CORRESPONDENCE
SENT BY: JON E. SCHMIDT & ASSOC,;
- . Q
Jon E. Schmidl ol'ld Assoc;loles
LondSC:Qpe ""chlle<:lln & Site Planning
333 SoulMII'l 8olll.vOld . SUIte 200
Mil PQItn "'ocn, FIOII"C11 >>t~
1.I.(~1)~. Foil. (5061) ~o6OC;>1
E-moU: J.chmld"".u~
561659 6691;
JUL.20,01 10:52AM;
o
PAGE 1/1
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
eo -O~
TIME: .' s'
PAGES (INCLUDING COVER):
FAX": ( )
REFERENCE II:
W.O I~\ L...J.. ~.(. ~'c.r~'-'
COMP~Y:
FROM:
REGARDING:
--.J
COMMENTS:
~..~ ~L.
t-w~ h
J,.", ,.
~
,..,. ....:-+ - .l hf. ~
/
~
D~...~ 'la1......
-J
It>.......", .... ~#Ll. "&.._1 k. ~ ,,.,,. /i-L..,...~ ~ J ~"''''~"''"
- I ~ "
Ail b...~L.~-- t...~J~?.. ~~t!!C..c. ~L(~
"N~ ,~.......~~:--- ~:1i:.r~L~.1Jt.
";;;' }J.~ "of".u.'~.J
('~... ~.{...-.... #"'io~..J.
/
m
~
'prj.,_.A. b...... -
~
t....... ~11~
f- ,
.~....~
/.,.,,. ... to +
o
's -.; '-*-
,~ -'-'--~ L~.b
kt..
j.., ., _ ~t..~
. ...
... 1?1
. ~ .,
. THE INFORMATION CONTAlNED IN lHIS FACSIMILE IS PJUVILEGED AND CONFlDENTlAL
INFORMATION INTENDED ONLY FOR THE TJSB OF TIm ADDRESSEE. IF THE READER OF nDS
MESSAGE IS NOT THE INTENDED RECIPrs.NT. YOU AM HEREBY NOTIFIED lHAT ANY
DISSEMINATION, DlSTIWlUTION OR COpy OF nns COMM1JNlCATlON IS STRICTI. Y PROHIBITED. fF
ORIGINAL:
DwaL
4
Q
o
Galav, Lusia
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Galav, Lusia
Tuesday, July 17, 2001 1 :21 PM
Large, Tim
Harper, Andrea; Rumpf, Michael
Woolbright Professional Plaza NWSP 00-006 (Dr. Nguyen)
Tim,
The above referenced approved site plan is currently in the permitting process and have received first review comments,
Technically the site plan approval expires tomorrow, 7/18/01, The applicant has applied for a time extension, We are in the
process of making a determination regarding processing the application, If a permit will be issued soon, it may not be
necessary to process a formal time extension application, Could you please give me some indication regarding the time
frame for issuing their permits,
Thanks,
Lusia
1
o
Boynton Beach Code
e
21
Sec. 3. Preapplication conference.
A preapplication conference with the planning
and zoning department is encouraged prior to the
preparation and submission of any site plan required
pursuant to this chapter. The purpose of this
conference shall be for the staff and applicant to
discuss overall community goals, objectives, policies
and codes as related to the proposed development and
to discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions
expressed at the preapplication conference are not
binding for formal review purposes.
Sec. 4. Technical review.
When site plan review is required by the
provisions of this chapter, the review will be
conducted as outlined in Chapter 1, Article VIII,
Development Reviews.
(Ord, No. 96-54, ~ 1, 1-21-97)
Sec. 5. Expiration of site plan.
Upon approval of a site plan by the City
Commission, the applicant shall have (1) year to
secure a building permit from the development
department. If an applicant fails to secure a building
permit in that time, all previous approvals shall
become null and void, and the applicant will be
required to submit a new site plan and application;
provided, however, a clearing permit shall not
constitute a building permit plan for site plan review
purposes. At its discretion, the City Commission
may extend the approval of a site plan for a one-year
period, provided a request for extension is filed prior
to the expiration of the one-year period. In granting
such extensions the City Commission may impose
additional conditions to conform the site plan to
current development standards.
Sec. 6. Notification.
When a site plan has been scheduled for review
by the planning and development board, the planning
and zoning department shall supply the applicant with
a sign or signs to be posted on the subject property
1997 S-5
on which the site plan will be effective with the
following information:
(C'
A. Description of proposed use.
i}
B . Availability of plans for review of interested
citizens within the planning and zoning department.
C. Dates and times of the planning and
development board and City Commission meetings to
review the proposed plan.
Sec. 7. Submission requirements.
Each applicant shall submit to the planning and
zoning department the following plans and exhibits in
the number of copies specified by the planning and
zoning department, together with a site plan review
application and a fee adopted by resolution by the
City Commission.
A, Existing site characteristics map: A sealed
survey not older than six months showing all adjacent
streets, alleys and driveways, and also illustrating:
(~
1. Existing natural features, including but
not limited to lakes, trees and other vegetation and
soils and topography.
2. Existing buildings, building elevations,
other structures, including use, height, dimensions
and setbacks,
3. Existing utility lines and all easements.
4, Existing elevations (corder, street and
finished floor)
B. Site development plan:
1. A scaled drawing clearly illustrating
proposed buildings and other structures, and any
existing buildings and structures which are to be
retained, including use, height, dimensions and
setbacks ,
2,
driveways
Proposed off-street parking spaces,
and sidewalks, including location,
L