Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS 6.A.2 KRISPY KREME CONDITIONAL USE/SITE PLAN DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01- 263 TO: Chairman and Members Planning and Development Board FROM: Lusia Galav, AICP Principal Planner DATE: November 29,2001 SUBJECT: Krispy Kreme - COUS 01-005 Conditional Use Approval- Restaurant with drive-through facility PROPOSAL SUMMARY Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC is seeking conditional use / site plan approval for a restaurant with a drive-through facility. This conditional use proposal will also require a land use / zoning change. The project intent is to raze an existing residential duplex building located on a 0.26 acre lot and to combine this residential property with a 0.78-acre, commercially zoned property in order to construct a 4,680 square-foot restaurant on 1.04 total acres. This conditional use and site plan application is being reviewed concurrently with its land use amendment and rezoning request (LUAR 01-008). A restaurant, a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district, will front on Boynton Beach Boulevard. Entrances will be located on the front (north elevation) and side (east elevation) building facades. The applicant is also seeking conditional use approval to allow for a drive-through facility to be located to the rear (south elevation) of the building. The drive-through lane will commence, facing southward on the west side of the building. It will then wrap around the building turning eastward to the rear of the building in order to allow for adequate vehicular stacking in the drive-through lane. The drive-through window will face south. Applicant! Agent: Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC / Scott Barber of Gee & Jenson, Project name: Krispy Kreme General description: 4,680 square-foot restaurant with drive-through facility Property size: 45,470 square feet (1.04 acres) Current Land use: Medium Density Residential (MeDR) and Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Current Zoning: Duplex Residential (R-2) and Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Proposed Land Use: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Proposed Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) Krispy Kreme - COUS 01-005 Page 2 Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263 Location: Northwest 1st Avenue (between NW 1st Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard (SR804) east ofNW ih Street). West Industrial Avenue intersects with Boynton Beach Boulevard immediately north of the subject property. (See Exhibit "A" - Location Map) Total Building area: 4,680 square feet (See Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan) Surrounding land uses/zoning: North - Right-of-way of West Boynton Beach Boulevard (SR 804), then property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC), zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2), and developed with a service station (Texaco) to the northwest; to the northeast the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and West Industrial Avenue and farther east, right-of-way of Industrial Avenue then developed property classified Industrial (I) and zoned Light Industrial (M -1) (the locations of Lloyds Auto Electric and Foster Oil). East - Property classified Medium Density Residential (MeDR), zoned Duplex Residential (R-2) and developed with duplex (two-family) homes. South - Right-of-way of NW 1 st Avenue, then property classified Low Density Residential, zoned Single family Residential (R-I-A) and developed with single family homes; and West - Developed property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC), zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2) and occupied by a dental/medical office building. STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSIS Section 11.2.D of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to standards. The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional use approval, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following standards, where applicable: 1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Krispy Kreme - COUS 01-005 Page 3 Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263 The subject property has one point of ingress / egress. This point will be located off of Boynton Beach Boulevard and will directly align with West Industrial Avenue. No entrance or exit is proposed along Northwest 1st Avenue. No cross access is proposed with the property to the west. The entrance to the subject property is proposed to be a 15-foot wide opening. A landscaped median five- (5) feet wide will separate the entrance and exit lanes. When vehicles enter the subject property from Boynton Beach Boulevard, the landscaped median separates the entrance / exit lanes and also functions as a traffic control device, guiding vehicles onto the property in a westward direction. All landscape material in this landscaped median will be either tall or short enough to preserve the visibility and safe-sight requirements. The exit will consist of two (2) lanes, each 11 feet wide. They will provide the driver with either a left/straight or a right-turn out exit option. Prior to the issuance of a City building permit, this project must obtain Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval with regard to a westbound Boynton Beach Boulevard left-turn lane onto the subject property (see Exhibit "C"- Conditions of Approval). The on-site traffic circulation system for this parcel consists of a one- (1) way drive aisle that surrounds the entire building. The width of this one (1)-way drive aisle fluctuates between 14.4 feet and 27 feet. This (one-way) method of circulation was deemed to be the most efficient and trouble-free for service / emergency vehicles and patrons of the restaurant. A sidewalk, with its respective markings, connects the public right-oi-way with the front of the restaurant. For added convenience, an opening in the masonry wall located along the rear of the property is proposed to allow for residents of the adjacent residential neighborhood to access the subject site without excessive driving or trespassing on adjoining properties. This opening is proposed for the benefit of the adjacent residents but could be eliminated if opposed by the residents, the Board, or the Commission. 2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The required parking has been tabulated based on a restaurant use. The ratio used is one (1) space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. The total number of parking spaces required is 47 spaces. The site plan will provide 53 parking spaces, of which, three (3) spaces are designated for handicap use. The handicap spaces will be situated in the most appropriate on-site location, closest to the building's front entrance. The parking lot to the south and east sides of the proposed building will be screened from the adjacent residential properties by a masonry wall six (6) feet in height. No parking is proposed west of the building. That area is designated for loading areas, a drive-through lane, and the drive aisle. No loading area abuts or can be seen from residentially-zoned property. 3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above. The dumpster enclosure will be located at the southwest corner of the site. It is located in an area that is unobtrusive to pedestrian and vehicular traffic and is unnoticeable from Boynton Beach Boulevard, Northwest 1st Avenue, or residentially-zoned property. 4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility. Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable water and sanitary sewer will be in place via construction at the time of permitting. Krispy Kreme - GOUS 01-005 Page 4 Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263 5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character. The proposed pervious or "green" area is 8,280 square feet or 18% of the total site. Much of the perimeter of the site is constrained with overhead power lines. Most tall growing palm and shade trees would conflict with the guidelines of Florida Power & Light's "Right Tree, Right Place" publication. However, in an attempt to buffer the subject commercial property from the adjacent residential properties, the landscape plan proposes seven (7) Ironwood shade trees spaced every 20 feet along the east property line. Eleven (11) Cassia shade trees are spaced every 25 feet along the southern property line. Chapter 7.5 of the Land Development Code only requires one (1) tree spaced every 30 feet along these property lines. The aforementioned trees are placed in such a way as to create a continuous upper level canopy, serving as a formidable uninterrupted buffer along the east and south property lines. Also, a masonry wall six (6) feet in height with stucco on both sides is proposed along the east and south property lines. This wall will serve as a lower level buffer to the residential neighborhood. In addition, Spanish Stopper hedges will be placed outside the masonry wall facing the perimeter properties, which will further enhance the appearance of the wall 6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties. This conditional use application proposes several wall signs on the side (east) and front (west) facades. The restaurant's total allowable wall signage area (156 square feet) is based upon the following ratio: l-YJ square feet of sign area for every linear foot of building frontage on Boynton Beach Boulevard. The plan proposes to have a 41.5 square-foot internally lit wall sign centered on the east elevation. The east elevation faces residentially-zoned property. The 15 square-foot "Hot Now" neon sign originally was proposed near the top of the east elevation, above the awning similar to the front facade. However, in deference to staff's request Krispy Kreme has agreed to relocate the "Hot Now" sign to the lower window area on the east elevation. Staff determined that a neon sign placed above the awning on the east elevation might have caused excessive glare onto the adjacent property. The "Hot Now" sign is now proposed in one of the windows on a lower portion of the east elevation. Its placement allows it to be visible from Boynton Beach Boulevard but not visible from the neighboring property to the east. The front fa(:ade contains a 41.5 square-foot internally lit wall sign and two (2) "Hot Now" signs. Originally, Krispy Kreme had proposed neon banding to be located just under the top pilaster on the front and side fa(:ades. However, the neon banding has since been eliminated from the design due to staff's recommendation against this type of lighting. The monument sign will stand eight (8) feet high overall and contain an internally lit cabinet sign with the site address and neon lit "Hot Now" sign located below. The required site lighting for the parking areas will meet or exceed development standards and will not cause excessive glare onto adjacent properties. The photometric plan will be reviewed at the time of permitting. 7. Required setbacks and other open spaces. The proposed building and drive-through lane meets all setback requirements of the C-2 zoning district. The building will be situated in the center of the newly created parcel. 8. General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district. Krispy Kreme - GOUS 01-005 Page 5 Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263 In general, the proposed use is compatible with the existing commercial uses to the west of the subject property. The plan incorporates shade trees, a masonry wall, and shrubs to serve as a functional buffer between the subject property and the adjacent residential neighborhood. Chapter 9 of the Land Development Regulations (Community Design) indicates that when a distinct development or architectural pattern exists within a surrounding two-block area, consistency with that pattern shall be required. The established character of the built projects within a two block area (south side of Boynton Beach Boulevard) generally represent the Spanish/Mediterranean style. The proposed plans incorporate barrel/S-tile roof material and faux arches. However, bells or other type of towers and covered walkways, which are also representative of the Spanish/Mediterranean style, are strongly encouraged into the design. There will be minimal on-site impact and no adverse effects will occur from the proposed restaurant use. The site plan provides adequate buffering and the drive through will have little or no impact to the adjacent properties or to the surrounding area. It should be noted that the majority of the subject property is currently zoned for the proposed use. Land assemblage will allow for a larger project but also for better site design and greater landscape buffers for the adjacent residential properties. 9. Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The proposed building is designed as a one-story structure. The proposed building height is compatible in comparison with the neighboring properties. However, the maximum allowable height for the R-2 zoning district and C-2 zoning district is 25 feet. The top of the pitched roof for the proposed restaurant is 26 feet 6 inches. The current definition of building height in the City's Land Development Regulations is in the process of being amended to include "mean heights ", which in this case would allow for the proposed height as illustrated in this manner. However, by the current definition the applicant is required to either reduce the height of the roof by 1 foot 6 inches to comply with the current language in the code or to request and receive approval for a height exception (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Staffwould recommend approval if the latter option were the preferred choice of the applicant. The proposed roof design is a product of staff's recommendation to improve compatibility with the design of the existing commercial buildings to the west. The applicant willingly made design improvements that resulted in a small portion of the roof to exceed the maximum allowed height of the zoning district. 10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole. The proposed use will constitute additional convenience and choice for the City residents. This Krispy Kreme store will be the first of such stores in the City and only one of a few stores in South Florida. Its frontage on a major arterial (Boynton Beach Boulevard) and close proximity to Interstate 95 make the proposed restaurant an appropriate use for this site. 11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19, Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review). Krispy Kreme - GOUS 01-005 Page 6 Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263 With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project will comply with all requirements of applicable sections of city code. 12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance standards within Section 4.N. of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2; also, conformance to the City of Boynton Beach noise Control Ordinance. With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed restaurant with drive-through facility would operate in a manner that is in compliance with the above- referenced codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. Also, staff recommends that the audio component of the menu board for the drive through facility project sound to the west as to not create a disturbance to the residential neighborhood to the east and south (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). In conclusion, the applicant will have to apply for and obtain all necessary approvals and licenses from all applicable governing bodies in order for a certificate of occupancy to be issued. RECOMMENDATION Based on the discussions contained herein, compliance with development regulations, and the consistency with the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends that this request be approved subject to satisfying all conditions of approval as contained in Exhibit "C". LG/elj I ICH\MAIN\SHRDA T A IPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTSlkrispy kremelCOUSICOUS staff report. doc EXHIBIT "e" Conditions of Approval Project name: Krispy Kreme File number: COUS 01-005 Reference: 2nd Review plans identified as COUS 01-005 with a November 5, 2001 Planning & Zoning stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS- General Comments: None PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic Comments: None UTILITIES Comments 1. Fire flow calculation will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR Chapter 6, Article IV Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE Section 26-16(a)). 2. CODE Sec. 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. FIRE Comments: 3. A fire hydrant flow test is required prior to construction (City Ord. 9-3F). 4. Fire hydrants shall be no more that 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more that 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements a fire flow of 1500 g.p.m. at a residual pressure of not less that 20 p.s.i. is required (LDR Chapter 6, Section 16). POLICE Comments: None Conditions of Approval 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 5. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 inches thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P). 6. Provide an irrigation plan in conformance with the LDR Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 7. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City Unity of Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions of each property that is being unified is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 8. At the time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 9. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project, identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the site plan the number of new seats and the total number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all seats including those seats that are around the bar. 10. At time of permit review, submit for review an addressing plan for the project. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 11. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and sitework improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for review and approval by the Parks Department staff. Include on the plan location of any existing irrigation in the right-of- way. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: I DEPARTMENTS l INCLUDE I REJECT I 12. The applicant must provide a tree tabulation indicating the quantity of desirable existing trees which will be preserved, relocated or removed / replaced on the site. This tree tabulation should be correlated and the trees shown on page L-l. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 13. The site plan must identify the correct Future Land Use designations as defined by the City's Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent properties. 14. Staffrecommends that the audio component of the menu board related to the drive through facility project sound to the west as to not create a potential disturbance to the residential neighborhood. 15. The maximum building height in the C-2 zoning district is 25 feet. The top of the roof of the tower is 26 feet 6 inches. Either reduce the top of the tower by one and one-half (1 Y2) feet or request a height exception pursuant to Chapter 2, Section 4.H. 16. Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the Planning & Development Board meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). 17. Submit a color sample / swatch of all major exterior finishes. Each sample and / or elevation shall include the manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.). 18. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes, meters, transformers, shall be visually screened with appropriate landscaping / hedge material (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). The backflow preventer shall be painted to match the principle structure. 19. The dumpster enclosure and masonry wall shall resemble with respect to the color and materials, the design of the principal building. Include a wall detail to confirm similar architectural elements and integration with other site elements (Chapter 9, Section 1O.E.3.). 20. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division suggested that the City review traffic operations at the project access driveway, with emphasis on left-turns in and out of the site because the forecasted peak hour volumes indicate the need for provision of a westbound left-turn lane on Boynton Beach Boulevard onto the site. Prior to the issuance of a City building permit, this project must obtain Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval with regard to the westbound left-turn lane onto the subject property. ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 21. To be determined. Conditions of Approval 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: 22. To be determined. \\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\krispy kreme\COUS\Condition of Approval 2 page revised 2001 form.doc Plannine: Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner ~if From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Krispy Kreme NWSP # 01-012 1 st Review Date: September 24,2001 The applicant must provide a tree tabulation indicating the quantity of desirable existing trees which will be preserved, relocated or removed / replaced on the site. This tree tabulation should be correlated and the trees shown on page L-l. The proj ect should continue in the normal reVIew process. Kjh File . . CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS For review of: NWSP 01-012 1st review-fire Project Name or Address: Krispy Kreme 633 NW 1st Avenue Reviewed by: (JJr It_ Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Examiner/Fire Inspector Department: Fire and Life Safety Trade: Fire Department Phone: (561) 742-6753 Comments to: Sherie Coale by email on 9/20/01 CODE REQUIREMENTS Compliance with NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code, and city ordinances is required. 1) A fire hydrant flow test is required prior to construction. (City Ord. 9- 3F) 2) Roads and hydrants must be in place prior to any construction above grade. (NFPA 241 (1996) Standard for Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, sections 5-4.3 and 6-7.2.2. 3) Fire hydrants shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant. v Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements a fire flow of 1500 gpm at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi is required. (LOR Chapter 6 section 16) cc: S. Gale, Fire Marshal B. Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal r J DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 01-182 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: September 24, 2001 l~ ~j FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Civil Engineer RE: Krispy Kreme New Site Plan Review - 1st Review File No. NWSP 01-012 I have reviewed the above referenced Site Plans, forwarded to me on September 7,2001, against the Site Plan Review requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are my comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced. Code Requirements 1. On the Site Plan, add a general note that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, clearing & grubbing, excavation & fill, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 2. Show all existing utilities on Site Characteristics Map (Survey) and Site Development plan (LDR, Chapter 4, Section A.3). 3. Provide drainage plans and design data for site drainage as specified in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5. Show rim and invert elevations for all manholes and catch basins. Indicate, by note, that storm water will be contained on site (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.F.). Any work done within the right-of-way and/or to existing facilities within the right-of-way will require review, approval and permitting by the FDOT. 4. Provide photometrics and pole wind loading with the Lighting Plan in conformance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 11, Chapter 23, Article I, Section 5.B.7 and Chapter 23, Article II, Section A. Note that the proposed lights along the west side of the property will be in conflict with the dumpster area and loading zone. 5. The driveway width of 45 ft. exceeds the maximum allowed by the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section H.l. A variance shall be required. ", Engineering Department Memorandum No. 01-182 Re: Krispy Kreme, New Site Plan - Engineering 1 st Review September 24, 2001 Page Two 6. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P). 7. Add a note to the Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross- visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). Show sight triangles graphically on the Site Plan and Landscaping Plan. Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along all collector and arterial roadways. 8. Provide an Irrigation Plan in conformance with the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5. 9. Indicate, by note, that the color and texture of the dumpster enclosures shall match the building (LDR, Chapter 9, Section 10.E, and City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawing A-88007). Show on the detail that drop pins and sleeved holes will be provided to secure dumpster enclosure gates in the open and closed positions. 10. Provide details for curb, curb & gutter, and sidewalk conforming to the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.E. Provide a typical section for parking lot pavement conforming to LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.Q. Recommendations/Corrections 1. The City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances and Land Development Regulations can be viewed at www.ci.boynton-beach.fl.us. 2. Indicate which edition of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge and Standard Index is to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they have both English and Metric units. 3. Indicate the current version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices in the Paving and Drainage General Notes. 4. Coordination with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Department may be required for re-timing the signal for the westbound Boynton Beach Boulevard to Krispy Kreme southbound movement. A "No Right on Red" sign may be appropriate at the exit from Krispy Kreme. A stop sign at the driveway egress is not needed. 5. A separate permit will be required from the Florida Department of Transportation for the driveway cut onto Boynton Beach Boulevard. 6. Is the overhead wire shown within the 5 foot public use easement on the Boundary Survey being removed? It is not shown on the Site Plan. 7. Add "Stop" sign and stop bar at "Do Not Enter" sign on east side of building to prevent traffic from entering drive-through lanes. 8. Indicate where existing sidewalk ends and new sidewalk will begin. Handicap ramps shall be constructed in compliance with all applicable current federal, state and local standards. Engineering Department Memorandum No. 01-182 Re: Krispy Kreme, New Site Plan - Engineering 1 st Review September 24, 2001 Page Three 9. Revise the curb cut portion ofthe Handicap Ramp Detail to agree with the plan drawing on Sheet C-2. 10. Show written scale under graphic scale. 11. Make corrections as noted throughout plans. LUck Xc: H. David Kelley, Jr., PE./PSM, Utility Engineer Ken Hall, Enginering Plans Review Analyst, Inspector Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Plans Review Analyst, Inspector e:\My Documents\Krispy Kreme New Site Plan, Engr. 1st Review.doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 01- 194 TO: Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning FROM: TimothyK. Large ~ TRC MemberIBuilding Di'j ~~~ /~ ~ DATE: September 12,2001 SUBJECT: Project - Krisy Kreme File No. - NWSP 01-012 We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits. Buildine: Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Lan~e (561) 742-6352 1. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the building. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2, 4.3. 2. On the floor plan drawing, add a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the building. The location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted on the site plan drawing. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2,4.3. 3. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the handicap accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be consistent with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The accessible parking spaces that serve a use shall be located on the shortest safely accessible route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. The Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances shall have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrance. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2(5), 4.3, 4.6. 4. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the accessible entrance doors to the building. The symbol shall start at the accessible parking spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to the building. The symbol shall represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or other pavement markings that are required to be installed along the path. The location of the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width ofthe accessible route. (Note: The minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text to the drawing that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. This documentation shall include, but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel. 5. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition of the Standard Building Code]: a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100- year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction development regulations." b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans. c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving! drainage (civil plans). 6. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the property line. 7. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet AI. However, add to the floor plan drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the building. The location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible entrance doors that is depicted on the site plan drawing. 8. On the site plan, indicate within the footprint of the buildings the number of stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Also, add to the site data the number of stories in the building including identifying mezzanines, where applicable. Indicate the overall height of the building within the site data. The overall height of the building shall not exceed the height limitations of the Zoning Code. 9. On all floor plan drawings, indicate within the footprint of the building the number of stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines. 10. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the primary use of the structure/facility. 11. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City unity of title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions of each property that is being unified is required to be submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall match. 12. At the time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. 13. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project, identify on the site plan ifthe restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn over, or fast food with drive- through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the site plan the number of new seats and the total number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all seats including those seats that are around the bar. 14. At time of permit review, submit for review an addressing plan for the project. 15. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. bf s: IDevelopmentlBuilding-68 70IDocuments ITRCINWSP 01-012 PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #01-92 FROM: Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks Director j1J Barbara J. Meacham, Lands~pe Architect KrisPV Kreme e>~ September 11,2001 TO: THRU: RE: Date: 1. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and sitework improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for review and approval by the Parks Department staff. Include on the plan location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way. ,/ DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES MEMORANDUM NO. 01-228 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director of ~g an/Oning John A. Guidry, Utilities Director ~ ~ H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, Utility Engineer ~~- THRU: FROM: ,/ DATE: September 11,2001 J..,j , ~..,....... ...... RE: KRISPY KREME NWSP 01-012 -lstREVIEW We offer the following comments on the above noted project: GENERAL COMMENTS 1) Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE Sec. 26-12). 2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a)). 3) CODE Sec. 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 4) Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 5) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) (per LDR Chap. 4, Sec. 7F). 1../ Department of Utilities Memorandum # 01-228 Re: Krispy Kreme - 1 st Review Sept. 11,2001 Page 2 SPECIFIC CONDITIONS 6) LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by showing all hydrants. [Refer to Comment #2 above.] 7) Appropriate backflow preventer will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and the fire sprinkler line ifthere is one, in accordance with CODE Sec. 26-207. HDKJkd Xc: H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E., P.S.M., Utility Engineer Laurinda Logan, P.E., Civil Engineer Georganne Barden, Administrative Assistant File S:\Engineering\Dostal\KKreme Utility Comments 0911 Ol.doc DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEt:Jf MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01-000 FROM: TRC MEMBERS Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist James Prestinari, Police Department H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department Timothy K. Large, Building Division Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic Barbara Meacham, Parks Division Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department Lusia Galav, Planning Department Michael W. RumPf-)' ~ ).v Director of Plannin~ Z6ning TO: DATE: September 7,2001 RE: SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES 15T Review - New Site Plan Project - Krispy Kreme Location - 633 NW 1 st Avenue ,/ L Agent Scott Barber; Gee & Jenson File No. NWSP 01-012 Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on, September 21, 2001. When preparing your comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project. Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval: 1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments. 2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself. 3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the documents. 4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with other departmental impro\ements. Page 2 5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified. 6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project be forwarded through the approval process. All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e- mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project. First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee (TRC) members. MWR:lg Attachment XC: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal Marshall Gage, Police Department John Guidry, Utilities Director To Be Determined,Director of Engineering Don Johnson, Building Division Central File S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlkrispy kremelNWSPITRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc Revised 5-22-01 ~ '-'Gee & J enS'on Celebrating 50 Years of Design Excellence BOYNTON BEACH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION I, Stephen A. Gaydosh, Jr., PE - GC - PCC - CBI, do hereby certify to the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, of Palm Beach County that the application for Krispy Kreme on Boynton Beach Boulevard has been designed in full compliance with Section 7F of Chapter 4 of the Land Development Regulations (LDR), of Boynton Beach, Florida. I also acknowledge that the City of Boynton Beach's LDR may and does include requirements that are more stringent or restrictive than the requirements of other regulatory agencies including, but not limited to, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Any plans, calculations, reports, or other documents submitted to the City of Boynton Beach or any regulatory agency in support of the application have been prepared in full recognition of and in compliance with the City of Boynton Beach LDR. The site is 0.9378 Acres :t Impervious and 0.3244 Acres :t Pervious, for a total site area of 1.2622 Acres:t. The site is located on the South Side of Boynton Beach Boulevard, west of 1-95, and has been designed using an Exfiltration Trench System of 15" ~ Pipe to contain the entire runoff from a 100-Year, 72-Hour Storm Event on-site with no run-off leaving the development. 14/ Stephen A. Gaydosh, Jr., PE-GC-PCC-CBI Project Manager - Gee & Jenson E-A-P, Inc. Florida PE - 038464 10/15/01 OCT I 6 ?OJI "\ Ut drtij 1 ( ( :-~i ld One Harvard Circle, West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923 T(561) 515.6500 F(561) 515.6502 ENGINEERING IEB 0002934 ARCHITECTURE 1M C000656 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ILC COOOO50 LAND SURVEYING #LB 0002934 INTERIOR DESIGN liB 0001020 < 'i r~ I - - -1 ; II r- ~ ?5 --I r 0 -= <0 e: .... N 0 0 0 III - 0) e: an Gl .... .., - II 0 ~ .... 0) l{) Gl ~ Gl C> >< III Q) ~ U C 0 0 '<:t 11 >- CIJ "0 I '-- >- 0 0 e: .~ III Gl o .c: u e: Gl ... l- e: o :0:: III ... ~ ;;:: >< UJ CIJ "0 .;:: o u::: ~ Q) U E ~ ~m-r- ~ :::':::COCIJ >-O'<:t Q) 0.. C <0 >- CIl >-...-- -i:: 0 ~ 0 e::::':::IllNO o :0:: III ::s ~ III U E ... '0 0_ e:ZU) 1:) .~ - e: Gl ia ~ .~ ...... (,) ...... III e 0 e Gl D....ID.O 0) l{) <0 0 ~ N 0 ~ 0) ...-- III - .--.. III 0 CIl ::l (j) = 0 III .~ ::l - 0 (j) e: Q) .~ Q) 0.. III .~ Q) ~ c::: 0.. U ......- ......- .f; '-- '-- ......- 0 0 ~ 1:5 - U CIJ CIJ .f; U. U. CIJ () () 0:: >- CIJ o (V) ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 (V) f'... 0 '<:t l{) ~ f'... N 0 0 ...-- u:: u:: u:: 0- 0- 0- (j) (j) (j) ...-- (V) '<:t l{) (V) ex:> ex:> ...-- 0) 0 '<:t '<:t '<:t ...-- l{) III - III 0 III ::: U) (j) (j) (j) () () () <( <( <( ex:> '<:t N f'... '<:t N (V) N <0 ~ (V) ~ 0 0 ...-- CIJ Q) '-- CIJ <( Q) CIl '-- ::l <( CIJ 0 CIl Q) '-- .~ ::l <( 0 Q) .~ ro 0.. - E Q) 0 0... I- l{) f'... 0) 0 ..-- N ~ '<:t f'... ::l CIl 0 0 ~ .. .. N N N .. I < I N .. ::l .. I N 0 N Of'... 0; cO .... .... ...-- <0 <0 f'... ...... cx:i C\j '<:t C') ...... f'... C\j ...... 0 0 c::i 0 c::i .--.. 0:::'::: N .. I N + N < ::l o I ::l o N I N + 3: N I ......- o ~ .... .--.. ::l o ~ .. 0) (V) ::l"'-- 00 .. 0 ~~ ..- c:> c:> ('.J I-- U <:::) 1.D M I- ~ C> J: U) C! o .... ::s III 0 0 ... ~ C"l J: 0 C! en '<:t ...; 0 co '<:t an -.:t .... .... ~ 0 ~ .... I .... I .... U en U ~ CIJ an CIJ "": .... 0 ex:> ex:> N N ex:> (V) c <0 C f'... N (V) ., 0) ., f'... U 0 U CIJ "'": CIJ l{) 0) ...-- (V) ex:> (V) '<:t 0 <0 III 0 - 0 III 0 0 .c: (,) .--.. e: .--.. ~ Gl ~ ... ......- ~ I- ~ en ~ c :::.::: ~ Q) ...J '<:t f'... L() N CIl ::l N 0 0 I "'C Gl ... ::s C" Gl c::: Gl E ::s o > "'C Gl "'C .::; o ... c.. Gl E ::s o > Gee & Jenson E-A-P. Inc. Krispy Kreme City of Boynton Beach, Florida PROJECT NO. 21 -164.01 SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS 1) SITE DATA: 2) STAGE ELEVATIONS: ACREAGE Percent: From: IL Building: 0.10 Ac. 7.9% 2150 up Pavement: 0.84 Ac. 66.4% 18.00 2100 Dry Detention Area. 000 Ac. 0.0% 000 up Dry Detention Bank: 0.00 Ac. 0.0% 0.00 000 Open Space: 0.32 Ac. 25.7% 16.00 1800 TOTAL AREA: 1.26 Ac. 100.0% Total Impervious: 0.94 Average Existing Grade: 16.50 74.29% Average Proposed Grade: 19.25 Water Table: 10.00 Total Pervious: 0.32 25.71% 3) FLOOD and RAINFALL CRITERIA: 24 Hour Rainfall: 10 Year 25 Year 100 Year 8.00 10.00 1400 in. in. in. Min. Road Crown (NGVD): 22.30 Min. Floor Elev. (NGVD): 21.50 Maximum Available Soil Storage, SFWMD: 8.18 in. Allowable Discharge: Basin: 35 CSM 0.07 cfs C-51 4) COMPUTE STAGE STORAGE: Stage: Dry Detention Area)ry Detention Bank Pavement: Open Space Total: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 SFWMD Stg Storage_Krispy Kreme lCJ..15--01 sag. xis PAGE 1 10/15/01 5) WATER QUALITY: Greater of the following (5A. & 5B.) Store the first inch for the entire site or the amount of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness. A. First Inch: v = 1 in. x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Total lAc.): 1.26 B. 2.5 Times Percent Impervious: 1. Site Area = Total Area - ( Bldg. Area) Total lAc. ): 1.26 v = lac-ft) 0.11 2. Impervious Area = Site Area - Pervious Area Site lAc. l: Pervious: 1.16 0.32 3. 2.5 in. x Imperv./Site x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Imperv.: 0.8375 Therefore, the total required detention is either the First inch or 2.5 times the percent impervious, whichever is greater. The total required detention is: V(t): C. Pretreatment: V=lac-ft) 0.19 Bldo.: 0.10 Imperv. : 0.84 0.19 - - 0.5 inches of "Dry" detention pretreatment is required for sensitive receiving waters and greater than 40% impervious. 1. Compute 0.5 inch of required pretreatment - V(pt) V(pt) = 0.5 in. x (Total Area - Lake) Total lAc.): Drv Detention: 1.26 0.00 2. Compute resulting dry detention volume (V) V = Total Required Detention - Pretreatment) :Lill: 0.19 3. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the elevation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between.. $FWMD Stg Storage _ Knspy Kreme_1O-15-01_ sag_xis '&& 0.05 Stage: PAGE 2 /(pt)=(ac-ft) 0.05 V=(ac-ftl 0.14 6.00 0.00 None - - Site (Ac.): 1.16 ac-ft 6.50 0.00 #DIV/O! 10/15/01 6) RUNOFF (ZERO DISCHARGE): A. Soil Storaoe 1. Avg. Depth to Water Table = Avg. Proposed Grade - Water Level Avo. Grade: Water Level: D=lft.): 19.25 10.00 9.25 2. Soil Storage (S) = Available Soil Storage x Pervious AreafTotal Area (See C-35, SFWMD VoIN) Av. Soil SI 8.18 B. 100 Yr.-3 Dav Storm Event Finished Floor Elevation: 1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P): P72 = P24 x 1.359 P24 = P72 = 14.00 in. 19.03 in. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S) P72 (in.): 19.03 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft. /12 in. Ql!.i:!J.:. 16.72 Pervious: 0.32 S = lin.): 2.10 Total lAc. ): 1.26 Total lAc.) S = (in. ): 1.26 2.10 21.50 Q(In.): 16.72 V=lac-ft): 1.76 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between.. interpolate Runoff between.. 1i-; C. 25 Yr.-3 Dav Storm Event 1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P): P72 = P24 x 1.359 P24 = P72 = 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/{P + 0.8 x S) P72 (In.): 13.59 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.) V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in. Ql!.i:!J.:. 11.36 10.00 in. 13.59 in. Stage: S = (in.): 2.10 Total lAc. ): 1.26 6.00 0.00 None - - Q (In.): 11.36 V = lac-ft): 1.19 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is: Interpolate Stage between.. Interpolate Runoff between.. SFWMD Stg Storage Krispy Kreme 10-15-01 sag. xis Stage: PAGE 3 6.00 0.00 None NGVD 6.50 0.00 6.50 0.00 #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 10/15/01 D. 10 Yr.-1 Dav Storm Event (Minimum Road Grade) Min. Road Elevation(B.F.1. Site): Rainfall - 1 Day Duration (P): P24 = 8.00 in. 2. Runoff, Q (in.) Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S) P72 (in.): 8.00 S = (in.): 2.10 3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-It.) V = Q x Total Area x 1 1t./12 in. QJl!lJ: 5.93 Total (Ac. ): 1.26 4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge eievation is: Interpolate Stage between... Interpolate Runoff between.. Stage: i::cd I;: 7) DESIGN CONTROL STRUCURE: A. Set control elevation at or above required water qualitv volume of 22.30 Q (in.): 5.93 V = (ac-It): 0.62 6.00 0.00 None NGVD 6.50 0.00 B. Size circular control orifice for allowable discharqe for 25 vear 3 dav storm event see item 6C above. 0.14 , stage elev. None 1. Runoff in inches (Q)= 2. Runoff volume (ac-It)= 3. Zero discharge stage elevation= 4. Maximum design head (7.B.3-7A)(It.)= None c. Compute circ1uar orifice size 11.36 119 0.00 1. Basic equation is Q= 4.8A(H)^1.5, rearranged the equation is A= Q/4.8(H)^1.5 Where: A= area of orifice, sf ? Q= design discharge, cfs 0.07 H= design head over invert of crific 0.00 2. If Q=1.34 cfs and H= 3.96 It, then A= N/A sf N/A sq. inches SFWMD $Ig Storage _Krispy Kreme_10-15-01_sag_xls PAGE 4 #DIV/O! #DIV/O! #DIV/O! 10/15/01 8) FLOOD ROUTING (Discharge): SFWMD Flood Routing Program Input Data Project Area: Ground Storage: Termination Discharge: Distribution Type: Return Frequency: 24-Hour Rainfall: Reporting Sequence: Stage: (ft) 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 8) SUMMARY: Allowable Discharge: Required Storage: Required Pretreatment: Pretreatment Provided: Soil Storage: 10 Yr.-1 Day Storm: 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm: 100 Yr.-3 Day Storm: FLOOD ROUTING 10 Yr.-1 Day Storm: 25 Yr.-3 Day Storm: 100 Yr.-3 Day Storm: 0.62 1.19 1.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 Storage: (ac-ft) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 ac-ft ac-ft ac-ft NGVD NGVD NGVD I Hereby certify that the above alculations ar true and correct to t best of my knowledge an elief. DATE PRINTED: SFWMO 81g Storage Krispy Kreme~ 10 15-01_ sag.xls 15-0ct-01 DATE PREPARED: BY SAG PAGE 5 1.26 Ac. 2.10 in. 2.00 cfs SFWMD 10 Year 25 Year 100 Year 8.00 10.00 1400 in. STANDARDIZED Discharge: (cfs) 0.000 0.083 0.236 0.433 0.666 0.931 1.224 1.543 1.885 2.249 2.634 3039 3.463 0.07 cfs 0.19 ac-ft 0.14 ac-ft 1.41 ac-ft 2.10 in None None None NGVD Stage Elevation NGVD Stage Elevation NGVD Stage Elevation 0.00 000 0.00 cfs Disch. cfs Disch. cfs Disch. DATES REVISED: 10/15/01 BOynTOn KRISPY KREME conCURREnCY TRAFFIC IMPACT AnALYSIS .. Prepared for ~ GEE Ii JEnSOn .. Prepared by PlnDE~ TROOTM"n conSOL TlnG. Inc. 2324 Sooth Congress flvenae. Salte 1 H West Palm Beach. FL 33406 (561) 434.1644 II ~oJ \ "x~ \ ~J ~ \~ #PTC01.135 September 14. 2001 a. BOYNTON KRISPY KREME CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Introduction Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a proposed 4,368 SF Krispy Kreme restaurant in the City of Boynton Beach. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Article 15, Traffic Performance Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). Site Data The site is located on the south side of Boynton Beach Boulevard west of 1-95 as shown on Exhibit 1. Access to the proposed project is via one (1) driveway connection to Boynton Beach Boulevard at the signalized intersection with Industrial Avenue. Year 2003 conditions were examined for this analysis. Existing (2000) T raffle Conditions Exhibit 2 provides the 2000 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the surrounding roadway network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of Palm Beach County. Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor of 9.3% to the MDT volumes. These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the adopted LOS 0 service volumes. Project T raffle Trip Generation Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition were reviewed to determine acceptable daily trip generation rates for the proposed project. The daily trip generation rate used was from Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition was the source of the peak hour trip generation rates. Exhibits 3A, 3B and 3C provide the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data respectively for the proposed development. Concurrency Report 00-135 9-14-01 For Traffic Performance Standards purposes, based on the net new external daily trip generation of 1,505, the Test 1 radius of development influence is two (2) miles. The Test 2 radius of development influence is one (1) mile. Trip Distribution and Assignment A directional distribution was developed based on review of land use patterns and existing travel patterns. Exhibit 4 shows the assignment of daily and peak hour project traffic as well as the project impact percentage (% of daily adopted service volume). Future Traffic Conditions Roadway Improvements The Fiscal Year 2001-2005 Transportation Improvement Program from the MPO of Palm Beach County and the Palm Beach County Five Year Road Program were reviewed to determine if any roadways within the study area are scheduled to be improved. There are no scheduled improvements within the study area. Background Traffic Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of future background traffic volumes. Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 5 for the surrounding roadway links. Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County, was reviewed. No Major projects are projected to have a 10% impact on the study area roadways within the analysis time frame of the proposed development. Background growth projections based on historic data account for traffic associated with the committed developments in the area. Traffic Performance Standards Analysis Test 1 (Link Test) This first test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links required to be analyzed are projected to operate below adopted level of service standards. Exhibit 6 shows future daily, AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for the analyzed roadway links of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. All analyzed roadway links are projected Concurrency Report 00-135 9-14-01 2 to operate above the adopted Test 1 level of service standards, therefore, the requirements of Test 1 are met. Test 2 (Model Test) The second test examines traffic conditions based on model projections that are developed and maintained by Palm Beach County. No roadway links within one (1) mile are Test 2 deficiencies, therefore, the requirements of Test 2 are met. Intersection Analysis Major intersections for which a proposed development adds more than 10% of the total traffic on any link connecting a major intersection are required to be analyzed. No major intersections meet this requirement based on the proposed development's impact. Driveway Volumes AM and PM peak hour project driveway volumes are provided on Exhibit 7. Conclusions This analysis shows that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. Concurrency Report ()()-735 9-14-01 3 o GArEWAY BOULEVARD OLD BOYNTON ROAD [ NTS. BOYNTON BEAClI BOULEVARD LJ I ~ '" SIT E-J 0 '" [ 0 ::J <( <( z 2; 0 > ~ '" <( '0 ::J U V> '" 0 V> OJ 3 '" I- '" '" LJ ~ 3: z '" :5 0 u u :5 V> WOOLBRIGHT ROAD GOLF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE) 9/14/01 BOYNTON KRISPY KREME EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT LOCATION ~ o '~ 4l 15562 C 32500 1447 C 3020 6l 29392 C 46900 2733 C 4550 6l 40034 D 48900 3723 D 4550 ~ 113112 C 32500 11219 C 3020 4l 7663 C 32500 713 C 3020 LEGEND 6l 26997 C 46900 2511 C 4550 1------- 4L 26096 D , 32500 12613 D 3020 i - 6l - 136784 D 48900 3421D 4550 r I 61. 159707 F 1101600 14853 F i 8900 GATlWAY 60UlEVARD BOYNTON BLACH BOUI EVARD 6l 6l 31165C 28316C 46900 ::; 48900 2900 C z 2633 C 4550 > 4550 <( Vl Vl W '" lJ z o u BOYNTON KRISPY KREME 4l 18029 C 32500 1677 C 3020 OLD BOYNTON ROAD o <( o '" w U Z w '" 3: :5 [~241L2 C , 32500 1973 C 3020 1--2L.-- 19994 D 14900 929 D 1390 1_-- 2l 11 624 D 14900 10111 D 1390 61 40034 D 46900 3723 D 4550 \ [J SITE / h~(~~o~ 12987 D , 4550 6l 164248 F 101600 15275 F 8900 6l 35466 C 46900 32911 C 4550 [--.--- 6L 31670 C 46900 2964 C 4550 WOOLBRIGHT ROAD 2L 117320 14900 10'!lD 1390 GOLF ROAD (SW Brd AVLNUE) - ROADWAY LANES - DAILY TRAFFIC AND LOS - DAILY ADOPTlD SERVICE VOLUME - PlAK IIOUR TRAffiC AND IDS - PFAK HOUR ADOPTlD SERVICE VOLUME 4l 26676 0 32500 2667 D 3020 '" 5: 4l 33526 E 32500 3116 E 3020 [--- i 2l 11064 D 14900 1029 D 1390 1_------ 4l 13424 C ! 32500 11248 C I 3020 I 4l 13164 C 32500 1224C 3020 o '" <( ~ 4L :J 15472 C o 32500 ro 1439 C ~ 3020 '" u :5 '" o N.TS. 4l 16462 C 32500 1719C 3020 >- ~ 41. I 20666 C g 32500 I 1922 C ;( 3020 '" w o w ~ ~ 4l 23798 D 32500 22130 3020 4l 28056 D 32500 2609 D 3020 9/14/01 EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING (2000) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ~ Lf'l ,- ~ ,- r"'l 0 X '0 ,- -- en , ~ ,- ,- r"'l 0 -- ,- (I) U 01 , DO ,- f- 0 n:l a.. a.. 'f} ::l 0- (I) <J> a. ";:: ....- QJ c: E 0 QJ :;:; '- ~ ~ .. >..Q./ c..C: rI) Q./ -;: l? <C ~ c.. M c: .. ) ..... 01- :.0 - c:: >.. ..c:: >..= )( o ~ I.I.l caO "1'" ~ !O ,- ,... C .. r.n OJ a.. .... >< ... w I- :: OJ Z ,......, S r.n a.. -;: I- >- ...0 I . r.n r.n I1:l Q.. r.n "1'" ~ C- o;: ,- ,... I- !O .... 0 I- ,......, ,... - CIJ .... I1:l ell: c :J 0 +: 0 I1:l --.... .. "- OJ C OJ (oJ C- ... I- .c or;; c CIJ :J .... c 0 - N OJ r.n ::> "'0 c ~ I1:l ..... -.;:; c OJ -0 .u) OJ cz J 0"> 0'1 !O ,- ,... c Lr) lJ") ... r.n ,- CIJ a.. ,... .... >< ... w I- :: CIJ z ,......, *- .... Lr) - "<:t" r.n C- ... I- >- N N ...0 "1'" ~ I r.n N N r.n I1:l ,- ,... Q.. r.n ,- ,... a.. 1.0 ~ ... "- "- I- N N' !O .... 0 I- ,......, ,... - OJ L.l... - I1:l (f) ell: 0 c 0 0 0 +: ,- I1:l --.... ... N OJ C ,- OJ N (oJ M C- 1.0 ... I- >- .... or;; C OJ ..... C u.... - (f) co 1.0 M "<:t" ~ C OJ ro '- r.n ::J ::> 13 "'0 <fl OJ C cz I1:l -0 ..... 0 0 u.... ~ <fl ro u.... l1'l o lJ") ,... r.n C- o;: I- :: OJ z .... OJ Z 0 0 -' ::J (I) u 0 U ....- c (I) E a. 0 Qi > (I) 0 u C rtl -' U (l) ~ c ::J .c- c ::l 0 U -c u rtl (I) co E ra a.. (l) -c ....- '0 <J>' (l) (l) LL ....- U rtl a. E u rtl 0 ~ (I) ~ -c Vl ~ '(ii LL co' 0 c 0 "B (l) Vl (l) ~ ::l 0 V1 S U") ,- Vl ,- M a X '+- ,- ---- u-i 0 , '<t" ,- ,- M a ---- "... Q) U (J) , 0.0 ,- f- a '" "" 0- -- :::l 0- Q) Vl Cl.. ..... c: 0 :;; ro ... QJ c: QJ QJ ECJ OJ c.. ... -- ~ ... I- ;>..... c..::J -~ 0 CQ ~:I: M c:~ I ..... o ro :c ..... QJ c:Q.. ..s:: S~ x w CQ<!:: -;; N N ..... fIl 0 Q.. I- -;:: I- ..... N N ::s :: 0 Q.I Z 0 0 s::: - * ;>..- 0 ..o~ . fIl fIl fIl Q.. l':l -;:: 0 0 Q.. I- -;; N N ..... fIl 0 Q.. I- -;:: I- ..... N N -;; ::s ..... 0 0 I- 0 0 s::: - 6' CO ---- - 0 ,... ~ '-" Q.I t---. ..... l':l CO et: ,- I:: 0 0 + ~ x ... e Q.I --l I:: Ol Q.I N Q CO Q.. 0 -;:: II l- f- e --l ;>.. ..... -;; :) s::: Q) 0 ..... I:: - N Q.I fIl :) "'C I:: l':l ~ .....I '.j:l Vl e .....I Q) -<( 32 l- V) 0 Q) ex I- j -;; 0 0 ..... N N '" 0 ,- ,- Q.. I- -;:: I- ..... "<t "<t ::s :: 0 \.0 \.0 Q.I Z \.0 \.0 I:: - Lf') Lf') * ;>..- Lf') ..o~ "<t I fIl fIl fIl Q.. l':l .... Q.. I- CO CO Ol Ol -;; CO CO ..... ,- ,- fIl 0 N N Q.. I- .... I- ..... t---. t---. -;; ::s 0 0 ..... 0 ,- ,- 0 I- ,- ,- I:: ,- ,- - ,- ,- - 0:;- ,... '-" "<t --- Q.I ,- ..... Lf') l':l ~ ~ LL I:: if) 0 0 ::; 0 l':l 0 .... Q.I ,- s::: --- Q.I \.0 Q CO Q.. Ol ... "<t I- ;>.. ..... -;; s::: LL Q.I ..... if) I:: - CO \.0 M "<t ...... e Q) ~ fIl ::J ::> ru ...... "0 <fl Q) I:: oc l':l "U .....I Vl 0 0 .....I LL -<( ...... I- <fl 0 ru LL I- co ,- ,- N \.0 \.0 Lf') fIl Q.. ";:: I- -;; I:: .... Q.I ..... X w :: Q.I Z ..... G Q) z 0 ......J 2 (]) u 0 U ..... c Q) E Cl.. 0 OJ ;> (]) 0 u c '" ......J U (]) ~ c C ::J 0 c- :-e c :::l U 0 LU U ...c .:0 ...c u I '" (]) ro E ra 0- (]) -5 0 Vl- GJ (]) (]) f- LL ..... Vl U Qj '" Cl.. (]) E c '@J U c '" LU 0 C cr: 0 (]) ."" ~ '" t:: ...c 0 tfl Cl.. ~ Vl -m c LL '" r= CIJ- 0 a (]) c ..... .a 0 ."" ."" u Vl c (]) tfl (]) Q) ~ ~ :::l :::l 0 0 tfl tfl :s ~ If) ,.- '" ,.- "" .e. ~ '0 ,.- , '<t If) ,.- ,.- "" 0 --- ,.- l5'o u 0'1 . ,.- t- O rll 'll: CL ::l 0- <lJ '" a.. "5 c 0 "';:; <<.S 100. Q.I C CI.I Q.I ElJ CI.I 0.. 100. "_ :::-=: 100. >.,1- 0..100. rIl ::s .... 0 u :::-=: ::I: M C ~ J ...... 0 <<.S :.c ...... Q.I CQ.. .s:: S~ >< u.l CCQ.. lU N N - en 0 C- I- ... I- - .- .- ::J ~ 0 Q.I Z C .- .- - * .....- 0 ...J:J~ I en en en C- rd ... 0 0 Q.. I- lU N N - en 0 C- I- ";: I- - .- .- lU ::J - 0 0 I- .- .- C - ~ ('f) --- - '-0 ..... ~ '-" Cl.l Lf) - '-0 rd 0:: .- c 0 0 + :;:; X rd ... C Cl.l --l C '-0 Cl.l '" ("j co C- o ";: II I- ~ C --l ..... - "Vi :::J c Cl.l 0 - C - N Cl.l en :::> "'C C rd t1l ...l '.j:J (IJ C ...l Q) ~ -a I- "(ji 0 Q) cY I- ) lU 0 0 - co co en 0 C- I- ... - I- ::J co co ~ 0 ('f) M Cl.l Z N N C "t" "t" - * .....- Lf) ...J:J~ "t" I en en rIJ C- rd ";: Q.. I- '-0 '-0 1..0 '-0 lU '-0 '-D -- "t" "t" rIJ 0 .- .- C- I- ... I- - 0 0 lU ::J '" '" - 0 0 I- 1..0 '-D C '" '" - - co ..... '-" "t" --- Cl.l N - Lf) rd 0:: L.L C Vl 0 0 :;:; 0 rd 0 ... Q) .- C --- Q) co ("j "t" C- M ";: M I- ..... - "Vi C L.L Q) Vl - C - co '-D ('f) "t" ....... c Cl.l t1l .... en ::J :::> t1l ....... "'C lJ) Q) C cY rd U ...l (IJ 0 0 ...J L.L ~ ....... I- <fl 0 t1l L.L I- co '" '" ('f) .- "t" rIJ C- ";: I- lU c ... Q) - >< U.I ~ Q) Z - 0 Q) Z 0 -.J => <lJ -0 0 U ...., c <lJ E a.. 0 Qj > <lJ 0 -0 c rll -.J -0 <lJ <;:: 'c c => 0 .c- :-e c ::l -0 0 LU U ...r::. ...r::. ...., ..p u ! rll <lJ m E (ij CL <lJ ...r::. ...., '0 ",- G:i <lJ <lJ t- LL.. ...., <r> U (ij rll a.. (j) E c "50 -0 c rll LU 0 C ~ 0 <lJ "P ~ ~ ...r::. 0 tfl D.. <r> 'fii C LL.. ~ 0:;;- t- '0 0 <lJ C B 0 .~ "13 c <lJ tfl <lJ (j) ~ ~ ::l ::l 0 0 tfl tfl S ~ o o l7% I 10S 8 S 0.2% GATEWAY BOULEVARD 3% 4S 4 2 0.1')1, W"3% 4S 4 2 0.1 8% 120 9 6 0.4% OLD BOYNTON ROAD r-~-3% - I ~S I 2 0.1% 10% ISl 12 8 0.3% 20% 301 24 16 2.0% [HOYN ON BEACH BOULEVARD 2S% IW% 376 I 602 I 30 ~ ' 47 20 Z I 31 0.8% ~ 1.2% H% 226 18 ~ 12 0 O.S% <( S% 0 '" 7S w U 6 Z 4 w '" 0.2% S ::s 2% 30 2 2 0.1% 1% 1 S 1 1 0.1% '15%' 226 18 12 O.S% 1~3% 4S 4 2 0.1% SITEj V> V> W '" U Z o U 10% ISl 12 8 0.1% 3% 4S 4 2 0.1% WOOLBRIGHT ROAD 1% 1 S 1 1 0.1% GOlf ROAD (SW Brd AVENUE) LEGEND 40% " PERCfNT 015 I RIBUTlON 602 " DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC 47 "AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 31 " PM I'LAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 1.2% "% OF DAilY ADOPTED SERVICf VOl UME BOYNTON KRISPY KREME 40% 602 47 31 1.2% r / I I 20% 301 24 16 0.9% m 5' 3% 45 -1 2 0.1% 1% IS 1 1 0.1% N.T.S. I I I I I 5% 3% 75 4S 6 4 4 2 0.2% 0.1% 8% 120 9 6 0.4% )- <( 3% S 4S 0 I '" 3% u 4 <( ~ 45 I 2 ~ ~ 4 :( 0.1% :J 2 '" 0 w '" 0.1% I ~ t- ~ '" r2o/:~- u ! 30 :'5 on ' 2 2 0.09% 2% 30 2 2 0.09% 9/14/01 EXHIBIT 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ~ Exhibit 5 Boynton Krispy Kreme Historic Growth #PTC01-135 growth rate 01-135.xls 9/14/01 Page 1 of 1 Daily Traffic Volumes Growth Roadway 1997 2000 Rate Boynton Beach Blvd Congress Ave to Old Boynton Rd 30,319 28,316 -2.25% /Year Old Boynton Rd to 1-95 42,050 40,034 -1.62% /Year 1-95 to Seacrest Blvd 30,184 28,677 -1.69% /Year Old Boynton Road Congress Ave to Boynton Beach Blvd 11,073 11,625 1.63% /Year lOT"""(/)T""" tIl (")ox_ a u 0 0 0 ~- .0 ....I ,"<tl() T"""T"""C")~ 0--"- Q) uQ)~ OJ t- om E 0.. ,.-0.. 0 0 0 0 '11: en u 0 0 0 0 2 ~ en en Lf1 en CO CO N '1'" a '1'" '1'" M .- iU g 1..0 0 '" '1'" '" Lf1 '1'" 0 ..... '" .- co Lf1 0 0 en N en N to- ~ N '1'" N .- 8 tJ N M .- .- .~ 0 0 0 0 1..0 en M M 0 >- ... ....I c.. ::;;: Cl ... * * * * ~ cv S Q) 0 0 0 M M ~ ~ ~ ~ '-': ~ .- .- .- .- g 0 ~ ..s:: ~ Q) E co M en co e ::s Lf1 .- 1..0 '" \,j (5 co N co Lf1 .- > Ol:l~ 1..0 '1'" '" Lf1 C g .. .- M '" N II> M 0 1..0 1..0 co 0 co .- Ox r::!. N "<t N .- W Ol:l II> C 0 0 0 .. (II ....J II> l: ....J ....J -' N Ox tlj 1..0 1..0 '1'" ....I W ~ E ~ ... ~ fi: .~ .~ ~ ... - ~ tlj 1.0 c:: .....15< :.0......... .J: ~-:;; x 0 (II wr:cl- ~ l: ::l -0 ~ c o ~ o Lf1 COO;> ::Q -0 oB~ o -0 ...... +-J ~ (D g; 6 u <{ ...... n:l <J) E= QJ ~ 6 Vl ~ co B c -0 Lf) 865: -0 -0 -0 2:2:> co co CiS -c -c -c u u U n:l n:l n:l QJ QJ QJ co co co c c c 000 ~~~ 000 co co co ~ ::: "'C tlj & -0 > CiS ..r: u n:l QJ co C o ...... c >- o co o ...... QJ > <{ <J) <J) QJ ~ C o U -0 ~ c o ~ o co -0 6 tIl a u 0 0 0 ....I E 0 0 0 0 u a Lf) Lf) N 0-> Lf1 Lf) 0 M a '1'" '1'" M .- iU 6' 0 '" N 0-> ..... 0 1..0 0 '" Lf) 0 0 '" 0-> '" .- f- ~ N M N .- Cli: 8 :J a ti '" .- '1'" '1'" J: (II "<t '" N N '0' ~ ... ;1i c.. c.. w ~ ... * * * * ~ IV S Q) 8 0 0 M W ~ ~ ~ ~ '-': ~ M ~ .- .- .- .- 0 0 0 r::!. ..s:: ~ (II 0 E 0 M .- '1'" ... ::s co .- co Lf1 \,j (5 .- > Ol:l~ s::: 0 M M '" .- .. g M N 1..0 co II> 1..0 '" 1..0 0 Ox r::!. N M N .- W Ol:l II> s::: 0 0 0 .. (II ....J II> s::: ....J ....J ....J N J3 tlj 1..0 1..0 '1'" ....I -0 2: co -0 -c 0::: u C n:l 0 QJ ~ ...... co l: ~ c ::l 0 Lf) 0 co 0;> ...... -0 -0 ~ (5 0 2: 0 ...... co co 0 -0 ...... 0 ...... ~ <J) ...... QJ QJ QJ C b > 0 > <{ ...... n:l <{ <J) ~ QJ <J) Vl Vl <J) QJ 0 0 QJ 5J: co ...... 5J: c ::Q Lf) c 0 0;> 0 u 0 U -0 -0 -0 2: > 2: -0 co CiS co 0::: ~ ..r: -c -c c u u u 0 ctl n:l n:l ::: QJ QJ QJ C "'C co co co >- tlj c c c 0 0 co Cli: 0 0 0 ...... ...... ...... -0 ~ ~ ~ "6 0 0 0 co co co If) "00 ~ m c m ~ ~ c: Q) If) c 0 0 m Q) ""0 "5 e 0- .8 ""0 Q) ~ 5 If) m 3: Q) ~ .c ~ e OJ ~ 0 m ai > ~ OJ Q) c .!!l .c ~ e OJ 0 ";::: 0 ]i .c Q) Q; .c S l{) -.i .- .- ,Q ,Q .c ..c X X W W Q) Q) Q) Q) (/)(/) ~~ s~ o o N.T.S. 44 (30) r--- 67 (46) _m~ -1 ~I co ~~ N N ~ - '<t M '"' '<t I BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD ~ 2761 ~ SITE L LEGEND 44 - AM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC (3D) - PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRAFFIC 2761 - DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC 9/14/01 BOYNTON KRISPY KREME EXHIBIT 7 PROJECT DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ~