Loading...
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS (MAY 2003) ~=n Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL BOYNTON BEACH, FL Prepared for: Land Capital Group, Inc. Carrolton, Texas 047538000 May 2003 @Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 4431 Embarcadero Drive West Palm Beach, Florida 33407 561/845-0665 TEL 561/863-8175 FAX ~gg~ttr#G- Florida RegistrEcbrNnmber 5863(1 Engjneering Businc3s Number 696 t;!Z,/03 ~=n Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................ 1 INVENTORY AND PLANNING DATA ............................................................. 3 PROJECT TRAFFIC............................................................................................. 4 Traffic Generation.............................................................. ....................... 4 Traffic Distribution............................... .......................... .......................... 4 Traffic Assignment.................... ............ ........................................ ........... 6 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC.................................................... .............................. 8 ASSURED AND PROGRAMMED CONSTRUCTION ...................................... 9 PART ONE - INTERSECTION ANALYSIS ..................................................... 10 Intersections on Project Accessed Links ................................................. 10 Intersections with Ten Percent Project Traffic on Approach .................. 10 PART TWO - LINK EV ALUA TION ................................................................. 11 Total Peak Hour...................................................................................... 11 Test 2 ...................................................................................................... 13 SITE CIRCULATION AND TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS ........................ 14 CONCLUSION.................................................................................................... 16 APPENDIX................................................................................ .Following Page 16 047538000-0503 Pag~ii ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. LIST OF FIGURES Fiqure No. Title Paqe 1 Site Location Map........................................................................ 2 2 Project Assignment ...................................................................... 7 3 Peak Hour Site Access Traffic ................................................... 15 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title Paqe .1 Trip Generation.................................. ................... .'..;................... 5 2 Peak Hour Traffic Link Analysis............................................... 12 047538000-0503 Page ii ~=~ '* .,0 w Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. INTRODUCTION This is a traffic impact analysis for the proposed retail development to be located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard in Boynton Beach, Florida. The current proposed site plan includes 21,600 square of commercial retail development. The location of the site is illustrated in Figure 1. Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. was retained to prepare a traffic impact analysis for the project. This document presents the methodology used and the fmdings of the traffic impact analysis. The analysis was conducted in accordance with the currently adopted requirements of the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) of Palm Beach County. The analysis used current data available from Palm Beach County. A buildout year of 2003 was analyzed for the proposed development. 047538000-0503 Page 1 lANTANA RD. HYPOLUXO RD. ..J ~ ~ 0 ~ Ul ll: Ii! fl .... ll: 8 C> :i .... z ii: 0 0 i5 0 :z: ~ ~ :z: MINER RD. ~ff Got.TE.WAY BLVD. Ii! m~ 8 ., il ;~ OlD IIOYNTON RD. IIOYNTON IlE"ACH BlVD. SITE ~ ~ 2 WOOUlRlGHT RD. ~ Q) 'f.", (,) 0 GOlF RD. 0 ll: :z: 0 ~ (,) ll: .... ~ PIPER'S GlEN BLVD. ...... ~ Ii! - ...... 'dii ~ 95 AAWR PICT RD. 0 ll: >< 0 ~ ~ Iij;J ) FIGURE 1 BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE ~_n Kimley-Horn ~_U and Associates, Inc. . 047538000 ~"'1""" ~=~ u4J Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. INVENTORY AND PLANNING DATA The data used in this analysis were obtained from Palm Beach County and Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc. The data included: · 2003 peak hour traffic volumes · Roadway geometrics · Intersection turning movement counts 047538000-0503 Page 3 ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PROJECT TRAFFIC Traffic Generation The daily traffic generation for the development was based on trip generation rates published and accepted by Palm Beach County. The proposed development plan consists of 21,600 square feet of retail land use and is expected to generate 1,410 new external daily trips. Peak hour characteristics were based on information published in Institute of Transportation Engineers' report, Trip Generation, 6th Edition. The project is expected to generate 35 a.m. peak hour trips and 126 p.m. peak hour trips with the p.m. peak hour being the most adverse peak hour condition. Table I presents the proposed project's trip generation. Pass-by capture was applied based on the retail pass-by equation published and accepted by Palm Beach County. Traffic Distribution Traffic distribution was determined from a review of the roadway network and travel time characteristics along with the various attractions. The distribution according to the cardinal directions is: NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST 30 percent 30 percent 15 percent 25 percent 047538000-0503 Page 4 TABLE 1 BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL TRIP GENERATION Land Use Intensity Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Trips Total In Out Total In Out ~ Commercial Retail 21,600 sq. ft. 2,545 64 39 25 228 109 119 Pass- B y Capture Commercial Retail 44.60% 1,135 29 17 11 102 49 53 Net New Project Traffu: Va/urnes 1410 35 22 14 126 60 66 Driveway Volumes 2,545 64 39 25 228 109 119 Notes: Trip generation was calculated using the following data: Daily Traffic Generation Commercial Retail [P.B.C.] = Ln(T) = O.643Ln(X) + 5.866 AM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Commercial Retail [ITE 820] = Ln(T) = O.5%Ln(X) + 2.329 (61 % in, 39% out) PM Peak Hour Traffic Generation Commercial Retail [ITE 820] = La(T) = O.660Ln(X) + 3.403 (48% in, 52% out) Pass-By Capture Commercial Retail [P.B.c.] = % = 45.1 - O.0225{A) p:'iH751381JO(}.{boy.IO'IJt!tail.xIs]Irip...zt!. romp 5131Y200311:54 ~=~ ~~kIC. ~ "'~ .~ '#if 'i!i4! ,~ ... ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Traffic Assignment The peak hour external project trips were assigned to the surrounding roadways. Figure 2 illustrates the project assignment. Based on the net traffic generation, it was determined that the maximum radius of development influence for Test 1 of the Traffic Performance Standards is two miles. The Test 2 maximum radius of influence is one mile. 047538000-0503 Page 6 lANTANA RD. .. HYPOWXO RD. ..J 0 ~ 0 ~ ll: ll: .... .... ~ 8 ~ 0 i5 ll: ii: ~ C> :z: z :i 0 C> 0 :;: MINER RD. ~ I') Got.TE.WAY BLVD. ~ ~ ~ I"- .- d .q- 10 It: CI 2% 0 4%1\ ~ ... 0> 2% 4% 2% ~ OlD IIOYNTON RD. ~ SITE ~ 22% 8% 13% 10 23% 31% 0> 22% IIOYNTON BEACH BLVD. I g m ~ ~ ~ ~ 59% 10 ll: I"- ~ Ul ~ IX) 7% 1% 3% WOOI..BRlGHT RD. ~ I') GOlF RD. ~. ~ tj Q) (,) o .... ,. AAWR PICT RD. o ll: >< I (,) .... ~ ~ tj - ...... ~ PlPER"S GlEN BLVD. ~ Iij;J ) FIGURE 2 BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT NOT TO SCALE ~_n Kimley-Horn ~_U and Associates, Inc. . 047538000 ----- ...- .- 1'N' ~- "'" - .... :- ~- ;. ~ c_ ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Future background traffic includes two components in addition to existing traffic volumes: · Traffic from the unbuilt portions of committed developments · Historical traffic growth Projects listed in the Palm Beach County spreadsheet "Approved Development Traffic in West Boynton/Delray Area," traffic from the proposed BJ's Wholesale Club on Boynton Beach Boulevard, and traffic from the Wal*Mart Supercenter on Old Boynton Road were also included in the analysis. A summary of traffic from these projects is included in the Appendix. No other major projects will contribute greater than ten percent (10%) of the level of service standard on any link significantly impacted by the project during its buildout time frame. Because the buildout of this project is expected to occur by the end of 2003, no historic traffic growth was added to the 2003 counts. 047538000-0503 Page 8 .... -M" 'i<fJJilIj .'il'..... ... ~ '<4'1 ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ASSURED AND PROGRAMMED CONSTRUCTION A review was undertaken of the Five-Year Plans of Palm Beach County and FDOT as well as those improvements committed by the developers of projects in the area. No roadway improvements are planned within the limits of the study area. 047538000-0503 Page 9 ~=~ ~ ... .. ..- ... "'" - ~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PART ONE -INTERSECTION ANAL YSIS Intersections on Project-Accessed Links An analysis was undertaken for intersections nearest to each link directly accessed by the project on Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard. The intersections were analyzed using the Critical Sum planning methodology as outlined in the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). This analysis indicates that the critical sum at the intersections of Boynton Beach Boulevard & Winchester Park Boulevard, Boynton Beach Boulevard & Lawrence Road, and Old Boynton Road & Winchester Park Boulevard will not exceed the threshold of 1,400 vehicles per hour with the existing lane configurations. The critical sum analysis worksheets are included in the Appendix. Intersections with Ten Percent Project Traffic on Approach The Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards stipulate that an analysis shall be undertaken for intersections where the project traffic comprises 10% or more of the total traffic on at least one of the intersection approaches. No intersections were found to fall within the category of this level of project impact and therefore no additional intersections were analyzed. 047538000-0503 Page 10 ~=~ lffij ,- Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PART TWO - LINK EVALUATION Total Peak Hour A two-way peak hour link performance standard evaluation was undertaken for each link considering its total two-way peak hour traffic volume and the roadway laneage in place in 2003. Project traffic and total traffic for the two-way peak hour conditions are shown in Table 2. Boynton Beach Boulevard from Winchester Park Boulevard to Congress Avenue is significantly impacted by the project. The significantly impacted link will meet the two-way peak hour link level of service standards through the end of 2003. 047538000-0503 Page 11 c ... 5 l;l ". c: "" ". i.5 ". ~ c;; ... ~ g b == lZl =3 Vi -= ~ ~ lt ~-< ==~ ~~~ ;rol...l -<!:Qu ~ z... o t: ~~ i5~ !:Q !5 o == ~ -< rol lloo .,. .. ..* '".~ '. .. '. .... :1...1: .. 1;; .. ~ .. 'C "",~.; lZl .c i~ S~ ~ ~ = '0 ;> .. g == ..-: .. .. lloo a "" 1J ~ .;,-s ::8 Ii: QE 'C ~ ~ .. 0 :0- l...lU 8 Q~ ~ ~-~ c...ll.l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ Zo ... E .. e ~r.. .. ~ 'C C = " ~ ..-: '" .. !:Q S " ~ ~ &i o 0 0 0 zzzz ... u ~E E'E lloo~ f") l,(')............ ... C 5 .. ~ l::~ ..- lloo ~ -< ~~~lI< 0000 NNMO\ ~~~:} .. ., .. .. .J:> c E .. =...l Zo ....l ....l ....l ....l V') l/") '" N 0000 ~~~~-- M~M ....l ....l ....l ....l V'l V) \f') M " ~ -g ..c ~ 0 ~ -g~ S.c o p... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g 0 ~ g ~g gf~ j~8~ 'C "0 as ._ ~ ~ e ~ c ~ " oS ~ g c _ e ~:= ~ !:Q::;1....l 'C 5 '" " >- '" ...... '" '" 0- ;':: '" o 0- ;':: '" o 0 0 VI 0 0 0 0 zzz~zzzz ~~~t!~~~\O ~~~~~~~~ _N('f')V')NM V) 00000000 V)V)V)V)V')lrlNM V)\I)lI')\t')II')\f100 -.:f-.:i-.:i-.:i-.:i-.:fM~ 00000000 tEtEtEtEtEtE:i:i 00000000 V')V)V')V)V)\f')NN V)V)V)lI")V)V)oo -.:i-.:i~-.:i-.:i~MM ~~~~~~~~ -ci > ii:i "0 ... " ;; -a ~ ': ~ 8 ~ 5~~ ~ j ~ ..0 -e -d > t'3 "'l:;j > @o~g @ ~ S]~ -g~ ".: ~ !:Q ;j '1ii ~ p.. ,,-<-5~c ~ VI VI cu ~ r 8 VI l! i1 ~ oa ~ C l! ggfcO~~g ~8iiil~j~ " !:Q "0 g g >. 5 ~ "'0 ~ .<8 ~"fo ~ ~ VI:t ~ ~ ~ e g~V) ~.g uo5:~~ "0 " " " " C l>'. ~ c ~ -<" ii:i ~ ~ VI ~ ~ e 85~~ o Z 0- lI< ...... o '" o '" o ....l ... o '" o '" o ....l ... "0 " " l>'. " u c: e ~ .. ....l 'C ~~ .. i~a :5 .- ~ 8::;11: ::: ~ " Z ... ~ '" o 0- "1. ....l '" o 0- :J- ....l '" "0 > ii:i '" e u " " CI) ] > '" -a " 'C co .. ~ 'f ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. U5t',~~ ~ '-' !l' ~ j " " C " > <<: o Z o 0 0 0 ZZZZ '" 11")'\0-0\ lI< ... lI<~lI<lI< ~V)-r- o '" '" ..f 0000 0\0'10\0\ t:t;.:1:J-:J. o tE ....l ....l ....l ....l N M M M o '" '" ..f 0000 0\0'\0\0\ :J-:1:J-~ o ....l '" o:J o:J o:J o:J -ci l>'. C " " >> " co "0 6 -ci ] "0 > > g @ "'0 O~-5 [5 "8 l=: ~ ~ ~ O~.E >. ~ c .~ ~~E== ;3 6 ~ ~ ] -g ~ " 'C-a~ erj ciS B ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~c35 000 0 0 0 0 zzzzzzz ::!;~M~~~::: lI<lI<lI<lI<lI<lI<lI< ::~!::O\~~O\ 0000000 lrllrllrllrllrllrllrl lrl lrl lrl lrl Ill') l,(') l,(') ..:f..:f..:f..:f..:f..:f..:f 999999'9 1.0\01.0\0\0\0\0 0000000 V) l,(')V)V) V) V) V) V)V)V)V)V)V)lrl ..:f..:f..:f..:f..:f..:f..:f 0000000 tEtEtEtEtEtEtE -ci ] "0 > > ~ 55 "'C O~-5 g "'C gc::~~o~ "'g~ O~.1$ a~ ~ ~ ~ c:: .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .9 .0 <<: ~ ~B~~g"E~ "",D6co~~....l -ci > ii:i ~ ~ ] o = ~ "0 ~ ~ ~ ~ " -< " l>'. ~~8.~ ~ ~&'~ c 8 -ci > ii:i "0 .c g ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 5 c .c:: > .9 .0 <<: ~ g "E co ~ ~ ]-g ~ 0 -al>'. ciS B ~ ~ ~ ~ co :2 ClO c,j .E .,; C1) E:!!! ~g ~~ E"C ~@ ~ II ~ '" .., 8 ~ "" .!l, 3 !' i ~ Si .. ~ ... '. """ ',. \"iiiII ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Test 2 The Model Test 2 indicates a radius of influence of one mile from the site. None of the significantly impacted links are on the Test 2 list of deficient links. 047538000-0503 Page 13 ~=n i:i. ~. .... ... "'" ;'JiIlIli - ,,* I,. '" Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. SITE CIRCULA TION AND TURN LANE REQUIREMENTS Two driveways are proposed to serve the site. The property will directly access Boynton Beach Boulevard via a proposed right-in I right-out driveway, and Winchester Park Boulevard via a proposed right-in I right-out driveway. Driveway Classification According to the Palm Beach County "Guide Parking Lot and Street Access Design Criteria and Standards", it is necessary to classify project entrances as minor, intermediate, or major according to the following criteria: 1. Minor - Provides for a maximum average daily traffic of 500. 2. Intermediate - Provides service for a maximum average daily traffic from 501 to 2,000. 3. Major - Provides service for a maximum average daily traffic greater than 2,000. Using these criteria, the driveway on Winchester Park Boulevard would be classified as minor. The driveway on Boynton Beach Boulevard would be classified as major. Turn Lane Requirements Palm Beach County requires a right -turn lane when inbound peak hour right -turning traffic is 75 vehicles or more. Figure 3 presents the existing and proposed project a.m. and p.m. peak hour total volumes assigned to the project's access locations. Consideration of these volumes with respect to the Palm Beach County access design standards results in the determination that a westbound right-turn lane is warranted on Boynton Beach Boulevard at the site entrance. No additional turn lanes are warranted. 047538000-0503 Page 14 ~ Iij;J ) NOT TO SCALE ~ ...,..., ........ .... .... ....... 1-----------------------------------] ~ ~I ~(24) 5. L_____ IIOYNTON BEACH BLVD. SITE 13821 ........ Ll) OJ ....... o N f ~}5 (~8) LEGEND 35 AM PEAK HOUR VOLUME (98) PM PEAK HOUR VOLUME 121631 DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUME --~ FIGURE 3 BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC ~_n Kimley.Horn ~_U and Associates, Inc. o 047538000 ~=~ ,4ft .. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. CONCLUSION The Boynton Beach Retail project is proposed to be located on the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Winchester Park Boulevard in Boynton Beach, Florida. Based on the traffic impact analysis prepared for the entire site, the proposed development meets the requirements of the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. 047538000-0503 Page 16 ~=n Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. APPENDIX .. TABLE A-I BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL COMMITTED PROJECTS LIST Project Project Boynton Retail Project Major Project Start Year Buildout % Remain Buildout Factor Milin 2003 2001 0.40 2003 40% CibaGeigy 2003 2003 0.70 2003 70% HgnRchCm 2003 1998 0.65 2003 65% HgnBoyO 2003 1999 1.00 2003 100% Turner 2003 2002 1.00 2003 100% Winsberg 2003 2003 1.00 2003 100% Jog Est 2003 1998 0.63 2003 63% Royal Lks 2003 1998 0.35 2003 35% Rossmoor 2003 1998 0.30 2003 30% Siesta Key 2003 2002 1.00 2003 100% Shp@Madsn 2003 2004 1.00 2003 0% RB. Sl-Stor 2003 1999 0.86 2003 86% Excels Pare 2003 2002 1.00 2003 100% New Albany 2003 2004 0.88 2003 0% Hgn Assbg 2003 2004 1.00 2003 0% Walmart 2003 2000 1.00 2003 100% Chbd Lubveh 2003 2001 1.00 2003 100% Aberdn Com 2003 1999 1.00 2003 100% Nye 2003 2002 1.00 2003 100% Chimu 2003 1996 1.00 2003 100% Lantern Key 2003 2004 1.00 2003 0% Comnty Com 2003 1993 1.00 2003 100% Boynton Est 2003 1998 1.00 2003 100% Grove Plaza 2003 1997 1.00 2003 100% BJ's 2003 2003 1.00 2003 ,100% .,,* .. ... ... .. p:VJ475\38()()(J\{ boyntonJetail.xls ]majpro _list 5/91200312:59 ""'i4 .. ... ... ~ '11/ ". ... 4 -:e "... -..". TABLE A-2 BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL PM PEAK HOUR MAJOR PROJECT TRAmc Roadw.y Sicnifiamt .... 70.. 100" 100" 63" 35" ,... 100.. 0" 65" 0.. 100" 100.. Tolal F..... To 'mpod Milin CibaGe:ic;y Ilcn1loyO T~, JocEd RoyalLks R........ SIesta "'r Sbp@Mdsn Ex<cIs Po", Nc:w Albany Chbd Lubnh OJ'J P",Jod .. T~1Ik Old Boynton ROMI Military Trail Uwmlce Road Uwmlce Road Wiacbestcr Put. Blvd. Wincbc:sk:rPartBlvd. COIl!ftssAvc:nue Con!ftSS Aven.e Boyntoa Bc::ach Blvd. Baynton 8c:..h Boulc:vard Wc:stOrFlorida"5Tampikc: Aorida'5 Turnpike Hagea Ranch Ro.d Hagen Ranch Ro.d IogR.... Jog Ro.d El Clair Ranch Road 80 93 48 101 32 15 23 53 0 41 0 2,535 EI Clair Ranch Road Military Trail T1 84 40 " 31 19 42 46 0 36 463 MilitaryTra.iI UwmlCIe Road LawmlCle Road Wincbesta Put. Blvd. 48 48 WinchesteJ Park Blvd. CoagressAvenuc 83 83 Congress A vnue Old Boynton Road 31 31 Old Boyuton Road 1-95 1-95 ~Blvd Seaaest Blvd Feden.I Highway WooIbricht RoIHI EI Clair Ranch Road Military Tra.iI MiliIUy TRil UwralCle Road Lawrence Road Congress Avenue Congress Ave.1Ie 1-95 1-95 SeIacst Blvd 23rd A wouc Military TJUl Coagress Aveaae CoapeSl Ave.De: SeIacst Blvd Lyonl ROMI Lake: Worth Road Lu.tana Road PiDebunt Drive: Nordaor 10Cb A_ac 10th A_lie Lake Worth Road IJacc:'n R.Dc:h RNd "_R.... Gakway BoUevard GallCWay 8oUc:'vard Soya_ Bach Blvd. Soadl. ofBoyaIoa Bach Blvd.. Joe Roed North of 1011I Avnlle 10th Avenue Lake Worth ROIId Late Worth ROIld Mela1eaca Lane Me1a1eecaLane Laatua Road Laatua Road ProjectAocess ProjectAocess Hypolaxo Road HypoIww Road Lc: Chalet BCM&levard Lc: Cbakt Boa1c:vard Gateway Bolllcvanl Gateway Bollkvard Project Access Project Access Bo}'1lto. Beach Blvd. BO)'JIton Beacb Blvd. Woolbright Road Soutborwoolbright EI Clair R.ancb Road Boynton Bc::ach Blvd. Woolbright Road 9 63 34 33 0 14 153 Woolbright Road Piper'5 Gka Blvd. MUiwryTrail Le Cbakt Boa1c:vard Gateway Boulevard Gateway Boalevard Old BO)'Jltoll; Rd. Old Boyatoa Road Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach Blvd. Woolbright Road Woolbright Road 23rdAvenue 23rdAvenue Piper'5 Glen Blvd. Piper'5 Glen Blvd. Flavor Piel Road Lawrrnc:e ROIld Lantaaa Road Hypotuxo Road Hypolno Ro.d Miner ROIId Miner Road Gateway Boulevard Gateway Boakvard Old Boynton Road Old 8o)'ll~n Road BoyRton Beach Blvd. Boynton BQCh Blvd. Woolbright Road Concras Annuc: North or Lantana Road Lantana Road Hypolvw Road Hypolvxo Road Miner Road Miner Road Gateway Boulevard 24 24 Gateway Boulevard Old Boynton Road 24 24 Old Boynlon Road Boynton Beach Blvd 25 25 Boynton Beach Blvd. Woolbright Road Woolbright Road 23rd Avenue 23rdAvetlue: Lake: Ida Road '.95 HypolllllO Road Gateway Boulevard Gateway Boulevard Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach Blvd. Woolbright Road Sc:acrnt BouIe:vard HypolullO Road Gateway Boulevard Gateway Boulevard Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach Blvd. Woolbright Road Fc:dc:ral HichW8)' Gateway Boulevard Boynton Beach Blvd. BOYJlloll Beach Blvd. Ocean Avenue Oceaa Avenoe Woolbright Road OceanAvc:ouc: federal Higbway AlA AlA North or Ocean Avc:nuc So.1h ofOcc:aJl AvCIIllC ~1OO/1>4~__iLtI.'-""i~ .. .. .'A1 .. "iI"I, ,111! i'llll .. i'* ... - 1" "" ~!IIlIi'ii INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL (Existing Geometry) OLD BOYNTON ROAD @l WINC.HESTER PARK ROAD Growth Rate = Peak Season = Buildout Year = Years = 4.14% \.00 2003 o A M Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbonnd LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (03/29103) 26 12 25 2 11 2 24 636 43 40 320 8 Peak Season Volume 26 12 25 2 11 2 24 636 43 40 320 8 Background 26 12 25 2 11 2 24 636 43 40 320 8 Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Project Traffic 4% 4% 2% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 4% 2% 0% 0% Direction out out out in in in in in in in in in Project Traffic I I I 0 I 0 0 0 I I 0 0 Total 27 13 26 2 12 2 24 636 44 41 320 8 Critical Volume Analysis No. of Lanes I I I t 1 I I 2 1 <0 t I 2 I <0 I I 1 2 I <0 Aooroach Volume 66 I 16 704 369 Per Lane Volume 27 I 13 I 26 I 2 I 6 1 0 2413401 0 41 I t64 I 0 North-South Critical NB LT+SBTII= 33 SB LT+NBTII= t5 East-West Critical EB LT+WBTII- 188 WB LT+EBTII- 381 Maximum Critical Sum I 33 + 381 = 414 STATUS? UNDER PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (03/29103) t94 t21 137 54 t08 91 116 569 t26 97 749 67, Peak Season Volume 194 121 137 54 108 91 116 569 126 97 749 67 Background 194 121 137 54 108 91 116 569 126 97 749 67 Major Projects Traffic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 % Project Traffic 4% 4% 2% 0% 4% 0% 0% 0% 4% 2% 0% 0% Direction in out out in in in in in in in in in Project Traffic 3 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 Total 197 124 139 54 111 91 116 569 129 99 749 67 Critical Volume Analysis No. of Lanes I I I I I I 2 I <0 I 1 2 <0 1 I I 2 I <0 Approach Volume 460 I 256 814 I 915 Per Lane Volume 197 124 I o I 54 56 I 0 116 I 349 0 I 99 I 408 I 0 North-South Critical NB LT+SB TII- 253 SB LT+NBTII- 178 East-West Critical EB LT+WBTII- 524 WB LT+EBTII- 448 Maximum Critical Sum 253 + 524 - 777 STATUS? UNDER p:\D475\38O()(}1.[boyntonJnail.xlsjoldbo)'n_winchpk 5/91200312,59 ~.. <!ill!' ... .. "'" ,'JIll . ... ... .. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL (Future Geometry) BOYNTON BRACH Bom ,RV ARD @) T ,A WRRNCR ROAD Growth Rate = Peak Season = Buildout Year = Years = 1.83% 1.05 2003 5 AM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Sonthbound Eastbound Westbound LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (10/28/98) 31 83 59 169 284 93 91 1082 56 53 630 37 Peak Season Volume 33 87 62 177 298 98 96 1.136 59 56 662 39 Background 36 95 68 t94 327 107 105 1,244 64 61 724 43 Major Projects Traffic 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 24 0 15 22 0 % Project Traffic 0% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 23% 0% 7% 23% 1% Direction in in in in in in in in in out out out Project Traffic 0 0 2 1 0 0 0 6 0 1 4 I Total 36 95 86 195 327 107 105 1,274 64 77 750 44 Critical Volume Analysis No.ofLanes I T I I <0 I I I I I <0 I T 3 I <0 I t I 3 I <0 Aooroach Volume 217 I 629 1,443 I 871 Per Lane Volume 36 I 18t I 0 195 I 434 I 0 105 I 446 I o I 77 265 I 0 North-South Critical NB LT+SBTII= 470 SB LT+NBTII= 376 East-West Critical EB LT+WBTII= 370 WB LT+EBTII= 523 Maximnm Critical Sum I 470 + 523 = 993 STATUS? UNDER PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (10/28/98) 54 232 52 95 142 85 137 949 53 62 t062 179, Peak Season Volume 57 244 55 100 149 89 144 996 56 65 1.115 t88 Background 62 267 60 109 163 98 t58 1,091 61 71 1,221 206 Major Projects Traffic 0 0 36 0 0 0 0 51 0 34 48 0 % Project Traffic 0% 0% 7% 1% 0% 0% 0% 23% 0% 7% 23% 1% Direction in in in in in in in in in out out out Project Traffic 0 0 5 1 0 0 0 14 0 5 16 t Total 62 267 101 110 163 98 158 1,156 61 110 1,285 207 Critical Volume Analysis No. of Lanes 1 I 1 I <0 I 1 I 1 I <0 1 3 I <0 I t 3 I <0 Approach Volume 430 371 1,375 I 1,602 Per Lane Volume 62 I 368 I 0 110 I 261 I 0 158 406 I 0 I 110 498 I 0 North-South Critical NB LT+SBTII- 323 SB LT+NB TII- 478 East-West Critical EB LT+WBTII- 656 WB LT+EBTII- 516 Maximum Critical Sum I 478 + 656 - 1,134 STATUS? UNDER p:\fJ475\38OOO\j boyntonJt:lail.xls Jbb _lawrrna 5191200] 12..59 ",;/Ii .., . '. .. ''II!! '. ... ,"'" ,,,. "- '.. INTERSECTION ANALYSIS SHEET BOYNTON BEACH RETAIL (Existing Geometry) BOYNTON BEACH BOlJLEV ARD @l WINCHESTER PA RK ROAD Growth Rate = Peak Season = Buildout Year = Years = 0.73% 1.18 2003 2 AM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Southbonnd Eastbound Westbonnd LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (08/27/2001) 0 0 0 36 0 30 72 tl92 0 61 781 48 Peak Season Volume 0 0 0 42 0 35 85 1,407 0 72 922 57 Background 0 0 0 43 0 36 86 1,427 0 73 935 57 Major Projects Traffic 25 0 43 18 0 12 17 0 23 40 0 29 % Project Traffic 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 31% 49% 0% 0% 59% 0% Direction in in in out out out in out in in in in Project Traffic 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 7 0 0 13 0 Total 25 0 43 64 0 48 110 1,434 23 113 948 86 Critical Volume Analysis No. ofI.anes I I I I <0 I I I t I t I 3 I <0 I I I 3 I <0 Approach Volume 68 I tl2 1,567 I t.147 Per Lane Volume 25 I 43 I 0 I 64 I 0 0 tlO I 486 1 o I It3 345 I 0 Nonh.South Critical NB LT+SBTII= 25 SB LT+NBTII= t07 East-West Critical EB LT+WBTII= 455 WB LT+EBTII= 599 Maximnm Critical Sum I 107 + 599 - 706 STATUS? UNDER PM Peak Hour Intersection Volume Development Northbound Sonthbound Eastbound Westbonnd LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT LT Thru RT Existing Volume (08/27/200 I) 0 0 0 154 0 252 146 1071 0 110 1103 144, Peak Season Volume 0 0 0 182 0 297 172 1,264 0 130 1,302 170 Background 0 0 0 184 0 302 175 1,282 0 132 t,321 172 Major Projects Traffic 19 0 32 102 0 63 58 0 29 51 0 95 % Project Traffic 0% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 31% 49% 0% 0% 59% 0% Direction in in in out out out in out in in in in Project Traffic 0 0 0 14 0 0 19 33 0 0 36 0 Total 19 0 32 300 0 365 252 1,315 29 183 1,357 267 Critical Volume Analysis No. of Lanes I T I I <0 I I I I I I I 3 <0 I I I 3 I <0 Approach Volume 51 665 1.596 I 1.807 Per Lane Volume 19 T 32 I 0 300 I o I 0 252 I 448 I 0 I 183 I 542 I 0 North-South Critical NB LT+SBTII= 19 SB LT+NBTII- 332 East-West Critical EB LT+WBTII- 794 WB LT+EBTII- 631 Maximum Critical Sum I 332 + 794 - 1,126 STATUS? UNDER p:VJ475\38{)()(]1.j boyntonJnail.xls Jbb_winch 5/9/2(0) n 59