Loading...
REVIEW COMMENTS 8.B.l ASPEN GLEN (ANEX 06-006) ANNEXATION TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT NAMEjNUMBER: REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING 8< ZONING DMSION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-073 Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and Mayor and City Commission Kathleen Zeitler jLZ-- Planner ~ Michael W, Rumptf'- Director of Planning and Zoning May 16, 2006 Aspen Glen PUDjANEX 06-006 and LUAR 06-013 Annexation of a 9.34-acre parcel; Amend the Future Land Use designation from Palm Beach County Medium Residential, 5 units per acre (MR-5) to Low Density Residential (LDR) and rezone from Palm Beach County Agricultural Residential (AR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), Property Owner: Applicant! Agent: Location: Parcel Size: Existing Land Use: Existing Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Use: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lawrence Development Group, LLC Leonard Albanese (Managing Member) Bradley Miller Miller Land Planning Consultants, Inc. 7216 Lawrence Rd (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3050) (4.5 acres) 3904 71st Lane 5 (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3060) (4.8 acres) (see Exhibit "A") 9.34 acres Palm Beach County Medium Density Residential (MR-5) (max. 5.0 dujac) Palm Beach County Agricultural-Residential (AR) Low Density Residential (LDR) (max. 4.84 dujac) Planned Unit Development (PUD) 45 single-family detached zero lot line homes Page 2 Rle Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD Adjacent Uses: North: Single-family residential development (Jonathan's Grove) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned R1-A; South: Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound Phase I) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD); East: Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound Phase II) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD); West: Right-of-way for Lawrence Road, and further west, single-family zero-lot line development (Palmyra Estates) within unincorporated Palm Beach County designated MR-5 and zoned PUD, To the southwest across Lawrence Road, single-family zero-lot line residential development (Anderson PUD) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned PUD. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program; 2. The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the requirements for concurrency; 3, Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary; and, 4, The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development. PROJECT ANALYSIS Mr. Bradley Miller, agent for the property owner, Lawrence Development Group, LLC is proposing to annex into the City of Boynton Beach 9.34 acres located on the east side of Lawrence Road approximately one-quarter mile south of Hypoluxo Road. The subject property has 334 feet of frontage on Lawrence Road, a depth of 1,220 feet, and currently consists of two (2) vacated residential parcels (7216 Lawrence Road, and 3904 l1st Lane South) having a total of (4) units according to County Property Appraiser records. Page 3 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD Accompanying this request for annexation are requests to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan to classify the annexed land as "Low Density Residential" and to rezone this property to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), The proposed PUD would provide for the construction of 45 single-family zero-lot line dwelling units with a gross density of 4,82 dwelling units per acre. Because the subject property is less than ten (10) acres, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) classifies this as a "small scale" land use amendment. Unlike a "large- scale" amendment of ten (10) acres or more, a "small-scale" amendment is adopted prior to forwarding to the DCA, and is not reviewed for compliance with the state, regional, and local comprehensive plans prior to adoption, The subject property is surrounded on the south and east by the Nautica Sound PUD single-family zero lot line development, to the north by the Jonathan's Grove single-family development, and to the west (across Lawrence Road) by zero lot line development in Palmyra Estates and Anderson PUD. The proposed density and type of residential use (zero lot line) is consistent with the development found in the Nautica Sound, Palmyra Estates, and Anderson PUD communities, and will be compatible with the adjacent Jonathan's Grove Subdivision, Master Plan The applicant is proposing to rezone from Agricultural Residential (AR) to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), The required Master Plan submitted for the proposed PUD indicates one (1) internal cul-de-sac street with direct access to Lawrence Road, The proposed 50 foot right-of-way is located through the middle of the subject property due to the narrowness of the parcel. A total of 45 single-family lots are proposed with access only from the internal street. The Master Plan indicates zero lot line development with a typical lot size of 45 feet by 110 feet (4,950 square feet), Proposed minimum building setbacks would be 15 to 20 feet in front, 0 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other side, and 10 feet to the rear, The Master Plan zero lot line detail indicates the maximum lot coverage is 58% (2,875 square feet). Following approval of this request for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning, the project will require a site plan approval and plat approval prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project, The attached conditions of approval for the Master Plan (see Exhibit "C') specify some of the more important requirements of the forthcoming site plan approval, platting, and permitting, Review Based on Criteria The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C. Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or Page 4 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan. The subject property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone, therefore the referenced policy is not applicable; however, other applicable objectives and policies contained in the comprehensive plan include: ''Policy 1.17. 5 The City shall continue to maintain and improve the character of existing single-family and lower-density neighborhood~ by preventing conversions to higher densities, except when consistent with adjacent land uses, or with implementing redevelopment plans including the Boynton Beach 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan. Policy 1.19.1 The City shall continue efforts to encourage a full range of housing choices, by allowing densities which can accommodate the approximate number and type of dwellings for which the demand has been projected in the Housing and Future Land Use Elements" The subject property is located in the City's future annexation area, and is located outside the area of the City covered by the Bovnton Beach 20/20 Redevelooment Master Plan, The proposed project is similar in density and type of development to the subdivisions surrounding it, Therefore it is consistent with the directions of Policy 1.17,5. The provision of single family homes, as proposed on this site, offsets the recent trend in the City to develop multi-family projects and townhouses, thereby increasing the range of housing choices available to the market, and providing consistency with Policy 1.19.1. However, in this area we have consistently approved single-family projects, not multi-family and townhome projects, b, Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare, The proposed rezoning would not create an isolated district, but would relate to the adjacent developments surrounding the site. The proposed PUD is for a single-family residential community that is complimentary to the development patterns in the area along the Lawrence Road corridor, especially adjacent developments, c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. The proposed land use amendment and rezoning are the minimum changes to the property, to naturally accompany the annexation of this property from Palm Beach County. The proposed amendment is consistent with the future land use classification as recommended on the Future Land Use Map for this unincorporated area, and is consistent with surrounding land uses and zonings, both in the City and the adjacent unincorporated area. d. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadway~ and other public facilities. Page 5 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD The proposed land use amendment and rezoning is compatible with utility systems, roadways, and public facilities. The City already provides water and sewer service to the subject property, Based on the City's adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for potable water (200 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) and sewer service (90 GPCD), the projected demand is expected to be 19,350 gallons for water and 8,708 GPCD for sewer service. The City's utility plants currently have unreserved capacity to serve the projected demands of the proposed project. With respect to solid waste, the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority has stated that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the lO-year planning period. The traffic study prepared by the applicant's consultant indicates the project anticipates a traffic generation rate of 450 new trips per day, with available roadway capacity on Lawrence Road. The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed and approved the project for traffic concurrency and notes a project build-out date of 2008. Approval is pending from the School District of Palm Beach County in determining that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the projected student population generated from the proposed project, School concurrency is required prior to site plan approval (see Exhibit "C"- Conditions of Approval). Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the review of the building permit application, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities. e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent or nearby properties. The compatibility of the requested land use designation and rezoning has been discussed above, Surrounding development is low density residential developed at a density of 4.84 dwelling units per acre. The density of the proposed PUD is slightly less, 4.82 dwelling units per acre. The current uses within adjacent developments are all single-family residential (detached), with most being zero lot line development, similar to the proposed project. f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning. The property is physically developed with a total of 4 dwelling units under the existing County zoning district. However, the two (2) existing parcels are much larger than surrounding PUD development, and at a lesser density than allowed by the County MR-5 land use designation, If redeveloped in the County, with a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre (46 units), the subject property would need to be rezoned from AR to another County residential district consistent with MR-5. Economically, it is conducive for the property to be developed similar to the surrounding residential PUD development, whether developed in the City (45 units) or the County (46 units). However, the subject property should be developed in the City because it is an enclave surrounded on 3 sides by city limits, is located in the City's annexation area, and already receives city utilities and services. Page 6 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole, The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will allow for development of single-family zero lot line homes at a scale comparable, consistent, and compatible with adjacent existing development. The size of the subject parcel will afford a development similar in nature to surrounding residential development, and will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City, h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. The subject property is located in the City's annexation area and designated for Low Density Residential development. Both the type of housing (single-family detached zero lot line) and density (4.82 units per acre) proposed for the PUD is consistent with surrounding development in the City. There are very few comparable-sized vacant parcels within the City which could accommodate such a development, CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS In conclusion, and as indicated herein: 1. This request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program; 2, The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the requirements for concurrency; 3, Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary; 4. The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development; 5. The request will not create additional impacts on infrastructure that cannot be accommodated by the City at present; and, 6. The proposed development will contribute to the overall economic development of the City. In addition, the proposed Master Plan meets the minimum requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning subject to satisfying all recommended conditions (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval), If the Planning and Development Board or the City Commission recommends conditions, they will be included within Exhibit "C". ATTACHMENTS I-:X · II-n-] r: .. - .... I III~ '- ""\ -~ '" r " /" 1 in, ~ 264,6 feet - i- - " - , f---- f---- f----. '---. ~ .., '..,< . ~ '- ~ - ~ 1------ t-C / Ii / f-- Ie / o / .. ..- ~.- - 1: - \ ~ I '\ ~~\ ~~ -< ~ ~l71 ~ ~ t---- ..~ . /~~ ~ '---L ~\ \ ~ /j/ '-- J , Aspen Glen ~~ 'h C] ~ L[~ s o g, g , o ~ ~':J'.,., EXHIBIT B I~ .1 ! -"" CIl it I I,. ~ =="'="'-=~''====~-=! r ~ I Ii ---=----....:-;1: I 8' ~ I: I I' III ~ ~ ' ~ s< :IU S ~ ~~_lll D iiti~l. ~ Il'!'! · liP ii PI Ii I < jJ! 'I l; I~ If HI'I' .; uN ji , i ~:. .'u Iii i~;~;~ 11;: .l I....' 'I~ :'-." ',., I',: )1,:' ,,.,,. I ~ I~' , . ~ j , 1" ,.,'" 'I .; :"1 I II ; .1 : II I, I 'I' : ," I i'';,: 1-'. I' '1"" I ..ALrT~,S~1;, ~..;;.O;J.:;;.~T rwp , ,~ , .", ,. ,~ ~i .- ~~ .;~ ! i . , ~O!'~KECrRCu: ! , ~ I Aspen Glen i l , , 0 , , BoyntonBeoch,FL !![lWII ~l'l!ir!ll! IIi '11hi!W'!ii I ?1 ~ ff I ~i if ',. , , fill ij;' ~!;l~ .. . ! '1,0;:0>3:. - ~ ~ ~ z ;= 'I! ~ . 0 ~ h-.....z " ,,~ II z 1, e , z on EXHIBIT "C" MASTER PLAN Conditions of Approval Project name; Aspen Glen File number: LUAR 06-013 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan with a Mav 15, 2006 Planning and Zoning date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: NONE PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: L At the time of site plan submittal, provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and storm water treatment facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the method of drainage; existing water elevations; recumng high water elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one hundred-year storm elevation; drainage structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment methods; necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any other information pertaining to the control and management of storm and ground water, (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,T,) UTILITIES Comments; 2, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan submittaL FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE ANEX 06-006, LUAR 06-013 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 05/17/06 PAGE 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: NONE PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 3, At the time of site plan submittal, the applicant must indicate the disposition of the existing trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 4, Prior to site plan approval, the project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach County regarding school concurrency, 5. The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program, and must demonstrate their participation, The fees associated with this program shall be due at the time of oermittin~, 6, If potable water is to be used for irrigation purposes, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the irrigation system should have water conservin~ designs (such as a drip system), where oossible, ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined, ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined, 8.B.2 ASPEN GLEN (LUAR 06-013) LAND USE AMENDMENT/REZONING TO: FROM: THROUGH: DATE: PROJECT NAME/NUMBER: REQUEST: DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING &. ZONING DMSION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 06-073 Chair and Members Planning and Development Board and Mayor and City Commission Kathleen Zeitler ~ Planner ~ Michael W. Rumpff'. Director of Planning and Zoning May 16, 2006 Aspen Glen PUD/ANEX 06-006 and LUAR 06-013 Annexation of a 9.34-acre parcel; Amend the Future Land Use designation from Palm Beach County Medium Residential, 5 units per acre (MR-5) to Low Density Residential (LOR) and rezone from Palm Beach County Agricultural Residential (AR) to Planned Unit Development (PUD), Property Owner: Applicant! Agent: Location: Parcel Size: Existing Land Use: Existing Zoning: Proposed Land Use: Proposed Zoning: Proposed Use: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Lawrence Development Group, LLC Leonard Albanese (Managing Member) Bradley Miller Miller Land Planning Consultants, Inc, 7216 Lawrence Rd (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3050) (4,5 acres) 3904 71st Lane S (PCN: 00-43-45-07-00-000-3060) (4,8 acres) (see Exhibit "A") 9.34 acres Palm Beach County Medium Density Residential (MR-5) (max. 5.0 du/ac) Palm Beach County Agricultural-Residential (AR) Low Density Residential (LDR) (max, 4,84 du/ac) Planned Unit Development (PUD) 45 single-family detached zero lot line homes Page 2 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD Adjacent Uses: North: Single-family residential development (Jonathan's Grove) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned R1-A; South: Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound Phase I) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD); East: Single-family zero-lot line residential development (Nautica Sound Phase II) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD); West: Right-of-way for Lawrence Road, and further west, single-family zero-lot line development (Palmyra Estates) within unincorporated Palm Beach County designated MR-5 and zoned PUD, To the southwest across Lawrence Road, single-family zero-lot line residential development (Anderson PUD) within the City of Boynton Beach designated Low Density Residential (LDR) and zoned PUD, EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Staff recommends approval of the requested annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning for the following reasons: 1. The request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program; 2. The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the requirements for concurrency; 3. Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary; and, 4, The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development, PROJECT ANALYSIS Mr, Bradley Miller, agent for the property owner, Lawrence Development Group, LLC is proposing to annex into the City of Boynton Beach 9.34 acres located on the east side of Lawrence Road approximately one-quarter mile south of Hypoluxo Road. The subject property has 334 feet of frontage on Lawrence Road, a depth of 1,220 feet, and currently consists of two (2) vacated residential parcels (7216 Lawrence Road, and 3904 71" Lane South) having a total of (4) units according to County Property Appraiser records. Page 3 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD Accompanying this request for annexation are requests to amend the Future Land Use Map of the Comprehensive Plan to classify the annexed land as "Low Density Residential" and to rezone this property to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), The proposed PUD would provide for the construction of 45 single-family zero-lot line dwelling units with a gross density of 4.82 dwelling units per acre. Because the subject property is less than ten (10) acres, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) classifies this as a "small scale" land use amendment. Unlike a "large- scale" amendment of ten (10) acres or more, a "small-scale" amendment is adopted prior to forwarding to the DCA, and is not reviewed for compliance with the state, regional, and local comprehensive plans prior to adoption, The subject property is surrounded on the south and east by the Nautica Sound PUD single-family zero lot line development, to the north by the Jonathan's Grove single-family development, and to the west (across Lawrence Road) by zero lot line development in Palmyra Estates and Anderson PUD, The proposed density and type of residential use (zero lot line) is consistent with the development found in the Nautica Sound, Palmyra Estates, and Anderson PUD communities, and will be compatible with the adjacent Jonathan's Grove Subdivision, Master Plan The applicant is proposing to rezone from Agricultural Residential (AR) to a Planned Unit Development (PUD), The required Master Plan submitted for the proposed PUD indicates one (1) internal cul-de-sac street with direct access to Lawrence Road. The proposed 50 foot right-of-way is located through the middle of the subject property due to the narrowness of the parcel. A total of 45 single-family lots are proposed with access only from the internal street. The Master Plan indicates zero lot line development with a typical lot size of 45 feet by 110 feet (4,950 square feet). Proposed minimum building setbacks would be 15 to 20 feet in front, 0 feet on one side, 10 feet on the other side, and 10 feet to the rear. The Master Plan zero lot line detail indicates the maximum lot coverage is 58% (2,875 square feet). Following approval of this request for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning, the project will require a site plan approval and plat approval prior to the issuance of any building permits for the project. The attached conditions of approval for the Master Plan (see Exhibit "C") specify some of the more important requirements of the forthcoming site plan approval, platting, and permitting. Review Based on Criteria The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C. Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map, a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk manager, The planning department shall also recommend limitations or Page 4 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan. The subject property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone, therefore the referenced policy is not applicable; however, other applicable objectives and policies contained in the comprehensive plan include: "Policy 1.17. 5 The City shall continue to maintain and improve the character of existing single-family and lower-density neighborhoods, by preventing conversions to higher densities, except when consistent with adjacent land uses, or with implementing redevelopment plans including the Boynton Beach 20/20 Redevelopment Master Plan. Policy 1.19,1 The City shall continue efforts to encourage a full range of housing choices, by allowing densities which can accommodate the approximate number and type of dwellings for which the demand has been projected in the Housing and Future Land Use Elements" The subject property is located in the City's future annexation area, and is located outside the area of the City covered by the Bovnton Beach 20/20 Redevelooment Master Plan. The proposed project is similar in density and type of development to the subdivisions surrounding it, Therefore it is consistent with the directions of Policy 1.17.5. The provision of single family homes, as proposed on this site, offsets the recent trend in the City to develop multi-family projects and townhouses, thereby increasing the range of housing choices available to the market, and providing consistency with Policy 1.19.1. However, in this area we have consistently approved single-family projects, not multi-family and town home projects. b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare, The proposed rezoning would not create an isolated district, but would relate to the adjacent developments surrounding the site, The proposed PUD is for a single-family residential community that is complimentary to the development patterns in the area along the Lawrence Road corridor, especially adjacent developments, c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable. The proposed land use amendment and rezoning are the minimum changes to the property, to naturally accompany the annexation of this property from Palm Beach County, The proposed amendment is consistent with the future land use classification as recommended on the Future Land Use Map for this unincorporated area, and is consistent with surrounding land uses and zonings, both in the City and the adjacent unincorporated area. cI. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and other public facilities. Page 5 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD The proposed land use amendment and rezoning is compatible with utility systems, roadways, and public facilities. The City already provides water and sewer service to the subject property. Based on the City's adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for potable water (200 gallons per capita per day (GPCD) and sewer service (90 GPCD), the projected demand is expected to be 19,350 gallons for water and 8,708 GPCD for sewer service. The City's utility plants currently have unreserved capacity to serve the projected demands of the proposed project. With respect to solid waste, the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority has stated that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the lO-year planning period, The traffic study prepared by the applicant's consultant indicates the project anticipates a traffic generation rate of 450 new trips per day, with available roadway capacity on Lawrence Road, The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed and approved the project for traffic concurrency and notes a project build-out date of 2008, Approval is pending from the School District of Palm Beach County in determining that adequate capacity exists to accommodate the projected student population generated from the proposed project, School concurrency is required prior to site plan approval (see Exhibit "C"- Conditions of Approval). Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the review of the building permit application, and must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities, e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of adjacent or nearby properties. The compatibility of the requested land use designation and rezoning has been discussed above, Surrounding development is low density residential developed at a density of 4.84 dwelling units per acre, The density of the proposed PUD is slightly less, 4.82 dwelling units per acre, The current uses within adjacent developments are all single-family residential (detached), with most being zero lot line development, similar to the proposed project, f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing zoning, The property is physically developed with a total of 4 dwelling units under the existing County zoning district, However, the two (2) existing parcels are much larger than surrounding PUD development, and at a lesser density than allowed by the County MR-5 land use designation, If redeveloped in the County, with a density of up to 5 dwelling units per acre (46 units), the subject property would need to be rezoned from AR to another County residential district consistent with MR-5, Economically, it is conducive for the property to be developed similar to the surrounding residential PUD development, whether developed in the City (45 units) or the County (46 units), However, the subject property should be developed in the City because it is an enclave surrounded on 3 sides by city limits, is located in the City's annexation area, and already receives city utilities and services. Page 6 File Number: LUAR 06-013 Aspen Glen PUD g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole. The proposed land use amendment and rezoning will allow for development of single-family zero lot line homes at a scale comparable, consistent, and compatible with adjacent existing development. The size of the subject parcel will afford a development similar in nature to surrounding residential development, and will contribute to the range of housing opportunities available in the City, h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in districts where such use is already allowed. The subject property is located in the City's annexation area and designated for Low Density Residential development. Both the type of housing (single-family detached zero lot line) and density (4.82 units per acre) proposed for the PUD is consistent with surrounding development in the City. There are very few comparable-sized vacant parcels within the City which could accommodate such a development, CONCLUSIONSIRECOMMENDATIONS In conclusion, and as indicated herein: 1. This request is consistent with the objectives of the City's annexation program; 2, The requested land use amendment is consistent with the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan, including the requirements for concurrency; 3. Annexation of the subject property will eliminate a pocket of an unincorporated county area surrounded on three sides by the City boundary; 4. The requested land use and zoning are consistent with surrounding development; 5, The request will not create additional impacts on infrastructure that cannot be accommodated by the City at present; and, 6, The proposed development will contribute to the overall economic development of the City. In addition, the proposed Master Plan meets the minimum requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations, Therefore, staff recommends approval of the request for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning subject to satisfying all recommended conditions (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval), If the Planning and Development Board or the City Commission recommends conditions, they will be included within Exhibit "C". ATTACHMENTS ... 1 in, = 264,6 feet - -~ 7<0 . 'He . '-0 Ie I 1-; V ~ II [") I v 1-./'-1 III T t ,,,,,,\ F -~ - _~C---, ~ - - - ~ f-- '-- ~ ~ ~ \-- ~ f-- I (fl , it I,. g . ~r 5 u ~,:;,;._,. ~ ==~=If~l~~~-==_=~~~' ~. Ir' ----.:~l~t~ ~ lj< I~". a ~ II 5" ~ II -l ~ m --_-IT! ~ D lit_fir & Ii'!! .. liP ii PI Ii I ' jd 'I Ii l' ~ !fIlI'H '. uh ~[ i J, i~ ~hil>. N ~iH~~ .- ~~"\ ~ I , ! if ! , ,I I: 'I .'1' ;1 ~It ,.11 I: :, ~ i: d.1 -"11 I: 1:1 I: ~'J ~II 'I' ,I 'I I' ,I , . l~ ~~ ~i "~ i:;J ~~ , 11 EXHIBIT B I: ,I ! -:. .~ ~ !; l!;s ! , , J Aspen Glen , BoynlonBeach,FL " '., I',; "f .:' -\ ." ~'- I"~ ;"1,; II,;; ',if , I, 'I 'I', \i Iii \ ,']1 \ ,,:-:,1, !, , " T I k , NAVT~:...s~'1;. ~~O;,f.~T T'f , ~~.rCfl<:l! ! ~mj~!!ll' H'111~1!'l! !ill I 'ii" 'I'll ',.' I -', I! i III I', I ',fl' H, , I ' If ~. ~~~ ~r r ,~i i. ~ t I ~ r . , ! '\'. ()\l""":;: .: ~O>~F hf~~o~ " , 0 I! ~ '. . '0 n EXHIBIT "C" MASTER PLAN Conditions of Approval Project name: Aspen Glen File number; LUAR 06-013 Reference; 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan with a Mav 15. 2006 Planning and Zoning date stamo marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments; NONE PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: NONE ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. At the time of site plan submittal, provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and storm water treatment facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the method of drainage; existing water elevations; recurring high water elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one hundred-year storm elevation; drainage structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment methods; necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any other information pertaining to the control and management of storm and ground water, (Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3,T,) UTILITIES Comments: 2, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan submittal. FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE ANEX 06-006, LUAR 06-013 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 05/17/06 PAGE 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT BUILDING DIVISION Comments: NONE PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 3, At the time of site plan submittal, the applicant must indicate the disposition of the existing trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 4, Prior to site plan approval, the project must obtain approval from the School District of Palm Beach County regarding school concurrency, 5, The applicant is responsible for compliance with Ordinance 05-060, the "Art in Public Places" program, and must demonstrate their participation, The fees associated with this program shall be due at the time of nennitting, 6, If potable water is to be used for inigation purposes, the use of drought tolerant plant species (per the South Florida Water Management District Manual) shall be maximized and the inigation system should have water conserving desil!lls (such as a drip system), where nossible, ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined, ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: To be determined, 1st REVIEW COMMENTS Master Plan Project name; Aspen Glen File number: LUAR 06-013 Reference: I" review plans identified as a Master Plan with a March 3, Planning and Zoning date stamp marking, DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a), PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 2, Provide a notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering, ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 3, All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets, 4, Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments, Acceptance of this Master Plan during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission or upon site plan submission, 5, Provide a generalized statement of subsurface conditions on the property, plus location and results of tests made to ascertain subsurface soil conditions and groundwater depth (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,M,) 6, Show all utilities, including but not limited to, telephone, electricity, water, sewer, gas, cable, etc" on or adjacent to the tract (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,0,) 7, Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,P,) 8, Provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and storm water treatment facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the method of drainage; existing water elevations; recurring high water elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one hundred-year storm elevation; drainage 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 04/11106 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment methods; necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any other information pertaining to the control and management of storm and ground water. (Chapter 3, Article N, Section 3,T,) UTILITIES Comments; 9, Please provide a time line that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approvaL Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter, This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible, 10, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan submittaL I\, The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand, FIRE Comments: NONE POLICE Comments: NONE BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 12, At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract Por purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review, 13, At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Pee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or convevance of propertv, The following information 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 04/11/06 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT shall be provided: A A legal description of the land, B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan, C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided, The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans, D The number of dwelling units in each building, E The total amount being paid, (CBBCO, Chapter I, Article V, Section 3(1)) PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: NONE FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: 14, The applicant must indicate the disposition of the existing trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 15, On PUD Master Plan indicate property lines of all proposed lots 16, Consider locating the dry detention areas to a more central location within the development 17, Consider the slope of the dry detention areas to allow conversion to usable recreation / open space areas for the residents, 18, On PUD Master Plan indicate proposed signage locations and details, MWR/sc S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlAspen GlenlLUARI1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc Planning 1 st Review Comments ASPEN GLEN ANEX 06-006 L Submit two (2) completed annexation applications on our form (1 original, I copy) for the official file, The one reduced and faxed copy submitted is not legible enough for future scanning and archiving (see top of pages I and 2 of application), 2, Submit a separate certified legal survey with legal description of the property to be annexed (see I,b, on page 2 of application), 3, Submit a statement of the applicant's interest in the property, including a copy of the latest recorded warranty deed for the subject property (see 2, on page 2 of application), 4, You have submitted two (2) different Applicant's Certifications (one is indicating the applicant is the owner, one is indicating the applicant is the agent), Please clarify, 5, If the Applicant is the Agent, submit a copy of the Agency Agreement or written consent of the seller/owner (the full sized Affidavit is not completed on page 8 of application submitted, and the reduced copy of the Affidavit on page 6 of application submitted is not legible), 6, If the Applicant is the Owner, submit a recorded document (corporate papers) which authorizes him to represent and sign on behalf of the LLC, or written proof that he is an officer of the LLC 7, Revise top of page 3 of application for densities allowed (County is 5 not 4,84, City is 4,84 not 45), Revise existing and proposed use on page 3, Existing is vacated residential (total of 4 units), Proposed is Single Family Residential PUD (with 45 Zero Lot Line homes), 8, You have submitted two (2) different Owner's Authorizations (one is indicating the applicant is Miller Land Planning Consultants but it is not signed by Bradley, one is indicating applicant is owner), Please clarify, 9, Revise Justification Statement to include; (under present and proposed uses) specify what type of use buildings were for (total of 4 vacated residential units); under annexation specify what services are already provided by Boynton Beach; under land use and zoning specify County density ofMR/5, and since proposed density is 4,819 dulac round up to 4,82 dulac, and clarify that it is the density (not just land use) that is consistent with the other similar projects along Lawrence Road (and list the names of those projects); under application justification I) correct from "surrounded on all sides" to surrounded on three sides (north, east, south) by City; and go into more detail on what policies of the Comp Plan that it is consistent with; 2) specify what the development r patterns to the north, south, and east actually are; 3) land use designation is Low Density Residential (LDR) not CDR and correct statement that changed conditions do not apply (the subject property has changed from having county services to city services over time); 6) specify reason for annexation if subject property could be developed in a comparable way in the county, what are the advantages to the applicant. 10, Clarify formulas for existing and proposed under Impact Comparisons (maybe removing x 2.39 persons per unit and making that a footnote would make the formula less confusing), 11. Revise traffic statement I study per letter from Palm Beach County Traffic, Submit a revised traffic statement / study to Palm Beach County Traffic for concurrency approval, and one to us for the file, LUAR 06-013 c' 2, .-< 6, ~II. 1. Submit two (2) competed revised LUAR applications (1 original, 1 copy) for the official file, The LUAR application was revised in December 2005 and is available in our office or online at our website, Submit certified list of all property owners within a 400 foot radius of subject property and a tax map with radius indicated, 3, Revise comparison of impacts to include project phasing and a construction schedule, 4, Revise traffic statement I study per letter from Palm Beach County Traffic, Submit a revised traffic statement I study to Palm Beach County Traffic for concurrency approval, and one to us for the file, 5, Revise LUAR application to provide name of contact person I project manager associated with businesses listed (see 1.18, 20-23): architect, site planner, civil engineer, traffic engineer, and surveyor. t5 -'&tJ Submit a current survey dated not more than 6 months prior to application submittal. ij;las-;t/ 7, Provide notice of school concurrency from the School District of Palm Beach County, 8, Submit a revised Agent Consent Form (#2 on correct form should have a line to fill in the name of person designated to act as agent), 10, Provide revised items for the LU AR file which address same issues (see #4-10 under ANEX 06-006), On PUD Master Plan indicate property lines of all proposed lots, ~2, /13. ./ 14, Consider locating the dry detention areas to a more central location within the development Consider the slope of the dry detention areas to allow conversion to usable recreation I open space areas for the residents, On PUD Master Plan indicate proposed signage locations and details, To; From: Subject: Date: Planninl! Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist Ed Breese, Principal Planner Kevin J, Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Aspen Glen Master Plan (proposed 45 zero lot line single-family subdivision immediaitely south of Jonathan's Grove)-I st Review LUAR 06-013 April 10, 2006 Kjh File The applicant must indicate the disposition of the existing trees on the site in accordance with the Tree Preservation Ordinance, DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-064 List of Acronvms/Abbreviations: ANSI - American National Standards Institute ASeE - American Society of Civil Engineers CBB - City of Boynton Beach CBSA - Boynton Beach Amendments CBBCO - City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances CBBCPP - City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Policy CFR - Code of Federal Regulations EPA - Environment Protection Agency FBG - Florida Building Code FFHA - Federal Fair Housing Act FFPC - Florida Fire Prevention Code FIRM - Flood Insurance Rate Map F.S. - Florida Statutes LOR - Land Development Regulations NEe - National Electric Code NFPA - National Fire Prevention Assn NGVD - National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 SFWMD - South Florida Water Management District TO: Ed Breese Principal Planner FROM: Timothy K, Larn~ TART Member~vision DATE: April 4, 2006 SUBJECT: Project - Aspen Glen File No, - LUAR 06-013 - 1st review Buildina Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments)- Timothv K. Larae (561)742-6352 1 Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments, Acceptance of these plans during the TART (Technical Advisory Review Team) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the commission and at permit review, 2 Indicate within the site data the type of construction of the/each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 6, 3 Indicate within the site data the occupancy type of the/each building as defined in 2004 FBC, Chapter 3, 4 Place a note on the elevation view drawings indicating that the exterior wall openings and exterior wall construction comply with 2004 FBC, Table 704,8, or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302,2, Submit calculations that clearly reflect the percentage of protected and unprotected wall openings permitted per 2004 FBC, Table 704,8 or 2004 FBC, Residential, Section R302,2, 5 Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the minimum wind loads of 140 mph, Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2004 FBC, Section 1609 (Wind Loads), Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application, 6 At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction, 7 As required by LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7, submit a floor plan drawing, The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes, Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual", SIDevelopment\Building\ T ARTI TART 2006\Aspen Glen Page 1 0'2 ~. .. 8 Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) that is proposed for the building, Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: A The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data, "The proposed finish floor elevation _' _ NGVD is above the highest 1 DO-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD's surface water management construction development regulations," B From the FIRM map, identify in the site data the title of the flood zone that the building is located within, Where applicable, specify the base flood elevation, If there is no base flood elevation, indicate that on the plans, C Identify the floor elevation that the design professional has established for the building within the footprint of the building that is shown on the drawings titled site plan, floor plan and paving/drainage (civil plans), 9 On the drawing titled site plan identify the property line, 10 As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the building/s, The leading edge of the building/s begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line, In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides, 11 At time of permit review, submit separate surveys of each lot, parcel, or tract. For purposes of setting up property and ownership in the City computer, provide a copy of the recorded deed for each lot, parcel, or tract. The recorded deed shall be submitted at time of permit review, 12 At time of building permit application, submit verification that the City of Boynton Beach Parks and Recreation Impact Fee requirements have been satisfied by a paid fee or conveyance of property, The following information shall be provided: A A legal description of the land, B The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission- approved site plan, C If the project is a multi-family project, the building number/s must be provided, The building numbers must be the same as noted on the Commission-approved site plans, D The number of dwelling units in each building, E The total amount being paid, (CBBCO, Chapter 1, Article V, Section 3(f)) 13 Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for permitting shall meet the City's codes and the applicable building codes in effect at the time of permit application, 14 Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission, 15 The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction documents at the time of permit application submittal. If the project is multi-family, then all addresses for the particular building type shall be submitted, The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. bf SIDevelopmentlBuildingl T ARTI TART 2006\Aspen Glen Page 2 of 2 CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM / TO; Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE: April 5, 2006 FILE; LUAR 06-013 FROM: Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner SUBJECT: Aspen Glen REFERENCES: Site Plan ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: NOTE: These plans do not show building construction, development layout. I have no comments at this time, Page 1 of I ~ Coale, Sherie From: Rivers, Jody Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 10:48 AM To: Breese, Ed; Coale, Sherie Subject: LUAR - Aspen Glen Project: Aspen Glen File No,: LUAR 06-013 Recreation and parks has no comment at lhis lime, )ooll:j Rivers Parks Superinlendent City of Boynton Beach 100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd, Boynton Beach, FL 33425 (561) 742-6226 (561) 742-6233 (fax) A sense of COMMUNITY" It Starts in Parks What transforms a crowd into a community? Parks provide that chance, Boynlon Beach's parks are where lifetime friendships are formed, where generations can come together, where people discover what they have in common, It starts in parks, \ 3/27/2006 / " t"""" ~. ...... .... \ ( , "'\...., ) c)\.... . /'.; 1'>):::;'~'~,"-' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 06-042 FROM: Ed Breese, Principal Planner, Planning and Zoning Laurinda Logan, P,E" Senior Engineer t~ April 4, 2006 \ \- ) Ar 4 vua TO: L I --' , ~ "'f C.cv~ -----_ ,.LOf'1,.f"_j_ -_~r__1 DATE: RE: Review Comments Master Plan -1st Review Aspen Glen File No, LUAR 06-013 The above referenced Site Plans, received on March 24, 2006, was reviewed for Public Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances, Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LDR) referenced, PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1, Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse per the CODE, Section 10-26 (a), PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 2, Provide a traffic analysis and notice of concurrency (Traffic Performance Standards Review) from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering, ENGINEERING 3, All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets, 4, Please note that changes or revIsions to these plans may generate additional comments, Acceptance of this Master Plan during the Technical Advisory Review Team (TART) process does not ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission or upon site plan submission, 5, Provide a generalized statement of subsurface conditions on the property, plus location and results of tests made to ascertain subsurface soil conditions and groundwater depth (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,M,) 6, Show all utilities, including but not limited to, telephone, electricity, water, sewer, gas, cable, etc" on or adjacent to the tract (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,0,) 7, Provide a statement that all utilities are available and will be provided by appropriate agencies (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3,P,) 8, Provide a master storm water management plan outlining the primary and secondary drainage and storm water treatment facilities needed for the subdivision, The master storm water management Dilpt of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No, 06-042 RE: Aspen Glen, Master Site Plan -1st Review, LUAR 06-013 April 4, 2006 Page 2 plan shall consist of an engineering drawing; a written report indicating the method of drainage; existing water elevations; recurring high water elevations; the proposed design water elevations; one hundred-year storm elevation; drainage structures; canals; ditches; storm water treatment methods; necessary percolation; detention and management areas; and any other information pertaining to the control and management of storm and ground water, (Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.T.) UTILITIES 9, Please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible, 10, The proposed Master Plan is an existing site located within the Utilities' service area, and is located where water and sanitary sewer utility support is available, Additional comments will be provided at the time of site plan submittal. 11, The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand, LLlmr Cc: Jeffrey R Livergood, P,E" Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter V, Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities H, David Kelley, Jr., PEl P,S,M" City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Forestry & Grounds Manager, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM TO; Ed Breese, Principal Planner DATE; April 5, 2006 FILE: LUAR 06-013 FROM; John Huntington, Officer Crime Prevention Unit SUBJECT: REFERENCES: Aspen Glen Impacts of Proposed Site Plan Upon City Services ENCLOSURES: I have reviewed the impact for services for the proposed development on Lawrence Road located north of Nautica Sound, This community will consist of 45 single family homes, For the purpose of this study, a statistical analysis was completed to show the percentage of increase of police calls for service for the selected project area, A crime analysis for 2005 shows that there have been 6,169 calls for service for zone 10 and represents 9,5% of all calls for service, This is an increase of 4% over last year's figures, A similar community located on Lawrence Road, used as a comparison for this project, had 468 calls for service, Twenty-two percent of these calls were responses to residential alarms, A new development already under way, Palmyra II located just north of Knollwood PUD, with 85 single family homes will also add to the projected increase in calls for service to Zone 10, It must be noted that the development of Palmyra I which is located on the south west corner of Lawrence and Hypoluxo will be annexed into the city upon the completion of Palmyra II development. In addition, Knollwood PUD, a planned single family community of 152 homes will also add to the impact of services for this zone, Based on this comparison, a projected increase of 8% in calls for service in Zone 10 can be expected, With the projected development throughout the city, an increase of 35% in population can be expected, Total police calls for service have increased 66,8 % over the past 10 years, The need for additional officers in Zone 10 is evident by the high percentage of calls for service that one officer is currently handling, Due to new development throughout the city, all city services will be affected, Service requirements for the police department will be impacled greatly and the demand for more police personnel and equipment will be needed to balance the increase in population and projected traffic, The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E, Boynton Beach Boulevard p,o, Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425~0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 ,ttt)., \J::-< . I- (u-(\'-'" www.boynton-beach.org To: Peter Mazzella, Assistant Director, Utilities Kofi Boatang, Director of Utilities Matthew Immler, Police Chief Rodger Kemmer, Deputy Chief / Fire Marshal Jody Rivers, Parks Superintendent Cc: William Bingham, Fire Chief Wally Majors, Parks Director Laurinda Logan, Civil Engineer Rick Lee, Fire Protection Analyst John Huntington, Police Officer Ed Breese, Principal Planner ~ From: Date: Re: 3/22/06 Impacts of proposed site plan upon City facilities and services Project: Aspen Glen MEMORANDUM As part of the City's concurrency requirements, the City Commission directed the Planning & Zoning Division to report whether or not the City could maintain an adequate level of service with current infrastructure and / or staffing levels in order to support the proposed development. Plans for the above-mentioned project have been forwarded to your department's representative for their technical review and comment. We are requesting that you review the proposed project for anticipated impacts to your department's level of service (as requested by the City Commission) and provide us with your comments for direct insertion into our staff report. In the past, you have sent us something that indicates your current staff / infrastructure would either be able to support the proposed project or what would be required to meet the adopted level of service. Please respond no later than 2 weeks from today. Also, any recommendations that you believe that would enhance the project are certainly welcomed, I thank you for your assistance in this matter. Should you have any questions regarding the requested information, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6260, s: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Aspen Glen\LUAR\Impact Analysis.doc