Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS ~ t../' DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES MEMORANDUM NO. 01-224 TO. Michael W Rumpf, DIrector of Planning and ZOnIng John A. Gmdry, Utlhties Dlrecto~ , . " H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, UtIlIty Engmee~~''''' DATE: September 6,2001 THRU' FROM' RE' HIGH RIDGE, LOTS 9, 10, 11, 12 MPMD 01-004 -1 st REVIEW We offer the followmg comments on the above noted proJect: NO PLAN SUBMITTAL COMMENT 1) No Improvement plan, utilIty plan or landscape plan were included wIth thIS submIttal, therefore the UtIlItIes Department consIders thIS plan incomplete as submitted. However, smce thIS proposal IS located where utIlIty support IS avmlable, we are provIdmg only a cursory reVIew on the plan submittal. GENERAL COMMENTS 2) The proposed Master Plan is a re-configuratIOn of a portIOn of an existmg record plat. The eXIstmg cul-de-sac of the public roadway WIll be relocated, whIch reqUIreS a re-plattmg of thIS portIOn of the record plat. ApplIcant dId not submIt a prelImmary new record plat for reVIew. Although the Minor Road tract (Tract S-2) as shown on the eXIstmg record plat has been abandoned by ordmance of the CIty CommIsSIOn, It must be shown on the proposed new record plat as same WIth the vacatIOn statement so noted. 3) EXIstmg overhead and underground FPL easements as shown on the eXIsting record plat have not been addressed on the proposed Master Plan. How WIll the applIcant address these Issues? 4) All utIlity easements shall be shown on the rectIfied SIte plan and landscapmg drawmgs so that we may determme WhICh trees may mterfere WIth utIlItIes (both eXIstmg and proposed). In general, palm trees WIll be the only tree species allowed within utIlity easements. Canopy trees may be planted outSIde of the easement so that roots and branches WIll not Impact those utIlItIes WIthin the easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gIves publIc utIlitIes the authonty to remove any trees that mterfere WIth utIlIty services, eIther in utilIty easements or publIc nghts-of- way. MIchael W. Rumpf Re: HIgh Ridge Sept. 6,2001 Page 2 5) Palm Beach County Health Department permIts may be required for the water and sewer systems serving thIS project (CODE Sec. 26-12). 6) FIre flow calculations will be reqUIred demonstratmg the City Code reqUIrement of 1,500 g.p.m. at stated m LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec 16, or the requirement Imposed by the msurance underwnters, whIchever IS greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a)) 7) CODE Sec 26-34(E) reqUIres that a capacIty reservatIon fee be paid for thIS project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department applIcatIOn forms or withm 30 days of sIte plan approval, whIchever occurs first. ThIS fee will be determmed based upon final meter SIze, or expected demand. 8) Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. reqUIres the conservatIOn of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for imgatIOn where other sources are readIly aVailable. 9) LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16 reqUIres that all points on each bUIldmg WIll be wIthin 200 feet of an existmg or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the proposed plan meets thIS condItIOn, by showmg all hydrants. 10) Appropriate backflow preventers will be reqUIred for each water servIce to the bUIldings, and the fire spnnkler line If there is one, m accordance wIth CODE Sec. 26-207. HDKlkd Xc: Georganne Barden FIle S:\Engineering\Dostal\High Ridge MPMD 01-004-1 st review Utility Comments.doc / DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 01-171 !~.:-~.....,'~';--' ~f IJ Ii' rn) , ~' /n/ .... l / iL; Sfp E....~.. 6 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, DIrector ofPlanmng and Zonmg FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., CIvIl Engmeer t., \oi,'''' DATE: September 6,2001 RE: High Ridge P.I.D. Master Plan Modification (Major Modification) -1st Review File No. MPMD 01-004 I have revIewed the above referenced SIte Plans, forwarded to me on September 4, 2001, agamst the Master Plan Review reqUIrements outlmed m the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordmances. Followmg are my comments wIth the appropnate Code and Land Development RegulatIOns (LDR) referenced. Code Requirements 1. On the SIte Plan, add a general note that all plans submItted for specific permIts shall meet the CIty'S Code reqUIrements at tIme of applIcatIOn. These permIts include, but are not lImited to, the followmg: pavmg, dramage, clearing & grubbing, excavation & fill, curbing, site lightmg, landscapmg and imgatIOn. PermIts reqUIred from other permItting agencIes such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Flonda Water Management DIstnct (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage DIStrict (LWDD), Flonda Department of Environmental ProtectIOn (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engmeering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of EnvIronmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be mcluded wIth the permit request. 2. Show elevatIOns of the adjacent subdIvISIon per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.E. 3. Show topographIcal condItIons on the tract per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.G. 4 Show eXIstmg streets, alleys and easements on or adjacent to the tract per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIon 3.H. 5 Show all eXIstmg dramage dIstnct facIlItIes per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.1. 6. ProvIde a generalIzed statement of subsurface condItions per the LDR, Chapter 3, Section 3.M. 7. Show all eXIsting utIlItIes per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.0. 8. PrOVIde a statement that all utilItIes are avaIlable and wIll be provided by the appropnate agenCIes per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.P. 9. Provide a master storm water management plan per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.T. -- ,"", Engmeenng Department Memorandum No. 01-171 Re: HIgh RIdge P.I.D. - 1 st RevIew Comments September 6,2001 Page Two 10. Due to the extensIve changes to the P.I.D. a new boundary survey WIll be reqUIred adhering to the requirements of the LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg. ThIs includes easement descnptions and dImensions (graphic and written). It IS recommended that the new combmed lots be assigned a new number or desIgnatIOn for clanty. 11. The proposed changes to the P.I.D. wIll require the substantIation of the abandonment of the portion of Mmer Road east of High RIdge Road. LUck Xc: H. DavId Kelley, Jr., PEIPSM, UtIlity Engmeer File C:\My Documents\High Ridge PID, Engineering 1st Review Comments. doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 01-193 TO: Michael W. Rumpf DIrector ofPlanmng and Zomng FROM: Timothy L. Large ~ TRC Member/BUIldmg DIvIsIOn DATE' September 12,2001 SUBJECT: Site Plan Review 1 st Review - Master Plan Modification Project - High Ridge, PJ.D. LocatIOn-Lots 9, 10, II, 12 File No. - MPMD 01-004 ~. The BUIlding DIvIsion presently has no Issues with thIS request for the relocatIOn of the cul-de- sac. If you have any questIOns, I can be reached at 742-6352. m "~:2:1~~ MPARTM~NT'" DEVELOPMENT ,....... PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #01-90 TO: FROM: Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks DireclorJ: Barbara J. Meacham, Land ape Architect ~ High Ridge, P.I.D September 11, 2001 THRU: RE: Date: 1. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and sitework improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for review and approval by the Parks Department staff. Include on the plan location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: LusIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner From: Kevm J. Hallahan, Forester / EnVIronmentalIst Subject: High RIdge, P. I. D. (Lots 9,10,11,12) MPMD # 01-004 1 st ReVIew Date: September 13, 2001 I have no comments on the Master Plan ModIficatIOn proposed for the above proJect. The project should contmue m the normal review process. Kjh File 1/ HIGH RIDGE P.I.D. MPMD 01-004 1st Review Planning September 7, 2001 This master plan submittal does not substitute for a plat. Submit a revIsed plat of the PID showmg the relocatIon of the Commerce Road right-of-way m order for subsequent site plan approval. The master plan must indicate the distance in feet between the relocated Commerce Road nght-of-way and the boundary of the eastern plat line. The master plan should mdicate the lot hnes and dImensions of Lots 9 through 12 However, If the project mtent IS to combme the lots by unity of title, then showing each indIvIdual lot hne would not be necessary The site plan tabular data must mdicate the setbacks for the PID Obtain an easement from the property owner of Lot 1 to construct the sign denoted as "PID IdentIficatIon SIgn" IndIcate the dIstance the monument SIgns will be from the property hne. The monument signs must be at least 10 feet from the property line. Please clarify the two proposed monument signs. The SIgn closest to 1-95 does not comply with Chapter 21, Article IV, SectIOn 5.E. S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlHigh Ridge PID Revised Master Plan Master Sign.ge\lst Review - Planning. doc -DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01-000 FROM TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist James Prestinari, Police Department H. David Kelley Jr , Utilities Department Timothy K. Large, Building Division Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic Barbara Meacham, Parks Division Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department ~\ Michael W Rumpf - ' . !u Director of Planning an,_ nif TO DATE September 4,2001 RE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 1 ST Review - Master Plan Modification Project - High Ridge, P I D Location - Lots 9,10,11,12 Agent Winston Lee File No MPMD 01-004 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should also be made available at s:\Planning\shared or e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on, September 14, 2001. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval 1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself 3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents 4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with Page 2 other departmental improvements 5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified 6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution to the applicant. Additionally, the comments should be made available at 5:\ Planning\shared Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members MWR.lg Attachment XC' Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Department John Guidry, Utilities Director To Be Determined,Director of Engineering Don Johnson, Building Division Central File S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIFORMSITemplates and formslTRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc Revlsed 5-22-01 FACSIMILE 1 . ') I , I . ,<2..,j-(q 11 I-{ ~;.' C! <-0. -ell .. see, CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax From the office of Planning & Zoning TO: .:{) J1-1~ (:d.~~ J J :> tlMA '~.J-/~f~ v FAX: j(;/- ~~l'~ S:~~I I FROM: DATE: {flub JD! / ' NUMBER OF PAGES: (including cover) c-'5 RE: J:f/1 J-ef6ad:s and drf cf 7/o1!lG Y/hO- {l<<- lkc ~~1'" J' (<LA-- h2~ 2J'Ltd t" Ul4rfZ:k/J , / (J ~.; / If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you. yJrh /Jtf[ ~ ~Lc<< ~(Jc.. ,~SHISSION VERIFICATIOt'J REPORT I. TIME 08/06/2001 13:59 NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z FAX 5613756259 TEL 5513756250 DATE,TIME FAX NO./NAME DURA TI OH PAGE(S) RESULT MODE 08/05 13:57 95895559 00:02:01 03 Ok ST At'mARD ECr\1 .. 6 Boynton Beach Code It shall be unlawful for a person to display false or misleading statements upon signs, calculated to mislead the public as to anything sold, any services to be performed or mformatlOn dIsseminated The fact that any sign or display shall contain words or language sufficient to mislead a reasonable and prudent person in reading same, shall be prima facie evidence of a violation of this section by the person displaying the sign or permitting same to be displayed. (Ord No 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01) Sec. 3. Aesthetics. The aesthetic quality of a building or an entire neighborhood is materially affected by achieving VIsual harmony of the signs on or about a structure as it relates to the architecture of the bUlldmg or the adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical hmItations on signs imposed by this section, there are certain aesthetic considerations which must be met and are therefore subject to review by the Planning and Development Board when required. A The scale of the sign must be consistent with the scale of the building on which it is to be placed or painted and the neighborhood in which it is located. However, in no case shall it exceed the size provided for in other sections of this chapter. B. The overall effect of the configuration or coloring of the sign shall be consistent with the Community Design Guidelines The configuration and colors shall be complementary with other signs already on the building and on adjacent properties All freestanding signs shall be landscaped in an attractive manner, appropriate to the specific 10catlOn, with a minimum dimension of the landscaped area not less than two (2) feet. Landscaping shall be protected from vehicular encroachment. (Ord. No. 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01) Sec. 4. Interpretation. Where a question arises regarding the interpretation of this chapter, the most restrictive mterpretation shall prevaIl. 2001 S-15 Interpretations of this chapter shall be made by the director of development or designee. (Ord. No. 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01) (~. Sec. 5. Setbacks. All signs must meet a mimmum ten (10) foot setback measured from the property line to the closest surface of the SIgn. Where a building is closer than ten (10) feet from a property line, a freestanding sign can have its leading edge one half way between the property line and the building Wall signs can be on the building surface When an accessway intersects a public right-of- way or when the subject property abuts the intersectIon of two (2) or more public rights-of-way, all signage within the triangular areas described below shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet. The triangular areas above referred to are: (~ ~ -' A The areas of property on both sides of an accessway formed by the intersection of each SIde of the accessway and the public right-of-way line with two (2) sides of each triangle being ten (10) feet in length (or more when determined to be necessary by the development department), from the point of intersection and the third side being a line connecting the end of the other two (2) sides. B. The area of property located at a corner formed by the intersection of two (2) or more pubhc or private rights-of-way, with two (2) SIdes of the triangular area bemg thirty-five (35) feet in length along the abutting public right-of-way lines, measured from their pomt of mtersection and the third side bemg a line connecting the ends of the other two (2) lines. (Ord. No 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01) Sec. 6. Special signs. A. Temporary project development signs. Large areas under development shall be permItted two (2) signs not to exceed a combined aggregate area of two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Said signs shall ~ , , > General Provisions 11 Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan, as adopted and amended. EXTERIOR DISPLAY - Display of merchandise, as an accessory use in a lawful principal use, outside of the walls of the building or within any area which is not fully enclosed by building walls, in such a manner so as to allow for viewing or inspection of merchandise by customers. EXTERIOR STORAGE - The keeping of merchandise, materials, equipment or supplies, and the like, outside of the walls of a building or within any area which is not fully enclosed by building walls, which is generally not for the purpose of allowing inspection or viewing by customers. F ABRICA TION - The assembly or forming of goods using finished or semi finished materials, as opposed to the manufacture of primary materials. FACING OR SURFACE - Shall mean the surface of the sign upon, against or through which the message is displayed or illustrated on the sign. FAMILY - One (1) or more persons occupying a single housekeeping unit and using common cooking facilities, provided that all such persons shall be related by blood, marriage or adoption, except that not more than one (1) person who is not related as such shall also be permitted to reside in the same unit. Families who provide care in their own home as duly state licensed foster family homes, in which dependent children have been duly placed by the State of Florida, and which include not more than five (5) children (both natural and foster) in the household, are expressly included within this term. FAMILY DAY CARE - A residence providing day care services for a number of children which is limited in accordance with Florida law, and which shall be construed to be an accessory use to any dwelling unit located in a residential or PU district, or in any commercial zoning district, excluding C-4 district. FESTOONS - Strings of ribbons, lights, tinsel, small flags, discs, spinners, pinwheels or any device propelled by natural forces used for the purpose of attracting attention. 1997 S-5 FILL OR FILLING - Placing material removed from another area on and/or off site. FIXED PROJECTION SIGN - A sign, other than.a flat sign, which extends outward for more than eighteen (18) inches from the facade of any building and is rigidly affixed thereto. FLAG - A piece of cloth used as the national, state, municipal, civic or church symbol, registered corporate logo, or internationally recognized symbol, properly displayed in accordance with published federal, state, municipal, civic or church adopted guidelines and displayed on a designated pole located in a proper holder or in other ways approved by an appropriate national, state, municipal, civic or church agency. The maximum allowed is two (2) different flags per pole and only one (1) pole per lot or bay frontage. FLASillNG SIGN - A sign, either fixed or portable, which uses or contains intermittent or a sequential flashing light source with the exception of a time or temperature sign or Dow Jones average sign which is part of a permitted commercial sign. FLAT SIGN - A sign erected parallel to, and extending not more than eighteen (18) inches from, the facade of any building to which it is attached and supported throughout its entire length by the facade of the building and not extending above or beyond the building. FLOOR AREA, MINIMUM - The area of the floor or floors measured from the centerline of the exterior walls to the centerline of dividing walls. The area for garages, roofed-over screened porches and utility rooms shall be credited for fiftv (50) percent of floor ~ Open porches and carports shall be credited with twenty-five (25) percent of floor area. Accessory buildings shall not count as floor area if not accessible from the interior of the building. Not more than ten (10) percent of any minimum floor area shall be credited to screened-in porches or breezeways FOSTER CillLD - A child in foster care who has been placed in a foster home by the State of Florida.