REVIEW COMMENTS
8.B.l
ASPEN GLEN (ANEX 06-006)
ANNEXATION
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT NAMEjNUMBER:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING 8< ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-073
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and
Mayor and City Commission
Kathleen Zeitler jLZ--
Planner ~
Michael W, Rumptf'-
Director of Planning and Zoning
May 16, 2006
Aspen Glen PUDjANEX 06-006 and LUAR 06-013
Annexation of a 9.34-acre parcel; Amend the Future Land Use
designation from Palm Beach County Medium Residential, 5 units
per acre (MR-5) to Low Density Residential (LDR) and rezone from
Palm Beach County Agricultural Residential (AR) to Planned Unit
Development (PUD),
Property Owner:
Applicant! Agent:
Location:
Parcel Size:
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Land Use:
Proposed Zoning:
Proposed Use:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lawrence Development Group, LLC
Leonard Albanese (Managing Member)
Bradley Miller
Miller Land Planning Consultants, Inc.
7216 Lawrence Rd (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3050) (4.5 acres)
3904 71st Lane 5 (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3060) (4.8 acres)
(see Exhibit "A")
9.34 acres
Palm Beach County Medium Density Residential (MR-5)
(max. 5.0 dujac)
Palm Beach County Agricultural-Residential (AR)
Low Density Residential (LDR) (max. 4.84 dujac)
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
45 single-family detached zero lot line homes
Page 2
Rle Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Single-family residential development (Jonathan's Grove) within
the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential
(LDR) and zoned R1-A;
South:
Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound
Phase I) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density
Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD);
East:
Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound
Phase II) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low
Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development
(PUD);
West:
Right-of-way for Lawrence Road, and further west, single-family
zero-lot line development (Palmyra Estates) within unincorporated
Palm Beach County designated MR-5 and zoned PUD, To the
southwest across Lawrence Road, single-family zero-lot line
residential development (Anderson PUD) within the City of
Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and
zoned PUD.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning
for the following reasons:
1. The request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program;
2. The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive
Plan, including the requirements for concurrency;
3, Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county
area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary; and,
4, The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development.
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Mr. Bradley Miller, agent for the property owner, Lawrence Development Group, LLC is proposing to
annex into the City of Boynton Beach 9.34 acres located on the east side of Lawrence Road
approximately one-quarter mile south of Hypoluxo Road. The subject property has 334 feet of
frontage on Lawrence Road, a depth of 1,220 feet, and currently consists of two (2) vacated
residential parcels (7216 Lawrence Road, and 3904 l1st Lane South) having a total of (4) units
according to County Property Appraiser records.
Page 3
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
Accompanying this request for annexation are requests to amend the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan to classify the annexed land as "Low Density Residential" and to rezone this
property to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), The proposed PUD would provide for the
construction of 45 single-family zero-lot line dwelling units with a gross density of 4,82 dwelling
units per acre. Because the subject property is less than ten (10) acres, the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) classifies this as a "small scale" land use amendment. Unlike a "large-
scale" amendment of ten (10) acres or more, a "small-scale" amendment is adopted prior to
forwarding to the DCA, and is not reviewed for compliance with the state, regional, and local
comprehensive plans prior to adoption,
The subject property is surrounded on the south and east by the Nautica Sound PUD single-family
zero lot line development, to the north by the Jonathan's Grove single-family development, and to
the west (across Lawrence Road) by zero lot line development in Palmyra Estates and Anderson
PUD. The proposed density and type of residential use (zero lot line) is consistent with the
development found in the Nautica Sound, Palmyra Estates, and Anderson PUD communities, and will
be compatible with the adjacent Jonathan's Grove Subdivision,
Master Plan
The applicant is proposing to rezone from Agricultural Residential (AR) to a Planned Unit
Development (PUD), The required Master Plan submitted for the proposed PUD indicates one (1)
internal cul-de-sac street with direct access to Lawrence Road, The proposed 50 foot right-of-way is
located through the middle of the subject property due to the narrowness of the parcel. A total of
45 single-family lots are proposed with access only from the internal street. The Master Plan
indicates zero lot line development with a typical lot size of 45 feet by 110 feet (4,950 square feet),
Proposed minimum building setbacks would be 15 to 20 feet in front, 0 feet on one side, 10 feet on
the other side, and 10 feet to the rear, The Master Plan zero lot line detail indicates the maximum
lot coverage is 58% (2,875 square feet).
Following approval of this request for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning, the project
will require a site plan approval and plat approval prior to the issuance of any building permits for
the project, The attached conditions of approval for the Master Plan (see Exhibit "C') specify some
of the more important requirements of the forthcoming site plan approval, platting, and permitting,
Review Based on Criteria
The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff
analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map,
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in
dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written
approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk
manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or
Page 4
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the
property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
The subject property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone, therefore the referenced
policy is not applicable; however, other applicable objectives and policies contained in the
comprehensive plan include:
''Policy 1.17. 5
The City shall continue to maintain and improve the character of existing
single-family and lower-density neighborhood~ by preventing conversions to
higher densities, except when consistent with adjacent land uses, or with
implementing redevelopment plans including the Boynton Beach 20/20
Redevelopment Master Plan.
Policy 1.19.1
The City shall continue efforts to encourage a full range of housing choices,
by allowing densities which can accommodate the approximate number and
type of dwellings for which the demand has been projected in the Housing
and Future Land Use Elements"
The subject property is located in the City's future annexation area, and is located outside the
area of the City covered by the Bovnton Beach 20/20 Redevelooment Master Plan, The
proposed project is similar in density and type of development to the subdivisions surrounding
it, Therefore it is consistent with the directions of Policy 1.17,5. The provision of single family
homes, as proposed on this site, offsets the recent trend in the City to develop multi-family
projects and townhouses, thereby increasing the range of housing choices available to the
market, and providing consistency with Policy 1.19.1. However, in this area we have
consistently approved single-family projects, not multi-family and townhome projects,
b, Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use
pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare,
The proposed rezoning would not create an isolated district, but would relate to the adjacent
developments surrounding the site. The proposed PUD is for a single-family residential
community that is complimentary to the development patterns in the area along the Lawrence
Road corridor, especially adjacent developments,
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable.
The proposed land use amendment and rezoning are the minimum changes to the property, to
naturally accompany the annexation of this property from Palm Beach County. The proposed
amendment is consistent with the future land use classification as recommended on the Future
Land Use Map for this unincorporated area, and is consistent with surrounding land uses and
zonings, both in the City and the adjacent unincorporated area.
d. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadway~ and
other public facilities.
Page 5
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
The proposed land use amendment and rezoning is compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and public facilities. The City already provides water and sewer service to the subject property,
Based on the City's adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for potable water (200 gallons per capita per
day (GPCD) and sewer service (90 GPCD), the projected demand is expected to be 19,350
gallons for water and 8,708 GPCD for sewer service. The City's utility plants currently have
unreserved capacity to serve the projected demands of the proposed project. With respect to
solid waste, the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority has stated that adequate capacity
exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the lO-year planning period.
The traffic study prepared by the applicant's consultant indicates the project anticipates a traffic
generation rate of 450 new trips per day, with available roadway capacity on Lawrence Road.
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed and approved the project for traffic
concurrency and notes a project build-out date of 2008.
Approval is pending from the School District of Palm Beach County in determining that adequate
capacity exists to accommodate the projected student population generated from the proposed
project, School concurrency is required prior to site plan approval (see Exhibit "C"- Conditions of
Approval). Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the review of the building
permit application, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting
authorities.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future
use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
The compatibility of the requested land use designation and rezoning has been discussed
above, Surrounding development is low density residential developed at a density of 4.84
dwelling units per acre. The density of the proposed PUD is slightly less, 4.82 dwelling units per
acre. The current uses within adjacent developments are all single-family residential
(detached), with most being zero lot line development, similar to the proposed project.
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning.
The property is physically developed with a total of 4 dwelling units under the existing County
zoning district. However, the two (2) existing parcels are much larger than surrounding PUD
development, and at a lesser density than allowed by the County MR-5 land use designation, If
redeveloped in the County, with a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre (46 units), the
subject property would need to be rezoned from AR to another County residential district
consistent with MR-5. Economically, it is conducive for the property to be developed similar to
the surrounding residential PUD development, whether developed in the City (45 units) or the
County (46 units). However, the subject property should be developed in the City because it is
an enclave surrounded on 3 sides by city limits, is located in the City's annexation area, and
already receives city utilities and services.
Page 6
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the
needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole,
The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will allow for development of single-family
zero lot line homes at a scale comparable, consistent, and compatible with adjacent existing
development. The size of the subject parcel will afford a development similar in nature to
surrounding residential development, and will contribute to the range of housing opportunities
available in the City,
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in
districts where such use is already allowed.
The subject property is located in the City's annexation area and designated for Low Density
Residential development. Both the type of housing (single-family detached zero lot line) and
density (4.82 units per acre) proposed for the PUD is consistent with surrounding development
in the City. There are very few comparable-sized vacant parcels within the City which could
accommodate such a development,
CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS
In conclusion, and as indicated herein:
1. This request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program;
2, The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive
Plan, including the requirements for concurrency;
3, Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county
area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary;
4. The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development;
5. The request will not create additional impacts on infrastructure that cannot be
accommodated by the City at present; and,
6. The proposed development will contribute to the overall economic development of the
City.
In addition, the proposed Master Plan meets the minimum requirements of the City's Land
Development Regulations. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request for
annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning subject to satisfying all recommended
conditions (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval),
If the Planning and Development Board or the City Commission recommends conditions, they
will be included within Exhibit "C".
ATTACHMENTS
I-:X · II-n-] r:
.. - .... I III~ '- ""\
-~ '" r " /"
1 in, ~ 264,6 feet -
i- - "
-
, f----
f----
f----.
'---.
~
.., '..,< . ~
'- ~
-
~ 1------
t-C /
Ii /
f--
Ie
/
o /
.. ..- ~.-
- 1:
- \ ~
I
'\
~~\ ~~
-<
~
~l71
~ ~
t---- ..~
. /~~ ~
'---L
~\ \ ~
/j/ '-- J ,
Aspen Glen ~~ 'h
C] ~
L[~
s
o
g,
g
,
o
~
~':J'.,.,
EXHIBIT B
I~
.1
!
-""
CIl
it
I
I,.
~ =="'="'-=~''====~-=! r
~ I Ii ---=----....:-;1: I 8'
~ I: I I' III ~ ~ '
~ s< :IU S
~ ~~_lll
D
iiti~l. ~
Il'!'! ·
liP
ii PI
Ii I <
jJ!
'I
l;
I~
If HI'I'
.; uN
ji ,
i
~:. .'u
Iii i~;~;~
11;:
.l
I....'
'I~
:'-."
',., I',:
)1,:'
,,.,,. I ~
I~'
,
.
~
j
,
1"
,.,'" 'I
.; :"1
I II
; .1
: II
I, I
'I' :
," I
i'';,:
1-'.
I'
'1""
I
..ALrT~,S~1;, ~..;;.O;J.:;;.~T rwp
,
,~ , .",
,.
,~
~i
.-
~~
.;~
!
i
.
,
~O!'~KECrRCu:
! , ~ I Aspen Glen
i l
,
, 0
, , BoyntonBeoch,FL
!![lWII ~l'l!ir!ll!
IIi '11hi!W'!ii I
?1 ~ ff I ~i
if ',.
, ,
fill
ij;'
~!;l~
..
.
!
'1,0;:0>3:.
- ~ ~ ~ z ;=
'I! ~ . 0 ~
h-.....z
" ,,~
II z
1, e
, z
on
EXHIBIT "C"
MASTER PLAN
Conditions of Approval
Project name; Aspen Glen
File number: LUAR 06-013
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan with a Mav 15, 2006 Planning and Zoning date stamp
marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
L At the time of site plan submittal, provide a master storm water management
plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and storm water treatment
facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management
plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the
method of drainage; existing water elevations; recumng high water
elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one hundred-year storm
elevation; drainage structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment
methods; necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any
other information pertaining to the control and management of storm and
ground water, (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,T,)
UTILITIES
Comments;
2, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities'
service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is
available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan
submittaL
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
ANEX 06-006, LUAR 06-013
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
05/17/06
PAGE 2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
3, At the time of site plan submittal, the applicant must indicate the disposition
of the existing trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance,
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
4, Prior to site plan approval, the project must obtain approval from the School
District of Palm Beach County regarding school concurrency,
5. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art
in Public Places" program, and must demonstrate their participation, The
fees associated with this program shall be due at the time of oermittin~,
6, If potable water is to be used for irrigation purposes, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water
conservin~ designs (such as a drip system), where oossible,
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined,
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined,
8.B.2
ASPEN GLEN (LUAR 06-013)
LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING
TO:
FROM:
THROUGH:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING &. ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-073
Chair and Members
Planning and Development Board and
Mayor and City Commission
Kathleen Zeitler ~
Planner ~
Michael W. Rumpff'.
Director of Planning and Zoning
May 16, 2006
Aspen Glen PUD/ANEX 06-006 and LUAR 06-013
Annexation of a 9.34-acre parcel; Amend the Future Land Use
designation from Palm Beach County Medium Residential, 5 units
per acre (MR-5) to Low Density Residential (LOR) and rezone from
Palm Beach County Agricultural Residential (AR) to Planned Unit
Development (PUD),
Property Owner:
Applicant! Agent:
Location:
Parcel Size:
Existing Land Use:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Land Use:
Proposed Zoning:
Proposed Use:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Lawrence Development Group, LLC
Leonard Albanese (Managing Member)
Bradley Miller
Miller Land Planning Consultants, Inc,
7216 Lawrence Rd (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3050) (4,5 acres)
3904 71st Lane S (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3060) (4,8 acres)
(see Exhibit "A")
9.34 acres
Palm Beach County Medium Density Residential (MR-5)
(max. 5.0 du/ac)
Palm Beach County Agricultural-Residential (AR)
Low Density Residential (LDR) (max, 4,84 du/ac)
Planned Unit Development (PUD)
45 single-family detached zero lot line homes
Page 2
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Single-family residential development (Jonathan's Grove) within
the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential
(LDR) and zoned R1-A;
South:
Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound
Phase I) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density
Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD);
East:
Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound
Phase II) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low
Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development
(PUD);
West:
Right-of-way for Lawrence Road, and further west, single-family
zero-lot line development (Palmyra Estates) within unincorporated
Palm Beach County designated MR-5 and zoned PUD, To the
southwest across Lawrence Road, single-family zero-lot line
residential development (Anderson PUD) within the City of
Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and
zoned PUD,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning
for the following reasons:
1. The request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program;
2. The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive
Plan, including the requirements for concurrency;
3. Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county
area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary; and,
4, The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development,
PROJECT ANALYSIS
Mr, Bradley Miller, agent for the property owner, Lawrence Development Group, LLC is proposing to
annex into the City of Boynton Beach 9.34 acres located on the east side of Lawrence Road
approximately one-quarter mile south of Hypoluxo Road. The subject property has 334 feet of
frontage on Lawrence Road, a depth of 1,220 feet, and currently consists of two (2) vacated
residential parcels (7216 Lawrence Road, and 3904 71" Lane South) having a total of (4) units
according to County Property Appraiser records.
Page 3
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
Accompanying this request for annexation are requests to amend the Future Land Use Map of the
Comprehensive Plan to classify the annexed land as "Low Density Residential" and to rezone this
property to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), The proposed PUD would provide for the
construction of 45 single-family zero-lot line dwelling units with a gross density of 4.82 dwelling
units per acre. Because the subject property is less than ten (10) acres, the Florida Department of
Community Affairs (DCA) classifies this as a "small scale" land use amendment. Unlike a "large-
scale" amendment of ten (10) acres or more, a "small-scale" amendment is adopted prior to
forwarding to the DCA, and is not reviewed for compliance with the state, regional, and local
comprehensive plans prior to adoption,
The subject property is surrounded on the south and east by the Nautica Sound PUD single-family
zero lot line development, to the north by the Jonathan's Grove single-family development, and to
the west (across Lawrence Road) by zero lot line development in Palmyra Estates and Anderson
PUD, The proposed density and type of residential use (zero lot line) is consistent with the
development found in the Nautica Sound, Palmyra Estates, and Anderson PUD communities, and will
be compatible with the adjacent Jonathan's Grove Subdivision,
Master Plan
The applicant is proposing to rezone from Agricultural Residential (AR) to a Planned Unit
Development (PUD), The required Master Plan submitted for the proposed PUD indicates one (1)
internal cul-de-sac street with direct access to Lawrence Road. The proposed 50 foot right-of-way is
located through the middle of the subject property due to the narrowness of the parcel. A total of
45 single-family lots are proposed with access only from the internal street. The Master Plan
indicates zero lot line development with a typical lot size of 45 feet by 110 feet (4,950 square feet).
Proposed minimum building setbacks would be 15 to 20 feet in front, 0 feet on one side, 10 feet on
the other side, and 10 feet to the rear. The Master Plan zero lot line detail indicates the maximum
lot coverage is 58% (2,875 square feet).
Following approval of this request for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning, the project
will require a site plan approval and plat approval prior to the issuance of any building permits for
the project. The attached conditions of approval for the Master Plan (see Exhibit "C") specify some
of the more important requirements of the forthcoming site plan approval, platting, and permitting.
Review Based on Criteria
The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff
analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map,
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in
dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written
approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk
manager, The planning department shall also recommend limitations or
Page 4
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the
property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
The subject property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone, therefore the referenced
policy is not applicable; however, other applicable objectives and policies contained in the
comprehensive plan include:
"Policy 1.17. 5
The City shall continue to maintain and improve the character of existing
single-family and lower-density neighborhoods, by preventing conversions to
higher densities, except when consistent with adjacent land uses, or with
implementing redevelopment plans including the Boynton Beach 20/20
Redevelopment Master Plan.
Policy 1.19,1
The City shall continue efforts to encourage a full range of housing choices,
by allowing densities which can accommodate the approximate number and
type of dwellings for which the demand has been projected in the Housing
and Future Land Use Elements"
The subject property is located in the City's future annexation area, and is located outside the
area of the City covered by the Bovnton Beach 20/20 Redevelooment Master Plan. The
proposed project is similar in density and type of development to the subdivisions surrounding
it, Therefore it is consistent with the directions of Policy 1.17.5. The provision of single family
homes, as proposed on this site, offsets the recent trend in the City to develop multi-family
projects and townhouses, thereby increasing the range of housing choices available to the
market, and providing consistency with Policy 1.19.1. However, in this area we have
consistently approved single-family projects, not multi-family and town home projects.
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use
pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare,
The proposed rezoning would not create an isolated district, but would relate to the adjacent
developments surrounding the site, The proposed PUD is for a single-family residential
community that is complimentary to the development patterns in the area along the Lawrence
Road corridor, especially adjacent developments,
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable.
The proposed land use amendment and rezoning are the minimum changes to the property, to
naturally accompany the annexation of this property from Palm Beach County, The proposed
amendment is consistent with the future land use classification as recommended on the Future
Land Use Map for this unincorporated area, and is consistent with surrounding land uses and
zonings, both in the City and the adjacent unincorporated area.
cI. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and
other public facilities.
Page 5
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
The proposed land use amendment and rezoning is compatible with utility systems, roadways,
and public facilities. The City already provides water and sewer service to the subject property.
Based on the City's adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for potable water (200 gallons per capita per
day (GPCD) and sewer service (90 GPCD), the projected demand is expected to be 19,350
gallons for water and 8,708 GPCD for sewer service. The City's utility plants currently have
unreserved capacity to serve the projected demands of the proposed project. With respect to
solid waste, the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority has stated that adequate capacity
exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the lO-year planning period,
The traffic study prepared by the applicant's consultant indicates the project anticipates a traffic
generation rate of 450 new trips per day, with available roadway capacity on Lawrence Road,
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed and approved the project for traffic
concurrency and notes a project build-out date of 2008,
Approval is pending from the School District of Palm Beach County in determining that adequate
capacity exists to accommodate the projected student population generated from the proposed
project, School concurrency is required prior to site plan approval (see Exhibit "C"- Conditions of
Approval). Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the review of the building
permit application, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting
authorities,
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future
use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
The compatibility of the requested land use designation and rezoning has been discussed
above, Surrounding development is low density residential developed at a density of 4.84
dwelling units per acre, The density of the proposed PUD is slightly less, 4.82 dwelling units per
acre, The current uses within adjacent developments are all single-family residential
(detached), with most being zero lot line development, similar to the proposed project,
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning,
The property is physically developed with a total of 4 dwelling units under the existing County
zoning district, However, the two (2) existing parcels are much larger than surrounding PUD
development, and at a lesser density than allowed by the County MR-5 land use designation, If
redeveloped in the County, with a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre (46 units), the
subject property would need to be rezoned from AR to another County residential district
consistent with MR-5, Economically, it is conducive for the property to be developed similar to
the surrounding residential PUD development, whether developed in the City (45 units) or the
County (46 units), However, the subject property should be developed in the City because it is
an enclave surrounded on 3 sides by city limits, is located in the City's annexation area, and
already receives city utilities and services.
Page 6
File Number: LUAR 06-013
Aspen Glen PUD
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the
needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will allow for development of single-family
zero lot line homes at a scale comparable, consistent, and compatible with adjacent existing
development. The size of the subject parcel will afford a development similar in nature to
surrounding residential development, and will contribute to the range of housing opportunities
available in the City,
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in
districts where such use is already allowed.
The subject property is located in the City's annexation area and designated for Low Density
Residential development. Both the type of housing (single-family detached zero lot line) and
density (4.82 units per acre) proposed for the PUD is consistent with surrounding development
in the City. There are very few comparable-sized vacant parcels within the City which could
accommodate such a development,
CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS
In conclusion, and as indicated herein:
1. This request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program;
2, The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive
Plan, including the requirements for concurrency;
3. Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county
area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary;
4. The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development;
5, The request will not create additional impacts on infrastructure that cannot be
accommodated by the City at present; and,
6, The proposed development will contribute to the overall economic development of the
City.
In addition, the proposed Master Plan meets the minimum requirements of the City's Land
Development Regulations, Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request for
annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning subject to satisfying all recommended
conditions (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval),
If the Planning and Development Board or the City Commission recommends conditions, they
will be included within Exhibit "C".
ATTACHMENTS
...
1 in, = 264,6 feet
-
-~
7<0 . 'He .
'-0
Ie
I
1-; V ~ II [") I v
1-./'-1 III T t ,,,,,,\
F
-~ -
_~C---,
~
-
-
-
~
f-- '--
~ ~
~
\--
~
f--
I
(fl ,
it I,.
g
.
~r
5
u
~,:;,;._,.
~ ==~=If~l~~~-==_=~~~'
~. Ir' ----.:~l~t~
~ lj< I~". a
~ II 5"
~ II -l ~
m --_-IT! ~
D
lit_fir &
Ii'!! ..
liP
ii PI
Ii I '
jd
'I
Ii
l'
~
!fIlI'H
'. uh
~[ i
J,
i~ ~hil>.
N ~iH~~
.- ~~"\
~
I
,
!
if
!
,
,I
I:
'I
.'1'
;1
~It
,.11
I:
:,
~
i:
d.1
-"11
I:
1:1
I:
~'J
~II
'I'
,I
'I
I'
,I
,
. l~
~~
~i
"~
i:;J
~~
,
11
EXHIBIT B
I:
,I
!
-:.
.~
~
!;
l!;s
! ,
,
J Aspen Glen
,
BoynlonBeach,FL
"
'., I',;
"f .:'
-\ ."
~'- I"~
;"1,;
II,;;
',if
,
I, 'I
'I', \i
Iii \
,']1 \
,,:-:,1,
!,
, "
T
I
k
,
NAVT~:...s~'1;. ~~O;,f.~T T'f
,
~~.rCfl<:l!
! ~mj~!!ll' H'111~1!'l! !ill
I 'ii" 'I'll ',.' I -',
I! i III I', I ',fl' H,
, I ' If ~. ~~~
~r r ,~i i.
~ t I ~ r .
, !
'\'. ()\l""":;:
.: ~O>~F
hf~~o~
" , 0
I! ~
'. .
'0 n
EXHIBIT "C"
MASTER PLAN
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Aspen Glen
File number; LUAR 06-013
Reference; 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan with a Mav 15. 2006 Planning and Zoning date stamo
marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments; NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. At the time of site plan submittal, provide a master storm water management
plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and storm water treatment
facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management
plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the
method of drainage; existing water elevations; recurring high water
elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one hundred-year storm
elevation; drainage structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment
methods; necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any
other information pertaining to the control and management of storm and
ground water, (Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3,T,)
UTILITIES
Comments:
2, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities'
service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is
available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan
submittal.
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
ANEX 06-006, LUAR 06-013
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
05/17/06
PAGE 2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
3, At the time of site plan submittal, the applicant must indicate the disposition
of the existing trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance,
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
4, Prior to site plan approval, the project must obtain approval from the School
District of Palm Beach County regarding school concurrency,
5, The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art
in Public Places" program, and must demonstrate their participation, The
fees associated with this program shall be due at the time of nennitting,
6, If potable water is to be used for inigation purposes, the use of drought
tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District
Manual) shall be maximized and the inigation system should have water
conserving desil!lls (such as a drip system), where nossible,
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined,
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined,
1st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan
Project name; Aspen Glen
File number: LUAR 06-013
Reference: I" review plans identified as a Master Plan with a March 3, Planning and Zoning date stamp
marking,
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments:
1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-
6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section
10-26 (a),
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments:
2, Provide a notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review)
from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering,
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
3, All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be
reflected on all appropriate sheets,
4, Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments, Acceptance of this Master Plan during the Technical Advisory
Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments
may not be generated by the Commission or upon site plan submission,
5, Provide a generalized statement of subsurface conditions on the property,
plus location and results of tests made to ascertain subsurface soil conditions
and groundwater depth (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,M,)
6, Show all utilities, including but not limited to, telephone, electricity, water,
sewer, gas, cable, etc" on or adjacent to the tract (Chapter 3, Article IV,
Section 3,0,)
7, Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by
appropriate agencies (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,P,)
8, Provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and
secondary drainage and storm water treatment facilities needed for the
subdivision, The master storm water management plan shall consist of an
engineering drawing; a written report indicating the method of drainage;
existing water elevations; recurring high water elevations; the proposed
design water elevations; one hundred-year storm elevation; drainage
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/11106
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment methods; necessary
percolation; detention and management areas; and any other information
pertaining to the control and management of storm and ground water.
(Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3,T,)
UTILITIES
Comments;
9, Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer
services will be required to serve the proposed project Your starting date
for the time line should be the date of City Commission approvaL Also
provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and
the setting of the first water meter, This time line will be used to determine
the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project
upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible,
10, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities'
service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is
available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan
submittaL
I\, The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be
paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature
on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site
plan approval, whichever occurs first This fee will be determined based
upon final meter size, or expected demand,
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments:
12, At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract
Por purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer,
provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract The
recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review,
13, At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of
Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Pee requirements have been
satisfied by a paid fee or convevance of propertv, The following information
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/11/06
3
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
shall be provided:
A A legal description of the land,
B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and
the Commission-approved site plan,
C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be
provided, The building numbers must be the same as noted on the
Commission-approved site plans,
D The number of dwelling units in each building,
E The total amount being paid,
(CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(1))
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments:
14, The applicant must indicate the disposition of the existing trees on the site
in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance,
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
15, On PUD Master Plan indicate property lines of all proposed lots
16, Consider locating the dry detention areas to a more central location within
the development
17, Consider the slope of the dry detention areas to allow conversion to usable
recreation / open space areas for the residents,
18, On PUD Master Plan indicate proposed signage locations and details,
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlAspen GlenlLUARI1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc
Planning 1 st Review Comments
ASPEN GLEN
ANEX 06-006
L Submit two (2) completed annexation applications on our form (1 original, I copy) for
the official file, The one reduced and faxed copy submitted is not legible enough for
future scanning and archiving (see top of pages I and 2 of application),
2, Submit a separate certified legal survey with legal description of the property to be
annexed (see I,b, on page 2 of application),
3, Submit a statement of the applicant's interest in the property, including a copy of the
latest recorded warranty deed for the subject property (see 2, on page 2 of application),
4, You have submitted two (2) different Applicant's Certifications (one is indicating the
applicant is the owner, one is indicating the applicant is the agent), Please clarify,
5, If the Applicant is the Agent, submit a copy of the Agency Agreement or written consent
of the seller/owner (the full sized Affidavit is not completed on page 8 of application
submitted, and the reduced copy of the Affidavit on page 6 of application submitted is not
legible),
6, If the Applicant is the Owner, submit a recorded document (corporate papers) which
authorizes him to represent and sign on behalf of the LLC, or written proof that he is an
officer of the LLC
7, Revise top of page 3 of application for densities allowed (County is 5 not 4,84, City is
4,84 not 45), Revise existing and proposed use on page 3, Existing is vacated residential
(total of 4 units), Proposed is Single Family Residential PUD (with 45 Zero Lot Line
homes),
8, You have submitted two (2) different Owner's Authorizations (one is indicating the
applicant is Miller Land Planning Consultants but it is not signed by Bradley, one is
indicating applicant is owner), Please clarify,
9, Revise Justification Statement to include; (under present and proposed uses) specify
what type of use buildings were for (total of 4 vacated residential units); under
annexation specify what services are already provided by Boynton Beach; under land use
and zoning specify County density ofMR/5, and since proposed density is 4,819 dulac
round up to 4,82 dulac, and clarify that it is the density (not just land use) that is
consistent with the other similar projects along Lawrence Road (and list the names of
those projects); under application justification I) correct from "surrounded on all sides"
to surrounded on three sides (north, east, south) by City; and go into more detail on what
policies of the Comp Plan that it is consistent with; 2) specify what the development
r
patterns to the north, south, and east actually are; 3) land use designation is Low Density
Residential (LDR) not CDR and correct statement that changed conditions do not apply
(the subject property has changed from having county services to city services over time);
6) specify reason for annexation if subject property could be developed in a comparable
way in the county, what are the advantages to the applicant.
10, Clarify formulas for existing and proposed under Impact Comparisons (maybe removing
x 2.39 persons per unit and making that a footnote would make the formula less
confusing),
11.
Revise traffic statement I study per letter from Palm Beach County Traffic, Submit a
revised traffic statement / study to Palm Beach County Traffic for concurrency approval,
and one to us for the file,
LUAR 06-013
c' 2,
.-< 6,
~II.
1.
Submit two (2) competed revised LUAR applications (1 original, 1 copy) for the official
file, The LUAR application was revised in December 2005 and is available in our office
or online at our website,
Submit certified list of all property owners within a 400 foot radius of subject property
and a tax map with radius indicated,
3,
Revise comparison of impacts to include project phasing and a construction schedule,
4,
Revise traffic statement I study per letter from Palm Beach County Traffic, Submit a
revised traffic statement I study to Palm Beach County Traffic for concurrency approval,
and one to us for the file,
5,
Revise LUAR application to provide name of contact person I project manager associated
with businesses listed (see 1.18, 20-23): architect, site planner, civil engineer, traffic
engineer, and surveyor.
t5 -'&tJ
Submit a current survey dated not more than 6 months prior to application submittal. ij;las-;t/
7,
Provide notice of school concurrency from the School District of Palm Beach County,
8,
Submit a revised Agent Consent Form (#2 on correct form should have a line to fill in the
name of person designated to act as agent),
10,
Provide revised items for the LU AR file which address same issues (see #4-10 under
ANEX 06-006),
On PUD Master Plan indicate property lines of all proposed lots,
~2,
/13.
./ 14,
Consider locating the dry detention areas to a more central location within the
development
Consider the slope of the dry detention areas to allow conversion to usable recreation I
open space areas for the residents,
On PUD Master Plan indicate proposed signage locations and details,
To;
From:
Subject:
Date:
Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist
Ed Breese, Principal Planner
Kevin J, Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist
Aspen Glen
Master Plan (proposed 45 zero lot line single-family subdivision immediaitely
south of Jonathan's Grove)-I st Review
LUAR 06-013
April 10, 2006
Kjh
File
The applicant must indicate the disposition of the existing trees on the site in
accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance,
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-064
List of Acronvms/Abbreviations:
ANSI - American National Standards Institute
ASeE - American Society of Civil
Engineers
CBB - City of Boynton Beach
CBSA - Boynton Beach Amendments
CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach
Code of Ordinances
CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Policy
CFR - Code of Federal Regulations
EPA - Environment Protection Agency
FBG - Florida Building Code
FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act
FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code
FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map
F.S. - Florida Statutes
LOR - Land Development Regulations
NEe - National Electric Code
NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn
NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical
Datum of 1929
SFWMD - South Florida Water
Management District
TO: Ed Breese
Principal Planner
FROM: Timothy K, Larn~
TART Member~vision
DATE: April 4, 2006
SUBJECT: Project - Aspen Glen
File No, - LUAR 06-013 - 1st review
Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments)- Timothv K. Larae (561)742-6352
1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments,
Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does
not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit
review,
2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the/each building as defined in 2004
FBC, Chapter 6,
3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the/each building as defined in 2004 FBC,
Chapter 3,
4 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and
exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704,8, or 2004 FBC, Residential,
Section R302,2, Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and
unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704,8 or 2004 FBC, Residential,
Section R302,2,
5 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads
of 140 mph, Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of
ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads), Calculations
that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be
submitted for review at the time of permit application,
6 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed
construction,
7 As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing, The building plans are
not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes, Therefore, add the
words "Floor plan layout is conceptual",
SIDevelopment\Building\ T ARTI TART 2006\Aspen Glen
Page 1 0'2
~.
..
8 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for
the building, Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by
adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues:
A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data,
"The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 1 DO-year base
flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water
management construction development regulations,"
B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is
located within, Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation, If there is no base flood
elevation, indicate that on the plans,
C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building
within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan
and paving/drainage (civil plans),
9 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line,
10 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan
that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the
building/s, The leading edge of the building/s begins at the closest point of the overhang or
canopy to the property line, In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all
sides,
11 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of
setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for
each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review,
12 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks
and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of
property, The following information shall be provided:
A A legal description of the land,
B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-
approved site plan,
C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided, The building
numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans,
D The number of dwelling units in each building,
E The total amount being paid,
(CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f))
13 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's
codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application,
14 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this
project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application
submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the
development order and approved by the City Commission,
15 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of
permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular
building type shall be submitted, The name of the project as it appears on the Development
Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal.
bf
SIDevelopmentlBuildingl T ARTI TART 2006\Aspen Glen
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
/
TO;
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE:
April 5, 2006
FILE; LUAR 06-013
FROM:
Off. John Huntington
Police Department
CPTED Practitioner
SUBJECT: Aspen Glen
REFERENCES: Site Plan
ENCLOSURES:
I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments:
NOTE: These plans do not show building construction, development layout.
I have no comments at this time,
Page 1 of I
~
Coale, Sherie
From: Rivers, Jody
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:48 AM
To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie
Subject: LUAR - Aspen Glen
Project: Aspen Glen
File No,: LUAR 06-013
Recreation and parks has no comment at lhis lime,
)ooll:j Rivers
Parks Superinlendent
City of Boynton Beach
100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd,
Boynton Beach, FL 33425
(561) 742-6226
(561) 742-6233 (fax)
A sense of COMMUNITY" It Starts in Parks
What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance, Boynlon Beach's parks are where
lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover what they have in
common, It starts in parks,
\
3/27/2006
/
"
t""""
~. ...... .... \
( ,
"'\...., )
c)\.... . /'.;
1'>):::;'~'~,"-'
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 06-042
FROM:
Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning
Laurinda Logan, P,E" Senior Engineer t~
April 4, 2006 \
\- )
Ar
4 vua
TO:
L
I
--'
, ~ "'f C.cv~
-----_ ,.LOf'1,.f"_j_
-_~r__1
DATE:
RE:
Review Comments
Master Plan -1st Review
Aspen Glen
File No, LUAR 06-013
The above referenced Site Plans, received on March 24, 2006, was reviewed for Public Works,
Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances, Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LDR) referenced,
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
1, Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the
storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a),
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
2, Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from
Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering,
ENGINEERING
3, All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate
sheets,
4, Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments,
Acceptance of this Master Plan during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does
not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission or upon site plan
submission,
5, Provide a generalized statement of subsurface conditions on the property, plus location and results of
tests made to ascertain subsurface soil conditions and groundwater depth (Chapter 3, Article IV,
Section 3,M,)
6, Show all utilities, including but not limited to, telephone, electricity, water, sewer, gas, cable, etc" on
or adjacent to the tract (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,0,)
7, Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies
(Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,P,)
8, Provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and
storm water treatment facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management
Dilpt of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No, 06-042
RE: Aspen Glen, Master Site Plan -1st Review, LUAR 06-013
April 4, 2006
Page 2
plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the method of drainage;
existing water elevations; recurring high water elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one
hundred-year storm elevation; drainage structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment methods;
necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any other information pertaining to the
control and management of storm and ground water, (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.T.)
UTILITIES
9, Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to
serve the proposed project Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission
approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting
of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and
wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as
accurate as possible,
10, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located
where water and sanitary sewer utility support is available, Additional comments will be provided at
the time of site plan submittal.
11, The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either
upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within
seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first This fee will be determined based upon
final meter size, or expected demand,
LLlmr
Cc: Jeffrey R Livergood, P,E" Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V, Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H, David Kelley, Jr., PEl P,S,M" City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO;
Ed Breese,
Principal Planner
DATE;
April 5, 2006
FILE: LUAR 06-013
FROM;
John Huntington, Officer
Crime Prevention Unit
SUBJECT:
REFERENCES:
Aspen Glen
Impacts of Proposed Site Plan Upon City
Services
ENCLOSURES:
I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed development on Lawrence Road located north of
Nautica Sound, This community will consist of 45 single family homes,
For the purpose of this study, a statistical analysis was completed to show the percentage of increase of police
calls for service for the selected project area, A crime analysis for 2005 shows that there have been 6,169 calls
for service for zone 10 and represents 9,5% of all calls for service, This is an increase of 4% over last year's
figures, A similar community located on Lawrence Road, used as a comparison for this project, had 468 calls
for service, Twenty-two percent of these calls were responses to residential alarms, A new development
already under way, Palmyra II located just north of Knollwood PUD, with 85 single family homes will also
add to the projected increase in calls for service to Zone 10, It must be noted that the development of Palmyra I
which is located on the south west corner of Lawrence and Hypoluxo will be annexed into the city upon the
completion of Palmyra II development. In addition, Knollwood PUD, a planned single family community of
152 homes will also add to the impact of services for this zone, Based on this comparison, a projected increase
of 8% in calls for service in Zone 10 can be expected,
With the projected development throughout the city, an increase of 35% in population can be expected, Total
police calls for service have increased 66,8 % over the past 10 years,
The need for additional officers in Zone 10 is evident by the high percentage of calls for service that one
officer is currently handling, Due to new development throughout the city, all city services will be affected,
Service requirements for the police department will be impacled greatly and the demand for more police
personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and projected traffic,
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard
p,o, Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425~0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
,ttt).,
\J::-< .
I- (u-(\'-'"
www.boynton-beach.org
To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities
Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities
Matthew Immler, Police Chief
Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal
Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent
Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief
Wally Majors, Parks Director
Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer
Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst
John Huntington, Police Officer
Ed Breese, Principal Planner ~
From:
Date:
Re:
3/22/06
Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services
Project: Aspen Glen
MEMORANDUM
As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning
Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current
infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development.
Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative
for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for
anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and
provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent
us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the
proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond
no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would
enhance the project are certainly welcomed, I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should
you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at
742-6260,
s: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\LUAR\Impact Analysis.doc