REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-065
TO:
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner H---
FROM:
THROUGH:
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE:
April I, 2002
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project/Applicant: Office/Warehouse Condominiums, CKS Inc.
Agent: Jeffrey Smith, JMS Design Inc.
Owner: CKS Inc.
Location: East side of Old Dixie Highway between Miller Road and Gulfstream
Boulevard
File No: Annexation (ANEX 02-001)
Land Use Amendment/Rezoning (LUAR 02-001)
Property Description: Vacant property of 0.67 acres ofland located in unincorporated Palm Beach
County, classified Commercial and zoned GC (General Commercial)
Proposed change/use: To annex the subject property, to reclassify from Commercial to GC (General
Commercial), and rezone from GC (General Commercial) to C-4 (General
Commercial).
Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning:
North: Undeveloped property classified Commercial and zoned GC (General Commercial - Palm Beach
County)
Sonth: Developed property (Broward Pump and Supply Co.) classified GC (General Commercial) and zoned
C-4 (General Commercial)
East: Developed property (mobile home park) classified Commercial and zoned GC (General Commercial
- Palm Beach County
West: Right-of-way of Dixie Highway, further west F.E.C. Railroad right-of-way, then Seacrest Scrub
Preservation Area
Page 2
CKS, Inc.
File Numbers: ANEX 02-001 and LUAR 02-001
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Pursuant to Section 9.C.2(2) of the Land Development Regulations, staff is not required to review the
petition against the eight (8) criteria by which rezonings are to be reviewed as indicated in Section 9.C.7.,
as this petition is consistent with the city's Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map designation for
properties to be annexed within this vicinity. Instead, staff analysis will relate to consistency with other
relevant portions of the Comprehensive Plan, the city's annexation program and service capability.
This conunercial property is less than 10 acres in size, and therefore this proposed amendment to the
comprehensive plan is considered a "small-scale" amendment and is not subject to "compliance review"
by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA). This means that the proposed amendment, if
desired by the city, will be adopted first, then forwarded to the DCA for their records ("large-scale"
amendments cannot be adopted until found "in compliance" by the DCA).
The annexation of this parcel is consistent with the only policy within the comprehensive plan on
annexation. Policy 8.10.4, which requires the establishment of an annexation program, promotes orderly
annexation, and prohibits the creation of new enclaves. The annexation of the subject property will
further the efforts of the annexation program through reduction in the number of enclave properties. State
annexation law allows the annexation of enclaves that are less than 10 acres without the consent of
property owners. Currently, objectives of the annexation program include annexing all enclaves less than
10 acres. and to incrementally annex enclave properties with the intent to reducing them below the 10-
acre threshold.
The requested land use and zoning is consistent with the recommendations of Section VlII Land Use
Problems and Opportunities, sub-section l.q., found in the support documents for the 1989 City Of
Bovuton Beach Comprehensive Plan.
In connection with previous annexation studies, departments most affected by annexations (e.g. Police.
Fire, and Public Works), have been surveyed for issues related to service capability and costs. All
opinions previously collected from these departments supported the incremental annexation of enclaves.
These opinions have been based on the following:
I) The enclaves are all inunediately adjacent to areas within the city that currently receive
urban services;
2) Ample service capacity exists to serve adjacent unincorporated properties; and
3) Most enclaves currently receive service from the city via the mutual aid agreement
(Police and Fire/EMS only).
With respect to impact upon roadways, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the project
and determined that it meets Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
However, with respect to water and wastewater utilities, the review of the proposed site plan (which was
to have been reviewed concurrently with the subject applications) identified the absence of wastewater
lines directly accessible to the subject property. As part of site plan approval, access to city utilities, or an
acceptable alternative, must be designed. The review of the site plan application has been delayed to
allow for project engineers to evaluate and address this situation.
Page 3
CKS, Inc.
File Numbers: ANEX 02-001 and LUAR 02-001
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDA nONS
As indicated herein, this request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; will not create
additional impacts on infrastructure that have not been anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan; will be
compatible with adjacent land uses and will contribute to the overall economic development of the City.
Therefore, staff recommends that the subject request be approved. If conditions of approval are
recommended by the Planning and Development Board or required by the City Commission, they will be
included as Exhibit "B".
ATTACHMENTS
JISHRDAT A\PlanningIHudson\CKS IncILUAR\slaffreport,doc
Location MaPEXH'B'T"A"
CKS Inc.
I
L
J
-f-~-
N
W~E
800
.
o
800
1600
2400 Feet
.
s
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416.1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. Newell. Chairman
Carol A. Roberts. Vice Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L. Greene
County Mministrator
Robert Weisman
~An Equal Opportunity
AffirmatlVe Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
February 25, 2002
I'm R (,"
o ! !~ lir!
I nil we
!JdL'.
I~,\ 1"1 'I~C:--~::
I ! ;~ I !,
.-..:, ! n i
- J 2002 I ~
J
,
~ARTMENT OF DEVElOPMENT
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE:
CKS
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Michael:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study for the
development project entitled; CKS. pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in
Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project is
summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
New Daily Trips:
Build-out:
East of Old Dixie Highway, south of Miller Road
Boynton Beach
None
7,916 SF of General Industrial
52
2003
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the project generates less
than 200 new daily trips, and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm
Beach County.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030~
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
~.
Masoud Atefi, MS E
Sr. Engineer - Tra
cc: Yvonne Ziel Traffic Consultants Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F:\ TRAFFIC\malAdminlApprovals\020202.doc
~~
YVONNE ZIEL TRAFFIC CONSULTANTS, INC,
11440 86th St. North, West Palm Beach, Florida 33412
Telephone (561) 624-7262. Facsimile (561) 624-9578
September 19,2001
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE: Caliendo Warehouse - Trip Generation
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
This letter serves as the Traffic Generation Letter for the above-referenced project. The facility is
located on the east side of Old Dixie Highway, south of Miller Road in Boynton Beach. The
proposed project involves the construction of a 7,916 square foot (SF) light industrial facility.
Please find enclosed Tables I, 2, and 3 which provide the trip generation rates used and the trips
generated by the proposed project. The proposed project results in 52 new daily trips. Since the total
average daily traffic generation expected from the proposed project is less than 200 trips, a traffic
study is not required.
Sincerely,
E,ZIEL ~~f: :~N~LTANTS, INe.
~a1'
Linda Riccardi, PE tfif;!;/
Project Manager
ENCLOSURE
H
Traffic Engineering and Planning
.
I- r- r-
X
W
I- co I- r- r-
co 0::
I-X X W
2W W I-
W Ulo:: 2
Uo:: N W
o::W ~ 90w S....J
WI- 0::1- CO CO
0..2 1-2 W<>:
W :.::W 21-
CO US....J :.:: 0
m o..~ CO CO US I-
0 0.. I- 0
:20 :2 X
0..1-
0.. o..>-W
0:: ....J C?O::
~ 0
I- Ulw
:.:: 0 Ull-
USf3 I- <>:2
o..W
~~ ....J 0
<>:
0.. I-
0
l-
N ~ ~
I- ~ l- I- ~ ~
I-X UlX X
2W :.:: o..W W
W 0.. 0:: 0::
Uo:: CO 1-0:: <D <D
2 <D CD W
o::W CO 0 :'::W I-
WI- t: US!Z 2
0..2 W
W 0 o..W S....J
WUl N W :2....J r- r-
m I W <>:<>: r- r- WUl W<>:
U)W 0.. 0 I- Ul I- Ul90 21-
::01- 0:: CD ::02 0 ::00:: :.:: 0
oC!2 I- 00 I- 01- <>: I-
....J
I2 :.:: ~ 2 I- IS W
W <>:U) 0 N~~ ",WW 0.. I- 0
r-o::Q WW 0 f= 0:: :2 X
W<>:I- 0..1- I- <>: W<>:o:: W<>:2 <>:>-W
....JS<>: :2<>: 0:: ....JSW ....JSO
m 2 m
m 0:: <>:0:: W ~02 '0::
<>:OW 2 <>:OW UlW 0
1-02 W 1-0(9 I-O~ Ull-
2W (9 20.. 2m <>:2
W(9 r- W- I-Ul '" '" W, o..w
~o.. U) m 0.. _0:: 00.. '" '" -Ul
W <0 0:: ....JI- <>:0:: ....JU) ....J
<{- I- <>: <>:<>: ~ 0
uo:: 1-<>: I- U I- Uo..
I- ui
00:: 0
<>:90 0:: I-
W
0:: W S N N
I- 2 '" '"
(9 W
2
2
0 W CD >-
~ '"
W ~ 2 W ~ ?- m
WO 0 m 0 ,
t:0 N r-: <>: Ul
f= U5 U)
U ~ <>:
0..
0:: >-1-
0 '"
0.. m2
U) ,W
2 UlU
C!2 Ulo::
(9 (9 <>:W
~ I- ~ 0..0..
LL
LL 0 LL (9
U) W U) >
l- I- I- cii ~
I ::J I 0.. LL
(9 I- (9 0:: Ul
~ f= ~ I-
, U) , l- I Ul
....J 2 ....J S (9 0..
W <>: W <>: 0::
:;; 0:: W 0:: W ::;;
U) Ul 2 I-
(L ::J I- U ::J I- ....J
9 ~ U) 0:: U) ....J <>: S
a. ~ 0 ::J 0 ::J ~ W W
ID .. ::J 0::
if? ; 2 0 2 0 U) 2
'" N ::5 2 0 ::5 2 0 ::J I-
~ 0 U) I- U) ....J
0 ::J <>:
2 0 I-
::5 2 0
I-