAL YSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance can not be approved unless the board finds the following
a That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district.
b That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
Page 2
File No ZNCV 01-001
c That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building, or structure
f That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter
[ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
(Exhibit "C" contains the applicant's response to the above criteria)
The analysis of this request is focused on criteria "b" above It is assumed that the homeowner is
ultimately responsible for any action on his behalf As such, the property owner is responsible for the
outstanding enclosure permit. It is equally assumed that a contractor hired to do a job will know the code
and will act in good faith As stated in the application, the homeowner trusted his contractor who,
finished the job without securing the necessary permit, resulting in the creation of special conditions by
encroaching into the side setback.
Staff acknowledges that this situation is possible when the screen enclosure is not installed concurrent
with construction of the swimming pool. The Land Development Regulations, Chapter II, Zoning,
Section 11 E. SWIMMING POOLS, states "No swimmino 0001 shall be constructed closer than eight (8)
feet from any orooerty line ....." and Section 11 F SCREEN ENCLOSURES, requires that: "All screen
enclosures (screen walls and screen roof) shall comoly with buildino side yard setback.. ...". Within the
R-1-AA zoning district, which has a minimum side setback of seven and one-half (7 }'2) feet, the pool is
allowed to be placed one-half (1/2) foot closer to the property line than the screen enclosure Although
the lesser setback for the pool is justified by its unobtrusive characteristics, if the pool is not setback to
account for the screen enclosure setback, as well as the safety margin of 3 feet (Building Code requires
a minimum of 3 feet of interior deck space between the pool edge and screen enclosure), insufficient
space remains for the screen enclosure to be placed in a conforming manner It should be noted that
the setbacks for these two related site improvements could be changed to minimize the potential
conflicts, however, this action would require either an increase in the pool setback, or a decrease in the
minimum side setback for a screen enclosure Depending on the zoning district and lot sizes,
disadvantages could accompany either amendment.
While staff may understand how this situation may, in part, result from less than a complete awareness
of the city's regulations regarding screen enclosures and swimming pools, it is still a direct result of
avoidable actions taken by the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION
Therefore, staff recommends that the request for relief from Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5,C.2.a , to allow
a two and one-half (2.5) foot side setback variance within the R-1-AA zoning district, be denied due to
the lack of traditional hardship, and due to the circumstance being created by simple home
improvements. No conditions of approval are recommended, however, any conditions of approval added
by the Planning and Development Board or City Commission will be placed in Exhibit "0"
Page 3
File No ZNCV 01-001
Staff should indicate that past variance requests have been reviewed by the city using more than the
traditional criteria, or interpretations of this criteria placing greater emphasis on economic potential,
minor home expansions, and characteristics of surrounding properties For this reason, and to indicate
the consequence of denial, staff offers the following information for consideration'
1 The subject improvement represents a minor addition to the home with no negative impact to the
living area standard applicable to the subject zoning district, nor any measurable impact on adjacent
properties,
2 Staff has received a letter of support signed by six (6) of the adjacent neighbors, including the owner
of the property located immediately adjacent to the subject structure,
3. Due to layout of the site, full compliance would require substantial redesign of both the screen
enclosure structure and the pool (to retrofit it with safety handles if inadequate interior desk space is
provided) requiring significant cost; and
4 Given the existing location of the pool, and the minimum requirement for separation between pool
and screen enclosure (3 feet), the subject request represents the minimum required to make
reasonable use of the screen enclosure at its current location
It should be stated that this analysis and recommendation were not influenced by the current existence
of the improvement, nor does it support or justify construction of any improvement without a permit, or
exempt the property owner from any penalty applicable to construction activity conducted without proper
permits
MR/JA
Attachments
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGolfview Harbour VariancelStaff Reportdoc
6.A.l
GOLF VIEW HARBOUR
(GUTH VARIANCE)
VARIANCE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM #01-014
Staff Report for
Planning and Development Board
and
City Commission
Meeting
Date:
February 13, 2001
File No:
ZNCV 01-001 Side setback from property line
Location:
1185 SW 27th Avenue (Lot #7, Block 13, Golfview Harbour 2nd Section)
Owner:
Fred and Evelyn Guth
Project:
Pool screen enclosure addition to a single-family house zoned R-1-AA
Request:
Request for a variance from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5,C 2 a., to allow a two and one-half (2 5) foot reduction from
the minimum of seven and one-half (7.5) foot side setback resulting in a five (5) foot side
yard setback.
BACKGROUND
The subject property and neighborhood are currently zoned R-1-AA, single-family residential The
property is located on the south side of SW 27'h Avenue (see Exhibit "AU - location map) The applicant
has requested relief from the above-referenced code requirements to allow for the continued existence
of a pool screen enclosure addition in the rear yard. The desired improvement along with the pool was
built in 1998, resulting in the location of the enclosure at five (5) feet from the east property line instead
of the minimum seven and one-half (7~) feet required in the R-1-AA zoning district (see Exhibit "B" _
pool plan)
A permit and the corresponding inspection were approved for the pool and deck, the enclosure permit
was applied for but never secured. Due to the outstanding permit, the owner was contacted by the City's
Building Division. In response to the contact, the applicant submitted the building permit plans in hopes
of obtaining the necessary permits and rectifying the code violation Through this review process the
non-conformity was identified, which is the reason for this application.
Staff surveyed the area and it was observed that no other screen enclosure in this neighborhood appear
to be encroaching into the current side setback of seven and one-half (7~) feet. Furthermore, City
records show no other similar variances have been approved within this neighborhood
ANAL YSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance can not be approved unless the board finds the following
a That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or
building involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same
zoning district.
b That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
Page 2
File No. ZNCV 01-001
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of
the land, building, or structure.
f. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter
[ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
(Exhibit "C" contains the applicant's response to the above criteria)
The analysis of this request is focused on criteria "b" above. It is assumed that the homeowner is
ultimately responsible for any action on his behalf. As such, the property owner is responsible for the
outstanding enclosure permit. It is equally assumed that a contractor hired to do a job will know the code
and will act in good faith. As stated in the application, the homeowner trusted his contractor who,
finished the job without securing the necessary permit, resulting in the creation of special conditions by
encroaching into the side setback.
Staff acknowledges that this situation is possible when the screen enclosure is not installed concurrent
with construction of the swimming pool The Land Development Regulations, Chapter II, Zoning,
Section 11.E SWIMMING POOLS, states' "No swimminq 0001 shall be constructed closer than eiqht (8)
feet from anv orooertv line....." and Section 11.F. SCREEN ENCLOSURES, requires that: "All screen
enclosures (screen walls and screen roof) shall comolv with buildinq side vard setback.. ... ': Within the
R-1-AA zoning district, which has a minimum side setback of seven and one-half (7 'V2) feet, the pool is
allowed to be placed one-half (1/2) foot closer to the property line than the screen enclosure Although
the lesser setback for the pool is justified by its unobtrusive characteristics, if the pool is not setback to
account for the screen enclosure setback, as well as the safety margin of 3 feet (Building Code requires
a minimum of 3 feet of interior deck space between the pool edge and screen enclosure), insufficient
space remains for the screen enclosure to be placed in a conforming manner. It should be noted that
the setbacks for these two related site improvements could be changed to minimize the potential
conflicts; however, this action would require either an increase in the pool setback, or a decrease in the
minimum side setback for a screen enclosure. Depending on the zoning district and lot sizes,
disadvantages could accompany either amendment.
While staff may understand how this situation may, in part, result from less than a complete awareness
of the city's regulations regarding screen enclosures and swimming pools, it is still a direct result of
avoidable actions taken by the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION
Therefore, staff recommends that the request for relief from Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 5,C.2.a , to
allow a two and one-half (2.5) foot side setback variance within the R-1-AA zoning district, be denied due
to the lack of traditional hardship, and due to the circumstance being created by simple home
improvements. No conditions of approval are recommended, however, any conditions of approval added
by the Planning and Development Board or City Commission will be placed in Exhibit "0"
Page 3
File No. ZNCV 01-001
Staff should indicate that past variance requests have been reviewed by the city using more than the
traditional criteria, or interpretations of this criteria placing greater emphasis on economic potential,
minor home expansions, and characteristics of surrounding properties For this reason, and to indicate
the consequence of denial, staff offers the following information for consideration
1. The subject improvement represents a minor addition to the home with no negative impact to the
living area standard applicable to the subject zoning district, nor any measurable impact on adjacent
properties;
2. Staff has received a letter of support signed by six (6) of the adjacent neighbors, including the owner
of the property located immediately adjacent to the subject structure;
3. Due to layout of the site, full compliance would require substantial redesign of both the screen
enclosure structure and the pool (to retrofit it with safety handles if inadequate interior desk space is
provided) requiring significant cost; and
4 Given the existing location of the pool, and the minimum requirement for separation between pool
and screen enclosure (3 feet), the subject request represents the minimum required to make
reasonable use of the screen enclosure at its current location
It should be stated that this analysis and recommendation were not influenced by the current existence
of the improvement, nor does it support or justify construction of any improvement without a permit, or
exempt the property owner from any penalty applicable to construction activity conducted without proper
permits
MR/JA
Attachments
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGolfview Harbour VariancelSlaff Reportdoc
LOCATION MAP
Mr, GUTH Residence
EXHIBIT "A"
"" ~ or-:K 1- 1'-' - , l L~ >-_: : F-j~, V"'_.r c, ,_,__
~'~>- IfE-: :,:' ~;:: ~~, "
~~ ;:-~:::j~ H-~~~~
" 'r': 'T , '1v~ ::L~-
",. 't'.' '......0 u _q__u... ,'.. ....II~~ ~';::'-,~
-q 1 : I : R:3' R{)q~D.......,.-c-1, ,.,t;:,' :',
..'>: s W /5/... LJj/ENUE w()(JL8R/GH'T ~' \ u.. "
_ _ _ - - -, ,_. . f~- r In, / " TT ~ ] ~ II I I I ': ~
n., '---i~ ~} --i --' ;_L;;.~.:.... _~' ~~ I t:~(~~/J~~N"<" '~'I)
r~v' / PC '-",'" "-L 1 1-- { f:.j l
;'.: I~! ;~~: ~~ 1/ n~ '~;~~~~~! .... ~ -I[L~
_ ~. I --' III ,II /I CEC ~~~ ~ V~_, ~
/ c~(/ . w ~' '\(YV\X'~')( rr '--., !--"""), \;
J F~ a.:.:: -JV' K-:;.----" - -- ~I ,I! 11 ~ ' ./ /Y\'X0~~) , ""./ P1
\....,..1 f-ltJ11 '\, :, -J: ' .' "~"~~-m;;:;;;"'~'(/<J" ,~t= [I~
rTI'v'l ~:--\ I ". a..:.;jl:"" -. ~ ~~~\: <' f-t= 'l
:1 J ~~~: .=::~ 1 ~--~~ -- "'t5IJ1," I i~"Y w'<X ~ ',,,, '- _:\) ~
,_ I ~J' ,. AK II VIf r.: "Zi; ..,.0: %I'> '"' ')j{ 'y \..... -: \. 'J[
.. -I"~ ~ '~' )",1 \ r.- w-::- ~1...),1:i-ljy A ~ \-- ~r .. . (._
.' = "=" ,:== l'l.:rr..'t--.. ~.x..oc xy.~ .0-, " ~
r'--~~;" ", "~I"'( T ,
k: ,,' \." TIr,.". ~,.. -l'~\. "'-.1' L I ____
~;':'~j:". _..~<~~-: '~i .m"~"~~; : · ~~:-r ~?
:' 'j":\-iY-\' U-lL" a C1'1- ., I J b:!:::: ~. :::::
-. 1..0~', I ;. . '~ 14 II
_,,'II: \ \ \ \ II' h__'" '. 'II I. I -"
r :::,:.~ '. "r-7--1-',);I3 " ' ->-- "I I I 8' ,
::=! '\ I 1 I I i I I 1 1"1"'"," ~" --:"':' ',. ~:,!'." ;1 .~~ ~ I I, II 1 .1.1..1,,11 :r'd' " ,I '..1.' j,: R
~ I 1 r ~' . ",- "i.'-'TY LAK. ...ATe......Ay IT ,L. - '1-7 I
~ ", ...... 'I. . ; ~,A'" R/.... ",'(" Ile'~'"~'i'f'!'(' rT i I-{J: E"
,,~~ "H__" l1i:tt1..tt II ,.1 I " 'H' I,
,~' '."'./ 1....'/'~~ LI-J ~~~""'~~~R-H-11IJRJ:'Oj
~ J.. ~ =, ,@ I~.' i= ~ s.p:1r r.. ~ ri=t~>-\_)\\ ,l= .~- -1g{ , I ':: / ,.. '71
\~ ~:"~crl"~~ ::='~~~t ~J\&r:t~/-_;~i'~hY)j:rJ:+ ,/' ~r' ~~/2~:''': ~~1/
'- ""- ~ ,~~/. 10--1, I~ I .1 I "T! ! ~ ..... ,-1- ~rw1 - ;,' .. r;
- -. ;-- YL '1 7: - " 1" "" r- 91i' ~ .' ; ,'1.' .
_ r...l 7' _' _ ,', -r ' ,\- f- "I J 1 D t r 1 \ ( i I \ \) f--, '-:" ~ r j 'I
,- - ~ _ ~--,., ~ ...Ol'~'f- >'L'I'UJ 1 1 \ 1 1__ '7fi ,'I -, ,~: '~I ,: :" ,/ rl
J', h-- {):= : 1.lAi~ ,,'~ ,:= ell " rJ J~/ Jfl I.. ,I. ! " I ''/'V,'"'''' ,~, j. " ,i". -.'",::1,\ J ; I;)~'I
t -"~[r : II '- -- _--:::....../, " ,~JG" 'a;""., ".;,LT,~f'."AY""'Y~,^ '! I I ' ,j'l
f-' ,/ " Jo., .."" '" 'I i ,-r-- ' i' I ;.;;> ~~,I' I "~~T
t- ''<.. r- r--.. ,. , :~' ' , ,<.,. ~- ,,/
, I" 1,.1: +. ~.-: ~ ~ ~ i \ ~ ' '1
~ T 1 I . I I I -~ i" , : , ; : ~:Sr.L~t:t: ~ I , \ IT1t-=, t' r J I.
-"-- " 'f' i', ' 'I' I I I.J~,~ , f-, 1/
, ~~,-L,~ ' '..' "".: ~1'l'M I 1M' ' ~ 'l/I
rr , I / ~ I ! ! : ----:--l~ I , L : ~-'" +- +-~ ,-ti . , I
-1 ,'j I I ; ;~~'"t . "11"'1' :v';,:.c (, I," ,r-:....IJ't'/ 1/
a '11111111 ill '\ \ I ,II, In
I\. 11 :! li,l \.'_~~ ," ~i 'It.
c..~"'....... t... :L .:\ \~ '. --.i ,'jj 'tJ.I
H -1 '8 0/1IL'-"S"f./
-J [~~L 0 If 'V
\ :-=nl ,.. ir- n'J I 1810 FEET\' - .1.'.
~ 1:'~ -. . -......,. 'It-~l::
E'~;-;:( Ii .a~ES OF '~I ',I.
. .( l'~ 111-- .......
~: :b):)\-;i<~'~ -,~y9
~O.>-.,I '(:.1 ;'iI~y;.!
. .,c!. A "Y\ "
"<J III I I .LlJ \Y Y
- ~_.
J ..
../ 1.6
,~~I
t:
~ ~2-
~.......--..._..- .-
~
"
'--
I
I
1:1
!
~;:~~ 1~ ..
,.--''':::=,c;: -,
" _I
- ~;:?\l~_
... ~
:..
.J
lJ
I , I
Ii'
I I I
l II
4"(1
'-, J
~lJ
~ 0
~ 0
r
-::
~ lJ
r
p.
Z
~R
;l9-122
CD ;;:
o :D
-<.....>
~rna
z <n.;:
CD::E:::o
mNUl
)> ... .
n:T~
~~~
WCQ
~mc:
'" -'I
co :x:
cer
DATE,
6-26-91
Swimming CYool
EXHIBIT"B"
~ Ui~~
o~
D OJ:'{"
~ m-
r= 'T1
liiD
mm
DR
9
D
~
Z
m
X
(Ii
-l
~
D
m
(l
7\
~EET ·
I Cf' 2
IS'
.l>.
~
iji
,-
'"
8'-<311
f ~
V',.J
"
';
'"
?
~ ,.
'r.
r
,
28'
~
8~~
G\:Ix
m2.l>.
~~
:::!(l
rm
8g:
m
D
HR 4 HRS GUTf-l
1185 SW 2lTf-l AVE
BOYTON BEACf-l, FL
HSHElE,
~
c::::;,
" HORNIER CONSULTING IENGINIEERS,INC
5755 POWERLlNE ROAD. 1FT. LAUIDERIDAl.1E IFL 33.309
PHONIE NO: (954) 772-4940
IFAX NO: (954) 772-6840
NA T IC"N-AL
~A.~
IN.6TrTU~
EXHIBIT"C"
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
January 3, 2001
Mr. and Mrs. Fred H. Guth
Golfview Harbour
1185 SW 27th Avenue
Boynton Beach, Florida 33426
A. Because the pool screen was installed in 1997, it is a
special condition and circumstance peculiar to and not
applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in
the same zoning district.
B. We trusted the contractor (now deceased) for compliance
with all building codes, according to our contract.
C. We feel that the granting of the requested variance will
not give us any special privilege that is denied by this
Ordinance to other lands, buildings or structures in the
same zoning district.
D. It would deny the right to have the safety and health
protections provided by this screened enclosure and would
work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant to
have the structure removed and replaced.
SAFETY: Our yard is fenced except for the north section
bordering a canal. The pool screen is added protection
against a child or animal falling into the pool.
HEALTH: The pool screen keeps out waterfowl and most insects.
The screening is a hindrance to the entry of snakes and a
possible deterrent to alligators.
E. We think that the variance requested is the minimum variance
that will make possible the reasonable use of the land,
building or structure.
F. The variance will not be injurious to the area or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
We have received many compliments about the screen enclosure.
It is an asset to the community.
~
. (' .
F }1./- (i~ {-/' )~fll/t7t
~7" /C-/ -
#9~ C~ ftaz7~/<
LOCATION MAP
Mr. GUTH Residence
EXHIBIT "A"
----.,
~..---II ~ ~
. ~~}=J~
-' "--, c;:: '::::J
~r~,
.. -~ L --tc'1'~ .-. - ; --".-J ~- ~~'-"_r c
'-! :1:'~ '-' · . -".~ -::1- -- a.t:: - ~ i1 ,-. 0 "i',> ; iT _ r-' ~
r~;~J: ^""'ES OF ',...J~~r:=J"; .- '. 'S_'? I~ L_'..J I 'I-l-- -'-:~ ~:..~. ' -,--
<-,'~ ._,-:Jr~~""I:,;'1 ,-. ... .(~.--, ',_ ',_
~:j)~~-~~ ~.~ 'y'ft: 't - '- ~~ . ~ ~ ~:.I::; , ,"~ ~, ~ '===
if../_::f'.r ,:1 'y:;:r..l~r, ..L ~;- ~, .. ~,...," ,,' .:~c: ._ '", "'+~f1j '\ .;:::....-;~
i'),~ JJ~ Y , ' ... .~. '":''''' '. ~:3 -r _ ~ ~C:---i~ :1 '
d ~., .. .. ,': =" ~1 (S;v /5/1" -,qvENC/E WQOL.8RIGNT ~UI7~ -"-'~'~
~ '-;' '~~l: I ~ 11 / i II r- I R I.. II" ~~f::i} r,.
~ !TTl /,' -\ -- . --::', Lt;;;;.ii.1..J · ~~ 'I ) t::" '? J<..:\"~ ~ Ii;
~ ~I~:"" ~j 1 / PCIl-€3=; ~~ ~ .~~~~:,:: 1~., G~
-~ v , ~ ~2~~=: ~ ~I-fif
1" I~;: ~ ~~:~ .:: '~'T' ~7~~E~C:: ~~~~~' r0> ~ ~[
FlYC J,~,L____,___ "1f III I A\. v ~ '~XY. . ~
I~ ~,~~~~(f,Il! '~:-\ : -=t: ==:1:: .,' . r;;'~ __~ ,{~ ~~~'t:~'~ ,.-' '~:t= ~ j-
, : , r '\ I . .. ')..~ fr..-\ r', I- , ~
~ ~ U I~' }1,--: ~---~.- = :uJJ . '-i~ ~J"., '~ ~ )l~~:::,r-- "'~:~ t
... -1~J ~{i--:;-'- "AK '~~J ,.' ,=>e:: '-'1-'4" J ~~~)>;~~ k lL~'~\-1 ,-"I ..L::
:'~ r=:'\ )'" ,L...--_' . [ ""-,.( ~~...(', v '" ~'
.' ,": ~ ,~ "f:::..r I
FJ~~;' '~l .,' .~:~ '- i ' ~ >; ~~ ~....Jb!;;/
~ " ('l :' , , , --'=-=-". : : ,;::;" ~ 11 n ~ _ ::;:
.Ji :.: 3"YiT~:, l 8 ~-~J- '11 ,I .I -, " /I
" -"Q "\-\ \ \ '-~--:::::q'~: -'''''{~-,:'Q3 ,; ': =t:l ' I I I IT I ~"-t];' '!
J . "...... '\..:--"'~',' ,"', c, -\ 11.r "I ,.[ I I , R
' u Illil IIIll1 ' "".' ,',"'.. 11'-./lITf.i,I,I__I"',,I.. ~r'''''':L'-i'':';'', :
/" 11 (" cl: -~ w,p~" ~"'k oIL a/'ll"" ", <.",i,'''ttral , ~R"''''~Tl "l I rT I I ; I I ItJ ,: E r
~ /....,. ....". "....". "-mll ~ I "I I ,,1m u ~ ~Q; r IH- 11 !, OJ'
'3 ~. ' " ',\_ J->:':-~ \~, --tT llJ .,
.~' . ..,"~ ' '"...... - -::u:u 1-'-'" -\ .~_.___ ~:. ' '~'-7
-' -.~ .-' - 1 ,-....:. m t tti ,_ -r ~ ,', \..-, .1-_ F.,f I 1 .':' '
= .f~ I~.,: :~ - $.., r.. -'- i I: :i)\- ' t:- ~1::r( , 1 71-- '-: "
) V '\ t'",- . I~ ~~ '_ ~ i u,"!.t ''::", ~'i~"/il=fhN ~', q'
7-' -, ,C:: ~: -', - . fI nTTTJ 1 r [ I r I-I r' T I \ \ ) f:t -:;- c;p rE E19?t,: "
t ;;o....^ ;Y:-IoiS:._ -UfT \ I!~I 'If:{ , {. ,T' : Ii J: /J//
I- ~ t ;=.:: I.' ~ ~_ic....:l:J= - illlllTTrrj J~' .r I I I I T I I I :./"0' ;.,~ "=''' '..,:" ' : j,f)'j
t ~, ,~, ,- ~ =---==: {, . 'aJ(; 'oi..... .d:r,.~""Y I ~ I I I I (~'.J ~
1--., ~ =- T I....... - ~ J' ~ i "I lli - ... - ,_ '<, "
.v I ::: I- r-:; ~~ -;"+r'.>-l-' , , '~. :J~ j I I ' I i.I t,- ~'
~ : I . I I I '1.! :' , i , : ! ~,!l--f--J~ 111 1\ tT1=: ~I
't'T , I ' , I I I j. ~ H ~
~ . f. i, ',.L '.: '...: ~ ! I I I I H' t'l /
~~'--:-'1~ " , \ ~ +--J.-ti ''l'1 fI
/ ',' -r---1- '-.r . - ---/\,- I" -, r J .I
;.,;'j ; :~ ~ ~ . 'I~ L~~L1 (I' I : I I : \"~ fj: ~
, : ~I! I I 'I II IT I I I I I ,. ~_ . 7 '/YN rR!
1 , to:. :%-.. -~ ~ " I f / I /. .... !
c......N...<- \ ./ ';.J ,I/.... '-1
MIL'=S(/
\
\
\
L--
~
.... ~
-'
1
H [~~L 0
"-JUi" 1r- ~ , I
t ~ --1 r I \.....
I 1 ,
I I '
I I I
~ I I
Ann
1/8
1 I
I
I
C ",1'
_I
1=r=r=T
~lJ
& 0
~ 0
r
~lJ
r
1>
z
)ER;
~99-'22
OJ ;::
o ~
-<->
~~@5
;~~
~~!J1
o:r:ti
:""'<'0
'-~t=
~rii~
'" -<
C) J:
~
DATE:
6-26-91
Swimming :1>ool
EXHIBIT"B"
:r: Ui;;;~
~ a!!!
D CD ~..
~ m-
r= "T1
5iD
mm
DR
9
D
~
z:
Elm
0111
till
tJ2"
1-112"
II 15'
, ",
I ).1'
I II'
III
Sl-lEET ·
I OF 2
m
X
Ui
-;
z:
(;\
D
m
()
7\
iJi
,-
'"
-I>.: ::J
n
';.
1l\
~
~ ,.
...
~
28'
g)~~
G':rx
m2J>.
~~
::!()
t;m
D(Jl
m
D
u:
HR ~ HRS GUT~
1185 SW 2lT~ AVE
BOlTON BEAC~, FL
~ HORNER CONSULTING ENGINEERS,INC
'~5755 POWERLlNE ROAD. FT. LAUiDERIDAUE FL. 33309
J>.
~
8'-9"
HEHBE,
~
~
PHONE NO: (954) 772-4940
FAX NO: (954) 772-6840
""AT1~
~....~
Il"'ot6TrT\J'T"'e:
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO, PZ 01-004
TO: Sue Kruse
CIty Clerk
FROM: Michael W. Rumpf ~ 1"-
DIrector of Plannm~~ 'Zomng
DATE: January 22,2001
SUBJECT: Golf VIew Harbour (Mf. Fred Guth pnvate resIdence)
Zomng Code Variance 01-001
Accompanying this memorandum you will find an apphcal10n and supporting documentatlOn for
the above-referenced case. Checks m the amount of $400.00 to cover the review and processmg
of this applicatIOn have been forwarded to the Fmance Department.
The legal advertisement for this request w1l1 be forwarded to your office after review by the City
Attorney. The requested vanance is scheduled for the February 13, 2001 Planmng and
Development Board meetmg. Please advertise m the newspaper and notice to property owners
accordmgly
J:ISHRDA T AIPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTSIGolfview Harbour VarianceILegal notice,doc
'- l"",,QUEST FOR PUBLISHING ""
LEGAL NOTICES AND/OR LEGAL ADVERTISEMENTS
A completed copy of thIS routmg slIp must accompany any request to have a Legal NotIce or
Legal Advertisement publIshed and must be submitted to the Office of the City Attorney two (2)
working days prior to the first publishmg date requested below
ORIGINATOR: Planning and Zoning
PREPARED BY. Michael Rumpf DATE PREPARED January 22,2001
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF NOTICE OR AD. Zomng Code Vanance for Mr. Fred
Guth private residence to place a screen enclosure at five (5) feet from sIde property lIne
in lIeu of the seven-and-one-half(7.5) feet required by code. Planning and Development
Board meetmg to be held on February 13, 2001, at 7:00 p.m. at the CIty Hall CommIssIOn
Chambers, 100 E. Bovnton Beach Blvd., Boynton Beach Florida.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS: (Size ofHeadlme, Type SIze,
SectIOn Placement, Black Boarder, etc ) STANDARD LEGAL AD
SEND COPIES OF AD TO' All property owners (postmarked January 29,2001) wIthm 400 foot
radius of the sublect property, applIcant and DIrector ofPlannmg and Zoning.
NEWSP APER(S) TO PUBLISH: The Post
PUBLISHED: January 29,2001
LAST DAY TO FAX TO THE PAPER BY 3.00 P.M.: January 25,2001
APPROVED BY:
(dA ~v' Joe ~"I!.[tl<fF
(Ongmator)
ell ;),2/0/
I '
(Date)
(2)
(CIty Attorney)
(Date)
RECEIVED BY CITY CLERK.
COMPLETED.
1\ ...~ICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the following applIcatIOn has been made to the
PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD of the CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, for a heanng as mdIcated, under and pursuant to the prOVISIOns ofthe zoning code of
saId City:
Owner:
Fred & Evelyn Guth
Request:
Request a variance from the City of Boynton Beach Land
Development RegulatIOns, Chapter 2, Zonmg, SectIOn 5.C.2.a, to
place a screen enclosure at five (5) feet from the property line m
lieu of the seven-and-one-half (7.5) feet reqUIred by code for a
smgle-famIly bUIlding m a RlAA zonmg dIstnct.
Location:
1185 SW 2ih AVE
Legal:
Lot 7, Block 13 of Golf View Harbour 2nd Section
A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD
WILL BE HELD RELATIVE TO THE ABOVE APPLICATION AT THE
COMMISSION CHAMBERS, CITY HALL, 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BL VD.
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, ON TUESDAY, February 13, 2001, AT 7:00 P,M,
All mterested parties are notIfied to appear at saId heanngs m person or by attorney and be heard
or file any wntten comments pnor to the hearing date. Any person who decIdes to appeal any
decIsion of the Planmng and Development Board wIth respect to any matter considered at these
meetmgs will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a
verbatIm record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence
upon whIch the appeal IS to be based.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
(561) 742-6260
PUBLISH: THE POST
January 29,2001