CORRESPONDENCE
8-1 5--2002 8, 59AM
FROt,1 PLANNI'"G AND PEAL ES 561 434 8187
P.l
.-... THE SCHOOL DISTRICT Of PALM BEACH COUNTY 00
E!I PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1'0'')
~ 3300 FOREST HILL BOULEVARD - Cll0 r;: n !:j
!!i WEST PALM BEACH, FL 334<06 ~~~,.,y.<"-
....,,~~~
~
TO:
Facsimile Transmittal
PHONE: (561)484-tsmw FAX: (561 )4S4-ts187
1'1" of Pages so.t (including Cover PClge) .3
CVlcK) H UPS ON
- DATE: ~;S /t b /0 2-
.
FROM:
MR.. (j if<-R.:A N
-2.Y2-f,2 S9
.D~\J \.l) pe YOU NG
FAX N"
COMMENTS:
R.e '. ~~I\-NO BA-Y C DNC U~.~NCy
.peT€R.M.l~ AnD rJ
cc:
H' lOA TAl WP51 \DOC' 2
6-16-2002 9,00AH
FRO~~ PLAN!,I~,G N!D REAL ES 561 43~ P' '37
'~'5. '1';:~;:?i2 <U-,Ht.~,._8S
~I:~~jl~~~ ~~:0~
'~'m~Ol.~
iu · '"
~ Q!:!
\ .........
~""^""'~;,
. Zh,[/,.,...,
i'.....id&OlRft /-' / v':_'.
School OJstnf: of Palm 6..ch County
School CO"C~rt."cy Appli<::aticm and
SONici,.' Provids, Form
~,;Meon"_(q"..,tC':
''-'anin; ~tltnoot
The~&I~ol'?Unh.-eheo..rCy
~~ll~hAM:tHIlI~, (M~O
Wlfllt......e~P\. "~GS.,.13
(~1)~ (lf~\)H,.,,77
Aru.ntI~": ccm""'r~ ~Ci<<1
kt\r,lOf Ofstrfct ~
lO~.l G~\('~. __________
In.tro:cti~n.: .,ubltllt on. ~py Qr Ul~ ?orr PI~t'td Ilpplie.tIon a"~ tn. fOr the revt.w, fot It'ich new
.....1denti.1_1 ..-q~lrln9 0 lI'lem"n_;i un of <on.~"'ncy for .""""le. A o.tel'lllllallQn w,lll>e
p"'.lde<l wlIttln '~on. i13) VIlO<l<in; dll\'$ Or ",etipt of 8 <:Qr1lphote .,;>iIcetJ"". P d........iMllon i> not
tww:fDruble 8f')dib valId br on. )I'.(:;r from d~. Q~ i.'$l.Janoe. ~e Ihe o.V51t)~"'lt Orctw ls issueQ, tt,.
conClotTM1t:y d4t.~lnaij~ sf"iel'l ttJJ" ....'itl"l the~: ',velepment Order'.
;
Fort ~ ro bo ""1"'1>1010<1 by Appllcont '
A;ll'bnfo N~; \'OODS1~:; UND CEVELOH:ENT CORP.
AQeJlt'e Name: CA lH t'$: ~ BAr tgif.' ....
M*lIng.l\ddrotc, 41.00..jtF~ . ~+-h AIl';;'UHf fi"1", T .HrcBaJl.llF FI.31114
T.~honeNumijer: .)f:,' "$:9~"'.r,'-:, Fales""4eNurnt:or.....9.;i./_I.~O~lJM.,
i.
[H~RAN{I. EA Y
:r~,:.JtJJ:ITIW....llAQ;~
. n;;;!-l. ~~~I'~-:)n-()!)fI...DnK-__
-1'W:O~~ ll~C!.I'~~-SllOll.ll...~:L\'P--...
'"'7'!~e)t5 Sing I. Fern!)'
. Ap._.13 (3 110M... or leIS)
Hi~" 1'110. Aportments
_____ Age R_Ole4 Multo Or1ly
pt.lltdn, Pw,; ProvldO O~"t
'~appllcabte{ :;~~~~(t18 eo~e!~ F"ha'ft).i' J Plliln snowir'lQ tn. :uuonbeiC'.-d type of Imlt8 to receive
oertllicat. of .eneady~
NO I'tlASING ,
P...t fl. LO<i.' ,q.i......,ment C<lmplote"oss ~.IVl.W Oot. C<>nwl<lte ~ ;e~
7)-1/
~oG...m_ R,,,,,,onta1lvo ,'-
i'ml N....A~ /4/~^,
PA:l/ect Nome:
Munlcipollty !" UlUI1CClrpotabOcl Fee
""'F*lY C<>ntrol l'lumcer (PeN):
F>lClf<<:ll.oce!iotl:1
Concurrency Sorjtlce Area (eSA):
OJ!VELO~lI'(!NlI REOVEST:
TctalhfUnIts:' ~
l'olltJo" ~ ~,a;.efk:'I7OC.
Tltl. 2bv'.GC ~ ..
i:_
I:
"
"-ctlfl. TOb.C<l~dbySClloolD..~f~~2S r;,.1' -r
Oate 0"9''''. Fl.ocolvOlt 7(:3 1/02-... ~ c.... Num~r._Q2Q....!._;:;_L OJ.. sf
~ I "rify that the pro;evt ~Q1T.P[~;' \oL'~'1 ~,,<s ~QPted l..~vet of Service (LOS) t'or ScnOOI$.
~ I ~orlt,' lhallh. prt>jt!oot wi:! OCl\"P'1 wi~ tho .dopto<J c~ of Sorvl... (LOS) for ScMoo!.
s~b/eot 10 tn. ..l1B<;",,~ cOnOll!( ns
""Itt tho acloPlld L'VeI ef 9<"",,", (lOS' for
".1 (" i 01.-
~.
~~~.
,
'I~i
..) ,'-.
25
... ....
r'~.~:..
P. 3
;J.~'
"'
8-16-2802 8,55AH
F=<DH PLANN I \JG AND REAL ES 561 434 i" 87
P.2
THE SCHOOl O!STP.:1CTCI!
PAl.MeEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA
F'LA'INING DEPARTMENT
3320 FOREST HILL BLVD., c-331
WEST PAlM BEACf<, FL. 334%-5313
(561) 434-8020 FAX. (561) 434.8137
ARTMUR C. JOf<NSON, Ph.D.
SUFERINTENOENT
August 14, 2002
Mr. Orran Hudson
City of Boynton Beach
Planning & Zoning Department
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
RE: CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION - CASE NUMBER 02073101 - MERANO BAY
Dear Mr. Hudson:
The Palm Beach County Schoo! District has reviewed the above referenced project for E
Concurrency Determination.
Attached please find the approved Palm Beach Countl' School District Concurrenc~
Application and Service Provider Form for Merano Bay. This concurrency determination il:
valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. Once a Deve,lopment Order has been issuec
for the project, the concurrency determination will be valid for the life of the Developmen1
Order.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact me al
(561) 434-7343.
Sincerely,
David L. DeYoung, AICP
Planner
cc: Carlos J. Sallbe. Woodside Land Development Corporatic1n
enc.
S:IPlanning'.publiclDataICONCRNC2\conCWTency aetennination 1.tters\CD08 j 40:!.doc
AN EauAL OPPORTUNITY EMPt.oVefl
Legal Description: Merano Bay (AutoZone) Property
P. C. N. 08-43-45-22-06-000-0670
A portion of Section 2, according to the Plat of COQUINA COVE, as recorded in Plat
Book 24, Page 14, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being more
particularly described as follows:
Commence at the centerline intersection of Shore Drive and Ocean Inlet Drive as
shown on said plat; thence Southerly along said centerline of Shore Drive and the arc of
a curve, said curve being concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 182.40 feet a
central angle of 23023'56", a radial bearing at this point of North 90000'00" East an arc
distance of 74.49 feet to a point; thence South 00000'00" East a distance of 50.01 feet
to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the hereinafter described parcel, thence continue
South 00000'00" East a distance if 184.96 feet to a point; thence North 90000'00" West
along the South line of said Section 2, a distance of 290.46 feet to a point on the East
line of the parcel described in Official Record Book 606, Page 198 and the East right-of-
way line of U. S. Highway No.1; thence North 02054'00" East along said right-of-way
line a distance of 20.02 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the East having a
radius of 7,589.49 feet and a central angle of 01 047'46"; thence Northerly along the arc
of said curve a distance of 17.87 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of said
Shore Drive; thence South 90000'00" East along said South right-of-way line, a distance
of 202.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of
25.00 feet and a central angle of 76018'38"; thence Southeasterly, along the arc of said
curve a distance of 33.30 feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of
207.40 feet and a central angle of 22029'39"; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said
curve a distance of 81.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing in all 76,024.186 square feet or 1.745 acres more or less.
--
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
December 31, 2002
STEVEN M. SEIBERT
Secretary
Mr. Dick Hudson, AICP
City of Boynton Beach
Dept. of Development
Planning and Zoning Division
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Dear Mr. Hudson:
Thank you for submitting copies of the City's Small Scale Development Plan Amendment adopted
by Ordinance No. 02-057 on December 3, 2002, for our records. The reference number for the amendment
is 02S8.
The Department will not conduct a compliance review or issue a Notice of Intent regarding the
adopted small scale development plan amendment in accordance with procedures contained in Section
163.3187(3)(a), Florida Statutes.
If you have any questions, please contact me for the DRI and Plan Processing Section at
(850)922-1767.
Sincerely,
~1v;cr..'k-~
D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and Processing
DRE\lw
cc: Michael Busha, Ex. Director
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
JAN - 2 200J
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD' TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781
Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE
2796 Overseas Highway, Suile 212
Marathon, Fl 33050-2227
(3051289.2402
COMMUNITY PLANNING
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL3239g.2100
/8501488-2356
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
{850l413-9969
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100
1850l48B-7956
~\rY 0"
- - .
ij\._..~...............(;I
o ..... ..,=
~",.-:. ... 'v'"
'ON e
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building - Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment
December 13, 2002
,
Mr. D. Ray Eubanks, Community Program Administrator
Department of Community Affairs
Division of Community Planning
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FI 32399-2100
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Sirs:
Please find enclosed required documents on the above-referenced, adopted small-scale
amendments processed in accordance with Subsection 163.3187(1)(c)2., Florida Statues.
Amendment LUAR 02-006 totals 1.75 acres. With the adoption of this amendment the
cumulative total of acreage to date for the 2002 calendar year is 11.32 acres.
Enclosed you will find copies of Ordinance 02-057, reflecting approval by the City
Commission on December 3, 2002, staff reports for the amendment, the publication notice, an
updated land use map with the boundaries and locations of the subject properties in
relationship to the surrounding street and thoroughfare network, and the completed RPM-BSP-
Small Scale-1 form. Should you have any questions please contact me at 561-742-6264.
Respectfully submitted,
~j/
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
~
Cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
South Florida Water Management District
Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
J:\SHRDATA\P1anning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MERANQ BAy\LUAR\SS Transmittal DCA.dot
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Phone: (S61) 742-6260 . Fax (S61) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING & ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-206
(revised)
TO: Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Dick Hudson, ArcP
Senior Planner
THROUGH: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE: October 25, 2002
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project/ Applicant: Merano BayjWoodside Land Development Corp.
Agent: Carlos Ballbe
Owner: AutoZone, Inc.
Location: Southeast corner of Shore Drive and North Federal Highway
File No: Land Use Amendment (LUAR 02-006)
Property Description: Vacant property consisting of :1:1.75 acres, classified Local Retail
Commercial (LRC) and zoned IPUD Infill Planned Unit
Development
Requested change/use: To reclassify the subject property from Local Retail Commercial
(LRC) to Special High Density Residential (SHDR) in order to
construct a 20-unit fee simple townhouse community.
Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning:
North: Right-of-way of Shore Drive, then developed commercial (Yachtsman's Plaza) designated
Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned C-3 Community Commercial.
South: Right-of-way of Boynton (C-16) Canal, then developed single-family residential (Harbor
Estates) designated Mixed Use (MX) and zoned R-1-AA Single Family Residential (5.4
dujac).
East: Right-of-way of Shore Drive, then developed single-family residential (Coquina Cove)
designated Low Density Residential (LDR)(4.84 dujac) and zoned R-1-AA Single Family
Residential (5.4 dujac).
Page 2
File Number: LUAR 02-006
Merano Bay
West: Rights-of-way of Federal Highway and the Florida East Coast (FEC) Railroad, then
undeveloped property designated Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned C-3 Community
Commercial.
MASTER PLAN ANALYSIS
Under its present land use the property could be developed for the range of commercial uses
permitted with the existing Local Retail Commercial designation. This land use designation also
allows rezoning to the IPUD zoning district at a density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre for a
total of 18.9 units. The developer is requesting a change of land use to the Special High Density
Residential to allow the necessary 20 dwelling units per acre.
The City Commission adopted the Federal Highway Corridor Redevelopment Plan on May 15,
2001 to allow for a variety of housing styles at intensities that will assist in supporting the
downtown redevelopment. It also served as a catalyst to encourage redevelopment and infill
development of the eastern portion of the City along Federal Highway and to promote the
overall general economic expansion of the City. Implementation of the Plan included an
amendment to the Land Development Regulations to create the IPUD zoning district. This new
zoning district allows for a greater variety of housing types in order to redevelop infill parcels,
specifically along the Federal Highway corridor. This new zoning district allows for greater
flexibility in terms of lot size and setback restrictions. As promulgated in the Comprehensive
Plan, all development proposed within the IPUD should exceed the basic development
standards of the conventional residential zoning districts. This characteristic should be evident
in terms of a project's site design and site amenities. This project represents one of the first
requests for the IPUD zoning district designation. Staff recognizes this circumstance and
expects the best possible development, in particular, that this project will set the standard for
future IPUD developments. Staff determined that the layout of the buildings, the allocation of
back-up space, and the distance between each building are in the optimal configuration and
therefore, exceed the basic development standards,
In conclusion, the proposed site plan does meet the intent of the IPUD zoning district. As
previously stated, the subject property would be eligible for 10.8 units / acre or 18.9 total units
if converted to a residential use under the existing commercial land use. The plan proposes 20
total units or two (2) additional units over the current maximum allowable number of units.
The plan and its configuration of the townhouses buildings satisfy optimal design objectives
without forfeiting on any site amenities. Staff is recommending the approval of a
reclassification to the Special High Density land use classification, which allows the proposed
density .
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The eight criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in
Article 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C. Comprehensive Plan
Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff analysis when the
proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map.
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in
Page 3
File Number: lUAR 02-006
Merano Bay
dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written
approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk
manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or
requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the
property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
The property in question does lie east of Federal Highway, and therefore is in the hurricane
evacuation zone for a Category 1 (SaffirjSimpson Scale) hurricane; however, the applicant
proposes to develop a townhouse community of only 20 units, therefore falling below the 50-
unit level. Staff would recommend that the developer apprise each homebuyer in the
development of the fact that they are buying property in a hurricane evacuation zone and
provide a mechanism to disseminate continuing information to residents concerning hurricane
evacuation and shelters through a homeowners' or residents' association.
Policy 1.13.3 of the land Use Element reads:
"The City shall continue to encourage infill development and redevelopment by
implementing actions of the Boynton Beach 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan, and the
policies contained in the Coastal Management Element. "
The adoption of the Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) regulations was a direct response
to the cited policy directions as well as policy directions in the Federal Highway Corridor
Community Redevelopment Plan. The introduction to the regulations states:
"It is a basic public expectation that landowners requesting the use of the IPUD
district will develop design standards that exceed the standards of the basic
development standards in terms of site design, building architecture and
construction materials, amenities and landscape design. The extent of variance
or exception to basic design standards, including but not limited to requirements
for parking spaces, parking lot and circulation design, and setbacks, will be
dependent on how well the above stated planning expectations are expressed in
the proposed development plan. "
The site plan for the proposed development was approved by the Community Redevelopment
Agency Board on October 8, 2002, and by the City Commission on October 15, 2002. It meets
the basic expectations of the code through the provision of notable architectural character that
will be an enhancement to the corridor; convenient and adequate parking as well as
recreational amenities for residents and guests; and landscaping that is both varied and
abundant.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use
pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare.
Page 4
File Number: LUAR 02-006
Merano Bay
The proposed land use amendment would not create an isolated district, but would relate to the
adjacent single-family residential lands to the east and will form a logical transition between
that lower density residential development and the commercial development, lying to the north
of the subject site, along Federal Highway.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable.
A number of changed and changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. The
Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan, adopted by the City Commission on
May 15, 2001, included the following strategy to provide a strong residential base that is
aesthetically inviting:
"Encourage a variety of housing. Develop intensity standards that allow for a
variety of housing styles and types at intensities that will assist in supporting the
downtown and general economic expansion. "
In response to this strategy, the city adopted amendments to the land development regulations,
adding the Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD) zoning district to allow a greater range of
housing types to be developed on infill parcels, specifically along Federal Highway in the
entrance districts. Residential densities for the IPUD zoning district can range from 10.8 dujac
to 20 dujac. The two entrance districts are defined by the redevelopment plan as the areas of
the Federal Highway corridor from the north city limits to the Boynton (C-16) Canal, and from
Woolbright Road to the south city limits.
The IPUD zoning district regulations are relatively flexible in order to encourage developer
creativity, including townhouse developments on small infill and redevelopment parcels in
exchange for a superior residential project that exceeds conventional standards. In addition,
the South Florida housing market is experiencing a growing popularity of townhouse
developments as a residential unit of choice, particularly in urban areas.
d. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and
other public facilities.
Development of the property for residential use will reduce the demand for water and sewer
capacity from the potential demands, if the property is developed with the commercial uses and
intensities allowed under the existing land use and zoning. Likewise, utilizing the daily trip
generation rate used by the Fair Share Road Impact Fee Schedule, the project is expected to
have a total average trip generation of 140 trips per day. This is far less than the 2,623 trips per
day that 61,000 sq. ft. of commercial space would generate, if the property were developed
under its present land use designation. It is also less than the 500 trips per day threshold
requiring submittal of a traffic impact analysis. With respect to solid waste, the SWA has stated
in a letter dated December 18, 2001, that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's
municipalities throughout the 10-year planning period. The Palm Beach County School District
has reviewed the project for school concurrency and approved it. Lastly, drainage will also be
reviewed in detail as part of the review of the conditional use application, and must satisfy all
requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities.
Page 5
File Number: LUAR 02-006
Merano Bay
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future
use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
The master plan for the proposed use shows a residential development with easily accessible
recreational amenities, attractive elevations and well-designed residences that will have a
positive effect on adjacent residential property values.
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning.
Under its present land use and zoning the property could be developed for the range of
commercial uses permitted in the C-3 Community Commercial zoning district which permits a
maximum lot coverage of forty percent (40%) and a maximum building height of forty-five (45)
feet or four (4) stories. In 1998 a request for site plan approval was submitted to construct a
one story, 7,234 sq. ft. retail commercial building for auto parts sales. The applicant withdrew
the application prior to review by the City Commission.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the
needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
The proposed development is exemplary of the type of redevelopment and infill projects
envisioned when the IPUD regulations were adopted in that the design well exceeds the
requirements of the basic development standards as cited under the response to criterion "a';
above. This and similar developments will help to underpin the redevelopment efforts in the
Federal Highway Corridor and also increase the variety of types and styles of housing to support
general economic expansion.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in
districts where such use is already allowed.
There are very few residentially designated sites in the City that provide opportunities for small
to medium-sized developments of this type.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
As indicated herein, this request is consistent with the intent of the Infill Planned Unit
Development zoning district; will not create additional impacts on infrastructure that have not
been anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan; will be compatible with adjacent land uses and will
contribute to the overall economic development of the City. Therefore, staff recommends that
the approval of a reclassification to the Special High Density land use classification, which allows
the density proposed in the site/master plan. If the Community Redevelopment Agency Board
or the City Commission recommends conditions, they will be included within Exhibit "C".
ATrACHMENTS
J:\SHROATA\Planning\SHAREO\WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BAy\LUAR\STAFF REPORT LUAR3.doc
SMALL SCALE DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT
SUBMITTAL FORM
1. Name of Local Government
City of Boynton Beach
Person Completing this form
Dick Hudson
Phone number 561-742-6264
Name of Newspaper that notice of small scale was published The Palm Beach
Post
Date Publication Noticed November 2 & 12, 2002
(Please attach copy of notice)
2. Number of acres of small scale development amendments contained in package:
a. Within Urban Infill, Urban Redevelopment or Downtown Revitalization as
defined by Section 163.3164, FS 1.75
b. Within Transportation Concurrency Exception Area pursuant to Section
163.3180(5), FS
c. Within Regional Activity Centers or Urban Central Business Districts
pursuant to Section 380.06(2)(e), FS
d. Outside categories a, b, c
3. Cumulative total number of acres of small scale development amendments for the
calendar year:
a. Categories listed in Item 2 a, b, c. above 9.27
b. Categories listed in Item 2 d and above 2.05
4. Total number of acres of small scale development amendments in this
package that are located within a coastal high hazard area as identified in
the comprehensive plan 1.75
Pursuant to Rule 9J-11.015(2), Florida Administrative code, this form must be mailed
with all small scale development amendments as defined by Section 163.3187(1)(c),
Florida Statutes to:
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING
PLAN PROCESSING SECTION
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100
(904) 488-4925
J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTSIMERANO BAY\LUAR\SMALL SCALE FORM.DOT
ORDINANCE NO. 02- 05;
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH EAST CORNER OF SHORE DRNE AND NORTH
FEDERAL mGHW A Y (PROJECT KNOWN AS MERANO
BAY); AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 BY AMENDING
THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSNE PLAN OF THE CITY FOR THE
PROPERTY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND USE DESIGNATION IS
BEING CHANGED FROM LOCAL RETAIL
COMMERCIAL TO SPECIAL mGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (SHDR); PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTNE DATE.
"
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has
dopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use
lement by Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Govemment Comprehensive
lanning Act; and
WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future Land Use Element of a
omprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, has been followed; and
WHEREAS, after public hearing and study, the City Commission deems it in the
est interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the
omprehensive Plan as adopted by the City herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE
ITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section I: The foregoing WHEREAS clauses are true and correct and incorporated
erein by this reference.
Section 2:
Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby amended to reflect the
\....
\CA\Ordinances\Planning\Land Use\Merano Bay Land Use.doc
following:
That the Future Land Use of the following described land shall be designated as
SHDR (Special High Density Residential). Said land is more particularly described as
follows:
A portion of Section 2, according to the Plat of COQUINA COVE, as recorded in Plat
Book 24, Page 14, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being more
particularly described as follows:
Commence at the centerline intersection of Shore Drive and Ocean Inlet Drive as shown
on said plat; thence Southerly along said centerline of Shore Drive and the arc of a curve,
said curve being concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 182.40 feet a central angle
of23023'56", a radial bearing at this point of North 90000'00" East an arc distance of
74.49 feet to a point; thence South 00000'00" East a distance of50.01 feet to the POINT
OF BEGINNING of the hereinafter described parcel, thence continue South 00000'00"
East a distance if 184.96 feet to a point; thence North 90000'00" West along the South
line of said Section 2, a distance of 290.46 feet to a point on the East line of the parcel
described in Official Record Book 606, Page 198 and the East right-of-way line ofU. S.
HighwayNo. I; thence North 02054'00" East along said right-of-way line a distance of
20.02 feet to the beginning ofacurve concave to the East having a radius of7,589.49 feet
and a central angle of 01 047'46"; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve a distance
of 17.87 feet to a point on the South right-of-way line of said Shore Drive; thence South
90000'00" East along said South right-of-way line, a distance of 202.88 feet to the
beginning of a curve concave to the Southwest having a radius of25.00 feet and a central
angle of76018'38"; thence Southeasterly, along the arc of said curve a distance of33.30
feet to the beginning of a reverse curve, having a radius of207.40 feet and a central angle
of22029'39"; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve a distance of8\.43 feet to
the POINT OF BEGINNING.
Containing in all 76,024.186 square feet or \.745 acres more or less.
Section 2: That any maps adopted in accordance with the Future Land Use Element shall
e amended accordingly.
Section 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
Section 4: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be
ec1ared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
\CA\Ordinances\Planning\Land ~ee\Merano Bay Land Use.doc
emainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: This Ordinance shall become effective 31 days after adoption, unless
hallenged. If challenged, it becomes effective upon the issuance of a final order finding it in
ompliance.
FIRST READING this ~ day of Nollembu ,2002.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this ~ day of ~bCf" , 2002.
'-
CH, FLORIDA
,
r. ~~~
Vice
Commissioner
,\CA\Ordinances\Planning\Land Use\Merano Bay Land Use.doc
.
/
-~
THE PALM BEACH POST
Published Daily and Sunday
West Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF FLORIDA
COUNTY OF PALM BEACH
Before the undersigned authority personally appeared Wendy Elliott, who on oath says that she
is Telephone Sales Supervisjor of The Palm Beach Post, a daily and Sunday newspaper
published at West Palm Beach in Palm Beach County, Florida; that the attached copy of
advertising, being a ~in the matter of Land Use lMerano Bav) was published in said
newspaper in the issues of November 2. & lZ.2002. Affiant further says that the said The Post
is a newspaper published at West Palm Beach, in said Palm Beach County, Florida, and that the
said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Palm Beach County, Florida,
daily and Sunday and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in West
Palm Beach, in said Palm Beach County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the
first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she/he has
neither paid nor promised any person, fIrm or corporation any discount rebate, commission or
refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper.
~~
12'" day of Novef1 A/. 2~
f}~ ' fl \
S worn to and subscribed before this
Personally known 2Q!; or Produced Identification
Type of Identification Produced
cJJ
,/"
..,.... '
~~"" KAREN M McLlr-ITON
~." MY COMMISSION ;I CC 979669
:to'~Cli EXPIRES:Noo,. 15,201)$
HIC.,.3-NOTA.RV !=!.,. Notary ~C8 '" Bonding, 1l"lC.
(J {Zit
'-
(fff ys
~
NC:l
NOTICE Of
NOTICE OF LAND '
NOTICE OF
NOTICE IS HEREay GMN lho' the
lloard of THE CITY Of IlOYNTON
puauc HEARING, on Tuesday, ~
CITY HAll COMMISSION CHAMBERS,
verd, to consider this request submitted
Wood.ide Land De.eIooment Corp. The I
Of IlOYNTON aEACH, FLORIDA, ..;U
consider this request on Tuesday, NoYMi
Decembe< 3, 2002, at 6:30 p,m. 0< o. .
permits 0' the CITY HAll COMMISSION ~
lleach llou"""rd. The reques' i. d...:ribeci
LOCATION: Southeastcomer 01 She<e'l
REQUEST: Amend lhe Comprehen....
From - l.ocallW
To . Special t
, du/ae) ,
PROPOSl:D USl:: 2o.uni' fee .im~
LfGALllt:lUlll"II0N: ~'
, ~l:LllON 2, LESS THE
'COQUINA COVE' AC
THEREOf AS RECOR
Of THE puauc REC~
flORiDA, AND LESS TH
OfFICIAL RECOIlDS
RlGHT.Of-WA Y.
P.C.N.08.43-45-22__
L....atlon III
_Sol
R3.
~----
----
~-
II .'~i"
.
.
Thi. req_ am be viewed betw-1 the
p.m. at the Cilj< .. ~ Ileach Plann
Eas' lloynkln Ileach lloule.ord.
All inletesled porties are no.1ied 10 "-=
I:!Y atlomey and be heard. />osry _
decision of lhe Planning and o....k.,.,,~
..;lh '-' 10 any matfw c:onsiderWd-.
record al the ~ng. and for ""'" po
a -ootim recard .. lhe proceeding. i...
testimony and ..idence upon wllich lhe ap
The Gty shall fumion apprapriole aw<i5
.--ary 10 aIIorc/ an indiViclUal..;lh <> cli
portio,""" in and enjar the bonoIits <l (
CcndudocI bv the Gty. - - Psi
Iemt tww1Iy.Tour 12.q haun prioo: 10 Ilie p
the Cily 10 """an<>bIy aceommoclale your
CITY Of IlOYNl
PlANNING Ar-l
(561) 742-6260
PUBUSH: The Post
November 2, 20
November 12, 2
..~~i
~~... .1;, \~~
,,~,
,"
1,"
":O'b""~'
n,"Ft .
.--.-.- ,-
. , . )', ',") ,
...'.:, ~ ~ ;~.:~I ~.
.,J'
<
.,
'.,
)\:-\'
,
;;
;;
.~
~
;...."'-
1 \.-
o
.'f
,
,
'-...
~
"
,
::
-".;.,
$I:_
.,
,
- ..}I'/
;= ~--~<! :';"
'~.jl/
-
)
P.
~
~
~
------
r-
, ,"/.
_-->__1
~
~--..
'~~'~l~
~'-./"'l
.. ,
,., , I
f . y, .
,K-: 1/ '-
., ""J!
\ '~ ~/!....;
'\ '~,~ i~".
t. . ......
.-.
.,
! '
~
,.' I'
" I
,J' .J
,
/
'-.
',-
I
[<::.,
---1==7
I r'i
'sih' t
. \
,I'
,
[,;;-
,
~ - --~~. j
,., C .
____ 'l' ,/- /
/ cS2: VI ih -..-/
l~ ! ---r~-t! J
. ~'" ... . ~~ '!J :;,7'// ---r
., ,I.i 1. · r-1.[.! ;---;.'
~ ~J- \--J~' i
-:::;:;/', -, -" J
i- ')'
:
!
---.:
i
. "",. - ./
1\ ~'
;bl)J) .
"(-
--&
,
./
,
i/
.
c
l.
f--
I
..
-,
!'!L..s...";(b,lU__'ll..' .
&.
(.;
=----n---
.:.)
,
,
,
o
l
t
,
D
~
"~
tillillJ
MAP KEY
RESIDENTIAL
LOW DENSITY (LOR)
MAX 4.84 D.U.7ACRE
~
.
"
MODERATE DENSITY (MOOR)
. . . --
., .
MAX 7.26 D.U.I ACRE
MEDIUM DENSITY (MeQR)
MAX 9.68 0 .U.I ACRE
IBId ~I1IGH DENSfTY(HDB)
. .
Mt\X 10.8 D.U.7 ACRE
~fggm~- SPE CIAC HfGJ.:rt)ENSITy"-tSHOR)
-- MAX 20-();-U./ ACRE .... .
__C~O~~~C]i~b.;;
t- _-... ' '.:2.:..-~:0-.J-_'_"'M"__"_.'-<
~ 'O-F~FiCE:{OC), u""
--..... - ---.. ---~-. - -', .- --- - -
~ LOCAL RETAJL (LRC)
- - ,. ..-\ '-
~ GENERAL (GC)
-..._..... .-.---- . ---'.-~' -~ -
b'/<lfNDtJSTRIAL '-(1)
.
~
~
~
~
t.,..~tl
..'-..l......~.
":!'>,:." .~;
I
i
'. OTHER
AGRICUL TORE" (A)
f:-~ -'..-. ,'." .~- m.'._ """-'
RECREATIONAL (R)
~- -...-- ",.~---- ., - .-' ..;
J:~:t1B L.t.C_& P.RJV A I.E,_____(e..eJ~1) _' .. .
'.. j;
'<30 V ERN M E N'T A L / INS T (TtTt fON A L J
.,
,0)-
_. -..
~ MIXED USE (MX)
,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
Building
Planning & Zoning
OccupauonalLkense
Community Redevelopment
December 13, 2002
Joseph M. Yes beck, P.E.
District Director, Transportation Planning Office
Department of Transportation, District 4
3400 Commercial Boulevard, Third Floor
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309-3421
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Mr. Yesbeck:
Attached please find the adoption package sent to the Department of Community
Affairs on December 13, 2002, regarding the above referenced small-scale map
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~/l
......
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Attachments
J: \SHRDA T A \PLANNING\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BA y\LUAR\REVIEWAGENCYLElTER. DOT
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone 0 (561) 742-6260 Fax (561) 742.6259
G\'Y 0
- . "
,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
-;
(ll= ,=--.:-
o ~~. -=--=.- r
J- ------ (;
1; ~ B,V
rON 0'"
Building
Planning & Zoning
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
~
December 13, 2002
P. K. Sharma, AlCP, Lead Planner
Water Supply Department
South Florida Water Management District
P. O. Box 24680
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Mr. Sharma:
Attached please find the adoption package sent to the Department of Community
Affairs on December 13, 2002, regarding the above referenced small-scale map
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~p
--..
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Attachments
J:\SHRDATA \PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BAY\LUAR\REVIEWAGENCYlETTER.DOT
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 Fax (561) 742-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
Building
Planning & Zoning
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
o
February 26, 2001
Ms. Lynn Griffin
Director of the Office of Intergovernmental Programs
Department of Environmental Protection
3900 Commonwealth Boulevard
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Ms Griffin:
Attached please find the adoption package sent to the Department of Community
Affairs on December 13, 2002, regarding the above referenced small-scale map
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~i/
-
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Attachments
]:\SHRDATA \PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BAY\LUAR\REVIEWAGENCYLETTER.DOT
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 Fax (561) 742-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
Building
Planning & Zoning
Occupational License
Community Redevelopment
o
December 13, 2002
Michael J. Busha
Executive Director
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
301 East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300
Stuart, Florida 34994
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Mr. Busha:
Attached please find the adoption package sent to the Department of Community
Affairs on December 13, 2002, regarding the above referenced small-scale map
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~~I
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Attachments
J:\SHRDATA \PLANNING\5HARED\ WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BAY\LUAR\REVIEWAGENCYLETTER.DOT
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742.6260 Fax (561) 742-6259
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
Building
Planning & Zoning
OccupationalL~ense
Community Redevelopment
~
December 13, 2002
Lorenzo Aghemo, Director
Planning Division
Department of Planning, Zoning and Building
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Mr. Aghemo:
Attached please find the adoption package sent to the Department of Community
Affairs on December 13, 2002, regarding the above referenced small-scale map
amendment to the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Boynton Beach.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
~;!/
->.
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Attachments
]:\SHRDATA \PLANNING\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BAY\LUAR\REVIEWAGENCYlETTER.DOT
100 East Boynton Beach Blvd., P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425'()310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 Fax (561) 742-6259
I,;-r~ 0:
~o-~- ~~~~-: J
~ --.._ _.~..-:v
'V . v
'ON '0
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building - Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment
December 27, 2002
Ms. Terry Scheckwitz
Department of Transportation, District 4
3400 Commercial Boulevard, Third Floor
Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309-3421
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Merano Bay (LUAR 02-006)
Dear Ms Scheckwitz:
As per your request you will find enclosed the survey and approved site plan that
accompanies the above referenced land use amendment.
Please feel free to contact me at (561) 742-6260 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
lM;;!
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
-
Attachments
J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BAy\LUAR\FDOT LETTER lZ-27-Q2.DOT
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
Ij"YO,,"
-- - -
_.... -.-..
$o-..-g:-:;:-- ~
)...,--.:::- -",,- '?"
'V d "-
tON -e
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building _ Planning & Zoning - Occupational Licenses - Community Redevelopment
January 2, 2003
Mr. Carlos J. Ballbe
Keith & Ballbe, Inc.
1700 N.W. 64th Street
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
Re: Merano Bay LUAR02-006
Dear Carlos:
Enclosed you will find signed copies of the City of Boynton Beach Ordinance No. 02-
056, rezoning for the above referenced project; Ordinance No. 02-057, amending the
Future Land Use Map for the same project; and a copy of a letter to the City from the
Florida Department of Community Affairs indicating that the department will not be
conducting a compliance review or issuing a Notice of Intent regarding the land use
amendment.
If you have any questions, please call me at (561) 742-6264.
Yours truly,
~~
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
J; \SHRDA T A \PLAN NING\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\MERANO BA y\LUAR\lETTEROI-Q2-03 .DOT
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.f1.us
It
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Govemor
December 31, 2002
STEVEN M. SEIBERT
Secretary
Mr. Dick Hudson, AICP
City of Boynton Beach
Dept. of Development
Planning and Zoning Division
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach., FL 33425-0310
Dear Mr. Hudson:
Thank you for submitting copies of the City's Small Scale Development Plan Amendment adopted
by Ordinance No. 02-057 on December 3, 2002, for our records. The reference number for the amendment
is 02S8.
The Department will not conduct a compliance review or issue a Notice of Intent regarding the
adopted small scale development plan amendment in accordance with procedures contained in Section
163.3 I 87(3)(a), Florida Statutes.
If you have any questions, please contact me for the DR! and Plan Processing Section at
(850)922-1767.
Sincerely,
~.~~
D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and Processing
DRE\lw
cc: Michael Busha, Ex. Director
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
JAN - 2 2003
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.078\
Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us
I
/
CRmCAL STATE CONCERN RELD OFFICE
2796 Ovel'SeaS Highway. Suite 212
Marathon, Fl 33050-2227
(30S} 289.2402
COMMUNITY PLANNING
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100
IR<;n\dRR_?'>."'"
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee. Fl32399-2100
IR<;'n\<11"1.QCl6Q
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee. Fl32399-2100
IR<;nldAA70=
"
ORDINANCE NO. 02- OS7
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED ON TIm
sourn EAST CORNER OF SHORE DRNE AND NORTH
FEDERAL HIGHWAY (PROJECT KNOWN AS MERANO
BAY); AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38 BY AMENDING
THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE CITY FOR THE
PROPERTY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED
HEREINAFTER; SAID LAND USE DESIGNATION IS
BEING CHANGED FROM LOCAL RETAIL
COMMERCIAL TO SPECIAL HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL (SHDR); PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has
dopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land Use
lement by Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Government Comprehensive
lanning Act; and
WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future Land Use Element of a
omprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. has been followed; and
WHEREAS, after public hearing and study, the City Commission deems it in the
est interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the
omprehensive Plan as adopted by the City herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OFTHE
ITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Section I: The foregoing WHEREAS clauses are true and correct and incorporated
erein by this reference.
Section 2:
Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby amended to reflect the
'--.
,\CA\Ord.inance.\Plaru::r.ing\LoInd UBe\Meto1U10 Bay r..nd Ule.doc
H
remainder of this Ordinance.
Section 5: This Ordinance shall become effective 31 days after adoption, unless
challenged. If challenged, it becomes effective upon the issuance of a final order finding it in
FIRST READING this J.9- day of NO\fen.w , 2002.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this ~ day of ~bU , 2002.
CITY rJF BO
L
compliance.
FLORIDA
,
r.~~
Vice
c
Commissioner
~,\CA \Ordiniilftcelll\Planning\Land UBe\Merano Say Land UlIe. doe
,
I
I
!
I'
ORDINANCE NO. 02- OS-<.o
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH,
FLORIDA, REGARDING THE APPLICATION
OF MERANO BAY; AMENDING ORDINANCE
02-013 OF SAID CITY BY REZONING A
CERTAlN TRACT OF LAND MORE
PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM
C-3 (COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL) TO INFILL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (IPOD);
PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS,
SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has adopted
Ordinance No. 02-013, in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and
WHEREAS, AutoZone, Inc., as owner of the property more particularly
described hereinafter, has heretofore filed a Petition, through their agent, Carlos BaIlbe,
Woodside Land Development Corp., pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A-Zoning, of the
Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, for the purpose of rezoning a
certain tract ofIand consisting of I. 75 acres, said land being more particularly described
hereinafter, from C-3 (Community Commercial) to IPOD (InfiIl Planned Unit
Development), subject to all staff comments; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission conducted a public hearing on October IS,
2002, and heard testimony and received evidence which the Commission finds supports a
rezoning for the property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, during the public hearing the applicant for the Rezoning made
material representations which were considered and were relied on by the City
Commission in reaching its conclusions regarding the appropriateness of the proposed
rezoning. The material representations made by applicant are set forth in the minutes of
the City Commission meetingiPublic Hearing conducted October 15, 2002.
WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the proposed rezoning is consistent
ith an amendment to the Land Use which was contemporaneously considered and
approved at the public hearing heretofore referenced; and
WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it In the best interests of the
'nhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set
S:\CA\OrdinanceS\Planning\Rezoning\Rezoning . Merano Bay.doc
"
forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT:
Secti on 1.
The foregoing Whereas clauses are true and correct and incorporated
herein by this reference.
Section 2.
The following described land, located in the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida as set forth as follows:
A portion of Section 2, according to the Plat of COQUINA COVE, as recorded in Plat Book
24, Page 14, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida, being more particularly
described as follows:
Commence at the centerline intersection of Shore Drive and Ocean Inlet Drive as shown on
said plat; thence Southerly along said centerline of Shore Drive and the arc of a curve, said
curve being concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 182.40 feet a central angle of
23023'56", a radial bearing at this point of North 90000'00" East an arc distance of 74.49 feet
to a point; thence South 00000'00" East a distance of 50.01 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING of the hereinafter described parcel, thence continue South 00000'00" East a
distance if 184.96 feet to a point; thence North 90000'00" West along the South line of said
Section 2, a distance of 290.46 feet to a point on the East line of the parcel described in
Official Record Book 606, Page 198 and the East right-of-way line ofU. S. Highway No.1;
thence North 02054'00" East along said right-of-way line a distance of 20.02 feet to the
beginning ofa curve concave to the East having a radius 0[7,589.49 feet and a central angle
of 01 047'46"; thence Northerly along the arc of said curve a distance of 17.87 feet to a point
on the South right-of-way line of said Shore Drive; thence South 90000'00" East along said
South right-of-way line, a distance of 202.88 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the
Southwest having a radius of 25.00 feet and a central angle of 76018'38"; thence
Southeasterly, along the arc of said curve a distance of 33.30 feet to the beginning of a
reverse curve, having a radius of 207.40 feet and a central angle of 22029'39"; thence
Southeasterly along the arc of said curve a distance of 81.43 feet to the POINT OF
BEGINNING.
Containing in all 76,024.186 square feet or 1. 745 acres more or less.
e and the same is hereby rezoned from C-3 (Community Commercial) to IPUD (planned Unit
evelopment). A location map is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this
rdinance by reference,
Section 3: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City shall be amended
accordingly.
Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby
S:\CA\OrdinanceS\Planning\Rezoning\Rezoning _ Merano Bay.doc
"
repealed.
Section 6: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof
e declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
emainder of this Ordinance.
Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage.
FIRST READING this ~ day of t-tOl<<em h.-". , 2002.
SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this ~ day of~, 2002.
CITY BO B CR, FLORIDA
ATTEST:
(COrpO~~~!!1m'11111.
~" ,{~"ON lJ I~
~ 0 ........... ~ ~
~ ~ "':<:ORA1'''';:')'?O ~
~ 4. .'oY"" "V:e. :::
: 0 !u E
= > :2: =
;; ,... C n('\ :;
~ _ \ "g",v ~
~v ...... \ .....,.. ~
~ ........... Q ~
~lj/I FLO~\\\\~
1111111/11111\\\\\\
S:\CA\Ordinances\Planning\Rezoning\Rezoning _ Merano Bay.doc
Location Map
Merano Bay
EXHIBIT "Au
I
I
-----
-
R3:
i
,
---- ..- -
---
.-
------
------
-SEAIo"
-- /
v
____. I
-----z---
~EJ5T:J:jAYE-_:.. -=':'-= C2fJ
- '-R...d-A- "~ ,"'-;!- " -' IE,'
J -~,
-l, , <('
.~z-_ '0:
.-m ',W i
. : A _I . CJ I
-;"" ' ! UJ C3
'~SITE~;.~' "
'-1, ~., "
I ~ i"-'
' , If i I I''''B- . ',\.,I I I '
i/i ~., Ir,;:,,' ,
---! i ! I ~..:~" i ; ,
. 'u.r---
: Ii!; I BOYNTON CANAL C-16
! ;
-NE~T.J,W2L' ~.
IR+~
I . I I ,I .;
~;.J-41",_ ,._" , rJR
; I :' ! : ! . I ;
~
LAKE WORTH
ICWIV
,
-2~-==- NE-'J-4.""FH-AVr
j i Iii! , i
S,..,QRE no ,
, Ii : I I
, ,
! : : :
.
i~' I::! " Ii'
"en, I /:1 'j
:DO I
I!
::J.li!~;'!!.:.;;,i. 1<1 L J/ II!:
. , : : I\fE..13."tHJH/r= ! . I .! I: I ,~I-!:f/ i I
,; :111 11111 :::::.;.liiliW";~ I
'ill!IIII, ". :I";III~ 'II
o I
,:. ,i I :I';oI/I,I~', "I :1::', ,1,1,., ' ',' i--'3W! I
:i; i i~,k.lA:! ! , I,ll: : I I ;; "
' ,I 'r1LJ I " I, I ' , '/ I i I
: -1=:", i /1:1 ,I:
I .z . , I 'I '
'; I; IjTI i": I. ;';
'" . II
f). !
,'I
"
i 1m
f ii,en
1 10
,
i
I
I
I
o
SQO F..t
!
.
.-<>-.
.
,
, :
"
,
"
'00
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
. Building . Planning & Zoning - Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment
June 25, 2002
Mr. Carlos J. Ballbe
Woodside Land Development Corp.
4200 N. E. 15th Avenue
Fort Lauderdale. FL 33334
Re: Merano Bay Land Use Amendment and Rezoning Application
Dear Sir:
Weare in receipt of your application for land use amendment and rezoning for the property located at the
intersection of N. Federal Highway and Shore Drive in Boynton Beach. The following required items
were not included in the application package and must be available to us prior to our commencement of
the review:
1. A copy of the last recorded warranty deed.
2. A complete certified list of all property owners, mailing addresses, and legal descriptions for
all properties within at least four hundred (400) feet of the subject parcel as recorded in the
latest official tax rolls in the county courthouse shall be furnished by the applicant, including
a tax map showing placement of 400 feet boundary. Postage, and mailing labels or addressed
envelopes must also be provided. Said list shall be accompanied by an affidavit stating that
to the best of the applicant's knowledge said list is complete and accurate. Notification of
surrounding property owners will be done by the City of Boynton Beach.
3. A copy of the Palm Beach County Property Appraiser's maps showing all of the properties
referred to in paragraph e. above, and their relation to the subject parcel.
4. A statement by the applicant justifying the zoning requested, including reasons why the
property is unsuitable for development under the existing zoning and more suitable for
development under the proposed zoning. The statement should address the following criteria
which the Planning and Zoning Division utilizes in evaluating land use amendment and
rezoning applications:
a. Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be consistent with applicable
comprehensive plan policies. The division shall also recommend limitations or requirements
that would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property in order to comply
with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
b. Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be contrary to the established
land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts
or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted
with the protection of the public welfare.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed land use amendment/
rezoning desirable.
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Menino Bay LUAR
June 25,2002
Page 2
d. Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be compatible with utility
systems, roadways and other public facilities.
e. Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be compatible with the
current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties or would affect the property values
of adjacent and nearby properties.
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing land
use designation/zoning.
g. Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning is of a scale that is reasonably
related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts
where such use is already allowed.
5. A comparison of the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed
zoning, with the impacts that would be created by development under the proposed zoning,
with the impacts that would be created by development under the existing zoning, which will
include:
a. A comparison of the potential square footage of number and type of dwelling units under
the existing zoning with that which would be allowed under the proposed zoning or
development.
b. A statement of the uses that would be allowed in the proposed zoning or development,
and any particular uses that would be excluded.
c. Proposed timing and phasing of the development.
d. For proposed zoning of property to commercial or industrial districts, where the area of
the subject parcel exceeds one (1) acre, projections for the number of employees.
e. A comparison of traffic which would be generated under the proposed zoning or
development, with the traffic that would be generated under the current zoning; also, an
analysis of traffic movements at the intersections of driveways that would serve the property
and surrounding roadways, and improvements that would be necessary to accommodate such
traffic movements. For projects that generate move than five hundred (500) net trips per day,
a traffic impact analysis must be submitted which complies with the Municipal
Implementation Ordinance of the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance.
(1) For projects that generate two thousand (2,000) or more net trips per day, the
traffic impact analysis must be submitted to the City at least 30 days prior to the
deadline for land use amendment and/or rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by the City's traffic consultant and Palm
Beach County. The applicant shall be billed for the cost of review by the City's
traffic consultant.
Metano Bay LUAR
June 25, 2002
Page 3
(2) For projects that generate between five hundred (500) and two thousand (2,000)
net trips per day, the traffic impact analysis must be submitted at the application
deadline for land use amendment andlor rezoning, in order to allow for timely
processing of the application and review by Palm Beach County. However, if it
is the desire of the applicant to utilize the City's traffic consultant for review of
the traffic impact analysis prior to review by Palm Beach County, then the
procedure and requirements outlined under item "( I)" above shall be followed.
6. A check for the review process in the amount of $1,500 made payable to the City Of Boynton
Beach. This amount includes the rezoning and the land use application fee.
Please prepare and submit the information and documents described above to initiate the continued
processing of your application.
li~
Dick Hudson. AICP
Senior Planner
Do~umeml
City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON
BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742.6260
(561) 742.6259 Fax
From the office of
Planning & Zoning
TO:
(b~ I3dJlt<-G
FAX:
tJ ->4' 4-g 9 - (''?SOL
FROM:
DATE:
(;12;)02
NUMBER OF PAGES: (including cover)
4-
RE:
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you.
TRAt<SMISSION \lERIFICATION REPORT
L--
TIME OS/25/2002 13:58
NAME BOYNTON BEACH P & Z
FAX 5513755259
TEL 5513755250
DATE. TIME
FAA NO. /NAME
DURATION
PAGE(S)
RESU'_ T
MODE
OS/25 13: 55
91954489980203325
00:01:54
04
Ok
STANDARD
ECM