Loading...
CORRESPONDENCE 09/01/2005 14:48 5614348815 PLANNING DEPT PAGE 02/03 THESCHOOL D18TR1CT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. FLORIDA PlANNING DEI'JI\RTI.ENT 3300 FOR6T HILL BLVD.. c-110 WESTpALMSeACH.FL >>406-5813 (561) 434-8OZO FAX: (561) ~181 ARTHURC.JOHNSON, Ph.D. SUPERINTENDENT ~OOLo.~ llJ.?<l F ~ ~ BE'XH ~ September 1, 2005 Mr. Dick Hudson, Senior Planner Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION - CASE NUMBER #04043001C - BOYNTON VILLAGE Dear Mr. Hudson: The Palm Beach County School District has reviewed the request for a Concurrency Determination on the above referenced project for 1120 multi-family units. The original application for school concurrency for the same number of units was filed on April 30, 2004, but expired in April of this year. Attached please find the approved Palm Beach County School District Concurrency Application and Service Provider Form far Boynton Village. This Concurrency Determination is valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. Once a Development Order has been issued for the project, the concurrency determination will be valid for the life of the Development Order. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact me at (561) 434-8876. :1{)y Tonya Deal Senior Planner cc: Kim Glas-Castro, Ruden McClosky enc. L:IPI..o;ng\Publlo\IN'll!llOOV\Co\!<"mmoylCoooumn"l' PetennillOlioo Let\efSlConoumm0y\200SIC0404300!.doo A>l EQUAL O~POATUNlTY EMPLOYER 09/01/2005 89/81/2885 119111/ZI" 14:48 11:32 111M 5614348815 5617426259 n1...:r~IIIt!J, PLANNING DEPT PLANN1Nb ~lNIii D&PT PAGE ....-.- ""- PI&; 12/112 03/03 CD ..--..--- -~"='0:1; ---" __1-"-- ...--..-- .... 'nle$clllOOl ~Gf hlm.... Counlr - c .. 8alIGcII ~ Appallllon .....- 11.4.'" F_ _..4. Tt ...: ......_....,"'..~...tlJ-.-~ I .................dJ If~ =........~ '~L'III_._.___.......... ",.....1........~= t1"-~_offlllllllll".....-. ,.~".t.~L!...~"'_4.l1!d .... .. ... ~ ... .. "'....... QMlIt" D....Ar..... .,.... II --- .. .......... I A..................."..__~~._.LQCIer. __t4l_- _;II ..,........,. tJI~_-'..O""..L~. I Jo._...-.I-.&" I J-~''''!rJII!~ J ....., I J,......___..t.... I JlAMlPoIllo..... I ]TlIM....... ... T f _....-'--~ r 1 ~--...._,.... ..................-..--.......-..............--'""" ........ aMfB.t-ml Vf""", .rn ~_.. ___~ Oll-43-4'_I~l_ClOO..06aO - - ..-f_"....-.. ~f..:\~..~ ..... """ -sfirC. 2S b K::I[~ . -=----_.-=,"""----,,,-,..,. ....- ................ - ~ J "I_~ =e:t~:r! :: ::--- 4_~ ~~.___ ,. . :: _ i .............-------. ...-.... --- . "0'5 -- - ----..- ....................--. .--..--- - -- _ ,-.......,................-.----.- -="-==-"--"'~"~"-~. _ r_............_...._ -_'" \.. ":fir #I J"'............~~..~~.IIO(' FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall, West Wing 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 31 0 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax Planning & Zoning Division TO: Tonya Deal FAX: ~ 434-8187 FROM: Dick Hudson, AICP DATE: September 1, 2005 NUMBER OF PAGES: (including coverl 2 RE: Boynton Village Re-application If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you. 09/01/2005 09:24 5614348815 PLANNING DEPT PAGE 01/02 r('HOOLO~ ~~ ~ ~, q "~EACH ~~ THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3320 FOREST HILL BOULEVARD - C331 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406 FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL PHONE: 5611434-8020 FAX: 5611434-8187 "",.. r , .....--..,.;.., Number of pages sent (including cover page): 2 TO: Mr. Dick Hudson, Senior Planner, City of Boynton Beach DATE: September 1, 2005 FAX NUMBER: 742-6259 FROM: Tonya Deal, Senior Planner, SDPBC COMMENTS: Please sign the attached school concurrency and provider re-application form in "Part II, Local Government Review" and fax back to me at 561-434-8187 as soon as possible. Thank you. Attachment L;\PlennlnglPubllcUNTEROOVlConcurrancylConcurrency Determination LettersIFoxes\2005\FXC04043001.DOC 09/01/2005 09:24 5614348815 PLANNING DEPT PAGE 02/02 tn,. UtI The School Pl*!ct of ,.Im INch County PliID"lngDtpllrtmnt 1320 fo.... HIli Blvd. C-"0 Welt F"llm Ektad1, Fl 334D&-5813 PhGflII; (681) 434-8800 w(581) Bl:Hm FIIle (561)434-8187 ar'(561)4U1I15 Allendr;lfl; ca.v.umncy The $ChODI District of Palm Beach County School Concurrency Appllclltion & Service Provider FDrm Instructions: Submit on. copy of the completed applk:8tJon _net fees: for _ch new I"8&ldentlal proJocl requiring a doI1IrmlnotlOn '" concurrency for schools. A d_atlon will be provided within fifteen (15) working days of ,"ealpl of a complete .ppllcallon. A de_nation Is not tronsfe,able and is valid for QI"Q year from date of Issuance. Once thQ Development Ord8r as Issued, the concurrency cleIerrnina~on shall be valid for the life of the DevelOpment Order. P_. check (-I) typo "'application (on. only): [Xl Concurrency Oe18nnlnation [ ] Concurrency E~on [ J COl'1QlJTllncy Equivalency [ ] Adequate School Facilities Deb!nnlnatlon [ ] LOIter of No Implct [ 1 TIme ExtOnGlon F6U: Concurrency DeWR'n",..tion Of ~dlqu." SchQaI FaciRtln DetemlIndun IJZOO.DO lormor'll t'lluI20 unItS 1 20 unlbl VI".... .too.OO); EqutvtllHJcr'($121.DO);. Exemptlon<< LtUwof tIIel...-ct ($zs.00); Tmt I$nSIOn '$15.001 ~_~_-: ~&:~~~ -= ~ .,--; - -~ ~ ~ ~ if ~:_';' ~_=07~--==-~,'_-diJ.. '.,,.l -,-,-",,~'..>_rl.j.\._J..... ""'u_'.J . ..r-::< ~ Jt;-_~ PfNM ~". CWafU'NI:~pMn, jUfiiiiiOnJed..rmnrrlofldMtlllMllMntftNm Project Name: Bovnton Vil1a.O'A Municipality: Rnynton 'RAAC.h Property ConlrOl Numbor(PCN)' 08-43-45-20-01-000-0680 and -0090 LocatlonIAddreosofSUOj.ctProporly: NE corner of Con~re88 Ave and 011'1 Roynt.on llo::ui SectionITownshl P eel Acre e Total NOO1ber of Units Will tile Pro eel be Phased?' Concurre Servire Area A Si II F.ml MulU-Faml .rtmonls H h Rioe o Restricted Other than a ._ stories or less nts ultsOn - IIl1pp/1Cl111M, plate auactI a Phasing P1l11'1 showing 1M numblr IQ'Id tyfa ofunit8lO recetue CllII1!fk:8tIJ of CICQ.l~1'ft;y yeI~. AFt88trIcIIveCownl!mtll:~QlJ1!dftJf~oornroonll:l6l, OWNERSHIP I AGENT INFORMATION: Own"'. N.....: Klatt Contract: Purchaser: 1950 Conness Avenue LLC Agenra Nomo: R~~en MC5l~kl K1m G1 A,,-r.R"~rn M.llln9Add....: Z Lake'i .venue /1800 ~est ~zr BAACh. FT, 11401 ToIophonoNumber. _38-4___ Fox NumllOr: ~14-1442 I her9by ~ tho mtadlMts CM' InfMlMfion madt In btMOfmylcnawleda" .ro=ndg\{-os rs Agent Slgnaluro 0010 OWnor -"~ 3-___~~ J:: . .o1~Jz ~_';' ~'- ,bo.liL,-~ ..J. ~ ~ ~ r~-~c- Dolo Application FIIO<I: ~ovI0w0dBy: AI Did the Appllcont pay III. filing f.. to you? ~~_Slgnaturo Potlllon NUmbo" TIll.: ..qbollOIl. PlIll?',vm YES (PIe&H attaI#lPfOl'fd~l1l) (Woo. the appl1c8nl TnU81 ~ 'tMI SttlOOl District. Thl!l ~ DlsMclWl ncII ravlBw wtmout peynwnt). <5 Dato 8. TIme ReeeiVOd: Coso Number: I vertry that the profeCI compiles wtth the adop1~ l.evel at Service (LOS) fur SchOOla I W1rify thlld thl: p~ wm I;:I;II'T1p/y wi1h ~ ~ Level of SalVioa (LOS) for SCh.'>>!t. SUbject to tI'le attached conditions Il;iInllOt wnfy that tI'I$ ~ will eomj:lly \NIttI the adopted level of ServIce (LOS) for SdKJob School DiStrict Rop...ontatlve Dot_ :'l\rlMmf\tJ>1'hli('\O*~"~ONC1'..l<;jc;.,l"UR.\f;)'J!)I);; (~O'IC\lfm1~ AJl(lli~li~.DOC Department of Engineering and Public Works Po. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Tony MasHotti, Chairman Addie L. Greene, Vice Chairperson Karen T. Marcus Jeff Koons Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson County Administrator Robert Weisman ..._~ ;r:.; II, :1 ULII I I _J DEPARTMENT OF DfV[1 ('PH! ~n ; "An Equal Opportunity AfJinnative Action Employer" ~ printed on recycled paper February 1, 2005 Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE: Winchester Property - (Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr. Rumpf: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic study and responses to comments for the proposed project entitled; Winchester Property, comprised of two planned developments called; Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project is summarized as follows: Location: Municipality: Existing Uses: Proposed Uses: East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road. Boynton Beach None 1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums), 399,000 SF General Retail, 10,000 SF General Office. 16,584 603 Am and 1,357 PM 2008 New Daily Trips: New PH Trips: Build-out Year: Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed mixed-use project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, under the following conditions: . No building permits for more than 190 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for addition of third WB and EB through lanes on both approaches 01 GatewdY BOUlevard at In/; i:lterseciion of Con9~ess Avenue. . No building permits for more than 461 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for addition of NB dual left-turn ianes with proper receiving lanes, or adoption of appropriate CRALLS, for the intersection of Old Boynton Road and Congres5 Avenue. . No building permits for more than 733 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for addition of exclusive EB dual ieft-turn lanes with appropriate receiving lanes, or adoption of appropriate CRALLS at the Intersection of Old Boynton Road and Congress Avenue. . No building permits fo, more than 8.96 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for addition of an exclusive EB right-turn lane at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. . No building permits for more than 963 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for 5-laning of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard, from Congress Avenue to Boynton Beach Boulevard, or adoption of appropriate CRALLS, for all or some links along the arterial segment. . No building permits for more than 1,018 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for addition of an exclusive SB right-turn lane or adoption of appropriate CRALLS, at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and Congress Avenue. . No building permits for more than 1,181 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for addition of exclusive SB dual left-turn lanes at the intersection of Old Boynton Road and Boynton Beach 8oulevard. . No building permits for more than 1,208 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for 6-laning of Congress Avenue, from Lantana Road to Hypoluxo Road. . No building permits for more than 1,348 new external PM peak hour trips until construction begins for 6-laning of Congress Avenue, from Lantana Road to Melaleuca Lane. . Exclusive turn lanes are required the following project access locations, where not available: o SBL and NBR turn lanes along Congress Avenue at the north-most project access driveway o SBL turn lane along Congress Avenue at the middle project access driveway. o NBR turn lane along Congress Avenue at the south-most project access driveway. Within six (6) months from the date of municipal development order, the developer must enter into a Public Facilities Agreement (PFA) with Palm Beach County to fund and/or to construct any and all improvements that are not "Assured Construction" as the term is defined by the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The PFA must be in a fo~m acceptable to the Country Engineer The municipality shall not issue any building perrnits associated v'.;ith the project unless ~lnd unt;~ the PFl~. r:3S been app~Gved by the Board of County Commissioners. No building permits are to be issued by the City, after the build-out date specified above. The County traffic concurrency approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance. The following are suggested to the City of Boynton Beach: . Consider implementation of traffic circulation mitigation measures identified in the "Central Boynton Beach Regional Traffic Circulation Study' which has been required from the consultant. This report is targeted to identify peak hour operational problem5 and identify improvements, which includes extension of storage lengths at exclusive turn lanes at all intersections within the project area of influence. . Because of the high forecasted volumes for Gateway Boulevard, and the proposed mitigations necessary fo; this approval, it is suggested for the City to look into 6-laning of Gateway Boulevard, from Congress Avenue to High Ridge Road. . Due to the high forecasted peak hour volumes, provision of the following intersection turn-lanes are suggested where possible: o SBR at the intersection of Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road. o Additional second WBR lane at the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard and Old Boynton Road. o NBR at the intersection of Gateway Boulevard and High Ridge Road. This determination is subject to the conditions set forth in this ietter. These conditions must be included in the Development Order issued by the City. The Development Order must also provide that failure to meet any of these conditions shall give the County Engineer the right to rescind or amend the approval granted in this Traffic Performance Standards Review Letter. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ENGINEER n/!, Masoud Atefi, M Sr. Engineer - Traffic Division cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Kimley Horn & Associates File: General- TPS. Mun - Traffic Study Review F:\TRAFFIC\ma\Admin\Approvals\D40613.doc Hudson. Dick (Orran) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Glas-Castro, Kimberly [Kimberly.Glas-Castro@ruden.com] Monday, December 20,200412:24 PM Hudson, Dick (Orran) Miskel. Bonnie; RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us RE: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments We had a meeting with FDOT regarding their comments on the amendments. They were concerned that the amendment(s) had not been analyzed based on the maximum intensity permissible under the land use category. And while FDOT acknowledges that we used the maximum intensity that could be accomplished as a local project (without triggering DRI review, which would necessitate add11 State and Regional review) I they would like us to utilize the IIfootnote" approach that has been used elsewhere in the State. Basically, a footnote or symbol is placed on the property on the Future Land Use Map; and a notation is put at the bottom of the map/map key area that corresponds to the footnote/symbol. The footnotes would read something like: nper the Boynton Village SMU amendment, this property is restricted to 1,120 residential units, 10,000 s.f. of office and 149,000 s.f. of commercial uses, or the equivalent thereof. 11 and "Per the Boynton Town Center amendment, this property is restricted to 250,000 s.f. of commerical development, or the equivalent thereof." Roger Wilburn had confirmed DCAls acceptance of this approach. They prefer to amend the land use category to limit the permissible intensity to that which has been evaluated, but understand that this is a new citywide land use and the City wants to provide flexibility in intensity for other properties -- so the footnote approach is acceptable as an alternative -----Original Message----- From: Hudson, Dick (Orran) [mailto:HudsonD@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us] Sent: Monday, December 20, 2004 9:10 AM To, Glas-Castro, Kimberly Subject: RE: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments Kim, Give me the background on this. It is all news to me. Dick -----Original Message----- From: Glas-Castro, Kimberly [mailto:Kimberly.Glas-Castro@ruden.com] Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2004 4:13 PM To: Hudson, Dick (Orran); RumpfM@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us Subject: FW: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments ----~Original Message----- From: Roger.Wilburn@dca.state.fl.us [mailto,Roger.wilburn@dca.state.fl.us] Sent, Thursday, December 16, 2004 4,07 PM To: Glas-Castro, Kimberly Subject: Re: FW: Boynton Beach Amendments 1 It is not our preferred method but we will generally accept it. IIGlas-Castro, Kimberlyll <Kimberly. Glas-Ca To stro@ruden.com> <roger.wilburn@dca.state.fl.us> cc 12/16/2004 04,01 PM Subject FW: Boynton Beach Amendments I just want to confirm my email that this footnote approach is acceptable (so that the City will have a response by email from DCA) -----Original Message----- From: Kemper, Margaret Ray Sent, Thursday, December 16, 2004 3,42 PM To: Glas-Castro, Kimberly Subject: RE: Boynton Beach Amendments I have confirmed with Roger Wilburn that the footnote approach is ok so long as the notation on the future land use map is clear. DCA generally on its Future limitations. limitations. recommends that a local government create a notation table Land Use Map and then use numbers and text to define the That way, multiple parcels can be given density/intensity Call if you have any questions. -----Original Message----- From: Glas-Castro, Kimberly Sent, Wednesday, December 15, 2004 3,17 PM To: Kemper, Margaret-Ray Subject: Boynton Beach Amendments 2 Sembler amendments on winchester property. . . . . . . .. did you have a chance to speak with Caroline Knight about the "footnote" restricting intensity on the property? Kim Glas-Castro, AICP Certified Land Planner Ruden McClosky 222 Lakeview Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33401 telephone, (561) 838-4542 in Broward, (954) 761-2926 fax, (561) 514-3442 kim.glascastro@ruden.com NOTICE: This e~mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e~mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this email message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender. NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e~mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender. NOTICE: This email message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 954-764-6660 and delete this message. Please note that if this e~mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender. 3 Page 3 File Number: LUAR 04-006 Boynton Village ~~2.I?A ...,)1 U- &r1 <PJ; I ~"f9!-f' PROJECT ANALYSIS The parcels, which are the subject of this land use amendment, total 81.81 acres. Because of the size of the property under consideration, the Florida Department of Community Affairs classifies this amendment as a "large-scale" amendment. Following local board review and City Commission public hearing the amendment package was transmitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) on August 3, 2004 for review for compliance with the state, regional and local comprehensive plans prior to adoption. The normal review period is approximately 60 days; however, additional time was added to allow adequate response time for review agencies affected by the hurricanes. The City received DCA's report of their findings in an "Objections, Recommendations and Comments (aRC) Report" on November 19, 2004. This report from the state is generated from reviews against state, regional and local plans and other agencies' long-range plans and policies. The two objections were based on "lack of analysis" of: (1) availability of public facilities, and (2) traffic impacts for the maximum development potential of the sites. A matrix is attached, showing objections and comments from DCA and proposed responses (Exhibit "B"). The City has 60 days to either (1) adopt the amendment as transmitted, (2) adopt the amendment with changes in response to the aRC report, or (3) determine not to adopt the amendment and inform DCA of that decision. The adoption hearing is scheduled for the City Commission meeting on January 18, 2005. It is anticipated that DCA will issue a Notice of Intent (NOI) to find the amendments either "in compliance" or "not in compliance" approximately 60 days following receipt of the amendment package (March 14,2005). The amendments become effective 21 days following issuance of the NOL Master Plan Reauirements The regulations for the Suburban Mixed Use zoning district require that a master plan, including multi-year phases be submitted and reviewed for approval at the time of rezoning to SMU. Because of the length of time required by the large-scale land use amendment process, the applicant submitted a master plan (see Exhibit "C") for approval to coincide with adoption of the land use amendment and the rezoning. While master plan approval is required for rezoning to the SMU district, there is no such requirement for rezoning to C-3 Community Commercial as requested for the Boynton Town Center portion of the property; however, since the two rezonings are preceding simultaneously, staff has requested that any proposed access points from the property to the excluded parcel (Boynton Town Center) be shown on the plan and that compatibility be maximized with the remainder of the project through interconnectivity, consistent architectural design and other design attributes required by the SMU regulations. The proposed master plan meets the minimum requirements, as outlined in the zoning regulations for the Suburban Mixed Use zoning district with any exceptions noted in the Review Comments (see Exhibit D). Those requirements include: . Any proposed multi-year phasing for the project; . Locations of the different uses proposed, including open space or common areas, recreational facilities, residential areas, commercial uses, office uses, other permitted uses, and areas to be developed with integrated mixed-use structures; Page 4 File Number: LUAR 04-006 Boynton Village . Access and flow to each parcel; . Tabulations of total gross acreage in the development and the percentages thereof proposed to be devoted to the several land use types; . Tabulations demonstrating the proposed number of dwelling units, square footage of commercial, office and other uses; and, . Architectural design standards showing the following: design themes to be followed, building colors and color pallet options, maximum building heights and color elevation renderings depicting representative design concepts. Proiect Phases And Master Plan Overview The project is proposed for development in two phases. Phase I will consist of the spine road connecting the Renaissance Commons development on the north with Old Boynton Road on the south; a lake parcel of 8.38 acres (10.27% of the site); and a mixed-use parcel of 24.7 acres (30.27% of the site). The mixed-use parcel extends from the north boundary of the site at the Boynton (C-16) Canal southward along Congress Avenue to the boundary with the Boynton Town Center Project. Two access points are shown from Congress Avenue and connecting with the proposed spine road, each provides pedestrian and vehicular access to the site. The road from Congress Avenue opposite the entrance to the Boynton Beach Mall, is proposed to be lined with one- and two-story commercial buildings which will provide a "main street" atmosphere for the project. The lake parcel is located in the central eastern part of the property. It will be the principal storm water retention area for the development. Currently, the remainder of the project is scheduled for Phase II. With the exception of a 5.03- acre (6.16% of the site) parcel denoted as "park", parcels, identified for Phase II, would all be devoted to residential development, with townhomes located on the parcel surrounding the "lake parcel" and along the C-16 Canal, and condominiums on the two remaining parcels. The residential parcels total 43.47 acres or 53.3% of the total development. Tabular data show that the proposed land uses include 149,000 square feet of commercial and retail, 10,000 square feet of office and 1,120 units of multi-family residential development. A more recent breakdown shows that of the 1,120 residential units, there are 472 proposed townhouses (attached single family units) and 648 condominium units. The City has adopted a resolution requiring land dedication to satisfy the impact fee obligations; therefore, only a portion of the 5.03-acre "park parcel" counts toward the "usable open space" requirements. Based on the formulae included in the SMU development regulations, 30% of the land area devoted to single-family attached units and 20% of the land area devoted to mixed use and multi-family use must be "usable open space". In the mixed use and multi- family use areas, up to 50% of the usable open space may be made up of hardscaped plazas and public gathering places. In the townhouse areas, at least 50% must be in common pooled areas, though none of this usable open space must be in public parks. Under this requirement, a total of 17.65 acres must be earmarked for usable open space. The proposed 40-foot pedestrian greenway adjacent to the right-of-way of the E-4 Canal and the 25-foot greenway adjacent to the C-16 Canal will fulfill some of those requirements. There is no other indication Page 5 File Number: LUAR 04-006 Boynton Village how the applicant intends to fulfill these requirements; although staff will require that the developer provide a notation on the master plan giving a conceptual description or statement of assumptions as to how he proposes to meet the requirements. This notation will be used as a guide as site plans for each development tract are submitted. Also regarding recreation, a negative aspect of the proposed master plan is the lack of park space (private and public) located to take advantage of the lake area. While location of the proposed park parcel would maximize accessibility to non-residents of the development, it is assumed that the "main street" area will be patronized by more than just residents of the development. A passive area located between the spine road and the lake could be a special focal point and gathering place for a great number of people, and a true asset to the development. This would also fulfill the SMU requirements that developments utilizing the regulations provide public plazas and gathering places that are both well-designed and integrated into the overall design of the development; and also create higher quality environments for residents, businesses, employees, and visitors. A finding of consistency of the project with the Palm Beach County Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance is based on the assumption that certain roadway and intersection improvements will be necessary prior to buildout. Many of these improvements are already in the County's adopted long-range transportation plans, but may not be included in their Five- year Transportation Improvement Plan. Since these planned improvements may require acquisition of additional rights-of-way, their full implementation may be too costly to be practicable. Staff recommends a requirement of an explanation of the thresholds of development that trigger each of the roadway improvements. This should include both a comparable mix of uses similar to the subject request, as well as a scenario involving principally residential uses (Condition 5). This should be provided prior to approval of any of the individual site plans within the project. Review Based on Reauired Criteria The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C. Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. These criteria are required to be part of a staff analysis when the proposed change includes an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Map. a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the Citys risk manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan. The subject property is not located in the hurricane evacuation zone, therefore the referenced policy is not applicable; however, other applicable objectives and policies contained in the comprehensive plan include: Ranges of Allowable Percentages of Land Use Within the Area: Residential: 30%-70% Comrnercial (including office development): 30%- 70% The cumulative development in these areas shall be monitored annually to ensure that the proportion of rnixed uses is maintained. A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 4.0 may be considered for all uses, exclusive of parking structures, throughout the Mixed Use Core land use category. For the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal Highway within the Hurricane Evacuation Zone, while the residential density within a development may be up to 80 dwelling units per acre, the overall density for the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal Highway shall not exceed 40 dwelling units per acre. All land development located in the Mixed Use-Core category shall be required to submit a plan that includes a single unified design for the project, and shall conform to any adopted design plan( s) for the area covered by the category. Mixed Use-Suburban: This land use category shall only be applicable to lands located west of 1-95, and shall consist of the SMU Suburban Mixed Use zoning districts and/or any zoning district(s) which may be established in the future provided that the abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the Mixed Use-Suburban land use category. The land use category allows for a diversity of land uses and accommodates and encourages a mixture of uses, which may be arranged either vertically or horizontally along major arterial roadways. All land developrnent located in the Mixed Use- Suburban category shall be required to submit a rnaster plan that includes a unified plan of development for the project, which encourages synergy between proposed uses, promotes pedestrian or multi-modal linkages, maximizes usable open spaces and public spaces, and establishes design objectives for the project. The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include the following: All uses located in the Local Retail Commercial land use category and all uses located in the High Density Residential Land Use Category. Residential densities up to 20 dwelling units are permitted. A maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 1.0 is permitted for all non-residential uses, exclusive of parking structures, throughout the Mixed Use-Suburban land use category. Density and FAR shall be calculated based upon the gross acreage. City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments 04-2 1-20a Date: February 15, 2005 Future Land Use Element Ordinance No. 04-049 The following percentages, calculated as a percentage of the net area, shall be met in designing the mixture of uses: High Density Residential: 30%-70% Local Retail Commercial (including office development): 30%-70% In calculating the net area, roadway areas, parks, drainage, wetlands, or recreation tracts shall be excluded. The mix of uses proposed for any land development located in the Mixed Use- Suburban category shall be reviewed for aesthetics, design quality and physical compatibility with adjacent land uses; and shall conform to any adopted design planes) for the area covered by the category. General Commercial: This land use category shall consist of all C-4 General Commercial zoning districts, and any other zoning districts which may be established, including Planned Commercial Development districts, which are similar in character to the C-4 district, provided that all of the abovernentioned zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the General Commercial land use category. The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include, the following: All uses allowed in the Local Retail Commercial land use category, plus wholesale of non-hazardous commodities, business services, vehicle and boat storage; household storage; shops for fabrication, rebuilding, and repair on a custom basis. A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 0.50 may be considered for general commercial uses Industrial: This land use category shall consist of all M -I and Planned Industrial Development zoning districts, and any other industrial zoning districts which may be established, provided that all of the abovementioned zoning districts are shown on the Future Land Use Map within the Industrial land use category The uses allowed in this land use category shall be limited to, but shall not necessarily include, the following: Industrial uses, research and development, wholesale and distribution, business and repair services, warehousing and storage; transportation, communication, and utility facilities, retail sale of City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments 04-2 1-21 Date: February 15,2005 Future Land Use Element Ordinance No. 04-049 , The City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425-0310 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FAX: (561) 742-6285 www.boynton-beach.org OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER December 15,2004 Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 601 - 21 st Street - Suite 400 Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Via Facsimile tele. No. (772) 562-9689 Attention: Chris Ralph, PE Re: Spine Road Composition Boynton Town CenterNillage Dear Mr. Ralph: We have reviewed the facsimile transrnitted to this office yesterday on the above noted subject. We have also reviewed the development's proposed SMU Master Plan, last updated 12/07/04. With six (6) proposed intersections along the Spine Road corridor of which five (5) reflect left turn movements (northbound to westbound), it is very real that left turn lanes will be required along the corridor to handle those turning rnovements. This also reflects commercial and delivery movements into the commercial parcel. To this extent, an updated detailed TIA will be required for rnyreview. In reviewing your propose typical section for the Spine Road, several cornponents are unacceptable. As an example, using the FDOT Std. Index 301 & 302, the cornposition of a turn lane utilizing a 4- foot traffic separator and a 12-foot lane requires a minimum of a 17.50 foot median (roadway pavement edge to roadway pavernent edge). In addition, P.B.C. Traffic Engineering Division required bike lanes to be 4-feet in width, not the three (3) foot that you reflect on your typical. Further, and as you pointed out to rne, the city's standard is a distance of7 feet between the sidewalk and the curbing (i.e., Std. #P-3). With the use of curb & gutter, we have allowed for a six (6) foot grass area between the sidewalk and the curb & gutter. It is also noted that you have not considered any possible right turn lanes throughout the entire length of the Spine Road. We will require a traffic impact intersection analysis (including peak hour flows) for each intersection proposed to justifY the conceptual SMU plan. Based on the above, the typical section for the Spine Road (lOO-foot right-of-way requirement) needs to consist of the following (for a half right-of-way), left to right: America's Gateway to the Gulfstream . Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., Attention: Chris Ralph, PE Re: Boynton Town CenterNillage - Spine Road Composition December 15,2004 Page 2 5' Sidewalk 6' Grass area 2' Curb & gutter 4' Bike lane 12' Outside vehicle travel lane 12' Inside vehicle travel lane 9' Yz Median width = 50' Yz Right-of-way width A final roadway typical section will be settled upon after my review of the detail TIA, to be forthcoming. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please advise me at telephone number (561) 742-6488. Sincerely, lc/atV'f-Cec:~ '(~i~id Kelley, Jr., PE City Engineer HDK:ck xc: Jeff Livergood, PE, Dir. of Public Works Laurinda Logan, PE, Senior Civil Engineer Ken Hall, Plans Review Analyst Ed Breese, Senior Planner, P & Z Department File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Boynton Twon Center-Village, Spine Rd. Composition.doc ~~ Ruden ~II McClosky 222 LAKEVIEW AVENUE SUITE 800 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401-6112 (561) 838-4542 FAX: (561) 514-3442 KIM.GLASCASTRO@RUDEN.COM December 9,2004 VIA EMAIL Larry Hymowitz, AICP FDOT-District 4 3400 W. Commercial Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309 RE: Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendments- Boynton VillagelBoynton Town Center Dear Larry: Thank you for meeting with Bonnie Miskel, Andrea Troutman (via conference call) and me last week. This serves as a summary of our discussions, and our understanding of the outcome. I) Data and Analysis. Additional data was supplied in September which includes the traffic analysis for the requested land use changes based on the MPO/Palm Beach County 2020 model data, as well as the concurrency traffic study based on Traffic Performance Standards criteria and provides peak hour/peak direction information. In both of these studies, the projects do not have significant traffic on the FIHS (Interstate 95 is the closest and only FIHS roadway in the area). 2) Maximum Potential Intensity. The densities and intensities evaluated for the requested land use amendments are the maximum levels that could be reviewed as local projects without triggering DRI review. As you know, a DRI project would undergo additional scrutiny by State and Regional agencies, such as FDOT, and be reviewed for impacts to the regional roadway system. The project intensities that were evaluated for the land use amendments represent the maximum potential as a local (sub-DRI) project. To provide further assurance that more intensity will not be provided on the subject properties, a footnote could be added to the Future Land Use Map that, in effect, limits the density and intensity to that utilized in the comprehensive plan analyses. This "footnote" approach has been utilized elsewhere throughout the State to address intensity concerns. It is our understanding that with the adoption of a restrictive footnote on the Future Land Use Map, and with the formal City-transmittal of the supplemental traffic data and analysis that the FDOT's concerns have been addressed. If our understanding is incorrect, please let us know so that we may have follow up discussions in the next week. WPB:193650:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. r. n.......~ . <"T '" '..........., r _ ....... _ .,. n. rr _ ......., . .,......... _ .."""... C'T ,. ,r.r _ r. .............. _ rT ..r..-rh"n. ,n,... _ T'" .., .rr.... . .... ..n. _ ,.,rrT n.'.. ..r.......' Meeting Summary - Larry Hymowitz Page 2 Thank you again for your attention to this matter, as we are preparing for the City's consideration of adoption. Sincerely, ~~~')~-~ ( Kim Glas-Castro, AICP cc: Dick Hudson, AICP Caroline Knight Richard Foreman, Sembler WPB:193650:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LUCIE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TALLAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Division Memorandum TO: FROM: DATE: RE: Jim Cheraf, City Attorney Michael Rumpf, Director of Planning & Zoning December 2, 2004 Boynton Village Request for copies of any correspondence for the above from staff to the developer or its consultants are attached. enclosures S:IPLANNINGIPLANNING TEMPLATES\P&Z LETTERS AND MEMOSIP&Z MEMO.DOC Tucker, Patricia From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Rumpf, Michael Tuesday. November 30,20043:17 PM Greene, Quintus Tucker. Patricia; Breese, Ed; Hudson. Dick (Orran) RE: Boynton Village Q Directly to Jim or through You? MR. -----Original Message----- From: Greene, Quintus Sent: Tuesday, November 30,2004 1:46 PM To: Breese, Ed; Hudson, Dick (Orran); Rumpf, Michael Cc: Tucker, Patricia Subject: FW: Boynton Village Would you please follow-up on Jim's request. Thanks Q. --u-Original Message----- From: Cheraf, James Sent: Monday. November 29, 2004 5:41 PM To: Greene, Quintus Subject: Boynton Village I need a copy of all correspondence. if any, from your staff to the developer or its consultants. 1 . .' ~~ ~_: ~J;OR1~'" Department of Engineering and Public Works PO, Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Karen T Marcus, Chair Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman Jeff Koons Warren H Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Addie L. Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman "An Equal Opportunity Afflrmati~'e Actlon Employer" @ printed on recycled paper 0"1, October 19, 2004 Q lE<crsu~lE OCT28aM Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE: Winchester Property - (Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr. Rumpf: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received the traffic study for the proposed project entitled; Winchester Property, comprised of pursuant of two pianned developments called; Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project is summarized as follows: Location: Municipality: Existing Uses: Proposed Uses: East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road. Boynton Beach None 1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums), 399,000 SF General Retail, 10,000 SF General Office. N/A N/A 2008 New Daily Trips: New PH Trips: Build-out Year: Based on our review, the Traffic Division has the following comment: . Provide two copies of the proposed site pian to review potential for internalization between the separate land uses. The additional copy which is being requested by th0 i...1P(J for test 2 rrodel rUflS, needs to show all access loc3ticns as well as the alignment of the newly proposed Spine Road. . All daily and peak hour trip generation estimates must be based on the latest ITE equations, with the exception of the daily rate of 7 tripslDU for condominiums, and the use of the PM peak hour equation for office use from the 5th Edition Manual. . Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern ' Residential: o Assignment of 22% of all trips to 1-95 is too high, reduce to about 15%. o Too much of the project residential traffic (about 60%) seem to be generated trom within the projects radius of influence (4 miles). o Too much of project traffic is dropped on Old Boynton Beach Road. east of Lawrence Road. o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard. Same for Lawrence Road south of Boynton Beach Boulevard. . Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern - Non- Residential: o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard. o Too much of project traffic is dropped (5%) on Old Boynton Beach Road, east of Lawrence Road. . Exhibit3C, add a column to illustrate existing (base year) volumes for each link. . Provide a separate figure illustrating peak hour forecasts of traffic diversions in the vicinity of the site, expected due to construction of the new Spine Road. . Use of "Area type 6" is not allowed for the peak hour operational analysis at the studied intersections. Area type 3 is recommended for all approaches, unless cases where very high level of coordination is achieved on major corridors. . In a separate appendix provide full reports for the peak hour arterial (Urban Street) analysis where all inputs and segments are indicated. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, INEER /V) Masoud Atefi, Sr. Engineer- cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Kimley Horn & Associates File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review F:\TRAFFIClmalAdmin\Commenls\040613R.doc ~ Department of Engineering and Public Works PO Box 2122Q \-Vest Palm Beach. FL 3341h-122q (561) hR4-4000 wwwpbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Karen T t\.'1arcus, Chair Tony Masilottl. Vice Chamn::m Jeff Koons \Varren H Newell Mary McCarty Burr Aaronson Addie L Greene County Administrator Rubert \\..'E'lsman "An Equal Opport11mty Ajfrrmilrn'f Actlull Employer" ,AC' W printed on recycled paper October 19, 2004 Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach P.O Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE: Winchester Property - (Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village) TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW Dear Mr. Rumpf: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received the traffic study for the proposed project entitled; Winchester Property, comprised of pursuant of two planned developments called; Boynton Town Center & Boynton Village, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project is summarized as follows: Location: Municipality: Existing Uses: Proposed Uses: East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road. Boynton Beach None 1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums), 399.000 SF General Retail, 10,000 SF General Office. N/A N/A 2008 New Daily Trips: New PH Trips: Build-out Year: Based on our review, the Traffic Division has the following comment: . Provide two copies of the proposed site plan to review potential for internalization between the separate land uses. The additional copy which is being requested by t!li; j-.IP;/ rtii L85t;: 'i'I)G€: rIJ!1~., rv;:~~:,.~t, ~..) sh..::......w 2;!i acc;a.ss loc:~'ti[ms as w'2l1 as the alignment of the newly proposed Spine Road. . All daily and peak hour trip generation estimates must be based on the latest ITE equations, with the exception of the daily rate of 7 trips/DU for condominiums, and the use of the PM peak hour equation for office use from the 5th Edition Manual. . Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern - Residential: o Assignment of 22% of all tripS to 1-95 is too high, reduce to about 15%. c 100 much of the proJec: reslCiential traffiC (about 60%) seem to be generated ,rare within tile project s radiLls of influence (4 milesi. . . o Too much of project traffic is dropped on Old Boynton Beach Road, east of Lawrence Road. o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard. Same for Lawrence Road south of Boynton Beach Boulevard. . Address the following issues with the project trip distribution pattern - Non- Residential: o Provide justification as why there was no project traffic assigned to Military Trail, south of Old Boynton Beach Boulevard. u Too rnuch of project traffic is dropped (5%) on Ola Boynton Beach Road, east of Lawrence Road. . Exhibit 3C, add a column to illustrate existing (base year) volumes for each link. . Provide a separate figure illustrating peak hour forecasts of traffic diversions in the vicinity of the site, expected due to construction of the new Spine Road. . Use of "Area type 6" is not allowed for the peak hour operational analysis at the studied intersections. Area type 3 is recommended for all approaches, unless cases where very high level of coordination is achieved on major corridors. . In a separate appendix provide full reports for the peak hour arterial (Urban Street) analysis where all inputs and segments are indicated. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, INEER /V/ Masoud Atefi, SC Sr. Engineer - T ic Division cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. Kimley Horn & Associates File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review F'ITRAFFIClmalAdminICommentsI040613R.doc - ,.,' " -, c:::~ _' 4 ~__ ,<. ~_--:"'_____ .'\ _'_~i:~,--....i:J1.1 .j~;;... .._.--"____--" T R EA s~u' Itg :;i; i:f~ ~>~l ifJ.)N~~: PLAN N I N G .il: , ~~ ~i _~~,;- t -I '1 'I' .----' _ _, .~, -. I N D I .& N'-ca l'V E It ~ ~'M'KKlih ~- -PAL'\{ '_"C' _ -, -qf.';, c;'OU'N'Cf'i ,,-, BIrA C H (l_ ;IST'. eurCT It.e' 'It"'"'-.' ;.~_.~ October IS, 2004 Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton g"ach, FL 33435 Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Draft Amendments - DCA Reference No. 04-2 Dear Mr. Rumpf: Pursuant to the requirements of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, Council reviewed the above- referenced comprehensive plan amendments at its meeting on October IS, 2004. A review report was approved by Council for transmittal to the Department of Community Affairs as required by Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes. A copy of the approved report is attached for consideration by your governing body prior to adoption of the amendments. Please send one copy of all materials related to these amendments directly to our office once they are adopted by your governing body, pursuant to Chapter 9J-II, Florida Administrative Code. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me. Sincerely, T~e~:-- Deputy Director TLH:wh Attachment ocr "Bringing Communities Together" . Est. 1976 1.1 Easl Ocean Bouleval'd - Suite 1.. - SIUal'l, Florida 14"4 Phone (772) 221-4'" - SC 2".4'" - Fax (772) 221-4"7 _ E-m ail _ ad..in(i)lcrnc.our , [I ) [,1 SE~ I L ')(!(1,1 .-.--) STATE OF FLORIDA ,r rF'ARH 'rl\T ('. r'l __n__ '-T' (., .. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS JEB BUSH Governor N Dedicated to making Florida a bener place to call home" THADDEUS L. COHEN, AlA Secretary September 22, 2004 Ms. Margaret-Ray Kemper Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. 215 South Monroe Street Suite 815 Tallahassee, Florida 32301 Re: Renaissance Commons DRI (Motorola DRI), Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village Clearance Letter Request, CL-I005-004 Dear Ms. Kemper: The Department received your letter dated September 1, 2004 in which you requested an informal determination from the Department confirming that Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village (hereinafter referred to as the Boynton Projects) are not required to be aggregated with the Renaissance Commons Development ofRegionallmpact (DRI) and treated as a single development, pursuant to Section 380.0651(4), Florida Statutes (F.S.). Your request for a determination is made because James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., both manage entities that own the Renaissance Commons DR!. Additionally, Carl E. Klepper, Jr., and James Comparato both have an ownership interest in the Boynton Projects, although their respective ownership interest does not exceed twenty-five percent. When one of the developments at issue is a DRl, the aggregation criteria as set forth in Section 380.0651(4), Florida Statutes (F.S.), and in Rule 9J-2.0275, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), will govern the determination. Pursuant to Section 380.0651(4), F.S., two or more developments, "shall be aggregated and treated as a single development when they are determined to be part of a unified plan of development and are physically proximate to one another". According to the information provided, Renaissance Commons is north of the C-16 Canal, south of Gateway Boulevard, east of Congress A venue, and west of the E-4 Canal. Boynton Village is south of the C- 16 Canal, north of Old Boynton Road, east of Congress Avenue, and west of the E-4 Canal. Renaissance Commons and Boynton Village are separated by the C-16 Canal. Boynton Town Center is located at the intersection of Congress A venue and Old Boynton Road, and its northern and eastern boundaries are adjacent to Boynton Village. Therefore, the Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects are physically proximate as defined in Rule 9J-2.0275, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FiElD OFFICE 2796 Overseas Highway, Suile 212 Marathon, Fl 33050-2227 (305)289-2402 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: (a50) 486-8466/Suncom 278-6466 FAX; (850) 921-0781!Suncom 2'.n-07al Internet address: http://www.dca.slate.fl.us COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 323992100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850)488-2356 (850)413-9969 HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2555 Shumard Oak Bou!evard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850)488-7956 Ms. Margaret-Ray Kemper September 22, 2004 Page Two Further, pursuant to Subsection 380.0651(4)(a), F.S., two of the following criteria must be met in order to determine that two developments share a unified development plan: 1.a. The same person has retained or shared control of the developments; 1.b. The same person has ownership or a significant legal or equitable interest in the developments; or I.c. There is common management of the developments controlling the form of physical development or disposition of the parcels of the development. 2. There is a reasonable closeness in time between the completion of 80 percent or less of one development and the submission to a governmental agency of a master plan or series of plans or drawings for the other development indicating a common development effort. 3. A master plan or series of plans or drawings exists covering the developments sought to be aggregated which have been submitted for authorization to cornmence development. 4 The voluntary sharing of infrastructure that is indicative of a common development effort, except that which was required by a local government or other agency. 5. There is a common advertising scheme or promotional plan in effect for both developments. According to the information provided, Renaissance Commons is owned by Compson Associates of Boynton, LLC, and Compson Associates of Boynton II, LLC. James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., are the managers of both entities and have the ability to control the development of Renaissance Commons. Boynton Village is being acquired by 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC. Boynton Town Center is being acquired by Boynton Beach Place, LLC. James Comparato has a twenty percent interest and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., has a five percent interest in each of those companies with the remaining seventy-five percent being owned by the Sembler Company. Neither James Comparato nor Carl E. Klepper, Jr., will manage those entities. An affiliate of the Sembler Company will manage both 1950 Congress Avenue, LLC, and Boynton Beach Place, LLC, and will control their development. Neither the Sembler Company, nor its affiliate, which will manage Boynton Village and Boynton Beach Place, has an ownership or leasehold interest in Renaissance Commons or manages or controls Renaissance Commons. Except for James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper. Jr., none of the entities or individuals with an interest in Renaissance Commons has any ownership or leasehold interest in the Boynton Town Center or Boynton Village or an option to acquire all or a portion of these developments. Because James Comparato and Carl E. Klepper, Jr., do not manage Boynton Town Center or Boynton Village and their interest in these developments does not exceed twenty-five percent, and because neither the Sembler Company nor its affiliate has an interest in or manages Renaissance Commons, Renaissance Cornmons and Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village are not commonly owned, managed or controlled. Therefore none of the criteria I a - c would be met. The information provided indicates that the Renaissance Commons, Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village will be developed as totally separate and distinct developments. There is no master plan Ms. Margaret-Ray Kemper September 22, 2004 Page Thee or common plan of development for the properties which has been submitted to the City or to a permitting agency. While the properties will be developed concurrently, the reasonable closeness in time criterion is not met as that criterion requires the submittal to a governmental agency of a master plan indicative of a common plan of development. Therefore, the criteria of Subsections 380.065I(4)(a)2 and 3., F.S., have not been met. Rule 9J-2.0275(2)(e), F.A.C, provides that the sharing of infrastructure implies the voluntary joint use by two or more developments of internal roadways, internal recreational facilities or parks, amenities, or water, sewage or drainage facilities specifically constructed to accommodate the developments sought to be aggregated. Your information indicates that different surface management water systems will serve Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects and that the drainage facilities of one development will not be shared by the other. Access to Renaissance Commons will be provided via entry points along Congress Avenue and Gateway Boulevard, both of which are public roads. Access to the Boynton Projects will be provided via Congress Avenue and Old Boynton Road, which is also a public road. Water and wastewater service to the developments will be provided by the City. Electric service to the developments will be provided by Florida Power and Light. Therefore, as there will be no voluntary sharing of infrastructure other than that provided by the City or other agency, the criterion of Subsection 380.0651(4)(a)4, F.S., has not been met. Rule 9J-2.0275(2)(I), F.A.C., provides that a common advertising scheme or promotional plan means any depiction, illustration, or announcement which indicates a shared commercial promotion of two or more developments as components of a single development and is designed to encourage sales or leases of property. You have indicated that there will be no common advertising or promotional plan for the Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects. Therefore, the criterion of Subsection 380.0651(4)(a)5, F.S., has not been met. In conclusion, based on the above representations, Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects would not be part of a unified plan of development. Therefore, based on the information provided, the Department determines that Renaissance Commons and the Boynton Projects do not meet the aggregation criteria as outlined in Section 380.0651(4), F.S. Please be aware that the conclusions of this letter represent an informal determination based on the information presented in your letter and discussions with the Department. The Department has no independent knowledge of any of your assertions. The Department hereby reserves all rights pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, concerning these developments. Further review of these developments may be required if the developers' plans represented above are materially changed. If you have any questions or comments concerning this matter, please call Caroline Knight, Planner, at (850) 922-1773. Sincerely yours, C~~ Chief of Comprehensive Planning CG/ck cc: Mr. Michael Busha, Director, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Mr. Michael W. Rumpf, Director of Planning and Zoning, City of Boynton Beach FACSIMILE CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH City Hall. West Wing 100 E. Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box310 Boynton Beach. Florida 33425 (561) 742-6260 (561) 742-6259 Fax Planning & Zoning Division TO: Kim Glas-Castro FAX: ~ 514-3442 FROM: Dick Hudson DATE: 9/16/04 NUMBER OF PAGES: (including coverl 2 RE: SFWMD Comments Re: Boynton Village Kim. This came in yesterday from SFWMD. I assume you will handle the response. Dick If you receive this fax in error, or experience trouble with transmission, please notify our office Immediately, at (561) 742-6260. Thank you. ,\,>~Ell ^41, ~, l-',~<> ~'~~ t.'.'...'\ij'} ~(";<,-,,-,,~>~,; Os'" h""'c .,'\" " ,\. SOUTH FWRIL.. WATER MANAGEMENT DIS'lnICT 3301 Gun Gub Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 . FL WA1S 1.800-432-2045 . TOD (561) 697-2574 Mailing Address: P.o. Box 24680, West Palm Beach. FL 33416-4680 . \\ww.sfwmd.gov GOV 08-28 September 13, 2004 Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and DRl Processing Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Subject: Proposed Amendment Comments City of Boynton Beach, DCA# 04-2 South Florida Water Management District staff has cornpleted its review of the subject document. We have determined that the proposed amendment LUAR 04-006 (Boynton Village) is not supported by potable water facility capacity analysis, as required. The applicant needs to include the required analysis necessary to support the amendment and demonstrate that adequate water supply facility and service will be available concurrent with the impact of the development. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 682-6779. Sincerely, ~~ P.K. Sharma, AICP Lead Planner Water Supply Planning & Development Division PKS/nk c: Michael Busha, TCRPC Ken Metcalf, DCA Michael Rumpf, Boynton Beach /I"r~ ~ c_~_____ 'I' 'i I h. 1;1 f"~'''''--'-, , /J __0 e" '. L' On' ---- /; i11; -----~,,--L tv [;/ --", .."L~ I 51f114~1!J! .~' " '--. J I ' - ( ,~,. -. -.--- . I 'dEI'., 'H , .___ .~Ot\l~1 "- . .QP"E ' -'.-_-.., 'V/,f..;r' --...- GoVERNING BOARD EXECIfl7VE OFFTCE Nicolas J. Gutierrez, Jr., Esq., 01llir Pamela Brooks-Thomas, Vice-OMir Irela M. Bagu~ Michael Collins Hugh M. English Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E. Kevin McCarty Harkley R. Thornton Tmdi K Williams, P.E. Henry Dean, Execu/i()(' Director Page 1 of2 %" ~(" Rumpf, Michael From: Rumpf, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 5:34 PM To: 'Richard Foreman' Subject: RE: SMU Master Plan Richard, We've received the first portion of your package. Yes, we can continue to accept documents for the application, particularly those documents with the greater level of detail. We anxiously await your comprehensive (conceptual/draft) site plan to show details and how all parts will Interconnect. We are uncomfortable processing the master plan without the details, particularly given that we see some elements being finalized like the road. lakes and accessways which could affect ultimate design and unification of the greater project. We know that the further along this project progresses the less flexible are the individual parts, as we just experienced on the Renaissance project. Changes to the detailed document would be expected, but it would gives us something to work from. Let me know if I can continue to assist with the issues and questions of your development team. Michael Rumpf Planning & Zoning Director City of Boynton Beach 561-742-6260 m--Original Mes5age-_m From: Richard Foreman [mailto:Richard.Foreman@5embler.com] Sent: WedneSday, September 15, 20044:38 PM To: rumpfm@ci.boynton-beach.fl.us Cc: jcomparato@compson.com; Joe Filippelli Subject: SMU Ma5ter Plan i\1ike ~ Dick will be receiving our supplemental package for SMU Master Plan and attachments for Boynton Village today. One thing missing that you had asked for will be a rendered site plan. I plan to send to you a preliminary site plan, with the acknowledgement of it's early status, but I believe I can give you a better product and tool for your use if I can have a couple of days to make a few modifications and complete some rendering. I hope that is okay. Richard Foreman Senior Development :rvfanager The Sembler Company (404) 847 1801, exl. 205 (404)-847-1818. Fax Visit us online at: www.sembler.com NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachment to this e-mail message contains confidential information that may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not review, retransmit, convert to hard copy, copy, use or disseminate this e-mail or any attachments to it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by telephone at 727-384-6000 and delete this message. Please note that if this e-mail message contains a forwarded message or is a reply to a prior message, some or all of the contents of this message or any attachments may not have been produced by the sender. 9/1512004 ~.."",~ ",~.,.).~..:~" i;! ',,;I'),;""'~ o .~"nc.", ....l~ ", Z ...." ,-"" ,\,<".,'" ~,} ~;<:.",.: ./-, i: ~~ OS'''i;''i;'~i.'''~''Y '. .)." SOUTH FWRIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 3301 Gun Ouo Road. West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686,8800 . FL WATS 1.800.432.2045 . TDD (561) 697.2574 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 . V\ww.sfwmd.gov GOV 08-28 Septernber 13, 2004 Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and DRI Processing Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-21 00 Dear Mr. Eubanks: Subject: Proposed Amendment Comments City of Boynton Beach, DCA# 04-2 South Florida Water Management District staff has completed its review of the subject document. We have determined that the proposed amendment LUAR 04-006 (Boynton Village) is not supported by potable water facility capacity analysis, as required. The applicant needs to include the required analysis necessary to support the amendment and demonstrate that adequate water supply facility and service will be available concurrent with the irnpact of the development. If you have any questions or require additional information, please call me at (561) 682-6779. Sincerely, \Ill] J~~ ~. _ -L-~~ PK Sharma, AICP Lead Planner Water Supply Planning & Development Division PKS/nk c: Michael Busha, TCRPC Ken Metcalf, DCA Michael Rumpf, Boynton Beach ii '.J .' ., '.' !., ..~. ".. ~h ~~-_ 'c," ,.I II, k '-" , SfP I 5 ~~;-'71!J - I I . -'-.,1 I 'i Vf::' n- "'-.. -( ~ tl}~_1r,r\I; , ~ ~, I" , iir/: GOVERNING BOARD EXEClmVE OFFICE Nicolas J. Gutier:reL., Jr., Esq., 01/11r Pamela Brooks-Thomas, Vice-C/mir Irela M. Bague Michael Collins Hugh M. English Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E. Kevin McCarty Harkley R. Thornton Trudi K. Williams, P.E. Henry Dean, Ex('("utiw DIn'clor The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON 100 E. Boynton Beach Sculevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org August 26, 2004 Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re: Traffic Study: Boynton Town Center I (LUAR 04-007) and Boynton Village (LUAR 04-006) Combined TPS Traffic Study - aka Winchester Property Dear Mr. Atefi: We have been informed by John Corbett that a copy of the above referenced traffic study has been provided to you for review and comment. If this is not the ca5e, please let us know immediately and a copy will be furnished to you. Please review the information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide me with your written response. The land use amendments for these properties were transmitted to the Florida Department of Community affairs with the condition that their adoption is "contingent on clarification and consideration of traffic impact analysis requirements of Palm Beach County." If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260. S~J~ Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECr5\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center l\Traffic Atefi 8-26-04.doc ~~II aru/JIX;1e go J4/ A TIORNEYS AT LAW 309 LAKE A VENUE fj;h. JA';/A .Y~urk,j:J?6Y JOHN CORBETI TRELA 1. WHITE BRADLEY W BIGGS KEITH W. DAVIS R. MAX LOHMAN AREA CODE56 I TELEPHONE 586-71 16 TELECOPIER 586-961 I August 25, 2004 Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE Senior Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works 160 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, Fl. 33406 Re: Boynton Town Center (LUAR 04-007) and Boynton Village (LUAR 04-006) Combined TPS Traffic Study - a/k/a Winchester Property Dear Masoud; Enclosed is a new traffic study for the "Winchester Property". The Winchester Property includes two separate projects, Boynton Town Center and Boynton Village, that have been combined only for purposes of Traffic Performance Standards (TPS) review based on the TPS aggregation criteria. The enclosed traffic study replaces all prior studies that have been submitted to you for the Winchester Property. Please consider those studies withdrawn. On July 8,2004, you sent a letter to Michael Rumph, Boynton Beach Director of Planning and Zoning, stating that you would not review the traffic study until after the land use plan amendments are adopted by the City. As you and I discussed on July 16,2004, the City is concurrently processing the comprehensive plan amendments and zoning changes for both projects and would like the County to complete its TPS review prior to the City acting on the comprehensive plan amendments for the two projects. As you requested, I did discuss this issue with Lenny Berger, and he told me he would discuss this matter with you. If there is still any question about your immediate review of this study, please call me. Thank you for your prompt attention in this matter. Sincerely, ~ett cc; Dick Hudson, AICP (wi 2 traffic studies) Richard Foreman .--, , " _" ,~:'c, 1;:~;,-i7 ~ ' _;~ _-c~~__~_ ~"~__': .1;. T REA siT~-~~HC ii'I.~lcjl:~'l~~:A!~~ PLAN N I NG~ CO U'NLcti <Fj :" -< ...-- ;~ !' t- '~' " I NDIA'.N;-a nhk -~~:\'I"N~- .p~;L'M B~A c H(;~'lST'. tu-cnt'-c 1t-,,-~ - ;;~. August 17.2004 Mr. Dick Hudson Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach. FL 33435 Subject: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Draft Amendments. DC A Reference No. 04-2 Dear Mr. Hudson: This is to notify you that the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be providing a recommendation to the Departmcnt of Community Affairs (DCA) on the above-referenced plan amendments. which we received on August 6. 2004. Council staff will review the amendments for multijurisdictional impacts and impacts on signiticant regional resources and facilities and provide a written report to DC A within 30 calendar days of rcccipt. Staff anticipates prcscnting its report and recommended comments to Council at the regular meeting of September 17.2004. Prior to the Council meeting. Council staff will send you a copy of the meeting agenda and the staff report and recommendations. We invite you to attend the meeting. where you will be afforded an opportunity to address the Council. Following the meeting. the recommendations as approved by the Council will bc forwardcd to you and to DCA. If you have any questions or comments. please feel free to call. Sincerely. 2jH:'~ Deputy Director TLH/wh "Bringing Communities Togetber" . Est. 1976 11. East Ocean Boulevard - Suite 11. - Stuarl, "'lorida 14"4 Phone (772) 221-4'" _ SC 2"-4'" . Fax (772) 221-4"7 - E-mail - "dminrillernc 0"''' e STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor August 16,2004 THADDEUS l. COHEN Secretary Mr. Dick Hudson The City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Dept. 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Dear Mr. Hudson: The Department's records reflect that the City of Boynton Beach has submitted its second proposed comprehensive plan amendment submittal for the year 2004. The reference number for this package is DCA # 04-2. Pursuant to Section 163.3184(3)(b), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006(1), Florida Administrative Code, local governing bodies shall consolidate all proposed plan amendments into a sinale submission for each of the two plan amendment adoption dates durina the calendar vear. Therefore, amendment package DCA # 04-2 is the final submittal that the local government can submit for an amendment adopted during calendar year 2004 unless the amendment meets the requirements of Section 163.3187(1), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006(1 )(a)7, Florida Administrative Code. If the County is intending to submit another proposed amendment submittal package for adoption in this calendar year, the County should withdraw the amendment package DCA# 04- 2 and combine it with the other proposed amendments and then transmit it to the Department pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-11.006, Florida Administrative Code. The Department looks forward to working with and assisting the County in resolving any issues identified in this procedural matter. If you require further assistance concerning this issue, please contact me or Anita Franklin. Senior Plan Processor, at (850) 488-4925 or Suncom 278-4925. Sincerely, ~ ~'\( ~~ D. Ray Eubanks Plan Review and Processing Administrator DRE/af 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100 Phone. 850.488.8466/Suncom 278 8466 FAX. 850 921 0781/Suncom 291 0781 Internet address: htto:/lwww.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 (}.oerseas Higt-r.Nay, Surte 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, Fl33050-2227 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399 2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 {850l413-996fI 1850\ 488-7956 -- STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor THADDEUS L. COHEN Secretary August 16. 2004 Mr. Dick Hudson The City of Boynton Beach Planning and Zoning Dept. 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Post Office Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Dear Mr. Hudson: Thank you for submitting City of Boynton Beach' s proposed comprehensive plan amendments for our review. Our reference number for this amendment package is Boynton Beach 04-2. We have conducted an inventory of the plan amendment package to verifY thc inclusion of all required materials. The submission package appears to be complete, and your proposed plan amendment will be reviewed pursuant to Chapter 163. Florida Statutes. Once the review is underway, you may be asked to provide additional supporting documentation by the review team to ensure a thorough review. The Department's 0 RC report "ill be mailed to \OU on or about October 12. 200.... Also. please be advised that Section 163.3l84(8)(c), Florida Statutes, requires the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department' s Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's plan amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by law to furnish the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information to the Department. Please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted amendment package for compliance review. In the event no names, addresses are provided, please provide this information as well. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. If you have any questions please contact Marina Pennington, the Regional Planning Administrator that will be overseeing the review of the amendments. at (850) 487-4545. Sincerely. ~.~2~ D. Ray Eubanks, Administrator Plan Review and Processing DRE/af 2665 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone. 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX' 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: htto./lwww.dca state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Oierseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 (305\ 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 1850\ 413-9969 (850\ 488-7956 -- STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home" JEB BUSH Governor THADDEUS L. COHEN Secretary MEMORANDUM TO: Lindy McDowell, DEP Susan Harp, DOS Gerry O'Reilly, FDOT4 Terry Hess, Treasure Coast RPC PK Sharma, South Florida WMD Lorenzo Aghemo, Palm Beach County DATE: August 16, 2004 SUBJECT: COMMENTS FOR PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT LOCAL GOVERNMENT/ DCA AMENDMENT #: Boynton Beach 04-2 DCA CONTACT PERSON/PHONE NUMBER: Ken Metcalf (850)487-4545 COMMENTS DUE TO DCA NO LATER THAN: September 12, 2004 Please review the proposed comprehensive plan amendment documents for consistency with applicable provisions of Chapter 163, Florida Statutes and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code. Pursuant to FS 163.3 I 84(4 ),f01ward objections, recommendations and comments to the attention of Ray Eubanks, Administrator, Plan Review and Processing, at the Department address indicated below. Please use the above referenced DCA AMENDMENT NUMBER on all correspondence related to this amendment. Note: Review Agencies - The local government has indicated that they have mailed the proposed amendment diredly to your agem:y. See attached transmittal letter. Be sure to contact the local govemment if you have not received the amerulment. Also, letter to the local government from DCA acknowledging receipt of amendment is attached. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD. TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399.2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.1121.0781/Suncom 2111.0781 Internet address: htto.//www.dca.state.fl.u5 CRIT1CAL S1 ATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 CMmeas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Stunard Oak BouIeYard 2555 Shwnard Oak BouleYard 2555 Shl.mam Oak Boulev.ard Maraltiofl, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, Fl32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (850) 488-2356 (650) 413-9969 185O)4fl8.7956 ,~OOL DI& -J . ~ ~~g~q ~}~F()~EX<:ELL<t;t: ~ BEACH COU'" MEMORANDUM PLANNING DEPARTMENT 3320 Forest Hill Boulevard, #C-110 West Palm Beach, FL 33406-5813 Phone: (561) 434-8028 Fax: (561)434-8187 DATE: July 19, 2004 TO: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner Boynton Beach FAX: 742-6259 Anna Yeskey, Clearinghouse Coordinator Fax 434-4513 COPIES: Angela Usher, Mana r Intergovernmental R I tions FROM: RE; Proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments - BOY- 49 (LUAR 04- 04 Large Scale Amendment) 1) Location: 04-006 Boynton Village - North Congress at the Boynton Canal Size: 81.814 acres CSA: 19 LU Existing: Moderate Density Res. LU Proposed: Local Retail Commercial Proposed Development of Site: Commercial " The School District has no objection to this project. . 'J ti L_ -" 2) Location: 04-007 Boynton Town Center I - North Congress and Old Boynton Beach Blvd. Size: 25 acres CSA: 19 LU Existing: Moderate Density Residential7.26du/ac LU Proposed: Mixed use Suburban Proposed Development of Site: 1120 (Hiqh Rise) residential units; retail; office ':: The number of students generated by the multifamily project may be: 12 elementary: 6 middle: 8 high: CSA School Caoacitv Enrollment Los 17 Boynton Beach Comm. 2476 2528 102% H.S. 19 Conqress M.S. 1344 1349 100% 19 Galaxy Elem. 633 516 82% A Public School Concurrency Determination is not required as a part of the Land Use Amendment process, but in accordance with the adopted school concurrency program, . this land use amendment will require concurrency review in conjunction with the rezoning/site plan applications prior to issuing a residential site plan development order. Please confirm this project will be a high rise design. Please be advised that the level of service for all CSA's will be 110% August 1, 2004. Developments which will begin construction in 2004 or later will be evaluated against the 110% LOS for school concurrency. Further, schools that would currently serve the proposed development are subject to change due to boundary adjustments, to equalize utilization, or to provide capacity for the new student growth. 05/19/2004 13:12 551434pn1.5 PAGE 03 " , .:.\' m 1M SchHIl)lllb1o\ at.......... ~ """DI'l . . ~FoI'IiIt",""'C-110 VlIelII him s.::n. Fl 33G4I13 """""(511)__(511)_ FIre (66'] G4-111l or (lIe1) 4S4-II1S" ,1 ~ CoI_'_~1 \:'. "~' The School District of Palm Beach County School Concurrency Application & Service Provider Fonn ( .""trUC\lOnI: 8ullm~ OlIO ,copy of Ihe coiqplmd appltcollon and laM . ..ell ..... ...- project roqulrlng. .........1_ of concurrency"" a._. A~>IIIII" pr-- _ (1~ ~ daY' of..ceIpI cia compIeIe owJIc8llon. A __ ""nol U"""_ ond Ie valid lor one YO" from dOla of Isstl8llCll. 0ncll1he Oe.elGPlMfll Older leluue<!. !he ~ do\e_ she" be Y8lId for 1he IIfe of \he oe.eIopmont 0nIer. p_ .hock <'I typo of applIcotloo1 (one only): :tlO lJOnl>JO"lllncy Deteminlllon I ] Co<Qmncy EllelhpUon I I Concurrency t;quIvaIenCY [ I Adequat. SdlCOl focillli.. Dotemina1lOn I ]1.eIler of N. ~ I J TIme_ F"': Conc~ O*t:t'rrillftlt&on or~'" $etlooI Facl1dH oditnn-.oun .i.o.oO lor mort ~Iln 20 unit,...... or.... $1ao.oo}; Equlv1lllrntyl'12~.OOt. Exempdlm tf~ of Notmpacttl2LOlt"""'" &t.tIwkIn($'tUll) _1II!!~'C1I1;lJ.~NEmt&~ ~""'~~;;i,;;;~'1ttfM! dWIuW1v,*/wr P'-'" IIlIf~lftrrM(rdNl'MflCOBlIllntlDml proj.ct H.....' Boynton Villa2e MunlclpOlIIr. Bovnt on BeA~h pr_rty Control HumbetlPCN): 08-43-45-20-oi~000-0680 anel -0090 '. '. -r;.:.: l~~~- ;~?F , Location I Add.... of SUl>jod Proportr. Mid "~~;;~~' R~~~g"" AA ""........ D,"~ '. SectlonlTowno . pr Acre T 0101 Number of Units wm the Pr . et be _sod'l' Concure service Area 1f~.plee8eIltledi.PhHII'IOP*'IthoWInCI..rMJIbtfri1yplot'",,*,lD~oertfCelDaf~""". 'A~~l&rtJqlhdlar~~ C""',r / N':',:.:,,:!" OWNEReHIP I AGENT INFORMATION:' 7-.. ..: . .' '''1:.....-.-, ownofsH_: ~~~f ~fi; ~;~~r' ~}J~O Go~rm ~~I:~:': eat~:yl eac ." 'Cl s:cs".tr<l Telephone Humber: R3R-b ~L.? F"" Number. ---5..111- "\1.1.7 . . . 43 " J,lri"tS.;".. C:.'...,. 0If10~ then 8 rtrneIU stllOes or tell' . - J>v.inu.e. LloC . . ~;N~ DotO Appl_.n FlIod: -- By: Did thO AppUeam poy tho IUlng 10010 you? 11",m..afld~ID" _ '!-~.3'QCi natul1ll o.ttI. I~~ =on Numbor: L~..'~t~rr~M.JL,.. EJI'IOIH-.........,.",."u NO(lfnD.WIe~lf'lJIItlMl)'l1eSd'\tlOl~ The 5dwoI 0IIIftcl:..... nc1,~"" VlWIoUl~ I~OIIrtWyttt.ldlttIrnmII Of In~ mad_1ft UI' plpM bHtcfmy~ D'~"" Rocolvod: ." C".N~~ ~~c _ ' 1~thel.the~~&wittlthellldopWdL.~lafe~{LoS')rorl~ I ~ lIUlt the prqed will tOmpIy WIm Vle aOOplBCI Level 01' &tni'm (LOS) k f Schoo\t..~ t!cI tMI attached cont1ttions I cennol VW'Ify tI'IM. the project will rF-.OSI"'~ 51, ~ I OLf em II: ~ I 8~\I'l~nllllt.VUl.>1it..~!\'^'V\!.'''1l1:l\'U.J;: COOIl,",1~l\'Jh-::-. .....~i...w~pc:1(' PJlSD 1991 (N,"", 11~) Department of Engineering and Public Works po. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416- 1229 (561) 684-4000 wwwpbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Karen T. Marcus, Chair Tony MasHotti, Vice Chairman Jeff Koons Warren H Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Addie L Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman "An Equal Opportunity Affirmative Actlon Employer~ @ printed on recycled paper July 8, 2004 , , JUL \ 3 '/c,O~ Mr. Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning & Zoning Department of Development City of Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310 RE: Winchester Property TRAFFiC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REV!E"V Dear Mr. Rumpf: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has received the traffic study for the proposed project entitled; Winchester Property, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in Article 12 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project is summarized as follows: Location; Municipality: Existing Uses: Proposed Uses: New Daily Trips: New PH Trips: Build-out Year: East of Congress Ave., North of Old Boynton Road. Boynton Beach None 1,120 MF Residential Units (Condominiums) 213,499 SF General Retail, 10,000 SF General Office, and 186,500 SF Superstore (Target) N/A N/A 2008 Based on our review, the Traffic Division has the following comment: . Review of the traffic impact study for the proposed development is withheld pending on the final outcome of the site's land use plan amendment. Sincerely, if you have any que~;tions regaraing this determination, please contact me at 6:)4-4030 /2/). Masoud Atefi, MS Sr. Engineer - Tra R cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting, !nc. File: General - TPS . Mun . T~affic St:.Jdy ReVIew F:\TRAFFtC\malAdmin\Comments\040613 doc "';CREATION & PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. 04-78 ~. rn 0 \!1 ~ ,-- I ' ), [, I i ~I TO: Wilfred Hawkins, Assistant City Manager Mike =-,-umph, PlaIllling & Zoning Director Wally h1ajors, Recreation & Parks Director John Wildner. Recreation & Parks Deputy Director j" ~ Dick Hudson, Senior Planner IV Barbara Meacham, Parks & Landscape Planner file Jli .J4 DEPARTMENT OF DEVEU)PMENl FROM: xC: DATE: July 6, 2004 SUBJECT: WINCHESTER PROPERTY RECREATIOl' AND OPEN SPACE A~ (\ follow-up to our conversation (concerning the Recreation and Open Space issues associated with the Winchester property) the forowing comments are submitted. Current Recreation And Parks Develooment Impact Fee OrdinBr~ce is based on approximately 1,120 residential units allowed under the proposed zoning. 1.120 units X an average of$700 per unit - $784,000 (approx.) 2. Under The Previous Recreation And Open Space Land Dedication Ordinance, the dedication requirement is based on .015 acres per dwelling unit (6 acres per 1,000 population@ 2.5 average persons per dwelling unit). t,120 dwelling units X .015 acres - 16.8 acres Based on the developer provided private recreation, the City Commission could have granted up to one-half credit. (If reconunended by the Recreation and Parks Director for a minimum of 5 recreation elements of sufficient size and scope to provide for the impact of the additional development.) 3. The GreenwavslBikewavs Plan calls for negotiations with the developers to provide green space and bikeway linkages throughout the City. The same developer (Compson and Associates) agreed to provide minimum space for bikeways along the C-16 and E-4 canals. The 25-foot provided along the canal right-of-way through the Renaissance Commons development is considered to be the bare minimum required for bikeways. Since the Winchester development is being granted considerably higber density under proposed new zoning and this property is being improved as a planned unit development (P.U.D). it is appropriate that the development consider appropriate voluntary contributions in return for development incentives provided by the City. It is therefore recommended that this new development link the bikeways provided in the Renaissance Commons development along the canals (especially the E-4 canal), with a minimum of 50-feet adjacent to the right-of-way Including substantial acreage of open space land restored to preservation aUGhtI.' on en .mace and maintained bv the developcr. Recommendations The developers may provide a voluntary contribution of SO-feet of develoned Grecnways/Bikeways along the E-4 and L-26 canals ,'ight-of-way. The developer may also provide a minimum 8-acre tract of land restored and maintained as a 'pine flat wood' habitat. It is also recommended that this property be located adjacent to a drainage lake completely deve/oDed with littoral zone plantings and positioned in such a way as to provide a buffer for the Sky lake development to the southeast of the property and include a number of existing oak trees along the canal bank. It is also recommended that a portion of the Recreation and Park Impact Fee be designated for active recreation elements being proposed for the Congress Middle School replacement presently being considered south of tliis property along the Congress A venue corridor. If you have any questions, concems, and/or reconunendations about the above listed comments please let me know. J\\,'vlr Department of Planning, Zoning &. Building 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33406 (561) 233-5000 Planning Division 233-5300 Zoning Division 233~5200 Building Division 233~5100 Code Enforcement 233-5500 Contractors Certification 233-5525 Administration Office 233-5005 Executive Office 233~5003 www.pbcgov.com/pzb . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Karen T. Marcus. Chair Tony Masilotti. Vice Chairman jeffKoons Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Addie L Greene COl.nty Administrator Robert Weisman ~An Equal Opportunity AJJinnative Action Employer' @ printed on recycled paper June 23, 2004 Michael Rumpf. Director of Planning & Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 RE: Winchester Property aka: Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1 (LUAR 04-006 & LUAR 04-007) Dear Mr. Rumpf: Thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the above mentioned land use amendment. Palm Beach County is requesting additional traffic analysis in order to address the long-range (2025) traffic Impacts on the surrounding roadway network prior to the City's July 20th public hearing Please do not hesitate to contact me at 233-5373 or Vinod Sanda nasa my at 233-5337 if you have any further questions. Thank you. s~ Lorenzo A9ht~ Planning Direct~. r .. cc: Commissioner Warren Newell, District 3 Dan Weisberg, PSC Engineering, Traffic Division Dick Hudson, Boynton Beach Isaac Hoyos, PBC Planning Division Lisa Lowe, PSC Planning Division Khurshid Mohyuddin, PBC Ptanning Division T:\Planning\Comprehensive\T ransport\T raffic Analysis\municipality amend\Winchester -Boynton.doc r(( . ~ Tbe Citg 01 Bognton Beacb DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org June 11, 2004 Ms Kim Glas-Castro, AICP Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. 222 Lakevlew Avenue-Suite 800 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Boynton Town Center/Boynton Village Dear Ms Glas-Castro: Staff reports on the applications for rezonings for the above referenced projects are being completed in anticipation of the Planning and Development Board's review, scheduled for June 22, 2004. In light of the fact that each of these projects contain commercial use components, please Inform your dlents that the City will expect them to demonstrate consistency with the following policy contained In the Future Land Use Element of the City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan; "Policy 1.3.8 The City shall continue to adopt and enforce regulations to require that commercial projects proVide marginal access roads or cross access between sites, wherever practical, in order to minimize the need for trips on adjacent thoroughfares." In addition to connectivity between the two projects you represent, there is also an opportunity for these projects to provlde cross access with the Renaissance Commons project, currently being developed to the north. Staff would strongly recommend that your applicants work with the developer of Renaissance Commons to secure agreements for cross access. The development of a roadway connecting Old Boynton Road with Gateway Boulevard could have a positive effect of lessening traffic Impacts on Congress Avenue. If you have any questions regarding this requirement, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 742-6264. A:;1! Dick Hudson, AICP Senior Planner -- Department of Engineering and Public Works po. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, FL 33416~1229 (561) 684-4000 www.pbcgov.com . Palm Beach County Board of County Commissioners Karen T. Marcus, Chair Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman Jeff Koons Warren H. Newell Mary McCarty Burt Aaronson Addie L. Greene County Administrator Robert Weisman ~An Equal Opportumty Affinnative Action Employer~ @ printed on recycled paper May 25, 2004 Mr. Michael Rumpf Director Planning & Zoning City of Boynton Beach 100 East Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach, FL 33425-0310 RE: Winchester Property Comprehensive Plan Amendment Review Dear Mr. Rumpf: The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed two separate traffic studies to analyze traffic related impacts of Winchester Property, designated as Boynton Village, and Boynton Town Center, tor Comprehensive Plan Review, pursuant to the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. Based on our initial review, we have the following comment: . The combined impact of the two projects needs to be evaluated on the surrounding traffic network, within the overall project radius of infll,ence. Please combine the two projects and re-submit. If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030. Sincerely, Masoud Atefi. MsCE Sr. Engineer - Tra'ffi cc: Pinder Troulman Consulting, Inc. File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review 1~0 / i~_~=_- ,: n ! [ {' J L: MAY 2004 ..J I r Of i'ARTMENT OF [)EVFt OPMrNl F :ITRAFF IClmalAdminICommentsI040535-5.doc 05/19/2004 13:12 5614348015 PAGE 01 ~OOLOI& ~(i1 THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTIIIIENT 3320 FOREST HILL BOULEVA WEST PALM BEACH, FL ~ f\ ~ '.r r, " -~L_I.[,~_IL._:~_,.+';~_~ : ~': ' , (IU' L_"",.. FACSIMILE TRANSMITTAL PHONE: 561/434-8020 FA>:: 561/434-8187 Number of pages sent (including clover page): 6 TO: Dick Hudson, Senior Planner, City of Boynton Beach DATE: May 19, 2004 FAX NUMBER: 742-6259 FROM: David DeYoung, AICP, Planner, SDPBC COMMENTS: Attached please find a copy of the approvl~d school concurrency application and no impact application for Boynton Village and Westbrooke Homes at Boynton. Attachments S:\Plannlng\Public\lNTERGOV\Concurrency\Concurrency DetermInation l8tters\Faxes\F04~30r)1.DOC ARTHUR e. JOHNSON, Ph.D. SUPERINTENDENT . THE Sa-KXJL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA PLANNING llEPI'ffiMENT 3320 FOREST HILL BLVD.. <:-331 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33406-5813 (561) 434-8020 FAX: (561) 4J4.ll187 May 18, 2004 Mr. Dick Hudson, Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach. Blvd. Boynton Beach, FL 33435 RE: CONCURRENCY DETERMINATION - CASE NUMBER #04043001C --BOYNTON VILLAGE Dear Mr. Hudson: The Palm Beach County School District has reviewed the request for a Concurrency Determination on the above referenced. project for 1,120 multi-family units. Attached please find the approved Palm Beach County School District Concurrency Application and Service Provider Form for Boynton Village. This Concurrency Determination is valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance. Once a Development Order has been issued for the project, the concurrency determination will be valid for the life of the Development Order. If YOll have any questions regarding this determination, please feel free to contact me at (561) 434-7343. David L. DeYoun Planner ce: Kim Glas-Castro, Ruden McClosky ene. S:\Planning\Public\INTERG 0 V\Concurrency\Concurrenc)( Determinati,", Lellers\Concurrency\C404300 I.doc AN !:.aUAl CJPPORTUNITY t:.MPLOYER The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org May 18, 2004 Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin Senior Planner 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33416 Re: Transportation Analysis: Winchester Property Aka: Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1 Dear Mr. Mohyuddin: The enclosed transportation analysis, prepared by Pinder, Troutman Consulting, Inc., dated May 14, 2004 was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above- referenced Land Use Amendment. This supercedes the two studies previously forwarded to you. Following your review of the enclosed information please provide me with your written response. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6264. Sincerely, Dick Hudson, AICP Senior Planner DH/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center I\LUAR 04-006\Mouyhuddin.doc \ The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.or9 May 18, 2004 Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin Senior Planner 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33416 Re: Transportation Analysis: Winchester Property Aka: Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1 Dear Mr. Mohyuddin: The enclosed transportation analysis, prepared by Pinder, Troutman Consulting, Inc., dated May 14, 2004 was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above- referenced Land Use Amendment. This supercedes the two studies previously forwarded to you. Following your review of the enclosed information please provide me with your written response. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6264. Sincerely, ~;!/ Dick Hudson, AICP Senior Planner ~ DH/sc S:IPianningISHAREDlWPIPROJEcrSlBoynton Village-Boynton Town Center llLUAR 04-006\Mouyhuddin.doc t The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Aorlda 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org May 18, 2004 Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re: Traffic Study: Winchester Property Aka: (Boynton Village & Boynton Town Center 1) Dear Mr. Atefi: The enclosed traffic impact analysis, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. dated May 14, 2004, was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-referenced application. This supercedes the two studies previously forwarded to you. Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and me with your written response. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260. Sincerely, tf'-~ Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/SC Attachments IIII Ruden ~I McClosky 222 LAKEJIBN AVENUE SJlTE800 WEST PALM BEil\CH, FLORIDA 33401-6112 (561) 838-4542 FAX: (561) 514-3442 KIM .GLAs::ASTRO@RUDEN.COM May 17,2004 Dick Hudson, AICP Planning & Zoning Division City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard Boynton Beach. FL 33435 RE: Boynton Village I Boynton Town Center TPS Traffic Study Dear Dick: Enclosed you will find three (3) sets of the concurrency traffic study for the Boynton Village and Boynton Town Center projects. Because the projects are located on property owned by a single entity (Klett family). the projects are required to be aggregated for traffic considerations by the Countywide Traffic Performance Standards. Pinder Troutman has forwarded a copy of this traffic study directly to Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering; however, we have included an additional copy in case the City is required to formally transmit traffic studies to the County. We look forward to discussing the projects with staff. the Planning & Development Board and City Commission at upcoming meetings. Sincerely, r~ Kim Glas-Castro. AICP Enclosures WPB:178839:1 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. CARACAS. FT. LAUDERDALE. MIAMI. NAPLES. ORLANDO. PORT ST. LucrE. SARASOTA. ST. PETERSBURG. TAllAHASSEE. TAMPA. WEST PALM BEACH t The City of Boynton Beach DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org May 14, 2004 Mr. Khurshid Mohyuddin Senior Planner 100 Australian Avenue West Palm Beach, FL 33416 Re: Transportation Analysis: Winchester Property LUAR 04-006 Boynton Village LUAR 04-007 Boynton Town Center 1 Dear Mr. Mohyuddin: The enclosed transportation analysis, prepared by Pinder, Troutman Consulting, Inc. was recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-referenced Land Use Amendment. Following your review of the enclosed information please provide me with your written response. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6264. Sincerely, ~/ - Dick Hudson, AICP Senior Planner DH/sc S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECfS\Boynton Village-Boynton Town Center I\Khurshld.dot t The City of Boynton B DEVELOPMENT DEPA PLANNING AND ZONING 100 E. Boynton Beach P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Aorida 3 lCL: 561-742-62 FAX: 561-742-625 www.boynton-beach.org May 12, 2004 Mr. Masoud Atefi MSCE, Senior Traffic Engineer Palm Beach County Traffic Division Department of Engineering and Public Works P.O. Box 21229 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416 Re: Traffic Study: Winchester Property 81 acres (Boynton Village) Winchester Property 25 acres (Boynton Town Center 1) Dear Mr. Atefi: The enclosed traffic generation statements, prepared by Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. were recently received by Planning and Zoning for the above-referenced application. Please review the enclosed information for conformance with the County's Traffic Performance Standards Ordinance, and provide Tim Large, Building Code Administrator and me with your written responses. If you have questions regarding this matter, please call me at (561) 742-6260. Sincerely, ~.Z?-- Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning MWR/SC Attachments \ The Citl} 01 &l}11/011 Bead DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PlANNING AND ZONING DIVISON 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Ror1da 33425-0310 TEl: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org April 9,2004 Mrs. Kim Glas-castro, AICP 222 Lakeview Avenue, Suite 800 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Winchester Property (aka Boynton Place) Land Use Amendments and Rezonings Dear Kim: Because of the heavy SChedule of items before the City Commission the week, staff was unable to provide a check for completeness for the applications you submitted on April 2,2004. Upon completion of the check, we have found the following: 1. There is already a project with the name "Boynton Place" in the City and a sufficient number that include the name "Boynton". We know that the first name submitted is rarely the final name for any project; however, we do request that you provide an alternative name for the project. 2. You have submitted one application, which includes requests for two separate future land use designations and two separate applications for rezonings. While it Is important to assess the total impacts of the two projects, it Is also important to be able to analyze each project separately. We request that you submit two applications containing a land use amendment and rezoning request for each of the two portions of property. 3. The projected number of dwelling units Is predicated on utilizing the entire lOG.81-acre parcel. The portion proposed for a Mixed Use-Suburban designation allows a density of up to 20 dwelling units per acre, while the portion proposed for Local Retail Commercial designation allows 10.8 units per acre; however, units may not be transferred between the two parcels. The recalculation of density will impact the Public School Concurrency application, and will most probably impact the traffic study and water and sewer estimates. Please ensure that these Impacts are recalculated. . Page 2 Aprll 9, 2004 We are returning the one application for land use amendments and the two applications for rezonlngs and ask that you resubmit these, completed along the suggested guidelines. It Is important that the resubmlttals be made In a timely manner, so that we can maintain the established amendment schedule. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at 742-6264. Yours truly, jJu;/ Dick Hudson, AICP Senior Planner Cc: James Comparato J.r.?r.:..... ....~. fh'e CHI} 01 &I}nton Bea.cb. DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSON 100 E. Boynton Beadl Boulevard P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beadl, Florida 33425-0310 TEL: 561-742-6260 FAX: 561-742-6259 www.boynton-beach.org March 24, 2004 Mr. D. Ray Eubanks Community Program Administrator Division of Community Planning Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oaks Boulevard Tallahassee, FI 32399-2100 Re: City of Boynton Beach Comprehensive Plan Amendment Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) DR! (LUAR 03-009 & CPTA 03-001) Dear Mr. Eubanks: We are pleased to submit Comprehensive Plan amendments for the Motorola DR!. The Planning and Development Board reviewed the amendments at a public hearing on February 26, 2004 and forwarded the application with unanimous recommendations for approval. The City Commission/Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on March 16, 2004, following proper pUblic notice and also approved these amendments for transmittal. The changes proposed in the amendment: . is not, nor does it affect An Area of State Concern; · is an exception to the twice yearly limitation for plan amendments as noted in. Chapter 163.3187(1) F. S.; · is not proposed to be adopted under a joint planning agreement pursuant to Chapter 163.3171(3), F.S.; and, · has been submitted to Palm Beach County Planning Division, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, South Florida Water Management District, Florida Department of Transportation, Florida Department of State and Florida Department of Environmental Protection (see enclosed letters). Copies of the entire Comprehensive Plan have been sent to all the agencies listed in 9J- 11.008(9)(a). .. Page2 Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) DR! Amendment Transmittal March 25, 2004 The proposed amendment to the text of the Future Land Use Element establishes a Development of Regional Impact (DR!) future land use designation and provides corresponding policies for the Renaissance Commons (fka Motorola) DR!. The proposed site-specific FLUM amendment involves a change from Industrial (:1:37.29 acres) and Local Retail Commercial (:1:49.69 acres) to Development of Regional Impact (DRI) totaling :1:86.98 acres. Both staff reports and applicant's justifications for the amendments are included. No one signed the Courtesy Information List. The contact person for information regarding this amendment is: Dick Hudson, AICP, Senior Planner City of Boynton Beach 100 E. Boynton Beach Boulevard P. O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425 Telephone: (561) 742-6264 Fax: (561) 742-6259 Three copies of the proposed amendment (as included within the attached staff report) are provided for your review. As stated above, separate transmittals have been provided to the other required agencies. Sincerely, ~~ Dick Hudson, AICP Senior Planner Cc: Treasure Coast Regional Planning council South Florida Water Management District Florida Department of Transportation Florida Department of Environmental Protection Florida Department of State Palm Beach County Planning Division J:\SHRDATA\PIannlng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MotoroIa DRI\LUAR\OCA Transmittal.dot