REVIEW COMMENTS
6.B.l
GROVE PLAZA CAR WASH
(MPMD 02-001)
MASTER PLAN MODIFICATION
,
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-126
TO' Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
THROUGH: Michael W Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
FROM: Eric Lee Johnson, Planner
DATE: June 18, 2002
SUBJECT Grove Plaza - File No. MPMD 02-001
Master Pian Modification (Change of use on Parcel "E")
PROJECT NAME:
Grove Plaza - MPMD 02-001
LOCATION:
Grove Plaza, southeast corner of Lawrence Road and Hypoluxo Road
LAND USElZONING:
Local Retail Commercial (LRC) / Community Commercial (C-3)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Daszkal Development, LLC is requesting to modify the Master Plan for Grove Plaza. This development is
located on the south side of Hypoluxo Road, just east of Lawrence Road (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map).
The specific request is to construct a one-story 3,596 square foot car wash facility with 3,582 square feet of
covered porch and fabric shelter areas (NWSP 02-007). Parcel "E" was approved for 3,600 square feet of
restaurant. This master plan modification is required for the development of the car wash facility instead of a
restaurant on Parcel "E"
BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS
The entire master plan was once the location of a landscaping and nursery business. The master plan was
originally approved on September 19, 1995. It was approved for six (6) separate parcels, each of which would
be required to go through site plan review In 1999, the master plan was approved for a major modification for
the development of the first parcel (Parcel "A") and several changes to the remaining parcels. Parcel "A" was
approved for a gas station (7-Eleven convenience store with gas sales). The remaining parcels were
approved for a 3,800 square-foot bank, 6,540 square foot retail use (phase 3), 9,000 square foot retail use
(phase 4), a 3,600 square foot restaurant (Parcel "E"), and another 3,600 square foot restaurant (phase 6).
Tract "G" is the common area, which accommodates the access drives, drainage and buffer wall and
landscaping for the Grove Plaza master plan. Tract "G" allows for vehicular ingress/egress to the parcels
within the master plan from Hypoluxo Road. The only point of ingress / egress from Tract "G" to Parcel "E" will
be located along the east property line of Parcel "E" The car wash project does not propose any direct
connections onto Hypoluxo Road. The car wash project will share and utilize Tract "G" with the other parcels.
Tract "G" will not be affected as a result of the proposed development. However, direct access that was
originally planned between Parcel "E" and Parcel "D" (parcel to the west of "E") will be eliminated and replaced
with a landscape buffer
There is minimal difference with regards to traffic impacts. Since 143 new daily trips are anticipated as a
result of the proposed development, the Traffic Division of Palm Beach County determined that the project
Memorandum No. PZ 02-126
Grove Plaza (Grove Plaza Carwash), MPMD 02-001
Page 2
meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County
Each parcel is required to provide the minimum parking for their respective anticipated use. The following
summary outlines the required and provided parking for each parcel:
Parcel Name ReQuired Parkin!!: Provided Parkin!!:
Parcel A 12 28
Parcel B 16 28
Parcel C 33 35
Parcel D 45 45
Parcel E 04 09
Parcel F 36 40
The landscaping of the common area of tract "G" will satisfy the residential buffer requirement for Parcel "E" of
the Master Plan for Grove Plaza. Any common area trees and shrubs that are dead or in poor shall be
replaced upon recommendation of the City Forester / Environmentalist as a result of this request for master
plan modification (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The landscape plan for the development of
Parcel "E" is discussed in the corresponding Grove Plaza Car Wash site plan staff report (NWSP 02-007).
RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this master plan modification request. Staff
recommends approval, contingent upon the comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any
additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the
Conditions of Approval.
MR/ej
Xc: Central File
S:\Planning\sHARED\WP\PROJECTS\grove plaza\Car Wash MPMD & NWSP\MPMD\SlaH report2.doc
-----:-:-"-' ~~
Location Map
Grove Plaza Car Wash
I'
EXHIBIT "A"
---:I "~----:--~ -1- L,~:
f? -'---'---~ I -:-:r T ~ r-jM'---r ':- ,
. HYPCJtJ:J2<9_HD
,-
~~
Ngt!p City
..j~,
, ~,
I
,C~' c;
l~l:c-~:-ir
~.
I II
,
----!--,-;1 -
~-.!.'f-
1
_L
~ ,
~; t{~ ~
i~{_ 1 :--=2 ~.-
.-, i----< ,-, 1
njl'lll "-~d
'J:::Jl, c:r- Lt
~
i' _-
'L-"
,~
'--1 f=
AG
83,
--1---
~_~R1 PUD
c-
, -,
~I
I
I
c~rsl;-E ffl I ::-;~
i ~+.::",,:~,,::,::__._~: r-
~ ~-------- - c:-
:: If:~.~~;~-~~~~t2'~-I' ~
.j -;-r~ ~-,--.c~'- .-J
I !-__
r-
; :"8 +AL ~__'c'--j
i IJf'\illi\- I I ! ~ _~
0:::'
I
I
1-
=-_1 ~-
PUD;~=~-
,-
"MeaaOws" ~
-~~
~i~_
~::: ,-- '--, ~P"U~-cD: __~'=~ c
I ~~' : . .',: ~-;;.~
II ~ ~--=. - !I Ie..
! ::~lj'-KooJlw6bd GroveK
"-;1 i.~_~-;-' ,~!lL-':"'l~
rir'illi. -,I 1":T"iTiI' I i :!~
I ,_'. ~ j, " ,I' L
,II
_;31
~ J_'=P _
> ;--T~\
f-----------_.---'---,l."-----------.:..
I
'I
I
I,
I
i~~
,; II'
J.L.lL__
f I --'~II"-_
i ~p!~-D~L F~~
1,iL....." I-~I-----:: '- I rl-
IH't.=.. .,- . ~-~~
;=~ 1 awr..enc, ,OT';:
f-' '---." V:-J--,,-
:fr-':' j~ ,..i'Jjj_~ i-
,=:E::-c::jGr:ove"-:IT~=
r.J' F-'~'~,~' I-i'~-I~' -~'
,~-,
'-i ~ -r-'
,_--:. --;::-~
'~t:-'-'---'
'='----r
~-r---' 1---'
,-, 1 :-. ~~ t=-~'_; I
,--j --' - ,
-;-r'Ti'-::-l"- '
~L
--'---'-'~
, I
500
o
500
1000
1500
2000 Feet
~
~
..:.~-=-i--c--
'-
L.
h
~ t:1:;.-' '- ~
~::,
,
W~E
s
'i!=-i:' --:~l"_~~~~":~~~_ _ _'-,
\ I: , I =:' ;.; \ I
~h --I ... .~~ I ~
;[' :,,-._~' HI', 'll~ 'I
',' .t ~Ili:--:-~~ ,':) -ff
'I !: - " ,. JJ
-- ,~ _::2~::-n____'_::-'I."r',I' '=:;_nL:_~~
~- or=- " ;'
, \1
!: -- ",
f-." .;n_jTH1:.:.:-,_n-CI.I,,_111 C .
rl !fl;- S~
---:r- i lE!_ I
II:; i ~'-
r: \ ..
., :.' .::
:.; i, I'
iit ,~~~:
'.J'i !~':
) !UL:,;"(.
I 4 '~;:::,:.'~
Ii- J]: ~r ~
'I' ;., ~:,?
.'.: ~ :::-: ~
r ...? tl.
1: ,:,,"" ~-W:u-! (1111-1111;
~ '1 1=' .
-06 CoSl
elf
it if!
.w I :
'"
~
~
~
~
~I
,-
-
. :.;
~'i Sn
ti II:
. -
i!
~
o
.
0'
.'
"'
~
~
.
.
.-
-~, , :I,' '111
I' I~'
.j'l/ I ,I
! I ,I::
'! : :. I
. I ii'
. i -. -
. . ~ II
ii'"
.
//1 ~1TI' \
- --:
, ,
'-111-11/1"-1171
;""1 - . I: :
.. ~! ;;~ ;: '
II !;: I
:-.. I
"
~ 8
"
J
$
i
-;
~. l
-.
"
..
i~:
i .
1
! :
. ,
; :
i
.,
I
II
II
I,
'i
!I
-I
I
ij,_'
l : ,
1~ I ! it : , ,
.1 -," r P:=1i
,- r;. n'
t ~~ I ~ I~ ,~ ~
. It '.11 '
~ r' ! II :
j'- illL.... -
. , I,.
I.' :
: . : tl..:iJ ' )
'1'-- _,..
,
.-
I -I I r 1.1 I !;
,-
-
,
Il,.
I ~~~
I:
J';.; i
I !
"
.! ~
"J
. :'''i
$1 h.
!- ,1:
-
;I
'1 .-.... .";'~t
-~ -.--J1':=:1~'7..
':.-iX I
!. ff'!"
:I P ", .n., I r: 1
') :i to:: - i;t(li.!..--:.:J~.~"
: .. I, .. jl<''':-;'' HI
" , , "'E:!. ~ VII
":j ,:.;! :___n__~_ ~~!I!
[~ 1:'1' - - ......
t:ki'! --::: air-:
" :"__.!"'--~--gIF,---1
.-..._--.~_ : f!;f
L.
.
.- ._'~
-~ --
-.... -...... ..;~~~~~"s~_..._.:-.-:.:;:.~
--.. _. /'
. --
,-'\' ~:.";.... ':" ~.
! -
.
;i!
<
.
~
.
I
!
I-~
t.Z:--
<
N <:
<;
c.. -
~
l.!..! '"
> '-"
:) <
c:: ::;
~
I
U'
Z '"
-,,,,
, ~
(j'i' ;;
en ~
0,'-
c:: : VI
U,=
, c
,>-
c:: ' .."
Oi~
,-, ~
u' ,
0,-
c:: E.
c..f
Z ~
<
:c ._
<
z __
c:: ~
<
U
~4
~ ~ ~" '~i'r~"""''''~'''-'''.7"\-'''.'~ .....i....r;.'Oi:l:'~..._,"r.<;~.....;'\:7\'5'~"\-~-L'S~li'\~1':;.l"'l'l':'!
i l" 'I J:.' ..._. ~ 1 ~,~ II ,-"~>,,.. ~':..!.'7'.":,;'::J ') "'~I'."~'" '," ,>
.>
il
,Ii
ji
; Ii
."/
.' I
II
l.
'I
I.
J'I
I'
Uli
;;1;
j':jj
:II
!"II
'I
"
j,
I:
I
(
s
"
\'
,~ .
~ II
.,
j
i
h
Iii
I'
I,
t:
1
il
,
i
Exhibit "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Grove Plaza Car Wash
File number: MPMD 02-001
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as Master Plan Modification file # 02.001 with an June 4, 2002 Planning
and Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
1 There are twenty.two (22) dead trees along the residential landscape
buffer that must be replaced.
Co.
06/19/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
2. There is dead sod along this residential landscape buffer that must be
replaced.
3. All of the Ficus pumila vines along the residential landscape buffer wall
are dead and must be replaced. As proposed on the original landscape
plan, the roots of the Ficus pumila will not cause damage to public
roadways or other public works and may be replaced.
4 The existing irrigation sysytem must provide adequate water to all of the
landscape improvements along this residential landscape buffer.
5 There is graffiti on sections of the concrete wall that must be removed
from this residential buffer improvement.
6. The existing black vinyl chain link fence along the East perimeter of the
residential landscape buffer must be repaired in sections where it has
been vandalized or pushed over onto the ground.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Conunents: None
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Conunents:
1 To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Conunents:
2. To be determined.
MWR/elj
S:IPlannlngISHAREDIWPIPROJECTSlgrove plazalCar Wash MPMD & NWSPIMPMDICOA.doc
DEVElOPrt IT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMIS )N OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME. Grove Plaza Car Wash
APPLICANT'S AGENT David Daszkal / Daszkal Development, LLC
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS. 3837 Jonathans Way Boynton Beach, FL 33436
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: July 2,2002
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT Master Plan Modification
LOCATION OF PROPERTY Parcel E of Grove Plaza, east of Lawrence Road on the south side of
Hypoluxo Road
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the findings
and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the relief
sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative staff and
the public finds as follows:
1 Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with the
requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
_ HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth
on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included"
4 The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
- GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms and
conditions of this order
7 Other
DATED'
City Clerk
S:\PJanning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\grove plaza\Car Wash MPMD & NWSP\NWSP\OO.doc
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Hallahan, Kevin
Tuesday, June 18, 2002 2:20 PM
Johnson, Eric
Galav, Lusia
RE. COA Grove Plaza master plan
Eric,
I agree with your comment and request you add the rest of the sentence. Thanks. Kevin.
-----Original Messagem--
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 5.20 PM
To: Hallahan, Kevin
Cc: Galav, Lusia
Subject: COA Grove Plaza master plan
Kevin,
You have a condition of approval for the landscaping on the master plan that reads the following:
All of the Ficus pumila vines along the residential landscape buffer wall are dead and must be replaced.
I would like to add to the end of the above referenced sentence, "As proposed on the original landscape plan, the
roots of the Ficus pumila will not cause damage to public roadwavs or other public works and mav be replaced"
What does everybody think 'bout that? I didn't review the "original" landscape plan but I assume that you wouldn't
have made that comment without consulting it first. Furthermore, the Planning & Development Board members
recognize that in general, Ficus is not permitted and your original comment would be a conflict with the code.
eric
1
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Grove Plaza Car Wash
File number MPMD 02-00 I
Reference: I "review plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a March 26, 2002 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking
^~
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
I There are twenty.two (22) dead trees along this residential landscape ./
buffer that must be replaced. /
2. There is dead sod along this residential landscape buffer that must be V
replaced.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
06/04/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3 All of the Ficus pumila vines along the residential landscape buffer wall V
are dead and must be replaced.
4 The existing irrigation sysytem must provide adequate water to all of the /'
V
landscape improvements along this residential landscape buffer
5 There is graffiti on sections of the concrete wall that must be removed V
from this residential buffer improvement.
6. The existing black vinyl chain link fence along the East perimeter of the V
residential landscape buffer must be repaired in sections where it ahas
been vandalized or Dushed over onto the ground.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
7 Include the area of the canopy within methodology for determining v"
maximum lot coverage for the entire master plan.
8. The north arrow is incorrectly pointing east. Correct the direction of the V
north arrow
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDIIM'IPROJECTSlgrove plazalCar Wash MPMD & NWSPIMPMD\1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Grove Plaza Car Wash
File number' MPMD02-DOl
Reference: 1 "review plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a March 26. 2002 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking
I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BillLDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST ~~
Comments: " 50-&/
1 There are twenty-two (22) dead trees along this residential landscape ~.
buffer that must be replaced.
2. There is dead sod along this residential landscape buffer that must be
replaced. V
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
06/04/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3 All of the Ficus pumila vines along the residential landscape buffer wall V
are dead and must be replaced.
4 The existing irrigation sysytem must provide adequate water to all of the ............
landscape improvements along this residential landscape buffer
5 There is graffiti on sections of the concrete wall that must be removed V
from this residential buffer improvement.
6. The existing black vinyl chain link fence along the East perimeter of the
residential landscape buffer must be repaired in sections where it ahas ~
been vandalized or pushed over onto the ground.
PLANMNG AND ZONING
Comments:
7 Include the area of the canopy within methodology for determining
maximum lot coverage for the entire master plan.
8. The north arrow is incorrectly pointing east. Correct the direction of the
north arrow
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDI'M'IPROJECTSlgrove pla2aICar Wash MPMD & NWSPIMPMD\1ST REVIEWCOMMENTS.doc
,
(\~"' i/
~k ~ H /--'
15t REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Grove Plaza Car Wash
File number' MPMD02-001
Reference: I "review olans identified as Master Plan Modification with a March 26,2002 Planning and Zoning
Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
I
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BillLDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRO]'l,'MENT ALlST
Comments:
I There are twenty-two (22) dead trees along this residential landscape
buffer that must be replaced.
2. There is dead sod along this residential landscape buffer that must be
replaced.
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Grove Plaza Car Wash
File number' MPMD 02-00 I
Reference: 1 "review plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a March 26,2002 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
1 There are twenty-two (22) dead trees along this residential landscape
buffer that must be replaced.
2. There is dead sod along this residential landscape buffer that must be
replaced.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
05/13/02
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
3 All of the Ficus pumila vines along the residential landscape buffer wall
are dead and must be replaced.
4 The existing irrigation sysytem must provide adequate water to all of the
landscape improvements along this residential landscape buffer
5 There is graffiti on sections of the concrete wall that must be removed
from this residential buffer improvement.
6. The existing black vinyl chain link fence along the East perimeter of the
residential landscape buffer must be repaired in sections where it ahas
been vandalized or Dushed over onto the !!found.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
7 Include the area of the canopy within methodology for determining
maximum lot coverage for the entire master plan.
8. The north arrow is incorrectly pointing east. Correct the direction of the
north arrow
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlVvI'IPROJECTSlgrove pla",ICar Wash MPMD & NWSPIMPMD\1ST REVIEWGOMMENTS.doc
~-} c //[P .'D
-,
~
it/.
~ 6~ ,-"",-l~., H'-...fl.-..
.
}
\
.
~C.J<--P~ ~~r~
5/7 c r1:
. ' r~€.-thcJolOCf1
J4.>c.L'-\..Le \k.e CV\..e.Ct e:>-o ~ c.c~"ft..l L-0I..~ i1" IlI!'L'," ~L~1-)
01)'\ -"#1}.j7A""~ 1-0 -f'\ .'l J.;n J)....-t-;;-. ' .rvv1 TV' '
/' _ _ 'I)' '1"l> "" ''(;Iv, ~\A.IYV~ . ' ~ ~JA\.u...v1l-)
p,T ~ ~\h.e~ n~~~
('~ ~~t
~ ),) o.-~ ~ l/\'\.tDI'U'-tL, 1./' '\ eo-..1 cJ:xy-(L--i 11-..> cL-t.eh~
b>p -r--v wr1v-. ~
<::J
~
~
~
~\JSP
Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To'
Lusia Galav, Senior Planner
From:
Kevin J Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Grove Plaza Car Wash
NWSP 02-007, 1st Review
Date:
May 6, 2002
rove Plaza Common Area residentiallandsca e buffer
There are twenty-two (22) dead trees alonll this rp<i~entiol1"ndscape buffer that must be replaced.
- Th~re is dead sod along this residentiallandsca e buffer that must be replaced.
o the . on e resIdential landscape buf er wa ar must be replaced.
1 he existing irrigation system must proVl e a e
this residentiallandsca e buffer.
There is graffiti on sections of e co all that must be removed from this residential buffer
improvement. ,
---Tlie existing black vinyl chain link fence along the East perimeter of the residential landscape buffer must
be r "n sections where it onto the ound.
I
Landscape Plan
The landscape plan (for hedges and groundcover plants) does not meet the 50 % native species
requirements
There is an irrigation c
plan include with the site pia
-
;
The pr~~et sheltlltl eeptinlle in the normal review pro~.
Xc; Eric Johnson, Planner
Kjh
file