APPLICATION
PROJECT NAME: Arbo." .l Townhomes
LOCATION: 3450 S. Congress Avenue
PCN: 08-43-46-05-00-000-3030
I FILE NO.: LUAR 02-009 II TYPE OF APPLICATION: I
AGENT/CONTACT PERSON: OWNER: William H. Baker, Trustee
William Weitsma, William Weitsma Co. Inc. PHONE: 800-849-2729
PHONE: 274-4863 FAX: 803-324-1116
FAX: 274-7636 ADDRESS: 555 Paddock Parkway
ADDRESS: 25Seabreeze Avenue Rock Hill, SC 29731
Delray Beach, FL. 33483
Date of submittal/Proiected meeting dates:
SUBMITTAL / RESUBMITT AL 10/2/02
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A
PUBLIC NOTICE: 12/9/02, 1/7/03
TRC MEETING: N/A
PROJECTED RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
ACTUAL RESUBMITTAL DATE: N/A
2ND REVIEW COMMENTS DUE: N/A
LAND DEVELOPMENT SIGNS POSTED N/A
(SITE PLANS):
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD 12/19/02
MEETING:
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT N/A
AGENCY BOARD
CITY COMMISSION MEETING: 1/7/03
COMMENTS:
S:\Planning\sHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Arbolata Townhomes\2U02 PROJECT TRACKING INFo.doc
City Codes Accessed via Website www.b(l\nton~oeach.org.
www.amlcgal.comlboynton_beach_n.us
HAS APPLICANT ATTENDED A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING? Yes DATE: 9/17/02
.
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
.
.
This application must be filled out completely and accurately and submitted, together with the
materials listed in Section II below, in two (2) copies to the Planning Division. Incomplete
applications will not be processed. IrJO I ~ ~ ~ ~ W ~ r~l!
ti! iil'
PLEASE PRINT LEGIBLY OR TYPE ALL INFORMATION. I 'I I H _ ~ 1-'-
Il_1
, ,
I. GENERAL INFORMATION
1.
Project Name:
Artolata 'Ibwn Hanes
2. Type of Application (check one)
x
a, Land Use Amendment and Rezoning
b. land Use Amendment Only
c. Rezoning only
.
3. Date this application is accepted (to be filled out by Planning Division)
.
4,
Applicants Name (person or Business entity in whose name this application is made)
william Wietsna Co. 100.
Address: 25 Seabreeze Avenue Suite 304
Delrav Beach. Fl. 33483
Phone: 561-274-4863
(Zip Code)
FAJ<: 561-274-7636
5, Agent's Name (person, if any, representing applicant
william Wietsna
Address: 25 Seabreeze Ave. Suite 304
De1ray Beach, Fl. 33483
(Zip Code)
"none: 'Y<,1,,-1.'7A-4R/i,~
t-~: 'Y<,1,,-1.'7A-1'i,Yi,
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 2
6. Property Owner's (or Trustee's) Name:
william H. Baker, Trustee
Address:
555 Paddock Parkway
Rock HilL S. C.
29731
Phone:
800~849-2729
(Zip Code)
FAX: 803~24~1ll6
7.
Correspondence Address (if different than applicant or agent)"
.
N/A
"This is the only address to which all agendas, letters, and other materials will be
mailed
8. What is the applicant's interest in the sUbject parcel: (Owner, Buyer, Lessee, Builder,
Developer, Contract Purchaser, etc,)
Developer
9. Street Address or Location of Subject Parcel: Vacant Lam No Address
.
PCN (s)
08 43 46 05 00 000 3030
j4 ~D '. :jJ~
C' \LJ
.,; U~(..L
1\),
legal Description of Subject Parcel.. !<\e.ets (, ~s See D:r
11, Area of Subject Parcel (to nearest hundredth (1/100) of an acre: 16.087
12. Current Land Use Category: Irrlustrial
13: Proposed Land Use Category: High Density Res.
14, Current Zoning District: M~l
15, Proposed Zoning District: PUD
16 Intended use of subject parcel: Town ibnes
.
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 3
,
17. Developer or builder: william wietsma Co., Inc.
18. Architect: william wietsma
19. Landscape Architect: Tlunas White
20, Site Planner: william wietsma
21. Civil Engineer: Gerry Church
22. Traffic Engineer: Gerry Church
23, Surveyor: O'Brien, suiter & O'Brien
.
.
II. MATERIALS TO BE SUBMITTED WITH APPLICATION
The following materials shall be submitted in two (2) copies, unless otherwise indicated:
.
(please check)
~a.
This application form.
/._b,
A copy of the last recorded warranty deed.
..
_c, The following documents and letters of consent:
_(1) If the property is under joint or several ownership: a written consent to the application by
all owners of record,
.
_(2) If the applicant is a contract purchaser: a copy of the purchase contract and written
consent of the owner and seller, and
~(3) If the applicant is represented by an authorized agent: a copy of the agency agreement,
or written consent of the applicant, and
.
_(4) If the applicant is a lessee: a copy of the lease agreement, and the written consent of
the owner, and
.
_(5) If the applicant is a corporation or other business entity: the name of the officer or
person responsible for the application, and written proof that said person has the
delegated authority to represent the corporation or other business entity, or in lieu
thereof, written proof that he is in fact an officer of the corporation.
_d. A sealed boundary survey of the subject parcel by a surveyor registered in the State of Florida,
dated not more than six (6) months prior to the date of submission of the application, at a scale
prescribed by the Planning Division, and containing the following information:
~(1) An accurate legal description of the subject parcel.
.
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 4
.)(..(2) A computation of the total acreage of the subject parcel to the nearest hundredth
(1/100) of an acre.
.
JC(3) A tree survey, which conforms to the requirements of the City of Boynton Beach Tree
preservation Ordinance. (Also refer to Page 6, Sec. II h,(12) of this application if
property is occupied by native vegetation.) This requirement may be waived by the
Planning Director where found to be unrelated to the land use or zoning issues
involved with the application.
:t.- e.
A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses, and legal descriptions for all
properties within at least four hundred (400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the latest
official tax rolls in the county courthouse shall be furnished by the applicant, including a tax map
showing placement of 400 feet boundary. Postage, and mailing labels or addressed envelopes
must also be provided, Said list shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that to the best of
the applicant's knowledge said list is complete and accurate. Notification of surrounding
property owners will be done by the City of Boynton Beach.
.
.
-X,f. A copy of the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's maps showing all of the properties
referred to in paragraph e, above, and their relation to the subject parcel.
~g. A statement by the applicant justifying the zoning requested, including reasons why the
property is unsuitable for development under the existing zoning and more suitable for
development under the proposed zoning, The statement should address the following criteria
which the Planning and Zoning Division utilizes in evaluating land use amendment and rezoning
applications:
.
1) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be consistent with applicable
comprehensive plan policies. The division shall also recommend limitations or requirements
that would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property in order to
comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan,
.
2) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be contrary to the established
land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as
contrasted with the protection of the public welfare.
3) Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed land use
amendment/rezoning desirable.
4) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be compatible with utility
systems, roadways and other public facilities.
5) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be compatible with the current
and future use of adjacent and nearby properties or would affect the property values of
adjacent and nearby properties.
6) Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing land
use designation/zoning.
7) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning is of a scale that is reasonably related
to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 5
8) Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed.
~h. A comparison of the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed zoning,
with the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed zoning, with the
impacts that would be created by development under the existing zoning, which will include:
^ (1) A comparison of the potential square footage of number and type of dwelling units under
the existing zoning with that which would be allowed under the proposed zoning or
development.
x..(2) A statement of the uses that would be allowed in the proposed zoning or development,
and any particular uses that would be excluded.
.
~(3)
-X.(4)
Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
For proposed zoning of property to commercial or industrial districts, where the area of
the subject parcel exceeds one (1) acre, projections for the number of employees.
.
(5) A comparison of traffic which would be generated under the proposed zoning or
development, with the traffic that would be generated under the current zoning; also, an
analysis of traffic movements at the intersections of driveways that would serve the
property and surrounding roadways, and improvements that would be necessary to
accommodate such traffic movements. For projects that generate move than five
hundred (500) net trips per day, a traffic impact analysis must be submitted which
complies with the Municipal Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance,
(a) For projects that generate two thousand (2,000) or more net trips per day, the
traffic impact analysis must be submitted to the City at least 30 days prior to the
deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by the City's traffic consultant and Palm
Beach County. The applicant shall be billed for the cost of review by the City's
traffic consultant.
(b)
For projects that generate between five hundred (500) and two thousand (2,000)
net trips per day, the traffic impact analysis must be submitted at the application
deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by Palm Beach County. However, if it is
the desire of the applicant to utilize the City's traffic consultant for review of the
traffic impact analysis prior to review by Palm Beach County, then the procedure
and requirements outlined under item "a" above shall be followed.
.
NOTE:
Failure to submit traffic impact analysis in the manner prescribed above may
delay approval of the application.
L-(6) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the water demand for
development under the proposed zoning or development with water demand under the
existing zoning. Water demand shall be estimated using the standards adopted by the
Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such demand, unless a registered
engineer justifies different standards. Commitment to the provision of improvements to
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 6
the water system shall also be included. where existing facilities would be inadequate to
serve development under the proposed zoning.
.
"- (7) For parcels larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of sewage flows that would be
generated under the proposed zoning or development with that which would be
generated under the existing zoning. Sewage flows shall be estimated using the
standards adopted by the Palm Beach County Health Department for estimating such
flows. unless a registered engineer justifies different standards. Commitment to the
provision of improvements to the sewage collection system shall also be included,
where the existing facilities would be inadequate to serve development under the
proposed zoning.
-t (8) For proposed residential developments larger than one (1) acre, a comparison of the
projected population under the proposed zoning or development with the projected
population under the existing zoning. Population projections according to age groups
for the proposed development shall be required where more than fifty (50) dwellings. or
50 sleeping rooms in the case of group housing, would be allowed under the proposed
zoning.
.
.
)C (9) At the request of the Planning Division, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall also submit proposals for minimizing land use conflicts
with surrounding properties, The applicant shall provide a summary of the nuisances
and hazards associated with development under the proposed zoning, as well as
proposals for mitigation of such nuisances and hazards. Such summary shall also
include, where applicable, exclusion of particular uses, limitations on hours of operation,
proposed location of loading areas, dumpsters, and mechanical equipment, location of
driveways and service entrance, and specifications for site lighting, Nuisances and
hazards shall be abated or mitigated so as to conform to the performance standards
contained in the City's zoning regulations and the standards contained in the City's noise
control ordinance. Also, statements concerning the height, orientation, and bulk of
structures, setbacks from property lines, and measures for screening and buffering the
proposed development shall be provided. At the request of the Planning and
OP.>(~wJ. I3r.v.lr.ti Q( Cit)j Cr.lromjs'iinn" tbe <IJ;lr;Jlic.ant shaU also state the tvoe of
construction and architectural styles that will be employed in the proposed development.
_yt,10)At the request of the Planning Division, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall also submit the following information:
.
.
_(a) Official soil conservation service classification by soil associations and all areas
subject to inundation and high ground water levels.
_(b)
_(c)
Existing and proposed grade elevations.
Existing or proposed water bodies.
_(d) Form of ownership and form of organization to maintain common spaces and
recreation facilities.
_(e) A written commitment to the provision of all necessary facilities for storm
drainage, water supply, sewage collection and treatment, solid waste disposal,
hazardous waste disposal, fire protection, easements or rights-of-way, roadways,
recreation and park areas, school sites, and other public improvements or
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 7
.
III.
.
IV,
dedications as may be required.
_(11 )For rezonings to planned zoning districts, the specific requirements for submission of
applications for rezoning to such districts shall also be satisfied. Furthermore, all
materials required for a subdivision master plan shall also be submitted.
(12) Where conformance with the county's Environmentally Sensitive Lands Ordinance is
required, an Application for Alteration of Environmentally Sensitive Lands (Environmental
Impact Study) must be submitted to the Palm Beach County Department of Environmental
Resources Management (copy to City) prior to or concurrent with the submittal of the Land
Use Amendment and/or Rezoning Application to the City.
APPLICATION FEES
Fees shall be paid at the time that the application is submitted, according to the fees which
have been adopted by ordinance or resolution. The Planning Division will inform the applicant
as to the fees which are required. All fees shall be paid by check, payable to the City of
Boynton Beach.
Representative of the project must be present at all Technical Review Committee,
Planning and Development and City Commission meetings held to review this project.
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 8
V. APPLICANT'S OWNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
----------------------/
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED a0u,,,,,, WlJrJN,~
DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT:
, WHO BEING
.
1. He/she is the owner, or the owner's authorized agent, of the real property legally described in
Attachment A;
2. He/she understands the Future Land Use Map amendment application fee is nonrefundable
and in no way guarantees approval of the proposed amendment;
3. The statements within the Future Land Use Atlas amendment application are true, complete
and accurate;
4. He/she understands that all information within the Future Land Use Map amendment
application is subject to verification by City staff;
5. He/she understands that false statements may result in denial of the application; and
6. He/she understands that he/she may be required to provide additional information within a
prescribed time period and that failure to provide the information within the prescribed time
period may result in the denial of the application, ....
FURTHER AFFIANT SAYETH NOT.
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this2'''''day of(l:''1'''Ol/L- ,20 (11.-, by
Wilt.-!,.,..." Wh/J"'I q (Name of Person Acknowledging) who is personally
known to m ~r ho has produced pel ..1JL (type 0 ' entification) as
identific r n d wno did (did not take an oath.
Applicant's Signature
W\U,..1 ~ WI !A.~
Applicant's Name (Print)
Taking Acknowledgment)
';-ipf tf l.fJr.J
(Name of Acknowled r Typed, Printed or Stamped)
/LAJC1Ylyt
(Title or Rank)
7...<.7 ~~\l.. ~
Street Address
.
~'< ~,fL. ~3
City, State, Zip Code
Telephone ~ )2./4.. o/O"""?
(Serial Number, if any)
(Notary' Seal)
D. ;r'I
Q... . . .. DD01110411
.........
......1lnugII .
...... NaIIIy _. Inc. !
---.........
City of Boynton Beach
LAND USE AMENDMENT AND/OR REZONING APPLICATION
Page 9
VI. AGENT CONSENT FORM
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
----------------------1
BEFORE ME THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED 1t~;f4~ /I. .o,~Cr. WHO BEING
DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT:
1. He/she is the owner of the real property legally described in Attachment A;
2. He/she duly authorizes and designates to act in his/her behalf for the purposes of seeking a
change to the Future Land Use Map designation of the real property legally described in
Attachment A;
3. He/she has examined the foregoing Future Land Use Map amendment application and he/she
understands how the proposed change may affect the real property legally described in
Attachment A.
.
FURTHER AFFIANT SA YETH NOT.
Th, 'I''''''"' '"'~."' ''''"''"''''' "'fa, ~ Ih"Lit, of j:p/a/;-/ , 2O~ by
u// 11t17A? /I .~ (Name of Person Acknowledging) who is ~ally
JsDQ.wn to me or w 0 has produced (type of identifjcation) as
identification and who did (did not) take an oath. #' A '
~V-r;#I'i?e-
.
( gnature of Person Taking Acknowledgment)
Jd~/ r ,,~r-~/P/J
(Name of Acknowledger Typed, Printed or Stamped)
Owner's Signature
V/z/bA1 # ;;kr
Owner's Name (Print)
<<~ ~/&t~~ idr~@4//
. Street Acrcrress
~L,t gy ~c. ;t.fY?~
City, State, Zip Code
(Title or Rank)
(Serial Number, if any)
(Notary' Seal)
Telephone t15\ ~2A-...////
..'\11-."....... JOEL T. STRAWN
t:rA. "'I(f:; MY COMMISSION #. DD 090463
"",~.~, EXPIRES Februa~ 10, 2006
"'1.f.";;"r:.~-' BondooTnru Notary Public Undefilililers
....f""
JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT
Land Use Amendment
Arbolata Townhomes
.
The 16.087 acre property is located on the east side of Congress Ave. approximately one-
half (0.5) mile north of the City's boundary with Delray Beach. The vacant site has an
Industrial (IND) land use designation and is located in the M-I Zoning District. This
request is for a large-scale land use amendment to amend the land use designation to
High Density Residential (HDR). The property will eventually be rezoned to Planned
Unit Development (POD), It is the petitioner's intent to develop the site as a for-sale
townhouse residential community.
Surrounding Properties:
Current Use Land use ZoniDl!:
North Partiallv vacant and industrial IND M-I
South Various Industrial & Commercial IND M-I
East Caloosa Park R REC
West Hunter's Run LDR PUD
The property is located within a study area known as the 'Sou/hem Congress Avenue'
corridor. This corridor contains numerous M-I zoned parcels and is the subject of a
planning study by the City Planning Department.
The subject property is located directly across the street form the Hunter's Run PUD.
Hunter's Run is an established low density residential community which has spoken out
publicly in favor of their desire to have the subject property used for residential rather
than industrial uses. Considering the fact that the Policy 1.153 of the Comprehensive
Plan permits up to 50% of a property with an Industrial land use designation to be
commercial uses, the current IND land use is inappropriate for this location.
This property is located approximately one-half (0.5) mile from the southern entrance of
the City of Boynton Beach for visitors traveling north on Congress Ave. The support
documents of the City's Future Land Use Element identify this section of southern
Congress Ave. as, "a highly visible corridor" (pg. 119). As an important gateway to the
City, it is important to have a vibrant, high quality community located here that is
consistent in appearance and in use with the adjacent Hunter's Run development. To
continue with industrial and some commercial uses at this location is not consistent with
this strategy.
.4.rbolata T ownhomes
Page 1 af8
The HDR designation will encourage a residential use that is an appropriate transition
between the intensive nonresidential uses to the north and south, the municipal recreation
facilities to the east and the single family residential to the west. A townhouse
community at this location can be conditioned at rezoning to provide a buffer with lush
landscaping along Congress Ave. that is consistent with the extensive Hunter's Run
buffer. While a similar buffer can be requested of an industrial use, industrial users have
much less incentive to provide as well as to maintain such a buffer. Industrial sites are
subject to the vagaries of the local, national, and international business cycles. As is
evident elsewhere in the City, it is not uncommon for industrial sites to be vacant for
significant periods of time. A conversion of the subject property to owner-occupied
townhouse residences will provide for an important workplace location for employees in
the Southern Congress A venue corridor and will provide a residential community that
will maintain a high level of maintenance and appearance normally associated with
owner -occupied residences.
.
MARKET CONDITIONS
The City has an over-supply of property designated Industrial and is currently over-built
in terms of industrial square footage. A representation of this fact can be documented by
a review of the industrial market in the City. ONCOR International is an established
organization of independent real estate firms with over 180 world-wide offices that
monitors commercial and industrial real estate trends in local markets. According to their
year-end 2001 statistics, the industrial vacancy rate was II. 6 % for the Boynton Beach
sub-market. This sub-market market extends west of the municipal boundary to Florida's
Turnpike but does not include Delray Beach. This was by far the highest vacancy rate in
Palm Beach County, By comparison, Palm Beach County as a whole had a very
reasonable industrial vacancy rate of 3.3%. However, Boynton Beach industrial sub-
market's vacancy rate (11.6%) was double the second highest vacancy rate in the County
(West Palm Beach - 5 8%).
DEMAND
The excessive amount of property designated Industrial in the City is largely due to the
fact that the methodology used to determine the future demand for industrial property in
the City's 1989 Comprehensive Plan was based on outdated forecasting methods. The
Comprehensive Plan forecasts the amount of industrial lands that are required to meet the
needs of the population via a supply versus demand comparison. The Comprehensive
Plan essentially determines build-out demand for industrial property based on industrial
employment forecasts. These forecast methods were generally accepted at the time and
were based on an economic study prepared by Palm Beach County. However, since that
time, the County has recognized that the nature of industrial uses has changed such that
these employment forecasts are no longer the most effective method to determine demand
for industrial space. The Comprehensive Plan's employment forecasting method
overstated the demand for industrial space.
The County now relies upon its Commercial Needs Assessment Report to determine the
supply and demand for retail, office, and industrial space in their review of non-
.-lrbo/ata Townhomes
Page 2 aJ8
residential land use map amendments. This Report, which is continually updated,
recognizes that a "ratio method" is the most effective means to determine the demand for
industrial space. This ratio method was recommended and accepted by the County by
Ron Berger, an expert in industrial real estate who was recommended to the County by
the National Association of Industrial and Office Properties. This ratio method accounts
for both regional and local industrial needs. The ratio method used by the County to
determine industrial demand assumes that fifty (50) square feet (SF) of built industrial
space is required per capita. This fifty (50) SF per capita is the ratio that the County uses.
It is more accurate than the employment forecasting method which is too restrictive and
inflexible to incorporate the changing nature of industrial uses, The employment
forecasting method relies upon industrial employment of twenty years ago
The County's ratio method can be applied to the City's projected 2010 population based
on 2000 census data and as provided by the Palm Beach County Planning Division to
more accurately determine the projected 2010 demand for industrial property in the City:
.
. Multiply the projected 2010 population for the City by 50 SF per capita of
industrial space to determine the 20 I 0 industrial demand -
66,952 people X 50 SF- 3.347.600 SF of industrial sptU:e (projected demand)
In order to extrapolate the amount of industrial (IND) acreage necessary to generate this
amount of industrial square footage, a typical floor area ratio (FAR) must be established.
The City's 1989 Comprehensive Plan determined that the average FAR for built
industrial properties was 0.38. Using this FAR, there would have to be 202 acres of
Industrial (IND) land on the City's Future Land Use map to meet the projected demand
for the projected 2010 population. (3,347,600 SF.,. 0.38 FAR.,. 43,560 SF = 202 acres)
SUPPLY
The demand total above must now be compared to the projected supply of industrial
space. Based on data provided by the City, there are 248 developed and 497 undeveloped
acres of IND designated property in the City. This is a total of 745 acres. Assuming no
further annexations of industrial lands, this supply will remain the same in year 2010 In
order to determine the amount of industrial square footage that will actually be built from
this total supply, several assumptions must be made. Land area associated with project
right-of-way (ROW) has already been excluded from these totals. These following
assumptions have been taken directly from the Palm Beach County Commercial Needs
Assessment Report and will result in a more accurate accounting of the supply of
industrial lands in the City.
Assumption A: 25% of developed industrial lands are utilized for office uses. Therefore
this percentage of the approved IND acreage will be deleted form the supply,
{248 ac X 25% - 62 ac} 248 ac.(-) 62 ac. - 186 develoved1ND vroperty
Arbolata Towllhomes
Page 3 ~r8
Assumption B. 40% of undeveloped industrial lands will be used for office. Therefore,
this percentage of the undeveloped IND will be deleted from the supply.
{497 ac X 40% .. 199 ac.} 497 ac. (-) 199 ac. - 298 acres undeveloped IND property
Assumption C: Approvals do not typically build out to 100% of capacity. Therefore, a
reduction of 10% in the supply of both developed and undeveloped industrial
land is included.
186 ac. X 90% - 167 acres develoved industrial property
298 ac. X 90% - 268 acres undeveloved industrial property
SUM 435acres totalacres of IND land
Assumption D: Based on the City's Comprehensive Plan, industrial sites typically build
out to an FAR of 0,38, Therefore, the ultimate square footage of buildable
supply of IND is determined by multiplying the acreage of IND land by an
FAR of 0.38
435 acres X 0.38 - 7.200.468 SF of industrial ~71pply exists in the City
.
Based on the above assumptions, the current supply of industrial space is 7,200.468 SF.
SUPPLY VS. DEMAND
Using the more current and accurate supply and demand methodologies of the
Commercial Needs Assessment Report, the current supply ofland designated 'Industrial'
in the City will yield 7,200,468 SF of industrial space and there is a projected demand for
only 3,347,600 SF of industrial space. Therefore, the current supply of industrial space
outstrips expected demand by 3,852,868 SF.
7,200,468 SF supply of industrial space
(-)3.347.600 SF demand of industrial space
3.852.868 SF surnlus of industrial SDace
Assuming the City's 0.38 FAR for industrial properties, this translates into an excess of
233 acres ofIND designated property on the current Future Land Use map.
3,852,868 SF .,. 0.38 FAR.,. 43,560 = 233 acres orIND designated nronertv.
This over-supply of IND designated property in the City helps to explain the significant
industrial vacancy rates in the Boynton Beach sub-market. For comparative purposes,
one can review the supply of industrial property in the adjacent City of Delray Beach.
The projected 2010 population for Delray Beach (60,020) is very similar to that of
Boynton Beach (66,952). But while Boynton Beach has 745 acres of land designated
IND, the City of Delray Beach has only allocated 456 acres of land to the
Industrial/Commerce future land use category.
Based on the analysis above, the proposed land use change for the subject 16 acres from
IND to HDR will have no detrimental impact on the City's ability to provide services to
.4.rbolata Townhomes
Puge 4 018
its residents or industrial land to those who might need it. This proposal will in fact only
help to reduce the surplus supply ofIND designated property from 233 to 217 acres.
Responses to Land Use application items:
J/(g)
.
I) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be consistent
with applicable comprehensive plan policies. The division shall also
recommend limitations or requirements that would have to be imposed
on subseqnent development of the property in order to comply with
policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
The proposed land use amendment is consistent with numerous elements of the
Comprehensive Plan including:
Objective 1./7: The proposed amendment will minimize the land use
conflicts and help to maintain property values for the single family
community of Hunter's Run by removing the potential industrial/commercial
development of this property.
Policy 1.19.1: The proposed amendment will permit additional owner-
occupied housing at competitive prices at this location.
Policy 1.19,2: The proposed amendment will not impact the industrial
acreage that will provide for employment opportunities in the City. As
evidenced by the high industrial vacancy rates, the utilization of industrial
property for mixed use developments and the supply/demand analysis in the
previous section, there is an excess supply of IND designated property in the
City. Subsequent to this amendment, there will be still be an abundance of
IND designated property in the City to provide for its employment
opportunities. Employment opportunities are not being created with an over-
supply of industrial lands that remain vacant or underutilized. This
amendment will create immediate job opportunities for the construction and
supply trades. In addition, future employees in residence will be located on
this property to serve the community's area employment needs. This land use
change will ensure that the subject property, which has remained vacant and
unused for decades, will be utilized as its highest and best use.
Policy 1,19.4: This proposal will not prohibit the development of
industrial lands to maximize the linkages between complementary industries.
Any opportunities for linkages between the subject property and the
surrounding properties would likely have been accomplished over the
previous twenty years. The subject project will be planned to maximize
residential linkages between the Hunter's Run community west of Congress
Avenue and the municipal recreation facilities east of the subject property as a
residential in-fill site providing workplace employment housing in close
proximity to businesses located in this Southern Congress Avenue corridor.
.
In addition, the Land Use Problems and Opportunities section of the
Comprehensive Plan identifies that portions of this industrial district along
Congress Avenue, particularly those sites which are across the street from
Arbo/ata T ownhomes
Page 5 al8
Hunter's Run, should give strong consideration to the types of uses and
aesthetics in order to be compatible with single-family homes. Since this is
the only remaining undeveloped parcel that lies opposite Hunter's Run single-
family residences, it is clear that the industrial nature of this site has always
been a concern to the City. This amendment will resolve the incompatibilities
that the Comprehensive Plan presently identifies, As described in the
previous section, the upgraded aesthetics that the City will likely require at
project site plan review can be better implemented and maintained in an
owner-occupied residential community rather than an industrial subdivision.
,
2) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be contrary
to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district
unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts or would constitute a grant of
special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the
protection ofthe public welfare.
This land use amendment will serve as an appropriate transition from the more
intense surrounding industrial uses for the Hunter's Run single-family residences
to the west, the municipal recreation facilities to the east and will be a more
appealing gateway into the City along this highly visible Southern Congress
Avenue corridor. There will be no special privilege granted to the property
owner. The subject proposal will benefit the public welfare by reducing the
oversupply of IND land on the City's Future Land Use map, will permit the
introduction of an owner-occupied residential component adjacent to area
businesses and will provide for a residential component compatible with the
Hunter's Run single-family area on the west and the City's recreation facilities on
the east.
.
3) Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed land use
amendment/rezoning desirable.
There have been significant changes since the City's 1989 Comprehensive Plan
established the current IND land use. The nature of industrial uses has changed
such that the previous methodologies used for detennining the demand for
industrial property are no longer appropriate. As evidenced by the numerous land
use amendments in the City as well as City initiated amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan, the residential market has changed as well to pennit in-fill
residential opportunities within in the City.
4) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be
compatible with utility systems, roadways and other public facilities.
The proposed amendment will be completely compatible with the utility,
roadway, and all other public facilities. All municipal utilities are in available
adjacent to the subject property.
5) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be
compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby
properties or would affect the property values of adjacent and nearby
Arbo/ata Townhomes
Page 60J8
properties.
The Southern Congress Avenue corridor has provided a juxtaposition of industrial
and commercial uses east of Congress Avenue and residential uses west of
Congress Avenue. This amendment will permit an owner-occupied residential in-
fill project to be located close to workplace businesses and employment that can
be best provided by residents in close proximity to these employment
opportunities. The proposed amendment provides a residential transition between
Hunter's Run single-family residential to the west and the City's municipal
recreation facilities to the east while permitting the continuation of industrial uses
north and south of the subject property without interference and will contribute to
the stabilization and enhancement of values of adjacent and nearby properties.
.
6) Whether the property is physically and economically developable under
the existing land use designation/zoning.
The subject property is physically developable under the current land use / zoning
designation but has remained undeveloped for many years due to the oversupply
of industrial land area in the Boynton Beach sub-market. In light of the Boynton
Beach industrial sub-market's highest industrial vacancy rate in Palm Beach
County, this economic situation is likely to continue. An owner-occupied
residential in-fill project would provide an immediate tax base and immediate use
of this property compatible with existing commercial and industrial employment
opportunities, residential communities and municipal recreation facilities.
.
7) Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning is of a scale that is
reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a
whole.
The proposed land use amendment / rezoning is of a scale that reasonably relates
to the needs of the existing neighborhood and to the City as a whole. The subject
property is a perfect size for owner-occupied in-fill housing in close proximity to
area businesses and employment while providing a residential transition between
the Hunter's Run single-family residential community to the west and the City's
municipal recreation facilities to the east. This proposal further provides needed
residential inventory in the Southern Congress Avenue corridor and effective] y
reduces a portion of the industrial oversupply in this area.
8) Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed
use in districts where such use is already allowed.
Because of the land use diversity in the City of Boynton Beach, there may exist
other HDR approved properties where owner-occupied in-fill residential housing
can be constructed. This is a trend that the City has encouraged and will be
sponsoring in the foreseeable future. There are, however, very few, if any, HDR
approved properties in the City in this close proximity to workplace employment
centers such as the subject property and therein lies the uniqueness of this
location.
.4.rbo/ata TO"H'1lhomes
Page 70f8
IL (h.)
A comparison of the impacts that would be creaJed by the development under the
existing zoning with the impacts that woultl be creaJed by development under the
proposed zoning.
The subject property currently could be developed as an industrial parcel in the M-l
Zoning District According to the City's Land Development Regulations, an FAR of 2.4
is permitted in the M-l District. This would yield a potential 1,681,707 SF square feet of
industrial space that in all likelihood would never be utilized based on the preceding
analysis and the fact that it has been vacant for such a long time under its current land
use. Under the proposed land use designation. HDR, 173 dwelling units could be
developed. A traffic report is attached which indicates that the proposed use represents a
significant decrease in traffic on adjacent roadways.
ll.c.(6)
Comparison of water demand for proposed and existing zoning.
,
The City standard for determining water demand is 200 gallons per capita and 2500
gallons per day per acre for the non-residential uses. Accordingly, 83,000 gallons of
water could be generated with this amendment, whereas 42,017 gallons of water per day
would be generated under existing land uses. The effect of the property's additional
water demand on municipal utility facilities will not require additional improvements to
the existing water system.
ILc.(7)
Comparison of sewer demand for proposed and existing zoning.
The City standard for determining sewer demand is 90 gallons per capita and 2.4 persons
per unit The proposed land use will generate 37,350 gallons per day. Under the existing
land use, 37,000 gallons per day are estimated for the property. This increase in demand
is insignificant and can be easily met by the City's existing sewer facilities.
/Lc.(8-I2)
At the request of the Planning Department, Planning and Development Board, or City
Commission, the applicant shall provide additional information regarding the site.
Additional information will be provided to City staff and/or officials as requested.
Arbolata T ownhomes
Page 8 af8
Application for Land Use Amendment/Rezoning
AIboIala Tmmhomes
Congress Avenue &. S. W. 35" Avenue
Boynton Beach. Florida
Comparison of DweJIiDg Units Versus Induslrial Use
.
ITEM h. (I)
EXISTING POfENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONED INDUS1RIAL
SITE AREA: 100,152 Sq, Ft., 16.0811 Acres
SITE ZONING: Industrial
SITE DEVEWPMENT FAR: 0.60
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 420,451 Sq, Ft.
PROPOSED POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENT ZONED mGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
SITE AREA: 100,152 Sq, Ft., 16.0811 Acres
SITE ZONING: High Density, 10,8 Units/Acre,
SITE DEVELOPMENT: 112 Townhomes, 312, 1,500 Sq, Ft.
GROSS FLOOR AREA: 233,141 Sq, Ft,
ITEM h, (2)
USE PROPOSED FOR REZONING - moo DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
ITEM h. (3)
PROPOSED TIMING AND PHASING OF TIlE DEVELOPMENT
ITEM SCHEDULE - START SCHEDULE - COMPLETE
Land Use Amendment/Rezoning 10/2002 4/2003
Site Plan 10/2002 4/2003
Subdivision Plat 4/2003 8/2003
Pennits for Utilities and Draina2e 4/2003 8/2003
Bni1dinl! Pennits 8/2003 1012003
Commeru:e Construction 1012003 10/2006
ITEMh. (4)
Nor APPLICABLE
ITEM h, (5)
COMPARISON OF TRAFFIC GENERATED
EXISTING POTENTIAL TRAFFIC
SITE AREA: 100,152 Sq, Ft., 16.0811 Acres
SITE ZONING: Industrial
SITE DEVELOPMENT FAR: 0.60
BUILDABLE AREA: 420,451 Sq, Ft.
TRAFFIC GENERATION RATE: General Industrial 6,91 TripslI,OOO Square Feet, less 5% Pass-By
TRAFFIC GENERATED: 2,184 Trips per Day
PROPOSED POTENTIAL TRAFFIC
SITE AREA: 100,152 Sq, Ft., 16,0811 Acres
SITE ZONING: High Density, 10.8 Units' Acre.
SITE DEVELOPMENT: 112 Townhomes
TRAFFIC GENERATION RATE: Townbomes, Single Family A1tached Unit - 7 TripslDay/Unil
TRAFFIC GENERATED: 1,204 Trips per Day
,
ITEM h. (6 & 7)
COMPARISON OF WATER AND WASTEWATER DEMAND
EXISTING POTENTIAL WATER AND WASTEWATER DEMAND
fj/TE AREA.- 700, 752 Sf/, Ft., 16,0871 Acms
SITE ZONING: JnduslriaI
SITE DEVELOPMENT FAR: 0,60
BUILDABLE AREA: 420,451 Sq. Ft.
WATER DEMAND: 0.1 Gal/Sq, Ft. = 42,045 GPO.
WASTEWATER DEMAND: 0.1 Gal/Sq, FI, = 42,045 GPO.
PROPOSED POTENTIAL WATER AND WASTEWATER DEMAND
SITE AREA 700,752 Sq, Ft., 16,0871 Acres
SITE WNING: High Density, 10,8 Units/Acre,
SITE DEVELOPMENT: 172 Townhomes
BUILDABLE AREA: 1,500 Sq, Ft. Each.
WATER DEMAND: 250 GPO /Unit = 172 x 2,250 = 43,000 GPO.
WASTEWATER DEMAND: 250 GPO/Unit = 172 x 2,250 = 43,000 GPO.
ITEM h, (8)
EXISTING POTENTIAL POPULATION ZONED INDUSTRIAL
SITE AREA: 700,752 Sq, Ft., 16,0871 Acres
SITE ZONING: Industrial
SITE DEVELOPMENT FAR: 0.60
GROSS FL<X>R AREA 420,451 Sq. Ft.
NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES: 2,000+/-
PROPOSED rorENTIAL POPULATION WNED mGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
SITE AREA: 700,752 Sq, FI" 16.0871 Acres
SITE ZONING: High Density, 10.8 Units/Acre,
SITE DEVELOPMENT: 172 Townbomes, 3/2. 1,500 Sq. Ft.
NUMBER OF PERSONSIUNIT: 2.5
TOfALPOPULATION: 420
AGE GROUP 0-20 YEARS: 20%
AGE GROUP 20-40 YEARS 30"/0
AGE GROUP 40-60 YEARS 30%
AGE GROUP, OVER 60 YEARS 20"/0
Gerald B. ChurdJ. P.E.
Consulting Civil Engineer
505 N.E. 3'" Street, Suite 3
Delray Beach, F133483
PblFax (561) 266-9520
September 14, 2002
Mr, Peter Mazzella
AssiStlnt to the Utilities Director
124 E. Woolbright Road
Boynton Beach, Fl33435
RE: Availability of Water & Wastewater
AIbolata Townhomes
Dear Mr, Mazzella;
The proposed AIbolata Townhome project wiu be located at the southeast comer of the inter5eCtion of
Congress Avenue and S. W, 35th Avenue, a site plan is enclosed The existing 16-acre tract is vacant. A total
of 172 townhomes are planned ror the site.
A fire flow test was made at Congress Avenue and S,W, 35th Avenue, A copy of the flowtesl is included
The results indk:ate the availability of2,9l8 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi,
.
Based upon our present findings a Lift Station will be required. It is planned to connect to the existing 6"
force main in Congress Avenue,
Please confinn that this project may be certified for the availability of water and wastewater, subject to the
requirements and conditions of the City of Boynton Beach,
Thank you for your continued assistance.
Respectfully,
-G,--__..."'.M ,5 ~~~~
.~ ~
Gerald B. Church, P,E.
c;
William Wietsma
/
~~ ~ead 'JUre ~edette
FLOW TEST
Request Date:
8/26/02
Company: Gerald B. Church, PE
505 NE 3rd Street #3
Requested From: Gerald Church
Telephone Number: 561-266-9520
Facsimile Number: 561-266-9520
Delray Beach, FL 33483
SW 35111 Avenue & Congress Avenue
Location:
.
* DIAGRAM *
(Include direction, street names, hydrant locations, intersections and main sizes)
.lI ~ C I 3400 I
0
N
G H#<D
R
E
N S
S H#@
A SW 35th AVENUE
V I
E
Hydrant 1:
Hydrant 2:
Static Reading: 62 psi
Flow Reading: 50 psi = 1190 gpm
Residual Reading:
54 psi
Assign Date: 8/28/02
Tested By: FF III Woznick
Test Date: 9/12/02
Time Tested: 09:00 hours
AVAILABLE GPM AT 20 PSI RESIDUAL: 2,9189pm
,
IMAGEOl : FL-02-67444-Z 08126~ 10:36:3'7_
'"
Page 1 012
.,. ,
- -- ---- .---.- --'-
.- ~T'..:ui-tm 'i~~<iT-3S247'S .
.
-
jPllE1'AREO B1:1Ucoao .... IlETGlllIt '1:0,
JOEL T. 5"rIO\1OI. Esq.
3Qns5 i 7os~e%, P.A~
S51 S.E. 8tb street. SUiee .01
lJt!U'BY IM.~, ?1.addlS 31'1'4
t
1ilnI '100'2.3' l".. '137''1
.sun"""'." lJIf SIlSS
m. W li-~
"'"
~~
~c:;
.
This QUl~CLAI- aeeO,
19S7, by WILLIAM D. IlAI<P,
'to:
A;x@:culed 'this
'\'rU~ee O/1:/D
"It
{f'~ay of "",cetJl>er,
!11i77, ~irst party
DAViD ir"OOPBOll't BlUI'IPt,. ~ ~:a.::a.t~ i~ CClIIIlIIlOC Q.S to ..::1
9J'\4.1;~ide.d 5" i.n.tQJ:'8st ~ wlaOse "00.9'1: o:!.t::i.c:e add:es.s is post:. ozf.ic€
Box 1167'. RoCk B~~1, South Caro)i~A;
DONALD CYRUS 8A~SR. as Tenants in Common. as ~o ~~ upeiviGed
$% in~eEest. ~hose pos~ office oddres5 is ?os~ cf~~ce &Q5 11576.
Roc", Ilil1. So"~ CaJ:'Q1i,,'" ",,0
~5 ~, uS Tenan~S in cannan,. a5 ~~ an un4i~~~Qd 5~
i.n't.b~es.1:, 8$ C:Q.'S~2n. fOl: ~ A. ~'JiP, 'l.:maC!l::: tbe p).oriciS
'Oniforsa Cif:t.. t:,Q ~_,",a ad.... ~ ~- o:{:E..~ .v!Jl.~~... \..... 'l~_
office !lox 111>71>. IIDCk Rill, SO'..t:h cuo1ina: ...Hh (JOIJALD C":iRllS
llAK.i:a (Jesigtaated as .socc;essor C1I$t041a;:-. i -=, for allY reaJiQn ~
MAltLENE '8A1tD :Ls "U:aa~le 't.o se7"....e.
,Collec~~velY ~eferred ~o as s~d ?ar~~. Wnerevcr
y,se4,. 1Ies"e1.n ~ te~ -'!J.rs:e party" 3:rU:l ~$eao...a.
par~y_ ~bal~ ~~u4e ~i~la: ana plu~al~ hei~s,
leqal represe~eati~S~ aDd aSS1ghS of indi~idu~~S~
an4 ~be 5UCceSSOrs GD4 aS$i9n. of corporati~nSI ~~~~e-
ever the context: so c.dJnits or r~1X"es.'
.
,
, \
~TftESSSETft, tb~t the sai~ first party, for and i~ co~sie-
.raticm of the S\Dl. of 't1Dl 1510.001 Dollars. in haftd paid :.y \:he
.~id. second party.. t~ recQ~ v:tuitreof is bex-eby ac~:".owlec19'edr
does hereby r:em:i.se~ r81.e4SGI a:1.4 qui.ot-c:laLa "'Q;I:t.O t.hG.\' segopc
party foreverr all ~he ri~htr ti~l& interes~, el.~ ana deC3nd
which ~ said first paZ'ty !'.as in ana to tne z:>llowing ee-
scribed lot, piec;l 01' parcel of l~nd. situate lying ..:-.0. beir.q
ib the county of pa~~ aeach, S~ate o~ Yloria~. to wi~:
A crCl~ at land l)-ing in ~hc SQu.1:.hweS." 1./4 oj; the
'NClrthvest 1/4 of Sec:t:j,ol' '5 ~ TOMnSbip "" S(JP~'h,. lla.nse
43 BaS't., Pa1n. ~C!b coentY', F1o:r14a, ~lng more
f\l11Y desc;r;;i.be4 as 'faJ.].qw~n CQAtlence iI't ct=e wes'C.
O'Iarter corner of slUAl $eC'~i~ S, thence '61Dri:.!:1. :1,00 08' 20.
East, i!l~ aS$m0e4 belazing'. along t~li' *nexly :x:undar~~ of
said SectioZl tieing also elle "enterline of Consress t",..,,"o
(SJi 80"1).. 51Z.10 fee"t tc;a Q. yo;Lnt: 'Chence run dt:a l:ast,
?aJ::lL11s1 wi.'th t:.he sou1:he:'li' bou:1\4ary of <t.he af.cre~:!.d
l\nIll' 1J4, 53 feet. mQXe er less 'to a point. o~ int:ersec1:igr:,
with the Easterly 'X'i.qb:t.-ot'-....a.y l.ine of" congl:6s.s )".,..eJl~.
the ?oint of 1leqinning of the herein d.esc:dbeCl parcel,
tllence cOD1:inue due east, 11110.32 feet t" .. point ir-
the Eas~8rly bouneary o~ tha a=oresa1d S* 1/4 of the ~~
1/4; thence South 1- OS' 30. West, al~9 said Eester11
boundaxy ;;72.11 feei: ~o " )?Oiot, thence Clue Wes1: 1300.24
fee~ ~o a 9Oin~: ~en~e .Qrt~ 1- oS- 30. EaS~. 572_10
.feet "to 't:b~ l"oint of: 93!gin.:);i.P9~ LESS 1::.hEr Nor't.b 30 fee-/:.
t:.blU'Oaf~ -
plu5 ~. So~ 286.'4 fe~t of the gortb 572.10 fQe~ ef
the S_t:h 1144.90 feet of t.'1e SQut_st QUute!: ISli 1/4)
of tbe NOZthWC.n: O11areer !NIl 1/4) of Se=i= 5. Toomship
46 $o1Jt.b. JtAft<<e -lJ Eila~. 'paleA aooch CQUP-ty, Florida ~ LESS
1;:...... lIest 53.00 leet. t"areof a:>d ;:..SSS "'".. sa:01: 0;50 f__~
~reof ar-c ~~~$ ~h= so~th 10 feB~ ~~e=eo~.
f I
,
.
-
9'd-l00'QN
-:J-{O::l fJ~ ~5---1old6t>:21 2002'!3E'd35
~"""""~.,-,,. G~ 1!::IC d3S
.,.
lMAGEOl : FL-02-61444-2 08126/2002 10:36:31am
.
I
1--,
Pa:e2ot2
;r ~
-
U\'1S '100'.l.3'''~ '1:::7.2
!;~~ii'fr a ir':"~f \.....~ 15 ~:J.i.m.r ?i
NO'l'E. The said fir"t; party is herl3:by r..servinc; a:o unQlvided
8S~ in~ore=t in ~he ec..~ribed property.
'I'D IlAVE AND TO JlOLD th(! same oecse--her with all ar..ci s.in9ula;~
~be appQrteDaDCeS ~he~Qnto be1ob9ip9 O~ in anywise appertaining,
8bd .11 ~he e&~a~, ~i9ht, title~ in~eres~. lian, eqQity and .
elaim vha't.soever Qf t:he sua fir$1: port}", ei'tber .in law OJ:' cqui'ty,.
to 'the a:Ply proper tI$e" ~n'efif: ..-aiD behoof or the $:lid seeonc
pcq-ty fo:!'e....r..
X~ WITM~&~" the s~14 :irs~ ?a~ty h~3 $ig~d L~d
sealed ~hese p~esene8 the day and year first above written.
ar.d delivered
1MWZ~r=-&;:ISD-L1
'r/T'O 1/l3!77
STAT!!
Of 5".:;1. _ ~n/,NIf
,
v<(?~t:
COUN'I"Y OP
1. ItEltEay C3Jd'IFY -that on thi.e; a~}' ~ ttefore D:.E! a.~ Qffj,f;er duly
aQ~ho~~~ea in che S~a~e .rorQ$~i4 and ~ft ~~e C~~~~ Qzor.esa14 to
'taJc;e .eJmowJ.eclgemeots,. pe~son..lly appebred wil~ia;J:l B. BakeX'. t.o.
~ known ~o be ~ p~lBon aescribeci ift aJld \d'!o exeeutea ~'l)e fore-
g-oimJ instrusaent: as 'h"ust.ee.. ;;L~d l:u:kllOWledgea before me tha-c hI!
c2Ceau'Cd'd die saae..
WITNESS my b~d an4 offiei~~ $e31
i~s~ aforesaid ~his ~ day o~ D~c
Expire ,,-,'Y.JF :J&1'7J.j
, "\..~~_.-..~.:,..:"
y .~ ,~:;...r
~----,..--
'nITs I2MVIn'AllCE IS fOR. JIG, CDIISJ.DfJlATJOII JlIIQIII A 1...-&-..;. 'J:O A DEllUlClAllY
or DE ftIIst AIIIl 11", l~ lOr ISUB.JECt" 10 ~ S""..tIllP 1:1\1:
IOIIS_ 'I'D IllItE 1l~.OI 4(2)(a) :m4 0.>.
~ '';-100 "ON
3HOJ ~ ~15----Wd0S:21 200C'OC'd3S
..5:
~
.IM:AGEOl : FJ...02-67444-2 0lII26/2002 10:36:37am
....'" ............ 11110 ........." ....ol. 011_, ........
-;") eo..j.v.r " 4",'.
Ibis ~,.,.... WItS pnpONI:I ~
..,( Ia%rvB. AlA '-'".~
lIIarrantg .lttd 15TAT1I!OIlI' F4l"-SE(11III ,",02 I.S.)
oWdr." P.o. ~ :2
J!ut PalJA -. PI. 33402
""
(\-..1
.....
r::-.
_............. ..... 'ill<
60,.01 ........~
"80,'11_
Vi!P-
WIW:lIlI8. 1WCIiR, joUled I7f hie wif.., MI\flWm _
c"
Di .... C...., 01 YcJm . So,a" of Soutb cam1ina . ,,......... _d
1IIU.IlIII1I. --. -.., __ _. 4' _ 0-, 13, Wl7, .. 0II'III/IiII, vLt:h fIall
/iClOIltta04~ to <leal. in __ _ _'...........~ x.l~, "" _po;t._,
. to ~ -...... to sell. or to 1ea... or tD _, or ctI-..l.so to ~ ...a
110I1 ' '1 _ "...u........oftlJe__ilRInal__-l;r._~JsJO
...._. I ~Seii.th Ciz:01itWt.-2971~
".r:o..Irol .if-..f B:IIIttlnt.-l~- .~41.
<,
1'1",1
.
--Mltr. Tho. taid 9..... fa, oltllll i" cocuNl~m DI the .- at
~~ __ ani OO/lllO 1$10.00)--------- ---........
ClInd ,..... a,.d ~ COftfJ~~ Rt saG 91'01I1.,.. ill ..., "';.,1 .,. ~ gtoaIMI. lit. ~ ..1mtoI . ,..,.
C111:~ bM 9I'QIIIed, borgcMMd pet .... ,. .... ~ g.1'01IIIcc. GfId gfQftln's Nib _ GtPigm ~. _he loIhlwIng
d-=.&.ad Iaad. dkJoI.. Irflll!l ... bIno in .hJm Bear:t1 c-.,. R-I.... ......:a..
.
: ~
. ,
.. - 1!llI!JB1'1' .. 1IEP.lnO. ~ Oi' F1VE IS) I!NlalI.S
SlB1E'r lO~, ~ci<ns, """"""'" of _ and taes for: l:OO yoar 1980
_ _floor.
.
.,
Iy~
.Va
o-d _d tft'l"Or duoc!II NnriIr (..Ifr 'WO".M1 ,..., ai"tle fD s.oid fClnd. (t1Nl _'II del64d If. __ CIIfI'IiDlt ... 1......fuJ, dGim.:r. 01 CIU
peIIoGM \ -fla.1tJOI1'"
'" "QJ9lf1or -' "~ ore IIoed' Iw fll'llUllH ot plll<<Jl. g, UIIIl"" "Qllitlll.\.
.
JI\ 1I1i1lfl18 m~rtllC, .......~ "'" "_ ... ....""".. h.... ... ..01 tho
SotMd. ~.. ~;,. Cl~l PfU~
-,1/ d.. nt'L1/>O,.
n..... . "If /)7="..... r
ISooII
-,
pili' Un:t abOloll wI.....
(So.1l
...
....
~ STAn: OF rusu:DA.
- COIl"",, CfI'lltllIlBl\al
0.... . HeIny CfI1IIiT dMat.. thit.., bLlore ,., _ oIf'a, ..... CIUdIiI'iM 11;I folc.. _CUI ~~ ... ~ o~
e IIlrUIN II. lND, ;IcWBI1:Iy his !rife. l~ IW!llR
~ to ..,. "-""'.,. b. 1".-n-IJ.dIuct~ I. ond ....~ ~ ... roM8Diltsil ~ oH '-~.d IMr~ _ III'"
.. toa. y~..~ .
.., WIJMSS.. _... .......... "'... C_..... '- ..... .~~~'!Il,('7 ~"'J)!g 1 Jl
~ ,. SD. 1fI~~Ml., ~
",,~....... . ..... ..l~\f'"~~,..~i. ~PuI4c
. ~ !~aeeti~;f ~
~.;. .:VaL'~ic.~J
. .. "'..,...... ....-..~.:i/
..... .::::t::U)~".
fS<oI1
10'-'1'1'" :>..:'.:. ~ ,'j -~_:.~~ '\'-"'~
l . .~. . .: : ". . '. .JI'I~ .{
.' .... ~;. :' :Ut"~;-:!'!.J
.
Z'd
1OO'ON
3-lO::J Nt:JH9t::JNOW In*ll
Pagel~4
:21 2002'OC'd3S
~GEOl : FL-02-61444-2 0812612002 10:36:37am
.
=~
lof 3
!';l=11
'Ib0 ilOUtil 431.50 _ of tha IIarth 511.50 fat of tho l1a9t 339.93 _ of tile
,_t 392.93 totl: lU ~ at right _leal of.... _.,.. ~ (r.N 1/4)
ot tM Sou_ _""" (&If 1/') of Sccb<;n 5, :IllIohSbip 45 _. ~ 43 _c.
Pallo -. """,,ty, 1'k>ricB, k= _ ~ _ ...\db lOgin lOt _
- _of _ _~, therlce....~, iill:ln9' the Soutb
line of the ....~. a otisl:onaa of 20,~ !aor. to l:1le-1>>Ine of ~
of " CIll:'Ie, tz:IIIClOIe Ix> tIle~. haYing a "I'Iius of 20.0 faet ...:i a centrl1l
""91<: of 51'08'15'; ......" __1,., l\1cn<J tho -= of _ _. a dis-
tance ot 1l.81 foot: to . p:>1nt ill a Une _t lD said """"'" _ __1~
a1cnq &>id ~ line . <U.stonoe of 20.42 taet lD the Polm of Bog;""'Ulg.
SUl>jec:t Ix> an _t for utilities puxpooes """" the _ 11.0 f...t tl1oreaf,
lO::ntain1nt;r 3.36....... more or 1es>l
Parcel 2
'1b<> _ell 431,50 l<:et: of the _ 511.50 fioct of the &1st 124.9B feet of the
- U62.78 r""t las __ at r.iqh1:. "'l91ClSJ of the JOtO:ol_ __ IN'l1/4l
of W __ qoo<tor {SIt 1/4) of Slaccion 5, 'itllmshil' 45 Satth. ~ 43
SIst., l'a1m Beadt CbJn~, PlCll:-ic!a.
(COntain1no;! 1.2. ....... IlIXe or less)
SubjQOt to i!V\ ea.scm:mt 12.0 feet. 11'1 width, fo1; utilities pxcposes. tt'e cen~
~.ulll ot llJUch i:a 1ICI:e p1lI:'ticulady described as: fo.l.J.a,s;
~ at tl'a -...... """* of t:I-... _ described ;o.m:al, tl1er1co SoiJthe<ly
alcn;t the ~li<st: line of tl>> _ ~ibor:I parml. a .1_ of 6.69 faet: lD tilt>
170_ of Bogimiaj 0Ild tho: said _u.... of tl>e 12.0 _ ..........., _
~r mak1."'4 in mq,le ldtb the ~ eoat""..o of 9D.3215~., _eomed. fttm
North to Batt, am a.l.Clng the :said cet\t:l::l.ine of I:he 12.0 feac ~t:., "
<USUh:8 of. 124.99 feet to aft izJ~ with tbe: Ea&;t line of the ab:tve
~ _, and the l!l'Id of the antor1lne of tIlo n.o foot _to
-
-
....
7i'''''''"-l3
= South 'Jl.SO feet of t110 IIorth 511.50 feet roo ....."'A at l"iIabt Dll!Jh>s1
of <be lbl;t._ __ lb1Ii 1/4) of <.ha __ quorter ISl'l1/4); less tOO
~/QSt Uli2.79 feet o:hetoof (as ......"",,,S at right ~). AU of I:l1e _
J.y.inq in SeetiQ'l S, ~.., South, b1ge 43 .&ast... PQl)n Dea:h Codnt..1, FJ.oric:a.
(Ccntain:lnq 1.8~ """'", """" or ku:sl
5ubjeel: t<I an _ 12.0 teet in ..idth. for utilitios _, t:l>! CI!Jlter~
line of tohi<:h 10 _ po:tia>lar4> _ "" fallCfols.
C'<:lm>>oc;.og .t - _ _ of the _ <Ios<<itled -=,1, tl>In<e Sollthcrly.
~ tha >leat u... Of tIJO -... _ patoll, a cl1st."""" of 10,37 feet to tI.
[Io.int 0< ~ onci the said _lina of l:h2 12.0 fAo1C _b _ '
!/;oster1y. ~ illllllJllle>d.tb tho ~ _ of 90'32';2", -....5 ~
NonIl ... !:osl:, lJnd alcnJ tile saJ4 """terl!lle of 1M !Z.O file" _, a <Us-
....." of 190.89 _ to an .int:araac:ticn ".i.t:h eM liU1: IJna of "'0 o:.Ud -..
'l=iIr tlI>I 1/41 of I:l1e _t -"""" 1SIf 1/4) or 5ocI:ion 5 :nil the ens of
the O:!n'te!'line of the 12.0 fQQt ea&"arBlt..
Q..
CO>
N
-
...
ll:I
--,;;-......
Tou:I:"l1h.1
-=l--f()1"'~IN.JI..JVH).II
.Page 2 of 4
1.J.,...fQbo?T ~/~c;::t,:-....(':I~
)MAGEOl : FL-02..cJ7444-Z O8/21i/2002 10:36:37am
.
.-
~l\
10:3
P"""",,l'
'.a1e SOuth 1144.0 tat of ti>> _tho!s~ ~ (SN 1/4) of .... _ opct..
~ 1/4) of SllCtial 5. 'I'a.I1sIl/.p 46 _, Il<II1qe 4J _. 1'iUII _ ClouotjI,
Ploddo. Ie.. tI1<: _ 53,G feet~, fa< ti>> right of _ of O:mgmss
_. or>! subject to the I.oloo '*=/I ~ Di.tri<:l: ~ right of Ii8y
ror tal:Ol:al Car.::l >>>, 29 _r tbo SOo>th 5.0 r..,~ -..or. lass
11. t.rGd: of la1d lYin9 in tb<! 50'- o.e-o.lIrta' ISll 1141 of tho _.t
"""-o...-tar IliW 1/4) of Sec<ia> S. or-.Itip 46 South, Range 43 _. bolrq_e
fully _ ... follows,
CDlt~ at the West ~ IW J/4J ~ ot Secti.cn 5; ~ N l"OS'Xltl B,
an 0GSUEd l:eoIrinq, Akwig """ _II' l:tonlaly of oaio! Skti.:>n !:ioUl'J also tie
c:ent:erlin<: of Oongoess __ (SIl sa1), 1144.23 _ to .. po1nt; _.... <luo
l!:o.t, --.uti witl\ tf1so ~ ~ of the ._M _ ~
~'" 1/4). 53 _ ""'" or 1_ UJ . pnJlf: of ~ion ~;,th l:b> /lo$;:&<ly =l<Jht-
oNtay Uno of ~ -. thoa", ~ """ SlIst: lW,l.BO feet to tho "'int
of 1Ir.l9';--~~ ~ t:.'xt~ f'r : .~ ~ ~ ~ cD: Dst, I&J.U
ftIet;"'.IOinl:jntlJc_1y. '"':yafebe.~""","of_.~
(51/ 1/4) of tile .....I:l.....sl; ~ 0111/'). _ $ 1"05']0" N, 0lla1g' oaitl
Eo.....ly ~. 572.10 _ to a po;int; t/lB>O!! _ West, 650,12 toot '" .""int,
t:herlcc N 1'05(30" E:, Sn"lo .feet b;) thlt Pa:int of lb31nn1n<J.
(Oool:iW>illg 8.54 aaus)
SUbjoco to "" ea_ """" .... across tile follow;"'; clasc:d.boQ ~~,
'" .trip of land being 60 foot in wJdtb lying.in the Il>/ 114 of tb9 >IN 1/' of
5Ee~ion 5, 'lI>moIUp 4li South. :Range 43 Qst:, I:bIo --=llM or said strip of JAnd
locln.; ""'" ~y _ os folloe'
Oonmonol! lit tIlO _ 1/' ~ =-!II nlA ~,5.. ~.....rowW>" E
on on ~ Iurlag iloog. ti,,; weSt""ly ilI>uDSaty of .iI1l:I sectia'I . di.toIlOe of
57~.12 teoe to a !'Oint, t:heJ>:e _ _ . _ of 53,Ol fcot to . !'lint on
the eocistin!! _ly ~.l6lbt of _ 1inB of ~ _ _ _ EOIIlr DE
Ill!lmllIIl/G of thIII -....t1mool _lire, _........... due _ . <li_
of 1300.32 feet 1:0 . pol11t... tIr _ 1.ino of tile SIll 1/4 of t:Ila !if 1/4 of soiA!
5_ 5 and tIlf: lO.Ilft'CV _ of !aiill>!IIl:orllne,
Parml II i..!. also c}QSCl:ibed ,1G:
11>
....
....
A tr'lCt of land J;,.\ng' In !:be 511114 of tho! III 1/4 of 5ecI:ion 5. 'l>>Inshlp ..
south, JorvJe 4) East. ~ """" tIlUy "",=>I>!d .. foll...,,,
Cblnren::e at tho I\\oot 1/' soetiCll'l comer of .... Seetion 5, _e _ !lost .
<lis...... of Sl.Ol __ to. point on 01>0 exilot:lD; ~ right of ""'Y l.lm
or ""- _ on<! tilt> RmI! re __ of the _ deoa:ited pon:al,
l:hoooe " Olo os'zo. It ~ _ ....... _11' llM " di.st::Mcl> ST.!.l2 _ to
a pJint~ t:hma! dge $ISc a oAi'...."W:Q of llOO..12 feGtt; to a pgirtt:. an 'tbB Jb&t:
line of tho Srl1/4 of the I'M 1/4 of llld4 s-c:tJ.<a 5, _ S 01005'30" "al.aq
""icl East line a iSfGtanOO of 512.11 feet Ix> a P>iJ>t: ~ _ Wast a distoaco
of lJIlO.<< foot '" "'" "'Dll or _: contaiJ>ing 11.09 _. """" Q< l.o&s.
-
11. ..."ct of lard 1~ in I:l1e Sool_t 1/4 of the No_t 1/4 of Section 5.
_nip 46 so.~. Ilahge 0 !lOSt. tclng """" fully deac:ribod ... roue:.,.,
A.
1;1
....
-
II>
lID
p'd
too'ON
3-105 Nl:II-fflNOW ~5
l'age3of4
WdB17:2t 2002'0E"d35
JMAGEOl : ~444-Z 08!ZCi12OOZ lO:3fi:31_
,
.
.
BlOIIDI'r A
) of 3
l'><l:el 4 , _tlnuorl
a:.mance at t.I1e t'lest 1/4 OO:tllKof said SeotiCln 5. thonce" 1'08120. E, I!WI.
...- 1:<lor1nq, 0l1cng the _y ~ of sa14 ii<:e>ion 5, l:01ing al""
- __line of ~ _. lU4.~3!eot Ix> "p;>jnt.. t:henoo _ -.
53 lot>. ..,." or less "" . po;,.: of ~ ..1"" the eac;i.s.1:.i.ng ......twly
rigbt-o~ lJne of ~ __ on4 oJ.so tlIe -.... of ~ of <lie
heoUn.. .;;......... ~, ~ c::zmtime. _ Dst 649.90 teet: 'to ill !;loint.
- S 1'05'30" " S12.10 _ to "p>int:, .- _ I\lo6t 650.20 n.tt to
" I"l!nt of ~.... od.th lllo .FQ"",aicl_ly right-of....ay line of
Cm;ress AIJGDUe, ~ N 1608120- E aloAg 3ai4 J?aat l..1.ntl, 572.11 ~ to
I:hel'l>lntof~.
~ to an ........".t 0I1U _-..so '"'" _~ ~ P"'!"n;y,
A Strip of lAnd being 60 he<: In IoIidl:lt lying ;,. the Sl~ l/4 of the. 1/4 of
St!c1:ion S. ~ 46 SCUth. lIm"1Q 4l llaot, !:he """""'l.ine of Hi<! shi.p of
Illncl te.iDJ..",.. _l:ic.1J.arly dl!$aiIlod "" follooll,
~ at. t:be J0!St 1I4 SRc::r:.iCft a::&DIiar of AW Sect..i.Qn S: then<::e H 01008'20"
2 '" an _ bGtinq ~ the _ly I:ooMa>:y of _ S<:ct.ia. " cl!$l;ancR
Of 512,12 foee t.o a !'Dille, _ <1-... EaR" 4i8tan<:e of 53,01 feet to a lCint
"" """ ~ _lyr.igll.of""l'linoof~_andtherolll'1'OF
Bmn.."lCIG of ""'" ~CJnOl =-llM; t:IIonoe _t.imB due East a distan.:c
of 1300.32 _ to " painr "'" tilt 2ast. 1Joc of the lW l.i'4 of the Nit l/4 of ..id
Sed:icn 5 Ilnd the P01lII"Q!' _ of sa1d _linl>.
""=>1 S
IDts G am Q\, of .BYm) tIEAOi, a SIIbdi'\l'isim of ll1nds in Paba geach O:Q\t.y, Ploriea,
~ to ~ P.!M; _ OIl file in the ott1ce of ~ Qe<lc of t:ha Ciml11:
C::urt: in IlncI ,or WL1.oo leach C<oo#y, !'lari<la, III Plat !look 20, _ 1,
'1CllE1'HER liI1'JlI all riparian anil li~.l r~ts ~1ni!l9 tnu_
...
...
...
I:L.
o
...
-
0,
=
. IIfCClI'O ""'1Mll
. .lj.M 8El\CII COlllIII'I'. '"
,10"" 8. DUIIIlLf
Q.Eft~ CIKUIT CllllAr
~'d
3,jO:n~ ~lS
loo'ON
Page4of4
Wd6t>:21 2002'OC'd3S
cy-- q I . OlD
Time and Date ofMeeti, ~ I cL"'" /17 P 2 .::;..;'"
Those atten<;ling meeting: CL
"hAc' Yr~1 Ir;~~ '/:/';
/
Applicant's Name:
PRE-APPLICATION CONTACT QUESTIONS
;fh Cf
UkikJ4.-
d ' ('
cb'-1'./"-
~rf[ c(VI-/~J 7~..{j..7
~7V- y'J-(13
1. HAVE YOU SPOKEN TO ANY STAFF MEMBER ABOUT THE PROJECT?
Yes No
(IF YES, HAVE THOSE STAFF MEMBERS BEEN SCHEDULED FOR THE PRE-
APPLICATION MEETING?
STAFF MEMBERS NNvIE:
2,
LOCATION OF PROPERTY (CROSS STREETS/INTERSECTIONS)
,
~,
,/ E c1t:", ~, ~ 1 r_"-
WHAT WOUJ.D YOU LIKE TO DO?
V NEW PROJECT
BUILDING EXPANSION OR MODIFICATION
CHAt~GE IN PRlOR USE?
IS THE STRUCTURE CURRENTL Y VACANT?
VARIANCE TYPE: ) ') ,
POOL OR SCREEN ENCLOSURE Z.C T IJL,,~hL<h
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY? /
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY?
INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY?
DO YOU KNOW THE ZONING CODE DESIGNA TION~
k
/}ol. ir~f 7; <,<-fi~~c< ,9-
,
4.
TIME MID DATE PREFERRED
5,
HOW MAt'N PEOPLE WILL BE AT THE PRE-APP MEETING~
Note: Tell the persoll that someone from the Department will call them to COil firm the meeting.
..................................................................................
. Pre-application meetings should be scheduled for a minimum of one (1) hour time module, and should be scheduled
no less than two (2) days prior to date/time ofrneeting. If urgency is sensed, discuss with J\fike or Lusia.
. I\leetinl!s may be scheduled:
~ronday afternoons
Tuesday all day
Wednesday all day
Thursday mornings
Note: Lusia is not available for Tuesday a.m. meetings,
and Mike is not available on Mondays between 11 :30 a.m. and 2:30 p.m,
S:\P lann i ng\ Planning\Pre-applicationcontactquestions.doc
,
cO El7 ' 'Jill - Icc, ' ,<o'If;:, (n iZ 1.
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING LOG
I TEHE:
2-:0tJ
I
I
I
I
ATTENDING STAFF:
ATTENDING AS APPLICA1'iT:
PHONE:
NAlvIE OF APPLICAl'iT/CONTACT:
ADDRESS:
PHONE:
PROJECT ADDRESS:
FA_'\::
I FAX:
I
PROPOSED TYPE OF USE/OCCUPAl,CY:
I DATE SUBMITTAL RECEIVED: I DATE DEi'i'IED:
COM.l\1ENTS:
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
,
--.-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
,
J:\SHRDATA\P!anning\SH.-VtED\\YP\PROJECTS\PRE ~PPUC.-\TIO'\S :\lEETL.......C LOGS\Pre-Applj.:~ci<Jn ).{~e!jn~ Log.do..:
PRE-APPLICATION MEETING
SIGN IN SHEET
PLEASE PRINT
MEETING DATE:
TIME:
ATTENDING FOR APPLICANT:
NOTICE: The purpose of this conference shall be for the staff and applicant to discuss overall
community goals, objectives, policies and codes ass related to the proposed development and to
discuss site plan review procedures. Opinions express at the pre~application conference are not
binding for formal review purposes. Additional staff comments may be forth coming based on actual
laDS submitted for review.
City of Boynton Beach Attending for Applicant
Attending Staff
f,\ .
--~
I
I WIl.Lt~~ lJ>\~~~
I
I b:.d
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
C::" h~' n:.,(
,
I
I
i
I
I
J:\SHRD.-\TA\PlA."I;'iI:'lC\SH.-\..RED\\YP\FOR\IS\PRE-APPL ;-.rEET~G-SIG:'i [.".- SHEET.DOC