REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-096
THROUGH:
Chair and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency
Michael w. RumPff'.ot
Director of Planning & Zoning
TO:
FROM:
Ed Breese
Principal Planner~
DATE:
April 30, 2004
SUBJECT:
Coastal Bay Colony - File No. MPMD 04-002
Master Plan Modification (Amending setbacks)
PROJECT NAME:
Coastal Bay Colony - MPMD 04-002
LOCATION:
2505 South Federal Highway
APPLICANT:
Thomas Pagnotta, Director of Operations for Southern Homes
LAND USE/ZONING:
Special High Density Residential (SHDR) / Infill Planned Unit Development
(IPUD)
NATURE OF REQUEST
Mr. Thomas Pagnotta, Director of Operations for Southern Homes, is requesting to modify the Master Plan for
Coastal Bay Colony. This development is located on the west side of South Federal Highway, just south of
Golf Road (see Exhibit "A" - Location Map). The specific request is to amend the side setbacks for Lots 3 and
59 from the previously approved ten (10) feet to five (5) feet, in order to improve and enhance the front entry
and drive.
BACKGROUND/ ANALYSIS
On February 18, 2003, the City Commission granted site plan approval for the Coastal Bay Colony project, a
development consisting of 64 fee simple townhouse units in 12 separate buildings on a 4.34-acre parcel (see
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan). The plan also includes a recreation area with a clubhouse and pool. The number of
units within each building varies from three (3) to eight (8) units. The buildings will be two (2) and three (3)
stories high and include two (2) and three (3) bedroom units. The approval was subject to staff comments
and included concurrency certification for all applicable levels of service. On April 20, 2004, the City
Commission granted site plan time extension approval for this project, based upon staff and CRA
recommendation, as Southern Homes had been diligently working to finalize all required paperwork and
drawings.
According to the applicant, the proposed amendment would improve the entrance to the site by providing two
lanes of stacking in front of the entry gates. One lane would accommodate residents through an electronic
remote control within their vehicle. The other lane would allow visitors/guests to dial the individual
homeowners for admittance through a keypad system. Additionally, the maneuvering area immediately in
front of the gates has been expanded to improve the traffic circulation and turning movements of vehicles
Memorandum No. PZ 04-096
Coastal Bay Colony MPMD 04-002
Page 2
entering and exiting through the gates. As a result of these proposed improvements, the side setbacks of the
townhouses on lots 3 and 59 are being reduced from ten (10) feet to five (5) feet. The original Master Plan
proposed a six (6) foot high pre-cast concrete wall along the north and south properly lines of the
development, with lots 3 and 59 having ten (10) feet between the wall and the associated townhouse. As
proposed with this Master Plan Modification, lot 3 would now have five (5) feet between the structure and the
north buffer wall and lot 59 would have five (5) feet between the structure and the south buffer wall.
A review of the adjacent properties revealed that the properly to the north is a Sunoco Gas Station, zoned
Community Commercial (C-3), which would allow a zero (0) side setback from this project. However, the
portion of the Sunoco parcel immediately adjacent to the requested five (5) foot setback is an asphalt area
used for parking and traffic circulation. The properly to the south is a professional office plaza, zoned
Community Commercial (C-3), also requiring no side setback. The segment of the site immediately to the
south and adjacent to the requested five (5) foot setback is a portion of the large parking lot for the plaza.
Depending upon the ultimate use and site design if redeveloped, adjacent uses could negatively affect the
subject units of this project. However, based upon the above information, it would appear as though the
requested amendment to the Master Plan has little to no affect on the adjacent properties and improves the
on-site operations and traffic circulation for Coastal Bay Colony.
RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this Master Plan Modification request, and recommends
approval, based upon the attributes of the entire project, the compatibility of the proposed modification with
both the intent of the IPUD zoning and the surrounding urban environment, and given the lack of negative
impacts upon adjacent properties. This staff recommendation is contingent upon the comments indicated in
Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the CRA or City Commission
shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval.
MRjeb
Xc: Central File
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Southem Homes of Palm Beach\Coastal Bay Colony MPMD 04-Q02\Slaff Reportdoc
Location Map
COASTAL BAY COLONY
EXHIBIT "A"
//I_ I I S
I
. /. e ,I--- IU ,-1-
F'r7it% -I..
;'I I
~ /71/ lilt-"'
~~~/ =l c If 1 'E = = ~ ~
~J.~l' r ~ ~ 1C11--- ""1"
' ~~ 'J i--- >- ;f R3
~r -R~ ~ (tr I~~
,.'1 7 -,~ . I
~/ ~ PTJr)l IC
I
I" " SITE -
EB~ r l;~ r
,-' .. II' ~ I ffi'<,-.> rn ..->.
~ -I men 18,8 t:
1f w- [Dm~ p8=
.. mCO 8
I . m\9Z9~[] REC (
ffi1E I ~ym LlJ[DO
/ I ~~/ EBEIfE I~
ww
.
\
N
-- -^-
wy'
s
I
.
i
.
,
,
,
.
I
1 ! !
, '
~ I: ,r
i r r
HI!
~~
z~
Ot!l
, :>:
[~ ~
~gQ~
:i~s;:I:
":f!,:
OE-flet
~~ g:
'";(Jl to
t:~t>j>
~~~t-<
"'~ s.t'"'
~ ~ l::lJ
iO~~trj
~~ f,O~.
-. -
~w z
%g C".l
~ .
!( I
h '
,
i
r[l
" "
~
0 ~
)>
~~ )>
z
0)> 0
~r ~
, ~.. .
! 0': " afJ ~;~
~
I ~" ~ , "
~ 'j; u
0 !
r "
I 0 !
I z )0
~ z
I
I
I
~ I =1
o ,
; I * I
.L'/
I'
,I
II
'(
,
i
I
il
"\
J
,
1 ( ~~: G~,,/!~ :~ ~ 1
~i ~ 1>:;;;:) ~$-~; m~-'5J ~~~" ;
~I ~ ."--
l~ alf~l~=~'it ~
,/ If ~ ~ L\~l\ ~~i i
I I ,.I "bJ' 'I ,I! i j
i II,...,U ~. j ~'~ J I
1 !! 1 I . 1. -
, ." . ! I ~~ 0,-,--:-, :
, ~ I 0' . I 0, ' ',. -- ., .~'. ~ \f<
i~ ~i 1;< - : ~ IEI~t ~r ;.,~~ :i
lil II I ":I' . ,1'.1jj . '. II
J! :,'~rn J '", "., F i: ~ p
~ ~.~~ J~~~~~~r ~I'II-. I 8' d~~: 'I'
,_ .m' I ~-' _~ ", ,. Ill' '! 1 !~r:!IIl .
;[,.. .~" '~h ':'~o . =, '" I:
i0 .:~<~ I ~ '(: ." ','
n-~ ,'j~ I . .:'~ ~;@' ,:
~. ~~ "!ihf~ IJ"' if. . ! ,~. , ""
h ~i- ~ .-.we'r - r i~: 't,;.:i ,
,! 'f"il'Ii III! "' "L IIi,:5B~ \, )
~!I' ~ ~'MI- I ~.~ ~.i ===r===f"):.:_+'\:> : U
i~~ i ~~ ~:~ .\. '( 1.).. ! \ 1.. ~
r![,..' " ;11ft- :, " ,! I !! ' ii
i"; :! i !! I' i! I'i!!
"'t:;;dl ;0 'K ' 'l'.' -j) I ," ;' ,
_,~"J\ -~ r~.! '\ F '/ '
\'2':"-F~'"'~ ; ~ '0" ~ '-<:I! i i
.. '.' ~,w '" Ii'
I!'@ I"'.~""'~' )' I
." ; _ ""~ ,.,. '! EJ T 1 "
..t ~~l"l"; <L i', : !".ai- fr. I
,.':;;. -4 B~ ,,'!!i '
.':' .,..~ ii"'::::?::; \--' -- I
T' U,S. """,WA!! - --, --",..,j
j
~
.(
f~
,
g
y ,~~,t(S9UTH FEDERA -: a
-. "-" ":.::,::,_::.,L,,,.!::,I,G~W A YJ ;
___... ..' ,_' c. "',,,..,,"__ ~
" I
I
I
is ~ i II
il ~ ,. ~ m ~ iiSa ,- ."
!II ,
m j; j';j;j;j; " ~~
i l III i Ii
i! I i'
;
, , , " , "
I II II I II
" ,
il.!! ! IP; i
Ihlli! !I!" Iii I, II I
.!!" ~ I! ., 1'1.1 !
IW,,! !! :: ,I,' lllll'!
I~i~; ... S2 ~ ~ t tl ~i
ill! i Ill! '! !! II I
II ! i!1 ,i Illl! .,. ·
Ii ,II g I
I i III
EXHIBIT "B"
APPROVE PLAN
~
o
, c
,
I
~
..
~
,
N
'"
.
..
<
~
z
c
~
Q
o
r
~
~
o
..
"
,
Ii
I
,
,
IlHI
;:::;~
ll!i
mi
It)
."
~ ;
"
~ ~
,.
"
,
o , I
' ,
l : l
~H
.. .. ..
. . .
I: I: j:
~;.:
z~
()tJ:j
~ x
" t'l
~~o~
: ~~:t
'-0
~J~~
::;g 5'
:,:1JQt::D
w~tI:!:>
:::::;: :;It'"'
~?~t'"'
~;;; tx:l
oD;;~~
~o"'--
~o Z
. 0
e
o. j
"
" I
;.
i~ ,
,
.
,
r'
I
~
o ~
o ~
l>
~ l>
.~ z
g}. I.J
~r ~
~~ G;
~.{ pi
00 ~
.0
b (l
z l>
, z
,
, ,
' , ,
' J"
x : : I
~ I
.! : T_" . I
'\ , ... --'"'" I ,
'~--"i! '.J I
I~~;-'--^~: I)
of' -; r.- u'4..r . +-- I
i 'i F~IooolJ II'
~ii ~ V~ lli:tt
t~ ~.[ r =~ -;;::tel i : I
f/ ~ ~.~\~ ...~~i E !
" I" 1'''"- ll/, . ,I, , ; :
,. ~
! 0,.'." ; ;!. . ,!: " . f/:..~>.., /:' ~ :
,:, ~ i, ~, . " : .,rd ,i :!: . ~; r' llFf . rJ.i i
' ,!: [; I" . n ~ "' ; J. ' I I :
:,' !!i . -~n . 'I b--J"mo Ifp '.'
7', ii! :: ~ ~" III III ill... 11'.~.r i' 1
'.:t - J:. . ,I;',~;, .J.: __ . _~
_ I ' > .~):\~ 'a1C~ i. I fi;1 '1' : I ~
;~ E
' ", 0 ' ,..': =, /" \ fr I ~
1, ..l /"G.r, \,; .",,,"-'1 ,I,-O..L ~ : 1j
, ' ;' EJ..jj- : I,. \ " "\.J!,' , , II; . I I ';;
I") \ - " .:1 ""', , 'i: 2!
~
. .! I' fi;;nl ~' rmilHl",I,.J .JB- '\ .; ~(L''{,: L.i 9
.J/ 1 "~I .,,. !.! \ '1'..,,:, ''\\:''''-111
'I '.,,, '" J "" = /' _ "'" . .
I .; tJJIIl, '" :"" " ~ 1.~. T~i 1" .. i, 'I n!, rt
/ 0~1 ., ~fr! fU./ :1ij _"I ;! I I"
..l ~ ..J..,Ii.l1 t"l ~:~ J..J , '1/, 'c 1'1 '; ,
Ii : ~i i'EflI jj~~ Jnlh.' y~:"~ ~{l '! ( I
( ~I ), J;PJftJ\"" ~ <.I. <=~; :1 I
! - "" -~F IJ,'C}: "'" '",~ : ~ i
· ,,,. "'Ii;)1 - i ~8 Jl I
. j-,: -i,-
~ ~;. ~: ~ I
1.\]:" . ;
3 ffi!8,~~ ~ J~~:~ Q ~J -~ i '__ _ _ ,.~
-; \ - -- ~)
.f'7 ',~
"
"
. I II!"'" ill I
I!:I!! II . i , ,~ . ,
Iii!!! '11 II! i Ili II il I
lil!!! II .. i' Pqlli i
'II 1, ,. j'
ill; II !!, 'I '1'1"
I~~ ~~ ~.. f~LfI
.il""" ,,~;,;; :'! I '1'1'1"11',
i:t..~t:~ .. ;'f:~ '1 ~ j';j'; ~ I
!l'! i ,-! , ". I
11 i ~ si! !"';! ~ ~;; !tij&
'I, Ii! lljll
i'" :~~ e:c ~ ~
I! ! ! II !
, -!
i
~ u.s. HIGHWAY NO.l{SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY)
!;
;1
"
iI
!
......
:iH 888
'I :';'1"1
1m
!
. . I iill! I I
,
i ; Ii'!, Ii I I
! i!", .
. !. I ,
I !! . , I
,
,
j i ~ l ~m5 ;~ ; ..
; ~ i:i;.;e
Ii! ~ ~r;~~ '" , '"
I" . ,
!, I m I
L !II I ' ! ii i~
I , " , "
, , , I II
I II II
EXHIBIT "B"
PROPOSED PLAN
~
o
c
~
I
M
"
~
4
, '
i I
i
i
mi
"~".,
iii!
!!I!
! N ~
~~ 6a
0", '''<
-"" 'C
,. ~ ~ l<
, ~ " ,i,. 0,. '" , ..
:~I.)
,
EXHIBIT "C"
Conditions of Approval
Projecl name: Coaslal Bay Colony
File number: MPMD 04-002
Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a Master Plan Modification with a Planning and Zoning Department
dale slamp marking of Aoril 27 2004
.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Commenls: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Commenls:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
comments. Acceplance of these plans during the TRC process does not X
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
UTILITIES
Commenls: NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
MPMD 04,002 COA
05/04/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Commenls:
2. Continue tree planling scheme along the enlire length of the north side of X
Unit #3.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
3. NONE
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSISoulhern Homes of Palm BeachlCoaslal Bay ColonylMPMD 04-002ICOA.doc
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Coaslal Bay Colony
File number: MPMD 04-002
Reference' I" review olans idenlified as a with a Planning and Zoning Deoartment date stamo marking
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Commenls: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
O. Please note Ihal changes or revisions 10 Ihese plans may generale additional ,~.., '\
comments. Acceptance of Ihese plans during Ihe TRC pocess does nol " (, I
ensure Ihat additional comments may not be generalewy the Commission
and at permit review.
O. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheels. L,'-r "', \
i
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Commenls: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
I ST REVIEW COMMENTS I.doc
04/22/04
2
/
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Commenls: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Commenls:
O. Update Ihe Site Dala (Surface Coverage Aea) based upon changes reflected
in this modification 10 Ihe Master Plan.
O. Explain the proposed change in the pool area.
O. Whal is the purpose of the two (2) lane enll)' drive with only one card
reader. The two (2) lanes seem to make sense if one laneis for visilors
ulilizing a keypad syslem 10 contact the homeowner for admittance, while
the olher lane is for remote control access for residenls.
O. The area in front of the two (2) slol)' units appears 10 have been reduced
from 18' to 15' when scaled onthe site plan. Why?
O. The AlC units musl be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from any
property line. Note Unit #59.
O. All above ground mechanical equipment musl be visually screened.
O. Will there be any change 10 the landscape plans as a result of these setback
reduclions? If so, provide revised landscape plans.
MWRlsc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSlSoulhern Homes of Palm BeacliCoastal Bay ColonylMPMD 04-00211 ST REVIEW COMMENTS,doc
Vi A-S7Ef2. CeJP!j
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
Project name: Coastal Bay Colony
File number: MPMD 04-002
It
Reference: I review nlans identified as a with a Planninl> and Zoninl> Denartment date starnn marldnl>.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Comments: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
~~:
I. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional ~
comments. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not / /
ensure that additional comments may not be generated by the Commission
and at permit review.
-......-.....
2. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets. /
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Comments: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/22/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
3. Update the Site Data (Surface Coverage Area) based upon changes reflected /
in this modification to the Master Plan.
4. EJCjllain the proposed chanl(e in the pool area V
5. What is the purpose of the two (2) lane entry drive with only one card
reader. The two (2) lanes seem to make sense if one lane is for visitors ~
utilizing a keypad system to contact the homeowner for admittance, while
the other lane is for remote control access for residents.
6. The area in front of the two (2) story units appears to have been reduced /
from 18' to 15' when scaled on the site plan. Why?
7. The AlC units must be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from any V
, proPertv line. Note Unit #59.
8. All above ground mechanical equipment must be visually screened. /
9. Will there be any change 10 the landscape plans as a result of these setback V
reductions? If so, provide revised landscape plans.
MWR/sc
S:\Plannlng\SHA~!:O\lf.'r'\PROJECTS\Southem ~Homes of Palm Beach\CoastaIBay1'JoTon
T REVIEW COMMENTS.doe
j . ~~ 71-z.ee ~#(p ~ ~ nI-€ e>'VV712i5 ~ 6F ~
IJO'fl11-I s ({)(; Qp ()I/) (r .p, 3
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-069
TO:
Michael W. Rumpf, Director, Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Laurinda Logan, P.E., Senior Engineer
DATE:
April 22, 2004
RE:
Review Comments
Master Plan Modification - 1st Revie
Coastal Bay Colony
File No. MPMD 04-002
The above referenced Master Plan Modification, received on April 15, 2004, was reviewed for Public
Works, Engineering, and Utilities against the requirements outlined in the City of Boynton Beach Code of
Ordinances. Following are our comments with the appropriate Code and Land Development Regulations
(LDR) referenced.
PUBLIC WORKS - GENERAL
No comments at this time.
PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC
No comments at this time.
ENGINEERING
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional comments.
Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does not ensure that additional comments may
not be generated by the Commission and at permit review.
2. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets.
UTILITIES
No comments at this time.
LUck
Cc: Jeffrey R. Livergood, P.E., Director, Public Works (via e-mail)
Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Utility Director, Utilities
H. David Kelley, Jr., P.E./ P.S.M., City Engineer, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
Glenda Hall, Maintenance Supervisor, Public Works/Forestry & Grounds Division
Larry Quinn, Solid Waste Manager, Public Works/Solid Waste
Kenneth Hall, Engineering Plans Analyst, Public Works/Engineering (via e-mail)
File
S:\Engineering\Kribs\Coastal Bay Colony, Master Plan Mod., 1st review.doc
PLANNING AND ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sherie Coale, Senior Office Assistant
FROM: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
DATE: April 19, 2004
SUBJECT: Coastal Bay Colony (MPMD 04-002)
Please include the following comments in the TRC review of the above,mentioned
project:
1. Update the Site Data (Surface Coverage Area) based upon changes reflected in
this modification to the Master Plan.
2. Explain the proposed change in the pool area.
3. What is the purpose of the two (2) lane entry drive with only one card reader. The
two (2) lanes seem to make sense if one lane is for visitors utilizing a keypad
system to contact the homeowner for admittance, while the other lane is for
remote control access for residents.
4. The area in front of the two (2) story units appears to have been reduced from 18'
to 15' when scaled on the site plan. Why?
5. The NC units must be setback a minimwn of five (5) feet from any property line.
Note Unit #59.
6. All above ground mechanical equipment must be visually screened.
7. Will there be any change to the landscape plans as a result of these setback
reductions? If so, provide revised landscape plans.
>
~
.
..
Kemmer, Rodger
To:
Subject:
Coale, Sherie
MPMD 04,002
The change in set-backs should not present any changes or additional comments from our earlier review of NWSP 02-
026 ~
'.,~
'.'.'.'II"II:j::', CFPS
Fire Prolection Engineer
1
-.
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
BUILDING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. 04-085
TO: Ed Breese
Principal Planner
FROM: Timothy K. Large ~
TRC Member/Building DiViSiO~ '
DATE: April 19, 2004
SUBJECT: Project - Coastal Bay Colony
File No. - MPMD 04-002 - 1st review
/'
The Building Division has no issues with this site plan modification.
TKL:bf
S:\DevelopmentIBuilding\ TRC\ TRC 2004\Coastal Bay Colony
Page 1 of 1
PLANNING AND ZONING
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sherie Coale, Senior Office Assistant
FROM: Ed Breese, Principal Planner
DATE: April 19, 2004
SUBJECT: Coastal Bay Colony (MPMD 04-002)
Please include the following comments m the TRC review of the above-mentioned
proj ect:
1. Update the Site Data (Surface Coverage Area) based upon changes reflected in
this modification to the Master Plan.
2. Explain the proposed change in the pool area.
3. What is the purpose ofthe two (2) lane entry drive with only one card reader. The
two (2) lanes seem to make sense if one lane is for visitors utilizing a keypad
system to contact the homeowner for admittance, while the other lane is for
remote control access for residents.
4. The area in front of the two (2) story units appears to have been reduced from 18'
to 15' when scaled on the site plan. Why?
5. The AlC units must be setback a minimum of five (5) feet from any property line.
Note Unit #59.
6. All above ground mechanical equipment must be visually screened.
7. Will there be any change to the landscape plans as a result of these setback
reductions? If so, provide revised landscape plans.
mOM
FAX NO. :5617423224
lpr. 08 2004 01:36PM Pi
~' (T~fid
. ~}j..41A
"....,..: ;r
AT ElClYNTON "'EACH
April 8, 2004
City of Boynton Beach
Planning & Zoning Departmcnt
100 E, Boynton Beach Blvd.
Boynton Beach, Flotida 33435
Attention: Shetie Coale
Re: Coastal Bay Colony
In reference to our sitc plan modification dated 3/4/04, we are hereby requesting a side
set-back chauge from 10 feet to 5 feet. Lot 59 to the South and Lot 3 to the North are
the ouly two (2) lots alIeeted by this change. Additionally, Lot 59 now has a 5 toot
minimum at the southenmlost front set.back comer.
.friO' we$
The mad in frout ofBllilding 7 (10 border ofpropcrty) is a one-way road and 16 feet wide.
If 1. can be of any further service, please feel free to call m
rG\. R.\ "~-"i',
il[ I' ,.'
,Ii n,! r:'-
I, ;
I' n .
i. APR 8 2004
-
? 2._ 01:- '7 '2-
Carlos Ballbe
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Coale, Sherie [CoaleS@cLboynton,beach.ft.us]
Thursday, April 22, 2004 12:22 PM
'carlos@kbeng.com'
Coastal Bay Colony Master Plan Modification
~
1ST REVIEW
MMENTS.doc (63 KI
Carlos, here are the comments. We have TRC scheduled for 4/27 (Tuesday). Let
me know if this doesn't look possible. There are only a few comments to be addressed.
Remember, I'm not sending the coversheet so please provide 2
sets of responses to the comments and 12 revised plans. Thanks, Sherie
<<1ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc>>
(~/\V0~UA .
~~. u -1
',I \ \
j \
1
1 st REVIEW COMMENTS
Master Plan Modification
projecl name: Coaslal Bay Colony
File number: MPMD 04-002
t
Reference: I' review nlans idenlified as a with a Plannin!> and Zonin!> Denartment date stamn markin!>.
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS - General
Commenls: NONE
PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic
Comments: NONE
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments:
1. Please note that changes or revisions to these plans may generate additional
commenls. Acceptance of these plans during the TRC process does nol
ensure thai additional comments may nol be generated by Ihe Commission
and at permil review.
2. Provide written and graphic scales on all sheets.
UTILITIES
Comments: NONE
FIRE
Commenls: NONE
POLICE
Comments: NONE
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: NONE
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: NONE
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
1ST REVIEW COMMENTS
04/22/04
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments: NONE
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
3. Update the Sile Data (Surface Coverage Area) based upon changes reflecled
in this modification 10 the Master Plan.
4. Exnlain the proposed change in the pool area.
5. What is the purpose of the two (2) lane entry drive with only one card
reader. The two (2) lanes seem to make sense if one lane is for visitors
utilizing a keypad system to contacllhe homeowner for admittance, while
Ihe other lane is for remole control access for residenls.
6. The area in front of the two (2) story units appears to have been reduced
from 18' 10 15' when scaled on the site plan. Why?
7. The Ale units musl be setback a minimum of five (5) feel from any
nronerty line. Nole Unit #59.
8. All above ground mechanical equipment musl be visuallv screened.
9. Will there be any change to the landscape plans as a result of these setback
reductions? If so, provide revised landscape plans.
MWR/sc
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSISouthern Homes of Palm BeachlCoaslal Bay ColonylMPMD 04-00211ST REVIEW COMMENTS.doc