REVIEW COMMENTS
MAR-12-03 16:10 FROM:
10:4076481743
PIlGE
1/6
FOLEY:LARDNER
ATTOR.NEYS AT LAW
III NORTH ORANGE AVENUE, SUITE lacO
CRLANDO, FLORIDA 32801,2386
~. O. BOX 2193
ORLANOO, FLORIDA 32802.2193
n;LoPHONo, 407.423.7656
FACSIMILE, 407.648.1743
WWW.FOLEYLARDNER.COM
FACSIMILE TRANSMISSION
b
Total # of Pages )((including this page)
TO: PHONE #: FAX#:
Dick Hudson (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-62
City of Boynton Beach
59
I From:
Sender'.. Direct Dial:
Date:
R. Duke Woodson
User 10 No :
407.244.3247
March 12, 2003
03I498-0124
0823
ClientlMatter No :
MESSAGE:
Please see attached.
If there are any protllems with this transmission or if you have not
received all of the pages, please call 407,423.7656.
I Operator:
I
Time Sent:
Retum Original To:
Diana I. Roman
-]
CONFlDENT1AlJT'( NOTICE: THE INFORMAnON CONTAINED IN THIS FACSlMU MESSAGE IS INlelDED ONLY FOR THE PERSONAL A/I[I
CONFIOEN'I'1AL use OF THe DHIGNAl1!D R!:CIPIENT8 NAMIIW~. Uti:; M~ul:. MAY fit: AN AIIU~I:.~r1'
(;OMMUNIc;;A,TIQN~ A,NO M $UCH 1$ PRIVILeGeD AND CONFIDCNTIAL IF TffE READeR OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT THE nlTENDlII
RECIPIENT 01\ ANY AGENT RESPONSIBLE FOR DE1JVERJNG IT ro THE INlelDED REC1PlENr, YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED T;AT YI>ll
HAVE RECBVED THIS DOCUMENT IN ERROR. AND THAT AIff llEI/IEW, DISSEMINATION. OISTRlBUTlON OR COPYING OF THIS MESSA(;E:
IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOU NAill! RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR. PLEASE NOnFY us IMM9ltAIELY m'
TeLliPHONE AND RETURN THE ORIGINAL MESSAGE ro US BY MAIL. THANK YOU.
xxx.xxxxxx.xA
Cover Page 1 of 1
FOLEY & LARDN~J:
MAR-12-03 18:10 FROM:
ID:4078481743
P/IGE 2/8
M01OlOlA DII NOPe
RBPONSE TO ORe REPORT
The ~ data..oo analysis 1~1ds to Objedives and Recommendations in1he ORC R.opott
(DCA No 03-D1) issue by the ~tl,.e.1t of Community Affairs to the City of Boynton Beach. For
ease of te\Iiew, 1he Reoornmendalion Ita. ~ summarized followed by 1he RespJnse.
Recomrne..dation #1 I1!IaIes to the proyision of a marlcet anaI)9s.
Reoommelldalion 2: Pluvide data and anaIy5is for the availability of all pubrlC facilities UJlOII the
maximum allowable cfeveIopment intensities for local Retiu1 Collu ,le....d.
.
......ponse.
An anaI)'si$ of the maximum allowable dew!Iopment il1len5ilie; for the
pupa;ed Local RelaiI CommerdaI Iaod use d-'jI,'1aliOl, should indu:ie a
wmparison wan boIh the cunent land use desitJaaIion and the propO$ed
dev-elopment plan. Auadlments 1 and 2 provide the trip ges....ation for the
Existing Land Use~, Proposed Land Use []es~ and Propllfllld
Development Plan for Daily and PM peak hour respo.di.ey. The ExisIi"l!:and
Propol1ed land Use Oesifption ~.oent ill1llllSities are baseci. on
maximum aIkM'iIbIe illl!!llSilie5 in !he City of Boyntcn Beach Codes.
On a Daily basis, the number of external trips is higher under the PIop_
Land Use Designation than for !he Exis:ling Land Use Desiption. The
Proposed Ile\IeIOp",aol Plan is esIimaIed In ges",,"'"' 12,837 New Exb!lll;l!
l1lps as CXllIIpaJld In 62,331 New Exmmal Trip$ for the E..i.ti"o Land Use
Designation an~ 73,132 New ExtemaI Trips fur the I'ropoI;ed Land Use
V.;.<~..ctiu.l.
.
Ou~ lhe PM peak hour, the Proposed land Use Designatio., will gerll!late
lea; .- eocIemld !rips than die Existing Land Use Designatlon. The Pmpl500
Oe\.alopment Plan estirnaIed New blem.1l Trips (1,402> is substantially lea;
than either the Existing Land Use ~:ion (6,764 New fxtemaI Trip;) or
the f'I0p0sed 1.1Ind Use ~ (7,900J New ExtemaI Trips). DuriI1f: the
aiticaI PM peal, hour and in the more oiticaI oWbound direction, botiI the
Proposed Land Use DesignaIion and the Proposed 0eYeI0pment Plan are
eslimallld In generate less New ExlemaJ Tlrips than WOIlId be allowed Ullder
the Existing Land Use DesigllaIion. Inlemal matI'ioes are alt,.,:hed in the
Appendill.
a2-12!1 3.'12-03
MAR-12-03 16.11 FROM.
ID:4076481743
PoCIGE 3/6
ReoommendaIion 3: Provided a naffic anaIy.;is b1se upon the mlllit lo:u:oltly i.lViIiIabIe data ID
~ the peJk hour, peak dilecOOll, roadway lwei of service 5tandatd. and
ID cktennine the impad of this amendmeot upon the Florida Inll'llstate
Hid->' SysIern.
Aaadlment 3 provides a oomparison of the PM peak hour bip ~
porenliaI of the ~ and Proposed land use 5a!tI8rios. The f'roJ:iOIIed
Land Use plan is esIimaIed ID gellelale fewer New ExtemaI Trips thall the
Approved Land Use pl8Il. BoIh the number of inbound trip5 and oottnund
trips .are lower for r.he Proposed plan than for the J\pprovl!d plan. Therd'ore,
them wit be no ~ impact on r.he roadway IeYeI of ~ standards,
iIlduding the Florida ',dl4* Highway System.
,.
Rl!sponse;
.
..
fJ2.-1:l$1 s-,.us
MAR-12-03 16.11 FROM.
~H~
I~~t
a
~
l.
!
;
8
"
.
i
~
!
i
~
i i
.
C g
~ :0
j!j t
Ii! ~
J~ ~ ..
...
... ~
:a ~
1--
-00-
r= ci
! .
1~ .. ..
...
! 'C ::l ...
it :l/
I
0
J. .
l~ .. ..
... ::l
...
...... ~ ~
E
J :l;
I
t .!::.
...
...
~ ..;
'"
...
.~
~
..
$
-i
...
l:~ 0
..
..
I
;;l
1
.:1
'1i
i
"':q
S..
lJ l:i~
:fj:
-tt~
f~-<:>...
e '"
! ;z
... . '"
...
..
1'IJ"''''
i'C~~
.ll""l:iS
.*hltf
!:;:It>1
F"Cfi
'1i
i~re
-"''''
li~!
: f"lt ..
J
J
!
'2
'"
i
::J
1
-! :g
e! "!
Jill;l~
jl~ ..
11~~
Iii"'<:>
u. I
!1 Ie
"'1 s
ol~
i1~~
jil1ii
c:l:: ....
-....,
... ...
.....
"'! i 0
... .....
- '"
j
I
!I
]1
Il-
'i! "j
1-&
...
...
"'::
...
...
is
'"
...
...
.,
~
....
..
...
:,
....
i?l
N
'"
VI
S
~
ID.407648.743
\D,.,.....!12N~,........5
s;;se\D~!~IC!i~
~-'''''' .....
~i!
~~
~iW""!i;ilII).,ct\"'II\O
.. ....~""N....
...i! ~:::~5~
to- I I ....... C'Ot ,." III) _ ~
...
-;; .. 1C t"lI " \0 .... ... S 10.... ...1
J.e :; :; ~ ;:: ~ ~ (5 a ~ ~I
i!:fII)l">4 mN..- ~
...
~ .,Ill~l.~ I
~1I'fi~NttI'J~tw:lI~""''''' ~
-_flltN..............._ .-
2~li;~;t~~~:a~ ~
i...,....~.--."et):t'" !'}
-I - C!'lI
,...::!8lBS\!~$l:::;l~
-e.;"".",....CIi.....!! V'O'I"I
I- .- I.... ~ ... ~ N -
~:a :!!
iol'fi u.. u.. u.. u.. vi"", ~
&I!+ tnvt~~+w
I.~~II~ ~I~~I!
~,,~~~~;:;:;~
. .... _ . N
e ~i~~o:a
jfe .. "'I~ ...
~,c -=
.... ....
-
ll;olll::;ll;ltlltlll;ll;
!~~~~~~g~~
.50 "'O~CIId"'l!liI
VI' ~'I"'" t"4 c;c
... ..
....;00:3....3:<:>"'..
t:a;::~U\;:a.;5:~
f
I
8-
~
I
! & J l 11
11 It ~ i 11 c1:S'
II - 1.1.... -Ii!
.. ;i!1 1! i ~ ~Ii
~jijjJJii
PoCIGE 4/6
..
:a
...
..
....
...
..,
...
,
..
..
,
;!l
j
1m
.. ~*' ..,. ....
It ~! ~ 'i
1 it i. ~
lie I! e
jn~
IJl1L1I
u .0 '"j'
d cj; Q
e .. - ;;
!S Ii i ~
'I JI. JI.
! :1 ~ ll'
Ie, .. ~
:f!s.~
MAR-12-03 lS.11 FROM.
~
..
~
~ l
~
,- g8:c;e~=:::~ ~
;:: -- - --
" -
.. S~&lRt~!~~
..
.!i ........
e
I!
j! I
~
:J
~ S .:;
f .
!
j
d ) I III
<>.
;E "i
l ..
~j ~ ;; ~~ ! fi ...~ 22:S=::"~~N;;
1 I I ~ "('II QllC'~ &_ ~..........
c
1 f. I"n
. l , l!
. I J 111I
~ j :! !
Nst 1 11 1
it .3 .:s oJH
If J '", 1
tJ! ~ ~- fH~
l ~S5~
.
~iH
I~!i
8
.@
!
J
!
f
10.40764P-743
PoClGE 5/6
!i
i!
;;:
..
MAR:~2-03 16.12 FROM.
.....
.lii."
8""i.
l :E
o
I
i
,
,-
.
i
!
:lili ~
jd "J
Jl.. ~
U l
,,~_a
!
!.. ::I
! i
...
..-
1l,,1I~. l;
- .
;:;1 .. a
ll~ .n
>='S 0 "......"... N
....0.... ........ ...
.'l
::
E~~d!eiil ;;
J
10,407648-"43
PoCIGE
6/6
.
~
"
;;
j
j
€
I
J
j
I
"
T
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-297
TO:
FROM:
Mayor Jerry Broening
and City commis~io
Lusia Galav. AIC
Principal Planner )
J
DATE:
December 13, 2002
SUBJECT:
Motorola DRIA 02-002/MPMD 02-003
NOPC Amendment #1
ADDENDUM
This report is the addendum to the Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ
02-244 to the Planning and Development Board dated October 31, 2002. Updated
information is provided regarding the above referenced project.
Recommendations
The applicant has met with Palm Beach County and the Florida Department of
Transportation staff to resolve the objections regarding the methodology used to
determine traffic impacts. Both agencies have approved the revised methodology that
indicates the proposed development will remain within the range of the original 13,020
vested trips. Therefore, the NOPC #1 as proposed is not a substantial deviation.
Conditions of Approval
In addition, the Conditions of Approval, have been revised to reflect the concern of the
TCRPC regarding the mixed-use design for the development (see Condition # 14) and
the Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering requirements regarding turn lane
improvements (see Condition #15).
Attachments:
1. Letter from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council dated December 13,
2002.
2. Letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Division dated December 12, 2002.
3. Revised Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval.
,
.-. - -.,.i _ '=': .;) -D~ -- ~_ ;~-" ,,~~l,. .:> - ---.....------- - -""--: J.~'- .
. .,= ~ - ,iiii, '. - ,~: j -"....:;~. _ "r..._;t.".;~~_.... <~&. .-~ ::. _:O;>.~ Jrit~ ';%.. ,_-T ~
- -~~~. - ~""<-"-'T~-',-j "~----"Ji--~ _ ~ ~ '_ cr T~~---
T R_l~A ~(E ~ ~l1;~~N.~" _' ;'~N~I N',C-C:OU-'"N~'~~~
-.-' "'-;::r-'--'--'--::=="'--, - ..t:: _ _li3~. i ,-' -:=- _~... ~ ~" ,- ii--~-;jjj ~ ,....3
. _ -' .,.- ::: ~~.::-:: ' ~ j'= ~ -,,,- cr r~ - -,.~, >.~ ~.. ,- __:/l?' - ,
I-~~ ",..~=a~ ~ i;'~fi.~Jf):ff?- ;p.~ -:B 1i".t~ ~ 0_. -::S7F-;;r~V~~="
-0-"""" -ah,?, - ~=;! . r~';':. =~ ~),~ -~:. ,m-;',r-- <+=--;l:1r~ . .~ ~~ :'J ;:J ::J. ~-::f-
_ . - _ I -__..~L___,!J.. -.,. - JiJ
;.._.~~:-_.-:~~,~ - -- _~--,;~..--':~ =-";;::'_~~--.-~~r~-',~_ --~.:: -:' n__~~.al =
December 13, 2002
Mr, Michael W. Rumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33435
OEe
"
Subject: Motorola Development of Regional Impact
Notification of Proposed Change
Dear Mr. Rumpf
In accordance with the requirements of Section 380,06(19), Florida Statutes (F.S.), we have
reviewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of
Regional Impact (DRI)" (NOPe) for the Motorola DRI dated September 17, 2002,
The NOPC proposes to change the existing plan of development to allow development of 500
multi-family residential units, 450,000 square feet of office space, 63,500 square feet of retail
space including shops and restaurants, and 128,000 square feet of self storage space, The
applicant submitted additional information on October 23, 2002 requesting the inclusion of a
conversion matrix to allow changes in the plan of development to occur without the need to
amend the development order.
Council had concerns with the proposed changes including the proposed conversion matrix,
The applicant submitted a letter on December 10, 2002 stating that the applicant would no
longer be requesting a conversion matrix and provided additional information to address
Council's other concerns, Based on this information, Council has determined that the
proposed change will not create any additional regional impacts and, therefore, does not
object to the proposed change, However, an annual report for the Motorola DRI has not
been submitted since January 1985. The applicant should submit an annual report for the
project each year to be in compliance with the development order.
Also, the Strategic Regional Policy Plan for the Treasure Coast Region encourages the
formation of sustainable neighborhoods and communities, Sustainable communities should
include a compatible mix of land uses, well designed and maintained public spaces, builpings
and infrastructure, and a network of interconnected streets designed for various transpoft/ition
"B,.;,,!;,,! C(Jmm,."iti~$ T(J!~th~,." . E$t. 1976
301 East OceaD Boulevard - Suite 300 _ Stuart. Florida 34994
Phone (772) 221-4060 . SC 269-4060 _ Fu (772) 221-4067 _ E-mail. ;ldmirl~rrrnr ore>
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
December 13,2002
Page 2
modes. Council strongly encourages continued efforts to provide for mixed-use development
in the City. However, it is equally important that mixed-use development is done correctly.
There must be a true integration and appropriate mix of uses, not simply more than one use on
the property. There should be not only a fully integrated mix of uses but also a network of
streets. sidewalks, and bicycle paths and an accommodation for present or future use of
transit. There should be both a vertical and horizontal integration of land uses, and the land
uses should be of a type and nature that are appropriate and complementary to the area to be
served. The DRl master plan included with the proposed amendment materials does not
incorporate all the best components of mixed-use development. Council is available to assist
the City in working with the developer of the property to ensure that the proposed
development contains all the important components of good mixed-use development.
Please call if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
b~~
DRl Coordinator
cc: Ken Metcalf, FDCA
R. Duke Woodson, Applicant
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
Vest Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(5611684-4000
www.pbcgovcom
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Warren H. Newell. Chairman
Carot A. Roberts, Vice Chair
Karen T. Marcus
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Tony Masilotti
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
8An Equal Opporrunity
Affimtanve Action Employer"
@ printed on recycI6d papsf
~E' '
~ 'I \
'.J '.J
~._"'f'
December 12, 2002
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Director Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE:
Motorola DRI ,. Re.tised
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
previously approved DRI entitled; Motorola DR!. pursuant to the Traffic Performance
Standards in Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. The project
is summarized as follows:
Location:
Southeast corner of Congress Avenue and Gateway
Boulevard intersection.
Boynton Beach
13,020 Daily, 1,634 Peak Hour
450,000 SF General Office, 500 Multi Family Residential
Units, 15,000 SF Daycare, 10,000 SF High Quality
Restaurant, 6,000 SF High Tum-over Restaurant, 8,000 SF
Fast Food Restaurant, 20,000 SF General Retail, 4,500 SF
Bank & DT, and 128,000 SF Warehouse.
12,837, and 1,402 Peak Hour Trips
2005
Municipality:
Vested DRI Trips:
Proposed Uses:
New Daily Trips:
Build-out:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the revised DRI is
projected to generate less trips than what was previously approved, and therefore meets
the Traffic Performance St?ndards of Palm Beach County. Based on the peak hour
forecasts provided by the consultant, It is however suggested that the following project
access driveways turn-lanes to be provided:
. Southbound left-turn lanes along Congress Avenue, onto the northern and
the middle driveways.
. Northbound right-tum lanes along Congress Avenue, onto the southem and
the middle driveways.
. Westbound left-turn lane along Gateway Boulevard, onto the eastern
driveway.
. Eastbound nght-turn lane along Gateway Boulevard, onto the eastern
driveway.
I
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
~ THE CaUNZEN""'''R
Masoud Atefi, MS E
Sr. Engineer - Traffle.Division
cc: Pinder Troutam Consulting Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F:I TRAFFIClmalAdminlApprovalsl021 016.doc
EXHIBIT "e"
Revised
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Motorola
File number: DRIA 02-002
Reference: Revised 2'd review identified as Development of Regionallmpact Amendment Master Plan with a
ki
November 5, 2002 Planning & Zoning Department date stamp mar ng.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: To be determined. X
UTILITIES
Comments:
l. The Developer has agreed to furnish their own fire flow protection from an X
on-site source for all fire-flows above the City requirement of 1500 gpm (@
20 psi residual) demand. In the event the on-site source cannot be approved
by the City or other regulatory agencies, an engineering evaluation of the
additional impacts on the potable water system (as outlined in the next
condition dealing with sanitary sewer demand/capacity) will be required for
the demand/capacity of the potable water system as well. The on-site fire
protection system from this private source may therefore not be
interconnected with the City's potable water system.
2. The City recognizes prior vesting (for planning purposes) in the site of X
127,000 gallons per day (gpd) each for potable water and sanitary sewer
demand. In consideration of the condition stated above, the developer shall
fund an analysis, to be conducted by the City's engineers, evaluating the
ability of the City's sanitary sewer conveyance system to properly
accommodate the flows exceeding 127,000 gpd from this site. Funding of
this study shall be escrowed with the City upon request and the furnishing
of a written "not-to-exceed" cost estimate to the developer. Upon receipt of
the requested amount, the City shall endeavor to complete the analysis
within 120 days. In the event the analysis indicates that improvements are
required to the City's conveyance system, the developer shall commence the
design of said improvements upon requesting a total sewer commitment
exceeding 102,000 gpd (i.e. 80% of the vested amount). The developer shall
subsequently begin construction of the improvements after receiving City
approval of the design, (or furnish sufficient funding for the City to
construct said improvements, at the City's option). The commencement of
construction shall occur no later than the developer's request for a total
sewer commitment exceeding 114,300 gpd (90% of the vested amount). The
developer shall not be penalized or delayed by the City from constructing
additional phases to the project if he satisfies all conditions of the above
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
deadlines in a timely manner.
3. The developer shall be responsible for reserving purchasing all additional X
water and sewer capacity, based upon the requirements as stated in the
City's code, not heretofore purchased by the prior owners of the property.
FIRE
Comments:
4. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of X
the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire
Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFPA I, Fire
Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000
edition. (these codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire
Prevention Code)
5. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LOR Chapter 6, X
Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in
commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest
part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant.
Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition
to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire
flow of at least 1500 gpm is required.
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None X
BillLDING DIVISION
Comments: None X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments:
6. The notice mentions 500 residential units to be added to the development. X
These units would be subject to the Park and Recreation Impact Fee based
on the type of units involved.
Single Family, detached = $940 ea
Single Family, attached = $771 ea
Multi-family = $656 ea
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
7. The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. X
8. At time of site plan approval for any portion of the site included in the X
NOPC Amendment #1 request, the applicant will work with the Parks &
Recreation Department to provide a greenway I bikeway easement along the
east and/or south sides of this property especially along the E-4 canal.
FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None X
PLANNING A1"1D ZONING
Comments:
9. Pursuant to Chapter 380.06 (19)(e) 5.a. and (19)(e) S.c. the application for a X
proposed change IS presumed to be a substantial deviation. This
presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence.
10. The traffic study was submitted to Palm Beach County traffic engineering X
for approval. Approval is required prior to the Chapter 380 F.S. Public
Hearing for the NOPC Amendment #1.
II. Applicant must submit an Annual Report for the Motorola DRI by January X
1,2003.
12. The approval of NO PC #1 is contingent upon the approval of the Land Use X
Amendment from Industrial to Local Retail Commercial and the Rezoning
from Planned Industrial District (PID) to Community Commercial (C-3) for
the 49.685 acre portion of the DRI.
13. A replat may be required to develop the site. This will be determined at time X
of site plan approval.
14. At time of Site plan approval for the project, the applicant will work with
the TCRPC and City staff to incorporate the best components of mixed-use X
development.
IS. Based on Palm Beach County's review of the Traffic Analysis the following
improvements are required:
a) Southbound left-turn lanes along Congress A venue, onto the northern and X
the middle driveways.
b) Northbound right-turn lanes along Congress Avenue, onto the southern and
the middle driveways.
c) Westbound left-turn lane along Gateway Boulevard, onto the eastern
driveway.
d) Eastbound right-turn lane along Gateway Boulevard, onto the eastern
driveway.
Conditions of Approval
4
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
I. NONE X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
I. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\'M'\PROJECTS\Motorola DRI\DRI\COI.doc
MEMORANDUM
UTILITIES DEPARTMENT NO. 02-173
TO:
Lusia Galav, Principal Planner, Planning Department
FROM:
Peter Mazzella, Deputy Director, Utilities Department
DATE:
November 4, 2002
SUBJECT: Moturola Expansion Project
DRIA 02-002
We have reviewed the information submitted on projected water and sewer flows in
conjunction with the subject DRI amendment, and at this time we offer the following
comments:
1. The application for development approval submitted prior to development of the
Motorola site specified an anticipated total water and sewer demand for the site
at 127,000 gallol1s per day (each) at the completiun of final build out. This
number will therefore be used as the baseline value in evaluating the potential
impacts on the City's water and wastewater delivery systems.
'1 The projected flows for water and sewer provided by the applicant are 243,198
gpd, and 202,665 gpd respectively. The water flow does not include fire
protection demand.
3. The City's projected demand for the total site, based upon chapter 26 of the
code, are 294,215 gpd for water, and 255,865 gpd for sewer. Once again, the
water flow does not include fire protection.
4. Due to the magnitude of the increase ahove the prior approval, an engineering
evaluation of the off-site water and sewer systems will have to be conducted by
the City's engineer's, at the applicant's expense, in order to assure that the
offsite systems can adequately serve the expanded demands of this site. Flows
uf this magnitude from the Motorola site were not anticipated during
development of the Water and Sewer Master Plan, and must therefore be
evaluated at this time in accordance with sections 26-16 and 26-28 of the City
code. Fire flow demands which have neither been provided nor reviewed at this
time, will also have to be factored into the evaluation if they exceed the City
requirement of 1500 gallons per minute.
The following additional information is therefore requested in order to complete the
evaluation of this application:
A. Provide the ratcd fire flow demand for the existing and proposed buildings on
this site.
B. Provide a conceptual layout of thc proposcd on-site water main and sewer main
extensions.
C. Provide an engineering evaluation of the adequacy for the on-site sewage
pumping station. This on-site evaluation may be conducted by the applicant's
engineer, and shall result in a final recommendation towards acconmlOdating the
additional scwagc flow from the sitc, in vicw of current design standards.
D. Provide a schedule for the proposed expansion plans, including completion dates
for each phase and its anticipated demand.
E. Escrow sufficient funds to pay for the City's evaluation of the off-site water
and sewer delivery systems. This amount will be determined after the
information rcquested in items A- D is furnished. Any construction costs for
necessary off--site improvements will also bc borne by the applicant/developer of
the Motorola site.
Please feel free to contact me directly with any qucstions on this matter.
PVM
Xc:
Peter Mazzella
Dale Sugerman
John Guidry
File
. . NDV-04-2002 10:57
, I
, I
. I
I,
, I
P.01
TREASURE COAS1f REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCI~
301 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD
SUITE 300
STUART, FLORIDA 34994
PHONE: 772-221-4060
FAX: 772-221-4067
FAX TRANSMISSION
Date: r / I '-1 I ~ "-
Fax Number: ( ":)(p () I 'f 2.. - to 2. ~ ~
Number of Pages (including cover sheet): 3
Operator:
To: LU.Sl~ Gc.. fe-v
From: J, \'V\,. c",,::/oQ~
Project: YrcYv-.--o k. 0 R::I:..
I
Comments:
'cIOV-04-2002 10: 57
. -.i' ~ i
: I
,
. !
P.02
I.
I
i :lED BUSH
~VERNOR
, ,
\\
Florida Department of Transportation
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND ENVIRONlIIDlTAL MANAGEM>:NT - DISTlUCT 4
3400 W~t Cornrnercial Blvd., Jrd Floor, Ft. Lauderdale, FI 33309~3421
Telephone: (954) 777.4601: Fax: (954) 777-4671
Toll Free Number. 1-866-336-8435
October 21,2002
I
mOMAS F. J. JR.
SECRF-TARl
~~~"--J.~.,;jil-;)!1l:l
~,~t~~!J ~I;;
I
oCT 7 4 Z'1J~
,. . . ; . ~,
'". '.~ ~ ", -.- ~ .
i-\t.GICH~AL ?, ;"N:"jlj'<l..:: r>"',
Mr. James T. Snyder
DR! Coordinator
Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
30 I East Ocean Boulevard, Suite 300
Stuart, Florida 34994
Dear Mr. Snyder:
SUBJECT:
Motorola Development of Regional Impllct (DRJ)
City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County
NotifiClltion of ProPosed Change (NOpc)
I
This is in response to your letter dat",! August 7, 2002 (received September 25, 2002) regarding th" Notifi~
of Proposed Change (NOPC) for thet Motorola Development of Regional Impact (DR!). TIre Department bas
completed its review as swnrnarized below. . I
The Motorola DR! is located north of Boynton Beach Boulevard, south of Gateway Boulevard, eas1i ofCongiess
Avenue and west of Interstate 95 in the City of Boynton Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida. The Motorola DR!
was originally approved on January 7, 1980, with an expiration date of 30 years from the date of its renditi/>n.
The original DR! development, however, was projected to be complete in Year 2000, as evidenced by ~e
completion year ofPhsse ill of the DRL The development phases and intensity from the original Dm: are listcil in
the following table: I
I
Phase Completion Year Development Square Feet
1 198.1 Industrial Use/Offices 240,000
II 1990 Industrial Use/Offices 385,000
III 2000 Offices 200000
TOTAL 825.000
: I
i
I
In this NOPC, the applicant proposes the following change to the DR!:
I
. Convert rhe remaining 250.000 .<quare teet of industrial land-use enritlemenrsfor the property to /00
multi-family residential units and 40.000 square ftet of commercial space. .
The Department offers the followin~ comments regarding this NOrc and the accompanying traffic analysls:
1. There are inconsistencies related to the proposed land-use plan denoted in Attachment 2 -~riP
Generation Comparison, EXhibit "E" - Substantial Deviation Determination Chart, and Question .5
of the NOPC. More specifi<;ally, Attachment 2 denotes 450,000 square feet of Office use while lh e;s
no Office use shown in Exhibit E. Further, Exhibit E denotes 600,000 square feet ofIndustrial use,lmd
Attachment 2 shows none. Lastly, in NOPC Question No.5 and Exhibit "E" 40,000 square fed of
Commercial space is proposed; however, in Attachment 2, 63,500 square feet of Commercial sp~e is
deooted. These discrepancies should be explained. i
\NW'w.dat.state.f1 uS C!) R~YClED rPER
!
NOV-04-2002 10:58
P.03
Mr. James T. Snyder
October 21, 2002
Page 2
,
,
2. The calculation ofthe internal trips in Attachment 2 is incorrect. The applicant should usetheprocedb
outlined in the ITE Trip Generation Handbook (Chapter 7) to document how internal capture fas
calculated for this analysis. The internal capture summary sheets (matrix or "bubble diagrams") sholJld
be included as an appendix. The analysis should be revised, accordingly. I
3. The pass~by trips should not exceed 10% of adjacent street background traffic during the peak.. ho"'[or
25% of the project's external retail trips, whichever yields the lower number of pass~by trips. lhe
applicant did not demonstrate that these criteria have been met. Based on our review, the numbe~ of
pass-by trips proposed in thi~ analysis exceeds 25% of the project's external retail trips, and is therefPre
lllIacceptable. Further, the applicant has incorrectly applied the pass-by rates to the OffiCe and SJlf-
Storage land uses. Pass-by credit may only be used for retail trips. The analysis should be revised,
accordingly. I
In conclusion. the Motorola DR! NOpe provided to the Department is not sufficient. The Department reqlts
that the applicant address our comments so that we can complete our review of the NOPC. Please feel free to
contact this office at (954) 777-460 f should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
I
'I
,
.E.
Environmental Engineer
GS:kai/cw
cc: Paul Darst - DCA
Bob Romig
Gen')' O'Reilly
JOM Krane
::; :\OPE.'l.t\Cha1l W\040ri\.'YotomlaiNOPC 1 b.dot;
TOTAL P.03
. NDV-04-2002 10:11
P.01
. ,
,
: I
TREASURE COAST REGIONAL PLANNING COUNCIL
301 EAST OCEAN BOULEVARD
SUITE 300
STUART, FLORIDA 34994
PHONE: 772-221-4060
FAX: 772-221-4067
FAX TRANSMISSION
Date: III '1 I () 2-
FaxNumber: (.s;-Ccl) 7'1? - Co '?.':1
Number of Pages (including cover sheet): l...\
i. Operator:
, .
To: L..U!:,I~ Get IE-v
.
From: "-..1 ~ m S.,~ cQe,y-
Project: mo Rr'Co\ (\ I() r.<.~
Comments:
,
,
, !
,
. NDV-04-2002 10:11
I
~ --;:... I .Ilt j I '-' ~ ~r EI' .....-! ._~::: "'F-'<.-~"~~.Y 0 ,- /~ ,.......~JlJ '..JL I J---,---,cl-'-
< .>rJJ_~~=~c: "" :d~ - ~:i}"'<"'~~t5f:~,~:-,-;, : ~;i~+;."-'~-;;::.t~~.~~~;
IT R.ffA S=QJi: ~ ~~fr~~~N:~\.~,Po~~N~~ I ~jf~~y~~J9~l;~-
I 07 "" If:= - ~ ., W):"" B '. '-l--. II 1.' i -'- .=C- =J' . "~' I i>-----iii Ji}!J-',
~ = _ 1 - ... -~ ui.L ~ a 0 ~ ~";- ~ <;~,~(~, \. ~ ~ - -_.~ ~
'! IifD~A.~~R~-Ji~~_; -.' ~-~'I~cN~"-~P~3L~-':-:B';,?A'c!~c,_;~~~ ~ure~!~~~
I ~-a-~":' -~-' ~ =- "1~~.\" r--r=';;-- ~~~l~!~f~~,<=t!l1;'1:- ~~l"'r~ '=-..:~b? ~~""~I ::}--~.
^' _ ~ -:r I tc "...."'--".-_I-~..---!'t-.,~-=-. "...,--1.,_ "o;f~"l
I ~..J-:;:=,' I ," -,~;,,~""'::' ::::,. ",;;-~ ~~~-,_,-'.d' -,J'~J ,
, November 4, 2002
P.02
i!
~ ~chaeIVV. Flumpf
Planning and Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach., Florida 33435
. i Subject Motorola Development of Regional Impact
! I Notification of Proposed Change
: !
Dear~. Flumpf
In accordance with the requirements of Section 38006(19), Florida Statutes (FS.), we have
reviewed the "Notification of a Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development ~f
Flegional Impact (DRl)" (NOPe) for the Motorola DRl dated September 17, 2002. I
I
I
The NOPC proposes to change the existing plan of development to allow development of 5~0
multi-family residential units, 450,000 square feet of office space, 63,500 square feet ofret~
space including shops and restaurants, and 128,000 square feet of self storage space. Tpe
applicant has submitted additional information on October 23, 2002 requesting the inclusipn
of a conversion matrix to allow changes in the plan of development to occur without the need
to amend the development order. Council has the following concerns with the proposbd
changes:
1)
The existing Motorola DRI is approved for 625,000 square feet of industrial uses and
200,000 square feet of office use, which totals 825,000 square feet of eIiltitlemeots
not 850,000 square feet.
3)
Exhibit E, Substantial Deviation Detennination Chart, needs to be revised to reflect
the original plan of development and the proposed changes under each applih~le
land use (i.e office, industri~ retail, residential and industrial). !
The applicant did not provide data and analysis to justify the conversion matrix, ,]he
calculations to determine the conversion rates and what factor (i e. water, sFfr,
traffic. or affordable housing) is the more restrictive for each of the pro~osed
conversions have not been proVlded by the applicant. Also, the applicant has not I
2)
.,
"Bringing Communities Together" . EST. 1976
1.01 E;a~t OceAn Boulevard. SUII<.; .\1)0 . SCU;tft, Florid.. )49~~
Phon.. (~'1) 221-41H:it'l _ SC 269-"'060 _ Fax (S61) 221-4067 . E-moail - AdminlliHcrnc n-r(
. HDV-D4-2002 10: 12
P.D3
Mr. Michael W Rumpf
November 4, 2002
Page 2
Ii
provided the proposed minimum or maximum levels of development for each ofthe
land uses.in the conversion matrix. !
4)
The change in land use from non-residential to residential may change traffic patterns
for the project creating additional impacts to the regional roadway network. The
traffic analysis should be revised to include information on the present and proposbd
distnbution of traffic on the regional roadways in the area. A meeting with +e
review agencies and local government should be set to discuss the proposed
distribution of traffic and its potential impacts. . .
The last annual report for the Motorola DR! was submitted on January 19&5.
Therefore, the project is in violation of the City's development order. An ann~al
. I
report for the project should be subrrutted each year. If a conversion matrixi is
approved, the development order should be revised to require the applicant to report
use of the conversion matrix in the annual report. i
I
The Florida Department of Transportation has concerns with the traffic anal~iS
submitted with the proposed change (see attached letter) These concerns need to ibe
addressed. I
The applicant has submitted additional intormation to address some of these concerhs.
However, the information was not received to allow sufficient time for the review "gencies!to
comment, Until the above concerns are fully addressed, CO\Ulcil objects to the proposed
I
change. i
The Strategic Regional Policy Plan for the Treasure Coast Region encourages the fonnadon
of sustainable neighborhoods and communities Sustainable communities should inc1ud~ a
. I
compatible mix of land uses, well designed and maintained public spaces, buildings ;(nd
infrastructure, and a network of interconnected streets designed for various transporta~' on
modes. Council strongly encourages continued efforts to provide for mixed-use developm nt
in the City. However, it is equally important that mixed-use development is done corre ly.
There must be a true integration and appropriate mix of uses, not simply more than one use Ion
I
the property. There should be not only a fully integrated mix of uses but also a netwar~ of
streets, sidewalks, and bicycle paths and an accommodation for present or future use 1 of
transit. There should be both a vertical and horizontal integration of land uses, and the land
,
uses should be of a type and nature that are appropriate and complementary to the area tOI be
sel'led. The DRl master plan included with the proposed amendment materials does ~ot
incorporate all the best components of mixed-use development Council is available to assist
i
the City in working with the developer of the property to ensure that the propo~ed
development contains all the important components of good mixed-use development. I
i
, I
.1
I
i
5)
6)
. cICV-04-2002 10: 13
P.04
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
November 4, 2002
Page 3.
Please call if you have any questions
Sincerely,
,r1 j (Ji
~''-4- II..) - /Lrcav'
l James T. Snyder
DR! Coordinator
i.
~ I
,
,
cc: Ken Metcalf, FDCA
R Duke Woodson, Applicant
i.
, I
I
I
, ,
, ,
. I
TOTAL P.04
6.B.l
MOTOROLA (LUAR 02-007)
LAND USE PLAN
AMENDMENT/REZONING
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING 80. ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 02-245
TO: Chairman and Members
Planning and Development Board
FROM: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
THROUGH: Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE: November 1, 2002
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Project/ Applicant: MOTOROLA DRI/ Daryl M. Carter Maury L. Carter & Associates,
Inc.
Agent: R. Duke Woodson of Foley and Lardner
Owner: Motorola, Inc.
Location: 1500 Gateway Boulevard (Southeast corner of Congress Avenue
and Gateway Boulevard). See Attachment "A".
File No: Land Use Amendment/Rezoning (LUAR 02-007)
Property Description: Undeveloped portion of the :t85.55 acre DRI consisting of :t49.69
acres classified Industrial (I) and zoned Planned Industrial
Development (PID).
Proposed change/use: To reclassify the subject portion of the property from Industrial (I)
to Local Retail Commercial (LRC), and rezone from PID-Planned
Industrial Development to C-3 Community Commercial in order to
develop with 500 units of multi-family residential housing and
63,500 sq. ft. of commercial development.
Adjacent Land Uses and Zoning:
North:
The developed portion of the Motorola DRI that is to retain an Industrial land use
designation and PID Planned Industrial District zoning; farther north, right-of-way of
Gateway Boulevard then commercial development (Shoppes of Boynton) designated Local
Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned C-3 Community Commercial.
South:
Right-of-way of the C-16 (Boynton) Canal, then vacant property designated Moderate
Density Residential (MEDR) and zoned R-1-M Single Family Residential.
Page 2
File Number: LUAR 02-007
Motorola DRI
East:
Right-of-way of the Lake Worth Drainage District E-4 Canal, then developed property
(Boynton Beach High School) designated Industrial (I) and zoned PID Planned Industrial
Development (Quantum Park).
West:
Right-of-way of Congress Avenue then commercial development (Catalina Center)
designated Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned C-3 Community Commercial.
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The parcels, which are the subject of this land use amendment, total :t49.69 acres. Because of
the size of the property under consideration, the Florida Department of Community Affairs
classifies this amendment as a "large-scale" amendment. Following local board review and City
Commission public hearing, a "large-scale" amendment is transmitted to the Florida Department
of Community Affairs for review for compliance with the state, regional and local comprehensive
plans prior to adoption. Following the review period of approximately 60 days, DCA provides
the City with a report of their findings in an "Objections, Recommendations and Comments
(ORC) Report". The City then has 60 days to either (1) adopt the amendment as transmitted,
(2) adopt the amendment with changes in response to the ORC report, or (3) determine not to
adopt the amendment and inform DCA of that decision. According to Florida Statutes Chapter
163, large-scale amendments may only be adopted during two amendment cycles each
calendar year. An exception to that rule is in the case of a Development of Regional Impact
(DRI) where the law permits amendments to be adopted without being subject to the twice-
yearly restrictions.
The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff
analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map.
a. Whether the proposed land use amendment/rezoning would be consistent with
applicable comprehensive plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition
against any increase in dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane
evacuation zone without written approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency
Planning Division and the City's risk manager. The planning department shall also
recommend limitations or requirements, which would have to be imposed on
subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with policies contained
in the comprehensive plan.
The property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone; therefore, the prohibition against
increasing residential densities does not apply. Other applicable policies from the
comprehensive plan are cited below.
"Policy 1.15.1 The City shall continue to allow mixed commercial/residential uses in the C-3
Community Commercial zoned portion of the Local Retail Commercial land use
category and Mixed Use land use category, and Central Business zoning
Page 3
File Number: LUAR 02-007
Motorola DRI
districts, in accordance with the zoning regulations for these districts, where
such projects would not create significant land use conflicts, and public
facilities would be adequate to serve the project. . ."; and,
Policy 1.19.2
The City shall provide continued effort to allow for industrial acreagei.
however that Ian desi nated "Industrial" on the currentl a ed
Future Land Use MaD mav be converted to commercial or residential
~esi:nations if the conversion en would whicA caR acc6ffiffi6e1at-e t-l'ic
::~~6~:~ :=~:I cmple'fffiCRt ,\'hi~ ~ ~:C: ~=~ ~:: ~t~~
~:eI :~ ~~R1a:' t~~d t~~~i~~=;versi6~ ~f 1aA6 elc~~~~t:~ "~~~ri~" ~~
c R I . i9 Use t1ai9 uAless such c6R,,.eF516R ';;6ulel
generate a range of employment choices for current and future residents,
provide goods and services of regional importance, aReI retaiR re~i6Aal Rscal
and ecoR6ffiic Si~RiRcaRcc. or would Drovide oDoortunities for the City
to meet its Ion -ran e housin als' and ii is bun
adeauate data includina market analvsis. (This language reflects a
policy amendment as currently proposed in amendment cycle 1-2002.)
The proposed development for the site is consistent with both of the cited policies in that it will
provide both commercial and residential development. This development, as well as the
redevelopment of that portion of the site remaining with an "Industrial" land use designation
and PID zoning, is expected to generate employment opportunities and provide goods and
services, as well as add to the range of housing opportunities in the City.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use
pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare.
The proposed land use amendment/rezoning would not create an isolated district, but would
relate to the adjacent lands to the west across Congress Avenue that are developed with
commercial uses (Catalina Center) and are designated Local Retail Commercial and zoned C-3,
Community Commercial.
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable.
There are several conditions that have changed since the DRI, consisting of :t85.55 acres, was
approved in 1979. The project was originally expected to develop at buildout with a total of
825,000 square feet of industrial, research and development, and office uses. Even as planned,
this was an extremely inefficient use of land, with a floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.22, compared to
the maximum permitted by the development regulations (60% lot coverage x 4 stories= 2.4
FAR). As the environment of the telecommunications industry changed, the demand for the
developed space lessened, and the final phase, which consisted of 200,000 square feet of office
space, was never developed. Instead, Motorola has drastically reduced their operations within
the city, leaving 70% of the existing facilities vacant. The current industrial market conditions
remain poor. Moreover, the specialized nature of the existing buildings decreases their potential
adaptability for other industrial uses.
Page 4
File Number: LUAR 02-007
Motorola DRI
The reduction of the local Motorola labor force over recent years has negatively impacted the
local economy. The proposed reuse of the site as a multi-use development with a commercial
component will serve as an employment generator, establishing a partial compensation for
industrial employment losses.
d. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and
other public facilities.
The traffic analysis submitted on behalf of the applicant states that the Motorola DRI was
approved for 625,000 square feet of manufacturing space and 200,000 square feet of office use.
This would vest the project for 13,020 daily trips and 1,634 peak hour trips. According to that
same study, the proposed development plan will be limited to only generate a comparable
number of daily trips as are vested for the site. There are no projected increases in the daily
and peak hour trips above the vested number. (Attachment "B")
Utilizing Department of Health standards, the applicant states that when Motorola was operating
at full capacity, sewage flow was estimated at 62,500 gallons per day (gpd) and the estimated
water demand was 75,000 gpd. The City recognizes prior vesting (for planning purposes) in the
site of 127,000 gpd each for potable water and sanitary sewer. The developer is responsible for
reserving or purchasing all additional water and sewer capacity not previously purchased by the
prior owners of the property.
With respect to solid waste, in a letter dated December 18, 2001 the Palm Beach County Solid
Waste Authority has stated that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's
municipalities throughout the 10-year planning period. The School District of Palm Beach County
has reviewed the project and approved it for school concurrency. Lastly, drainage will also be
reviewed in detail as part of the review of the conditional use application, and must satisfy all
requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future
use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
Refer to responses provided under items "b"and "c'; above.
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning.
A portion of the property is developed with 625,000 square feet of industrial space, including
ancillary office and storage, and an additional 200,000 square feet of office use is approved but
unbuilt. As explained in (c), the specialized nature of the existing buildings limits their potential
adaptability for other industrial uses, including other desirable light industrial uses. The
demand in recent years has been focused on warehousing and distribution; however, after a
relatively long period of high construction activity, the local industrial markets have been
negatively affected by the economic downturn. Given the overall market conditions, it may be
Page 5
File Number: LUAR 02-007
Motorola DRI
cost prohibitive to wait out the period of time required to locate industrial uses that would be an
ideal match for this unique type and size of space.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the
needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
Over the past decade, the concept of an industrial park has evolved from its traditional
character of a basic, single use industrial area to a flexible district form featuring a mix of
components tailored to the needs of local business and industrial groups. The mix may contain
industrial, finance, technology and research as well as other uses, including residential and
retail. The size of the Motorola DRI site makes it an ideal candidate for such redevelopment.
It is expected that the master plan for the project will be developed with this concept in mind.
As such, it will contribute to economic development of the City. Additionally, mixed-use
developments that include housing, shopping and employment opportunities offer the possibility
of internal capture of traffic that single-use developments do not.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in
districts where such use is already allowed.
The site is one of the two Developments of Regional Impact in the City. The other, Quantum
Park, has already almost completely developed with a mixture of industrial, commercial and
residential uses. The subject site is the only other place in the City where such a mixture of
uses can occur in close proximity to the retail core anchored by the Boynton Beach Mall.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
As indicated herein, this request is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan; will
not create additional impacts on infrastructure that have not been anticipated in the
Comprehensive Plan; will be compatible with adjacent land uses and will contribute to the
overall economic development of the City. Therefore, staff recommends that the subject
request be approved. If the Planning and Development Board or the City Commission
recommends conditions, they will be included within Exhibit "C".
ATTACHMENTS
J:\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECT5\Motorola DRI\LUAR\STAFF REPORT lUAR.cIoc
!-
!!,!
i"
I
Ii"
z
f:i
~
(J>
..,
..,
m
;U
f-
(J>
f-
en
N
;;
z
,i
PWI3
NW~2ND-A"~
,
- PlJlD
"
f-
(J>
f-
en
N
;;
Z
""
L~
w
"
;'i
p
z
:;
<{
en
T'- I'
,II
I,
, I
Ii
I,;
,
I
CAT1Ul'tA
I
Location Map
MOTOROLA P.I.O.
I;
i i
i i C3
'I
I, I I
-
w
~
'"
'"
z
0
()
'F
C3
"
-.--.-
i~
I
BOYNTON.Q.I\IAL
R1AA
o
/,
I
, . .
GA:r~-W!Y~-I?t~Q
:-0'
~....
;u.
a
G1
m
'"
~
o
EXHIBIT "A"
QUANTUM PARK
Pig
\1...
. DO E-4 CANAL
,- , 1--:
NvI drHAVE
0.3 Miles
;)>
'"
"
:s
'0
;u
,
_ ____=--:r .
'"
o
f"
w
'"
,I
"
!'I -:i:
~, f
ji'-
--, ,
,
w-<?-'
s
EXHIBIT "B"
PU'tDE'R TROOTMfift COftSOLTlftG. Iftc.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
November 1, 2002
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm BeJch, FL 334flh
(561) 4J4-1 644 F.lx 434- H)63
www.plndertroutman.conl
Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin
Palm Beach County Planning
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, Fl 33406
Re: Motorola DRI NOPC - #PTC02-129
Dear Mr. Mohyuddin:
Attached please find a Comprehensive Plan Amendment trip generation analysis for the above
referenced project
The existing land use designation on the 85.54 acre site is Industrial. It is proposed to change the
land use on a portion of the site. Proposed land use designations are local Retail Commercial on
45.45 acres and Industrial on the remaining 40.09 acres. City code allows 40% lot coverage and 4
stories for local Retail Commercial and 60% lot coverage and 4 stories for Industrial.
The owner/developer cannot build to this intensity because of an existing ORion the property.
Therefore, the owner/developer will voluntarily restrict the uses and intensities of the site. The
maximum development will be limited based on the total external trips approved for the existing
DR!.
Attachment 1 presents a comparative trip generation analysis for the existing land use designation,
proposed land use designation and the proposed development plan. The maximum 13,020 new
external daily trips is the threshold currently approved under the Motorola DR!. .
Please call this office is you have any comments.
KMP/ldr
Enclosures
NO\! - 5 200l
cc: Dick Hudson
Jeff Douglas
Duke Woodson
LettcrMohyuddin02-129 11.'-02
g,
~ N N
~g9o
8S::;~
u 0 ~
>- ~.
~ ~
"* g:
,.:,
o
C
.
l!::
ci.
E
8
e
11,
'5
Q1
o
~
'in
>-
;;;
c:
<
c:
.2
~
<; ;;;
c: ~
'"
lJ ::>
Q. "'C
.'" .s
,..
c: c:
'" .2
c::
'" ""
> c:
... 02 'in 00
C a c: 'in
'" '"
'" ~ ..c: a
E 0 ~ 00
..c: >- Q. c:
u B E 'iij
~ o 0 'x
< :Eu .....
... ...
P! ... ~
N N
Z':: ~ ",.
'" '"
'11'.
0
.,;
,..-
~=
~ ~
::Q .:: '" '"
....:: ~ ...
... ...
,.; ,.;
2! ~ ~ ~
'" '"
~ .g. "'. "'.
';( ,.. N N
..... '" '"
.g '11'. '11'.
0 0
0 0
... 0 0
;;;
c:
:;; ,
.5
:> .9-
c: >-
0'"
u-
..
- c:
~ :;;
..
(J .5
- ~ - -
~ .g '" '"
'" '"
N N'
,..,.. '" '"
-
:::
2l .....
.. on
"" 0
0
c: 0
0 .:::
.'"
.. '"
:;; ",
c: -0
.,
(J
.9
.::
c
.~ .....
on
~ ...
c: ",
2l '"
.5 N'
...
",
",'
" 0
..... '"
!:: 0 ...
u ~
51
::J
'"
c:
..
-'
~
~
~
'"
e
;;;
'u
>-
'"
E.
E
o
U
's
.,
""
;;;
u
o
....J
'"
c:
'"
;;;
"E
~
::>
"'C
.s
~ ~ - ... '"
'" '" ...
'" .~ '" ~ ",
z':: ",' ",' ....
N ... '"
'11'. '11'.
0 0
'" '"
,..- N
-9=
~ ~
~ .~ ~ - N
<>-.:: '" N .,
.... '" -
~ ",' ",'
- -
2! ~ N '" '"
~ '" '"
Qj .~ N ., 0
';( ... ~ N N
..... N '" ",
.~ '11'. '11'.
0 0
0 0
,.. 0 0
;;;
c:
:;;
.5
:> .9
c: >-
0'"
u-
..
- e
~ >-
.. '"
(J .5
N '" '"
- ~ ... ., ",
~ .g N ., 0
,..,.. ~ ,'. N'
N '" ",
'"
~ '"
.,
., ..... .,;
';;; on +
"" 0 is
0
c: 0 c:
0 ~ ....J
.'" - '"
.. '" ...
:;; ", '"
c: -0 0
"
(J "
.g. EO
0- c:
....J
~ 0
..... .....
.~ on on
~ ", M
c: '" .,
2l ~. '"
.5 ~ ...:
", '"
~ ...
..;: ",'
" 0
..... '" ... 0
!:: 0 ~ N
U .,
"
~
::J
'"
c:
..
....J
-;;; on
'S ....J
~ <
~ .~ ,..
'" 0
.5 "
"" 0-
c:
o
.'"
'"
6'0
'in
.,
a
"'C
51
o
Q.
o
>-
<>-
c:
'"
c::
N 0 ., ., ... ... '" N ", 0
~ ~ ., '" 0 ., :;; '" 0 :;; ., N
" .~ '" '" '" 0 "! N 0
Z':: ",' M N' ~ M'
...
'11'. '11'. '11'. '11'. ?fl. '11'. '11'. '11'. ?fl.
0 0 0 0 0 0 '" 0 0
'" 0 0 '" '" '" ... -<i on
,..- M ... ... ... ... ...
.0:::
J. ~
::Q .:::- ... M N ., '" ... - on ...
<>-.:: '" 0 N 0 ", '" N - '"
... , '" - ~ '" ", on ",
... M'
.. .0 0 ~ 0 ", ~ 0 M ... ...
c: .9 '" on ~ ... ~ '" '" '" 0 on
Qj ";: ., ... o. ., '" '" ... ... M ",
';(0- ",' '" ~ ",' N ... ",'
..... ...
~ ?fl. '11'. '11'. * ?fl. '11'. '11'. '11'. '11'. '11'.
.~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '"
0- ., 0 '" 0 ., on 0 on on .,
;;; ~ ... ~ ...
c: '" 0 ., 0 '" ., N 0 '" ...
>-
2l '" '" '" ", '" ", ... '" ... M
M M - ~ N "'-
.5 ...
"
:> .~
c: >-
00-
u-
- ..
c:
~ ~
..
(J .5
M 0 ", 0 N ", N M 0 .,
~ .g ... 0 ., 0 ., .0 N ", N .,
N "'- ~ ", '" ", ... ... M ...
0-'" .... M ~ M' N' ~ .,'
~
... '"
- on '"
::: ~ .,
2l M ..... ..... ..... ..... on ..... .....
+ on on on on + on on
.. is :3 0 g 0 is g 0
'" 0
::J 0 0 o.
c: c: 0 0 0 c:
.g ....J Cl - ... ~ ... ....J ... ~
., - - - - - M - -
i:! '" '" '" on ... N ... ... "1
" '" N ~ M ... '" N N
c: 0 .,; ", 0 -0 0 '"
" '" ., M ", '"
(J " ~ ... " N
.g EO EO
... c: c:
....J ....J
~
..... ::> ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .....
.~ on Cl on on on on on on on
~ :3 :3 :3 :3 g :3 :3 :3 :3
e
" 0 '" 0 0 0 0 on 0
c: o' ",' 0 ",' .,' 0 .... .,'
on ... ... N N
... ...
..... " 0 0 on ~ N ... 0 N ~
'"
!:: 0 ~ N '" M M M N - '"
U '" N '" ., ., '" ., ", ~
:;;
> ~
0
c: ~
5 '" "
" ~ 0 0
~ ... 0 ..c:
::J ~ ..... "
;;; ..c: - :;;
'" R I~ ~ e :=
c: J: :I: .. ..
.. ~ .....
, , , " 'j
....J .~
~ f!! c: c: c a
c: .. .. .. .9
.. 5 5 5_
" " u
~ '" I~ s .:lI .:lI ~ ~ on
E 'in ~ ~ ~ e -
" " " " " .. Q;
0 '" Cl '" '" '" "" '" on
~
c:
(lJ
E
Q.
o
OJ
>
'"
a
"'C
ill
o
Q.
o
>-
<>-
EXHIBIT "B"
g
~
:2
0
$
;;
~
a.
..Q
O.
>
.(Ii
."
e
.
~
~
."
:J
,.. "
C 0
, .~
8 '0
w
~ ~
u '"
.
.l! I
E
" ,
a. 0
C
. 0
-5 ()
'0 .; ~ .;
,:: 0 .0
~ 'C ~ ~
. '" ~
..... co
u ~ ~ ~
. . ." ." C
a. . c c
.s . . . .
e 0 . 11,
." .'" ~ ~
~ .;; , , ,
. . 0
Q 8 > 5
~ 0
~ u u
. ]; ]; ];
~
~ ~ '" '" ~
. e .,; .,; .,;
..... , ;; ;; ;;
.i >- . ~
.,; '0 . ~
~ u ~
0 <
0 .~ ~ g ~
.~ ~ .
u .,; 0 .,;
~ E ~ . .
::: Ei '5 :!: ii)
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Motorola
File number: LUAR 02-007
Reference"
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE ,
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERlENVIRONMENT ALlST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
\. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
\. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHAREDI'M'\PROJECTS\Motorola DRI\LUAR\COI.doc
OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT
PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH (DCA No. 03-D1)
I. CONSISTENCY WITH CHAPTER 163, F.S., AND RULES 9J-S & 9J-11, F.A.C.
The Department has completed its review of the proposed amendment to the City of Boynton
Beach Comprehensive Plan (DCA No. 03-DI). The amendment involves a change to the Future
Land Use Map in support of an amendment to the development order for the Motorola
Development of Regional Impact. The Department has the following objection.
Objection:
The proposed Future Land use Map amendment is internally inconsistent with Boynton Beach
Land Use Element Policy 1.19.2. which requires that a change in land use from an industrial
designation to commercial be based upon adequate data including market analysis. Additionally.
the proposed amendment is not supported by sufficient data and analysis demonstrating that an
adequate level of service will be available to serve development based upon the maximum
allowable intensity for the proposed designation.
[Rule 9J-5.005(2)(a), 9J-5.005(5)(a), 9J-5.006(3)(c), 9J-5.019(3)(a) and (t), F.A.C. and Section
163.3177(2) and (IO)(h), F.S.]
Recommendation:
The City should ensure that the proposed amendment is internally consistent by supplying
data and analysis in support of the land use conversion from Industrial to Local Retail CommerciaL
The City should provide data and analysis based on the maximum allowable development
intensities, for the Local Retail Commercial land use.
1. Provide adequate data, including market analysis, in support of the conversion ofland use
from Industrial to Local Retail Commercial in compliance with the requirements of
Boynton Beach Land Use Element Policy 1.I9.2(ii).
Response:
A market analysis, as prepared by the applicant, is attached as "Exhibit A ". This has been
reviewed by the City's staff and found to meet the requirements of Land Use Element Policy
1.I9.2(ii).
2. Provide data and analysis for the availability of all public facilities based upon the
maximum allowable development intensities for Local Retail CommerciaL The City
should analyze those services and make a determination that sufficient capacity exists,
with no lowering of an adopted level of service, to provide essential services based upon
the maximum extent of potential development allowed.
Response:
A traffic analysis comparing the impacts of the maximum allowable development intensities
is included in "Exhibit C". An analysis of water and wastewater facilities is provided as
"Exhibit B"; however, the developers' agreement, as provided for under S 163.3220-
163.3243, F.S. limits the amount of development possible on the subject site, as well as the
remainder of the DR!, which is not a part of this amendment. In additIOn. the City requires
the payment of capacity reservation fees for both water and sewer services prior to issuing
permits for all developments. These fees, like the City's recreation impact fees and the range
of Countywide impact fees are in place solely to address the provision of infrastructure and
services COncurrent with the impacts of the development.
3. Provide a traffic analysis based upon the most recently available data to address the peak-
hour, peak direction, roadway level of service standards, and to determine the impact of
this amendment upon the Florida Intrastate Highway System.
Response:
A traffic analysis based upon the most recently available data to address the peak-hour, peak
direction, roadway level-of-service standards and to determine the impact of the amendment
on the Florida Intrastate Highway System is attached as "Exhibit C".
II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The City of Boynton Beach's proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment does not adequately
address and further the following goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan Chapter 187,
Florida Statutes.
(16) Land Use Goal and Policy 5, to encourage and assist local governments in establishing
comprehensive impact-review procedures to evaluate the effects of significant
development activities in their jurisdictions.
Recommendation:
The City should revise the proposed amendment to be consistent with the State Comprehensive
Plan (see specific objections, comments and recommendations included in this report).
Response:
Please see the responses to the three recommendations included above.
Attachments:
l\SHRDATA\Planning\SHARED\\VP\PROJECTS\.I,IOlOrob DRJ\Ll'AR\ORC Response rtf
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL MARKET ANALYSIS
The City of Boynton Beach is Palm Beach County's third-largest municipality,
with a population of approximately 60,500 residents. The City's population grew 30 percent
between 1990 and 2000 and is projected to grow approximately 3 percent annually during the
next 10 years.
Residential and non-residential growth in the City mirrored its population
increase during the period from 1990 to 2000. The number of housing units in the City rose
from 25,544 in 1990 to 30,643 in 2000. During that period, the City issued building permits
for 2,468 single-family and 3,277 multi-family residential units within the municipal
boundaries. A majority of the multi-family units constructed were apartments.
According to The Development Atlas of Boynton Beach, Florida, prepared by
the City's Planning and Zoning Division in May 2002 (the "Development Atlas"), the number
of single-family building permits issued by the City each year has been declining since 1997,
while the number of multi-family residential permits approved each year has increased.
"Economic cycles aside, these trends are likely to continue. Both the limited amount of vacant
residential land within the city and future redevelopment scenarios, with possibility of
increased densities, will encourage multi-family housing," according to the Development
Atlas.
The amount of commercial and industrial development in the City between 1996
and 2001 fluctuated based on economic conditions. In 1996, there were 351,918 square feet of
commercial and industrial facilities constructed in the City, with that number increasing to a
peak of 723,412 square feet in 1999 and declining to 378,003 square feet in 2001. Industrial
development comprised 401,973 square feet of the numbers referenced above in 1999 and
251,657 square feet in 200 I, despite poor local economic conditions.
The taxable values of residential and non-residential properties within the City
increased 42.5 percent from 1993 to 2001. The total taxable value of residential properties
increased from $1,095,335,716 in 1993 to $1,671,747,547 in 2001, an increase of 52.6
percent. The total taxable value of commercial properties increased from $390,772,702 in
1993 to $554,030,196 in 2001, a 41.8 percent increase. For industrial properties, the total
taxable value increased from $147,314,213 in 1993 to $176,928,582 in 2001, a 20.1 percent
mcrease.
006.287405.1
.
.
All parcels within the City have been designated with one of the following land
use categories:
Land Use Acrea2e Percent of Total
Residential 6,670.81 acres 66.31 percent
Commercial 1,317.78 acres 13 . 10 percent
Industrial 972.39 acres 9.67 percent
Agricultural 49.77 acres 0.49 percent
Recreation 732.01 acres 7.28 percent
Public/Private Institutions 317.66 acres 3 . 16 percent
Of the land uses listed above, there are 192 vacant commercial parcels totalling
299 acres. Out of those 192 commercial parcels, 58 are more than two acres in size and 110
are smaller than one acre in size. There are also 37 vacant industrial parcels that total 192
acres. Of those 37 industrial parcels, 13 are more than two acres in size and 7 are smaller than
one acre in size.
There are also few remaining residential parcels. As of March 2002, there were
only seven residential parcels, totalling approximately 300 acres, remaining in the City that
were larger than two acres. The total number of residential dwellings approved to be
constructed on those parcels is 1,758 units.
The data regarding vacant land presented above is evidence that the City is
quickly running out of developable land and will soon be built out. Thus, it is imperative that
City leaders allow the highest and best uses to be made of all remaining vacant land, regardless
of the current land use and/or zoning designations of the parcels.
The new owners of the Motorola DR! are seeking to amend the land use
designation of the property from Planned Industrial District (all 87.4 acres) to Industrial (39.3
acres) and Local Retail Commercial (48.1 acres). The reason for the proposed land use change
is simple: Motorola, once the second-largest employer in the City, has all but shut down its
operations in Boynton Beach, leaving a vacant, technologically outdated facility on the
property. As indicated in the Development Atlas, the share of manufacturing employment
within the City "has dropped significantly in recent years, mainly due to loss of employment at
Motorola." The peak employment at the Motorola facility was 2,700 workers. The current
number of employees is less than 500.
The combination of the loss of manufacturing jobs combined with annual
increases in the amount of industrial building space available in the City has resulted in a high
vacancy rate for such facilities. That vacancy rate does not include the 37 vacant industrial
parcels located within the City. Thus, the demand for construction of additional industrial
facilities in the City will be low for years to come.
006.287405.1
2
.
..
In contrast, the needs for additional multi-family housing stock, with related
commercial enterprises, will be very high during the next few years. There are few vacant
residential properties remaining in the City, particularly parcels that are more than two acres in
size.
Because the City is facing build out, leaders have had to make difficult decisions
about what to do with the remaining vacant land. Certainly, City leaders want to have the last
vacant parcels developed with facilities that would constitute the highest and best uses of the
land.
In the case of the Motorola property, City leaders have tried for years to attract
a new manufacturing venture to that site, with no success. Those leaders have now determined
that converting the existing Motorola manufacturing facility to an industrial and office complex
and allowing development of vacant land on the site for residential and ancillary COmmercial
uses not only is the best use for the property but will generate the most tax revenue for the City
in the long term.
The land use and facility availability data presented in this report clearly
indicates that the conversion of the Motorola property from a solely manufacturing facility to a
multi-use project is supported by the real estate and employment markets for the area, as well
as by City leaders.
006.287405.1
3
EXHIBIT B
ANALYSIS PROVIDED BY CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
WATER UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
Taken at a retail rate of usage, based upon our Code, the demand for 3,463,543 square
feet of retail stores would be:
Water:
432,947 gpd
Sewer:
346,358 gpd
This would likely be more intensive than most industrial uses.
It also exceeds the volume based upon earlier estimates for the
apartment/office/commercial combined site which is planned to occupy the entire 85.55
acres or the DRI as shown on the attached Table 1:
n::
w
>-
<l:
=:
;;:
0
...J
U.
...J
<l:
>-
0
>-
0 0 0 0 0 0 "' 0 0 '"
0 0 N "" 0 0 ..... ..... N '"
C "' 0 "" ..... ..... "' '" "" ~ en
..... "' ..... OJ OJ N ",.
a. '" ~ '" N N ~
c.:l M
~
0
...J
U.
"" U.
0 '" 0
0 0 >- 0 0 0 "' 0 0
0 0 "'
N ci Z "' '" CO '" ..... 0 "" ..... CO
M N '" 0 ""
;:; Z => "" N
"" 0 OJ ..... OJ "" "" N ""
CO N "" CO ~ ": CO '" CO
>- N OJ ,.: 0 "" 0 N "" N
"' ..... ~ '" "' '" "' '" "'
W '" '" CO "". ...... ~ '" <17
W 0 <17 ~ ~ <17
U. () <17 '"
a. >-
<l: Z
() =>
.-l
W
...J
i:ll >-' >-' >- >-'
;: u. u. u.
u.
0 >-' 0 0 0
Z (f) <( <l: (!! (f) (f)
0 0 W 0 0
;:: 0 W (f) 0 0 0
<l: ~ -i 0 ...J - Il. ~ ~
n:: () (3 <l: Il. <l: 0 c.:l (3 (3
w =: 0 Il. CD CD CD Il. "' Il. 0 Il.
f-. >- 0 ...J CD CD N CD Il. CD
~ ~ ...J ...J 0 "" OJ ~ CD
"' "' ..... OJ "" "' "'
u. <l: N "" "" "" 0 ~ ~
Q.
0
....
~ (f)
W
Cl >-
Gl z
>-' >-' => >-'
'" W
0 u. ::i => u. CD u.
=>
Q. cj q 0 q (f) >- cj <l: cj
0 >- (f) w w w >- u. (f) D:: (f)
g: Z 0 <l: cj 0 0 0
0 CO ~ "! w 0 >- 0
=> ~ 0 (f) (f) (f) ~
f-. '"
~ ....
0
II:
'" ~
Cl
Ul 0 C2'
:;; ::J
g: >- >- >- 0
'" z z Z I W
W W W "" 0
<: :;;: :;;: :;;: N ...J u:
0 f- >- >- f- <l:
:t: i:: D:: D:: D:: 0 U u.
0
() '" <l: <l: <l: 2S D::
Ul .... Il. Il. Il. W W W
::, <l: <l: <l: >- :;;: CD CD
lXI () :;;: :;;: :;;: Z :;;: <l: ;:2
<: .... 0 0 0 <l: 0 D::
C3 D:: 0 0
~ 0 0 0 ::J 0 f- f-
S: W D:: D:: D:: i'" ...J (f) (f)
~ 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ LL u.
0 u: w w w (f) Z ...J ...J
0 ;r u. '" '" '" W w <l: w w
lXI 0 N "" D:: D:: '" (f) (f)
~
ill
3=
ill
Vl
==
0
-'
lL
-'
..:
....
0
....
a a a a a a "' a a on '"
a a a a a a r-- r-- N '"
"' a a a r-- "' '" '" ~ 00 '" '"
C r-- N '" '" '" N 0 ,..: ":
0.. '" ~ "' a N r-- '" '"
t:l N '" "'
~ N "'-
0 r--
0 '"
-' ~ <fl
lL
lL Vl a
0 .... a a a "' a a
a a "'
ci Z "' '" '" '" r-- a '" r-- '"
'" N '" a '"
z ::> N
....
ill Vl
ill 0
lL c.J
0.. .... ~
Z Ql
..: ~
c.J ::> Ql
Vl
"C ro
" '"
'" ,.,
>-' >-' >-' >-' ~
lL lL Ll.. Ql ~
d lL d d 1;; "
Z Ul >-' 0 Ul Ul 3= 0
0 <i ..: ~ ~ ~
a ill a a 0 .2
>= a ill ~ 0 a a - ~
..: .J 0 -' "- ~ ~ '"
~ c.J 0 <( "- <( 0 (') 0 0 Ql ."
ill 3= 0 '"
0 "- (') (') (') "- "' "- "- ~ 0.
3= 0 -' (') (') N (') "- (') '" '"
ill -' -' a a a (') .<: '-'
"' a a a '" "' "'
Vl Ll.. ..: N '" '" '" 0 c.J "'
'" "
Ql 2:
~ "
"'
Ul .u ~
t:: '" Q)
Z lL 2
>-' >-' :::> >-' ~ "
Ll.. :j :j lL ill lL 0
(') '" ~
d 0 :::> ci >-' d <( d c.J '"
0 Ul 2:
.... Ul uj ill ill .... Ll.. Ul 0: Ul ro "
Z a <( d a a a -0 "'
a '" N "! ill a .... a "
::> ~ 0 Ul Ul Ul .... 0:
12 .c
:J
:::> 0)
.... .... .... a ~
z z Z I ill Q;
ill ill ill '" U
::; ::; ::; N -' LL ~
.... .... .... .... <( "C
0 Ll.. C
0: 0: 0: a a
<( <( <( ~ 0: "
"- "- "- ill ill ill Cii
<( <( <( .... ::; (') (') ."
::; ::; ::; z ::; <( <( :J
<( 0: 0: 0-
a a a 0: a a a "
a a a :::> U .... f- "
ill 0: 0: 0: ~ -' Ul Ul
s;> 0 0 0 ~ ~ u:.. Ll.. :::>
Ll.. ill ill ill Ul Z -' -' ci
Ll.. C!l C!l C!l ill ill <( ill ill \!:!.
a N '" 0: 0: C!l Ul (f)