REVIEW COMMENTS
7.D.l
ECKERD DRUGS @ TARGET
(MSPM 03-003)
MAJOR SITE PLAN MODIFICATION
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-087
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning & Development Board
FROM:
Michael Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
i
THRU:
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP
Planner
DATE:
April 17, 2003
PROJECT:
Target Commercial Center (Eckerd) / MSPM 03-003
REQUEST:
Major Site Plan Modification
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: Andrew Berger / American Development Corporation
Applicant/Agent: Erik J. Wilczek / Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
Location: 1895 North Congress Avenue (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) / Community Commercial (C-3)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No changed proposed
Proposed Use:
Pharmacy with drive-thru facility
Acreage:
555,330 square feet (12.79 acres)
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Right-of-way for Gateway Boulevard, farther north is developed residential,
zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD);
South:
Catalina Shopping Center, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
East:
Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then farther east is Motorola, zoned
Planned Industrial Development (PID);
West:
Developed residential, zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD).
Target - MSPM 03-003
Page 2
Memorandum No. PZ 03-087
BACKGROUND
The Target Commercial Center is comprised of three (3) main parcels and one (1) subordinate parcel.
Parcel "A" is 2.27 acres and contains an existing 11,786 square foot stand-along building (which Eckerd
proposes to occupy) and 14,200 square feet of in-line commercial space. Erik J. Wilczek, agent for
Eckerd is seeking conditional use / major site plan modification (CGUS 03-001) approval for a pharmacy
with a drive-through facility to occupy the 11,786 square foot building. Parcel "B" contains the Target
store and a majority of the shopping center's parking area. Parcel "C" contains a stand-alone Carrabba's
restaurant. According to the site plan (sheet S-l), the subordinate fourth parcel, namely, Parcel "0" is
comprised of the buffer and swale area of the shopping center's perimeters along Gateway Boulevard
and Congress Avenue. The entire shopping center is 12.79 acres in area and contains 144,438 square
feet of building area.
The applicant proposes to occupy an existing one (i)-story 11,786 square foot building currently
occupied by Rack Room Shoes and previously occupied by Barnes & Noble and Bookstop. No change is
proposed to the total project square footage. The proposed pharmacy is a permitted use in the C-3
zoning district but the drive-through feature requires conditional use approval. The drive-through facility
would be located on the east portion of the existing stand-alone building on Parcel "A", facing Congress
Avenue. The facility would have one drive-through lane, running much of the length of the eastern
fa<;ade. This drive-through lane would eliminate ten (10) parking spaces. Since the parking is shared
throughout the entire shopping center (all three (3) main parcels), the proposed drive-through lane
would eliminate all of the center's excess parking spaces. As a result, the shopping center would both
require and provide for 769 parking spaces. Unlike a Planned Commercial Development (PCD) such as
Grove Plaza or BJ's Wholesale Club, the Target Commercial Center is not a master plan. However, the
modifications proposed to Parcel "A" impact the entire shopping center. Therefore, this major site plan
modification (MSPM 03-003) to the Target site plan is required concurrent with Eckerd's request for
conditional use approval (CGUS 03-001).
ANALYSIS
As previously mentioned, the proposed modifications would be made to Parcel "A" of the Target
Commercial Center. The changes proposed on this site plan submittal relative to the original site plan
approval include the elimination of ten (10) parking spaces for the construction of a drive-through lane
along the eastern fa<;ade of an existing stand-alone building on Parcel "A". Therefore, this site plan is
being amended to reflect the changes made to Parcel "A". The requested modifications result in no
increase in impacts above those currently vested by the approved site plan. The City's Engineering
Division has reviewed and approved the configuration of the drive-through lane as it relates to the
localized traffic patterns throughout the entire shopping center. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division
has determined that the drive-through facility would have little or no impact to the site in terms of traffic
concurrency.
RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this major site plan modification request. Staff
recommends approval, contingent upon the comments indicated in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval.
Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented
accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
S.\PJanningISharedIWpIProjectslEckerd Drugs ProjectsIMSPM 03,003 @TargetlStaffReport,doc
Location Map EXHIBIT "A"
Eckerd Drugstore @ Target Commercial Center MSPM 03-003
-1--:
---1
tEj'1
T1::rJ
IlJil
ffi11
EttJl
-11,1
r--
l~\
\
I
I
· IFUD
"7~
,,/IJ< \
\
-~
I
I
NIC
C3
Y-',J /"
--{
\
- \
F~111..... ...
, - / I~-! / /
~-----! / I / ;'
) - ,/ / I
\ ,I /
- / I
------------,.. ",' ./ l-~
I \ I
It \~~~~;r~I.P~..R,K,
I II \ If-' \ \
I \ I \ /-',
~tVD>'(
~-,
'. \
II
I I.
'1
C3
I
~
\
I
\
I
MOTOROLA \
PIDII
I.
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
\
\ J, /
~ /
t
I
I
~~
\
1
)
N
w-<?-'
s
'---------- EXHIBIT "B"
'T1-T"""ir'T'i-rr,..i,-r
i ! 1 j f 1 I i~"'! I I
r/?:~-.-JJ' ~ I "~' " " " " " " " 'nD ~!~ ~ H 1~.7;. C
",.......' / I L! I I~lJJ t ::j
'l~' Ci - L_ r"<:_r;: --~
r '~... --T-- ~ r-.l--....J...:::~~'::;.?"I ::1
)~:> ~~~~ l[r~~~:!j~~l'l ~l:
'... ~':.. :I,lJ: ..: '" i : -~~
,~ !' - -_ _ _ ,r _I+:L C) , )>' -",
,"7~ '-- -P.-- '. ::1":: . I Z I ::""
,...,'/ II '~"''''''''''''' I~' ~h '-~''0' '0 --1-- k=-I-:iif.---=:;-:llLEJ4' G';~I
,,;'" ffl ........~.,.~I ':--........(1 '~_ '" --,-- It I I:J..1
{;; (.;t,'';;'/ '':O.;..'"'W / \ ',-.t / 1'",- ~-'-- U" 4 $'! ~ 1
,;l >If' "It ~,-<, ~'~~~/ II ~, -;- '1
:'4' ........ " _ -~'" / /4_ "'... -11
,;; "~I ...... / ~(/" .,~",' I I I '01 I I I 'II'
" ,/ ...... \ ' ..../ot:,< I I """" , , I ,
,...., 1 F/ ......~' ~~,/ '~"
,to' ...:~; II / , ~ %.( I I "...:::
~ ,:-,.. h ............ ~~..'... ' '
1" Itv ......~.... ... r) r
;; .~. '>~ ...............'...~Nt/ ,v,
'.. (~ ~ ~ ~~~ ....~"t,1
./ ,:';r; .....:- ,,~~ I' ~ ~'
7... "... f ~" D l:l..... ,/ I' is N: F I
6000' ... t I J ;;'~", /1 / y~ I
SOlo...21.\1 '/ l ~ ~ ~ 1/ ftl'; 7'-l:l''''~
-'t - '....., JA/ '+1"1> ~ ~I /., ~I"/,
II ~ : I Jf"fl ...r- ~ f/~ 1/'/ // ' ,.
'1 .. (:;"'$.1/ I >vf ~~~ &1 Y?~I / 1 /7-:t:!~' , , , 1
-...! < / ............ ~ LIlt; ...-.= 'I h / f~ I I / ,
,"', I / f I ;:: Z r.:. }/ i 1;' 1 I~"l~
j ...:; /' I g " ...., / / I. 1 / , 1 / 1
~, ,"', / ,<.) ~ '7 ! >! i../ / , ,
~ ...... / <(... / /' ~! /,/;X~i)/~I E/ j'
'" ) J ....... ' , I ~ {t"J.." I'
~fcr47/ ,.../ /{l) ~ ~" I", ~~~4'~'
, I ......... '/,' 7 Il tJ y:(;:" ' , / /"
Nfl........ 1/....//1 I~j~' 1/
~J.i \i:J~~!1 ~ ~/ /hf-. I,/',~tt,,/i/hll
, If ~ ~~~~~J~t~3~:~~. / / rt{l1' , / I (7/~~~' I
Ii: r1T'---------:nr-1..:},.>~.o ,., / /,. ylv.....i>,: , ,''',;;;z,t /
J '!' 'lI -;0 ~ A""!' 1"''1-" :" '''"\1 ~~
"' - i" ful"'l ..'e" ~~f "NH~/ '//
. ,II 8> ....."'&. ... I ~ ' , 1 I I'
1 I ~:t'lll 1/1- -" ') t-,' I I '.;I. I ,
6< . ~ ~ It ~r- "" If 'j;! € ~ / / I I. tv.: L I I
No S":eor-~ -It]. ..,: ~ly , .. ;; 0/ /'!,Jf.,/ , , 't / ;,;-i.'iJ , 1
'}-' '~--------i-----'L.-"""l- '" " '" ~ I ;"~ I ~ l..;.z~ I I ~
\J r 7.....-__-4____ ---__L_-'_::::::+:::::I .I I " /"", ' ,~ 1 I 1 1 !~ lv.J~
....~ t I I l <' ~~.J I , 1<.,..1 I I I r-
'-i--;j=I.-::::-r.::.-:-'--ojo:=-.:;o.;.---- //~ A ' // l-J./l I I I ,'/
~L_J___L_~! L.__-L,,_.V"(~," /11, 1/~~,t;.,~II,
If'j fr-r-r'"r";=rT;- ;:T-t-t-----------~ f.... I 'l-y 1'7' I I N" I I
/ r-"fJ U i ! I ! I ! I '.. JT, i fTTlTfTTl ..., , / , Y'f.. "" , ' , 'f~/J ,
! ~3.- t j j , I . I I , I I I I I ! I I t ~f I I /~ ;"j. I , I /:; ~~
, L - r>' , J. "JO,,!, , N y. I " , ' , ~;J.i)
I ~',- t'j i : 11 ~~7 I 1/7'1./ / , I,,.. 1
I : p: q i : i i..;.J ':'lU : : 01 i : : I , , I ; I a~ ~ i I~~~I I I // f/.Y:../J /' I I I
1;"'1- J..,J,.J....t..J....J.-J -l-,-ltl... ~~I Iff ci / F..~ ./ / ' I / ~I. / I
tT ... --- . ----- ----, ...: ~ S " 7-!",:~ 1 // //"''-'..i ,
~ ,~o," .. =;0 , i-~'" , , /~" 1 , , ' ,'.,"y,:,., , ,
dffil I ~M I I 1/ I I /..." ~ ,i' N 't../ I
.. - ~-t I f. I / f I / I '}.l~ I I I y~
I~= ~~ i tI: ~ //~YIL~/~'.L, I // I/;L/~'.L, I I // V
r--r al: pt. ~ ~ / I"l}./y..../ / I /ft'Y'/:Y,!/ I
:~:[ _J Fr:~- ~ IE~J..././'/I i~/~'f:,~///
~:t c::..J .. , , I I I I -j;- , " I"'f.!./\ ' , It:!:!)
r-=' .... - i I ! r I ! I _, I "-J
1--- " ~ I
L-l::"l:;~:::,'I, Itlll!l!
. ,. , I ! r l"'~l
- .......I....J.......i.....L.J....J
-,----=.::..;.== -
:u1;~
:~i
g;"'::l
~~
P'~ ----
....
'II! I!! I!!II i~ 'I!!II! ~ ~I i i
i -, i~ I i~i I'" 0
iE. i~~i~: I I ;~
II i I I r~
IiI II I
1 ~ hUil I I
. !l!:!:!:!: . f
;:1 wi Ii' r
"", Ie,'
;:! . ~ 111',lil a I
:::: .!: !:!:!:I III
" "I! i J
. !: I
I
.
,
ii
,
ii
,
1;1
t
r-
II
81
'II
I
I
.
"
,
,
I
I
I
I
n
II
II
II
II
II
[D
LB
EXBJN) PLAZA SITE PLAN
~
11115 N. CONClIEBlI A\9IE
8OlNT'ON BEACH, FL
'"
'"
~
-z
~~
>>~
s~
10
i
c
1"'1
-ll
:J
I
~
"~~:::l!j
~~~ AVENUE
----
----
.........
...
...
...
.
NO. ..- IY ....
1 IllE'M[ POt fIRST RE'JEW COMMEJf1S ...
pt~
t
2/f1 /03
..... '1IIIijlll r!!:IJ pi~
I' "I II
'i'l' lill ~;!, · J !II
'IU,..
,I pll · ~air It jl" !~
EIIK _ -.cmc. PL "llh=i
RIlE NOt 112M
..'"
EXHBIIT "C"
Maior Site Plan Modification
Project name: Target
File number: MSPM 03-003
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as Maior Site Plan Modification with a April I ,2003 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
COA
04/17/03
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
1. The site plan (sheet 8-1) tabular data is incorrect. The required parking for
the Eckerd store is based on gross floor area, not leasable area. Revise the
parking data on sheet 8-1 to indicate that 124 parking spaces are required for
Parcel "A" and 769 parking spaces are required for the entire commercial
center.
2. Remove any storage containers or other objects currently kept on site that may
obstruct any parking spaces due to impacts on surplus parking spaces
(elimination of 10 spaces).
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS:
Comments:
3. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION COMMENTS:
Comments:
40 To be determined.
MWR/elj
S:\Planning\Shared\Wp\Projects\Eckerd Drugs Projects\MSPM 03-003 @ Target\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Yllcls+-< 'e
Project name: Eckerd @ Catalina
File number: MPMD 03-002
Reference: 1 slreview plans identified as Master Plan Modification with a February 19. 2003 Planning and
Zoning Department date stamp marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
.
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
17. The required number of handicap accessible parking spaces shall comply
with the 2001 Florida Building Code, Section 11-401.2(5). The 2% rule is
only applicable to parking spaces in the amounts of501-10000
The parking space requirements are for the entire shopping center, which
totals over 700 spaces. Therefore, the 2% rule applies as was previously
approved by the city planning department.
18. Add a labeled symbol to the. site plan drawing that identifies the location of "
the handicap accessible parking spaceso The quantity of the spaces shall be
consistent with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code
for Building Construction 0 The accessible parking spaces that serve a use
shall be located on the shortest safely accessible route of travel from
adjacent parking to an accessible entrance 0 The Florida Accessibility Code
for Building Construction states that buildings with multiple accessible
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS-MasterPlan-RESPONSE. doc
03/28/03
2
DEPARTMENTS
entrances shall have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest
to the accessible entrance 0 Florida Accessibility Code for Building
Construction, Section 401.2(5), 4.3, 4060
The parking spaces have been better identified on the plan and comply with
the code, as previously approved by the city planning department.
INCLUDE REJECT
190 On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents
the property lineo
The property line has been better identified as requested.
20. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations,
submit a current survey of the subject property.
A current survey of the property has been included.
210 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed constructiono
Comment noted.
220 Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed
perimeter wall. Identify the type of the wall material and the type of material
that supports the wall, including the typical distance between supports.
Also, provide a typical section view drawing of the wall that includes the
depth that the wall supports are below fmish grade and the height that the
wall/fence is above fmish grade. The location and height of the wall shall
comply with the wall regulations specified in the Zoning Codeo
There is no perimeter wall. We have included details of the dumpster wall.
23. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum
number of required handicap accessible parking spaceso Also, state the code
section that is applicable to the computationso
The handicap space requirement was determined when the master plan was
approved (most recently during the Target expansion). We have not
deviated from that requirement under Section 11-4.1.2(5).
:a
240 Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents
the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the
subject request.
A limit of construction has been added to all the plan view sheets (C2-C4).
---./...
250 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or
tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City
computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract.
The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit reviewo
The property will be under land lease and retain current ownership.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS-MasterPlan-RESPONSE. doc
03/31/03
3
'I
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
~
!:.) The modifications proposed to the master plan are contingent upon the
approval of the accompanying request for conditional use (CODS 03-001)0
COJllment noted.
~ On the master plan sheet S-l, show the proposed changes to the Parcel "A"
portion of the site
Plan sheet S-1 has been modified per comment.
28. According to the approval of the Target minor site plan modification
(MMSP 00-068) and the issuance of building permit 01-0846, the master
plan indicates that 780 parking spaces are required and 780 parking spaces
exist, which would leave no surplus of spaces for the entire shopping centero
Since this is shared parking and the proposed drive through would
eliminate 10 parking spaces, it would cause the entire development to fall
below the development standardo Either create 10 additional parking spaces
to compensate for the loss of spaces or apply for a variance from the parking
requirements of the Land Development Regulationso
The master plan parking requirement of 780 spaces was based on the gross
building area of the shopping center plus the restaurant requirement. Per
Boynton Beach LDR, CD 2, Sec 1l.D.16.d, parking requirement for
shopping centers should be based on gross leasable area. A table attached to
this response shows the leasable area and the resulting requirement of 768
parking stalls. The proposed drive-thru eliminates 10 spaces, but the final
number of stalls provided is 769, 1 more than required by code. Therefore,
a variance is not necessarv.
290 The tabular data on the master plan as it relates to parking requirements is
incorrect. The number of required parking spaces for the Target store
equals 561 spaces. Parcel "A" requires 130 parking spaceso The restaurant
requires 89 parking spaces
The parking tabular data has been revised. See response to comment 28
',flbtfve.
)6\ The tabular data on the master plan is incorrect because the total square
footage of each element of the Building Area Breakdown does not equal
144,474 square feet. The tabular data needs to be corrected to reflect the
\. accurate building areaso 1\:lso, indicate the existing and'proposed building \;
areas. For example, will the building to be occupied by Eckerd be increased
in size?
The tabular data has been revised on 8-1. The Eckerd will be using the
existing building and only adding architectural elements to the exterior and
placing holes in the walls to accommodate openings (drive-thru, man doors,
etc). Therefore, the Eckerd will not increase the buildin!!'s size.
1,)
'7
1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS-MasterPlan-RESPONSE. doc
03/28/03
4
DEPARTMENTS
The proposed canopy areas of the Eckerd store shall count towards lot
coverage. This must be reflected in the master plan (sheet 8-1) tabular datao
t S-1 has been revised er comment.
On the master plan (sheet S-I), label the subject project as Parcel "A" in
order to be consistent with the survey.
t S-1 has been revised er comment.
The configuration of the east property line of Parcel "A" is inconsistent
between the master plan and the site plan (CaDS 03-001). The master plan
shall show the correct configuration of the east property line of Parcel "A",
including the five (5)-foot wide limited access easement along the east
property lineo
Sheet S-1 has been revised er comment.
MWR/sc
1-
INCLUDE REJECT
H:\044 Jobs\044628000\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS-MasterPlan-RESPONSE.doc
~
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 03-030
TO: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM: Timothy K. Large ~
TRC Member/Building DiviSi~
DATE: February 26,2003
SUBJECT: Project - Eckerd @ Catalina
File No. - MPMD 03-002 - 1st review
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for
Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in
compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits.
BuildinQ Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothy K. LarQe (561)
742-6352
1. The required number of handicap accessible parking spaces shall comply with the
2001 Florida Building Code, Section 11-4.1.2(5). The 2% rule is only applicable to
parking spaces in the amounts of 501-1000.
2. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the
handicap accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be
consistent with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for
Building Construction. The accessible parking spaces that serve a use shall be
located on the shortest safely accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an
accessible entrance. The Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction
states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall have accessible
parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrance. Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2(5),4.3,4.6.
3. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the
property line.
4. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit
a current survey of the subject property.
5. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
S:IDevelopmentlBuildingl TRCI TRC 2003\Name of project
Page 1 of 2
6. Add to the submittal a partial elevation view drawing of the proposed perimeter
wall. Identify the type of the wall material and the type of material that supports the
wall, including the typical distance between supports. Also, provide a typical
section view drawing of the wall that includes the depth that the wall supports are
below finish grade and the height that the wall/fence is above finish grade. The
location and height of the wall shall comply with the wall regulations specified in
the Zoning Code.
7. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum number
of required handicap accessible parking spaces. Also, state the code section that
is applicable to the computations.
8. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the
location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject
request.
9. At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For
purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a
copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be
submitted at time of permit review.
bf
S:IDevelopmentIBuilding\ TRC\ TRC 2003 \Name of project
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Fire and Life Safety Division
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of:
MPMD 03-002 1st review-fire
Project Name and Address:
Eckerd @ Catalina
1895 N. Conqress Avenue
Department:
.p~ Rodqer Kemmer, Fire Protection Enqineer
Fire and Life Safety
Reviewed by:
Phone:
(561) 742-6753
Comments to:
Sherie Coale by email on 2/25/03
CODE REQUIREMENTS
All site plan issues addressed on plans, no comments.
cc: Steve Gale
Bob Borden
c'i tY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
/'"
TO:
FILE: MPMD 03-002
FROM:
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
3/3/03
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Eckerd @ Catalina
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No comments.
TRC Memorandum
Page 1 of 1
Coale, Sherie
From: Hallahan, Kevin
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 3:14 PM
To: Coale, Sherie
Cc: Galav, Lusia
Subject: 03-Plan.doc
Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Eckerd Drug @ Catalina Center
Master Plan Modification- 18t Review
MPMD 03-002
Date:
March 3, 2003
I have no comment on the proposed Master Plan Modification.
Kjh
File
3/312003