Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE ': "'J- -, ': L' --I:). F, ~'.. . ';So" "(~c':' L ,,,.;< ~f, Michael From: Sent: To: Subject: Rumpf, Michael Friday, September 27,20029:27 AM Johnson, Don; Byrne, Nancy FW: Bethesda comments on rezoning ordinance Just FYI, despite my comments, I believe the rezoning ordinance will go forward with language granting the Building Department with responsibility determining appropriateness for using 4th Street for parking lot construction tasks. MR -----Original Messagen~h From: Rumpf, Michael Sent: Thursday, September 26, 20029:52 AM To: Cheraf, James Cc: Lamanna, Rosemarie; Byrne, Nancy Subject: Bethesda comments on rezoning ordinance Jim, I have reviewed the letter from Bethesda dated September 19th wherein they state the following: 1) the need more flexibility regarding access through SW 4th Street; 2) that the Building Division will be able to make exceptions to the limitations; and 3) the property owners will be coordinated with during the site plan process. My recommendation is that the specific language needed to allow Bethesda the minimum access necessary for the project be added to the ordinance so the Commission is aware of the needs and is responsible for approving the wording. I think I can speak for the Department when I say that the Building Division should not be left to determine the appropriate level of use of 4th Street. Mike 1 DATE 9/13/02 9/26/02 9/26/02 REQUESTS AND COMMENTS ON DRAFT BETHESDA REZONING ORDINANCE 02-053 FROM Tim Monaghan, Esq.-Atty for Bethesda Mike Rumpf Tim Monaghan COMMENT/REQUEST Add language to allow for limited access from SW 4th to accommodate unsafe conditions such as power lines. Suggested language: OUTCOME Requested language added to ordinance Sec 2 c. .~ (( (~ " ~"... Forwarded to staff That during construction on the for review property, neither the applicant, or its agents or assigns, will use S. W. 4th Street for ingress or egress, except for minimum use to complete the landscaping and improvements to the berm/pathway area. In response to a request by the contractor for the project, the Building Department may approve exceptions to this condition, as necessary to accommodate specific situations during the construction process where it is determined to be unsafe or unreasonable to require access from the east side of the property. Any such request and approval shall seek to avoid or minimize any disruption to the adjacent residential neighborhood. Language requested by Monaghan should be reviewed by Commission. Exceptions, if any, should not be reviewed solely by the Building Denartment. Request for new language: Sec. 2 f- Applicant agrees to repair, at its expense, any damage sustained by adjacent properties which is caused by its contractors, or its other agents or its employees, during the course of construction. Review Commission ftrst reading Ordinance. Review Commission ftrst reading Ordinance. with at of with at of 9/30/02 Quinus Green Language requested by Monaghan puts Review with City and staff in untenable position. Commission at first reading of Ordinance. Commission action: ~f. Michael From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Lamanna, Rosemarie Monday, September 30, 2002 9:45 AM 'Timothy Monaghan' Cherof, James; Rumpf, Michael RE: FW: Bethesda comments on rezoning ordinance ~ Rev 092502 ezoning - Bethesda. The Ordinance which was submitted to the Commission for the agenda package will not be altered further prior to first reading. All comments and suggestions regarding further amendments will be submitted to the Commission and, if any, can be made by the Commission First or Second Reading. I am attaching a copy of the last revised Ordinance, which is in the agenda package. ---Original Message----- From: Timothy Monaghan [mailto:tem@smclawfirm.com] Sent, Thursday, September 26, 2002 3,59 PM To: Lamanna, Rosemarie Cc: Robert.Taylor@BethesdaHealthcare.com Subject: Re: FW: Bethesda comments on rezoning ordinance Rosemarie, The Hospital has asked me to submit the following language for the city!s consideration for inclusion into the ordinance. This would be a new condition f. under Section 2 of the ordinance: f. Applicant agrees to repair, at its expense, any damage sustained by adjacent properties, which is caused by its contractor, or its other agents or its employees, during the course of the project. By the way, I have spoken to Mike Rumpf and I understand that he is preparing substitute language for the exception language in 2.c. which would permit limited use of 4th Street where required by site conditions. I will be out for surgery tomorrow but will be checking my e-mail over the weekend. Please forward any revised ordinance as soon as available. Please forward same also to Robert.Taylor@Bethesdahealthcare.com Thank you very much for your assistance, Tim Monaghan >>> "Lamanna, Rosemarie]] <LamannaR@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us> 09/26/02 11:29AM >>> Comments from our Planning Director. > -----Original Message----- > From: Rumpf, Michael > Sent, Thursday, September 26, 2002 9,52 AM > To: Cherof, James > Cc: Lamanna, Rosemarie; Byrne, Nancy > Subject: Bethesda comments on rezoning ordinance > > Jim, I have reviewed the letter from Bethesda dated September 19th wherein > they state the following' > > 1) the need more flexibility regarding access through SW 4th Street; > 2) that the Building Division will be able to make exceptions to the > limitations; and > 3) the property owners will be coordinated with during the site plan 1 > process. > > My recommendation is that the specific language needed to allow Bethesda > the minimum access necessary for the project be added to the ordinance so > the Commission is aware of the needs and is responsible for approving the > wording. I think I can speak for the Department when I say that the > Building Division should not be left to determine the appropriate level of > use of 4th Street. > > Mike > 2 ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF BETHESDA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL; AMENDING ORDINANCE 02-013 OF SAID CITY BY REZONING A CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREIN, FROM R-1-AA (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) TO PU (PUBLIC USAGE); PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has adopted Ordinance No, 02-013, in which a Revised Zoning Map was adopted for said City; and WHEREAS, Bethesda Memorial Hospital, as owner of the property more particularly described hereinafter, has heretofore filed a Petition, through their agent, James Gentile/Kilday and Associates, Inc., pursuant to Section 9 of Appendix A- Zoning, of the Code of Ordinances, City of Boynton Beach, Florida, for the purpose of rezoning a certain tract of land consisting of:!: 1.43 acres, said land being more particularly described hereinafter, from R-1-AA (Single Family Residential) to PU (Public Usage), subject to conditions regarding future expansions and access from SW 4th Street, and the reversion to existing zoning; and WHEREAS, the City Commission conducted a public hearing on August 20, 2002, and heard testimony and received evidence which the Commission finds supports a rezoning for the property hereinafter described; and C:\Documents and Settings\rumpfm\Local SettingS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7\Rev 092502 Rezoning - Bethesda - 1.43 acres.doc WHEREAS, during the public hearing the applicant for the Rezoning made material representations which were considered and were relied on by the City Commission in reaching its conclusions regarding the appropriateness of the proposed rezoning. The material representations made by applicant are set forth in the minutes ofthe City Commission meetinglPublic Hearing conducted August 20th, 2002. WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the proposed rezoning IS consistent with an amendment to the Land Use which was contemporaneously considered and approved at the public hearing heretofore referenced; and WHEREAS, the City Commission deems it in the best interests of the inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1. The foregoing Whereas clauses are true and correct and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. The City Commission based upon the representations and consent of the applicant in public hearing, imposes the following conditions to the rezonmg: a. That the applicant apply for a building permit on or before August 20, 2004; b. That if applicant fails to apply for a building permit on or before August 20, 2004, zoning on the property will revert to R-l-AA; c. That during construction on the property, neither the applicant, or its agents or assigns, will use S.W. 4th Street for ingress or egress, except C:\Documents and Settings\rumpfm\Local SettingS\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7\Rev 092502 Rezoning - Bethesda 1 43 acres.doc for minimum use to complete the landscaping and improvements to the berm/pathway area. In response to a request by th~ c()ntractor for . the rrojechthe Building Dep<llimentl11!ly..approve exceptions to this condition, as necessary to accommodate specific.situations during the construction process where it is determined to be unsafe or unreasonable to require access from the east side of the property. Any such request and approval shall seek to avoid or mmlmlze any disruption to the adjacent residential neighborhood. d, There will be no ingress or egress to the property from S.W. 4th Street, following construction of the proposed parking lot; and e. The applicant's Board of Directors/Trustees will adopt a Resolution expressing its EQP1mitm"llt opt to acquire additional property to the r; ;><5 vtf / west or n~rty which is the subject of this rezoning, for further expansion of the hospital, support facilities or parking area.. Failure of applicant to comply with the foregoing conditions, whether construed as conditions precedent or conditions subsequent, shall constitute grounds for reconsideration or rescission of the approval of petitioners application for rezoning. Section 3. The following described land, located in the City of Boynton Beach, Florida as set forth as follows: Lots 1 through 8, inclusive. Block I, Seacrest Hills, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 25, Page 74, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. Containing approximately:!: 1.43 acres ofland. , be and the same is hereby rezoned from R-l-AA (Single Family Residential) to PU (Public C:\Documents and Settings\rumpfm\Local Settings\Temporary Internet Files\OLK7\Rev 092502 Rezoning Bethesda 1.43 acres.doc Usage) A location map IS attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part of this Ordinance by reference. Section 4: That the aforesaid Revised Zoning Map of the City shall be amended accordingly. Section 5: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. Section 6: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the remainder of this Ordinance. Section 7. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon passage. FIRST READING this _ day of ,2002. SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this day of ,2002. CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA Mayor Vice Mayor Commissioner Commissioner Commissioner ATTEST: City Clerk (Corporate Seal) C:\Documents and Settings\rumpfm\Local Settings\Ternporary Internet Files\OLK7\Rev 092502 Rezoning Bethesda - 1.43 acres.doc 08/28/2002 16:56 5617426011 PAGE 01 ~ - ~ 1.q 1iJ{10\ ,1-- c..o,p-r u...,...,r:,,~-- ~~ ~J'{> " ~ _.w;., - - - Bethesda MCDlorial Hospital August 27, 2002 Mr. Kurt Bn:ssner City Manager The City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Bach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33425 Dear Kurt: I would like to request that the following three Bethesda items scheduled for an Ordinance First Reading next Tuesday, Sept. 3'" at the City Commission meeting be delayed until at least their Sept. 17't> meeting. These three items are: 1) Bethesda Physician Parking (LUAR 02.004) 2) Bethesda Rezoning (REZN 02-004) 3) Bethesda Physician Parking (NWSP 02-011) The Hospital is making this request for the attorneys for the City and Hospital have not been able to have any communication to date on this issue. A postponement will provide enough time to ensure that the wording of the conditions to be included in the Ordinance are complete and meet both parties' expectations. Thank you in advance for your consideration to this request. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to eontact me. Sincerely, . ~/1iIJ Robert B. Hill President & CEO RECEIVED AlJG 2 8 2002 CfJY MANAGER'S OFFICE 2815 South Seacrest Boulevard' Boynton Beach, Florida 33435' (561) 737.7733 . ,~ ,- , "- ~ '> '.i, ). L '_' i ,. L.,. \: _>,0 )' \ , '. Date: To: Fax: Project No.: Pages : Commen18 : From the desk of.. Jamie A. Gentile Kll...DA Y & ASSOCIATES, lC\'c. 1551 FORUM PLACE, SLTIE lOOA WEST P;\LV! BEACH, FL 33401 jamie@kiJdayinc,com www.kildayinc.com (561)689-5522 Fax: (561)689-2592 '.v, 25: " 08/19/02 Dick Hudson, Senior Planner Kurt Bressner, City Manager Quintus Green, Director of Development Robert Hill, Bethesda Memorial Hospital Timothy E. Monaghan, Esq. 742.6259 561-278-9462 742-6011 742-6089 737-4534 352.18 Bethesda 6 including cover sheet Attached is a memo regarding Bethesda Physician's Parking (LUAR 02-(04). If you ha\'e any questions please contact me at (561).689.5522 Jamie ~20m Jog.fax Kilday & Associates Landscape Architects / Plal)ners 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 689-5522' Fax (561) 689-2592 E-Mail: info@kildayinc.com MEMORANDUM Date: August 19,2002 To: Dick Hudson City Planner From: Kieran Kilday Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Physician Parking Expansion (LUAR 02-004) Our File No.: 352.18 Because the Boynton Beach Land Development Code requires that land use amendments and rezonings be subject to eight criteria listed in Article 2 Section 9 Administration and Enforcement Item C, I felt it important that we address each of those items in greater detail as an ajdendum to the initial justification statement which addresses these issues in response to the staff analysis contained in your memo of July 15, 2002. These criteria are: A. Whether the proposed land use amendment would be consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan policies. Policy 1.16.1 references institutional uses in two areas. First: within the definition of Low Density Residential the statement is made, "Public, educational, and institutional uses located within the zoning districts may be placed in the Public and Private Governmental / Institutional land use category...". This statement is a reflection that many public, governmental and institutional uses have been routinely located in or adjacent to residential areas. In such cases, the Public and Private Governmental / Institutional land use category will be placed upon these properties despite the fact that they may be surrounded by residential uses and in fact may actually be zoned residential as well. There is a clear recognition that these type of uses often coexist with surrounding residential areas. The second reference is merely the definition of Public and Private Governmental / Institutional land use which specifically lists hospitals and other health care services and agencies as a permitted use. There are no other references within the Comprehensive Plan to this land use so, therefore, this proposed amendment must be judged to be consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan polices. In addition, the Future Land Use Element Support Documents Page 44 states, "that additional acreage will be added to the category Public and Private Governmental / Institutional Land (PPGI), if additional government or institutional uses are established in the City, beyond those which can be anticipated at the present time. It is not possible, however, to estimate the acreage requirements for these uses, until such time as these uses actually become established." Mr. Dick Hudson August 19, 2002 Page 2 Undoubtedly, the increased demand on the hospital could not have been predicted in 1959 when the hospital was established. The Future Land Use Support Documents further substantiate that point. However, the staff report goes further to apply Commercial and Industrial land use criteria from the comprehensive plan to this use despite the fact that there is no technical basis for such an application. Specifically, the report references Policies 1.17.3 and 1.17.4. These policies require buffer walls and vegetative screening between industrial and residential uses, wherever practical. It should be noted that despite the fact that this policy does not apply to Public and Private Governmental I Institutional uses, the plan submitted by Bethesda Hospital provides both buffer walls and solid vegetative screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residential properties. So even in the event these policies are applied to the hospital site, the plans submitted for the site meet these policies. Lastly, the staff report discussion of this issue notes incompatibilities quoting from the original justification statement with regard to the mechanical equipment currently existing on the hospital property in the service court area. It should be noted that the comprehensive plan amendment does not propose to place any mechanical equipment on the expanded area. In meetings with the neighboring property owners the issues of incompatibilities on the existing hospital property concerned primarily sound from air conditioner coolant fans, the incinerator blower, dumpster pickup, and delivery of supplies. In those discussions, there was never an issue as it related to the existing doctor parking which takes place in that same area. The purpose of the compatibility statement contained in the original justification statement was to show how the expanded area of the application could effectively seal off existing incompatibilities which are not a subject of this application and create a better condition utilizing the property abutting the residential neighborhood to the west (including buffer walls and vegetation). B. Whether the proposed amendment / rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an Isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Clearly, the land use amendment does not create and isolated district. The proposed amendment is to designate the additional lots with the same land use designation as the rest of the adjacent hospital property. There is currently an interface between the hospital's land use and the residential land use along the entire west property line. Of the eight lots included in this application, five of the lots have been owned by the hospital for over 30 years. These lots were purchased by the hospital in the 1960's with a knowledge that additional growth of healthcare may require their future utilization. A sixth lot adjacent to the original five lots was purchased approximately one year ago, Prior to filing this application, a meeting was held inviting the property owners along SW 4th Street to explain the hospital's plans. Following that meeting, two adjacent property owners approached the hospital with an offer to sell their properties to the hospital. The hospital has entered H:Clientsl352.181Correspondence/HudsonOB1902 Mr. Dick Hudson August 19, 2002 Page 3 into a contract to include these properties in its addition. These later two lots directly abut the service loading area of the hospital. Inclusion of these lots with the original lots made sense in the hospital's effort to buffer its most intensive service activities "which already exist" from nearby residents. With the additional walls and landscape screening as recommended in the comprehensive plan, the public welfare of the immediate neighborhood will be protected. C. Will a change in conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable? As previously stated the hospital was established in 1959. Needless to say there has been an explosion of growth in the Boynton Beach area over these past 40 years. The hospital has expanded and grown in order to service the Boynton Beach community. The service area, which includes the doctor parking area, has been located in this area of the hospital since its inception. All of the doctor ancillary services are directly accessed from this service area in the basement of the building. Beyond the doctor entrance doors are the medical offices, medical library, medical records and places for appropriate signing in and out of the hospital. With the growth of the hospital, the number of doctors utilizing the hospital has increased significantly. There is a current identified need for providing additional doctor spaces. Location of these spaces has never been an issue of discussion in previous parking analysis as parking for doctors needs to be located to properly access the internal circulation and records of the hospital. The service area is an isolated area separated from the rest of the hospital parking. While there may be a need to provide additional parking accommodations for the public and other hospital employees, that accommodation will not be located in this area and the physician parking cannot be located properly or efficiency elsewhere on the site. D. Will the proposed use be compatible with utility systems, roadways and other public facilities? The staff report properly indicates, as does the Site Plan, that there will be not access between the hospital and SW 4th Street from this parking area. Therefore, there will be not impacts from this proposed parking area on the neighboring street system. Staff did not find any problems with this application meeting this standard. E. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties. As previously stated, the proposed use is merely an expansion of an existing use which has been located on this spot since 1959. The design of the proposed use and the limitation of the use to parking protects neighboring residential properties. In fact there are many areas throughout the city of Boynton Beach where parking is located adjacent to residential areas, With proper landscaping and buffering the parking has no negative affect on the adjacent residential property. As part of the presentation to the Planning and Development Board, a Property Sales Analysis was provided showing no negligible H:Clients/352.1 81Correspondence!Hudson081 902 Mr. Dick Hudson August 19, 2002 Page 4 difference in property values between properties abutting parking facilities and properties abutting other residential uses. It should be noted that the study did show a distinct valuation drop on those few lots directly abutting the service court of the hospital, a reflection of the intensive activities which take place in that area. The properties which will be included in this parking expansion provide a clear and defined buffer between the service area and the adjacent residential properties. With respect to the comment in the staff report, staff and the applicant agree that there are existing compatibility issues within the service court of the hospital. However, The applicant has never agreed that the expanded parking area would be an incompatibility with the adjacent residential area, In fact, it is the belief of the applicant that properly landscaped and buffered parking will provide an acoustic barrier between the current activities within the service area and the residential neighborhood beyond, a condition which does not currently exist. F. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning. While the property is physically able to be developed under the current zoning, there is a question as to its economic viability. As previously stated, analysis of property sales in the area have shown that these particular lots abutting the service court have been depressed as compared to the surrounding neighborhood, Any attempt to develop new homes on the vacant sites from a practical standpoint need to recognize the difficulties of marketing these properties with the intensity of activities taking place within the hospital service court directly adjacent to them. It was for this reason two property owners approached the hospital to include their properties in the expansion area. If the interest is to maintain and enhance the value of the surrounding community, appropriate utilization of these properties for landscape buffering and screening would better accommodate the stability of the neighborhood rather than attempting to build new homes on property that has already reflected depressed values in previous resales. G. Whether the proposed amendment / rezoning Is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole. As previously stated, the Site Plan specifically sets back the parking area 30 ft. from SW 4th Street. By setting back the parking and proposing to enclose it in a structure, any parking and or building area is recessed to the same set backs as the single family homes located on both sides of the street. The west 30 ft. of the lot has been restricted for use as a landscape buffer. This section of the neighborhood does not have existing sidewalks. The proposed plan incorporates a sidewalk / pedestrian path area along the entire frontage of tthis property tying into the sidewalk located immediately north of the site. The hospital has agreed to restrict the use of this property to the ongrade parking and to further restrict the use of the west 30 ft. to landscaping and pedestrian uses as part of this application. Therefore, the use of this site will be harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and of H:Clients/352.181Correspondence!Hudson081902 . Mr. Dick Hudson August 19, 2002 Page 5 appropriate scale. H. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. As previously indicated, the hospital has been located on this property since 1959. The hospital has grown in accordance with the needs of the community. The relationship ofthe physician parking to the physician activities which take place inside the hospital accessed immediately off the service court has been a continuing operation through all these years. The hospital purchased five of the eight lots over 30 years ago knowing that some expansion of this area may need to take place at some time. There is no other adequate area in the hospital to provide physician parking in proper relationship to the internal hospital services. Convenience of physician parking is of critical concern to the hospital in allowing a physician to arrive at the hospital, pick up records and service patients in a timely manner. This issue becomes extremely critical when there is an emergency situation. The intent of this application is to provide the assurance that a doctor arriving at the hospital can park easily and close to the records they need in order to serve patients promptly. Summary It is the belief of the applicant that all eight criteria listed in the Land Development Code have been met in this application. The design and limitation of the use on this property to parking and the design of the parking to provide appropriate barriers and buffer allows for the use to occur in the place its needed without adversely affecting the surrounding neighborhood. The hospital has met with the neighborhood three times in an effort to accommodate the needs of the hospital while at the same time providing safeguards to the residents in its design. The hospital in committed to continue meeting with the neighborhood to assure that the design of the facility has no negative effect upon it. Cc: Kurt Bressner, City Manager Quintus Green, Director of Development Robert Hill, Bethesda Memorial Hospital Tim Monaghan, Attorney H:Clientsl352.181Corre.pondence/HudsonOB1902 Edward T. Currier 449 S.W. 4th Ave. Boynton Beach, Fl. 33435 736-6345 FAX 734-3364 e-mail LC~381.aol.com TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ,- .) C:ZJ'~> C'D~b - .--\ ;,;:-~S\\ C .., ':; ',: vY'0 y(\ o ,~ ij ~/;;'2~002 f,\lj t~J IU' '1 9 2002 ' J u LL V $ ?(,O( tfL em MANAGER'S OFFICE As a member of the P&D Board, I was present at our last meeting, which took place in the Chambers, on 7/23/02. One of the issues involved the request to change the Zoning, at the Western boundary ofthe property owned by Bethesda Hospital. In the opinion of "staff", the request should have been denied. This would be for the hospital to build a parking garage housing seventy-three parking spaces, for the Doctor's vehicles. This would be adjacent to the rear entrance of the hospital, making it convenient for the doctors, and not necessitate much walking. The hospital would erect a wall, that would minimize the noise and odors, emanating from the hospital freight and service area. A barrier wall should have been in place years ago. It barely passed on a four to three vote. There were more than a hundred of the residents of Chapel Hill in attendance, and when the vote came in, they became extremely vociferous. Their properties are being intruded upon. They don't want to be looking at the back end of a concrete parking garage. The City set up these zoning laws for a good purpose, and they should not be infringed upon. At least two members of the P&D Board were at the hospital the day of the meeting, being escorted about, and surely getting a selling job. Bethesda Hospital is BIG BUSINESS. Competing with JFK and DELRA Y COMMUNITY, and coming in third. They should build their multi-level parking garage on the property they own on 23 rd., and let the doctors walk. It is good exercise. They should not be permitted to intrude into a residential neighborhood. I wonder how the vote would have gone had they wanted to intrude upon "Hunter's Run."? I beseech you to vote your conscience at the next Commission Meeting, and reverse the voting of the P&D BOHrn Thi< i< <till thp [TSA Hnn H npr<on'< rights and property, should be respected Sincerely, Ed Currier t~V{t I ;l !."< r-- l . t . fl( ,/ , I "~I IJ t f' ,'; ,/ ..L-\.~ 1'- 1fti'. Co (J1 +-0 ~O~ 7 -}/-co,;z 'r , Kilday & Associates Landscape Architects / Planners 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 689-5522 . Fax 1561) 689-2592 E-Mail: info@kildayinc.com July 25, 2002 Ms, Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Request for Postponement Petition Numbers LUAR 02-004, REZN 02-004 and NWSP 02-011 Our File No.: 352.18 Dear Ms. Galav, Attached you will find a letter from Mr. Robert Hill of Bethesda Hospital requesting postponement of the above reference petitions to the August 20, 2002 City Commission meeting. Additionally, attached you will find a letter that our office is sending to all of the residents of Chapel Hill inviting them to a meeting at the Hospital to discuss the hospital's proposal. We would very much like to have your attendance at the meeting as well. It is up to you whether you want to get actively involved in the meeting or merely to attend as an observer. It is our intent to provide as much information as possible to the entire neighborhood and see if there is some common ground to be found. Attachments H:\Clients\0352 Hili\0352.18\Correspondence\Galav_July 25, 2002.DOC ~""::"" "'" .-:- - = 73471B9 ROBERT HILL PAGE Bl/01 ~~ KJ~ FA)", 0cS'1 - d S ~ '2.. Bethesda Memorial Hospital July 25, 2002 Mr. Kurt Bressner City Manager The City of Boynton Beach 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Dear Kurt. As discussed with you by Robert B. Taylor, CFO, we would like to request that the following three Bethesda Memorial Hospital items scheduled for the August 6th City Commission Meeting be delayed until their August 20th meeting. The 3 items are: 1) BMH Physician Parking (LUAR 02-004) 2) BMH Re-zoning (REZN 02-004) 3) BMH Physician Parking (NWSP 02-011) The Hospital has previously held two (2) meetings including the most affected property owners on Southeast 4th Street. As the attendance at the Planning and Development Board indicated. interest in this project extends well beyond the immediate properties on Southeast 4th Street. For those residents In attendance. this delay is requested to allow us the opportunity to meet with all the residents of Chapel Hill in an effort to try to address any issues that they may have in opposition to the physician parking. Thanking you in advance for your consideration in this request. I will be out of the office for several days, so if you have any questions please contact Roger L Kirk, Executive Vice President. at 737-7733, Extension 4400. Sincerely. ~~1/~ Robert B. Hill~ President/CEO RlBOYNTONCITYBRESNER nl5 Sollth Seacr.,t Boulevard. Boynton Beach. Florida 33435. (56l) 737-7733 . July 25, 2002 Resident Name Address City, State Zip Re: Bethesda Hospital Proposed Physician Parking Expansion OUf File No.: 352.18 Dear On behalf of the administration and staff at Bethesda Hospital, I am inviting you to attend a presentation and workshop regarding the proposed Physician Parking Expansion at Bethesda Hospital. As I indicated at the recent Planning and Development Board meeting, the Hospital had previously held two (2) meetings, including the most affected property owners on Southeast 4th Street. As the attendance at the Planning and Development Board indicated, interest in this project extends well beyond the immediate properties on Southeast 4th Street. For those residents in attendance at the Planning and Development Board meeting, it was their first opportunity to hear a full presentation in a less than ideal setting. For that reason, I have been authorized to postpone the August 6, 2002 public hearing at the City Commission to August 20, 2002 in order to hold another presentation at the Hospital. At that meeting, we will present the plans which were shown to the Planning and Development Board the other night. Additionally, we will take input from the residents as to what, if any, changes could be made to make this project more acceptable to the neighborhood. At the Planning and Development Board, a suggestion was made that the land area along Southeast 4th Street be developed as a pedestrian linear park with amenities such as lighting, seating and fountains. We will be prepared at the upcoming meeting to discuss some of these design alternatives. The meeting will be held at the Clayton Conference Center beginning at 6:30 PM on August 8, 2002. The best way to get to the auditorium is by entering the hospital at the Ambulatory Surgery Center located along Seacrest Boulevard. Thank you. Sincerely, Kieran J. Kilday H:Clients/352.18_CorrespondencellettecResident LatteeJuly 25, 2002 The City of BOYTl4-on Beach OFFICE OF .dE CiTY MANAGER 100 E. Boynton Beach Bouleuard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 City Manager's 0fJU:e: (561) 742-6010 FAX: (561) 742-6011 e.mail: city.m.anager@::i.boynton.beach.fl.us www.ci.boynton-beachjLus ~'YO'. ." -- ...-- . ':~:.' ':".:: r \=-.- =-J .t"-ON 0 ,-----..- .--------- -~"I --.- ---: ! ~ .1 'i, 25 To: City Commission From: Kurt Bressner, City Manager Date: .~ ..". ~ Subject~ July 24, 2002 "'~Me~rio;pit:iR:Z~~'k~R~:;;:-: - =-..- .~ I'm currently in Naples, FL and received a cell phone call from BobTaylor, VP of Bethesda. The Planning and Development Board approved the hospital's zoning request last night on a 4-3 vote. The hospital has requested that all matters pertaining to the proposed parking garage be tablJlnntil August 20th. Mr'-Taylor advised the hospital is requesting the additional time to meet with the neighbors and address their concerns and the staff objections to the petition, if possible. I told Mr. Taylor that this was a good idea as it provides the residents and the hospital more time to resolve their differences. We will be receiving an official letter from the hospital on Thursday. I recommend that the Commission honor the request of the hospital. Thank you. Cc: James Cherof Wilfred Hawkins Dale Sugerman Janet Prainito \... Quintus Greene ..._"1..;.~;.\2 '::~S!J.)~ ,. .)V & ,:: ,.r:' ~(.;" ~ 42 Date: To: Fax: Project No.: Pages: Comments: From the desk of... Jamie A. Gentile KILDAY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 1551 FORUM PLACE, SOlTE rOOA WEST PALM BEACH, FL33401 jamie@kildayinc,com www.kildayinc.com (561)689-5522 Fa..: (561)689-2592 07/26/02 G.::~ia Galev & Dick Hudson 742.6259 352.18 Bethesda Residential Expansion 7 including (over sheet Attached is a request for postponement to the Aug, 20, 2002 City Conuuission Hearine for the Bethesda Physician's Parking. If you have any questions please contact me at (561)-689.5522 Jamie .' ~1 ' !L',~ , 0/; '1>'.;... i; -Jfl ~ ~ ,'") (( : S' <; ,41h '~ J.g..(p. i C. 2'. ." 1 ~ : 36Mi1 ~: JA~ & A:30C;h~:) U-~D. 7tS ..--. Kilday lk Associates Landscape Architects I Planners 1551 Forum Ploel. Suit. l00A West Palm a.ach, Florid. 33401 (561) 889-&522 . Fox (561 J 68s-2592 E.Mail: info@kildayinc.com July 25.2002 Ms, Lusia Galav City of Boynton Beach . 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Re: Request for Postponement Petition Numbers lUAR 02-004, REZN 02-004 and NWSP 02-011 Our File No,; 352.18 Dear Ms. Galav, Attached you will find a letter from Mr. Robert Hill of Bethesda Hospital requesting postponement of the above reference petitions to the August 20, 2002 City Commission meeting. Additionally. attached you will find a letter that our office is sending to all of the residents of Chapel Hill inviting them to a meeting at the Hospital to discuss the hospital's proposal. We would very much like to have your attendance at the meeting as well. It is up to you whether you want to get actively involved in the meeting or merely to attend as an observer. It is our intent to provide as much information as possible to the entire neighborhood and see if there is some. common ground to be found. Attachments H:\CllenlSlO352 HW\Il3~2. '8\C0f:I$~ond.nco\G91av_July 25. 2002.00C .UL, :6. 2002 ~: :56AV '. "AY &':: :AT~~,'- .--.-.-'----'-.':Iiu, 7L3~-'_c 3 Kilday & Associ.tes landscape Arcllitll<:t$ / Piar'lners 1551 Forum 1'18co. Suite 10QA West Pllm Belch, Florid. 33401 (5611669-5522' Fax (561) 6$9-2592 www.kildsyinc.com July 25, 2002 Mr. Dick Hudson City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425.0310 Re: Request for Postponement Petition Numbers LUAR 02-004, REZN 02-004 and NWSP 02.()11 Our File No.: 352.18 Dear Mr. Hudson. Attached you will find a letter from Mr. Robert Hill of Bethesda Hospital requesting postponement of the above reference petitions to the August 20. 2002 City Commission meeting. Additionally, attached you will find a letter that our office is sending to all of t/'1e residents of Chapel HHI inviting them to a meeting at the Hospital to discuss the hospital's proposal. We would very much like to have your attendance at the meeting as well. It is up to you whether you want to get actively involved in the meeting or merely to attend as an observer, It is our intent to provide as much information as possible to the entire neighborhood and see if there is some common ground to be found. c;~~ ..t~ . amie A. Gentile Attachments H:Clienr.l3:iZ.16_<;orrespQndeIlce/Hud5on-oluly 2'. 2002 , "~""" '1 :-"iA~~ 1'!'r'I\\' ~ \-,~","'\-"- "~_, ,~, L~~L I I ';, III 734~" '1M' & h~~v~.~I~) --- '-~~1 ll~-~ --:. 4-"-'-- ROBERT HILl.. ,) '"" 'I-'AGE 61/01 July 25, 2002 to,~ Kd~ FA-X. "8'1 - ~ S l1 'Z.. 8echeM:i Melllorial HOIIpicaI Mr. Kurt Bressner City Manager The City of Boynton Beael1 100 e, Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton aeach, Florida 33425 Dear Kurt, As discussed with you by Robert B. Taylor, CFO, we would like to request that the following three Bethesda Memorial Hospital Items scheduled for the August 6'" City Commls.ion Meeting be de/ayed until their August 20t/l meeting. The 3 items are: 1) BMH Physician Parkil1g (LUAR 02-004) 2) BMH Re..zcning (REZN 02-004) 3) BMH Physician Parking (NWSP 02-011) Tile Hospital has previously held two (2) meetings including the most affected property owners on SClutheast 411I Street. As the attendance at the Planning and Development Board indicated, interast in this project extends Well beyond the immediate properties on SO\ltheast 4t1l Strwet. For those residents In attendal1ce, this delay is requ8$ted to alloW us the opl)Ortunlty to meet with III the residents of Chapel Hill in an effort 10 try to address any issues that they may have in Opposition to the physIcian parking. Thanking you In advance for your consideration in this request. I will be out of the office for several days, so if you have any questions please contact Roger L: Kirk, Executive Vice President, at 737-7733. extension 4400. . Sincerely, ~~~ Robert B. Hjll~ Pre6ident/Ceo RtBOYNTONC'TvBReSNER 21115 South SoIa.""'l Boule""rd' Boyncon Beach. FloridIl334J" (:561) 737.77)3 '.v,-. 26 2:11: 2 ::.; 7 A'I JAY & ASSCC[A"iES ~~H_.._-..n 748- P 5 H_____. July 25, 2002 Resident Name Address City, State Zip Re: Bethesda Hospital Propoaed Physician Parking Expansion Our File No,; 352.18 Dear On behalf of the administration and staff at Bethesda Hospital, I am inviting you to attend a presentation and workshop regarding the proposed Physician Parking Expansion at Bethesda Hospital, As I indicated at the recent Planning and Development Board meeting, the Hospital had previously held two (2) meetings, including the most affected property owners on Southeast 411\ Street. As the attendance at the Planning and Development Board indicated, interest in this project extends well beyond the immediate properties on Southeast 4th Street. For those residents in attendance at the Planning and Development Board meeting, it was their first opportunity to hear a full presentation in a less than ideal setting. For that reason, I have been authorized to postpone the August 6, 2002 public hearing at the City Commission to August 20, 2002 in order to hold another presentation at the Hospital. At that meeting, we will present the plans which were shown to the Planning and Development Board the other night. Additionally, we will take input from the residents as Ie what, if any, changes could be made to make this project more acceptable Ie the neighborhood_ At the Planning and Development Board, a suggestion was made that the land area along Southeast 4111 Street be developed as a pedestrian linear park with amenities such as lighting, seating and fountains, We will be prepared at the upcoming meeting to discuss some of these design altematlves. The meeting will be held at the Clayton Col'Iference Center beginning at 6:30 PM on AugU8t 8, 2002. The best way to get to the auditorium is by entering the hospital at the Ambulatory Surgery Center located along Seacrest Boulevard. Thank you, Sincerely, Kieran J. Kilday H:C1I1nW2,'8):Qrreepondenctllelle<_AHidonI ~ellOr..,JUIy25. 2002 July 25, 2002 IfDJ ~((;~UW~~ lfU JUL 2 5 2llO2 1Y CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE V iJt> 7J.2..'dCf1- Bethesda Memorial Hospital Mr. Kurt Bressner City Manager The City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 c"w~ R, L''.-tc..~\:. ~^) . -J IY;P('(\ v' 'i) Gel, Pri:l-c~~ ,,\ ,,[Jc\ \ C,,\--y to ,,,,,,",,,,-,> 4- \,[}- ~L'~' Dear Kurt, As discussed with you by Robert B. Taylor, CFO, we would like to request that the following three Bethesda Memorial Hospital items scheduled for the August 6th City Commission Meeting be delayed until their August 20th meeting. The 3 items are: 1) BMH Physician Parking (LUAR 02-004) 2) BMH Re-zoning (REZN 02-004) 3) BMH Physician Parking (NWSP 02-011) The Hospital has previously held two (2) meetings including the most affected property owners on Southeast 4th Street. As the attendance at the Planning and Development Board indicated, interest in this project extends well beyond the immediate properties on Southeast 4th Street. For those residents in attendance, this delay is requested to allow us the opportunity to meet with all the residents of Chapel Hill in an effort to try to address any issues that they may have in opposition to the physician parking. Thanking you in advance for your consideration in this request. I will be out of the office for several days, so if you have any questions please contact Roger L. Kirk, Executive Vice President, at 737-7733, Extension 4400. Sincerely, ~ ~ 1,i.d- Robert B. Hill<L& President/CEO RlBOYNTONCITYBRESNER /1'1 C 6 ,)~ L 2815 South SeaCfest Boulevard" Boynton Beach. Florida 33435 "1561) 737-7733 _\~YO'" =,,- .~- , .- ..-" . - ,..,.---- "'0-..."::. =~ ~'" =.c .,d' tv" rON ~ DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division . Building - Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment October 18, 2002 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks, Community Program Administrator Department of Community Affairs Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Fl 32399-2100 Re: City of Boynton Beach Bethesda Parking (LUAR 02-004) Dear Sir: Please find enclosed required documents on the above-referenced, adopted small-scale amendment processed in accordance with Subsection 163.3187(1)(c)2., Florida Statues. The total number of acres for this amendment is 1.43. With the adoption of this amendment the cumulative total of acreage to date for the 2002 calendar year is 6.36 acres. Enclosed is Ordinance 02-052, reflecting approval by the City Commission on October 15,2002, the publication notice, an updated land use map with the boundaries and location of the subject property in relationship to the surrounding street and thoroughfare network, and the completed RPM-BSP-Small Scale-I form. If you have any questions please contact me at 561- 742-6264. Respectfully submitted, 7t - /I Vutv F ~ Dick Hudson, AICP, Senior Planner Cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council South Florida Water Management District Florida Department of Transportation Florida Department of Environmental Protection MWR J\SHRDATA\PIJnnLng\HUDSON\A~E:-.IDMENT SMALL SCAt E\DCA :-.IQ\lC~ dOl City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton.beach.fl.us II ! ORDINANCE NO. 02- ~.;L AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-38, BY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE COMPREHENSNE PLAN OF THE CITY, ADOPTING THE PROPER LAND USE OF PROPERTY MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED HEREINAFTER (BETHESDA HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN PARKJNG - 1.43 ACRES OF LAND); SAID LAND USE DESIGNATION IS BEING CHANGED FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO PUBLIC & PRIVATE GOVERNMENTAL/INSTITUTIONAL (PPGD; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTS, SEVERABILITY, AND AN EFFECTNE DATE. WHEREAS, the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida has dopted a Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan and as part of said Plan a Future Land se Element by Ordinance No. 89-38 in accordance with the Local Government omprehensive Planning Act; and WHEREAS, the procedure for amendment of a Future Land Use Element of a omprehensive Plan as set forth in Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, has been followed; and WHEREAS, Bethesda Memorial Hospital, owners of the property hereinafter escribed, by and through their agents and representatives have filed an application for a and Use Amendment to reclassifY the property hereinafter described from low density esidential to public and private governmental/institutional; and WHEREAS, the City Commission conducted a public hearing on August 20, 002, and heard testimony and received evidence which the Commission finds supports a and Use Amendment for the property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, during the public hearing the applicant for the Land Use mendment made material representations which were considered and were relied on by he City Commission in reaching its conclusions regarding the appropriateness of the roposed Land Use Amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Commission finds that the proposed Land Use Amendmenth '\CA\orclinanceS\Planning\Land Use - a..t.hellda 1 43 i1ctl!lI.doc II is consistent with the goals and objectives set forth in the City's Comprehensive Plan; 'and WHEREAS, after public hearing and deliberation, the City Commission deems it I 'in the best interest of the inhabitants of said City to amend the aforesaid Element of the I I . Comprehensive Plan as adopted by the City herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COMMISSION OF HE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA, THAT: Section 1: The foregoing Whereas clauses are true and correct and incorporated erein by this reference. Section 2. Ordinance No. 89-38 of the City is hereby amended to reflect the ollowing: hat the Future Land Use of the following described land shall be designated as Public d Private Government/Institutional (PPGI). Said land is more particularly described as ollows: Lots I through 8, inclusive, Block I, Seacrest Hills, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 25, page 74, Public Records of Palm Beach County, Florida. Section 3: That any maps adopted in accordance with the Future Land Use Element hall be amended accordingly. Section 4: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby epealed. Section 5: Should any section or provision of this Ordinance or any portion thereof e declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such decision shall not affect he remainder of this Ordinance. Section 6: This Ordinance shall become effective 31 days after adoption, unless hallenged. If challenged, it becomes effective upon the issuance of a final order finding it in ompliance. sf . f FIRST READING this L day of {Jdo!J~r ,2002. ,\O\Ot'dinances\<'lannin9\Land Use - Bethesda 1.43 anee.doc I' SECOND, FINAL READING and PASSAGE this ~ day of OC.TOE!.E~ 2002. 0111 BE =-------- , ~~' ' Vice Mayor ~~ ~~ ~net" Commissioner ~ Ci lerk orpo!\\l.re\S\!!iI~111111. ~,,\\~. r;oE.ACIt I'~ " 0 \ .....~.... ~ $ '" .;..~co ..... ~ ~ <- /~ .... ~ =c:>-:o 0: '" '" =c 0 :~ n. ! 0 :: = '" :0 ,:,.v : - '" '" \0 ~J I a:: '" ~\.l.oo"'~ "....o~ --/. .... .,..... I'."v " .../ ..., _., .... ~ ~~" ~/O \,.::::- 11/; \\'\. /"/1111I11111\\\\ !S,\CA.\O~dinance8\Plolnnin9\Lolnd Use - Bethesd", 1.43 dcre8.doc I ! II SMALL SCALE DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL FORM 1. Name of Local Government City of Boynton Beach Person Completing this form Dick Hudson Phone number 561-742-6264 Name of Newspaper that notice of small scale was published The Palm Beach Post Date Publication Noticed July 9, 2002 & July 23, 2002 (Please attach copy of notice) 2. Number of acres of small scale development amendments contained in package: a. Within Urban Infill, Urban Redevelopment or Downtown Revitalization as defined by Section 163.3164, FS 0 b. Within Transportation Concurrency Exception Area pursuant to Section 163.3180(5), FS 0 c. Within Regional Activity Centers or Urban Central Business Districts pursuant to Section 380.06(2)(e), FS 0 d. Outside categories a, b, c 1.43 3. Cumulative total number of acres of small scale development amendments for the calendar year: a. Categories listed in Item 2 a, b, c. above 4.31 b. Categories listed in Item 2 d and above 2.05 4. Total number of acres of small scale development amendments in this package that are located within a coastal high hazard area as identified in the comprehensive plan 0 Pursuant to Rule 9J-11.015(2), Florida Administrative code, this form must be mailed with all small scale development amendments as defined by Section 163.3187(1 )(c), Florida Statutes to: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS BUREAU OF STATE PLANNING PLAN PROCESSING SECTION 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2100 (904) 488-4925 \\CH\MAIN\SHRDATAIPLANNINGIHUDSONICOMP PLAN PROCESSISMALL SCALE FORM.DOC ..:...~"~~~~.:-::. -:."'; ~ - -~~~~:::::-.::::::..:~. .' t ,. ~~'\:~\~l'i,m"E.i':Ii:i"::ru: " ......_~- "-. '"-'-.. ~ -~1:--___...__... _'.~ o::-::;-'~" ~-.,. -~- i _____ _...." ::.<' -.--.,.......... -., ~o~'^'L~' ~ ,___ ,/ , . '~"------~ . ~ it . . '7A U'. -.c -'L~,:"~~~t-..~...< ..' Ii \.l~~,::.; \ i ~ ': ~ :.. '._ ""..., --.,..;..o..,~:-y. ~ 'or,.,. '- . " _ ---v.!1i% ~.' '. . .. ~.. ..v.... >- _~" .= ~' .-:- 'r"-'-,..-'Lt- ---.!. .. J:JI.~' ,~ "".' . "- _ . .___. ,. . . '.. . ~ .....=.- . ." '. ..., ..., : - '-, r.. -'!.t , -; "'" /'... f.; r; '-... . . :"-~'v/ .., ""'~.~.e., : 1('" CO ". ." t ._ . '. '-,,~_.. ,.------;-, ,.~=-. .-j, :~1t -:;:.::. , 1..lL...!.''':4= :rtlJb-~ '~'.,. I'.' <. ~~ --..__ ~-- X." I I -: "1~--+.)"'l,.~ 'l,-,~ __. __t.~... '1- .r1-. 1i--:-- ~~______.-'_" +, ( ... W _--I f ,<- -t.... fj" ~ ~ _ ... ',.........._ ~ . ~' , , .-' ,.... 'L.-J.-_, ,. ~ _...,.... '. _~_" 'I . ."\--;. i,.~... '. ....~,"'~."". " _ ". .. . ,. I,~..".. ........., '''''''''''H4"i\,-", ....c-<..... ,. . . . .... ~'.' '. ~ ~. . ~" . ~ - .. ....'v,-.'-.'.8. -tl~.t.."~'4'1' ". ~ffi"\ .'0 ' -..~ .,.~ i ~~r . ., --":-'r.~' '-';-~ '--"- ,'. ,I! w'J.. _Ill -- , " ", " '. ,~ . ~-. t" fj"''''; h,.", 'IJl,,- ,. ___.;.__..". .. . - "--~3 .:.. ",;' 1 '}-'i., I . ~.. T' IT. l ~J.J.t'. /. < ~, . ."; ~.":" . ", ;; ~.H "'i';;i('"j .,----. 1.-.'fC1.~.''',~ n,.."'"" ~, 'X~ 12........,.., ., . ",,' , , ~ ---,~,,.n~,.,~;,;;;~,;.~~:-,., ,~ '. \ : ._._ '..,: --"~""f}'~~~. .'.. "j','.. '~"':"-:"<'"'.;:;;,~~z,~.",., "~<:;. .," ',-,-; ~,f;' ~'I'..j,., '. '~\::' L r->~ -'~':-::'r!V:!;1',."" . '....".'I.~ '._'. '.'.-''k~'''ii",",.~ ' ~ ')' . ,~,-) <,'. t' "', .,..~" ....r--. '. "_', i ~""" '. ~ ....'" ~.--::- '-...<.,:, ,".'_ .... '... "'-,~, ,..,"'.....-,--.".. . .,,', - ;o....~"-;" ..".!.' .~.~I~~ . ~'). ')-.'P:'. . :cJ-, .' "'- ' " ..; .':::J . ~ A: :1 J ..."......,,:~">-) ',,",, ' , ~ .,<1.... . ')~<-\, ,--, --I', ':C~ ~... ,~ _ #'~ '\ ~ "'~ )'10"'-"-{.,l: -'" ~ .:"" ''"''''''',. /- ' ." ,. _ ,,;-j,,':'):;, ~hj , .4,,~'>;':~ .~"\' .- :' '_ _ "\'''\~,:'.-,\;-..., ,. " .~~.,,;'.:, ',"" '/l" '.,...., .' _"}..l , . ~'''" ~ ~ ."1"<''>'''' .. I':,.",. ...... _.. ~, '~l':. ';'''';' " . ''')''!--'''''''.7r-r>.. .'n:p, . ""\~l' -,,"'"')'1. :.....*\~...,~...... '"\';"'~') 'f; .e(~'""{.'l;:;""-4-:':}' . ,......., "\""~ .. :; ~ .., \'-:O("~{?:t1 . :~.r~1~:n1-lj.~ ;';"';'<:l.:r-),~,,' "\-,:'rT"."')1 ", ...,~....,>>:"""-,... .,.. -"".^'';;/ "'1 c-"j,.~.xr.",., '~~"l',:,..I~"1"'~~ ,<~~j':lr?~~ Pdic1:!~~:''-{, :---..:.: ---= - iii;'-::.... Ch,"i :i --I /"~'r II "-1 ,I, ~ ~ttL! B {J l~ i ~ 1/ ~. '1. \ '1 it '- L>:"<><o:.Jl .! CT.-I~ ':':""":'''':. ',-.' '.c .....: .~-.m.::--ffii::'. " ~::,......,. .'!.;:r:.. ". ,." ,,: . ':nr., . 0 ....1.' J: ~ mr:'i. .!fj~,y . ..;,...... ; '''~..--- l. .. ~ ... ~ I \-L_U ; .'--r :~ 'J '_.. L ('.1'1;!,~1.'1 '_ 1<." T~+J, ' I r'_.. L, , i1 - -~",:~;i.~... "Jj.J,..~,t;.....__ : i' \"~ 'I -1 r'''''t'iJ.,;.~ ..,' '" l.'ll(l 400t! IJ'IIELLING UNITS dlLT CONGREGATE ;, IE DENSITY AI'I'ROVED MAP KEY RESIDENTIAL D LOW DENSITY (LOR) MAX 4.84 D,U)ACRE =r:.-:-:. 821 MODERATE DENSITY (MOOR) MAX 7.2'6 D.U.lACRE __J; _ , F-'.: MEDIUM DENSITY (MeDR) MAX 9.68 D,U.lACRE , , . - '.. ~ HIGH DENSITY (HDR) M'AX 10,8 D.U,/ACRE ., ) ,~- " f .~ '......1'"..." '.'" . .',~.~, If - - .' I? . , >~~.l 1"( COMMERCIAL ~. [.'0] OFFICE (OC) ~ LOCAL RETAIL (LRC) ."0." ~~ GENERAL (GC) \::. [) - c_~ INDUSTRIAL (I) OTHER CJ AGRICULTURE (A) 1 C.] RECREATIONAL (R) CJ PUBLI.C & PRIVATE (PPGI) GO VE RNME N TAL II N ST IT UTI 0 NA L ~.4 MIXED USE (MX) ~:::; 011 FE RENT LAtJD USE CATEGORY THAN THAT SHOWN ON MAP APPLIES (AS INDICATED BY ABl3REVIATIONl. IF USE ANLJ DEVELOPMENT COMPLIES WITH USE l' RESTRICTIONS AND RECOMBINATION OF PARCELS SPECIFIED IN TEXT OF FUTURE LAND USE AND COASTAL MANAG[MENT ELEMENTS . r~ CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT-nUSE AIID . DC:VELOPMENT OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO RECOMMENDATIONS CONTAINED III CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMEN r ELEMENTS. _ SI'ECIAL HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL. Llfvlll [fj TO COASTAL AREA AS SET FOfHH IN COASTAL ~',^!'IAG~ ~.H-tJ! l ~ l:t.1f'~JT '.1 II. ',( :)f) (I r1 lJ I-\! rtF HE PALM BEACH POST Published Daily and Sunday est Palm Beach, Palm Beach County, Florida PROOF OF PUBLICATION ,ACH lOrity personally appea,ed Kevin D. Austin, who on oath says that sing Manager of The Palm Beach Post, a daily and Sunday st Palm Beach in Palm Beach County, Florida; that the attached copy tice in the matter of Public Hearinl!, Land Use Amendment, n said newspape, in the issues of Julv 9, 23, 2002. Affiant further s a newspaper published at West Palm Beach, in said Palm Beach e said newspaper has heretofo,e been continuously published in said 1, daily and Sunday and has been entered as second class mail matte, llm Beach, in said Palin Beach COWlty. Florida, for a period of one . publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant :1either paid nor promised any person., fIrm or corporation any 1 0' refund for the purpose of sec g this vertisement for paper. -----= fore this 9~ day of August, .D. 272 , /\ ) 1 ': 1 /; I / I , 1)1 roduced Identification Iced ,j \-f McUi\TON .1!SSICN *CC97%69 I.ES Nl)Y \5. 200J ry Servrce &. 8cna1r'l9. Inc or NO. 457424 NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING NOTICE OF LAND USE AMENDMENT NOTICE OF REZONINGS NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN thet the Plenning end 0., oIocment Beer<! <:lTHE CfIY Of BOYNTON BEACH. flORIDA. will conduct e PUBlIC HEARING, en Tuesdcy, July 23, 2002 et 7:00 p.m. in th.CfIY HAIl COMMISSION CHAMBER>, 1<X1..EfI'IBcy:ntcn . Beech Boul_cd Ie con,ider thi, requ..' ,ubmilfod bv Chri, Korr of IGIdcy end As..,. ciele" Inc. en b;helf of Bethesde Memoriel ~",ilal. 'rho City Commiuien of THE CfIY OF BOYNTON BEACH. FLORIDA. will 01", hold public heanngs Ie con,ider thi, r:eques' on Tu~, A'!9'J,'6, 2002 end See_be.. 3.2002 ot 6:30 p.m.. or e, soon th....,1ter 0' the agende pennits e' the CflYHAU. COMMISSION CHAMBERS. 100 Eo,' Bcynlcn Beech BouleYCcd. Th. request i, described e, follows: lOCAl1ON: PROPt:RTY A Six properties kxoled on the ea,t ,ide of SW 4" Street 12700 . Block)leleling 1.43 acres PeNs 08-43-45-33-01-001-0010. . 0030, 0050. 0060, 0070 and 0080 Amend the Como<ehen,,,,, Plan Future land Use Mop: From - low Den,ity Residen6el(LDR) To - Public & Privale Gavemment/ln,61utiono1 ROZOlle( From- RlAA (Singl. Family R..iden6el-5.40 du/acl To - PU (Public Use JIllOIfOiSa!D lISE: Auxiliol)' perking area :..1lt!SaI'llllR LOTS 1 THROUGH 8.INClUSlVEtBlOCK I, SEACREST , . ',. HIllS, ACCORDING 10 THE PlA THEREO. AS RECORDED . IN I'IAT BOOK 25. PAGE 74, PUBlIC RECORDS Of PAlM BI!AOi COUNTY. FLORIDA. PROPt:RTY B South ,ide 01 South-t 23- A_ue (Golf Roedl bel-. South Seecrest Bou"""cd and Inten_ 95 _hng 10.37 acres PCN 0&-43-45-33-1 Q-QO(}OOl 0 'Re=.: . From - Planned Uni' OovoIopmen' To - PU (Public Use) : .~ USI: No chang.. ~~IlEScRIPnoN: PlAT Of B.M.H.' PROPt:IUY. ACCORDING TO THE PlAT 'SJi~~;;'. ..;.,.. THEREOF AS RECORIlW IN PlAT BOOK 49. PAGES 43 ,)1-~ ,'. . AND 44 OF TH~ PUBUC RECORDS Of PAlM BEACH "'., COI:JNTY. flORIDA ..... LocalIon Map IlfQUfST: R!QUUT, lOCATION: REQUE51'..., 'i';';~Vi:~ ":',,",~';';.:. ..~:'" ,;:~ =~= 'Cl g -- =Pl~."'~"".. ....'. . -- C1...... ,,___ .. .. . . - --~ Tlii~'con bo~ the houniilWrl..... and >:JU p.m. otth. <;1. of' 8eoch Planning end Zoni"9 DiviJioft; rOO Ealtllcyntcn 8eoch Bouleva . AlI;h...~QI'O notiRocIlecppecrolsai,~ in -01 the P1aorby.atlcmey and be . My F*"!'" who decides Ie _ .." d.asian .a.n","9 and 0.. .Ie...,.,t Beeid or City CQI11mis,i_wilIi '-Pc 10 ..." motler conSIdered J' th... meelillQl wilf need ~ recoid at the Pi:~~"~ I. h JlUfPO'Oecord"'?YncI~d leth enlUre.lhat a ~ record of the ~ *-~ whidi r I U e$ e testimony and ..idence upon which a . ""'. . =" 1omiaIl2PP.'!lfriOle ouxinary aido aiod...;c.. wh<<e neces",ry lethe afford ~ ,- wittr Q cftSObil"Y an ~ ~. PJiicipate in and enjoy . cA a ~ J?I1'9ram, or cctivity CcncIucticl bY "'" City. Please conlccl Petri~la 1$.611 742-62i!8, ot r.asl twenty-Tour (24) hours prior Ie the program or ac11v,ty In"'" lor iho City Ie reascnobly accommodate your request. CfIY Of BOYNTON BEACH PlANNING AND ZONING DIV1SION (561) 742-6260 =-- "i-==t'- ..-- ->---- PUBU5H: The Post July 9,2002 and July 23,2002 A~G, 19. 2(i02 12:5~PM ':, cAY & A'~or"TE0 '1".... '.. v,i"., " NO. 153 114 Kilday & Associates Landscape ArehitectslPlanners 1551 FOI1lII1 Place Slit8 10l1A West Pam Beach. Florida 33401 (561)689-5622 Fax (581)889-2592 From: Date: ~ - I q - 0.;2., Fax transrni ttal 'ntr Q v n\ -+ v ~ G y'i..'\.... Toe ~v,.. + ~H~~~-W Toe D l~~ \...\ l.I d:)o t'\ TOI F__ '&C1>> '\ v. J. - L,.p~q Fax #1 '1 Ll a - bO I \ Fax#; \~'l.- t..~",c; , Fax#; Tot \' l WI ('\'"'\0'(\ '" C\ h" '" To; ~,;7b"""""J.. \~ltl Fax#:'5bl -~.."\'~- c\'-\laa FBx* "\ 'l{\ - 4 ~ 14 CJ "'8- C POI' bY'- [J P..... Comnwnt [J _. Reply CJ '"'- bcycIe Q Project # 'b 0:;- 'J- . \ "6 '* Re: . Addltlou" Commentsl Pag.. Pnduding Cover Sheet) ....... @] ORIGINAl. TO FOLLOWIHTHE MAlL....,...... D SAV~ OUR PROPERTY VA~aES!! As you may have heard, Bethesda Hospital is petitioning the city for approval of a parking garage on SW 4th street, right in our neighborhood! All of us must put our time and efforts toward this important goal of stopping this eyesore from being built or we will fail. If we don't get involved, we shouldn't complain when our property values drop! The following information should be used to let our city officials know how we feel. Please take the time to have your voice heard! Call today! Elected Officials - Terms of Office The Mayor and Commissioners are elected to three year terms and are limited by the City Charter to serving two consecutive three-year terms. The Mayor and Commissioners may be contacted through the City Manager's Office, (561) 742-6010, or at the numbers listed under each Commissioner's biography Gerald Broening- Mayor - lG4-47l6 Gerald F. Broening was reelected to his second term as Mayor in March 2000 with a mandate to keep the City on the progressive course it had adopted during his first term in office. Ron Weiland- 734-6885 Mr. Weiland is serving his second term as District I city commissioner. Mack McCray - 732-9213 Mack McCray was named to the City Commission in June 2001 to fill the seat vacated by Bruce Black in District II. Muir C. Ferguson. 732-3753 Muir C. "Mike" Ferguson was named to the City Commission in December 2000 to fill the unexpired term of William Sherman in District III. He was elected in his own right in March 2001 and will serve until November 2003. Chdrlie Fisher - 276-3722 Mr. Fisher is serving his first term as the District IV City Commissioner A~'G. '9. 2", : 2'= 12 52 FV,~K : _DAY & A ~,':'OC! h -;: S:-::'.- '."~ ';~)'- ~ 4- . :~v. l."....-,; , . STRAWN, MONAGHAN & COHEN, P.A. e4 NOFrntEA5r I'OUJU1oi -'IIENUi DELRAY IlEACfoI. FLORIlA ~183 Attorney. 8nd Counselors S_I.;o_ TllIO'l'WV I!. MONot4I1AN oIOE, T. tTIW/oW "'- -- --~--"" IoIoWl.: TUO....I!MANe~r~ August 16, 2002 _eounll-_OIJAII_s....;"g .,.., N.W. a..c-,....... ..,11.4040 Fl ~ucI"",.1o, _dl3J:lOll (0$4, 4Ic.lI016 P.o. ... ,'''' ,..11.1........ FIall.. 3231T_, (850) e.'.TOlI TELEPHONE lH'l2'....... 'TEI.~~(U'I)~ VIA FAX (854) 7'71-4923 and U.S. MAIL Kerry Ezral, Esq. Goren, Cherof, Doody & Ezrol 3099 East Commercial 61vd. Suite 200 Ft. lauderdale, FL 33308 Re: Bettre8da Memorial Hospital Rezoning Request City of Boynton Beach File #: Land Use AmendmentIR.etoning (LUAR 02-004) Bethesda Hospital Physician Parking Dear Mr. Ezrol: I am writing this letter on benalf of Bethesda MemorIal Hospital, Inc. in regards to tI1e abOlle referenced project. I appreciate havinll had the opportunity to discuss 5ame with you yelterday. As I mentioned at tnat time, the Hospital has asked me to find a legal mech9l'1iam whereby they can voluntarily commit to certain lend use restrictions on the subject proj:lerty. Specifically, the Hospital would like to be able to assure the adjacent residential neighborhood that the use of this ~raj:lerty will be limited to II low intensity parking area. As II practical mder, the site is not suitable-for other more lntensive uses anWlay. Nonetheless, in order to provide additional comfort to the our neighbors to the west, the Hospltalllllked me to find II mechanism which we could bath agree would legally impose the deslrecl restrictions. . 1 hailS S0lT18 expertise in this area as I represented the Town of Lake Park for a periOd often (10) years. from 1989 until 1999. I have also been involved in 2'oning and land USl!llssues for the Town ofTequests and the Town of Flaim Beach. In my experience, It is not unusual for a rezoning applicant to voluntarily colT1mlt to certain additional use restrictions, beyond those impOSed by the general zoning code. Itis my understanding that you are in agreement that a use restrlctfon, sud1 as deSCribed herain, to Which the applicant voluntarily submits. would, indeed, be legally bindIng Ullon the applicant. . HULTHCAMJdW. C()J/1'OR.cTE'EMPLf)I'UIlNT. . ~ESTATt:. ESTATES AND l'l!tIS7:S. COYE1lNMENTA/.. 'J8. '9. ?~G2 '2:52PM--- KUAY I, A:~'Y:Am"- NO c-~.v , L)." L. 4 Kerr~ Elrol, Esq. August 16,2002 Page 2 Accordingly, in conjunction with our l'8Cluest to the City Comml$$lon for approval of this rezoning, we are requesting that the fallowing restrictive language be mede a part of the ordinance or other approving action by the City: .Use of the property shall be limited to on glilde parlQng only. No awcture win be permitted other than walls and parking enclosures utilized to screen views of the on grade parking, as approved by the site plan approval process of the City of Boynton Beach. Furthermore, the west thirty (301 feet of the property shall be used solely for landscaping and walls for buffering and pedestrian walkways." If you have any questions or comments regarding this letter or the reque&ted restrictive language, pi.... advise me as soon as possible. We would also welcome any suggestions from City staff and. of course, members of the City Commlsslon.. In the meantime, I would appreciate your forwardifl9 this letter to the City Commission for their consideration in conjunction with the publlc heetlng on this matter scheduted for Tuesday, August 20. Z002. Thank you again for your time and consideration in this matter. Sincerely, TEM/ee cc: Robert B. Hili. Pr:esident. Bethesda Memorlal Hospital. Inc. l<:\oloml-bmhlut.. LDl.wpG AIJ~. n 20)2 12:5i'I,! (:LDAY & A:20CiA'ES r~o, 253 ~ 2 '4 . .~ .- KildaV & Associates Landscape Architects I Planners ~551 Forum Place. Suite 100A Wost Palm B.ach. Florida 33401 (56') 65S.5522. Fax (561' 889-2592 E.Mail: info~~iJd.yinc.com MEMORANDUM Date: Augum 19. 2002 TO: Quintus Green Director of Development From: Kerry Kilday Re: Bethesda Physician Parking Expansion (LUAR 02.(04) Our File No.: 352,18 Attached you will find a letter prepared by Tim Monaghan. attorney for Bethesda Hospital, to Mr. Kerry Ezrol. attorney for the City of Boynton Beach. In that letter. Mr. Monaghan recommends a condition of approval which would restrict the use of the residential parcels which are part ofthe land use amendment. It is my suggestion that this restriction become a condition of the land use amendment. A restrictive condition at the land use amendment level will provide the greetest safeguard that the restriction wiil be honored through future years. For your information. Palm Beach County routinely conditions land use amendments. Oftentimes. these conditions relate to changes to commercial land uses. Because the commercial land use category is so broad the County will sometimes approve a commercial land use provided that it is severely restricted as to the actual future use ofthe property. In this case. the hospital is requesting a PPGlland use category. Again. a condition restricting tI1e use of this property strictly to ongrade parking forthe hospital will provide additional safeguards for the neighborhood. Please cail me if you have any questions or suggestions. JHJ/KJK Cc; Kurt Bressner, City Manager Dick Hudson, City Planner Tim Monaghan. Esq. Robert Hill, Bethesda Memorial Hospital H:ClienW352.16/ComJspondance!GreenO!1902 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary October 30, 2002 Mf. Dick Hudson, Sf. Planner Boynton Beach Department of Development Planning and Zoning Divi,io'l Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 Dear Mr. Hudson: Thank you for submitting copies of the City's Small Scale Development Plan Amendment adopted by Ordinance No. 02-052 on October 15,2002. for our records. The reference number for the amendment is 02S6. The Department will not conduct a compliance review or issue a Notice of Intent regarding the adopted small scale development plan amendment in accordance with procedures contained in Section l63.3l87(3)(a), Florida Statutes. If you have any questions. please contact me for the DR! and Plan Processing Section at (850)922-1767. Sincerely, ~/Z E~kS' Administrator Plan Reviev.' and Processing DRE\lw cc: Michael Busha, Ex. Director Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council .-12002 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2'00 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.92' .0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAl STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway, SUlle 212 Marathon, FL 33050-2227 (305)289-2402 COMMUNITY PLANNING 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850)488-2356 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Ta!1ahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850)413-9969 HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 488-7956 , " Kilday & Associates Landscape Architects / Planners 1551 Forum Place, Suite 100A West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 (561) 689-5522' Fax 15611689-2592 E~Mail: info@kildayinc.com k:i MEMORANDUM Date: August 19, 2002 To: Dick Hudson City Planner From: Kieran Kilday Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Physician Parking Expansion (LUAR 02-004) Our File No.: 352.18 Because the Boynton Beach Land Development Code requires that land use amendments and rezonings be subject to eight criteria listed in Article 2 Section 9 Administration and Enforcement Item C, I felt it important that we address each of those items in greater detail as an addendum to the initial justification statement which addresses these issues in response to the staff analysis contained in your memo of July 15, 2002. These criteria are: A. Whether the proposed land use amendment would be consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan policies. Policy 1.16.1 references institutional uses in two areas. First: within the definition of Low Density Residential the statement is made, "Public, educational, and institutional uses located within the zoning districts may be placed in the Public and Private Governmental / Institutional land use category...". This statement is a reflection that many public, gOllernmental and institutional uses have been routinely located in or adjacent to residential areas. In such cases, the Public and Private Governmental / Institutional land use category will be placed upon these properties despite the fact that they may be surrounded by residential uses and in fact may actually be zoned residential as well. There is a clear recognition that these type of uses often coexist with surrounding residential areas. The second reference is merely the definition of Public and Private Governmental / Institutional land use which specifically lists hospitals and other health care services and agencies as a permitted use. There are no other references within the Comprehensive Plan to this land use so, therefore, this proposed amendment must be judged to be consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan polices. In addition, the Future Land Use Element Support Documents Page 44 states, "that additional acreage will be added to the category Public and Private Governmental / Institutional Land (PPGI), if additional government or institutional uses are established in the City, beyond those which can be anticipated at the present time. It is not possible, however, to estimate the acreage requirements for these uses, until such time as these uses actually become established." Mr. Dick Hudson August 19,2002 Page 2 Undoubtedly. the increased demand on the hospital could not have been predicted in 1959 when the hospital was established. The Future Land Use Support Documents further substantiate that point. Howeller, the staff report goes further to apply Commercial and Industrial land use criteria from the comprehensive plan to this use despite the fact that there is no technical basis for such an application. Specifically, the report references Policies 1.17.3 and 1.17.4. These policies require buffer walls and vegetatille screening between industrial and residential uses, wherever practical. It should be noted that despite the fact that this policy does not apply to Public and Private Governmental/Institutional uses, the plan submitted by Bethesda Hospital provides both buffer walls and solid vegetative screening between the proposed parking area and adjacent residential properties. So even in the event these policies are applied to the hospital site, the plans submitted for the site meet these policies. Lastly, the staff report discussion of this issue notes incompatibilities quoting from the original justification statement with regard to the mechanical equipment currently existing on the hospital property in the service court area. It should be noted that the comprehensive plan amendment does not propose to place any mechanical equipment on the expanded area. In meetings with the neighboring property owners the issues of incompatibilities on the existing hospital property concerned primarily sound from air conditioner coolant fans, the incinerator blower, dumpster pickup, and delillery of supplies. In those discussions, there was never an issue as it related to the existing doctor parking which takes place in that same area. The purpose of the compatibility statement contained in the original justification statement was to show how the expanded area of the application could effectively seal off existing incompatibilities which are not a subject of this application and create a better condition utilizing the property abutting the residential neighborhood to the west (including buffer walls and lIegetation). B. Whether the proposed amendment / rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Clearly, the land use amendment does not create and isolated district. The proposed amendment is to designate the additional lots with the same land use designation as the rest of the adjacent hospital property. There is currently an interface between the hospital's land use and the residential land use along the entire west property line. Of the eight lots included in this application, fille of the lots have been owned by the hospital for over 30 years. These lots were purchased by the hospital in the 1960's with a knowledge that additional growth of healthcare may require their future utilization. A sixth lot adjacent to the original five lots was purchased approximately one year ago. Prior to filing this application, a meeting was held inviting the property owners along SW 4th Street to explain the hospital's plans. Following that meeting, two adjacent property owners approached the hospital with an offer to sell their properties to the hospital. The hospital has entered H:ClientsJ352.18/CorrespondencelHudson081902 Mr. Dick Hudson August 19,2002 Page 3 into a contract to include these properties in its addition. These later two lots directly abut the service loading area of the hospital. Inclusion of these lots with the original lots made sense in the hospital's effort to buffer its most intensive service activities "which already exist" from nearby residents. With the additional walls and landscape screening as recommended in the comprehensille plan, the public welfare of the immediate neighborhood will be protected. C. Will a change in conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable? As previously stated the hospital was established in 1959. Needless to say there has been an explosion of growth in the Boynton Beach area over these past 40 years. The hospital has expanded and grown in order to service the Boynton Beach community. The service area, which includes the doctor parking area, has been located in this area of the hospital since its inception. All of the doctor ancillary services are directly accessed from this service area in the basement of the building. Beyond the doctor entrance doors are the medical offices, medical library, medical records and places for appropriate signing in and out of the hospital. With the growth of the hospital, the number of doctors utilizing the hospital has increased significantly. There is a current identified need for providing additional doctor spaces. Location of these spaces has never been an issue of discussion in previous parking analysis as parking for doctors needs to be located to properly access the internal circulation and records of the hospital. The service area is an isolated area separated from the rest of the hospital parking. While there may be a need to provide additional parking accommodations for the public and other hospital employees, that accommodation will not be located in this area and the physician parking cannot be located properly or efficiency elsewhere on the site. D. Will the proposed use be compatible with utility systems, roadways and other public facilities? The staff report properly indicates, as does the Site Plan, that there will be not access between the hospital and SW 4th Street from this parking area. Therefore, there will be not impacts from this proposed parking area on the neighboring street system. Staff did not find any problems with this application meeting this standard. E. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties. As previously stated, the proposed use is merely an expansion of an existing use which has been located on this spot since 1959. The design of the proposed use and the limitation of the use to parking protects neighboring residential properties. In fact there are many areas throughout the city of Boynton Beach where parking is located adjacent to residential areas. With proper landscaping and buffering the parking has no negative affect on the adjacent residential property. As part of the presentation to the Planning and Development Board, a Property Sales Analysis was provided showing no negligible H:ClientsJ352.18/CorrespondencelHudson081902 Mr. Dick Hudson August 19,2002 Page 4 difference in property lIalues between properties abutting parking facilities and properties abutting other residential uses. It should be noted that the study did show a distinct valuation drop on those few lots directly abutting the service court of the hospital, a reflection of the intensive activities which take place in that area. The properties which will be included in this parking expansion provide a clear and defined buffer between the service area and the adjacent residential properties. With respect to the comment in the staff report, staff and the applicant agree that there are existing compatibility issues within the service court of the hospital. However, The applicant has never agreed that the expanded parking area would be an incompatibility with the adjacent residential area. In fact, it is the belief of the applicant that properly landscaped and buffered parking will provide an acoustic barrier between the current activities within the service area and the residential neighborhood beyond, a condition which does not currently exist. F. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning. While the property is physically able to be developed under the current zoning, there is a question as to its economic viability. As previously stated, analysis of property sales in the area have shown that these particular lots abutting the service court have been depressed as compared to the surrounding neighborhood. Any attempt to develop new homes on the vacant sites from a practical standpoint need to recognize the difficulties of marketing these properties with the intensity of activities taking place within the hospital service court directly adjacent to them. It was for this reason two property owners approached the hospital to include their properties in the expansion area. If the interest is to maintain and enhance the value of the surrounding community, appropriate utilization of these properties for landscape buffering and screening would better accommodate the stability of the neighborhood rather than attempting to build new homes on property that has already reflected depressed lIalues in previous resales. G. Whether the proposed amendment / rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole. As previously stated, the Site Plan specifically sets back the parking area 30 ft. from SW 4th Street. By setting back the parking and proposing to enclose it in a structure, any parking and or building area is recessed to the same set backs as the single family homes located on both sides of the street. The west 30 ft. of the lot has been restricted for use as a landscape buffer. This section of the neighborhood does not have existing sidewalks. The proposed plan incorporates a sidewalk / pedestrian path area along the entire frontage of tthis property tying into the sidewalk located immediately north of the site. The hospital has agreed to restrict the use of this property to the ongrade parking and to further restrict the use of the west 30 ft. to landscaping and pedestrian uses as part of this application. Therefore, the use of this site will be harmonious with the surrounding neighborhood and of H:Clients/352.181Correspondence/Hudson081902 Mr. Dick Hudson August 19, 2002 Page 5 appropriate scale. H. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. As previously indicated. the hospital has been located on this property since 1959. The hospital has grown in accordance with the needs of the community. The relationship of the physician parking to the physician activities which take place inside the hospital accessed immediately off the service court has been a continuing operation through all these years. The hospital purchased five of the eight lots oller 30 years ago knowing that some expansion of this area may need to take place at some time. There is no other adequate area in the hospital to provide physician parking in proper relationship to the internal hospital services. Convenience of physician parking is of critical concern to the hospital in allowing a physician to arrive at the hospital, pick up records and service patients in a timely manner. This issue becomes extremely critical when there is an emergency situation. The intent of this application is to provide the assurance that a doctor arriving at the hospital can park easily and close to the records they need in order to serve patients promptly. Summarv It is the belief of the applicant that all eight criteria listed in the Land Development Code have been met in this application. The design and limitation of the use on this property to parking and the design of the parking to provide appropriate barriers and buffer allows for the use to occur in the place its needed without adversely affecting the surrounding neighborhood. The hospital has met with the neighborhood three times in an effort to accommodate the needs of the hospital while at the same time providing safeguards to the residents in its design. The hospital in committed to continue meeting with the neighborhood to assure that the design of the facility has no negative effect upon it. Cc: Kurt Bressner, City Manager Quintus Green, Director of Development Robert Hill, Bethesda Memorial Hospital Tim Monaghan, Attorney H:Clients/352.181Correspondence/Hudson081902 ./ / / / / Sep 25 02 02:07p CIt~ Attorne~)s O~Fice 561-742-6054 ,_~J'."l...~ .. \ STRAWN, MONAGHAN & COHEN, P.A. 54 NORTHEAST FOURTH AVENUE DELRAY BEACH. FLORIDA 33483 Attorneys and Counselors 6 ~~ ! ~ pro ('Ilr""rr G~~ ~.c'I'i'r '~' Browarcl CountY, 'Medal ' . ~lj~ _' ": 5101 ~.w, 2~ venlm. ~if H lauderdale, Florida 33309 . .' (954) 484-0016 JEFFREY l. COHEN" TIMOTHY E MONAGHAN JOEL T STRAVom TELEPHONE (561) 278-9400 TELECOPIER (561) 27B-9462 Of Counsel' TCR:RY MEEK"" "Board Certifleo' in HeaIlO Care law . P.O. a,OX 13441 Tallahassee. Flonda 32317-3341 (850)893-7821 E-MAIl. TMONAGHANImSMCLAWFIRM.COM September 19, 2002 VIA E-MAIL & U.S. MAIL James A Cherof, Esq. City Attorney City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33435 Re: Conditions on BetheSda Memorial Hospital Rezoning Request City of Boynton Beach File #: Land Use Amendment/Rezoning (LUAR 02-004) Bethesda Hospital Physician Parking Dear Jirn: This letter is written with regard to Condition 2.c. of the Bethesda Rezoning Ordinance relating to access to the property from South West 41h Street. during the construction of the physician parking facilities. The initial draft of the ordinance limited access from South West 4th Street to the delivery of landscape materials. I have discussed this issue with the chief engineer for Bethesda Hospital and although he does not yet have construction plans in hand, he anticipates that there may be a few other circumstances wherein it would be inadllisable to limit access to the hospital side of the property. By way of example, there are high tension wires along the eastern border of these lots. These are the lines which supply power to the Hospital. If there are instances during the project wherein it is necessary to use a crane or to unload heavy equipment. it may be unsafe to access the property by passing under these power lines. We understand the sensitillity of this issue and wish to proceed with this project in a manner that will minimize any impact on our neighbors. For this reason, it is our intention to conduct as much actillity from the Hospital side as practically possible. We would suggest the following process. Once construction plans halle been developed by the Contractor. we would like to sit down with the City's Building Department . HEALTH CARE LAW. r()RPORATE. EMPLOYMENT. . REAL ESTATE. ESTATES AND TRUSTS. GOVERNMENTAL. Sep 25 02 02:07p CIt~ Attorn@~~s Offic@ 561-742-6054 p.3 James A. Cherof, Esq. September 19, 2002 Page 2 and plan out the Project. At that time, we expect to be able to more specifically identify those instances when it will be necessary to access the property from South West 4th Street. We do not anticipate having any problems reaching an agreement with the City on this issue. We think those circumstances requiring access from South West 4th Street will be apparent to both the Hospital and to City staff. In any case, the attached language makes any exception to the Condition subject to Building Department approval. One final note, as you know, we will be going through a site planning process, during which time we will be meeting with the neighborhood to receive their input on the design of the Project. These neighborhood meetings will give us an opportunity to discuss the construction process with the residents and advise them of the times during which it will be necessary to utilize South West 4th Street. Attached please find proposed language for an exception procedure relating to condition 2.c. for the attached Rezoning Ordinance. If you have any questions or comments, please call. We would like to make sure that there is a consensus on these issues well in advance of the October 1, 2002 first reading of the ordinance. Please keep me appraised during staffs review of this submission. Thank you lIery much. Sincerely, TEMIbI Attachment cc; Robert B. Hill, President Kerry Kilday, Esq. K\-tern\-bmh\rezoning physician parking 104.0211\Cjty of 88 Itr to Cherof.wpd Sep 25 02 02:07p CIt~ Attorne~Js Office 561-742-6054 p.4 ATTACHMENT DRAFT In response to a request by the contractor for the project, the Building Department may approve exceptions to this condition, as necessary to accommodate specific situations during the construction process where it is determined to be unsafe or unreasonable to require access from the east side of the property. Any such rel!.uest and approval shall seek to avoid or minimize any disruption to the adjacent residential neighborh.... K:\-tern\-bmh\rezoning physician parking 104.021 HExceptions to condition J-$~ ,," ~ !>f$ / . f.( (.P / ~ / .(,t;( ~"~ err ~o KT:\ ~d: 'v~ON€>' DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT . Building _ Planning & Zoning - Occupational Ucenses . Community Redevelopment October 3, 2002 Ms. Maggie Woodall 2616 SW 5'" Street Boynton Beach, FL Dear Ms. Woodall: This letter is in response to your request. made at the City Commission Meeting of October 1, 2002, that area residents be notified whenever Bethesda Hospital issues are on the City Commission Agenda. Please be advised that whenever a formal action, such as a rezoning. is initiated on any parcel in the City, the staff of this department is required, by law, to notify all property owners of record within 400 feet of the affected parcel. '. This was the procedure followed in the case of the request by Bethesda Hospital to rezone property on SW 4'" Street However, this legal notification requirement only applies to the initial public hearing in such cases. Given this fact, as well as the fact that the area of interest involving the Bethesda Hospital rezoning case now extends to residents far beyond the 400-foot radius, it would be prohibitively expensive to provide such a notification each time any item involving Bethesda appeared on the City Commission agenda. As an altemative means of keeping area residents informed, the staff of this department provides copies of City Commission agenda items and relevant backup materials regarding Bethesda Hospital to three (3) designated neighborhood representatives. These individuals, in tum, are responsible for conveying this information to their neighbors. The three individuals are: Scott Pape Michelle Hoyland Bob Bordelon (561) 243-7040 (office) (561) 243-7040 (office) (561) 523-3063 (cell) We recommend contacting one of these individuals should you have further questions or require additional information conceming the current issues involving the relationship of your neighborhood to Bethesda Hospital. Sincerely, Am /0}L~ '---' QUintus Greene Development Director City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 . Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 DhnnA" 1"~1\ 7.t?..s;'1c:tl . lAIUAAI kn\l"tnn_n.:..~,..h nrn ~"YO" .::.c- ~ _ .-.. -."- --- -.---....- 0>0=:- .~....--~__ J J- :--- _':-.". '?'" 'V . v 'ON '0 DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division . Bui/ding . Planning & Zoning . Occupational Licenses . Community Redevelopment June 20, 2002 Ms Anna Yes key Clearinghouse 9835-16 Lake Worth Road, Suite 223 Lake Worth, Florida 33467 Re: Bethesda Memorial Hospital Parking File No. LUAR 02-004 Location: Six properties located on the east side of SW 4th Street (2700 Block) totaling 1.43 acres. PCNs 08-43-45-33-01-001-0010,0030,0050,0060, 0070 and 0080 Dear Anna: Attached is the completed Executive Summary for the above-reference Comprehensive Plan Amendment. If further information is needed, please contact me at (561) 742-6264. Sincerely Ala Dick Hudson, Senior Planner Ene!: \ \CH\MAIN\SH RDA T A \PLA.NNING\SHARED\ WP\PRQJECfS\BETHESDA \LUAR 2002\IPARC CDVER.DOT City of Boynton Beach. 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd.. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. FL 33425-0310 Phone: (561) 742-6260 . Fax (561) 742-6259 . www.ci.boynton-beach.fl.us Page 1 of2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS DATE: June 20. 2002 Reference #: LUAR 02-004 General Information Initiating Local Government: City of Boynton Beach Contact Person: Dick Hudson. Senior Planner Address: 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard. Boynton Beach. FL 33425 TelephonefFax: (561) 742-6264/(561) 742-6259 fax Applicant! Agent Kilday & Associates. Inc.lKieran Kilday TelephonefFax: (561) 689-5522/ (561) 689-2592 fax Proposed Comprehensive Plan Textual Amendments General Surnmary of Amendments: , _ amendments relating to traffic circulation or the roadway networks _ amendments relating to affordable housing Amendments related to the following elements: - land use - traffic circulation - mass transit ports and aviation _ housing - infrastructure sub-elements _ coastal management - conservation _ recreation and open space _ intergovernmental coordination _ capital improvements - other i I Summary of addition (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: Page 2 of2 Summary of proposed change (s) to adopted comprehensive plan: Proposed Amendments to the Future Land Use Map Location of proposed map amendment (include a location map): Six properties located on the east side of SW 4th Street (2700 Block). PCNs 08-43-45-01-0010. 0030. 0050, 0060. 0070, and 0080 Size of Area Proposed for Change (acres): 1.43 acres Present Future Land Use Plan Designation (include a density/intensity definition): Low Density Residential (4.84 do/ac) Proposed Future Land Use Designation (include a density/intensity definition): Public & Private GovernmentaVInstitutional (PPGl) Present Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition): RlAA(Single Family Residential- 5.40 do/ac Proposed Zoning of Site (include a density/intensity definition) Public Use (PU) Present Development of Site: Three single family homes and three vacant lots Proposed Development of the Site, if known (Number of Dwelling Units; Commercial Square Footage; Industrial Square Footage; Other Proposed usage and intensity): Auxiliary parking structure Is proposed change a Development of Regional Impact? N/A Comprehensive Plan Change Processing Daterrime/Location Scheduled for Planning & Development Board July 23. 2002/7:00 p.m.lCity Commission Chambers. 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd., Boynton Beach, FL Date/Time/Location Scheduled for LP AlGoverning Body Public Hearing August 6. 2002/6:30 p.m.lCity Commission Chambers, 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.. Boynton Beach, FL Scheduled Date for Transmittal to DCA September 10.2002 I I ,T- - C6 f '. - C e> TO"' ,.r" . Ci~~ Ci~~ r ') /1" '. vi' 1- - - ;- -':,1(" , ,--"', ./ ..jJJ \ e ,\\.1 Q/. N....~ ^.'- ,. Mlr" cf I r'. I" I: /,: 7 Commissioner Mike Ferguson City of Boynton Beach PO Box 3 10 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 July 22, 2002 $yLU {A-~ A-- r/ A--.Tf ff- S-s;.'S~ sv....J S"~ Ave Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Bethesda Hospital Application for Rezone of SW 4th St Parcel Dear Commissioner: Please accept this as notice of opposition against the proposed rezoning requested by Bethesda Hospital on SW 4th Street. We feel the impact on the overall neighboring subdivisions will be negative in relation to property values and the way of life. Since we are a major portion of the residential tax base, we feel our opinions should be taken into consideration. Thank you in advance for your consideration. ~ Sincerely. RECEIVED I .j U L 1 7 LJ02 CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE Mike Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. PO Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 July 17,2002 Yvonne Cacioli / Kimberly Traber 2619 SW 4TH Street Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: Bethesda Hospital Application for Rezone of SW 4th St. Parcel Dear Director Rumpf: Please accept this as a notice of opposition against the proposed rezoning requested by Bethesda Hospital on SW 4th Street. We feel the impact on the overall neighboring subdivisions will be negative in relation to property values and our way oflife. Since we represent a major portion of the residential tax base, we feel our opinions should be taken into consideration. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, ~ ~'~k KIm y Traber Commissioner Mike Ferguson City of Boynton Beach PO Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 July 22, 2002 ; ) - - / ".'1 '-L",/., (~' .I __ ) Boynton Beach. FL 33435 RE: Bethesda Hospital Application for Rezone of SW 4th St Parcel Dear Commissioner: Please accept this as notice of opposition against the proposed rezoning requested by Bethesda Hospital on SW 4th Street We feel the impact on the overall neighboring subdivisions will be negative in relation to property values and the way oflife. Since we are a major portion of the residential tax base, we feel our opinions should be taken into consideration. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, ci"""J:.0~"," J)~ c~~v-_ ,y:c ' 1- ~( - I IC~ / '- C 7. ).-/ '- /,../ ( \ if. -."z . IL.'" ~ t ;_ - ( / -:( '-I ucc:-t {(/0~{~~' / '~.dc>l t'~ ~ ~?f. C-/L- eel 'j// (~. t" ~< :\" , I. '.')J /" t :/.1." J ,t<'("i l"" l '< ,\/--1; ~ ~L,' I"'~--'!, L-i-u/ /'J j u_ /2" // ,/ '--- !,/EC(, _ ~ '//;' ;;;; !cd'. ; 7 July 15. 2002 Mr. Mike Rumpf Planning and Zoning Dir. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 33425 P~e; ~-(C RE: Bethesda Memorial Amendments Along S 1 Use Map Dear Mike: This letter is in regards to the de dlentioned above. As you are probably aware Bethesda Hospita, _^pand their campus into the "Chapel Hill" residential neighborhood. I , _.<lng to make you aware of this residential community's opposition to the proposaL Find attached a petition that has been distributed to residents within our community. This petition indicates that there is an overwhelming opposition to the proposed incursion. Please include this petition and my letter in the staffreport for the applications associated with the proposed garages. There are no planning principles that would support these actions. They will only serve to fracture one of the most important residential communities in the City. This community is widely recognized as one of the most desirable communities in Palm Beach County by evidence of the rapidly rising property values. If you have any questions, please contact me at 738-4633. Sincerer j" ~ 4a(( ~ 2715 SW 4th Street Boynton Beach, FL 33435 The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. Print :;; yc.u /14 (] (4v;f-( ( /! CbAJJJ~ M. Aron ER}G rdd ~~M 'j-fll d Cby LJJIJ(IE 7m Sa) :J1'd./JUe.- " A,DA~/\ \j).Q*,~(~ 70/ S~I~V'1 Av-J( 6J 'R} S ('; fLFfYJi 7) ) S"tJ, ('),lfII AIlE ~ 3u:-A+J J1tA-tcJJo/ 7/6 s.u Z-Cf17l- Me. bliZA ~ 1/0 Sw1JfHt~ (J[ I ,&J.. --=- J C:we/'l 1. 7JI?I'JKE J/ tl () A AI --y;;; nA 5 ~'------ ([) LC, 4 Cf)('L/L S . ~. -JU710~# 4?'jz/rnJJI? r;1f~ )1cK /?c (c"-" L~dr? :if7P~ J~ hn Le".,;;;"s LLtcy Ie WI'S DIt {blV'-2- r~(1 Address s-::rr:sw c2fTtt./h E !)717 511/. YffflAi/e 'S7fJ 5W Z'fA(f~ S7J7 S uJ 2-Y-:N~ ~; ~w 7-; ~L 'Sf tJ, dirt vi 70;( $, a.I elL! 4,!/e..... 51? 5. rJ. J '"r"/k_ 1{ 0;).. S0 ~ ~ 7<L I<... (' 7d 6<; (1). ..13 t2l1e.m~~ 7/f) '54J;;J.~-b ~. SF's", .0 T,..(r :2 </1-zsc.U s;.-.s;- ,). t/ 2- D :5 ilJ 5"'1 51- :<'/).1; 51-v yz sf- :25').:0 /() ,)E ~ The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are Opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. b $1X:;;;;uc ;~t~ ~. - ~ ~ ~r~ ~tU~Ar- yt c:S?r. <9 {/ /'9 .IV A I A- P If MY( Co /' L - 5.40 r /? 5c.---s." ;:',.e i{f:/[JJj{ (f/~ ri;Z/117{K trrKDr ~ 77<01 lo€"'>-I--er ~ ~~o=h~ ) I~h (? L 0 I , ( ----' )" ~ ( ...,- !~c; V-r'"r I I/.' 13'---'- " '1.1., (.("(/0- , OJ.Ju..U/-o (/5J44AO /3 t!iQ~ /J I ~;.,-'~ ~ Print < ~ ..:>curr- \'Sf<- ' ) , -k K\~-h I 0\=1/1K I ( h. v LCJ;.s- ~ I.-:-S'~ ,7)/01<.4 r2 v 5 5 ~ , ';r-- ~=-., /AJ,j7--2"Ur' (! ~F/Lt4 gr.A Y\ LA/cO rnAAI fkJ",I, firtu~ 1 JV!1iJ(yF SRtn1A' J:~/ /''i'~/AW('J CIlt14/L,f ~(~(J c?,/-;// ~'.N/ ~9ft V~:Vt ce.;?'Cz p B);SClflh i?5og. S' l1/ ~-ct, '';t: 9-#2'J yY !7S'i: cJLf; /5. fl.). (jfj~ . . Address L ( I <) 5 uJ ( I rJ' Sf- :;;)'Y,()') ,<;\'O Lii-h s{ ::<(. Ss' I. u). ~,)-f-. )C:J\' 5C--~ u?oS7 ~;;.:Ot>-;-7 k.> L/- ~"{- 2Go7 - SUI !~S-f; d, fo- J '1 S. uJ 'I ~ :S1: .2 0/'/9 S'<-v y Ji 2 7C:' ?S<:.v ~<";--C J40F 8W4H73r. .:?i/oo 5. iJ. LIP. 5r ,~<t-/~ ~ki. <I ,\--h '~/? 5~~ '1"51-. 25'1? J (.(.' '1-" 5/ ;){ I) SL-;.J 4'1/' ~-l .;<'bFJ 5"4/ ,/,I~ ...s. /. ; \ The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. K(l(ef\ CeiL 2.10:1 CjJ.';. f? St- <8roJ\r6" ~C~ ;:)>xS1. 'E:Lf),~~ 11- N IV J9- l, ('0/ t- /'1\,;1 # ~ 7 0 '1 :;, Lv' '(;Ifl- 5/, P/o.n J YUle>\, ;)/~ 71J~ IIP--r:v& 7.1iv1f M II- -z...-(c5-j CL-.~ . i ~ '-U 'f"\ OhnnCl Hoov~r lie Sz 2-fh Rv-e. ;t1,(kw.\ ~lviAt 7ift/3 AhNU0d c+ , 17 fJ1~v, J' ,/")~ fl. . I , /I ..... -~ (" 7- I c:~- (1'.:',"/ A f-r; 1 t7 ' (0); /':t.r ..x Ie:) / .). :J 777 0 j- i/J v'::>:.jL . '\1/;' I I J../h ~I, I V '11. //1 -:0.:-" . e/^l/ Ill, .~ 1/ 0( ~ (U ~w iJ ., ':::>T' 125, ~ ~ ;;:7c)'f S'-J ~j J ef~ ~'e 111/ /) , ( , I '---SJ / 0 If./I(j 'I L ;/V\clJ2) fJ1(}~Y E, ~l9i7jvl\ , / ;)AI f? fbp/p, ~--' '1'L-~.z./& (; /~ /~ /N ,~ J~ )' I~ Gn~M- " / . Y, ~7 ~/~# 1// (;?.{~L Print : , ; )-.,., ~~. net/II ?f/'" I( Uf-1C'--D (I I - r '. .'" I ~ :. i-- ~r /0 7 ,C' / \...-U r u U . {fi rL V . /l" Vf;NNE L./:ltlt?L/ r-J , t (.,I,IJ IJ--{ N ,J \h'lYlI'jhfl .N!' 0:""" Er#. u.L , '. " Address "__ I .!,-.. \ ~.J' "..- I --1. I-.../f' C/.) l(' " ~'i.. . --- e;; fV _:;J jL , jfj ~--jc..u ;n'f'~~ '27c; '/0 ? fl'Sf ) (/er 5.~v,' '-I::d--f.r 3"3c1 Ofcllr);,I! fk- 2&3/ ~ l-ft I r j --, ;, I ( j( L _ '.1., ~'J_ 'J '-:,L-c.. ~ ." .". ..-J ,}. /' ,~s/q S0 ~/;0 ~ / / J- , /)<"" (j l ({ '.\'1 I.' (I)Co .JuJ ,--' 6T ;J5D~ Su-'Y~+J 1.:./ /)/'1;. r I'......J:! ('; eX. _,') tv ,7 , J The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map. Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. Siqnature Print ~~ K.-A \.4e\ // -~ //f'o:-, /V L-~ - ~\\ ~II + l~fi>L. 1 ~ -~- /30.0 4. ..&. " L.. kA~ 'Y,r\\;JWA e -// \J ~ /;<<"---p //_1'./0/ 'S AU.., A. SeAAajO.l ~) ~Ol,rr~f /~ y~ -C ")/11 r r/ { ~ lJ Y'~,1L. (Y). A.0rv.s", 1;( ft- W 1/01 }.jqA/N MOl- L- ;2t/( YtU Lj~ S:t- I . - 2kd.et!f.. Pi/wAf ~NrJf:LL--rVAKJo!bC1E" ;).g, 7 \.0. qik ~l:r:~i ~ ]'l,~~I'e mO\..\\~OV1 /~j:~~ Address ~fo!q 5w <:(/'" S7 ::;'-h) q SW~ Jl . 13'i...-r<'-l BMu! :3 O),Q e H.....e.~/ol'LL J) c.. 20 2. '\ --l,' I ,r I . I I D /7 j -' - - '\ AI - \}, I\"'. / .- ..-/ / -- -- -'J <<:;' ." .' , ~: V::-,-, c ./5".: /" (A' // -4",/ , L. /- )01 S:./.;J. ~7d A-,.., . --.3O-z--.> W -Z 7 CZu..IL ;:2J2 ~\ s.. \v . 4 S r ol.;PY::; SC0 V- ->r 2JWo SCdq1AS-t The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map. Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. ~t""- (k2T / Print Address lnV'lY)A L. fV\€-\JQne ::5.' )11ii?K d/(MOJL f0'r'Y/ ~j)er -& ~((-< iittlfl(D /- , Lf 7/q S,UJ.cQ7 PLa.ce-- ]Cfj.J (Y!(a"/1l-1)~J L4-'lV 7d-=3 s: ii/ ;2 7t-< P!CfCV 7/1 Sf GJ, ;;27 PI, ~tj (!JVjd III; AI vd. tJ,. 715 S<<.l 2..?" PL- 56YN 7 I fl ~ .5 t:cY ;? 7 /!f /1'0/1 (l! ~ ~J r::reQ;IJiJ?J L.1tR . V/('foli'a UaurrLl- '711jS~J ~ 'I PI/-ftp W {'f\ i ~ ~u. V\ ~bA- d-... 7 D I S W (, -tt-.. St- EveJ.jfl kDeser -;>0 It \0 J2~JUJoo]) Lr\ C~~ YJ1~ 71'7 yJ ;;2~ PUI-cf:..- --srfm cS F: ECKLdZ ;;2 fro .s- w 5:;). .;;;,~ P-<;-tt/)PI~ (lJ r ,~ 7:1&:1- -<;, W. QS ~. fJE7Eq ,T;;A).xJ()____ c!tf/O{/,('0 ~/ cr HhonJc. S. ~r7I-+:~ ~GO,) 5 w J>/A. J'j-, 1 Lc/LE :>;1/1/~ J qJD S U) ylf r; C-{~ ,S)- 7 /~ 5 t.J 'j..1"; The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map. Zoning Map. and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. 0I~ ~~ Print -K,M MA~NU:; QtBL ~<. In \; S H-7t'.\3 ~ '1 Address 2h" S IAJ .2f K. 0v<J--f! .~ ~J..FL 33 Lj3s The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. t;;'/14 ])t'J11;:~ DCA.+r,cia L Olscm f;cc r'~ (j I~o~ Jinn;j;~r L ()7. 'Son 7/15iiJ 02)ffi,:4vf' /U.U? C~Y;5 M(>joJ,~ 11-( :SW'L-S--"'''J]1/E: )?04-\(\.-;~ tfC<;t;)u.!Yr-- 7>( Sc:-/ ? t;,~ A-e- /111"c,-< J___ IrC/-;':w, ,:;)-A~ \ arm v-)-ef\ -'03 COW 3~~ Ax rH\LL\f \2" ~~ '5i1 So 2~-rtl i1i Print laNt iJrult;J1.rrh/1 r" I t~~ \f~tJ~ ~M~/ Lnw-e-r m ft{L T" i/J Zu-id a,j{;/c! Address SSe, SaJ J.>-'fk ~ sJ c. J' - w ;;. j,fk tf.-e- ::U~/Z S \j -Sf. ~ ~1, ~&( 0 5vJ j'fh :5T 5G:"CSu)X4..v~ 70qSwc2s'~ 7 I ( S c.J .7 51/---tiL '7/S 5uJ,.JS 4v1'. 7/9 S,U), ;)S A-u-e. 7 [<1 ~LJ zK A-iA . - The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map. and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. SiQnature ~. / ~. Print tl2. ;J .Dili ~ 'kv:1\~~'~~S,~ p/)"", I J /7 ' 1/ , . , 1')';2.1 A1 ,\" E P (f- ft R-, ~k~} llA~&.sk 5 r: AlQH 0<;tQJ~ Address ,9G? If.r, ,(uJ <{fA c:T" ,;;2(01 (~ iW ~ ~T ~lh SIJJ ~iv,.Sl:' 7~/ S'U). ;:;2 7-r-; A~ 26025(1/ 1\/ . ~ ::2'9(\lp ~A/q{+ ~+ A dg6(p~4~ d f? r- A t./ ./f#- # ~8db 5.w ~-I~ Sf ,')[0 liP? * 5w 4~ s--c:-,_ ;)7Di ~( The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map, and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. Print f(aJ3/N 0-!-E&(Z/Cf( CE\.-\A- ~ \ V \i'-.) ~L--I\~/J :fe^- ~re{l Lv z. 6 S dY? ) 'fI1 U c l6u, L(j51J~_ Y/C--;::' ~ >--- ~~ J~/~ S/)J~~ 1~rY/ KG! th (V( a \( If'-uJ I c;g/s .tL/9 !:;)J{- ))/Juf (4c S";W/~cJY (\, () (<. Rf", ~ -:S:A ({ M A rJ M oN 1 ~ 0;:: 'r~^ AIJ Address ~-I 0 ~ AJS;Ci -3').() <uNS'F"\ 0( 2eJ Svt rJ5z..--( CVi cJhpe/IM! gk). d c;;)O 15 tv' 'ItA 5/ 10'3 ~c-L !+ILL 5LY~. "1 N Cky::eJ N {( 3b'IJ fe'N /.Vi),o(r j),.-- ~()! J ]::-~W-udr:!- Dc..- 3o!),.~(dJr7i ~. 3odx), fe.vJu<<;od Do<.., 3'(}/{//~~~ rzS ,,>ur-'?'efeJ. 71~ SvrJ5crf(o. 71~ 5oI'Jscr fp. The undersigned hereby oppose the unwanted expansion of Bethesda Hospital into the existing single family neighborhood on the west side of the hospital. The undersigned are opposed to the proposed changes to the Future Land Use Map, Zoning Map. and Site Plan for a proposed parking garage for properties located along SW 4th Avenue in our community. The undersigned request that the City of Boynton Beach deny these proposals and protect the established residential character of our neighborhood. JMcltAk ~~ 4,/L: ~ 1ft7 ~~ . IilM.C ffi!.zAF,,"" ~7f~~. ~/Vd/J;# h4/1'elo~. fi~ (J~ ~P/~C;6J~(-C(V~ I"f) Q. <:.(' e.; .-y; e tr\ .l,..\ 1 Siqnature . 9 ~ /10~~ - cil!ff- rlfl~k-~ Print fJIC WilliaM.. Hvl/\o.~}jr S\l C,J,w ScoZz.M-fy.rA, ~ -- ~ \'>,-'-1 \ tlIL!Ke-<-1 (!. &~~ '- C,/ Et.y,J ~ 6~5 uz. / [/?/iLU9 ('?IAt:K. Jer0 N CODb51 ~~ \----,G-x~ \_\v,'&..~ I / \ ~ r rlr ) t1v.-P I v Address 920 surJSf. T R.6A;O 9210 SuN~ ~f\"\J ~\S c:. \-\f\PEL IilZ..... GlJr(J 8/5 cttA'Pf:L- f+1LL BLVD. 1:J~ qJ;, NO l?7 ,eo ,1;7 /1 W&:5 t u) ~Z-(C~ 3 () Dc:!. y-I e.sT i}'I.b Q Jll--.~ tV S 30Q+, 'rf~s;,T "rlo~ D Lj;lIV't SOlD We~"o6..-:d 3 OJ 0 LJs.s----;-rv 000 H'+;:Y;' ........... 9d)~ \// AI (i~r KQI:)o r,;, '55JI1'5N td;l-f) ~L\;3 S\v0S9--\- Qi)aR. yo!: ~~f Rd. iL,orla LFlH--f'nU',-e. 203 5(~rr;e+-12rJ, M.4-L L,4!7?6--:A//C/:? 603 ~VVh/S6/ ~.o ~[,(?, tv, CORR/R-1[2 1/7 :5&P5ETf:!z;6J;p (r), /< GvS S 6 ;69 SCAD sS- U) 69/ SvnW ;< c( 3000 C~lIect.l( Ur? fCSOD ~c!Jw~. Gnn" f--b Wef-lsn JOL I ~[Ht:e>TIJJ (:;( sel~ /:e *rs/q '1