The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS I 7.G.2 HAMPTON COURT (NWSP 02-023) NEW SITE PLAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-023 SITE PLAN REVIEW STAFF REPORT PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND CITY COMMISSION January 21, 2003 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Name/No.: Hampton Court / NWSP 02-023 Property Owner: RSPB, LLC Agent: Bob Bentz - Land Design South Location: South side of Southwest 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) approximately 600 feet east of Congress Avenue Land Use: High Density Residential (HDR) Current Zoning: Multi-family Residential (R-3) Proposed Zoning: Planned Unit Development (PUD) Project size: Site Area. Pervious Area. Lot Coverage Area Gross Density Number of units' 4.7 acres (204,682 square feet) 195acres(41.5%) 1 28 acres (27.4%) 1407 d\1\elling units per acre (du/ac) 66 d\1\elling units Adjacent Uses: (see Exhibit "A" - Location rvlap) North: Right-of-way for Southwest 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) then developed single-family residential (Leisureville) classified Moderate Density Residential (726 du/ac) and zoned Single-family Residential R1-AA (54 du/ac), developed as a Planned Unit Development. South: Right-of-way for the Lake Worth Drainage District (L-27 also known as the Lazy Lake Waterway) lateral canal, then developed single-family residential classified Low Density Residential (4 84 du/ac) and :zoned Single-family Residential (R1-AA) East: Right-of-way for Southwest 13th Street then developed single-family residential (Golfview Harbour) classified Low Density Residential (484 du/ac) and 2Dned Single- family Residential (R 1-AA) West: Right-of-way for Congress Avenue then developed residential property (Isles of Hunter's Run) classified Low Density Residential (LOR) land use at a densityof 484 dulac, and zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. Proposal: Bob Bentz, agent for RSPB, LLC proposes to construct 66 townhouse units on 16 08 acres All site development is proposed to occur in one phase This request for new site plan approval will be contingent upon the approval of the corresponding rezoning application (REZN 02-007) and the amendment of a 1989 Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (see Page 2 , Hampton Court New Site Plan Staff Report Memorandum No PZ 03-023 Background: Background section below) The subject site is a portion of properties located on both the northeast and southeast corners of Southwest 23rd Avenue and Congress Avenue that were the subject of a 1989 "Stipulation and Settlement Agreement" between the property owners and the City Of Boynton Beach. As part of the agreement that allowed the property to be rezoned to R-3 Multi-family Residential zoning, the use of the property was limited to an Adult Congregate Living Facility with 248 units (beds) The agreement also governs building heights, roof pitch, parking lot lighting, dumpster placement, use of the Lake Worth Drainage District Canal right-of-way, buffering, and landscaping (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). In September 2002, the property owners and the City requested consent from the Court to allow the Planning & Development Board to review this corresponding rezoning request for the remaining vacant portion of the subject property (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). If approved, the settlement agreement V\Ould have to be amended accordingly Site Characteristics: As previously mentioned, the subject property is a rectangular-shaped lot located on the south side of Southwest 23rd Avenue, east of Congress Avenue. According to the Environmental Assessment (January 14, 2003), the majority of the subject parcel had been previously cleared. Vegetation remaining on the parcel consists of a scattered slash pines and exotic trees and shrubs The open areas on the site are comprised of disturbed open field over-grown with native and non-native weedy herbaceous plants. No endangered, threatened, or species of special concern as listed by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Florida Fish Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) were observed on the project site. No unique or endangered habitat, migratory bird rookeries, wading bird habitat or colonial bird nesting I roosting areas are located on the subject site Evidence of Osprey utilizing Australian and Slash pine trees as feeding perches was observed However, the Osprey is not listed as a species of special concern in the State of Florida, except for in Monroe County Also, no wetlands or other surface waters are located on this parcel Concurrency: a. Traffic- b. Drainage- A traffic statement for this project was submitted and sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for their review and approval. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division determined that the project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review The City's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval The Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review, when more complete engineering documents are required The on-site drainage system shall be accomplished via a combination of green swales, exfiltration trenches, and dry retention The drainage design shall conform to the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach, South Florida Water Management District, and the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) The paving, grading, and drainage plan shows an outfall into the LWDD canal This point of outfall will require permits from the LWDD According to the LWDD, when improving a piece of property that abuts an LWDD right-of-way, the developer is typically required to dredge or improve that portion of the right-of-way (canal) that directly abuts said property in case of an emergency (hurricane) If possible, City staff respectfully requests the applicant petition the LWDD to dredge the right-of-way adjacent to the subject property, to the minimal extent possible (to the satisfaction of the District) so as to not impact the flora and fauna that may be found in the LWDD Page 3 . Hampton Court New Site Plan Staff Report Memorandum No PZ 03-023 Driveways: right-of-way (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) One point of ingress I egress, 50 feet in width is proposed along Southwest 23rd Avenue The width of this opening will require approval of an administrative waiver from the Engineering Division of Pulbic Works (see "Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) Staff determined that no deceleration entry lanes are required This opening will consist of two (2) lanes (residents and guests) The resident lane will be 12 feet in width The guest lane will be 15 feet in width. The egress lane will be 15 feet in width According to the site plan, the driveway would accommodate both left and right-turns along South\1\est 23rd Avenue The site plan indicates emergency vehicle ingress I egress will be provided at two (2) gated openings along Southwest 23rd Avenue. The surface of these openings will be made of grass blocks. This will allow for emergency vehicles to enter the site should the main entrance be obstructed Another gated emergency vehicle opening will be located at the end of the cul-de-sac on Southwest 13th Street. Although partially improved, the Engineering Division of Public Works will require the cul-de-sac to be compliant with City standards. The Fire Department will require a Knox or key activated lock at these alternate points of emergency access (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Parking Facility: Parking required for the townhouse units is based on a ratio of two (2) spaces per unit, including five (5) spaces for the recreation area. Since 66 townhouse units and a recreation area are proposed, a total of 137 parking spaces are required. The proposed site plan provides a total of 158 parking spaces The site plan indicates 66 garage spaces, 66 driveway spaces, and 26 guest spaces for a total of 158 parking spaces The handicap spaces will be dimensioned 12 feet in width with five (5) feet of striping by 18 feet - six (6) inches in length. The site plan shows that the drive aisles will be 25 feet wide. As proposed, all parking lot (parking space) and drive aisle dimensions comply with the Engineering Division Standard Drawings Landscaping: The proposed pervious area of the parcel equals 1 95 acres or 41.5% of the total site. The landscape plan shows 399 palm and shade trees, 69.9% of which will be native species The landscape plan also provides for 5,347 shrubs and groundcover, of which 54% will be native The site landscaping will exceed the minimum plant material required by Chapter 7.5 of the Land Development Regulations The depth of the west landscape buffer will vary but when scaled will be at least 27 feet at its widest point and 10 feet where the dumpster enclosure is proposed This west landscape buffer would contain a buffer wall six (6) feet in height. Sweet Mahogany, Red Bay shade trees and Sabal palm trees are proposed to buffer the buildings from the adjacent property The buffer wall will be five (5) feet from the property line. A row of Redtip Cocoplum hedges is proposed on the outside ofthe buffer wall. The size of the south landscape buffer will vary but when scaled, it appears to be at least 25 feet in width at its widest point and approximately nine (9) feet where the pool deck is proposed. The southern buffer will contain two rows of staggered Red Bay shade trees No buffer wall is proposed along the south property line where it is required in accordance with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (see E>tlibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The size of the east landscape buffer (adjacent to Southwest 13th Street) will vary but will be at least 40 feet in width at its widest point and 15 feet from the pool deck. It too will contain Sweet Mahogany, Red Bay shade trees and Sabal palm trees. The buffer wall will be five (5) feet from the property line Similar to the west landscape buffer, a row of Redtip Page 4 Hampton Court New Site Plan Staff Report Memorandum No PZ 03-023 Building I Site: Cocoplum hedges is proposed along the outside of the buffer wall. The landscape buffer adjacent to Southwest 32nd Avenue will be 15 feet in width measured from the property line to the buffer wall This buffer will contain Sweet Mahogany, Red Bay shade trees with Sabal palm trees and Redtip Cocoplum hedges. According to the site plan (sheet "A1"), a C.B S wall, six (6) feet in height would surround the entire property, except for along the southern property line adjacent to the LWDD canal The exclusion of a wall along the south property line conflicts with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) A fence would be required around the pool area pursuant to the Florida Building Code for safety reasons (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The 66 dwelling units are proposed within eight (8) separate buildings on the 4.70-acre site The proposed density is 14.07 dwelling units per acre which has been tabulated using the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement's maximum bed figures, unbuilt beds on the affected property and a conversion of surplus beds approved under the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement's to dwelling units (2 3 bed / unit) This total density is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Map but arguably, from the applicant's perspective, supported by the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement. Each of the eight (8) buildings would contain one (1) of five (5) types of units. The unit types will range between two (2) and three (3) bedrooms but vary slightly in terms of their overall living area and number of floors. The townhouse buildings will be setback as follows' 40 feet from Southwest 32nd Avenue, 20 feet from the west property line; 40 feet from the east property line (which abuts Southwest 13th Street), and at 25 feet from the south property line. The buildings will be separated from each other by at least 25 feet. The cabana building, located at the southeast corner of the property will be setback approximately 29 feet from both the east and south property lines. The dumpster enclosure will be located 10 feet from the west property line. The dumpster enclosure location conflicts with the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The plans do not show any proposed improvements within the LWDD right-of-way Community Design: The PUD zoning district allows a maximum building height of 45 feet; however, a lesser height could be imposed if compatibility with adjacent properties becomes an issue. The proposed two (2)-story fee-simple townhouses will be 29 feet - 10 inches at the peak of the roof (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) The slope of the roof is four and one-half (41'2) to 12, which is steeper than the four (4) to 14 required by the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement allows (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) The proposed buildings would be primarily tan in color (Sherwin Williams SW#2044 - Bedouin Beige) with a light yellow base (Sherwin Williams (SW#1366 - Harvest Moon) The roof will be made of concrete roof tiles According to the Typical Light Detail shown on the site plan, the freestanding outdoor lighting fixtures will be 10 feet in height and be illuminated until 2 00 a m. Although the height of the pole is not an issue, the Stipulation and Settlement Agreement only allows the lights to be on until 11.00 p m (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) Signage: The elevations show that no building wall signs are proposed. An "entry wall" sign is proposed along the northern buffer wall as shown on sheet "SP 2 of 2". The plans are absent of details; however, according to the applicant, the sign will be blue and the letters will be gold The detail of the proposed entry sign(s) shall include the total signage area and colors in order to confirm architectural compatibility with the buildings. The sign area may not exceed 64 square feet in area Staff recommends consistency between the proposed sign(s) and the HomelAOod Residence sign (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval) Page 5 Hampton Court New Site Plan Staff Report Memorandum No PZ 03-023 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this site plan request be approved contingent upon the approval of the corresponding rezoning application (REZN 02-007) and subject to the comments included in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval The Technical Review Committee (TRC) recommends that the deficiencies identified in this exhibit be corrected on the set of plans submitted for building permit. xc: Central File S:\Planning\Shared\ Wp\Pnjects\HalTl'ton Court\NWSP 02-D23\StaffReport.doc Location Map HAMPTON COURT EXHIBIT "A" PUD I I i II I I I C1 :=-~00t~~~ ~~. \ '"::>' ~-<--<- \ 0~/ , , , L I ! , I - I ! i I f- , III 1'- -- r--II r--- I i I '- j II- I "1 i ' Ii I /'/ ~ t- I If-- -/ I L ,t--1 - 1/, - i I I i-- - / 7 I' -- 1 - -I ' I - I I - ?/ I-- - J - - I' , I f _ II-- - _/ I f ~ N I I I w~, s ~$ ~r; ;::;: ~::r:: <:0 "h r- . '""F'>: ~<:o g 'l'!'f~l"ol ;~~ I fl ) ,~) .., rr~-- '" , ,! ,! l!'> 85 . '" <0 i ~1 } ~ ~; t I ' ~ ~ '.l'!~!~h~ I ~<:::J;:; 11 ~l d!t "v) I .J h ,;" '----R- ~f:'~i!~~i I:::! , .! Ii !,i1 a 1! !. 'l'h~. :<: c.:: ~ ~f f~ ~~ ~t 1 <L :i f~ :i!i 'I :1 ~;f: 1------ ~..~l~i~ I ~ ~ ~l; I ! F1l ; . Iil !q 1 ~c~~..-t-.~~",~~~ o~~"-";o~~~3;;:~ ~ '" ,., '" C':l fi ir~f.~Hfi!r~~Jf{!!!~rr~~ ~ !{l;;,d "o:..".',,>lrf. ~ "~~l H ;r~~ ~IH ~ [~~ J>'l o~ ~~;)O...... ~ , ~ ~ "i g> ..'l W' - ~:.~i.: f~ W HI9j\Su""'\4IqlSUAV,dwg,Olfl~/lOOJOlI'OO so AM Oc.9lOOEPC l,,,,,] -' ~I ,;; :; o ~~ rim F , ~ g P'" ..' b [" " ~f. lfl1J~ IiI g';; ~p " ~! !fi~~ H n .. '" [<: !;.~ H ! [! : r~ ~ ~ u " !lli I tii:~ B! jr ~~ , . <l"J' t1 !f< j,. U ., ~i , f[ i!: Ii ~ ~ " M ;;: ~ ' ; i"t If il;~ ~... ~:l , U , lap " "" ~! ::-: ~ ~ ~ &:': "'I .}] a illl a'f! ~~ ~ i : ~ t i r~ H i "- ~ ~ '!.~ ~ ; HH ! ~~ ~~ !' fJ &~ '. ,1 !Ill !, It ~~ f f ~] ~l !~ ~H~ ! rii i: ~ [~ "~ KJJil! If <;=ffii t D ~,~:: I i ';111 -~ ~! ~ ~!~!fi~~~~ir 1 ~fl t- o-' ~ ~ff[ '" ~ " -' ~ ;':;J;t~2.f!-~r fa "f' ,. -; 1m t- ~ lli:: ~~U;!r t:J ~ a~~&~i'~b~"'J '" .. h'H'~o[" [f) -; :'~~~i:~~j!;E; () -- ~ c :5 .lol'lhf ,~l =ti .>. i!!WW~H "h~ ~lt; ::! i~! 0 l~:n '>: ~lai;f~'''if~ ~~i~ ~it :[!ii;:fJ.~Jf f~' ~h'::a~E il; ;!W~m!!i :~~ 1 g[,., ;ri , , , ';; ~ BOUNDARY & TOP-OGRA~- SURV~~:~=j F~':d2~~o~~lo~. CENT_~~__~9YNT?_~. JC'~~'::~~____=d PORTION OF TRACT 4 r- _ JA~ GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 3RD SECTION ~*,~;[~ _, 80_~NTO~. 8EAC~~~__JfA'c'-~~-,--.__-,----- IHHt U ~'"rJ <o~8~ ;g g ~~~ g t::: ~ ~ ~ C) a r- -., "' i'i ::;: ::r:: h -, '" i;> <:0 " g -, '" "" "" '" <:::J V) r.-, " :::! a <: C) a t;:; 0 ~ '"' ;~ ~ ~ i:;:1 '. i '" d, t~ I! -j ". lj .. ~i ~;:J ,I !~ " 'I I' , ~ ;;, ; :; ~, I II 1'1 CONGRESS AVENUE :;> ~ .. ff~: d';;; ;r[ il'':'c:. ~ !" ~~~ :[ 1i! ,. . ~ri ~~ ;! fq n, 1; ~~g ,. ::;:;s ~if <. ~f .' ii~ ~~ " <" ~ . " !I '" .. H .'. <"~ ~;;;~ .' ., ~: I ~~ l! ~; a B '" . g.[~ ;a . '. ~~~ li ,. ~! "'~' ~ .' ,i'., f.i HI .' " -, '! ~ ~ i~ f' "' :!i ~2 g ~i: If nr f~ -. n g. ~ ~I ., :r J! H ri~ 3" ~ 1;', h ,. r ~ f' hi ~ ~ 'I '. t~ p ~H B! ~~~ H~ !H P ~ ] It !li 1i " P " " <:. ~ J~ i ~ ~ H NOT INCLUDED '! r '" '" 6 s: ~ ~g I I: ; ~ i \ 'LJ >'? ~ '~"~~~" ~?b:: J;~,~d' ~~ is ::J ~~': >'1 ~I' Fl 1 I~ C) a r- -., ~ ~ ::;:. ~ '" <:0 a -.: ~ .~ ~ '<:::J ~ ~~ " V) r.-, " -., Q; <: I 'I I .; , !~~~ ;~g ~ , >." I" j ;-1 1 "'to'",-1- f I I "": ~ I . I I . ~'" ~~ '" i '2 ~ < I:l~~ i ~~5Q ',...1;18 ~~ ~ II ...~. ~~~I~ I " '. i_~', i ~ j;\"", / ~~ ~H: ' <-~ 't,;t "\" " 8 '(i:'> :;: :'- ~i """'- 11 ~ ~ 'u8,ai", ~.. ~. 502'21'36"[', JJS,W'(TOr',i '". ~;~ ~ '~i~ f!L- " i -< 2il., , l I ~~ : ;i ~ ~ :.il ~ ~ 9 ~~ ~ '" ~.~ ~, l~ ~ " '" :<: -, ~~~.~ ~ : '. :1" -~"--~~~ :: ?ON;;....~, -'- ,,[.oJ 0) ;;, --; ~ ~ V) .r.-, CC). -< Ci <: S.w 12TH COURT ---j"'"-'-~- I EXHIBIT "B" ',...-, ~ ~. ~ ' H I- i -l ::j ;; 0.- "': ~ "" ::! c ? '''' ~!~ t: '" ~ 0 ;.. "" ~, ~ I ;::i t ~ I -:i ~ ," '" ~~, ~ >'. :!,.]i H ,; -"1 ~. , !t -., ;;:: h " -< .. " ;~ I :'.l ~ , ~ , , I I ''''i . -I>. ~: i~ " II ~~ , J..~ I '~. :~ 11!"'-' ;';! ,t i'!i . '11' .e'l ~~ T!I ~ I 'I' !!lli,lill !5, III ~ ~J! " ub IlJ 0 :Ii h ~ ,!!' ~ . I a .1,1 :1 I'I~ ~ 1'1 m dl~ i~' ~ :11', Jl ~ ~.. I" -,I ~ -Ii. '.r hI II ~! 'I ,... , ?; 6 ,. ~ ,... l> -< m ~ j 11 ,... l> ~ ~ ~i: I '" ~ ~-If i! I . I 0 m --f L . ! ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~! I ~ ~" ! d , ~ ?; ,. II~" . ... . ~ Iii Ili'~ " "~ ! ~ I,!II ::;; .. is ~ :~i II~':: ::: I ~ sl, II If ~-- ---; D>rj e :;; 'Ii" I; 1- I I. ~,I' , ',' g I. < ,r EJrA r ~Ij i It 1iJ~ ~ ~ :II," ,. .&1 --'::! l II I~I I I 2 6 JI ~ - ~ I: Ji; I I 6 I! ~ ! -- i q J' s- ~ i~ ~ ~ a .. .= i II!IIB i",1 .. .. II -- J ~ 11'lli;o' I\) If EXHIBIT "B" " " , , " " '" "~ ~, " , , ~ l I-lOMEWOOD VILLAS C;:~F . ZONING. Fi!-3 :.. ~ t. FLU. I-lDFi! I . I _ I' - I i I J , " " N ,,~f;; rz- !;=L'2! ::t~m 0,< OJ;r= iV~f;; o it ~ If 0 il ~ ~-4~ c m ~ ~ ,. - r I, STREET II GOLF VIEW ~I\ I-lAFi!BOUFi! ESTATES ) I I ZONING. Fi!-3 FLU. LDI'O! .~ ~ , ~ li'fll,."111 f tlil "~"~ i,i~,!j! ""Ifflll ilJ!~lifl ~ r~I,-f Ir, *,,1 i i! IQ"I I Ilill> 'i "i 'i J . it · II '. ,I , Iii I I " · elf < trll I elM I,nl ;h a ; i 11111 : fill i i :11 In MI: ... ..1.1 ~l HAMPTON COURT I ;3! PREP ARED FOR CENTEX HOMES ~ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH. FLOROA LAND. DESIGN SOUTH lcrdIcape AIcI1IIcla, Lanll Pll:lrnng \' ., , 1 , i , \ \ i 1 ; \ .Jt~ I . iJ " ; 1 ; I \>~- "- .. '--------- . F IBIT "B" . . f " ] " ~ '11 ~ ~ or ] :1'. f~ I ! S IU: ~ ..ni la~ if! ~ "''''! ... r-. f Ul .. - . i f Y &1IJ.13TH ~~ 0 0,. ~2 f ;R~ ~~ LAND ' ~ DESIGN SOUTH LandIcape M:I1IIlIc:lu8/ Lancl ~ ~AMPTON COURT PREPARED FOR CENTEX ~OME5 CITY Of' eoYNTON eEACI-/. FLORIDA EXHIBIT "B" <:Il ~-:1 ~ m ~ ~ ~- ------- --- "1 .G I -<: 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ t'"" m ." t'"" ~ m ~ .., <""' @ !1 j ;:J 0 m 8 z ~ OJ '" C5 8 z j .. ~ ~ g ~ ~ ,., ~ ,., 0 .... '" 8 .... ~ :I: ~ '" ~ ~ 8 tl .. ~ ~ :I: ~ ~ ,., 8 10 <:Il <:Il ~ ~ ~ n 0 t'"" t'"" ~i~ ~ t'"" n ::<:l 0 n <:Il ::<:l <:Il ?~ t:1 1'~~8l\ii~ ~ 0 <:Il m ~~1 00_(') <:Il m -~8: <:Il ~'tb(i-.J~~ <:Il n 88[ ~ <:Il ::l =.~ ~ m ~!~ 1:: :I: t'"" n ~ t:1 0 ::l g ~ ,., ~~~ > ~ ~ ~~z "rj ~ i:lc::noo ,,"'''' ~t; ~~~~ ~t; ~2- ~ ....8 ;j8 ~ (") 802S 0 C;~~~ qg ~ :1:.. [5J S-mS .. .... ~ Cl :I:..~~ 0 S~~S :1:...... '" ..,,,,,,, ..'" m ZO~ z~ ..'" .... ~8 ~ z- tl ~EQ .... ~ zr; :r: j~Oj~ 08 0 g 0'" @ Po o::!l .0 "'Z ~ GJill'1 "'z m ~ Vl~~~ z; GJ;!l'1 ",z m GJ'" ",..,., [5J 82 ~ GJGJ~ [5J "'b'" GJ~ 8 ",GJ m ~~~ ~ ~Oj .. '''OJ m '" ~m~ ~Oj ~~ ~mE ~ ;';;~8 "',., 8 ~ ~ R 08 8'" R ",-<<""' ~1O 0 ....> 0 ::l@~ ,., 2 I"' w ~ zi" '" :t Cl s:: ~ GJ 0'1 ~ ~~ ~ z ;j '" ~ 0 z ill ~ R (1 0 I P!III ~BI .. .1 iPI I\) I I I ~ III 5 ~ ..I I\) · II ~I HAMPTON COURT fit PREPARED FOR CENTEX HOMES CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOROA LAND. DESIGN SOUTH LcniIcape~1 LancI Plan \ \ I Il ~.... \1 ~ \ nl : I' . i J " I . m~l~~~~~~~ \: !ll~1lI2iillr-h~;J ! ~~~~S ~:~~ i i!r-~;J!: !iIOl I ~ j~I!~ll~::i;G ! Z~ ~~III~anll>!~.. I ~c....; 0 t;lj ~!i ~ II b b h .......>.......i7~r-~ln~3!r- II ~ 2Z.......~ 1I~!;~r..fllli i' ~~~~ ili~~r- ~g~ ~~ >-~h"nrll !!:~ ' ~1.o\J~ Ii:!; !:lJl ~li I, :::>< ~> ~i~U~ Ih 'It ~~ -....l 1:5 r ~11I ~ ~~ iil"~ I N~ 1--1 .. ::If \I \J ~ I NO NV t!J !n -< i ~ I 00 ""-~.. III il ~ \:l Ow g~ i"'~1lI ;W !.. w N~ :~PlE ~ i i ~I tT1 ~i t ~ ~ ~ Of i ~ ~ 9~(J '- r-1Ii~ I ~ m III ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ i !; I ~ -I () -I J> r f I .' 11 J II i z -I I ~ . III I !il z J> -I Ii i -I III JJ j; r I I I I J ! I . ~ I ~ ~ ~ . I I I I I I I I I I II I ~ I ~ ij ~ . I! i ;: I ~l_ '---- ,. i1! iI Hill ~ i~ i i,'; I ! II I I III il i i Ii. ;1 ;: i", I, II . ., . I I: 1 ~I a. , .~ A Ii I' .i Ii .. 10 f' hU R ~, UP I ! nUll! IIlIn; liliiij .......,.. 'IIU'I EXHI IT "B" ~t""' bJ>~ O?C::l ~~~ (Jd~2; ~~Z~~ ~~~oz~ ~~~ ~ O~ 0 ~~ ~ &1..~n~ cn@O~ tJ~~ >y~ ~~ ~rn !::? I cn~~ s Ocn d I ~(j) ~B. ::czo F ~~ ~ i ~~~i il ~~::z[f. J ~~~~ 8 ~ !!1 ~ ~~l.'~ ~~ 2m'" It:1;J ~:xa ii1::l~ i ~~ ~I h J !~~::l :i ~ii1 Jf' ! s'li I: i! ~J ~ ill ~ (I'" ... ~ 5: : ~~ ~~~ leii1 ~ ilIl ~ ~~ l= lio ii1 \) flltl). j ~ I ~ lti~j z !1! ~ ~.... - (Ii ~ I: ~ II i! -( m ~ IH J ~ : It!. . . :~!~ . i!i 11 ""'"" 'I! r II Itd C I 'II. I . 1111 , 'II ~ iI!J,fD I in!' I ,'fUll I'll, till III; f I f 11 I ,II ~ .'11'11 III Jdl i II m :I!II J 1!!lJ! I' JIfl I III ~ ,t" p.~ ,f ~ "I'll m jH~1 I ( I ; P'I D '~~'I' ~m. · I~ .. .. .. '.. 1111' , .11. liE ~; =n i ~ ~ml liq J j ,':~'!' ~ .... 111, I i I!. I ~ I I I · I ! I i , . u.. , . . ..,.., . 1'111 l '" . Iii r lIUI,t' I "" II , 111/'1 , ~I> iI!finl i I H' J , f ,Wll 1I,I ~ tll fll! f III} 1 I " 'I' I I 'I ~ "III I 'I ( I I~ I JI II i f r II m :II!, J I !If! (f f (If II I' 0 I' f ' 'r ~ f' r I~ ~III f IH~I I ' "I m I - II' ....... I: 'I ;~:; ~ff : Pi j ,.~; ;n ~ "'""!f~" iHHi' ~r ",," " I '''H'"'' I " '". ~" '~'''' I' i Ii ,: ,. " Ii, ~. I! I If P I I I , . I . I ! , "1. . ....... . 1!ll . ! . III r iUUH' I mi I IIIU , 1111> jflJ'ra I "I' I IIfff I ',I ~ trill'; ; I!I I lid' I III ~ j ,lIq I I, I I' ffi I II . :UU I In I I HI fl I I I 0 ,:h, , "J ~ JI If ~ ~ III f ~ml ( ",I,m II II' , , . " ::~I : JPPIo,. . "~ n " . p. "n'" · I!I r ". . -0. ., ~~~r I ~n', . II' f at if 'il'. l' · J I Q Ii ,: ~~, """II. I ,I ~ I il! f II < I I . 1/ n " ! II r : II f! III iffi II '" !!I ~II; '" '" ai I il -: If t Q..!h~;!"; ,if .. ... .. '" i i~ ~~ 0 0'- ~~ f ;II'" -{ ;JIll ~ EXHIBIT "B" PREPARED FOR CENTEX !-IOMES CIT.,. OF ""'rNTON I!lEACI-l. FLORIDA I-IAMPTON COURT DE~~. SOUTH IandIcape M:I1I8cluIt, LanclI'lclrl*1l EX IBIT "B" lOa! "',. i to i :",. .. ,." '" ,. " .. ..i ,. "IOIi! ~ rl~l~i 1~1~IHj ilii'f.r:~~!~! ~liIP~ll~~! ~!rJmR~~l~~~IIII~~'" {II ~ 11!! l~ ~ '~~)I~ II 'll! ~, !ij II' liJ~11 ~!~. i I! ,. ~ ! ~ ~~! ~ ~II'i'I' ~ ! ! ~~ I I "f .ll! 'a I!" 1 ri f 111, ii !., II.' J '! ' ; .," l~' I" Ii!" JIIII, I! IJ I. 1~1 ~~ iI~lr~~'r~~i ;l~~~i ~1;: ll!~~i ,i ~,~I~~!i ~I~!~i~!i ~;~ij~l~l H ~ ~~ l!~n~lmt~~f !i ~ m~l ll~ ~Jl ~ ~I ~ i~ !1~~r~1 ~l~~l~'l ~Ii ,-= ~{~ 11 j,i !~II "I' III' ~I!!, ~ III,.! J f .! If I b Ilil ~:I~! 9' U' r " ~, lll~ fil 1;'I.':.f:1 ~ ,I: I r.: I lit.:"I' " I" r I: i' I' J' " II ,:, r "I r ,. '" "'c ..,. :0 " "Il'l " ""I" "I \'".." ,. ". IJIII !~W ~'i ~~!fi~~~il ~~J~iI ~!f'l mIJ'~i~! ~11~ltl'I' I" ~Ij Wi ~ ~Il't'! Il~~ ~i j~fli~i i I' (" ij ,Jf~ t rJ !J",' I Qlt I Ii:" !,l,. .'1 '11 II!' ~,I,., ." " ,. '" I !l~ pi n!i:.i ~i! 11~w.lm I IIP.I t~1 !l1!II' Iii! ;bh!i~i! I:' "llftl ,'I' IIIf!'lih a III 1'1 ~I~~ !!:( :ill~'li! lid,' I~;il' III. If~J!~li !", J!' '.. i" II" f M.~ F31..or.ilV '..2 ._M i~i III . . .. ................ ... IHUHI ~iil >>.... ....-. isi 0 r '.' Ol> iiaJ~ni:ll~ .. ~g iillft~ fz ill) 'r.; Hf Irr"~1 "II" ili .-1 ~1, Wll~! 1 Iii 1 hl;I!I( II t n~1 III ~(fl 1. !tlll~11 11'1 I Ill,' Ii ~ili 110 jiltl I I m ~1iJ I I ili 0 "I I! ''VIlli I' iU WII'!R!J HII !~fr 1i C · .81' .-IIIji,1 ,. P,~ i i '~iJn~i' H ,,II " I l' " I [a.lf r dH) I " T m 1 m; i 1 ' ii .. ~ ni · ! J11 ( ~ 15i ~ .. H' . IJ! II: ~~~ ~ IIl1pPPPPjlppp H'i~ ==== .. ,I. . III II . ~ I'~' . ;~; , 1;~~~~'i~11 H.~ mm J "II " ........... . nnu I 1 5 4" ~.', 1!11!1!i1;~:4:4 H~I ...... II II ( I~ ;,' 121~22~~~~ nl.' ........, z IS W @11 11UJ~ if! .. J j ! 1= ~~~ ~~~~~~~fIIll'l' ~Ht m,,, J " . " ".' . ~~:'l!Ii~ -i I , i: 1 i il n.t UJJU J I , t:J I' I ~ 1 I I H J II II , n I ~ i ! J I II ~ ~ . r 11 ~ f! II f inti 11 m ! II all aU! m it - Is.. iJ TI ~..i ~.... I .. .. .. ! U! i i~ Or ~~ 0 l:~ ' I-IAMPTON COURT LAND. DESIGN SOUTH I.CInCIICCII:l8 AliCI1Il8CkI8/Land ~ F'~EF'A~ED FO~ CENTEX I-lOME5 CITY Of' BOYNTON eeACI-I. FLO~IDA ~ r""f'"1 ~ ,"':-'l~ T'....-:':~ EXHIBIT "B" ... ~ " " f:1 I~. s . d~r:mIJ~ ___L~l~--...!___L_ _ :I~ l I, I I' , , < > ~~ ~~" _ ,.... --,,- _- __--=.1.....- :.r~..~ _ ~i -l 1 10 l: '1 ~ , ' , ~ ~ I I , ------~ , I ~ " ."j -- ~ !.;. ,-, I rT.T'l r, r+-':\~[rTTT-' I I I ! I' I II r; ~ I I I I I , , .' I .", i I I I ~' 1.. I , I ~l\cl1' 'nn" I rm Ii (II Iii I, .I ,JLJ '-rhLI I I I ~ 3 ('21 ; \ ~r _ tJ! ~ ~ " ~ ~ '1 \9 " ,: ~ ~ -::! , ~ 0' " .1 ) I~ ~ .. ::; ~ I .. 0-1 , I ~ I ~ [;; g ,I t.; - " I: ~ ,P ; \~1 ~ " ::; ,V>' ~ -,~-- oJI.; ,., -/~ - -- ~ ~'~ " I ,I, ~ gl i,}1 6~1 )> r-'- r---- '0 :l> I ' ~;I( <....'"l~I' 00 g; :01 l.O I ~~- " , I I " ~ I I I : ___L_~_---1 J;i 'P' .z ~. .:; ~ >.J HAMPTON COURT-BOYNTON BEACH ".~ ',E,', FOR CENTEX HOMES DEMOLITION PLAN ""00" O.R.T. C C L CONSULTANTS. INC. I..O.~DSC.~l .+JlCIfIrtcn [IOVIRO/llll(HtAl CONSUl.TAm ..... ,. __ -..0.. ... ..0.. IK4l ......u.. ~...l/II I[ACH C",~Il{HS OIlUNDO OA!'E 10 8 02 H -;;-J c;:l ~I "'i'1 C:;-'. ~'l ....'...;"' ;. ( , >, . ~ c'~:, c;;:; :.z: ~\ ::.0 c: C'? --t - c;::) ::z == ~ 4C .......... ~ ;'l:'~~ <0 -< ~ ~ " ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ p 5 ~, )> z ',--' ,;,.:; ....., = = U) EXHIBIT "B" ,. .. " " k : ~1' " ;~~;~ ")1 . ~ ~ Li )':.1' '. -(':.,~-- ) ,~I -_~~~ _-=~-\L~ ~..-1-=."-"':. .... .~~<.. ~' '. 10 .~ "a-r.:. " I:"'t --. -, ~ r ~ J. ,1,_ .'.''''.' Cr' ~~ -~'t ~~~i!~l1l~W~;;! _-'6' ...-=~z.:::;~t: 't~~~~ ~y -!:..~ _t- t~ ):; 7~ 0 /~ I Co IS; \. E: 1'1 !J I' :, ~~Idi . .q~~~ 1 ~g I~"I I .~~"" I ~o'~~I- ~ll:01>- l ii~:gl I'~ 1 I t~ I I') : ig~ F :~~ I"Q 1 I I j..~ I I , pi t i;J ~ 'Sq, I--if "', i ~: ! ~ ;r~ot ... ,I 'I: ':_hl-:!~' , Ii -'<1'00 1 II t'J; t ... "< I , -'SOI L -'-'~ ~_(';4: i <,:;~)~.( ~ :! ~ :! .:::; , 1 ' ~. I :.... ..... jiol.v .v ' .....1... ~ 1,.,' i:j I~I If I'" S I~' I ''/> -- 'I I. " so, ==i: " I'. " , '''"0 " 'q, I, J -,~, , I ~ I~l I~~ ,a~ , ~i Iv ."e ~/'!"~ --~ Iii II ~ h r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ H i , ."4 ---.J " , ~ ..;: ~ ,I 7' . " li '~ I , ~ ,~ i , ~ ~I i ~ I I -I J '," I Ii! i: g d~ q~ .~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~: J .., ~ li ~ ~ ~ )> 5i5;.5565~~ ~ d ~ d{ d <1' ri ri ~ ~ 0 ;e;~;;;;q ;0 ~.:l~"';ll~~~;lI... }> ~n~"~~"n Z ~d~~~ggp is ~P~~~H~6 t'l :"~ ".'" {~~ 8 ~;: ~~~ t'l H? 0;'; 6 .;"5 ~~: . ~ ~ ~ " . ~~ C~-- .-. -OOU'mAS R. TAYLOR FLORIDA REG. ,W 50569 ~-- ~~ +--' I L ~-~ --~~ ~f--~HAMPTON COURT-BOYNTON BEACH ".~ .". ;1 -' FOR CENTEX HOMES 01 PAVING, GRADING, AND """EO o.n DRAINAGE CONCEPTUAL PLAN om 10 . 02 I,.\IfQSCAI'( AIIaI1T[CrS [~VI_IIl[HTA~ CONSl.I~TAH1S C C L CONSULTANTS, INC. [NOINtERS noo_~Il\1l.W. _,"" _...0-..00.",_ (IUJ.....'* l'OV~.lfIO IUClo! ~AOl lu.cl! G.6.1lD0fS ORI..I.HOO EXHIBIT "B" I I I! ~ f' I I I I I I I I I I I I ! o <; ~ ~ I I I ~ I I I I I >: ;;J ~ '-'h >: o I ------..J......--..-- ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ :' ;;J " :' ~ I <; " " ~ I I~\ I', ~' I!' '\1 ~ I I ~ l} '.' ~--=-~-,~ - ~ , , ! ~~ / 'I,' s,,,, STH" '''.. ~,T~E~.., i~-' ., _, _ .. 8~_ W(ll'DPOlI'fI?POL[ ~ _~___~~I(.,!.r)~(;1 . --__" I~~ I:~ I;~ i ! t~ I i I I" I !: 4o'~.fO.1 c... -po ::z tUO~1 A I ::!: I i i' 88 .1 I ,Ix ~ ,., I ;u ". Z nnn.o~ 0 o~ U1 '" ~~qpin ~~ ,., ::!: ~i ~~j:."i2~Z ,., !fJHH ;u r g '" co ~~ i~~~ '" ~ z i ..,..'" 0 H r~ 0 II""" i I~~~ , c I I H-fiO j I :1 I I : ~ I ! I i i ~ ..c ~ ~I "';''''''" I ~.':"'~' I I i~/'~~2~E~~ --1 . i"" f(l';;:I~"'~ "o~~~~1\'a ' ~8'~~M '0 , ;~i.~~~h~ : ~~"~ ~ g. ' ~g~~~.h . f~~~~~g ~ , - ""~~"' · I i ~~!l~:~~~~ I ~~Q~~i~Q m~;~'i ~~~~~g g~ ~~ ,. ~i I I .. I I ~! '~ ! I ,! ! ! , I '" >-, ,-~ (' ~'-~- I _.._.....______ DOUGLAS R T/WLGR FLORIDA REG NO 50569 -~~ ';"'w '" = = w HAMPTON COURT-BOYNTON FOR CENTEX HOMES WA TER AND SEWER CONCEPTUAL PLAN BEACH DRAwN B.E.I. OfSlGNEOB.E.L C C L CONSULTANTS,INC. I.),IID$CA~t ~1t(:~I1[CTS [HVIRQNlI[I'lTAL COH5U\.UNTS CHECKEOO.R,T. OArr 108 02 not'_...........\OIl. . .....[ 100 __.."" n. l.Sot. l''') '''-u<>o 'OIl'AHO BUtH ,.o.LlI .tACH OA~O(HS OIlUHDO EXHIBIT "B" ... ;00 '" ~ "O:---__~5>C." :~&~ II ":~~~~ I , I- , ~ f >: i;J ~ 1- I' .' 1; f ~ , , ---+-----1 (21 ;; ~ ~ ... ~ .... i:' i;J '" i:' ,::; I I, ~ .., I, I I', I , I .r-t-I- "J' " ~ i ~ ;; ~ .., I ::':.) I I, I II,' f I" /' ~ f""!""'t -== --- ~ \''''''''''1 ~ "'7 "''''... '" ...._N-<><::E<c;-<"''''O.."'''l::r''....-;::<;l..,,.,on...~ I """ " ,,,,,, ""'''''' " """ """ " " """ """ """" il!!ljil!!li~ilil!!!,ijl1liim -'2g~ i j I __ r: - DouiCi:s'R- I J-dLO"R Fl.ORIDA REG NO 5056~ ----,~--- :J> :z ~ c... N = = w HAMPTON COURT-BOYNTON BEACH "'~ ..<.1. FOR CENTEX HOMES PAVEMENT MARKINGS AND SIGN AGE CONCEPTUAL PLAN C C L CONSULTANTS, INC. tNOINCCltS ~ECKED O.R.T. L..lHMeAn ARCMlTtcn IIMAOHII(HrAl COH$UUAN1"S -... ---.......... (K41"....._ ~AUI K,t,CH C,l,ItD(KS DATE 10 8 02 ::a ...,.., ...:::: -- ~ I"""'l'"'I C':J '- "P :z. ...... ''-'l c::> i:33 !1 ! I~~,-i.: ~ ~ ! i';'.lrD I tL- ~i::: ";1 !!!! !~: ;~ ~ Hi I ,I ~g I II ~~ ! \ ~lj1! :~Ea ;;i!' '~<1 :2 a~ 1"1 iii, ii', j;1~~ :~:i ," lj;,i ~~~~ ~i~; _ ." 'I;' 1-' 'i! Ti lsi ~ ill I.' n Iii ,~! " I i I" !~: i II "ll !l~~ ~;i . I' ,;1 ju; ,,' ~a '. " ~!, " ~. ;ii II ji ~l , 'i"", ! ,! Ii o i' l~i IILI' iml!! .. " ,~l " ! n., ~", i ~;1 ii ~ iil il;i'l ',qll '"';;;g:.. I": ,OIl ~ OZ~ i'i ~g\r)' C)C J> ~\ :::C~ I~ ~:\\' OJ> -< (J1. 00 U1::O en <.0 i H d !i ., 8 0 ~~~ ~q! ~i~ l1; l! @@66 @ @ @ 0) 1 :g' ~i, I , i 5' 8;; r ~: ! i.~ l'i a! '~'1 i'~ : ~~ ~ ~r ij I ! ~i !~ Ii ;~ Ilih1i ~ HI!! !I '1 ~ la. ,,I "I,'~ · ~.~ ""- ~... i- . · iii ~!I ~";~ II ; ~ I .. a~ i ~ ~"" " I ~ ~{!I~ 1 ~ ,; ,~ ": Hij ~!. I g ~~ !I l I ~. ~ " : 1 i~ :: ! gj' ~ ! ;1 ;j : . j I ~, ~~ : ! ! ,8 0 , I :; 1 i '. ~ ! l iii . !i~ \'-0. '~i~m:':~ L: i........ ;"~~~ H oga .:.... ll! ' 1,)1 5~ 6;d. 'I '"'" I !.' 1. ~ i ~ ! i' i.-: , I ~ ~I " I~ i~ ,. I ~ HAMPTON COURT BOYNTON BEACH o,,~ B,LI, . FOR CENTEX HOMES ...... c ~ I TYPICAL DETAILS AND I SECTIONS C,"ECKEOD.R.T. OESICNEOB..I DArE 10 8 02 I ~'I " I " . k ~, ;! -. .-1 -j ~i; !!: t' ~ ~. I, ij II : r u - i ! ;~ t ~ l 'I ~ ~ , I' 1 I ! ! ! i ~ III il. ~. . IJ 1 Si '! , h il i In . I ~ ~ ,,! I i i~ ~ h!!]' ~ ~- ~ g~ lk ~ 11 " . U ~: ;! :--~ ~i l' . ..._,__~ .1 , I, " ~, :! '. EXHIBIT "B" i ~I Iim~~lli !; :~i~' l;;1 j ::l'~ II 1 , < 1 I, , o i" ~ I~ I !I~ 'i "'. _ -1 } ~!i ". ~:! . ~ I ! C C L CONSULTANTS, INC. M1t"1O __IUO<,I'ls,\Gt. ('l-O).".noo PAUl .tACk G.l~O[I<S O~LANOO ~,... IqJ .-1 'm ~r .~ )> -I 5 z ~/~ IJ c:JCJO c:JCJO I '" ", . mil! il! il! ii! ii! mill OJ ..:;~ i lTI" i------T' r", I ,/ -\jij I /' -1l~ i ml!! ! "'4i1!!! , i ' ! I i i! ' ~ ~ii~~i .~ ':1 r ,~~~~ ~ ~I , : 1\1 i! ~:I i ! : ~~ !! i i ! !! i! ! i i i! I j ! i i " : ' Ii ;u G5 ::I: -I m r m ); -I 5 z i i '1' , ,: ~ ., , OJ ;\ ! '\, i \, ~ ! I,ll : . I i ~ L :~O;~II'I a)> I i H.I ~ 'I 6, ~i i .. I ~ ~ il =1 di 0> 0 I :. d!~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ l ;u m )> ;u m r m ~ 5 z i '" "I " ~ ! !! il! i ii ii! i ii OJil! ! !! i ii OJIII I ji iii il! j ii ! ii i Ii i i! i i! i ii iil i ii OJ'I: Ii OJ Ii i! i! , ii ii ii !i ii I IDD~li DD I: ;.! i I~DI i DD ! 1001 i DO i i IIi [DD~I' DD I) I 83 ~1~J :'!![ffil ! ii! ! ii! i ii! , , " : i ii i;H; ii !I~i~ ~~ , .p ~~ , I~ ~;u ~m ; ~ i~ m I!~ i' ~ H_ fa I Z ~ ~ I t OJ 'B" r !~ I' !l ~~ !; ! j ! ! I i i ! I i ~: ,; ~l ~j ~ iI ~I ;~ .l '1 \l I ELEVATIONS CENTEX HOMES HAMPTON COURT 10-PLEX CONDOMINIUM Boylan Beach 1 Palm Beach Co., Fl Southeast Fl. Division I Phone. 561-536.1000 8198 ~::g F8JI.' 561.536-1060 8o"1Tlton Beach, FL33437 =:=:r=:.;:::=rr.::., ~::'lo':: =--::::-.:,.., =~-: -= -:.-=-==- ":r.::-~~""'" "-=~,,~=.... " ~~.; .f ~i! i! I j' J I II bil! - nol II r- CJc::lO ::: n j '--''---'O! I II -n '--'"-' I'" -I, m' i !! ;~ I OJ::I I ~ ! i ii ~ g i i ii ! i ii i ! ii ~! gJlli ~ ~ j ._.::~JJ i I 11" i fl, to , ~J _ ,.. i / \i ii : i~ ~: :: ljs lLJ! i ii ! ii ! i ~, f ! i i i i ~;iii;~: ~1J' , I II I, " : i ii I, " : i .. ! : f' ! ! ! ;:0 G'5 J: -I ~m 'h; 1< ,~ ~O ,z J ~ . ~ ~'It . I ( , L, i\ : 'l~ ! . i ! i ! i ;:0 ~ ;:0 m r- m < ~ o z ) . ,I II l- E8 1001 ! DO ! i 'I: ~gC::HI! DO lal I i i ! i 'l ~. ~ i : :: , I II i: :: : ! !i !!! i ii iqp" ~I\~~ h I ~~H ~ "i 3 ~~ , i ! ! , ::Jfo i i iHI iHI ~ J -0 )> ;;0 -I j~ l-n Ii ;;0 l~ 0 ,t Z .1 ~ ~; r- om '< S i ~ li ~~ ~s !i ~ i' " ;~O'!!L ~ II, II ~ II '. ~II ".:p> ~ ~ s 1::; E"! 0') - I :1 dB~ ~~, ~ ~ ~ { Ii g to '" If, :r - -~ .------ . ---- - .' UU_J ii -- ODD 8J ~IT' ODD i i .lni I ! :IUIL hi DOOr I DOOr ! , fnnni i [[] i II II II \ ! D09F ODD ~ I II lill : 11 B3 ,;=00;:;: . DO lr I CJc::lD lcor! I CJc::lO ii , I ~ CJc::lD I'~;~ CJc::lD II 1\ ~BP~ :: 0 ,. I! ! ,\ i ~ 0 ! 0 i I fTT ,i [[]~ ODD I Iroo ~ I: TI ~ i II i ~} i ' 00 i 1=00 : I I I 11 I~ I'CJc::lD II: it I!~ ! ! CJCJD i i II I &:---!W!i Ii ::Jfo ! i II ' I i i " (f) -I ;:0 m m -I ;m I~ c~. ~-1 '0 Z i '" .. " <i r Ii ] ~, . ~ 'P" ~~~h \~~ ~~ .u ~. ~ql il \1 ~ I ~l i; ~. I () o < m Z I -I ' &;;0-< I , I CJCJD 1m' CJCJD Ih; a < CJCJO l CJCJO I. i [I] [I] "" .. " <'l I HAMPTON p COURT 8-PLEX CONDOMINIUM Boyton Beach I Palm Beach Co., F Southeast FI. Division I .,.. JoQ Roe. Phone: 561-536-1000 SuICe 200 Fax: 561-53IH06O Boymon Beech, Fl33437 ELEVATIONS =r: :-.::"=: =: =:!r':' ":..c::-:' Ill':: ca..::r::-.:.-tJ ....... ........-m........ ...~.CIIlloa......................._..... ......,.........-....,.t_llalic.-.__ tooSc.nt..H........ CENTEX HDMES t ,. t if 't ii I~I~ ~Il~i i imil d hd .';1 ~lgl ~'ib:al ~~ I~u ~ e~ ~ la:iit al uA! · all.i"Q~ I~ mll Q~ U"I.I.W g3 ~I~I ~i ~d Mill ~l . "i ~ tQa t I&F~5 . a Jilt Ii I!l ~ &hil; i h,; h i~i i l!:h! II~liii i ~~1 ~ t~n. ~ ~'- ~ xh i i~iij~ , tl~ I iln l III :i~ u~ tlltll il~ I t ni~ ~ ~I _ii ~ii ~Jdi l~U~ I~i ~~l ~IR I~i iUII li 3 :;011;'1 )> 'I 'I'. f p. 1'_1 ~ ' ~ '" ,1IiW . I ~I i~~ 01 W h ~ ~ {\ 1(1 () (j\ (j\ (j\ m (\ !5 , ~~ ~ ~j ~ z -; m 1(1 () 1(1 m r m < )> ::!n ;~mt I~ ~l~ "i ~~t ~'t ~ .., -< :n " TYP , I I t ~I(I .- r.fj\ "::t 6' ow \J m m r m < )> -; () z ~ m )> ~ m r m < )> -; () z ~-' '. ~ ,'1\ ~ J: i~p i.~. ~ ~~ . ~I ; ~~ ~? 68 .., !J \ , \: ~ll~~i ;'1;; t>~ ~..i ELEVATIONS II POOL CABANA _..........._..__..,......._ ...~Io.._ ...... Hampton Court ....'"..-....-l........_._=._.......iIII........I....~ BoyntoD Beach Florida' ~...':.'*..:':l-:.~~~..=-.!..O'::"""_Io.._tl~~_'!~_ ' I EXHIBIT "B' It ~ () Z -; m ,- m < )> -; () Z r m It -; w \J In m ,- m < )> --; () Z I I ~c,:i "'-~' ~.. " I I I ,,- I:ENTEX HOMES SouthEast FIonda I 11Q1 Jog: Road Phone. 6el.53~'OOO SUIte 200 F..: 561.536-1116C BoynlOll8Mci1, Fl ~M37 EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval PrOject name' Hampton Court File number: NWSP 02-023 Reference: 2nd reVIew reVIsed plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan WIth a January 14, 2003 Planmng and Zonmg Department date stamp markmg, 1/ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments, 1 Pnor to permIt applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- 6200) regardmg the storage and handlmg of refuse. The dumpster WIll be supplIed by PublIc Works, PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2 Southwest 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land Development DIVISIOn, PermIt SectIon) JunsdlctIOn, All roadway connectIOns must be permItted by them m addItIon to the CIty CopIes of all reqUIred County permIts will be reqUIred to be prOVIded at the tIme of permlttmg, UTILITIES Comments, 3 All utilIty easements shall be shown on the SIte plan and landscape drawmgs (as well as the Water and Sewer Conceptual Plan Sheet) so that we may determme whICh trees may mterfere WIth utilItIes, In general, palm trees wIll be the only tree speCIes allowed wlthm utilIty easements, Canopy trees may be planted outSIde of the easement so that roots and branches WIll not Impact those utilItIes wlthm the easement m the foreseeable future, The LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 18.1 gIVes publIc utIlItIes the authonty to remove any trees that mterfere WIth utilIty sefV1ces, eIther m utilIty easements or publIc nghts-of-way. 4 FIre flow calculatIOns will be requIred demonstratmg the CIty Code reqUIrement of 1,500 g.p,m. as stated m the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectIOn 16, or the reqUIrement Imposed by msurance underwrIters, whIchever IS greater (see CODE, SectIOn 26-16(b)), FIRE Comments, COA 01/24/03 2 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 5. Emergency access shall be provIded at the start of a project and be mamtamed throughout constructIon per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, SectIOn 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constrnction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, SectIOn 5-4,3 6 CIty Ordmance SectIOn 9-6, 3 /7-11 reqUIres approved automatIc fire spnnkler systems throughout all buildmgs or structures regardless of the type of constructIon whIch are three (3) stones or more m heIght or all buildmgs or structures m excess of 30 feet m heIght as measured from fimsh ground floor grade to the undersIde of the topmost roof assembly 7 The FIre Department will reqUIre a Knox or key actIvated lock at the alternate pomts of emergency access, POLICE Comments: None ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 8 Show proposed SIte lIghtmg on the landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,B 4) The lIghtmg deSIgn shall provIde a mlmmum average lIght level of one foot-candle, Include pole wmd loadmg, and pole details m conformance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectIOn 11, Chapter 23, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5.B,7 and Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIon A on the Llghtmg Plan, 9 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to lIght fixtures to elnnmate future shadowmg on the parkmg surface (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn A.l b) 10 Full dramage plans m accordance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtICle N, SectIOn 5 will be reqUIred at the tIme of permlttmg. 11, IndICate to what standard the project IS to be constructed, If the FDOT Standard SpeCIficatIons for Road & Bndge ConstructIOn and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 SpeCIficatIons are recommended smce they contam both EnglIsh and MetrIC umts, 12 An excavatIon/fill permIt WIll be reqUIred for thIS proJect. Accordmgly cross- sectIOns, which extend 25 feet mto the abuttmg propertIes, will be reqUIred, 13 After CommISSIOn approval of the Master SIte Plan, the applIcant shall enter the plat process through the Engmeenng DlVlsIOn of PublIc Works, COA 01/24/03 3 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments, 14 IdentIfy wIthm the sIte data the fimsh floor elevatIOn (lowest floor elevatIOn) that IS proposed for each buildmg, Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn IS m comphance WIth regulatIOns of the code by addmg specIficatIOns to the SIte data that address the followmg Issue [SectIOn 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 Flonda Buildmg Code]' The desIgn professIOnal-of-record for the project shall add the followmg text to the SIte data, "The proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn _' _ NGVD IS above the hIghest 100-year base flood elevatIOn apphcable to the bUIldmg SIte, as determmed by the South Flonda Water Management DIstnct's surface water management constructIOn development regulatIOns," 15, At ttme of permIt revIew, submIt SIgned and sealed workmg drawmgs of the proposed constructIOn, 16 Sheets A-2 & A-3 Delete all references to the S.B,C 1997 EdItton and the SFBC. The code m effect IS the 2001 EdItton of the Flonda Buildmg Code, 17, SubmIt plans for the cabana and recreatIOn area If they are mcluded m thIS SIte plan reVIew PARKS AND RECREATION Comments, 18. The plans mdIcate that there WIll be 24 smgle family attached homes and 42 multI-family umts m thIS development. Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, of the Land Development RegulatIOns, the formula IS apphed towards the calculatton of the Parks and Recreatton Facihttes Impact Fee as follows, . 24 Smgle Family Attached Umts @ $ 771 each, . 42 Multt-family Umts @ $656 each, Therefore, the $46,056 fee IS due at the ttme of the first apphcable buildmg permIt. FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: 19, The apphcant should mdIcate on the landscape plans the eXIstmg nattve trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the SIte. The tree COA 01/24/03 4 1/ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT survey shows 20 Slash PIne trees (total of 440 calIper Inches), 1 Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco Plum plants, ThIs should be IndICated wIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan, The eXIstIng trees located In the canal nght-of- way should be left on the property to proVIde an addItIonal landscape buffer Chapter. 7,5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C) PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 20 ThIS request for new SIte plan approval will be contIngent upon the approval of the correspondIng rezonIng applIcatIOn (REZN 02-007) 21 The HIgh DensIty ReSIdentIal (HDR) underlYIng land use allows for 10 8 dwellIng UnIts per acre but the proposed densIty IS 14,07 dwellIng UnIts per acre. Staff must confirm that the wntten JustIficatIOn for the proposed densIty IS acceptable (see ExhibIt "D") ThIS Will reqUIre a determInatIOn from the CIty Attorney's office and may reqUIre consent from the owner of the Homewood ReSIdence property 22 AccordIng to the JOInt MotIon and Agreed Order, dated October 7, 2002, If the correspondIng request to rezone the property from R-3 to PUD IS approved by the PlannIng & Development Board, "the partIes may petItIOn the Court for modIficatIOns to the (StIpulatIOn and Settlement) Agreement. The applIcant will be reqUIred to eIther amend the Agreement or modIfy the plans to comply as stIpulated, 23, The entrance (proposed on Golf Road) can be no WIder than 36 feet (Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn R.I.). The EngIneenng DlVlsIOn of PublIc Works must approve the request for an admInIstratIve waIver. 24 On the SIte plan tabular data, the area of the proposed reSIdentIal and recreatIOnal land uses (expressed In terms of percentages) IS Incorrect. ThIS must be rectIfied, 25 The detail of the proposed entry SIgn(S) shall Include the total sIgnage area and colors In order to confirm archItectural compatibIlIty WIth the buildIngs (Chapter 9, SectIon 10, 1.) Staff recommends utilIZIng the same elements of the Homewood ReSIdence SIgn (property dIrectly to the west) Into the deSIgn of the proposed SIgn(S) 26 A fence would be reqUIred around the pool area pursuant to the Flonda BuildIng Code for safety reasons 27 On the landscape plan, ensure that the landscape quantItIes and speCIes match between the graphIC IllustratIon and the tabular data, 28 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqUIres that the Alhambra Square COA 01/24/03 5 II DEPARTMENTS South and Alhambra Square ACLF, BUIldmg heIght shall not exceed two (2) stones, The plans comply and therefore, staff has no recommendatIOn. Plans must remam consIstent With agreement or agreement amended as necessary 29 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqUIres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF' Roof pItch not to be steeper than 4/12 The plans are m vIOlatIOn of thIS stIpulatIOn, Staff recommends amendmg the Agreement so that there IS no vIOlatIOn. If the Agreement IS not amended, the plans must be changed to comply wIth the stIpulatIOn, 30 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqUIres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF' All dumpsters to be located away from adjacent reSIdentIal areas, and at least one hundred feet from the south property Ime of the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF Parcels, The plans are m VIOlatIOn of thIS stIpulatIOn, Staff recommends amendmg the Agreement so that there IS no VIOlatIOn, If the Agreement IS not amended, the plans must be changed to comply wIth the stIpulatIOn, 31 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqUIres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF' ParkIng lot lIghtmg shall be shaded and shIelded so as to not shme dIrectly mto adjacent reSIdentIal areas; parkIng lot lIghtmg shall not be Illummated after 11'00 p,m., parkIng lot lIghtmg poles shall be at the mImmum heIght permItted or allowable by BOYNTON BEACH, A note on the plans mdIcates that the lIghts will remam illummated untIl 2 00 a,m. as reqUIred by Code Therefore, the plans are m VIOlatIOn of thIS stIpulatIOn. Staff recommends amendmg the Agreement so that there IS no VIOlatIOn, however, If restnctIons are placed on project lIghtmg, the lIghtmg should not be below the typIcall!ghtmg levels of publIc streets, 32 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqUIres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF Use of the property shall be hrmted to an Adult Congregate LIvmg Facihty. The proposed use VIOlates thIS stIpulatIOn, Staff recommends amendmg the Agreement so that there IS no VIOlatIon. The Agreement must be amended to allow the proposed umt (townhouse) types, If not amended, the plans must be modIfied to comply WIth the stIpulatIOn, 33 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqUIres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF A combmatIOn of landscapmg and wall (the "Wall") shall be constructed on the south property Ime of the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF parcels. The plan and deSIgn of the Wall shall be coordmated WIth and approved by the governmg ASSOCIatIOns of the adjacent reSIdentIal property Approval of the Wall shall not be unreasonably WIthheld by the governmg aSSOCiatIOns, the Wall shall be constructed at no cost or expense to the governmg aSSOCIatIOns. The lack of the wall along the south property Ime VIOlates this stIpulatIOn, Staff recommends a combmatIOn of wall / landscapmg SImilar to the Homewood ReSIdence to be placed along the southern property Ime of the subject property ThIS would reqUIre amendmg the Agreement. INCLUDE REJECT COA 01/24/03 6 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 34. The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqmres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF, At such tIme as buildmg plans are presented to BOYNTON BEACH for pernut, copIes of the Wall plan and sIte plan shall be submItted to the governmg assocIatIons, Staff has no opmIOn on thIS reqmrement. 35 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqmres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF' No parkmg spaces or Improvements except landscapmg shall be constructed or mstalled m the Lake Worth Dramage DIstnct "nght-of-way" south of the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF parcels. The plans comply and therefore, staff has no recommendatIOn, 36 The StIpulatIOn and Settlement Agreement reqmres that the Alhambra Square South and Alhambra Square ACLF DeceleratIOn entry lanes shall be provIded at each entrance If deemed necessary by BOYNTON BEACH, The plans comply and therefore, staff has no recommendatIon, 37 If possible, CIty staff respectfully requests the apphcant petItIOn the L WDD to dredge the nght-of-way adjacent to the subject property, to the mmImal extent possible (to the satIsfactIOn of the DIStrICt) so as to not Impact the flora and fauna that may be found m the L WDD nght-of-way ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments, 38 To be determmed, ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments. 39. To be determmed, MWR/elj So\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\Hampton Court\NWSP 02-023\COA.doc (- r WEINER & ARONSON, P.A. EXHIBIT "0" ATrORNEYS AT LAW The Clark House 102 North Swinton Avenue Delray Beach, Aorida 33444 Telephone: (561) 265-2666 Telecopier: (561) 272-6831 E-mail: delraylaw@bellsouth.net MICHAEL S. WEINER CAROLEJ.ARONSON JASON S. MANKOFF OF COUNSEL ROBERT MARC SCHWARTZ, P.A. Florida Bar Board Certified Real Estate Lawyer January 7,2003 Via Hand-Delivery Mr. Michael W. Rumpf, Chairman Director of Planning & Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 ill,~;~;:~ ill Re: Hampton Court Our File No.: CENT004 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT ..- Dear Mike: This justification is in response to Comment No. 82 of the 1st Review Comments for Hampton Court dated December 16, 2002. This comment states that the High Density Residential (HDR) underlying land use allows for 10.8 dwelling units per acre, but the proposed density is 14 dwelling units per acre. The Comprehensive Plan justifies the approval of 66 units and is not inconsistent with this development plan. To understand why 66 units should be approved by the City of Boynton Beach, it is important to understand the history of the property. This property was involved in litigation in which a settlement was reached in a Stipulation and Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") dated October 31, 1989. This Agreement zoned the property R-3 (multi-family) ACLF with no less than 248 units. Since this property has been subject to litigation, there are unique circumstances specific to this property which support the approval of 66 units Policy 1.16.3 of the Future Land Use Element states that the City shall continue to implement the recommendations as set forth in the Land Use Problems and Opportunities section of the support documents for the Future Land Use Element. This policy indicates that the recommendations contained in this section shall apply "regardless of the status of the City's development regulations". Section 8.c. of the Land Use Problems and Opportunities section discusses the property on the southeast corner of Golf Road and Congress Avenue and clearly states that the land use, zoning and the use and development of the property shall be in accordance with the Agreement. Therefore, the conversion of the remaining 155 units to 66 dwelling units is clearly supported by the (- ( EXHIBIT "0" Mr. Michael W. Rumpf January 7, 2003 Page 2 fD) m @_: ,rR) WJ[ JAN - 7t""3 ~ Comprehensive Plan and support documents. A copy of Future Land Use Element Policy 1,16.3 and support document Section 8.c. are attached. Since only 93 of the 248 "beds" were developed, 155 remaining "beds" converts to 66 dwelling units based on the previous Comprehensive Plan, EAR, Page 36 Housing Chapter which states that "densities for group homes in PUD's should correspond to the average number of persons per household for the City as a whole, which would be equivalent to 2.3 beds times the number of dwellings allowed under the Future Land Use Plan." Accordingly, the application is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach. MSW:ab 0:\CENT004\Letter Rumpf.Jano7.2003.wpd tr'\\ "-:2:' -"" / --., -- \ r - _ ~ 1-- --- --'- --- ! U'\ / 0'", -' ,", ~ ,~ ), ./.. / 1- __ ': ---""#"\;1) '> ION' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 03-015 TO Michael W, Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning FROM. Laurinda Logan, P.E , Senior Engineer DATE" January 23, 2003 RE: Standard Review Comments New Site Plan - 2nd Review Hampton Court File No. NWSP 02-023 The above referenced Site Plans, received on January 19, 2003, were reviewed against the comments made during the 1 st Review and TRC meeting The following comments remain to be addressed and/or revised as noted (i e . remain as Conditions of Approval), PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1 Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works, PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 1 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) is under Palm Beach County (Land Development Division, Permit Section) jurisdiction All roadway connections must be permitted by them in addition to the City Copies of all required County permits will be required to be provided at the time of permitting ENGINEERING 1. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7 B.4.) The lighting design shall provide a minimum average light level of one foot-candle On t~ L;'9hting Plan, ~.~:~=~:~;:~~~;lh.~~~i:~~O ~~ t~~~::;' E: 7:~ ~ = electric31 control 3nd to rom3in on until 2:00 3,m, (LOR, ,i, c i . ,3, Include pole wind loading, and pole details in conformance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 11, Chapter 23, Article I, Section 5 B,7 and Chapter 23, Article II, Section A on the Lighting Plan. -If FS~~() Ploos~ ;:;~~Or/~~~~~tFies ~s paFt.,o~ your. T~C.,P1~n Suemitta/s; it is mI:Jch 0::18fo:- t<J ideR#f; :::JRe. GefreGt 8Rj done.one.os nm. than ~.h..e-yel:;j 8. e-Jr.3r#Rg OR-8-pefFR.t! 2, It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1 b) Department of Public Works, Ertgineering Division Memo No. 03-015 Re, Hampton Court, New Site Plan 2nd Review January 23, 2003 Page 2 3 Full drainage plans in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting, 4. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FOOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units. 5, An excavation/fill permit will be required for this project. Accordingly cross-sections, which extend 25 feet into the abutting properties, will be required, 6 After Commission approval of the Master Site Plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the Engineering Division LUck Cc: Jeff Livergood, P,E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S,M" City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Hampton Court, New Site Plan 2nd Review.doc 1st REVIE\V COMMENTS New Site Plan . -... --, , " , , '-'- - j..... IIC /'~ ~ PrOject name Hampton Court File number' NWSP 02-023 Reference' 151 review plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan With a November 20, 2002 Planmnl!; and Zontnl!; Department date stamQ markIng. I' DEPARTl\IEl\"TS PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. Pnor to permit applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- 6200) regardmg the storage and handlmg of refuse The dumpster wIll be supplIed by PublIc Works, 2 Indicate by note that the site dumpster enclosure shall be constructed m accordance With CIty Standard A-8807 INCLUDE :.L ["---- "-1:-1 _. "~ ~ ,j .l:.... l...., \. REJECT :;~\\7i ::,.) __ _J A mlmmum dumpster pad IS reqUIred measurmg 10 feet x 10 feet (msIde ~'1z/ dimenSIOn mcludmg gates) (LOR, Chapter 7 5, Article II. SectIon 5,J and : /-\ ;7IC~ ;... ~ Article III, SectIOn 9,A.9.a) 3 4 Provide a mmImum turnmg radIUS of 60 feet to approach the dumpster Provide a mmlmum backmg clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad, (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIOn I1.J,2 b) 5 The proposed locatIOns of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of eXltmg the SIte. Alternate locatIOns or configuratIOns need to be considered, The developer may also WIsh to consIder use of a compactor m place of dumpster(s). The compactor enclosure shall be constructed m the same manner as a trash enclosure; however the truck access for a compactor IS rear-10admg as opposed to front-loadmg for trash bms, 6 The west dumpster locatIOn IS too close to the dnveway of the adjacent ACLF, please relocate, 7 Staff belIeves that the trash capacity proVided may not be adequate for the number of umts proposed m thIS development. Please consIder the additIOn of another dumpster or mcreasmg the capacity of the dumpsters provIded, PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments' 8 Provide a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards ReView) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engmeenng for the Traffic Impact Statement pnor to Issuance of a buildmg permit. 9 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land I L~ I \' '7/ C':- , I '--- (qr " \V"7IU=- ( \ '- --J k>.:l -- , Yl'-r/,--~ ~i /' \ !, 7,1.,;T' \ \ " \ ,,- ~~ I '~ -Ie,'::-I 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 2 -- , . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT II Development DlVlsIOn, PermIt Sectron) junsdlctIOn. All roadway ;1"':-_ I connectIOns must be permItted by them In addItIOn to the City Caples of all ~\'- .,'z, ,I - I reqUIred County permIts w1l1 be required to be provIded at the time of \ \ i permItting, ~ ~ I ~ 10 Please correct discrepancIes between AM and PM distributIOns gIven In \ iflll.:.... , Table 4 and shown In FIgure 4 of the Traffic Impact AnalYSIS I , \. \ 11 There currently are four lots and four dwellings fronting the SW 13th Street l~ r---,,~ I roadway, whIch IS a part of the plat of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND "7 "'~ i \ I ( I'-.J SECTION The ongrnal cul-de-sac was reconfigured Into a "bulb" deSIgn \ \ ~ <''','X.' I dunng a prevIOUS re-plattmg process (ORB 2584, Pg, 479, PBCR) As part -.><::'<'-i~~ , I of the apphcant's proposed ehmmatIOn of the roadway traversmg the project {~ft"'J~ lCi ',r SIte In an east-west dIrectIOn, the apphcant shall create a nevI eul de sac tf1 v~ the "bulb" nght ~f way &et~s!';lp for <:l1('b a purpg~e, .r-Ie:' tt%-,(~ \':M Y1?). ~ , ;.;o,l(t\/Vl~ ,{Ire 11'X. -'.....10)(.\(1".'7(.;1'1 ''; ,U1,,^,{ly (lit"l ')~1!) Vv (L~\ r\.jIJIC<:...I- ~r[c;'1.~:;> L:~ lit e-l.. rZl d"-j 12 The mam entrance does not connect to SW 23rd A venue Please correct. \...----- li{ \. ! t1/c: 13 The two (2) gated fire department access pOints are not acceptable and WIll i,c-'\" '., not be pernutted, Staff recommends provldmg secondary access VIa SW yJ~ i II";:~ 13th Street (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 8 C.2 and Ordinance 02-033 - LDR, (U I Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, Sectron 1,A.4) ~YhO-~1:~:'\.. 14 The two (2) dead-end "accessways" are greater than 1 00 feet m length and );(06 they WIll reqUIre a proper turn-a-round. ThIS can be eIther a) a cul-de-sac ~ configuratIon, b) a shunt turn-a-round, c) a 'T'- turn-a-round, or d) a wye \, / turn-a-round, t"lllrY\lr'1 ,,\jL.ijVev ('ittl,..u::"'t {i.l't),..l i .~. 15 The parkIng spaces shown up agamst the dwellmg UnIt are labeled as 18,5 ~L feet (SIte Plan Sheet 1 of 1), WIth no overhang (or walkIng around room) r\/7/~ between the vehIcle and the. buildmg, access IS denIed, Increase the parkIng space length to 20 feet m thIS SItuatIOn, ModIfy the SIte plan accordmgly '~J I 16 Staff strongly recommends reconsldenng the locatIOn of the mall kIosks. L~/-'j The proposed locatIOns WIll require reSIdents to stop wlthm the travel way 'I I.. . \ I to drop off or pIck up mall. An alternate locatIOn could be wlthm the mam , ~ J entry dnveway where It IS recommended that parallel parking spaces be I prOVIded adjacent to the kIOsks to allow for safe parking whlle usmg the maIlboxes. I I 17 Current standards reqUIre 27 feet backup dIstance WIth mInImum 9 foot by k~ I I 18 foot parkIng stalls (Standard Drawmg B-9800 1) The Engmeenng \1/7/'-~ DlVlsIOn will be amendmg thIS standard to require a 25 foot backup distance , ) \ WIth a mInImUm 9 Yz foot by 18 Y2 foot parking stall and may WIsh to "- - conSIder thIS as an alternative to the eXisting standard, An admInIstratIve waIver wIll be necessary to use the new standard, A backup dIstance less than 25 feet WIll not be allowed, 18 On the site and CIvil olans. show and IdentifY all necessarv traffic control ~ I 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT devices such as stop bars, stop SignS, double yello\\ lane separators stnpIng, . I ;~7IC-1 directIOnal arrows and "Do Not Enter" slgnage, etc See City Standard DrawIngs B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for stnpIng detaIls. ) , , 19 The Code requires that street names should not be phonetIcally simIlar ~1"3, (LDR, Chapter 5, Article V, SectIOn I,D 8) ObtaIn approval from PolIce and Fire that the subdivIsion name, Hampton Court \\0111 be acceptable when ~~i I there IS a Hampton Inn already In the City (on Gateway Boulevard) I UTILITIES I Comments: I I 20, All utilIty easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape draWIngs (as well as the Water and Sewer Conceptual Plan Sheet) so that we may determIne which trees may Interfere with utIlitIes, In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed withIn utIlIty easements. Canopy trees , may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches Will not Impact those utIlItIes withIn the easement In the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7 5, Article I, SectIOn 18 1 gives publIc utIlIties the authonty to remove any trees that Interfere With utilIty services, either In utilIty easements or publIc nghts-of-way I 21 Palm Beach County Health Department penruts Will be required for the water and se\ver systems servIng thiS project (CODE, SectIOn 26-12) 22 Fire flow calculatIOns will be reqUIred demonstratIng the City Code reqUIrement of 1,500 g,p.m, as stated In the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, SectIOn 16, or the reqUIrement Imposed by Insurance underwnters, whichever IS greater (see CODE, SectIOn 26-16(b)) 23 The CODE, SectIOn 26-34(E) reqUIres that a capacity reservatIOn fee be paid for thiS project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department applIcatIOn forms or \V1thIn 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. ThiS fee wIll be determIned based upon final meter Size, or expected demand, I 24 Comprehensive Plan PolIcy 3 C 3 4 requires the conservatIOn of potable water City water may not, therefore, be used for lITIgatIOn where other sources are readily available, 25 Water and sewer lInes to be owned and operated by the City shall be Included WithIn utIlity easements, Please show all proposed easements on the engIneenng draWIngs, USIng a mInimum Department wldth of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated Via separate Instrument to the City as stated In the CODE, SectIOn 26-33(a) 26 ThiS office wIll not reqUIre surety for InstallatIOn of the water and sewer utIlitIes, on conditIon that the systems be fully completed. and given to the 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 5 I I DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ground t100r grade to the undersIde of the topmost roof assembly POLICE i I Comments. NONE I I I , ENGINEERING DIVISION , i I i Comments: I i 37 All comments requmng changes and/or correctIOns to the plans shall be 1 ~niD?l ret1ected on all appropnate sheets. 1rT: J \ , i '---' 38 Show all eXIstmg utIlItIes on sIte development plan (LDR, Chapter 4" ~11l)3 w. SectIOn 7,A.3) ( . \ ~ 39 Show proposed sIte IIghtmg on the site ana landscape plans (LDR, Chapter k? 4, SectIOn 7,B 4) The IIghtmg desIgn shall provide a mmImum average. .... tnlcs lIght level of one foot-candle, On-the IIghtmg plan, spec-lfy that the lIght (, poles shall wlthstanda 140MPH WInd load (WR, Chapt.ef 23, ArtldeII~ \",-- -SectIon A.I ;aandFlor-Hia-B~Hldmg Code) ProvIde a note that the fixtures shall be {)perated by. photo.electncal control and to remam on until 2 00 ' a.m, (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn A. I ,a" Include pole wmd load 109, and pole details 10 conformance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle I IV, SectIOn 11, Chapter 23, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5,B 7 and Chapter 23, ArtIcle I II, SectIOn A on the LIghtmg Plan, If possible please provIde photometrIcs .as part of your TRe plan submittals - It IS much eaSIer to IdentIfy and correct any defiCIencIes oow than while you are waltmg on a permIt. i I 40 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to lIght :r7/()~ fixtures to elImmate future shadowmg on the parkmg surface (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIon A,I b) '- " ~ . , I 41 Show SIght trIangles on the landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II, ~i71";~ I SectIOn 5,H,) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the SIght trIangles( ( , \ along all collector and artenal roadways. \ I \ \ I \ 1'------/ 1h..1 I ,/ I 42 IndIcate, by note on the landscape plan, that wIthm the SIght trIangles there tl.,. v\"':::"'-- I shall be an unobstructed cross-vIsibilIty at a level between 2,5 feet and 6 \~lllt~ r feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,H), ! 43 The landscape plan scale shall match that of the SIte plan (LDR, Chapter 4, ?\"7/cl SectIOn 7 C 1) ''--.J I 44 A five (5) foot WIdth SIdewalk along SW 23rd Avenue IS reqUIred, and shall i.ct; I ( \fIlL.:' I be placed one (1) foot north of the north property hne (LDR, Chapter 6, I Article IV, SectIon 10.T" and Chapter 22, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5) \, II ~ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 6 -47 I I I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I I 45 ProvIde an engIneer's certIficatIOn on the draInage plan as specIfied In '~L-- I LOR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F.2 , ~ \ I /,! ...-.-oj I \ - ,I The draInage plan proVIded does not proVIde sut1iclent proposed elevatIOn ~ 'J , 46 " . I InformatIOn for revIew purposes, Also provIde typical sectIons and/or \'171 C,'" details of the proposed dry detentIOn area, swales and proposed dramage ~J I structures (LOR, Chapter 4, SectIon 7,F I) 47 Full draInage plans m accordance WIth the LOR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle TV, I ~y6~ SectIOn 5 WIll be reqUIred at the tIme of permIttIng, \ , \ -- ' -,' I~ 48 IndIcate by note that catch basm and manhole covers shall be bIcycle proof "e II 71 C. r:., (LOR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle TV, SectIOn 5,A.2 f) \. \ \ 49 IndIcate to what standard the project IS to be constructed; If the FOOT (e Standard SpeCIficatIOns for Road & Bndge ConstructIOn and Standard ~~nlO~ Index are to be used - the 2000 SpeCIficatIOns are recommended smce they contam both EnglIsh and Metnc UnIts. 50 ProvIde \VfItten and graphIC scales on all sheets, I i~ 7lC ) 51 The setbacks for BUIldmgs #1 & #7 as shown on the SIte Plan IndIcate 27 I '. I feet and 25 feet respectIvely The CIVIl dra\vIngs sheets reflect 94 feet and ~7/0~ .00 feet respectIvely (Sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 4) Please rectIfy thIS dIscrepancyaccordmgly ',,- 52 An excavatIOn/fill penmt WIll be reqUIred for thIS project. Accordmgly (J7IC->' cross-sectIOns, whIch extend 25 feet Into the abuttmg propertIes, WIll be reqUIred, 53 After CommISSIOn approval. of the Master SIte Plan, the applIcant shall enter ''''71<!3 the plat process through the Engmeenng DIVISIOn, ( 54 Show locatIOn of recreatIon area, dumpsters, maIl kIOSks, etc on all CIVIl J I~ \If 7tC~~ drawmgs, '. \ 1 I 55 The sIte data (SIte Plan - Sheet I of 1) should IndIcate 2 parkIng spaces for '~7/()"> 66 UnIts, not 112 ~\ , f~ 56 The project name IS gIven Incorrectly on the Landscape Development Plans !.; II ilL..' f as "The Harbors" Please correct. 57 Correct spellIng on Item #3 of CIVlI Engmeenng cover sheet. ~n//, ( BUILDING DIVISION ~) I i Comments: .. 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan jfl'l ~~./\ Project name Hampton Court FIle number' NWSP 02-023 Reference' 1 S(revlew plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan WIth a November 20, 2002 PlannIng and ZonIng Department date stamp markmg. II I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General I Comments, 1 PrIor to permIt applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- \/ I 6200) regardmg the storage and handlIng of refuse The dumpster WIll be I supplIed by PublIc Works, 2 IndIcate by note that the sIte dumpster enclosure shall be constructed In /' accordance WIth CIty Standard A-8807 3 A mInImum dumpster pad IS reqUIred measurIng 10 feet x 10 feet (InSIde / dImenSIOn mcludIng gates) (LOR, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,J and ArtIcle III, SectIOn 9.A.9.a) 4 ProvIde a mInImum turnIng radIUS of 60 feet to approach the dumpster / ProVIde a mInImum backmg clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad, (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIOn 11,1.2 b) 5 The proposed locatIOns of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east / enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of eXItIng the SIte, Alternate locatIOns or configuratIOns need to be consIdered. The developer may also WIsh to consIder use of a compactor In place of dumpster(s) The compactor enclosure shall be constructed In the same manner as a trash enclosure; hO\vever the truck access for a compactor IS rear-loadIng as opposed to front-Ioadmg for trash bms, 6 The west dumpster locatIOn IS too close to the drIveway of the adjacent 1/' ACLF, please relocate 7 Staff belIeves that the trash capacIty proVIded may not be adequate for the /1 number of UnIts proposed m thIS development. Please consIder the addItIOn of another dumpster or IncreasIng the capacIty of the dumpsters provIded. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic I I Comments. I I 8 ProvIde a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards ReVIew) / from Palm Beach County Traffic EngIneerIng for the Traffic Impact Statement prIor to Issuance of a buIldmg permIt. I 9 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land I . 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 2 II I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I Development DIVISIOn, PermIt SectIOn) JunsdlctlOn, All roadway connectIOns must be permItted by them In addItIOn to the CIty CopIes of all V reqUIred County permIts wIll be requIred to be provIded at the tIme of permIttIng. I 10 Please correct dIscrepancIes between AM and PM dIstributIOns gIven In V Table 4 and shown In FIgure 4 of the Traffic Impact AnalYSIS, 11 There currently are four lots and four dwellIngs frontIng the SW 13th Street roadway, WhICh IS a part of the plat of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND /' SECTION The ongInal cul-de-sac was reconfigured Into a "bulb" deSIgn durmg a prevIOus re-plattmg process (ORB 2584, Pg, 479, PBCR) As part of the applIcant's proposed elmunatlOn of the roadway traversmg the project SIte In an east-west dIrectIOn, the applIcant shall create a new cul-de-sac In the "bulb" nght-of-way set aSIde for such a purpose 12 The maIn entrance does not connect to SW 23rd A venue Please correct. / 13 The two (2) gated fire department access pOInts are not acceptable and wIll not be permItted, Staff recommends proVIdIng secondary access VIa SW ~ 13th Street (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 8 C,2 and Ordmance 02-033 _ LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn I,AA) 14 The two (2) dead-end "accessways" are greater than 1 00 feet m length and ~ they WIll reqUIre a proper turn-a-round, ThIS can be eIther a) a cul-de-sac configuratIOn, b) a shunt turn-a-round, c) a 'T' - turn-a-round, or d) a wye turn-a-round, 15 The parla.ng spaces shown up agamst the dwellmg UnIt are labeled as 18.5 / feet (SIte Plan Sheet 1 of 1). WIth no overhang (or walla.ng around room) between the vehIcle and the buildmg, access IS denIed, Increase the parla.ng space length to 20 feet m thIS SItuatIOn, ModIfy the SIte plan accordmgly 16 Staff strongly recommends reconsldenng the locatIOn of the maIlla.osks The proposed locatIons wIll reqUIre reSIdents to stop wlthm the travel way V to drop off or pIck up mall, An alternate locatIOn could be wlthm the mam entry dnveway where It IS recommended that parallel parla.ng spaces be proVIded adjacent to the kIosks to allow for safe parkmg whIle usmg the maIlboxes, 17 Current standards reqUIre 27 feet backup dIstance WIth mmlmum 9 foot by / 18 foot parla.ng stalls (Standard Drawmg B-9800 1) The Engmeenng DIVISIOn will be amendmg thIS standard to requIre a 25 foot backup dIstance WIth a mmlmum 9 Yz foot by 18 Yz foot parla.ng stall and may WIsh to conSIder thIS as an alternatIve to the eXlstmg standard. An adminIstratIve waIver Wlll be necessary to use the new standard. A backup dIstance less than 25 feet will not be allowed, 18 On the site and CivIl olans. show and Identlfv all necessarv traffic control I 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 3 I i DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT devIces such as stop bars, stop SIgnS, double yellow lane separators StrIpIng, /' dIrectIOnal arrows and "Do Not Enter" sIgnage, etc See CIty Standard DrawIngs B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for stnpIng detaIls. 19 The Code reqUIres that street names should not be phonetIcally sImIlar / (LDR, Chapter 5, ArtIcle V, SectIon I,D 8) ObtaIn approval from PolIce and FIre that the subdIvISIOn name, Hampton Court wIll be acceptable when there IS a Hampton Inn already In the CIty (on Gateway Boulevard) UTILITIES Comments. 20 All utIlIty easements shall be shown on the sIte plan and landscape draWIngs (as well as the Water and Sewer Conceptual Plan Sheet) so that we may if determIne WhICh trees may Interfere WIth utilItIes. In general, palm trees WIll be the only tree speCIes allowed WIthIn utilIty easements, Canopy trees may be planted outSIde of the easement so that roots and branches will not Impact those utIlItIes WIthIn the easement In the foreseeable future, The LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 18 1 gIves publIc utIlItIes the authonty to remove any trees that Interfere WIth utIlIty serVIces, eIther In utIlIty easements or publIc nghts-of-way 21 Palm Beach County Health Department permIts WIll be reqUIred for the V water and sewer systems servIng thIS project (CODE, SectIOn 26-12) 22 FIre flow calculatIOns WIll be reqUIred demonstratIng the CIty Code / reqUIrement of 1,500 g,p,m, as stated In the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn 16, or the reqUIrement Imposed by Insurance underwrIters, whIchever IS greater (see CODE, SectIOn 26-16(b)) 23 The CODE, SectIOn 26-34(E) reqUIres that a capacIty reservatIOn fee be / paId for thIS project eIther upon the request for the Department's SIgnature on the Health Department applIcatIOn forms or WIthIn 30 days of SIte plan approval, whIchever occurs first. ThIS fee wIll be determIned based upon final meter SIze, or expected demand, 24 ComprehensIve Plan PolIcy 3 C 3 4 requIres the conservatIOn of potable / water CIty water may not, therefore, be used for lITIgatIOn where other sources are readIly aVailable, I 25 Water and sewer lInes to be owned and operated by the CIty shall be V Included WIthIn utIlIty easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engIneenng draWIngs, USIng a mInImUm Department \Vldth of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedIcated vIa separate Instrument to the CIty as stated In the CODE, SectIOn 26-33(a) /1 26 ThIS office WIll not reqUIre surety for InstallatIOn of the water and sewer V I utIlItIes, on condItIOn that the systems be fully completed, and gIven to the 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 4 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT CIty UtIhtIes Department before the first permanent meter IS set. Note that / settmg of a permanent water meter IS a prereqUISIte to obtammg the CertIficate of Occupancy 27 PVC matenal IS not permitted on the City'S water system, All hnes shall be / DIP 28 The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, SectIOn 16 requires that all pomts on each / bUIldmg be wlthm 200 feet of an eXIstmg or proposed fire hydrant. PortIOns of BUIldmgs #5 and #7 do not appear to meet thIS reqUIrement. Please demonstrate that the plan meets thIS condItIOn, by showmg all eXIstmg and proposed hydrants, 29 Appropnate backflow preventers wIll be reqUIred on the domestIC water / servIce to the bui1dmg, and the fire spnnkler lme If there IS one, m accordance WIth the CODE, SectIOn 26-207 30 A bUIldmg permIt for thIS project shall not be Issued untIl thIS Department / has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer Improvements reqUIred to servIce thIS project, m accordance WIth the CODE, SectIOn 26-15 31 The LDR, Chapter 3, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn 3(P) reqUIres a statement be / mcluded that (other) utIhtIes are avaIlable and will be proVIded by the appropnate agenCIes, ThiS statement IS lackmg on the submitted plans, 32 Show how utIhtIes (water and sewer) are connected to each bUIldmg/umt. / FIRE r 33 A mmlmum 1,500 GPM @ 20 pSI fire flow IS reqUIred, (LDR Chapter 6 / section 16) 34 DeSign documents where underground "vater mams and hydrants are to be ~ / proVided, must demonstrate that they wIll be mstalled, completed, and m service pnor to constructIOn work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) SectIOn 29-23.2 35 Emergency access shall be proVIded at the start of a project and be / mamtamed throughout constructIOn per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, SectIOn 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constmction, Alteration. and Demolition Operations, SectIOn 5-4 3 36 City Ordmance SectIOn 9-6, 3 17-11 reqUIres approved automatIc fire I spnnkler systems throughout all buIldmgs or structures regardless of the type of constructIOn WhICh are three (3) stones or more m height or all bUIldmgs or structures m excess of 30 feet m heIght as measured from fimsh 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 5 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ground floor grade to the undersIde of the topmost roof assembly POLICE Comments, NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments. 37 All comments requmng changes and/or correctlOns to the plans shall be / reflected on all appropnate sheets, 38, Show all eXlstmg utihtles on SI te development plan (LDR, Chapter 4, /' SectlOn 7,A.3) 39 Show proposed SIte hghtmg on the SIte and landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, SectlOn 7,BA) The hghtmg desIgn shall proVIde a mmlmum average / hght level of one foot-candle On the hghtmg plan, specIfy that the hght poles shall WIthstand a 140 MPH wmd load (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectlOn A.1.a and Flonda BUlldmg Code) ProvIde a note that the fixtures shall be operated by photo-electncal control and to remam on untIl 2 00 a,m, (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectlOn A.1.a,) Include pole wmd loadmg, and pole detalls m conformance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectlOn 11, Chapter 23, ArtIcle I, SectlOn 5,B 7 and Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, Sectlon A on the LIghtmg Plan, If possible please provIde photometncs as part of your TRC plan submittals - It IS much eaSIer to Identlfy and correct any defiCIencIes now than whlle you are wmtmg on a permIt. 40, It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to hght / fixtures to ehmmate future shadowmg on the parkmg surface (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, Sectlon A. 1 b) 41 Show SIght tnangles on the landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II, ~ ./ SectlOn 5.H,) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the SIght trIangles along all collector and artenal roadways, 42 IndIcate, by note on the landscape plan, that wlthm the SIght trIangles there /' shall be an unobstructed cross-vIsiblhty at a level between 2,5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II, SectlOn 5,H) 43, The landscape plan scale shall match that of the SIte plan (LDR, Chapter 4, V SectlOn 7.Cl) 44 A five (5) foot WIdth Sidewalk along SW 23rd Avenue IS reqUIred, and shall t// be placed one (1) foot north of the north property lme (LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectlOn lOT, and Chapter 22, ArtIcle I, SectlOn 5) 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 6 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I I 45 Provide an engmeer's cerhficatIOn on the dramage plan as specified m /1 LOR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F,2 I 46 The dramage plan provided does not provide sufficient proposed elevatIOn I ~ mformatIOn for review purposes. Also provide typical sectIOns and/or details of the proposed dry detentIOn area, swales and proposed dram age structures (LOR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7.F 1) 47 Full dramage plans m accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, / SectIOn 5 wlll be reqUlred at the hme of permIttmg, 48 Indicate by note that catch basm and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof / (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, SectIOn 5.A.2 f) 49 Indicate to what standard the project IS to be constructed, If the FOOT /' Standard SpecificatIOns for Road & Bndge ConstructIOn and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 SpecificatIOns are recommended smce they contam both Enghsh and MetrIc umts, 50, ProVide wntten and graphic scales on all sheets, t/ 51 The setbacks for BUlldmgs #1 & #7 as sho\V11 on the Site Plan mdlcate 27 / feet and 25 feet respechvely The CIVil drawmgs sheets reflect 94 feet and ,00 feet respechvely (Sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 4) Please rechfy thiS discrepancy accordmgly 52 An excavatIOn/fill permit will be reqUlred for thiS project. Accordmgly /' cross-sectIOns, whIch extend 25 feet mto the abuttmg propertIes, will be reqUlred, 53 After ConumssIOn approval of the Master Site Plan, the apphcant shall enter / the plat process through the Engmeenng DIVIsIOn. I 54 Show locatIOn of recreatIOn area, dumpsters, mall kIosks, etc on all CIVIl / drawmgs, 55 The site data (Site Plan - Sheet 1 of 1) should mdlcate 2 parkIng spaces for / 66 umts, not 112 56 The project name IS given mcorrectly on the Landscape Development Plans /1 as "The Harbors " Please correct. I 57 Correct spellmg on Item #3 of ClVll Engmeenng cover sheet. ~ I I BUILDING DIVISION I I Comments, 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 7 DEPARTMENTS mCLUDE 58 IndIcate wIthm the sIte data the type of constructlOn of each bUlldmg as defined m Chapter 6 of the 200 I Flonda BUlldmg Code 59 Add a labeled symbol to the sIte plan drawmg that represents and dehneates the path of travel for the accessible route that IS requIred between the accessible parkIng spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each bmldmg, The symbol, reqmred to be mstalled along the path, shall start at the accessible parkmg spaces and termmate at the accessible entrance doors to each bmldmg, The symbol shall represent the locatlOn of the path of travel, not the 10catlOn of the detectable warnmg or other pavement markIngs, The locatlOn of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a dnve/lane area that IS located behmd parked vehIcles, IdentIfy on the plan the WIdth of the accessible route. (Note The mImmum WIdth reqUlred by the code IS forty-four (44) mches) Add text to the drawmg that would mdIcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned m comphance wIth SectlOn 43 (Accessible Route) and 46 (ParkIng and Passenger Loadmg Zones) of the Flonda Accessiblhty Code for Buildmg ConstructlOn, Please note that at tlme of permIt revIew, the apphcant shall provIde detailed documentatlOn on the plans that will venfy that the accessible route IS m complIance wIth the regulatlOns specIfied m the Flonda Accessibihty Code for BUlldmg ConstructlOn. ThIs documentatlOn shall mclude, but not be hmIted to, provIdmg fimsh grade elevatlOns along the path of travel 60 Identlfy wIthm the sIte data the fimsh floor elevatlon (lowest floor elevatlOn) that IS proposed for each buildmg, Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn IS m comphance WIth regulatlOns of the code by addmg specIficatlOns to the SIte data that address the followmg Issues [SectlOn 3107 1.2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 F10nda Bui1dmg Code] a) The desIgn professlOnal-of-record for the project shall add the followmg text to the SIte data, "The proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn _ _ NGVD IS above the hIghest 100-year base flood e1evatlOn apphcable to the bm1dmg SIte, as determmed by the South Flonda Water Management DIStrIct'S surface water management constructlOn development regulatIOns," b) From the FIRM map, Identlfy m the SIte data the tltle of the flood zone that the bmldmg IS located wIthm. Where applIcable, specIfy the base flood elevatlon, If there IS no base flood elevatIOn, mdIcate that on the plans, c) Identlfy the floor elevatlOn that the deSIgn professlOnal has establIshed for the bmldmg wIthm the footpnnt of the bUlldmg that IS shown on the drawmgs tltled SIte plan, floor plan and pavmg/ dramage (clVlI plans) 61 The buildmg plans are not bemg revIewed for comphance WIth the apphcable bmldmg codes, Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout IS conceptual" below the drawmg tltled Floor Plan found on sheets A-2 &A-3 t/' REJECT I /1 / / 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 8 DEPARTMENTS 62 Place a note on the elevatIOn VIew drawmgs mdlcatmg that the wall openmgs and wall constructIOn comply wIth Table 600 of the 2001 Flonda Buddmg Code 63 At tIme ofpenmt reVIew, submIt sIgned and sealed workmg drawmgs of the proposed constructIOn, 64 Add to each bUIldmg that IS depIcted on the SIte plan drawmg a labeled symbol that IdentIfies the locatIOn of the proposed handicap accessible UnIts, Add to the drawmg the calculatIOns that were used to IdentIfy the mInImUm number of reqUIred UnIts Also, state the code sectIOn that IS applIcable to the computatIOns Show and label the same UnIts on the applIcable floor plan drawmgs ComplIance wIth regulatIOns specIfied m the FaIr Housmg Act IS reqUIred (Federal FaIr Housmg Act DesIgn and ConstructIOn ReqUIrements, 24 CFR 100.205) 65 Add to the drawmg the calculatIOns that were used to IdentIfy the mmlmum number of reqUIred handIcap accessible parkmg spaces Also, state the code sectIon that IS applIcable to the computatIOns, 66 Add a labeled symbol to the SIte plan drawmg that represents and delIneates the path of travel for the accessible route that IS reqUIred between the accessible UnIts and the recreatIOnal amenItIes that are provided for the project and other common area elements located at the SIte The symbol shall represent the locatIOn of the path of travel, not the locatIOn of the detectable warnmg or other pavement markmgs reqUIred to be mstalled along the path, The locatIOn of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a dnve/lane area that IS located behmd parked vehIcles IdentIfy on the plan the WIdth of the accessible route (Note' The mmlmum WIdth reqUIred by the Code IS 44 mches) Add text that would mdlcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned m complIance WIth regulatIOns specIfied m the FaIr Housmg Act. Please note that at tIme of permIt reVIew, the applIcant shall provIde detailed documentatIOn on the plans that WIll venfy that the accessible route IS m complIance WIth the regulatIOns specIfied m the Flonda AccessibIlIty Code for BUIldmg ConstructIOn, ThIS documentatIOn shall mclude, but not be lllmted to, provldmg finIsh grade elevatIons along the path of travel 67 Sheets A-2 & A-3 Delete all references to the S,B C 1997 EdItIOn and the SFBC The code m effect IS the 2001 EdItIOn of the Flonda BUIldmg Code 68 The parallel clear floor space for the shower m UnIt 1210 does not comply WIth the Federal Fair Housmg Act GUIdelInes. The clear floor space shall be 30" WIde x 48" deep and shall be clearly dImenSIOned on the plan, The clear floor space must be flush WIth the control wall 69 SubmIt plans for the cabana and recreatIOn area If they are mcluded m thIS SIte plan reVIew INCLUDE t/ , I t/ {/ REJECT v / ~ / / 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 9 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 70 Clearly show complIance wIth Table 500 of the 2001 Flonda BuIldIng Code for allowable area and heIght. 71 Where parkIng IS prOVIded on a multI-famIly bUIldIng sIte, accessible parkIng spaces on an accessible route are reqUIred for resIdents and VISItors A mInImUm of 2% of the parkIng spaces servIng covered dwellIng UnIts must be made accessible and be located on an accessible route Two percent of the parkIng garages provIded for the accessible UnIts shall comply WIth the Federal FaIr HOUSIng Act. PARKS AND RECREATION I Comments, I 72 The plans IndIcate that there will be 66 SIngle famIly attached homes In thIS / development. AccordIng to Chapter I, ArtIcle V, of the Land Development RegulatIOns the formula for SIngle FamIly Attached UnIts IS applIed towards the calculatIOn of the Parks and RecreatIOn FacIlItIes Impact Fee as follows 66 SIngle FamIly Attached UnIts @ $ 771 each = $ 50,886 The fee IS due at the tIme of the first applIcable bUIldIng permIt. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments, 73 The applIcant should IndIcate on the landscape plans the eXIstIng natIve trees that WIll be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the SIte / The tree survey shows 20 Slash PIne trees (total of 440 calIper Inches), 1 Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco Plum plants. ThIS should be IndIcated WIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan. The eXIstIng trees located In the canal nght-of-way should be left on the property to prOVIde an addItIOnal I landscape buffer [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] 74 The apphcant should proVIde an envIronmental assessment of how the / proposed draInage outfall W1llImpact the eXIstIng wadIng bIrd habItat In the I canal [EnVlronnemental RegulatIons, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] I Plant List, Sheet L-l 3 of 3 75 Trees, shrubs / hedges, and groundcover matenals should not be Included If / hsted on the Palm Beach County InVaSIve speCIes hst. [EnVlronnemental I RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle I Sec 19. A, 5 1 !I 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 10 II DEPARTMENTS 76 All trees shown on the landscape plans must be 12 feet-14 feet In heIght and 3 Inches In calIper at tIme of plantIng, [Envlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C, 2 ] 77 The landscape plans do not Include the CIty SIgnature trees at the Ingress / egress locatIOns to the sIte, [Envlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C, 2 ] 78 The Laurel Oak trees should be substItuted wIth another natIve tree specIes more SUItable to the dry sandy soIls on the sIte, Irri2ation System 79 There IS not an lITIgatIOn system deSIgn Included wIth the landscape plans, [EnvIronnementaI. RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,A.] Comments, @ x PLANNING AND ZONING The proposed "outfall #1" may negatIvely Impact the eXIstIng flora and fauna In the Lake Worth DraInage DIstrIct (LWDD) Canal adjacent to the subject property SubmIt an envIronmental assessment to ascertaIn future Impacts, Any dIscharge Into the canal will reqUIre all the necessary permIts from the L WDD /K;, ~ I<e v f' U On the SIte plan tabular data, the area of the proposed reSIdentIal and recreatIOnal land uses (expressed In terms of percentages) IS Incorrect. ThIS must be rectIfied, The HIgh DenSIty ReSIdentIal (HDR) underlYIng land use allows for 108 dwellIng umts per acre but the proposed denSIty IS 14 dwellIng umts per acre, ProVIde wntten JustIficatIOn for the proposed denSIty, whIch e, ce ds the maXImum allowed by the ComprehensIve Plan, -< V ~-tvv\ ...--- PrOVIde a scaled draWIng of the cabana (floor plan and elevatIOn) On the elevatIOns, Include the heIght, extenor dImenSIOns, extenor color, and matenals to be used (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7.D) lAJ t U SI a y s in --l)@'.'elopment Board, and CIty C8Ffl111ISSlOfl, Sho w alNIgnage (entry SIgnS) pn~::::~::l ~~~~'v\ {;:ommIttee ~el4surc COll1pll~ CadU'lt.jt..:- wrll--Ul1tlcrg9 sepmatc reVIew at ~ Pre"188-3 detaIl of the p-;~posed entry Slgn(S), Includ~ the total slgnage area and matenals / colors whIch accurately show the appearance In order to confirm archItectural compatibilIty WIth the bUIldIngs INCLUDE / --'7rLr ~ REJECT v ~ I / t/ / :,/ / / 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 11 II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT A dramage statement IS reqUIred pnor to the Technical RevIew CommIttee meetmg (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F,2 ) 1/ Is thIS to be a gated community? If so, prOVIde elevatIOns of the pnvacy wall The elevatIOns of the pnvacy wall shall mclude the extenor finish and proposed colors, Staff recommends mstalhng a pnvacy wall SIX (6) feet m heIght along the east property lIne, / The entrance (proposed on Golf Road) can be no wIder than 36 feet (Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn H,l) Staff recommends extendmg the landscaped medIan to the property lIne If medIans are extended, conSIder mcorporatIng pedestrIan refuge Islands mto theIr desIgn, J( The proposed backup dIstance (24 feet) and dnve aIsle wIdth IS not permItted, v The proposed "Gated FIre Department Access" must be approved by the FIre Department. 'T A-G\c 'to Utu ~ - 'T )?O) On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 2 of 3", the plant schedule IndIcates 'U that 84 F AK are proVIded but when counted, It adds up to 42 Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIC representatIOn, ~ ,~ ~ \J ~ ../' Q On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 2 of 3", the plant schedule does not mclude the THY but when counted, It adds up to 42 THY Correct the plant schedule so that It mcludes the THY / On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 55 QV are proVIded but when counted, It adds up to 56 QV Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIC representatIOn, ./ On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 38 QL are proVIded but when counted, It adds up to only 39 QL. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIC representatIOn, / On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule IndIcates that 18 SM are prOVIded but when counted, It adds up to 19 SM Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIC representatIOn, / On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule IndIcates that 103 SP are prOVIded but when counted, It adds up to 105 SP Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIC representatIOn, / On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule IndIcates that 810 CHR are prOVIded but when counted, It only adds up to 786 CHR, Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIC representatIOn, J On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 77 F AK are orovIded but when counted. It only adds uo to 65 F AK, t/ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 12 II DEPARTMENTS Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIon, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule IndIcates that 116 PHI are provIded but when counted, It adds up to 158 PHI. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIOn. On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule does not Include the 27 EFO Correct the plant schedule so that It Includes the EFO x The elevatIOn draWIngs shall Include the manufacturer's name and color code Also, on the elevatIOn draWIngs, staff recommends USIng a "color schedule" to IdentIfy each proposed color 1\~ PrOVIde a typIcal draWIng that Includes the heIght and color/matenal of all .7'\ proposed freestandIng outdoor lIghtIng poles, The deSIgn, style, and IllUmInatIOn level shall be compatible wIth the bUIldIng deSIgn (heIght) and shall conSIder safety, functIon, and aesthetIc value (Chapter 9, SectIon 10.F 1 ) Place a note on the SIte plan that all above ground mechamcal eqUIpment such as extenor utIhtyboxes, meters, transformers, and back-flow reventers shall be vIsuall screened Cha ter 9. SectIOn 10 C 4 .1 V Staff recommends screemng the AlC umts wIth eIther landscapIng or a knee ~\ wall. Label the locatIOn of the AlC pads on the SIte plan, The dumpster enclosure shall resemble wIth respect to the color and matenals, the desIgn of the pnncIpal bUIldIngs and shall be Integrated wIth other SIte elements (Chapter 9, SectIOn IO.E.3) On the sIte plan, place a note IndIcatIng thIS reqUIrement. Staff recommends connectIng the Internal SIdewalk to the SIdewalk that WIll be reqUIred along Golf Road, f possible, staff recommends preservIng the Slash pInes. sc S'\Planning\SHARED\VVP\PROJECTS\Hampton Court\NVVSP 02-023\ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc INCLUDE REJECT v / V" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'B '-I l ) e,yt T 0 e_C'::>ctc-tA-: (0 l (, Lt/ 0':::::' 7J . CD ~ c,;-te p~ YA7~ )vC~ . IIJt~ svtu ~ )~CLvpr ~ G) ~,~ o D~ w1~dr MUr JJ4.Q, F" I ~VlA/I~ r~g @ ~ ~ (WVb~ vJl ~ J ~~w~N~ -~~ vvt~ ~ - I 0\.-1- ~~4\,tpCt-L~"'(7 tI @ EjJVlr~ ~;j- [) C~lj1xvQ .xIQ~lkz~_~. @ Lt2~ ~ 3Jv1 ~ 0{4 . (~~ ' a.C47~ ') ED tJw ~(0 t {(' 5 LAN D . t~~~s~I~~~i~~chitecture DESIGN Environmental Consultation SO UTH 561-478-8501 FAX 561-478-5012 2101 Centrepark West Drive Suite 100 West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 January 7, 2003 ill ~@~~\Yl JM~ - 7 {~, J PLANNING AND ZONING DEPT LUCIa Galav CIty of Boynton Beach 100 E Boynton Beach Blvd, Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Response To 1 sl Review Comments for Hampton Court Dear Mrs, Galav' As requested, thIS letter represents the applIcant's response to the TechnIcal RevIew CommIttee (TRC) comments our office receIved on December 16, 2002. The followmg IS a lIst of each of the comments followed by a brIef explanatIOn of how It has been addressed. PrIor to permIt applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742-6200) regardmg the storage and handlIng of refuse The dumpster wIll be supplIed by PublIc Works. The applicant will contact the Public Works Department prior to permit regarding the storage and handling of refuse, 2 IndIcate by note that the SIte dumpster enclosure shall be constructed m accordance wIth CIty Standard A-8807 A note has been added to the site plan stating that the dumpster enclosure will be constructed in accordance with City Standard A-8807 3 A mInImUm dumpster pad IS reqUIred meaSUrIng 10 feet x 10 feet (msIde dImenSIOn mcludmg gates) (LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,J and ArtIcle III, SectIOn 9,A.9,a) The applicant is proposing two dumpster pads on the subject property Both of these pads are 10 feet x 12 feet. 4 ProVIde a mInImUm turnmg radIUs of 60 feet to approach the dumpster ProVIde a mInImUm backmg clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad, (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIon l1.J.2,b) The revised site plan provides a minimum turning radius of 60 feet and a minimum backing distance of 60 feet. 5 The proposed locatIons of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of eXItmg the SIte Alternate locatIons or configuratIons need to be conSIdered. The developer may also WIsh to conSIder use of a compactor m place of dumpster(s) The compactor enclosure shall be constructed m the same manner as a trash enclosure, however the truck access for a compactor IS rear-loadmg as opposed to front-loadmg for trash bms The location of the east dumpster has been revised in order to provide more efficient access The trash will be picked up from each unit by a private company and dumped into the two (2) dumpsters provided on site. The City will then enter the site and have easy access to the two (2) dumpsters 6 The west dumpster locatIon IS too close to the drIveway of the adjacent ACLF, please relocate Upon reviewing the site plan for the ACLF building it was determined that the trash facilities for the ACLF are adjacent to the driveway Therefore the proposed location of the dumpster is consistent with the existing plan to the west, In addition. the applicant is proposing a six (6) foot wall along the western property line and five (5) foot buffer The combination of the dumpster enclosure, wall, and buffer will sufficiently separate the proposed dumpster from the property to the west. 7 Staffbeheves that the trash capacIty provIded may not be adequate for the number ofumts proposed In thIS development. Please consIder the addItIOn of another dumpster or IncreasIng the capacIty of the dumpsters provIded, The two (2) dumpsters provided will be sufficient for the 66 Dwelling units Trash pickup will be scheduled as to provide optimal service, 8 ProvIde a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards RevIew) from Palm Beach County Traffic EngIneerIng for the Traffic Impact Statement prIor to Issuance of a buildIng permIt. Attached to this letter is a letter from PBC Traffic Division identifYing that this project meets the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards 9 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land Development DIVIsIOn, PermIt SectIOn) JUrISdIctIon, All roadway connectIOns must be permItted by them In addItIon to the CIty. CopIes of all reqUIred County permIts will be reqUIred to be proVIded at the tIme of permIttIng, CCL Consultants, Inc, will provide copies of all permits to the City of Boynton Beach as soon as they are obtained. 10 Please correct dIscrepancIes between AM and PM dIstributIons gIven In Table 4 and shown In FIgure 4 of the Traffic Impact AnalYSIS, A revised Table 4 and Figure 4 is attached to this letter 11 There currently are four lots and four dwelhngs frontIng the SW 13th Street roadway, whIch IS a part of the plat of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION The OrIgInal cul-de-sac was reconfigured Into a "bulb" deSIgn durIng a preVIOUS re-plattIng process (ORB 2584, Pg. 479, PBCR). As part of the apphcant's proposed ehmInatIon of the roadway traversIng the project SIte In an east-west dIrectIOn, the a pphcant s hall create anew cul-de-sac In the" bulb" rIght-of-way set aSIde for such a purpose As part of the Land Development process the applicant will create a new cul-de-sac in the "bulb" right-of-way 12 The maIn entrance does not connect to SW 23rd Avenue Please correct. The plan has been revised so that the entrance does connect to SW 23rd Avenue. 13 The two (2) gated fire department access pOInts are not acceptable and will not be permItted, Staff recommends prOVIdIng secondary access VIa SW 13th Street (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 8 C.2 and OrdInance 02-033 - LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIon I.AA) The applicant met with staff regarding both the fire department access points to SW 23rd Avenue and the secondary entrance onto SW 13th Street, At that meeting it was determined that the applicant would provide a secondary Fire/Rescue access only onto SW 13th Street, In addition it was discussed that the two (2) access onto SW 23rd would remain in place so that the Fire Department will have an easy exit when servicing the property 14 The two (2) dead-end "accessways" are greater than 100 feet In length and they will reqUIre a proper turn-a-round. ThIS can be eIther a) a cul-de-sac configuratIOn, b) a shunt turn-a-round, c) a 'T'- turn-a-round, or d) a wye turn-a-round, Hampton Court TRC Page 2 of 14 January 7,2003 In previous discussions with the Fire Department it was determined that the proposed access ways with the grass block onto SW 23rd will provide for sufficient ingress/egress to the site, By providing the accessways the applicant is not required to provide a cul-de-sac, shut turn-a-round, a "T" turnaround, or a Hye turnaround. 15. The parkmg spaces shown up agamst the dwellIng umt are labeled as 18,5 feet (SIte Plan Sheet 1 of 1). With no overhang (or walkmg around room) between the vehIcle and the buildmg, access IS demed. Increase the parkmg space length to 20 feet m thIS SItuatIOn. ModIfy the SIte plan accordmgly The applicant met with staff to discuss the size to the proposed driveways for the site, At that meeting it was determined that the applicant would request an Administrative Waiver to allow the reduced tandem parking area, A required space in the City of Boynton Beach is 9 YJ feet by 18 YJ feet, The applicant will be requesting a Waiver to allow the space to be 8 feet by 18 YJ feet, 16 Staff strongly recommends reconsIdenng the locatIOn of the mail kIosks The proposed locatIOns will reqUIre resIdents to stop wIthm the travel way to drop off or pICk up mall An alternate locatIon could be wIthm the mam entry dnveway where It IS recommended that parallel parkmg spaces be proVIded adjacent to the kIosks to allow for safe parkmg while usmg the mailboxes, The mail kiosks have been relocated to an area that is closer to parking in order to reduce the likely hood of residents blocking the roadway while checking their mail, 17. Current standards reqUIre 27 feet backup dIstance WIth mmImum 9 foot by 18 foot parkmg stalls (Standard Drawmg B-9800 1). The Engmeenng DlVlsIOn will be amendmg thIS standard to reqUIre a 25 foot backup dIstance wIth a m mImum 9 Yz foot by 1 8 Yz foot p arkmg s tall and may wIsh to conSIder thIS as an alternatIve to the eXIstmg standard, An admImstratIve waIver will be necessary to use the new standard, A backup dIstance less than 25 feet will not be allowed, The site plan has been revised to show 25-foot drive isles throughout the community This will provide for the required 25-foot back-up distance, 18 On the SIte and CIvil plans, show and IdentIfy all necessary traffic control deVIces such as stop bars, stop SIgnS, double yellow lane separators strIpmg, dIrectIOnal arrows and "Do Not Enter" sIgnage, etc. See CIty Standard Drawmgs B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for strIpmg details. A "Pavement Markings and Sign age Conceptual Plan" has been provided. 19 The Code reqUIres that street names should not be phonetIcally SImilar (LDR, Chapter 5, ArtIcle V, SectIon I,D 8). Obtam approval from PolIce and FIre that the subdIVISIOn name, Hampton Court WIll be acceptable when there IS a Hampton Inn already m the CIty (on Gateway Boulevard) The applicant submitted a request for street name approval to Lynn Hayes at the City of Boynton Beach, She will review with different agencies to determine if appropriate, 20 All utilIty easements shall be shown on the SIte plan and landscape drawmgs (as well as the Water and Sewer Conceptual Plan Sheet) so that we may determme WhICh trees may mterfere WIth utilItIes, In general, palm trees wIll be the only tree speCIes allowed wIthm utilIty easements, Canopy trees may be planted outSIde of the easement so that roots and branches will not Impact those utilItIes wIthm the easement m the foreseeable future The LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle I, SectIon 18 I gIves publIc utilItIes the authonty to remove any trees that mterfere WIth utilIty servIces, eIther m utilIty easements or publIc nghts-of-way All proposed Water and Sanitary Sewer Easements are shown on the civil engineering plans 21 Palm Beach County Health Department permIts WIll be reqUIred for the water and sewer systems servmg thIS project (CODE, SectIOn 26-12) Hampton Court TRC Page 3 of 14 January 7,2003 CCL Consultants, Inc, will apply for water and sewer permits from Palm Beach Health Department and will provide to the City of Boynton Beach a copy of these permits as soon as they are obtained. 22, FIre flow calculatIOns will be reqUIred demonstratmg the CIty Code reqUIrement of 1,500 g,p,m, as stated m the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIon 16, or the reqUIrement Imposed by msurance underwrIters, whIchever IS greater (see CODE, SectIon 26-16(b)) Fire Flow Calculations will be provided with Final Engineering plan submittal at permit application. 23. The CODE, SectIon 26-34(E) reqUIres that a capacIty reservatIon fee be paId for thIS project eIther upon the request for the Department's SIgnature on the Health Department applIcatIon forms or wlthm 30 days of SIte plan approval, whIchever occurs first. ThIS fee will be determmed based upon final meter SIze, or expected demand, Capacity Reservation Fee will be paid within the given time period, 24 ComprehensIve Plan PolIcy 3 C.3 4 reqUIres the conservatIOn of potable water. CIty water may not, therefore, be used for lITIgatIon where other sources are readily avaIlable City water will not be used for irrigation. 25. Water and sewer lmes to be owned and operated by the CIty shall be mcluded wlthm utilIty easements, Please show all proposed easements on the engmeenng drawmgs, usmg a mmlmum Department WIdth of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedIcated VIa separate mstrument to the CIty as stated m the CODE, SectIon 26-33(a). Water and sanitary sewer easements have been shown on the civil engineering plans 26 ThIS office will not reqUIre surety for mstallatIon of the water and sewer utilItIes, on condItIon that the systems be fully completed, and gIVen to the CIty UtIlItIes Department before the first permanent meter IS set. Note that settmg of a permanent water meter IS a prereqUISIte to obtammg the CertIficate of Occupancy Your comments have been acknowledged. 27. PVC matenalls not permItted on the CIty's water system. Alllmes shall be DIP Water mains have been revised to be DIP instead of pvc 28 The LDR, Chapter 6, ArtICle IV, SectIon 16 reqUIres that all pomts on each buildmg be wlthm 200 feet of an existmg or proposed fire hydrant. PortIons of BUIldings #5 and #7 do not appear to meet thIS reqUIrement. Please demonstrate that the plan meets thIS condItIOn, by showmg all eXlstmg and proposed hydrants, All buildings on their entirety are within 200 feet of a proposed fire hydrant, 29 Appropnate backflow preventers will be reqUIred on the domestIc water servIce to the buildmg, and the fire spnnkler lme If there IS one, m accordance WIth the CODE, SectIon 26-207 Bacliflow preventers have been shown on the civil engineering conceptual plans 30 A bUIldmg permIt for thIS project shall not be Issued until thIS Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer Improvements reqUIred to servIce thIS project, m accordance WIth the CODE, SectIOn 26-15 Your comment has been acknowledged. Hampton Court TRC Page 4 of 14 January 7, 2003 31 The LDR, Chapter 3, ArtIcle N, SectIon 3(P) reqUIres a statement be mcluded that (other) utilItIes are avaIlable and will be provIded by the appropnate agencIes, ThIS statement IS lackmg on the submItted plans. A statement regarding utilities has been added to sheet 4 of 6 of the civil engineering conceptual plans 32, Show how utilItIes (water and sewer) are connected to each buildmg/umt. Water and sewer services to each building has been shown on sheet 4 of 6 of the civil engineering conceptual plans 33. A mlmmum 1,500 GPM @ 20 pSI fire flow IS reqUIred. (LDR Chapter 6 section 16) Your comment has been acknowledged, 34 DeSIgn documents where underground water mams and hydrants are to be proVIded, must demonstrate that they wIll be mstalled, completed, and m servIce pnor to constructIon work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) SectIOn 29-2,3.2 A note has been added to sheet 4 of 6 of the civil engineering conceptual plans which adresses this comment, 35 Emergency access shall be provIded at the start of a project and be mamtamed throughout constructIOn per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, SectIon 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, SectIOn 5-4,3, The applicant will provide access to the site from the start to the finish of the construction process 36 CIty Ordmance SectIOn 9-6, 3 /7-11 reqUIres approved automatIc fire spnnkler systems throughout all buildmgs or structures regardless of the type of constructIOn whIch are three (3) stones or more m heIght or all buildmgs or structures m excess of 30 feet m heIght as measured from fimsh ground floor grade to the underSIde of the topmost roof assembly All buildings on are two (2) stories in height. All buildings will be less than 30-feet in height. 37 All comments requIrIng changes and/or correctIons to the plans shall be reflected on all appropnate sheets, All sheets have been revised to show all changes outlined in this letter 38 Show all eXlstmg utilItIes on SIte development plan (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,A.3) All existing utilities have been identified on the site development plan, 39 Show proposed SIte IIghtmg on the SIte and landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,BA) The IIghtmg deSIgn shall proVIde a mmlmum average lIght level of one foot-candle On the IIghtmg plan, speCIfy that the lIght poles shall WIthstand a 140 MPH wmd load (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIon A,l,a and Flonda BUIldmg Code) ProVIde a note that the fixtures shall be operated by photo-electncal control and to remam on untIl 200 a,m. (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn A.1.a,) Include pole wmd loadmg, and pole details m conformance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectIon 11, Chapter 23, ArtIcle I, SectIon 5,B 7 and Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIon A on the Llghtmg Plan, If possible please prOVIde photometrlcs as part of your TRC plan submIttals - It IS much eaSIer to IdentIfy and correct any defiCIencIes now than while you are waltmg on a permIt. A (vpicallight pole and fixture has been added to the revised site plan. In addition, the apphcant provided the above referenced notes regarding the site lighting A photometric plan will be provided at the time of permit, Hampton Court TRC Page 5 of 14 January 7,2003 40 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to lIght fixtures to elImmate future shadowmg on the parkmg surface (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIon A.I b) The lighting will be installed as to have minimal impact on the landscaping 41 Show SIght trIangles on the landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,H.) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the SIght tnangles along all collector and arterIal roadways The landscape plans have been revised to show sight triangles 42 IndIcate, by note on the landscape plan, that wlthm the SIght trIangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-vIsibilIty at a level between 2,5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II, SectIon 5,H) A note has been added tot he landscape plans stating that there will be an unobstructed c ross- visibility at the level between 2 5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement, 43. The landscape plan scale shall match that of the sIte plan (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIon 7 C.I) As part of the resubmittal package the applicant has included a landscape plan at the same scale, 44 A five (5) foot wIdth sIdewalk along SW 23rd Avenue IS reqUIred, and shall be placed one (1) foot north of the north property Ime (LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectIOn 10.T., and Chapter 22, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5). The site plan and landscape plan has been revised to show a jive foot sidewalk along the south side of SW 23rd Ave, one (1) foot north of the subject property's property line, 45 ProVIde an engmeer's certIficatIon on the dramage plan as speCIfied m LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F,2 An engineer's certificate has been added to the drainage plan, 46 The dramage plan prOVIded does not proVIde suffiCIent proposed elevatIOn mformatIOn for reVIew purposes. Also prOVIde typIcal sectIOns and/or details of the proposed dry detentIOn area, swales and proposed dramage structures (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIon 7,F 1) Additional elevations and details have been included within the civil engineering conceptual plans 47 Full dramage plans m accordance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectIon 5 will be reqUIred at the tIme of permIttmg. Your comment has been acknowledged. 48 IndIcate by note that catch basm and manhole covers shall be bICycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle N, SectIon 5,A.2,f) A note to address this comment has been added on sheet 6 of 6 of the civil engineering conceptual plans 49 IndIcate to what standard the project IS to be constructed, If the FDOT Standard SpeCIficatIOns for Road & BrIdge ConstructIon and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 SpeCIficatIons are recommended smce they contam both EnglIsh and MetrIC umts, A note to address this comment has been added on sheet 6 of 6 of the civil engineering conceptual plans 50 ProVIde wntten and graphIC scales on all sheets The applicant has provided a written and graphic scale on all applicable sheets Hampton Court TRC Page 6 of 14 January 7,2003 51. The setbacks for Buildmgs #1 & #7 as shown on the SIte Plan mdIcate 27 feet and 25 feet respectIvely The cIvil drawmgs sheets reflect 94 feet and 00 feet respectIvely (Sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 4). Please rectIfy thIs dIscrepancy accordmgly The discrepancy between the civil and site plan have been addressed. The setback for building #1 is 27-feet andfor building #7 it is 20-feet. 52 An excavatIon/fill permIt WIll be reqUIred for thIS project. Accordmgly cross-sectIons, whIch extend 25 feet mto the abuttmg propertIes, will be reqUIred, The applicant will apply for all required permits associated with the development of the subject property 53 After CommIssIOn approval of the Master SIte Plan, the applIcant shall enter the plat process through the Engmeenng DIVISIon, The applicant will enter into the plat process after Commission approval, 54. Show locatIOn of recreatIon area, dumpsters, maIl kIOsks, etc on all CIvil drawmgs. The Civil Plans have been revised to show the recreation area, dumpsters, and mail kiosks 55 The SIte data (SIte Plan - Sheet 1 of 1) should mdIcate 2 parkmg spaces for 66 umts, not 112 The parking data has been revised to correctly reflect what the applicant is proposing 56 The project name IS gIven mcorrectly on the Landscape Development Plans as "The Harbors" Please correct. The landscape development plans have been revised to correctly reflect Hampton Court as the property name. 57 Correct spellmg on Item #3 of CIvil Engmeenng cover sheet. The spelling has been corrected on item #3 of the Civil Plans 58. IndIcate wIthm the SIte data the type of constructIon of each buildmg as defined m Chapter 6 of the 2001 Flonda BUIldmg Code, The property will be constricted as Type 6 construction, 59 Add a labeled symbol to the SIte plan drawmg that represents and delmeates the path of travel for the accessible route that IS reqUIred between the accessible parkmg spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each buildmg, The symbol, reqUIred to be Installed along the path, shall start at the accessible parkmg spaces and termmate at the accessible entrance doors to each buildIng, The symbol shall represent the locatIon of the path of travel, not the locatIOn of the detectable warnIng or other pavement markIngs. The locatIon of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel In a dnve/lane area that IS located behInd parked vehIcles IdentIfY on the plan the WIdth of the accessible route (Note' The mInImUm WIdth reqUIred by the code IS forty-four (44) Inches) Add text to the draWIng that would IndIcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned In complIance WIth SectIon 4,3 (Accessible Route) and 46 (ParkIng and Passenger LoadIng Zones) of the Flonda AccessibIltty Code for BUIldIng ConstructIon. Please note that at tIme of permIt reVIew, the appltcant shall proVIde detaIled documentatIon on the plans that will venfy that the accessible route IS In compltance WIth the regulatIOns speCIfied In the Flonda Accessiblltty Code for Buildmg ConstructIon, ThIS documentatIOn shall mclude, but not be lImIted to, prOVIdIng fimsh grade elevatIons along the path of travel An arrow has been added to the plans to identifY the path of travel from the accessible parking spaces to the accessible units Each building has two (2) accessible units There are seven (7) buildings and therefore there are fourteen (14) accessible units The applicant has provided the Hampton Court TRC Page 7 of 14 January 7, 2003 required route to the units All of the sidewalks meet the requirements for an accessible pathway. therefore all buildings are accessible. 60 IdentIfy wlthm the sIte data the fimsh floor elevatIOn (lowest floor elevatIon) that IS proposed for each bUIldmg. Venfy that the proposed elevatIOn IS m complIance wIth regulatIons of the code by addmg speCIficatIOns to the sIte data that address the followmg Issues [SectIon 3107 1,2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 Flonda Buildmg Code] a) The desIgn professIOnal-of-record for the project shall add the followmg text to the sIte data, "The proposed fimsh floor elevatIOn _ _ NGVD IS above the hIghest 100-year base flood elevatIon applIcable to the buildmg sIte, as determmed by the South Flonda Water Management DIStrICt'S surface water management constructIOn development regulatIons," b) From the FIRM map, IdentIfy m the SIte data the tItle of the flood zone that the buildmg IS located wlthm, Where applIcable, speCIfy the base flood elevatIon, If there IS no base flood elevatIon, mdlcate that on the plans, c) IdentIfy the floor elevatIon that the deSIgn profeSSIOnal has establIshed for the bUIldmg wlthm the footpnnt of the buildmg that IS shown on the drawmgs tItled SIte plan, floor plan and pavmg/ dramage (CIvil plans) As requested the required notes have been added to the site plan, 61 The buildmg plans are not bemg reVIewed for complIance WIth the applIcable bUIldmg codes. Therefore, add t he words" Floor plan layout 1 s conceptual" below the drawmg tItled Floor Plan found on sheets A-2 & A-3. The words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" has been added to the architectural plans 62 Place a note on the elevatIon VIew drawmgs mdlcatmg that the wall openmgs and wall constructIon comply WIth Table 600 of the 2001 Flonda Buildmg Code A note has been added to the elevations stating that the wall openings and wall construction will comply with Table 600 of the 2001 Florida Building Code, 63 At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt SIgned and sealed workmg drawmgs of the proposed constructIOn, The applicant will submit signed and sealed working drawings at the time of permit submittal, 64 Add to each buildmg that IS depIcted on the SIte plan drawmg a labeled symbol that IdentIfies the locatIOn of the proposed handIcap accessible umts. Add to the drawmg the calculatIons that were used to IdentIfy the mmlmum number of reqUIred umts, Also, state the code sectIOn that IS applIcable to the computatIOns, Show and label the same umts on the applIcable floor plan drawmgs, ComplIance WIth regulatIons speCIfied m the FaIr Housmg Act IS reqUIred (Federal FaIr Housmg Act DeSIgn and ConstructIon ReqUIrements, 24 CFR 100,205) As previously stated, each building has a total of two accessible units Therefore there are a total of 14 accessible units The entry point to these units h as been identified 0 n t he revised site plan, Notes have been added to the plan identifYing what code section was referenced. 65 Add to the drawmg the calculatIOns that were used to IdentIfy the mmlmum number of reqUIred handIcap accessible parkmg spaces, Also, state the code sectIOn that IS applIcable to the computatIOns, The applicant met with a member of the building department to discuss the required handicap parking It was determined that Section 24 CFR-100 205 requires 2% of the surface parking to be accessible, The applzcant is proposing a total of 90 surface spaces and is therefore required to provide a total of 2 accessible spaces The applzcant is providing for a total of four (4) spaces Hampton Court TRC Page 8 of 14 January 7,2003 66 Add a labeled symbol to the sIte plan drawmg that represents and delIneates the path of travel for the accessible route that IS reqUIred between the accessible umts and the recreatIonal amemtIes that are provIded for the project and other common area elements located at the sIte The symbol shall represent the locatIon of the path of travel, not the locatIon of the detectable warnmg or other pavement markmgs reqUIred to be mstalled along the path, The locatIon of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a drIve/lane area that IS located behmd parked vehIcles, IdentIfy on the plan the wIdth of the accessible route. (Note The mImmum wIdth reqUIred by the Code IS 44 mches) Add text that would mdIcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned m complIance wIth regulatIons specIfied m the FaIr Housmg Act. Please note that at tIme of permIt revIew, the applIcant shall provIde detailed documentatIon on the plans that will verIfy that the accessible route IS m complIance wIth the regulatIons specIfied m the FlorIda AccessibilIty Code for Buildmg ConstructIOn, ThIS documentatIon shall mclude, but not be lImIted to, provIdmg fimsh grade elevatIOns along the path of travel The site plan has been modified to show the path of travel from the accessible units to the proposed recreation areas All of the sidewalks proposed for the subject property are a minimum of 48" in width. Therefore all sidewalks will be accessible, so there are numerous routes to the proposed recreation area, 67 Sheets A-2 & A-3. Delete all references to the S,B C 1997 EdItIon and the SFBC The code m effect IS the 2001 EdItIon of the FlorIda Buildmg Code. The references to the S.B C 1997 edition and the SFBC have been deleted. 68. The parallel clear floor space for the shower m Umt 1210 does not comply WIth the Federal FaIr Housmg Act GUIdelInes. The clear floor space shall be 30" WIde x 48" deep and shall be clearly dImenSIOned on the plan. The clear floor space must be flush WIth the control wall, The plans have been revised to show the required clear floor space, 69. SubmIt plans for the cabana and recreatIon area If they are mcluded m thIS sIte plan reVIew Along with this letter the applicant has included the architectural plans for the cabana. 70 Clearly show complIance WIth Table 500 of the 2001 FlorIda Buildmg Code for allowable area and heIght. The floor plans and elevations have been revised to show compliant with Table 5 00 oft he 2001 Florida Building Code, 71. Where parkmg IS prOVIded on a multi-family buildmg sIte, accessible parking spaces on an accessible route are reqUIred for reSIdents and VISItors A mImmum of 2% of the parkmg spaces servmg covered dwellmg umts must be made accessible and be located on an accessible route. Two percent of the parkmg garages prOVIded for the accessible umts shall comply WIth the Federal FaIr Housmg Act. The applicant has provided a total of four (4) handicap spaces The total number of surface spaces is 156 spaces Two percent of 156 is 3 12 spaces The applicant is providing four (4) so therefore is consistent with the requirement of the Federal Fair Housing Act. 72 The plans mdIcate that there will be 66 smgle famIly attached homes m thIS development. Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, of the Land Development RegulatIons the formula for Smgle FamIly Attached Umts IS applIed towards the calculatIon of the Parks and RecreatIon FaCIlItIes Impact Fee as follows, 66 Smgle FamIly Attached Umts @ $ 771 each = $ 50,886 Hampton Court TRC Page 9 of 14 January 7, 2003 The fee IS due at the tlme of the first apphcable buildmg permIt. The applicant agrees to pay all fees associated with the Development of this property 73 The apphcant should mdlcate on the landscape plans the eXlstmg natlve trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the SIte The tree survey shows 20 Slash Pme trees (total of 440 cahper mches), 1 Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco Plum plants, ThIS should be mdlcated WIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan, The eXlstmg trees located m the canal nght-of-way should be left on the property to prOVIde an addltlonal landscape buffer [Envlronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter. 7.5, ArtIcle II Sec 7.C] The landscape plans have been revised to show a total of 18 trees to be preserved within the LWDD Canal ROW Typically when an applicant submits for permits from LWDD it is a requirement to remove any vegetation within the LWDD canal ROW The applicant is not responsible for what happen outside of the property lines 74 The apphcant should proVIde an envIronmental assessment of how the proposed dramage outfall will Impact the eXlstmg wadmg bIrd habItat m the canal [Envlronnemental. Regulatlons, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C.] Due to the pretreatment of the water prior to discharge, it will not impact the existing wading bird habitat in the canal. The applicant will obtain all required permits in order to construct the outfall to the canal, Plant List. Sheet L-2. 3 of 3 75, Trees, shrubs / hedges, and groundcover matenals should not be mcluded If Itsted on the Palm Beach County mvasIve speCIes Itst. [EnVlronnemental. Regulatlons, Chapter. 7.5, ArtIcle I Sec 19, A,S] All invasive species have been removed from the revised landscape plans 76 All trees shown on the landscape plans must be 12 feet-14 feet m heIght and 3 mches m caItper at tlme ofplantmg, [Envlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C, 2 ] A note was added to the plant detail on the revised landscape plans 77 The landscape plans do not mclude the CIty SIgnature trees at the mgress / egress locatlons to the SIte. [EnVlronnemental. Regulatlons, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C,2,] The landscape plans have been revised to show yellow elders at the entrance to the community 78 The Laurel Oak trees should be substltuted WIth another natlve tree speCIes more smtable to the dry sandy soils on the SIte. The Laurel Oaks were replaced with Red Bays on the revised landscape plans 79. There IS not an Imgatlon system deSIgn mcluded WIth the landscape plans. [Envlronnemental. Regulatlons, Chapter. 7.5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,A.] The applicant will provide an irrigation plan at the time of permit, 80 The proposed "outfall #1" may negatlvely Impact the eXlstmg flora and fauna m the Lake Worth Dramage DIStnCt (LWDD) Canal adjacent to the subject property SubmIt an envIronmental assessment to ascertam future Impacts. Any dIscharge mto the canal will reqmre all the necessary permIts from the L WDD The proposed outfall into the LWDD canal will have little to no effect on the surroundingjlora and fauna. The applicant will obtain all required permits for outfall to the L WDD canal, Hampton Court TRC Page 10 of 14 January 7, 2003 81 On the sIte plan tabular data, the area of the proposed resIdentIal and recreatIonal land uses (expressed m terms of percentages) IS mcorrect. ThIS must be rectIfied, The site plan has been revised to correctly state the percentages of land for recreation and residential, 82 The HIgh DenSIty ReSIdentIal (HDR) underlymg land use allows for 10 8 dwellIng umts per acre but the proposed denSIty IS 14 dwellIng umts per acre ProvIde wnttenJustIficatIon for the proposed denSIty, whIch exceeds the maXImum allowed by the ComprehensIve Plan. Please find attached a justification regarding the request for a density higher then 10 8 dwelling units per acre based on information contained in the Comprehensive Plan, 83 ProVIde a scaled drawmg of the cabana (floor plan and elevatIOn). On the elevatIons, mclude the heIght, exterIor dImenSIons, exterIor color, and matenals to be used (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,D ). Along with the revised architecturals, the applicant has included a scaled drawing of the proposed Cabana, The Cabana will follow the same color scheme as the proposed residential buildings 84 All sIgnage IS subject to reVIew and approval by staff, the Planmng & Development Board, and CIty CommISSIon, Show all sIgnage (entry SIgnS) prIor to Techmcal ReVIew CommIttee to ensure complIance WIth Code or It will undergo separate reVIew at a later tIme. ProVIde a detaIl of the proposed entry SIgn(S), mcludmg the total sIgnage area and materIals / colors WhICh accurately show the appearance m order to confirm archItectural compatibilIty WIth the buildmgs, A detail of the proposed signage has been included on the revised site plan, The total sign face is 64 square feet. The sign face will be Blue with Gold letters The sign will be stucco 85. A dramage statement Isreqmred prIor to the Techmcal ReVIew CommIttee meetmg (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7 ,F.2 ) The applicant previously submitted a drainage statement for the subject property A copy of this drainage statement is attached to this letter 86 Is thIS to be a gated commumty? If so, prOVIde elevatIons of the prIvacy wall, The elevatIons of the prIvacy wall shall mclude the exterIor fimsh and proposed colors, Staff recommends mstallmg a prIvacy wall SIX (6) feet m heIght along the east property lme. The subject property will be gated. The revised landscape plans show an elevation of the proposed panel wall, In addition please find attached to this letter a color chip for the proposed wall. The proposed color is Sherwin Williams Harvest Moon (SW 1366) The wall will be installed along the west, north, and east property lines 87 The entrance (proposed on Golf Road) can be no WIder than 36 feet (Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIon H.1) Staff recommends extendmg t he landscaped medIan tot he property I me I f medIans are extended, conSIder mcorporatmg pedestnan refuge Islands mto theIr deSIgn. The Boynton Beach Code states that the entrance is required to be 36-feet unless approved by the Engineering Division, Our office met with the Engineering Division and it was determined that the proposed opening is appropriate due to the configuration of the gated entrance, Reducing the entrance to 36-feet would cause awkward turning movements at the entrance to the site, 88 The proposed backup dIstance (24 feet) and drIve aIsle WIdth IS not permItted, The drive isles have been revised to reflect a backup distance of 25 feet, 89 The proposed "Gated FIre Department Access" must be approved by the FIre Department. Hampton Court TRC Page 11 of14 January 7,2003 Our office contacted the Fire Department and it has been determined that the proposed access points are acceptable for exit only The access points will be stabilized with grass block in order to provide for a stabilized ground for the fire department 90, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 2 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 84 F AK are provIded but when counted, It adds up to 42 Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIOn, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 91 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 2 of 3", the plant schedule does not mclude the THY but when counted, It adds up to 42 THY Correct the plant schedule so that It mcludes the THY The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 92, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 55 QV are provIded but when counted, It adds up to 56 QV. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIOn. The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 93, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdICates that 38 QL are provIded but when counted, 1 t adds up too nly 3 9 Q L. Correct the plant schedule sot hat 1 t matches the graphIc representatIon, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 94 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 18 SM are provIded but when counted, It adds up to 19 SM. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIon, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 95 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 103 SP are provIded but when counted, It adds up to 105 SP Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIOn, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 96, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdICates that 810 CHR are provIded but when counted, It only adds up to 786 C HR. Correct the plant schedule so that 1 t matches the graphIc representatIon, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 97 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 77 F AK are provIded but when counted, It only adds up to 65 F AK, Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIon, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 98 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 116 PHI are provIded but when counted, It adds up to 158 PHI. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphIc representatIOn, The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number 99 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", t he plant schedule does not mclude the 27 EFO Correct the plant schedule so that It mcludes the EFO The landscape plans have been revised to reflect the correct number Hampton Court TRC Page 12 of 14 January 7,2003 100 The elevatIOn drawmgs shall mclude the manufacturer's name and color code Also, on the elevatlOn drawmgs, staff recommends usmg a "color schedule" to IdentIfy each proposed color Please find attached to the front of each of the Architectural's a color schedule for each of the buildings The color's are as follows First & Second Floor Body - Sherwin Williams. SW 2044, Bedouin BeIge Accents (Shutters, Entry Doors) - Sherwin Williams. SW 2378, Ocatillo All Smooth Stucco Bands - Sherwin Williams. SW 2448, Summer White 101. ProVIde a typIcal drawmg that mcludes the heIght and color/materIal of all proposed freestandmg outdoor lIghtmg poles. The deSIgn, style, and illummatlOn level shall be compatible WIth the buildmg deSIgn (heIght) and shall consIder safety, functIon, and aesthetIc value (Chapter 9, SectIon 10,F 1) A lighting detail has been added to the revised site plan, The exact location of the lighting will be determined prior to building permit. The proposed lighting will not exceed the City's requirements for "spill over" lighting onto adjacent properties 1 02 Place a note on the SIte plan that all above ground mechamcal eqUIpment such as exterIor utilIty boxes, meters, transformers, and back-flow preventers shall be vIsually screened (Chapter 9, SectIon 10.C 4.). A note has been added to the site plan stating that all above ground mechanical equipment will be visually screened. 103 Staff recommends screemng the AlC umts WIth eIther landscapmg or a knee wall Label the locatIon of the AlC pads on the SIte plan, The location of the AIC pads has been identified on the revised site plan, In addition the landscape plans show a landscape hedge around the Ale units 104 The dumpster enclosure shall resemble WIth respect to the color and materIals, the deSIgn of the prIncIpal buildmgs and shall be mtegrated WIth other SIte elements (Chapter 9, SectlOn lO,E,3) On the SIte plan, place a note mdICatmg thIS reqUIrement. The dumpster enclosure will resemble the proposed buildings in both design and color The enclosure will be cinder block construction with a stucco finish. The proposed color is Sherwin Williams Harvest Moon (SW 1366). 105 Staff recommends connectmg the mternal SIdewalk to the SIdewalk that will be reqUIred along Golf Road, The site plan shows a four (4) foot sidewalk that runs along the east side of the entrance. This sidewalk connects the internal sidewalk to the proposed sidewalk along Golf Road. 106 If possible, staff recommends preservmg the Slash pmes, Due to the layout of the site and the location of the existing pines on site it is not possible to preserve many of the slash pines on site, There are several pines located within the L WDD canal easement. The preservation of these trees is up to the LWDD We hope thIS letter suffiCIently addressed all of your comments regardmg the Hampton Court PUD proJect. If so, It IS our understandmg that thIS project will go before the Plannmg and Development Board on January 28, 2003 and contmue to the CIty CommIsslOn on February 4, 2003 Please contact our office IS thIS IS not the case Hampton Court TRC Page 13 of 14 January 7,2003 We look forward to workmg wIth you on the remamder of the approval process for thIS project. If you have any questIOns about thIS letter, or the project m general, please do not hesItate m contactmg our office Smcerely, Land Des~n South ld6 I'=. Semor Project Manger cc. Bob Bentz Kevm Borkenhagen MIchael Wemer Brandy IgleSIas Enclosures - Traffic MaterIals, Dramage Statement, DensIty JustIficatIon N'\AdminCM\Cindy\Letters\Brad C\L Galav Hampton Court 1st Review Response.doc File #. 389.57C Hampton Court TRC Page 14 of 14 January 7, 2003 i . 'I 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan Project name Hampton Court FIle number' NWSP 02-023 Reference' 1 S(revlew plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan wIth a November 20,2002 PlannIng and ZonIng Department date stamp markmg I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. I PrIor to permIt applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- t 1 t''"'' 6200) regardIng the storage and handlIng of refuse The dumpster wIll be " \ 11'".: supplIed by PublIc Works, 2 IndIcate by note that the sIte dumpster enclosure shall be constructed m ;'" 'L ,I, i accordance WIth CIty Standard A-8807 3 A mInImum dumpster pad IS reqUIred measurIng 10 feet x 10 feet (mslde , - , . dImenSIOn mcludIng gates) (LDR, Chapter 75, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,J and ArtIcle III, SectIOn 9.A.9,a) 4 PrOVIde a mInImUm turnmg radIUS of 60 feet to approach the dumpster I. i,Jr'l, ProVIde a mmlmum backmg clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front 1. edge of the dumpster pad, (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIOn ll,J,2 b) 5 The proposed locatIOns of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east l..~ enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of . ., eXltmg the SIte, Alternate locatIOns or configuratIOns need to be conSIdered, \ The developer may also WIsh to conSIder use of a compactor m place of dumpster(s) The compactor enclosure shall be constructed m the same manner as a trash enclosure; however the truck access for a compactor IS rear-loadmg as opposed to front-Ioadmg for trash bInS, 6 The west dumpster locatIOn IS too close to the drIveway of the adjacent I, .. ,. . . ACLF, please relocate, 7 Staff belIeves that the trash capacIty proVIded may not be adequate for the I: '"' , number of umts proposed m thIS development. Please conSIder the addItIOn of another dumpster or mcreasIng the capacIty of the dumpsters proVIded. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments, ProVIde a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards ReVIew) . " ~ 8 ~. '--'" from Palm Beach County Traffic EngmeerIng for the Traffic Impact Statement prIor to Issuance of a buIldmg permIt. I 9 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land I 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 2 II DEPARTMENTS Development DlVlsIOn, PermIt Sectron) junsdlctIOn, All roadway connectIOns must be permItted by them In addItIOn to the CIty CopIes of all reqUIred County permIts will be reqUIred to be provIded at the tIme of permItting. 10 Please correct dIscrepancIes between AM and PM dIstributIOns gIven In Table 4 and shown In FIgure 4 of the Traffic Impact AnalysIS, 11 There currently are four lots and four dwellings fronting the SW 13th Street roadway, WhICh IS a part of the plat of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION, The ongrnal cul-de-sac was reconfigured Into a "bulb" deSIgn dunng a prevIOUS re-plattIng process (ORB 2584, Pg, 479, PBCR) As part of the apphcant's proposed ehmmatIOn of the roadway traversing the project SIte In an east-west dlrectron, the apphcant shall create a new eul-de-sac tn the "bulb" Hght-Qf-way-6etaSHJe for such a purpose, , :'. 'i ' : ,I (v, 12 The main entrance does not connect to SW 23rd Avenue Please correct. 13 The two (2) gated fire department access pOints are not acceptable and WIll not be permItted, Staff recommends prOVIding secondary access VIa SW 13th Street (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 8 C.2 and Ordinance 02-033 _ LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn I,AA) \.....~ '\./rl.:: '\ ,I'{ ,'". "", .... \ 14 The two (2) dead-end "accessways" are greater than 100 feet In length and they WIll reqUIre a proper turn-a-round, ThIS can be eIther a) a cul-de-sac configuratIOn, b) a shunt turn-a-round, c) a 'T' - turn-a-round, or d) a wye turn-a-round. J , '" . . i 1 15 The parkmg spaces shown up against the dwelling Ulllt are labeled as 18,5 feet (SIte Plan Sheet 1 of 1) WIth no overhang (or walkmg around room) between the vehIcle and the bUIlding, access IS dellled. Increase the parking space length to 20 feet In thIS SItuatIOn. ModIfy the SIte plan accordingly 16 Staff strongly recommends reconsldenng the locatIOn of the maIllaosks. The proposed locatIOns WIll reqUIre reSIdents to stop WIthin the travel way to drop off or pIck up mall An alternate locatIOn could be wlthm the main entry dnveway where It IS recommended that parallel parking spaces be proVIded adjacent to the kIOsks to allow for safe parlang whIle USing the mailboxes, 17 Current standards reqUIre 27 feet backup dIstance WIth nulllmum 9 foot by 18 foot parlang stalls (Standard DraWing B-9800 1) The EngIneenng DIVISIOn will be amending thIS standard to reqUIre a 25 foot backup dIstance WIth a mIlllmum 9 Yz foot by 18 Yz foot parlang stall and may WIsh to conSIder thIS as an alternatrve to the eXIsting standard, An admInlstratrve warver WIll be necessary to use the new standard, A backup dIstance less than 25 feet will not be allowed. 18 On the site and CIvIl olans, show and IdentlN all necessarv traffic control INCLUDE REJECT ~y. \ 1/ f~. l...-, ~ , ...: '; ;':..,- ..::;.., r~ ~l,~... . , .. i ./ \ '.",,\ + '6 i'"' , - . . I ~ ., ~, ~ 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 3 I II REJECT i DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE I devIces such as stop bars, stop SIgnS, double yellow lane separators stnpmg, .06 .. ,t-. dIrectIOnal arrows and "Do Not Enter" sIgnage, etc See CIty Standard ' . Drawmgs B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for stnpmg detarls. 19 The Code requIres that street names should not be phonetIcally sImIlar ' .~ '. (LDR, Chapter 5, ArtIcle V, SectIOn l.D 8) Obtam approval from PolIce and FIre that the subdIvIsIOn name, Hampton Court wIll be acceptable when there IS a Hampton Inn already m the CIty (on Gateway Boulevard) UTILITIES Comments, 20 All utIlIty easements shall be shown on the SIte plan and landscape drawmgs (as well as the Water and Sewer Conceptual Plan Sheet) so that we may determme whIch trees may mterfere wIth utIlItIes, In general, palm trees WIll be the only tree specIes allowed wlthm utIlIty easements, Canopy trees may be planted outsIde of the easement so that roots and branches WIll not Impact those utIlItIes wlthm the easement m the foreseeable future, The LDR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 18 1 gIves publIc UtIlItIes the authonty to remove any trees that mterfere wIth utIlIty servIces, eIther m utIlIty easements or publIc nghts-of-way 21 Palm Beach County Health Department permIts WIll be reqUIred for the water and sewer systems servmg thIS project (CODE, SectIOn 26-12) 22 FIre flow calculatIOns will be reqUIred demonstratmg the CIty Code reqUIrement of 1,500 g,p,m. as stated m the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn 16, or the reqUIrement Imposed by msurance underwrIters, whIchever IS greater (see CODE, SectIOn 26-16(b)) 23 The CODE, SectIon 26-34(E) reqUIres that a capacIty reservatIOn fee be paId for thIS project eIther upon the request for the Department's SIgnature on the Health Department applIcatIOn forms or wlthm 30 days of SIte plan approval, whIchever occurs first. ThIS fee WIll be determmed based upon final meter SIze, or expected demand, 24 ComprehensIve Plan PolIcy 3 C.3 4 reqUIres the conservatIOn of potable water CIty water may not, therefore, be used for lITIgatIOn where other sources are readIly available, 25 Water and sewer lmes to be owned and operated by the CIty shall be mcluded wIthm utIlIty easements, Please show all proposed easements on the engmeenng drawmgs, usmg a mmImum Department WIdth of 12 feet. i The easements shall be dedIcated Via separate mstrument to the CIty as I stated m the CODE, SectIon 26-33(a) I 26 ThIS office WIll not reqUIre surety for mstallatIOn of the water and sewer I I utIlItIes, on condItIon that the systems be fully completed, and gIVen to the 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 5 II I I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ground floor grade to the undersIde of the topmost roof assembly I i POLICE r I Comments NONE I I ENGINEERING DIVISION I Comments, I l .. 37 All comments requIrIng changes and/or correctIOns to the plans shall be I- !.IJ \ , reflected on all appropnate sheets, 38 Show all eXIstIng utIlItIes on sIte development plan (LDR, Chapter 4, -J" I \ . SectIOn 7,A3) 39 Show proposed sIte lIghtIng on the sIte and landscape plans (LDR, Chapter - 4, SectIOn 7,B 4 ) The lIghtIng desIgn shall prOVIde a mInImUm average I. .. \ ~ lIght level of one foot-candle, On the lIghtIng plan, speCIfy that the lIght poles shall wIthstand a 140 MPH WInd load (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn Al.a and Flonda BuildIng Code) PrOVIde a note that the fixtures shall be operated by photo-electncal control and to remaIn on untIl 2 00 a.m, (LDR, Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn A1.a,) Include pole WInd loadIng, and pole details In conformance wIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn 11, Chapter 23, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5.B 7 and Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn A on the LIghtIng Plan, If possible please prOVIde photometncs as part of your TRC plan submIttals - It IS much eaSIer to IdentIfy and correct any defiCIencIes now than whIle you are waItIng on a permIt. 40 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to lIght t~ -or fixtures to eIurunate future shadowIng on the parkmg surface (LDR, I Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, SectIOn Al b) 41 Show sIght tnangles on the landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II, 7 ;r r :1 . . SectIOn 5 ,H.) Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sIght trIangles along all collector and artenal roadways, 42 IndIcate, by note on the landscape plan, that wIthIn the sIght trIangles there ~ . shall be an unobstructed cross-vIsibIlIty at a level between 2,5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5 H) 43 The landscape plan scale shall match that of the SIte plan (LDR, Chapter 4, ! , i . SectIOn 7 C 1) 44 A five (5) foot WIdth SIdewalk along SW 23rd Avenue IS reqUIred, and shall . be placed one (1) foot north of the north property lIne (LDR, Chapter 6, I ArtIcle IV, SectIOn lOT, and Chapter 22, ArtIcle I, SectIOn 5) I 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 6 I II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I 45 ProvIde an engmeer's certIficatIOn on the dramage plan as specIfied m ~ ;"r,. '.. LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7.F,2 , 46 The dramage plan provIded does not provide sufficIent proposed elevatIOn t:_ ) t/,~ mformatIOn for reVIew purposes, Also provIde typIcal sectIOns and/or detaIls of the proposed dry detentIOn area, swales and proposed dram age structures (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7.F 1) 47 Full dramage plans m accordance wIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, ll..i , .' f SectIOn 5 wIll be requIred at the tIme of permIttmg. \ " 48 IndIcate by note that catch basm and manhole covers shall be bIcycle proof .. \ (LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn 5,A,2 t) 49 IndIcate to what standard the project IS to be constructed, If the FDOT . -. Standard SpecIficatIOns for Road & Bndge ConstructIOn and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 SpecIficatIOns are recommended smce they contam both Enghsh and MetrIc umts. 50 ProvIde wntten and graphIC scales on all sheets, , .r' . , 'I ~ 51 The setbacks for BUIldmgs #1 & #7 as shown on the SIte Plan mdlcate 27 -, feet and 25 feet respectIvely The CIVIl drawmgs sheets reflect 94 feet and " ; : . ' 00 feet respectIvely (Sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 4) Please rectIfy thIS dIscrepancy accordmgly 52 An excavatIOn/fill permIt will be reqUIred for t1115 project. Accordmgly l'/~ . cross-sectIOns, whIch extend 25 feet mto the abuttmg propertIes, \vIll be , reqUIred, I 53 After ConumssIOn approval of the Master SIte Plan, the applIcant shaIl enter [ ", . the plat process through the Engmeenng DIVIsIOn. I 54 Show locatIOn of recreatIOn area, dumpsters, mall kIosks, etc on all CIVIl r/~ \ ! drawmgs, \ 55 The SIte data (SIte Plan - Sheet I of 1) should mdlcate 2 parkmg spaces for b'''- . I 66 umts, not 112 56 The project name IS gIven mcorrectly on the Landscape Development Plans '( ; . .,:. as "The Harbors" Please correct. , , Correct spellmg on Item #3 of ClVlI Engmeenng cover sheet. Ii,. 57 '...... \ BUILDING DIVISION Comments, ., y. , , , / 1 st REVIE\V COMMENTS New Site Plan ./ '- ~/ .- I , .'>, J ( ,j" Project name Hampton Court FIle number' NWSP 02-023 Reference 1 S(revlew plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan wIth a November 20,2002 Plannmg and Zonmg Department date stamp markmg, II I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments. 1 PrIor to permIt applIcatIon contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- I 6200) regardIng the storage and handlIng of refuse The dumpster wIll be supplIed by PublIc Works, 2 IndIcate by note that the sIte dumpster enclosure shaH be constructed In accordance wIth CIty Standard A-8807 3 A mInImum dumpster pad IS reqUIred measurIng 10 feet x 10 feet (InSIde dImenSIOn IncludIng gates) (LDR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,J and ArtIcle III, SectIOn 9,A,9 a) 4 ProVIde a mInImUm turnIng radIUs of 60 feet to approach the dumpster ProVIde a mInImum backIng clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad, (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIOn II,J.2 b) 5 The proposed locatIOns of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east enclosure, do not aHow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of eXItIng the SIte. Alternate locatIOns or configuratIOns need to be consIdered, The developer may also wIsh to consIder use of a compactor In place of dumpster( s) The compactor enclosure shaH be constructed In the same manner as a trash enclosure; however the truck access for a compactor IS rear-loadIng as opposed to front-loadIng for trash bInS. 6 The west dumpster locatIOn IS too close to the drIveway of the adjacent ACLF, please relocate, 7 Staff belIeves that the trash capacIty proVIded may not be adequate for the number of UnIts proposed In thIS development. Please consIder the addItIOn of another dumpster or IncreasIng the capacIty of the dumpsters proVIded. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments, 8 ProVIde a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards ReVIew) from Palm Beach County Traffic EngIneerIng for the Traffic Impact Statement prIor to Issuance of a buIldIng permIt. 9 SW 23rd A venue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land II .... ~ ....... 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 2 I I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I Development DlVlslOn, PermIt SectIOn) junsdlctlOn, All roadway connectIons must be permItted by them In addItIOn to the CIty CopIes of all reqUIred County permIts WIll be reqUIred to be provIded at the tIme of I permIttIng. i 10 Please correct dIscrepancIes between AM and PM dIstributIOns gIven m I Table 4 and shown In FIgure 4 of the Traffic Impact AnalYSIS, I II There currently are four lots and four dwellmgs frontIng the SW 13th Street roadway, whIch IS a part of the plat of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION The ongInal cul-de-sac was reconfigured Into a "bulb" deSIgn dunng a prevIOus re-p1attIng process (ORB 2584, Pg, 479, PBCR) As part of the applIcant's proposed elImInatIOn of the roadway traversIng the project sIte In an east-west dlrectlOn, the applIcant shall create a new cul-de-sac In the "bulb" nght-of-way set aSIde for such a purpose. 12 The maIn entrance does not connect to SW 23rd A venue Please correct. 13 The two (2) gated fire department access pOInts are not acceptable and will not be permItted, Staff recommends proVIdIng secondary access vIa SW 13th Street (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 8,C.2 and OrdInance 02-033 - LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectlOn 1.A.4) 14 The two (2) dead-end "accessways" are greater than 1 00 feet In length and they WIll reqUIre a proper turn-a-round, ThIs can be eIther a) a cul-de-sac configuratIOn, b) a shunt turn-a-round, c) a 'T'- turn-a-round, or d) a wye turn-a-round. 15 The parla.ng spaces shown up agaInst the dwellIng UnIt are labeled as 18 5 I feet (SIte Plan Sheet 1 of 1) WIth no overhang (or walla.ng around room) between the vehIcle and the bUIldIng, access IS denIed. Increase the parla.ng space length to 20 feet In thIS SItuatIOn, ModIfy the sIte plan accordIngly 16 Staff strongly recommends reconsIderIng the locatIOn of the maIlla.osks, The proposed 10catlOns WIll requIre reSIdents to stop WIthIn the travel way to drop off or pIck up mall, An alternate locatIOn could be WIthIn the maIn entry dnveway where It IS recommended that parallel parla.ng spaces be proVIded adjacent to the klOsks to allow for safe parkIng whIle USIng the mailboxes. 17 Current standards reqUIre 27 feet backup dIstance WIth rrunImum 9 foot by 18 foot parla.ng stalls (Standard DraWIng B-9800 1) The EngIneenng DIVISIOn wIll be amendIng thIS standard to requIre a 25 foot backup dIstance WIth a mInImum 9 12 foot by 18 Yz foot parla.ng stall and may WIsh to conSIder thIS as an alternatIve to the eXIstIng standard, An admInIstratIve waIver WIll be necessary to use the new standard, A backup dIstance less than 25 feet WIll not be allowed, 18 On the SIte and CIvil olans. show and Identify all necessary traffic control o 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan o /et VI (01 ,/1;l ,;~ ProJ ect name Hampton Court FIle number' NWSP 02-023 Reference' 1 strevIew plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan Department date stam12 markIng wIth a November 20,2002 Planning and Zonmg DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I PUBLIC WORKS - General I i Comments, 1 PrIor to permIt applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- 6200) regardmg the storage and handlIng of refuse The dumpster WIll be supplIed by PublIc Works. 2 IndIcate by note that the SIte dumpster enclosure shall be constructed m accordance wIth CIty Standard A-SS07 3 A mInimUm dumpster pad IS reqUIred measurIng 10 feet x 10 feet (msIde dImensIOn mcludmg gates), (LOR, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5.1 and ArtIcle III, SectIOn 9,A,9,a) I 4 ProVIde a mmImum turnmg radIUS of 60 feet to approach the dumpster ProvIde a mInimUm backmg clearance of 60 feet (measured from the iront edge of the dumpster pad, (LOR, Chapter 2, SectIOn 11,J,2 b), 5 The proposed locatIOns of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of eXItmg the SIte, Alternate locatIOns or configuratIOns need to be consIdered. The developer may also WIsh to consIder use of a compactor m place of dumpster(s) The compactor enclosure shall be constructed m the same manner as a trash enclosure; however the truck access for a compactor IS rear-Ioadmg as opposed to front-Ioadmg for trash bms, 6 The west dumpster locatIOn IS too close to the drIveway of the adjacent ACLF, please relocate, 7 Staff belIeves that the trash capaCIty prOVIded may not be adequate for the number of Units proposed m thIS development. Please conSIder the addItIon of another dumpster or mcreasmg the capaCIty of the dumpsters prOVIded. I PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic , Comments, I 8 PrOVIde a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards ReVIew) from Palm Beach County Traffic EngmeerIng for the Traffic Impact Statement prIor to Issuance of a buIldmg permIt. 9 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land \.. , o 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 4 DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT City Utlhtles Department before the first permanent meter IS set. Note that settmg of a permanent water meter IS a prereqUlslte to obtammg the Certificate of Occupancy 27 PYC matenal IS not permitted on the City'S water system. Alllmes shall be DIP 28 The LDR, Chapter 6, Artlcle IV, SectlOn 16 requires that all pomts on each bmldmg be wlthm 200 feet of an eXlstmg or proposed fire hydrant. Portlons ofBmldmgs #5 and #7 do not appear to meet thiS reqmrement. Please demonstrate that the plan meets thiS condltlOn, by showmg all eXlstmg and proposed hydrants, 29 Appropnate backflow preventers Will be reqmred on the domestlc water service to the bmldmg, and the fire sprmkler lme If there IS one, m accordance with the CODE, SectlOn 26-207 30 A bmldmg permit for thiS project shall not be Issued untll thiS Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer Improvements reqmred to semce thiS project, m accordance with the CODE, SectlOn 26-15 31. The LDR, Chapter 3, ArtICle IV, SectlOn 3(P) reqmres a statement be mcluded that (other) utlhtles are avallable and Will be proVided by the appropnate agencies, ThiS statement IS lackmg on the submitted plans 32, Show how utlhtles (water and sewer) are connected to each bmldmglumt. FIRE - ,J'T i')':' 33 A mmlmum 1,500 GPM @ 20 pSI fire flow IS reqmred. (LDR Chapter 6 p~ / section 16) 34 DeSign documents where underground water mams and hydrants are to be 'Ie6G proVided, must demonstrate that they Will be mstalled, completed, and m V service pnor to constructlOn work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) SectlOn 29-2,3,2 35 Emergency access shall be prOVided at the start of a project and be ~ mamtamed throughout constructlOn per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, SectlOn 3-5, and NFP A 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constnlctioll, Alteratloll, and Demolition Operations, SectlOn 5-4 3 36 CIty Ordmance SectlOn 9-6, 3 17-11 reqmres approved automatic fire ,,/" // spnnkler systems throughout all bulldmgs or structures regardless of the ,,/ type of constructlOn which are three (3) stones or more m height or all bmldmgs or structures m excess of 30 feet m height as measured from fimsh I Project name Hampton Court FIle number' NWSP 02-023 Reference 1 sl reVIew plans IdentIfied as a New SIte Plan Department date stamp markIng, wIth a November 20, 2002 ~ lA/G::>. ,ilA~~ fO-Vvr~;;> JJ { ~tll [TI c:rIvfS lh ~~~ 0~ ..., and Zonmg it 1st REVIEW COMMENTS New Site Plan DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General I Comments, I I 1 Pnor to permIt applIcatIOn contact the PublIc Works Department (561-742- 6200) regardmg the storage and handlmg of refuse The dumpster wIll be supplIed by PublIc Works, 2 IndIcate by note that the sIte dumpster enclosure shall be constructed m accordance wIth CIty Standard A-8807 3 A mlmmum dumpster pad IS reqUIred measurmg 10 feet x 10 feet (msIde dImensIOn mcludmg gates) (LDR, Chapter 75, ArtIcle II, SectIOn 5,J and ArtIcle III, SectIon 9,A.9,a) 4 ProVIde a mmlmum turmng radIUS of 60 feet to approach the dumpster ProVIde a mmlmum backmg clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad, (LDR, Chapter 2, SectIOn 11,J.2 b) 5 The proposed locatIOns of the dumpster enclosures, partIcularly the east enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of eXItmg the sIte, Alternate locatIons or configuratIOns need to be conSIdered, The developer may also WIsh to conSIder use of a compactor m place of dumpster(s). The compactor enclosure shall be constructed m the same manner as a trash enclosure; however the truck access for a compactor IS rear-Ioadmg as opposed to front-Ioadmg for trash bms, 6 The west dumpster locatIOn IS too close to the dnveway of the adjacent ACLF; please relocate 7 Staff belIeves that the trash capaCIty proVIded may not be adequate for the number of umts proposed m thIS development. Please conSIder the addItIOn of another dumpster or mcreasmg the capaCIty of the dumpsters prOVIded, PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments 8 PrOVIde a notIce of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards ReVIew) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engmeenng for the Traffic Impact Statement pnor to Issuance of a buIldmg permIt. I 9 SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) IS under Palm Beach County (Land I 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 6 I REJECT II DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE 45 ProvIde an engmeer's certIficatIOn on the dramage plan as specIfied m I LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F.2 I 46 The dram age plan provIded does not provIde sufficIent proposed elevatIOn mformatIOn for reVIew purposes Also provIde typIcal sectIOns and/or detaIls of the proposed dry detentIOn area, swales and proposed dramage structures (LDR, Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F 1) 47 Full dramage plans m accordance WIth the LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, I SectIOn 5 WIll be reqUIred at the tIme of permIttmg. I 48 IndIcate by note that catch basm and manhole covers shall be bIcycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, ArtIcle IV, SectIOn 5,A.2 1) 49 IndIcate to what standard the project IS to be constructed, If the FDOT Standard SpeCIficatIOns for Road & Bndge ConstructIOn and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 SpeCIficatIOns are recommended smce they con tam both EnglIsh and MetrIC umts. 50 PrOVIde wrItten and graphIc scales on all sheets, 51. The setbacks for BUIldmgs #1 & #7 as shown on the SIte Plan mdlcate 27 feet and 25 feet respectIvely The clVll drawmgs sheets reflect 94 feet and 00 feet respectIvely (Sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 4) Please rectIfy thIS dIscrepancy accordmgly 52, An excavatIOn/fill permIt WIll be reqUIred for thIS proJect. Accordmgly cross-sectIOns, whIch extend 25 feet mto the abuttmg propertIes, WIll be reqUIred, 53 After CommISSIOn approval. of the Master SIte Plan, the applIcant shall enter the plat process through the Engmeenng DIVISIOn, 54 Show locatIOn of recreatIOn area, dumpsters, mail kIOSks, etc on all CIVIl drawmgs, 55 The SIte data (SIte Plan - Sheet 1 of 1) should mdlcate 2 parkmg spaces for 66 umts, not 112 I 56 The project name IS gIven mcorrectly on the Landscape Development Plans as "The Harbors" Please correct. 57 Correct spellmg on Item #3 of ClVll Engmeenng cover sheet. BUILDING DIVISION Comments, I 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 7 DEPARTMENTS 58 IndIcate wlthm the sIte data the type of constructIOn of each bulldmg as defined m Chapter 6 of the 2001 Flonda Bulldmg Code 59 Add a labeled symbol to the sIte plan drawmg that represents and delmeates the path of travel for the accessible route that IS reqmred between the accessible parkIng spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each bmldmg, The symbol, reqmred to be mstalled along the path, shall start at the accessible parkIng spaces and termmate at the accessible entrance doors to each bmldmg, The symbol shall represent the locatIOn of the path of travel, not the locatIOn of the detectable wammg or other pavement markIngs. The 10catlOn of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel m a dnve/lane area that IS located behmd parked vehIcles, Idenhfyon the plan the WIdth of the accessible route (Note' The mImmum WIdth reqmred by the code IS forty-four (44) mches) Add text to the draw10g that would mdlcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned m comphance WIth SectlOn 43 (Accessible Route) and 46 (ParkIng and Passenger Loadmg Zones) of the Flonda AccessibIhty Code for Bmldmg ConstructlOn, Please note that at hme of permIt reVIew, the appl1cant shall provIde detmled documentatIOn on the plans that WIll venfy that the accessible route IS m comphance WIth the regulatlOns specIfied m the Flonda Accessiblhty Code for Bmldmg ConstructlOn, ThIS documentatIOn shall mclude, but not be hmlted to, provldmg fimsh grade elevatlOns along the path of travel. 60 Idenhfy wlthm the SIte data the fimsh floor elevatlOn (lowest floor elevatlOn) that IS proposed for each buildmg, Venfy that the proposed elevatlOn IS 10 comphance WIth regulatIOns of the code by addmg speCIficatIOns to the SIte data that address the followmg Issues [SectlOn 3107 1,2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 Flonda Bmld10g Code] a) The deSIgn professlOnal-of-record for the project shall add the followmg text to the SIte data. 'The proposed fimsh floor elevatlOn _' _ NGVD IS above the hIghest 100-year base flood elevatlOn appl1cable to the buildmg SIte, as determmed by the South Flonda Water Management DIStrIct'S surface water management constructlOn develo ment regula From the FIRM map, Idenhfy m the SIte data the tItle of the flood zone that the bmldmg IS located wlthm. Where apphcable, speCIfy the base flood elevatIOn, If there IS no base flood elevatIon, mdIcate that on the plans, ./J'lJc) IdentIfy the floor elevatIOn that the deSIgn professlOnal has estabhshed F for the bmldmg wIthm the footpnnt of the bmldmg that IS shown on the drawmgs htled SIte plan, tloor plan and pavmg/ dram age (CIVIl plans) (61 The bmldmg plans are not bemg revIewed for comphance WIth the apphcable bmldmg codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout IS conceptual" below the drawmg tItled Floor Plan found on sheets A-2 &A-3 INCLUDE REJECT V' 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 8 '7 II I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I 62 Place a note on the elevatIOn VIew drawIngs IndIcatIng that the wall 1/ openmgs and wall constructIon comply wIth Table 600 of the 2001 Flonda I I I BUIldmg Code I 63 At tIme of permIt reVIew, submIt sIgned and sealed workIng drawmgs of the ~ proposed constructIOn, 64 Add to each bUIldmg that IS depIcted on the sIte plan drawmg a labeled symbol that IdentIfies the locatIOn of the proposed handIcap accessible UnIts, Add to the draWIng the calculatIOns that were used to IdentIfy the mInImUm number of requIred UnIts, Also, state the code sectIOn that IS V applIcable to the computatIOns, Show and label the same UnIts on the applIcable floor plan draWIngs, ComplIance wIth regulatIOns speCIfied In the FaIr HOUSIng Act IS reqUIred (Federal FaIr HOUSIng Act DesIgn and ConstructIOn ReqUIrements, 24 CFR 100,205) 65 Add to the draWIng the calculatIOns that were used to IdentIfy the mInImUm V number of reqUIred handIcap accessible parkIng spaces, Also, state the code sectIOn that IS applIcable to the computatIOns. 66 Add a labeled symbol to the SIte plan draWIng that represents and delIneates the path of travel for the accessible route that IS reqUIred between the accessible UnIts and the recreatIOnal amenItIes that are prOVIded for the project and other common area elements located at the SIte, The symbol shall represent the locatIOn of the path of travel, not the locatIOn of the detectable warnIng or other pavement markIngs reqUIred to be Installed 1/ along the path, The locatIon of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel In a dnve/lane area that IS located behInd parked vehIcles IdentIfy on the plan the wIdth of the accessible route (Note' The mInImUm WIdth t/ reqUIred by the Code IS 44 Inches) Add text that would IndIcate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route IS deSIgned In complIance wIth regulatIOns speCIfied In the FaIr HOUSIng Act. Please note that at tIme of permIt revIew, the applIcant shall prOVIde detaIled documentatIOn on the plans that WIll venfy that the accessible route IS In complIance WIth the regulatIOns speCIfied In the Flonda AccessibIlIty Code for BUIldIng ConstructIOn, ThIS documentatIOn shall Include, but not be IIrruted to, proVIdIng fimsh grade elevatIOns along the path of travel 67 Sheets A-2 & A-3. Delete all references to the S,B C 1997 EdItIOn and the / SFBC The code In effect IS the 200 I EdItIOn of the Flonda BUIldIng Code, 68 The parallel clear floor space for the shower m UnIt 1210 does not comply / V wIth the Federal FaIr HOUSIng Act GUIdelInes The clear floor space shall be 30" WIde x 48" deep and shall be clearly dImenSIOned on the plan, The clear floor space must be flush wIth the control wall 69 SubmIt plans for the cabana and recreatIOn area If they are Included m thIS ~ j SIte plan reVIew 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 9 I :1 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I I 70 Clearly show complIance wIth Table 500 of the 2001 Flonda BUIldmg Code i for allowable area and heIght. I I 71 Where parkmg IS provIded on a multi-family bUIldmg sIte, accessible parkmg spaces on an accessible route are requIred for resIdents and VIsItors. A mmlmum of 2% of the parkmg spaces servmg covered dwellIng UnIts must be made accessible and be located on an accessible route Two percent of the parkmg garages provIded for the accessible UnIts shall comply \vIth the Federal FaIr Housmg Act. I PARKS AND RECREATION Comments, 72 The plans mdlcate that there WIll be 66 smgle famIly attached homes m thIS development. Accordmg to Chapter 1, ArtIcle V, of the Land Development RegulatIOns the formula for Smgle FamIly Attached UnIts IS applIed towards the calculatIOn of the Parks and RecreatIOn FaCIlIties Impact Fee as follows 66 Smgle Famrly Attached UnIts @ $ 771 each = $ 50,886 The fee IS due at the time of the first applIcable burldmg permIt. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST I Comments, I 73 The applIcant should mdlcate on the landscape plans the eXlstmg natIve trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the SIte, The tree survey shows 20 Slash Pme trees (total of 440 calIper mches), 1 Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco Plum plants, ThIS should be mdlcated wIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan, The eXlstmg trees located m the canal nght-of-way should be left on the property to proVIde an addItIOnal landscape buffer [EnVlronnemental Regulations, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] 74 The applIcant should prOVIde an envIronmental assessment of how the proposed dram age outfall Wllllmpact the eXlstmg wadmg bIrd habItat m the canal [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] Plant List, Sheet L-2, 3 of 3 75 Trees, shrubs / hedges, and groundcover matenals should not be mcluded If lIsted on the Palm Beach County mvasIve speCIes lIst. [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle I Sec 19, A, 5] I t 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 9 I I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 70 Clearly show complIance wIth Table 500 of the 2001 Flonda Bmldmg Code I for allowable area and heIght. i 71 Where parkmg IS proVIded on a multi-famIly bmldmg SIte, accessible parkIng spaces on an accessible route are reqmred for reSIdents and VISItors, A mmImum of 2% of the parkmg spaces servmg covered dwellmg umts must be made accessible and be located on an accessible route. Two percent of the parkIng garages proVIded for the accessible umts shall comply WIth the Federal Fair Housmg Act. PARKS AND RECREATION L, u;v.t's, A(\l\:> '1 ~ In>4 L 1"1','''' yro , Comments: /' 72 The plans mdl~-;"hat there wIll be i64.smgle family attached homes m thIS development.~ccordm~ to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land !.(e';ilopment RegulatIOns the formula:'fm Sll'lgl@ famIly ,^.ttaefied Umt~p3IIed X towards the calculatIOn of the Parks and RecreatIOn FacIlItIes Impact Fee as i follows I d L.I ! / <3 15 () '1 GtrSmgle J:arrnly Attached Umts @ $ 771 each =$ 50,88~ _ ~ ;' , t./fJ. JII1"1Lf,-I-A(I1,{., tl.v. T~ Ci2 'I> (p~l.t fA-H ::;.. ~ 1( p,L U 14/~ The fee IS due at the tIme of the first applIcable bmldmg perml!T i-/ (., I D? .~jI""/~ FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST f Comments, I 73 The applIcant should mdIcate on the landscape plans the eXIstmg native trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the SIte, The tree survey shows 20 Slash Pme trees (total of 440 calIper mches), 1 Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco Plum plants, ThIS should be mdIcated WIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan, The eXIstmg trees located m the canal nght-of-way should be left on the property to prOVIde an addItional landscape buffer [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] I 74 The applIcant should prOVIde an envIronmental assessment of hovv the I proposed dram age outfall WlllImpact the eXIstmg wadmg bIrd habItat m the canal [EnVlronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] Plant List, Sheet L-2, 3 of 3 75 Trees, shrubs / hedges, and groundcover matenals should not be mcluded If lIsted on the Palm Beach County mvasIve speCIes lIst. [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7.5, ArtIcle I Sec 19, A, 5 1 1..-t-J 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 12/16/02 9 f-G~ r1 .()~ \ . . I II I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I 70 Clearly show complIance wIth Table 500 of the 2001 Flonda BuIldIng Code for allowable area and heIght. 71 Where parkIng IS provIded on a multI-famIly bUIldIng sIte, accessible parkIng spaces on an accessible route are requIred for reSIdents and VIsItors. A mInImum of 2% of the parkIng spaces servIng covered dwellIng UnIts I must be made accessible and be located on an accessible route Two percent of the parkIng garages proVIded for the accessIble UnIts shall comply wIth the Federal FaIr HOUSIng Act. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 72 The plans IndIcate that there wIll be 66 sIngle famIly attached homes In thIS development. AccordIng to Chapter 1, ArtIcle Y, of the Land Development RegulatIOns the formula for SIngle FamIly Attached UnIts IS applIed towards the calculatIOn of the Parks and RecreatIOn FaCIlItIes Impact Fee as follows I 66 SIngle FamIly Attached UnIts @ $ 771 each = $ 50,886 The fee IS due at the tIme of the first applIcable bUIldIng permIt. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments 73 The applIcant should IndIcate on the landscape plans the eXIstIng natIve trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the SIte The tree survey shows 20 Slash PIne trees (total of 440 calIper Inches), 1 / Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco Plum plants. ThIS should be IndIcated wIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan, The eXIstIng trees located In the canal nght-of-way should be left on the property to proVIde an addItIOnal landscape buffer [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] 74 The applIcant should proVIde an envIronmental assessment of how the proposed draInage outfall wIll Impact the eXIstIng wadIng bIrd habItat In the V canal. [Emlronnemental RegulatIOns. Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 7 C ] Plant List, Sheet L-2., 3 of 3 75 Trees, shrubs / hedges, and groundcover matenals should not be Included If V lIsted on the Palm Beach County InvaSIve specIes lIst. [EnVlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle I Sec 19, A, 5 1 .. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 1 2/I 6/02 10 I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 76 All trees shown on the landscape plans must be 12 feet-14 feet m heIght and / 3 mches m calIper at tIme of plantmg, [Envlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C, 2 ] 77 The landscape plans do not mclude the CIty SIgnature trees at the mgress / / egress locatIOns to the sIte, [Envlronnemental RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C, 2 ] I 78 The Laurel Oak trees should be substItuted wIth another natIve tree specIes -/ more sUItable to the dry sandy soIls on the sIte Irri2ation System / There IS not an lITIgatIOn system desIgn mcluded wIth the landscape plans, 79 [EnVlronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,A.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments, I I I 80 The proposed "outfall #1" may negatIvely Impact the eXlstmg flora and fauna In the Lake Worth Dramage Dlstnct (LWDD) Canal adjacent to the subject property SubmIt an envIronmental assessment to ascertam future Impacts, Any dIscharge mto the canal will reqUIre all the necessary permIts from the LWDD 81 On the sIte plan tabular data, the area of the proposed resIdentIal and recreatIOnal land uses (expressed m terms of percentages) IS mcorrect. ThIs must be rectIfied. 82 The HIgh DensIty ResIdentIal (HDR) underlYIng land use allows for 10 8 dwellmg UnIts per acre but the proposed densIty IS 14 dwellmg UnIts per acre ProvIde wntten JustIficatIOn for the proposed densIty, whIch exceeds the maxImum allowed by the ComprehensIve Plan, I 83 ProvIde a scaled drawmg of the cabana (floor plan and elevatIOn) On the elevatIOns, mclude the heIght, extenor dImensIOns, extenor color, and matenals to be used (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,D ) 84 All SIgn age IS subject to revIew and approval by staff, the PlannIng & Development Board, and CIty COnllnISSlOn Show all slgnage (entry SIgnS) pnor to TechnIcal RevIew CommIttee to ensure complIance wIth Code or It WIll undergo separate revIew at a later tIme ProvIde a detaIl of the proposed entry Slgn(S), mcludmg the total slgnage area and matenals / colors whIch accurately show the appearance In order to confirm archItectural compatibIlIty wIth the bUlldmgs --. . Facsimile TRANSMITTAL CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH 100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 310 BOYNTON BEACH, FLORI DA 33425-0310 FAX: (561) 742-6259 PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION to: J enmfer LISZak:, Land DesIgn South fax #: 478-5012 date: December 16, 2002 from: LUSla Galav, PrincIpal Planner re: I :S1 REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Hampton Court Please find attached the first review comments for your project. To stay on the current review schedule, please do the followmg steps listed below, and bring all documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday, January 7, 2002. I Revise your plans incorporating all comments lIsted herem, including the addItIon of notes on plans to confirm response to general statements/ comments, and bring 10 copIes to the TRC review meetmg (full sets mcludmg all pages ongmally submItted), 2 SubmIt the additIOnal informatIOn as requested wlthm the attached comments, ( l.e, traffic analysis, engineenng certification, etc.) 3. Prepare a wntten response (7 copies) consistmg of a lIst bnefly summanzmg how each comment has been addressed on the revIsed plans or WIth the supplemental informatIOn mcluding locatIOn on the plans ( thIS promotes an expedItIOUS 2nd reVIew by staff and your project representatIves dunng the TRC meetmg );and 4. SubmIt reductIOns (8 Yz X 11) for the proposed sIte plans, elevations and landscapmg plan (this IS required for the final report and publIc presentatIOn). Planning and Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 742-6260 Fax: 742-6259 The apphcant should not attend a TRC (2nd reVIeW) until all documents have been revIsed and copIed for staff review. If plans wIll not be fully revised and brought to the scheduled TRC meetmg, contact Lusia Galav m this office by the Thursday pnor to the scheduled meeting date, Projects deviating from the onginal schedule are eligible for review at subsequent meetmgs, which are held every Tuesday. To reschedule, contact Sherie Coale, by the Thursday prior to the Tuesday TRC meetmg that you desIre to attend, The remamder of the reVIew schedule WIll be adjusted accordmgly, If you have questions on the attached comments, please contact the respective reviewer usmg the attached list of TRC representatives, If the plans are reasonably complete and all sIgnificant comments are addressed following TRC (2nd reVIew), the project is forwarded to the Planmng and Development Board Meeting that falls approXImately 2 to 3 weeks followmg the TRC meetmg. An "*,, by any comment Identifies a comment that must be addressed prior to moving forward to the Planning and Development board, Note: Items recognIzed by staff as typIcally outstandmg at thIS point mc1ude a traffic report and/or confirmation of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County dramage certIficatIOn by a hcensed engineer, signed "Rlder to SIte Plan Apphcation" form and colored elevations of the proposed proJect. ThIS information IS necessary for the project to proceed. If you have submitted thIS mformatIOn, please dIsregard thIS note. DEPARTMENT REPRESENT A TlVE REPRESENT A TlVES' PHONE FAX DESIGNEE Engmeenng Dave Kelley Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6485 Buildmg Don Johnson TImothy Large 742-6352 742-6352 FIre Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382 Rodger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357 Police Department Marshall Gage John Huntmgton 737-6167 737-3136 Utilities Pete Mazzella H. DaVId Kelley Jr. 742-6401 742-6485 Pubhc Works-General Larry Qumn Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6485 Public W orks- Traffic Jeffrey LIvergood Launnda Logan 742-6482 742-6485 Parks & Recreation John Wildner 742-6227 742-6233 F orester/Environmentahst Kevin Hallahan Kevm Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259 Plannmg & Zoning Michael Rumpf, LUSIa Galav 742-6262 742-6259 CHAIRMAN Revised 01114/02 .. --~ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH FIRE & LIFE SAFETY 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd POBox 31 0 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS For review of' NWSP 02-023 15t review-fire Project Name or Address Hampton Court, E of Conq" S of SW 23rdAv Reviewed by' ~ Rodqer Kemmer, Fire Protection Enqineer, Department: Fire and Life Safety Trade. Fire Department Phone' (561) 742-6753 Comments to' Sherie Coale by email on 11/27/02 CODE REQUIREMENTS 1) A minimum 1,500 GPM @ 20 psi fire flow is required (LOR Chapter 6 section 16). 2) Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code , (2000) Section 29-2 3 2 3) Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demo/ition Operations, Section 5-4 3 4) City Ordinance Section 9-6,3, /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout all buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are 3 stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 ft, in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly, cC. S Gale, Fire Marshal B Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal ,- / DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 02-237 TO Michael W Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning FROM' Laurinda Logan, P,E., Senior Engineer DATE: December 9, 2002 RE Standard Review Comments New Site Plan - 1 st Review Hampton Court File No. NWSP 02-023 The above referenced Site Plans, forwarded on November 27, 2002, were reviewed by representatives from Public Works, Engineering and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR) referenced PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works 2. Indicate by note that the site dumpster enclosure shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard A-8807. 3 A minimum dumpster pad is required measuring 10 ft. x 10 ft. (inside dimension including gates) (LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5 J and Article III, Section 9,A.9,a) 4 Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad (LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.2,b) 5. The proposed locations of the dumpster enclosures, particularly the east enclosure, do not allow the garbage truck any reasonably easy means of exiting the site Alternate locations or configurations need to be considered. The developer may also wish to consider use of a compactor in place of dumpster(s), The compactor enclosure shall be constructed in the same manner as a trash enclosure; however the truck access for a compactor is rear-loading as opposed to front-loading for trash bins 6, The west dumpster location is too close to the driveway of the adjacent ACLF; please relocate. 7 Staff believes that the trash capacity provided may not be adequate for the number of units proposed in this development. Please consider the addition of another dumpster or increasing the capacity of the dumpsters provided. Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 02-237 Re. Hampton Court New Site Plan 1st Review December 11, 2002 Page Two PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 1, Provide a notice of concurrence (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering for the Traffic Impact Statement. 2, SW 23rd Avenue (Golf Road) is under Palm Beach County (Land Development Division, Permit Section) jurisdiction, All roadway connections must be permitted by them in addition to the City Copies of all required County permits will be required to be provided at the time of permitting 3, Please correct discrepancies between AM and PM distributions given in Table 4 and shown in Figure 4 of the Traffic Impact Analysis 4 There currently are four lots and four dwellings fronting the SW 13th Street roadway, which is a part of the plat of GOLF VIEW HARBOUR 2ND SECTION. The original cul-de-sac was reconfigured into a "bulb" design during a previous re-platting process (ORB 2584, Pg 479, PBCR). As part of the applicant's proposed elimination of the roadway traversing the project site in an east-west direction, the applicant shall create a new cul-de-sac in the "bulb" right-of-way set aside for such a purpose. 5 The main entrance does not connect to SW 23rd Avenue Please correct. 6 The two (2) gated fire department access points are not acceptable and will not be permitted Staff recommends providing secondary access via SW 13th Street (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 8.C 2, and Ordinance 02-033 - LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 1.A.4). 7 The two (2) dead-end "accessways" are greater than 1 00 feet in length and they will require a proper turn-a-round, This can be either a) a cul-de-sac configuration, b) a shunt turn-a-round, c) a 'T'- turn- a-round, or d) a wye turn-a-round. 8. The parking spaces shown up against the dwelling unit are labeled as 185ft. (Site Plan Sheet 1 of 1). With no overhang (or walking around room) between the vehicle and the building, access is denied. Increase the parking space length to 20 feet in this situation, Modify the Site Plan accordingly 9 Staff strongly recommends reconsidering the location of the mail kiosks The proposed locations will require residents to stop within the travel way to drop off or pick up mail. An alternate location could be within the main entry driveway where it is recommended that parallel parking spaces be provided adjacent to the kiosks to allow for safe parking while using the mailboxes 10 Current standards require 27 feet backup distance with minimum 9 foot by 18 foot parking stalls (Standard Drawing B-98001). The Engineering Division will be amending this standard to require a 25 foot backup distance with a minimum 9 1'2 foot by 18 1'2 foot parking stall and may wish to consider this as an alternative to the existing standard. An administrative waiver will be necessary to use the new standard, A backup distance less than 25 feet will not be allowed. 11 On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc, See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 for striping details, Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 02-237 Re' Hampton Court New Site Plan 1st Review December 11, 2002 Page Three 12, The Code requires that street names should not be phonetically similar (LOR, Chapter 5, Article V, Section 1.0.8), Obtain approval from Police and Fire that the subdivision name, Hampton Court will be acceptable when there is a Hampton Inn already in the City (on Gateway Boulevard), ENGINEERING 1 All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets, 2 Show all existing utilities on Site Development plan (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7,A.3) 3. Show proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.B 4.) The lighting design shall provide a minimum average light level of one foot-candle. On the Lighting Plan, specify that the light poles shall withstand a 140 MPH wind load (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1 a and Florida Building Code) Provide a note that the fixtures shall be operated by photo- electrical control and to remain on until 2.00 a,m. (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1.a,) Include pole wind loading, and pole details in conformance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 11, Chapter 23, Article I, Section 5,B,7 and Chapter 23, Article II, Section A on the Lighting Plan, If possible please provide photometries as part of your TRC plan submittals - it is much easier to identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit! 4 It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future shadowing on the parking surface (LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.1 b), 5 Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5 H.) Reference FOOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along all collector and arterial roadways. 6 Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 25' and 6' above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5,H) 7. The Landscape plan scale shall match that of the Site plan (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7,C 1). 8 A 5 foot width sidewalk along SW 23rd Avenue is required, and shall be placed 1 foot north of the north property line (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10,T , and Chapter 22, Article I, Section 5) 9 Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7 F,2, 10 The drainage plan provided does not provide sufficient proposed elevation information for review purposes Also provide typical sections and/or details of the proposed dry detention area, swales and proposed drainage structures (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F 1), 11. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting 12, Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.A.2.f). Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 02-237 Re. Hampton Court New Site Plan 1st Review December 11 , 2002 Page Four 13 Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FOOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units, 14. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. 15. The setbacks for Buildings #1 & #7 as shown on the Site Plan indicate 27' and 25' respectively The civil drawings sheets reflect 94' and 00' respectively (Sheets 2, 3, and 4 of 4). Please rectify this discrepancy accordingly 16 An excavation/fill permit will be required for this project. Accordingly cross-sections, which extend 25 feet into the abutting properties, will be required 17 After Commission approval of the Master Site Plan, the applicant shall enter the plat process through the Engineering Division. 18 Show location of recreation area, dumpsters, mail kiosks, etc, on all civil drawings 19 The Site Data (Site Plan - Sheet 1 of 1) should indicate 2 parking spaces for 66 units, not 112! 20, The project name is given incorrectly on the Landscape Development Plans as "The Harbors" Please correct. 21, Correct spelling on item #3 of Civil Engineering cover sheet. UTILITIES 1, All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape drawings (as well as the Water and Sewer Conceptual Plan Sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future The LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article I, Section 18 1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 2, Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12) 3 Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p m as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Section 26-16(b)) 4 The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand Re. Hampton Court New Site Plan 1st Review Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 02-237 December 11 , 2002 Page Five 5 Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water, City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 6. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum Department of width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Section 26-33(a). 7 This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy 8. PVC material not permitted on the City's water system, All lines shall be DIP 9 The LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Portions of Buildings #5 and #7 do not appear to meet this requirement. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all existing and proposed hydrants, 10 Appropriate backflow preventers will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-207. 11 A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 12. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3(P) requires a statement be included that (other) utilities are available and will be provided by the appropriate agencies, This statement is lacking on the submitted plans 13 Show how utilities (water and sewer) are connected to each building/unit. LUck Cc: Jeff Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Pete Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr , P.E./ P S,M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Hampton Court New Site Plan 1st Review.doc --./ c'tTy OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MIchael W, Rumpf DATE: Dir. of Plannmg & Zoning 12/01/02 FILE' NWSP 02-023 FROM: Off. John Huntmgton Police Department CPTED PractitIOner SUBJECT: Hampton Court REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have vIewed the above buildmg plans and have the followmg comments: No Comments . . '" "DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 02-283 / TO Michael W Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning Timothy K. Large ~ TRC Member/Building Divisio~ FROM DATE December 3, 2002 SUBJECT Project - Hampton Court File No - NWSP 02-203 - 1 st review We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Larae (561) 742-6352 1 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of each building as defined in Chapter 6 of the 2001 Florida Building Code 2 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to each building The symbol, required to be installed along the path, shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to each building The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route (Note The minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches) Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4 3 (Accessible Route) and 4 6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel 3 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for each building Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues [Section 3107 1 2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 Florida Building Code] a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data "The proposed finish floor elevation _ _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations" b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building IS located within Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/ drainage (civil plans) S/Development/Building Code Administrator/TRC/02/Hampton Court Page 1 of 2 .. . 4 The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheets A-2 & A-3 5 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the wall openings and wall construction comply with Table 600 of the 2001 Florida Building Code 6 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction 7 Add to each building that is depicted on the site plan drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the proposed handicap accessible units Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required units Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations Show and label the same units on the applicable floor plan drawings Compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act is required (Federal Fair Housing Act Design and Construction Requirements, 24 CFR 100 205) 8 Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number of required handicap accessible parking spaces Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations 9 Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible units and the recreational amenities that are provided for the project and other common area elements located at the site The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings required to be installed along the path The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles Identify on the plan the width of the accessible route (Note The minimum width required by the Code is 44 inches) Add text that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with regulations specified in the Fair Housing Act. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel 10 Sheets A-2 & A-3 Delete all references to the S B C 1997 Edition and the SFBC The code in effect is the 2001 Edition of the Florida Building Code 11 The parallel clear floor space for the shower in Unit 1210 does not comply with the Federal Fair Housing Act Guidelines The clear floor space shall be 30" wide x 48" deep and shall be clearly dimensioned on the plan The clear floor space must be flush with the control wall 12 Submit plans for the cabana and recreation area if they are included in this site plan review 13 Clearly show compliance with Table 500 of the 2001 Florida Building Code for allowable area and height. 14 Where parking is provided on a multi-family building site, accessible parking spaces on an accessible route are required for residents and visitors A minimum of 2% of the parking spaces serving covered dwelling units must be made accessible and be located on an accessible route Two percent of the parking garages provided for the accessible units shall comply with the Federal Fair Housing Act. bf SIDevelopmentlBuilding Code Administrator/TRCI02lHampton Court Page 2 of 2 .---- PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #02-90 TO: Mike Rumph, Planning and Zoning Director John Wildner, Parks Director ~ Barbara Meacham, Parks anckandscape Planner FROM: cc: RE: Hampton Court - New Site Plan Date: December 6, 2002 The Parks Department has reviewed the new site plan for the Hampton Court Development. The following comments are submitted: 1. The plans indicate that there will be 66 single family attached homes in this development. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations the formula for Single Family Attached Units is applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 66 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each = $ 50,886 2, The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. JW \-)i=C - Q Xiii, L l... ) ,. '-.'- vl_ -- ~ Planninf! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Lusia Galav, Pnncipal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / EnvIronmentalIst Subject: Hampton Court New SIte Plan - 1 st Review NWSP 02-023 Date: December 10, 2002 Existinf! Trees The applIcant should mdIcate on the landscape plans the eXIstmg natIve trees that wIll be preserved, relocated, or Removed / replaced on the sIte, The tree survey shows 20 Slash Pme trees (total of 440 calIper mches), 1 Sabal Palm, and 4 large Coco plum plants. ThIS should be mdICated wIth a separate symbol on the landscape plan, [EnvIronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter. 7,5, ArtIcle II Sec 7.C] Plant List. Sheet L-2. 3 of 3 2. Trees, shrubs / hedges, and groundcover matenals should not be mcluded If lIsted on the Palm Beach County mvasIVe speCIes lIst. [EnvIronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter 7,5, ArtICle I Sec, 19, A, 5 ] 3, All trees shown on the landscape plans must be 12'-14' m heIght and 3" m calIper at tIme of plantmg, [EnvIronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter, 7 5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C, 2] 4, The landscape plans do not mclude the CIty SIgnature trees at the mgress / egress locatIons to the SIte. [EnvIronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter 7,5, ArtIcle II Sec 5,C,2,] 5 The Laurel Oak trees should be substItuted wIth another natIve tree speCIes more sUItable to the dry sandy soils on the SIte Irrieation System 6 There IS not an ImgatIon system desIgn mcluded wIth the landscape plans, [EnvIronnemental. RegulatIOns, Chapter, 7,5, ArtICle II Sec 5,A.] kjh FIle " ---- HAMPTON COURT NWSP 02-023 1st Review Planning December 13, 2002 The proposed "outfall #1" may negatively impact the existing flora and fauna in the Lake Worth Drainage DIstrict (LWDD) Canal adjacent to the subject property Submit an envIronmental assessment to ascertain future Impacts. Any dIscharge into the canal will reqUIre all then the necessary permits from the L WDD On the site plan tabular data, the area of the proposed residential and recreational land uses (expressed in terms of percentages) is incorrect. This must be rectIfied, The High DenSIty ReSIdential (HDR) underlymg land use allows for 10,8 dwellmg units per acre but the proposed denSIty is 14 dwellmg units per acre ProVIde written justIfication for the proposed density, whIch exceeds the maXImum allowed by the ComprehensIve Plan. Provide a scaled drawing of the cabana (floor plan and elevatIOn) On the elevations, include the height, extenor dimensIOns, extenor color, and materials to be used (Chapter 4, Section 7,D ) All signage is subject to review and approval by staff, the Planmng & Development Board, and City Commission, Show all signage (entry signs) prior to TechnIcal ReVIew Comnuttee to ensure compliance With Code or it will undergo separate reView at a later time, ProVide a detail of the proposed entry sign(s), mcluding the total signage area and materials / colors which accurately show the appearance in order to confirm architectural compatibihty With the buildmgs, A dramage statement is required pnor to the Technical ReView Comnuttee meetmg (Chapter 4, SectIOn 7,F.2,) A traffic impact statement is required pnor to the TechnIcal ReVIew Comnuttee meeting. The project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach County regardmg school concurrency prior to the Issuance of a buildmg permit. If a fence is required around the pool/clubhouse area, proVide a detail of the fence includmg the dimensions, material, and color (Chapter 4, Section 7,D ) Is this to be a gated community? If so, proVide elevatIOns of the privacy wall, The elevations of the privacy wall shall include the exterior finish and proposed colors. Staff recommends mstalling a pnvacy wall six (6) feet in heIght along the east property line, The entrance (proposed on Golf Road) can be no WIder than 36 feet (Chapter 23, ArtIcle II, Section H.l ), Staff recommends extending the landscaped median to the property line If medians are extended, conSIder incorporatmg pedestrian refuge islands into their deSIgn, The proposed backup distance (24 feet) and drive aisle width is not pernntted, The proposed "Gated Fire Department Access" must be approved by the Fire Department. On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 2 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 84 FAK are proVIded but when counted, It adds up to 42, Correct the plant schedule so that it matches the graphic representatIon, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 2 of 3", the plant schedule does not include the THY but when counted, it adds up to 42 THY Correct the plant schedule so that It mcludes the THY 10 On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule indIcates that 55 QV are provided but when counted, It adds up to 56 QV Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphic representation, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule indIcates that 38 QL are provIded but when counted, It adds up to only 39 QL. Correct the plant schedule so that it matches the graphic representation, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdIcates that 18 SM are provIded but when counted, it adds up to 19 SM. Correct the plant schedule so that it matches the graphIc representation. On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdicates that 103 SP are provIded but when counted, it adds up to 105 SP Correct the plant schedule so that it matches the graphIc representation, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule indicates that 810 CHR are provided but when counted, it only adds up to 786 CHR. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphic representatIOn. On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule mdicates that 77 FAK are provIded but when counted, It only adds up to 65 F AK. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphic representatIon. On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule indicates that 116 PHI are provided but when counted, it adds up to 158 PHI. Correct the plant schedule so that It matches the graphic representation, On the landscape plan labeled "sheet 3 of 3", the plant schedule does not mclude the 27 EFO Correct the plant schedule so that it includes the EFO The elevation drawings shall mclude the manufacturer's name and color code, Also, on the elevation drawmgs, staff recommends using a "color schedule" to IdentIfy each proposed color Provide a typical drawing that includes the height and color / material of all proposed freestanding outdoor lightmg poles, The design, style, and illuminatIOn level shall be compatible with the buildmg deSIgn (heIght) and shall consider safety, functIOn, and aesthetic value (Chapter 9, SectIOn 1O.F 1 ) Place a note on the site plan that all above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, and back-flow preventers shall be visually screened (Chapter 9, Section 10 C 4 ). Staff recommends screening the AlC umts WIth eIther landscaping or a knee wall. Label the locatIOn of the AlC pads on the SIte plan. The dumpster enclosure shall resemble WIth respect to the color and matenals, the design of the pnncipal buildings and shall be integrated with other SIte elements (Chapter 9, Section 1O.E,3) On the site plan, place a note indicating this requirement. Staff recommends connectmg the internal sidewalk to the SIdewalk that will be required along Golf Road, If possible, staff recommends preservmg the Slash pines, S.\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\Hampton Court\NWSP 02-023\Planning 1st review.doc r DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-271 TO TRC MEMBERS Rodger-Kemmer, Fin~ Proh:~r.tinll Ellgilleer KE'\Iin Hall3han, Forc~te';EI'vifOAmeOta!ist- . lo"n Huntington, Pnlir.F! nepf'lrtmeAt- ~ I David K~II~y Jr , Utilities Depal tlllent 'ftrAetAY I<. Ldl ye, t:::mtteIif::l::J Dil1sioR .Ken Hall, (Englneenng) Public Vv'orks-General Jehn VVildner, Par ks DIVIS!orr- Launnda Logan, Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department ;/Jl Michael W Rumpf', Director of Planni n ting November 22, 2002 FROM DATE RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 15T Review - New Site Plan Project - Hampton Court Location - East of Congress, south of SW 23 Avenue Agent Jennifer Liszak, Land Design South I?.. File No NWSP 02-023 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Pie se review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be ade available via e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on Thursda December 2002. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval. 1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2 The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents 4, Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental imprm.ements . " , Page 2 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e- mail Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members MWRlg Attachment XC Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Department Pete Mazzella, Assistant Dir Of Utilities Jeffrey Livergood, Public Works Director Don Johnson, Building Division S \Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Hampton Court\NWSP 02-023\TRC Memo for 1st Plans Review doc ReVIsed 1/14/02