REVIEW COMMENTS
7.B.1
RENAISSANCE COMMONS PHASE II
(NWSP 03-016)
NEW SITE PLAN
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-263
STAFF REPORT
Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board and City Commission
Michael Rumpf
Planning and Zoning DirectO;fr ,
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP
Planner
November 12, 2003
Renaissance Commons (Phase Two) / NWSP 03-016
New Site Plan
Property Owner:
Applicant:
Agent:
Location:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Compson Associates of Boynton, LLC
Compson Associates of Boynton, LLC
Mr. James Comparato and Mr. Carl Klepper
East side of Congress Avenue, south of Gateway
Boulevard (see Exhibit "AU - Location Map)
Existing Land Use/Zoning:
Local Retail Commercial (LRC) / Community Commercial
(C-3)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning:
Proposed Use:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
No change proposed
4,200 square foot commercial/retail building
0.5360 acre (23,348 square feet) - a component of the
entire site of 28.36 acres or 1,235,717 square feet
Developed Motorola site zoned Planned Industrial Development (PID);
Right-of-way for Boynton (C-16) Canal, then farther south is vacant properly,
zoned Single-family Residential (R-1AA);
Right-of-way for Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD) Equalizing E-4 Canal, then
farther east is the Boynton Beach Community High School, zoned PID; and
Staff Report - Renaissance Commons Phase II (NWSP 03-016)
Memorandum No PZ 03-263
Page 2
West: Right-of-way for Congress Avenue, then father west are developed commercial
properties, zoned Community Commercial (C-3).
BACKGROUND
Proposal:
On July 15, 2003, Compson Associates of Boynton, LLC, owner of the 28.36-acre
parcel was approved for a large-scale mixed-use project known as Renaissance
Commons (NWSP 03-007). The project consisted of a 10,662 square foot
commercial building combined with eight (8) townhouse units, a 4,338 square foot
stand-alone commercial building, 250 multi-family (apartment) units with their two
(2) parking garages, and 242 fee-simple townhouse units. All components of the
project were approved for Phase One except for the 4,338 square foot stand-alone
commercial building. The stand-alone commercial building was noted as being a
part of Phase Two. Accordingly, when the Renaissance Commons (NWSP 03-007)
project was reviewed, no floor plans or elevations were included for the Phase Two
building. As a condition of approval, staff required full site plan review for just the
Phase Two building. Therefore, this submittal represents the information that was
required for the Phase Two building, conceptually approved in July of 2003.
However, at this time, the applicant is proposing a 4,200 square foot commercial
building instead of a 4,338 square foot building. This new building would be 138
square feet smaller than what was originally approved. However, the 138 square
foot difference would be returned to the project during Phase Three (see
accompanying staff report for Renaissance Commons Phase III - NWSP 03-017).
Site Characteristic: The Phase Two portion of the subject site is a small component (0.53 acre) of the
entire 28.36-acre rectangular-shaped parcel. The entire parcel, known as
Renaissance Commons, is located on the east side of Congress Avenue and north
of the C-16 Canal, extending eastward to the LWDD E-4 Canal. The applicant has
no intention of subdividing this 0.53-acre "leased lot" from the greater parcel.
Therefore, no cross-parking or cross-access easements would be required and
there would be no setback issues as well.
All uses proposed in the Renaissance Commons project are permitted in the C-3
zoning district. The proposed commercial areas (of Phase One and Two) would be
divided into two (2) separate buildings. As mentioned in the original Renaissance
Commons staff report (NWSP 03-007), Phase One consisted of the vast majority of
the commercial and residential development, while this phase (Phase Two),
represents only the review of the stand-alone commercial building, proposed in the
northwest corner of the site. A lift station located off the property (on the Motorola
site to the north - Phase Three) may require upgrades as a result of this project.
The required upgrade of the off-site lift station would be determined at the time of
permitting. This boundary survey of the 28.36-acre parcel showed an existing
metal fence running in a north-south direction along the western property line
(near Congress Avenue). It connects to the same fence used on the Motorola site
(Phase Three). This boundary survey also showed two (2) existing asphalt paths
within the interior of the site and various easements that were dedicated on the
28.36-acre site. If required, the abandonment and / or re-dedication of easements
Staff Report - Renaissance Commons Phase II (NWSP 03-016)
Memorandum No PZ 03-263
Page 3
must be recorded prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy.
ANALYSIS
Concurrency:
Traffic: Generally, a project's anticipated traffic is generated by two factors, namely the
proposed use and its intensity. Typically, the intensity is measured by the
proposed building area (in square feet). When the original Renaissance Commons
(NWSP 03-007) project was reviewed, a traffic statement was sent to Palm Beach
County Traffic Division for their review and approval. At that time, the Traffic
Division determined that the project was part of the previously approved Motorola
Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and met the Traffic Performance Standards
of Palm Beach County. Also, at the time of its review, the City's Engineering
Division of Public Works required various off-site improvements as a result of this
project. No new conditions are required as a result of the development of Phase
Two. However, since July of 2003, the developer has assembled the Motorola
property to the north (see accompanying staff report for Phase Three - NWSP 03-
017). This property to the north is earmarked for the third phase of the
Renaissance Commons project. A revised traffic impact analysis was sent to the
Traffic Division for their review and approval. The new analysis, which includes all
three phases of the Renaissance Commons project consists of 300 apartment units,
200 townhouse units (for a total of 500 dwelling units), and 43,820 square feet of
retail space. As proposed, the retail area would be divided into five (5) separate
buildings. No building permits will be issued until the Traffic Division determines
that the entire project meets the Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) of Palm
Beach County.
Drainage: Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. According to
the original Renaissance Commons (NWSP 03-007) staff report, the project would
discharge into the LWDD E-4 Canal, which would be limited by a control structure
to 62.6 CSM at the 25-year storm event. Additional on-site retention would be
provided within a new lake constructed off the northeast corner of the property
adjacent to the LWDD E-4 Canal. A berm would be placed around the perimeter of
the site with a top elevation equal to or exceeding the calculated 25-year three (3)
day storm event to prevent unpermitted discharge from the site.
At this time, the Engineering Division is recommending that the review of specific
drainage solutions for Phase Two be deferred until time of permit review. All South
Florida Water Management District permits and other drainage related permits
must be submitted at time of building permit (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of
Approval).
School:
School concurrency is not required for non-residential uses. The original
Renaissance Commons, which included Phase One and Two, was approved for 500
dwelling units and met the concurrency requirements of Palm Beach County.
Staff Report - Renaissance Commons Phase II (NWSP 03-016)
Memorandum No PZ 03-263
Page 4
Driveways: No direct points of ingress / egress are proposed on any roadways as a result of
the development of this second phase of the Renaissance Commons project. On
the entire 28.36-acre parcel, Phases One and Two were approved with a total of
four points of ingress / egress. Two (2) of these four (4) points were approved as
driveway openings directly onto Congress Avenue. The closest point of ingress /
egress onto Congress Avenue from the 0.53-acre portion of the Renaissance
Commons project would occur from a main entry driveway that runs along the
subject property's north boundary line. For edification purposes, "north boundary
line" is not a property line but rather is only used to describe limits of the Phase
Two construction. In any event, this point of ingress / egress (from Congress
Avenue) is proposed to connect to an internal driveway that would run in an east-
west direction along the northern limits of the subject Phase Two property. Access
to the Phase Two portion of the project would only occur internally by driving
through the parking lots of Phase One. There would be no direct ingress or egress
involving Congress Avenue for this small "leased" portion.
Parking Facility: The Renaissance Commons project proposes a mix of residential and commercial
uses. The Phase Two component only deals with a 4,200 square foot retail
building. Commercial uses require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of
floor area. Therefore, 21 parking spaces would be required. The project would
provide 22 parking spaces, one (1) space in excess of what is required. The detail
of the parking spaces (as shown on sheet SP-2) indicates that parallel parking
spaces would be dimensioned nine (9) feet - six (6) inches in width by 25 feet in
length. All other parking spaces would be dimensioned nine (9) feet - six (6)
inches in width by 18 feet - six (6) inches in length, except for handicap spaces,
which would be 12 feet in width with five (5) feet of striping by 18 feet - six (6)
inches in length. At the time of permitting, the applicant is required to submit a
rectified overall site plan indicating the parking required / provided for Phase One
and Phase Two (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
Landscaping: According to the tabular data of the Renaissance Commons (NWSP 03-007) site
plan approved in July of 2003, the total pervious area equaled 7.28 acres or
25.66% of the entire 28.36-acre site. No significant changes have been made to
the landscape plan or pervious area as a result of this Phase Two development.
The landscape material that was approved in Phase One would remain as-is in the
landscape buffers around Phase Two. The landscape plan (sheet L2 of 3) proposes
a variety of trees and shrubs around the Phase Two building. This plant material
includes Ligustrum, Live Oak, and Brazilian Beauty Leaf shade trees and Coconut,
Alexander, Pygmy Date, and Christmas palm trees. The shrubs / groundcover
would include the following: Redtip Cocoplum, Yellow Ixora, Podocarpus, and
Viburnum. A vast majority of these species were approved on the Phase One
landscape plan. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the landscape plan
(sheet L3 of 3) tabular data must indicate the percentage of native species to
ensure that at least 50% of the plant material is native (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions
of Approval). However, it must be noted that this native plant material requirement
is applied to the entire 28.36-acre parcel and not just this small portion of the
project. The applicant, could in fact, choose to install over 50% non-native plant
material on this Phase Two portion if a minimum of 50% native plant material is
Staff Report - Renaissance Commons Phase II (NWSP 03-016)
Memorandum No PZ 03-263
Page 5
maintained throughout the entire 28.36-acre site.
Building and Site: The proposed building and site design would generally meet code requirements
when staff comments are incorporated into the permit drawings. The Phase Two
portion of the Renaissance Commons project was conceptually approved as a 4,338
square foot bank with a drive-through lane. However, the plans have been
modified and the floor plan (sheet A-1) now shows it proposed as a one (1) story,
4,200 square foot building with three (3) retail bays. The building, including the
arcades, would be 91 feet in length by 58 feet - six (6) inches in depth. The
maximum building height in the C-3 zoning district is 45 feet. The elevation
drawings (sheet A-2) show that the top of the roof would be 27 feet in height. The
top of the decorative cupola would be 41 feet in height.
Design: The entire Renaissance Commons project was designed with extensive high quality
treatment of ground floor public space, discrete separation of private residential
spaces (to the rear and upper levels of the project) and articulated building bases
with store fronts, pilasters, cornices, and arcades proposed on the mixed-use
building. Also, the roof material would be composed of Terracotta Cement S-tiles.
The elevations (sheet A-2) show that this Phase Two building would be consistent
and compatible with the Phase One commercial building. The consistency and
compatibility in architectural enhancements includes foam banding, similar building
colors, same roof type, awnings, and similar exterior finish. To maintain
consistency, these same features are also repeated on Phase Three (see
accompanying staff report for Renaissance Commons Phase Three - NWSP 03-
017). All buildings in the commercial portion of all three (3) phases would be
multi-colored and have a stucco exterior finish. The building colors would be light
brown (IeI #553) and light yellow (ICI #667) with a grayish (ICI #769) trim. The
canvas awnings would be hunter green and the buildings would be adorned with
black metal railings. The outdoor freestanding lighting fixture detail (sheet SP-2)
does not indicate the structure's dimensions. The Phase One detail, approved in
July of 2003, illustrated that the structure would be approximately 15 feet tall and
come with a variety of lighting fixtures (lamps). Staff recommends utilizing the
same pole heights and lighting fixtures that were approved during Phase One (see
Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval).
Signage: The elevation of the commercial building (sheet A-2) shows that each tenant would
have the same sized wall signs, similar to the signs approved in Phase One. Once
the building is built and all tenants of the commercial buildings are determined, the
cumulative area of all wall signage would have to comply with Chapter 21, Article
IV, Section 2.C. of the Land Development Regulations (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions
of Approval). The cumulative signage area would be based on the west building
fa~ade. A note on the elevations (sheet A-2) indicates that the signs would consist
of reverse channel letters that are Helvetica medium gloss black font. No
additional freestanding monument signs are allowed or proposed for Phase Two.
Staff Report - Renaissance Commons Phase II (NWSP 03-016)
Memorandum No PZ 03-263
Page 6
RECOMMENDATION:
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff
recommends approval, contingent upon successfully satisfying all comments indicated in Exhibit "Cn -
Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be
documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
5:\Plannin9\5HARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Commons\NW5P 03-016 Phase II\Slaff Report,doc
Location Map
RENAISSANCE COMMONS
EXHIBIT "A"
~,
\jIC
~
.
I
--,
! ill
II 'I
, I,
I
I
!C3
I
\,-,
( r,
'I' ,,'I
\' ,
1,,1 /,---c
, \\",\ _,........-r i \..----c--
------1'l.r-~,
, , ,i" I I i \
' I', I ! \___-
, , /
, " GATEWAYBJ0iD
\'\ \ \
,I \\ II \ \,
~,",I.-------------',"\
1,\ \
,', \
" \
1,1,
II \
')~II
, ,
mr
'II.
I;"':
I,
,
I
i I
(~
I
L-
,':-.------------
'('
'\
\>~I,
" /
,-------------- ,/
"~,
-'
I .~
'11
, ,-' I I
ill
I"
I,
~-
;
,
'"lJ
u
L-
L
7
~
(
'"
b,
I)
(/"
:1
"
PIO
I
I
i
, /jPIO
'y/ I
, !
i :J
.--------r- I
, I I
i I
i i :j
I L.J,
I
~ ni
,
,
I
,
I
W~E I
S I
/
--"" 0';", i,
". -"-?"f' - n i '" '" it ~..
iliiijll'j!Ij!llilf!IIIIIIII!:lli
il'I I i'! I . I'!. :1 I
'll!!!!i!!!l Iii I!
it illllH i i i I i
., i.1 ,II i I I
i jJ! g.19, _ ,
i I' I' !
I -, f
I I .
. I .,
ii I'iiiliii!! il!
"- ~i#j~#~-,~9.9. ~~-l
"':l lll-,,,,,,,ll.ll.'l. '" ,"
'l.g "..iU... _ I!
'i H , II ~ I
. "
I ;;
'j
iSi~-~-~
~I ~ ;;: i:i I -I ~
"II' ,
:~ :tjl
! ._il:;
· B Ii
'1.1 i\ iiii'!ljjilij!llillli,lil
": '. lP I . I
Ii H Ii I J
~ ~.. ~; I i
I !' !
· i
i I
ie! "1 !'iiJlW
il! I I H,ll"
,! } I ·
: i I I
. .
'i 1 I
I ;
i I
.
!
.
..
r;BH'i~a
;;':,l "''''',;0
;... J ,.
,
,
i
,
I
i
1
l
;~
"
~~
~~
"
'<
I
I
!
j
I
'l~i"i x
r\,.~
,i,s;.
l~,",
" '.
.~ ~?
, ~
.
''''I1>S
',j' !6;
ll"l ~~
~I ~m
p
i
i'
,
!!
I
I.
I Ii
p
~
i ~
j 5
"1l
;::
m
z
-I
~
>
;::
~
>
"
.
~I~~~ ~~
liii!~~
i1,' ii~~
., ~ F
<l~ "("l_
! ~
~
trj
Z
>
~
rJ).
rJ).
1<Jl1.1 I() ~
~j) ~- v ,.........
'co; IF ~ Z
c:::;::l <$!l '1".-, 'lOl,o
~ '~ (/,-
9;~'hi:?c,....,
Q ~ lfUll c,ci ~ \ J.
~ ~ (Ilf/! :'ill ffi trj
IGlii ~g, (hi '-----'
iiII,' .'~ _ ,....,
dO. 'lij] \ J.
<<~[02il 0
.?S (L~ 3:
LUll r -~~
U 5:
~~u') ~ 9 ~
-,^u, g ~
Kjl ~ 0
d0
Z
rJ).
\V
i',1
,
"l ' ~)
C'il
, ~
'---,;;)
"
!,
"~
~~
~
i
r;~
(~~
l ~_,;
,
ilg,,~
.1'1~
Ii!' ~
!I, !~
!1I
"
o
~
'<n,
F
,_u
~V
I
'I ~!J ~
'r f ..
;1;;1 i'i
H II; I)
1111: l
H k m
H' x
, . !I'I ,q 0
l'l I I ! II ~~
~ ~ i ,i,
, . i~ ~
., 'I , ,)>
l! ' . , ~
"I z
i I " I G)
I ,
i " ,
, !' Ii :,
I ~'
'i i.
I,
'I
I
I I
,
,
1"1
!I
,
. I
~:-o~.._,,: _ ,_,~:,,:,;~, =. .:~:;:;;: ':~c:":::,, 7."~,:~.,,;,,,.::; :::,;;:"=;; :-;':'-~',::: ",,:::, - ,"0..""
HIBIT "B"
i~
~ il
il~--I
Ii . 9~
,- -, p~
- -~JJ: ~
,
9~
'. p.
,. ~
I: ~ -
, -
:11,
,.-
, ,
, -
,
,
~
d
t
t
~
",~~
g -0
r
)>
~ z
"
:;,~ ~ ~
It \\
38
/'~....
"
"
..
, '---
~I~-
=L-T"'"-'
- ~~-- -4
-~.- --- -'-
1
~--
~ __ ----=-----' _ --.. - ...:====l__ c- _-=-=~
---.------..-......-
,--
"\
(-=-
, 7
~ e~:'
<::: '
=
,
=,
; ,'lz~Ci;n
W ..""
I~! ~ ~
" ,Ii
,... -"",r_,,,,,<
o "..",
() -,--c::::lT;;
~ ~ ~: ~ :;
a2 il ,~
B 'i: ,~
,~ '.
ftj ~ ",~ ""~, .
o F2~"-,!~j
}; ~"'\ }.. ""~
l!(~~ '''Itl
~ \ Ii
--. I..
L ___ .J
Nt ~~rd~
IREIJIAISSAIHICIE COMIMiOIllllS
I.!l'HASE II
~
CQM>SQ"l ASSOCIATES a= OOYTOO II. u...c,
M'
EIO'fNTON €EACk A..CQIDA
:::.?:,;,t~:t'~!'0!':ii:;~t:~~:.=.~~...:l .;-.:;:;~='t ,~,';:':;;.:';i~~~~;~:.:,~":,;,.a.'I::;":;'~:'~;;w.:.
~
'~~ ~
~i ;il - lL
'Iii ~~I-' I"" .--1
. \ ' 'I [: "
2 ili'l~ !;il~ ~"k I'" II · 11ft" '1 ft In
. lil:'!i !!ei' "11 .;! - Ii jl il ! 'I ~ B _..~."..
III, In,J i d Iii! I!I l~~ 'Il]~ '1'!1 'I"':;'~CC i'!g r'FJ;
I I I,! "!1 " li~' I l Pi" j' ,z~, "
, " 1" II '> '1'1' I , '~I, f
, !" j:i!l 'e I " ' lilllli!1 \ ',"--
. MO . _ ,..L lIiiljiil
., SA URIZ i;';;:~:";::c" (
LAZAR M"'" .. l ~1li:W1AI3~'!!'li'IrG
ARCH'Tlm & PLANNER' C0~ "..:. ~~....~..
].. "SSOC'A~OFBOT1
" B01N~O..... ON LI, L.l ,c.
NBEACH,PLCi<IOA
1il\ .\.J~li!-
~\ 1r-1m~~/~~7. jj I~ tl
~',., ;l::?~{ 1: ,;'~l- III 'I
. ,~,:I I ,_- ~!;~t - I --~
, ' : : _ Ii- - I -,
, +_ , ," " 1"/ '.' I
,_,1' _J ........ ~~ ~ I
, "";{Y _j" ::r~ '" J ~. ,!~J~-- ~-G
I ..<IS " ~ ...... I 1 ~ 'I:~ I J ~
I .:{,", .., ~'- .~~-' .
I.>/., _ _~ ~ ' ~ I_j >, ~~
~: _- ': ~,.._' '---'' " II
, I I - ,-"-"=.. ,',' .4['1'
_ ,;' . _',_ 'il', "
l I : ,I' I '~" 'J"
01 -,~ :-'=- ' "11"1 1'- '
, _.,. __,-'0- ",,_--c> t',: I
I' " - - -~' ~~. I,' I
,...-=;- -==......._ .~r
: 1~ ,l; ,\
",_ ::~-: '111,1"1'1
I' I ,I I
__ 1-,,: ill'jll
: -.-----1:1 II ,
,... : ,-;----"1 ,I' II
j \ 'j": , 'I
<'. ", ITTTTTri ) .: :: 11'111
" I,' ~,' II
1\ ' - II II '
__ " ".oil, I'll
: '\fJLJUI 1-.J~~JI
i.' ~{U,~ !i ::1111::
I ; ,'t<!! .=JI::, II
:' E'l' II' III1
: r I:'L~ ~':i :1'1 II! ~' \ii
I ,I II I -<J>
: J ,,!:' 'I II i~' 'II
!I: j if ' Jt '"1"11 i i Ii! '1
'I' I: '\ ~....,.C* ' :E :- I ,I h !'\
II t/ " I ,IITTTl) ." i :' II 11\1
ril-- ~-r'-c- . 1-;: I: :\i
liTI""::- _~ I ! \
I
I
I
I
I '~
I
I
I
',;<
1]
1:
l>
(fJ
m
"
q
"'
~ (\(,(1)
.--.. ~~ 5
, ]?lS
r@ ~,,- ~
" '
I v' U
~ Ii@ I j:
. ,I.
EXHIBIT "B"
l
o
o
7
~
m
"'
m
"
<
m
z
c
m
illl' ~@~
I ~ i
1111I1I11:Illi
i !!iIII'lllll!1
111'1,11'
.1
I
I
II
II
llill,,,I i
.,
I!?'F,'
i i iill i Ilil!~ Iii 111111
, !ii ,1 I I".!'il
I II t Il't
. I ;i Ii
~'-'I'I
. ",,11
, L:ulL ,....- '!I,
11~~~!IIIF.Ili!ii lll!l'li!~ Iii i I
~fil' ~ '1'1' I j" I
~~dll~il II il! II Iii
! II I I II :
L,", ,! I' I I
__ Ii,
J ~~\l:~
!~ I .
~ \ ~
b L ' II
L .-
,
~
1
0 11
r
0
. 0
'l
. ;Jl
)>
z
~ ID
r
0
(j)
C)>
~,
oi~
~\~
r!;~
~
~~g ~ ~
r"l~ ~9
'l6~ (j)~
2 ~l IiWF
~ =1B2l
'"
\ F
! '"
, li!
~ ~
..
~@
~
I
~
" "'''I
'i;'~'
~ ~,
,hi
n n r-t -- -'--'~I ~~-,-,~:= -"~:~~~;: --'-~l)
,- I In 'n_ ~,- __ /,'/,/ I.'L':
, / \ I
, . !i II, ,
_ I I I I ! I I , I I I: :
-- I I
'i
I,
I,
I
I
,
,
,
, ,
: I
"
"
'i
I,
16'. I
l --rib' i
, ,
"
"
'i
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,"
i'l
,
,
,
,
,
I
"
" '
"
t~"
\. ;'c
'- ^.~
",-"" I
I
Nt ~~rd~
EXHIBIT "B"
-~--- -
.
~
.. ,r~
-L '~~ I
;;:,4 '-.-~'~"
,-'
I
--r
....-
&.
&.&.
~.
Pt,l
!.2i:
,
~ -
t-:.;rJ(f)~
Om-lo
O~2(i)
~F-<'"
"
.
..;
!
~;" "
31'. 2"~'"
2~ -
24'..-
j'
,!
~ & ' " j . ~T' I
", ",,",""
~; : ;i;~'j:- 6~';'~J ~ .~,tIU,r1
"!i" ""'Tn
.
,iQ
r .,,,,,,;<....,(>,,...
R i'CEt
~ l:; ~! ~ !~
~ ~ ,- ,~
d 5~, I~,:
i ~ ;~ .u
Q f':~'~' -.;-~
!~ f,:~ &~}~'I
,~ (
lID '
~L,,_ !!
RIENAIS"3iIlllClE COiilMlON~
PHA$IE II
=
CX':lM'SON ASSOCIA~ OF BOYTON II. L..LC,
BOYNTOO EEAO-l. R-QI;!IDA
:~t~~_:;1f,d:~~,r:~~."t7~0:";';.~ ';"".~"^"':':::'.~,~' ,~:;':..:-::',"":'.~:':'~.1' :;:':;~,::'.::O .~-;:;'::;~<;'.. ~~~.:.
"'"''''MWJ<."".,'''',H.>.'''''
,"","",..m''''~''"'''
n~! _I "
0 :e
] m m
l> . en
en --i
-; J
pl ,
m
< , ~
l>
--i
(5
Z
~ ,.~
~ ,~!
~ Iii
~ q ~
I!
(M) ~"
~
!l ::or!.,,1
411-01 ___ A1..d'_
0 en
0
c
. i!
m
~
~ l>
--i
(5
Z
~
~
!!!l &
'~,
:','
Ii
~~
"
"
'!
I
" 'V
'~~'I I
I ~~ ~ - ~
i ~z
o ----'-
, ~ n
"
, €>-
!:l ~ m ,,:i
~ ~ ~Jlf'l
~ i:"IS J.-
Ik!l Ji. &
-~ '
~lj
...=.
Iii ~ i~:
Ii. 1m,
iii J i~i
~u :~:
h ;!cn:
Ih t ::g:
.1 ~ '0:
.I~ J L~
" .\ill
:/Y r". "n::~"(o?
.l'l! i!!i,(i,1
11!"lml'l~
i! ." 'jl-IZ
8' .11 ~I h 0
I' hi -- II oj
I!!ll il!'"
! I . II i;:
Idl"!I'
Ii I I "I
EXHIBIT "B"
o
.
~
~
~
~
..Cd
tt MOURIZ 1Ji:=.:::='K "."A"'A~'" "o,,"o~.
t """"'.." PJtlASIl; II
SAlA.Z^.R CQMPSON ASSOC1~5 OF BOHON u...c
MCHITECTS & PlANNERS <.m"""'"""....' "","",,,",,,"'__ we ...u,.."'.....~:c:'::o::-=~~ _...;;;;..-;;.-_,;;.
~~~t.."_'''''~' "'M~'_""'_' ,-_..~__,"__.____~,""",
I' .
il~ ,.
II: :!
d:~U
"
'; ;!!
~~
~;; = ....
u~ IW
.,0
Ii"
i !
I ;::
~ ~ !il
~ ~ >
H~
~d
~ I ~
q~
~ ~
~~
fi
~
~
~
'"
m
;:;
in
~~
>z
~ n
mm
~n
o
II:
"'
!il
~
i
."
ill
c:
"'
~
'"
-<
m
i!i
z
m
m
'"
Z
.,
'" ~ ... ., -
~ !OJ
~ ~
~
"'5",..~",
;;-'
!
<;>
,
~
~
~
0'
II
~
,
Il I
. f.
. I
L ,
I
I" I' !i ,I,
"
~ ' '
j .'
, , j!
_L
Oi
. ,
I I'.
I. '
, '
"'-----I
~---~~~
Ii
~F
','"
f;':t
.';
hl-T
:-_,,1
'.i ;<
l,; lJ
';":1"
:~/ g;~
;:~~ ~~
';
,~nA'_
1 r'
i ~I~;r
illll
'1111,
)1111. :1>1"
1-: II: ;;.~ :m
; ::I_lt :LJ II1I
,.tJ!!-II. "+11111
, I_~' II! 11:1111
H'Ij.II, 11;,"11-
.~,' I ~_ 'I, I I. 1111'
e, '! 1 II' 11'1111~
,JjJl~! ,,.,,'"
:J V~", : I':::::
~_,,'I\ j.,",_;;,_ 11,1i11'
Jt;'~ +il;:;"2" "ESiiW
d:J "I;J 1'__...,_"_,-':""""'~:2:!I'--_Jt!i
)~'1'11 }~,", i --r~'l---
:~: :,--1 '~>_ - n"
...rJf.. ' ,,'7- ' ",I'
'1"-' I ", '" l~l,:
" ',"1' ' , '" 'I' III~ ,"'",
~~;;2~~"d~""c~uii :!> ,II' ,ill., I"
__'~'f~~~~,.:;'lJ; i ll"-=.J>
, , / ,~i ; i'll
/ -(':~ l: r : ~jl,,: ,i~
/ ,_~:~ \ s
::;.: -,
",' .l#l' f
1m
I (I
I I ~I
'" :':~~
:~~~~?~~:. ~ ~ ~:;~ ~ ~ ~:-~-:~~i>
I::
'"
::1
II:
'"
'"
::1
"
"
"
"
"
:'
,"
---'~
t
u
~,--"
,.If'
<
~"
"II""'; I
3; i ~~~ i
H~~~ i ~;I ~
~~~~ ~ II' I
_I"~ II'
",' "-.
"'1 'II
i!~.~ ~ J.
. ~. ~ .
iSi ij"
'ili II
. ~. 1
'''!~ ;. , " . ~ U"
". I ,!".,,, I
~~ ";~:~;:H
!il'! !!! iil If!!:! !i i
I'i!' ~ ! i III 1i,IlI II
,!",p' ~ -i, I"i'" .I!
~~~~ ~ 'is eii~ i gi~ ~~ Ii
~I~!i ~ :,8 1..;l~1 ~i ..
~~161 ~ ~I! lilll~~;;
.,!!;;; ;:~ ~:I::i
~~!~ i~ ill ~ ;
.,Ii !i 1:1;'
I;;a ~ iii ~ ~
. ~ .
ii" :'1'; ,,;.; I'
I! !li,' qlll' i
ill 1-;; ~ ~i' ' l
III I" ~ . . . - I
~il P:~ II i;;~ :1
Iii iii': !i!'!i
,., II lib;;!
., I;; "...~ I
-10 II < ~~,.
I!, ,i! ill'
. .
~
:~~:.'""U.". '0' . , 'u'
suniii.R.". .H'
~:!g~~~~H Hi i liP ~! ii
i'!!iiill!iillliqni:~
.1l11il:P"!: in II
~ j I' ! ~ - !
I 5
'jIDo'l: .1]ITIJ,..li .~
nmHiil!!iI'!" ~
i I_~.q~. .u1i ! iI
_ duq!!LH ~
:; ~,; ~ pt'
. j ~ . J A:
Ii:
! !
\ ~
,
I
I
j
,
,
I
I
I
,I
1 :1
'T
I!
"
,
EXHIBIT "B"
~
.
;!
g
~
m
~
,
"
,:
,
H
I'
i' ,
0; ~' ,. ';IV""
'" ~
,
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Renaissance Commons Phase II
File number: NWSP 03-016
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with a November 4. Planning and Zoning
Department date stamp marking,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments:
1. City of Boynton Beach Utility Department approval and Palm Beach County
Health Department permits will be required for all water and sewer work on
this project (CODE. Section 26-12),
2. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code
requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR. Chapter 6, Article IV,
Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever
is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)),
3. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer
utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the
City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that
setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancv.
4. A building permit for this project shall not be issued unlil this Department has
approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to
service lhis projecl, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15.
5. All utility conslruction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities
Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction
Standards" manual (including any updates); and will be reviewed at the time
of construction permit application,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
6. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets,
COA
11/12/03
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
7. At the time of permitting, ensure that proposed canopy trees do not conflict
with the freestanding outdoor lighting fixtures, It may be necessary to replace
or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate future
shadowing on the parking surface (Chapter 23, Article II, Section A,l.b),
8. The sight triangle shown on Sheet SP-1 does not meet FDOT Standard Index
546 as stated. Please correct.
9. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the
LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of
permitting.
10. Engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable
City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for
constructability at the time of construction oermit aoolication.
FIRE
Comments:
11. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained
throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3-5,
and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction, Alteration. and
Demolition Operations, Section 5-4,3,
POLICE
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
12, Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the
minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure
shall be determined by the provisions of Chapter 6 of ASCE 7, and the
provisions of Section 1606 (Wind Loads) of the 2001 FBC, Calculations that
are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of
Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit aoolication.
13, At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the
proposed construction.
14, A water-use permit for the irrigation system is required from the SFWMD, A
copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S.
373.216.
COA
11/12/03
3
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
15. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of
Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be
provided at the time of building permit application:
>- The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan.
>- The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how
much is for sewer. (CBBCO), Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
16, At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract.
For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded
deed shall be submitted at time of permit review,
17. The required fire separation between tenants in building #6 shall comply with
Section 704 and Table 704 of the 2001 FBC.
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
18. The applicant must indicate on the landscape plan, the eXlstmg trees /
vegetation that will be preserved, relocated, and removed / replaced on the
site, A separate symbol should be used on the landscape plan to identify
these trees / vef!etalion.
19. All shade trees on the Plant List must be listed in the specifications as a
minimum of 12-14 feet in height, three (3) or four (4) inches in caliper at
DBH four and one-half (4.5) feet off lhe ground, and Florida #1 (Florida
Grades and Standards manual) The height of lhe trees may be larger than 12-
14 feet to meet the three (3) or four (4) inch caliper requirement (Chapter 7,5,
Article II Sec. S.C. 2.).
20. During the permit review process, the proposed 22,000 square foot lake
shown on sheet SP-1 must be designed with upland and littoral zone trees /
vef!etation alonf! 50% of the lake oerimeter (Chaoter 7,5, Article II Sec. SA.).
21. The irrigation design should be designed for water conservation and tree
health. All shade and palm trees should receive irrigation from a bubbler
source, including the lake plantinf!s (Chaoter 7.5, Article II Sec. SA.).
22, Turf areas should be limited in size. Landscape (bedding plants) areas should
COA
11/12/03
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
be designed on separate zones with proper time duration for water
conservation (Chapter 7,5, Article II See,S, C.2.).
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
23, The traffic impact analysis for the entire Renaissance Commons project
consists of 300 apartment units, 200 townhouse units (for a total of 500
dwelling units), and 43,820 square feet of retail space, As proposed, the retail
area would be divided into five (5) separate buildings. No building permits
can be issued until the entire project meets the Traffic Performance Standards
(TPS) of Palm Beach County, At the time of permitting, submit a rectified
overall site plan, indicating all the above referenced uses and their respective
square footages. The number of units and retail buildings areas proposed on
the rectified overall plan must match the annroved traffic imnact analysis.
24. If not done so already, abandonment and rededication of easements must be
recorded prior to issuance of a building permit for the proiect.
25. Staff wants to ensure that the (entire) Renaissance Commons' parking
requirements are still met. At the time of permitting, submit a rectified
overall site plan indicating an updated required / provided parking tabulation
(for Phase One and Two).
26. Since Phase Two is not proposed as a separate out-parcel, include a revised
setback table (as shown on sheet SP-2) with only the "front yard" information
comnleted.
27. Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the
building color (Chapler 9. Section lO,CA,), Place a note on the sile plan
indicating this requirement.
28, All trees, if proposed as trees. must be alleast 12 feet in height and three (3)
caliper inches at the time of their installation (Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section
5,C,2,). This would apply to the Ligustrum, Bouganvillea, and Pygmy Dale
palm trees.
29. Once the building is built and all tenants of the commercial buildings are
determined, the cumulative area of all wall signage would have to comply
with Chapter 21, Article IV, Section 2.C. of the Land Development
Regulations.
30. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species
(Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5,P). On the landscape plan (sheet L3 of 3),
provide the percentage of native canopy trees. palm trees, shrubs / accents,
and groundcover to ensure compliance with this code requirement. This
requirement applies to the entire 28.36-acre site known as Renaissance
COA
11/12/03
5
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Commons and not just this phase.
31. The Landscape Plan (Sheet L2 of 3) does not depict the trellises and
associated landscaping visually portrayed on the elevations (sheet A-2).
Please update this sheet and ensure that these structures and landscaping do
not encroach into the loading space and do not infringe on the exit access for
pedestrian movements.
32. For the Phase Two portion of Renaissance Commons project, staff
recommends utilizing the same outdoor freestanding lighting fixture's pole
heights and lighting heads that were approved during Phase One,
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD COMMENTS:
Comments:
33, To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS:
Comments:
34, To be determined.
ELJ
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Commons\NWSP 03-016 Phase meOA.doc
DEVELOP!>.. .NT ORDER OF THE CITY COMMl~ .>ION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: Renaissance Commons Phase Two
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Mr. James Comparato and Mr. Carl Klepper - Compson Associates, Inc.
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 980 North Federal Highway, Suite 200, Boca Raton, FL 33432
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: December 2,2003
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Site Plan approval for a 4,200 square foot commercial building on a
28.368-acre site in a C-3 zoning district.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: East side of Congress Avenue, north of the Boynton Canal
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above, The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1, Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations,
2, The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3, The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set
forth on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included",
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk,
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S:\Plannlng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renalssance Commons\NWSP 03-016 Phase IIIDO.doc
FROM: CITY OF BOYNTON BCH UTIL11 lc~ ~RX NU. ; ~bl(~~b~~~
JU.l. l. ( -=::::ralQ.:l 1Q.:l..1 rrTI r--=::::
. ,
~I'"
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NO. 03.101
',I,
,,-\"
,..>> i"
TO:
Diane Reese, Financ~rec~r
p~ V. Mazzella, ~tilities Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 8, 2003
SUBJECT: Capital Facilities charge Transmittal - Motorola Site . Renai..anee
COlDIDorik
The developer has elected to pre-pay the capital facilities charges for a portion of this
project rather than pay the capacity reservation fee, as allowed by section 26-34(B) of the
City's code.
'.
The capital facilities charie ill baaed upon the unit size and COWlt as shown on the
attached sheet. Payment of this fee waa a condition of the purchase contract for the land,
which is why we are receiving such a large amount at this time. The plans for tho project
are still being revised, so we cannot ascCJtain exact buUding and unit numbers or
addresses at this t.ime. We ww. however, request a breakdown of buildIDllUld UIIIt
numben for thele capital f.cUitlea eharp8 frolD the developer. and traDImlt that
information to the BuilcUnl Dlvlllon 10 that these IUIIOUllts may be properly
eredUed.
The attaebed check no. 1601 in the amount ofS447,693.8S sh~uld be credited as follows:
Water Capital Facilities Charge
Sewer Capital Facilities Charge
Amount $ 380,092.08
Amount$~
Total ~
, :
Please deposit this check in the appropriate cap fee accounts. Thank you.
The reservation fee for the balance of this project is being sent to you under separate
cover.
Attachment
PVM
Xc: Peter Mazzella (w/copy of att:acluncn~)
Tim Large, BuildiDS Division, Dept. of DllVClopment (w/copy of attachmentl)
John Pagliarulo, Building Division (w/copy of attac}1m"11ts)
File
FROM : CITY OF BOYNTON BCH UTILIT1~~ ,RX NU. : ~bl(4~b~~~ JUl. l( ,:::lQlQ~ t:I..J..1.r,11 r..J
,
.'
;a...'" i~~~im i~
II pjlJllJl
" ~!! sra!l~ Ii
111m
~f~
~f ~~I I;
Ii i
~~
m
l- i
I
~ ...... f ..~p'..,..p !
:..,m.. :. ...bI"''''
I I !ll",rn {TI:!lmrn~'" , ..
c:1'!=I p. j!!!=I P I
II !=!= i != !=!=
S'
! ~
.lK I
~I II ~ ~~ U~ I~I
!i~ ..
1 !::l
J:.i ~~ .... ~; ~~.~ i
....I Ii)
iI.. 1 I I
sit ~ ~
I
l I , 1
lr
e.. If t
M !%;~~~! i~
I !l!2!: a
~
I!I. ~!I I Et~l~ gi
',' I
Ii,
~f~ i j jjl-lIlgOl I~ I
~Ii "all
I
lil
II ~ ~ !:!: mUll
lilll.ll. !l$~
, , ~ I ~~~
III ill Slr:l8
iliil~m j
121 I ~~~
'" "N~
~~UM : CITY OF HUYNIUN H~H UIIL111~~
t ~ t"'H^ ["tw. . ;,)OJ. r....O:::'Ol::::IO
..I\,.I.J.. .1.1 ,,,,",U-' ~""""'''''''' ....
....,
...
-
Dale S. sugerman, Assistant City Manager
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beaoh, F/orld8 33425
581.742-tJ466 (telephone)
661-742-8298 (fax)
8Uf..mMn8n1 bDVfttan,.Matlh R.ue (e-mail)
City of Bovnton
6e~lch, Flol idzl
\
{
"--" ~
,~~~
'nil carll<IeppBr- Ctll.lp1D11 A8&0Cia\llll
.... 1i81-3D1~
...... 1lltI-3Il1.e67ll
... Q1(1f d R8c8Ipl
"'11II Dale S. Sugem1III1. AlI&I8I8nt CIty MaI.eger
....... rIVe
.... 07117103
CCI None
c ...... C ..... ...11- [J ...... c_._..... c .........,
Cl......u~c1.
.c.a.....~
Mr. Klepper-
Congratulations on the approval of your site-plan by the BoynlDn Beach City
Comml88lon this put Tue&day evening. M per your .-quest. attached 18 a oapy of
the docun'lentatloll' .haWing recelpt of the payment for water and eewer Impact fees
for the Renal_nee Commons project, TheBe fees are payment for the 127,000 gpcl
capital facllltiee charges thllt were originally vested In the MotOrOla DR!.
Should you need any additionai infannlltlon, please be sure to contact me at the
telephone number of e-malladdreSl lI.led abOVe.
1,- Dak-
Dale S. Sugerman, AslIi.tant City Manager
ct:-~ 1)mt-
:n....
-
~~M : CITY O~ HUYNIUN H~H UIIL111c~
t'H^ r'lu. . JOJ.. r.....::::.o.:::.='o
.,Ju..L. .Lr lC:.CJu.... ~............,., ''''
.
...,
Dale S. sugerman, Assistant City Manager
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beaoh, Florida 33425
581-742-8456 (telephone)
661.742~298 (faK)
'b~.oI bIWntari.:~ah.n.UB (e-mail)
City of Boynton
Beach, Flol Ida
\
OMMW'l -:t\- ~ {
'........... )-//
_~.-c/
'IbI carll<Ieppllr- CanpIOI1 AI80Cialllll
r.a fllI1-391~
"'IN Dale S. s~, A.N11Jd: CIty MalI8glll'
......1 F'1V8
..... fllI1-391-8670
..... (17117103
... COW d R8ceIpI
CCI None
C...... C ,.,....4" C...n-lPc...-- [] ......., C"__Rnv'"
. cw,..'......1I
Mr. Klepper-
Congratulations on the approval of your lite-plan by the Boynton Beach City
CommIuIon this put TuBlday evening. M per your J8quea~ attached is a oopy of
the docunentatlof'\ shoWing receipt of the payment for water and sewer Impact t'eeB
for the Renal_nc8 eommone projeCt. TheBe feel are payment for the 127,000 gpd
capital facilities charges that \MIre origlnaUy vested In the Motorola DR!.
Should you need any additional info".llItIon, please be sure to contact me at the
telephone number of e-mail addrese Us18d abOVe.
',- D a.k-
Dale S. Sugerman. As&i8tant City Manager
~.V DO\t.
:rL-'
FROM: CITY OF BOYNTON BCH UTILlll~~ rRX NU. : ~bl(q~b~~~
JUl. .i( ~lQlQ") lQ.:l~.L(rl'l r'~
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NO. 03-101
. . ,~:"
...a i"
TO:
Diane Reese, Finance Erec~r
P~r V. Mazzella, ~tilities Director
FROM:
DATE:
July 8, 2003
SUBJECT: Capital Facilities Charge Transmittal - Motorola Site . Renaissanee
Commori'i
The developer has elected to pre-pay the capital facilities charges for " pordon of this
project rather than pay the capacity reservation fee, as allowed by section 26-34(E) of the
City's code.
'.
The capital facilities charge ill based upon the unit size and count as shown on the
attached sheet. payuumt of this fee was a condition of the purchase contract for the land.
whieb is why we are receiving such a large amount at this time. The plans for the project
are still being revised, so we C8JIJlCIt asc~in exact building and unit numbers or
addresses at this time. We ww. however, request a breakdown of buiJdlDl and UIIIt
awaben for these capital factJ1tiell ebal1Ies from the developer, amd tr....mlt that
informatioD to the BuBdtng Division .0 that these 8PlOUlltB may be properly
eredlted.
The attached chcckno. 1601 in the amount ofS447,693.8S sh~uld be credited as follows:
Sewer Capital Facilities Charge
Amount $ 380,092.08
Amount S....61.6fll,ll
Total ~
Waw Capital FacUities Charge
, i
Please deposit this check in the appropriate cap fee accounts. Thank you.
The reservation fee for the balance of this project is being sent to you under separate
cover.
Attachment
PVM
Xc: Peter Mazzella (w/copy of amahp'ePts)
Tim Large, Building Division, Dept. of Development (w/copy of attaclunlmtR)
John Pagliarulo, Building Division (w/copy of attacIunents)
File
FROM: CITY OF BOYNTON BCH UTILITI~~ ~RX NU. : ~bl(q~b~~~
JUl. I( .r:::;t:llQ.,) lO..JoJ.lrTI r..J
;II"'''' N,,~(,IN"" ;~
II pjlDal ~~PlIR;~
~!! SlshS r
!il I~Un al
elf
:aq-
I. t mg~ I
9
mm m
l- I
!~ ""IS"''''''''' ~
"'.... J
~i:D:' . ....lDN'"
I !llrnrn fT1~!llrn~rn . ..
~f c:l'P o. cP l' I
!=!= i= !=!=
I
I !l'
~
i I
~l ~ ~~ U~ IiI
~~ ..
I !::l
.!:l ~~ ~ ~; ~9'~ i
....I iii
iii.. 1 1 o ~ I
I:,
J ~
, 1
IS'
f ! !!If!~~~! Ii
M I !!l!!l!l a
~
Il I!I I Itl~~ I~
'"'
i
~
ii1if~ i i:l1"lIl~Di i~ I
~I i .. "all
....
..
IiI 1
11 ~ ~ !!l!!l ~ 1'1 I
Qll.1I. ~S~ "lll~ !!l
I I ~~~ to l~
, . ~~I 19i!l
III ill linl!
;"~i~i i
ill I ~~~
;., .. ~ ~ ii'A.. i
10/31/2003 09:31
5514341553
PINDER TROUH1AN
PAGE 02
PINDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING. INC.
October 30, 2003
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
www.pindertroutman.com
Transportation Planners and Engineers
Ms. Sherrie Coale
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box310
Boynton Beach, Ft. 33425-0310
Re: Renaissance Commons - Phase II - #PTC03.75
Dear Ms. Coale:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to 1" Review Comments regarding traffic issues for the above referenced
project. The department comment is summarized below with a response following.
Public Worb - Traffic
5. Comment:
Response:
County Notice of Concurrency
Attached is a copy of the County's letters of concurrency for the Motorola project as well
as the City's letler regarding vested trips. The proposed, Phase I and Phase II,
development is well below the thresholds approved for the entire project as well as below
the trips for the approved plan. Attachments 1A-1 C provide the daily, AM and PM peak
hour trip generation analysis for the proposed plan.
Planning & Zoning
68. Comment:
Response:
Equivalency Analysis
Attachments lA-l C include the comparison of the approved 3,500 SF bank with the
proposed 4,200 SF of retail. This analysis shows that the proposed development generates
less traffic than the approved development
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
AMT/ldr
Attachments
cc: Carl Klepper
Jeff Schoors
letre, Coale 03-75 ItJ.30-03
Pi
10/31/2003 09:31
tn~.$ro"I
~g!l'O
.....~flIY'"
~~~t
o
~
~
...
a
=
!!
.
j
...
c
t
'E
.."
e::
..
~
..c::
....
..
e::
o
E
< g e::
~ u.g
... e ~
5i c UJ
] .m~
<.> ..
~ 5i .g-
<"'I-
5614341663
J is. '" '" '" ~ ~
. '" . ." '"
.. .- "l. "!. IX> . '"
z~ ~ ~ .-
." ~ ." ~
0 co
>-~ 0 0 ..= ...;
..,c . .
.
a.~ . ;1; co
co ""
....... ' . "" '" 0_
~
~ '" '" '" ..... '" '"
!i .~ ~, '" N '" '"
N "t IX> '"
.Jl.... ~ ~ ~ ",-
~ ~ ~ ~ ."
.2 ""
'" '" 0 cO
~ ...: ...: 0 0
.... ~ ~
;;;
E IX> '" 0 '" ""
.l!l '" 0 ..... '" ('of
.E ~ ~ ~ '"
,: .~
:$....
u-
..
-e
=.21
Us:
1; _~ :5 ~ ..... '" '"
'" ('of '"
~ "", '" ~
o "C ",- ",,-
........ ~ ~
~ ""
""
c ~
.21 '" u..
+ '"
~ 8 8
c: :l :l ,
,g 0 0 c: ~
- - -' -
'"
l! ..... ..... . ~
~ "" "!
0 '"
.. ""
U 8 '"
.~ E
~
.... e::
....
.~ '" '"
::l ::l u.. u..
.. 0 0 '" '"
c: 0 8 0 8
.21 0 0
.5 '" '" "t '"
~ ",'
~
.. 0 0 0 '"
......
.... 0 '" '" N ~
-u N N '" '"
~ Sl
c: ::l
.. 0
E 1
Sl II
:l e::
-r
... , . .~
c: ;;; OJ
~ "" 'oW 0
e:: c:
1II 1II .
... ... S .>t
~ .;; e::
~ ~ .z
.."
Ql
>
2
0..
~
>
...
<
Q
PINDER TROUH1AN
0 ..... ~
'" '" '"
0 '" '"
M ",- .'
~
N N '"
~ .e. .e.
N ~
~ ~ !::!
-
N '"
~ ~ ~
fj ~ fj
S ill S
~
c:
c: ::l
::l 0
8 u
=
~ ."
.. c:
U ..
... '"
0 ill
z "'
.c:
...
02
0
"'
E
s
~
<
'C:
....
...
J!l
'"
~
,
>
...
~
~ .9- '" '" . ~
. '" '" '"
"l. "!. '" N
z~ ~ ~ -i'
." ~ ."
0 '"
>-~ 0 0 ...=
..,c .
,
a .9- ..... .....
...~ 0 0
, . co '"
"' .e '" '" ~ co
j;:: . '" 0 '"
"', "'_ co_ 0
~ ~ ~ .,,'
~ ~ ~ "1ft.
.e .
'" "l 0 cO
~ ...: ... 0
.... ~
OJ
c:
~ IX> '" :5 '"
.l!l '" 0 '"'
.5 ~ ~ N .
,: .e
c: ~
8=
ow
- E
= .l!l
U.5
- .e 0 0 8 ~
.l! ._ 0 0 0
~ ., "t
o ~ ",-
........ ~ N ."
~ ""
""
c ~
.l!l ."
~ +
8
c: :l :l
0 e. 0 e::
."" - ....
'"
l! ..... ... .
~ '"
Ql c::i
U 8
.~ E
~
.... t::
....
.~ .. ..
::l ::l u..
.. 0 0 '"
c: 8 8 ~
J!l
.E '" '" '"
.-
~
.. 0 0 0
......
.... 0 '" '" ('of
-u N '" '"
'c: Sl
::l
.. 0
€ .c:
ill c:
:l ~ ~
.." , ,
c: OJ OJ
ow
-' "" ""
c: c:
1II 1II
... ... ]j
j .;;
~ ~
.."
ill
o
Q..
o
~
....
PAGE 03
g
~
;;,
~
I
.Il
~
~
!!
~
-c
~
c
::l
...=
5 ~
Q -c
u~
1 ~:I
~ ~
;"
~~
u.. C:
i~
E ~
;;;!'
~ ~
'" c
~ -8
.J'! !'!
-= 8..
"j;; ~
u.. l!
ol"l-
go
,a, ~
j]
~ ~
Q Q
SlSl
c!::!
10/31/2003 09:31
"'!!J:..!!'"
""~~'15
8Q.....
dH
.....~
~
~
~
o
1
1
t
:s
=
...
"
..
! 11
....
... e
- ...
co ...
~ <
.
E ..
. c " ::>
~\Jj 0
~ . ~ :I:
" y . ..
~ co co
.... .1.3 <
~
,..... ...
"- ~
<I~
5614341663
1!:2 :::::1 ..
~
N
...
-
~":i~~ ..~ ~
~
. 0 ~ N
!
...... ~N ill
.s N ~ ~ ~
~~ ~~
.!"Eioo l~
*
.f~ .... '"
. , ~ ~ ~
~..~ ii ...
..... ~
~ ~
...
~...~~ "'.. 0
~ ~ ~
ti :::I .... N
EO
! ...... :!;:::l ~
Sr"ol.......
.~ ~~ tt ~
~
t~l"\IN ~~ .
H...~ ...... '^
Jj ~
.:
>.@
8;;
-"
; ~ .
tJ~
1~= ;; ..
N
~
...
.~.... ~ ~ N" ~
..." ~ N~ ...
10 N
... ...'" ~'" 0;
N~ N N
.:
6'_
.!:?;
Ei- :0..
j~~ at~
:;l",
siSiS U
.~--
t.l~~ i~
~=o '^~
" ci
.~ ,
... E
5
~H :l;il;
iiss ~~
.5I"l1N
~~
~
~OO ON
; ~~ go;
'81
&
:!l J CO
'T
... r.i . .~
Ii I
- 1! 0 ~
-I li <
J ...
0
6 6 6
a. ~. ~
..
~
~ ~
~ ~
<a
~
N <:!
::! '"
I j
~
-
PINDER TROUH1AN
,
..
::>
o
:I:
..
<
~
...
~
1!0\""'~ ..
.....N '"
. ~ N
...
-
.;: 1l'I.. 0 ..
l-~rt"""~ 0
.o~ N
.
Z
......'" ~
.sN,...r- '"
~~~
fEoo;
.!! .... ~
l- . , N N
1P~ iii
N
~...
i= ""....10 ...
-!;~......... ~
EO N
! ........ 18
.st'lC....N
~l'" '"
~
,~ . . ~ ~
joooNNC .
.111 ....
oE,."".." N
Jj ~
.:
,:~
S...
y ..
-e
; Jj ,
"s
19 ~ I:;; St
. ~ N
el-
.;:...::.: ~:c ~
I- ,,~ N
-0 N
~ ...'^~
I- N~~ R
s
6'
.!:?
ai~ ~
'"
at
.!I~J:;:; N
:J~~ ~
...
~ ~~ .
g
.,::; l 5
Ii ci ci Ii
" '"
.~ ci
,
... E
5
.!i~~ ill
...
iiss i
SI"lIN ...
~
~-82~ 0
=8NN g
'8 I
&
:!! j
3ji ~
1 i:5
'1 s
1
&.
e
...
PAGE 04
,
6
9
'2
~
i
!
j
]
~
:>
t~
,h
P
~t
q
h
}=
.L
Hi
~h
~.. -i.
Ih
iH
cas
10/31/2003 09:31
~u.;;
~:;;ai.
~~~.l
s!
~
~
,J,
c
1
I
J
=
1
"
II
.2
...
.
i
E
u 0 ~
~u.g
- ~ l!
:;" 11
E .. ..
....-u
~ ~ C-
....'"
<.....
5514341553
111~=~~
1.1'" ~
~~:;~~~
eO
z
"'::8""......
.=;: "'.
~l~
~aoci;~
* - _ 0
....:;: \Ole
lN~\Of"t
.....O'l"".....
~ ~ ~
....
~~f ~ :;;:::::;::;;
11'I""""....
.5::"'\010
~~~~
.L.. .
~~""'IO~~
e"'O'IoII\CJ\
...- ,.......
..5
,;}
Ii':::
U'1i
- ~
I ~
01
"if1~~Sf
~...'!""'.....-
...
.
...100110
~~\O"''''''O'I
10
~ u'\f'4NID
N.....,..,CJI
..5~
~~
- "'a
!;!:i~!!!l
a~~~ll;~
aI ........!'PI
c:~:::J+
ilo!~8~
..."'....,S.....
I"!~o~
tJoo::g~
~ ~
... E
~
~
~ ~ clS 1.1. It.I.
~c Vllll
l~~~~
~,.,
~
"0
~
2
...
...
<
c>> coo N
....~......-
t::aNNIOG\
..
:;,
o
:z:
..
<
....
...
:1:
...
~j
II ~ =
;:, ... -
]ii !
:li'i~
,I!...l!,z
..
,.,
...
:;
"l.
~
~
-
'"
...
~
..
~
~
!
~
~
~
t
-
:2;
..
~
...
-
i
...
'"
...
..
,.,
,.,
,.,
*
..
,,;
...
...
...
,.,
'"
..
...
..
...
'"
,.,
~
<
o
,.,
'"
,.,
,.,
.Ii!
~
j
3
~
"
<3
PINDER TROUH1AN
"0
1
e
...
158: l!l ..
...
,.,
....
.
i!:'S~~ '" '"
... ,.,
~o ~
.
z ~:s
~ ,.,
.5 ~ ..
..
-~~ >II.
'"
~!:::loo ;
I.!! N 1:!
..~ , , ...
l~=~ ~
,.,
~ ~ ...
....
~ ....,.,,., ,.,
....~ ...,.,,,, ...
'1i . ~
EO
~ ~:s ... '"
..5~ ... ...
..
,e.~a a f;
"!
...~"'<<lI~ '"
~i;!":!! -
...
.5
,; ,~
= ~
0'"
u....
- ~
:; ~
<.,j ,
1""11011) ..
"'0'" ...
~ ~- ...
....
I.J:I. ... \I).., !il
~~""to"IO\
sO ~
0
.... ........ ..
.....'" '"
.5~ ..
'"
5;;;-~ ~
!:
,., ... ,.,
!~~ i
~:e ".;
=::J::J +
i~~ 8
~..... ~
i"!"! ~
00
<.:>
.l! ci
.
.... E
=
-
.~ c3h
!gg Ii:
.$ro'1N ~
...
~
tl'O~O
....a.. l;l
~ NN
~ I
!H
." , ,
!-,.
i1 ~
II 1 ;!:
0
....
..
:;,
o
:z:
..
<
....
...
l
PAGE 05
g
-
2
.
~
!
f
1!
-'l
l
:>
t'
~j
Ii
~.i
!'"
115
1 ,l
]~
Jt
H
. ~
0'>;
H
H
E5
10/31/2003 09:31
5514341553
PINDER TRDUH1AN
PAGE 05
DEPARTMENT OF DEVElOPMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION
. a.tiIdInfI . """';1'IJ&ZDniftg . 0--'. ,.,..,~ · ~R~.J!I'.:....,....._...
~f~~t~
August 29. 2002
Mr. K3hart M. Pinda, AlCP
Pinder Troutman Consulting. Inc.
2324 South Congress Avenue
Suile 1H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: Motorola DR!
Dear Mr. Pinder:
1 am respondiDg to your letter to Michael Rumpf, date4 August 26, 2002. reprding vested trips for the
Motorola DR!. 1 concur with your asse"""'enl, that the Motorola DR! is vested for 13.020 daily trips
aud 1,634 PM peak hour trips.
If you have any additional questioDS, please contact me a1 561. 742~260.
Sincerely,
~A~V
Lusia Galav, AlCP
Principal PIanDcr
Cc: Michael Rumpf, PlaaDing & Zoning Director
Jim Chcrof, City Anomey
$.~~r -I"'IT . ..,.,....T_......
CilydB..,..t..<._. 1ar 1lB..,.....8oKh-. P.o. BaI:no -!lor lIaCIt.- >>,,~o
10/31/2003 09:31
~.f""'~
_..W"'~
P.O. _ 21229
"'.... Palm ..act>. ..._ ':HI..I.......
\5.,168.....000
-~.<!,",
.
--~
_.r~
C'.8nwal......
WlIrnn H. tie.-c.ll, CNlrmon
C_'" -... Vice Choir
~...ftT.Marc.'"
MaoJ MCC:Iny
aun Aa1'OftJOt1
""'" MuilORl
Addie I.. Graene
~ ..........Mo.~J'
Robotn: \Neil man
--.,.....,.,..-",
_.......~
@"'-"'--
5514341553
PINDER TROUTHAN
PAGE 07
December 12. 2002
i
I
i
i
I
I
!
,
I
I
.
i
I
Mr. ~ RIrIlpf
DindIDr Planning & Zonag
City of BayIllon BeacI1
100 Ed BOyOtM Beadl BauleVilrd
BoyOton Beac:h. FL 3342fHl310
RE: Motorola DR! - Reviled
TAAFFlC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS MVIEW
Our Mr. Rump!:
!
The ~Irn Beach County TraffIC DiviSion has reviewed the ttafflC 5latem~' t fo,-the
Pf8Viously approve<! DRI entitled: Motorola ORI pursuant lo the Trafl\c; P rfonMnc&
Stand8nls ~ Al1Ide 15 of the Palm Beach COUTlIy land Oe\IelOPment Code. projec::t
is 5IIr11fT\8liZed as taIcJW$: I
Location:
I
southeast corner of congre&s Avan~ an1 GatjlWaY
BouleVard i'ltelS8CliOn.
IlOVntDn Beach
13,020 Daily. 1,1134 Peel< Hour
~50,OOO SF GenenlI Olfioe. 500 Mulli Family ~icllJntlal
Units, 15,000 SF D8yCMl, 10.000 SF Hilah _ QualitY
Reslauranl, 6,000 SF High Tum-over Res1auraljt, 8,000 SF
Fast Food Res1aurenl. 20.000 SF General RelII'it, ~.5ClO SF
Bank & 01', alld 12B,OllO SF W,.ehouse. I
12.837. and 1,402 Peak HW'Tr\pll .
2005
Municipally:
V..ted OR! Tripe:
Proposed u...:
Nwr Dally Trips:
Build~Ul:
I
\
I
e.ed on our review, \118 Traffic Division lms determined lhatlhe
projedled to getlI!rBtelesS trips than what was prevlCIu&Iy approled, and lh
the TraIliC PerfomIance S1a1dards of Palm Beach COunty. Based on
fofKll$tS prO\/iCll!d 1Iy the c;ortSIlIlIInI, it is IlCllMMlf' suggesll!d tlIalll1e foA
access drivewa)'$ tul'n-\ane$ to be provided: I
. Soul/lbOUnd lall-Ium 1an85 810119 CQr\gf8$$ Avenue. onlothe r and
the middle driveWa '
___ ..non,' _____ ys
. NorIhbOUf1d righl~tum lanes "long Congress AWrNe. onlo!he t' u\Ilt!m and
the middle drt\l8wayS.
. Weslbound Ieft.lum lane along Gateway Boulevard, onto i e~em
driveoo8Y-
. EastPound riglll-Iurn lane a!ong G2ltewav Boule'nrd. ontO ~e ea6lern
dnv-v. I
1
I
I
!
I
I
10/31/2003 09:31
pIt-mER TROUH1AN
F'AGE 08
OCC.13.200z 5:02PM
"
:
5514341553
.: IRATIC ENG
t-lO.421
P.3
i
!
Attachment 1(Cont'd.)
i ,
I
,
i
i
I
I .
I .
If you nave any questions regardifl!llhis detenninlllion. please COfllacl me 811684""030,
i
'"
Sincerely.
):J~.
~ . ~ ~'
Masoue! Alefi. M
51. Engineer ~ T
= Pind..- Tn>utam Con....1ling Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun . Tl1Il!ic Study R...n.w
F:\TRAFFIC\rT1lllAdmJllApprova/sIOZ 101 fl.dac
I
10/31/2003 09:31
\
, ,~
'4;~~
Depumaent of ~eeria,
and "',"Uc __
P,O. Box 21229
West !'.Im lleach. FL J3416.1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbc:gov.com
.
Pabn Beach c......ty
Board of County
CoIIUIIbsionen
l<aren T. Marcus. Chair
Tony MasiJotti. Vice Ch~rman
Jeff I<Dons
Warren H. Newell
Mill)' MCCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L Greene
County Admlnisuator
Roben Weis.man
'An&pWOppo_
"IJimwti.. Action Elnp/Dye'"
~
5514341553
PINDER TROUH1AN
PAGE 09
U;::;$J
May 21, 2003
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. FL 34425-0310
RE: Motorola 29 - Renaissance Commons
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County TraffIC Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the project
entitled; Motorola 29, Renaissance Commons pursuant to the TraffIC Performance
Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project
is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
East side of Congress Avenue, south of Gateway Boulevard
Boynton Beach
None
500 MF Residential Units, 11.500 SF General Retail, 3,500 SF Bank
with DT.
4,531
383 - PM Peak Hour
2004
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the project is part of the
previously approved Motorola DRI. and also meets the Traffic Performance Standards of
Palm Beach County.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 664-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICjo OF THE, GQ.lJ:NlYE~GI!\tEE~
Masoud Atefi, MS
Sr. Engineer" Tra
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc.
File: General. TPS - Mun . Tralic: Study Review
F:\TRAFFIC'malAdminlApprovlls\D30523,doc
. '
RENAISSANCE COMMONS
NWSP 03-016
1st Review Planning
October 9, 2003
On July 15,2003, the City Commission approved the project known as Renaissance Commons
project (NWSP 03-007). Condition of Approval #37 stated, "The stand alone commercial
building (shown as Phase II) proposed in the northwest comer of the property will require
separate site plan review". Staff acknowledges that this project will satisfy that condition. Also,
Condition of Approval #48 stated, "For consistency and compatibility, staff recommends that the
stand-alone commercial building (Phase II) should incorporate the same architectural
enhancements as that of the mixed-use building (i.e. foam banding, similar building colors, same
roof type, awnings, and similar exterior finish).
The Renaissance Commons project (NWSP 03-007) was approved for 500 multi-family dwelling
units, 11,500 square feet of general retail, and a 3,500 square foot bank with a drive-through
feature. A revised traffic impact statement or equivalency determination is required for Phase II
because this 4,200 square foot building will take the place of the 3,500 square foot bank with
drive-through.
Staff acknowledges that this project represents only the second phase the Renaissance Commons
site plan and is not proposing to subdivide into a separate out-parcel. Staff also acknowledges
that the plans approved by the City Commission included 15,000 square feet of retail, of which,
4,328 square feet was earmarked for Phase II. Since this is an updated plan of the project
approved by the City Commission, it should show the most updated information, such as required
/ provided parking, Staff wants to ensure that the (entire) Renaissance Commons' parking
requirements are still met. Please provide an updated parking tabulation for the entire
Renaissance Commons project, which would now include the Phase II use, building area,
required, and provided parking. Note: required parking for this type of use would be the same as
in Phase 1- one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area.
If not done so already. abandonment and rededication of easements must be recorded prior to
issuance of a building permit for the project.
No site-specific survey for Phase II was required for this submittal. By submitting a site-specific
survey, it appears that applicant wants to subdivide the lot to create a separate out-parcel. The
only survey required for Phase II would be an updated (not older than six months) version of the
original project's survey,
A drainage statement is required prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting (Chapter 4,
Section 7.F.2,), The drainage statement is subject to review by the Engineering Division of
Public Works.
A cross-access / cross-parking agreement will be required if Phase II is a "leased" parcel.
The method of trash removal will be subject to Public Works' review and approval.
On the site plan, provide a label indicating the number of parking spaces for each row.
. .
.
The elevation (sheet A-2) must indicate the paint manufacturer's name and color code (Chapter 4,
Section 7.D.).
Include a color rendering of all elevations prior to the Technical Review Committee meeting
(Chapter 4, Section 7.D.2.). Include color swatches,
Equipment placed on the walls of the buildings shall be painted to match the building color
(Chapter 9, Section 10.CA.). Place a note on the site plan indicating this requirement.
The Crape Myrtle trees (as shown on the Typical Unit Plan, sheet L6 of 7) must be installed at
mimmum 12 feet overall height and three (3) caliper inches (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section
5,C.2,).
On the landscape plan (sheet L2 of 3), identify the trees proposed in the landscaped median.
All trees, if proposed as trees, must be at least 12 feet in height and three (3) caliper inches at the
time of their installation (Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5.C.2.). This would apply to the
Ligustrum, Coconut, Alexander, Pygmy Date, and Christmas palm trees.
Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species (Chapter 7,5, Article II,
Section 5.P). On the landscape plan (sheet L3 of 3), provide the percentage of native canopy
trees, palm trees, shrubs / accents, and groundcover to ensure compliance with this code
requirement.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Renaissance Connoons\NWSP 03-0]6 Phase lI\Planning 1st review,doc
Planninn Memonnldum: For SlcT! En\'in'i1mt'ntalist
To:
Eric Johnson, Planner
From:
Kevin 1. Hallahan, Forester! Environmentalist
Subject:
Renaissance Commons Phase II and III
New Site Plan - 1 st Review
NWSP 03-016, 03-017
Date:
October 8, 2003
"
Landscape Plan-Plant List Sheet L3 of 3
The applicant must indicated on a landscape plan the existing trees! vegetation that will be
preserved, relocated, and removed! replaced on the site. A separate symbol should be used on
the landscape plan to identify these trees! vegetation.
1. All shade trees on the Plant List must be listed in the specifications as a minimum of 12'-
14' height, 3" or 4" caliper at DBH (4.5' off the ground), and Florida #1 (Florida Grades
and Standards manual) The height of the trees may be larger than 12'-14' to meet the
3"or 4" caliper requirement. [Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec.
S.C. 2.]
2. The Details sheet section on this page should include a line indicating where the height of
the large tree and palm tree will be measured at time of planting and inspection,
3. The applicant should show on Sheet L2 of3 an elevation cross-section detail indicating
how the height ofthe proposed landscape material on the Phase I landscape plan will
visually buffer the proposed parking lot facility on Phase II from the Congress Avenue
road right-of-way.
4, The applicant should add a note that no Cypress mulch can be used on the site.
5. The applicant should add a note that all utility boxes or structures (not currently known or
shown on the plan) should be screened with Cocoplum hedge plants on three sides.
6. The proposed 22,00sq. Ft. lake shown on sheet SP-l must be designed with upland and
littoral zone trees! vegetation along 50% of the lake perimeter. [Environmental
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. SA.]
Irril!ation Plan
7. There is no irrigation system design included with the site plans, The irrigation design
should be designed for water conservation and tree health. All shade and palm trees
should receive irrigation from a bubbler source. This includes the lake plantings,
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. SA.]
8. Turf areas should be limited in size, Landscape (bedding plants) areas should be
designed on separate zones with proper time duration for water conservation.
[Environmental Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Article II Sec. 5. C.2.]
Kjh
File
0\,~'~ 't\)'.2
C Il..
L" . ,.,'
(.' I D :::j"""'; ~~:y .
/
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 03-192
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
t\
,)
DATE:
October 9, 2003
RE:
Review Comments
New Site Plan - 1 st Review
Renaissance Commons Phase II
File No. NWSP 03-016
The above referenced Site Plans, received on September 18, 2003, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS. GENERAL
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the
storage and handling of refuse.
2. Provide a dumpster enclosure per the LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J.2.b.
3. Indicate by note that the site dumpster enclosure shall be constructed in accordance with City
Standard Drawing G-4.
4. Provide a minimum turning radius of 60 ft. to approach the dumpster. Provide a minimum backing
clearance of 60 ft. (measured from the front edge of the dumpster pad.) (LDR, Chapter 2, Section
11.J.2.b,)
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
5. Provide a notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County
Traffic Engineering.
6. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars,
stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc.
Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a
pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings
"K" Series for striping details.
7, Show all off-site improvements needed for this project.
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-192
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase II_1st Review
October 9, 2003
Page 2
8. The site plans depict a median opening on the Catalina Dr. extension approximately 140 ft. from
Congress Ave. This condition is not permitted per Condition of Approval #4, Renaissance Commons
Phase I (NWSP 03-007).
ENGINEERING
9. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets.
10. Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may
not be generated by the Commission and at permit review,
11. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets.
12. The plans refer to "Existing Conditions" throughout the plans for improvements that are not existing,
nor have they been reviewed and approved by the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department or
Building Department. Permitting for this project is dependent on successful review, approval(s), and
construction of Renaissance Commons Phase I infrastructure and associated off-site improvements.
Please indicate how these projects will be phased to ensure that all required improvements will be in
place prior to beginning the permitting process.
13. If possible please provide photometrics as part of your TRC plan submittals - it is much easier to
identify and correct any deficiencies now than while you are waiting on a permit!
14, It may be necessary to replace or relocate large canopy trees adjacent to light fixtures to eliminate
future shadowing on the parking surface (LDR, Chapter 23, Article II, Section A,1,b).
15. Revise note on the Landscape Plans regarding the sight triangles that "There shall be an
unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 8' above the pavement." (LDR, Chapter 7,5,
Article II, Section 5.H.)
16, The sight triangle shown on Sheet SP-1 does not meet FDOT Standard Index 546 as stated, Please
correct.
17. The Landscape Plans (Sheet L2 of 3) indicates proposed landscaping outside the limits of the
proposed project. Please correct.
18. The medians on Congress Avenue have existing irrigation and plant material belonging to the City of
Boynton Beach, Any damage to the irrigation system and/or plant material as a result of the
contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved
by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please
acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above
stated information.
19. The proposed Cocos Nucifera (Green Malayan) palms shall be oriented in such a manner that they
do not overhang the roadway.
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-192
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase II - 151 Review
October 9, 2003
Page 3
20, Relocate Quercus Virginiana (Live Oak) along Catalina Dr. extension on the west side of the
proposed building. The specified 5 ft. of clear trunk will create a conflict with traffic (trucks, etc.)
21. Phoenix Dactylifera "Medjool" are proposed in the Catalina Dr. extension but are not called out in the
Landscape Quantities or on the plans, The spread of these palms is greater than the width of the
median. Please correct.
22. Proposed landscaping along the north side of the proposed building overhang into the travel way on
the Catalina Dr. extension. Please correct.
23. Provide a drainage plan showing existing and proposed elevations, flow areas and any required
drainage structures. Include preliminary drainage calculations. Specify storm sewer diameters and
materials, inlets types, etc. on drainage plan. Indicate grate, rim and invert elevations for all
structures. Indicate grade of storm sewer segments,
24, Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section
7.F.2.
25. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting.
26. Indicate by note that catch basin and manhole covers shall be bicycle proof (LDR, Chapter 6, Article
IV, Section 5.A.2.g).
27. Engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach
Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit
application.
UTILITIES
28. No utility plan was included with this submittal, therefore, the Utilities department considers this plan
incomplete as submitted. However, contemplated uses as submitted during the NOPC #1 process,
indicate that office, retail, commercial, self-storage, restaurant and residential uses are proposed.
In view that the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMF) is reluctant to increase new
water uses, several questions come to mind:
i. Is this proposed density suitable for the location? An increase of 300% over and above
the existing approved land use.
ii. Is the timing for the proposed re-development near-term or far-term? This has a
significant bearing on the consumptive use requirements.
iii. An intensification of this magnitude warrants a re-evaluation of our utilities master plan in
order to evaluate the adequacy of the service main network in the area. Obviously
any off-site improvements required to support this development will be the
responsibility of the applicant. To date, the applicant has not convinced the
Department that it has the utility capacity to support this proposed development.
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-192
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase II_1st Review
October 9, 2003
Page 4
29. All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as well as the Water and
Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm
trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted
outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement
in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the
authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public
rights-of-way.
30. City of Boynton Beach Utility Department approval and Palm Beach County Health Department
permits will be required for all water and sewer work on this project (CODE, Section 26-12),
31, The plans refer to "Existing Conditions" throughout the plans for improvements that are not existing,
nor have they been reviewed and approved by the City of Boynton Beach Utilities Department,
Building Department, or Palm Beach County Health Department. Permitting for this project is
dependent on successful review, approval(s), and construction of water, sewer and drainage
improvements of Renaissance Commons Phase I. Please indicate how these projects will be
phased to ensure that all required improvements will be in place prior to beginning the permitting
process,
32. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as
stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance
underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)).
33, The LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 also requires that all points on each building will be within
200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant. Please demonstrate that the plan meets this
condition, by showing all hydrants.
34, PVC material not permitted on the City's water system. All lines shall be DIP.
35. Appropriate backflow preventer(s) will be required on the domestic water service to the building, and
the fire sprinkler line if there is one, in accordance with CODE Sec. 26-207,
36. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either
upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final
meter size, or expected demand,
37. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility
easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum
width of 12 feet. The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in
CODE Sec. 26-33(a).
38. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not,
therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available.
39. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the
systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent
meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the
Certificate of Occupancy.
Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-192
Re: Renaissance Commons Phase 11_15t Review
October 9, 2003
Page 5
40. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for
the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE,
Section 26-15.
41, The Preliminary Engineering plan apparently indicates the sanitary sewer service tying into a sanitary
sewer manhole. This condition is not permitted. Please correct.
42, All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities
Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates);
and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Renaissance Commons Phase II, 1st Review.doc
~'
Wildner, John
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Wildner, John \
Monday, Septe er 22, 2003 2:45 PM
Coale, Sherie \ \
Renaissance Commons Phase II and III
Sherie - The Recreation and Parks Department has no comments on Renaissance Commons Phase II and III. There
does not appear to be any residential component in these phases, No Recreation and Parks Impact Fee is therefore
required,
John
1
. ----------
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
Fire and Life Safety Division
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd,
P.O, Box310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS
For review of:
NWSP 03-016 1st review
Project Name and Address:
Renaissance Commons Phase II
Conqress Ave, S, of Gateway (Motorola Site)
4. Rodqer Kemmer, Fire Protection Enqineer
Reviewed by:
Department:
Fire and Life Safety
Phone:
(561) 742-6753
Comments to:
Sherie Coale by email on 9/19/03
Code Requirements
Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be
maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code,
Section 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction, Alteration,
and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3.
cc: Steve Gale
Bob Borden
r
ClfY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf DATE:
Dir. of Planning & Zoning
9/23/03
FILE: NWSP 03-016
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Renaissance Commons Phase II
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
No Comment.
."
.--
SUBJECT:
Project - Renaissance Commons Phase II
File No. - NWSP 03-016
List ot Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ASCE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBC - Florida Building Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F,S, - Florida Statutes
LDR - Land Development Regulations
NEC - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
ManaQement District
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 03-207
FROM:
Michael W, Rumpf
o;ffictoc of PI,oo;og ~
Timothy K. Large ;:
TRC Member/Building IVlsion
TO:
DATE:
September 30, 2003
We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board
review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the
working drawings submitted for permits,
Building Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments)- Timothv K. Large (561)742-6352
1 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the wall openings and wall
construction comply with Table 600 of the 2001 FBC,
2 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind
loads of 140 mph, Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the
provisions of Chapter 6 of ASCE 7, and the provisions of Section 1606 (Wind Loads) of
the 2001 FBC, Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional
registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit
application,
3 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction,
4 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is
proposed for the building, Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with
regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following
issues:
a) The design professional,of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site
data, "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 100-
year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the
SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations,"
b) From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building
is located within. Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation. If there is no
base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans,
c) Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building
within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor
plan and paving/ drainage (civil plans),
S,lDevelopmentlBuildinglTRCITRC 20031Renaissance Commons Phase /I
Page 1 of 2
5 On the drawing titled site plan, identify and label the symbol that represents the property
line.
6 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site
plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading
edge of the building/s. The leading edge of the building/s begins at the closest point of the
overhand or canopy to the property line,
7 CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not,
therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available,
8 A water-use permit for the irrigation system is required from the SFWMD. A copy of the
permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373,216.
9 If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of Boynton Beach
Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building
permit application:
a) The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the
Commission-approved site plan,
b) The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for
sewer.
(CBBCO), Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34)
10 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel or tract. For
purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the
recorded deed for each lot, parcel or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time
of permit review.
11 The title sheet denotes "M" occupancy, Type IV, unprotected. Sheet A-2 and SP-2 notes
Type V, unprotected. Indicate the correct type of construction of the structure per Chapter
6 of the 2001 FBC.
12 Sheet A-2 notes "Bldg A @ Phase III similar-reverse. Please clarify the meaning of this
statement.
13 The required fire separation between tenants in building #6 shall comply with Section 704
and Table 704 of the 2001 FBC.
14 Preliminary engineering sheet number 1 of 1. Change the slope of the handicap ramp
from 12:1 to 1:12 perSeclion 11-4.8.2 of the 2001 FBC,
bf
S:IDevelopmentIBuilding\TRC\TRC 20031Renaissance Commons Phase /I
Page 2 of 2