REVIEW COMMENTS
6.A.2
KRISPY KREME
CONDITIONAL USE/SITE PLAN
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01- 263
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
FROM: Lusia Galav, AICP
Principal Planner
DATE: November 29,2001
SUBJECT: Krispy Kreme - COUS 01-005
Conditional Use Approval- Restaurant with drive-through facility
PROPOSAL SUMMARY
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC is seeking conditional use / site plan approval for a restaurant with a
drive-through facility. This conditional use proposal will also require a land use / zoning change.
The project intent is to raze an existing residential duplex building located on a 0.26 acre lot and to
combine this residential property with a 0.78-acre, commercially zoned property in order to construct a
4,680 square-foot restaurant on 1.04 total acres. This conditional use and site plan application is being
reviewed concurrently with its land use amendment and rezoning request (LUAR 01-008). A restaurant,
a permitted use in the C-2 zoning district, will front on Boynton Beach Boulevard. Entrances will be
located on the front (north elevation) and side (east elevation) building facades. The applicant is also
seeking conditional use approval to allow for a drive-through facility to be located to the rear (south
elevation) of the building. The drive-through lane will commence, facing southward on the west side of
the building. It will then wrap around the building turning eastward to the rear of the building in order to
allow for adequate vehicular stacking in the drive-through lane. The drive-through window will face
south.
Applicant! Agent:
Krispy Kreme of South Florida, LLC / Scott Barber of Gee & Jenson,
Project name:
Krispy Kreme
General description: 4,680 square-foot restaurant with drive-through facility
Property size:
45,470 square feet (1.04 acres)
Current Land use:
Medium Density Residential (MeDR) and Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Current Zoning:
Duplex Residential (R-2) and Neighborhood Commercial (C-2)
Proposed Land Use: Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Zoning:
Neighborhood Commercial (C-2)
Krispy Kreme - COUS 01-005
Page 2
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263
Location:
Northwest 1st Avenue (between NW 1st Avenue and Boynton Beach Boulevard
(SR804) east ofNW ih Street). West Industrial Avenue intersects with Boynton
Beach Boulevard immediately north of the subject property. (See Exhibit "A" -
Location Map)
Total Building area: 4,680 square feet (See Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan)
Surrounding land uses/zoning:
North -
Right-of-way of West Boynton Beach Boulevard (SR 804), then property classified Local
Retail Commercial (LRC), zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2), and developed with a
service station (Texaco) to the northwest; to the northeast the intersection of Boynton
Beach Boulevard and West Industrial Avenue and farther east, right-of-way of Industrial
Avenue then developed property classified Industrial (I) and zoned Light Industrial (M -1)
(the locations of Lloyds Auto Electric and Foster Oil).
East -
Property classified Medium Density Residential (MeDR), zoned Duplex Residential (R-2)
and developed with duplex (two-family) homes.
South -
Right-of-way of NW 1 st Avenue, then property classified Low Density Residential, zoned
Single family Residential (R-I-A) and developed with single family homes; and
West -
Developed property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC), zoned Neighborhood
Commercial (C-2) and occupied by a dental/medical office building.
STANDARDS FOR EVALUATING CONDITIONAL USES AND ANALYSIS
Section 11.2.D of the Land Development Regulations contains the following standards to which
conditional uses are required to conform. Following each of these standards is the Planning and Zoning
Division's evaluation of the application as it pertains to standards.
The Planning and Development Board and City Commission shall consider only such conditional uses as
are authorized under the terms of these zoning regulations and, in connection therewith, may grant
conditional uses absolutely or conditioned upon the conditions including, but not limited to, the
dedication of property for streets, alleys, recreation space and sidewalks, as shall be determined necessary
for the protection of the surrounding area and the citizens' general welfare, or deny conditional uses when
not in harmony with the intent and purpose of this section. In evaluating an application for conditional
use approval, the Board and Commission shall consider the effect of the proposed use on the general
health, safety and welfare of the community and make written findings certifying that satisfactory
provisions have been made concerning the following standards, where applicable:
1. Ingress and egress to the subject property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to
automobile and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire
or catastrophe.
Krispy Kreme - COUS 01-005
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263
The subject property has one point of ingress / egress. This point will be located off of Boynton Beach
Boulevard and will directly align with West Industrial Avenue. No entrance or exit is proposed along
Northwest 1st Avenue. No cross access is proposed with the property to the west. The entrance to the
subject property is proposed to be a 15-foot wide opening. A landscaped median five- (5) feet wide
will separate the entrance and exit lanes. When vehicles enter the subject property from Boynton
Beach Boulevard, the landscaped median separates the entrance / exit lanes and also functions as a
traffic control device, guiding vehicles onto the property in a westward direction. All landscape
material in this landscaped median will be either tall or short enough to preserve the visibility and
safe-sight requirements. The exit will consist of two (2) lanes, each 11 feet wide. They will provide
the driver with either a left/straight or a right-turn out exit option. Prior to the issuance of a City
building permit, this project must obtain Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval with regard to
a westbound Boynton Beach Boulevard left-turn lane onto the subject property (see Exhibit "C"-
Conditions of Approval). The on-site traffic circulation system for this parcel consists of a one- (1)
way drive aisle that surrounds the entire building. The width of this one (1)-way drive aisle fluctuates
between 14.4 feet and 27 feet. This (one-way) method of circulation was deemed to be the most
efficient and trouble-free for service / emergency vehicles and patrons of the restaurant. A sidewalk,
with its respective markings, connects the public right-oi-way with the front of the restaurant. For
added convenience, an opening in the masonry wall located along the rear of the property is proposed
to allow for residents of the adjacent residential neighborhood to access the subject site without
excessive driving or trespassing on adjoining properties. This opening is proposed for the benefit of
the adjacent residents but could be eliminated if opposed by the residents, the Board, or the
Commission.
2. Off-street parking and loading areas where required, with particular attention to the items in
subsection above, and the economic, glare, noise, and odor effects the conditional use will have on
adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The required parking has been tabulated based on a restaurant use. The ratio used is one (1) space
for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. The total number of parking spaces required is 47
spaces. The site plan will provide 53 parking spaces, of which, three (3) spaces are designated for
handicap use. The handicap spaces will be situated in the most appropriate on-site location, closest
to the building's front entrance. The parking lot to the south and east sides of the proposed building
will be screened from the adjacent residential properties by a masonry wall six (6) feet in height. No
parking is proposed west of the building. That area is designated for loading areas, a drive-through
lane, and the drive aisle. No loading area abuts or can be seen from residentially-zoned property.
3. Refuse and service areas, with particular reference to the items in subsection 1 and 2 above.
The dumpster enclosure will be located at the southwest corner of the site. It is located in an area
that is unobtrusive to pedestrian and vehicular traffic and is unnoticeable from Boynton Beach
Boulevard, Northwest 1st Avenue, or residentially-zoned property.
4. Utilities, with reference to locations, availability, and compatibility.
Consistent with Comprehensive Plan policies and city regulations, all utilities, including potable
water and sanitary sewer will be in place via construction at the time of permitting.
Krispy Kreme - GOUS 01-005
Page 4
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263
5. Screening, buffering and landscaping with reference to type, dimensions, and character.
The proposed pervious or "green" area is 8,280 square feet or 18% of the total site. Much of the
perimeter of the site is constrained with overhead power lines. Most tall growing palm and shade
trees would conflict with the guidelines of Florida Power & Light's "Right Tree, Right Place"
publication. However, in an attempt to buffer the subject commercial property from the adjacent
residential properties, the landscape plan proposes seven (7) Ironwood shade trees spaced every 20
feet along the east property line. Eleven (11) Cassia shade trees are spaced every 25 feet along the
southern property line. Chapter 7.5 of the Land Development Code only requires one (1) tree spaced
every 30 feet along these property lines. The aforementioned trees are placed in such a way as to
create a continuous upper level canopy, serving as a formidable uninterrupted buffer along the east
and south property lines. Also, a masonry wall six (6) feet in height with stucco on both sides is
proposed along the east and south property lines. This wall will serve as a lower level buffer to the
residential neighborhood. In addition, Spanish Stopper hedges will be placed outside the masonry
wall facing the perimeter properties, which will further enhance the appearance of the wall
6. Signs, and proposed exterior lighting, with reference to glare, traffic safety, economic effect, and
compatibility and harmony with adjacent and nearby properties.
This conditional use application proposes several wall signs on the side (east) and front (west)
facades. The restaurant's total allowable wall signage area (156 square feet) is based upon the
following ratio: l-YJ square feet of sign area for every linear foot of building frontage on Boynton
Beach Boulevard. The plan proposes to have a 41.5 square-foot internally lit wall sign centered on
the east elevation. The east elevation faces residentially-zoned property. The 15 square-foot "Hot
Now" neon sign originally was proposed near the top of the east elevation, above the awning similar
to the front facade. However, in deference to staff's request Krispy Kreme has agreed to relocate the
"Hot Now" sign to the lower window area on the east elevation. Staff determined that a neon sign
placed above the awning on the east elevation might have caused excessive glare onto the adjacent
property. The "Hot Now" sign is now proposed in one of the windows on a lower portion of the east
elevation. Its placement allows it to be visible from Boynton Beach Boulevard but not visible from the
neighboring property to the east. The front fa(:ade contains a 41.5 square-foot internally lit wall sign
and two (2) "Hot Now" signs. Originally, Krispy Kreme had proposed neon banding to be located
just under the top pilaster on the front and side fa(:ades. However, the neon banding has since been
eliminated from the design due to staff's recommendation against this type of lighting. The monument
sign will stand eight (8) feet high overall and contain an internally lit cabinet sign with the site
address and neon lit "Hot Now" sign located below. The required site lighting for the parking areas
will meet or exceed development standards and will not cause excessive glare onto adjacent
properties. The photometric plan will be reviewed at the time of permitting.
7. Required setbacks and other open spaces.
The proposed building and drive-through lane meets all setback requirements of the C-2 zoning
district. The building will be situated in the center of the newly created parcel.
8. General compatibility with adjacent property and other property in the zoning district.
Krispy Kreme - GOUS 01-005
Page 5
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263
In general, the proposed use is compatible with the existing commercial uses to the west of the subject
property. The plan incorporates shade trees, a masonry wall, and shrubs to serve as a functional
buffer between the subject property and the adjacent residential neighborhood. Chapter 9 of the Land
Development Regulations (Community Design) indicates that when a distinct development or
architectural pattern exists within a surrounding two-block area, consistency with that pattern shall
be required. The established character of the built projects within a two block area (south side of
Boynton Beach Boulevard) generally represent the Spanish/Mediterranean style. The proposed plans
incorporate barrel/S-tile roof material and faux arches. However, bells or other type of towers and
covered walkways, which are also representative of the Spanish/Mediterranean style, are strongly
encouraged into the design.
There will be minimal on-site impact and no adverse effects will occur from the proposed restaurant
use. The site plan provides adequate buffering and the drive through will have little or no impact to
the adjacent properties or to the surrounding area. It should be noted that the majority of the subject
property is currently zoned for the proposed use. Land assemblage will allow for a larger project but
also for better site design and greater landscape buffers for the adjacent residential properties.
9. Height of building and structures, with reference to compatibility and harmony to adjacent and nearby
properties, and the city as a whole.
The proposed building is designed as a one-story structure. The proposed building height is
compatible in comparison with the neighboring properties. However, the maximum allowable height
for the R-2 zoning district and C-2 zoning district is 25 feet. The top of the pitched roof for the
proposed restaurant is 26 feet 6 inches. The current definition of building height in the City's Land
Development Regulations is in the process of being amended to include "mean heights ", which in this
case would allow for the proposed height as illustrated in this manner. However, by the current
definition the applicant is required to either reduce the height of the roof by 1 foot 6 inches to comply
with the current language in the code or to request and receive approval for a height exception (see
Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Staffwould recommend approval if the latter option were the
preferred choice of the applicant. The proposed roof design is a product of staff's recommendation to
improve compatibility with the design of the existing commercial buildings to the west. The applicant
willingly made design improvements that resulted in a small portion of the roof to exceed the
maximum allowed height of the zoning district.
10. Economic effects on adjacent and nearby properties, and the city as a whole.
The proposed use will constitute additional convenience and choice for the City residents. This
Krispy Kreme store will be the first of such stores in the City and only one of a few stores in South
Florida. Its frontage on a major arterial (Boynton Beach Boulevard) and close proximity to Interstate
95 make the proposed restaurant an appropriate use for this site.
11. Conformance to the standards and requirements which apply to site plans, as set forth in Chapter 19,
Article II of the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. (Part III Chapter 4 Site Plan Review).
Krispy Kreme - GOUS 01-005
Page 6
Memorandum No. PZ 01 - 263
With incorporation of staff comments, the proposed project will comply with all requirements of
applicable sections of city code.
12. Compliance with, and abatement of nuisances and hazards in accordance with the performance
standards within Section 4.N. of the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2; also, conformance to
the City of Boynton Beach noise Control Ordinance.
With incorporation of all conditions and staff recommendations contained herein, the proposed
restaurant with drive-through facility would operate in a manner that is in compliance with the above-
referenced codes and ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach. Also, staff recommends that the audio
component of the menu board for the drive through facility project sound to the west as to not create a
disturbance to the residential neighborhood to the east and south (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval). In conclusion, the applicant will have to apply for and obtain all necessary approvals and
licenses from all applicable governing bodies in order for a certificate of occupancy to be issued.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the discussions contained herein, compliance with development regulations, and the consistency
with the Comprehensive Plan, staff recommends that this request be approved subject to satisfying all
conditions of approval as contained in Exhibit "C".
LG/elj
I ICH\MAIN\SHRDA T A IPlanninglSHAREDI WPIPROJECTSlkrispy kremelCOUSICOUS staff report. doc
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Krispy Kreme
File number: COUS 01-005
Reference: 2nd Review plans identified as COUS 01-005 with a November 5, 2001 Planning & Zoning stamp
marking.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments
1. Fire flow calculation will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in LDR Chapter 6, Article IV Section
16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is
greater (see CODE Section 26-16(a)).
2. CODE Sec. 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this
project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health
Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval,
whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter
size, or expected demand.
FIRE
Comments:
3. A fire hydrant flow test is required prior to construction (City Ord. 9-3F).
4. Fire hydrants shall be no more that 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any
structure shall be no more that 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be
to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition to domestic
requirements a fire flow of 1500 g.p.m. at a residual pressure of not less that
20 p.s.i. is required (LDR Chapter 6, Section 16).
POLICE
Comments: None
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
5. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways
and shall be 6 inches thick within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section P).
6. Provide an irrigation plan in conformance with the LDR Chapter 7.5, Article
II, Section 5.
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
7. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City Unity of
Title form. The form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one
lot. A copy of the recorded deed with legal descriptions of each property that
is being unified is required to be submitted to process the form. The property
owner that is identified on each deed shall match.
8. At the time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of
the proposed construction.
9. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project,
identify on the site plan if the restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn
over, or fast food with drive-through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the
site plan the number of new seats and the total number of seats provided. On
the floor plan, chronologically number all seats including those seats that are
around the bar.
10. At time of permit review, submit for review an addressing plan for the
project.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
11. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and sitework
improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for review
and approval by the Parks Department staff. Include on the plan location of
any existing irrigation in the right-of- way.
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments:
I DEPARTMENTS l INCLUDE I REJECT I
12. The applicant must provide a tree tabulation indicating the quantity of
desirable existing trees which will be preserved, relocated or removed /
replaced on the site. This tree tabulation should be correlated and the trees
shown on page L-l.
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
13. The site plan must identify the correct Future Land Use designations as
defined by the City's Comprehensive Plan for the adjacent properties.
14. Staffrecommends that the audio component of the menu board related to the
drive through facility project sound to the west as to not create a potential
disturbance to the residential neighborhood.
15. The maximum building height in the C-2 zoning district is 25 feet. The top
of the roof of the tower is 26 feet 6 inches. Either reduce the top of the tower
by one and one-half (1 Y2) feet or request a height exception pursuant to
Chapter 2, Section 4.H.
16. Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the Planning &
Development Board meeting (Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.).
17. Submit a color sample / swatch of all major exterior finishes. Each sample
and / or elevation shall include the manufacturer's name and color code
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.1.).
18. All above ground mechanical equipment such as exterior utility boxes,
meters, transformers, shall be visually screened with appropriate landscaping /
hedge material (Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). The backflow preventer shall be
painted to match the principle structure.
19. The dumpster enclosure and masonry wall shall resemble with respect to the
color and materials, the design of the principal building. Include a wall detail
to confirm similar architectural elements and integration with other site
elements (Chapter 9, Section 1O.E.3.).
20. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division suggested that the City review
traffic operations at the project access driveway, with emphasis on left-turns
in and out of the site because the forecasted peak hour volumes indicate the
need for provision of a westbound left-turn lane on Boynton Beach Boulevard
onto the site. Prior to the issuance of a City building permit, this project must
obtain Palm Beach County Traffic Division approval with regard to the
westbound left-turn lane onto the subject property.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
21. To be determined.
Conditions of Approval
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
22. To be determined.
\\CH\MAIN\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\krispy kreme\COUS\Condition of Approval 2 page revised 2001 form.doc
Plannine: Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
To:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner
~if
From:
Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Subject:
Krispy Kreme
NWSP # 01-012
1 st Review
Date:
September 24,2001
The applicant must provide a tree tabulation indicating the quantity of desirable existing trees
which will be preserved, relocated or removed / replaced on the site. This tree tabulation should
be correlated and the trees shown on page L-l. The proj ect should continue in the normal
reVIew process.
Kjh
File
. .
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of:
NWSP 01-012 1st review-fire
Project Name or Address:
Krispy Kreme
633 NW 1st Avenue
Reviewed by:
(JJr It_
Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Examiner/Fire
Inspector
Department:
Fire and Life Safety
Trade:
Fire Department
Phone:
(561) 742-6753
Comments to:
Sherie Coale by email on 9/20/01
CODE REQUIREMENTS
Compliance with NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, NFPA 1, Fire Prevention Code,
and city ordinances is required.
1) A fire hydrant flow test is required prior to construction. (City Ord. 9-
3F)
2) Roads and hydrants must be in place prior to any construction above
grade. (NFPA 241 (1996) Standard for Safeguarding Construction,
Alteration, and Demolition Operations, sections 5-4.3 and 6-7.2.2.
3) Fire hydrants shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest part
of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant.
v
Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In
addition to domestic requirements a fire flow of 1500 gpm at a residual
pressure of not less than 20 psi is required. (LOR Chapter 6 section
16)
cc: S. Gale, Fire Marshal
B. Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
r J
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
MEMORANDUM
NO. 01-182
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE:
September 24, 2001
l~
~j
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Civil Engineer
RE:
Krispy Kreme
New Site Plan Review - 1st Review
File No. NWSP 01-012
I have reviewed the above referenced Site Plans, forwarded to me on September 7,2001, against the Site
Plan Review requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are my
comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced.
Code Requirements
1. On the Site Plan, add a general note that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's
Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following:
paving, drainage, clearing & grubbing, excavation & fill, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and
irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of
Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage
District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County
Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach
County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be
included with the permit request.
2. Show all existing utilities on Site Characteristics Map (Survey) and Site Development plan (LDR,
Chapter 4, Section A.3).
3. Provide drainage plans and design data for site drainage as specified in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5. Show rim and invert elevations for all manholes and catch basins. Indicate, by note, that
storm water will be contained on site (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.F.). Any work done within the
right-of-way and/or to existing facilities within the right-of-way will require review, approval and
permitting by the FDOT.
4. Provide photometrics and pole wind loading with the Lighting Plan in conformance with the LDR,
Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 11, Chapter 23, Article I, Section 5.B.7 and Chapter 23, Article II,
Section A. Note that the proposed lights along the west side of the property will be in conflict with the
dumpster area and loading zone.
5. The driveway width of 45 ft. exceeds the maximum allowed by the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II,
Section H.l. A variance shall be required.
",
Engineering Department Memorandum No. 01-182
Re: Krispy Kreme, New Site Plan - Engineering 1 st Review
September 24, 2001
Page Two
6. Sidewalks adjacent to parking lots shall be continuous through all driveways and shall be 6 in. thick
within driveways (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section P).
7. Add a note to the Landscape Plan that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-
visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5.H.). Show sight triangles graphically on the Site Plan and Landscaping Plan. Reference FDOT
Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along all collector and arterial roadways.
8. Provide an Irrigation Plan in conformance with the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.
9. Indicate, by note, that the color and texture of the dumpster enclosures shall match the building (LDR,
Chapter 9, Section 10.E, and City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawing A-88007). Show on the detail
that drop pins and sleeved holes will be provided to secure dumpster enclosure gates in the open and
closed positions.
10. Provide details for curb, curb & gutter, and sidewalk conforming to the LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.E.
Provide a typical section for parking lot pavement conforming to LDR, Chapter 23, Article II.Q.
Recommendations/Corrections
1. The City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances and Land Development Regulations can be viewed at
www.ci.boynton-beach.fl.us.
2. Indicate which edition of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge and Standard Index is
to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they have both English and Metric units.
3. Indicate the current version of the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices in the Paving and
Drainage General Notes.
4. Coordination with Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Department may be required for re-timing
the signal for the westbound Boynton Beach Boulevard to Krispy Kreme southbound movement. A
"No Right on Red" sign may be appropriate at the exit from Krispy Kreme. A stop sign at the
driveway egress is not needed.
5. A separate permit will be required from the Florida Department of Transportation for the driveway cut
onto Boynton Beach Boulevard.
6. Is the overhead wire shown within the 5 foot public use easement on the Boundary Survey being
removed? It is not shown on the Site Plan.
7. Add "Stop" sign and stop bar at "Do Not Enter" sign on east side of building to prevent traffic from
entering drive-through lanes.
8. Indicate where existing sidewalk ends and new sidewalk will begin. Handicap ramps shall be
constructed in compliance with all applicable current federal, state and local standards.
Engineering Department Memorandum No. 01-182
Re: Krispy Kreme, New Site Plan - Engineering 1 st Review
September 24, 2001
Page Three
9. Revise the curb cut portion ofthe Handicap Ramp Detail to agree with the plan drawing on Sheet C-2.
10. Show written scale under graphic scale.
11. Make corrections as noted throughout plans.
LUck
Xc: H. David Kelley, Jr., PE./PSM, Utility Engineer
Ken Hall, Enginering Plans Review Analyst, Inspector
Frantz LaFontant, Engineering Plans Review Analyst, Inspector
e:\My Documents\Krispy Kreme New Site Plan, Engr. 1st Review.doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 01- 194
TO: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM: TimothyK. Large ~
TRC MemberIBuilding Di'j ~~~ /~ ~
DATE: September 12,2001
SUBJECT: Project - Krisy Kreme
File No. - NWSP 01-012
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits.
Buildine: Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. Lan~e (561) 742-6352
1. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan a labeled symbol that
identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the building. Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2, 4.3.
2. On the floor plan drawing, add a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible entrance doors to the building. The location of the doors shall match the
location of the accessible entrance doors that are depicted on the site plan drawing. Florida
Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2,4.3.
3. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that identifies the location of the handicap
accessible parking spaces. The quantity of the spaces shall be consistent with the
regulations specified in the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. The
accessible parking spaces that serve a use shall be located on the shortest safely accessible
route of travel from adjacent parking to an accessible entrance. The Florida Accessibility
Code for Building Construction states that buildings with multiple accessible entrances
shall have accessible parking spaces dispersed and located closest to the accessible
entrance. Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction, Section 4.1.2(5), 4.3, 4.6.
4. Add a labeled symbol to the site plan drawing that represents and delineates the path of
travel for the accessible route that is required between the accessible parking spaces and the
accessible entrance doors to the building. The symbol shall start at the accessible parking
spaces and terminate at the accessible entrance doors to the building. The symbol shall
represent the location of the path of travel, not the location of the detectable warning or
other pavement markings that are required to be installed along the path. The location of
the accessible path shall not compel the user to travel in a drive/lane area that is located
behind parked vehicles. Identify on the plan the width ofthe accessible route. (Note: The
minimum width required by the code is forty-four (44) inches). Add text to the drawing
that would indicate that the symbol represents the accessible route and the route is designed
in compliance with Section 4.3 (Accessible Route) and 4.6 (Parking and Passenger Loading
Zones) of the Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. Please note that at
time of permit review, the applicant shall provide detailed documentation on the plans that
will verify that the accessible route is in compliance with the regulations specified in the
Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction. This documentation shall include,
but not be limited to, providing finish grade elevations along the path of travel.
5. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is
proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with
regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following
issues [Section 3107.1.2, Chapter 31 of the Boynton Beach amendments to the 1997 edition
of the Standard Building Code]:
a) The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site
data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-
year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the South
Florida Water Management District's surface water management construction
development regulations."
b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the
building is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there
is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans.
c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building
within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor
plan and paving! drainage (civil plans).
6. On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the property
line.
7. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor
plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the
applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual"
below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on sheet AI. However, add to the floor plan
drawing a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance
doors to the building. The location of the doors shall match the location of the accessible
entrance doors that is depicted on the site plan drawing.
8. On the site plan, indicate within the footprint of the buildings the number of stories that are
in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines. Also, add to the site data the
number of stories in the building including identifying mezzanines, where applicable.
Indicate the overall height of the building within the site data. The overall height of the
building shall not exceed the height limitations of the Zoning Code.
9. On all floor plan drawings, indicate within the footprint of the building the number of
stories that are in the building including, where applicable, mezzanines.
10. Indicate on the floor plan drawing within the footprint of the building the primary use of
the structure/facility.
11. At time of permit review, provide a completed and executed City unity of title form. The
form shall describe all lots, parcels or tracts combined as one lot. A copy of the recorded
deed with legal descriptions of each property that is being unified is required to be
submitted to process the form. The property owner that is identified on each deed shall
match.
12. At the time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction.
13. To properly determine the impact fees that will be assessed for the project, identify on the
site plan ifthe restaurant is a high quality, eat-in high turn over, or fast food with drive-
through type of restaurant. Also, identify on the site plan the number of new seats and the
total number of seats provided. On the floor plan, chronologically number all seats
including those seats that are around the bar.
14. At time of permit review, submit for review an addressing plan for the project.
15. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the location and
perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request.
bf
s: IDevelopmentlBuilding-68 70IDocuments ITRCINWSP 01-012
PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #01-92
FROM:
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
John Wildner, Parks Director j1J
Barbara J. Meacham, Lands~pe Architect
KrisPV Kreme e>~
September 11,2001
TO:
THRU:
RE:
Date:
1. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and sitework
improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for
review and approval by the Parks Department staff. Include on the plan
location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way.
,/
DEPARTMENT OF UTILITIES
MEMORANDUM
NO. 01-228
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director of ~g an/Oning
John A. Guidry, Utilities Director ~ ~
H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/PSM, Utility Engineer ~~-
THRU:
FROM:
,/
DATE:
September 11,2001
J..,j ,
~..,.......
......
RE:
KRISPY KREME
NWSP 01-012 -lstREVIEW
We offer the following comments on the above noted project:
GENERAL COMMENTS
1) Palm Beach County Health Department permits may be required for the water and sewer systems
serving this project (CODE Sec. 26-12).
2) Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m.
as stated in LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters,
whichever is greater (see CODE Sec. 26-16(a)).
3) CODE Sec. 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon
the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final
meter size, or expected demand.
4) Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may
not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available.
5) Provide an engineer's written certification that drainage will conform to all rules of the City and
the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) (per LDR Chap. 4, Sec. 7F).
1../
Department of Utilities Memorandum # 01-228
Re: Krispy Kreme - 1 st Review
Sept. 11,2001
Page 2
SPECIFIC CONDITIONS
6) LDR Chap. 6, Art. IV, Sec. 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of
an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition, by
showing all hydrants. [Refer to Comment #2 above.]
7) Appropriate backflow preventer will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and
the fire sprinkler line ifthere is one, in accordance with CODE Sec. 26-207.
HDKJkd
Xc: H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E., P.S.M., Utility Engineer
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Civil Engineer
Georganne Barden, Administrative Assistant
File
S:\Engineering\Dostal\KKreme Utility Comments 0911 Ol.doc
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMEt:Jf
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 01-000
FROM:
TRC MEMBERS
Bob Borden, Deputy Fire Marshal
Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist
James Prestinari, Police Department
H. David Kelley Jr., Utilities Department
Timothy K. Large, Building Division
Ken Hall, (Engineering) Public Works-General
Jeffery Livergood, Public Works-Traffic
Barbara Meacham, Parks Division
Laurinda Logan, Engineering Department
Lusia Galav, Planning Department
Michael W. RumPf-)' ~ ).v
Director of Plannin~ Z6ning
TO:
DATE:
September 7,2001
RE:
SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCEDURES
15T Review - New Site Plan
Project - Krispy Kreme
Location - 633 NW 1 st Avenue
,/
L
Agent
Scott Barber; Gee & Jenson
File No.
NWSP 01-012
Find attached for your review the plans and exhibits for the above-referenced project. Please review the
plans and exhibits and transmit formal written comments. Comments should be e-mailed to
Sherie Coale and I no later than 5:00 P.M. on, September 21, 2001. When preparing your
comments, please separate them into two categories; code deficiencies with code sections
referenced and recommendations that you believe will enhance the project.
Adhering to the following review guidelines will promote a comprehensive review and enable the
applicant to efficiently obtain Technical Review Committee approval:
1. Use the review standards specified in Part IV, Land Development Regulations, Site Plan Review
and the applicable code sections of the Code of Ordinances to review and formulate comments.
2. The documents submitted for the project were determined to be substantially complete with the
exception of traffic data, however, if the data provided to meet the submittal requirements is
insufficient to properly evaluate and process the project based on the review standards or the
documents show code deficiencies, additional data and/or corrections should be requested by the
reviewer by contacting Lusia Galav, or myself.
3. Each comment shall reference the section of the code that is incorrectly depicted on the
documents.
4. Technical Review Committee member(s) shall identify in their comments when the plans depict or
when the location and installation of their departmental required improvements may conflict with
other departmental impro\ements.
Page 2
5. When a TRC Member finds a code deficiency that is outside of his/her review responsibility, the
comment and the specific code section may be included in their review comments with the name of
the appropriate TRC Member that is responsible for the review specified.
6. If a TRC member finds the plans acceptable, he/she shall forward a memorandum, within the time
frame stated above, to me. The memorandum shall state that the plans are approved and that they
do not have any comments on the plans submitted for review and that they recommend the project
be forwarded through the approval process.
All comments shall be typed, addressed and transmitted or e-mailed to Sherie Coale and I for distribution
to the applicant. Please include the name and phone number of the reviewer on this memorandum or e-
mail. Lusia Galav will be the Planning and Zoning staff member coordinating the review of the project.
First review comments will be transmitted to the applicant along with a list of Technical Review Committee
(TRC) members.
MWR:lg
Attachment
XC: Steve Gale, Fire Marshal
Marshall Gage, Police Department
John Guidry, Utilities Director
To Be Determined,Director of Engineering
Don Johnson, Building Division
Central File
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlkrispy kremelNWSPITRC Memo for 1st Plans Review .doc
Revised 5-22-01
~ '-'Gee & J enS'on
Celebrating 50 Years of Design Excellence
BOYNTON BEACH STORMWATER MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATION
I, Stephen A. Gaydosh, Jr., PE - GC - PCC - CBI, do hereby certify to
the City of Boynton Beach, Florida, of Palm Beach County that the
application for Krispy Kreme on Boynton Beach Boulevard has been
designed in full compliance with Section 7F of Chapter 4 of the Land
Development Regulations (LDR), of Boynton Beach, Florida. I also
acknowledge that the City of Boynton Beach's LDR may and does
include requirements that are more stringent or restrictive than the
requirements of other regulatory agencies including, but not limited to,
the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE), the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA), the Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD)
and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). Any
plans, calculations, reports, or other documents submitted to the City of
Boynton Beach or any regulatory agency in support of the application
have been prepared in full recognition of and in compliance with the
City of Boynton Beach LDR.
The site is 0.9378 Acres :t Impervious and 0.3244 Acres :t Pervious, for
a total site area of 1.2622 Acres:t. The site is located on the South Side
of Boynton Beach Boulevard, west of 1-95, and has been designed
using an Exfiltration Trench System of 15" ~ Pipe to contain the entire
runoff from a 100-Year, 72-Hour Storm Event on-site with no run-off
leaving the development.
14/
Stephen A. Gaydosh, Jr., PE-GC-PCC-CBI
Project Manager - Gee & Jenson E-A-P, Inc.
Florida PE - 038464
10/15/01
OCT I 6 ?OJI
"\
Ut
drtij 1
(
( :-~i ld
One Harvard Circle, West Palm Beach, FL 33409-1923 T(561) 515.6500 F(561) 515.6502
ENGINEERING IEB 0002934 ARCHITECTURE 1M C000656 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ILC COOOO50 LAND SURVEYING #LB 0002934 INTERIOR DESIGN liB 0001020
< 'i
r~
I
- - -1 ;
II
r- ~
?5
--I
r
0
-= <0
e: .... N
0 0 0
III - 0)
e: an
Gl ....
.., - II
0
~ .... 0)
l{)
Gl ~
Gl
C> ><
III
Q)
~
U
C
0
0
'<:t
11
>-
CIJ
"0
I
'--
>-
0
0
e:
.~
III
Gl
o
.c:
u
e:
Gl
...
l-
e:
o
:0::
III
...
~
;;::
><
UJ
CIJ
"0
.;::
o
u:::
~
Q) U
E ~
~m-r- ~
:::':::COCIJ
>-O'<:t Q)
0.. C <0 >-
CIl >-...--
-i:: 0 ~ 0
e::::':::IllNO
o
:0::
III
::s
~
III
U
E
...
'0
0_
e:ZU)
1:) .~ - e:
Gl ia ~ .~
...... (,) ...... III
e 0 e Gl
D....ID.O
0) l{) <0
0 ~ N
0 ~
0)
...--
III
- .--..
III
0 CIl
::l (j)
= 0
III .~ ::l
- 0 (j)
e: Q) .~ Q)
0..
III .~ Q) ~
c::: 0.. U
......- ......- .f;
'-- '-- ......-
0 0 ~
1:5 -
U
CIJ CIJ .f;
U. U. CIJ
() () 0::
>-
CIJ
o
(V)
~ ~ ~
0 0 0
(V) f'... 0
'<:t l{) ~
f'... N 0
0
...--
u:: u:: u::
0- 0- 0-
(j) (j) (j)
...-- (V) '<:t
l{) (V) ex:>
ex:> ...-- 0)
0 '<:t '<:t
'<:t ...-- l{)
III
-
III
0
III
:::
U)
(j) (j) (j)
() () ()
<( <( <(
ex:> '<:t N
f'... '<:t N
(V) N <0
~ (V) ~
0 0 ...--
CIJ
Q)
'-- CIJ
<( Q)
CIl '--
::l <( CIJ
0 CIl Q)
'--
.~ ::l <(
0
Q) .~ ro
0.. -
E Q) 0
0... I-
l{) f'... 0) 0
..-- N ~ '<:t
f'...
::l CIl
0 0
~ .. ..
N N N
.. I < I
N .. ::l ..
I N 0 N
Of'...
0; cO
.... ....
...-- <0 <0
f'... ...... cx:i C\j
'<:t C') ......
f'... C\j ......
0 0
c::i 0
c::i
.--..
0:::':::
N ..
I
N
+
N
<
::l
o
I
::l
o
N
I
N
+
3:
N
I
......-
o
~
....
.--..
::l
o
~
..
0)
(V)
::l"'--
00
.. 0
~~
..-
c:>
c:>
('.J
I--
U
<:::)
1.D
M
I-
~
C>
J:
U)
C!
o
....
::s III
0 0
... ~
C"l
J:
0 C! en '<:t
...; 0 co '<:t
an -.:t
.... .... ~ 0 ~ ....
I .... I ....
U en U ~
CIJ an CIJ
"": ....
0
ex:> ex:>
N N
ex:> (V)
c <0 C f'...
N (V)
., 0) ., f'...
U 0 U
CIJ "'": CIJ l{)
0)
...-- (V) ex:>
(V) '<:t
0 <0
III 0
- 0
III 0
0
.c:
(,) .--..
e: .--.. ~
Gl ~
... ......- ~
I- ~ en
~ c
:::.::: ~ Q)
...J
'<:t f'... L()
N
CIl ::l N
0 0 I
"'C
Gl
...
::s
C"
Gl
c:::
Gl
E
::s
o
>
"'C
Gl
"'C
.::;
o
...
c..
Gl
E
::s
o
>
Gee & Jenson E-A-P. Inc.
Krispy Kreme
City of Boynton Beach, Florida
PROJECT NO. 21 -164.01
SFWMD SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT CALCULATIONS
1) SITE DATA: 2) STAGE ELEVATIONS:
ACREAGE Percent: From: IL
Building: 0.10 Ac. 7.9% 2150 up
Pavement: 0.84 Ac. 66.4% 18.00 2100
Dry Detention Area. 000 Ac. 0.0% 000 up
Dry Detention Bank: 0.00 Ac. 0.0% 0.00 000
Open Space: 0.32 Ac. 25.7% 16.00 1800
TOTAL AREA: 1.26 Ac. 100.0%
Total Impervious: 0.94 Average Existing Grade: 16.50
74.29% Average Proposed Grade: 19.25
Water Table: 10.00
Total Pervious: 0.32
25.71%
3) FLOOD and RAINFALL CRITERIA:
24 Hour Rainfall:
10 Year
25 Year
100 Year
8.00
10.00
1400
in.
in.
in.
Min. Road Crown (NGVD):
22.30
Min. Floor Elev. (NGVD):
21.50
Maximum Available Soil Storage, SFWMD:
8.18 in.
Allowable Discharge:
Basin:
35 CSM
0.07 cfs
C-51
4) COMPUTE STAGE STORAGE:
Stage: Dry Detention Area)ry Detention Bank Pavement: Open Space Total:
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.50 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 0.00
5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
6.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
SFWMD Stg Storage_Krispy Kreme lCJ..15--01 sag. xis
PAGE 1
10/15/01
5) WATER QUALITY:
Greater of the following (5A. & 5B.)
Store the first inch for the entire site or the amount
of 2.5 times the percentage of imperviousness.
A. First Inch:
v = 1 in. x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in.
Total lAc.):
1.26
B. 2.5 Times Percent Impervious:
1. Site Area = Total Area - ( Bldg. Area)
Total lAc. ):
1.26
v = lac-ft)
0.11
2. Impervious Area = Site Area - Pervious Area
Site lAc. l: Pervious:
1.16 0.32
3. 2.5 in. x Imperv./Site x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in.
Imperv.:
0.8375
Therefore, the total required detention is
either the First inch or 2.5 times the percent
impervious, whichever is greater.
The total required detention is:
V(t):
C. Pretreatment:
V=lac-ft)
0.19
Bldo.:
0.10
Imperv. :
0.84
0.19
-
-
0.5 inches of "Dry" detention pretreatment is required for sensitive
receiving waters and greater than 40% impervious.
1. Compute 0.5 inch of required pretreatment - V(pt)
V(pt) = 0.5 in. x (Total Area - Lake)
Total lAc.): Drv Detention:
1.26 0.00
2. Compute resulting dry detention volume (V)
V = Total Required Detention - Pretreatment)
:Lill:
0.19
3. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the elevation is:
Interpolate Stage between...
Interpolate Runoff between..
$FWMD Stg Storage _ Knspy Kreme_1O-15-01_ sag_xis
'&&
0.05
Stage:
PAGE 2
/(pt)=(ac-ft)
0.05
V=(ac-ftl
0.14
6.00
0.00
None
-
-
Site (Ac.):
1.16
ac-ft
6.50
0.00
#DIV/O!
10/15/01
6) RUNOFF (ZERO DISCHARGE):
A. Soil Storaoe
1. Avg. Depth to Water Table = Avg. Proposed Grade - Water Level
Avo. Grade: Water Level: D=lft.):
19.25 10.00 9.25
2. Soil Storage (S) = Available Soil Storage x Pervious AreafTotal Area
(See C-35, SFWMD VoIN)
Av. Soil SI
8.18
B. 100 Yr.-3 Dav Storm Event
Finished Floor Elevation:
1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P):
P72 = P24 x 1.359
P24 =
P72 =
14.00 in.
19.03 in.
2. Runoff, Q (in.)
Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S)
P72 (in.):
19.03
3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.)
V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft. /12 in.
Ql!.i:!J.:.
16.72
Pervious:
0.32
S = lin.):
2.10
Total lAc. ):
1.26
Total lAc.) S = (in. ):
1.26 2.10
21.50
Q(In.):
16.72
V=lac-ft):
1.76
4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is:
Interpolate Stage between..
interpolate Runoff between..
1i-;
C. 25 Yr.-3 Dav Storm Event
1. Rainfall - 3 Day Duration (P):
P72 = P24 x 1.359
P24 =
P72 =
2. Runoff, Q (in.)
Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/{P + 0.8 x S)
P72 (In.):
13.59
3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-ft.)
V = Q x Total Area x 1 ft./12 in.
Ql!.i:!J.:.
11.36
10.00 in.
13.59 in.
Stage:
S = (in.):
2.10
Total lAc. ):
1.26
6.00
0.00
None
-
-
Q (In.):
11.36
V = lac-ft):
1.19
4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge elevation is:
Interpolate Stage between..
Interpolate Runoff between..
SFWMD Stg Storage Krispy Kreme 10-15-01 sag. xis
Stage:
PAGE 3
6.00
0.00
None
NGVD
6.50
0.00
6.50
0.00
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
10/15/01
D. 10 Yr.-1 Dav Storm Event (Minimum Road Grade)
Min. Road Elevation(B.F.1. Site):
Rainfall - 1 Day Duration (P):
P24 =
8.00 in.
2. Runoff, Q (in.)
Q = {(P - 0.2 x S)^2}/(P + 0.8 x S)
P72 (in.):
8.00
S = (in.):
2.10
3. Total Runoff Volume, V (ac-It.)
V = Q x Total Area x 1 1t./12 in.
QJl!lJ:
5.93
Total (Ac. ):
1.26
4. From the Stage - Storage Curve, the zero discharge eievation is:
Interpolate Stage between...
Interpolate Runoff between..
Stage:
i::cd
I;:
7) DESIGN CONTROL STRUCURE:
A. Set control elevation at or above required water qualitv volume of
22.30
Q (in.):
5.93
V = (ac-It):
0.62
6.00
0.00
None
NGVD
6.50
0.00
B. Size circular control orifice for allowable discharqe for 25 vear 3 dav storm event see item 6C above.
0.14 , stage elev. None
1. Runoff in inches (Q)=
2. Runoff volume (ac-It)=
3. Zero discharge stage elevation=
4. Maximum design head (7.B.3-7A)(It.)=
None
c. Compute circ1uar orifice size
11.36
119
0.00
1. Basic equation is Q= 4.8A(H)^1.5, rearranged the equation is A= Q/4.8(H)^1.5
Where: A= area of orifice, sf ?
Q= design discharge, cfs 0.07
H= design head over invert of crific 0.00
2. If Q=1.34 cfs and H= 3.96 It, then
A=
N/A sf
N/A sq. inches
SFWMD $Ig Storage _Krispy Kreme_10-15-01_sag_xls
PAGE 4
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
#DIV/O!
10/15/01
8) FLOOD ROUTING (Discharge):
SFWMD Flood Routing Program Input Data
Project Area:
Ground Storage:
Termination Discharge:
Distribution Type:
Return Frequency:
24-Hour Rainfall:
Reporting Sequence:
Stage:
(ft)
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
8) SUMMARY:
Allowable Discharge:
Required Storage:
Required Pretreatment:
Pretreatment Provided:
Soil Storage:
10 Yr.-1 Day Storm:
25 Yr.-3 Day Storm:
100 Yr.-3 Day Storm:
FLOOD ROUTING
10 Yr.-1 Day Storm:
25 Yr.-3 Day Storm:
100 Yr.-3 Day Storm:
0.62
1.19
1.76
0.00
0.00
0.00
Storage:
(ac-ft)
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
ac-ft
ac-ft
ac-ft
NGVD
NGVD
NGVD
I Hereby certify that the above alculations ar true and
correct to t best of my knowledge an elief.
DATE PRINTED:
SFWMO 81g Storage Krispy Kreme~ 10 15-01_ sag.xls
15-0ct-01
DATE PREPARED:
BY SAG
PAGE 5
1.26 Ac.
2.10 in.
2.00 cfs
SFWMD
10 Year 25 Year 100 Year
8.00 10.00 1400 in.
STANDARDIZED
Discharge:
(cfs)
0.000
0.083
0.236
0.433
0.666
0.931
1.224
1.543
1.885
2.249
2.634
3039
3.463
0.07 cfs
0.19 ac-ft
0.14 ac-ft
1.41 ac-ft
2.10 in
None
None
None
NGVD Stage Elevation
NGVD Stage Elevation
NGVD Stage Elevation
0.00
000
0.00
cfs Disch.
cfs Disch.
cfs Disch.
DATES REVISED:
10/15/01
BOynTOn KRISPY KREME
conCURREnCY TRAFFIC IMPACT AnALYSIS
..
Prepared for
~
GEE Ii JEnSOn
..
Prepared by
PlnDE~ TROOTM"n conSOL TlnG. Inc.
2324 Sooth Congress flvenae. Salte 1 H
West Palm Beach. FL 33406
(561) 434.1644
II
~oJ \ "x~ \
~J ~ \~
#PTC01.135
September 14. 2001
a.
BOYNTON KRISPY KREME
CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Introduction
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a
proposed 4,368 SF Krispy Kreme restaurant in the City of Boynton Beach. The purpose of this study
is to determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Article 15, Traffic
Performance Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC).
Site Data
The site is located on the south side of Boynton Beach Boulevard west of 1-95 as shown on Exhibit 1.
Access to the proposed project is via one (1) driveway connection to Boynton Beach Boulevard at the
signalized intersection with Industrial Avenue. Year 2003 conditions were examined for this analysis.
Existing (2000) T raffle Conditions
Exhibit 2 provides the 2000 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the surrounding roadway
network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of Palm Beach County.
Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor of 9.3% to the MDT volumes.
These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the
adopted LOS 0 service volumes.
Project T raffle
Trip Generation
Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC and the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition were reviewed to
determine acceptable daily trip generation rates for the proposed project. The daily trip
generation rate used was from Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach
County ULDC. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition
was the source of the peak hour trip generation rates. Exhibits 3A, 3B and 3C provide the
daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data respectively for the proposed development.
Concurrency Report 00-135 9-14-01
For Traffic Performance Standards purposes, based on the net new external daily trip
generation of 1,505, the Test 1 radius of development influence is two (2) miles. The Test 2
radius of development influence is one (1) mile.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
A directional distribution was developed based on review of land use patterns and existing
travel patterns. Exhibit 4 shows the assignment of daily and peak hour project traffic as well
as the project impact percentage (% of daily adopted service volume).
Future Traffic Conditions
Roadway Improvements
The Fiscal Year 2001-2005 Transportation Improvement Program from the MPO of Palm
Beach County and the Palm Beach County Five Year Road Program were reviewed to
determine if any roadways within the study area are scheduled to be improved. There are
no scheduled improvements within the study area.
Background Traffic
Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of future
background traffic volumes. Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 5 for the surrounding
roadway links. Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County, was reviewed. No
Major projects are projected to have a 10% impact on the study area roadways within the
analysis time frame of the proposed development. Background growth projections based on
historic data account for traffic associated with the committed developments in the area.
Traffic Performance Standards Analysis
Test 1 (Link Test)
This first test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links required to
be analyzed are projected to operate below adopted level of service standards. Exhibit 6
shows future daily, AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for the analyzed roadway links of
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. All analyzed roadway links are projected
Concurrency Report 00-135 9-14-01
2
to operate above the adopted Test 1 level of service standards, therefore, the requirements of
Test 1 are met.
Test 2 (Model Test)
The second test examines traffic conditions based on model projections that are developed
and maintained by Palm Beach County. No roadway links within one (1) mile are Test 2
deficiencies, therefore, the requirements of Test 2 are met.
Intersection Analysis
Major intersections for which a proposed development adds more than 10% of the total
traffic on any link connecting a major intersection are required to be analyzed. No major
intersections meet this requirement based on the proposed development's impact.
Driveway Volumes
AM and PM peak hour project driveway volumes are provided on Exhibit 7.
Conclusions
This analysis shows that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Concurrency Report ()()-735 9-14-01
3
o
GArEWAY BOULEVARD
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
[
NTS.
BOYNTON BEAClI BOULEVARD LJ
I
~ '" SIT E-J 0
'" [
0 ::J <(
<( z 2;
0 > ~
'" <( '0 ::J
U V> '" 0
V> OJ
3 '" I-
'"
'" LJ ~
3: z '"
:5 0 u
u :5
V>
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
GOLF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE)
9/14/01
BOYNTON
KRISPY KREME
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION
~
o
'~
4l
15562 C
32500
1447 C
3020
6l
29392 C
46900
2733 C
4550
6l
40034 D
48900
3723 D
4550
~
113112 C
32500
11219 C
3020
4l
7663 C
32500
713 C
3020
LEGEND
6l
26997 C
46900
2511 C
4550
1-------
4L
26096 D
, 32500
12613 D
3020
i - 6l -
136784 D
48900
3421D
4550
r
I 61.
159707 F
1101600
14853 F
i 8900
GATlWAY 60UlEVARD
BOYNTON BLACH BOUI EVARD
6l 6l
31165C 28316C
46900 ::; 48900
2900 C z 2633 C
4550 > 4550
<(
Vl
Vl
W
'"
lJ
z
o
u
BOYNTON
KRISPY KREME
4l
18029 C
32500
1677 C
3020
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
o
<(
o
'"
w
U
Z
w
'"
3:
:5 [~241L2 C
, 32500
1973 C
3020
1--2L.--
19994 D
14900
929 D
1390
1_--
2l
11 624 D
14900
10111 D
1390
61
40034 D
46900
3723 D
4550
\
[J
SITE /
h~(~~o~
12987 D
, 4550
6l
164248 F
101600
15275 F
8900
6l
35466 C
46900
32911 C
4550
[--.---
6L
31670 C
46900
2964 C
4550
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
2L
117320
14900
10'!lD
1390
GOLF ROAD (SW Brd AVLNUE)
- ROADWAY LANES
- DAILY TRAFFIC AND LOS
- DAILY ADOPTlD
SERVICE VOLUME
- PlAK IIOUR TRAffiC AND IDS
- PFAK HOUR ADOPTlD
SERVICE VOLUME
4l
26676 0
32500
2667 D
3020
'"
5:
4l
33526 E
32500
3116 E
3020
[---
i 2l
11064 D
14900
1029 D
1390
1_------
4l
13424 C
! 32500
11248 C
I 3020
I 4l
13164 C
32500
1224C
3020
o
'"
<(
~ 4L
:J 15472 C
o 32500
ro 1439 C
~ 3020
'"
u
:5
'"
o
N.TS.
4l
16462 C
32500
1719C
3020
>-
~ 41.
I 20666 C
g 32500
I 1922 C
;( 3020
'"
w
o
w
~
~
4l
23798 D
32500
22130
3020
4l
28056 D
32500
2609 D
3020
9/14/01
EXHIBIT 2
EXISTING (2000) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
~
Lf'l ,- ~ ,-
r"'l 0 X '0
,- -- en
, ~
,- ,- r"'l
0 -- ,- (I)
U 01 , DO
,-
f- 0 n:l
a.. a..
'f} ::l
0-
(I)
<J>
a.
";::
....-
QJ c:
E 0
QJ :;:;
'- ~
~ ..
>..Q./
c..C:
rI) Q./
-;: l?
<C ~ c..
M c: .. )
..... 01-
:.0 -
c:: >..
..c:: >..=
)( o ~
I.I.l caO
"1'" ~
!O ,- ,...
C
.. r.n
OJ a..
....
>< ...
w I-
::
OJ
Z
,......,
S
r.n
a..
-;:
I-
>-
...0
I .
r.n
r.n
I1:l
Q..
r.n "1'" ~
C-
o;: ,- ,...
I-
!O
....
0
I-
,......,
,...
-
CIJ
....
I1:l
ell:
c :J
0
+: 0
I1:l --....
.. "-
OJ
C
OJ
(oJ
C-
...
I-
.c
or;;
c
CIJ :J
....
c 0
-
N
OJ
r.n
::>
"'0
c ~
I1:l
..... -.;:;
c
OJ
-0
.u)
OJ
cz
J
0"> 0'1
!O ,- ,...
c Lr) lJ")
... r.n ,-
CIJ a.. ,...
....
>< ...
w I-
::
CIJ
z
,......, *-
.... Lr)
- "<:t"
r.n
C-
...
I-
>- N N
...0 "1'" ~
I
r.n N N
r.n
I1:l ,- ,...
Q..
r.n ,- ,...
a.. 1.0 ~
... "- "-
I- N N'
!O
....
0
I-
,......,
,...
-
OJ L.l...
-
I1:l (f)
ell: 0
c 0
0 0
+: ,-
I1:l --....
... N
OJ
C ,-
OJ N
(oJ M
C- 1.0
...
I-
>-
....
or;;
C
OJ
.....
C u....
- (f)
co
1.0
M
"<:t"
~
C
OJ ro
'-
r.n ::J
::> 13
"'0 <fl
OJ
C cz
I1:l -0
.....
0
0
u....
~
<fl
ro
u....
l1'l
o
lJ")
,...
r.n
C-
o;:
I-
::
OJ
z
....
OJ
Z
0
0
-'
::J
(I)
u
0
U
....-
c
(I)
E
a.
0
Qi
>
(I)
0
u
C
rtl
-'
U
(l)
~
c
::J
.c-
c
::l
0
U
-c
u
rtl
(I)
co
E
ra
a..
(l)
-c
....-
'0
<J>'
(l)
(l)
LL
....-
U
rtl
a.
E
u
rtl
0
~
(I)
~
-c
Vl
~
'(ii
LL
co'
0
c
0
"B
(l)
Vl
(l)
~
::l
0
V1
S
U") ,- Vl ,-
M a X '+-
,- ---- u-i 0
, '<t"
,- ,- M
a ---- "... Q)
U (J) , 0.0
,-
f- a '"
"" 0-
--
:::l
0-
Q)
Vl
Cl..
.....
c:
0
:;;
ro
...
QJ
c:
QJ QJ
ECJ
OJ c..
... --
~ ...
I-
;>.....
c..::J
-~ 0
CQ ~:I:
M c:~ I
..... o ro
:c ..... QJ
c:Q..
..s:: S~
x
w CQ<!::
-;; N N
.....
fIl 0
Q.. I-
-;::
I- ..... N N
::s
:: 0
Q.I
Z 0 0
s:::
-
*
;>..- 0
..o~
. fIl
fIl
fIl Q..
l':l -;:: 0 0
Q.. I-
-;; N N
.....
fIl 0
Q.. I-
-;::
I- ..... N N
-;; ::s
..... 0
0
I- 0 0
s:::
-
6'
CO
----
- 0
,... ~
'-"
Q.I t---.
.....
l':l CO
et: ,-
I:: 0
0 +
~ x
... e
Q.I --l
I:: Ol
Q.I N
Q CO
Q.. 0
-;:: II
l- f-
e
--l
;>..
.....
-;; :)
s:::
Q) 0
.....
I::
- N
Q.I
fIl
:)
"'C
I::
l':l ~
.....I '.j:l Vl
e .....I
Q) -<(
32 l-
V) 0
Q)
ex I-
j
-;; 0 0
..... N N
'" 0 ,- ,-
Q.. I-
-;::
I- ..... "<t "<t
::s
:: 0 \.0 \.0
Q.I
Z \.0 \.0
I::
- Lf') Lf')
*
;>..- Lf')
..o~ "<t
I fIl
fIl
fIl Q..
l':l ....
Q.. I- CO CO
Ol Ol
-;; CO CO
..... ,- ,-
fIl 0 N N
Q.. I-
....
I- ..... t---. t---.
-;; ::s 0 0
..... 0 ,- ,-
0
I- ,- ,-
I:: ,- ,-
- ,- ,-
- 0:;-
,...
'-" "<t
---
Q.I ,-
..... Lf')
l':l ~
~ LL
I:: if)
0 0
::; 0
l':l 0
....
Q.I ,-
s::: ---
Q.I \.0
Q CO
Q.. Ol
... "<t
I-
;>..
.....
-;;
s::: LL
Q.I
..... if)
I::
- CO
\.0
M
"<t
......
e
Q) ~
fIl ::J
::> ru
......
"0 <fl
Q)
I:: oc
l':l "U
.....I Vl
0
0 .....I
LL -<(
...... I-
<fl 0
ru
LL I-
co
,-
,-
N
\.0
\.0
Lf')
fIl
Q..
";::
I-
-;;
I::
....
Q.I
.....
X
w
::
Q.I
Z
..... G
Q)
z 0
......J
2
(])
u
0
U
.....
c
Q)
E
Cl..
0
OJ
;>
(])
0
u
c
'"
......J
U
(])
~
c
C ::J
0 c-
:-e c
:::l
U 0
LU U
...c
.:0 ...c
u
I '"
(])
ro
E
ra
0-
(])
-5
0
Vl-
GJ (])
(])
f- LL
.....
Vl U
Qj '"
Cl..
(]) E
c
'@J U
c '"
LU 0
C cr:
0 (])
."" ~
'"
t:: ...c
0 tfl
Cl.. ~
Vl -m
c LL
'"
r= CIJ-
0 a
(]) c
.....
.a 0
.""
."" u
Vl
c (])
tfl
(]) Q)
~ ~
:::l :::l
0 0
tfl tfl
:s ~
If) ,.- '" ,.-
"" .e. ~ '0
,.-
, '<t If)
,.- ,.- ""
0 --- ,.- l5'o
u 0'1 .
,.-
t- O rll
'll: CL
::l
0-
<lJ
'"
a..
"5
c
0
"';:;
<<.S
100.
Q.I
C
CI.I Q.I
ElJ
CI.I 0..
100. "_
:::-=: 100.
>.,1-
0..100.
rIl ::s
.... 0
u :::-=: ::I:
M C ~ J
...... 0 <<.S
:.c ...... Q.I
CQ..
.s:: S~
><
u.l CCQ..
lU N N
-
en 0
C- I-
...
I- - .- .-
::J
~ 0
Q.I
Z
C .- .-
-
*
.....- 0
...J:J~
I en
en
en C-
rd ... 0 0
Q.. I-
lU N N
-
en 0
C- I-
";:
I- - .- .-
lU ::J
- 0
0
I- .- .-
C
-
~
('f)
---
- '-0
..... ~
'-"
Cl.l Lf)
- '-0
rd
0:: .-
c 0
0 +
:;:; X
rd
... C
Cl.l --l
C '-0
Cl.l '"
("j co
C- o
";: II
I- ~
C
--l
.....
-
"Vi :::J
c
Cl.l 0
-
C
- N
Cl.l
en
:::>
"'C
C
rd t1l
...l '.j:J (IJ
C ...l
Q) ~
-a I-
"(ji 0
Q)
cY I-
)
lU 0 0
- co co
en 0
C- I-
... -
I- ::J co co
~ 0 ('f) M
Cl.l
Z N N
C "t" "t"
-
*
.....- Lf)
...J:J~ "t"
I en
en
rIJ C-
rd ";:
Q.. I- '-0 '-0
1..0 '-0
lU '-0 '-D
-- "t" "t"
rIJ 0 .- .-
C- I-
...
I- - 0 0
lU ::J '" '"
- 0
0
I- 1..0 '-D
C '" '"
-
- co
.....
'-" "t"
---
Cl.l N
- Lf)
rd
0:: L.L
C Vl
0 0
:;:; 0
rd 0
...
Q) .-
C ---
Q) co
("j "t"
C- M
";: M
I-
.....
-
"Vi
C L.L
Q) Vl
-
C
- co
'-D
('f)
"t"
.......
c
Cl.l t1l
....
en ::J
:::> t1l
.......
"'C lJ)
Q)
C cY
rd U
...l (IJ
0
0 ...J
L.L ~
....... I-
<fl 0
t1l
L.L I-
co
'"
'"
('f)
.-
"t"
rIJ
C-
";:
I-
lU
c
...
Q)
-
><
U.I
~
Q)
Z
- 0
Q)
Z 0
-.J
=>
<lJ
-0
0
U
....,
c
<lJ
E
a..
0
Qj
>
<lJ
0
-0
c
rll
-.J
-0
<lJ
<;::
'c
c =>
0 .c-
:-e c
::l
-0 0
LU U
...r::. ...r::.
....,
..p u
! rll
<lJ
m
E
(ij
CL
<lJ
...r::.
....,
'0
",-
G:i <lJ
<lJ
t- LL..
....,
<r> U
(ij rll
a..
(j) E
c
"50 -0
c rll
LU 0
C ~
0 <lJ
"P ~
~ ...r::.
0 tfl
D..
<r> 'fii
C LL..
~ 0:;;-
t-
'0 0
<lJ C
B 0
.~ "13
c <lJ
tfl
<lJ (j)
~ ~
::l ::l
0 0
tfl tfl
S ~
o
o
l7%
I 10S
8
S
0.2%
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
3%
4S
4
2
0.1')1,
W"3%
4S
4
2
0.1
8%
120
9
6
0.4%
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
r-~-3% -
I ~S
I 2
0.1%
10%
ISl
12
8
0.3%
20%
301
24
16
2.0%
[HOYN ON BEACH BOULEVARD
2S% IW%
376 I 602
I 30 ~ ' 47
20 Z I 31
0.8% ~ 1.2%
H%
226
18
~ 12 0
O.S% <(
S% 0
'"
7S w
U
6 Z
4 w
'"
0.2% S
::s
2%
30
2
2
0.1%
1%
1 S
1
1
0.1%
'15%'
226
18
12
O.S%
1~3%
4S
4
2
0.1%
SITEj
V>
V>
W
'"
U
Z
o
U
10%
ISl
12
8
0.1%
3%
4S
4
2
0.1%
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
1%
1 S
1
1
0.1%
GOlf ROAD (SW Brd AVENUE)
LEGEND
40% " PERCfNT 015 I RIBUTlON
602 " DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC
47 "AM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
31 " PM I'LAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
1.2% "% OF DAilY ADOPTED
SERVICf VOl UME
BOYNTON
KRISPY KREME
40%
602
47
31
1.2%
r
/
I
I
20%
301
24
16
0.9%
m
5'
3%
45
-1
2
0.1%
1%
IS
1
1
0.1%
N.T.S.
I
I
I
I
I
5% 3%
75 4S
6 4
4 2
0.2% 0.1%
8%
120
9
6
0.4%
)-
<( 3%
S 4S
0 I
'" 3% u 4
<(
~ 45 I 2 ~
~ 4 :( 0.1%
:J 2 '"
0 w
'" 0.1% I ~
t-
~
'" r2o/:~-
u ! 30
:'5
on ' 2
2
0.09%
2%
30
2
2
0.09%
9/14/01
EXHIBIT 4
PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
~
Exhibit 5
Boynton Krispy Kreme
Historic Growth
#PTC01-135
growth rate 01-135.xls
9/14/01
Page 1 of 1
Daily Traffic Volumes Growth
Roadway 1997 2000 Rate
Boynton Beach Blvd
Congress Ave to Old Boynton Rd 30,319 28,316 -2.25% /Year
Old Boynton Rd to 1-95 42,050 40,034 -1.62% /Year
1-95 to Seacrest Blvd 30,184 28,677 -1.69% /Year
Old Boynton Road
Congress Ave to Boynton Beach Blvd 11,073 11,625 1.63% /Year
lOT"""(/)T""" tIl
(")ox_ a u 0 0 0
~- .0 ....I
,"<tl()
T"""T"""C")~
0--"- Q)
uQ)~ OJ
t- om E
0.. ,.-0.. 0 0 0 0
'11: en u 0 0 0 0
2 ~ en en Lf1 en
CO CO N '1'"
a '1'" '1'" M .-
iU g 1..0 0 '" '1'"
'" Lf1 '1'" 0
..... '" .- co Lf1
0 0 en N en N
to- ~ N '1'" N .-
8
tJ N M .- .-
.~ 0 0 0 0
1..0 en M M
0
>- ...
....I c..
::;;:
Cl
... * * * *
~ cv
S Q) 0 0 0 M
M ~ ~ ~ ~ '-':
~ .- .- .- .-
g 0
~
..s::
~ Q)
E co M en co
e ::s Lf1 .- 1..0 '"
\,j (5 co N co Lf1
.-
>
Ol:l~ 1..0 '1'" '" Lf1
C g
.. .- M '" N
II> M 0 1..0 1..0
co 0 co .-
Ox r::!. N "<t N .-
W
Ol:l II>
C 0 0 0
.. (II ....J
II> l: ....J ....J -' N
Ox tlj 1..0 1..0 '1'"
....I
W
~
E
~
...
~
fi: .~
.~ ~
... -
~ tlj
1.0 c::
.....15<
:.0.........
.J: ~-:;;
x 0 (II
wr:cl-
~
l:
::l
-0
~
c
o
~
o Lf1
COO;>
::Q -0
oB~
o -0 ......
+-J ~ (D
g; 6 u
<{ ...... n:l
<J) E= QJ
~ 6 Vl
~ co B
c -0 Lf)
865:
-0 -0 -0
2:2:>
co co CiS
-c -c -c
u u U
n:l n:l n:l
QJ QJ QJ
co co co
c c c
000
~~~
000
co co co
~
:::
"'C
tlj
&
-0
>
CiS
..r:
u
n:l
QJ
co
C
o
......
c
>-
o
co
o
......
QJ
>
<{
<J)
<J)
QJ
~
C
o
U
-0
~
c
o
~
o
co
-0
6
tIl
a u 0 0 0
....I
E 0 0 0 0
u
a Lf) Lf) N 0->
Lf1 Lf) 0 M
a '1'" '1'" M .-
iU 6' 0 '" N 0->
..... 0 1..0 0 '" Lf)
0 0 '" 0-> '" .-
f- ~ N M N .-
Cli: 8
:J
a ti '" .- '1'" '1'"
J: (II "<t '" N N
'0'
~ ...
;1i c..
c..
w
~ ... * * * *
~ IV
S Q) 8 0 0 M
W ~ ~ ~ ~ '-':
~ M ~ .- .- .- .-
0 0
0
r::!.
..s::
~ (II
0 E 0 M .- '1'"
... ::s co .- co Lf1
\,j (5 .-
>
Ol:l~
s::: 0 M M '" .-
.. g M N 1..0 co
II> 1..0 '" 1..0 0
Ox r::!. N M N .-
W
Ol:l II>
s::: 0 0 0
.. (II ....J
II> s::: ....J ....J ....J N
J3 tlj 1..0 1..0 '1'"
....I
-0
2:
co
-0 -c
0::: u
C n:l
0 QJ
~ ...... co
l: ~ c
::l 0 Lf) 0
co 0;> ......
-0 -0 ~
(5 0 2: 0
...... co co
0 -0 ...... 0
...... ~ <J) ......
QJ QJ QJ
C b
> 0 >
<{ ...... n:l <{
<J) ~ QJ <J)
Vl Vl <J)
QJ 0 0 QJ
5J: co ...... 5J:
c ::Q Lf) c
0 0;> 0
u 0 U
-0 -0 -0
2: > 2: -0
co CiS co 0:::
~ ..r: -c -c c
u u u 0
ctl n:l n:l
::: QJ QJ QJ C
"'C co co co >-
tlj c c c 0
0 co
Cli: 0 0 0
...... ...... ...... -0
~ ~ ~ "6
0 0 0
co co co
If)
"00
~
m
c
m
~
~
c:
Q)
If)
c
0
0
m
Q)
""0
"5
e
0-
.8
""0
Q)
~
5
If)
m
3:
Q)
~
.c
~
e
OJ
~
0
m
ai
>
~
OJ
Q)
c
.!!l
.c
~
e
OJ
0
";:::
0
]i
.c
Q)
Q;
.c
S
l{) -.i
.- .-
,Q ,Q
.c ..c
X X
W W
Q) Q)
Q) Q)
(/)(/)
~~
s~
o
o
N.T.S.
44 (30)
r---
67 (46)
_m~ -1
~I co ~~
N N
~ -
'<t M
'"' '<t
I
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
~
2761
~
SITE
L
LEGEND
44 - AM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
(3D) - PM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
2761 - DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC
9/14/01
BOYNTON
KRISPY KREME
EXHIBIT 7
PROJECT DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
~