REVIEW COMMENTS
7.C.l
ECKERD DRUGS @TARGET
(COUS 03-001)
CONDITIONAL USE
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-086
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning & Development Board
FROM:
Michael Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
Eric Lee Johnson, AIep 4k
Planner (f
THRU:
DATE:
April 17, 2003
PROJECT:
Eckerd @ Target Commercial Center / COUS 03-001
REQUEST:
Conditional Use approval for a drive-through facility
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: Andrew Berger / American Development Corporation
Applicant/Agent: Erik J. Wilczek / Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Location: 1895 North Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) / Community Commercial (C-3)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use:
Pharmacy with drive-through facility
Acreage:
98,745 square feet / 2.27 acres
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Remainder of Target shopping plaza, zoned Community Commercial (C-3),
farther north is right-of-way for Gateway Boulevard;
South:
Catalina Shopping Center, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
East:
Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then farther east is Motorola, zoned
Planned Industrial Development (PID);
West:
Remainder of Target shopping plaza, zoned Community Commercial (C-3).
Eckerd at Target Shopping Center - COUS 03-001
Page 2
Memorandum No. PZ 03-086
BACKGROUND
Erik J. Wilczek, agent for Eckerd is seeking conditional use / major site plan modification approval for
pharmacy with a drive-through facility.
The applicant proposes to occupy an existing one (1) story 11,786 square foot building currently
occupied by Rack Room Shoes and previously occupied by Barnes & Noble, and Bookstop. The existing
building is located on Parcel "A" of the Target Commercial Center. Parcel "A", which is 2.27 acres, is
comprised of the subject stand-alone building as well as a number of smaller in-line bays (14,200 square
feet). The Target Commercial Center is comprised of three (3) main parcels, namely Parcel "A" which
was already described, Parcel "B", which is the Target store, and Parcel "C", a stand-alone Carrabba's
restaurant. The fourth parcel (Parcel "D") is subordinate and is comprised of the buffer and swale area
of the shopping center's perimeters along Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue.
The proposed pharmacy is a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district but the drive-through feature
requires conditional use approval (see Exhibit "D" - Justification). The drive-through facility would be
located on the east portion of the existing stand-alone building on Parcel "A", facing Congress Avenue.
The facility would have one drive-through lane, running much of the length of the eastern fa~ade. This
drive-through lane would eliminate ten (10) parking spaces. The parking is shared throughout the entire
shopping center (all three (3) main parcels). Unlike a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) such as
Grove Plaza or BJ's Wholesale Club, the Target Commercial Center is not a master plan. However, the
modifications proposed to Parcel "A" impact the entire shopping center. Therefore, a major site plan
modification (MSPM 03-003) to the Target site plan is being processed concurrently with this conditional
use application. If approved, the construction of the drive-through facility, the proposed building fa~ade
enhancements, and the installation of plant material would occur in one (1) phase.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDmONAL USES AND ANALYSIS
Section 11.2.D of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which
conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to standards.
The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as
are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant
conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the
dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined
necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny
conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an
application for conditional use approval, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the
proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings
certifying that satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following standards, where
applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular
reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access
in case of fire or catastrophe.
,
Eckerd at Target Shopping Center - COUS 03-001
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 03-086
Comparable to outparcels located in Planned Commercial Development Districts, this project would
utilize existing access drives of the Target Commercial Center. Currently, the shopping plaza has two
(2) main points of ingress / egress. One of the two points is an access drive that is shared with the
Catalina Shopping Center to the south. The other point of access is located on Parcel ''8'' along
Gateway Boulevard. None of these access points would be altered as a result of the proposed site
improvements.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in
subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on
adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
Required parking for pharmacies is one (1) space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. The
existing building that Eckerd would occupy is 11,786 square feet in area. No building additions are
proposed to the existing structure. However, the proposed drive-through lane, proposed along the
eastern fa~ade would eliminate ten (10) existing parking spaces. The existing building, coupled with
the other commercial portion of Parcel '~" totals 25,986 square feet. Therefore, Parcel '~" requires
124 parking spaces and 130 parking spaces are provided. However, the elimination of 10 parking
spaces (due to the drive-through facility) would eliminate all of the shopping centers excess parking
spaces. The shopping center would require and provide 769 parking spaces.
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The dumpster enclosure would remain in its current location at the rear (south) of the building.
According to the demolition plan (sheet C-3), the existing enclosure walls, pavement and concrete
walk would be removed and replaced with a new dumpster enclosure and loading zone area. This
refuse and service area would be enhanced and is currently located in an area that is unobtrusive to
pedestrian and vehicular traffic and unnoticeable from Congress A venue. The dumpster location is
positioned in such a way to facilitate efficient removal of trash.
4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility.
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable water
and sanitary sewer are available for this project.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character.
Much of the landscaping of Parcel '~" would remain unaltered except for the elimination of 222
square feet of pervious area due to the drive-through lane and other site improvements. This loss of
pervious area represents an insignificant change to the total amount of pervious area in the entire
shopping plaza.
The landscape plan (sheet LA-1) proposes the addition of four (4) Live Oak trees, nine (9) Sabal
palm trees, five (5) Crape Myrtle trees, and two (2) Cat palms. Additional hedges and groundcover
would be provided as needed. Additional landscaping would be required along the east property line
to screen the drive-through facility. The intent of Chapter 9, Community Design Plan, Section 11.H.
is to screen the drive-through feature as much as possible from the adjacent right-of-way (Congress
Avenue). This chapter requires that drive-through windows that face rights-ot-way be screened or
hidden through architectural design and specific landscaped areas (such as a berm). The landscape
"It,
Eckerd at Target Shopping Center - COUS 03-001
Page 4
Memorandum No. PZ 03-086
plan (sheet LA-i) shows the proposed landscape material and cross-section of the drive-through
facility in relation to the eastern portion of the site. Staff has determined that the cross-section is
inadequate and the intent of Chapter 9 is not fully met. As a result, the applicant would be required
to provide additional landscape material or substitute plant species as a condition of approval. This
would be required within the proposed landscape island directly east of the drive-through as well as
along the eastern perimeter buffer. At the time of permitting, these buffer areas shall be enhanced
to the satisfaction of the City Forester/Environmentalist to ensure compliance with intent of Chapter
9 - Community Design (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and
compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
This conditional use application proposes three (3) wall signs for the Eckerd drug store. Two (2) of
these wall signs are proposed on the front (north) fa~ade while the third is proposed on the east
building facade. The ''Eckerd'' wall sign proposed on the front fa~ade would be 30.47 square feet in
area. The second wall sign on the north fa~ade ('Drive- Thru Pharmacy") is 32.29 square feet in
area. The ''Eckerd'' wall sign proposed on the east fa~ade would be the same as the one in the front
(30.47 square feet in area). Collectively, all wall signs would be 93.25 square feet in area. This
would comply with Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 3.C
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The proposed canopies and drive-through lane would meet all setback requirements of the C-3
zoning district. No open spaces are being diminished as a result of the drive-through lane.
8. General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district.
In general, the proposed use is compatible with the commercial uses of the existing shopping center
and the C-3 zoning district. There would be minimal on-site impact and no adverse effects would
occur from the pharmacy use. The construction of the drive-through lane would eliminate ten (10)
parking spaces but would not cause the shopping center to fall below the development standards.
The drive-through facility would have little or no impact on the adjacent properties or the
surrounding area. The proposed building alterations, colors and roof material are compatible with
the existing buildings in the shopping center.
9. Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and
nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The maximum allowable height for the C-3 zoning district is 45 feet. The building was originally
designed and would remain as a one-story structure. The top of the parapet wall would be 20 feet
tall and the peak of the large parapet, when scaled, is nearly 28 feet tall. These building heights are
proposed well below the maximum height allowed by the C-3 zoning district. The building height is
compatible in comparison with the neighboring commercial properties.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The proposed pharmacy and drive-through would constitute additional convenience and choice for
the City residents. The existing building currently fronts on a major arterial (Congress Avenue) and
Eckerd at Target Shopping Center - COUS 03-001
Page 5
Memorandum No. PZ 03-086
is in close proximity to Interstate 95. This, with its close proximity to neighboring residential
development makes the proposed site an ideal location for this type of use. The closest stand-alone
pharmacy is located at the southeast corner of Hypoluxo Road and Congress A venue.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter
19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review).
With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project would comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of city code.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance
standards within Section 4.N. of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2; also, conformance to
the City of Boynton Beach noise Control Ordinance.
With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed
pharmacy with drive-through facility would operate in a manner that is in compliance with the above-
referenced codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach.
RECOMMENDATION
It should be noted that the preferred location of the drive-through window is at the west side of the
building. However, staff acknowledges that the elimination of parking spaces west of the building would
have greater impact to the in-line stores, opposite the project, due to the limited number of parking
spaces at this location. Therefore, based on the discussions contained herein, compliance with
development regulations, and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends that this
request for conditional use be approved subject to satisfying all conditions of approval as contained in
Exhibit "C". Furthermore, pursuant to Chapter 2 - Zoning, Section 11.2 Conditional Uses, a time limit is
to be set within which the proposed project is to be developed. Staff recommends that a period of one
(1) year be allowed to initiate this project.
LG/elj
S:IPlanninglSharedlWplProjectslEckerd Drugs ProjectsleaDS 03-001 @ TargetlStaff Report.doc
Location Map
Eckerd Drugstore
EXHIBIT "A"
iHn
I
I
:1 y
II !- -
I !
(II) IPUO
I,
~-----
I-~;-
.;,------------
I) ".'. -1\
C 'I,
, ---"--- --
NIC
I
pulo
I
(
\~
l
r
~
r
MOTOROLA
PIO
---
1
?~~
JT'I
I
I
i
1
,I
\-- --
fill1
1ul
ILLlI
'IT'I
],1\-1 ~
LLL'i
LFflI
o
N
w~,
s
;i ~Ji I
. :.![ I
I ~N/jl';(; .'T
. i l ,'lJ ~\ -. f!, f' ~
Memorandum
To: Planning and Zoning Department
City of Boynton Beach
From: Erik Jon Wilczek, P.E.
Date: March 28, 2003
Subject: Eckerd Conditional Use Justification for Approval
File Number MPMD 03-002
The following is a justification memo for the approval of the Conditional Use
for Eckerd Drug Store from Chapter 2, Section 11.2.D. of the City of Boynton
Beach Land Development Regulations. The bold text following each item from
the code is provided by the applicant in response to the code.
****************************************************************
D. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES. The
planning and development board and City Commission shall consider only such
conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations
and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or
conditioned upon the faithful adherence to and fulfillment of such restrictions
and conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for
streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary
for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or
deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
section. In evaluating an application for conditional use, the board and
commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health,
safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that
satisfactory provision has been made concerning the following standards, where
applicable:
\~
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures
thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and
convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe.
The existing building will be utilized, and there will be no changes to the
ingress and egress. Per staff comment and to enhance the project, a
handicap accessible connection from the building to the sidewalk in the
Congress Avenue R/W is proposed. '"
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular
attention to the items in subsection D.l. above, and the economic, glare, noise,
EXHIBIT "0"
. I i Ii I
II i!i I
. . I
L.'
,
~
and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties,
and the city as a whole.
No additional parking will be added as part of this submittal. Loading area
will be in the same area as previously approved. It will be brought to code
in dimension, improving the interface with traffic flow. Additional
landscaping has been added to the site to reduce effects of loading area.
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in
subsection D.I. and D.2. above.
The dumpster enclosure will be screened per code with wall and
landscaping.
4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility.
NA, existing utilities will be used.
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type,
dimensions, and character.
The existing landscaping will be increased to buffer the drive-thru and
enhance the character of the building. Native species will be the majority of
plant material. All trees will be greater than 12' in height at planting.
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic
safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and
nearby properties.
The only additional lighting will be recessed lighting under the 4'
pedestrian canopy that is directed down. Therefore, there should be
negligible impact to the roadway or neighboring properties.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
NA, the project will occupy the existing building and the reduction in
pavement basically equals the new pavement.
8. General compatibility with adjacent properties, and other property in
the zoning district.
The architectural elements of the adjacent buildings have been
incorporated into the building fa~ade. Specifically the 'western' roof
element from the adjacent Target store has been incorporated, as well as
the replacement of the fabric canopies to barrel tile roof canopies.
9. Height of buildings and structures, with reference to compatibility
~ and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. ~
The ex(~ting one-story structure will be used. All additional fa~ade features
will be consistent with adjacent buildings.
EXHIBIT "0"
EXHIBIT "0"
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as
a whole.
The impact should be negliable; the existing use is commercial, the
proposed use is commercial.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site
plans, as set forth in Chapter 4 of the City of Boynton Beach Land Development
Regulations.
The plans have been reviewed by City staff and will conform to the City
stantards.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in
accordance with the performance standards, Section 4.N of Chapter 2; also,
conformance to the City of Boynton Beach Noise Control Ordinance, Chapter
15, Section 15.8 of the Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances.
The proposed will comply with City noise ordinances.
13. Required analysis. All conditional use applications for bars,
nightclubs and similar establishments shall include the following analysis:
NA
a. Data on the sound emitting deviceslequipment and the methods
and materials to be used to assure that the acoustic level of the City Code will be
met.
b. The analysis shall specify the authority and/or basis for
determination of the acoustic level of the sound emitting devicesl equipment.
c. The analysis of any sound retention, reduction or reflection shall
include information such as the nature, types and coefficients of sound
absorbent and sound-reflecting materials to be used, coatings of the surfaces of
ceilings, walls, windows, and floors and insulation to be used.
d. It shall also verify that sound standards shall be met during the
normal opening of doors for people entering and exiting the establishment.
:;....
''.i
.~
..
(' I) .
!} It{ ~AT"fC
"
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Conditional Use
Project name: Eckerd @ Catalina
File number: COUS 03-001
Reference: 1st review plans identified as a Conditional Use with a February 14, 2003 Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking.
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- ;/
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be
supplied by Public Works.
2. Provide a dumpster enclosure detail, and indicate by note, that the dumpster
enclosure shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing A- /'
88007 (LDR, Chapter 2, Section I1.J.2.b).
3. A minimum dumpster pad is required measuring 10 feet x 10 feet (inside t/
dimension including gates). (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J and
Article III, Section 9.A.9.a).
4. The required gates for the dumpster shall contain long steel rods to drop into V
tpe pavement in order to secure the gates in the open and closed positions.
Drilled holes (for concrete) or metal sleeves (for asphalt) shall be provided
for the locking rods.
5. Wall for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a V
minimum of six (6) feet high and shall be CBS construction with a finish
matching that of the adjacent building(s). Accent shrubs shall be provided
along the screen walles) (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J, Section
5.J and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3).
6. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 feet to approach the dumpster. /
Provide a minimum backing clearance of 60 feet (measured from the front
edge of the dumpster pad. (LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.2.b).
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
03/06/03
2
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for specific
permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application.
These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, l/
drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required
from other permitting agencIes such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of
Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department
(PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm
Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management
(PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request.
8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be /
reflected on all appropriate sheets.
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets (missing on architectural ~
plans and survey).
10. Show sight triangles on the landscape plans (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, /
Section 5.H.).
11. Indicate, by note on the landscape plan, that within the sight triangles there V
shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5 feet and 6
f~et above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.).
12. The medians on Congress A venue have existing irrigation and plant
material belonging to the City of Boynton Beach. Irrigation water is /
provided from within the Catalina Center. Any damage to the irrigation
system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations shall
be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the
City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer.
Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note
to the plans with the above stated information.
13. Provide a lighting plan showing that the site meets the mInImUm site t/
lighting requirements of the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.
14. On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control
devices (including existing traffic control) such as stop bars, stop signs, V
double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not
Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where
applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include a pavement message in
yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard
Drawings B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for striping details.
15. The parking stall detail does not meet the requirements of City Standard L/
! Drawing B-98001. Correct as necessary.
16. Drive un windows used for commercial uses shall not be located on a L/
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
03/06/03
3
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
building that faces a public street unless the requirements of the LDR,
Chapter 9, Section I1.H are met.
17. Show the accessible route from the public sidewalk to the entrance as ~
stipulated by the Florida Accessibility Code.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
18. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as /
defined in Chapter 6 of the 2001 Florida Building Code.
I
19. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the V
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or
structure shall be determined by the provisions of Chapter 6 of ASCE 7, and
the provisions of Section 1606 (Wind Loads) of the 2001 edition of the
Florida Building Code. Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design
professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review
at the time of permit application.
20. Sheet C-2 - The required number of handicap accessible parking spaces /'
shall comply with the 2001 Florida Building Code, Section 11.4.1.2(5). The I
2% rule is only applicable to parking spaces in the amounts of 50 1-1 000.
21. Boundary and topographic survey notes Eckerd's building as "Rack Room V
Shoes". Clarify.
22. Indicate on the floor plan (Sheet A-I) if any alterations will be done on the /
interior of the structure.
23. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) ~
that is proposed for theleach building. Verify that the proposed elevation is
in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the
site data that address the following issues [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of
the 2001 Florida Building Code]:
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone
that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base
flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS
03/06/03
4
DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
plans.
24. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents V
the property line.
25. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, t./
submit a current survey of the subject property.
26. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V
proposed construction.
27. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum ~
number of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code
section that is applicable to the computations.
28. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents /
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
29. The applicant should show on the landscape sheet LA-l the health condition
of all of the existing trees and vegetation along the perimeter of the site. All
missing, dead or poor health condition trees I vegetation must be replaced
throughout the site.
30. The existing irrigation system for the site must be operational and extended
to provide coverage to the newly created landscape island.
31. The existing landscape plantings along Congress A venue should be
increased to visually buffer the drive through area from the public right-of-
way.
PLANNING AND ZONING
,... ents:
I ~ This project requires conditional use approval. Provide justifielltioll for ,j
approval of the proj~ct ba~ed on the litandaFds fer evaluating contiitienal
u"~<: fOl1J:J.d in rh;!rt~r 2, ~@ction 1l-.2.D. efthe City of BOYflton Beadl..Land.
,..,.
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
03/07/03
5
-
L
DEPARTMENTS
On the site plan (sheet C-2), indicate by note that the proposed drive
throu h feature will eliminate 10 arkin s aces.
34. According to the approval of the Target minor site plan modification
(MMSP 00-068) and the issuance of building permit 01-0846, the master
plan indicates that 780 parking spaces are required and 780 parking spaces
exist, which would leave no surplus of spaces for the entire shopping center.
Since this is shared parking and the proposed drive through would
eliminate 10 parking spaces, it would cause the entire development to fall
below the required standard. Either create 10 additional parking spaces to
compensate for the loss of spaces or apply for a variance from the parking
re uirements of the Land Develo ment Re ulations.
35. On the site plan (sheet C-2), indicate all existing building areas (expressed
in square feet). Also, the building area indicated for "Building A"on the
tabular data does not does not match the graphic detail. Please revise
accordin I .
On the site plan (sheet C-2) and the survey, ensure that the number of
parking spaces indicated by the labels relates to the total number of parking
s aces that are shown in each arkin ou.
On the site plan (sheet C-2), indicate the distance between the proposed
cano over the drive throu h window and the east ro e line.
Changes to the dumpster enclosure and its surrounding area must be
a roved b the En 'neerin Division of Public Works.
On the floor plan (sheet A-I) and the site plan (sheet C-2), show or indicate
the precise location of the proposed drive through window. Staff needs to
measure the ro osed ueuin distance.
On the site plan (sheet C-2) tabular data, identify the subject property as
"Parcel A: Tar et Commercial Center".
The survey shows 142 existing parking spaces, however, the site plan
tabular data indicates that 143 parking spaces exist. This discrepancy
between the two must be corrected.
Provide paint swatches for the elevations (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.).
A drainage statement is required prior to the Technical Review Committee
eetin (Cha ter 4, Section 7.F.2.).
Place a note on the landscape plan or sheet LA-3, indicating that mulch
other than Cypress shall be used and maintained for landscape purposes
(Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.8. .
Fifty percent (50%) of site landscape materials must be native species.
Indicate the amount of native material in the plant list of the landscape plan
(Cha ter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P).
Place a note on the site plan that all above ground mechanical equipment
such as exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, and back-flow
reventers shall be visuall screened (Cha ter 9, Section 10.CA.).
"
?
x
The east and west building fayades shall have windows that occupy no less
than 25% of the fayade and that are located at the pedestrian level (Chapter
9, Section l1.H.l).
0Mk \ pt.vl ~)~ ltW
"
INCLUDE
REJECT
./
/
,/
v
/
V
/
~
v
t/
~/
v'
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
03/07/03
6
'7 (0
l
DEPARTMENTS
The building fayade shall be modulated and divided into smaller identifiable
ieces to articulate the lane of the fa ade Cha ter 9, Section 11.H.2.).
The east landscape buffer (along Congress Avenue) shall contain sufficient
landscaping to meet the intent of Chapter 9, Section I1.HA through I1.H. 7.
Thill b'lffrr iltrip llh1ll e511ta~11 Ii minilllu1ll two (2) fuut tall earth bGrm-aloog
th~ntire leRgtflOfrall;d "A" aud shall have a SlOpeltOTlo-exceeda ratio"
oftbrpp-tQ 9ne (3: 1) (Chllptel 9, SlJdioll ll;tr.5-:):C-Qerdinatewith City
Fo . ision.
The newly created drive through landscape island shall contain sufficient
landscaping to meet the intent of Chapter 9, Section 11.HA through I1.H.7.
T.his island shaU..coRtaiFl. a FFHRimm,u n;vo (2) foot tall earth berm-and-shaH
hay .
The east and west building fayades shall be designed to be as attractive in
appearance as the front of the building (Chapter 9, Section ILL). Staff
recommends coordinating with the City's Planner I Urban Designer
(Mar ell Beltran 742-6263) as an additional resource.
The proposed building elevations show a typical Eckerd drugstore that
;contains only a few compatible architectural elements with the Target and
'Catalina Shopping Center. Staff recommends coordinating with the City's
Planner I Urban Designer (Margelly Beltran @ 742-6263) to ensure
com atibili .
X Staff recommends installing a hedge within the landscape strip that
\ separates the drive aisle east of the "Retail A" building and the parking
areas west of the ro osed Eckerd buildin .
1
54. On sheet A-2, indicate the proposed sign color(s) and total signage area
(Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 2.C.). The elevations shall quantify the
total signage area. As proposed, the Sand Finish Stucco 32" x 32" pattern
would count towards total si a e area.
X On the elevations, staff recommends eliminating the 4" x 8" x 16" split
faced masonry unit finish because it does not match any building in the
sho ping center.
MWR/sc
INCLUDE REJECT
/
t,/
S:IPlanning\SHAREDIWPIPROJECTS\Eckerd Drugs Projects\COUS 03-001 @ Catalinal1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
./
~
~
./
~
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
Johnson, Eric
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Johnson, Eric
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: 03-Plan.doc
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subj ect:
Eckerd Drug @ Target Shopping Center
Conditional Use- 2nd Review
caus 03-001
Date:
April 9, 2003
Sheet LA-l
1. The applicant should show more cross-sections (x-section) detail for the two (2) proposed
raised berm areas:
Area 1: the raised berm immediately adjacent to the drive-through isle (x-section A-A)
Area 2: the raised berm (x-section B-B)
2. The two-berm height, width and slope for construction purposes should be drawn on the
plan.
3. The trees, and plant species, height, width and planting spacing for each berm x-section
should be drawn on the plan.
4. The quantity of trees and plants to be installed on each of the two-berm areas should be
shown on the plan.
5. The elevation (height) of the vehicles and the raised berm areas in relationship to each
other should be shown on the plan.
The applicant's Landscape Architect may want to telephone me to discuss each ofthe comments as
agreed to at the last TRC meeting.
kjh
File
A /1 (\/,)(\/"\,2
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of2
Johnson, Eric
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Johnson, Eric
Cc: Rumpf, Michael
Subject: RE: Eckerd landscape
Eric,
1. Yes.
2. Correct. Yes. I agree.
Thanks. Kevin.
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2003 1:10 PM
To: Hallahan, Kevin
Cc: Rumpf, Michael
Subject: Eckerd landscape
Kevin,
I was reviewing your additional conditions of approval (see below). I wanted to make sure that you are
okay the conditions and plans as they are presented. I am making the following assumptions:
1. You are satisfied with their plans as they are presented and that you will require the comments
referenced below at the time of permitting.
2. That the items requested below will not require major site changes afterwards, should the CC approve
the plans. Future major site changes, in itself would require Commission approval.
I make these assumptions because major changes are easier to deal with now rather than later. Please
respond. Thanks. Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2003 3:02 PM
To: Johnson, Eric
Cc: Coale, Sherie
Subject: 03-Plan.doc
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Eckerd Drug @ Target Shopping Center
Conditional Use- 2nd Review
caus 03-001
Date:
April 9, 2003
Ii /1 1 /'")(\/)':2
TRC Memorandum
4/1112003
Page 2 of2
Sheet LA-l
1. The applicant should show more cross-sections (x-section) detail for the two (2)
proposed raised berm areas:
Area 1: the raised berm immediately adjacent to the drive-through isle (x-section A-
A)
Area 2: the raised berm (x-section B-B)
2. The two-berm height, width and slope for construction purposes should be drawn on
the plan.
3. The trees, and plant species, height, width and planting spacing for each berm x-
section should be drawn on the plan.
4. The quantity of trees and plants to be installed on each of the two-berm areas should
be shown on the plan.
5. The elevation (height) of the vehicles and the raised berm areas in relationship to each
other should be shown on the plan.
The applicant's Landscape Architect may want to telephone me to discuss each of the
comments as agreed to at the last TRC meeting.
kjh
File
PlanniD!! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester I Environmentalist
Subject:
Eckerd Drug @ Target Shopping Center
Conditional Use- 2nd Review
caus 03-001
Date:
April 9, 2003
){.~
Sheet LA-l
-
----
1. The applicant should show more cross-sections (x-section) detail for the two (2) proposed
raised berm areas:
Area 1: the raised berm immediately adjacent to the drive-through isle (x-section A-A)
Area 2: the raised berm (x-section B-B)
2. The two-berm height, width and slope for construction purposes should be drawn on the
plan.
3. The trees, and plant species, height, width and planting spacing for each berm x-section
should be drawn on the plan.
4. The quantity of trees and plants to be installed on each of the two-berm areas should be
shown on the plan.
5. The elevation (height) ofthe vehicles and the raised berm areas in relationship to each
other should be shown on the plan.
The applicant's Landscape Architect may want to telephone me to discuss each of the
comments as agreed to at the last TRC meeting.
kjh
File
Facsimile
TRANSMITTAL
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
100 E. BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
P.O. BOX 310
BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA 33425-0310
FAX: (561) 742-6259
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
to: Erik Wilczek, P.E. Kimley-Hom & Associates, Inc.
fax #: 954-739-2247
date: March 6, 2003
from: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
re: 1 ~ 1 REVIEW COMMENTS FOR Eckerd Drug @ Target
Please find attached the first review comments for your project. To stay on the
current review schedule, please do the following steps listed below, and bring all
documents to the TRC scheduled for Tuesday, April 1, 2003.
1. Revise your plans incorporating all comments listed herein, including the addition of
notes on plans to confirm response to general statementsl comments, and bring 10 copies
to the TRC review meeting (full sets including all pages originally submitted);
2. Submit the additional information as requested within the attached comments; ( i.e. traffic
analysis, engineering certification, etc.)
3. Prepare a written response (7 copies) consisting of a list briefly summarizing how each
comment has been addressed on the revised plans or with the supplemental information
including location on the plans ( this promotes an expeditious 2nd review by staff and
your project representatives during the TRC meeting );and
4.
Submit reductions (8 Y2 X 11) for the proposed site plans, elevations and landscaping plan
(this is required for the final report and public
presentation).
Planning and Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
The applicant should not attend a TRC (2nd review) until
all documents have been revised and copied for staff
742-6260
Fax: 742-6259
review. Ifplans will not be fully revised and brought to the scheduled TRC meeting, contact
Lusia Galav in this office by the Thursday prior to the scheduled meeting date. Projects
deviating from the original schedule are eligible for review at subsequent meetings, which are
held every Tuesday. To reschedule, contact Sherie Coale, by the Thursday prior to the Tuesday
TRC meeting that you desire to attend. The remainder of the review schedule will be adjusted
accordingly. If you have questions on the attached comments, please contact the respective
reviewer using the attached list ofTRC representatives.
Ifthe plans are reasonably complete and all significant comments are addressed following TRC
(2nd review), the project is forwarded to the Planning and Development Board Meeting that falls
approximately 2 to 3 weeks following the TRC meeting. An "*,, by any comment identifies a
comment that must be addressed prior to moving forward to the Planning and Development
board.
Note: Items recognized by staff as typically outstanding at this point include a traffic report
and/or confirmation of the traffic concurrency approval from the Palm Beach County
drainage certification by a licensed engineer, signed "Rider to Site Plan Application"
form and colored elevations of the proposed project. This information is necessary for
the project to proceed. If you have submitted this information, please disregard this note.
DEPARTMENT REPRESENT A TIVE REPRESENTATIVES' PHONE FAX
DESIGNEE
Engineering Dave Kelley Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Building Don Johnson Timothy Large 742-6352 742-6352
Fire Department Steve Gale Bob Borden 742-6602 364-7382
Rodger Kemmer 742-6753 742-6357
Police Department Marshall Gage John Huntington 737-6167 737-3136
Utilities Pete Mazzella H. David Kelley Jr. 742-6401 742-6485
Public Works-General Larry Quinn Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Public W orks- Traffic Jeffrey Livergood Laurinda Logan 742-6482 742-6485
Parks & Recreation John Wildner 742-6227 742-6233
F orester/Environmentalist Kevin Hallahan Kevin Hallahan 742-6267 742-6259
Planning & Zoning Michael Rumpf, Lusia Galav 742-6262 742-6259
CHAIRMAN
Revised 01114/02
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIEckerd Drugs ProjectslCOUS 03-001 @CatalinalIstReviewcommentsFAXCOVER.doc
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME 03/07/2003 15:25
NAME
FAX
TEL
SER.# BROE2J409484
DATE, TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
03/07 15:21
91954739224703326
00:03:24
11
OK
STANDARD
ECM
/"
/
~""I~~O"
I '\
, \
I '\
\ J
(11~' if ,)
..~~.~/
, / t) ,'.j \:J) '..
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 03-039
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
DATE:
March 6, 2003
RE:
Standard Review Comments
Master Plan Modification/Cond
Eckerd's @ Catalina Center
File No. MPMD 03-002 and CO US 03-0
The above referenced Site Plans, forwarded on February 19, 2003, were reviewed by
representatives from Public Works, Engineering, Utilities against the requirements outlined in the
City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances (LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.2 and Chapter 3, Article
IV, Section 3).
The applicant has provided the information required in Chapter 3, Master Plan Review; following
are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR)
referenced for conditional uses:
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the
storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works.
2. Provide a dumpster enclosure detail, and indicate by note, that the dumpster enclosure shall be
constructed in accordance with City Standard Drawing A-88007 (LDR, Chapter 2, Section
11.J.2.b).
3. A minimum dumpster pad is required measuring 10ft. x 10ft. (inside dimension including
gates). (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a)
4. The required gates for the dumpster shall contain long steel rods to drop into the pavement in
order to secure the gates in the open and closed positions. Drilled holes (for concrete) or metal
sleeves (for asphalt) shall be provided for the locking rods.
5. Wall for the enclosure shall be provided on three sides and are to be a minimum of 6 ft high
and shall be CBS construction with a finish matching that of the adjacent building(s). Accent
shrubs shall be provided along the screen wall(s) (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.J,
Section 5.J and Article III, Section 9.A.9.a, and Chapter 9, Section 10.C.3).
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-039
Re: Eckerd's @ Catalina Center, Master Plan Modification/Conditional Use - 1st Review
March 6, 2003
Page 2
6. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster. Provide a minimum
backing clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad. (LOR, Chapter
2, Section 11.J.2.b).
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
No comments as this time.
ENGINEERING
7. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the
City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to,
the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits
required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT),
South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD),
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health
Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others,
shall be included with the permit request.
8. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all
appropriate sheets.
9. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets (missing on architectural plans and survey).
10. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.).
11. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an
unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LOR, Chapter
7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.).
12. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the
City of Boynton Beach. Irrigation water is provided from within the Catalina Center. Any
damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the contractor's operations
shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of
Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this
notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated
information.
13. Provide a lighting plan showing that the site meets the minimum site lighting requirements of
the LOR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A.
Public Works Department, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-039
Re: Eckerd's @ Catalina Center, Master Plan Modification/Conditional Use - 151 Review
March 6, 2003
Page 3
14. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices (including
existing traffic control) such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping,
directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area"
(where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow
indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 for
striping details.
15. The Parking Stall detail does not meet the requirements of City Standard Drawing B-98001.
Correct as necessary.
16. Drive up windows used for commercial uses shall not be located on a building that faces a
public street unless the requirements of the LOR, Chapter 9, Section 11.H are met.
17. Show the accessible route from the public sidewalk to the entrance as stipulated by the Florida
Accessibility Code.
UTILITIES
No comments at this time.
LUck
Xc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E.I P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Parks
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Eckerd's @ Catalina Ctr. 1st Review.doc
.------
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 03-031
TO: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM: Timothy K. Large~
TRC Member/Buil~
DATE: February 27,2003
SUBJECT: Project - Eckerd Drug @ Catalina Center
File No. - COUS 03-001 - 1 st review
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for
Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in
compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits.
BuildinQ Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. LarQe (561)
742-6352
1. Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the building as defined in
Chapter 6 of the 2001 Florida Building Code.
2. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum
wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be
determined by the provisions of Chapter 6 of ASCE 7, and the provisions of
Section 1606 (Wind Loads) of the 2001 edition of the Florida Building Code.
Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the
state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application.
3. Sheet C-2 - The required number of handicap accessible parking spaces shall
comply with the 2001 Florida Building Code, Section 11.4.1.2(5). The 2% rule is
only applicable to parking spaces in the amounts of 501-1000.
4. Boundary and topographic sUNey notes Eckerd's building as "Rack Room Shoes".
Clarify.
5. Indicate on the floor plan (Sheet A-1) if any alterations will be done on the interior
of the structure.
6. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is
proposed for the/each building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance
with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address
S:IDevelopmentlBuildinglTRCITRC 20031Eckerd Drug @ Catalina Center
Page 1 of 2
the following issues [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the 2001 Florida Building
Code]:
a) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the
building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If
there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans.
7. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the
property line.
8. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit
a current survey of the subject property.
9. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
10. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number
of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that
is applicable to the computations.
11. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
bf
S:\DevelapmentIBuildingITRCITRC 20031Eckerd Drug @ Catalina Center
Page 2 of 2
-
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Fire and Life Safety Division
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of:
COUS 03-001 1st review-fire
Project Name and Address:
Eckerd @ Catalina
1895 N. Conqress Avenue
Reviewed by:
~~
Rodqer Kemmer, Fire Protection Enqineer
Department:
Fire and Life Safety
Phone:
(561) 742-6753
Comments to:
Sherie Coale bv email on 2/25/03
CODE REQUIREMENTS
All site plan issues addressed on plans, no comments.
cc: Steve Gale
Bob Borden
Wildner, John
From: Wildner, John
Sent: Friday, February 28/ 2003 3:25 PM
To: Coale, Sherie
Subject: Eckaerd Drug @ Catalina Center; Safe and Secure Storage
The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the above mentioned plans.
We have no comments at this time. Plans are being returned separately.
John
-- "",,,7""
/1, ,
CEPt>~:-, ,
. ,
'----~
;"':1
! 1,
,{ 'i
,. ,
//
Ci TY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
,;
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
3/3/03
FILE: CODS 03-001
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Eckerd Drug@CatalinaCenter
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comments.
.~
Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Eckerd Drug @ Catalina Center
Conditional Use- 1 st Review
caus 03-001
Date:
March 3, 2003
Existinl! Trees and Vel!etation.
I. The applicant should show on the landscape sheet LA-l the health condition of all of the existing
trees and vegetation along the perimeter of the site. All missing, dead or poor health condition
trees I vegetation must be replaced throughout the site.
2. The existing irrigation system for the site must be operational and extended to provide coverage
to the newly created landscape island.
3. The existing landscape plantings along Congress Avenue should be increased to visually buffer
the drive through area from the public right-of-way.
Kjh
File