CORRESPONDENCE
4-02-2004 2,28PM
FROM PLANNING AND REAL ES 561 434 8187
P.1
~OOLDI&.A
lIJ · ;o:l
~ 0 q
"J, &""""=,,,J L'-
~ BEAOi COU~',
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
PLANNING DEP,"RTMENT
3320 FOREST HILL BOIULEVARD - C331
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406
FACSIMILE TRANSMITfAL
PHONE: 561/434-8020
FAX: 561/434-8187
Number of pages sent (including cover page): 3
TO: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner. City of Boynton Beach
DATE: April 2, 2004
FAX NUMBER: 742-6259
FROM: David DeYoung. AICP, Planner, SDPBC
COMMENTS: Attached please find a copy of the approved school equivalency
application and provider form for Serrano Beach.
cc: Angela Usher, AICP, Manager Intergovernmental Relati'Jns
S~\P"anninQ\f'ublic\lNTERGOV\ConCUIT8ncy\ConeurrenCy Determination Letters\Faxes'F04022402Q.DOC
4-02-2004 2,29PM
FROM PLANNING AND REAL ES 561 434 8187
P.2
TH~ SCHOOl. OISTRICT OF
PALM B~ COUNTY, FLORIOA
f'l.AI\I>llNG~
3300 FORESTHILLBLVO., G-t10
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406-U13
(561) ~20 FAX: (561) 434-8187
ARTHUR C. JOHNSON, Ph.D
SUPERINTENDENT
April 1, 2004
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: EQUIVALENCY DETERMINATION - CASE NUMBER 04022402Q - SERRANO
BEACH
Dear Mr. Hudson:
The Palm Beach County School District has reviewed the request for an Equivalenclf
Determination on the above referenced project.
Serrano Beach was approved for 92 multi-family units by thE! City of Boynton Beach on April
1, 2003. The proposed modification to Serrano Beach to convert the approved 92 multi-famillf
units to 47 single family units will generate an "Equivalen'I" impact on Schools located 11
Concurrency Service Area (CSA) 19. Consequently, the proposed conversion will n<It
increase the number of school age children in CSA 19.
Attached please find the approved Palm Beach Coun1y School District Concurrenclf
Application and Service Provider Form for Serrano Beach.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact me (It
(561) 434-7343.
Sincerely,
~~
David L. De u , A~
Planner
cc: Chip Bryan of Julian Bryan & Associates
ene.
S:\PlanninglPublic\lNTERGOV\Concurrency\Concurrency Determination Leners\Equivalency\Q04022402.doc
AN EQUAl. OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYE R
4-02-2004 2,29PM
FROM DLANNING AND REAL ES 561 434 8187
P.3
, L...... 11 '.1 4\,l
I ""''''''- '.II-
3-02-2004 2, 2GPM
FROM ~ANN1NG A/I() REAL ES 561 434 6187
P.2
m
~
l1'Iese_Of.tIItel"""-~c....r,
ra...-.G l ..~
,____l>IlO
__-......-..u
I_CIOl}_"(S61)_
_....Q....."'..."Il_.
~tll ~_
n.e__~__C!eunl1
~_"'r. . .&~-""",,
".._If SIIldI:_~.,_..................~....tw..........................,......,.~~~...,.. .j~ ,..,...........
....,. r .. .""~wi'lhir.......(II)......,.."'......J............. Alii . 1 ....--................0IIe7SP
_....~OIIOt*~OrIII'b.,...,.....~I . .11..~.tw_.~~....-OtdrL
__1'1_"___ ./
!I""- . (1__ l"'_~
(.........."......DlII T r ~~'IlfM..... [ JT..,....
,..C ....A,..........!b....4 ...--.-""'"' D,h.. .... ......,.,..._._,'.....,....~
.... ___,,_...._~.....__"'l
~~,~~~.-Li____
,.... .."..,...... - '--"....""'~ ,.,......JIt-
__ ~rHf.1WO ~(.Oi. t~~) .. I ~ 'T' C.J~ '1 ~nIon f!'fnrl-;
~~~~ OOQ&.l.oS'~( 00 DOc:I ~2D
-
TctI!~......".
~... ..
C_-:'_"'7~-"
...
I~~
~-
~;
~~~""
M.F to~F;:
..~.....-.~~~""'~MI,..rIf.....lofmlt..__..,~,..,.,.
.,,__.._..._--- t:;AC2iOl5
(,~--~e.. .
=~ ~ ~~2i~Y
~""'t: Q,t NIl, -'!l71 ,.~ ~. ::J9~- ~~
I ~ ___........ Of' ....
----
.... ~ ~..............,.,... It.. ~"1fr:I
'Z.}J.OLJ
-
,.,. ~~tl~FiftMI;
-0"
-;;-" ~:e~~
--,-.-..-
NO(tfre.tnt~*",""""~Olill'!Ill
DodI:a"Dlllllc~~
-~
V.'4"'1QI",~~'IrlIt...~UYtrIoOf~(c"osl"'~ ,
= '--~-_._~--
_ l-=--l'IlIift"'m~E_"'~_ie\* ,.,~
........ 0
-6-
~
3-02-2004 2,25PM
FROM pi ANNING AND REAL ES 561 434 8187
P.1
Pkonc: (560434--8020
Facsimile Transmittal
[ax; (560434-8187
. N' of P"ges sent (including Cover P"ge) ~
~Or\
DA~E: :3/2/0L{
TO:
fAX N"
r(~k
7Lf2-~2S0
~
FROM:
COMMENTS: _O~ l'V\J\.... ~ on. ~
~~i~~~:
~J2.RJ) ) fill fA ~~. ~ ~OLX
J-Jo-<k~~(rY\-Q a:t Lf~4.- ?\~7 -
T~ s;o j11JJ~ I
cc:
H'\I)ATA\WP51\I)OC'2
3-02-2004 2,26PM
FROM pi 4NNING 4ND RE4L ES 561 434 8187
P.2
~rJ
'" . '"
~ Q ~
~-~
"Tlle $chooI Di&bic:tQfP;a;lm Beach County
Plannlng_
3JZO tol'CltHillBlvd. ClIO
WClit PaJm 8e;ld1,. Ft. 3:w05-S313
1'100.'" (S61)4~800 0.-($01) %3.3877
Fa)I.1 (S61) 434-1187 1;1("(561) 4J4-8S1 S
AttentIon: Concurrenc:y
The School District of Palm Beach County
School Concurrency Application & SeIV;ce Provider F"nn
Ins~~ Submit OM COPY of the COl'npl*d appllcatJon and ffllI$ fer each new r.$~1 projec::t requiring oil d~itlation of ooncurren~ fqr
sdKr9l$. A~. . t:.w. vnll be proVided within fifteen (13) working d&)'S or~ipt ofa cotql.appliWton. A&~ is oot~ ~ is valkl forOMyeM
hm _ (lfi$$ll&ftCe. 0Dcc ~ DevcloprYlellt Ol'def i$ i~ the OOr'IC\llTCl1oC;Y t1etsn'ninatiO'ft shall be valid ~tbe tHe ofUlt DeNelopment Ocdc:c.
PIeiJ.&V d'I<<;k (v) type of ~pfieatiaft (one only): /
ll"""""""'~'" I JCo_~ lo1~rl!qW>ol.ll'Y
{ )~Scb;IoI~dliticsOdermirmtion ( ]f,.etterofNol~ [ JT;mll~
Fees: ConQ.llmney ~inetlOfl or Adequate Sdtoot FOIIc;.ilitiC5 De-~ln~o(1 ($200.00 fat more thatl 20 UfUb,/20 UI'Iits Of" Ies$ $100.00);
Equill;llency ($125.00); Ex*"'ption or &Mter of No Impact {$2S.00}; Time Extension ($75-.00)
~~~~;..~;~!'d.;:i};":i-'.f'~I0f't~4~
~ IIIt11cn /I cqPFt>fth~$lIUJIifx(ffl8;t1Rp[tm, W1~r~,d~Jutltool Cf1l~1I1fr1r-
ProjoOl....... "'_.. r"", f.. A~ Ir> /~(.f", CM Se;v~) M.....;.....,,' Il_ 3. J' 11. 0\.1- '- _ /l.__ - ,
~r ,..-~V '-'~\ . ~ 1--' t''trJY1 'J..{J.[..i'J
P..."..".Co_' N......' (peN)' 00'I,?45?;o1 00 me 5"02.0
F:--~-'"' -, -,-- - . - - ._,
".:.i )"J:. ""';y. -~'_h _c _, L~~J
~n I ~ofSl.lbjectProplllrty:
e..
" j]~::~~~,; L~:;:;'~
I
C"r a -I >Sche;ol]
~:..~.;" ~" ,'~:
$e(:aoofT own:;"'ip{Range
Projad ___oe
TotaINllmberofU~
WiU the Project be Ph~7' (YIN)
~encY~S6Mee Area (CSA)
. 'I,: ':~~' :r.X1
Single Famity
MI,II~smily (othm"th3n ,apartments)
~ments{3~ Of less)
HlghRissApar(tnents
..... __ (AdUlls Only)-
~~
'.lOIl\ 9 2. -
) I.t?;
cJA,"-'W- ~
fv1,F m~f"
$/''I>f'
~ .7
If7
1
to If a~ieatlle. ptsasc attach a Pha~ing PliJn ~110~ng tile ~bef and type of 1,JI'Ii\$ to fecer/El certificate of oeQ.JpSnCy yearly.
. A Restrictive Covenant is rB:Quire<l rOf age-restricted com(!'l!,.lt~$. 5 A c 270 V3
QWNEJtSHlP, AGENT IN'FOaMATIQN;
""""'."..~ ~~"""
~:&N**, .lJ.clJ i--.~,.~.I~
Maltillg' MdrtsSl ~ .J\.~"~I~~
~Q.~L."" ~ '"'7:-A-:>-.;:L
T....._"......~ =1 ?-AI,fl'( 'nN_, _ ~/- ::>/11- ne,,~
I henllby certify tfMt ~9nt~ or InforJTliJtiOfl.
-,
or p1'i11l$ $UbmltWd ~h iIlrt' true and !;QlTC:d to the bftt Qf my
2.11.0'-/
Do"
'~.".~
I: 'i " ' , ' , . ~
O;jlb! Appllg~ Filed:.
Re'rieWed By:
p .,
PetltiOJ1 Num~'t":
TIUc:
'ftj~~~tYL-
cant p;llY lhe filing fee to )'IJu?
Yl$ (Please ilIttaeh proof of payn\er\Q
NO (If no, the ~ic:3trt. must pay ~ School D1sb1Cl
Oate&'nroe.Rt!l:ei'r'tlf:
C'~N:~:~~~~~
I Y8rify t!'lallhe pr*d compl~ wlth 1h6 a,dQpI~ Level of $e!'\lice (lOS) for School5
J veritYdtatthC'pn;l~twill ~ompry witll ttw IWClpl.l:d t.e'..~1 of!=;~'t (LOS) mr ~hooIJs.\lbjl!d: to the :l.ItIlebtd~
1 ~ veri1Y!bat lht project will COI'I'IPly with ~ ado'pl~ Level of~\vice (LOS) fl>l' ScboQl~
S<:l1qolDistridRepre$mtati'lrt
1>0"
-8"
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
Planning & Zoning
Division
TO: Inga
FAX: 434-8187
FROM: Dick Hudson
NUMBER OF PAGES: (including
cover!
2
DATE: 3/2/04
RE: Serrano Beach
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you.
TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT
TIME
NAME
FAX
TEL
SER.#
01/09/2002 03:59
PLANNING
5517425259
BR0L3J875851
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
01/09 03:58
94348187
00: 01: 05
02
OK
STANDARD
ECM
ADMINISTRATION
21 COUNTRY ROAD
VILLAGE OF GOLF
FLORIDA 33436.5299
(561) 732-0236
FAX 1561) 732.7024
t/
~
1/-;:; \ 1'l?
CxJ.h ~\.\..s.1.'Y'
.:~~Vf1l[Y. DEPARTMEN-v'\,k f-.
~ _ L~1)'''''J4-2918 ",7 :;
UTILITY ?;PAATMENT 1,)- 3 .,u
(561/ ,37.7995 )
RECEIVED
Mr. Lee Wische, Chairman
Boynton Beach Planning and Development Board
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FI 33432
JUL 23 2003
CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE
July 21, 2003
RE: SERRANO BEACH ANNEXATION (ANEX 03-001)
LAND USE AMENDMENT ( LUAR 03-005)
Dear Mr. Wische:
We have reviewed the proposed Annexation and Site Plan for Serrano
Beach, and we would like to compliment the developer and the staff for a
project that limits the traffic impacts and demand for City services by
reducing the number of units on the property, yet increases the tax base
for the City.
There are a few comments we would like to provide to ensure that the
project is compatible with the surrounding neighbors. They are as follows:
1. The proposal calls for a 10 foot landscape buffer and a 10 foot
building setback along the west property line adjoining the Village
of Golf, for a 20 foot total and a 15 foot setback along the north
property adjoining Silverlake for a 25 foot total setback. The City
PUD regulations require that perimeter buffers and setbacks within
PUDs must mirror those in abutting development to ensure
adequate separation between buildings. The rear setback
requirement in the Village of Golf is 25 feet, the same as Silverlake.
Therefore, to meet the City regulations, the rear setback for the lots
along the west property line must also be increased to 25 feet.
2. The developer is proposing 7 model homes that would be available
for development on this property. Two models are single or one
story units and 5 models are two story units. The Village has
restricted the units along the Village's west property line to one
story units, and we are requesting that at least half or 7 of the lots
along our border be restricted to the single story models to avoid
the potential for a solid wall of concrete 30 feet high. The residents
of Silvertake have requested that the lots along their border also be
restricted to the single story models.
3. There was no mention in the plan of any street lights. If street lights
are to be installed, the Village would like to request the lights not be
located so as to shine onto any of the adjoining residential property.
Decorative front yard lights, at a height of 5-6 feet might be more
suitable in this development.
4. A general comment regarding the upkeep and maintenance of the
fence and landscape buffer, as the trees and plants will be in the
rear yards, there should be a provision in the PUD for continued
maintenance as well as a requirement that the property owners not
be allowed to remove the trees along the landscape buffer. The
hedge along the fence line is to be installed at a height of 2 feet.
The hedge should be allowed to grow to a height of 6 feet and
maintained at 6 feet.
The above points are being requested by the Village of Golf. There are
some general review comments being provided as follows:
A. The developer is proposing to construct an entrance with a
new bridge area outside their property in the LWWD
property. Provisions should be made for continued
maintenance, as the LWOD maintenance schedule is not
suitable for residential development.
B. The residents of SlIverlake are requesting that the lift station
be relocated from the northern boundary of the development.
A possible location is along the eastern boundary, as that is
adjacent to the school drainage area and would only require
a minimum of additional piping to reach the northern
manhole connection point.
C. It is not clear from the plans that on the south side of the
property, along the front of the development, that the fence
should be located on the inside of the landscape buffer, so
the landscaping faces the street, and along the rest of the
property the landscaping should be on the homeowners side
of the fence.
D. The drainage in this section runs from a high point of Military
Trail to a low at Congress Avenue. The entire area was
previously all muck and as Silverlake was developed in the
early 1970's, the drainage regulations were not as stringent
as they are today. The drainage plan needs to be reviewed
very closely as this area has historical drainage problems.
Thank you for your consideration of our requests. City staff will be
available at the hearing to address any questions you may have.
Sincerely, 2 ~
~otos
Mayor, Village of Golf
Cc: Mayor Broening and City Commission
City Manager Kurt Bressner
Mike Rumpf, Dir. Of Planning and Zoning
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
Po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.c?m
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. Newell. Chairman
Carol A. Roberts, Vice Chair
Karen T Marcus
Mary McCarry
Bun Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addle L. Greene
County Administrator
Rob~rt \Velsm3.:1
"An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer-
, printed on recycJed paper
March 7, 2003
ATTACHMENT 1
(fZ~I?'>="~=[Q)
C.'-" '.
\, ,t,.r.-,,::";'
J . -'
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Serrano @ Boynton Beach - Bach Property
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the project
entitled; Serrano @ Boynton Beach - Bach Property, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The project is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Use:
New Daily Trips:
Build-out Year:
Hunters Golf club, Summit Lane, West of Congress Ave.
Boynton Beach
None
98 MF Residential Units
686
2004
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the
Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Sincerely,
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
"
Masoud Atefi, MSCE
Sr. Engineer - Traffic Divisio
cc: Pinder Troutm Co tting Inc.
Fiie: General- IPS - Mun - T rafic Study Review
F :\TRAFFIC\ma\A.dmin\A.pprovals\030222.00c
Attachment 2
DACH Property
Trip Generation Comparison
#PTC03-13
5/30/2003
tripgen Comp 03-13 5-29-03jo.xls
Page 1 ofl
Approved Daily
ITE Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Residential Multi Family 230 98 Dus 7/DU 686
Prooosed Daily
ITE Total
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1 ) Trips
Residential Single Family 210 47 Dus 10 /DU 470
Net New Trips
(216)1
Approved AM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In 1 Out 1 Total
Residential Multi Family 230 98 Dus 0.51 /DU (17/83) 91 411 50
ProDOsed AM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In I Out 1 Total
Residential Single Family 210 47 Dus 0.75 /DU (25/75) 91 261 35
Net New Trips
(15)1
Approved PM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In I Out I Total
Residential Multi Family 230 98 Dus 0.62 /DU (67/33) 411 201 61
Proposed PM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In 1 Out 1 Total
Residential Single Family 210 47 Dus 1.01 /DU (64/36) 301 171 47
Net New Trips
(14)1
(1) Soun::e: Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County Unified land Development Code (ULDq.
(2) Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition.
FACSIMILE
CIl Y OF BOYNTON BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
Planning & Zoning
Division
TO: Kathleen Chang
FAX: 233-5365
FROM: Dick Hudson
DATE: July 8, 2003
NUMBER OF PAGES: [including
cover)
15
RE: Serrano Beach Traffic Study (
Kathleen,
The attached Concurrency Tratfic Impact Analysis is a copy of the one Khurshid reviewed in
April, and had no comment on. When the applicant reduced the density of the project and
resubmitted his application, I saw no reason to request an updated Concurrency Analysis,
since the Planning Division had "no comment" on the more intense development proposal. I
have also included the updated tratfic equivalency statement from the traffic consultants
for the project, and County response to the TPS Review, even though I realize that you are
interested in impacts to the 2020 network and not Traffic Performance Standards.
If you need anything more, please call.
Dick Hudson
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you.
ITRANSMIS'~ION IIERIFICATIOt: REPORT]
DATE,TIME
FAX NO./NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESULT
MODE
07/1'8 09: 4E:
923:'5355
00: 1:3: 03
15
OK
STAt.DARD
ECM
TIME: 07108.'20133 1'9 !il
~IAME:
FAX
TEL
~;ER. # BRCiE:?..J40948<1
DACH PROPERTY
CONCURRENCY TRAffiC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Prczpared for
D.R. HORTOtt. IttC.
Prczpared by
PlttDER TROOTMfitt COttSOL TlttG. IttC.
2324 Sooth Congrczss fivcznocz. Saitcz 1 H
Wczst Palm Bczach. FL 33406
(561) 434-1644
1\ /
(~V
~ \\~. \
\ ",,\ \~'IJ
\ f~ \\?h
A :tfl! M. Troutman, P.E.
Flor~:~1gistration #45409
~ IU
FEB I 9 2cm
#PTC03-13
)anoary 30. 2003
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPT
,
;0j
~
DACH PROPERTY
CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Introduction
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a
proposed 98 multi family DUs in the City of Boynton Beach. The purpose of this study is to
determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Article 15, Traffic Performance
Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC).
Site Data
The site is located on the west side of Congress Avenue as shown on Exhibit 1. Access to the
proposed project is via local roadway connections to Congress Avenue. Year 2004 conditions were
examined for this analysis.
Existing (2001) Traffic Conditions
Exhibit 2 provides the 2001 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the surrounding roadway
network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of Palm Beach County.
Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor of 9.3% to the MDT volumes.
These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the
adopted LOS 0 service volumes.
Project Traffic
Trip Generation
The daily trip generation rate used for this project was from Section 10.8, Fair Share Road
Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC. The Institute of Transportation Engineers
(ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition was the source of the peak hour trip generation rates.
Exhibits 3 provides the daily, AIv\ and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed
development. For Traffic Performance Standards purposes, based on the net new external
Report 03-1] 1-29-03
daily trip generation of 686, the Test 1 radius of development influence is one (1) mile. The
Test 2 radius of development influence is one-half ('/2) mile.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
A directional distribution was developed based on review of land use patterns and existing
travel patterns. Exhibit 4 shows the assignment of daily and peak hour project traffic as well
as the project impact percentage (% of daily adopted service volume).
Future T raffle Conditions
Roadway Improvements
The Fiscal Year 2003-2007 Transportation Improvement Program from the MPO of Palm
Beach County and the Palm Beach County Five Year Road Program were reviewed to
determine if any roadways within the study area are scheduled to be improved. There are
no scheduled improvements within the study area.
Background T raffle
Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of future
background traffic volumes. Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 5 for the surrounding
roadway links. Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County, was reviewed. No
Major projects are projected to have a 10% impact on the study area roadways within the
analysis time frame of the proposed development. Background growth projections based on
historic data account for traffic associated with the committed developments in the area.
T raffle Performance Standards Analysis
Test 1 (link Test)
This fir.;t test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links required to
be analyzed are projected to operate below adopted level of service standards. Roadway
links within one-half mile and those outside one-half mile with a project impact greater than
1 % of the LOS D are required to be analyzed. Exhibit 6 shows future daily, AM and PM peak
hour traffic conditions for the analyzed roadway links. All analyzed roadway links are
Rl..'pvrtOJ-1J 1-29-03
2
projected to operate above the adopted Test 1 level of service standards, therefore, the
requirements of Test 1 are met.
Test 2 (Model Test)
The second test examines traffic conditions based on model projections that are developed
and maintained by Palm Beach County. No roadway links within one-half ('/2) mile are Test
2 deficiencies; therefore, the requirements of Test 2 are met.
Intersection Analysis
Major intersections for which a proposed development adds more than 10% of the total
traffic on any link connecting a major intersection are required to be analyzed. No major
intersections meet this requirement based on the proposed development's impact.
Oriveway Volumes
AM and PM peak hour project driveway volumes are provided on Exhibit 7.
Conclusions
This analysis shows that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Report O]~ 13 , .29.0J
3
o
OLD BOYN rON ROAD
c
<
o
~
U
z
~
~
:5
[
BOYN TON BEACH FJOUI FV,\RD
5
z
;;
<
~
~
~
u
z
o
u
~
~
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
COlF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE)
~
LAKE IDA ROAD
DACH
PROPERTY
o
~
<
:;;
:;
o
~
~
~
u
<
~
NTS.
>
<
f
~
;;'
i g
[
01/28/03
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION
~
[
o
010 BOYNTON ROAD
N.TS.
80YNTON I3fACH IiOUUVARD >
<
~
0
0 ~ " ~
<
< Z j I
0 >
" <
< ~ "
U ~ ~ 0
3 ~ m 8
" ~
" u ~
> z "
~ 0 u
u <
~
6lD
51620
48900
32700
4550
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
I
I
I
GOLF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE)
~
2l
105860
14900
9840
1390
6lD
]5540
48900
31210
4550
I 2l
:127760
II 14900
,11880
1390
I
I
I
[
6lD
27810
48900
27810
4550
LAKE IDA ROAD
'lD
19920
32500
20450
3020
LEGEND
6lD
54800
48900
3300 0
4550
"0
190-150
32500
1771 D
! 30~O
610 - ROADWAY LANES
35480 D- DAilY TRMFtC AND LOS
48900 . DAllY ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
33000 - PEAK HOUR: TRAffiC AND LOS
4550 - PEAK HOUR ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
01/26/03
EXHIBIT 2 r::::l
EXISTING (2001) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ~
DACH
PROPERTY
....,...., "',--
0""')(,-
M ~ 0 0
B ~ r.,o-
N .
t-cD~
It:: ~a...
S
~
,:.,
o
c
.
""
n.
S
CC
~ 0
OJ '.i:j
0.'"
o ~
~ Q)
M Cl.. C
Q)
:0 I u ~I
~ u 0.
x <( .<;:
w... 0 I-
'" '"
<Xl <Xl
'" '"
-9
~ .<;:
l- I-
-
S
<IJ
:0
'"
c: ::J
0 0
.'" ~
~ "-
<IJ
c:
Q)
~
~
.? ~ ~
::l ::l
0 0
~
c: <Xl <Xl
<IJ 0'> 0'>
c:
2
E
<IJ '"
~ u...
::J
-0 ::l
c: ::;;:
'"
-' .!l1
c: <Jl
-'
cu ~
-0
.;;;
<IJ 0
'" I-
~
::l
o
I
-'"
'"
Q)
Cl..
~
<(
0 0
'3 '" '"
0
I-
.~ - -
.". .".
.= ~
::l
'3 0
0
I-
0'> 0'>
c:
-
!:!. ;;:;
<Xl
<IJ ~
~ "-
'" S
'"
c: ::J
0 0
.~ ~
-
Qj '"
c: c:i
<IJ
U
.e-
.=
~ ~
?- ::l ::l
0 0
~
c: <Xl <Xl
<IJ
- 0'> 0'>
-=
~
E
<IJ '"
~ u...
::J .'"
-0 0;
c: ::;;:
'"
-' ~
c: <Jl
-'
<IJ <(
-0
.;;; I-
<IJ 0
'" I-
~
::l
o
I
-'"
'"
Q)
Cl..
~
Cl..
- -
'" '"
19
0
I-
I.e- 0 0
N N
~ ~
I- ::l
19 0
0
I-
- -
.". .".
-=
!:!. ;;:;
,.,
<IJ ~
:0 "-
'" '"
c: ::J
.2 0
:0 ~
N
Qj '"
c: c:i
<IJ
U
.e-
.=
.?- ~ ~
::l ::l
0 0
~
c: <Xl <Xl
<IJ 0'> 0'>
c:
2
'E
cu '"
~ u...
::J -
-0 0;
c: ::;;:
'"
-' -;;;
--g <Jl
-'
cu <(
-0
.;;; I-
<IJ 0
'" I-
0
9
2-
.
."
0
U
C
.
E
n.
0
"
>
.
0
."
C
.
~
."
.
C
'c
:J C
>- 0
c ~
0 '"
0
U ~
.c .c
u ,;;
. !
.
~
c
~
.
-5
(;
~-
. "'
.
~ >-
u '"
.
n. .
.s .
c
." '00
. c
0 ~
'" c
~ .~
. ~
.c
~ <5
.'" Si-
c
~ .
0'- eo
<0 '0
.
3 :'j
5 ,
.
~ .E
;; ;;
u u
5 5
0 0
~ ~
:: is!
[
o
~
COlF ROAD (SW Z3rd AVENUE)
OLD BOYN rON ROAD
o
<
o
~
U
~
~
~
<
~
s%
"
3
3
0.23%
SITE
lAKE IDA ROAD
s%
"
3
3
0.10%
LEGEND
60% . PERCENT DISTRIBUTION
412 - DAilY PROJECT TRAFFIC
30 . AM PEAK HOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
37 - PM PEAK HOUR
PROjECT TRAFFIC
0.84% - '" OF DAilY ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
BQYN TON BEACH BOUllVAl-1:O
N.TS.
~
o
~
<
~
"
o
.
~
~
~
u
~
~
>
<
~
~
~
~
>
<
~
~
oc
U
Z
o
u
SO%
HJ
"
I "
10.70","
<
'"
o
[
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
60%
'"
30
"
0.114%
sr.
"
3
3
0.23%
01/28/03
DACH
PROPERTY
'0%
m
20
"
0.56%
)U%
20'
"
"
O.4Z~
S%
"
3
3
I O.10~
EXHIBIT 4 r::::l
PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ~
#PTC03-13
9rowth 03-13 1-27 -03jo.xls
1/29/2003
Exhibit 5
DACH Property
Historic Growth
Daily Volumes Growth
Roadway 1998 2001 Rate
Golf Road
West of Congress Avenue 9,805 10,586 2.59% /Year
East of Congress Avenue 11,316 12,776 4.13% /Year
lake Ida Road
West of Congress Avenue 20,555 21,992 2.28% /Year
East of Congress Avenue 16,124 19,045 5.71% /Year
Congress Avenue
North of Golf Road 31,798 35,162 3.41% /Year
South of Golf Road 33,349 33,554 0.20% /Year
North of lake Ida Road 25,882 29,906 4.93% /Year
South of lake Ida Road 29,908 35,480 5.86% /Year
(f')('f)(/).......
""'0 x-
MOO~
o ~;,;r..-
UC>>OQ)
I-~'Ol
a.......<O(Q
~ C';'lo....
~
'"
~
rO
o
"'
'in
>-
m
c:
'"
E.!!!
OJ "'
o..~
0 '"
'" ct c:
~ <(
:0 I ~
~ U ~
<( "'
X OJ
w 0 >-
;;;
.!!l
VJ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
-'
.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
u 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
9- '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
<C <C <C <C ... ... N N
'" ... ... ... ... ~ ~ M M
U
-;;; ... '" <C '" '" ... '" '" ~
0 N '" N '" '" '" '" M
" N ~ <C N ... ... '" '"
0 '" ... ... N ~ ... M N
>- ~ M M M ... ~ ~ N N
Ei
u M N .". '" .". ... .". .".
Q) .". ~ "- a M M M M
'0' M .". N N
>- ct
-'
<(
0
- :;; ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
~ Q) - 0 M '" '" M <C ~
<::. "': N ~ <<! '" ~ ~ "-
::< ..... M 0 .". '" N .". N '"
0
0
N
.<:
~ OJ
E - N '" 0 .". '" '" N
0 ::l N 0 .". :.0 .". ... M '"
0 "- '" '" '" .".
0 M N ... '" <C - - M
>
00_ N .". '" 0 '" '" N '"
c:
.'" 0 '" '" 0 <C <C "- '" .".
"' 0 - '" '" .". '" "- '" 0
'x '" M '" '" 0 N - '"
W ~ M M N M - - N ~
~"' 0 0 0 0 0 0
.;:; Q) -' -'
"' c: -' -' -' -' N N -' -'
'x '" '" '" '" '" .". .".
w -'
'0 '0
:;; :;;
> >
Q) Q)
Q) Q) :; Q) :;
" ::l 0 ::l 0
'0 c: c: CD c: CD
'" Q) Q) 1>: Q) ~
0 ~ > > "'
-" '" <( Q) <( Q)
c: ~ u "' b "' b
-' 0 .g "' '" "' '"
Q) Q) Q) Q)
lJ '0 '" 19! '" 9! VJ
9 '" ~ c: 9 c: 9
0 0 0
'0 & '" 9 u Q) u '"
'" '" " ::l
0 Ui :2 '0 9 c: 9 e:
'" 9 '" - '" Q)
~ Q) 0 '<ij > '<ij >
'0 -" '" I~ <( ~ <(
'" '" '" "' "'
15 0 -' "' "'
:2 '" '"
'" 9 19! 19!:
0 ~ Q) ~ lS
0 0 & -" e: c:
~ '" i 0 i 0
lJ Ui -' u u
Q) Q) '" Q)
::l ::l " ::l '0 '0
~ e: e: e: e: '" '"
Q) '" '" Q) '0 '0 0 0
> > > > '" '" '" '"
~ <( <( <( <( 0 0
'0 "' "' "' "' '" '" '" '"
'" "' "' "' "' ~ ~ :2 :2
0 Q) '" '" '" 0 0
I~ 9!: ~ ~ Q) Q)
'" lJ lJ -" -"
e: e: e: e: '" '"
0 0 0 0 -' -'
U U U U
VJ
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00
-'
.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
u
9- '" '" '" '" '" '" N N
'" '" '" '" M M 0 0
'" .". .". ... .". - - M M
U
-;;; ::< "- "- "- M '" .". - '"
" 0 .". "- M M '" .". '" '"
0 '" - N '" 0 M - 0
>- ~ M M M M ~ - N N
'" ~
::l
0 ~ "- ... '"
u - M M M M
I '" M M N -
'0'
" ct
<(
w
0-
w
lJ :;; ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
i::i ~ '" ~ 0 M '" '" M <C -
- ~ "': N '" <<! '" - N "-
W ~ 0 .,,:
> M ... '" N N '"
<( 0
0
N
.<:
~ Q)
E '" N '" M M -
0 ::l .". '" M - <C '" .". N
0 0 M - .". '" "- - - M
>
00_
e: ~ 0 - ;;; 0 .". <C '" -
.'" 0 "- N 0 <C .". "-
"' 0 N - "- M <C - 0 "-
'x ~ M M N M '" - N -
W
~"' 0 0 0 0 0 0
.;:; IV -' -'
"' c: -' -' -' -' N N -' -'
'x '" '" '" '" '" .". ...
w -'
'0 '0
:;; :;;
> >
Q) '"
Q) OJ :; '" :;
" " 0 ::l 0
'0 e: e: '" e: CD
'" '" OJ ~ '" -
0 > > "' > "'
-" '" <( <( :!! <( Q)
c: u "' u "' b
.- 0 .~ "' '" "' '"
-' '" '" Q) '"
lJ '0 ~ 9! VJ 15; '"
9 '" <' e: 9 e: 9
0 0 0
'0 & '" 9 u OJ U '"
'" " ::l
0 Ui '" 9 e: 9 e:
:2 '0
'" 9 '" '" '"
1:' '" 0 .- > '<ij >
'" <( <(
'0 -" '" ..= I~
I~ '" '" '" "' "'
0 -' ~ "' "'
.D :2 '" Q)
0 '" 9 ~ I?] ~ t;;,
'"
0 0 & -'" e: e:
~ '" i 0 i 0
lJ Ui -' U U
Q) OJ '" Q)
::l " ::l ::l '0 '0
~ c: c: c: c: '" '"
Q) OJ OJ '" '0 '0 0 0
> > > > '" '" '" '"
~ <( <( <( <( 0 0
'0 "' "' "' "' '" '" '" '"
'" "' "' "' "' ~ ~ :2 :2
0 '" '" Q) Q) 00
9!: I!j! !j! ~ '" '"
'" lJlJ -'" -"
c: c: c: '" '"
0 0 0 0 -' -'
U U U U
u-i~
-
E.:.c
:.c.:.c
x x
~ ~
OJ '"
OJ '"
V> V>
s~
) "- .-1--" ~~_':'.':-":
-I~" .
tl ~s--'_."':,.-:::---"":7'---:-~"~- l T
~um"~f"~"~::~'i";."'-T"rO'J ~#'/~::~:.:;;.
~-~ ' . ''''''''~-J'..) ~J ~_#'~l:..::;~~..
- no \. "_..,,,,,-,-_ _ '_m_
.a.~.....
~=--~:
_._:~~
It....~7--~--:-.........
1 1--\ --r
I
V_-',-T_ .-.~ ....-------~~ ~-r+-j ,.
. ...~;-::~~~:.l.-,.,",/~-:,.t-.: .__,~~LJ_.
"
_--,__l.~~ ...~:':."':~v~.__
,.".,
C.3':.:-'~:,-~rZ'.'
-', j,
rt;
ill / i[f!
t1J .'
- J
v
\
"
'---
~;::~;~.{:. : ,
:~~f:::~~:.~.:.
....,
r...t---'~'--ru'-~-T:..~t-.~~~ r ~-rr~";-";'-
MAP KEY
RESIDENTIAL
o
LOW DENSITY . (LDR)
J
MAX 4.84 D.U)ACRE
~
~~
,
MODERATE DENSITY. (MOOR)
. .. -. .
(- . I
'MAX 7.26 D.U.lACRE
, .
"1 '~"l
I"
"
) '., ~
"
,I"
'r""
~ :~ 7 'w~.;
u .
'S '-"
,..
C
BITIl.............
........
........
MEDIUM DENSITY.(MeDR)
MAX 9.68 D.U.lACRE'
,
"
"
,
~Jtt'_:::_' ,.,';;':',"--
~ ; -
! ;
, l
, ,~. -"'-~-
.~~~\<1"t ~ "-'!l'c
I
U
I' --
! $ I.~I
.f ~ ,":- :
I,l, __
_ HIGHDENS[TY' (HDR).
M:!I.X 10.8 D.U.lACRE
lffiilill) SPECIAL HIG!iDENSITY"(SHDR)
.MAX 20-D,U.l ACRE "
F .-~:9-MMEJJ_CIAb.;::
~ OFFICE (OC)
~. , ,
',----,-.:
, .
.' ';J.">\~'
,
: C:0J;:,f,j.:z.6.1
I'
.: '
" --------,
~ LOCAL RETAIL (LRC)
~ GENERAL (GC)
o INDUSTRIAL" (I)
Ilb'_~w DIl.
'- /)
\)
-
-
--
-
OTHER
'.~
,--
1""1 AGRICULTURE ". (A)
f . lc,.._.
FS.\.:j RECREATIONAL (R)
~
. M!Xfib.-USE COREIi!"jtitl
I .
I (MX-C)
.,. ---'-"-"-- -, -..
PUBLl.C & PRIVATE (PPGI)
GOVERNMENTAL/INSTITUTIONAL J
,
.~
f='c~ CONSERVATION
(CON) ~
(MX)
t , .
,
MIXED USE
.....
:...~, DIFFERENT LAND USE CATEGORY. THAN THAT SHOWN
ON MAP APPLIES (AS INDICA TED BY ABBBEVIA TION),
. i
IF USE AND DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH .USE'
. .
1'. .RESTRICTIQNSAND RECOMBINATIONu.OF PARCELS
. .SPECIFIED IN TEXT OF FUTURE LAND USE AND
. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENTS. ~.
, . -
'-. ""- - . -- . --,-- -- '
t'~ CONSERVATION OVERLA_Y DISTRICT--USE AND
. DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST
This completed cover sheet must accompany all agenda item requests. Please place check marks
in the boxes as indicated. Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form. Submit
original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of aaenda reauest (with back UD) to the
City Clerk's office. Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below. Incomplete or
late items will be returned to originating department.
Requested City
Commission Meeting
Dates
DAu ust 5 2003
DAu ust 19, 2003
~Se tember 2 2003
DSe tember 16 2003
DOctober 7, 2003
DOctober 21 2003
DNovember 5 2003
DNovember 18, 2003
Deadline for Submittal to City P & DjCRA Requests Deadline
Clerk's Office
Departments are responsible for securing the following
si natures on attached A enda Re uest Form:
De artment Head D
Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services D
Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds D
All back u material is attached ~
All exhibits are attached & marked e. ., Exhibit "A' ~
'i'\UJ\Z--
Department Head's initials:
Serrano at Boynton (WAR 03-00S) Second Reading - Amend
Please do not write in the shaded area below.
Legal Department signature D
City Manager's signature
D
ITEM RETURNED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S):
Signature(s) missing D
Incomplete submittal D
Missed deadline D
Other D
Reason:
Person contacted to pick up rejected request
by
bg - 7/19/02
S:\Planning\Planning TemplateslAgenda Item Cover CHECKU5T Aug S-Nov 18, 2003.doc
on
(Date)
-
((...--....
I,
\ '
\J
tc
NO.S:J~203
NonCE OF PUBUC HEARINGS
NOncE OF ANNEXATION
NoncE OF lAND USE AMENDMENT
NonCE OR REZONING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that !he PIann;ng ~'~NG~'-' iloa<<I clM aTY Of
BOYNTON 1lfA0i, flORIDA, wiD conduct 0 HCAOO on T~, Apn1 22 2003
016:30 p'.m. in ~ CIT'( HAll. COMMI~~~" 100 EasI_'_
BouIoooaril, 10 awidoo-Ih.. ~ subm""", """ ..... on beI-df of BeIfi !'eod.;. Tho
CiIv Ccmmiuion oIM aTY OF BOYNTON 01, FlORIDA, ...~ obo hold PIJBUC
HfAlltolGS 10 con.;d...Ih;. _, on T.....dav Wwzt 6, 2003 and T.....dav,.Iuno 3
2003. Each eubl;c hearing wiD be hokI 01 7:lX> p.m., '" '" ""'" ~ '" h
agopdo f'.O'!!'ib 01 !he CITYHAll. COMMISSION OiAMIlERS, 100 Eoot I\oynIon -.
lOuIe,aid. Tho ..,...., ;, de.cribed '" fellow"
LOCA_ 1,300'feet -' of ec-e.. A,..., on !he noo1h .;de cl!he l<Ooo
Wo<th Dm~ 0;_ COteroII'.28) CoooI.
An_
~!he eomp..I.emNe PIon FulunlIond U. Map:
From. MR'5IPa1m_r_~)
T.. Mod;um DoNity ~ (MoOR)
Rezone:
IIEQUEST:
IIEQUEST:
~
From - AR (Palm Beach C<ounlr!
To - PlIO PkJnned Unit 0..-'1"""_<<
-.I (TowMou.e) o...iopment
The 5outhomt _IS.E. 1/4) of !he _.......
(S.w. I/M cl!he SoIAh-tquo".dS.E. 1/4) cl Section
31, T.........;p, 45 s...h, ~ <!j Eoot. Palm _
CounIy, FIoriilo. LESS oke Souoh 40 feet lhen.oI.
AREA OF SITE: 424,377' ~ feel '" 9.742 """',
more or leu.
PROPOSED USE:
lEGAl. DESCIII'IION:
Location u.....
Sem.loat ~.a.:r
\l.V'
1fpU
-
4'
,
-~
1h;, __ can be '"-eel boow.en!he hou" 018:00 ..m. and 5~~._"'_~5oty
cllloynion Beach Plann;ng and Zoning OM';""', 100 EaslIloynion _u.
All irltw,sI&d parties, are notified 10 Of?P8Or at soid hearilJ9l in per)O!1 or by ~
and be heonI. AnY ~ who dec;ae. 10 oppeoI _ dOc;,;.".,. of !he I'lo,,"ng onCl
I:leYeIopm.II Boan1 or City CommisWor\ with respect to any molter" considered at these
_ng. will need 0 ..a.d of !he pn>oeecl;!1ll' and r... ouch P.U'P"'" may need 10
ensure ihat 0 ...nxmm JKOrd of the proceedir'!9s is mode. 'WhiCh record inCludes the
...many and ...n.lence ..".., whK:l. rhO oppeaI ;.10 be bo.ed.
The Gty shaI fumid-. PPP"9.P'iote auxiliary atds and services where neceuory to
aHord on individuol with a diSability an ~ ~nity 10 P.CJrticiJ>Oh! in and enjoy
the benefits of a 581'Vic:e. p~, or octtvity Conducted ~ the CIty. Please contoct
l'oIricio TucQ,-I561) 742,6268, oIleo., _.Iou, 124) hQu" pric' 10 !he prog",m
or odivity in order fOr the City Ie reasonably accommodatie your request.
OTY OF BOYNTON IlfAOi
PlANNING AND ZONING DlV1SION
1561) 742'0260
PntDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING. INC.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
2124 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
15611434-1644 Fax 434-1663
www.pindertroutman.o)m
May 30, 2003
Mr. Michael Rumpf
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33452
Re: Serrano at Boynton Beach - #PTC03-13
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The purpose of this letter is to provide a traffic equivalency statement for the above referenced
project.
Approval from Palm Beach County Traffic Division showing that the Traffic Performance Standards
were met for the 98 multi family residential units is provided on Attachment 1. It is now proposed to
develop 47 single family residential units. Attachment 2 provides the trip generation comparison
between the approved and proposed development. The proposed development generates less daily,
AM and PM peak hour trips than the approved development. Therefore, the project is in
compliance with the Traffic Performance Standards.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
l/;/I--;1'
01;;'~;->
Adrea M. Trout~~/P.E. 5/3tjo:;
FI rida Registration .#45409
AMT/ldr
Attachments
cc: Karl Albertson
Masoud Atefi
Letter Rumpf 03-13 5-30-03
Pi