CORRESPONDENCE
Ducoste-Amedee, Maxime
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Galav, Lusia
Friday, February 14, 200310:15 AM
Ducoste-Amedee, Maxime
FW: Access
Max,
You can include this information in the staff report.
Lusia
-----Original Message-m-
From: Kelley, David
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:12 AM
To: Galav, Lusia
Subject: RE: Access
Lusia:
You should also note that the driveway off of NE 9th Ave is replacing the original platted alleyway (in
the same location) therefore leaving the existing utilities accessible via the new driveway location. If
the variance is for Federal Highway, then the right-in, right-out access driveway is still recommended.
Dave.. ..
--mOriginal Messagenm
From: Galav, Lusia
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:05 AM
To: Kelley, David
Subject: RE: Access
Will do,
-----Original Messagenm
From: Kelley, David
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Galav, Lusia
Cc: Rumpf, Michael; Ducoste-Amedee, Maxime
Subject: RE: Access
I would use the 120-foot distance for the variance on this application, noting in the justification
section that the Chapter 23 requirement did not change to meet the changes made in the
other chapters of the LOR during the first upgrade of the LOR approved by the City
Commission on 08/20/02, but staff is recommending the change in the next update (currently
in preparation).
Dave....
-----Original Messagemn
From: Galav, Lusia
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:25 AM
To: Kelley, David
Cc: Rumpf, Michael; Ducoste-Amedee, Maxime
Subject: RE: Access
Thanks Dave.
1
We have a variance applicdtion for the Schnars Business Center regarcflng driveway distance from the
intersection on Federal Hwy. I wanted to make sure we used the correct code citation. We will use the one
from Chapter 6 since it is the most recent change. They don't meet the 120 feet either but it's less of a
variance.
We can change the code with the other revisions you gave me.
Thanks.
Lusia
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelley, David
Sent: Thursday, February 13, 20034:23 PM
To: Galav, Lusia
Subject: RE: Access
Lusia:
I will certainly try!!! The minimum driveway location now noted in Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 1.A.3. was the one changed via the Ordinance #02-033, in August, 2002. This
deals with arterial streets, which we felt was only fair since there are numerous lots in
the city to which anything larger would not allow access to them. This section also
applies to residential access driveways as well as commercial driveways, and in
compatible with our new Std, Dwg. #K-15 (Driveway Location Criteria). As a matter of
fact, sub-sub section #1,2 & 3 are related and shown on this Std. Dwg.
In regards to Chapter 23, Article II, Section H.3., for some reason, this sub-sub section
was not picked up in the above cited Ord. changes. We need to change this piece of
the pie to align with the other changes made. I note in the Ord. that sub-sub section 1.
(Width) and sub-sub section 2. (Drive radii) were updated, but no explanation at to why
#3 was not updated at the same time. Obviously another fau paux.
Sorry about that.
Dave....
-----Original Message-----
From: Galav, Lusia
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 5:20 PM
To: Kelley, David
Subject: Access
Dave,
Could you please explain the difference between the driveway access requirements found in LDR
Chapter 6, Article IV, Sec. 1. A. 3. and Chapter 23, Article II, H. 3. Is there a conflict regarding
distance from intersection on an arterial, or am I reading it wrong? Remember, the code citation in
Chapter 6 was included in the recent revision. Please advise.
Lusia
2
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd.
P,O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO:
J E F f=- ,,(}Uf Nt) fL's
I I
Iv! It X ifY1i /)u {.v 5%
I
02/ID12Do3
I I
V 1+ R-,'A ;J U ;&: ~ i-{ e-s, r
FAX:
56(-;21/- S/t!2
FROM:
DA TE:
NUMBER OF PAGES: (including
cover)
~
RE:
jEff)
(1J E 'if /1.t) f r:; A 7" OJ De- Stlt.o <V F 0 r~ ~ 1:>;2-," ve tN '7 II /!1'< .... <J {e
is. A- s roilo fA.}. L j) IC I 0h~t7Z-- .23 !IlL( ff. ,f. 3>. , /i ~p N Dr
___ C Ha f JbfL- ~ /" rtJl C-t2 I" I geL r'o,J 1 It.
,J wiLL CH A tJC:,t:r-'f ru fut:-5 r L ;pJ&iAJl6e ON r 4ft' k '41 r'ORJ
A U 0 (l D;",;af . 'f you HfnN: ,AP 7 'f w:;-jTION5 I ("4 [j M c:
1 fr'P'M f- dJiA Cb '3, f3
~f you receive this fax in error, or experienc t . . .
Immediately, at (561) 742-6260, Thank you.e rouble wIth transmIssIon, please notify our office
''-
City Codes Accessed Via Webslte
www.bovnton-beach.org
www.amlegal.corrvbovnton beach B.
Has applicant attended a pre-application meeting? Yes Date 10-0
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
CODE VARIANCE APPLICATION
UlU.l!i'ff [,4J 1 1/'-/'1
-'--, I
A4200.~~ !: l..
~
SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: SEE SCHEDULE OF DATES FOR BOARD MEETINGS AND
SUBMITTAL DATES:
Please Print (in ink) or Type
Submittal Date:
The undersigned owner(s) hereby respectfully petition(s) the City Of Boynton Beach to grant to
petitioner(s) a special exception or variance to existing code of said City pertaining to the property
hereinafter described and in support thereof state(s):
Property involved is described as follows: Lot(s) 21.22, 23 less the west 17' thereof:
toqether with Lot 20 . less the east 55 feet thereof,
Block~, Subdivision "Lake Addition to Bovnton"
Plat Book 11 Page 71 or otherwise described as
follows:
Property Address 924 N. Federal Hiqhwav
PCN Number 08-43-45-21-32-004-0210: 08-43-45-21-32-004-0201
Variance requested including code chapter and section, existing code standards (Le.
setback distance, number of required parking spaces etc,), requested standard and the
variance (existing code standard minus requested standard).
Part III Land Development Regulations. -Chapt@r 6. ,Article N. Section 1A.
L 4-A ~ 2..::'; A fl. T'cLt: n. . I-I, 3> ,
Request variance to allow centerline of driveway on Federal Highway to be 107' from NE 9th Avenue
right-of-way instead of the required 180'.
The following documents are required to be submitted with this application to form a single package.
Incomplete package will not be accepted:
1. Two sealed surveys by a registered surveyor in the State of Florida, not over six (6) months
old, indicating:
A. All property lines
B, North arrow
C, Existing structures and paving
D. Existing elevations
E, Rights-of-way, with elevations
F. Easements on or adjacent to the site
G. Utilities on or adjacent to the site
H. Legal Description