CORRESPONDENCE
09/01/2005 14:48
5614348815
PLANNING DEPT
PAGE 02/03
THESCHOOL D18TR1CT OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA
PlANNING DEI'JI\RTI.ENT
3300 FOR6T HILL BLVD.. c-110
WESTpALMSeACH.FL >>406-5813
(561) 434-8OZO FAX: (561) ~181
ARTHURC.JOHNSON, Ph.D.
SUPERINTENDENT
~OOLo.~
llJ.?<l
F ~
~ BE'XH ~
September 1, 2005
Mr. Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION - CASE NUMBER #04043001C - BOYNTON
VILLAGE
Dear Mr. Hudson:
The Palm Beach County School District has reviewed the request for a Concurrency
Determination on the above referenced project for 1120 multi-family units. The original
application for school concurrency for the same number of units was filed on April 30, 2004,
but expired in April of this year.
Attached please find the approved Palm Beach County School District Concurrency
Application and Service Provider Form far Boynton Village. This Concurrency Determination
is valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. Once a Development Order has been
issued for the project, the concurrency determination will be valid for the life of the
Development Order.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact me at
(561) 434-8876.
:1{)y
Tonya Deal
Senior Planner
cc: Kim Glas-Castro, Ruden McClosky
enc.
L:IPI..o;ng\Publlo\IN'll!llOOV\Co\!<"mmoylCoooumn"l' PetennillOlioo Let\efSlConoumm0y\200SIC0404300!.doo
A>l EQUAL O~POATUNlTY EMPLOYER
09/01/2005
89/81/2885
119111/ZI"
14:48
11:32
111M
5614348815
5617426259
n1...:r~IIIt!J,
PLANNING DEPT
PLANN1Nb
~lNIii D&PT
PAGE
....-.- ""-
PI&; 12/112
03/03
CD ..--..---
-~"='0:1;
---"
__1-"--
...--..--
.... 'nle$clllOOl ~Gf hlm.... Counlr - c ..
8alIGcII ~ Appallllon .....- 11.4.'" F_
_..4. Tt ...: ......_....,"'..~...tlJ-.-~ I .................dJ If~
=........~ '~L'III_._.___.......... ",.....1........~=
t1"-~_offlllllllll".....-. ,.~".t.~L!...~"'_4.l1!d
.... .. ... ~ ... .. "'....... QMlIt" D....Ar..... .,.... II --- .. ..........
I A..................."..__~~._.LQCIer.
__t4l_- _;II ..,........,.
tJI~_-'..O""..L~. I Jo._...-.I-.&" I J-~''''!rJII!~ J .....,
I J,......___..t.... I JlAMlPoIllo..... I ]TlIM.......
... T f _....-'--~ r 1 ~--...._,....
..................-..--.......-..............--'"""
........ aMfB.t-ml Vf""", .rn ~_..
___~ Oll-43-4'_I~l_ClOO..06aO - -
..-f_"....-.. ~f..:\~..~ ..... """
-sfirC. 2S b
K::I[~
. -=----_.-=,"""----,,,-,..,.
....- ................ -
~ J "I_~
=e:t~:r! :: ::--- 4_~
~~.___ ,. . :: _ i
.............-------. ...-....
---
. "0'5
--
-
----..-
....................--.
.--..---
- --
_ ,-.......,................-.----.-
-="-==-"--"'~"~"-~.
_ r_............_...._ -_'"
\..
":fir #I J"'............~~..~~.IIO('
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
City Hall, West Wing
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box 31 0
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
Planning & Zoning
Division
TO: Tonya Deal
FAX: ~ 434-8187
FROM: Dick Hudson, AICP
DATE: September 1, 2005
NUMBER OF PAGES: (including
coverl
2
RE: Boynton Village Re-application
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you.
09/01/2005 09:24 5614348815
PLANNING DEPT
PAGE 01/02
r('HOOLO~
~~
~ ~, q
"~EACH ~~
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
3320 FOREST HILL BOULEVARD - C331
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
PHONE: 5611434-8020
FAX: 5611434-8187
"",.. r
, .....--..,.;..,
Number of pages sent (including cover page): 2
TO: Mr. Dick Hudson, Senior Planner, City of Boynton Beach
DATE: September 1, 2005
FAX NUMBER: 742-6259
FROM: Tonya Deal, Senior Planner, SDPBC
COMMENTS: Please sign the attached school concurrency and provider
re-application form in "Part II, Local Government Review"
and fax back to me at 561-434-8187 as soon as possible.
Thank you.
Attachment
L;\PlennlnglPubllcUNTEROOVlConcurrancylConcurrency Determination LettersIFoxes\2005\FXC04043001.DOC
09/01/2005 09:24
5614348815
PLANNING DEPT
PAGE 02/02
tn,.
UtI
The School Pl*!ct of ,.Im INch County
PliID"lngDtpllrtmnt
1320 fo.... HIli Blvd. C-"0
Welt F"llm Ektad1, Fl 334D&-5813
PhGflII; (681) 434-8800 w(581) Bl:Hm
FIIle (561)434-8187 ar'(561)4U1I15
Allendr;lfl; ca.v.umncy
The $ChODI District of Palm Beach County
School Concurrency Appllclltion & Service Provider FDrm
Instructions: Submit on. copy of the completed applk:8tJon _net fees: for _ch new I"8&ldentlal
proJocl requiring a doI1IrmlnotlOn '" concurrency for schools. A d_atlon will be provided within
fifteen (15) working days of ,"ealpl of a complete .ppllcallon. A de_nation Is not tronsfe,able and is
valid for QI"Q year from date of Issuance. Once thQ Development Ord8r as Issued, the concurrency
cleIerrnina~on shall be valid for the life of the DevelOpment Order.
P_. check (-I) typo "'application (on. only):
[Xl Concurrency Oe18nnlnation [ ] Concurrency E~on [ J COl'1QlJTllncy Equivalency
[ ] Adequate School Facilities Deb!nnlnatlon [ ] LOIter of No Implct [ 1 TIme ExtOnGlon
F6U: Concurrency DeWR'n",..tion Of ~dlqu." SchQaI FaciRtln DetemlIndun IJZOO.DO lormor'll t'lluI20 unItS 1 20 unlbl
VI".... .too.OO); EqutvtllHJcr'($121.DO);. Exemptlon<< LtUwof tIIel...-ct ($zs.00); Tmt I$nSIOn '$15.001
~_~_-: ~&:~~~ -= ~ .,--; - -~ ~ ~ ~ if
~:_';' ~_=07~--==-~,'_-diJ.. '.,,.l -,-,-",,~'..>_rl.j.\._J..... ""'u_'.J . ..r-::< ~ Jt;-_~
PfNM ~". CWafU'NI:~pMn, jUfiiiiiOnJed..rmnrrlofldMtlllMllMntftNm
Project Name: Bovnton Vil1a.O'A Municipality: Rnynton 'RAAC.h
Property ConlrOl Numbor(PCN)' 08-43-45-20-01-000-0680 and -0090
LocatlonIAddreosofSUOj.ctProporly: NE corner of Con~re88 Ave and
011'1 Roynt.on llo::ui
SectionITownshl
P eel Acre e
Total NOO1ber of Units
Will tile Pro eel be Phased?'
Concurre Servire Area A
Si II F.ml
MulU-Faml
.rtmonls
H h Rioe
o Restricted
Other than a ._
stories or less
nts
ultsOn -
IIl1pp/1Cl111M, plate auactI a Phasing P1l11'1 showing 1M numblr IQ'Id tyfa ofunit8lO recetue CllII1!fk:8tIJ of CICQ.l~1'ft;y yeI~.
AFt88trIcIIveCownl!mtll:~QlJ1!dftJf~oornroonll:l6l,
OWNERSHIP I AGENT INFORMATION:
Own"'. N.....: Klatt Contract: Purchaser: 1950 Conness Avenue LLC
Agenra Nomo: R~~en MC5l~kl K1m G1 A,,-r.R"~rn
M.llln9Add....: Z Lake'i .venue /1800
~est ~zr BAACh. FT, 11401
ToIophonoNumber. _38-4___ Fox NumllOr: ~14-1442
I her9by ~ tho mtadlMts CM' InfMlMfion madt In
btMOfmylcnawleda"
.ro=ndg\{-os
rs Agent Slgnaluro 0010
OWnor
-"~ 3-___~~ J:: . .o1~Jz ~_';' ~'- ,bo.liL,-~ ..J. ~ ~ ~ r~-~c-
Dolo Application FIIO<I:
~ovI0w0dBy: AI
Did the Appllcont pay III. filing f.. to you?
~~_Slgnaturo
Potlllon NUmbo"
TIll.: ..qbollOIl. PlIll?',vm
YES (PIe&H attaI#lPfOl'fd~l1l)
(Woo. the appl1c8nl TnU81 ~ 'tMI SttlOOl District.
Thl!l ~ DlsMclWl ncII ravlBw wtmout peynwnt).
<5
Dato 8. TIme ReeeiVOd:
Coso Number:
I vertry that the profeCI compiles wtth the adop1~ l.evel at Service (LOS) fur SchOOla
I W1rify thlld thl: p~ wm I;:I;II'T1p/y wi1h ~ ~ Level of SalVioa (LOS) for SCh.'>>!t. SUbject to tI'le
attached conditions
Il;iInllOt wnfy that tI'I$ ~ will eomj:lly \NIttI the adopted level of ServIce (LOS) for SdKJob
School DiStrict Rop...ontatlve
Dot_
:'l\rlMmf\tJ>1'hli('\O*~"~ONC1'..l<;jc;.,l"UR.\f;)'J!)I);; (~O'IC\lfm1~ AJl(lli~li~.DOC
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
Po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Tony MasHotti, Chairman
Addie L. Greene, Vice Chairperson
Karen T. Marcus
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
..._~
;r:.;
II, :1
ULII
I
I
_J
DEPARTMENT OF DfV[1 ('PH! ~n ;
"An Equal Opportunity
AfJinnative Action Employer"
~ printed on recycled paper
February 1, 2005
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE:
Winchester Property - (Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village)
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study and responses to
comments for the proposed project entitled; Winchester Property, comprised of two
planned developments called; Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village, pursuant to
the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land
Development Code. This project is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road.
Boynton Beach
None
1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums), 399,000 SF General
Retail, 10,000 SF General Office.
16,584
603 Am and 1,357 PM
2008
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed mixed-use
project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, under the
following conditions:
. No building permits for more than 190 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for addition of third WB and EB through lanes on both
approaches 01 GatewdY BOUlevard at In/; i:lterseciion of Con9~ess Avenue.
. No building permits for more than 461 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for addition of NB dual left-turn ianes with proper receiving
lanes, or adoption of appropriate CRALLS, for the intersection of Old Boynton
Road and Congres5 Avenue.
. No building permits for more than 733 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for addition of exclusive EB dual ieft-turn lanes with
appropriate receiving lanes, or adoption of appropriate CRALLS at the
Intersection of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue.
. No building permits fo, more than 8.96 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for addition of an exclusive EB right-turn lane at the
intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue.
. No building permits for more than 963 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for 5-laning of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard, from
Congress Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, or adoption of appropriate
CRALLS, for all or some links along the arterial segment.
. No building permits for more than 1,018 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for addition of an exclusive SB right-turn lane or adoption of
appropriate CRALLS, at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Congress
Avenue.
. No building permits for more than 1,181 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for addition of exclusive SB dual left-turn lanes at the
intersection of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach 8oulevard.
. No building permits for more than 1,208 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for 6-laning of Congress Avenue, from Lantana Road to
Hypoluxo Road.
. No building permits for more than 1,348 new external PM peak hour trips until
construction begins for 6-laning of Congress Avenue, from Lantana Road to
Melaleuca Lane.
. Exclusive turn lanes are required the following project access locations, where
not available:
o SBL and NBR turn lanes along Congress Avenue at the north-most
project access driveway
o SBL turn lane along Congress Avenue at the middle project access
driveway.
o NBR turn lane along Congress Avenue at the south-most project
access driveway.
Within six (6) months from the date of municipal development order, the developer must
enter into a Public Facilities Agreement (PFA) with Palm Beach County to fund and/or to
construct any and all improvements that are not "Assured Construction" as the term is
defined by the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The PFA must be in a fo~m
acceptable to the Country Engineer The municipality shall not issue any building
perrnits associated v'.;ith the project unless ~lnd unt;~ the PFl~. r:3S been app~Gved by the
Board of County Commissioners.
No building permits are to be issued by the City, after the build-out date specified above.
The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set
forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance.
The following are suggested to the City of Boynton Beach:
. Consider implementation of traffic circulation mitigation measures identified in
the "Central Boynton Beach Regional Traffic Circulation Study' which has been
required from the consultant. This report is targeted to identify peak hour
operational problem5 and identify improvements, which includes extension of
storage lengths at exclusive turn lanes at all intersections within the project area
of influence.
. Because of the high forecasted volumes for Gateway Boulevard, and the
proposed mitigations necessary fo; this approval, it is suggested for the City to
look into 6-laning of Gateway Boulevard, from Congress Avenue to High Ridge
Road.
. Due to the high forecasted peak hour volumes, provision of the following
intersection turn-lanes are suggested where possible:
o SBR at the intersection of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road.
o Additional second WBR lane at the intersection of Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Old Boynton Road.
o NBR at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road.
This determination is subject to the conditions set forth in this ietter. These conditions
must be included in the Development Order issued by the City. The Development Order
must also provide that failure to meet any of these conditions shall give the County
Engineer the right to rescind or amend the approval granted in this Traffic Performance
Standards Review Letter.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER
n/!,
Masoud Atefi, M
Sr. Engineer - Traffic Division
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
Kimley Horn & Associates
File: General- TPS. Mun - Traffic Study Review
F:\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\D40613.doc
Hudson. Dick (Orran)
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Glas-Castro, Kimberly [Kimberly.Glas-Castro@ruden.com]
Monday, December 20,200412:24 PM
Hudson, Dick (Orran)
Miskel. Bonnie; RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
RE: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments
We had a meeting with FDOT regarding their comments on the amendments.
They were concerned that the amendment(s) had not been analyzed based on
the maximum intensity permissible under the land use category. And
while FDOT acknowledges that we used the maximum intensity that could be
accomplished as a local project (without triggering DRI review, which
would necessitate add11 State and Regional review) I they would like us
to utilize the IIfootnote" approach that has been used elsewhere in the
State.
Basically, a footnote or symbol is placed on the property on the Future
Land Use Map; and a notation is put at the bottom of the map/map key
area that corresponds to the footnote/symbol. The footnotes would read
something like: nper the Boynton Village SMU amendment, this property
is restricted to 1,120 residential units, 10,000 s.f. of office and
149,000 s.f. of commercial uses, or the equivalent thereof. 11 and "Per
the Boynton Town Center amendment, this property is restricted to
250,000 s.f. of commerical development, or the equivalent thereof."
Roger Wilburn had confirmed DCAls acceptance of this approach. They
prefer to amend the land use category to limit the permissible intensity
to that which has been evaluated, but understand that this is a new
citywide land use and the City wants to provide flexibility in intensity
for other properties -- so the footnote approach is acceptable as an
alternative
-----Original Message-----
From: Hudson, Dick (Orran) [mailto:HudsonD@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us]
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:10 AM
To, Glas-Castro, Kimberly
Subject: RE: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments
Kim,
Give me the background on this. It is all news to me.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Glas-Castro, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Glas-Castro@ruden.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 4:13 PM
To: Hudson, Dick (Orran); RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Subject: FW: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments
----~Original Message-----
From: Roger.Wilburn@dca.state.fl.us
[mailto,Roger.wilburn@dca.state.fl.us]
Sent, Thursday, December 16, 2004 4,07 PM
To: Glas-Castro, Kimberly
Subject: Re: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments
1
It is not our preferred method but we will generally accept it.
IIGlas-Castro,
Kimberlyll
<Kimberly. Glas-Ca
To
stro@ruden.com>
<roger.wilburn@dca.state.fl.us>
cc
12/16/2004 04,01
PM
Subject
FW: Boynton Beach Amendments
I just want to confirm my email that this footnote approach is
acceptable (so that the City will have a response by email from DCA)
-----Original Message-----
From: Kemper, Margaret Ray
Sent, Thursday, December 16, 2004 3,42 PM
To: Glas-Castro, Kimberly
Subject: RE: Boynton Beach Amendments
I have confirmed with Roger Wilburn that the footnote approach is ok so
long as the notation on the future land use map is clear.
DCA generally
on its Future
limitations.
limitations.
recommends that a local government create a notation table
Land Use Map and then use numbers and text to define the
That way, multiple parcels can be given density/intensity
Call if you have any questions.
-----Original Message-----
From: Glas-Castro, Kimberly
Sent, Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3,17 PM
To: Kemper, Margaret-Ray
Subject: Boynton Beach Amendments
2
Sembler amendments on winchester property. . . . . . . .. did you have a
chance to
speak with Caroline Knight about the "footnote" restricting
intensity
on the property?
Kim Glas-Castro, AICP
Certified Land Planner
Ruden McClosky
222 Lakeview Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
telephone, (561) 838-4542
in Broward, (954) 761-2926
fax, (561) 514-3442
kim.glascastro@ruden.com
NOTICE: This e~mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message
contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you
are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert
to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e~mail or any attachments to
it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us
immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete
this message. Please note that if this email message contains a
forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the
contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced
by the sender.
NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e~mail message
contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you
are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert
to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to
it. If you have received this email in error, please notify us
immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete
this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a
forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the
contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced
by the sender.
NOTICE: This email message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains
confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate
this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please
notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this
message. Please note that if this e~mail message contains a forwarded message or is a
reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments
may not have been produced by the sender.
3
Page 3
File Number: LUAR 04-006
Boynton Village
~~2.I?A ...,)1
U- &r1 <PJ; I
~"f9!-f'
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The parcels, which are the subject of this land use amendment, total 81.81 acres. Because of
the size of the property under consideration, the Florida Department of Community Affairs
classifies this amendment as a "large-scale" amendment. Following local board review and City
Commission public hearing the amendment package was transmitted to the Florida Department
of Community Affairs (DCA) on August 3, 2004 for review for compliance with the state,
regional and local comprehensive plans prior to adoption. The normal review period is
approximately 60 days; however, additional time was added to allow adequate response time
for review agencies affected by the hurricanes. The City received DCA's report of their findings
in an "Objections, Recommendations and Comments (aRC) Report" on November 19, 2004.
This report from the state is generated from reviews against state, regional and local plans and
other agencies' long-range plans and policies. The two objections were based on "lack of
analysis" of: (1) availability of public facilities, and (2) traffic impacts for the maximum
development potential of the sites. A matrix is attached, showing objections and comments
from DCA and proposed responses (Exhibit "B").
The City has 60 days to either (1) adopt the amendment as transmitted, (2) adopt the
amendment with changes in response to the aRC report, or (3) determine not to adopt the
amendment and inform DCA of that decision. The adoption hearing is scheduled for the City
Commission meeting on January 18, 2005. It is anticipated that DCA will issue a Notice of
Intent (NOI) to find the amendments either "in compliance" or "not in compliance"
approximately 60 days following receipt of the amendment package (March 14,2005). The
amendments become effective 21 days following issuance of the NOL
Master Plan Reauirements
The regulations for the Suburban Mixed Use zoning district require that a master plan, including
multi-year phases be submitted and reviewed for approval at the time of rezoning to SMU.
Because of the length of time required by the large-scale land use amendment process, the
applicant submitted a master plan (see Exhibit "C") for approval to coincide with adoption of the
land use amendment and the rezoning. While master plan approval is required for rezoning to
the SMU district, there is no such requirement for rezoning to C-3 Community Commercial as
requested for the Boynton Town Center portion of the property; however, since the two
rezonings are preceding simultaneously, staff has requested that any proposed access points
from the property to the excluded parcel (Boynton Town Center) be shown on the plan and that
compatibility be maximized with the remainder of the project through interconnectivity,
consistent architectural design and other design attributes required by the SMU regulations.
The proposed master plan meets the minimum requirements, as outlined in the zoning
regulations for the Suburban Mixed Use zoning district with any exceptions noted in the Review
Comments (see Exhibit D). Those requirements include:
. Any proposed multi-year phasing for the project;
. Locations of the different uses proposed, including open space or common areas,
recreational facilities, residential areas, commercial uses, office uses, other permitted
uses, and areas to be developed with integrated mixed-use structures;
Page 4
File Number: LUAR 04-006
Boynton Village
. Access and flow to each parcel;
. Tabulations of total gross acreage in the development and the percentages thereof
proposed to be devoted to the several land use types;
. Tabulations demonstrating the proposed number of dwelling units, square footage of
commercial, office and other uses; and,
. Architectural design standards showing the following: design themes to be followed,
building colors and color pallet options, maximum building heights and color elevation
renderings depicting representative design concepts.
Proiect Phases And Master Plan Overview
The project is proposed for development in two phases. Phase I will consist of the spine road
connecting the Renaissance Commons development on the north with Old Boynton Road on the
south; a lake parcel of 8.38 acres (10.27% of the site); and a mixed-use parcel of 24.7 acres
(30.27% of the site). The mixed-use parcel extends from the north boundary of the site at the
Boynton (C-16) Canal southward along Congress Avenue to the boundary with the Boynton
Town Center Project. Two access points are shown from Congress Avenue and connecting with
the proposed spine road, each provides pedestrian and vehicular access to the site. The road
from Congress Avenue opposite the entrance to the Boynton Beach Mall, is proposed to be lined
with one- and two-story commercial buildings which will provide a "main street" atmosphere for
the project. The lake parcel is located in the central eastern part of the property. It will be the
principal storm water retention area for the development.
Currently, the remainder of the project is scheduled for Phase II. With the exception of a 5.03-
acre (6.16% of the site) parcel denoted as "park", parcels, identified for Phase II, would all be
devoted to residential development, with townhomes located on the parcel surrounding the
"lake parcel" and along the C-16 Canal, and condominiums on the two remaining parcels. The
residential parcels total 43.47 acres or 53.3% of the total development.
Tabular data show that the proposed land uses include 149,000 square feet of commercial and
retail, 10,000 square feet of office and 1,120 units of multi-family residential development. A
more recent breakdown shows that of the 1,120 residential units, there are 472 proposed
townhouses (attached single family units) and 648 condominium units.
The City has adopted a resolution requiring land dedication to satisfy the impact fee obligations;
therefore, only a portion of the 5.03-acre "park parcel" counts toward the "usable open space"
requirements. Based on the formulae included in the SMU development regulations, 30% of
the land area devoted to single-family attached units and 20% of the land area devoted to
mixed use and multi-family use must be "usable open space". In the mixed use and multi-
family use areas, up to 50% of the usable open space may be made up of hardscaped plazas
and public gathering places. In the townhouse areas, at least 50% must be in common pooled
areas, though none of this usable open space must be in public parks. Under this requirement,
a total of 17.65 acres must be earmarked for usable open space. The proposed 40-foot
pedestrian greenway adjacent to the right-of-way of the E-4 Canal and the 25-foot greenway
adjacent to the C-16 Canal will fulfill some of those requirements. There is no other indication
Page 5
File Number: LUAR 04-006
Boynton Village
how the applicant intends to fulfill these requirements; although staff will require that the
developer provide a notation on the master plan giving a conceptual description or statement of
assumptions as to how he proposes to meet the requirements. This notation will be used as a
guide as site plans for each development tract are submitted.
Also regarding recreation, a negative aspect of the proposed master plan is the lack of park
space (private and public) located to take advantage of the lake area. While location of the
proposed park parcel would maximize accessibility to non-residents of the development, it is
assumed that the "main street" area will be patronized by more than just residents of the
development. A passive area located between the spine road and the lake could be a special
focal point and gathering place for a great number of people, and a true asset to the
development. This would also fulfill the SMU requirements that developments utilizing the
regulations provide public plazas and gathering places that are both well-designed and
integrated into the overall design of the development; and also create higher quality
environments for residents, businesses, employees, and visitors.
A finding of consistency of the project with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance
Standards Ordinance is based on the assumption that certain roadway and intersection
improvements will be necessary prior to buildout. Many of these improvements are already in
the County's adopted long-range transportation plans, but may not be included in their Five-
year Transportation Improvement Plan. Since these planned improvements may require
acquisition of additional rights-of-way, their full implementation may be too costly to be
practicable. Staff recommends a requirement of an explanation of the thresholds of
development that trigger each of the roadway improvements. This should include both a
comparable mix of uses similar to the subject request, as well as a scenario involving principally
residential uses (Condition 5). This should be provided prior to approval of any of the individual
site plans within the project.
Review Based on Reauired Criteria
The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff
analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future
Land Use Map.
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in
dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written
approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the Citys risk
manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or
requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the
property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
The subject property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone, therefore the referenced
policy is not applicable; however, other applicable objectives and policies contained in the
comprehensive plan include:
Ranges of Allowable Percentages of Land Use Within the Area:
Residential: 30%-70%
Comrnercial (including office development): 30%- 70%
The cumulative development in these areas shall be monitored annually to
ensure that the proportion of rnixed uses is maintained.
A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 4.0 may be considered for all uses, exclusive
of parking structures, throughout the Mixed Use Core land use category. For
the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal Highway within the Hurricane
Evacuation Zone, while the residential density within a development may be
up to 80 dwelling units per acre, the overall density for the Mixed Use-Core
area east of Federal Highway shall not exceed 40 dwelling units per acre.
All land development located in the Mixed Use-Core category shall be
required to submit a plan that includes a single unified design for the project,
and shall conform to any adopted design plan( s) for the area covered by the
category.
Mixed Use-Suburban: This land use category shall only be applicable to lands
located west of 1-95, and shall consist of the SMU Suburban Mixed Use
zoning districts and/or any zoning district(s) which may be established in the
future provided that the abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the
Future Land Use Map within the Mixed Use-Suburban land use category.
The land use category allows for a diversity of land uses and accommodates
and encourages a mixture of uses, which may be arranged either vertically or
horizontally along major arterial roadways. All land developrnent located in
the Mixed Use- Suburban category shall be required to submit a rnaster plan
that includes a unified plan of development for the project, which encourages
synergy between proposed uses, promotes pedestrian or multi-modal linkages,
maximizes usable open spaces and public spaces, and establishes design
objectives for the project.
The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not
necessarily include the following:
All uses located in the Local Retail Commercial land use category and all uses
located in the High Density Residential Land Use Category. Residential
densities up to 20 dwelling units are permitted. A maximum Floor Area Ratio
(FAR) up to 1.0 is permitted for all non-residential uses, exclusive of parking
structures, throughout the Mixed Use-Suburban land use category. Density
and FAR shall be calculated based upon the gross acreage.
City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments 04-2
1-20a
Date: February 15, 2005
Future Land Use Element
Ordinance No. 04-049
The following percentages, calculated as a percentage of the net area, shall be
met in designing the mixture of uses:
High Density Residential: 30%-70%
Local Retail Commercial (including office development): 30%-70%
In calculating the net area, roadway areas, parks, drainage, wetlands, or
recreation tracts shall be excluded.
The mix of uses proposed for any land development located in the Mixed Use-
Suburban category shall be reviewed for aesthetics, design quality and
physical compatibility with adjacent land uses; and shall conform to any
adopted design planes) for the area covered by the category.
General Commercial: This land use category shall consist of all C-4 General
Commercial zoning districts, and any other zoning districts which may be
established, including Planned Commercial Development districts, which are
similar in character to the C-4 district, provided that all of the abovernentioned
zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the General
Commercial land use category.
The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not
necessarily include, the following:
All uses allowed in the Local Retail Commercial land use category, plus
wholesale of non-hazardous commodities, business services, vehicle and boat
storage; household storage; shops for fabrication, rebuilding, and repair on a
custom basis. A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 0.50 may be considered for
general commercial uses
Industrial: This land use category shall consist of all M -I and Planned
Industrial Development zoning districts, and any other industrial zoning
districts which may be established, provided that all of the abovementioned
zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the Industrial
land use category
The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not
necessarily include, the following: Industrial uses, research and development,
wholesale and distribution, business and repair services, warehousing and
storage; transportation, communication, and utility facilities, retail sale of
City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan
Amendments 04-2
1-21
Date: February 15,2005
Future Land Use Element
Ordinance No. 04-049
,
The City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
FAX: (561) 742-6285
www.boynton-beach.org
OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER
December 15,2004
Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.
601 - 21 st Street - Suite 400
Vero Beach, Florida 32960
Via Facsimile
tele. No. (772) 562-9689
Attention: Chris Ralph, PE
Re: Spine Road Composition
Boynton Town CenterNillage
Dear Mr. Ralph:
We have reviewed the facsimile transrnitted to this office yesterday on the above noted subject. We
have also reviewed the development's proposed SMU Master Plan, last updated 12/07/04. With six
(6) proposed intersections along the Spine Road corridor of which five (5) reflect left turn
movements (northbound to westbound), it is very real that left turn lanes will be required along the
corridor to handle those turning rnovements. This also reflects commercial and delivery movements
into the commercial parcel. To this extent, an updated detailed TIA will be required for rnyreview.
In reviewing your propose typical section for the Spine Road, several cornponents are unacceptable.
As an example, using the FDOT Std. Index 301 & 302, the cornposition of a turn lane utilizing a 4-
foot traffic separator and a 12-foot lane requires a minimum of a 17.50 foot median (roadway
pavement edge to roadway pavernent edge). In addition, P.B.C. Traffic Engineering Division
required bike lanes to be 4-feet in width, not the three (3) foot that you reflect on your typical.
Further, and as you pointed out to rne, the city's standard is a distance of7 feet between the sidewalk
and the curbing (i.e., Std. #P-3). With the use of curb & gutter, we have allowed for a six (6) foot
grass area between the sidewalk and the curb & gutter.
It is also noted that you have not considered any possible right turn lanes throughout the entire length
of the Spine Road. We will require a traffic impact intersection analysis (including peak hour flows)
for each intersection proposed to justifY the conceptual SMU plan.
Based on the above, the typical section for the Spine Road (lOO-foot right-of-way requirement) needs
to consist of the following (for a half right-of-way), left to right:
America's Gateway to the Gulfstream
.
Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., Attention: Chris Ralph, PE
Re: Boynton Town CenterNillage - Spine Road Composition
December 15,2004
Page 2
5' Sidewalk
6' Grass area
2' Curb & gutter
4' Bike lane
12' Outside vehicle travel lane
12' Inside vehicle travel lane
9' Yz Median width
=
50' Yz Right-of-way width
A final roadway typical section will be settled upon after my review of the detail TIA, to be
forthcoming. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise me at telephone number
(561) 742-6488.
Sincerely,
lc/atV'f-Cec:~
'(~i~id Kelley, Jr., PE
City Engineer
HDK:ck
xc: Jeff Livergood, PE, Dir. of Public Works
Laurinda Logan, PE, Senior Civil Engineer
Ken Hall, Plans Review Analyst
Ed Breese, Senior Planner, P & Z Department
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Boynton Twon Center-Village, Spine Rd. Composition.doc
~~ Ruden
~II McClosky
222 LAKEVIEW AVENUE
SUITE 800
WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401-6112
(561) 838-4542
FAX: (561) 514-3442
KIM.GLASCASTRO@RUDEN.COM
December 9,2004
VIA EMAIL
Larry Hymowitz, AICP
FDOT-District 4
3400 W. Commercial Boulevard
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
RE: Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments-
Boynton VillagelBoynton Town Center
Dear Larry:
Thank you for meeting with Bonnie Miskel, Andrea Troutman (via conference call) and
me last week. This serves as a summary of our discussions, and our understanding of the
outcome.
I) Data and Analysis. Additional data was supplied in September which includes the traffic
analysis for the requested land use changes based on the MPO/Palm Beach County 2020 model
data, as well as the concurrency traffic study based on Traffic Performance Standards criteria and
provides peak hour/peak direction information. In both of these studies, the projects do not have
significant traffic on the FIHS (Interstate 95 is the closest and only FIHS roadway in the area).
2) Maximum Potential Intensity. The densities and intensities evaluated for the requested land
use amendments are the maximum levels that could be reviewed as local projects without
triggering DRI review. As you know, a DRI project would undergo additional scrutiny by State
and Regional agencies, such as FDOT, and be reviewed for impacts to the regional roadway
system. The project intensities that were evaluated for the land use amendments represent the
maximum potential as a local (sub-DRI) project.
To provide further assurance that more intensity will not be provided on the subject properties, a
footnote could be added to the Future Land Use Map that, in effect, limits the density and
intensity to that utilized in the comprehensive plan analyses. This "footnote" approach has been
utilized elsewhere throughout the State to address intensity concerns.
It is our understanding that with the adoption of a restrictive footnote on the Future Land
Use Map, and with the formal City-transmittal of the supplemental traffic data and analysis that
the FDOT's concerns have been addressed. If our understanding is incorrect, please let us know
so that we may have follow up discussions in the next week.
WPB:193650:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
r. n.......~ . <"T '" '..........., r _ ....... _ .,. n. rr _ ......., . .,......... _ .."""... C'T ,. ,r.r _ r. .............. _ rT ..r..-rh"n. ,n,... _ T'" .., .rr.... . .... ..n. _ ,.,rrT n.'.. ..r.......'
Meeting Summary - Larry Hymowitz
Page 2
Thank you again for your attention to this matter, as we are preparing for the City's
consideration of adoption.
Sincerely,
~~~')~-~
(
Kim Glas-Castro, AICP
cc: Dick Hudson, AICP
Caroline Knight
Richard Foreman, Sembler
WPB:193650:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning and Zoning Division
Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
Jim Cheraf, City Attorney
Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning
December 2, 2004
Boynton Village
Request for copies of any correspondence for the above from staff to the developer or
its consultants are attached.
enclosures
S:IPLANNINGIPLANNING TEMPLATES\P&Z LETTERS AND MEMOSIP&Z MEMO.DOC
Tucker, Patricia
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Rumpf, Michael
Tuesday. November 30,20043:17 PM
Greene, Quintus
Tucker. Patricia; Breese, Ed; Hudson. Dick (Orran)
RE: Boynton Village
Q
Directly to Jim or through You? MR.
-----Original Message-----
From: Greene, Quintus
Sent: Tuesday, November 30,2004 1:46 PM
To: Breese, Ed; Hudson, Dick (Orran); Rumpf, Michael
Cc: Tucker, Patricia
Subject: FW: Boynton Village
Would you please follow-up on Jim's request. Thanks
Q.
--u-Original Message-----
From: Cheraf, James
Sent: Monday. November 29, 2004 5:41 PM
To: Greene, Quintus
Subject: Boynton Village
I need a copy of all correspondence. if any, from your staff to the developer or its consultants.
1
.
.'
~~
~_:
~J;OR1~'"
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
PO, Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T Marcus, Chair
Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
"An Equal Opportunity
Afflrmati~'e Actlon Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
0"1,
October 19, 2004
Q lE<crsu~lE
OCT28aM
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Winchester Property - (Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village)
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received the traffic study for the proposed
project entitled; Winchester Property, comprised of pursuant of two pianned
developments called; Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. This project is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road.
Boynton Beach
None
1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums), 399,000 SF General
Retail, 10,000 SF General Office.
N/A
N/A
2008
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has the following comment:
. Provide two copies of the proposed site pian to review potential for internalization
between the separate land uses. The additional copy which is being requested
by th0 i...1P(J for test 2 rrodel rUflS, needs to show all access loc3ticns as well as
the alignment of the newly proposed Spine Road.
. All daily and peak hour trip generation estimates must be based on the latest ITE
equations, with the exception of the daily rate of 7 tripslDU for condominiums,
and the use of the PM peak hour equation for office use from the 5th Edition
Manual.
. Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern '
Residential:
o Assignment of 22% of all trips to 1-95 is too high, reduce to about 15%.
o Too much of the project residential traffic (about 60%) seem to be
generated trom within the projects radius of influence (4 miles).
o Too much of project traffic is dropped on Old Boynton Beach Road. east
of Lawrence Road.
o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to
Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard. Same for
Lawrence Road south of Boynton Beach Boulevard.
. Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern - Non-
Residential:
o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to
Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard.
o Too much of project traffic is dropped (5%) on Old Boynton Beach
Road, east of Lawrence Road.
. Exhibit3C, add a column to illustrate existing (base year) volumes for each link.
. Provide a separate figure illustrating peak hour forecasts of traffic diversions in
the vicinity of the site, expected due to construction of the new Spine Road.
. Use of "Area type 6" is not allowed for the peak hour operational analysis at the
studied intersections. Area type 3 is recommended for all approaches, unless
cases where very high level of coordination is achieved on major corridors.
. In a separate appendix provide full reports for the peak hour arterial (Urban
Street) analysis where all inputs and segments are indicated.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
INEER
/V)
Masoud Atefi,
Sr. Engineer-
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
Kimley Horn & Associates
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F:\TRAFFIClmalAdmin\Commenls\040613R.doc
~
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
PO Box 2122Q
\-Vest Palm Beach. FL 3341h-122q
(561) hR4-4000
wwwpbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T t\.'1arcus, Chair
Tony Masilottl. Vice Chamn::m
Jeff Koons
\Varren H Newell
Mary McCarty
Burr Aaronson
Addie L Greene
County Administrator
Rubert \\..'E'lsman
"An Equal Opport11mty
Ajfrrmilrn'f Actlull Employer"
,AC'
W printed on recycled paper
October 19, 2004
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Winchester Property - (Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village)
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received the traffic study for the proposed
project entitled; Winchester Property, comprised of pursuant of two planned
developments called; Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village, pursuant to the Traffic
Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development
Code. This project is summarized as follows:
Location:
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road.
Boynton Beach
None
1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums), 399.000 SF General
Retail, 10,000 SF General Office.
N/A
N/A
2008
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has the following comment:
. Provide two copies of the proposed site plan to review potential for internalization
between the separate land uses. The additional copy which is being requested
by t!li; j-.IP;/ rtii L85t;: 'i'I)G€: rIJ!1~., rv;:~~:,.~t, ~..) sh..::......w 2;!i acc;a.ss loc:~'ti[ms as w'2l1 as
the alignment of the newly proposed Spine Road.
. All daily and peak hour trip generation estimates must be based on the latest ITE
equations, with the exception of the daily rate of 7 trips/DU for condominiums,
and the use of the PM peak hour equation for office use from the 5th Edition
Manual.
. Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern -
Residential:
o Assignment of 22% of all tripS to 1-95 is too high, reduce to about 15%.
c 100 much of the proJec: reslCiential traffiC (about 60%) seem to be
generated ,rare within tile project s radiLls of influence (4 milesi.
. .
o Too much of project traffic is dropped on Old Boynton Beach Road, east
of Lawrence Road.
o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to
Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard. Same for
Lawrence Road south of Boynton Beach Boulevard.
. Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern - Non-
Residential:
o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to
Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard.
u Too rnuch of project traffic is dropped (5%) on Ola Boynton Beach
Road, east of Lawrence Road.
. Exhibit 3C, add a column to illustrate existing (base year) volumes for each link.
. Provide a separate figure illustrating peak hour forecasts of traffic diversions in
the vicinity of the site, expected due to construction of the new Spine Road.
. Use of "Area type 6" is not allowed for the peak hour operational analysis at the
studied intersections. Area type 3 is recommended for all approaches, unless
cases where very high level of coordination is achieved on major corridors.
. In a separate appendix provide full reports for the peak hour arterial (Urban
Street) analysis where all inputs and segments are indicated.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
INEER
/V/
Masoud Atefi, SC
Sr. Engineer - T ic Division
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc.
Kimley Horn & Associates
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
F'ITRAFFIClmalAdminICommentsI040613R.doc
- ,.,'
" -, c:::~ _' 4 ~__ ,<. ~_--:"'_____ .'\ _'_~i:~,--....i:J1.1 .j~;;... .._.--"____--"
T R EA s~u' Itg :;i; i:f~ ~>~l ifJ.)N~~: PLAN N I N G
.il: , ~~ ~i _~~,;- t -I
'1
'I' .----' _ _, .~, -.
I N D I .& N'-ca l'V E It ~ ~'M'KKlih ~- -PAL'\{
'_"C' _ -, -qf.';,
c;'OU'N'Cf'i
,,-,
BIrA C H (l_ ;IST'.
eurCT It.e'
'It"'"'-.'
;.~_.~
October IS, 2004
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
Post Office Box 310
Boynton g"ach, FL 33435
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments - DCA Reference No. 04-2
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land
Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Council reviewed the above-
referenced comprehensive plan amendments at its meeting on October IS, 2004.
A review report was approved by Council for transmittal to the Department of Community
Affairs as required by Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. A copy of the approved report is
attached for consideration by your governing body prior to adoption of the amendments. Please
send one copy of all materials related to these amendments directly to our office once they are
adopted by your governing body, pursuant to Chapter 9J-II, Florida Administrative Code.
If you have any questions, please feel free to call me.
Sincerely,
T~e~:--
Deputy Director
TLH:wh
Attachment
ocr
"Bringing Communities Together" . Est. 1976
1.1 Easl Ocean Bouleval'd - Suite 1.. - SIUal'l, Florida 14"4
Phone (772) 221-4'" - SC 2".4'" - Fax (772) 221-4"7 _ E-m ail _ ad..in(i)lcrnc.our
,
[I
) [,1 SE~
I
L
')(!(1,1
.-.--)
STATE OF FLORIDA
,r rF'ARH 'rl\T ('. r'l
__n__
'-T' (., ..
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
JEB BUSH
Governor
N Dedicated to making Florida a bener place to call home"
THADDEUS L. COHEN, AlA
Secretary
September 22, 2004
Ms. Margaret-Ray Kemper
Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A.
215 South Monroe Street
Suite 815
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
Re: Renaissance Commons DRI (Motorola DRI), Boynton Town Center
and Boynton Village Clearance Letter Request, CL-I005-004
Dear Ms. Kemper:
The Department received your letter dated September 1, 2004 in which you requested an informal
determination from the Department confirming that Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village (hereinafter
referred to as the Boynton Projects) are not required to be aggregated with the Renaissance Commons
Development ofRegionallmpact (DRI) and treated as a single development, pursuant to Section 380.0651(4),
Florida Statutes (F.S.). Your request for a determination is made because James Comparato and Carl E.
Klepper, Jr., both manage entities that own the Renaissance Commons DR!. Additionally, Carl E. Klepper, Jr.,
and James Comparato both have an ownership interest in the Boynton Projects, although their respective
ownership interest does not exceed twenty-five percent.
When one of the developments at issue is a DRl, the aggregation criteria as set forth in Section
380.0651(4), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and in Rule 9J-2.0275, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), will govern
the determination. Pursuant to Section 380.0651(4), F.S., two or more developments, "shall be aggregated and
treated as a single development when they are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and are
physically proximate to one another".
According to the information provided, Renaissance Commons is north of the C-16 Canal, south of
Gateway Boulevard, east of Congress A venue, and west of the E-4 Canal. Boynton Village is south of the C-
16 Canal, north of Old Boynton Road, east of Congress Avenue, and west of the E-4 Canal. Renaissance
Commons and Boynton Village are separated by the C-16 Canal. Boynton Town Center is located at the
intersection of Congress A venue and Old Boynton Road, and its northern and eastern boundaries are adjacent
to Boynton Village. Therefore, the Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects are physically proximate
as defined in Rule 9J-2.0275, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.).
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FiElD OFFICE
2796 Overseas Highway, Suile 212
Marathon, Fl 33050-2227
(305)289-2402
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone: (a50) 486-8466/Suncom 278-6466 FAX; (850) 921-0781!Suncom 2'.n-07al
Internet address: http://www.dca.slate.fl.us
COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 323992100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
(850)488-2356 (850)413-9969
HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2555 Shumard Oak Bou!evard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
(850)488-7956
Ms. Margaret-Ray Kemper
September 22, 2004
Page Two
Further, pursuant to Subsection 380.0651(4)(a), F.S., two of the following criteria must be met in order to
determine that two developments share a unified development plan:
1.a. The same person has retained or shared control of the developments;
1.b. The same person has ownership or a significant legal or equitable interest in the
developments; or
I.c. There is common management of the developments controlling the form of physical
development or disposition of the parcels of the development.
2. There is a reasonable closeness in time between the completion of 80 percent or less of one
development and the submission to a governmental agency of a master plan or series of plans or
drawings for the other development indicating a common development effort.
3. A master plan or series of plans or drawings exists covering the developments sought to be
aggregated which have been submitted for authorization to cornmence development.
4 The voluntary sharing of infrastructure that is indicative of a common development effort, except
that which was required by a local government or other agency.
5. There is a common advertising scheme or promotional plan in effect for both developments.
According to the information provided, Renaissance Commons is owned by Compson Associates of
Boynton, LLC, and Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC. James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., are
the managers of both entities and have the ability to control the development of Renaissance Commons.
Boynton Village is being acquired by 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC. Boynton Town Center is being acquired
by Boynton Beach Place, LLC. James Comparato has a twenty percent interest and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., has a
five percent interest in each of those companies with the remaining seventy-five percent being owned by the
Sembler Company. Neither James Comparato nor Carl E. Klepper, Jr., will manage those entities. An affiliate
of the Sembler Company will manage both 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC, and Boynton Beach Place, LLC, and
will control their development. Neither the Sembler Company, nor its affiliate, which will manage Boynton
Village and Boynton Beach Place, has an ownership or leasehold interest in Renaissance Commons or
manages or controls Renaissance Commons. Except for James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper. Jr., none of the
entities or individuals with an interest in Renaissance Commons has any ownership or leasehold interest in the
Boynton Town Center or Boynton Village or an option to acquire all or a portion of these developments.
Because James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., do not manage Boynton Town Center or Boynton
Village and their interest in these developments does not exceed twenty-five percent, and because neither the
Sembler Company nor its affiliate has an interest in or manages Renaissance Commons, Renaissance
Cornmons and Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village are not commonly owned, managed or controlled.
Therefore none of the criteria I a - c would be met.
The information provided indicates that the Renaissance Commons, Boynton Town Center and
Boynton Village will be developed as totally separate and distinct developments. There is no master plan
Ms. Margaret-Ray Kemper
September 22, 2004
Page Thee
or common plan of development for the properties which has been submitted to the City or to a permitting
agency. While the properties will be developed concurrently, the reasonable closeness in time criterion is not
met as that criterion requires the submittal to a governmental agency of a master plan indicative of a common
plan of development. Therefore, the criteria of Subsections 380.065I(4)(a)2 and 3., F.S., have not been met.
Rule 9J-2.0275(2)(e), F.A.C, provides that the sharing of infrastructure implies the voluntary joint use
by two or more developments of internal roadways, internal recreational facilities or parks, amenities, or water,
sewage or drainage facilities specifically constructed to accommodate the developments sought to be
aggregated. Your information indicates that different surface management water systems will serve
Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects and that the drainage facilities of one development will not
be shared by the other. Access to Renaissance Commons will be provided via entry points along Congress
Avenue and Gateway Boulevard, both of which are public roads. Access to the Boynton Projects will be
provided via Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, which is also a public road. Water and wastewater
service to the developments will be provided by the City. Electric service to the developments will be provided
by Florida Power and Light. Therefore, as there will be no voluntary sharing of infrastructure other than that
provided by the City or other agency, the criterion of Subsection 380.0651(4)(a)4, F.S., has not been met.
Rule 9J-2.0275(2)(I), F.A.C., provides that a common advertising scheme or promotional plan means
any depiction, illustration, or announcement which indicates a shared commercial promotion of two or more
developments as components of a single development and is designed to encourage sales or leases of property.
You have indicated that there will be no common advertising or promotional plan for the Renaissance
Commons and the Boynton Projects. Therefore, the criterion of Subsection 380.0651(4)(a)5, F.S., has not been
met.
In conclusion, based on the above representations, Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects
would not be part of a unified plan of development. Therefore, based on the information provided, the
Department determines that Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects do not meet the aggregation
criteria as outlined in Section 380.0651(4), F.S.
Please be aware that the conclusions of this letter represent an informal determination based on the
information presented in your letter and discussions with the Department. The Department has no independent
knowledge of any of your assertions. The Department hereby reserves all rights pursuant to Chapter 380,
Florida Statutes, concerning these developments. Further review of these developments may be required if the
developers' plans represented above are materially changed.
If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please call Caroline Knight, Planner, at
(850) 922-1773.
Sincerely yours,
C~~
Chief of Comprehensive Planning
CG/ck
cc: Mr. Michael Busha, Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning, City of Boynton Beach
FACSIMILE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
City Hall. West Wing
100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd.
P.O. Box310
Boynton Beach. Florida 33425
(561) 742-6260
(561) 742-6259 Fax
Planning & Zoning
Division
TO: Kim Glas-Castro
FAX: ~ 514-3442
FROM: Dick Hudson
DATE: 9/16/04
NUMBER OF PAGES: (including
coverl
2
RE: SFWMD Comments Re: Boynton Village
Kim.
This came in yesterday from SFWMD. I assume you will handle the response.
Dick
If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office
Immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you.
,\,>~Ell ^41,
~, l-',~<>
~'~~
t.'.'...'\ij'}
~(";<,-,,-,,~>~,;
Os'" h""'c .,'\"
" ,\.
SOUTH FWRIL.. WATER MANAGEMENT DIS'lnICT
3301 Gun Gub Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 . FL WA1S 1.800-432-2045 . TOD (561) 697-2574
Mailing Address: P.o. Box 24680, West Palm Beach. FL 33416-4680 . \\ww.sfwmd.gov
GOV 08-28
September 13, 2004
Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and DRl Processing
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Proposed Amendment Comments
City of Boynton Beach, DCA# 04-2
South Florida Water Management District staff has cornpleted its review of the subject
document. We have determined that the proposed amendment LUAR 04-006 (Boynton
Village) is not supported by potable water facility capacity analysis, as required. The
applicant needs to include the required analysis necessary to support the amendment and
demonstrate that adequate water supply facility and service will be available concurrent
with the impact of the development. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please call me at (561) 682-6779.
Sincerely,
~~
P.K. Sharma, AICP
Lead Planner
Water Supply Planning & Development Division
PKS/nk
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Ken Metcalf, DCA
Michael Rumpf, Boynton Beach
/I"r~ ~ c_~_____
'I' 'i I h. 1;1 f"~'''''--'-,
, /J __0 e" '. L' On' ----
/; i11; -----~,,--L tv [;/ --",
.."L~ I 51f114~1!J!
.~' " '--. J I
' - ( ,~,. -. -.---
. I 'dEI'., 'H , .___
.~Ot\l~1
"- . .QP"E '
-'.-_-.., 'V/,f..;r'
--...-
GoVERNING BOARD
EXECIfl7VE OFFTCE
Nicolas J. Gutierrez, Jr., Esq., 01llir
Pamela Brooks-Thomas, Vice-OMir
Irela M. Bagu~
Michael Collins
Hugh M. English
Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E.
Kevin McCarty
Harkley R. Thornton
Tmdi K Williams, P.E.
Henry Dean, Execu/i()(' Director
Page 1 of2
%" ~("
Rumpf, Michael
From: Rumpf, Michael
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 5:34 PM
To: 'Richard Foreman'
Subject: RE: SMU Master Plan
Richard,
We've received the first portion of your package. Yes, we can continue to accept documents for the application,
particularly those documents with the greater level of detail. We anxiously await your comprehensive
(conceptual/draft) site plan to show details and how all parts will Interconnect. We are uncomfortable processing
the master plan without the details, particularly given that we see some elements being finalized like the road.
lakes and accessways which could affect ultimate design and unification of the greater project. We know that the
further along this project progresses the less flexible are the individual parts, as we just experienced on the
Renaissance project. Changes to the detailed document would be expected, but it would gives us something to
work from.
Let me know if I can continue to assist with the issues and questions of your development team.
Michael Rumpf
Planning & Zoning Director
City of Boynton Beach
561-742-6260
m--Original Mes5age-_m
From: Richard Foreman [mailto:Richard.Foreman@5embler.com]
Sent: WedneSday, September 15, 20044:38 PM
To: rumpfm@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us
Cc: jcomparato@compson.com; Joe Filippelli
Subject: SMU Ma5ter Plan
i\1ike ~ Dick will be receiving our supplemental package for SMU Master Plan and attachments for Boynton Village today.
One thing missing that you had asked for will be a rendered site plan. I plan to send to you a preliminary site plan, with
the acknowledgement of it's early status, but I believe I can give you a better product and tool for your use if I can have a
couple of days to make a few modifications and complete some rendering. I hope that is okay.
Richard Foreman
Senior Development :rvfanager
The Sembler Company
(404) 847 1801, exl. 205
(404)-847-1818. Fax
Visit us online at: www.sembler.com
NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged.
If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any
attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 727-384-6000 and
delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the
contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender.
9/1512004
~.."",~
",~.,.).~..:~"
i;! ',,;I'),;""'~
o .~"nc.",
....l~ ", Z
...." ,-"" ,\,<".,'"
~,} ~;<:.",.: ./-, i: ~~
OS'''i;''i;'~i.'''~''Y
'. .)."
SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
3301 Gun Ouo Road. West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686,8800 . FL WATS 1.800.432.2045 . TDD (561) 697.2574
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 . V\ww.sfwmd.gov
GOV 08-28
Septernber 13, 2004
Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and DRI Processing
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Tallahassee, FL 32399-21 00
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
Subject:
Proposed Amendment Comments
City of Boynton Beach, DCA# 04-2
South Florida Water Management District staff has completed its review of the subject
document. We have determined that the proposed amendment LUAR 04-006 (Boynton
Village) is not supported by potable water facility capacity analysis, as required. The
applicant needs to include the required analysis necessary to support the amendment and
demonstrate that adequate water supply facility and service will be available concurrent
with the irnpact of the development. If you have any questions or require additional
information, please call me at (561) 682-6779.
Sincerely,
\Ill] J~~ ~. _
-L-~~
PK Sharma, AICP
Lead Planner
Water Supply Planning & Development Division
PKS/nk
c:
Michael Busha, TCRPC
Ken Metcalf, DCA
Michael Rumpf, Boynton Beach
ii '.J
.' .,
'.'
!., ..~. "..
~h ~~-_
'c," ,.I II, k '-"
, SfP I 5 ~~;-'71!J
- I I
. -'-.,1 I
'i Vf::' n-
"'-.. -( ~ tl}~_1r,r\I;
, ~ ~, I" ,
iir/:
GOVERNING BOARD
EXEClmVE OFFICE
Nicolas J. Gutier:reL., Jr., Esq., 01/11r
Pamela Brooks-Thomas, Vice-C/mir
Irela M. Bague
Michael Collins
Hugh M. English
Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E.
Kevin McCarty
Harkley R. Thornton
Trudi K. Williams, P.E.
Henry Dean, Ex('("utiw DIn'clor
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beach Sculevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
August 26, 2004
Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: Traffic Study: Boynton Town Center I (LUAR 04-007) and Boynton Village (LUAR
04-006) Combined TPS Traffic Study - aka Winchester Property
Dear Mr. Atefi:
We have been informed by John Corbett that a copy of the above referenced traffic study has been
provided to you for review and comment. If this is not the ca5e, please let us know immediately and
a copy will be furnished to you.
Please review the information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards
Ordinance, and provide me with your written response. The land use amendments for these
properties were transmitted to the Florida Department of Community affairs with the condition that
their adoption is "contingent on clarification and consideration of traffic impact analysis requirements
of Palm Beach County."
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260.
S~J~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECr5\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Traffic Atefi 8-26-04.doc
~~II aru/JIX;1e go J4/
A TIORNEYS AT LAW
309 LAKE A VENUE
fj;h. JA';/A .Y~urk,j:J?6Y
JOHN CORBETI
TRELA 1. WHITE
BRADLEY W BIGGS
KEITH W. DAVIS
R. MAX LOHMAN
AREA CODE56 I
TELEPHONE 586-71 16
TELECOPIER 586-961 I
August 25, 2004
Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE
Senior Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
160 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, Fl. 33406
Re: Boynton Town Center (LUAR 04-007) and Boynton Village (LUAR 04-006)
Combined TPS Traffic Study - a/k/a Winchester Property
Dear Masoud;
Enclosed is a new traffic study for the "Winchester Property". The Winchester Property
includes two separate projects, Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village, that have been
combined only for purposes of Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) review based on the TPS
aggregation criteria.
The enclosed traffic study replaces all prior studies that have been submitted to you for
the Winchester Property. Please consider those studies withdrawn.
On July 8,2004, you sent a letter to Michael Rumph, Boynton Beach Director of
Planning and Zoning, stating that you would not review the traffic study until after the land use
plan amendments are adopted by the City. As you and I discussed on July 16,2004, the City is
concurrently processing the comprehensive plan amendments and zoning changes for both
projects and would like the County to complete its TPS review prior to the City acting on the
comprehensive plan amendments for the two projects. As you requested, I did discuss this issue
with Lenny Berger, and he told me he would discuss this matter with you. If there is still any
question about your immediate review of this study, please call me.
Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter.
Sincerely,
~ett
cc; Dick Hudson, AICP (wi 2 traffic studies)
Richard Foreman
.--, , " _" ,~:'c, 1;:~;,-i7 ~ ' _;~ _-c~~__~_ ~"~__': .1;.
T REA siT~-~~HC ii'I.~lcjl:~'l~~:A!~~ PLAN N I NG~ CO U'NLcti
<Fj :" -< ...-- ;~ !' t- '~' "
I NDIA'.N;-a nhk -~~:\'I"N~- .p~;L'M B~A c H(;~'lST'. tu-cnt'-c
1t-,,-~ -
;;~.
August 17.2004
Mr. Dick Hudson
Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach. FL 33435
Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan
Draft Amendments. DC A Reference No. 04-2
Dear Mr. Hudson:
This is to notify you that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be providing a
recommendation to the Departmcnt of Community Affairs (DCA) on the above-referenced plan
amendments. which we received on August 6. 2004.
Council staff will review the amendments for multijurisdictional impacts and impacts on
signiticant regional resources and facilities and provide a written report to DC A within 30
calendar days of rcccipt. Staff anticipates prcscnting its report and recommended comments to
Council at the regular meeting of September 17.2004.
Prior to the Council meeting. Council staff will send you a copy of the meeting agenda and the
staff report and recommendations. We invite you to attend the meeting. where you will be
afforded an opportunity to address the Council. Following the meeting. the recommendations as
approved by the Council will bc forwardcd to you and to DCA.
If you have any questions or comments. please feel free to call.
Sincerely.
2jH:'~
Deputy Director
TLH/wh
"Bringing Communities Togetber" . Est. 1976
11. East Ocean Boulevard - Suite 11. - Stuarl, "'lorida 14"4
Phone (772) 221-4'" _ SC 2"-4'" . Fax (772) 221-4"7 - E-mail - "dminrillernc 0"'''
e
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
August 16,2004
THADDEUS l. COHEN
Secretary
Mr. Dick Hudson
The City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Dept.
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Dear Mr. Hudson:
The Department's records reflect that the City of Boynton Beach has submitted its
second proposed comprehensive plan amendment submittal for the year 2004. The reference
number for this package is DCA # 04-2. Pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes
and Rule 9J-11.006(1), Florida Administrative Code, local governing bodies shall consolidate all
proposed plan amendments into a sinale submission for each of the two plan amendment
adoption dates durina the calendar vear. Therefore, amendment package DCA # 04-2 is the
final submittal that the local government can submit for an amendment adopted during calendar
year 2004 unless the amendment meets the requirements of Section 163.3187(1), Florida
Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006(1 )(a)7, Florida Administrative Code.
If the County is intending to submit another proposed amendment submittal package for
adoption in this calendar year, the County should withdraw the amendment package DCA# 04-
2 and combine it with the other proposed amendments and then transmit it to the Department
pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006, Florida Administrative
Code.
The Department looks forward to working with and assisting the County in resolving any
issues identified in this procedural matter. If you require further assistance concerning this
issue, please contact me or Anita Franklin. Senior Plan Processor, at (850) 488-4925 or
Suncom 278-4925.
Sincerely,
~ ~'\( ~~
D. Ray Eubanks
Plan Review and Processing Administrator
DRE/af
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100
Phone. 850.488.8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX. 850 921 0781/Suncom 291 0781
Internet address: htto:/lwww.dca.state.fl.us
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2796 (}.oerseas Higt-r.Nay, Surte 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Marathon, Fl33050-2227 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399 2100
(305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 {850l413-996fI 1850\ 488-7956
--
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
THADDEUS L. COHEN
Secretary
August 16. 2004
Mr. Dick Hudson
The City of Boynton Beach
Planning and Zoning Dept.
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Post Office Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Dear Mr. Hudson:
Thank you for submitting City of Boynton Beach' s proposed comprehensive plan amendments for our
review. Our reference number for this amendment package is Boynton Beach 04-2.
We have conducted an inventory of the plan amendment package to verifY thc inclusion of all required
materials. The submission package appears to be complete, and your proposed plan amendment will be
reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163. Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be asked to provide
additional supporting documentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review. The Department's 0 RC
report "ill be mailed to \OU on or about October 12. 200....
Also. please be advised that Section 163.3l84(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to
provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department' s Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish
their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption
hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to
furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the Department. Please provide
these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment
package for compliance review. In the event no names, addresses are provided, please provide this
information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format.
If you have any questions please contact Marina Pennington, the Regional Planning Administrator that
will be overseeing the review of the amendments. at (850) 487-4545.
Sincerely.
~.~2~
D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator
Plan Review and Processing
DRE/af
2665 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100
Phone. 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX' 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781
Internet address: htto./lwww.dca state.fl.us
CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2796 Oierseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard
Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100
(305\ 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 1850\ 413-9969 (850\ 488-7956
--
STATE OF FLORIDA
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS
"Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home"
JEB BUSH
Governor
THADDEUS L. COHEN
Secretary
MEMORANDUM
TO: Lindy McDowell, DEP
Susan Harp, DOS
Gerry O'Reilly, FDOT4
Terry Hess, Treasure Coast RPC
PK Sharma, South Florida WMD
Lorenzo Aghemo, Palm Beach County
DATE: August 16, 2004
SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT
LOCAL GOVERNMENT/ DCA AMENDMENT #:
Boynton Beach 04-2
DCA CONTACT PERSON/PHONE NUMBER:
Ken Metcalf (850)487-4545
COMMENTS DUE TO DCA NO LATER THAN:
September 12, 2004
Please review the proposed comprehensive plan amendment documents for consistency
with applicable provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida
Administrative Code. Pursuant to FS 163.3 I 84(4 ),f01ward objections, recommendations and
comments to the attention of Ray Eubanks, Administrator, Plan Review and Processing, at the
Department address indicated below.
Please use the above referenced DCA AMENDMENT NUMBER on all
correspondence related to this amendment.
Note: Review Agencies - The local government has indicated that they have mailed the proposed
amendment diredly to your agem:y. See attached transmittal letter. Be sure to contact the local
govemment if you have not received the amerulment. Also, letter to the local government from
DCA acknowledging receipt of amendment is attached.
2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100
Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.1121.0781/Suncom 2111.0781
Internet address: htto.//www.dca.state.fl.u5
CRIT1CAL S1 ATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
2796 CMmeas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Stunard Oak BouIeYard 2555 Shwnard Oak BouleYard 2555 Shl.mam Oak Boulev.ard
Maraltiofl, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100
(305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (650) 413-9969 185O)4fl8.7956
,~OOL DI&
-J . ~
~~g~q
~}~F()~EX<:ELL<t;t:
~ BEACH COU'"
MEMORANDUM
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
3320 Forest Hill Boulevard, #C-110
West Palm Beach, FL 33406-5813
Phone: (561) 434-8028
Fax: (561)434-8187
DATE:
July 19, 2004
TO:
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner Boynton Beach FAX: 742-6259
Anna Yeskey, Clearinghouse Coordinator Fax 434-4513
COPIES:
Angela Usher, Mana r
Intergovernmental R I tions
FROM:
RE;
Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - BOY- 49
(LUAR 04- 04 Large Scale Amendment)
1) Location: 04-006 Boynton Village - North Congress at the Boynton Canal
Size: 81.814 acres
CSA: 19
LU Existing: Moderate Density Res.
LU Proposed: Local Retail Commercial
Proposed Development of Site: Commercial
"
The School District has no objection to this project.
. 'J ti
L_
-"
2) Location: 04-007 Boynton Town Center I - North Congress and Old Boynton
Beach Blvd.
Size: 25 acres
CSA: 19
LU Existing: Moderate Density Residential7.26du/ac
LU Proposed: Mixed use Suburban
Proposed Development of Site: 1120 (Hiqh Rise) residential units; retail; office
'::
The number of students generated by the multifamily project may be:
12 elementary: 6 middle: 8 high:
CSA School Caoacitv Enrollment Los
17 Boynton Beach Comm. 2476 2528 102%
H.S.
19 Conqress M.S. 1344 1349 100%
19 Galaxy Elem. 633 516 82%
A Public School Concurrency Determination is not required as a part of the Land Use
Amendment process, but in accordance with the adopted school concurrency program,
.
this land use amendment will require concurrency review in conjunction with the
rezoning/site plan applications prior to issuing a residential site plan development order.
Please confirm this project will be a high rise design.
Please be advised that the level of service for all CSA's will be 110% August 1, 2004.
Developments which will begin construction in 2004 or later will be evaluated against the
110% LOS for school concurrency. Further, schools that would currently serve the
proposed development are subject to change due to boundary adjustments, to equalize
utilization, or to provide capacity for the new student growth.
05/19/2004 13:12
551434pn1.5
PAGE 03
"
,
.:.\'
m
1M SchHIl)lllb1o\ at.......... ~
"""DI'l . .
~FoI'IiIt",""'C-110
VlIelII him s.::n. Fl 33G4I13
"""""(511)__(511)_
FIre (66'] G4-111l or (lIe1) 4S4-II1S"
,1 ~ CoI_'_~1
\:'.
"~'
The School District of Palm Beach County
School Concurrency Application & Service Provider Fonn
(
.""trUC\lOnI: 8ullm~ OlIO ,copy of Ihe coiqplmd appltcollon and laM . ..ell ..... ...-
project roqulrlng. .........1_ of concurrency"" a._. A~>IIIII" pr--
_ (1~ ~ daY' of..ceIpI cia compIeIe owJIc8llon. A __ ""nol U"""_ ond Ie
valid lor one YO" from dOla of Isstl8llCll. 0ncll1he Oe.elGPlMfll Older leluue<!. !he ~
do\e_ she" be Y8lId for 1he IIfe of \he oe.eIopmont 0nIer.
p_ .hock <'I typo of applIcotloo1 (one only):
:tlO lJOnl>JO"lllncy Deteminlllon I ] Co<Qmncy EllelhpUon I I Concurrency t;quIvaIenCY
[ I Adequat. SdlCOl focillli.. Dotemina1lOn I ]1.eIler of N. ~ I J TIme_
F"': Conc~ O*t:t'rrillftlt&on or~'" $etlooI Facl1dH oditnn-.oun .i.o.oO lor mort ~Iln 20 unit,......
or.... $1ao.oo}; Equlv1lllrntyl'12~.OOt. Exempdlm tf~ of Notmpacttl2LOlt"""'" &t.tIwkIn($'tUll)
_1II!!~'C1I1;lJ.~NEmt&~
~""'~~;;i,;;;~'1ttfM! dWIuW1v,*/wr P'-'" IIlIf~lftrrM(rdNl'MflCOBlIllntlDml
proj.ct H.....' Boynton Villa2e MunlclpOlIIr. Bovnt on BeA~h
pr_rty Control HumbetlPCN): 08-43-45-20-oi~000-0680 anel -0090
'.
'.
-r;.:.: l~~~- ;~?F
,
Location I Add.... of SUl>jod Proportr. Mid "~~;;~~' R~~~g"" AA ""........
D,"~
'.
SectlonlTowno .
pr Acre
T 0101 Number of Units
wm the Pr . et be _sod'l'
Concure service Area
1f~.plee8eIltledi.PhHII'IOP*'IthoWInCI..rMJIbtfri1yplot'",,*,lD~oertfCelDaf~""".
'A~~l&rtJqlhdlar~~ C""',r / N':',:.:,,:!"
OWNEReHIP I AGENT INFORMATION:' 7-.. ..: . .' '''1:.....-.-,
ownofsH_: ~~~f ~fi; ~;~~r' ~}J~O Go~rm
~~I:~:': eat~:yl eac ." 'Cl s:cs".tr<l
Telephone Humber: R3R-b ~L.? F"" Number. ---5..111- "\1.1.7
. . . 43
"
J,lri"tS.;".. C:.'...,.
0If10~ then 8 rtrneIU
stllOes or tell'
. -
J>v.inu.e. LloC
. .
~;N~
DotO Appl_.n FlIod:
-- By:
Did thO AppUeam poy tho IUlng 10010 you?
11",m..afld~ID"
_ '!-~.3'QCi
natul1ll o.ttI.
I~~
=on Numbor: L~..'~t~rr~M.JL,..
EJI'IOIH-.........,.",."u
NO(lfnD.WIe~lf'lJIItlMl)'l1eSd'\tlOl~
The 5dwoI 0IIIftcl:..... nc1,~"" VlWIoUl~
I~OIIrtWyttt.ldlttIrnmII Of In~ mad_1ft UI' plpM
bHtcfmy~
D'~"" Rocolvod: ." C".N~~ ~~c
_ ' 1~thel.the~~&wittlthellldopWdL.~lafe~{LoS')rorl~
I ~ lIUlt the prqed will tOmpIy WIm Vle aOOplBCI Level 01' &tni'm (LOS) k f Schoo\t..~ t!cI tMI
attached cont1ttions
I cennol VW'Ify tI'IM. the project will
rF-.OSI"'~ 51, ~ I OLf
em II: ~
I
8~\I'l~nllllt.VUl.>1it..~!\'^'V\!.'''1l1:l\'U.J;: COOIl,",1~l\'Jh-::-. .....~i...w~pc:1('
PJlSD 1991 (N,"", 11~)
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416- 1229
(561) 684-4000
wwwpbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Tony MasHotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
"An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Actlon Employer~
@ printed on recycled paper
July 8, 2004
,
,
JUL \ 3 '/c,O~
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE: Winchester Property
TRAFFiC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REV!E"V
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received the traffic study for the proposed
project entitled; Winchester Property, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in
Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project is
summarized as follows:
Location;
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
New Daily Trips:
New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road.
Boynton Beach
None
1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums) 213,499 SF General
Retail, 10,000 SF General Office, and 186,500 SF Superstore
(Target)
N/A
N/A
2008
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has the following comment:
. Review of the traffic impact study for the proposed development is withheld
pending on the final outcome of the site's land use plan amendment.
Sincerely,
if you have any que~;tions regaraing this determination, please contact me at 6:)4-4030
/2/).
Masoud Atefi, MS
Sr. Engineer - Tra
R
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, !nc.
File: General - TPS . Mun . T~affic St:.Jdy ReVIew
F:\TRAFFtC\malAdmin\Comments\040613 doc
"';CREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-78
~.
rn 0 \!1 ~
,--
I '
), [,
I i
~I
TO:
Wilfred Hawkins, Assistant City Manager
Mike =-,-umph, PlaIllling & Zoning Director
Wally h1ajors, Recreation & Parks Director
John Wildner. Recreation & Parks Deputy Director j" ~
Dick Hudson, Senior Planner IV
Barbara Meacham, Parks & Landscape Planner
file
Jli
.J4
DEPARTMENT OF DEVEU)PMENl
FROM:
xC:
DATE:
July 6, 2004
SUBJECT:
WINCHESTER PROPERTY RECREATIOl' AND OPEN SPACE
A~ (\ follow-up to our conversation (concerning the Recreation and Open Space issues associated with the Winchester property) the
forowing comments are submitted.
Current Recreation And Parks Develooment Impact Fee OrdinBr~ce is based on approximately 1,120 residential units
allowed under the proposed zoning.
1.120 units X an average of$700 per unit - $784,000 (approx.)
2. Under The Previous Recreation And Open Space Land Dedication Ordinance, the dedication requirement is based on .015
acres per dwelling unit (6 acres per 1,000 population@ 2.5 average persons per dwelling unit).
t,120 dwelling units X .015 acres - 16.8 acres
Based on the developer provided private recreation, the City Commission could have granted up to one-half credit.
(If reconunended by the Recreation and Parks Director for a minimum of 5 recreation elements of sufficient size and
scope to provide for the impact of the additional development.)
3. The GreenwavslBikewavs Plan calls for negotiations with the developers to provide green space and bikeway linkages
throughout the City. The same developer (Compson and Associates) agreed to provide minimum space for bikeways along
the C-16 and E-4 canals. The 25-foot provided along the canal right-of-way through the Renaissance Commons
development is considered to be the bare minimum required for bikeways.
Since the Winchester development is being granted considerably higber density under proposed new zoning and this property
is being improved as a planned unit development (P.U.D). it is appropriate that the development consider appropriate
voluntary contributions in return for development incentives provided by the City.
It is therefore recommended that this new development link the bikeways provided in the Renaissance Commons
development along the canals (especially the E-4 canal), with a minimum of 50-feet adjacent to the right-of-way Including
substantial acreage of open space land restored to preservation aUGhtI.' on en .mace and maintained bv the developcr.
Recommendations
The developers may provide a voluntary contribution of SO-feet of develoned Grecnways/Bikeways along the E-4 and L-26 canals
,'ight-of-way. The developer may also provide a minimum 8-acre tract of land restored and maintained as a 'pine flat wood' habitat.
It is also recommended that this property be located adjacent to a drainage lake completely deve/oDed with littoral zone plantings and
positioned in such a way as to provide a buffer for the Sky lake development to the southeast of the property and include a number of
existing oak trees along the canal bank.
It is also recommended that a portion of the Recreation and Park Impact Fee be designated for active recreation elements being
proposed for the Congress Middle School replacement presently being considered south of tliis property along the Congress A venue
corridor.
If you have any questions, concems, and/or reconunendations about the above listed comments please let me know.
J\\,'vlr
Department of Planning,
Zoning &. Building
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 233-5000
Planning Division 233-5300
Zoning Division 233~5200
Building Division 233~5100
Code Enforcement 233-5500
Contractors Certification 233-5525
Administration Office 233-5005
Executive Office 233~5003
www.pbcgov.com/pzb
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus. Chair
Tony Masilotti. Vice Chairman
jeffKoons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L Greene
COl.nty Administrator
Robert Weisman
~An Equal Opportunity
AJJinnative Action Employer'
@ printed on recycled paper
June 23, 2004
Michael Rumpf. Director of Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
RE:
Winchester Property aka: Boynton Village & Boynton Town
Center 1 (LUAR 04-006 & LUAR 04-007)
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the above mentioned land use
amendment. Palm Beach County is requesting additional traffic analysis in
order to address the long-range (2025) traffic Impacts on the surrounding
roadway network prior to the City's July 20th public hearing
Please do not hesitate to contact me at 233-5373 or Vinod Sanda nasa my at
233-5337 if you have any further questions. Thank you.
s~
Lorenzo A9ht~
Planning Direct~. r
..
cc: Commissioner Warren Newell, District 3
Dan Weisberg, PSC Engineering, Traffic Division
Dick Hudson, Boynton Beach
Isaac Hoyos, PBC Planning Division
Lisa Lowe, PSC Planning Division
Khurshid Mohyuddin, PBC Ptanning Division
T:\Planning\Comprehensive\T ransport\T raffic Analysis\municipality amend\Winchester -Boynton.doc
r(( .
~
Tbe Citg 01 Bognton Beacb
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
June 11, 2004
Ms Kim Glas-Castro, AICP
Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A.
222 Lakevlew Avenue-Suite 800
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Boynton Town Center/Boynton Village
Dear Ms Glas-Castro:
Staff reports on the applications for rezonings for the above referenced projects are being
completed in anticipation of the Planning and Development Board's review, scheduled for June
22, 2004. In light of the fact that each of these projects contain commercial use components,
please Inform your dlents that the City will expect them to demonstrate consistency with the
following policy contained In the Future Land Use Element of the City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan;
"Policy 1.3.8 The City shall continue to adopt and enforce regulations to require that commercial
projects proVide marginal access roads or cross access between sites, wherever
practical, in order to minimize the need for trips on adjacent thoroughfares."
In addition to connectivity between the two projects you represent, there is also an opportunity
for these projects to provlde cross access with the Renaissance Commons project, currently
being developed to the north. Staff would strongly recommend that your applicants work with
the developer of Renaissance Commons to secure agreements for cross access. The
development of a roadway connecting Old Boynton Road with Gateway Boulevard could have a
positive effect of lessening traffic Impacts on Congress Avenue.
If you have any questions regarding this requirement, please do not hesitate to contact me at
(561) 742-6264.
A:;1!
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
--
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
po. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416~1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus, Chair
Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
~An Equal Opportumty
Affinnative Action Employer~
@ printed on recycled paper
May 25, 2004
Mr. Michael Rumpf
Director Planning & Zoning
City of Boynton Beach
100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310
RE: Winchester Property
Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review
Dear Mr. Rumpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed two separate traffic studies to
analyze traffic related impacts of Winchester Property, designated as Boynton Village,
and Boynton Town Center, tor Comprehensive Plan Review, pursuant to the Palm
Beach County Land Development Code.
Based on our initial review, we have the following comment:
. The combined impact of the two projects needs to be evaluated on the
surrounding traffic network, within the overall project radius of infll,ence. Please
combine the two projects and re-submit.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
Masoud Atefi. MsCE
Sr. Engineer - Tra'ffi
cc: Pinder Troulman Consulting, Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
1~0 / i~_~=_-
,: n ! [
{' J L: MAY 2004 ..J
I r
Of i'ARTMENT OF [)EVFt OPMrNl
F :ITRAFF IClmalAdminICommentsI040535-5.doc
05/19/2004 13:12 5614348015
PAGE 01
~OOLOI&
~(i1
THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTIIIIENT
3320 FOREST HILL BOULEVA
WEST PALM BEACH, FL
~ f\ ~ '.r r, "
-~L_I.[,~_IL._:~_,.+';~_~ : ~': ' ,
(IU'
L_"",..
FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL
PHONE: 561/434-8020
FA>:: 561/434-8187
Number of pages sent (including clover page): 6
TO: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner, City of Boynton Beach
DATE: May 19, 2004
FAX NUMBER: 742-6259
FROM: David DeYoung, AICP, Planner, SDPBC
COMMENTS: Attached please find a copy of the approvl~d school concurrency
application and no impact application for Boynton Village and
Westbrooke Homes at Boynton.
Attachments
S:\Plannlng\Public\lNTERGOV\Concurrency\Concurrency DetermInation l8tters\Faxes\F04~30r)1.DOC
ARTHUR e. JOHNSON, Ph.D.
SUPERINTENDENT .
THE Sa-KXJL DISTRICT OF
PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
PLANNING llEPI'ffiMENT
3320 FOREST HILL BLVD.. <:-331
WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406-5813
(561) 434-8020 FAX: (561) 4J4.ll187
May 18, 2004
Mr. Dick Hudson, Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach. Blvd.
Boynton Beach, FL 33435
RE: CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION - CASE NUMBER #04043001C --BOYNTON
VILLAGE
Dear Mr. Hudson:
The Palm Beach County School District has reviewed the request for a Concurrency
Determination on the above referenced. project for 1,120 multi-family units.
Attached please find the approved Palm Beach County School District Concurrency
Application and Service Provider Form for Boynton Village. This Concurrency Determination
is valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. Once a Development Order has been
issued for the project, the concurrency determination will be valid for the life of the
Development Order.
If YOll have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact me at
(561) 434-7343.
David L. DeYoun
Planner
ce: Kim Glas-Castro, Ruden McClosky
ene.
S:\Planning\Public\INTERG 0 V\Concurrency\Concurrenc)( Determinati,", Lellers\Concurrency\C404300 I.doc
AN !:.aUAl CJPPORTUNITY t:.MPLOYER
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
May 18, 2004
Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin
Senior Planner
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Re: Transportation Analysis:
Winchester Property
Aka: Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1
Dear Mr. Mohyuddin:
The enclosed transportation analysis, prepared by Pinder, Troutman Consulting, Inc.,
dated May 14, 2004 was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-
referenced Land Use Amendment. This supercedes the two studies previously
forwarded to you. Following your review of the enclosed information please provide me
with your written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6264.
Sincerely,
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
DH/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center I\LUAR 04-006\Mouyhuddin.doc
\
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.or9
May 18, 2004
Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin
Senior Planner
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Re: Transportation Analysis:
Winchester Property
Aka: Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1
Dear Mr. Mohyuddin:
The enclosed transportation analysis, prepared by Pinder, Troutman Consulting, Inc.,
dated May 14, 2004 was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-
referenced Land Use Amendment. This supercedes the two studies previously
forwarded to you. Following your review of the enclosed information please provide me
with your written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6264.
Sincerely,
~;!/
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
~
DH/sc
S:IPianningISHAREDlWPIPROJEcrSlBoynton Village-Boynton Town Center llLUAR 04-006\Mouyhuddin.doc
t
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Aorlda 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
May 18, 2004
Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: Traffic Study: Winchester Property
Aka: (Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1)
Dear Mr. Atefi:
The enclosed traffic impact analysis, prepared by Pinder Troutman
Consulting, Inc. dated May 14, 2004, was recently received by Planning
and Zoning for the above-referenced application. This supercedes the
two studies previously forwarded to you.
Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the
County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim
Large, Building Code Administrator and me with your written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561)
742-6260.
Sincerely,
tf'-~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/SC
Attachments
IIII Ruden
~I McClosky
222 LAKEJIBN AVENUE
SJlTE800
WEST PALM BEil\CH, FLORIDA 33401-6112
(561) 838-4542
FAX: (561) 514-3442
KIM .GLAs::ASTRO@RUDEN.COM
May 17,2004
Dick Hudson, AICP
Planning & Zoning Division
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
Boynton Beach. FL 33435
RE: Boynton Village I Boynton Town Center TPS Traffic Study
Dear Dick:
Enclosed you will find three (3) sets of the concurrency traffic study for the Boynton
Village and Boynton Town Center projects. Because the projects are located on property owned
by a single entity (Klett family). the projects are required to be aggregated for traffic
considerations by the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards.
Pinder Troutman has forwarded a copy of this traffic study directly to Palm Beach
County Traffic Engineering; however, we have included an additional copy in case the City is
required to formally transmit traffic studies to the County.
We look forward to discussing the projects with staff. the Planning & Development
Board and City Commission at upcoming meetings.
Sincerely,
r~
Kim Glas-Castro. AICP
Enclosures
WPB:178839:1
RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A.
CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LucrE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TAllAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH
t
The City of Boynton Beach
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
May 14, 2004
Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin
Senior Planner
100 Australian Avenue
West Palm Beach, FL 33416
Re: Transportation Analysis:
Winchester Property
LUAR 04-006 Boynton Village
LUAR 04-007 Boynton Town Center 1
Dear Mr. Mohyuddin:
The enclosed transportation analysis, prepared by Pinder, Troutman Consulting, Inc.
was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-referenced Land Use
Amendment. Following your review of the enclosed information please provide me with
your written response.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6264.
Sincerely,
~/
-
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
DH/sc
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECfS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center I\Khurshld.dot
t
The City of Boynton B
DEVELOPMENT DEPA
PLANNING AND ZONING
100 E. Boynton Beach
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Aorida 3
lCL: 561-742-62
FAX: 561-742-625
www.boynton-beach.org
May 12, 2004
Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
Department of Engineering and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, Florida 33416
Re: Traffic Study: Winchester Property 81 acres (Boynton Village)
Winchester Property 25 acres (Boynton Town Center 1)
Dear Mr. Atefi:
The enclosed traffic generation statements, prepared by Pinder
Troutman Consulting, Inc. were recently received by Planning and
Zoning for the above-referenced application. Please review the
enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic
Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code
Administrator and me with your written responses.
If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561)
742-6260.
Sincerely,
~.Z?--
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
MWR/SC
Attachments
\
The Citl} 01 &l}11/011 Bead
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PlANNING AND ZONING DIVISON
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Ror1da 33425-0310
TEl: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
April 9,2004
Mrs. Kim Glas-castro, AICP
222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 800
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Re: Winchester Property (aka Boynton Place)
Land Use Amendments and Rezonings
Dear Kim:
Because of the heavy SChedule of items before the City Commission the week, staff was
unable to provide a check for completeness for the applications you submitted on April
2,2004. Upon completion of the check, we have found the following:
1. There is already a project with the name "Boynton Place" in the City and a
sufficient number that include the name "Boynton". We know that the first
name submitted is rarely the final name for any project; however, we do
request that you provide an alternative name for the project.
2. You have submitted one application, which includes requests for two separate
future land use designations and two separate applications for rezonings.
While it Is important to assess the total impacts of the two projects, it Is also
important to be able to analyze each project separately. We request that you
submit two applications containing a land use amendment and rezoning
request for each of the two portions of property.
3. The projected number of dwelling units Is predicated on utilizing the entire
lOG.81-acre parcel. The portion proposed for a Mixed Use-Suburban
designation allows a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre, while the
portion proposed for Local Retail Commercial designation allows 10.8 units
per acre; however, units may not be transferred between the two parcels.
The recalculation of density will impact the Public School Concurrency
application, and will most probably impact the traffic study and water and
sewer estimates. Please ensure that these Impacts are recalculated.
. Page 2
Aprll 9, 2004
We are returning the one application for land use amendments and the two applications
for rezonlngs and ask that you resubmit these, completed along the suggested
guidelines. It Is important that the resubmlttals be made In a timely manner, so that
we can maintain the established amendment schedule.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6264.
Yours truly,
jJu;/
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: James Comparato
J.r.?r.:.....
....~.
fh'e CHI} 01 &I}nton Bea.cb.
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON
100 E. Boynton Beadl Boulevard
P.O. Box 310
Boynton Beadl, Florida 33425-0310
TEL: 561-742-6260
FAX: 561-742-6259
www.boynton-beach.org
March 24, 2004
Mr. D. Ray Eubanks
Community Program Administrator
Division of Community Planning
Department of Community Affairs
2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard
Tallahassee, FI 32399-2100
Re: City of Boynton Beach
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) DR! (LUAR 03-009 & CPTA 03-001)
Dear Mr. Eubanks:
We are pleased to submit Comprehensive Plan amendments for the Motorola DR!. The
Planning and Development Board reviewed the amendments at a public hearing on
February 26, 2004 and forwarded the application with unanimous recommendations for
approval. The City Commission/Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on March
16, 2004, following proper pUblic notice and also approved these amendments for
transmittal.
The changes proposed in the amendment:
. is not, nor does it affect An Area of State Concern;
· is an exception to the twice yearly limitation for plan amendments as
noted in. Chapter 163.3187(1) F. S.;
· is not proposed to be adopted under a joint planning agreement pursuant
to Chapter 163.3171(3), F.S.; and,
· has been submitted to Palm Beach County Planning Division, Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council, South Florida Water Management
District, Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Department of State
and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (see enclosed
letters).
Copies of the entire Comprehensive Plan have been sent to all the agencies listed in 9J-
11.008(9)(a).
.. Page2
Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) DR!
Amendment Transmittal
March 25, 2004
The proposed amendment to the text of the Future Land Use Element establishes a
Development of Regional Impact (DR!) future land use designation and provides
corresponding policies for the Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) DR!. The proposed
site-specific FLUM amendment involves a change from Industrial (:1:37.29 acres) and
Local Retail Commercial (:1:49.69 acres) to Development of Regional Impact (DRI)
totaling :1:86.98 acres. Both staff reports and applicant's justifications for the
amendments are included.
No one signed the Courtesy Information List.
The contact person for information regarding this amendment is:
Dick Hudson, AICP, Senior Planner
City of Boynton Beach
100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard
P. O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, Florida 33425
Telephone: (561) 742-6264
Fax: (561) 742-6259
Three copies of the proposed amendment (as included within the attached staff report)
are provided for your review. As stated above, separate transmittals have been
provided to the other required agencies.
Sincerely,
~~
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
Cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning council
South Florida Water Management District
Florida Department of Transportation
Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Florida Department of State
Palm Beach County Planning Division
J:\SHRDATA\PIannlng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MotoroIa DRI\LUAR\OCA Transmittal.dot