TRAFFIC STUDY (MAY 2003)
~ttDER TROOTMAtt COttSOlTlttG. Ittc.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
2324 South Congress Aveflue, Suite 1 H
We;! Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 4341663
www.pindertroutman.com
February 12, 2004
Mr. James T. Snyder, AICP
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
301 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 300
Stuart, FL 34994
Re: Renaissance Commons DRI (fka Motorola) NOPC # 2 - #PTCC03-75
Dear Mr. Snyder:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to comments regarding the traffic analysis for the above
referenced project.
Trip Generation and Distribution
1. An analysis showing where the project has significant impact over and above, that which has
previously been reviewed, has been provided in the revised traffic study.
2. Documentation on how DRltrips are being distributed has been provided.
Pass-By Reduction
3. Pass-by trips do not exceed 10% of adjacent street traffic. Retail pass-by is 2S% and it has been
agreed with FDOT to use a 26% pass-by for the Day Care. Documentation has been provided.
land Use Conversion Matrix
4. The land use conversion matrix (based on trips) has been revised and is attached.
S. Documentation on how the conversion rates were established is provided.
Intersection and Driveway Analyses
6. Intersection analyses have been provided.
7. The Gateway Boulevard/Congress Avenue intersection analysis has been provided along with
signalized project driveways. The project does not have an impact of 200 vehicles per hour on
any 1-95 ramps.
letter SnyderOJ-75 2-12-04
Pi
Mr. James T. Snyder, AICP
Re: Renaissance Commons DRI (fka Motorola) NOPC # 2 - #PTCC03-75
February 12, 2004
Page 2
All of these comments have been addressed in the revised traffic analysis and the land use conversion
matrix attached.
Please contact this office if you have additional comments.
KMP/ldr
Enclosures
cc: Chon Wong
Masoud Atefi
Michael Rumph
James Comparato
Kim Glas
teller Snyder 03-75 2-12-04
Pi
RENAISSANCE COMMONS
CONVERSION MATRIX
TRIP GENERATION RATE CALCUlATION
Trip Generation Rates are based on New T rips from Exhibit S of the NOPC #2 T raffjc Report.
Office
Retail
Residential - Apartment
Residential - T own home
Residential- Condominium
From ITE
Industrial
1,000 SF Office
To Industrial
To Retail
To Residential - Apartment
To Residential- Townhome
To Residential- Condominium
03~75 2-12-04
310 + 247.8
640 + 198
76 + 145
149 +376
493 +327
- 1.2S1/1 ,000 SF
= 3.23/1,000 SF
= O.524/DU
= OA57/DU
- OAS7/DU
0.98/1,000 SF
RENAISSANCE COMMONS
CONVERSION MATRIX
SAMPLE CALCUlATION
310+ 247.8 = 1.2S1 Trips/l,OOO SF
1.251 + 0.98 = 1,276 SF
1.251 + 3.23 387 SF
1.251 + 0.524 = 2.39 DUs
1.2S1 + OAS7 = 2.74 DUs
1.251 + 00457 = 2.74 DUs
RENAISSANCE COMMONS
CONVERSION MATRIX
Office Industrial Multi Family Commercial
Apartment T.H.&
Condo
1,000 SF Office 1,276 SF 2.39 DU 2.74 DU 387 SF
1,000 SF Industrial 783 SF 1.87 DU 2.14 DU 303 SF
1 Multi Family (Apartment) 419 SF 535 SF 1.15 DU 162 SF
1 Multi Family (T.H. & Condo) 36S SF 466 SF 0.87 DU 142 SF
1,000 SF Com mercial 2,582 SF 3,296 SF 6.16 DU 7.07 DU
03-7.'i 2-12-04
"
I Ruden
~~ McClosky
222 LAKEVEW AVENU:
S urn: 800
\tVEST PALM BEACH, FL~IDA 33401-6112
(561) 838-4542
FAX: (561) 514-3442
KIMGLASCASTR OUIR ua: N.COM
November 11,2003
Michael Rumpf, AICP
Planning & Zoning Director
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33345
Jim Snyder, AICP
DRl Coordinator
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
301 East Ocean Blvd., Suite 300
Stuart, FL 34994
Caroline Knight
Division of Community Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399
Chon Wong
FDOT District 4
Planning and Environmental Management
3400 W. Commercial Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale, Fl 33309
Masoud Atefi
Traffic Engineering
Palm Beach County
160 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33407
RE: Revised Traffic Analysis and Notice of Proposed Change ("NOPC") to the
Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) Development of Regional Impact Proposal
WPB:173895: 1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS . FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA .WEST PALM BEACH
Page 2
In response to the comments issued December 15, 2003 by the Florida Department of
Transportation, the traffic analysis submitted to support the NOPC has been revised. Enclosed
you will find a summary letter prepared by Pinder Troutman and a traffic analysis dated
February 17,2004.
The comments relating to the Use Conversion Matrix have caused the figures to be
revised, and as such, the updated Use Conversion Matrix we are proposing for the Renaissance
Commons DR! is enclosed. This updated table includes revisions to the water/sewer analysis
that were prepared in response to comments from the City Utility Department.
We are confident that the revised traffic analysis presents clear and convincing evidence
to rebut the presumption of substantial deviation. We look forward to future conversations with
you regarding this proposal as we prepare for the City's public hearing.
Sincerely,
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH,
SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, PA
K~
Kim Glas-Castro, AICP
cc: Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC
E. Lee Worsham, Esq.
WPB,173B9S,1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE . MIAMI. NAPLES. PORT ST. LUCIE . SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE . TAMPA .WEsT PALM BEACH
.
MOTOROLA DRI Nope
Current Uses:
500 multi-family residential units
63,500 s.f. retail
450,000 s.f. office
128,000 s.f. industrial (warehouse) use
Proposed Uses:
213,000 s.f. retail (includes 15,000 s.f. daycare)
247,800 s.f. office
1551 multi-family residential units
and establishment of a Use Conversion Matrix:
Office
Multi-Family1
Commercial
1000 sf office
2.39 du
387 sf
I multi-family du 365 sf
142 sf
1000 sf commercial 2,582 sf
6.16 du
I Conversion to or from residential use is based on PM peak hour trip generation rates fur Apartments or
Townhouse/Condos, whichever is the more restrictive conversion factor.
WPB: 164603:6
Use Conversion Matrix
Analyses were conducted based on 1) water/sewer flows, 2) peak hour traffic trips, and 3)
employment (affordable housing demand).
Boynton Beach Utilities provided input on the water/sewer rates to be utilized. These
rates differ from the City's Comprehensive Plan adopted level of service standards, and
are based on the connection fees that are paid by new development projects based on
"EDUs" (equivalent dwelling units.) These EDU rates were used for evaluation
purposes, but do not appear to be reliable for comparing and contrasting service and
facility demand generated by the different uses.
Employment for retail, office and industrial uses was evaluated. Due to the property
location and characteristics, a manufacturing wage was not selected; rather a
warehouse/transportation job was utilized. The median income for this job exceeds that
of the median retail and office job. The resulting number of employees at a "very low
income" rate is low. The difference between the industrial I and commercial/office
employee generation rates for very low income are so varied that this employment factor
does not represent reliable use conversion ratios.
As a result of the problems in the water/sewer and employment evaluations, peak hour
traffic appears to be the most reliable factor for determining land use conversions. Peak
hour trips are also preferred because the DR! has an approved number of peak hour trips
associated with the project that originate in the ADA. The proposed Use Conversion
Matrix utilizes solely the peak hour trips and does not mix analysis factors or try to select
the most constraining ratio due to concerns with the water/sewer and employment
analyses. Another reason peak hour trips were selected for the proposed Use Conversion
Matrix is for traffic's regional significance. Water and sewer demand is a local service
consideration that does not impact Regional or State facilities. Generalized income data
does not reflect housing need when converting land uses. Traffic on the regional
roadway network (whether county, city or state roads) is the relevant factor of
significance when considering changes in land use and new or changed impacts.
I Industrial land use has been eliminated from the Use Conversion Matrix, as it is not
seen as a viable use in the proposed mixed use Renaissance Commons. In the future, if
Industrial use is desired, an NOPC will be filed to convert approved use(s) to Industrial
use.
WPB: 167072:2
RENAISSANCE COMMONS (tka Motorola) DR!
USE CONVERSION
ANALYSES
Total Water/Sewer Flow:
1000 sf office
I multi-family du
1000 sf commercial
100 gallons/day
374 gallons/day
271 gallons/day
Water/Sewer-Based Conversion Matrix:
Office
Multi-Familv
Commercial
1000 sf office
.26du
369 sf
1 multi-family du 3740 sf
1380 sf
1000 sf commercial 2710 sf
.73 du
Total Trips: (max = 13,020 daily trips and 1,634 peak hour trips)
Trips-Based Conversion Matrix: (based on PM peak hour trip generation rates)
Office Multi-Family
Apartment T.H./Condo
1000 sf office 2.39 du 2.74 du
I multi-family du (apartment) 419 sf l.l5 du
I multi-family du (HI/Condo) 365 sf 0.87 du
1000 sf commercial 2582 sf 6.16 du 7.07 du
Commercial
WPB:164251:9
387 sf
162 sf
142 sf
Affordable Housing:
Very Low Income = $31,400
Low Income = $50,250
(4 person household - 7/10/03, PBC-HCD)
Commercial:
1.83 employees at Very Low Income level per 1,000 s.f.
0.10 employees at Low Income level per 1,000 s.f.
Office:
2.83 employees at Very Low Income level per 1,000 s.f.
O. I 4 employees at Low Income level per 1,000 s.f.
Employee-Income Based (Very Low Income) Conversion Matrix:
Office
Multi-Family
Commercial
1000 sf office
1546 sf
1 multi-family du
1000 sf commercial 650 sf
Employee-Income Based (Low Income) Conversion Matrix:
Office
Multi-Family
Commercial
1000 sf office
1400 sf
1 multi-family du
1000 sf commercial 714 sf
WPB:164251:9
PINDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING. IN(.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
October 30, 2003
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434.1663
www.pindertroutman.com
Ms. Sherrie Coale
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Re: Renaissance Commons - Phase II - #PTC03-75
Dear Ms. Coale:
The purpose of this letter is to respond to 1" Review Comments regarding traffic issues for the above referenced
project. The department comment is summarized below with a response following.
Public Works - T rafflc
5.
Comment:
Response:
County Notice of Concurrency
Attached is a copy of the County's letters of concurrency for the Motorola project as well
as the City's letter regarding vested trips. The proposed, Phase I and Phase II,
development is well below the thresholds approved for the entire project as well as below
the trips for the approved plan. Attachments 1A-1C provide the daily, AM and PM peak
hour trip generation analysis for the proposed plan.
Planning & Zoning
68. Comment:
Response:
Equivalency Analysis
Attachments 1A-1C include the comparison of the approved 3,500 SF bank with the
proposed 4,200 SF of retail. This analysis shows that the proposed development generates
less traffic than the approved developmenL
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office.
AMT/ldr
Nlri
2003
Attachments
cc: Carl Klepper
Jeff Schnars
letter Coale OJ 75 7030-03
Qj
.....M...!!!M
~g~o
ON.
U;:::M
....~O
~~~
6
ID
~
.
~
~
~
'"
o
."
C
.
~
.
.c
~
C
ID
I'f'
"E
-
"
c
'"
'"
'"
'"
.L:
c..
'"
c
0
E "
E '"
<: 0 c ;;.
U 0 0
"" ~
~ '" '" a.
c u ~ a.
'" c '" <:
E '" c
'" '"
.L: '" U >-
u .;;; -'
'" c a. <
~
~ '" .~
<: <.: t- O
N on <"1 ~ ~
~ .~ " '" " on <"1
~ "!. ro " "!.
z,= ~ ~ "
*- *- *- *-
0 0 ro q
",- ci ci " '"
..oS " "
. .~
~
~ " " ro
'" .= ro ro '"
l1. 0 '" "" 0,
~
:g '" N on "- on '"
~ .g. " '" N "" '"
"', N on ro "!.
xf- ~ ~ ~ on
w
*- *- *- *- *-
.~ 0 0 0 0 '"
on on 0 0 ro
,= "- "- ci 0
~ ~
..
!:
'" ro on 0 "" '"
~ on 0 "- '" N
E ~ ~ ~ on
;> .~
c .=
0
u ..
- !:
~
.. J!i
(J c:
-
0 0 "- ro on
- .~ 0 0 '" N N
~ ".:; ~ ", "', '"
f- f- N ~ ~ ",'
- '"
'"
S ro
'" on "-
~ + V>
..
a< g 0
:::J :::J 0
c: 0
~ 0 0 c: ~
- - ~ -
""
~ "- "- " ~
'" '" "!.
c ci on
'" '"
(J II N
.9- E
.= c:
~
~ ~
C ::l ::l u.. "-
.;;; 0 0 V> V>
C 0 0 0 0
'"
c 0 0 0 0
<"1 N "!. "!.
~ ""
~
'" 0 0 0 N
W "
t: 0 N "" N ~
U N N ro '"
C '"
~
::l
'" 0
.5 ..r;
c:
'" ~ ::
'"
:::J 0 "
<( f- a,
"0 . 0
c: <ti - >
.. .. '"
--' -~ ~ 0
(l) '" - 0
--0 --0 -'"
-in -;;; 2 c
'" (l) (l) ..
"" "" "" ro
0 "- ~
N "" ""
q roo on
"" N ,,'
N N ""
0 0 0
- - -
'" N ~
N ~ N
- - -
ro N on
~ 2
~ "
'" --'
--'
c
" ::l
::l 0
0 u
u
=
'lIo --0
c:
U ..
l1. ~
0 '"
~ z ~
0 ..
..r;
~ l1.
02 a.
-" ~
0 f- a.
.. <:J ~
"2 '"
> --0
0 Ie (l)
0 >
0
~ <( a.
~ <(
~
<:J
J!i
~
'"
>
"
'"
'"
o
a.
o
~
c..
N .,., " ~
~ .~ " '" '" ""
"', "!. '" N
Z'= ~ ~ "
*- *- *-
0 0 ro
",- 0 0 "
..oS "
0 '"
'"
'" a. "- "-
.. ." 0 0
l1. f- 0 ro ro
.. N on 0 ro
!: .~ " '" ""
'" "', N ro 0,
~ .= ~ ~ ~ on
X
w
*- *- *- *-
.~ 0 0 0 ":
on .,., 0 ro
.= "- "- 0
~
-
..
!: ro on 0
J!i ""
.,., 0 0 '"
c ~ ~ N "
'"
;> .9-
c: -
0 f-
U -;;;
- !:
~
.. (l)
(J c
-
0 0 ~ 0
- -~ 0 0 0
.g ";:: , ", 0, "!.
f- f- N ~ N on
'"
- '"
S ro
'" on
... +
"" g
c :::J :::J
.2 0 0 c:
- - --'
~ ""
"- "- "
'" '"
c ci
(l)
(J II
.9- E
,= c:
--'
C '" ~
::l ::l "-
.;;; 0 0 V>
C 0 0 0
J!i 0 0 '"
c "" N ro
,,'
~
'" 0 0 0
w --0
t: 0 N "" N
U N N ro
C '"
'"
::l
'" 0
.5 ..r;
c
(l) ~ ::
~
:::J 0
<( f-
"0 0 0
c <ti <ti
..
--' "-g ".g
'" '"
--0 --0 ,-
'in 'in ..
'" '" "
"" "" ""
>-
-'
<
o
0
0
~
2-
ID
."
0
U
"
ID
E
Q.
0
~
ID
0
."
c
.
~
."
ID
c
'2
::>
2;- ~
c .g
~
0 ~
U
.c .c
u "'
.
ID i
~
E
--;;;
~
ID
-5
"i5
'"
ID ~
ID
"-
1:1
. ~
Q. ID
E ID
C
." ''''
. ~
0
'" c
~ 0
. ~
.c ~
'"
'. c
"- ~
'" ....
0 "i5
c 1'J
.g .3
u ~
ID c
'"
~ ID
U
~ 5
0 0
'" '"
- "
"'t<> <11..,
"':-8]'0
Ss.::
1-<,,>0 Ill:.
0-00'"
'to.---...."-
6
"
n
o
-g
.
]
~
w.,
~
5
=
."
C
.
ID
~
.
.c
~
~
c
o
E
E
'" 0
~U
~ ~
c u
~ c
~ ~
u .;
~ ~
<'"
c
,9
'iii
0;
c
~
'-'
.g.
....
."
ID
>
E
Q.
Q.
<
'"
::>
o
I
'"
<
~
"-
::;;
<
~~:2~~
o
>-
;::;
~O
ID
Z
~~O\~
~
;;~~~
"'
~;:;
.0 -
.:. ~
;:1.9-
0.. "
....
#.#.#..*
aalXlo
cicio:itci
~~
'" '"
~ ~
~~~~~
o
~....
i=-
--;;; ~
EO
J'l
x
~
~;:::';:.~
~
....o::t'<tN
.=N..-NN
"#.#.*'*
~&ggg
~~Nc:i~
ID
~--;;;
OE....M......,.
1'J
"'
:> .~
c "
0>-
u-
.
-c
- "
. .
t,;l~
]~~::1
o ~
>-
;;:;
'ljO
o
>-
0\<'1<:"40\
<"'l"-N"-
;;~~~
"'
~-
~~
-~
~~-~~
~aO\'"
"\O~~:;;
SSNO
:1:::J.::t8
ee2'5..!:::
:;:;~S~
cici~N
~
1'J
.
~
c
,9
"
0;
C
ID
t.:l
,9
i=-
,*
c
J'l
"'
~ -
~ ::l LI- u..
OOV'lVl
0000
0000
..., N to 10
'~'
ID
~"O
.... 0
-u
COOM
N"" "".-
NC'oIalO'l
- ~
c ~
. 0
5.c
1): :;; ~
~<~
'"
~~~
C C
ID ID
:g:g'3~
IV ~ tl.> n:I
c.:a:c.:::c:o
o
"
E
c
~
-'i
ID
-,
B
'"
~
N
~
N
M
'"
'"
M
.,.
;;;
o
M
N
.,.
'"
'"
'"
~
..
~
~
~
N
M
~
.,.
N
0;
~
:<
....
o
>-
~
.,.
~
"',
N
o
'"
N
'"
~
ID
~
;;
.
ID
'"
C
S
c
o
'"
'0
C-
D
'"
o
.
'0
B
o
::i
~
'0
J'l
~
N
o
"'.
~
N
g
N
-
N
~
~
c
"
o
U
;;;
U
0..
o
Z
,=
'"
ID
>
o
a.
<(
"
M
'"
M
~
~
.<:::'
~
~
ID
~
c
~
o
U
=
'0
c
.
~
~
.
.c
0..
~
'0
ID
>
o
a.
~
<(
"0
ID
~
o
Q.
o
a.
'lj ~ ~ ~ ~
;! '" N ~
0 N
>-
~
~ - ~ ;: >' '"
~ N 0
~ 0 ~ N
ID
Z
~ .,. ~ ~
"' N ~ ~ ~
#-.# '"
0 0 '"
~;:; 0 0 ..
.0_ .,.
~ a.
. -- M ~
~ i=- N
'lj ~ ~ '" 0
.,. '" .,. '"
0 ~ N
- ....
i=- ~ ;: '" .,.
~ N ~ ~
-;;; ~ ~ N
E 0
J'l
X
~ .,. .,. '" '"
"' N ~ N '"
** '" '"
~ 0 0 0
~~ '" 0
~ N N 0 .,.
0; ~
.c --;;;
i5 E .,. M ~ ;:<
J'l
"'
~
" ~
C ;::
0
u -;;;
- E
~
. J'l
t.:l "'
-;;; ~ '" :;; N
::! '" ~
'0 N
>-
~
~ ~ ~ ~
;:; - ;:< ~ N N
"
0 N
'lj
0
>- .,. ~ ~ 0
N ~ ~
"'
0;
~ ;;
" ,;; '"
.!< '" '" '"
~" N
. ~ ~ M
~ N
C ::> ::> +
0 00 8
.~ --
.,. c
. ~ .,. ~
c 0 0 '"
ID ~
t.:l ..,
,9 0
"
i=- E
5
~ -
* " ~
" " '"
c 0 0 >l
J'l 0 0
"' M N '"
.,.'
~
ID 0 0 0
~'" N ~ N
t:8 N N '"
" ~
ID ~
5.2
ID " C
. ~
:s <( 0
>-
'0
c .. --;;;
.
~ '~ '~ ~
c c
. ID ~
'0"0 -jj <(
-;;;(;i >-
ID . . 0
'" '" '" >-
'"
::>
o
I
'"
:::;
"-
::;;
<
6
o
2
.
8
o
~
~
o
1
o
]
~
o
J
~~
8~
~c5
. ~
~ ~
~ "-
'l;
.*
- ';;
~
~ .
5 ~
~!j
~ 5 ~
&; ~ ;
... Q. ~
~ c: '"
",' ~ ~
ci '0 ~
5 ] ~
~ ~ ~
4i iIi 8l
~ ~ 0....
a Sl ~
_ ~ n
...,""...!!!""
"-0><_
83..,;~
U"""""",
b:a6::'
'lI:,........,c..
6
~
~
~
o
~
"
.
i
~
"
f
"C
C
..
"
~
.
.c
0..
~
c
o
E
E
u 0
~U
- "
c u
" c
E :ll
J::. .~
U .
~ ~
<'"
c
o
'"
~
ID
C
"
<.:J
E-
;:
;:.;:;
~ 0
ID
Z
fO~~~~
" ~
....
"'.....0'1'"
...........,....,-.:t
.=
......"'''''''
~~~
~;:;
-" -
~ '"
. ,-
.. -
....
****
00 CD 0
00";..0
~...
~g
!j~~~~
0'- ......-
l~ ....
"C
ID
>
o
;;.
Q.
<
'"
::>
o
:I:
""
<
w
~
::;:
0..
;:-
--;;; ~
cO
0;
~
~~;:::~
...... \O'f') '"
..=;: \0 10 CD
****
~~ggg
Qj;E"cO~~
L--;;;
OC-.:tO\l.f')O'I
g..- .-.-
.=
:> .e.
c -
0....
U m
:; ~
. 1'J
lJ.=
fO~~lJ"lS:
'0..- ..-......-
....
;:"5
--;;;0
"
>-
~~~~
lJ"lNN'"
N"''''O'I
.=
~8
"'~
~MM~O
~~8~
"''''-.:t\f)
~':e.,..;o
JJ+g
ee.8z
N -.:t C f'...
.cm-'r-..
c:io~';
~ If')
o
II
E
ID
..
'"
o
~
.
0;
o
ID
lJ
,~
;:
.?
~
o
ID
~
~ ~
:::1:::1...... ......
OOVlV':l
0000
0000
.....N":.1.l'l
::rJ
Q,lOOON
~"8~~~~
U
~
!~
~ m ~
=><~
--0
C:"'iCfii
1Il-:;::l-:;::l
~ 0 0
ID ID
:Q:Q'.e~
~~~~
.s
.=
"
,~
is
~
~
~
~
~
~
...
~
N
...
~
o
'"
"'
'"
...
N
~
~
~
*
'"
~
.;
~
'^
~
~
~
N
~
N
"'
"'
~
'"
~
<
....
o
....
...
~
~-
N
o
'"
.<::;
'"
i!
ID
~
L
~
ID
~
c
B
c
o
~
"i5
o
a:
o
..,
e
B
o
::i
;E
."
*
ID
>
N
o
"',
N
-e.
N
-
N
i!
~
c
~
o
U
"
U
~
o
z
~
'"
~
~
-e.
.<::;
~
i!
~
c
~
o
U
=
."
c
.
~
L
..
~
<<:
'::"5
~ 0
ID
Z
"C
"
~
o
Q.
e
0..
'"
::>
o
:I:
""
<
w
0..
::;:
~
"'iC~~:-g
" ~
....
~~~
~~...
~~N
..=::<'o-.:t
~;:;
~-;
.
~....
***
ooce:
oo-.:t
~
]~~::5
o ~ ~
~....
;:
~~~
"'~'"
--;;; ~
cO
0;
l<
w
~~~
..=::<.Or-..
***
000
",00
"cOo
~
~
w ~
.c--;;;
i5 c
0; ~
~
...~'"
;:; .e-
o _
0>-
U .
-;; ~
. 1'J
lJ.=
"'iC:;g~~
'0.......- .-
>-
.- ~:;; ~
;: ~
--;;;0
"
....
~ N ~
N~'"
.=
;:;
~
"'
:::::!.MM:!.
~~~
QI--O
n; ~ ~ ~
CIl:: -- --- M
c;:J::::l+
.2 ee8
~ N -.:t C
4; <.0 m-'
~oc:i~
(.J ~
,e "
;:
~
c
1'J
.=
~ ~
~ " ~
00",
000
00",
~N'"
...
~
llJOOO
.....-oNl""JN
!=8NNCO
~
!~
ID . ~
:s<~
"0
t::"'iC"'iC
III -:;::l",p
~ 0 0
ID ID
~~ .Ei
~&~
N
~
E
c
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
N
N
N
~
~
...
~
~
~
'"
~
N
*
~
~
.;
:;:
N
~
...
o
~
~
N
'"
N
o
o
'2
.
~
o
U
"
E
o
o
l
o
]
]
C
::l
f g
8:B
-fi~
. ~
it
.i
Je
'"
~
<
....
o
....
"
~ ~
o.
..€ ~
~]'
o
~ "
. 0
~ :3
;Ji is
~.t
'"-
00
" .
o ,
~ ~
~ ~
o 0
~ ~
.
(j(
'\
. .r--"
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION
. BuiIt.fb'Jg . Pfanning&Zoning . 0rcx:upatI0naI~ · CammunityR....d...b1-r-.~.r
~?~
August 29,2002
Mr, KM1art M, Pinder, AlCP
Pinder T routm.an Consulting. Inc,
2324 South Congress Avenue
Suite IH
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: Motorola DR!
Dear Mr. Pinder:
I am n:sponding to your letter to Michael Rumpf, daled August 26, 2002, regarding vested trips for the
Motorola DRL I concur with your assessment, that the Motorola DR! is vested for 13,020 daily trips
and 1,634 PM peale bour trips,
lfyou have any additional questions, please contact me at 561-742-6260.
Sincerely,
dM~d~v
Lusia Galav. AICP
Principal Planner
Cc: Michael Rumpf, Planning & Zoning Director
Jim Cherof, City Anomey
S.~~~T_la..
Cityof~_. 1DC d.B..,.."",.---. p,o, BaJ:310 . Boy Bach, Florida ;"<2"'"10
l)~~ of EnCiftc.c:Tbtt
and h'blic \1lIOdl.
P.O. ~1l 212.'2.Q
v.:en ~m Ba:lch. 1""_ 'J3416-1229
($6l) 6~4-1000
~_pbcgrn...c?m
.
him Be.&.dt Co'llllty
e.a.r4 or County
Conunl..i.>>el'S
W;lI'"ren H. lie.....e1I. Ch:J.lrm:m
Carol A. f\.ober1s. VIce Chatf
t<A-ren T. M:;UCUS
.....'Y M,C:my
Bun ~TOn~n
'lbroy M;l$itorn
Add.e L G;eene
eo.n.ty MldtltUattatOr
RobefJ Wel:;;ITlOlJ'1
.An ~ ap,-rul'J't}'
J\tTlrr.Hui1"t" Mrioo bnplDyT
@ fXInI-~ """"'.d".,-
December 12. 2002
Mr, Michael Rumpf
Drector Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beacl1
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynlon Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE:
Motorola DR! - Revised
TRAFACPERFORMANCESTANDAROSRBnEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The P<\1!n Beach County Traffc Divtsion has reviewed the traffIC stalem~' nl for the
previously approved DRI entiUed; Molorola DRI pursuant 10 the Traffic P rfonwmce
Staf\dards i1 ArtIcle 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. 8 project
is summam;ed as fonOlNS: I
,
Location: Southeast comer of Congress Avenue an1 Gal~
Boulevard inten;ecijon,
Boynton Beach
13,020 Daily, 1,634 Pe<>1< Hour
450,000 SF General Office. 500 Multi FiI'TIily ~idl'ntial
Units, 15,000 SF Daycare, 10.000 SF Hiph Qu<\lity
Rest<>uran~ 6.000 SF Hogh Tum-<>ver Restauran~ 8,000 SF
Fast Food Restl>urant 20,000 SF General Re~il, 4,500 SF
BanI< & OT, and 126,000 SF Warehouse, I
N8WDaiIyTrips: 12.637, and 1,402 Peak Hour Trips !:
Build-<lut: 2005 I
I
Based on our review, tIl8 Traffic Division has determined thai the r$eed ORI is
projected to generate less trips than whal was previously approved. and tl1 fOre meets
tile TraffiC Performance S:andards 01 Palm 6eaGh County, Base<l on pea~ hour
fOrecests provided by lite collsul1ant, ~ is hOO/ever suggested that the foil . prOject
access drrvew<r(S tlJl'n-lanes 10 be provided: ' .
I
. ~~=;~=;~anes along Congress Avenue, onlothe rem and
. Northbound righHum I<>nes along Congress Avenue. onto tile tU\tl~ and
the middle driveways.
I
. Westbound left-Ium lane along Gateway Boulevard, onto lhe ei'Stem
driveway. !
. EastPound rigllt-turn lane a~ong Galeway Bou\e~ard. ontO \ne eastern
driveway, I
I
I
,
Municipality:
Vested ORl Trip":
Proposed Uca.:
\
\
I
DEC,13.200~ S'82PM
i
,
T ~RFFnC EI'iG
1-10,421
P.3
!
Attaclhment 1(Cont'd,}
If you have any questions regarding this determination. please COQtact me a11684-4030.
;
Sincerely.
/Y7
cc.: Ptnder T routam Consuttinglnc.
File: General - TPS - Mun . Tr.tr", Study R....iew
F :ITRAFF IC\rnalAdminlApprQvalslOZ 1 01 6.doc
~,
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach. FL 33416- I 229
(561) 684--4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Tony Masilotti. Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weis,rnan
. An Lqw:z.l Opportunity
^.lftrmatiy~ Action Errrployc--
r\l~;::~
May 21, 2003
Mr. Michael W, Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Motorola 29 - Renaissance Commons
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf,
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the project
entitled; Motorola 29, Renaissance Commons pursuant to the Traffic Perfonnance
Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code, This project
is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
East side of Congress Avenue, south of Gateway Boulevard
Boynton Beach
None
500 MF Residential Units, 11,500 SF General Retail. 3,500 SF Bank
with DT,
4,531
383 - PM Peak Hour
2004
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has detennined that the project is part of the
previously approved Motorola DRI, and also meets the Traffic Performance Standards of
Palm Beach County,
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COLJNTYEl'lc.;I.N.EER
/1/7..n L'
Masoud Atefi, MS
Sr. Engineer - T ra
cc: Pinder Troutman Consurting Inc.
Fi~: General- TPS - Mun - TraflC Study Review
F :\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\A.pprovals\030523.doc
MOTOROLA 29
TRAFFIC IMPflCT firlflL YSIS
Prepared for
COHPSO" fiSSOClfiTES OF BOY"TO". LLC.
Prepared by
PI"DEl TROUTHfi" CO"SULTI"G. I"C.
2324 South Congrl2Ss fivenue. Suite 1"
West Palm Beach. FL 33406
(561) 434-1644
,
" , ('!.tI\ 1( {t~~/
12 V((L'- r 11 fv. D
5 / 1/02
Rebecca]. Mulcahy, P.E.
Florida Registration #42570
~
#PTC03-75
Hay 9. 2003
~
Qi
MOTOROlA 29
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Introduction
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a
proposed residential/commercial development in the City of Boynton Beach. The site is a portion of
the approved Motorola DR!. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed development
meets Traffic Performance Standards.
Site Data
The site is located on the east side of Congress Avenue south of Gateway Boulevard as shown on
Exhibit 1. Access to the proposed project is via a full median opening signalized intersection and a
right in/right out connection to Congress Avenue and a full median opening signalized intersection on
Gateway Boulevard. Year 2004 conditions were examined for this analysis.
Existing T raffie Conditions
Exhibit 2 provides the 2001 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the surrounding roadway
network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of Palm Beach County.
Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor of 9.3% to the MDT volumes.
These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the
adopted LOS D service volumes.
Project T raffle
Trip Generation
Section 10.8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC and the
Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation, 6th Edition were reviewed to
determine acceptable daily trip generation rates for the proposed project. Exhibit 3 provides
the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed development For
Report 03-75 5-9-03
Traffic Performance Standards purposes, based on the net new external daily trip generation
of 4,531, the Test 1 radius of development influence is two (2) miles. The Test 2 radius of
development influence for the proposed development is one (1) mile.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
A directional distribution was developed based on review of land use patterns and existing
travel patterns. Exhibit 4 shows the assignment of daily and peak hour project traffic as well
as the project impact percentage (% of daily adopted service volume).
Future T raffie Conditions
Roadway Improvements
A review of the Transportation Improvement Program from the MPO of Palm Beach County,
and the Palm Beach County Five Year Road Program was completed. There are no roadway
improvements within the study area.
Baekground T raffie
Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of future
background traffic volumes. Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 5 for the surrounding
roadway links. Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County, was reviewed. No
Major projects are projected to have a 10% impact on the study area roadways within the
analysis time frame of the proposed development. Background growth projections based on
historic data account for traffic associated with the committed developments in the area.
T raffie Performanee Standards Analysis
Test 1 (Link Test)
This first test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links required to
be analyzed are projected to operate below adopted level of service standards. Roadway
links within one-half mile and those outside one-half mile with a project impact greater than
1 % of the LOS D service volume are required to be analyzed. Exhibit 6 shows future daily,
AM and PM peak hour traffic conditions for the analyzed roadway links. All analyzed
Report 03-75 5-9-03
2
roadway links are projected to operate above the adopted Test 1 level of service standards;
therefore, the requirements of Test 1 are met.
Test 2 (Model Test)
The second test examines traffic conditions based on model projections that are developed
and maintained by Palm Beach County. There are no Test 2 deficient links within the radius.
Therefore, the requirements of Test 2 are met
Intersection Analysis
Major intersections for which a proposed development adds more than 10% of the total
traffic on any link connecting a major intersection are required to be analyzed. No major
intersections meet this requirement based on the proposed development's impact.
Driveway Volumes
AM and PM peak hour project driveway volumes are provided on Exhibit 7.
Internal Roadways
Internal roadway volumes are provided on Exhibit 8.
Conclusions
This analysis shows that the proposed development meets all of the requirements of the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
Report 03 75 5-9-03 3
o
o
GATEWAY BOlli [VARD
N.TS.
,.SHEI
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
BOYNTUN B(ACH BOULEVARD
0
~
<
0 " ~
Z
< > :>
~ 0 ~ 0
" ~ < ~ ~
~ C) ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ <.J ~
< ~ Z U
. ~ :: ~
~ ~ 0
~ :s u
,
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
GOlf ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE)
05(09/03
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION
~
-I MOTOROLA 29
II
D
6LD
121424 C
i 48900
i 1992 C
I 4550
,-----
I 4LO
117242 C
132500
11604 C
: 3020
~
0(
~
~
>
~
;':
::!
>:
I'LD
32750 C
48900
3046 C
. 4550
GATfWAY BOULEVARD
; bLD
127477 C
I', 48900
2555 C
4550
I
119~~~C
32500
: 1795 C
! 3020
01 0 BOYNTON ROAD
o
<:
o
~
U
~
~
;:
:5
~ 6LD
'134741 C
48900
3131 C
I 4550
GOLF ROAD ($W 23rd AVLNUE)
LEGEND
6LD - ROADWAY LANES
354800- DAILY T_RAFFle AND LOS
48900 - DAILY ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
3300 0 - PEAK HOUR TRAffiC AND LOS
4550 PEAK HOUR ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
MOTOROLA 29
I f>LD
1]0952 C
i 48900
'287<) C
45~O
I~
~~
JrSJH;
L~
I--~LD-
1382920
148900
i3561 D
I 4550
I
~
z
~!_ 6LO
~r6233 0
......, 48900
:3133700
Z 4550
o
U
: 4LD
.28110 D
. 32500
'26140
i 3020
------
1;-
;'21';4 D
I 14900
11300
I 1390
\
~
o
~
<:
~
"
o
rn
G
~
u
~
~
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
BOYNTON BEACH BOULEVARD
I'LD
30038 C
48900
i 2794 C
! 4550
oLD
;34174 C
'14890U
3178 C
4550
EXHIBIT 2
EXISTING (2001) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
o
I
N.TS.
~
05/09/03
~
"'...."",....
6~00
~.-;~i
~ ~.
'*' Me...
o
~
'5
c
g
'" ~
N !;-;
M..!2 C
_ 0 ~
:.c 0 l;)
~~o.
J3~;E
>-
-'
<:
o
.~ N If"ll''"l.--
~ ~O\"""""
Qi.;:: "',t"ta:> '7
Z~.-...-
",O-"!?-.,?,,,o
oowo
>.__ ci d..t-...o
..oS '7'7
. .
~ ...
0.;:
"I~
"''''
"'M
~.~ N "" t-. ""
c: vO\N<""l
.s';:: 0\ t"t If!. co
X I- .-
W
.~ ':::R. ':::R. ':::R.-O
00880'
.;:: If"llf"l 0
I-r-.:r--:dd
"
E
E..............
.E
(0 L"l 0 <""l
If"lOt-.O'\
,: .~
o "
0....
u-
.
_0
l!l ;-;
Us
_.~ 00 t-. co
S~'CC~("'~
0';:: '": '7,..0 '"
I-I-N...-.....
'"
'"
'"
E ~~
ci1JJ28
ooc:~
----r:;:;-'-.
~~"
"'N
oon
lil~ ~
c
o
.2
11
.
o
.
U
.~
;:
~8
.
$ 8
.E M
.
~~~
D~~
ggg
N ~ ~
....- <""l~
L.U~OOON
t:8~~@cr;
.
.
a; 0
~ ~11~1
~ 1 ] = ~II
~ ~ ~ ~I i
M
~
,,'
'"
'"
0,
~
'"
'"
~
~'
?f'.
'"
oi
'"
~
~
N
",'
O'\lf"lt-.N
~",,"a:>.....N
'" ~
:qr::.""~
.;:: ....
.... 0
~ 0 ~
.
z
~~~~
.E
>'N
.0 _
~ l:l
1'1l';;;;:
0.;:
?f 6'("* "*
00000
do:i~
~~
s~~g~
o ~
.....
;:
Il~ -
N'"
:q r::.........
~~.....N
lUlU
.~ . 0
a; >>= N NO.....
-5~
0:::'7<"')<""1-.:1"
.
E:
,: .~
o "
0....
u-
.
- 0
. "
. .
V,E
s~gs~:J:
o ~
....
0'\<""1,",0\
N""..... ....
.;:: ....
l- ~ ,....
]90
o
....
'7lf"l0lf"l
N N N
.E
B "IMI~I~
~ ~I~I~~ ~
~ :J::l + g II
ffi ;I;I~~II
iOlorl
i .5
.1.1 rnl
.~;:'::l U. u...
E ~I:I; ;1
c: <""l N If') If"l
- 'M
.
w""
.... C
-u
OOON
~;:Jg;
'"
:l
o
I
><
-<
~
0.
~
- $
~ 5
.p II
] iji III ~
tl~ ~1~1 ~
ci\:jci\: ~I~I 8
M
~
N
M
N
o
'"
;;;
"
o
c,
'"
N
N
;:::
8
~
..
;!
'"
,,-,
~
M
N
~
'"
:l
o
I
><
-<
~
0.
~
5~g;;::~
o ~
....
~ ~
~ 0
~
~~2~
~~O'\~
.E ~
......~
1'~
.
. .-
0.;:
8SG;8
00-*0
~ ~
~g
s~~;;;:2
o ~ -
.....
;:-
- 0
EO
E
<
w
~~~~
on '.D r....
"'~'"
.E
g~~I~
L
~.=r-..OOOO
,s~
Ow~O\'7;::
E:
,: .~
o "
0....
u .
- 0
. "
. 0
CiS
s&8~a:
~ .........
~"5
]90
o
....
~~~~
If"lNCO'.D
N r-...... O'l
.E ~
~'Io
~~~~~
C:!.<",)M~lf"l
~ ~ ~ ~I~
.g e e gl~1
~f6~5::::
~dd~~
~ ;n
.~ 8181+1 ~
~ g 219~1
- ~l<"')'
~OOON
~-g~~@o:;
-u
- $
o ~
o 0
~ ~~II~I
3 i!i/l!jl
M
'"
M
~
~
~
M
N
~
0'.
'"
~
"
~
'"
"
'"
N
0'
'"
~
'"
'"
"
~
N
,',
M
N
M
~
'2
.
1:
u
"
~
~
o
l'
~
"
-'
"
.l!
~
~ g
o .
833
] ~
if
H
~ ~
~ .
E.: ~
- ...
3.s
~ c
. 0
i .~
. ~
: 2
~ '0
c .
o 0
~ ~
~ ~
"~ "~
'"
~
'"
....
o
....
~ B
o
o
9% 28%
408 1269
25 76
34 107 25%
126% 2.60% 1133
"'
96
3.49')(.
GATEWAY BOULEVARD
42%
1903
'"
101 41%
3.89% 1858
112
157
3.80%
" 10% '%
453 227
27 14
38 19 26%
1.39% 1.52% 1178
71
10U
OLD BOYNTON ROAD 241%
'. . '-
~
<'
~
~
>-
~
g
'>
BOYNfON BEACH BOULEVARD
2% 18%
91 816
5 I " 49
0 8 I ~ 69
<
0 fl.19% > 1.b7% ~
~ < ~
U ~-~ ~ ~
z 10- ~
6% ~
~ ~
" 272 Z
~ 16 0
23 CO
0.56%
WOOlBRIGtn ROAD
GOLF ROAD (SW 23rd AVENUE)
LEGEND
41% . PERCENT DISTRIBUTION
1858. DAILY PROJECT TRAFFIC
112 AMPl:AKHOUR
PROJECT TRAFFIC
157 . PM PEAK HOUR
PRQt[CT TRAHIC
3.80% % OF DAilY ADOPTED
SERVICE VOLUME
o
~
<
~
~
o
~
~
~
U
~
MOTOROLA 29
EXHIBIT 4
PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
NTS.
~
05/09/03
~
#PTC03.75
9rowth 03.75 5-5-03.xls
5/9/2003
Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 5
Motorola 29
Historic Growth
Dailv Traffic Volumes Growth
Roadway 1998 2001 Rate
Old Boynton Rd
Military Trail to Lawrence Road 14,531 17,242 5.87% /Year
Lawrence Rd to Congress Ave 17,087 19,300 4.14% /Year
Congress Ave to Boynton Beach Blvd 11,671 12,154 1.36% /Year
Boynton Beach Blvd
Military Trail to Lawrence Road 29,817 32,750 3.18% /Year
Lawrence Rd to Congress Ave 33,990 34,741 0.73% /Year
Congress Ave to Old Boynton Rd 30,316 30,038 .0.31% /Year
Gateway Boulevard
Military Trail to Lawrence Road (1) 18,390 21,424 7.93% /Year
Lawrence Rd to Congress Ave (1) 24,583 27,477 5.72% /Year
Congress Ave to High Ridge Road (2) 26,779 28,110 3.29% /Year
Congress Ave
Hypoluxo Road to Gateway Boulevard 29,543 30,952 1.57% /Year
Gateway Blvd to Old Boynton Rd 42,816 38,292 .3.65% /Year
Boynton Beach Blvd to Woolbright Rd 30,393 34,174 3.99% /Year
.
" ..,.
"
Average 309,916 326,654 1.77% /Year
(1) Utilized available MDT s for 1999.
(2) Utilized available MDTs for 1999/2000.
Exhibit 6
Molorola29
Test 1 Analysis
IPTC03-75
518103
te5t103-755-5-03
Pagelofl
DAilY
[Xisting Existing Growth (2003) (1) Totol
Roadwav link La"", 2001 Volume %/Y_ Proied e2l flOO3) Capacitv LOS
O~B nton Rd Militarv Trail to lawrence Rd. 4LD 17242 3218 5.87% 45 20505 32500 D
Old Boynton Rd Lawrence Rd. to Con ess/'.;;,;. 4LD 19300 2498 4.14% 4<> 2.........,. 32500 D
Old Bovnton Rd COrllV"ess Ave to Bovnton Beach Blvd 2l 12154 503 1.36% 227 12884 14900 D
Bovnton Beach aMi Miiitarv Trail to Lawrence Rd. 6LD 32750 3225 3.18% 45 36020 48900 D
Boynton Beach Blvd Lawrence Rd. to Con essAve. OlD 34741 766 0.73% 91 35598 48900 D
Bovnton Beach Blvd COrJl!ress Ave to Old Boynton Rd 6lD 30038 453 0.50% 816 31307 48900 D
Gatewav Boulevard MihtarvTral1 to Lawrence Rd. 6lD 21424 ';512 7.93% 45 26981 48900 D
Gatewa Boulevard Lawrence Rd. to COlWress Ave. 6LD 27477 4990 5.72% 227 32694 48900 D
Gateway Boulevard COrJl!ress Ave to Site 4lD 28110 2867 3.29% 408 31385 32500 D
Gatewav Boulevard SIte to Hif.h Ridee Road 4LD 28110 2867 3.29% 1133 32110 32500 D
c:orwess Ave Hypoluxo Rd. to Gateway Blvd. 6lD 30952 1481 1.57% 1269 33702 48900 D
C~ess Ave Gateway Blvd. to Site OlD 38292 577 0.50% 1903 40772 48900 D
Corn>:Il'SSAVfi' SitE' to Old Rovnlon Ro. 610 .1R2<n 577 0..'i0% lR'>R 40727 4/I'lOO I)
Com!ress Ave Old Boynton Rd to Boynton Beach Blvd 6l0(1) 36233 546 0.50% 1178 37957 48900 D
C~ress Ave Boynton Beach Blvd to WooIbrWht Road 6LD 34174 4256 3._ m 38702 48900 D
~ PEAK HOUR
lxisting l:.xisting Lrowth (2003) (1) lotal
Roadway link La"", 2001 Volume %/Y .., Proiect(2) (2003) Caoacitv LOS
Old Bovnton Rd Militarv Trail to Lawrence Rd. 4lD 1604 299 5.87% 3 1906 3020 D
D~ ntonRd Lawrence Rd. to Co fessAve. 4LD 1795 232 4.14% 27 2054 3020 D
ok! Boynton Rd COOWes5 Ave to Boynton Beach BNd 2l 1130 47 1.36% 14 1191 1390 D
Bovnton Beach Blvd Militdrv T t<lil to Lawrence Rd. 6lD 3046 300 3.18% 3 3349 4550 D
Beach BMI Lawrence Rd. to C ressAve. OlD 3231 71 0.73% 5 3307 4550 D
Bovnton ~am RIvrt Col1J':~ Aw 10 Old Boynton Rei hI[) 2794 42 O.~ 4. 2M'> 4.'i50 I)
Gatewav Boulewrd Militarv Trail to Lawrence Rd. OlD 1992 512 7.93% 3 2507 4550 D
Cate\'.'a" Boule-.'aro l3wrence Rd. to COrn!r~_ .6.\'e. 6lD 2555 464 5.72% 14 3033 4550 D
Gateway Boulevard Con2ressAve to Site 4LD 2614 267 329% 25 2006 3020 D
Gatewav Boulevard Site to Hieh Ridee Rood 4lD 2614 267 3.29% 68 2949 3020 D
Co ressAlle luxo Rd. to Gateway Blvd. .,D 2879 138 1.57% 76 3093 4550 D
COnj1JeSSAve Gateway Blvd. to Site OlD 3561 54 0.50% 115 3730 4550 D
COnltres5 Ave Site to oid Bovnton Rd. .LD J561 54 0.50% 112 3717 4550 D
COrn!ress Ave Old Bovnton Rd to Boynton Beach Blvd 6LD(1) 3370 51 0.50% 71 3492 4550 D
COrK!ress Ave BOYnton Beach Blvd to WooIbril!:ht Road 6LD 3178 396 3._ 16 3590 4550 D
PM PlA.K HOUR
l:.xtstmg l:.xlStJng t;rowth (2003) (1) lotal
Roadw.ov link La"", 2001 Volume %/Y... Proiect (2) (2003) Caoacitv LOS
Old Boynton Rd MilitHY Trail to Lawrence Rd. 4LD 1604 299 5.87% 4 1907 3020 D
Old 8()fynton Ref Lawrence Rd.-toE~Iwe. 4lD 1795 232 4.14% 38 2005 3020 D
Old Boynton Rd Cone.Je5S Ave to Bovnton Beach Blvd 2l 1130 47 1.36% 19 1196 1390 D
Boynton Beach Blvd Militarv Trail to Lawrence Rd. 6lD 3046 300 3.18% 4 3350 4550 D
n BeadlBIvd Lawrence Rd. to C Ave. OlD 3231 71 0.73% 8 3310 4550 D
Rovnton !k>ach 81vrl COfWll'S.~ AIIF: 10 Olct Rovnlon RrI OIl) 2794 42 0__'i0% .. 2qo.'i 4')')0 I)
Gatewav Boulevard Militarv Trail to Lawrence Rd. OlD 1992 512 7.93% 4 2508 4550 D
Gatewa':' Boulevard l.n'.'renre Rd. to ~re<...s AVe. 6lD 2555 464 5.72% 19 3038 4550 D
Gatf'Way Boulevard Cone.ressAvetoSite 4LD 2614 267 3.29% 34 2915 3020 D
Gatewav Boulevard Site to Hil1h RKkoe Road 4LD 2614 267 3.29% 96 2977 3020 D
Cone.ress Ave Hypoluxo Rd. to Gateway Btvd. 6LD 2879 138 1.57% 107 3124 4550 D
Cone:ressAve Gatewav Blvd. to Site 6LD 3561 54 0.50% 161 3776 4550 D
ComressAve Site to Old Bovnton Rd. .LD 3561 54 O.50';lb 157 3771 4550 D
COR1!res5 Ave Old Boynton Rd to Bovnton Beach Btvd 61.0 (1) 3370 51 0.50% 100 3521 4550 D
COneJ'E'SS Ave Bovnton Beoadl Blvd to Woolbrie:ht Road 6lD 3178 396 3._ 23 3597 4550 D
(1) A\fefage of adjacent counl5.
(2) See ExhIbrt3.
o
w
=>
z
w
>
-<
Of>
Of>
w
'"
lJ
N.T.S.
GA
Z 8 (45)
0 .
U
TEWAY BLVD 1 (2) ., ~
. ~~
N ~
873
a I Sb ISO)
~ 4 (3)
80 (75)
"'L. I
3448
~.
1 IS) ~ -
SITE
sj \42 (45)
3 1278
'-
-I~ -
;1
...-i
-I
~
LEGEND
11 -AM PEAK HOUR
(34) -PM PEAK HOUR
1278 -DAILY TRAFFIC
~
.1 MOTOROLA 29
EXH IBIT 7
PROJECT DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
o
~
05109103
o
o
~
o
'"
<{
>
~
-'
::J
o
'"
>-
N.T.S.
~ ~
::J <{
z 3:
~ ~
> '<
<(
'" lJ
'" 0
~
'" c-
lJ
Z ,
0 I
U ;:::1 ~
::0.,
"" .,-,
I .,-,
.
873
-
~2.0~ 1472
-
37 (66) .
! ...j .
...j ---I
~ N g
<Oi ~, !:J
<0' :!i
---j a;)! ~
~ n
<0 1400
~----
1428 SITE ( I
i
-~
~-
JlRO~ )
8 (371 .
672 _.
LEGEND
41 -AM PEAK HOUR
(20) .PM PEAK HOUR
672 -DAILY TRAFFIC
MOTOROLA 29
EXHIBIT 8
INTERNAL ROADWAY VOLUMES
05/09/03
~