Loading...
TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS (JUL 2002) MARltlA VILLAGE COtlCORREtlCY TRAFFIC IMPACT AtlflL YSIS Preparczcl for GO~AY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Preparczcl by PINDE~ T~OOTMAN CONSULTING. INC. 2324 Soath Congress Avenae. SUite 1 tt West Palm Beach. FL 33406 (561) 434-1644 #PTC02.96 Jaly 26. 2002 /vv t~\ Ml-i' . f\\ ,X (\ I\. \, rv \\ \ ~~\' 1\0 'I f~" "\ V'v~ " k \ A1.re\ M, Troutman, P.E. FlonCla Registration #45409 \'1 : JUL 2. 6 I;' " _.-----1 _.--'~Ir " = ~ MARINA VILlAGE CONCURRENCY TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS Introduction Pinder Troutman Consulting, Inc. (PTC) has been retained to conduct a traffic impact analysis for a proposed mixed-use development in the City of Boynton Beach. The purpose of this study is to determine if the proposed development meets the requirements of Article 15, Traffic Performance Standards, of the Palm Beach County Unified Land Development Code (ULDC). Site Data The site is located on the north side of Ocean Avenue as shown on Exhibit 1, It is proposed to develop a mix of Retail, Office, Marina and Residential units on the site, Access to the proposed project will be via Ocean Avenue and NE 2"" Avenue (extension of Boynton Beach Boulevard east of Federal Highway). Year 2005 conditions were examined for this analysis, Existing (2000) Traffic Conditions Exhibit 2 provides the 2001 annual average daily traffic (MDT) volumes for the surrounding roadway network as compiled by the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) of Palm Beach County, Peak hour traffic volumes were determined by applying a 'K' factor of 9.3% to the MDT volumes. These volumes are also shown on Exhibit 2 along with roadway lanes, levels of service (LOS) and the LOS D service volumes, Project Traffic Trip Generation Se,1ion 10,8, Fair Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach County ULDC was reviewed to determine acceptable daily trip generation rates for the proposed project's land uses, The Institute of Transportation Engineers (lTE), Trip Generation, 6'h Edition was utilized as the source for peak hour trip generation rates, Rt-'fXJr( 02-96 7-26-02 Exhibits 3A, 3B and 3C provide the daily, AM and PM peak hour trip generation data for the proposed development. Because of the mixed-use nature of the project, a portion of the project traffic will remain on site and is internal to the project. For Traffic Performance Standards purposes, based on the net daily trip generation of 3,557, the Test 1 radius of development influence is two (2) miles, The Test 2 radius of development influence is one (1) mile, Trip Distribution and Assignment A directional distribution was developed based on land use patterns and the existing roadway network. Exhibit 4 shows the assignment of daily and peak hour project traffic as well as the project impact percentage (% of daily adopted service volume), Future Traffic Conditions Roadway Improvements A review of the Transportation Improvement Program (FY 2002-2006) from the MPO of Palm Beach County, adopted May 2001, and the Palm Beach County Five Year Road Program, adopted July 24,2001, was completed, There are no programmed roadway improvements within the radius of influence, Background Traffic Historic growth trends and Major Project traffic must be analyzed in the projection of future background traffic volumes, Historic growth data is provided on Exhibit 5 for the surrounding roadway links, Major Project data, compiled by Palm Beach County, was reviewed, No Major Project is projected to have a 10% impact on the analyzed roadway links during the huildout time frame of the proposed development. Traffic Performance Standards Analysis Test 1 (Link Test) This first test of the Traffic Performance Standards examines if any roadway links, required to be analyzed, are projected to operate below adopted level of service standards, Exhibit 6 Report 02-96 7-26-02 1 shows future average daily and average peak hour traffic conditions for the study area roadway links at project buildout. All roadway links are projected to operate above the adopted level of service; therefore the requirements of Test 1 are met. Test 2 (Model Test) The second test examines traffic conditions hased on model projections that are developed and maintained by Palm Beach County, There are no Test 2 deficiencies within the radius of development influence, Therefore, the requirements of T cst 2 are met. Conclusions This analysis shows that the proposed development meets the requirements of the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County, Report 02 9'-' 726 02 J o o o <: o '" NTS, MINER ROAD w (] o '" I g I 0 '" .,- GATFWAY BOUI EVARD > w ~ => 0 <D L <: w U 0 ~ OLD BOYNTON ROAD ~ SITE w => z w > <: ~ ~ w '" (] 7 o U '0 '" o '" <: > w ~ => o <D f- ~ w '" u <: w ~ WOOLBRIGHT ROAD GOLF ROAD (5W 23rd AVENUE) 07/24!02 MARINA VILLAGE EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT LOCATION ~ o o o <: o '" MINI::.R ROAD w (] o '" I (] I NTS, CATEWAY BOlJUVARD I "D H7~nl llc,no 11'lnc lIl/II 110~'41~ C ll'ilHl If\Bl( HUO o '" .,- :> ~ ~ => o <D f" 21,,41) 11~'''' il1100 11:1411 OLD BOYNTON ROAD ~ f>l1J !()(HIl( 411~OO ny,le 4',',", 1.10 17~';(, !) 411'100 3411.1 D 45r,(l ~ln 4lDo lI)ll4HlJ 1.lIBr,l 12,,00 12';011 1;''l~ 0 111'1' 'lOin J070 OCEAN ^ V[ 0 '" '0 , ;; '" "0 1l1l2(l[l W U';lIl1 ~ I" Ill1,'ID => ]()7H11J U.l20 0 H'mn <D 1LD q"loll f- '4!H!lll 1<"10 ~ .l1~(HI W n.,,,n '" 1010 U <: 4111 w 1';(,4',( ~ 11:'00 .111',( Hun 111l nc,llf,1J .12';00 I " lh~(ll) llnbO lOlU 14'mu 'lIARD I 1],,0 ~ w => Z w > '" ~ ~ ~ '" (] Z o U WOOl,BRll.HT ROAD CO" ROAD (5W 2Jrd AVENUFj LEGEND 6l.D ROADWAY I AN~S 374';6 f)- DAILYTRAHIC AND IOS 48900 . DAilY AUOPTlO 5(RVKT VOlUMI 14fH U - PlAK HOUR lRArrlC fiND [OS 4550 PlAKHOIJRADOl'110 StRVICI. VULUMI AVAILARI f 2000/01 AAD 1 07/24/02 MARINA VILLAGE II EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING (2001) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ~ "-Dq~~ m 0 "'__ ~ ~ ~~ i~~; ~ o ~ b c .g ~ W W C ocW .!J!O M;;' .9- ~,:: :D .S >- :.c~= J5:Eo ~ x ,1; ro ro ~ ~ ., ~'i: .. ~ .. 0 ~ "' N " ~ '0 .>- ~ ~ M Z '" '" #. ** ~ 0 00 ,1; ..; ~ oci .. Co ~ :0 ;': ~ ., ~ ~, ~, ~ ~ ~ " '" N ~ ~ N ~ 'i: a h .. a M ~ N h, ~ ., x f- N ~ ..; w ,0 #. #. 6":. ,,":. '0 a a 0 ro .. ~ 0 0 0 ~ E . ~ ~ " 2J Co N a .. N ro ~ M '" ~ ro E ~ ~ M g :0 N '" ro a a M :: N h M "', f- N' ~' jj 0 >- ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ro ~ 2J '" M . + + ~ X x c 0 S 5 ::J '~ . M ro 0 Vi " .. ~ ~ h ., ~ 0 0 0 '" . <.J " " N ,~ r= r= >- 5 .s ,~ 0 . . .:J ,g ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Vi a a h a N ~ ., .. ~ N ..' ..; N .. '\' . . u :5 '0; . u '" 0 -" .:l .~ ~ . "; . ~ - " ;': '~ u '~ . ~ ." :, 0 '" 0 ::;: ::;: >- o o I ~ . . ~ ::;: <: '" ~ .. h M 0 M M N a ,". ~ N . Co '5 ~ ~ h c. h ~ ~ a N . 0 ~ ~ z E N a a ~ M N M N h #. #. '#.-0$> ~ 0 o ~" ..; ~ cia .. ~~ -9~ ~ '" ~ 'E '" N ;;; >- N ~ ~ h M ;;; jj ~ M N 0 ~ N >- . Co :'l .. h N ro , 0 M .. 0 ~ ~ 0 "' .E a N a ~ M .. M N '" E #. 0', ";f.-"'o #. 00' ~ 0 a a ,- '" 0 0 0 ai .. . ~ ~ E 2J Co .. .. .. N 0 ~ N '" '" a :;: M M ~ .. ~ 0 N f- h ~ ro ~ :;:; . , N :: ~ ~ 0 '" N ~ M C, N 0 ~ M N >- a ~ E is" c, F: .. 2 oj '" ~ '" M 2J g; :;: " '" . ~ ~ ro ~ '" c, '" ~ 0 + + -,= a a .3 i5 8 ::J a ~ .s 0 0 , . 0 ~ ,- ro . g; '0 0 '-' 0 0 g a 0 " " >- t:= " .s .s ,~ 0 . 2J :5 E ~ ~ 0 ,- ~ ~ ~ 0 a h a N N h .. ~ ~ N ..; ..' N .. ~ . . u :5 '. . u '" 0 -" .:l E ~ . "; ~ ~ - . " ;': '~ u '~ . ~ ." :, 0 '" 0 ::;: ::;: >- o o I ~ . . ~ ::;: ~ '" a ro ~ h a M M ~ M 0 ~ - M . >- Co N :;:; M ., , ;;; ~ ~ . ~ . 0 Z ro h .. .. M E ~ a ., ~ ~ #. #. '# #. ~ '0 0 a -i .. ~- -9[::!. ~ .~ .. N ~ a ~ " :2 ~ >- .. a ~ ., ~ M jj M .. ~ .. 0 N ~ >- . Co ~ M :;:; M M , N M ;; .. 0 ~ E 2J x ro h .. ~ M W a a N ~ ~ c. E ,0 5 "* ~~ ~ a a N ~ ci ci ci ro .. . ~ ~ ,C E 2J Co .. ~ h ~ h E ~ ~ M '" ro '0 N ro M .. .. ., h 0 N ~ .. >- '" h h .. h , N M ~ N 11; ~ N Co 0 '" '" ro ~ ~ ~ 0 :: :: .. >- N E ~ 6 - oj ro " ~ ->; ,~ a 2J M M oe 0 '" ~ . ~ M '" " ~ M ro oe a 0 . a 0 8 , ::J q '~ p ~ c '" . ~ ~ - 0 'jl N ::" . ~ <.J 0 h 0 0 ,~ " 0 >- .= " .s ~ c ,~ 0 . . .:J ,g ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Vi a a h a c. ~ h .. ~ N ~' ~' N .. \' . ~ u '0; ::J . '" u -" 0 .:l E ~ . ~ . ~ - . '~ ,,, <: '" u " >- . '" ." 0 ~ 0 ::;: ::;: >- ~ n , D . u 0 . ~ 1> 0 ~ g- o ~ ~ ji <; , ~ 0 ro 0 0 0 ~ 2 . ~ " 6 u 0 B ~ . ~ ~ 0 0 u ~ .g ~ ~ u 0 . . n " rn . E ] .. ] ~ n e , 0 ~ . ~ 0 i 0 0 0 , ;E u ~ ~ ~ ~ " '0 J ~ J rn ~ ~ ,1; 0 ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . 0 r 11 f 0 0 ~ 0 0 . 9 I . ~ ~ e :;' ~ ~ rn 0 0; ~ . 0 . i 0 2 B ~ ~ ~ j , ] ~ = .. .. o o o <: o '" MINER ROAD w o o '" I g I NT,S, WOOLBRIGHT ROAD 0 '" <( > ~ ~ => 0 <D 5'''' Z <: m w '" 2\1% U " m 0 {)Si~!' '" " 50'}!. 2.19';::, 2()')(, 25% 711 IlIl'l '" m ~ " '0< 21'1% 1.74% 1()% 1.~h '" U 15% 1.10% 0 '" 1\1 '" ',I, '0 I <: 11>4% '" ", > 14'J W H ~ ~ " 0 n.n'li> <D '\0% f- 10(,7 ~ (,() w '" '" U 1.21\% "" <: w It\5 ~ H. '" ILlII\% 4(1% 1421 UO I " '" 1-- 4.111% H, , 111% , , (,40 , 1'--';;:- 11.11% H, "' I '" 1.<)7% '" '" 11')% GATFWAY BOUlFVARD I '" H. , , , 0.2470, OLD BOYNTON ROAD 5% '" '" '" O.Jb')h ~ w => Z w > <: ~ ~ w '" o 7 o U GOLF ROAD (5W 23rd AVENU~) LEGEND 40?(. PIRCfNT IJISTRlIllJTION 1423 DAilY PROJfCT IRA! IIC BO AM PI AI( HOUR PROJ[C1 I RAHIC 112 . PM PEAK HOUR PROjlCI J'RAlffC 4.)8%- % or DAILY ADorno ~fRVICf VOLUM~ 07/24/02 MARINA VILLAGE EXHIBIT 4 PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT ~ Exhibit 5 Marina Village Historic Growth #PTC02~96 Growth 02-96 7-24-02jo,xts 7/26/2002 Page 1 of 1 Daily Traffic Volumes Growth Roadway 1998 2001 Rate Old Boynton Rd Congress Ave to Boynton Beach Blvd 11,671 12,155 1,36% /Year Boynton Beach Blvd Congress Ave to Old Boynton Rd 30,316 30,03B ~0.31 % /Year Old Boynton Rd to 1-95 42,572 3B,B48 -3,01% /Year 1-95 to Seacre5t Boulevard 29,855 30,099 0,27% /Year Seacre5t Boulevard to Federal Highway (1) 14,729 14,285 -1,02% /Year Ocean Avenue Federal Highway to Ocean Blvd 5,006 9,257 22.74% /Year Woolbright Road 1-95 to Seacrest Boulevard 33,1 B7 35,645 2.41% /Year federal Highway to Ocean Blvd 10,213 9,776 -1.45% /Year Golf Road 1~95 to Seacre5t Boulevard 11,891 12,636 2.05% /Year Seacre5t Blvd Gateway Blvd to Boynton Beach Blvd 13,40B 14,750 3,23% /Year Boynton Beach Blvd to Woolhright Rd 16,260 16,503 0,50% /Year Woolbright Rd to Golf Road 21,138 20,029 -l.7B% /Year Federal Highway Gateway Blvd to Boynton Beach Blvd (2) 20,922 20,242 ~ 1,31% /Year Boynton Beach Blvd to Woolbright Rd (2) 22,129 24,2BB 3.79% /Year Woolbright Road to Golf Road (2) 26,116 2B,5B6 3,68% /Year Ocean Boulevard North of Ocean Avenue 6,734 B,706 8,94% /Year South of Ocean Avenue B,223 10,710 9,21% /Year Areawide 324,370 336,553 1,24% /Year (1) Utilized available 1997/9B - 2000/01 MDT, (2) Utilized available 199B/99 - 2001 MDT, tONW...... 0l0")(_ N ~ ,00 0__ N"'--- otOOI1l t-~'Ol Q..I'-"<tm =II: ~Q.. ~ w m N o 1;; '" \1.1 "~ OC~ '" >- ::=-;0 '"'>~ ~ '" <: :..0 c ~ rn v w::i'f- *tJ o~;ft.;ft.;f!.~;ft.~~;ft.;ft.~ >- < (f: ~ q- to 0 m:O I'- 0> ro -l c....: t! O! t"') ,-- ..... LO I'- N ~~ONN;:..r.....""'cici C'i................ #~# ~ m m m ON ~ OOOUUUUOUUUUUUUU ~ "~OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO uooooooooooooooo 9~:qri~~~~::qri:q~:q~?;?; Jq-MM~MM~MMMMMM.-.- S:g~M&jR: ooo:::1~~ t-!::!;M~~ ~:;; NO ;':0 f- #.'" o # ?;<!. 00.. "<p, 69.. (sf:!.. *- #- # #- ",9, b' ,0 do.. (so. <.Dg:q~~~U)U)t---'-~M~lf)U) ,.. ~ :;: o u ~ ~ .0' N n: O'>~~I.OCOCOO'>I.O ~OCOCO ,,~~~~~~AMt---~3~~ "09. # .,. .,. r1 r1 0'2.. ,,'2.. 09. (j?, 27"09. q-of-q-..,...,...,. t"1 C'I r! t"! C'1 "'! _~*?;9..o-R.*#. NCl!q-q-q-"1""" :::: <- ('1 "'! r! C'1 C'! ~* ~..--- ~ ~,..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.-.-- ~ ~ ~ o N -;,R 69.. .,. .,. "'! t"! ~ .. ~ 05~N~~O~~~~5~~5~~ ~~~~~~ "1"l.Or~co..---~~,.....q-U) > ~-COO'>lf)lf) t,I.OOM~NCOCOI.OO ~5"1"O'>COCO If)MIf)ONq-CONO ~~~~~~O~~~~~~~~~~ "~(lJ '" c ,- , " ~ w 000-100-1000000-1-1 \O;:t;:t rl -;;t -;:f- i'1;:t -;;t -;f- -;f-;:t;:t <'Ir] I~ ~ ljii I ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~.o ~.o -o~g~~g~ ~65:~6S:~'1!(l) ~ t:: g ~I ~ g - ~ E -o-g~~LJg~8~~ ~ co g a:i go CD .8 cOJ-o-o-o~-5~ ~~~~~ii5~1: 03; ;; c .~ >- I:: gg3:g:3~.8Li 2~82~~ ogs:O~~ ~ c :::; " " " .f ;:u.~ o ~ ~ ~I~ .8 -0 ~I~ 0:::-m~-m3: 6~6~~ i::.5:: co <li I oqOJ:::O" CO - u lii -0 tt') ltI <fI -0 50.'~~.f " m ~ >- ~~ .9~ c c ro , ~ ~ U U 00 ~~ 00 ~~ " - o 0 Z.J: -0-0-0-0 > > > ;.. roco co co ~-D-5-o--5 3: 8:l 8:l 8:l 8:l -oCOCOCOID (g I:: C C I:: 0::: g 0 .8 .8 C C C C > >- >- o 0 0 0 CD CO CO CO >>>-0-0 ~~~~~ %%%-3~ <fIIIIOO w w w co CD tibb-mrii~cc 'tl <1l <1l lii lii <lJ <1l <1l <lJ<lJ<lJ-o-o-o<lJW V"lV"lv)~~~OO ~ ~ o 0 c c " ~ ~ , .i:.i:~ ;a ~ (5 t; B LJ 00 " " " >- > >- CCia:iCil *1- ****<f,** >-~~O">q-~COOO">If) == c.... "1"'-- t--- "M.- ~ If) C3~ONr~;::..t~""':ci **'* h '" ~ ~ oON *'*<f.* CO h 0">0"> "'! 0: ~ ~ <"""I.... ~ ~ ~ OOOUUUUOUUUUUUUU ~ c "0 0 0 0 <"lOa 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~88~88~888888~~ ~"1"MM""'<"'1<"'1~MMM<"'1<"'1M~ u -mU)<.O<.O 08;;;8 1-~<"'1M gsRNrott');g~~:;J:~1.O ~~~~~~~~~~g f- #.'" o ~M "'"' ~;:' *- "t~...~ Cl :5 fi * '* '* * 5" :5 #. '* <f. 1.0 r1 i'1lf'1 V ~ If'1 tt') t-........ N M If'1 If) If) '" OJ o I '" <: w ~ u "~ 0 1.0 M If) C'l M 1', t- ::: M ~ ~ ~ t-... t, o C'~ <.0 co ~ ~ M ..--- ,--,~ ""' v' ~. ,-- ..--- n: J? 0--" .,..,. C'l N ~~~'?i~ei~~~' r~r!N(,I<,!",!rrr!r~ ~ , 0' ~ :::< b'*,.......---~~~~.....,.....~..---.--~~..---~ o N 60. 0"" .". "1" N N ~ ~ o ~ Uo > ~~~~O~~$?:~~~a;;s; ~~ C ~ M 0"> C1'l 0"> ''1 C'I If) <""1 M ~ .~~~~880~~~~~~~ w ~ .sID '" ~ ,- , X~ W 30ID ~;;;g: 000-100-1000009-1-1 \3;:t:;:f C'l;:t -:t: N";i;:t -;; ~;:i.". N i'I s >- ~ ~ jii I -:;i2 iii~, ~ ,- ~15 <lJO-o 00 0 , c> 0 o~'" C .8 ,,0 g > lJ mg 9~ ~~~ - ~ - rooo~ >-I::~ ~.9:3 ~ ~ 0 - > 0 ags: ~ c :::; " rn ~ >- T~ 2~ 2~ ;.no.' ;;; ~ " ~ o '" ~:;~~ mCCiwro -.e.-.e.-.e....s::::. U U u u nj nj nj 'tl W <lJ W W co coco cn C C C C o 0 9 .9 C C C c 6 [; c) 1) CDCDCOcn ~ ~ o 0 c ~ ~ ~ .i: .i: c c , , ~ ~ u u 00 > > -o~~:;~~~ ~m~~I~~...s::::. O::::t:tOJIII ouutimriirii LJ <1l <1l nj ~ Q:; lii <lJ Il.I <lJ -0 -0 -0 V'lv)v)~~~ ~i2 001" ~ u ro ~ co ~ 0" o , S:S~ c.8_ >" 0 ~ > lJ in 0 g...s::::. ~ " u" >- ' '" 'CD <1J.. ~ i'] a '0 *~o8-E~ lJCDs:~a ~ ~ o 0 c c ~ ~ >- > <:<: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u 00 " " ~ ~ > > ~ ~ ~:l o 0 0000 c ~ '" , ~ . u u 00 f-- o ;:; o 0.0 0_ ~:e U1; ~: ~Gl "'<Il ~~