TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS (JUL 2002)
MARltlA VILLAGE
COtlCORREtlCY TRAFFIC IMPACT AtlflL YSIS
Preparczcl for
GO~AY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
Preparczcl by
PINDE~ T~OOTMAN CONSULTING. INC.
2324 Soath Congress Avenae. SUite 1 tt
West Palm Beach. FL 33406
(561) 434-1644
#PTC02.96
Jaly 26. 2002
/vv
t~\ Ml-i' .
f\\ ,X
(\ I\. \, rv
\\ \ ~~\' 1\0
'I f~" "\ V'v~ "
k \
A1.re\ M, Troutman, P.E.
FlonCla Registration #45409
\'1 :
JUL 2. 6
I;' "
_.-----1
_.--'~Ir " =
~
MARINA VILlAGE
CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
Introduction
Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. (PTC) has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a
proposed mixed-use development in the City of Boynton Beach. The purpose of this study is to
determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Article 15, Traffic Performance
Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC).
Site Data
The site is located on the north side of Ocean Avenue as shown on Exhibit 1, It is proposed to
develop a mix of Retail, Office, Marina and Residential units on the site, Access to the proposed
project will be via Ocean Avenue and NE 2"" Avenue (extension of Boynton Beach Boulevard east of
Federal Highway). Year 2005 conditions were examined for this analysis,
Existing (2000) Traffic Conditions
Exhibit 2 provides the 2001 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the surrounding roadway
network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of Palm Beach County,
Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor of 9.3% to the MDT volumes.
These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the
LOS D service volumes,
Project Traffic
Trip Generation
Se,1ion 10,8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC was reviewed
to determine acceptable daily trip generation rates for the proposed project's land uses, The
Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6'h Edition was utilized as the
source for peak hour trip generation rates,
Rt-'fXJr( 02-96 7-26-02
Exhibits 3A, 3B and 3C provide the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the
proposed development. Because of the mixed-use nature of the project, a portion of the
project traffic will remain on site and is internal to the project. For Traffic Performance
Standards purposes, based on the net daily trip generation of 3,557, the Test 1 radius of
development influence is two (2) miles, The Test 2 radius of development influence is one
(1) mile,
Trip Distribution and Assignment
A directional distribution was developed based on land use patterns and the existing roadway
network. Exhibit 4 shows the assignment of daily and peak hour project traffic as well as the
project impact percentage (% of daily adopted service volume),
Future Traffic Conditions
Roadway Improvements
A review of the Transportation Improvement Program (FY 2002-2006) from the MPO of Palm
Beach County, adopted May 2001, and the Palm Beach County Five Year Road Program,
adopted July 24,2001, was completed, There are no programmed roadway improvements
within the radius of influence,
Background Traffic
Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of future
background traffic volumes, Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 5 for the surrounding
roadway links, Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County, was reviewed, No
Major Project is projected to have a 10% impact on the analyzed roadway links during the
huildout time frame of the proposed development.
Traffic Performance Standards Analysis
Test 1 (Link Test)
This first test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links, required to
be analyzed, are projected to operate below adopted level of service standards, Exhibit 6
Report 02-96 7-26-02
1
shows future average daily and average peak hour traffic conditions for the study area
roadway links at project buildout. All roadway links are projected to operate above the
adopted level of service; therefore the requirements of Test 1 are met.
Test 2 (Model Test)
The second test examines traffic conditions hased on model projections that are developed
and maintained by Palm Beach County, There are no Test 2 deficiencies within the radius of
development influence, Therefore, the requirements of T cst 2 are met.
Conclusions
This analysis shows that the proposed development meets the requirements of the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County,
Report 02 9'-' 726 02
J
o
o
o
<:
o
'"
NTS,
MINER ROAD
w
(]
o
'"
I
g
I
0
'"
.,-
GATFWAY BOUI EVARD >
w
~
=>
0
<D
L
<:
w
U
0
~ OLD BOYNTON ROAD ~
SITE
w
=>
z
w
>
<:
~
~
w
'"
(]
7
o
U
'0
'"
o
'"
<:
>
w
~
=>
o
<D
f-
~
w
'"
u
<:
w
~
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
GOLF ROAD (5W 23rd AVENUE)
07/24!02
MARINA
VILLAGE
EXHIBIT 1
PROJECT LOCATION
~
o
o
o
<:
o
'"
MINI::.R ROAD
w
(]
o
'"
I
(]
I
NTS,
CATEWAY BOlJUVARD
I "D
H7~nl
llc,no
11'lnc
lIl/II
110~'41~ C
ll'ilHl
If\Bl(
HUO
o
'"
.,-
:>
~
~
=>
o
<D
f"
21,,41)
11~''''
il1100
11:1411
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
~
f>l1J
!()(HIl(
411~OO
ny,le
4',',",
1.10
17~';(, !)
411'100
3411.1 D
45r,(l
~ln 4lDo
lI)ll4HlJ 1.lIBr,l
12,,00 12';011
1;''l~ 0 111'1'
'lOin J070
OCEAN ^ V[
0
'"
'0 , ;;
'" "0
1l1l2(l[l W
U';lIl1 ~ I"
Ill1,'ID => ]()7H11J
U.l20 0 H'mn
<D 1LD q"loll
f- '4!H!lll 1<"10
~ .l1~(HI
W n.,,,n
'" 1010
U
<:
4111 w
1';(,4',( ~
11:'00
.111',(
Hun
111l
nc,llf,1J
.12';00
I " lh~(ll)
llnbO lOlU
14'mu
'lIARD
I 1],,0
~
w
=>
Z
w
>
'"
~
~
~
'"
(]
Z
o
U
WOOl,BRll.HT ROAD
CO" ROAD (5W 2Jrd AVENUFj
LEGEND
6l.D ROADWAY I AN~S
374';6 f)- DAILYTRAHIC AND IOS
48900 . DAilY AUOPTlO
5(RVKT VOlUMI
14fH U - PlAK HOUR lRArrlC fiND [OS
4550 PlAKHOIJRADOl'110
StRVICI. VULUMI
AVAILARI f 2000/01 AAD 1
07/24/02
MARINA
VILLAGE
II
EXHIBIT 2
EXISTING (2001) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
~
"-Dq~~
m 0 "'__
~ ~ ~~
i~~;
~
o
~
b
c
.g
~
W
W C
ocW
.!J!O
M;;' .9-
~,::
:D .S >-
:.c~=
J5:Eo
~
x ,1; ro ro ~ ~ .,
~'i: .. ~ .. 0 ~
"' N " ~ '0
.>- ~ ~ M
Z
'" '" #. **
~ 0 00
,1; ..; ~ oci
..
Co
~ :0 ;': ~
.,
~ ~, ~,
~ ~ ~
" '" N ~ ~ N
~ 'i: a h .. a M
~ N h, ~ .,
x f- N ~ ..;
w
,0 #. #. 6":. ,,":.
'0 a a 0 ro
.. ~ 0 0 0 ~
E . ~ ~ "
2J Co N a .. N ro
~ M '" ~ ro
E ~ ~ M
g :0 N '" ro a
a M :: N
h M "',
f- N' ~'
jj
0
>-
~ ..
~ ~ ~
ro ~
2J '" M
. + +
~ X x
c
0 S 5 ::J
'~
. M ro 0 Vi
" .. ~
~ h ., ~
0 0 0 '"
.
<.J " " N
,~ r= r=
>- 5 .s
,~
0 .
. .:J
,g ~ ~
~ ~ 0 Vi
a a h a
N ~ ., ..
~ N
..' ..;
N
..
'\'
.
. u
:5 '0;
.
u '"
0 -"
.:l .~ ~
. "; . ~
- " ;':
'~ u '~
. ~ ." :, 0
'" 0 ::;: ::;: >-
o
o
I
~
.
.
~
::;:
<:
'" ~ .. h M 0
M M N a
,". ~ N
.
Co '5 ~ ~ h c. h
~ ~ a N
. 0 ~ ~
z
E N a a ~ M
N M N h
#. #. '#.-0$>
~ 0 o ~"
..; ~ cia
..
~~
-9~
~ '"
~ 'E '" N ;;;
>- N
~ ~ h M ;;;
jj ~ M N
0 ~ N
>-
.
Co :'l .. h N ro
, 0 M
.. 0 ~ ~
0
"'
.E a N a ~ M
.. M N '"
E
#. 0', ";f.-"'o #.
00'
~ 0 a a ,-
'" 0 0 0 ai
.. . ~ ~
E
2J Co .. .. .. N
0 ~ N
'" '" a :;: M M
~ .. ~
0 N
f-
h ~ ro ~ :;:;
. , N ::
~
~ 0
'" N ~ M C, N
0 ~ M N
>- a
~
E
is" c, F:
..
2 oj '"
~ '" M
2J g; :;: " '"
. ~ ~ ro ~
'" c, '" ~
0 + + -,= a
a
.3 i5 8 ::J a
~ .s 0 0 ,
.
0 ~ ,- ro
. g; '0 0
'-' 0 0
g a 0
" "
>- t:= "
.s .s
,~
0 .
2J :5
E ~ ~ 0 ,-
~ ~ ~
0 a h a
N N h ..
~ ~ N
..; ..'
N
..
~
.
. u
:5 '.
.
u '"
0 -"
.:l E ~
.
"; ~ ~
- . " ;':
'~ u '~
. ~ ." :, 0
'" 0 ::;: ::;: >-
o
o
I
~
.
.
~
::;:
~
'" a ro ~ h a
M M ~ M
0 ~ - M
. >-
Co N :;:; M .,
, ;;; ~
~ . ~
. 0
Z
ro h .. .. M
E ~ a .,
~ ~
#. #. '# #.
~ '0 0 a
-i
..
~-
-9[::!.
~ .~ .. N ~
a
~ " :2 ~
>-
.. a ~ ., ~
M
jj M .. ~ ..
0 N ~
>-
.
Co ~ M :;:; M M
, N M ;;
.. 0 ~
E
2J
x ro h .. ~ M
W a a N
~ ~ c.
E
,0 5 "* ~~
~ a a N
~ ci ci ci ro
.. . ~ ~ ,C
E
2J Co .. ~ h ~ h
E ~ ~ M
'" ro '0 N ro M
.. .. ., h
0 N ~ ..
>-
'" h h .. h
, N M ~ N
11; ~ N
Co 0
'" '" ro ~ ~ ~
0 :: :: ..
>- N
E
~ 6
- oj ro "
~ ->; ,~ a
2J M M oe
0 '" ~
. ~ M
'" " ~
M ro oe a
0 . a
0 8 , ::J q
'~ p
~ c '"
. ~ ~ -
0 'jl N ::"
. ~
<.J 0 h 0 0
,~ " 0
>- .= "
.s ~
c
,~
0 .
. .:J
,g ~ ~
~ ~ 0 Vi
a a h a
c. ~ h ..
~ N
~' ~'
N
..
\'
.
~ u
'0;
::J .
'"
u -"
0
.:l E ~
.
~ . ~
- . '~ ,,, <:
'" u " >-
. '" ." 0
~ 0 ::;: ::;: >-
~
n
,
D
.
u
0
.
~
1>
0
~
g-
o
~
~
ji
<;
,
~
0
ro
0 0
0 ~
2
. ~
" 6
u
0 B
~ . ~
~
0 0
u ~ .g
~ ~
u 0
.
. n "
rn .
E ]
.. ]
~
n e ,
0 ~
. ~
0 i 0
0 0
,
;E u ~
~ ~ ~
" '0
J ~ J
rn
~
~
,1;
0
~ ~ @
~ ~
~ ~ .
~ .
0
r 11 f
0
0 ~ 0
0 . 9
I . ~
~
e :;' ~
~ rn
0 0; ~
. 0 .
i 0 2
B ~
~
~ j ,
]
~
= .. ..
o
o
o
<:
o
'"
MINER ROAD
w
o
o
'"
I
g
I
NT,S,
WOOLBRIGHT ROAD
0
'"
<(
>
~
~
=>
0
<D
5'''' Z
<:
m w
'" 2\1% U
" m 0
{)Si~!' '"
" 50'}!.
2.19';::,
2()')(, 25%
711 IlIl'l
'" m ~
" '0<
21'1% 1.74%
1()%
1.~h
'"
U
15% 1.10%
0 '"
1\1
'" ',I,
'0 I <: 11>4%
'" ", >
14'J W
H ~
~
" 0
n.n'li>
<D '\0%
f- 10(,7
~ (,()
w
'" '"
U 1.21\%
"" <:
w
It\5 ~
H.
'"
ILlII\% 4(1%
1421
UO
I " '"
1-- 4.111%
H,
, 111%
, , (,40
,
1'--';;:- 11.11% H,
"'
I '" 1.<)7%
'"
'"
11')%
GATFWAY BOUlFVARD
I '"
H.
, ,
,
0.2470,
OLD BOYNTON ROAD
5%
'"
'"
'"
O.Jb')h
~
w
=>
Z
w
>
<:
~
~
w
'"
o
7
o
U
GOLF ROAD (5W 23rd AVENU~)
LEGEND
40?(. PIRCfNT IJISTRlIllJTION
1423 DAilY PROJfCT IRA! IIC
BO AM PI AI( HOUR
PROJ[C1 I RAHIC
112 . PM PEAK HOUR
PROjlCI J'RAlffC
4.)8%- % or DAILY ADorno
~fRVICf VOLUM~
07/24/02
MARINA
VILLAGE
EXHIBIT 4
PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT
~
Exhibit 5
Marina Village
Historic Growth
#PTC02~96
Growth 02-96 7-24-02jo,xts
7/26/2002
Page 1 of 1
Daily Traffic Volumes Growth
Roadway 1998 2001 Rate
Old Boynton Rd
Congress Ave to Boynton Beach Blvd 11,671 12,155 1,36% /Year
Boynton Beach Blvd
Congress Ave to Old Boynton Rd 30,316 30,03B ~0.31 % /Year
Old Boynton Rd to 1-95 42,572 3B,B48 -3,01% /Year
1-95 to Seacre5t Boulevard 29,855 30,099 0,27% /Year
Seacre5t Boulevard to Federal Highway (1) 14,729 14,285 -1,02% /Year
Ocean Avenue
Federal Highway to Ocean Blvd 5,006 9,257 22.74% /Year
Woolbright Road
1-95 to Seacrest Boulevard 33,1 B7 35,645 2.41% /Year
federal Highway to Ocean Blvd 10,213 9,776 -1.45% /Year
Golf Road
1~95 to Seacre5t Boulevard 11,891 12,636 2.05% /Year
Seacre5t Blvd
Gateway Blvd to Boynton Beach Blvd 13,40B 14,750 3,23% /Year
Boynton Beach Blvd to Woolhright Rd 16,260 16,503 0,50% /Year
Woolbright Rd to Golf Road 21,138 20,029 -l.7B% /Year
Federal Highway
Gateway Blvd to Boynton Beach Blvd (2) 20,922 20,242 ~ 1,31% /Year
Boynton Beach Blvd to Woolbright Rd (2) 22,129 24,2BB 3.79% /Year
Woolbright Road to Golf Road (2) 26,116 2B,5B6 3,68% /Year
Ocean Boulevard
North of Ocean Avenue 6,734 B,706 8,94% /Year
South of Ocean Avenue B,223 10,710 9,21% /Year
Areawide 324,370 336,553 1,24% /Year
(1) Utilized available 1997/9B - 2000/01 MDT,
(2) Utilized available 199B/99 - 2001 MDT,
tONW......
0l0")(_
N ~ ,00
0__ N"'---
otOOI1l
t-~'Ol
Q..I'-"<tm
=II: ~Q..
~
w
m
N
o
1;;
'"
\1.1 "~
OC~
'" >-
::=-;0
'"'>~
~ '" <:
:..0 c
~ rn v
w::i'f-
*tJ o~;ft.;ft.;f!.~;ft.~~;ft.;ft.~
>- < (f: ~ q- to 0 m:O I'- 0> ro
-l c....: t! O! t"') ,-- ..... LO I'- N
~~ONN;:..r.....""'cici C'i................
#~#
~ m m
m
ON
~
OOOUUUUOUUUUUUUU
~
"~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
uooooooooooooooo
9~:qri~~~~::qri:q~:q~?;?;
Jq-MM~MM~MMMMMM.-.-
S:g~M&jR:
ooo:::1~~
t-!::!;M~~
~:;;
NO
;':0
f-
#.'"
o
# ?;<!. 00.. "<p, 69.. (sf:!.. *- #- # #- ",9, b' ,0 do.. (so.
<.Dg:q~~~U)U)t---'-~M~lf)U)
,..
~
:;:
o
u
~ ~
.0' N
n:
O'>~~I.OCOCOO'>I.O ~OCOCO
,,~~~~~~AMt---~3~~
"09. #
.,. .,.
r1 r1
0'2.. ,,'2.. 09. (j?, 27"09.
q-of-q-..,...,...,.
t"1 C'I r! t"! C'1 "'!
_~*?;9..o-R.*#.
NCl!q-q-q-"1"""
:::: <- ('1 "'! r! C'1 C'!
~* ~..--- ~ ~,..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.-.-- ~ ~ ~
o
N
-;,R 69..
.,. .,.
"'! t"!
~
.. ~
05~N~~O~~~~5~~5~~
~~~~~~ "1"l.Or~co..---~~,.....q-U)
>
~-COO'>lf)lf) t,I.OOM~NCOCOI.OO
~5"1"O'>COCO If)MIf)ONq-CONO
~~~~~~O~~~~~~~~~~
"~(lJ
'" c
,- ,
" ~
w
000-100-1000000-1-1
\O;:t;:t rl -;;t -;:f- i'1;:t -;;t -;f- -;f-;:t;:t <'Ir]
I~
~
ljii
I
~~ ~~
~~ ~~
~.o ~.o
-o~g~~g~
~65:~6S:~'1!(l)
~ t:: g ~I ~ g - ~ E
-o-g~~LJg~8~~
~ co g a:i go CD .8
cOJ-o-o-o~-5~
~~~~~ii5~1:
03; ;; c .~ >- I::
gg3:g:3~.8Li
2~82~~
ogs:O~~
~
c
:::;
"
"
"
.f ;:u.~
o ~ ~
~I~ .8
-0 ~I~
0:::-m~-m3:
6~6~~
i::.5:: co <li I
oqOJ:::O"
CO - u lii
-0 tt') ltI <fI -0
50.'~~.f
"
m
~ >-
~~
.9~
c c
ro ,
~ ~
U U
00
~~
00
~~
" -
o 0
Z.J:
-0-0-0-0
> > > ;..
roco co co
~-D-5-o--5
3: 8:l 8:l 8:l 8:l
-oCOCOCOID
(g I:: C C I::
0::: g 0 .8 .8
C C C C
> >- >-
o 0 0 0
CD CO CO CO
>>>-0-0
~~~~~
%%%-3~
<fIIIIOO
w w w co CD
tibb-mrii~cc
'tl <1l <1l lii lii <lJ <1l <1l
<lJ<lJ<lJ-o-o-o<lJW
V"lV"lv)~~~OO
~ ~
o 0
c c "
~ ~ ,
.i:.i:~
;a ~ (5
t; B LJ
00
" " "
>- > >-
CCia:iCil
*1- ****<f,**
>-~~O">q-~COOO">If)
== c.... "1"'-- t--- "M.- ~ If)
C3~ONr~;::..t~""':ci
**'*
h '"
~ ~
oON
*'*<f.*
CO h 0">0">
"'! 0: ~ ~
<"""I.... ~ ~
~
OOOUUUUOUUUUUUUU
~
c
"0 0 0 0 <"lOa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~~88~88~888888~~
~"1"MM""'<"'1<"'1~MMM<"'1<"'1M~
u
-mU)<.O<.O
08;;;8
1-~<"'1M
gsRNrott');g~~:;J:~1.O
~~~~~~~~~~g
f-
#.'"
o
~M
"'"'
~;:'
*- "t~...~ Cl :5 fi * '* '* * 5" :5 #. '* <f.
1.0 r1 i'1lf'1 V ~ If'1 tt') t-........ N M If'1 If) If)
'"
OJ
o
I
'"
<:
w
~
u
"~ 0 1.0 M If) C'l M 1', t- ::: M ~ ~ ~ t-... t,
o C'~ <.0 co ~ ~ M ..--- ,--,~ ""' v' ~. ,-- ..---
n:
J? 0--"
.,..,.
C'l N
~~~'?i~ei~~~'
r~r!N(,I<,!",!rrr!r~
~ ,
0' ~
:::<
b'*,.......---~~~~.....,.....~..---.--~~..---~
o
N
60. 0""
.". "1"
N N
~ ~
o ~
Uo
>
~~~~O~~$?:~~~a;;s;
~~
C ~ M 0"> C1'l 0"> ''1 C'I If) <""1 M ~
.~~~~880~~~~~~~
w ~
.sID
'" ~
,- ,
X~
W
30ID
~;;;g:
000-100-1000009-1-1
\3;:t:;:f C'l;:t -:t: N";i;:t -;; ~;:i.". N i'I
s
>-
~
~
jii
I
-:;i2
iii~,
~ ,-
~15
<lJO-o
00 0 ,
c> 0
o~'"
C .8
,,0
g > lJ
mg
9~
~~~
- ~ -
rooo~
>-I::~
~.9:3
~ ~ 0
- > 0
ags:
~
c
:::;
"
rn
~ >-
T~
2~
2~
;.no.'
;;;
~
"
~
o
'"
~:;~~
mCCiwro
-.e.-.e.-.e....s::::.
U U u u
nj nj nj 'tl
W <lJ W W
co coco cn
C C C C
o 0 9 .9
C C C c
6 [; c) 1)
CDCDCOcn
~ ~
o 0
c ~
~ ~
.i: .i:
c c
, ,
~ ~
u u
00
> >
-o~~:;~~~
~m~~I~~...s::::.
O::::t:tOJIII
ouutimriirii
LJ <1l <1l nj ~ Q:; lii
<lJ Il.I <lJ -0 -0 -0
V'lv)v)~~~
~i2
001"
~
u
ro
~
co
~
0"
o ,
S:S~
c.8_
>" 0
~ > lJ
in 0
g...s::::. ~
" u"
>- ' '"
'CD <1J..
~ i'] a '0
*~o8-E~
lJCDs:~a
~ ~
o 0
c c
~ ~
>- >
<:<:
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
u u
00
" "
~ ~
> >
~ ~
~:l
o 0
0000
c ~
'" ,
~ .
u u
00
f--
o
;:;
o
0.0
0_
~:e
U1;
~:
~Gl
"'<Il
~~