The URL can be used to link to this page

REVIEW COMMENTS , . DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-63 \') & 1 ?/~ G " If! )'4 q1 TO: TRC MEMBERS Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Review Analyst Kevin Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist John Huntington, Police Department H. David Kelley, Jr., Utilities Department Timothy Large, Building Department Jeff Livergood, Public Works, Traffic Ken Hall, Public Works, General Laurinda Logan, Engineering LusiaGalav, Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks ~v ~ FROM: Michael W. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 25, 2003 SUBJECT: 3" Review- Major Site Plan Modification Project- The Residences @ Marina Village Location: 743 NE 1"' Avenue Agent: Lawrence Justiz- The Related Group File No.-MSPM 03-001 Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits, for the 3 cd review on the above referenced proj ecl. Please provide me with this documentation no later than Wednesday, March 26. 2003. MWR: sc S IPlanningISHAREDlWP\PROJECTSIMARINAIMSPM O~-OOl\~rd Re\1CW Memo doc I ;11t e ,q:s.r ~ ){-- " ~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-63 TO: TRC MEMBERS Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Review Analyst Kevin Hallahan. ForesterlEnvironmentalist John Huntington, Police Department H. David Kelley, Jr., Utilities Department Timothy Large, Building Department Jeff Livergood, Public Works, Traffic Ken Hall, Public Works, General Laurinda Logan, Engineering LusiaGalav, Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks ~\J..f 1--~f, FROM: Michael W. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 25, 2003 SUBJECT: 3" Review- Major Site Plan Modification Project- The Residences @ Marina Village Location: 743 NE I" Avenue Agent: Lawrence Justiz- The Related Group File No.-MSPM 03-001 Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits, for the 3 ,. review on the above referenced project. Please provide me with this documentation no later than Wednesday, March 26, 2003. 'Iv hA. f( l-t-. '-f. z...- MWR: sc S. \Pllll1ning\SHAREDlWP\PROlECTS\MARINA\MSPM OJ-OOI\Jrd Review Memo.doc ~ c>(~ DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-63 TO: TRC MEMBERS Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Review Analyst Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist John Huntington, Police Department H. David Kelley, Jr., Utilities Department Timothy Large, Building Department Jeff Livergood, Public Works, Traffic Ken Hall, Public Works, General Laurinda Logan, Engineering LusiaGalav, Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks j,lp--6. =~ I n. 50 FROM: Michael W. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 25, 2003 SUBJECT: 3" Review- Major Site Plan Modification Project- The Residences @ Marina Village Location: 743 NE 1" Avenue Agent: Lawrence Justiz- The Related Group File No.-MSPM 03-001 Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits, for the 3 ,. review on the above referenced project. Please provide me with this documentation no later than Wednesday, March 26, 2003. MWR: sc S,IPlanningISHAREDlWPlPROJECTS\MARlNAIMSPM 03-001\3rd Review Memo doc DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-63 TO: TRC MEMBERS Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Review Analyst Kevin Hallahan, ForesterlEnvironmentalist John Huntington, Police Department H. David Kelley, Jr., Utilities Department Timothy Large, Building Department Jeff Livergood, Public Works, Traffic Ken Hall, Public Works, General ......... Laurinda Logan, Engineering LusiaGalav, Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks FROM: Michael W. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 25,2003 SUBJECT: 3" Review- Major Site Plan Modification Project- The Residences @ Marina Village Location: 743 NE 1"' Avenue Agent: Lawrence Justiz- The Related Group File No.-MSPM 03-001 Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits. for the 3" review on the above referenced project. Please provide me with this documentation no later than Wednesday, March 26, 2003. IIIz. hI'. 1",\ ~ - MWR: sc SIPlanning\SHAREDlWP\PROJECTS\MARlNA\MSPM OJ-OOIIJrd Review Memo doc lI1U.JU0(.c ~ (, j-=",lZ,::;/C'3 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-63 TO: TRC MEMBERS Rodger Kemmer, Fire Plans Review Analyst Kevin Hallahan, Forester/Environmentalist John Huntington, Police Department H. David Kelley, Jr., Utilities Department Timothy Large, Building Department Jeff Livergood, Public Works, Traffic Ken Hall, Public Works, General Laurinda Logan, Engineering LusiaGalav, Planning & Zoning John Wildner, Parks FROM: Michael W. Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director DATE: March 25, 2003 SUBJECT: 3" Review- Major Site Plan Modification Project- The Residences @ Marina Village Location: 743 NE I"' Avenue Agent: Lawrence Justiz- The Related Group File No.-MSPM 03-001 Please document your review time and calculated cost based on your hourly rate plus benefits, for the 3" review on the above referenced project. Please provide me with this documentation no later than Wednesday, March 26,2003. .L';; (Y(; ..--;:,. '1};:z ,- ---- . )li / .'t! Ii" \ ,,,ii I \.'V~ I MWR: sc S IPlanningISHAREOIWPlPROJECTS\MARINAIMSPM 03-00 [\3rd Review Memo.doc DEPARTMENT OF PVBLlC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 02-000 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: February 28, 2003 RE: Review of COUS 98-008 Conditions of Approval Major Site Plan Modification The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group .....-file No. MSPM 03-001 Per your reques1 the Condi1ions of Approval from COUS 98-008 were reviewed against 1he above referenced plans and 1 st Review comments. Following are comments that we believe should be addressed by 1he current developer (The Related Group) during this approval process. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL Comments #1 and #2, COUS 98,008, may be deleted. They are being addressed wi1h new comments for MSPM 08,001. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC Add 1he following comments: 1 Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/S1udy, to determine if signal timing changes, slriping modifica1ions, or lane additions are necessary as a result of 1his development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. 2. The applicant shall be required 10 dedica1e to the Ci1y 25 feet of land adjacent to 1he exis1ing NE 6th Slreet as currenlly platled and in use, to allow the Ci1y the abili1y 10 control ingress }lnd ;gres~ in10. . the project site and maintenance of exis1 and proposed City u1ilities. UY\ 0;>5 ~,:.fL ~,,~ I/rd... h'7 5 1/ C( fi C<- fN~{v-'; lY( ~yA""-~ ENGINEERING Delete Commen1s #17,19,21,24,25,28, and 30, COUS 98,008. They are either being addressed wi1h new comments for MSPM 08,001 or have been addressed. The following comments (revised for this project) Irarn CGUS 98,008 should be added to our previously made comments for MSPM 08,001. ,/ Pay a "Fee in Lieu Of' de'dication as set forth in the LDR, Chapter 1, Article V. , Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24, 2003 Page 2 /' The Ci1y of Boyn10n Beach and 1he applican1 shall jointly participate in extending Boynton Beach Blvd. east from i1s current point of terminus as outlined in 1he Revised Development Agreemen1 and indicated on the approved plan. (LOR, Chapler 4, Section 8.C; Chapter 6, Article III, Sec1ion 12; Chap1er 6, Article IV, Sec1ion 10; Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.3; Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.B; Chapter 2, Section 11.2.0) This comment shall be read in conjunction wilh Paragraph 17.G 6 of 1he Revised Developmen1 Agreement. /The applicant shall agree to incorporate in the dock leasing agreemenls a stipulation disallowing boat tenants from using the public parking spaces along Casa Loma Blvd., NE 6th St., the private roadway west of the residential building and the first floor of the parking garage for their parking purposes. The dock leasing agreements must also stipulate that live aboards are not allowed in accordance with the DEP permit. Provide the City with copies of the proposed leasing agreements for review and approval. / The applicant shall agree to incorporate in the leasing agreements for all retail uses a stipulation disallowing retail employees from using the public parking spaces along Casa Loma Blvd., NE 6th SI., the private roadway west of the residential building and the first floor of the parking garage for their parking purposes. Provide the City with copies of the proposed leasing agreements for review and approval. t;l..llnlll""""PllrcggsalJrthe R.,vi"'i'a Oe;v"IOfJlI,,,,,t J\!ijFeCII'''''Ltfovide the City with the appropriate ~.;:(oJ..- CJ documents to designate public access and recreational uSlt"easements::fslrthe F. _~_ I I 1I~lh pH:!; 0 II ;f1 at the Intracoastal Waterway, lhg fleae:3triBA f3Btl:1'''<1Y~ h"lw.,.,n "'ng SA tRs AQrlh "irle> of the -prgi3e~eJ 'It::tdil buildh Ig! cl,Jrer.th(:.' G.Ol:JllYdl J ctl cz. loeated ~~c:t nf the prop9~B8 resiEf9r.atisl b1lilding, i~11)9inQ a walkw",~' Jg thEl80rlh property lire> of the sitp. , 8. Show proposed p ic f . 'lies on the site plan and construclion and use detail of proposed designs " for 1he propose :.ca&::l !.eFAEl verlook, Casa Loma Blvd., OII,ej lI,e; fJuollc cUUII) ard fer nil"i,,'''. Plans LJ~ shall include posed public ameni1ies such as benches/sealing, trash receptacles, bike racks, ~tains, Iigh1ing, landscaping, etc. ;l'Regarding proposed conslruction of Casa Loma Blvd., NE 61h St., and 1he priva1e roadway 1he applicant should be aware that roadways constructed in muck or peat shall be constructed in conformance wi1h the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.E. f. Shqwthe six fishc;leaning and garbage stafkins required by theDEP permit on the Site Plan. UTILITIES Dele1e Commen1s #3,10, COUS 98,008. They are either being addressed with new commen1s for MSPM 08-001 or have been addressed. The following commen1s (revised for this project) from COUS 98-008 should be added to our previously made comments for MSPM 08,001. Gl Note 1hat the addition of multi-story condominium buildings and townhouses greatly intensifies the U use of the site above what was originally anticipated. This change will result in ?n addi1ional capital facilities charge, if approved. The developer is responsible for payment of all adaitional fees. 2. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24, 2003 Page 3 hlAl1 infrastructure improvemen1s necessary for 1his en1ire site mus1 be completed before the firs1 U certifica1e of occupancy is issued, other than for docks and fuel pumps constructed simultaneously with related support infras1ructure including access roads, water and sani1ary sewer, regardless of bonding or olher surety. For 1his purpose, "infrastructure" shall be defined as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and a second paved access road for service and emergency purposes. Cc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e'mail) Peter Mazzella, Assistant 10 Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Foreslry & Grounds Division (PW/F&G) Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e,mail) File J:\SHRDATA\Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Major Mod - Marina - Review of Old CommentS.doc \'^- ~ 's \l~s f< ""^"- CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER INTER-DEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE JAN - J ,:1'/ DATE: G" 'January 2, 2003 ,t- Scott Blasie Bob Borden Kurt Bressner Nancy Byrne Jim Cherof Marshall Gage Lusia Galav Steve Gale Quintus Greene Ken Hall Kevin Hallahan Dick Hudson John Huntington G&-t ev,,,., ,-1: ,_.t. '" - 5e.11 q ',Sc/f"'" If.., ',7 Doug Hutchinson oJ Don Johnson p) S - ~e(' lpc.\(. pe.<.o.,' I ~'t''( I..L David Kelley V"" "\ l -, ~" ~'t '7 \ Rodger Kemmer -:Is ,,",C,.l'., (( u'"'(' (,(: J, , Bob Kenyon ,,(.~ "",,,,-Ie,'~ " ,,,\ .~ Tim Large O'i~(=K. ',' Mark Law \.)c._ ~'i!lt$\",(.Yk'{- "".,<1-<<",),<,' Jeff Livergood, _ , Ie' . .' ) L . d L \kj I U \. ~ \.. u '\ eLL" '^', ,,(., ( '> ' aUrin a ogan ' " ' ' ,,' . Pete Mazzella . Larry Quinn Mike Rumpf John Wildner FROM: Dale S. Sugerman, Assistant City Manager SUBJECT: Agenda & Supporting Documentation for Staff "Summit" Meeting on the Marina Project/Marina District- Monday, January 13, 2003~\~ ;\'\'1 , / 10:00 am - 4:00 pm YJ'1 _ L (< ck: '!'" J f, "'''~.l~ oY <x-' Conference Room "C" C c, ,., {. ,.." '" /' ,,' (k:s_ (v'; / <,,(-' Cc f '. L C' ..,.," ~0.<pS' Attached is the agenda for the staff "summit" meeting that we have scheduled on the Marina. Also attached are three documents: 1) The currently active Second Revised Development Agreement (with a two page Third Revised Development Agreement addendum); 2) The Amended Mediation Agreement (settling the lawsuit between Garcia, Two Georges and the City), and; 3) The Approved Development Order (including Conditions of Approval) for the Revised Marina Site Plan. Please review your copy of each of these three documents and bring them with you to the summit meeting with any notes on which items have been met, which items have been modified, and which items are still outstandina accordina to your oarticular discioline. I) The purpose of the first half of the meeting is so we can get a complete, up-to-date r; accounting of where all of the issues stand on the Marina project. ,1 The purpose of the second half of the meeting is so we can develop a staff consensus on our vision for the Marina District going forward. For the afternoon session, we will have maps, aerials and GIS information available in the room. Lunch will be provided by the City Manager between the two halves of the full-day meeting. If you have any questions or comments about this process, or about any of the attachments, please be sure to contact me at extension 6456 prior to the meeting. ':D~ Dale S. Sugerman Assistant City Manager AGENDA STAFF "SUMMIT" MEETING ON THE MARINA PROJECT! MARINA DISTRICT Monday, January 13, 2003 10:00 am - 4:00 pm Conference Room "C" I. Welcome and introduction- purpose of meeting. II. Review and accounting of disciplines: a) Outstanding permits b) Use issues c) Parking issues d) Utility issues e) Engineering issues f) Police/Fire issues g) Public Works issues h) Other TRC issues III. Public access IV. Mixed use V. Pending litigation (Molle vs. City of Boynton Beach) VI. Other issues Lunch will be served in Conference Room "C" VII. The Marina District Visioning Process- Quintus Greene, Facilitator VIII. Final questions/discussion IX. Adjournment NOTES: ~"" rr--~ I' f \, l I ...' . \ l ) , / ['> <_.// ,-\' ,,-'J....) ,", DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 03-032 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning DATE: February 25, 2003 \ FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer RE: Review Comments Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group File No. MSPM 03-001 The above referenced Site Plans, forwarded on February 6, 2003, were reviewed by representatives from Public Works, Engineering, Solid Waste, Parks and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Developmen1 Regulations (LOR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building NO.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 for striping details. 4. The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The 3-foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. 5. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). . ' Department of Development, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-032 Re': The Residences at Marina Village, Major Site Plan Modification - 1st Review Comments February 25, 2003 Page 2 6. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every 50 feet around the circle. 7. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the sou1hwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast corner of this same intersection. 8. Extend the stop bar at the east leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. (westbound traffic is one-way only at this location). 9. Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr., which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). 10. Post "No Parking" for both East and West Marina Drive (both sides of roads). 11. Provide directional pavement arrows throughout. 12. All pavement return radii shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The following intersections do not meet this criteria: SE corner of Marina Dr. (NE 6th Street) and Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) @ 30 feet. NW corner of Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 15 feet. NE corner of Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 10 feet. SW corner of Marina Dr. (northward) and Boynton Beach Blvd. Extension (NW 2nd Ave.) @ 15 feet. 13. Public parking spaces may not be counted towards required parking. 14. The two story commercial building and the adjacent restaurant should have an additional two handicap parking spaces to provide the minimum required based on the "provided" parking (not to include the two next to Two George's Restaurant). 15. Provide cross-sections and details for the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension. This section of roadway shall be constructed in conjunction with other site improvements. ENGINEERING 16. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other D~velopment, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-032 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Major Site Plan Modification _1'1 Review Comments February 25, 2003 Page 3 permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 17. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 18. Show all proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (the Photometrics plan does not agree with the Site Plan and Landscape Plan). 19. Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans, using 35 feet on public rights-of-way (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A 10 foot sight triangle is allowable at the parking garage ingress/egress point. There appears to be conflicts between landscaping and lines of sight at each of the intersections with sight triangles depicted. Please correct. 20. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). 21. The City of Boynton Beach has existing irrigation, hardscaping, and plant material along Ocean Avenue. Any damage as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. 22. Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. 23. Provide details for the proposed paver systems showing compliance with the LDR, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.8.d.(2). 24. Review proposed landscaping, particularly along the center median at the intersection of Marina Dr. and East Ocean Ave., for possible conflicts with trucks and street maintenance equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.) 25. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. use of Ficus species shall not be permitted. 26. Be consistent with use of scale(s). The overall site plan uses an engineering scale with the remaining landscaping plans utilizing an architectural scale. Additionally the scale noted on Sheets L-4 and L-5 is incorrect. At a minimum, the LDR requires the Landscape plan (in this case the Overall Site Planting Plan) scale shall match that of the Site plan - which you have done (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.1). However for the detailed drawings please use an engineering scale at an appropriate scale, say a 20 scale. 27. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Seclion 7.F.2. Department of Development, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-032 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Major Site Plan Modification _1st Review Comments February 25, 2003 Page 4 28. The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #EI 50-0129079-001). This permit will be required to either be amended, again, or to be adhered to. Revise the Drainage Plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. 29. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 30. Structures #2 and #5 are incorrectly identified as Manholes, they should be called out as Inlets. 31. Verify storm sewer diameter between Manholes #10 and #11, and #1 and the existing manhole at the west end of Marina Dr. They are called out as 24 inches, with 30 inch HOPE used upstream of this site and 36 inch storm sewer used downstream. 32. Runoff from roads, parking lots, and other impervious areas must be routed through percolation areas prior to discharge (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.1.d). 33. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FOOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units. 34. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. 35. Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. 36. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved. 37. The sidewalks on either side of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) shall be widened to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act both as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. 38. An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be permitted. Too much roadway flooding is possible, with settlement around the inlets, leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. 39. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. 40. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. 41. Specify type of ownership. Are the town homes to be condominiums or fee simple? Will the apartments be rental or condominiums? Department of Development, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-032 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 sl Review Comments February 25, 2003 Page 5 42. Will the project be constructed in phases? If yes please provide a phasing plan. UTILITIES 1. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the Water & Sewer Plan Sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (Scheff/era Arboricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of-way. Due 10 the depth of the proposed sanitary collection trunk sewer re-route along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shall be required to be a minimum of 35-feet wide. The use of Florida Royal Palms (Roystonea elata), within proposed utility easements, is discouraged due their size at maturity. The same situation exists along the south roadway area (Marina Drive) at the initial re- routing of the sanitary trunk line. 2. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26-12). 3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). In addition, the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all pOints on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). 4. CODE, Article II, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. 6. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (and wider where noted above). The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Article II, Section 26-33(a). Department of Development, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-032 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Major Site Plan Modification _1st Review Comments February 25, 2003 Page 6 7. Again, the proposed re-routing of the sanitary trunk sewer (approximately 660 LF) will replace some 378 LF currently routed in an existing utility easement routed through proposed Buildings No. 1 & 2 as well as the swimming pool area. First, the re-route to the east then north (on East Marina Way) and back to the master lift station is Questionable at best as this puts a major transmission trunk into brackish soil conditions which include some 8 to 17 feet of unsuitable soil composition. This would require cradle and pile to construct throughout its length to ensure the relocated system will work. You are advised that the current (permitted) relocated trunk tracks westward to the west property line, then northward along the west property line to the NW 2nd Avenue right-of-way and reconnects with another major trunk system at a point near the link about to enter the master lift station. In addition, the soil conditions along the current permitted route are acceptable for this task. Second, the proposed re-route of the sanitary trunk sewer can only achieve a longitudinal slope of 0.08%, which is below the acceptable minimum. The additional calculations called for last June 2002, and submitted by the design engineer, reflected that capacity may be available, but velocity was not. In order to overcome the Utilities Department concerns, the re-routed sanitary trunk system should increase to a 30-inch diameter in order to allow for the slow moving capacity in the re-route segments 8. While PVC material mav be allowed on the City's water system on this particular project; poly-lined DIP is preferred. HOWEVER, all sanitary lines shall be poly-lined DIP on either the 24-inch or 30- inch trunk line segment; PVC will be acceptable on the 8-inch collection segment. 9. The proposed 1O-inch water main connection from NW 2nd Avenue to the line located in Marina Drive (currently known as Casa Loma Boulevard) will require a 20-foot horizontal separation along East Marina Drive, due to the depth of the sanitary trunk sewer. (Refer to Comments noted above.) 10. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 11. A building permit for this project shall not be issued un1il this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with CODE, Article II, Section 26-15. 12. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.0. requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. In addition, the LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.P. requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 13. Utility construction details as shown on Civil Engineering (CE) sheets C-6 thru C-8 will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual; and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Department of Development, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-032 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Major Site Plan Modification - 151 Review Comments February 25, 2003 Page 7 14. Any utilities placed/remaining under the landscaped island within the West Marina Drive right-of-way shall require a hold-harmless agreement for future utility maintenance. 15. There is some conflict between the General Notes and Water & Sewer Separation Notes on Sheet C2. The minimum required horizontal separation between water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc. is 10 feet. There is no exception for sewer lines. Please correct, and as appropriate, consolidate LUck Xc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division (PW/F&G) Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Residences @ Marina Village 1st Review Comments.doc ---- PARKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM #03-07 TO: FROM: Mike Rumph, Planning and Zoning Director John Wildner, Deputy Recreation and Parks Directorji Boynton Beach Marina, 1st Review-Major Site Plan Modification RE: Date: February 11, 2003 The Recreation and Parks Department has reviewed the major site plan modification for the Boynton Beach Marina Development. The following comments are submitted: 1. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each = 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each = Total = 9,252 221,728 $ 230,980 2. The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. JW ----- DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT BUILDING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 03-024 TO: Michael W. Rumpf Director of Planning and Zoning FROM: Timothy K. Large ~ TRC Member/Building Divi~ DATE: February 11 , 2003 SUBJECT: Project - Boynton Beach Marina File No. - MSPM 03-001 - 1st review We have reviewed the subject plans and recommend that the request be forwarded for Board review with the understanding that all remaining comments will be shown in compliance on the working drawings submitted for permits. BuildinQ Division (Site Specific and Permit Comments) - Timothv K. LarQe (561) 742-6352 1. Sheet A-2. Parking Breakdown Table. The calculations for the required handicap accessible parking spaces in the garage are based on a total number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. The plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces. Clarify on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. 2. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. 3. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submil a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on Sheets A-9 thru A-12. 4. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. bf S:IDeve/opmentIBui/dingITRCITRC 20031Boynton Beach Marina MSPM 03,001 Page 1 0/1 ~ CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH Fire and Life Safety Division 100 East Boynton Beach Blvd. P.O. Box 310 Boynton Beach, Florida 33425,0310 PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS For review of: MSPM 03-001 1st review-fire Project Name and Address: Boynton Beach Marina 743 NE 1st Avenue ~ Rodqer Kemmer. Fire Protection Enqineer Reviewed by: Department: Fire and Life Safety Phone: (561) 742-6753 Comments to: Sherie Coale by email on 2/19/03 CODE REQUIREMENTS Water & Sewer Plan (C,5) is inadequate. Hydrants are not clearly shown and the dock standpipe system with the Fire Department Connection (FDC) is not shown. Show location of all the FDC's for all buildings with fire sprinkler protection. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFPA I, Fire Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFP A 10 I, Life Safety Code, 2000 edition. (These codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire Prevention Code) Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall be no more than 300 ft. apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 ft. from a hydrant. Connections shall be to mains no less than 6 inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm is required. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29,2.3.2. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3,5. and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction. Alteration, and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO Tl80, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division 11, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide, or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. City Ordinance Section 9,6, 3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: I. All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are 3 stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 ft. in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. 2. All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 Class I, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFP A 70, National Electrical Code, and NFP A 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.4.2 cc: Steve Gale Bob Borden L.Y OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIlJA. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ~/ TO: 2/21/03 FILE: MSPM 03-001 Michael W. Rumpf DATE: Dir. of Planning & Zoning FROM: SUBJECT: Boynton Beach Marina REFERENCES: Site Plan Off. John Huntington Police Department CPTED Practitioner ENCLOSURES: I have viewed the above building plans and have the following comments: I. Show placement of traffic signs on site plan. 2. Show direction of traffic flow. TRC Memorandum Page 1 of I ~. Coale, Sherie From: Hallahan, Kevin Sent: Thursday, February 27,20039:29 AM To: Coale, Sherie Cc: Galav, Lusia Subject: 02,Plan.doc Planning Memorandum: Forester / Environmentalist To: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner From: Kevin J. Hallahan, Forester / Environmentalist Subject: Boynton Beach Marina Major Site Plan Modification - I sl Review MSPM 03-001 Date: February 27,2003 Existinl! Trees I. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. 2. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] Irrigation System 3. There is not an irrigation system design included with the landscape plans. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5,A.] kjh File 2/27/2003 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 02-000 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Direc10r, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P E, Senior Engineer DATE: February 28, 2003 RE: Review of COUS 98-008 Conditions of Approval Major Site Plan Modification The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group File No. MSPM 03-001 Per your request 1he Conditions of Approval from COUS 98-008 were reviewed agains1 the above referenced plans and 1 st Review comments Following are comments 1hat we believe should be addressed by the curren1 developer (The Rela1ed Group) during this approval process. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL Comments #1 and #2, COUS 98,008, may be deleted They are being addressed wi1h new comments for MSPM 08,001. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC Add the following commen1s: 1. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of 1his developmenl. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic sludy shall also consider any improvemen1s on Boyn10n Beach Blvd. east of , Federal Highway to the si1e. (j1nbs.s'f}.1 zfrUci"'-ptl1hw,t ~b:"Jowwd..., 2. The applicant shall be required to dedica1e to the City 25 feel of land adjacen110 1he existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to con1rol ingress and egress into the projec1 site and maintenance of exis1 and proposed City utili1ies. ENGINEERING Delete Comments #17, 19, 21, 24, 25, 28, and 30, CO US 98-008. They are either being addressed with new comments for MSPM 08,001 or have been addressed. The following comments (revised for this projact) :,-0.,1 CCUS 93,008 should be addE;d to our previously made comments for MSPM 08-001. 7. ~ ~, Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03,xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modificalion - 1st Review, MSPM 03,001 February 24,2003 Page 2 4. The Ci1y of.Boynton Bach and the ap . ant sh II join11y participa1e i extendi g Boynton Beach Blvd. east from its curr nt poin1 of ter nus as out ined in the Revis Developm nt Agreemen1 a d indica1e.d' on the appr ved plan. DR, Chapter ,Section 8.C' hap1er 6, Arti Ie III, Sec' 12: Chapy{r 6, Article IV, ectio ; Chap1er 6, Articl IV, Se . n 10.3; Chapter 6, Article I ,Section 10.B: Chapter 2, Sec1io .2.0) This comment shal e read in conjunction with ar aph 17.G.6 of lI1e Revised Developmenl Agreement. 5. - 6. <lWll'xt 8. Show proposed public facilities on the site plan and construction and use detail of proposed designs for the proposed Casa Loma Overlook, Casa Loma Blvd., ? "U , ,.. " fa for review. Plans shall include proposed public amenilies such as benches/seating, trash receptacles, bike racks, drinking fountains, lighting, landscaping, etc. 9. 10. UTILITIES Delete Comments #3,10, COUS 98-008. They are either being addressed wi1h new comments for MSPM 08-001 or have been addressed. The following commen1s (revised for this project) from CO US 98,008 should be added to our previously made comments for MSPM 08-001. 1. Note thai 1he addition of multi'slory condominium buildings and townhouses greatly intensifies the use of the site above wha1 was originally an1icipated. This change will result in an additional capital facilities charge, if approved. The developer is responsible for payment of all additional fees. 2. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24, 2003 Page 3 3. All infrastructure improvements necessary for 1his entire site must be completed before the first certificate of occupancy is issued, olher than for docks and fuel pumps constructed simultaneously with related support infras1ructure including access roads, water and sanitary sewer, regardless of bonding or other surely. For this purpose, "infrastructure" shall be defined as po1able water, sani1ary sewer, drainage, and a second paved access road for service and emergency purposes. Cc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e,mail) Peter Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utili1ies H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mai!) Glenda Hall, Main1enance Supervisor, Public Works/Fores1ry & Grounds Division (PW/F&G) Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Was1e Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File J:\SHRDATA\Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Major Mod - Marina - Review of Old Comments.doc ~"'-2.. .,\1(\:/.... . .~"[ .) ~ /, / /v l'/(:)~.~:.,''-' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 03-034 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning DATE: February 28, 2003 FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer RE: Review of COUS 98-008 Conditions of al Major Site Plan Modification The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group File No. MSPM 03-001 Per your request the Conditions of Approval from COUS 98-008 were reviewed against the above referenced plans and 1st Review comments. Following are comments that we believe should be addressed by the current developer (The Related Group) during this approval process. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL Comments #1 and #2, COUS 98-008, may be deleted. They are being addressed with new comments for MSPM 08-001. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC Add the following comments: 1. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications. or lane additions are necessary as a result of this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. 2. The applicant shall be required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. ENGINEERING Delete Comments #17,19,21,24,25,28, and 30, COUS 98-008. They are either being addressed with new comments for MSPM 08-001 or have been addressed. The following comments (revised for this project) from COUS 98-008 should be added to our previously made comments for MSPM 08-001. , Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-034 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Review of COUS 98-008 Conditions of Approval February 28, 2003 Page 2 3 P' 'i';!i!IIAtl:>c"~;:'i'\_:A;'..;;;l;.it,.;:l;1ll!1'___~'Iii.__.lIlilJ^'''t.I&'V . ,a'i!".:l,J<li!__l,!t,,,:'""'..,"II"_____~""~_,..IIli_,~, " 4. The City of Boynton Beach and the applicant shall jointly participate in extending Boynton Beach Blvd. east from its current point of terminus as outlined in the Revised Development Agreement and indicated on the approved plan. (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 8.C; Chapter 6, Article III, Section 12; Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10; Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.3; Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.B; Chapter 2, Section 11.2.D) This comment shall be read in conjunction with Paragraph 17.G.6 of the Revised Development Agreement. 5. 6. 7. 8. Show proposed public facilities on the site plan and construction and use detail of proposed designs for the proposed Casa Loma Overlook, Casa Loma Blvd., and the public courtyard for review. Plans shall include proposed public amenities such as benches/seating, trash receptacles, bike racks, drinking fountains, lighting, landscaping, etc. 9. Regarding proposed construction of Casa Loma Blvd., NE 6th St., and the private roadway 1he applicant should be aware that roadways constructed in muck or peat shall be constructed in conformance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 10.E. 10. Sn~""J!.~~~::=r~~-" ~",,";Wlt:r.ill_1!;Il:."""'1j;"'^ " "'~ '-<Plan: " I,/,mIII_""t_!!lJyl!l!lV\.l1ll:lS!li!<l9!l_IIllJ\lB"ll'N..I....IiM~JiiIilllllll.llAW.,qJ,lti!ii,~, ,^, UTILITIES Delete Comments #3-10, CO US 98-008. They are either being addressed with new comments for MSPM 08-001 or have been addressed. The following comments (revised for this project) from COUS 98-008 should be added to our previously made comments for MSPM 08-001. , Department of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-034 Re: The Residences at Marina Village, Review of COUS 98-008 Conditions of Approval February 28, 2003 Page 3 1. Note that the addition of multi-story condominium buildings and townhouses greatly intensifies the use of the site above what was originally anticipated. This change will result in an additional capi1al facilities charge, if approved. The developer is responsible for payment of all additional fees. 2. All infrastructure improvements necessary for this entire site must be completed before the first certificate of occupancy is issued, other than for docks and fuel pumps constructed simultaneously with related support infrastructure including access roads, water and sanitary sewer, regardless of bonding or other surety. For this purpose, "infrastructure" shall be defined as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and a second paved access road for service and emergency purposes. LUck Cc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division (PW/F&G) Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineering\Kribs\Residences at Marina Village (Marina) Rev. of COUS 98-008 Condo of Appr..doc 2nd , , REVIEW COMMENTS - Responses from The Related Group Major Site Plan Moditication (Responses in "Bold") Project name' Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-00 I Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a March 18. 2003 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Conunents: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. Comment is noted. 2. Staffrecommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. All dumpster pick-up locations shown on Sheet A-2. Details at each location shown on Sheet A-3. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Show traffic control devices within the east turn,around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). Traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one way arrow signs in the inner circle have been added to the plans. Pavement directional arrows are shown within the drive aisles along Casa Lorna. 4. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. The plans reflect the curbing around the circle painted yellow and "no parking-file lane" signs every fifty (50) feet around circle. 5. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast corner of this same intersection. Stop signs and 24-inch stop bars have been added at the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and East Marina Drive. 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Gronp 03/24/03 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 6. Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop,off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarifY traffic movement(s ), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intcrsection) to two,way traffic (north and west of intersection). Resolved in first T.R.e. meeting with 35' radius and road taper. 7. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. The traffic study for Marina Village was recently completed by Pinder Trontman and forwarded to the City and PBC. PBC has notified us that the "...project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Bcach County." 8. Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be required to dedicate to the City 25 feet ofland adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. A) Applicant formally petitions the City to abandon its portion of NE 6th Street so this roadway will become a privatcly owned and maintained road. B) In the alternative, if the adjacent property owners decide not to accept the abandoned portion of NE 6th Street, applicant will dedicate to the City 25' of its property to create a full public road R.O.W. UTILITIES Comments: 9. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public Page 2 of 9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT rights,of,way. All utility easements are shown on the engineering site plan and landscape plans. Proposed tree locations have been adjusted to not intcrfere with underground utility lines. 10. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (SchejJlera Arboricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of,way. A) Ficus microcarpa "Dwarf Green Island," a non,invasive low growing scrub, has been deleted from the plant list and plans. B) Scheffiera Arboricola "trinette" is not a tree. This is a Dwarf ornamcnta1 scrub which in not invasive and is used throughout the landscape industry in sonth Florida. We would propose to use this plant. C) Florida Royal palms are proposed for this project. They are a native to sonth Florida. D) The cnrrent architectural site plan has been used to prepare the landscape plan. All property lines are correct. 11. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.rn. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by msurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26,16(b )). In addition, the LDR. Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). A) All existing and proposed fire hydrants are depicted on the schematic engineering water and sewer plans. B) No fire hydrants will be required on the west property line since all buildings are fully sprinkled and accessible from public streets. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 12. Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the photometrics plan does not agree with the site plan and landscape plan). Site lighting, site and landscapc plans are all coordinated. 13. Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. Correct City landscaoine: at Ocean Blvd. is shown in site and Page 3 of 9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT landscape plans. Note regarding protection of City landscaping added to Sheet A-I and Sheet L-2. 14. Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. Engineer's Certification is on Sheet C-3 of the Engineering plans. 15. The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #E1 50,0129079, 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. Please see attached letter to the various agencies regarding drainage. Once the permitting approach is defined, calculations will be snbmitted for your review. 16. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Comment is noted. 17. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. Written and graphic scales have been added to all sheets. 18. Provide a cross-section of the east tum,around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. A cross-section of the east tnrn-around has been added to Sheet C- 4. 19. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2,12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. Applicant is filing a reqnest for variance to allow for the private roads within Marina Village to be constructed pursuant to the plans submitted, i.e., 24' of driving surface from inside face of curb to inside face of curb. 20. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. Page 4 of 9 2nd REVIEW r:OMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment is noted. 21. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. Spelling has been corrected. 22. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the Intracoastal Waterway. We agree to comply with this comment. FIRE Comments: 23. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29,2.3.2. Comment noted. 24. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3,5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO T180, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division 11, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide, or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of its intended use. Comment is noted. 25. City Ordinance Section 9,6, 3. /7,11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are Page 5 of 9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. Comments are noted. 26. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 Comment is noted. 27. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 Comment is noted. 28. Class 1, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.4.2. Comment noted. POLICE Comments: BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 29. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(N), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. Comment is noted. 30. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. Comment is noted. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: Page 6 of 9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 31. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter I, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi,family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units@ $ 771 each = 9,252 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each ~ 221,728 Total = $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. Applicant agrees to pay the parks and Recreation Impact Fees for the residential mix of units approved by the City for Marina Village. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Trees 32. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. The tree survey is attached. 33. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantifY the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] To the exteut possible, existing on-site trees will be relocated to available site areas. A tree management plan will be prepared prior to any request for removal or relocation of any trees. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 34. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land Use Amendment to the MX,C designation that allows the density proposed. Comment is noted. 35. Residential single-family attached units (Townhouses) are not permitted in the MU,H district. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F. - Table 6F-l). The applicant has requested a Code review to add Townhomes to the list of permitted uses. Site Plan approval is contingent upon the approval of this amendment to the LDR's. Page 7 of9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comment is noted. 36. All utility, storm sewer and access easements in conflict with the proposed building must be abandoned and relocated prior to issuance of a building permit for this phase of the project. Comment is noted. 37. The required build,to setback line on Ocean A venue is 10 feet if the intent is to widen the sidewalk. The site plan indicates a 12 foot setback in some areas. Revise the plan to 10 feet for the center portion of the building. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6, F) Center nortion revised to 10' setback. 38. Developer is required to establish a property owners association for the project. A) If it becomes apparent that a POA between the property owners would offer some benefit to the area for parking and garbage disposal issues, and if the other property owners are willing to form a POA with the applicant, then the applicant would be glad to study a possible POA fnrther. B) The City has notified all property owners that they must provide for their own parking and garage disposal. Applicant will provide for the parking and garbagc disposal for its own project, Marina Village. 39. The information provided under "Project Data" on the site plan does not correspond to the information provided on the application, particularly the pervious/impervious area calculations. Please review and revise. Project data and site plan application information have been coordinated. 40. Place a note on sheet A,2 that charter, drift fishing or sightseeing boats are not permitted to operate out of the 38 dock spaces provided on site. Note added to Sheet A-2. 41. Site plan approval is contingent upon approval of the height exception. (Ch.2 SecA.F.) Comment is noted. 42. Submit color elevation drawings for all sides of all buildings prior to the CRA Board meeting. Color elevations will be orovided. 43. Place a note on Sheet A,2 that reads: All rooftop equipment must be screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. (Ch .9. Sec. 11) Note added to Sheet A-2. 44. Location for monument signs are shown on the site plan. Provide a detail for these signs showing dimensions, material, lettering and colors. Any signage not shown on the plans will require separate approval from the CRA and City Commission. A seoarate annrova1 will be requested for sign age. 45. The proposed plan docs not meet the parking reqUIrements as provided in LDR's Chapter 2, Sec. 11. Applicant has requested to use the "fee in lieu of' orovision in Ch. 2, Sec. II H, to compensate for the 70 space deficit. Page 8 of 9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group 03/24/03 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Site plan approval is contingent upon CRA and City Commission approval of this project. A total of $70,000.00 would be required to be paid prior to issuance of a building permit. Comment noted. 46. The landscape code Chapter 7.5 requires that 50% of 1ill.landscape material provided be native. Rcvise note and calculations on Sheet L-2 accordingly. The current landscape plan includes more than 50% native trees and Palms. Shrub and Ground Cover is under 50% based on lack of availabilitv of suitable native plant variety. 47. Tree trunks shall be a minimum four-inch caliper with seven (7) feet of vertical clearance for visibility. (Ch .2. Sec. 6, F.8.a. (2). Revise note on Landscape Plan sheets. The Notes on the Plant Specifications have been revised.. 48. Revise sheet L-I and L-4 to reflect the correct table for the parking garage (see Sheet A-2) The parking garage tables have been removed from the landscape plans. 49. Landscape Plan Sheet L-4 indicates 8 Medjool Date Palms (PD) on the plan but lists only 2. Revise the plant list. The auantities have been corrected. 50. Landscape Plan Sheet L-4 indicates 2 Alexander Palms (PE,2) on the plan but lists 5. Revise the plan accordingly. The auantities have been corrected. 51. Elevations and floor plans for the 2-story commercial building and restaurant will require separate CRA and City Commission approval. Comment is noted. 52. All trees shall be a minimum of 12 feet in height with a minimum caliper of 3 inches. (Ch.7.5, Art. II, Sec.5.C.2). The minimum tree heights, Note and Specifications have been chanl1:ed. 53. Explain the changes in the Project Data for Paved Vehicular Use Area, Sidewalks, Pools and Pool Decks, Pervious Area and Water Area. The nrevious submittal (1" Review Comments) was incorrect. J:\THE RELATED GROUP\PROPERTY FOLDERS\BOYNTON BEACH MARINA\2nd Review StaffComments\2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group.doc Page 9 of9 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification &triA )J /4'Sff It- Project name: Bo ton Beach Marina File number: M 03-001 :2"- Reference: review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a MarchJ-l( 2003 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT , PUBLIC WORKS - General , I Comments: rY Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. .K Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: X Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). A Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "'no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 1 Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast corner of this same intersection. ~ Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarifY traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). j Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. 8. Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment. the applicant shall be required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. UTILITIES Comments: All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. * 10. Thp. T ~nrlC',?~@ l?1af1. fe:Rg~t'i thp 1I<::p. nfnri'en Lluud {F;LU.) ./.'Y{;l-una,pa) urhi....h m;n nAt 1-.~ 13sFHHFted. U-s€ QfTr-i~4'tTp (5"'~<<fjJ(rfl.l~s6.'-ief)!>3) and Fforida Reyal Paltru: tr88~/fhr:p\?i' ii ,:ri'i\Ollr"ged. Th.~ LaflBSeap... PIau also r~fk,e;t3 u 'Plup""dJ lil~" that a.ae3 flat 1lg.lG6 'H;{h pTPvif\ll<;: ~rc;p.ptahle rg~Qv:ElJ l~ellt-vf-vydy. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). 1,1 add;t;vH, th" LDR, Chi1pkl 6, Anidt: rv, St:\,;LiuH 16 l(.'!uires that all poiI1t~ 6ft each b\lilelil'lg '",ill Be '::ithil'l 200 feet 9f 111 py;ct;ng 9r pr8Jl63ea fi,c l'ydl1l"t (as the RQi'e grags, 1'151 a;:, Llu;; llu~1;; Oil;;;:'). rt..a;:,~ dI;;1l1uu;:.llal"" tllGlt Lll\..< pIau LUCcts- tbl~ rrmclit;on hy ~H9~..,qRg all fiyaraHt3 (b6th fhoposcd auJ ~Ai.:lting). ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the hotometrics Ian does not a ee with the site Ian and landsca elan). 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ~ Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of ex filtration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #EI 50-0129079- 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. 16. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. )c( Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. 1. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lane ~jf:. including the parking garage entryways (north and east)} VfCY~( previollc;:ly ~ppTnvp.n with thp rnrrp....t nridt'h bnpC' :l:R9 faaa.'::a-ys, ";lith fi ft1ir amo1mt Of mnrl...- betu,,,,,,,.,., City it<:1ff 1:R.Q. t.H~ a.s','slapers 18 ad",,,!ualdy ddillGSS ak pre',qgl:lsl) applvv~d, VI ~[lL1" ivadwd)' i~ LO be ahandvl1l:id, ploviae ~ulr1p.nce of eeflscflt Elf aajaeent I'rElj'lefly S':.'Rers. 20. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at. the Intracoastal Waterway. 'theie ~hW -j,e. pR.v,ded O:+~ -+.vo--e. ~l . FIRE Comments: Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29-2.3.2. 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 4 . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT / B ! 24. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction. Alteration. and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO Tl80, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division 11, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide, or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. I 3 ~ity Ordinance Section 9-6, 3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are ( ~ in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. d High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each ( ^ floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 o High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, L - (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 ~ Class 1, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Comments: BUILDING DIVISION 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 5 DEPARTMENTS Comments: r;-, , 29.) At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all J bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is beinl! used. ~ At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the . - -) proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: ,.. "0 The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this :./ development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each = 9,252 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each = 221,728 Total = $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: \~ ~ The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. "33\ The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify ~ the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: INCLUDE REJECT 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 6 DEPARTMENTS Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land Use Amendment to the MX,C desi ation that allows the densi ro osed. Residential single-family attached units (Townhouses) are not permitted in the MU-H district. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F. - Table 6F-I). The applicant has requested a Code review to add Townhomes to the list of permitted uses. Site Plan approval is contingent upon the approval of this amendment to the LDR's. All utility, storm sewer and access easements in conflict with the proposed building must be abandoned and relocated prior to issuance of a building ermit for this hase of the ro' ecl. The required build-to setback line on Ocean A venue is 10 feet if the intent is to widen the sidewalk. The site plan indicates a 12 foot setback in some areas. Revise the plan to 10 feet for the center portion of the building. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F) Developer is required to establish a property owners association for the ro.ecl. The information provided under "Project Data" on the site plan does not correspond to the information provided on the application, particularly the ervious/im ervious area calculations. Please review and revise. Place a note on sheet A,2 that charter; drift fishing or sightseeing boats are not ermitted to 0 erate out of the 38 dock s aces rovided on site. Site plan approval is contingent upon approval of the height exception. (Ch.2 SecA.F. Submit color elevation drawings for all sides of all buildings prior to the CRA Board meetin . Place a note on Sheet A-2 that reads: All rooftop equipment must be screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. Ch .9. Sec. II) L . these sigRs skev,if1.~ d~u~Gll.:t~vu5, nu~t(.l~Al, ktt(.J.~llg 009. ~.....1I"\r5 .AtJj signage wd .1 " r'"~ will require separate approval from the CRA and Ci Commission. The proposed plan does not meet the parking requirements as provided in LDR's Chapter 2, Sec. 11. Applicant has requested to use the "fee in lieu of' provision in Ch. 2, Sec. 11 H, to compensate for the 70 space deficit. Site Pla~D~val is contingent upon eRA and City Commission approval of this . A total of $70,000.00 would be required to be paid prior to issuance of a buildin ermil. The landscape code Chapter 7.5 requires that 50% of all landscape material rovided be native. Revise note and calculations on Sheet L,2 accordin I Tree trunks shall be a minimum four,inch caliper with seven (7) feet of vertical clearance for visibility. (Ch .2. Sec. 6, F.8.a. (2). Revise note on Landsca e Plan sheets. Revise sheet L-l and L-4 to reflect the correct table for the parking garage (see Sheet A,2 Landscape Plan Sheet L-4 indicates 8 Medjool Date Palms (PD) on the plan but lists onI 2. Revise the lant list. Landscape Plan Sheet L-4 indicates 2 Alexander Palms (PE-2) on the plan but lists 5. Revise the Ian accordin I . INCLUDE REJECT No ${q 11 2f?rvawz. i!. 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Elevations and floor plans for the 2-story commercial building and restaurant will re uire se arate CRA and Cit Commission a roval. All trees shall be a minimum of 12 feet in height with a minimum caliper of 3 inches. Ch.7.5, Art. II, Sec.5.C.2 Explain the changes in the Project Data for Paved Vehicular Use Area, Sidewalks, Pools and Pool Decks, Pervious Area and Water Area. MWR/sc 1 J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\BLANKS FORMS FOLDER\lST REVIEW COMMENTS.DOC Mt: OffibiMJ.. , .-- 7 ;)4. AdJtQ.Y) a.J.lfiC!OldJJ--tM If) "fk "'/M.e /2; 2<!t~ ~~ 4M1rPd ~~c&hc..,.;~~1uJ- ~\'-'2. " (I ) 'c\ ~ 1/ )-~---~-,,- I J ().< ' DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 03-057 TO: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner, Department of Development/Planning & Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: March 26, 2003 RE: Review Comments Major Site Plan Modification - 3rd Review The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group File No. MSPM 03-001 Based on our TRC meeting of March 25, 2003 please revise the following 2nd Review Comments: UTILITIES 9. No change. 10. Please relocate the Florida Royal Palms proposed in the utility easements to prevent the possibility of damage to subsurface structures. 11. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstra1ing the City Code requirement of 1,5000 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). ENGINEERING 19. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feel (2-12 fool lanes) paved width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east), with the exception of (East) Marina Drive. This segment of roadway may consist of 2 - 11 foot lanes (22 feet paved width). Width is measured from edge to edge of pavement and shall not include any portion of adjacent curb and gutler. If you have any questions or need additional informa1ion please feel free to give me at call at x6482. LUck Cc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) H. David Kelley, Jr., PE/ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File S:\Engineeting\Kribs\Residences@MarinerVillage_3rd Review Comments.doc: , m'''' 0" ....I,F.,~[~(..'. III _.. I ...... J: o - -.-;;: 0 J.... _.MM' '_" V' 'VrON e" . o DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 03-XXX TO: Lusia Galav, Principal Planner, Department of Development/Planning & Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer DATE: March 26, 2003 Ol2.ArT RE: Review Comments Major Site Plan Modification - 3rd Review The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group File No. MSPM 03-001 '3/ZfI:/03 Based on our TRC meeting of thiSodate please revise the following 2nd Review Comments: march 25,2tJ03 UTILITIES 9. No change. 1 O. The-l:andscape:pla[lJeflects.th~Se-<lf..Green:lsland~F-lcu&MiGorcarpa)..Wl11Cllwi1l'not-be'Qermitted. Please relocate the Florida Royal Palms proposed in the utility easements to prevent the possibility of damage to subsurface structures. 11. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,5000 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). ENGINEERING 19. All roadways, shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) paved width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east), with the exception of (East) Marina Drive. This segment of roadway may consist of 2 - 11 foot lanes (22 feet paved width). Width is measured from edge to edge of pavement and shall not include any portion of adjacent curb and gutter. If you have any questions or need additional information please feel free to give me at call at x6482. Cc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail) H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File J:\SHRDATA\Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Major Mod - Marina - Related Group-3rd Review Comment Revisions.doc < . . . 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-001 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a March 18. 2003 Planning and Zonin De artment date stam markin . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-( l~z'31 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be ---J supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners re ardin shared use of centralized facilities. (:3/Z~ <3 PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 4. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 5. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 6. Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of ",---j"3/Z51 ~ Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings win need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing \'Zf5/(T changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result f this develo men!. The stud shall include the im act of traffic accessin , @ , , . . 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Ocean A venue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. @ Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be I _ required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing N~ ( :S~Z80 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. UTILITIES Comments: 9. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article 1, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 10. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) which will not be permitted. Use-of-Trinette,(&heffiera-Arborieola)-and Florida-Royal-Palms-treesl&hrubs..is..diSC{)uraged" The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of-way. ~l~ .to tMlcale... IYIOVtnt\ (O'la.I~ off' 0( '5A . 11. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). In addition, the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 12. Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the ~123IC53 ohotometrics nlan does not alrree with the site nlan and landscaoe olan). ( "--.) . . . . . 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 13. Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. 14. Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 15. The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #EI 50-012907~ 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. 16. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. \ (ZJ5( '3 17. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. 18. Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. 19. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site wa previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. 20. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction . L acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in( accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. 22. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the' Intracoastal Waterway. 1hL~ <>I'tCllI b<.- pro\llck?t CLt..j-hL hM<:- 6f m.mr.,,- 21. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. FIRE Comments: 23. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29-2.3.2. 'i . .' 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 01l-t" Maior Site Plan Modification 5('S IO~ Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-001 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a MaiO[ Site Plan Modification with a March 18. 2003 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 4. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate uno parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 5. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 6. Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). 7. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing - . . i 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 031l9/03 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 13. Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. 14. Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified In LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 15. The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Pennit #EI 50-0129079- 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. 16. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 17. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. 18. Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. 19. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. 20. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. 21. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. 22. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the Intracoastal Waterway. FIRE Comments: 23. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be / provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29-2.3.2. .. . . y' 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 24. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevelllion Code, Section 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constn,ction. Alteration. and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. / LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO T 180, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division ll, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling. Testing and Reporting Guide. or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. 25. City Ordinance Section 9-6, 3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in / excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. 26. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A ~ sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 27. High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe ~ system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevelllion Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 28. Class 1, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFP A 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby V' Power Systems. shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevelllion Code, (2000) Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Comments: BUILDING DIVISION 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 5 ~ ~ ) )-03 3'0' . . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 29. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or Bl is bein" used. 30. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 31. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi,family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each ~ 9,252 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each ~ 221,728 Total ~ $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. ~ FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST ) '--- ------ Comments: Trees V 32. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. 33. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be ~ ,/ preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: " 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification /. " I' , y ;.~-;- 0/..:.: " '':':J / I {( /" (~,,). ,..j Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03,001 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a March 18. 2003 Planning and Z 0 d ki onIng enartment ate stamn mar n". DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742, ",,-, 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent tolin the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 4. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 5. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter " and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 6. Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop,off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s ), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two,way traffic (north and west of intersection). 7. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of ~ this development. The studv shall include the impact of traffic accessing " \. ," 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffi c study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. S. Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. UTILITIES Comments: 9. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may ~ interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section IS. 1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 10. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) \ which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (Schefflera Arboricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of-way. 11. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, '\. Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26,16(b)). In addition, the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 12. Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the photometrics plan does not agree with the site plan and landscape plan). ~ 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification L" ~/- ole: 4<<./1 I'~~. ' ~ J/ pit Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03,001 Reference: 2nd review lans identified as a Ma" or Site Plan Modification with a March 18 Zoninl! Deoartment date stamo markinl!. 2003 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General I I Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners rel!ardinl! shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. Show traffic control devices within the east turn,around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 4. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking,fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 5. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 6. Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarifY traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). 7. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of this develoomenl. The study shall include the imoact of traffic accessinl! . 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I 24. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3,5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction. Alteration. and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO Tl80, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge COllstn/ctioll (2000) Division ll, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide. or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. 25. City Ordinance Section 9,6, 3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. 26. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 27. High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 28. Class 1, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFP A 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Comments: BUILDING DIVISION - 2nd REVIEW COMMENTS 03/19/03 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: 29. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the / Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Reauirements #7 (A or B) is being used. 30. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the V proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 31. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each = 9,252 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each = 221,728 Total = $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Trees 32. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. 33. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. (Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article 11 Sec. 7.C.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: ~hJ ~~~~ rt REVIEW COMMENT~ 2Vl'.l Maior Site Plan Modification Project name: ~ton Beach Marina File number:~PM 03-001 J.ia.ech I!=;/ Reference: 1- review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Fe19nlUfV 5. 2003 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General ...comments: l Y Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742, 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. ( y 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick,up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic C'}"'ments: On the site and civil plans, show and identifY all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 for striping details. k The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LDR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. ( '~\ Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including J pavement arrows and one,way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive L, (Casa Loma). ( Y Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no ~ parking,fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. iJ Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT X Extend the stop bar at the east leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. (westbound traffic is one-way only at this location. ( ~ Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two,way traffic (north and west of /' intersection). IX Post "No Parking" for both East and West Marina Drive (both sides of I roads). )<}. Il Provide directional pavement arrows throughout. I 1. All pavement return radii shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The following I \ intersections do not meet this criteria: a) SE comer of Marina Dr. (NE 6th Street) and Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) @ 30 feet. b) NW comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @15 feet. c) NE comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 10 feet. d) SW comer of Marina Dr. (northward) and Boynton Beach Blvd. Extension (NW 2'" Ave.) @ 15 feet. LX Public parking spaces may not be counted towards required parking. '~. The two story commercial building and the adjacent restaurant should have an additional two handicap parking spaces to provide the minimum required based on the "provided" parking (not to include the two next to Two George's Restaurant). K Provide cross,sections and details for the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension. This section of roadway shall be constructed in conjunction with other site -- improvements. ( j Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Bovnton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 3 DEPARTMENTS -=- improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. ~7. nless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be equired to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. UTILITIES Comments: "" ( 18.') All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well J as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public ~ rights,of-way. ~ The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (SchejJlera Arhoricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of,way. I ~. Due tot he depth 0 f the proposed sanitary collection trunk sewer re-route along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shall be required to be a minimum of 35-feet wide. I ~. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26- 12). ( ~Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, ~ Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II. Section 26-16(b)). In addition. the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). V. CODE, Article II, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee 1\ INCLUDE REJECT 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined I based upon final meter size, or expected demand. r Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. ~5. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (and wider where noted above). The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Article II, Section 26-33(a). 2 Again. the proposed re,routing of the sanitary trunk sewer (approximately I 660 LF) wi\l replace some 378 LF currently routed in an existing utility easement routed through proposed Buildings No. 1 & 2 as well as the swimming pool area. First, the re,route to the east then north (on East Marina Way) and back to the master lift station is questionable at best as this puts a major transmission trunk into brackish soil conditions which include some 8 to 17 feet of unsuitable soil composition. This would require cradle and pile to construct throughout its length to ensure the relocated system will work. f 2 You are advised that the current (permitted) relocated trunk tracks westward I to the west property line, then northward along the west property line to the NW 2" Avenue right-of-way and reconnects with another major trunk system at a point near the link about to enter the master lift station. In addition, the soil conditions along the current permitted route are acceptable for this task. ~ The proposed re-route of the sanitary trunk sewer can only achieve a longitudinal slope of 0.08%, which is below the acceptable minimum. The additional calculations called for last June 2002, and submitted by the design engineer, reflected that capacity may be available, but velocity was not. In order to overcome the Utilities Department concerns, the re-routed sanitary trunk system should increase to a 30,inch diameter in order to allow for the slow moving capacity in the re,route segments. ~. While PVC material may be allowed on the City's water system on this particular project; poly, lined DIP is preferred. All sanitary lines shall be poly-lined DIP on either the 24,inch or 3~-inch trunk line segment; PVC will be acceptable on the 8-inch collection segment. / , The proposed lO-inch water main connection from NW 2" A venue to the line located in Marina Drive (currently known as Casa Loma Boulevard) wi\l require a 20,foot horizontal separation along East Marina Drive, due to the depth of the sanitary trunk sewer. (Refer to Comments noted above.) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ~ This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. ~. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with CODE, Article II, Section 26,15. 3 . The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.0. requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. In addition, the LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.P. requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 3f Utility construction details as shown on Civil Engineering (CE) sheets C,6 thru C,g will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual; and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. 3Y. Any utilities placed/remaining under the landscaped island within the West Marina Drive right,of,way shall require a hold,harmless agreement for future utility maintenance. ~. There is some conflict between the General Notes and Water & Sewer Separation Notes on Sheet C2. The minimum required horizontal separation between water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc. is ten (10) feet. There is no exception for sewer lines. Please correct, and as appropriate, consolidate. ~. Note that the addition of multi-story condominium buildings and townhouses greatly intensifies the use of the site above what was originally anticipated. This change will result in an additional capital facilities charge, if approved. The developer is responsible for payment of all additional fees. ~ All infrastructure improvements necessary for this entire site must be completed before the first certificate of occupancy is issued, other than for docks and fuel pumps constructed simultaneously with related support infrastructure including access roads, water and sanitary sewer, regardless of bonding or other surety. For this purpose, "infrastructure" shall be defined as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and a second paved access road for service and emergency purposes. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: ~. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencIes such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. ~ All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. ~. Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the photometrics plan does not agree with the site plan and landscape plan). A'f Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans, using 3 5 feet 0 n public rights,of,way (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A 10 foot sight triangle is allowable at the parking garage ingress/egress point. There appears to be conflicts between landscaping and lines of sight at each of the intersections with sight triangles depicted. Please correct. i Indicate, by note on the landscape plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a \evel between 2.5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). *. The City of Boynton Beach has existing irrigation, hardscaping, and plant material along Ocean Avenue. Any damage as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. Q Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. 41. Provide details for the proposed paver systems showing compliance with the LDR, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.8.d.(2). I 4'Q. Review proposed landscaping, particularly along the center median at the 1\ I ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT intersection of Marina Dr. and East Ocean Ave., for possible conflicts with trucks and street maintenance equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.) i Per the LDR, Chapter 7 .5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. use of Ficus species shall not be permitted. i Be consistent with use of scale(s). The overall site plan uses an engineering scale with the remaining landscaping plans utilizing an architectural scale. Additionally the scale noted on Sheets L-4 and L-5 is incorrect. At a minimum, the LDR requires the landscape plan (in this case the overall site planting plan) scale shall match that of the site plan which you have done (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.I). However for the detailed drawings please ~. use an engineering scale at an appropriate scale, say a 20 scale. ~ Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified in 0\ LDR. Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. ~ The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #EI 50-0129079- 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. Q Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. ~. Structures #2 and #5 are incorrectly identified as Manholes, they should be called out as Inlets. ~. VerifY storm sewer diameter between Manholes #10 and #11, and #1 and the existing manhole at the west end of Marina Dr. They are called out as 24 inches, with 30 inch HDPE used upstream of this site and 36 inch storm sewer used downstream. sX. Runoff from roads, parking lots, and other impervious areas must be routed through percolation areas prior to discharge (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, , Section 5.l.d). i{. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units. 8 Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. @ Provide a cross-section of the east turn,around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. I ~9) All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2,12 foot lanes) in width. 1 ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. h The sidewalks on either side of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) shall be widened to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act both as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. ~: An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be permitted. Too much roadway flooding is possible, with settlement around the inlets, leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. ~ Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit ~ application. 0) Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. \4. Will the project be constructed in stages? If yes please provide a staging ~ plan. "",' 65. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access V and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the Intracoastal Waterway. FIRE Comments: ~. The water and sewer plan (C,5) is inadequate. Hydrants are not clearly shown and the dock standpipe system with the Fire Department Connection (FDC) is not shown. Show location of all the FDC's for all buildings with fire sprinkler protection. IX The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention. II This ordinance adopts NFPA I, Fire Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000 edition. (These codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire Prevention Code). V Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants In 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT commercial applications shall be no more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to mains no less than six (6) inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 A' psi, a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm is required. ( 69. \ Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be ~ provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, a nd in service prior to construction work p er the Florida Fire Prevention Code, """. (2000) Section 29,2.3.2. 70. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be J maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3,5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constmction, Alteration. and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO Tl80, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Constmction (2000) Division 11, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide. or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. f/'\ 71. ) City Ordinance Section 9-6, 3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire I....J sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or an buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) An buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are ~ in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. 72. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, "--/ supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 .5 High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, /"'.. (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 '/' "\ V Class I, Type 60, standby p ower in accordance with NFPA 70, National Electrical Code, and NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Svstems. shan be orovided. Florida Fire Prevention Code. (2000) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Ctmments: 1Xs. / Show placement of traffic signs on the site plan. .~ Show direction of traffic flow. \. BUILDING DIVISION Cpmments: f\ / Vi7. Sheet A-2. Parking Breakdown Table. The calculations for the required handicap accessible parking spaces in the garage are based on a total \ number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. The plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces. ClarifY on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. 3 78. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. ~ As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found ~ on Sheets A,9 thru A,12. 80.} At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the / proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION ents: \ I ~~, plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi,family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities imnact Fee as follows: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 11 ~ \W' DEPARTMENTS 12 Single Family Attached Units@ $ 771 each = 9,252 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each = 221.728 Total = $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: Trees The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] Irril!ation System There is not an irrigation system design included with the landscape plans. Please provide one. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec.5,A.] PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: The traffic study must meet the requirements of Palm Beach County Traffic En ineerin rior to issuance of a buildin ermil. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land Use Amendment to the MX-C desi ation that allows the densi ro osed. Residential single-family attached units (Townhouses) are not permitted in the MU-H district. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F. - Table 6F,I). R@Il'lQ"g tAgH! H-QHl the a Code review.~ c ?'dd To"","'u,pJ -Ie. Itu I,~tf- t,,~ IUJ' All utility, storm sewer and access easements in conflict with the proposed building must be abandoned and relocated prior to issuance of a building ermit for this hase of the ro' ecl. The required build-to setback line on Ocean Avenue is 10 feet if the If,!tent is to widen the sidew Ik The site Plan.iudicatest 12 t setback;,''Re~e? , c<1 f'#.r pr.,..J1t.... "f-IAJ.. 75l)/t I ~. the Ian to 10 feet t . I. ( h.2, ec. , Developer is required to establish a property owners association for the ro'ecl. Provide the "net buildable" land area calculation under Project Data on the INCLUDE REJECT t/'<fi[A h= S,k (I"" "". fUrk-dZ r'",d~'" C't i1rJ- 8r 'f;.0 ?>n<i ""J f-o 'Iu. L-Dr:~ . 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 12 DEPARTMENTS Site Plan Sheet A-2. (Ch. 4) INCLUDE REJECT / ! 2.f (I I uM,..:h So";',..,,,,,,,, /1J>.f-J/Jitj; ,?/21'/a3 slips being provided than ]'( tluce ;: ng Ilflif -:;,," n v pp the pIer. (lej,<.) (c11J1< fII ~ SA-iP d '" ?J..?r~'" 1\ ,t Pfov~d~ a ddail fuJ. ull sigHage 13FEI]38Sea fer tfle pI~CGt. The J.uuutlineRt aign she.,T!. if!. the 1~8rtk..est e Elmer aftRe aile 111tlJt be 10 feet back flUlII1:he e. Plea .site an. (Ch. 21) The garage entrances appear to be 20 feet in width. Engineering standards re uire a minimum of 24 feet. Revise lans accordin I . How do residents in Building 3 access the pool and fitness center amenities? Please ex lain and rovide a note on the lans. ,,' ,t; The proposed plan does not meet the parking requirements fur twn alia Iilr€e qeoroom f.e€ideHtial HLit.3. 1\'\"6 and t.flice SeMSQIR units f@GJ.11ire 1'.',19 !r~r'f>S Wr "nit (0, 2, Spc 1:~ ~~~~~e ~e rG>I~d F"rlrinp; or:-Gempensate-fur the 129 I'.FkiHg .I"G. aeficit by U.,: [J 'J..~ fee in lieu of' provision in C . 2, Sec. 11 H r.eq'Il?!t ~ v~ri~n('f' or rf"qllf~d ~ sad...... 1l..vil;W tv allvn 1.$ spaces .......~.# .,k, CU", $.kr'/h'1' Label the location of all surface parking spaces included for this project on the Site Plan Sheet A-2. According to the table on Sheet A-2, parking spaces in the garage total 665 not 664 as shown. Please revise accordin I . On the parking layouts for each floor 0 f the garage, Sheet A,22, provide dimensions and a s ace count for each floor. Provide a typical parking space detail for regular and handicap spaces. j,v" Provide traffic control markings (stop signs/stop bars) at both entrances to the arkin ara e. Who will construct improvements on Boynton Beach Boulevard? These improvements are the responsibility of the developer to accommodate access to Building No. I Lobby and parking garage? Provide details regarding construction plans and time frame prior to issuance of a building ermil. ~uffl1d r,+t<: a~ dv)<~n "" '!u..JU.t fl",-,- t..tdA. C~ det.J .t.... Yw",,- S,,'Tw SA",-..,,:" O{''''''~ ~ 1-<:'"Y'''1 ~ <"(1M! Am1 SI1'''''I'' ,oat ChdWn C4 0!fl"'~1 klti r.ef,)'~ ..u}2rcU-e ' ?VPT1/JhJ -/.0" _ lL. I (IlA 2..,1 t1J-. {' ~JNlJ ...,,;0:; 0 '/0 " ,,?PMi' 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/18/03 13 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Landscape Plan indicates the use of the ficus species. Ficus is not permitted. (Ch 7.5, Art. II, Sec. 5.C.). Revise lans accordin I . Landscape Plan Sheet L-4 shows 262 Schefflera (SU) on the site plan but lists 294. Please correct. Also, review the use of the Schefflera species that I a ears on the Palm Beach Coun list of Prohibited Trees. Landscape Plan Sheet L-5 indicates 23 Green Maypan Coconut (CN) of the Ian but lists 27. Revise lans accordin I . Landscape Plan Sheet L,5 indicates 200 Philodendron Selloum (PS) on the Ian but lists 100. Revise lans accordin I . Pervious Landscape Area calculations on the Site Plan Sheet A -2 don ot match those on the Landsca e Plan Sheet L-2. Revise lans accordin I . he landscape code Chapter 7.5 requires that 50% of all landscape material rovided be native. Revise note and calculations on Sheet L,2 accordin I . Indicate the method and source of irrigation of the Landscape Plans. Tree trunks shall be a minimum four-inch caliper with seven (7) feet of vertical clearance for visibili . Ch.2. Sec. 6, F.8.a. (2) ;. .:(' 1.Jo./(?],.., -,' i', :; ,!c h, Will flower containers be used along the fa9ade adjacent to Ocean Avenue? Please indicate on the Landsca e Plan. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6 F.8.e) Minimum tree sizes planted along the west side of the project shall be 16 feet. (previous CRA comment) MWR/sc J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHARED\WP\FORMS\BLANKS FORMS FOLDER\1ST REVIEW COMMENTS DOC ..---.,. J ,', I,. /" '; >.! I ' I - , " .' {.., (' .,1 " l :if I'''' / I ' -,' t ..~ c~ : I I . ;-.:c .1-) , , -....::>> I. " , - , I , u.( L~ " / " . 1'-$1 " , ~ ". " -- I , l , , i , to j ! , i .- . '1,1 (,.' v/,'.J, ("I.;j;' /- , //.~+; ) 01\ ,,+.1 r .; I ~, -. I .0' 1"'/,, J' " 2.. fl, , , Iy, '-lie (I.' " I,'j,i.t( , ~ -............,..- / "';I! I, J'" ,I );,., ",-/ , I <':li '1:/ C(/_1 ','~ ~ I ( , . .1 " .( ~~.F;, " j I" ...",. :-- '.'r.t.'~ \h 0.1,1 [.-.' :'1'J:),. '., ~ ............ I . { 'I , I - ~.I' ,-.:', .J;"JIJ'l (~J /1; 'I " I " T~ - , < fl,,) f,'v'Ii'" ~d ,- rl'~ rl~.'(.J)r,:...iv J; J., ..tU! II! .:/.,./ ~I': C1. I,' , roJ"". I ""/':,1,,,-1.[[.; ~6,e. ::.) "C' if) ___:1"_, --1:'11. (,., (1" 'I I !):. I'~J :- , ,I ,;' --- . :( ,()): 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS - Responses from The Related Group Maior Site Plan Modification (Responses in BOLD) Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03,001 Reference: 1" review plans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a February 5. 2003 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. This comment is noted. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick,up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building NO.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilIties. A) Trash rooms added for the townhouses at the west cnd of the townhouses. B) Trash doors added for restaurant and commercial building at south side of restaurant building. C) Trash rooms added at North end of Building #3 for Building #3 apartments and commercial space. D) Trash rooms for Buildings #1 and #2 located at west end of each building in garage. E) The proposal for all locations is to nse moveable dumpsters and have maintenance staff locatcd dumpsters outside trash rooms on designated trash pick-up days and to place dumpsters into trash rooms after pick-up. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section II.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B,90013 for striDing details. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT See revised sheet C3 Schcmatic Paving and Drainage Plan for additional information. All applicable traffic control markings have been depicted on this sheet. 4. The fire lane sign age and markings shall conform to the LDR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. Per Sun-Tech Engineering's meeting with Ms. Laurinda Logan and Mr. Roger Kemmer, this item will not bc required along Marina Drive since this rcquirement is not valid for streets. 5. Show traffic control devices within the east tum,around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). Per Sun-Tech Engineering's meeting on March 10,2003 with Ms. Laurinda Logan this item is not applicable. 6. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking, fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. See revised plans. The cnrbing around the cul,de-sac is now labeled to be painted yellow and "no parking - fire lane" signs are designated at 50' intervals around the circle. 7. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer ofthis same intersection. See revised plans. This intersection has been modified to become a 3-way stop. A cantilevered mast arm has also been designated for the eastbonnd Marina Drive for visibility. 8. Extend the stop bar at the east leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Lorna Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. (westbound traffic is one-way only at this location. Per Snn-Tech Engineering's meeting on March 10,2003 witb Ms. Laurinda Logan this item is not applicable. 3117/2003' 5:56PM Page 2 of 23 DEPARTMENTS 9. Stall strongly recommends deleting the "bump,out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr. from the drop,off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one,way, westbound (east of intersection) to two,way traffic (north and west of intersection). A) "One-Way" traffic is NOT proposed for any interior roads for Marina Village. B) Due to tight conditions at buildings, streets, and sidewalks, the "bump-out" at this location is proposed to remain. To alleviate the problem associated with the transition from the parking lot to the west, 3 parking spaces have been removed on the south side of the parking lot at the transition point. This also provides space for much needed landscaping at the sonth end of thc north leg of Marina Drive. 10. Post "No Parking" for both East and West Marina Drive (both sides of roads) . See revised plans. "No Parking" signs have been added on both East and West Marina Drive at 50' incremcnts. 11. Provide directional pavement arrows throughout. See revised plans. Directional pavement arrows have been added. 12. All pavement return radii shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The following intersections do not meet this criteria: a) SE comer of Marina Dr. (NE 6'h Street) and Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) @ 30 feet. b) NW comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @15 feet. c) NE comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 10 feet. d) SW comer of Marina Dr. (northward) and Boynton Beach Blvd. Extension (NW 2'" Ave.) @ 15 feet. Pavement radii of 30' have been provided at intersections noted. 13. Public parking spaces may not be counted towards required parking. Public spaces on Boynton Beach Blvd. have been deleted from this site plan and are not counted toward required parkin!!. 311712003' 5:56 PM Page 3 of 23 INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 14. The two story commercial building and the adjacent restaurant should have an additional two handicap parking spaces to provide the minimum required based on the "provided" parking (not to include the two next to Two George's Restaurant). Two additional handicap parking spaces have been added adjacent to the restaurant. 15. Provide cross,sections and details for the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension. This section of roadway shall be constructed in conjunction with other site improvements. A) The Boynton Beach Blvd. extension is revised to comply with existing 30' R.O.W. A cross-section is provided in the civil drawings. The section of roadway will be constructed prior to the first building CO. B) The CRA has already selected a design/build team for the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension, and has indicated that this new roadway will be constructed by the CRA and completed prior to Marina Village requesting CO.'s. 16. Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to detel111ine if signal timing changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Boynton Beach Blvd. The traffic study shall also consider any improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. The traffic study for Marina Village was recently completed by Pinder Troutman and forwardcd to the City and PBC PBC has notified ns that the "...project meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County." 17. Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. A) Applicant formally petitions the City to abandon its portion of NE 6'h Street so this roadway will bccome a privately owned and maintained road. B) In the alternative, if the adjacent property owners decide not to accept the abandoned portion of NE 6th Street, applicant will dedicate to the City 25' of its property to create a full public road R.O.W. 3/17/2003' 5:56PM Page 4 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT UTILITIES Comments: ]8. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services. either in utility easements or public rights'of-way. Utility easements are shown on the site plan, landscape plan, and schematic engineering plan. Proposed three locations have been adjusted to avoid conflicts with underground utility lines. 19. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcmpa), which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (Schejjlera Arboricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right,of,way. A) Ficus microcarpa "Dwarf Green Island" a non-invasive low growing scrub has been dcleted. B) Schefllera Arboricola "trincttc" is not a tree. This is a Dwarf ornamental scrub which in not invasive and is used thronghout the landscape industry in south Florida. We would propose to use this plant. C) Florida Royal palms are proposed for this project. They are a native species that is better adapted to the soil conditions. D) The current architectural site plan has been nsed to prepare the landscape plan. All property lines are correct. 20. Due to the depth of the proposed sanitary collection trunk sewer re-route along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shall be required to be a minimum of 35,feet wide. All proposed utility easements for both the water and sewer systems have been discussed with the Utilities Department. 21. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26, 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 5 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 12). This comment is noted and permits will be obtain cd prior to the start of construction. 22. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). In addition, the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). A) All existing and proposed fire hydrants are depicted on the schematic engineering water and sewer plans. B) No fire hydrants will be required on the west property line since all bnildings are fully sprinkled and accessible from public streets. 23. CODE, Article II, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. The applicant has already paid to the City Utility Department thc Utility Reservation Fee in thc amount of $54,062.90, which was based upon the proposed site plan's intensity of uses. 24. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available. This comment is noted, however there are no cost effective alternatives readily available for irrigation. 25. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (and wider where noted above). The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Article II, Section 26'33(a). A) All proposed utility easemcnts are shown on tbe schematic engineering plaus. B) Utility easements will be dedicated via separate instrument to the City. 3/1712003' 5:56 PM Page 6 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 26. Again, the proposed re,routing ofthe sanitary trunk sewer (approximately 660 LF) will replace some 378 LF currently routed in an existing utility easement routed through proposed Buildings No. I & 2 as well as the swimming pool area. First, the re,route to the east then north (on East Marina Way) and back to the master lift station is questionable at best as this puts a major transmission trunk into brackish soil conditions which include some 8 to 17 feet of unsuitable soil composition. This would require cradle and pile to construct throughout its length to ensure the relocated system will work. Based on thc current design and soils reports by Ardaman and Associates, construction of this main will require the excavation of the majority of unsuitable material and replaced with cleau fill. 27. You are adVised that the current (permitted) relocated trunk tracks westward to the west property line, then northward along the west property line to the NW 2"" A venue right,of,way and reconnects with another major trunk system at a point near the link about to enter the master lift station. In addition, the soil conditions along the current permitted route are acceptable for this task. The previonsly permittcd route does not conform to the new site plan. The project Geotechnical Engineer (Ardaman) will advise as to how to deal with nnsuitable material. 28. The proposed re-route of the sanitary trunk sewer can only achieve a longitudinal slope of 0.08%, which is below the acceptable minimum. The additional calculations called for last June 2002, and submitted by the design engineer, reflected that capacity may be available, but velocity was not. In order to overcome the Utilities Department concerns, the re-routed sanitary trunk system should increase to a 30,inch diameter in order to allow for the slow moving capacity in the re,route segnlents. Based on the Ten States Standards, the longitudinal slope of 0.8% is acceptable for a 24" main. This slope meets the required scouring velocity as indicated in the calculations previonsly submitted. 29. While PVC material may be allowed on the City's water system on this particular project; poly-lined DIP is preferred. All sanitary lines shall be poly, lined DIP on either the 24,inch or 30-inch trunk line segment; PVC will be acceptable on the 8,inch collection segment. The design plans will reflect the material change to poly-lined DIP (shown on Sheet C5). 3117/2003' 5:56 PM Page 7 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 30. The proposed I O,inch water main connection from NW 2"d A venue to the line located in Marina Drive (currently known as Casa Loma Boulevard) will require a 20, foot horizontal separation along East Marina Drive, due to the depth of the sanitary trunk sewer. (Refer to Comments noted above.). The material and rcquired separation of 10' has been approved by the Utility Dcpartment. 31. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilIties, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City UtilIties Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. This comment is noted. 32. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to servICe this project, in accordance with CODE, Article II, Section 26,15. This comment is noted. 33. The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.0. requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. In addition, the LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.P. requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. This comment is noted and is now inclnded on Sheet C2 General Notes. 34. Utility construction details as shown on Civil Engineering (CE) sheets C-6 thru C-8 will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual; and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. This comment is noted. 35. Any utilities placed/remaining under the landscaped island within the West Marina Drive right,of,way shall require a hold,harmless agreement for future utility maintenance. 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 8 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT , The landscaped island in West Marina Drive has been removed. 36. There is some conflict between the General Notes and Water & Sewer Separation Notes on Sheet C2. The mmlmum required horizontal separation between water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc. is ten (10) feet. There is no exception for sewer lines. Please correct, and as appropriate, consolidate. This comment is noted. 37. Note that the addition of multi,story condominium buildings and townhouses greatly intensifies the use of the site above what was originally anticipated. This change will result in an additional capital facilities charge, if approved. The developer is responsible for payment of all additional fees. This comment is noted. 38. All infrastructure improvements necessary for this entire site must be completed before the first certificate of occupancy is issued, other than for docks and fuel pumps constructed sImultaneously with related support infrastructure including access roads, water and sanitary sewer, regardless of bonding or other surety. For this purpose, "infrastructure" shall be defined as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and a second paved access road for service and emergency purposes. This comment is noted. ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 39. Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage. curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. This comment is noted and incorporated on Sheet C3 Schematic 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 9 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Paving and Drainage Plans. 40. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. This comment is noted. 41. Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the photometrics plan does not agree with the site plan and landscape plan). Revised photometrics are provided. See Sheet A-24 and A-2S. Site lighting poles coordinated with the site plan, landscape plan, and photometrics plan. 42. Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans, using 35 feet on public rights-of,way (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A 10 foot sight triangle is allowable at the parking garage ingress/egress point. There appears to be conflicts between landscaping and lines of sight at each of the intersections with sight triangles depicted. Please correct. All site triangles are depicted on the site plan. All conflicts have been removed from the sight triangles. 43. Indicate, by note on the landscape plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross,visibility at a level between 2.5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). The Note has been added to Sheet L,2 throngh L-S. 44. The City of Boynton Beach has existing irrigation, hardscaping, and plant material along Ocean A venue. Any damage as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. The note has been added to thc General Notes on the Cover Sheet, N otc #6. 45. Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. The existing trees in the sidewalk along Ocean A venue are shown 3117/2003' 5:56 PM Page 10 of 23 DEI' ARTI\1ENTS INCLUDE REJECT on the site plan and landscapc plan. The landscape plan has becn revised to show Ocean Avenue plautiug. 46. Provide details for the proposed paver systems showing compliance with the LDR, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.8.d.(2). See detail provided on Sheet C4. 47. Review proposed landscaping, particularly along the center median at the intersection of Marina Dr. and East Ocean Ave., for possible conflicts with trucks and street maintenance equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.) Thc centcr median at West Marina Drive north of Ocean Blvd. has been removed. 48. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. use of Ficus species shall not be permitted. These Ficns species havc bcen deleted. 49. Be consistent with use of scale(s). The overall site plan uses an engineering scale with the remaining landscaping plans utilizing an architectural scale. Additionally the scale noted on Sheets L,4 and L,5 is incorrect. At a minimum, the LDR requires the landscape plan (in this case the overall site planting plan) scale shall match that of the site plan - which you have done (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7 .C.1). However for the detailed drawings please use an engineering scale at an appropriate scale, say a 20 scale. The overall planting plan is I" = 40'. All detail planting plans have been modified to have a scale of 1" = 20'. 50. Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified in LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. This comment is noted and incorporated on Sheet C3 Schematic Paving and Drainage plan. 5!. The current SFWMD pennit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of ex filtration trench (per Specific Condition #2 ofpermit #EI 50,0129079, 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. 3/17/2003' 5 :56 PM Page 11 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT The existing referenced permit (DEP Permit # EI 50,0129079,001) will be closed out and tbe existing SFWMD permit will be modified to direct runoff to the City retention arca. 52. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. This comment is noted. 53. Structures #2 and #5 are incOlTectly identified as Manholes, they should be called out as Inlets. This comment is noted. 54. Verify storm sewer diameter between Manholes # 1 0 and # 11, and # I and the existing manhole at the west end of Marina Dr. They are called out as 24 inches, with 30 inch HDPE used upstream of this site and 36 inch storm sewer used downstream. This comment is noted and revised on the plans. 55. Runoff from roads, parking lots, and other impervious areas must be routed through percolation areas prior to discharge (LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.l.d). This comment is noted. 56. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units. This comment is noted and is addressed on Sheet C2 General Notes. 57. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. Written and graphic scales are provided on all engineering plan sheets. 58. Provide a cross,section of the east turn-around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. 3117/2003' 5:56PM Page 12 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT See revised plans. A cross-section of the cul,de,sac has bcen incorporated into the design for ease of construction. 59. All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the COlTect width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. All roadways have bccn revised to a minimnm of 24' from face of curb to face of curb. Both garage entrances have been revised to 24' wide. 60. The sidewalks on either side of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) shall be widened to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act both as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. A) The sidewalk at the north side of Marina Drive (Casa Loma Blvd.) has been revised to 6'-0" wide to allow for 2'-0" of car overhang and a minimum 4'-0" clear sidewalk. B) Applicant proposes to not install the sidewalk at the south side of the parking lot to provide a space for landscaping. 61. An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be pennitted. Too much roadway flooding is possible, with settlement around the inlets, leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. This comment is noted and thc design is revised to incorporate a "crown" section. 62. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. This comment is noted. 63. Conect spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. This comment is noted and is revised. 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 13 of 23 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 64. Will the project be constructed in stages? If yes please provide a staging plan. Marina ViIla!!e will be built in the followin!! approximate sta!!es: Stage 1) Building #1 and the large portion of the garage. Stage 2) Building #2 and the small portion of the garage. Stage 3) The townhouses and the restaurant/retail on the Overlook. 65. Providc the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the Intracoastal Waterway, We agree to comply with this comment. FIRE Comments: 66. The water and sewer plan (C,5) is inadequate. Hydrants are not clearly shown and the dock standpipe system with the Fire Department Connection (FDC) is not shown. Show location of all the FDC's for all buildings with fire sprinkler protection. See revised plans. Hydrants and Fire Department Connections are now shown. 67. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFP A 1, Fire Prevention Code. 2000 edition, and NFP AID 1, Life Safety Code, 2000 edition. (These codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire Prevention Code). This comment is noted. 68. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants in commercial applications shall be no more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to mains no less than six (6) inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm is required. 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 14 of 23 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT This comment is noted. 69. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29,2.3.2. Water mains and hydrants will be installed, completed and in service prior to construction. 70. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3,5, and NFP A 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constnlction, Alteration, and Demolition Operations. Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO Tl80, in accordance with the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construetion (2000) Division 11, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling. Testing and Reporting Guide, or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. Emergency access will be providcd at thc start of the project and maintained throughout construction. 71. City Ordinance Section 9,6,3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. All buildings will be provided with automatic sprinkler systems. 72. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 15 of 23 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT , tJoor. Florida Fire Prevcnlion Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 This comment is noted. 73. High,rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.2 This comment is noted. 74. Class I, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFP A 70, National Electrical Code, and NFP A 110, Standard for Emergencv and Standby Power Systems, shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.4.2. This comment is noted. POLICE Comments: 75. Show placement of traffic signs on the site plan. Traffic signs are shown on civil drawings Sheet C3 (Paving and Drainage plans). 76. Show direction of traffic tJow. Traffic flows are shown on civil drawings Sheet C3 (Paving and Drainage olans1. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 77. Sheet A,2. Parking Breakdown Table. The calculations for the required handicap accessible parking spaces in the garage are based on a total number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. The plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces. Clarify on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. The Parking Calculations have been updated in the Project Data table. 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 16 of 23 . DEPARTl\1f~NTS INCLUDE REJECT , 78. At the time of permit review. the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. This comment is noted. 79. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on Sheets A,9 thru A-12. This Note has been added to Sheets A-9 throngh A-l2. 80. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. This comment is noted. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 81. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi,family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each = 9,252 338 Multi,family Umts @ $ 656 each = 221,728 Total = $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. Applicant agrees to pay the Parks and Recreation Impact Fees for the residential mix of units approved bv the City for Marina Village. 3117/2003' 5:56PM Page 17 of 23 . DRPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: Trees 82. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. The Tree Survey is attached. 83. The applicant must prepare a tree managemcnt plan (document) to quantify the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site. This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations. Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] To the extent possible, existing on-site trees will be relocated to available areas adjacent to the site. Irrigation System 84. There is not an irrigation system design included with the landscape plans. Please provide one. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 5 ,A.] A complete automatic irrigation system plan will be submitted prior to the time of building pcrmits (100% coverage, and 50% overlap). PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 85. The traffic study must meet the requirements of Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering prior to issuance of a building pe1111il. Tbis comment is noted. Our traffic stndy, by Pinder Troutman, has been submitted to the City and to PBC. 86. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land Use Amendment to the MX,C designation that allows the density proposed. Applicant understands this comment. 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 18 of 23 ~ f , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 1 po: Residential single, family atlachcd units (Townhouses) are not pennitted in /Y the MU,H district. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F. - Table 6F,I). Remove them from the ~ plan or request a Code review. Applicant has submittcd to the Mr. Mike Rnmph of the Planning Department, our letter rcquest for thc City to amend its MU-H zoning district to change townhouse from a Non-Permitted Usc to a Permitted Use. r-, ~ All utility. storm sewer and access easements in conflict with the proposed building must be abandoned and relocated prior to issuance of a building permit for this phase of the project. This comment is noted and will be addressed prior to the issnance of a building permit. 89. The required build,to setback line on Ocean Avenue is 10 feet if the intent 1 is to widen the sidewalk. The site plan indicates a 12 foot setback. Revise the plan to 10 feet to meet the code requirement. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6, F) . ~ Building #3 has been revised to provide a 10' setback to the commercial use at the ground Iloor. 90. Developer is required to establish a property owners association for the rz project. . A) If it becomes apparent that a POA bctwcen the property owners would offer some benefit to thc area for parking and garbage disposal issues, and if the other propcrty owners are willing to form a POA with the applicant, then thc applicant would be glad to study a possible POA further. B) The City has notified all property owners that they must provide for their own parking and garage disposal. Applicant will provide for the parking and garbagc disposal for its own project, Marina Village, , / !\ Provide the "net buildable" land area calculation under Project Data on the Site Plan Sheet A-2. (Ch. 4) The Net Buildable land area is provided in the Project Data table on Sheet A-2. --r 92. The information provided under "Project Data" on the site plan does not correspond to the information provided on the application, particularly the b rd' pervious/impervious area calculations. Please review and revise. ~v\~ ~ The site plan application will bc correctcd to correspond with the revised Project Data. 3/17/2003' 5 :56 PM Page 19 of 23 2 ~ 99. "~ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE Provide the total floor area calculations for all uses under the Project Data section of the Site Plan Sheet A,2 The Total Floor Arca calculation is provided in Project Data on Sheet A-2. The revised plans show two (2) less boats slips being provided than previously approved. Please explain. Two of the 40 boat slips are for "Transicnt Usc" and are not proposed for sale or lease; therefore, these two slips will not require parking spaces. 95. If charter, drift fishing or sightseeing boats are proposed, additional parking . s required per Ch 2. Sec. 11, H.e.(11). No charter, drift fishing, 01' sightseeing boats are proposed for the marina slips. (11JIt' I'uk' fiN-" Provide height dimensions to peak of rooffor all buildings on the elevation drawings. A height exception may be required. (Ch 2. Sec. 4.F.) Building height dimensions are provided on building elevation drawings. Height exception dimcnsions are provided on Elevation "A" at Building #1 and #2. Provide dumpster locations for the commercial buildings on the pier. Indicate method of refuse pick,up for the project. (Ch. 4) All trash dumpster locations arc shown in the site plan on Sheet A- 2 and in building plans for Buildings #1, #2, and #3. See response to comment #2 for further discussion of trash pick-up plan. Submit color elevation drawings for all sides of all buildings prior to the CRA Board meeting. This comment is noted. All rooftop equipment must be srreened from view at a minimum distance of600 feet. (Ch .9. Sec. 11) J'ltl<?>> (tUl< w jJ-<Lf f '2 . All rooftop equipment is screened from view by roof parapets and mansards. (L I O<l.l Provide a color chart for all buildings on the elevation drawings indicating ~ the manufacturers name and number. 3117/2003' 5:56 PM lJoC4U ,/~},j ~ (~(oy,4I"<d Ifl~ Page 20 of 23 ~ REJECT CJ , ~y DEPARTMENTS rJJ "J ~ (~~ r. ') \:~. ./ ~ The color charts are provided on the building elevation drawings. rovide a detail for all signage proposed for the project. The monument sign shown in the northwest comer of the site must be 10 feet back from the property line. Please provide thIS dimension on the site plan. (Ch. 21) The monument sign location had been revised to meet the minimum setback requirements. Signage design provided on Sheet A- 20. The garage entrances appear to be 20 feet in width. Engineering standards require a minimum of 24 feet. Revise plans accordingly. The garage cntrances have been revised to 24' wide. The revised width is shown on site plan Sheet A-2. How do residents in Building 3 access the pool and fitness center amenities? Please explain and provide a note on the plans. Residents from Bnilding #3 will have card access through the main entrance at Building #2 and the gate cntry at the east side of the pool court (Note added to Shcet A-2). 04. The proposed plan does not meet the parking requirements for two and three bedroom residential units. Two and three bedroom units require two spaces per unit. (Ch 2, Sec. 11) Provide the required parking or: Compensate for the 129 parking space deficit by using the "fee in lieu of' provision in Ch. 2, Sec. 11 H, request a variance or request a code review to allow 1.5 spaces ~ per unit for two and three bedroom units. Applicant will apply to thc City and the CRA for a reduction in required parking. Applicant will apply to the CRA and the City under the "Payment in Lieu of Parking" program. Label the location of all surface parking spaces included for this project on the Site Plan Sheet A,2. There are no snrfacc parking spaccs assigned to this project. Pursuant to the Mediation Agreement, all parking on Casa Loma Blvd. are".. .nonexclusive reciprocal parking..." spaces for use by the public. A total of 45 surface spaces parking spaces are shown on the revised site plan along Casa Loma Blvd. Applicant has included 22 ofthe 45 spaces in the total Parking Provided count in the Project Data table. According to the table on Sheet A,2, parking spaccs In the garage total 665 not 664 as shown. Please revise accordingly. ~;p ~ ara e has been reviscd to include additional Page 21 of 23 INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS spaccs. Refer to the revised Parking Calcnlations on Sheet A-Z and thc revised garage plans on Sheet A,ZZ. On the parking layouts for each 1100r of the garage, Sheet A-22, provide dimensions and a space count for each 1100r. The parking space count and dimensions are now provided. ;y, . 1 8. rovide a typical parking space detail for regular and handicap spaces. IfJ .;.}J. _~,~ The parking space details are provided on Sheet A-ZZ. f rovide traffic control markings (stop signs/stop bars) at~ entranc~ to the parking garage. Sce revised plans. Traflic control markings are shown on schematic engineering plans. Who will construct improvements on Boynton Beach Boulevard? These improvements are the responsibility of the developer to accommodate access to Building No.1 Lobby and parking garage? Provide details regarding construction plans and time frame prior to issuance of a building permit. A) The "CRA piau" for Boynton Beach extension has heen removed from our site plan. We are now showing a Z,lane access road within the cnrrent 30' wide R.O.W. of Boynton Beach Blvd. B) The CRA Executive Dircctor has indicated to us that the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension will be built hy the CRA, which has already selected a design - bnild team, including Kimlcy-Horn and Burkhart Construction. Furthcr, this extcnsion project will be completed long before our request for the lirst C.O. for Marina Village. Landscape Plan indicates the use of the ficus species. Ficus is not permitted. (Ch 7.5, Art. II, Sec. 5.C.). Revise plans accordingly. Ficus ground cover has been deleted. ~ Landscape Plan Sheet LA shows 262 Scheft1era (SU) on the site plan but lists 294. Please correct. Also, review the use of the Schefflera species that appears on the Palm Beach County list of Prohibited Trees. ~ Shrub counts bave been corrected (Sec comment/response #19). 113, Landscape Plan Sheet L-5 indicates 23 Green Maypan Coconut (CN) of the plan but lists 27. Revise plans accordmgly. 3/17/Z003' 5:56 PM Page 22 of 23 INCLUDE REJECT DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE Coconut counts have been corrected. 114. Landscape Plan Sheet L,S indicates 200 Philodendron Selloum (PS) on the plan but lists 100. Revise plans accordingly. ~"/ Jw.~ Philodendron counts have been corrccted. ~ Pervious Landscape Area calculations on the Site Plan Sheet A-2 do not match those on the Landscape Plan Sheet L,2. Revise plans accordingly. Pervious landscape area calculations have been changed to reflect correct architectural site data. he landscape code Chapter 7.5 reqUIrcs that 50% of andscape material rovided be native. Revise note and calculations on Sheet L,2 accordingly. ~ 50% of all Code Required Landscape Materials are provided as native. Counts indicated on Landscape Site Data and Native Species indicated on Plant Lists. {l9. 117. Indicate the method and source ofinigation of the Landscape Plans. rt " Irrigation Note addcd under Landscape Site Data. Antomatic system with 100'10 coverage and 50% ovcrlap with rain sensors. City ,water is to bc uscd. - Tree trunks shall be a minimum four-inch calipcr with seven (7) feet of vertical clearance for visibility. (Ch .2. Sec. 6, F.8.a. (2) Clearance visibility heights of trces shown on Plant Lists, and Note dded to Landscape Site datc. Will flower containers be used along the fayade adjacent to Ocean Avenue? Please indicate on the Landscape Plan. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6 F.8.e) Pre,cast containcrs added to Ocean Avenue building fa~ade (see Sheet L-3). 120. Minimum tree sizes planted along the west side of the project shall be 16 feet. (Previous CRA comment) Tree and palm heights along west property line to be 16' minimum (see Plant Lists). I2e II I~Jh..d- L-5' c{!J/':"-;- I ST REVIEW COMMENTS Responses from The Related Group s-M 11-2 3/17/2003' 5:56PM Page 23 of 23 REJECT . O Q" e(.lbhc. woVlc0/~cl'Kritl <{ . ""n~lnUVi'::J 'Tvzdhc... 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification L..a.U VlV\d tl Lo4an 3/1BIO~ :.) Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-001 Reference: 1 "review olans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a February 5.2003 Planning and Zonin De artment date stam markin . DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be/ supplied by Public Works. ( 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at / the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners re ardin shared use of centralized facilities. Oot clUM 'OkV-",> I"D\ PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LDR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-900l3 for striping details. <J'N 4. The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. (JOAN' Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. ShoW. pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). Q) Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of thl same intersection. o o 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 8. Extend the stop bar at the east leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa ~J/e 5 Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. (westbound traffic is one-way only at this ( location. $ Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of 1~ . Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. ~i3/I'e;IU Marina Dr. from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify ~J traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). , 10. Post "No Parking" for both East and West Marina Drive (both sides of ( "< \ 3/1e> ~ roads). "- ~ ) 11. Provide directional pavement arrows throughout. '\ 'BWolc 3> 12. All pavement return radii shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The following ( /, \ intersections do not meet this criteria: '\311e>fC rl~lIt'l~ ....... ,,"-v,. C rA"-'IfI.-JP ~ ~.c:: ~i .:. i IJl" J.rh, \'L Ll / 3 a) SE comer of Marina Dr. (NE 6th Street) and Marina Dr. (Casa Loma ( ) Blvd.) @ 30 feet. b) NW comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @15 feet. c) NE comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 10 feet. d) SW comer of Marina Dr. (northward) and Boynton Beach Blvd. Extension (NW 2'" Ave.) @ 15 feet. 13. Public parking spaces may not be counted towards required parking. I.... .... \ oile~ 3> 14. The two story commercial building and the adjacent restaurant should have ~~AO an additional two handicap parking spaces to provide the minimum required 0"3 based on the "provided" parking (not to include the two next to Two George's Restaurant). 15. Provide cross-sections and details for the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension. ( ~O/lef F-> This section of roadway shall be constructed in conjunction with other site improvements. @ Provide a Traffic Impact Analysis/Study, to determine if signal timing 1'e/~, changes, striping modifications, or lane additions are necessary as a result of ( this development. The study shall include the impact of traffic accessing Ocean Avenue from Marina Way and accessing Federal Highway from Bovnton Beach Blvd. The traffic studv shall also consider anv o o 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. 17. Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be l\~.~ required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE( 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing" and proposed City utilities. UTILITIES Comments: 18. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 19. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) which will not be permitted. Use ofTrinette (Schefflera Arboricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of-way. 20. Due to the depth of the proposed sanitary collection trunk sewer re-route along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shall be required to be a minimum of 35-feet wide. 21. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26- 12). 22. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)). In addition, the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). 23. CODE, Article II, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee . o 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: ~ Add a general note to the site plan that all plans submitted for specific I..... permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. 'Q 3IIB~ These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 40. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be ( ~/Lex' reflected on all appropriate sheets. @ Show all proposed site lighting on the site and landscape plans (the ( ~ 3//6/1 photometrics plan does not agree with the site plan and landscape plan). @ . '\ J" Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans, using 35 feet on public rights-of-way (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A 10 foot sight triangle is allowable at the parking garage ingress/egress point. There appears to be conflicts between landscaping and lines of sight at each of the intersections with sight triangles deoicted. Please correct. 43. Indicate, by note on the landscape plan, that within the sight triangles there (s/efO~ shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5 feet and 6 feet above the pavement (LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.H.). 44. The City of Boynton Beach has existing irrigation, hardscaping, and plant ( :J'''''O, material along Ocean A venue. Any damage as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information. oIL 45. Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and 1~3A5fCE the proposed landscaping will be resolved. ':dd nole'" rf p'd<-CI1Dn 46. '-J-"-"'~ 'v. l I-J I~~f( Provide details for the proposed paver systems showing compliance with the-. LOR, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.8.d.(2). ( 47. Review proposed landscaping, particularlv along the center median at the I'-----..J B .3 '3 03 3 .' . o 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 7 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT intersection of Marina Dr. and East Ocean Ave., for possible conflicts with trucks and street maintenance equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.) ( '\. 48. Per the LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2. use of Ficus species shall not be permitted. ( (3"0 03 49. Be consistent with use of scale(s). The overall site plan uses an engineering scale with the remaining landscaping plans utilizing an architectural scale. Additionally the scale noted on Sheets L-4 and L-5 is incorrect. At a minimum, the LDR requires the landscape plan (in this case the overall site planting plan) scale shall match that of the site plan - which you have done (LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.l). However for the detailed drawings please use an engineering scale at an appropriate scale, say a 20 scale. 50. Provide an engineer's certification on the drainage plan as specified LDR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2. 51. The current SFWMD permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F. of 5 exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #EI 50-0l29079{ '"3/1el03 001). This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. \ . . Full drainage plans in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, ~3fleIO: Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. ( \ ~ . Structures #2 and #5 are incorrectly identified as Manholes, they should be' ) called out as Inlets. 52. 53. 54. Verify storm sewer diameter between Manholes # I 0 and # 11, and # 1 and the existing manhole at the west end of Marina Dr. They are called out as 24 inches, with 30 inch HDPE used upstream of this site and 36 inch storm sewer used downstream. 55. Runoff from roads, parking lots, and other impervious areas must be routed through percolation areas prior to discharge (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section S.l.d). \ 5'" 56. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units. Provide written and graphic scales or@'Sheets. / Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type \~ construction, including the appropriate specifications. \' 57. 58. 59. All roadwavs shall be a minimum of 24 feet 12-12 foot lanes) in width. . ' . o 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 8 DEPARTMENTS including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair . I amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately addres each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. 60. The sidewalks on either side of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) shall be widened to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act both as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. 6 I. An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be permitted. Too much roadway flooding is possible, with settlement around the inlets, leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. 62. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in/ accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawing~ and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. 63. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. 64. Will the project be constructed in stages? If yes please provide a stagin Ian. . ( " 65. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the Intracoastal Waterway. FIRE Comments: 66. The water and sewer plan (C-5) is inadequate. Hydrants are not clearly shown and the dock standpipe system with the Fire Department Connection (FDC) is not shown. Show location of all the FDC's for all buildings with fire s rinkler rotection. 67. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapler 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire Protection and Prevention." This ordinance adopts NFP A 1, Fire Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000 edition. (These codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire Prevention Code). 68. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LDR Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants m INCLUDE REJECT ". 03 ~'e/O 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification , ,,---:--- ...... \:... /.~ \ '---' / \ /rI/'J , / / Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-001 Reference: l"review olans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Februarv 5.2003 Planning and Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking. '........ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (S6l-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section ll.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for striping details. 4. The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. 5. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 6. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 7. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. .' 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT improvements on Boynton Beach Blvd. east of Federal Highway to the site. 17. Unless the applicant petitions for abandonment, the applicant shall be required to dedicate to the City 25 feet of land adjacent to the existing NE 6th Street as currently platted and in use, to allow the City the ability to control ingress and egress into the project site and maintenance of existing and proposed City utilities. UTILITIES Comments: 18. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species '\/ allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 19. The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) ~ which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (Schefflera Arboricola) and Florida Royal Palms trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of-way. . 'j( 20. Due to the depth of the proposed sanitary collection trunk sewer re-route /~. " . along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shall be required to be '-"',""'__ I .~J , a minimum of 35-feet wide. ~, '-.. . . (' 21. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the ' (' " ,'1" I '/:>.J water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26- 12). J 22. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article N, , Section 16, or the requirement imposed by msurance underwriters, \ whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-l6(b )). In addition, the LOR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies). Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing). , 23. CODE, Article II, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee ' 'y:(, -~,/ ,', I {"{ /'-: ,..... 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 4 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. '\j 24. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable /" " water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other , ' sources are readily available. Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be '. t. 25. fri \1- included within utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (and wider ", f, j J! '" where noted above). The easements shall be dedicated via separate (;.. instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Article II, Section 26-33(a). , , 26. Again, the proposed re-routing of the sanitary trunk sewer (approximately \ ;( "'( 660 LF) will replace some 378 LF currently routed in an existing utility . ,- l' \ easement routed through proposed Buildings No. I & 2 as well as the ': :(. \ / swimming pool area. First, the re-route to the east then north (on East c* Marina Way) and back to the master lift station is questionable at best as I 'I I( this puts a major transmission trunk into brackish soil conditions which include some 8 to 17 feet of unsuitable soil composition. This would require cradle and pile to construct throughout its length to ensure the relocated system will work. 27. You are advised that the current (permitted) relocated trunk tracks westward "~ to the west property line, then northward along the west property line to the ,. NW 2"d A venue right-of-way and reconnects with another major trunk .'.// system at a point near the link about to enter the master lift station. In I,' >r-~~J ' addition, the soil conditions along the current permitted route are acceptable for this task. 28. The proposed re-route of the sanitary trunk sewer can only achieve a r'\ longitudinal slope of 0.08%, which is below the acceptable minimum. The ~:XI additional calculations called for last June 2002, and submitted by the design engineer, reflected that capacity may be available, but velocity was ,>-. not. In order to overcome the Utilities Department concerns, the re-routed ,x , . sanitary trunk system should increase to a 30-inch diameter in order to allow ' , for the slow moving capacity in the re-route segments. 29. While PVC material may be allowed on the City's water system on this \"/c- particular project; poly-lined DIP is preferred. All sanitary lines shall be e/\ poly-lined DIP on either the 24-inch or 30-inch trunk line segment; PVC ,;,. , '. J> v will be acceptable on the 8-inch collection segment. , 30. The proposed lO-inch water main connection from NW 2"d A venue to the / . (.;. line located in Marina Drive (currently known as Casa Loma Boulevard) , " (./', . will require a 20-foot horizontal separation along East Marina Drive, due to ,(/".J , the depth of the sanitary trunk sewer. (Refer to Comments noted above.) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 5 , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE !\EJECT ~R 31. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer ' :!{\~,'V utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. " /;~ 32. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department " r ./;;: - has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to /",..:: f service this project, in accordance with CODE, Article II, Section 26-15. '~ ~ 33. The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.0. requires Master Plans to show ' , //\ ( all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the 1/ \/- point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities ./ i' ), construction needed in order to service this project. In addition, the LOR, (/ ''/ Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.P. requires a statement be included that ./r', utilities are available and will be provided by all appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 34. Utility construction details as shown on Civil Engineering (CE) sheets C-6 /-\'~! '. ' "'. thru C-8 will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All 'c \ /... . utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities '\ / Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and " \.' Construction Standards" manual: and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. 35. Any utilities placed/remaining under the landscaped island within the West /- '/ , \. Marina Drive right-of-way shall require a hold-harmless agreement for '1._, \ I -~~'<,\ ! future utility maintenance. . , ... , ",/ . 36. There is some conflict between the General Notes and Water & Sewer /\~r- Separation Notes on Sheet C2. The minimum required horizontal " separation between water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc. is ten (10) feet. ',/,~/ ... - There is no exception for sewer lines. Please correct, and as appropriate, " , consolidate. , 37. Note that the addition of multi-story condominium buildings and ~\ ... '/t townhouses greatly intensifies the use of the site above what was originally '.... r "x, i anticipated. This change will result in an additional capital facilities charge, '--/ "- "'I. - if approved. The developer is responsible for payment of all additional fees. , , -, 38. All infrastructure improvements necessary for this entire site must be \ ' , " \ completed before the first certificate of occupancy is issued, other than for docks and fuel pumps constructed simultaneously with related support ./ ' I infrastructure including access roads, water and sanitary sewer, regardless of ~' bonding or other surety. For this purpose, "infrastructure" shall be defined as potable water, sanitary sewer, drainage, and a second paved access road , " for service and emergency purposes. 03 ~\k- '3,'\~' DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Trees 82. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. V The Tree Survey is attached. 83. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify the trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed / replaced on the site, This should be coordinated with the identification symbol used on a landscape plan sheet. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7,5, Article II Sec. 7.C.] To the extent possible, existing on-site trees will be relocated to v available areas adjacent to the site. Irrigation System 84. There is not an irrigation system design included with the landscape plans. Please provide one. [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec.5,A.] V A complete automatic irrigation system plan will be submitted prior to the time of building permits (100'Yo coverage, and 50% overlap). PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 85, The traffic study must meet the requirements of Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering prior to issuance of a building pemlit. This comment is noted. Our traffic study, by Pinder Troutman, has been submitted to the City and to PBC. 86. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land Use Anlendment to the MX-C designation that allows the density proposed. Applicant understands this comment. 3/17/2003' 5:56PM Page 18 of 23 o ,~Q) \ [\9: '"P DEPARTMENTS Residential single-family attached units (Tm\11houses) are not permitted in the MU-H district. (Ch, 2, Scc, 6,F, - Table 6F-l), Remove them from the plan or request a Code revlcw INCLUDE REJECT Applicant has submittcd to the Mr. Mike Rumph of the Planning Dcpartment, our letter request for the City to amend its MU-H zoning district to change townhouse from a t\'on-Permitted Usc to a Permitted Use. 88 All utility, stOilll sewer and access easements In conflict with the proposed building must be abandoned and relocated pnor to issuance of a building permit for this phase ofthc project. 89. 1 This comment is notcd and will be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. The required build-to setback line on Ocean A venue is 10 feet if the intent is to widen the sidewalk. The site plan indicates a 12 foot setback. Revise the plan to 10 feet to meet the code requirement. (Ch, 2, Sec. 6, F) " Q.,W Building #3 has been revised to provide a 10' setback to the r commercial use at the ground noor. 90. Developer is required to establish a property owners association for the ;Z project. A) If it becomes apparent that a POA between the property owners would offer some benefit to the arca for parking and garbage disposal issues, and if the other property owners are willing to form a POA with the applicant, then the applicaut would be glad to study a possible POA further. B) The City has notified all property owners that they must provide for their own parking and garage disposal. Applicant will provide for the parking and garbage disposal for its own project, Marina Village. 10- ; ~,r 1 \jJ 1$(' tp i/) (~ C/ ~.$ <" 'I \ I X \ , '-./ )( /~ \~) I (l.,. /'\ \~' , ') I. Provide the "net buildable" land area calculation under Project Data on the Site Plan Sheet A-2. (Ch. 4) The Net Buildable land area is provided in the Project Data table on Sheet A-2. The information provided under "Project Data" on the site plan does not correspond to the informatlOn provided on the application, particularly the perv"ious/impervlOus area calculations. Please review and revise. The site plan application will be corrected to correspond with the revised Pro' ect Data. 3/17/2003' 5:S6 PM Page 19 of 23 1st REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification (\\Lt; ) /' d'~ ;<....-' Project name: Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-001 Reference: I "review olans identified as a Maior Site Plan Modification with a Februarv 5.2003 Planning and Zonin" Denartment date stamn markin". DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: I. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (S6l-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: 3. On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-9800 1 and B-900 13 for striping details. 4. The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than IS,OOO SF. 5. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 6. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 7. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 8 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, or if the roadway is to be abandoned, provide evidence of consent of adjacent property owners. 60. The sidewalks on either side of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) shall be widened to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act both as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. 61. An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be permitted. Too much roadway flooding is possible, with settlement around the inlets, leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. 62. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the time of construction permit application. 63. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. 64. Will the project be constructed in stages? If yes please provide a staging olan. 65. Provide the City with the appropriate documents to designate public access and recreational use easements for the proposed public overlook at the Intracoastal Waterway. FIRE Comments: 66. The water and sewer plan (C-5) is inadequate. Hydrants are not clearly shown and the dock standpipe system with the Fire Department Connection / (FOe) is not shown. Show location of all the FDC's for all buildings with fire sprinkler protection. 67. The site plan and master plan design documents shall adhere to Chapter 9 of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fire / Protection and Prevention. n This ordinance adopts NFPA I, Fire Prevention Code, 2000 edition, and NFPA 101, Life Safety Code, 2000 edition. (These codes, as amended are identified as the Florida Fire Prevention Code). 68. Design documents shall demonstrate compliance with LOR Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants. Hydrants m 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 9 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT commercial applications shall be no more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 feet from a hydrant. / Connections shall be to mains no less than six (6) inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 psi, a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm is required. 69. Design documents where underground water mains and hydrants are to be provided, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in ,/ service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 29-2.3.2. 70. Emergency access shall be provided at the start of a project and be maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3-5, and NFPA 241, (1996) Safeguarding Construction. Alteration, and Demolition Operations, Section 5-4.3. Emergency access roadways must be firm and unyielding, having a bearing value of not less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO Tl80, in accordance with the FOOT Standard Specifications for ./ Road and Bridge Construction (2000) Division 11, Section 160, STABILIZING. A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing frequency shall not be less than that specified in the FOOT Sampling, Testing and Reporting Guide, or as required by the Fire Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free from ruts, depressions, and damage, and at the required bearing value for the duration of it's intended use. 71. City Ordinance Section 9-6, 3. /7-11 requires approved automatic fire sprinkler systems throughout the following: a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground floor grade to V the underside of the topmost roof assembly. b) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction that are in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. 72. High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 9.7. A ,/' sprinkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11.8.2.1 73. High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 9.7. Florida Fire Prevention Code, ;/' (2000) Section 11.8,2,2 74. Class I, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFPA 70, National V Electrical Code, and NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Svstems. shall be orovided. Florida Fire Prevention Code. (2000) 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Comments: 75. Show placement of traffic signs on the site plan. 76. Show direction of traffic flow. BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 77. Sheet A-2. Parking Breakdown Table. The calculations for the required handicap accessible parking spaces in the garage are based on a total number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. The plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces. Clarify on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. 78. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. 79. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on Sheets A-9 thru A-12. 80. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 81. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter I, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities imoact Fee as follows: I ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03103/03 10 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Comments: , 11 ___ 7S, Show placement of traffic signs on the site plan. ,/) 1/fi; 76. Show direction of traffic flow. ( ~,g --.J BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 77. Sheet A-2. Parking Breakdown Table. The calculations for the required ,- handicap accessible parking spaces in the garage are based on a total number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. The plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces. Clarify on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. 78. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. 79. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on Sheets A-9 thru A-12. 80. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 81. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter I, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities imoact Fee as follows: 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification ~ tv::! /J14 Project name: Boynton Beach Marina /1.' 0' t1 '> File number;MSPM 03-001 ? tJl :::::> Reference: l"review lans identified as a Ma'or Site Plan Modification with a Februa 2 03 Plannin Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking ~/ DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: I. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- 6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2. Staffrecommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. Full size compactor units are recommended - at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent to/in the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjacent property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments; 3. On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-9800l and B-900l3 for striping details. 4. The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B. & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. 5. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 6. Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. 7. Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. ',' ',' r- 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 03/03/03 10 "70 1S~ g~ 'l :{ (" DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Section 11.8.4.2. POLICE Comments: 75. Show placement of traffic signs on the site plan. 76. Show direction of traffic flow. ---. ~~ILDING DIVISI~N ) \.. ~ Comments: 77. ,- Sheet A-2. Parking Breakdown Table. The calculations for the required handicap accessible parking spaces in the garage are based on a total 1/ number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. The plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces. V Clarify on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. 78. At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100.205(C)(3)(IV), Requirement #7(2), ~ Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. 79. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawing. The building plans are not being reviewed for V compliance with the applicable building codes. Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on Sheets A-9 thru A-12. / 80. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the t/ pronosed construction. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 81. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities imoact Fee as follows: DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT . 78, At the time of permit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR I 00.205(C)(3 )(IV), Requirement #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. This comment is notcd. 79. As required by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, submit a floor plan drawmg. The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes, Therefore, add the words "Floor plan layout is conceptual" below the drawing titled Floor Plan found on Sheets A-9 thru A-12, This Note has been added to Sheets A-9 through A-12. 80. At time of permit review, submIt signed and sealed working drawings of the proposed construction. ThIs comment is noted. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 81. The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this X development and 338 multi-family units. According to Chapter 1, Article V, of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family fJ Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: 12 Single Family Attached Units @ $ 771 each = 9,252 338 Multi-family Units @ $ 656 each = 221,728 Total = $ 230,980 The fee is due at the time of the first applicable building permit. Applicant agrees to pay the Parks and Recreation Impact Fees for the residential mix of units aDllroved bv the City for Marina Villa!'e. 3/17/2003' 5:56 PM Page 17 of23 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02/20/03 4 ~ , , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Submit a traffic study prior to the TRC meeting. The traffic study must meet the requirements of Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering prior to issuance of a building oermit. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land Use Amendment to the MX-C designation that allows the density orooosed. Residential single-family attached units (Townhouses) are not permitted in the MU-L district. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F. - Table 6F-l). Remove them from the plan or reauest a Code review. All utility, storm sewer and access easements in conflict with the proposed building must be abandoned and relocated prior to issuance of a building oermit for this ohase of the oroiect. The required build-to setback line on Ocean A venue is 10 feet ifthe intent is to widen the sidewalk. The site plan indicates a 12 foot setback. Revise the plan to 10 feet to meet the code reauirement. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6, F) Provide the "net buildable" land area calculation under Project Data on the Site Plan Sheet A-2. (Ch. 4) The information provided under "project Data" on the site plan does not correspond to the information provided on the application, particularly the perviouslimoervious area calculations. Please review and revise. Provide the total floor area calculations for all uses under the Project Data section of the Site Plan Sheet A-2 The revised plans show two (2) less boats slips being provided than previously aoproved. Please exolain. If charter, drift fishing or sightseeing boats are proposed, additional parking is required oer Ch 2. Sec. 11, H.e.(ll). Provide height dimensions to peak of roof for all buildings on the elevation drawings. A height exceotion mav be reauired. (Ch 2, Sec. 4.F.) Provide dumpster locations for the commercial buildings on the pier. Indicate method of refuse nick-uo for the oroiect. (Ch. 4) Submit color elevation drawings for all sides of all buildings prior to the CRA Board meetinl!. All rooftop equipment must be screened from view at a minimum distance of 600 feet. (Ch .9. Sec. 11) Provide a color chart for all buildings on the elevation drawings indicating the manufacturers name and number. Provide a detail for all signage proposed for the project. The monument sign shown in the northwest corner of the site must be 10 feet back from the orooertv line. Please orovide this dimension on the site plan. (Ch. 21) A 20 foot pavement width is shown for the north two-way section of Marina Drive and the one-way, two lane, south portion. Engineering standards require a minimum of22 feet be provided (II feet per lane) Revise plans accordinglv. The garage entrances appear to be 20 feet in width. Engineering standards require a minimum of 22 feet. Revise olans accordingly. How do residents in Building 3 access the pool and fitness center amenities? Please exolain and orovide a note on the plans. The proposed plan does not meet the parking requirements for two and three bedroom residential units. Two and three bedroom units reauire two soaces 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02/20103 S . II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT per unit. (Ch 2, Sec. 11) Provide the required parking or: Compensate for the 129 parking space deficit by using the "fee in lieu of' provision in Ch. 2, Sec. 11 H, request a variance or request a code review to allow 1.5 spaces oer unit for two and three bedroom units. Label the location of all surface parking spaces included for this project on the Site Plan Sheet A-2. According to the table on Sheet A-2, parking spaces in the garage total 665 not 664 as shown. Please revise accordingly. On the parking layouts for each floor of the garage, Sheet A-22, provide dimensions and a snace count for each floor. Provide a typical parking space detail for regular and handicap spaces. Provide traffic control markings (stop signs/stop bars) at both entrances to the oarking garage. Who will construct improvements on Boynton Beach Boulevard? These improvements are needed to accommodate access to Building No. 1 Lobby and parking garage? Provide details regarding construction plans and time frame orior to issuance of a building permit. Landscape Plan indicates the use of the ficus species. Ficus is not permitted. (Ch 7.5, Art. II, Sec. S.C.). Revise nlans accordingly. Landscape Plan Sheet L-4 shows 262 Schefflera (SU) on the site plan but lists 294. Please correct. Also, review the use of the Schefflera species that aopears on the Palm Beach County list of Prohibited Trees. Landscape Plan Sheet L-5 indicates 23 Green Maypan Coconut (CN) of the plan but lists 27. Revise olans accordinglv. Landscape Plan Sheet L-S indicates 200 Philodendron Selloum (PS) on the plan but lists 100. Revise nlans accordin<!lv. Pervious Landscape Area calculations on the Site Plan Sheet A-2 do not match those on the Landscaoe Plan Sheet L-2. Revise olans accordinglv. The landscape code Chapter 7.5 requires that 50% of!!lLlandscape material provided be native. Revise note and calculations on Sheet L-2 accordinglv. Indicate the method and source of irrigation of the Landscape Plans. Tree trunks shall be a minimum four-inch caliper with seven (7) feet of vertical clearance for visibility. (Ch .2. Sec. 6, F.8.a. (2) Will flower containers be used along the fal'ade adjacent to Ocean Avenue? Please indicate on the Landscane Plan. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6 F.8.e) Minimum tree sizes planted along the west side of the project shall be 16 feet. (Previous CRA comment) MWRlsc J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHAREDlWP\FORMS\BLANKS FORMS FOLDER\1ST REVIEW COMMENTSDOC . Conditions of Approval 6 /, I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE ! REJECT ! 28. All bathrooms and kitchens in the dwelling units shall comply with the X provisions of the Federal Fair Housing Act, 24 CFR 100.205il:l(3)(I-IV), Requirement #7(1)(2), subparagraphs (A) or (B). Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use of the fixtures. The clear floor space for the fixtures shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of Requirement #7 (A or B) is being used. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: 29. Since this development would be classified as most similar to a multi-family X development, the City should charge the applicant an impact fee of $656 per dwelling unit. The park impact fee for the 277 units would be $181,712. Payable prior to issuance of a building permit. 30. Submit detailed irrigation plans for right-of-way landscape and irrigation X improvements during the construction document permitting stage, for review and approval by Parks Department and Public Works Department staff. Include on the plan the location of any existing irrigation in the right-of-way. FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST r"mmpnk Existinl! Trees 31. The applicant must identify and quantify the Royal and Washington Palm X trees that exist throughout the site. The landscape plans should indicate the existing trees that will be preserved, or relocated throughout the site. These trees should be shown with an appropriate symbol on the landscape plans. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: ~~ "- ..fr:;#c .s-iud't t'1!</A :1-0 ~ (Jell . '::!J ' 32. ra lC study must meet the requirements of Palm Beach County traffic X engineering prior to building permit. ,> 33. ~ll utility, storm sewer and access easements in conflict with the proposed X .-------1luilding must be abandoned and relocated prior to issuance of a building permit for this phase of the project. ...?; 34)>rovide traffic control markings (stop signs/stop bars) at both entrances to the X / parking garage. -~.. --.. - 7' b~;1 ais~ih'i~~~OOng garage ~hould be 24 feEt. Provide a , X dimensron on the sit an sheet A2. .. ' .. 2, : 3. "--. ~ ~.; ;,0" I, 10,; I I,) i f /.I{ I ~. ' , ,~ ';"': ...,} '/1 ; '/ . I J: (Fl ir I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I , ~Who will construct improvements on Boynton Beach Boulevard? These X improvements are needed to accommodate the access to the Building NO.1 Lobby and parking garage. Provide details regarding construction plans and time frame prior to issuance of a building permit. 37. At time of permitting provide a landscape plan for the off-site dumpster area. (Ch.7.5,Art.II, Sec.5.J.) X (- " l2.~:' No site signage was submitted for approval. Signage plans to be submitted X separately for CRA Board and City Commission approval. / 39.. Submit a color elevation drawing for all sides of Buildings NO.1 and No.2 4--/J ? prior to the CRA Board meeting. X ~O)All rooftop equipment must be screened from view at a minimum distance of , - 600 feet. (Ch.9.Sec.ll) X ~larrisSiibJectt()'approvaI of the rezoning request-to MU-H. , ---. ~ 42. There is a discrepancy in the total gross acreage for the project. The site plan sheet A-2 indicates 7.349 (inclusJes y, of Cas a Loma) and the surv;:y indicates X 6.93. Correct, the survey to re.flect the correct'project area. j ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS Comments: 43. Lighten the paint color proposed for the ends of the parking garage (approx. 2 X shades). 44. Since this development would be classified as most similar to a multi-family X development, the City should charge the applicant an impact fee of $656 per dwelling unit. Condition #29 is corrected to include the following unit total and impact fee calculation: 282 units and $184,992. ~ Minimum tree sizes planted along the west side of the oroiect shall be 16 feet. X ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS Comments: I 1. To be determined. I I I It S:\Plannlng\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\MARI NA\MSPM 02.005\COA.doc , DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM NO. 02-000 TO: Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning FROM: Laurinda Logan, P.E" Senior Engineer DATE: February 24, 2003 RE: Review Comments Major Site Plan Modification -1st Review The Residences at Marina Village (Boynton Marina) The Related Group File No. MSPM 03-001 The above referenced Site Plans, forwarded on February 6, 2003, were reviewed by representatives from Public Works, Engineering, Solid Wasle, Parks and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations (LOR) referenced. PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL 1. Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742-6200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster will be supplied by Public Works. 2, Additional comments will be made after a meeting between the developers, Engineering and Solid Waste, to be held at 2:00 p,m., Monday, February 24. 2003. PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC 3. On the Site and Civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yellow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc. Delineate and stripe the "Loading Area" (where applicable - LOR, Chapter 2, Section 11.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "No Parking - Loading Zone". See City Standard Drawings B-98001 and B-90013 for striping details, 4, The fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article II, Sections B, & M, The 3-foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered. Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area greater than 15,000 SF. 5. Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including pavement arrows and one-way arrow signs in the inner circle. Show pavement directional arrows within the drive aisles along Marina Drive (Casa Loma). 6, Show the curbing around the circle painted yellow and appropriate "no parking-fire lane" post signs every 50 feet around the circle, 7, Show a "Slop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the intersection of Marina Dr, (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E. Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for , Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification -1st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24,2003 Page 2 visibility, Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast corner of this same intersection, 8. Extend the stop bar at the east leg of the intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd,) and E. Marina Dr. (westbound traffic is one-way only at this location, 9, Staff strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd,) and E. Marina Dr. which separates E. Marina Dr, from the drop-off area in front of Building #2. Additional pavement markings will need to be added at this intersection to clarify traffic movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of inlersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). 10, Post "No Parking" for both East and West Marina Drive (both sides of roads), 11, Provide direclional pavement arrows throughout. 12. All pavement return radii shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The following intersections do not meet this criteria: SE corner of Marina Dr. (NE 6th Street) and Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd,) @ 30 feet. NW corner of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd,) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 15 feet. NE corner of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) @ 10 feet. SW corner of Marina Dr. (northward) and Boynton Beach Blvd. Extension (NW 20d Ave.) @ 15 feet. 13. Public parking spaces may not be counted towards required parking. 14. The two story commercial building and the adjacent restaurant should have an additional two handicap parking spaces to provide the minimum required based on the "provided" parking (not to include the two next to Two George's Restaurant), 15. Provide cross-sections and details for the Boynton Beach Blvd. extension. This section of roadway shall be constructed in conjunction with other site improvements, ENGiNEERING 16. Add a general note to the Site Plan that all plans submitted for specific permits shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. These permits include, but are not limited to, the following: paving, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irrigation. Permits required from other permitting agencies such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (LWDD), Florida Department of Environmental Prolection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Engineering Department (PBCED), Palm Beach County Department of Environmental Resource Management (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification -1st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24,2003 Page 3 17. All comments requiring changes and/or corrections to the plans shall be reflected on all appropriate sheets. 18, Show all proposed site lighting on the Site and Landscape plans (the Photometries plan does not agree with the Site Plan and Landscape Plan). 19. Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans, using 35 feet on public rights-of-way (LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5.H.) A 10 foot sight triangle is allowable at the parking garage ingress/egress point. There appears to be conflicts between landscaping and lines of sight at each of the intersections with sight triangles depicted. Please correct. 20. Indicate, by note on the Landscape Plan, that within the sight triangles there shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2.5' and 6' above the pavement (LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5.H.). 21. The City of Boynton Beach has existing irrigation, hardscaping, and plant material along Ocean Avenue. Any damage as a result of the contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced to the equivalent or better grade, as approved by the City of Boynton Beach, and shall be the sole responsibility of the developer. Please acknowledge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information, 22, Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and the proposed landscaping will be resolved. 23. Provide details for the proposed paver systems showing compliance with the LOR, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.8.d.(2). 24. Review proposed landscaping, particularly along the center median at the intersection of Marina Dr. and East Ocean Ave., for possible conflicts wilh trucks and street maintenance equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks, delivery trucks, etc.) 25. Per the LOR, Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.C.2, use of Ficus species shall not be permitted. 26. Be consistent with use of scale(s). The overall site plan uses an engineering scale with the remaining landscaping plans utilizing an architectural scale. Additionally the scale noted on Sheets L-4 and L-5 are incorrect. At a minimum, the LOR requires the Landscape plan (in this case the Overall Site Planting Plan) scale shall match that of the Site plan - which you have done (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.1). However for the detailed drawings please use an engineering scale at an appropriate scale, say a 20 scale. 27. Provide an engineer's certification on the Drainage Plan as specified in LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.F.2, 28. The current SFWMO permit on file for this project requires 2000 L.F, of exfiltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Permit #EI 50-0129079-001). This permit will be required to either be amended, again, or to be adhered to, Revise the Drainage Plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review. 29. Full drainage plans in accordance with the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification - 1 st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24, 2003 Page 4 30, Structures #2 and #5 are incorrectly identified as Manholes, they should be called out as Inlets, 31. Verify storm sewer diameter between Manholes #10 and #11 and #11 and the existing manhole at the west end of Marina Dr. It is called out as 24 inches, with 30 inch HOPE used upstream of this site and 36 inch storm sewer used downstream. 32. Runoff from roads, parking lots, and other impervious areas must be routed through percolation areas prior to discharge (LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5.1.d). 33. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FOOT Standard Specifications for Road & Bridge Construction and Standard Index are to be used - the 2000 Specifications are recommended since they contain both English and Metric units. 34, Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets, 35. Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type of construction, including the appropriate specifications. 36. All roadways, shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and east). This site was previously approved with the correct width lanes and roadways, with a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was previously approved, 37. The sidewalks on either side of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) shall be widened to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act both as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. 38. An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be permitted. Too much roadway flooding is possible, with settlement around the inlets, leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. 39. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time, All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynlon Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for construclability at the time of construction permit application. 40. Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes. be co miniums simple. the 42. Will the project be constructed in phases? If yes please provide a phasing plan. !l /l ,. 1 I Lm'-sk'4.c-tyCL &~1'3lG<~' UTILITIES 1. All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as well as the Water & Sewer Plan Sheet) so that we may determine which trees may interfere with utilities, In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within Ihe easement in the foreseeable future, The LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article I, Section 18,1 gives public utilities the authority to remO'/8 any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification -1st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24, 2003 Page 5 o;Y The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficus Micorcarpa) which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (Schefflera Arboricola) r 0 a s trees/shrubs is discouraged. The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property line' that does not agree with previous acceptable roadway right-of-way. Due to the depth of the proposed sanitary collection trunk sewer re-route along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shall be required to be a minimum of 35-feet wide, The use of Florida Royal Palms (Roystonea e/ata), within proposed utility easements, is discouraged due their size at maturity. The same situation exists along the south roadway area (Marina Drive) at the initial re- routing of the sanitary trunk line. 2, Palm Beach County Health Department permits~,& be required for the water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26-1 ). <'J'l5 3. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II, Section 26-16(b)), In addition, the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as the hose drags, not as the hose flies), Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing 9l! hydrants (both proposed and existing). 4. CODE, Article II, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within 30 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 5, Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of potable water, City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where olher sources are readily available. 6, Water and sewer lines to be owned and operated by the City shall be included within utility easements, Please show all proposed easements on the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (and wider where noted above), The easements shall be dedicated via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Article II, Section 26-33(a). 7. Again, the proposed re-routing of the sanitary trunk sewer (approximately 660 LF) will replace some 378 LF currently routed in an existing utility easement routed through proposed Buildings NO.1 & 2 as well as the swimming pool area. First, the re-route to the east then north (on East Marina Way) and back to the master lift station is questionable at best as this puts a major transmission trunk into brackish soil conditions which include some 8 to 17 feet of unsuitable soil composition. This would require cradle and pile to construct throughout its length to ensure the relocated system will work. You are advised that the current (permitted) relocated trunk tracks westward to the west property line, then northward along the west property line to the NW 2'd Avenue right-of-way and reconnects with another major trunk system al a point near the link about to enter the master lift station. In addition, the soil conditions along the current permitted route are acceptable for this task. Second, the proposed re-route of the sanitary trunk sewer can only achieve a longiludinal slope of 0.08%, which is below the acceptable minimum. The additional calculations called for last June 2002, and submitted by the design engineer, reflecled that capacity may be available, but velocity was not. In order to overcome the Utilities Department concerns, the re-routed sanitary trunk system Dept. of Public Works, Engineering Division Memo No. 03-xxx RE: Boynton Beach Marina, Major Site Plan Modification -1st Review, MSPM 03-001 February 24, 2003 Page 6 should increase to a 30-inch diameter in order to allow for the slow moving capacity in the re-route segments. 8. PVC material may permitted on the City's water system on this particular project: poly-lined DIP is preferred. HOWEVER, all sanitary lines shall be poly-lined DIP on either the 24-inch or 30-inch trunk line segment; PVC will be acceptable on the 8-inch collection segment. 9, The proposed 10-inch water main connection from NW 2cd Avenue to the line located in Marina Drive (currently known as Cas a Loma Boulevard) will require a 20-fool horizontal separation along East Marina Drive, due to the depth of the sanitary trunk sewer. (Refer to Comments noted above.) 10. This office will not require surety for installation of the water and sewer utilities, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Ulilities Department before the first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy. 11. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with CODE, Article II, Section 26-15. 12, The LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.0. requires Master Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the point of service for water and sewer, and the proposed off-site utilities construction needed in order to service this project. In addition, the LDR, Chapter 3, Article IV, Section 3.P. requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all appropriate agencies. This statement is lacking on the submitted plans. 13. Utility construction details as shown on Civil Engineering (CE) sheets C-6 thru C-8 will not be reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual; and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. 14, Any utilities placed/remaining under the landscaped island within the West Marina Drive right-of-way shall require a hold-harmless agreement for future utility maintenance. 15, There is some conflict between the General Notes and Water & Sewer Separation Notes on Sheet C2, The minimum required horizontal separation between water, sanitary sewer, storm sewer, etc. is 10 feet. There is no exception for sewer lines. Please correct, and as appropriate, consolidate notes. Cc: Jeffrey L. Livergood, P.E., Direclor, Public Works (via e-mail) Peter Mazzella, Assistant to Director, Utilities H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division (PW/F&G) Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste Ken Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail) File J:\SHRDATA\Engineering\Logan\Plan Reviews\Major Mod - Marina - Related Group.doc 1 st REVIEW COMMENTS Maior Site Plan Modification Protect name' Boynton Beach Marina File number:MSPM 03-001 Reference' 1" review olans identified as with a PlanninQ and Zoning De12artment date stamo marking ... DEP ARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - Gcncral Comments: , I I I Prior to permit application contact the Public Works Department (561-742- i (200) regarding the storage and handling of refuse. The dumpster wilI be supplied by Public Works. 'I II 2. Staff recommends adding trash pick-up locations (small compactor units) at the east end of the townhomes, at the two story commercial building, and at the north end of Building No.3. FulI size cnmpactor units arc recommended at the east end of the Marina (possibly in the restaurant) and adjacent tolin the Lift Station enclosure. Coordinate with adjaccnt property owners regarding shared use of centralized facilities. ,------" PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic (' omlnents: , ! 3, On the site and civil plans, show and identify all necessary traffic control ! , devices such as stop bars, stop signs, double yelIow lane separators striping, directional arrows and "Do Not Enter" signage, etc, Dclincatc and stripc the "Loading Area" (where applicable.. LOR, Chaptcr 2, Section ll.J); include a pavement message in yellow indicating "~o Parkmg - LO:lding Zone". 1 See City Standard Drawings B-9800l and B-900l3 for striping details. 4 Thc fire lane signage and markings shall conform to the LOR Chapter 23, Article U, Sections B, & M. The three (3) foot high "Fire Lane" words shall be placed along both lanes and staggered, Please note this requirement is applicable to buildings with a gross area grcater than 15,000 SF, I , S, Show traffic control devices within the east turn-around area including , and the circle, Show pavement arrows one-way anow SIgnS m lOner pavcmult directIOnal arrows wnhin the drl' c: aisles along l'vlarina Drive II (Casa Lama). 6. Show the curbing around the circlc painted yelIow and appropriate "no I II parking-fire lane" post signs every fifty (50) feet around the circle. ,I 7, Show a "Stop" sign and 24 inch stop bar at the southwest leg of the ! intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd,) and E, Marina Dr. for traffic control. Place the stop sign on a cantilevered mast arm for visibility. Add a "Do Not Enter" and "Left Turn Only" sign at the southeast comer of this same intersection. 1ST REVIEW CO",IMENTS 02/28/03 " , , DEPARTME1IiTS INCLUDE REJECT I II 8 Extend the stop bar at the east leg of thc intersection of Marina Dr. (Casa I I Loma Blvd.) and E, Marina Dr (westhound tranic is onc~way only at this location. 'I II 9 StatT strongly recommends deleting the "bump-out" on the west leg of :1 Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and E, Marina Dr. which separates E. I I Marina Dr. from the drop-off arca m front of Building #2, ^dditional i I pavement markings will need to bc added at this intersection to clarify tramc movement(s), especially where transitioning from one-way, westbound (east of intersection) to two-way traffic (north and west of intersection). 10, Post "No Parking" for both East and West Marina Drive (both sidcs of , roads) . , I I I 11. Provide directional pavement arrows throughout. i 'I 12, All pavement return radii shall be a minimum of 30 feet. The following intersections do not meet this criteria: , : a) SE comer of Marina Dr. (NE 6'" Street) and Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) @ 30 feet. , b) NW comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd.) and Marina Dr. (northward) I @15 feet. I c) NE comer of Marina Dr. (Casa Loma Blvd,) and Marina Dr. (northward) 'S 10 feet. d) SW comer of Marina Dr. (northward) and Boynton Beach Blvd, Extension (NW 2"d Ave,)@ 15 feet. 13. Public parking spaces may not be counted towards required parking. 14, The two story commercial building and the adjacent restaurant should have I an additional two handicap parking spaces to provide the minimum required I : based on the "provided" parking (not to include the two next to T\vo George's Restaurant). I 14, Provide cross-sections and details for the Boynton Beach Blvd, extension, I This section of roadway shall be constructed in conjunction with other site I improvements, I :, I UTILITIES I I Comments: , I I ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02;'2X/03 , , , DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I II ,I 15, All utility easements shall be shown on the site and landscape plans (as wcll as the water & sewer plan sheet) so that we may determine whIch trees may i interfere with utilitIes, In general, palm trces will be thc only trce species all owed within utility easemcnts, Canopy trees may he planted outside of the easements so that roots and branches will not impact those ulilities within the easement in the foreseeablc future. The LDR, Chapter 7,5, Article I, Section IS, I gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees , that interfere with lltility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 16, The Landscape Plan reflects the use of Green Island (Ficlls Micorcwpu) 'I which will not be permitted. Use of Trinette (Scheff/em Arboricola) and I Florida Royal Palms trces/shrubs is discouraged, The Landscape Plan also reflects a 'property linc' that does not agree with prcvious acceptahle roadway right-of-way, 17. Due to the depth of the proposed sanitary coIlection trunk sewer re-route I along East Marina Drive, the sanitary sewer easement shaIl be required to he ! a minimum of 35-feet wide. IS, Palm Beach County Health Department pemlits WlII be required for the I water and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Article II, Section 26- 12), 19. Fire !low calculations wiIl be required demonstrating the City Code requirement of 1.500 g,p.m. as stated in the LOR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16. or the requirement imposed by insurance unuerwriters, whichever is greater (see CODE, Article II. Section 26.l6(b)), In addition. the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16 requires that all points on each building will be within 200 feet of an existing or proposed fire hydrant (as thc hose drags, not as thc hose flies), Please demonstrate that the plan meets this condition by showing all hydrants (both proposed and existing), 20, CODE, Article 11, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee i be paid for this project either upon the request for the Department's ~i ~natlJre on the Hp3.1th Depmtment Z1.pplicltinn forms or within ]0 days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined I based upon final meter size, or expected demand, :1 , 21. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3,C.3.4, requires the conservation of potable , , water. City water may not, therefore, be used for irrigation where other sources are readily available, !I I 22. IVliter and sewer lines to be owned and opcrated by the City shall be ~ I included WIthin utility easements. Please show all proposed easements on I the engineering drawings, using a minimum width of 12 feet (and wider I ! where noted above). The easements shalI be dedicatcd via separate instrument to the City as stated in the CODE, Articlc 11, Section 26-33(a), 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02,'20/03 4 I I, OEPARTMEi\TS IINCI.UOE ~CJEl'T Ii 0' Again, thc proposed rc.routing of the sanitary trunk sewer (approximately ~_.... Ii 660 LF) w1l1 rcplace somc 378 LF currently routed in an cxisting utihty I casement routed through proposed Buildings No. I &2 as wc1! as the swimming pool area. First, the rc-route to the east then north (on East i Marina Way) and back to the master lit! statIon is questiunable at bcst as i , this puts a major transmission trunk into brackish sui I conditions which , include some S to 17 feet of unsuitable soil composition. This would reqUIre cradle and pile to construct throughout its length to ensure the relocated system wi1! work. I I 24. You arc advised that the current (permittcd) relocated trunk tracks westward , to the west property line, thcn northward along the west property hne to the i i NW 2"d A venue right-of-way and reconnects with another major trunk ! system at a point near the link about to enter the master ht! station, In addition, the soli conditions along the current permitted route are acceptable :1 for this task. 25, The proposed re-route of the sanitary trunk sewer can only achieve a longitudinal slope of 0.08%, which is below the acceptable minimum. The additional calculations ca1!ed for last June 2002, and submitted by the design engineer, reflected that capacity may be available, but velocity was not. In order to overcome the Utilities Department concerns, the re-routed sanitary trunk system should increase to a 30-inch diameter in order to allow for thc slow moving capacity in the re-route segments, , 26, While PVC material may be allowed on the City's water system un this I particular project; poly-lined DIP is preferTed. All sanitary lines shall be poly-lined DIP on either the 24-inch or 30-inch trunk line scgment; PVC wi1! be acceptable on the S-ineh collectIon scgment, The proposed 1 O-inch water main connectiun from NW 2"" A venue to the , 27. , line located in Marina Drive (currently known as Casa Loma Boulevard) I will require a 20-foot horizontal separation along East Marina Drive, due to the depth of the sanitary trunk sewer. (Refer to Comments noted above,) J~, :ni.:; offic;:" \\'111 rot rcq1l1re Sl1ff'ty filr i!ist~dbtion of the \';~ter and sewer I utIhtIes, on condition that the systems be fully completed, and given to the City Utilities Department before thc first permanent meter is set. Note that setting of a permanent water meter is a prerequisite to obtaining the Certificate of Occupancy, , 29, A buildmg pernlit for this project shall not be issued until this Department ]-;:lS appro\ed the plans for the \vater and:of St\ver in1prTilccmt:nts reyuired tu I service tillS proJect, m accordance with CODE, Anicic II. Section 26-15, 11 30, The LOR, Chapter 3, Article IV. Scctton 3 O. requires Mastcr Plans to show all utilities on or adjacent to the tract. The plan must therefore show the Doint of service for water and sewer. and the DroDosed ot1~site utilities 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 112.2R/03 5 'I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT construction needed in ordcr to service this project. In addition. the LOR. Chaptcr 3, Article lV, Section 3,P, requires a statement be included that utilities are available and will be provided by all appropriate agencies. Th1s statement is lacking on the submitted plans, , 31 Utility construction details as shown on Civil Engineering (CE) sheets C-6 thru C -8 will not be rcviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utllitics Department's "Utilities Enginccring Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual; and will be rcviewed at the time of construction permit application, 32- Any utilities placed/remaining undcr thc landscaped island within the West Marina Drive right-of-way shall require a hold-harmless agreement for future utility maintenance, 33, There is some conflict between the General Notes and Water & Sewer i Separation Notes on Sheet C2. The minimom required horizontal I, separation hetween \vater, sanitary sewer, staml se\ver, etc. is ten (10) feet. '~-:'i..'1 c L~ no e.v;,;\;,')'I ".',: ior sc\'/c:r jllll'~;. FlL'J.,,"' ~TTTCCl, ;"tnJ as a~'p[i..'t~'nzue, I. consolidate. " , I ! .. I I I ENGINEERING DIVISION I il ! I, Comments: i I ,~---~-,-,- --- ".-.----.. , ! !i 0' .:\cd a gcn~r:JJ nute tu thc site plan tilat all plans submittcll f{)[ sI,ecific " _)i.T jl , pcrmi ts shall meet the City's Code requirements at time of application. , These permits include, but are not limited to, the fl)llowing: pavmg, drainage, curbing, site lighting, landscaping and irTigation, Pelmits required ! ti-om other permitting agencIes such as Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT), South Florida Water Management District I (SFWMD), Lake Worth Drainage District (L WOO), Florida Department of I ! Environmental Protection (FDEP), Palm Beach County Health Department , (PBCHD), Palm Beach County Enginecring Department (PBCED), Palm ;, , Beach County Department or EnVIronmental Resource !vIanagement (PBCDERM) and any others, shall be included with the permit request. 35, All conunents requiring changes andlor corrections to the plans shall be rel1ccted on all appropriate sheets. I 36. Show all proposed site lighting on thc site and landscape plans (the I I photometrics plan does not agree with the site plan and landscape plan), 37, Show all sight triangles on the Landscape plans, using 35 feet on public i I rights-of-way (LOR, Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5,H,) A 10 foot sight , triangle IS allowable at the parking garage ingress/egress point. There appears to be conflicts between landscaping and lines of sight at each of the 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02l28/03 6 II :1 DEPART:YIENTS INCLllOE REJECT :1 I intersections with sirrht triangles denicted, Please correct. , , I 3R Indicate. by note on the landscape plan, that within the sight triangles thcrc shall be an unobstructed cross-visibility at a level between 2,5 feet and 6 fcet abovc the pavement (LOR. Chapter 7,5, Article II, Section 5,H,). Ii 39. The City of Boynton Beach has existing inigation, hardscaping, and plant material along Ocean A venue, Any damagc as a result of the contractor's I operations shall bc repaired or rcplaced to the equivalent or better grade, as I I approved by the City of Boyrton Bcach, and shalI bc the sole responsihility of the developer. Plcase acknowlcdge this notice in your comments response and add a note to the plans with the above stated information, , :i 40, Indicate how conflicts between the City's landscaping on Ocean Blvd. and II the proposed landscaping wilI bc rcsolved. 41. Provide details for the proposed paver systems showing compliance with thc LOR, Chapter 2, Section 6.F.8,d,(2). 42. Review proposed landscaping, particularly along the center median at the intersection of Marina Dr. and East Ocean Ave" for possible conflicts with trucks and street maintenance equipment (street sweepers, garbage trucks, dcli very trucks, etc.) , 43, Pcr the LOR. Chapter 7.S, Article II. Section 5.C.2. Lise of ficus species , ::1-]:..11 [jot h.: ~';':;-; 1tLkd. I , :~consistcnt with use ofscale(s). The overall site plan uses an cngineering I , scale with the remaining landscaping plans utilizing an architectural scale. i Additionally the scale noted on Sheets LA and L-5 is incorrect. At a Ii minimum, the LDR requires the landscape plan (in this case the overall site 1 , planting plan) scale shall match that of thc site plan - which you have donc (LOR, Chapter 4, Section 7.C.l), However for the dctailed drawings please use an engineering scale at an appropriate scale. say a 20 scale. 45, Provide an engineer's ccrtification on the drainage plan as specified 111 LOR. Chapter 4, Section 7,F,2. I , 46. The current SFWMD permit on tIle for this project requires 2000 L.F. of , I c"tlltration trench (per Specific Condition #2 of Pcrmit #El 50-0129079- 001 ) This permit will be required to be adhered to, or amended. Revise II the drainage plan and calculations accordingly and resubmit for review, : II 47, F ulI drainage plans in accordance with the LOR, Chaptcr 6, Al1icle IV. I I , Scction 5 will be required at the time of permitting, I :,1 4R, Structures #2 and #5 are incorrcctly identified as Manholes, they should be called out as Inlets. I I I: 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02,'28/'03 7 i; DEPARTMENTS rNCLUDI' REJECT 't .)9, Verify storm sewer diameter between Manholes #10 and #11, and #1 and !, the existing manhole at the west end of Marina Dr They arc called out as II 24 inches, with 30 inch HOPE used upstream of this site and 36 inch storm sewer used downstream. I ,I : 50. Runoff from roads, parking lots, and other impervious areas must be routed I , through percolation areas prior to dischargc (LDR, Chapter 6. Article IV, , Section 5,1.d), I I I 1 S1. Indicate to what standard the project is to be constructed; if the FDOT , Standard Specifications for Road & Blidge Construction and Standard Index are to be uscd - the 2000 Specifications arc recummended since they contain both English and Metric units. 52. Provide written and b'faphic scales on all sheets. II I 53. Provide a cross-section of the east turn-around area to show the type of I construction, including the appropriate specifications, 5,), All roadways shall be a minimum of 24 feet (2-12 foot lanes) in width, including the parking garage entryways (north and cast). This site was ! , prevlOusly approvco. \vith the cnrrect \vidth lanes anJ 1'03::1\V31':-;, \\'ith a fair amount of work between City staff and the developers to adequately address I each area based on its use. Please revise the plans back to what was I previously approved. !! 55. The sidewalks on cither side of Marina Dr. (Caso Loma Blvd,) shall be widcned to a minimum seven (7) foot width to act hoth as a pedestrian path and as a continuous wheel stop. 56, An inverted roadway crown for Section B-B shall not be permitted. Too much roadway flooding IS possible, with settlement around the inlets. leaving significant maintenance and repair concerns. 57, Paving, Drainage and site details will not bc reviewed for construction acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in II accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and will be reviewed for constructability at the tIme of construction permIt application, , , I ! 5S, Correct spelling of "stripping" to "striping" in the Paving Notes, I 59, Will the project be constructed in stages" If yes please provide a staging II plan. ! :1 , i' FIRE I! Comments: !I I 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02,128/03 8 , DEPARTVIENTS INCLUDE REJECT 'I , 60, The water and sewer plan (C-5) is inadcquate, Ilydrants arc not clearly shown and the dock standpipe system with the Fire Department Connection (FOe) is not shown, Show location of all the FDe's for all buildings with fire snrinklcr nrotection, I " " 61. Thc sitc plan and master plan desi!,'1l documcnts shall adhere to Chapter 9 of II the Code of Ordinances of the City of Boynton Beach entitled "Fin..: Protection and Prevention, I! This ordinance adopts NFPA I, Fire II PreveJltioll Cude, 2000 edition, and NFP A 101, Life Safe/v Cude, 200U ! edition. (These codes, as amended arc identified as the Florida Fire I' Prevention Cude!. , 62. Dcsign documents shall demonstrate eompliancc with LDR Chapter 6, Section 16, which provides requirements for hydrants, Hydrants m commercial applications shall bc no more than 300 feet apart and the remotest part of any structure shall be no more than 200 feet from a hydrant. Connections shall be to mains no less than SIX (6) inches in diameter. In addition to domestic requirements at a residual pressure of not less than 20 I , psi, a fire flow of at least 1500 gpm is required, , I I I , , , 63. "'0"' ~~';'~ .i~l'~:n~.:; ::,c,,': underground water mains and hydrants are to be I providcd, must demonstrate that they will be installed, completed, and in I service prior to construction work per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Scetion 29-2.3.2. 64. Emera-eney access shall be providcd at the start oI a project and bc ~ ~ maintained throughout construction per the Florida Fire Prevention Code, Section 3-5, and NFP A 241, (1996) Safeguarding Constructiun, Alteratiun. , and Demnlitir)}1 Operations, Section 5-4,3. Emergency access roadways , must be finn and unyielding, having a bearing value afnot less than 40 (i.e. LBR 40), compacted to 98'% of the maximum density as determined by AASHTO T180, in accordance with the FOOT Standard Specifications for Ruad and Bridge CUl1stnlctiun (2000) Division 11, Section 160. STABILIZING, A copy of the test results shall be provided and accepted prior to above grade construction. Testing Irequency shall not be less than that specified in the FDOT Sampling, Testing and Repurting Guide, or as rcquired by thc Firc Marshal. The roadway shall be maintained free Irom ruts, dcpressions, and damage. and at the required bearing value for the I duration of it's intended use. I 65. CIty Ordinance Section 9-6, 3. 17- 11 requires approved automatic lire I sprinkler systems throughout the following: I I , a) All buildings or structures regardless of the type of construction which are three (3) stories or more in height or all buildings or structures in excess of 30 feet in height as measured from finish ground Jk10r t,Jfadc tu the underside of the topmost roof assembly. , I 1 S1' REVIEW COMMENTS 02,'28/03 9 II II ! DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJEt' b) All buildings or structures regardless of the typc of construction that are I in excess of 12,000 square feet per floor. 66. High-rise buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Scction 9,7. A ',I spnnkler control valve and a waterflow device shall be provided for each floor. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) Section 11,8,2,1 I[ 07, High-rise buildings shall bc protcctcd throughout by a Class I standpipe I system m accordance with Scction ,),7, Florida Fire Prevention Cod/!, I (2000) Section 11.8,2.2 , i 68, Class 1, Type 60, standby power in accordance with NFP A 70. Natiollal Electrical Code. and NFP A 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby I I Power Systems, shall be provided. Florida Fire Prevention Code, (2000) , Scctian 11.8.4.2, . -------, POLICE ~ Comments: , , _. n_ _..._._...,_._~_,_._____._.____ .__ - " !, 69, Show placement of traffic signs on the site plan, 'I 70 Show direction of traffic flow, BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 71. Sheet A-2. Parking Breakdown Table, The calculatlOns for the required handicap accessible parking spaces 111 the garage are based on a total number of 813 spaces, which requires 17 accessible spaces. Thc plans also note there are 664 spaces in the garage which requires 14 accessible spaces, Clarify on the plans the correct number of parking spaces in the garage and i the correct number of required accessible parking spaces. 72. At the time of pennit review, the construction plans shall show that all bathrooms in the covered dwelling units comply with the provisions of thc Federal Fair Housing Act 24 CFR 100,205iC)(3)(lV). Requircmcnt #7(2), Paragraph (A) or (8), Clear floor space shall be provided at fixtures to allow a person in a wheelchair or other mobility aid use ofthe fixturcs, Clear floor space shall be shown on the plans and designate which option of I Requirements #7 (A or B) is being used. i , , c, As i'eqUlred by Chapter 4, section 7 of the Land Development Regulations, ! ,0 II submit a floor plan drawing, The building plans are not being reviewed for compliance with the applicable building codes, Thercfore, add the words .. u --. _... J 1 ST REVIEW rOMlvIENTS 02,'28,'03 10 OEPARTME:"iTS "Floor plan layout is conecptual" below the drawing tItlcd Floor Plan f')llnd on Sheets A-9 thru A-12, 74. At timc ofpcrmit review, submit signed and sealed workmg drawings ofthc proposed construction. __ J PARKS Ai'iD RECREATION Comments: 75, The plans indicate that there will be 12 single family attached homes in this development and 338 multi-family units, According to Chapter 1, Article V. of the Land Development Regulations, the formulas for Single Family Attached Units and Multi-family units are applied towards the calculation of the Parks and Recreation Facilities impact Fee as follows: I 1_- 12 Single family Attaehcd Units liP $ 771 each - 9.252 338 Multi-family Units (!lJ S 656 each = 22 1.728 Total - $ 230,980 The fee is duc at thc time of the tlrst applicable building pennit. FORESTERJE:'-IVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Trees 77. The applicant must submit a tree survey of the existing trees on the site. 7'8. The applicant must prepare a tree management plan (document) to quantify thc trees on the site. This document should outline those trees that will be preserved, relocated, or removed 1 replaced on the site, This should be coordinated with the identitlcation symbol used on a landscape plan sheet, [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec. 7.C.J 79, Irri!!:ation System Thcre is not an irrigation system design included with the landscape plans, [Environnemental. Regulations, Chapter. 7.5, Article II Sec, 5,A.j I !, I I 'I ,I :1 Comments: PLANNING AND ZONING 80, Submit a traffic study prior to the TRC meeting, The traffic study must mcct INCLUDE REJECT I ~~~I 'I II II 'I II I I !i , :1 I ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02.'28,:'03 II C : DEPARTMENTS II\CUTDE ReJECT : the requirements of Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering prior to ! I issuancc of a building pennit. I - I 81. Approval of the site plan is contingent upon approval of the Land I ise i Amendment to the MX-C designation that allows the denSIty proposed. 82, Residential single-family attached units (Townhouses) are not permitted in I i the MIT-H district. (Ch. 2, Sec. 6,F, - Tablc 61'-1). Remove them hom the I , plan or request a Code review, I 83, All utility, storm sewer and access easements in conDict with the proposed i I building must be abandoned and rclocated prior 10 issuance of a building ~ I permit for this phase of the project. ! ~4. The required build-to setback line on Ocean Avenue is 10 feet if the intent I IS to widen the sidewalk. The site plan indicates a 12 foot sctback. Revise I the plan to 10 feet to meet the code requiremcnt. (Ch, 2, Sec. 6, F) I I 85, Developer is requircd to establish a propcrty owners association for the ;1 1 II proiect. il 86. Provide the "net buildable" land area calculation under Project Data on thc Site Plan Shcet A-2, (Ch. 4) 87, The infOlmation providcd under "project Data" on the site plan does not correspond to the information provided on the application, pmiicularly the perviouslimpervious area calculations. Please review and revise. 88. Provide the total floor area calculations for all uses under the Project Data I sectIon of the Site Plan Sheet A-2 I , 89. The revised plans show two (2) Icss boats slips being provided than previous Iv aooroved. Please exolain. 90, If chartcr, drift tlshing or sightseeing boats are proposed, additional parking is f."Cluired per Ch}-,.~ec, 11, H.e.( 11). . 91. Provide height dimensions to pcak of roof for all buildings on the elevation drawings, A height exceotion mav be required. (Ch 2, Sec. 4.F,) 92, Provide dumpster locations for the commercial buildings on the pIer. Indicate method of refuse pick-up for the E'.r<:>iect. (Ch, 4) 93. Submit color clevation drawings for all sides of all bUIldings pnor to the i CRA Board meeIing, ! 94. All rooftop equipment must bc screcncd from view at a minimum distance II I of 600 feet. (Ch ,9, Sec. 11) I 95, Providc a color chart for all buildings on the elevation drawings indicating I , the manufacturers name and number. , i I 96. Provide a detail for all signage proposed for the project. The monument sign I shown in the northwest comer of the site must be 10 fect back from the property line, Please orovide this dimension on the site olan, (Ch, 21) n, The garage cntrances appear to be 20 feet in width, Enginccring standards I require a minimum of 24 feet. Revise plans accordinQly, i I 98, How do residents in Building 3 access the pool and tltness center amenities" Please explain and orovide a note on the plans. 99, The proposed plan does not meet the parking requirements for two and three bedroom residential units, Two and three bedroom units require two spaces per unit. (Ch 2, Sec, 11) Provide the required parking or: Compcnsate for I the 129 parking space deficit by using the "fee in lieu of' provision in Ch, II 2. Sec. II H, request a variance or request a code review to allow 1,5 spaces 1ST REVIEW COMMENTS 02:'28/0J P - II DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT I per unit for twu and three bedroom units. I I I I Label the location of all surfacc parking spaces 1l1cludcd for this projcct un I I ~~'1 100, I I the Site Plan Sheet A-2. I m ~ 101. According to the tablc on Sheet A-2, parking spaces in the garage total 665 I I not 664 as ShOVll1. Please revise accordingly i I 102, On the parking layouts il)r each floor of the garage, Shect A-22, provide , I dimensions and a space count for each Iloor ! --- 103. Provide a typical parking space dctail for regubr and handicap spaces. i I 104, Provide traffic control markings (stop signs/stop bars) at both cntranccs to - the oarking garage, - 105, Who will construct improvemcnts on Boynton Beach Boulcvard'J These improvements are needed to accommodate access to Building No. I Lobby and parking garage? Provide details regarding construction plans and time I frame prior to issuance of a building permit. ! 106, Landscape Plan indicates the use of the ficus species, Ficus is not permitted. I (Ch 7.5, Art. II, Sec. S.c.). Revise plans accordingly 107, Landscape Plan Sheet LA shows 262 Scheft1era (SU) on the site plan but lists 294. Please correct. Also, review the use of the Sehemera species that appears on the Palm Beach County list of Prohibited Trees, ] OS, Landscape Plan Sheet L-5 indicates 23 Green Maypan Coconut (CN) of the plan but lists 27, Revise P~~~!Yj.a(~~~0.1.l.'1 :"y. ___ roY. Landscape Plan Sheet L-S indicates 201l Pllllodendrun ScHoum (PS) on the plan hut lists 100, Revise plans accordingly. 110, Pcrvious Landscapc Area calculations on the Site Plan Sheet A-2 do not I n~~tch t12.ose on the Landscape Plan Sheet L-2'.Bce..vise plans accordingly. 111, The landscape code Chapter 7,5 requires that 50% of <tlllandscape matcrial provided be native, Revise note and calculations on Sheet L-2 accordingly, 112, Indicate the method and source of ilTigation of the Landscape Plans. 113, Tree trunks shall be a minimum t'our-inch caliper with seven (7) feet of vertical clearance for visibility, (Ch ,2. Sec, 6, F,S.a. (2) 114, Willl10wer containers be used along the fa<;ode adjaccnt to Ocean Avenue') JI Please indicate on the Landscape Plan, (Ch, 2, Sec, 6 F.S.e) 1 IS Minimum tree sizes planted along the west side of the project shall be 16 ,. feet. (Previous CRA comment) --- MWR'sc J:\SHRDATA\PLANNING\SHAREDlWP\FORMS\BLANKS FORMS FOLDER\lST REVIEW COMMENTS.DOC