REVIEW COMMENTS
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-168
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board and
Mayor and ~~~ission
Dick Hudso~A1cp
Senior Planner
Michael W. Rumpr~
Director of Planning and Zoning
July 11, 2003
Serrano Beach Annexation (ANEX 03-001) and
Land Use Amendment/Rezoning (LUAR 03-005)
To annex the subject property;
to reclassify from MR-5 Medium Density Residential (Palm Beach
County) to Low Density Residential (City), and
to rezone from AR-Agricultural Residential to PUD Planned Unit
Development
Property Owner:
Applicant/Agent:
Location:
Size:
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
PropDsed Land Use:
Proposed ZDning:
Proposed Use:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Beth Pesch I
Chip Bryan/Julian Brian and Associates, Inc.
1,300 feet west of Congress Avenue on the north side of the Lake
Worth Drainage District Lateral Canal 28 (L-28) (see Exhibit "A")
PCN # 00-43-45-31-00-000-5020
:1:9.74 acres
MR-5 (Palm Beach County) (3-5 dwelling units per acre [du/ac])
AR-USA, Agricultural-Residential in the Urban Services Area (Palm
Beach County)
Low Density Residential (4.84 du/ac)
PUD Planned Unit Development
47 zero lot line single family homes
Page 2
File Number: LUAR 03-005/ANEX 03-001
Serrano Beach
Adjacent Uses:
North:
To the northeast, three single family homes in Silverlake Estates
designated Low Density Residential (LDR) at 4.84 du/ac and
zoned PUD Planned Unit Development. Actual built density of the
PUD is 2.04 du/ac. To the northwest, unincorporated property
developed with one, two story single-family residence designated
MR-5 (Medium Density Residential at 5 du/ac) and zoned AR-USA,
Agricultural Residential in the Urban Services Area.
South:
Immediately south are the rights-of-way of the Lake Worth
Drainage District L-28 Lateral Canal and Palmland Drive, then
developed residential (Chanteclair Villas Condominiums)
designated HDR (High Density Residential at 10.8 du/ac) and
zoned R-3 Multi-family Residential (10.8 du/ac). Actual built
density of the duplex unit development is 7.42 du/ac. To the
west of Chanteclair Villas is the Palmland Villas development with
a built density of 8.57 du/ac.
East:
Developed Elementary (Crosspointe) School designated PPGI
(Public & Private Governmental/Institutional) and zoned PU Public
Use.
West:
Property within the Village of Golf designated single family
residential and built at a density of 0.3 du/ac. The property
immediately adjacent to the subject site consists of one single-
family home on a 1.6 acre parcel and a portion of a vacant parcel
of 4.5 acres.
MASTER/SITE PLAN ANALYSIS
All applications for a rezoning to a PUD Planned Unit Development must be accompanied by a
master/site plan. In this instance, a site plan has been submitted and is being reviewed
simultaneously with this application. The plan shows thirty-nine (39) of the homes arranged
backing up to the periphery of the property. A ten (10) foot landscape buffer tract surrounds
these buildings, and a loop road provides access. An additional eight (8) residences are
positioned inside the loop road on the north of the property. A lake, almost an acre in size,
occupies the center of the property and a small tot-lot is shown at the southwest corner of the
loop road.
Lot sizes are typically 115 feet by 45 feet.
Front:
Side
Rear to Buffer
(Rear Setback adjacent to Silverlake
Building setbacks are as follows:
25 feet to road/drive edge
10 feet one side
10 feet (20 feet separation)
15 feet [25 feet separation])
Page 3
File Number: LUAR 03-005/ANEX 03-001
Serrano Beach
Designs shown for the residences are a derivative of Mediterranean architecture with stucco
walls, S-tile roofs and decorative moldings, appliques and columns. Proposed models range
from single-story/three-bedroom unit to a two-story/five bedroom unit, with air conditioned
living areas ranging from 2,110 square feet to 2,931 square feet.
The maximum density allowed by the Low Density Residential land use classification is 4.84
dulac, which would provide the developer a maximum of 47 units. Maximum height in all
residential zoning districts except R-3 Multi-family Residential is 30 feet. In addition, PUD
regulations require that perimeter buffers and setbacks within PUDs must mirror those in
abutting development to ensure adequate separation between buildings. The proposed
landscape buffer of 10 feet combined with the proposed rear setback of 15 feet equals the
required setbacks and buffer of the Silverlake development. Both the elementary school
building to the east, and the Chanteclair development to the south are more than adequately
separated from building sites in the proposed development.
The site does not provide direct access to a major roadway or transportation system, which is a
requirement for major planned unit developments (Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2.5,
Section 8, A). This requirement was placed in the code primarily to address impacts of larger
developments that otherwise might introduce large amounts of traffic onto local neighborhood
streets, and to properly distribute traffic onto the adjacent roadway system. Since the impacts
from the proposed development are expected to be minor as compared to the average PUD,
due to the facts that there are slightly less than 10 acres in the development and only 47
dwelling units, staff does not consider the requirement to have the importance that would
usually be given to it.
PROJECT ANALYSIS
This property is less than 10 acres in size, and therefore this proposed amendment to the
comprehensive plan is considered a "small-scale" amendment and is not subject to "compliance
review" by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). This means that the proposed
amendment, if approved by the city, will be adopted, then forwarded to the DCA for their
records ("large-scale" amendments cannot be adopted until reviewed for consistency by the
DCA).
State annexation law allows the annexation of enclaves that are less than 10 acres without the
consent of property owners; however, in this instance, the annexation is at the request of the
property owner. Currently, objectives of the annexation program include annexing all enclaves
less than 10 acres in all areas of the City that meet adopted level-of-services standards, and
incrementally annexing enclave properties with the intent to reduce them below the lO-acre
threshold. Pursuant to Section 9.C.2(2) of the Land Development Regulations, staff is not
required to review the petition against the eight (8) criteria by which rezonings are to be
reviewed as indicated in Section 9.C.7., as this petition is consistent with the city's
Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation for properties to be annexed within this
vicinity. Instead, staff analysis will relate to consistency with other relevant portions of the
Comprehensive Plan, the city's annexation program and service capability.
Page 4
File Number: LUAR 03-005/ANEX 03-001
Serrano Beach
The requested land use and zoning is consistent with the recommendations of Section VIII Land
Use Problems and Oooortunities; found in the support documents for the 1989 City of Bovnton
Beach Comorehensive Plan. Sub-section 8.d. of that document states:
"These parcels should be annexed and placed in the Low Density Residential land use
category. Development of these properties should generally be limited to single-family
detached dwellings, so as to be compatible with the one-story condominiums which lie
to the south and the single-family subdivision lying to the north. "
In connection with previous annexation studies, departments most affected by annexations
(e.g. Police, Fire, and Public Works), have been surveyed for issues related to service capability
and costs. All opinions previously collected from these departments supported the incremental
annexation of enclaves. These opinions have been based on the following:
1) The enclaves are all immediately adjacent to areas within the city that currently
receive urban services;
2) Ample service capacity exists to serve adjacent unincorporated properties; and
3) Most enclaves currently receive service from the city via the mutual aid
agreement (Police and Fire/EMS only).
The Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's traffic
study and verified that capacity exists on Congress Avenue to accommodate this proposed
amendment. In addition, the City's Director of Public Works has determined that no
improvements to Palmland Drive will be necessitated by the impacts of proposed development.
The Palm Beach County Planning Division has also reviewed the application and has determined
that the development will not result in a negative impact on the area roadway network in the
year 2020.
With respect to solid waste, in a letter dated December 18, 2001 the Palm Beach County Solid
Waste Authority has stated that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's
municipalities throughout the lO-year planning period. The School District of Palm Beach County
has reviewed the application and has determined that adequate capacity exists to accommodate
the resident population. Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the review of
the conditional use application, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage
permitting authorities.
CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS
As indicated herein, this request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; will
not create additional impacts on infrastructure that have not been anticipated in the
Comprehensive Plan; will be compatible with adjacent land uses and will contribute to the
overall economic development of the City. Therefore, staff recommends that the subject
request be approved. If conditions of approval are recommended by the Planning and
Development Board or required by the City Commission, they will be included as Exhibit "B".
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\5HARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\LUAR 03-Q05\STAFF REPORT NEW.doc
Location Map
Serrano at Boynton Beach
--,
PU
,-
,,' ; :1 I -,,,,':-;
~I~~I'---'---"-
I : :1tt7 )::i,'-'
'J~I'~----\
'---i ,--'--'-lJ__<
--!/i--i~ IT IT ~
---J/'----.J' I,! I I, I I <
--./L__li I i Il'l I I " 'll::
-!'_~- . I""
~7/ rll, '.' II \ I'" ,:,:'t
_' I I I. . ' .'i-
, i I I I I I I : I I I I ~~/.';-
I ~
-~~
1---
~\\F'.. ~:~
_IL ' ~c
\... . JI :.--J f:::-J II
, - I 'LJIL.
i" J' -:'r--\~ i-i!
~~I' ," -~""~ r--/i,'- :~JI,::
,L---i '1'- ~:~ P U t)i~i-"i
,-HIH t~7i ~ ~I
NJ C , g ~ I.-J "'_1, ~L~,-"r-j,!
. .' -:q - ~-'--oo~pB -' , . ~->
". I ,--_, Ie. --.,;0. ,.-eAANaffi-.,.! I I I ' ; - i
1, 'L---------'" --r< ; i ii' , ',, 'I I I I I
--'--s.GOUi'LU<"l'-RD_ -_
~ -~ I 'SITE
-\.
\
\
,
;',-:
, I
I_i,', 'I I
,.'T.-,
I i
,~, ",'
I '--I-----.!-' I
itll I :,~
, "
I' ! i i',~,--,
I I , '
r'-- " RJ' :.
'l---.J----------:--: ,
~ I '
! I, I -.L
.J '
L "
.,-- f- -
, I
, I
I
C1
',, ~ :3
li~1
,I I
Ii
-~n
~MLAND.DR-
,
"e--
Il
1i?? I
REel lR1i I
~rJ~1
I~' ~
. iT '
I"
III
."
PU
-~
----.::-----
-. _ _________________ ~~ /:\ ,; .~. ~~ ~_L
<~~ ::;\c\-.~-~ l' -./
1,1 P U ~-(i7L=1
ili:1 ~-j7i--i'
I~{',.---,
0---- --1, I, " '
l
!'I~
,I
ii,
- -',I',
,-
.
800
o
800 Feet
N I
w4-' ,
s I
Location Map
Serrano at Boynton Beach
cz:y-
'PU
u(
REC
.
'00
-,
''::'..
Exhibit "A"
u
y
.
R I I I I TR:H:I:J::l:1 :
IIII .
I IffiHB
H I
o
80C Feet
PU
.
W~,
s
I~YO"
",o~-.-~~
>-'l-':~
7"ON '3
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. 60x 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
June 19, 2003
Mrs. Ca rrie Pa rker Hill
Village of Golf Administration
21 County Road
Village of Golf, FL 33436
Re: Serrano Beach
ANEX 03-001 & LUAR 03-002 (Amended Application)
Attached is the completed IPARC Executive Summary and location map for the above
referenced applications for annexation and Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The
applications have been amended to request a density of 4.84 units per acre in order to
develop 47 single-family detached residential units (zero lot line).
If you have any questions, please contact me at (561) 742-6260.
Sincerely,
lJ?;C- ff
-
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
J:\SHRDATA\Plannmg\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano@ BB\LUAR\03 002 REAPPUCAllON\Letterhead CPHill.dot
Ii\~y Or.-
~.- ,...::-
~-_.::...~
IJl _:'.... :.: I
O~-- Co
;.'!-""': ~'v"
I'ON e
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment
June 19, 2003
Ms Anna Yes key
Clearinghouse
9835-16 Lake Worth Road, Suite 223
Lake Worth, Florida 33467
Re: Serrano Beach
File No. LUAR 03-002 (Amended Application)
Location: 1,300 feet west of Congress Avenue on the north side of the Lake Worth
Drainage District Lateral (L-28) Canal.
Dear Anna:
Attached is the completed Executive Summary for the above-reference Comprehensive
Plan Amendment. Please notice that the application has been revised to request a
designation of Low Density Residential (4.84 dujac).
If further information is needed, please contact me at (561) 742-6264.
Sincerely
2/
.....
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
Encl:
J: \SH RDA T A \PLANNING\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\SERRANO@ BB\LUAR\03 -002 REAPPLICATION\IPARC COVER. DOT
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
Page lof2
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS
DATE: June 19,2003
Reference #: ANEX 03-001. LUAR 03-002 (AMENDED)
General Information
Initiating Local Government: City of Boynton Beach
Contact Person: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Address: 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard, Boynton Beach, FL 33425
Telephone/Fax: (561) 742-6264/(561) 742-6259 fax
Applicant/Agent Beth Peschl/Chip Bryan (Julian Bryan and Associates)
TelephonelFax: (561) 391-7871/ (561) 338-5996 fax
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Textual Amendments
General Summary of Amendments:
_ amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks
i _ amendments relating to affordable housing
i Amendments related to the following elements:
- land use
- traffic circulation
- mass transit
_ ports and aviation
_ housing
- infrastructure sub-elements
_ coastal management
- conservation
_ recreation and open space
_ intergovernmental coordination
_ capital improvements
- other
Summary of addition (s) to adopted comprehensive plan:
I
,
Page 2 of2
Summary of proposed change (s) to adopted comprehensive plan:
Proposed Amendments to the Future Land Use Map
Location of proposed map amendment (include a location map): 1,300 feet west of Congress A venue on the north side of
the Lake Worth Drainage District Lateral (L-28) Canal.
Size of Area Proposed for Change (acres): :1:9.742 acres
Present Future Land Use Plan Designation (include a densitylintensity definition): MR-5 (Palm Beach County) 3-5 du/ac
Proposed Future Land Use Designation (include a densitylintensity definition): Low Density Residential (LDR) 4.84 du/ac
Present Zoning of Site (include a densitylintensity definition): AR (Palm Beach County)
Proposed Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) PUD Planned Unit Development (4.84 du/ac)
Present Development of Site: Vacant
Proposed Development of the Site, if known (Number of Dwelling Units; Commercial Square Footage; Industrial Square
Footage; Other Proposed usage and intensity): 47 zero lot line single family dwelling units.
Is proposed change a Development of Regional Impact? N/A
Comprehensive Plan Change Processing
DatelTime/Location Scheduled for Planning and Development Board Public Hearing
July 22, 2003/6:30 p.m.!City Commission Chambers, 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd., Boynton Beach, FL
DatelTime/Location Scheduled for LP NGoveming Body Public Hearing
August 5, 200317:00 p.m..!City Commission Chambers, 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd., Boynton Beach, FL
Scheduled Date for Transmittal to DCA September 9. 2003
l\SIIRDA T A\Planning\SHAREDI WP\PROIECTSISeTnmo@ BB\LUAR\03-002 REAPPLlCA TlON\Exec$umJPARC doc
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
PD. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
~An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employern
@ printed on recycled paper
June 2, 2003
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE:
Serrano @ Boynton Beach - - Revised Plan
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
previously approved residential project entitled; Serrano @ Boynton Beach - Bach
Property, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach
County Land Development Code. The project is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Previous Approval:
Previous Approval:
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Hunters Golf club, Summit Lane, West of Congress Ave.
Boynton Beach
None
98 MF Residential Units
47 SF Residential Units
470
47 - PM Peak Hour
2004
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the revised deveiopment
plan generates less daily and peak hour trips than previously approved, and therefore,
meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENqlNEER
M
F:\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\030603.doc
,
PinDER TROUTMAn ConSULTinG. Inc.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(5b1) 434-1644 Fax 434-166J
www.pindertroutman.com
May 30, 2003
Mr. Michael Rumpf
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33452
Re: Serrano at Boynton Beach - #PTC03-13
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The purpose of this letter is to provide a traffic equivalency statement for the above referenced
project.
Approval from Palm Beach County Traffic Division showing that the Traffic Performance Standards
were met for the 98 multi family residential units is provided on Attachment 1. It is now proposed to
develop 47 single family residential units. Attachment 2 provides the trip generation comparison
between the approved and proposed development. The proposed development generates less daily,
AM and PM peak hour trips than the approved development. Therefore, the project is in
compliance with the Traffic Performance Standards.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
};';/l
A/uv-l--~
n reaM. Troutmary:P.E. 5;4010.3
FI ida Registration #/45409 I"
AMT/ldr
Attachments
cc: Karl AI bertson
Masoud Atefi
LetterRumpl 03-13 5-30-03
Pi
Dtpartmtnt of Engjnt~ring
and Public Works
Po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416-1229
(S61) 684-4000
www.pbcgov_com
.
Palm Beach county
Board of County
commission~rs
Warren H_ Newell, Chairman
Carol A_ Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L Greene
county AdministfiJ.tor
Rob~n VJeisma!1
-An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action EmploYeT~
, printed on recycled paper
ATTACHMENT 1
fC'C00Rn"'T'T5"
l1\l, ~!/.r.-:/liYJ
March 7, 2003
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Serrano@ Boynton Beach - Bach Property
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the project
entitled; Serrano @ Boynton Beach - Bach Property, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. The project is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Use:
New Daily Trips:
Build-()ut Year:
Hunters Golf club, Summit Lane, West of Congress Ave.
Boynton Beach
None
98 MF Residential Units
686
2004
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the project meets the
Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE O~ THE C~TY ~I~R
/Y7 ' r:)-I-d'----
,
Masoud Atefi, MSCE
Sr. Engineer - Traffic Divisio
cc: Pinder T ro Co Iting Inc.
File: General- TPS - Mun - Trafic Study Review
F :\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\030222.doc
Attachment 2
DACH Property
Trip Generation Comparison
#PTCOJ-13
5/30/2003
trip!?n Comp 03 13 ') 29 mJo.xls
PilgP-l of,
Aporoved Dailv
ITE Total
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Residential Multi Family 230 qR Dus 7/DU 686
Proposed Daily
ITE Total
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (1) Trips
Residential Single Family 210 47 Dus 10 IDU 470
Net New Trips
(216)1
Approved AM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In I Out 1 Total
Residential Multi Family 230 9R Dus 0.51 IDU (17/83) 91 411 .,0
Proposed AM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
Land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In 1 Out I Total
Residential Single Family 210 47 Dus 0.75 IDU (25/75) ql 261 35
Net New Trips
(15)1
Aporoved PM Peak Hour
IrE Total Trips
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In I Out 1 Total
Residential Multi Family 230 98 Dus 0.62 IDU (67/33) 411 201 61
Proposed PM Peak Hour
ITE Total Trips
land Use Code Intensity Trip Generation Rate (2) In 1 Out 1 lotal
R{'sidcntial Single r amily 210 47 Dus 1.01 IDU (64/36) 301 171 47
Net New Trips
(14)1
(1) Source: Section 10.8, FaIT Share Road Impact r et's, of the Palm Beach County Unified land Devf'lopmenl Code (ULOC).
(2) Source: Institute of 1 rclnspurtation Engim>er5 (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition.