REVIEW COMMENTS
~
t../'
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
NO. 01-224
TO.
Michael W Rumpf, DIrector of Planning and ZOnIng
John A. Gmdry, Utlhties Dlrecto~ , . "
H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, UtIlIty Engmee~~'''''
DATE:
September 6,2001
THRU'
FROM'
RE'
HIGH RIDGE, LOTS 9, 10, 11, 12
MPMD 01-004 -1 st REVIEW
We offer the followmg comments on the above noted proJect:
NO PLAN SUBMITTAL COMMENT
1) No Improvement plan, utilIty plan or landscape plan were included wIth thIS submIttal, therefore
the UtIlItIes Department consIders thIS plan incomplete as submitted. However, smce thIS
proposal IS located where utIlIty support IS avmlable, we are provIdmg only a cursory reVIew on
the plan submittal.
GENERAL COMMENTS
2) The proposed Master Plan is a re-configuratIOn of a portIOn of an existmg record plat. The
eXIstmg cul-de-sac of the public roadway WIll be relocated, whIch reqUIreS a re-plattmg of thIS
portIOn of the record plat. ApplIcant dId not submIt a prelImmary new record plat for reVIew.
Although the Minor Road tract (Tract S-2) as shown on the eXIstmg record plat has been
abandoned by ordmance of the CIty CommIsSIOn, It must be shown on the proposed new record
plat as same WIth the vacatIOn statement so noted.
3) EXIstmg overhead and underground FPL easements as shown on the eXIsting record plat have not
been addressed on the proposed Master Plan. How WIll the applIcant address these Issues?
4) All utIlity easements shall be shown on the rectIfied SIte plan and landscapmg drawmgs so that we
may determme WhICh trees may mterfere WIth utIlItIes (both eXIstmg and proposed). In general,
palm trees WIll be the only tree species allowed within utIlity easements. Canopy trees may be
planted outSIde of the easement so that roots and branches WIll not Impact those utIlItIes WIthin the
easement in the foreseeable future. LDR Sec. 7.5-18.1 gIves publIc utIlitIes the authonty to
remove any trees that mterfere WIth utIlIty services, eIther in utilIty easements or publIc nghts-of-
way.
MIchael W. Rumpf
Re: HIgh Ridge
Sept. 6,2001
Page 2
5) Palm Beach County Health Department permIts may be required for the water and sewer systems
serving thIS project (CODE Sec. 26-12).
6) FIre flow calculations will be reqUIred demonstratmg the City Code reqUIrement of 1,500 g.p.m. at
stated m LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec 16, or the requirement Imposed by the msurance
underwnters, whIchever IS greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a))
7) CODE Sec 26-34(E) reqUIres that a capacIty reservatIon fee be paid for thIS project either upon
the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department applIcatIOn forms or withm
30 days of sIte plan approval, whIchever occurs first. ThIS fee will be determmed based upon final
meter SIze, or expected demand.
8) Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. reqUIres the conservatIOn of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for imgatIOn where other sources are readIly aVailable.
9) LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16 reqUIres that all points on each bUIldmg WIll be wIthin 200 feet of
an existmg or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the proposed plan meets thIS
condItIOn, by showmg all hydrants.
10) Appropriate backflow preventers will be reqUIred for each water servIce to the bUIldings, and the
fire spnnkler line If there is one, m accordance wIth CODE Sec. 26-207.
HDKlkd
Xc: Georganne Barden
FIle
S:\Engineering\Dostal\High Ridge MPMD 01-004-1 st review Utility Comments.doc
/
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
NO. 01-171
!~.:-~.....,'~';--'
~f IJ Ii' rn)
, ~'
/n/ .... l
/ iL; Sfp
E....~..
6
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, DIrector ofPlanmng and Zonmg
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., CIvIl Engmeer
t.,
\oi,''''
DATE:
September 6,2001
RE:
High Ridge P.I.D.
Master Plan Modification (Major Modification) -1st Review
File No. MPMD 01-004
I have revIewed the above referenced SIte Plans, forwarded to me on September 4, 2001, agamst the
Master Plan Review reqUIrements outlmed m the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordmances. Followmg
are my comments wIth the appropnate Code and Land Development RegulatIOns (LDR) referenced.
Code Requirements
1. On the SIte Plan, add a general note that all plans submItted for specific permIts shall meet the CIty'S
Code reqUIrements at tIme of applIcatIOn. These permIts include, but are not lImited to, the followmg:
pavmg, dramage, clearing & grubbing, excavation & fill, curbing, site lightmg, landscapmg and
imgatIOn. PermIts reqUIred from other permItting agencIes such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Flonda Water Management DIstnct (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage
DIStrict (LWDD), Flonda Department of Environmental ProtectIOn (FDEP), Palm Beach County
Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engmeering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
County Department of EnvIronmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be
mcluded wIth the permit request.
2. Show elevatIOns of the adjacent subdIvISIon per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.E.
3. Show topographIcal condItIons on the tract per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.G.
4 Show eXIstmg streets, alleys and easements on or adjacent to the tract per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIon
3.H.
5 Show all eXIstmg dramage dIstnct facIlItIes per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.1.
6. ProvIde a generalIzed statement of subsurface condItions per the LDR, Chapter 3, Section 3.M.
7. Show all eXIsting utIlItIes per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.0.
8. PrOVIde a statement that all utilItIes are avaIlable and wIll be provided by the appropnate agenCIes per
the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.P.
9. Provide a master storm water management plan per the LDR, Chapter 3, SectIOn 3.T.
--
,"",
Engmeenng Department Memorandum No. 01-171
Re: HIgh RIdge P.I.D. - 1 st RevIew Comments
September 6,2001
Page Two
10. Due to the extensIve changes to the P.I.D. a new boundary survey WIll be reqUIred adhering to the
requirements of the LDR, Chapter 5, Plattmg. ThIs includes easement descnptions and dImensions
(graphic and written). It IS recommended that the new combmed lots be assigned a new number or
desIgnatIOn for clanty.
11. The proposed changes to the P.I.D. wIll require the substantIation of the abandonment of the portion
of Mmer Road east of High RIdge Road.
LUck
Xc: H. DavId Kelley, Jr., PEIPSM, UtIlity Engmeer
File
C:\My Documents\High Ridge PID, Engineering 1st Review Comments. doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 01-193
TO: Michael W. Rumpf
DIrector ofPlanmng and Zomng
FROM: Timothy L. Large ~
TRC Member/BUIldmg DIvIsIOn
DATE' September 12,2001
SUBJECT: Site Plan Review
1 st Review - Master Plan Modification
Project - High Ridge, PJ.D.
LocatIOn-Lots 9, 10, II, 12
File No. - MPMD 01-004
~.
The BUIlding DIvIsion presently has no Issues with thIS request for the relocatIOn of the cul-de-
sac. If you have any questIOns, I can be reached at 742-6352.
m "~:2:1~~
MPARTM~NT'" DEVELOPMENT
,.......
PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #01-90
TO:
FROM:
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
John Wildner, Parks DireclorJ:
Barbara J. Meacham, Land ape Architect ~
High Ridge, P.I.D
September 11, 2001
THRU:
RE:
Date:
1. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and sitework
improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for
review and approval by the Parks Department staff. Include on the plan
location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way
Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
LusIa Galav, PnncIpal Planner
From:
Kevm J. Hallahan, Forester / EnVIronmentalIst
Subject:
High RIdge, P. I. D. (Lots 9,10,11,12)
MPMD # 01-004
1 st ReVIew
Date:
September 13, 2001
I have no comments on the Master Plan ModIficatIOn proposed for the above proJect. The
project should contmue m the normal review process.
Kjh
File
1/
HIGH RIDGE P.I.D.
MPMD 01-004
1st Review Planning
September 7, 2001
This master plan submittal does not substitute for a plat. Submit a revIsed plat of the PID showmg the
relocatIon of the Commerce Road right-of-way m order for subsequent site plan approval.
The master plan must indicate the distance in feet between the relocated Commerce Road nght-of-way and
the boundary of the eastern plat line.
The master plan should mdicate the lot hnes and dImensions of Lots 9 through 12 However, If the project
mtent IS to combme the lots by unity of title, then showing each indIvIdual lot hne would not be necessary
The site plan tabular data must mdicate the setbacks for the PID
Obtain an easement from the property owner of Lot 1 to construct the sign denoted as "PID IdentIficatIon
SIgn"
IndIcate the dIstance the monument SIgns will be from the property hne. The monument signs must be at
least 10 feet from the property line.
Please clarify the two proposed monument signs. The SIgn closest to 1-95 does not comply with Chapter
21, Article IV, SectIOn 5.E.
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlHigh Ridge PID Revised Master Plan Master Sign.ge\lst Review - Planning. doc
-DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01-000
FROM
TRC MEMBERS
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
James Prestinari, Police Department
H. David Kelley Jr , Utilities Department
Timothy K. Large, Building Division
Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General
Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic
Barbara Meacham, Parks Division
Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department
Lusia Galav, Planning Department
~\
Michael W Rumpf - ' . !u
Director of Planning an,_ nif
TO
DATE
September 4,2001
RE
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
1 ST Review - Master Plan Modification
Project - High Ridge, P I D
Location - Lots 9,10,11,12
Agent Winston Lee
File No MPMD 01-004
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should also be made
available at s:\Planning\shared or e-mail to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on,
September 14, 2001. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories;
code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will
enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval
1 Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself
3 Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents
4 Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
Page 2
other departmental improvements
5 When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified
6 If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they
do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project
be forwarded through the approval process
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Additionally, the comments should be made available at 5:\ Planning\shared
Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-mail. Lusia Galav
will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review
comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC)
members
MWR.lg
Attachment
XC' Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
John Guidry, Utilities Director
To Be Determined,Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Central File
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIFORMSITemplates and formslTRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc
Revlsed 5-22-01
FACSIMILE
1 . ') I , I .
,<2..,j-(q 11 I-{ ~;.' C! <-0. -ell .. see,
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
1 00 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO:
.:{) J1-1~ (:d.~~
J J
:> tlMA '~.J-/~f~ v
FAX:
j(;/- ~~l'~ S:~~I
I
FROM:
DATE:
{flub JD!
/ '
NUMBER OF PAGES: (including cover)
c-'5
RE: J:f/1 J-ef6ad:s and drf cf 7/o1!lG Y/hO-
{l<<- lkc ~~1'" J' (<LA-- h2~ 2J'Ltd t" Ul4rfZ:k/J ,
/ (J ~.;
/
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you.
yJrh /Jtf[ ~ ~Lc<< ~(Jc..
,~SHISSION VERIFICATIOt'J REPORT
I.
TIME 08/06/2001 13:59
NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5613756259
TEL 5513756250
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURA TI OH
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
08/05 13:57
95895559
00:02:01
03
Ok
ST At'mARD
ECr\1
..
6
Boynton Beach Code
It shall be unlawful for a person to display false
or misleading statements upon signs, calculated to
mislead the public as to anything sold, any services to
be performed or mformatlOn dIsseminated The fact
that any sign or display shall contain words or
language sufficient to mislead a reasonable and
prudent person in reading same, shall be prima facie
evidence of a violation of this section by the person
displaying the sign or permitting same to be displayed.
(Ord No 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01)
Sec. 3. Aesthetics.
The aesthetic quality of a building or an entire
neighborhood is materially affected by achieving
VIsual harmony of the signs on or about a structure as
it relates to the architecture of the bUlldmg or the
adjacent surroundings. In addition to the mechanical
hmItations on signs imposed by this section, there are
certain aesthetic considerations which must be met and
are therefore subject to review by the Planning and
Development Board when required.
A The scale of the sign must be consistent with
the scale of the building on which it is to be placed or
painted and the neighborhood in which it is located.
However, in no case shall it exceed the size provided
for in other sections of this chapter.
B. The overall effect of the configuration or
coloring of the sign shall be consistent with the
Community Design Guidelines The configuration
and colors shall be complementary with other signs
already on the building and on adjacent properties
All freestanding signs shall be landscaped in an
attractive manner, appropriate to the specific 10catlOn,
with a minimum dimension of the landscaped area not
less than two (2) feet. Landscaping shall be protected
from vehicular encroachment.
(Ord. No. 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01)
Sec. 4. Interpretation.
Where a question arises regarding the
interpretation of this chapter, the most restrictive
mterpretation shall prevaIl.
2001 S-15
Interpretations of this chapter shall be made by
the director of development or designee.
(Ord. No. 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01)
(~.
Sec. 5. Setbacks.
All signs must meet a mimmum ten (10) foot
setback measured from the property line to the closest
surface of the SIgn. Where a building is closer than
ten (10) feet from a property line, a freestanding sign
can have its leading edge one half way between the
property line and the building Wall signs can be on
the building surface
When an accessway intersects a public right-of-
way or when the subject property abuts the
intersectIon of two (2) or more public rights-of-way,
all signage within the triangular areas described below
shall provide unobstructed cross-visibility at a level
between thirty (30) inches and six (6) feet. The
triangular areas above referred to are:
(~
~ -'
A The areas of property on both sides of an
accessway formed by the intersection of each SIde of
the accessway and the public right-of-way line with
two (2) sides of each triangle being ten (10) feet in
length (or more when determined to be necessary by
the development department), from the point of
intersection and the third side being a line connecting
the end of the other two (2) sides.
B. The area of property located at a corner
formed by the intersection of two (2) or more pubhc
or private rights-of-way, with two (2) SIdes of the
triangular area bemg thirty-five (35) feet in length
along the abutting public right-of-way lines, measured
from their pomt of mtersection and the third side
bemg a line connecting the ends of the other two (2)
lines.
(Ord. No 00-78, ~ 2, 1-2-01)
Sec. 6. Special signs.
A. Temporary project development signs.
Large areas under development shall be permItted two
(2) signs not to exceed a combined aggregate area of
two hundred fifty (250) square feet. Said signs shall
~
,
, >
General Provisions
11
Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan, as adopted and
amended.
EXTERIOR DISPLAY - Display of merchandise, as
an accessory use in a lawful principal use, outside of
the walls of the building or within any area which is
not fully enclosed by building walls, in such a
manner so as to allow for viewing or inspection of
merchandise by customers.
EXTERIOR STORAGE - The keeping of
merchandise, materials, equipment or supplies, and
the like, outside of the walls of a building or within
any area which is not fully enclosed by building
walls, which is generally not for the purpose of
allowing inspection or viewing by customers.
F ABRICA TION - The assembly or forming of goods
using finished or semi finished materials, as opposed
to the manufacture of primary materials.
FACING OR SURFACE - Shall mean the surface of
the sign upon, against or through which the message
is displayed or illustrated on the sign.
FAMILY - One (1) or more persons occupying a
single housekeeping unit and using common cooking
facilities, provided that all such persons shall be
related by blood, marriage or adoption, except that
not more than one (1) person who is not related as
such shall also be permitted to reside in the same
unit. Families who provide care in their own home
as duly state licensed foster family homes, in which
dependent children have been duly placed by the
State of Florida, and which include not more than
five (5) children (both natural and foster) in the
household, are expressly included within this term.
FAMILY DAY CARE - A residence providing day
care services for a number of children which is
limited in accordance with Florida law, and which
shall be construed to be an accessory use to any
dwelling unit located in a residential or PU district,
or in any commercial zoning district, excluding C-4
district.
FESTOONS - Strings of ribbons, lights, tinsel, small
flags, discs, spinners, pinwheels or any device
propelled by natural forces used for the purpose of
attracting attention.
1997 S-5
FILL OR FILLING - Placing material removed from
another area on and/or off site.
FIXED PROJECTION SIGN - A sign, other than.a
flat sign, which extends outward for more than
eighteen (18) inches from the facade of any building
and is rigidly affixed thereto.
FLAG - A piece of cloth used as the national, state,
municipal, civic or church symbol, registered
corporate logo, or internationally recognized symbol,
properly displayed in accordance with published
federal, state, municipal, civic or church adopted
guidelines and displayed on a designated pole located
in a proper holder or in other ways approved by an
appropriate national, state, municipal, civic or church
agency. The maximum allowed is two (2) different
flags per pole and only one (1) pole per lot or bay
frontage.
FLASillNG SIGN - A sign, either fixed or portable,
which uses or contains intermittent or a sequential
flashing light source with the exception of a time or
temperature sign or Dow Jones average sign which is
part of a permitted commercial sign.
FLAT SIGN - A sign erected parallel to, and
extending not more than eighteen (18) inches from,
the facade of any building to which it is attached and
supported throughout its entire length by the facade of
the building and not extending above or beyond the
building.
FLOOR AREA, MINIMUM - The area of the floor
or floors measured from the centerline of the exterior
walls to the centerline of dividing walls. The area for
garages, roofed-over screened porches and utility
rooms shall be credited for fiftv (50) percent of floor
~ Open porches and carports shall be credited
with twenty-five (25) percent of floor area.
Accessory buildings shall not count as floor area if
not accessible from the interior of the building. Not
more than ten (10) percent of any minimum floor area
shall be credited to screened-in porches or
breezeways
FOSTER CillLD - A child in foster care who has
been placed in a foster home by the State of Florida.