The URL can be used to link to this page

AGENDA DOCUMENTS CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to Citv Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to Citv Clerk's Office 0 August 3, 2004 (Noon.) July 19,2004 0 October 4, 2004 (Noon) September 20, 2004 0 August 17, 2004 (Noon) August 2, 2004 0 October 19, 2004 (Noon) October 4, 2004 0 September 7, 2004 (Noon) August 16,2004 0 November 3, 2004 (Noon) October 18, 2004 0 September 21,2004 (Noon) September 7, 2004 [gI November 16, 2004 (Noon) November 1, 2004 0 Administrative 0 Development Plans NATURE OF [gI Consent Agenda 0 New Business AGENDA ITEM 0 Public Hearing 0 Legal 0 Bids 0 Unfmished Business 0 Announcement 0 Presentation 0 City Manager's Report RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the November 16,2004 City Commission Agenda under Consent Agenda. The Community Redevelopment Agency Board recommended denial of this project at their November 9th meeting. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 04-262. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Edward Medical Office (NWSP 04-012) Hany Edward Hany Edward 3908 North Federal Highway Request for new site plan approval for a 11,796 square foot medical office building in the C-3 zoning district. PROGRAM IMPACT: N/A FISCAL IMPACT: N/A ALTERNATIVES: N/A 1A ~k b i)t5- Development epartment Director City Manager's Signature ~-_ At-#L /' Planning and Zoning fPfector City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-012\Agenda Item Request Edward Medical Office B1dg NWSP 04-012 11-16- 04.doc S:\BULLETIN\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM.DOC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-262 STAFF REPORT ADDENDUM TO: Chair and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Board FROM: Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director Eric Lee Johnson, AICP t; J. Planner V November 1, 2004 THRU: DATE: PROJECT NAME/NO: REQUEST: Edward Medical Office Building / NWSP 04-012 New Site Plan BACKGROUND: This memorandum is an addendum to the New Site Plan staff report (Memorandum No. PZ 04-210) - see attached. Mr. Hany Edward owns a 0.72-acre parcel of land, located on the west side of South Federal Highway approximately 350 south of the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and South Federal Highway. In May of 2004, Mr. Edward submitted a request to annex (ANEX 04-004) the subject property into the City of Boynton Beach, to rezone (LUAR 04-008) from General Commercial (Palm Beach County) to Community Commercial (C-3), and new site plan approval in order to construct an 11,957 square foot medical office building. Staff reviewed and recommended approval on all three (3) applications. On September 14, 2004, the Community Redevelopment Agency Board reviewed the annexation, rezoning, and site plan. The Board recommended approval of Mr. Edward's request for annexation and rezoning but voted to table the site plan for the lack of consistency with the design guidelines endorsed by the Board. The Board tabled the plan indefinitely and recommended that the applicant revise the plan, meet with staff, and then return to the Board with a plan that would embrace those guidelines. The principal deficiencies noted by the Board were the lack of continuity between the first and second floors, the detail of the north (front) fa~ade, the height of the parapet wall, and the lack of foundation landscaping along the south (rear) fa~ade. On September 21, 2004, the City Commission, in keeping with the Board's recommendations, voted to table the site plan, and approved the annexation and rezoning applications. Therefore, the property is now located within the city limits and zoned Community Commercial (C-3) but there is no approved site plan of record. This site plan represents Mr. Edward's continuing efforts to construct a medical office building on his 0.72-acre parcel. A medical office building is a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district. The construction of the building, parking lot, and all other site Improvements would occur wIthIn one (1) phase. SUMMARY OF CHANGES: The original plan proposed a building that was 11,957 square feet in area. The revised site plan shows that the building size was reduced by 161 square feet, for a total of 11,796 square feet. Ukewlse, the number of parking spaces was reduced from 60 to 59 spaces. This reduction In building area occurs at the rear of the buildIng. The floor plan shows that the building would have two (2) landscaped atriums at the rear of the building. The building would still be sItuated with a zero (0) side setback along the south Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-262 Page 2 property line but now, two (2) recesses or "cut-outs" in the rear facade would allow for the installation of tall-growing, thin palm trees. These trees would help to break up the great wall expanse (at the rear of the building) and to soften "built environment" with natural plant material. The landscape plan shows that . four (4) Fishtail palm trees (14-16 feet in height) and 30 Simpson Stopper would be installed within these recesses. Internal doors leading Into the atrium allow for plant maintenance. The previous elevations showed the top of the parapet wall at 26 feet - two (2) inches In height. The elevations have been revised to show that the top of the parapet wall is now proposed at 29 feet in height. Also, two (2) decorative medallions have been added to the parapet wall for extra appeal and height. The middle decorative tower increased in height, from 34 feet - one (1) inch (as dimensioned at the mean height level) to 36 feet - seven (7) inches (also measured at the mean height level). The front and rear of the building appear different because the columns on the first and second floor now align with each other whereas previously, they did not. This use of repeated elements will help to unite the first and second floors. The columns proposed at the end of the building are now thicker (in width) in order to achieve a greater sense of balance and order between the columns. Finally, more block windows have been added to the rear elevation. It is the opinion of staff that these changes satisfy the noted deficiencies. RECOMMENDAnON: Staff has reviewed the modifications that were made to the project and is recommending approval, subject to satisfying all comments itemized in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-012\Staff Report addendum.doc DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-210 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Board THRU: FROM: Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director Eric Lee Johnson, AICP <;;: ~ Planner '(J August 31,2004 Edward Medical Office Building / NWSP 04-012 DATE: PROJECT NAME/NO: REQUEST: New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRIPTION Property Owner: Mr. Hany Edward Applicant: Mr. Hany Edward Agent: Mr. Hany Edward Location: West side of South Federal Highway, approximately 350 feet south of the intersection of Old Dixie Highway and South Federal Highway (see Location Map - exhibit "A j Existing Land Use: CH/5 Commercial High Intensity (Palm Beach County) Proposed Land Use: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Existing Zoning: CG General Commercial (Palm Beach County) Proposed Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3) Proposed Use: 11,957 square foot medical office building Acreage: 0.72-acre (31,702 square feet) Adjacent Uses: North: Developed commercial property with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3); South: Developed commercial property classified as Palm Beach County Commercial High / Medium Residential MR-5 (CH / 5) land use and zoned Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 2 East: Palm Beach County General Commercial (CG); Right-of-way for South Federal Highway, then farther east is undeveloped residential property (future Waterside residential development by Southern Homes, Inc.) with a Special High Density Residential (SHDR) land use classification, zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD); Developed residential property classified as Palm Beach County Medium Residential (5 units per acre - RM/5) land use and zoned Palm Beach County Residential Multi-family (RM). PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION West: Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject conditional use were mailed a notice of this request and its respective hearing dates. The applicant certifies that they posted slgnage and mailed notices In accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007. BACKGROUND Proposal: Mr. Hany Edward is requesting new site plan approval for the construction of an 11,957 square foot medical office building on a 0.72-acre parcel. The subject property is currently located outside the city limits and is under Palm Beach County jurisdiction. The applicant Is also concurrentiy requesting to annex the property into the city and to rezone to the Community Commercial (C-3) zoning district. Therefore, approval of this site plan Is contingent upon the approval of the corresponding requests for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning (ANEX 04-004 and LUAR 0+008 - see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). A medical office building is a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district. The construction of the building, parking lot, and all other site improvements would occur within one (1) phase. Site Characteristic: The subject property is a small, partially developed, rectangular-shaped lot that contains overgrown grass and various shade and palm trees. The survey shows that a concrete ramp currently proVides access to the site from South Federal Highway. This concrete ramp extends westward, connecting to rock and mulch paths that are located within the parcel's' Interior. There are two (2) vacant buildings located in the northeast corner of the property. These buildings would be demolished shortly after site plan approval. Also, support poles for a former billboard are currently located along the southern property line. Ukewise, these poles would be removed after site plan approval to make way for new building construction. The survey shows that a water-well Is currently located along the north property line, near the center of the property. It would be removed (because of the new parking areas) but would be re-established elsewhere on-site for Irrigation purposes. Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 3 ANALYSIS Service I Impacts: Traffic- A traffic impact statement for this project was submitted and sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for their review and approval. The Division sent the following statement: "Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed project does not constitute a 1% LOS D Capacity Impact on Federal Highway, and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. No building permits are to be Issued by the town, after the bulld- out date speCified above (2005)". Drainage- Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The City's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division found the conceptual drainage plans to be acceptable at this time and Is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review, when more complete engineering documents are required (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). As proposed, the on-site drainage system shall be accomplished via a combination of green swales and extiltration trenches. School- School concurrency is not required for this type of project. Utilities- There is sufficient potable water pressure to provide domestic and fire-flow needs for this low-rise facility. The project would connect to the existing four (4) inch force main for sanitary sewer. Police- This project has been reviewed for potential service impacts and availability, and based upon the planned office use, it has been determined that services allocated to, or existing within the area are adequate to provide the project with a necessary level of service. Fire- This project has been reviewed for potential service Impacts and availability, and based upon the planned office use, It has been determined that services allocated to, or existing within the area are adequate to provide the project with a necessary level of service. Driveways: The existing concrete ramp, located on South Federal Highway would be upgraded and transformed Into the property's main driveway opening. This opening would be 24 feet In width and would provide for both vehicular Ingress and egress. It would allow for right-turn only egress. Parking Facility: Medical offices require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed bUilding would be 11,957 square feet In area and therefore, the project would require 60 parking spaces. The site plan (sheet S-l) shows that 60 parking spaces are proposed, six (6) of which, would be designated for handicap Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 4 landscaping: parking. Retail uses could be allowed In the building due to the fact retail Is a permitted use In C-3 zoning district and that the parking ratio for medical office and retail Is the same (1 space per 200 square feet). The parking spaces would be dimensioned nine (9) feet in width by 18 feet In length. The 90-degree handicap space would be 12 feet In width with five (5) feet of striping by 18 feet In length. As proposed, the vehicular back-up distance would be at minimum, 24 feet In width to comply with the Engineering Standards. The parking lot lighting Is shown on the photometric plan (sheet E-1). According to the photometric plan, the proposed lighting levels near the perimeters would be minimal. It should have no adverse affect on the neighboring properties. The site plan (sheet S-1) tabular data indicates the proposed pervious area of the parcel would equal 4,651 square feet or 14.7% of the total site. The landscape plan (sheet L1 of 2) indicates that 57% of the trees would be native and 86% of the shrubs / groundcover would be native. At the time of permitting, the landscape plan would have to be revised to indicate the native plant material categorized as follows: Palm trees, shade trees, and shrubs / groundcover (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The east (front) landscape buffer would be at least seven (7) feet in width. The Federal Highway Cross-Section (sheet L1 of 2) illustrates the varying types of shade and palm tree species proposed within this buffer. The Entry-Way Enlargement (sheet L2 of 2) indicates the proposed plant type and quantities. The plant material includes the following: Duranta Gold Mound, Purple Showers, Sliver Buttonwood, Chinese Fan Palm, Simpson Stopper, Dwarf Firebush, and Travelers Palm trees. The side landscape buffers (north and south) would be at least two and one-half (2- V2) feet in width. These buffers would contain a row of Sliver Buttonwood trees and Redtip Cocoplum hedges. One (1) tree would be installed every 25 feet. The landscape architect and the City Forester would determine the relocation and mitigation of all existing trees during field inspections occurring at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). The rear (west) landscape buffer would be at least two and one-half (2 V2) feet in width. The small properties to the west lie outside the city limits but they are zoned residential. Therefore, the applicant Is proposing a buffer wall along this west property line, which would help serve as a buffer between the subject project and the abutting properties to the west. The buffer wall detail Indicates It would be a C.B.S. wall, six (6) feet In height and eight (8) Inches In width. No color(s) are depicted on the wall detail so therefore, staff Is recommending that the color(s) of the buffer wall should be compatible with the approved building colors (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Finally, the landscape plan also shows that a row of Simpson Stopper would be Installed on the Inside of the wall while Fakahatchee grass Is proposed on the outside of the wall. Building and Site: The proposed building Is designed as a flat-roofed, two (2)-story structure with under-story parking. The elevations (sheet A-2) Indicate that this flat rooftop would be 24 feet In height and the top of the parapet wall would be 26 feet in height. The Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 5 peak of the decorative towers would be 32 feet - one (1) Inch In height. The maximum height allowed for new buildings in the C-3 zoning district is 45 feet. The building would comply with the height restrictions of the C-3 zoning district. The minimum front setback in the C-3 zoning district is 20 feet; the building would be setback 22 feet - 11 inches. The required side setbacks in the C-3 district are zero (0) feet and 15 feet (on corner lots) and since the subject lot Is nestled between lots, no side setback would be required. As proposed, the building would be setback zero (0) feet on the south side and 46 feet - 11 inches on the north. The minimum rear setback Is 20 feet; the project provides 153 feet - nine (9) inches. As previously mentioned, an existing water-well would be eliminated from its current location and established elsewhere on the site. According to the applicant, the probable location for the new well would most likely occur at the southwest corner of the property, near the proposed lift station. The proposed dumpster enclosure would be located at the northwest corner of the site. In keeping with staffs' recommendations and to help soften the hardscape, a large, landscaped island is proposed within the center of the expansive parking lot. Finally, development would be a gated community. A white aluminum fence is proposed near the front (east) property line. The North and South Aluminum Fence Detail (sheet A-3) Indicates that it would be a white aluminum fence, six (6) feet in height. The C.B.S. columns of the fence would be painted to match the building. At the time of permitting, staff would ensure compliance with Fire Code regarding emergency and fire truck access to the site is constantly maintained (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Design: The proposed design is compatible with the surrounding built environment and would generally enhance the overall success of the Federal Highway corridor. The architecture and style of the proposed building is consistent with the newer medical office buildings and would be considered an upgrade to the buildings within the immediate area. The main wall colors can be described as orange and yellow in color with white accents. Although similar, the proposed colors indicated on the black I white elevation drawings submitted herein, do not match the colors indicated on the colored elevations. Buildings, structures, and site elements are not required to match surrounding existing developments, but shall be In visual harmony with surrounding developments. Buildings shall achieve visual unity in character and design concepts In part, through building colors. Staff feels that the proposed building colors represented on the colored elevations are too vibrant and not in keeping with the Intent of the Community Design Plan. Therefore, staff recommends redUcing the Intensity of the proposed building colors In order to achieve a higher degree of compatibility and harmony with the surrounding properties (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Regardless of the main wall colors, the accent trim-work would be painted white, which Is consistent with past approvals. Signage: No wall signs are proposed. The site plan (sheet 5-1) shows that two (2) entry features are proposed along the front (east) property line, outside of the safe-sight Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 6 triangle. One of these entry structures would be a water fountain; the other would be a monument sign. The Entry Fountain & Sign detail shows that these structures would be no more than six (6) feet in height. The monument sign would have black Palantino style letters constructed of aluminum, mounted flush on the structure. The site plan does not indicate the setback of both structures but only the monument sign would be required to be at least 10 feet from the property line (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). RECOMMENDAnON: The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval, contingent upon the approval of the corresponding requests for annexation and rezoning, in conjunction with successfully satisfying all comments Indicated In Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. 5: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJEcrs\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-012\Staff Report.doc - '"".... EDWARD MEDICAL OFFICE LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A HDR SHDR CHIS -:. LRC CHIS ) . .. .. ., ... ~w.. LEGEND ...... City Boundary Lllnd uses: LRC . Local Retail Commercial HDR . High Density Residential IHDR . lpeclal High Density Residential MR-6 . Medium Residential (county) CHIS . Commercial High, w/underlylng MR-S (county) - I=XHIBIT "B" >, II! III! !l!P !!!iI .,.. '11'1 "...~ .111.11 I". '1J !~ ::0 co _.Iul ; .HI 1"1 ... " -. r 3: it II- ~ .1121 z ;> .. ~ i .... ~ I ". B > lZ IE' ::0 ~ 0 -< ... ! II t ! . co !~. .. u. 4l1~ hi . ~ I'; 1'1111. IIIII1 iii! !I! .1.1.11 I!~ Iii I I I &1 ~ 11..10 II~ I IS ~ III!! . i I. Is u I I I I II q ! Jllll I' !-utlll I J l II J I I Ii I I U U r G I"Hl~1 I l :s. . __ ll. I · rrl~ II I rl I r' q ~l i III ~'- SllE PI.Nl 1i1'I~Ii;! 00)> flllt_~ ti~ I: ~R'% HANY mWMD OFFICE aoc. Hi" 1!lI ~ ~~~~A. J.E;U1U1~ __ illl II!J I.il~ !8~i II~ ~, III ,I il id :r 0 :r 0 :II a; ~ 1 ~ , i :r ~ 0 . gt q ~ ~ III r :i! ~ ~H~ !*! luul FXHIB\T i ''8'' ~II ~ rere mni !lE C'> ~.... a II ~ ; r~~ ~ Im~ . ~liin ~ ; ~ <; ~ ~I i!~ ~ i "a{~i = ~~ i; a <l~ ~~ ~ z ; IQ a @5! iti a{~ ~ 5! ~i~ ~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ij~~i ~ ; ~~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~ '" s:: I'T1 0 (") :r ::t> r- 0 OJ II II c r- 0 :z: ~ .. :r ,I 0 ; :r 0 ~ ! ;rrr-rl n 101 !ii!;:~J~ fQftH~=~=~~ ~ ...!!.i )> I lJ I If .!lI1 ~ ;;1. DnRAY BEACH FLORIDA. I ! ;o",,;u 00 ' --- If;~ lIC1l iil. _ __ III 1"1 i ~ I - <;>98 DDDi il! ill ill Ji ~i~ ;i~ I g: g: z ~ :I: p ~ ~~~ G ~II D~ ~~~ ill ~I~ ~ - !2 ~Ict{ -I >' ,I ~! irrrl-i~! !~; 0 !U;~:i~!~ 'OU<<-~;~nt~ ~ i I '1_ jI"S ~ 00 llELRAY lIEACH. FLORIOA. i N ~.!: vi..... UIo. . III j i I id I ~( , .A" .' .tU,J II.! .1 . I' l " Cj:ff'ltl ii q'.~l:llt.l. II, .}l1 iill' · ft! It I;'" " " I I I. rnl .I ," fi I! ,II II 1~ I 1m I I 1 I i I I EXHIBIT "B" I j"f'lti. to. -'I'D i: H ,1 hfHfluHJ It i~~m~H ~~~~iiii ~ ~ II II 1/11111111111 'I illllll!1111 II!'IIIII II! r ! Hlluflf U I j{1 (111I1 1',1 Ii i ~ 11l"lt'P f,. J 11(, I'::Z:: I., ,-; . liim I J'lhhJI I I C f :I"if! q"Uji :: :Htfl m? · II J. L, '" "'1 ,f m ' .. , ') , , , I Hilll~I!~lfUrn:.iFr(I'-liflWlm i 1IIIi~IIIII~IIJIIII!llltlIIIIJlllllilfll 'I 'Jlatlf,iftl I PI'!,hii f i-tll I ~ ;,i~]l!.ltiji II IllIJl~~11 tf:I;I~ Iii I '(I'fl r .l .' II f'f lid I r I_ J '1'11'li. hit n if d ili i .hlll J ) ,: 11'~III" I. iH f 'ur t · in if flilH! fPH m Pill n In If It.; I If It I iff ! 11 n f I r , I 2 '. rf . '11111. I ! . ;c I if Q ~ - .~ .,.... ~~~ I landscape & Irrigation plans for: I M4fGNtf IDWA<<OSOMCe aUtlolN. 3908 N Federal Hwy. 'Boynton ~ach, Fl DESIGNI;:D BY: €AiRaI<< & AftCt€IA'. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS INC. 7" N.E. 5th AVE. Delroy BeoCh, R. 33483 561-272-9621 ; i I I f . \ ... I p ~ ~Ii , ,.: ! ~'.rrr-i~i !~~IIOl! IU!.:iJ~ ~~~;;;:~::~ ~ ::_11- t ~ n~~S!!ll a' ll€UlAY BEACH, FlCAlDA. 0J U~:V1iil9 ... u.. . - .. H R ~e I l\~ ~ f.~' '. . ~ ...Jr"-'-l . I=XHIBIT "B" 11 G I R I !; ~ ~ ~ :z ... GGG ~~~I 'i li~ Ii J ~ f I III j i I id EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval - Revised Project name: Edward Medical Office Building File number: NWSP 04-012 Reference: 311d review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an October 19. 2004 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. I DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None X PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: None X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section X 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Federal Highway. 2. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. UTILITIES Comments: 3. At the time of permitting, please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates X when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the time line should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This time line will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 4. All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as X well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable COA revised 11/05/04 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 5. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water X and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 6. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article IV, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-l6(b )). 7. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid X for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 8. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. reqUIres the conservation of X potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irrigation. 9. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this X Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 10. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's "Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application FIRE Comments: 11. Hydrants must flow a minimum of 1500gpm @ 20psi over domestic use. X These hydrants must be fully operational before construction can begin. 12. All security entrance gates must have an electronic key number pad or an X approved alternative and be compliant with the minimum fire department requirements of Section 9-1: Roadway Security Gates and Emergency Access. 13. Fire Department access shall be maintained throughout construction. This X COA revised 11/05/04 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT includes any security gates. City Ordinance 9-3F. POLICE Comments: None X BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 14. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X proposed construction. 15. Add to the building that is depicted on the drawing titled site plan and floor X plan a labeled symbol that identifies the location of the handicap accessible entrance doors to the building. 2001 FBC, Sections 11-4.1.2, 11-4.1.3, and 11-4.3. 16. Add to the drawing the calculations that were used to identify the minimum X number of required handicap accessible parking space/so Also, state the code section that is applicable to the computations. 17. Identify within the site data the finish floor elevation (lowest floor elevation) X that is proposed for the building. Verify that the proposed elevation is in compliance with regulations of the code by adding specifications to the site data that address the following issues: The design professional-of-record for the project shall add the following text to the site data. "The proposed finish floor elevation _. _ NGVD is above the highest 100-year base flood elevation applicable to the building site, as determined by the SFWMD' s surface water management construction development regulations." 18. As required by the CBBCO, Part III titled "Land Development Regulations", X submit a site plan that clearly depicts the setback dimensions from each property line to the leading edge of the building/so The leading edge of the building/s begins at the closest point of the overhang or canopy to the property line. In addition, show the distance between all the buildings on all sides. 19. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with X approved opening protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2. 20. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are COA revised 11/05/04 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 21. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 22. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the X location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 23. At time of permit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X proposed construction. 24. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 25. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. 26. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article II, Sections 26-34) 27. At time of permit review, submit a signed and sealed survey as required by X CBB LDR, Chapter 2, Section 9. 28. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 29. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X documents at the time of permit application submittal. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. PARKS AND RECREATION COA revised 11/05/04 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Comments: None X FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST Comments: Map of Boundarv Survey sheet 13 total Existing Tree species; Live Oak (5), Palm (6), Almond tree (1), and Rubber tree (1). 30. The landscape plan does not indicate the trees that will be preserved, X relocated, or removed / mitigate on-site. Therefore, at the time of permitting, the landscape plan (sheet L1 of 2) shall indicate those trees that would be preserved, relocated, and removed / mitigated on the site. Also, the landscape plan tabular data should indicate the total caliper inches of existing trees proposed to be removed and show all caliper inches of replacement trees on the landscape plan. A separate symbol should be used on the landscape plan to identify the mitigation trees. Staff recommends preserving any Live Oak or Palm trees that are in good health. This determination will be made at the time of permitting. 31. The landscape plans should include a details sheet indicating by a line where X the height, caliper @ DBH, clear trunk, and gray wood area of the shade and palm trees will be measured at time of planting and inspection. 32. At the time of permitting, all shrubs specifications should indicate the height X and spread dimensions. 33. At the time of permitting, the applicant should show on Sheet L-l an X elevation cross-section detail of the actual heights of the proposed landscape trees and vegetation at the time of planting that will (proper scale) visually buffer the proposed buildings from the Federal Highway right-of-way. 34. At the time of permitting, the proposed trees should be installed at a X minimum height that will provide for tree canopies at the 25'-35' height level along Federal Highway. These trees should be installed in an effort to break up the expanse of the buildings. This design should visually obscure portions of the second story level of the buildings. The applicant should evaluate the trees design along the North, South, and West elevations shown on landscape sheet. PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 35. On the site plan tabular data (sheet S-l), correctly indicate the proposed X building setbacks. Also, indicate that the Land Use is "Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and the zoning is "Community Commercial" C-3). COA revised 11/05/04 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. The project surveyor certifies that the lot area is 31,702 square feet. The site X plan tabular data does not reflect the same. Prior to the issuance of any permits, revise either one of the plans so that they are both consistent with each other. 37. The removal/relocation of trees is subj ect to review and approval of the City X Forester / Environmentalist. 38. On the landscape plan (sheet 1 of 1), ensure that the plant quantities must X match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. 39. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species X (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). At the time of permitting, please categorize the plant material and quantify as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. 40. The monument sign must be located at least 10 feet from the front (east) X property line (Chapter 21, Article III, Section 5.). COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGNECY CONDITIONS: Comments: 41. None X CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS: Comments: 42. To be determined. MWR/elj S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-012\COA revised.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST This completed cover sheet must accompany all agenda item requests. Please place check marks in the boxes as indicated. Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form. Submit original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of agenda request (with back up) to the City Clerk's office. Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below. Incomplete or late items will be returned to originating department. Requested City Deadline for Submittal to City P &: D/CRA Requests Deadline Commission Mee~ing Clerk's Office Dates Au ust 3 2004 o Au ust 17 2004 o Se tember 7 2004 Se tember 21 2004 October 4 2004 October 19 2004 o November 3 2004 IZI November 16 2004 Departments are responsible for securing the following si natures on attached A enda Re uest Form: De artment Head Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds All back u material is attached All exhibits are attached & marked e. . Exhibit "A' $)I\&f- f' 46- Department Head's initials: Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Please do not write in the shaded area below. Legal Department signatl,Jre 0 ITEM RETURNED FOR THE F0LLOWING REASON(S): City Manager's signature o Person contacted to pick up rejected request by bg - 7/19/02 S:\Planning\Planning Templates\Agenda Item Cover Sheet Checklist Aug 3 - Nov 16, 2004.doc on (Date) ({( CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office 0 August 3, 2004 (Noon,) July 19,2004 0 October 5,2004 (Noon) September 20, 2004 0 August 17, 2004 (Noon) August 2, 2004 0 October 19,2004 (Noon) October 4,2004 0 September 7, 2004 (Noon) August 16, 2004 0 November 3, 2004 (Noon) October 18,2004 ~ September 21,2004 (Noon) September 7, 2004 0 November 16, 2004 (Noon) November 1, 2004 0 Administrative 0 Development Plans NATURE OF ~ Consent Agenda 0 New Business AGENDA ITEM 0 Public Hearing 0 Legal 0 Bids 0 Unfinished Business 0 Announcement 0 Presentation 0 City Manager's Report RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the September 21,2004 City Commission Agenda under Consent Agenda. The Community Redevelopment Agency Board with a unanimous vote, recommended that the subject be table indefinitely, to allow the applicant the opportunity to redesign the project to improve building appearance and landscaping. For further details pertaining to the request, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 04-210. EXPLANATION: PROJECT: AGENT: OWNER: LOCATION: DESCRIPTION: Edward Medical Office (NWSP 04-012) Hany Edward Hany Edward 3908 North Federal Highway, Delray Beach (unincorporated) Request for new site plan approval for a 11,957 square foot medical office building in a proposed C-3 zoning district. PROGRAM IMPACT: FISCAL IMPACT: ALTERNATIVES: N/A N/A N/A Develo e De artment Dir tor City Manager's Signature ~t)~ Planning and n g Director City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-0 12\Agenda Item RequestEdward Med Office BId NWSP 04-012 9-21-04,doc S:\BULLET1N\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM,DOC D~ELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING DMSION MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-210 STAFF REPORT TO: Chair and Members Community Redevelopment Agency Board Michael Rumpf Planning and Zoning Director Eric Lee Johnson, AICP <:;.~ Planner TI August 31, 2004 THRU: FROM: DATE: PROJEcr NAME/NO: REQUEST: Edward Medical Office Building / NWSP 04-012 New Site Plan PROJECT DESCRlPnON Property Owner: Mr. Hany Edward Applicant: Mr. Hany Edward Agent: Mr. Hany Edward Location: West side of South Federal Highway, approximately 350 feet south of the Intersection of Old Dixie Highway and South Federal Highway (see Location Map - Exhibit "A'') Existing Land Use: CH/5 Commercial High Intensity (Palm Beach County) Proposed Land Use: Local Retail Commercial (LRC) Existing Zoning: CG General Commercial (Palm Beach County) Proposed Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3) Proposed Use: 11,957 square foot medical office building Acreage: O.72-acre (31,702 square feet) . Adjacent Uses: North: Developed commercial property with a Local Retail Commercial (LRC) land use classification, zoned Community Commercial (C-3); South: Developed commercial property classified as Palm Beach County Commercial High / Medium Residential MR-5 (CH /5) land use and zoned Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 2 East: Palm Beach County General Commercial (CG)i Right-of-way for South Federal Highway, then farther east Is undeveloped residential property (future Waterside residential development by Southern Homes, Inc.) with a Special High Density Residential (SHDR) land use classification, zoned Infill Planned Unit Development (IPUD)i Developed residential property classified as Palm Beach County Medium Residential (5 units per acre - RM/5) land use and zoned Palm Beach County Residential Multi-family (RM). PROPERTY OWNER NOTIFICATION West: Owners of properties within 400 feet of the subject conditional use were mailed a notice of this request and Its respective hearing dates. The applicant certifies that they posted signage and mailed notices in accordance with Ordinance No. 04-007. BACKGROUND Proposal: Mr. Hany Edward Is requesting new site plan approval for the construction of an 11,957 square foot medical office building on a 0.72-acre parcel. The subject property Is currently located outside the city limits and is under Palm Beach County jurisdiction. The applicant is also concurrently requesting to annex the property into the city and to rezone to the Community Commercial (C-3) zoning district. Therefore, approval of this site plan Is contingent upon the approval of the corresponding requests for annexation, land use amendment, and rezoning (ANEX 04-004 and LUAR 04-008 - see exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). A medical office building is a permitted use in the C-3 zoning district. The construction of the building, parking lot, and all other site Improvements would occur within one (1) phase. Site Characteristic: The subject property Is a small, partially developed, rectangular-shaped lot that contains overgrown grass and various shade and palm trees. The survey shows that a concrete ramp currently provides access to the site from South Federal Highway. This concrete ramp extends westward, connecting to rock and mulch paths that are located within the parcel's' Interior. There are two (2) vacant buildings located In the northeast corner of the property. These buildings would be demolished shortly after site plan approval. Also, support poles for a former billboard are currently located along the southern property line. Ukewlse, these poles would be removed after site plan approval to make way for new building construction. The survey shows that a water-well Is currently located along the north property line, near the center of the property. It would be removed (because of the new parking areas) but would be re-established elsewhere on-site for Irrigation purposes. Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 3 ANALYSIS Service /Impacts: Traffic- A traffic impact statement for this project was submitted and sent to the Palm Beach County Traffic Division for their review and approval. The Division sent the following statement: "Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the proposed project does not constitute a 1% LOS D Capacity Impact on Federal Highway, and therefore meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. No building permits are to be Issued by the town, after the build- out date specified above (2005)". Drainage- Conceptual drainage information was provided for the City's review. The CIty's concurrency ordinance requires drainage certification at time of site plan approval. The Engineering Division found the conceptual drainage plans to be acceptable at this time and is recommending that the review of specific drainage solutions be deferred until time of permit review, when more complete engineering documents are required (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). As proposed, the on-site drainage system shall be accomplished via a combination of green swales and exfiltration trenches. School- School concurrency is not required for this type of project. Utilities- There is sufficient potable water pressure to provide domestic and fire-flow needs for this low-rise facility. The project would connect to the existing four (4) inch force main for sanitary sewer. Police- This project has been reviewed for potential service impacts and availability, and based upon the planned office use, It has been determined that services allocated to, or existing within the area are adequate to provide the project with a necessary level of service. Fire- This project has been reviewed for potential service Impacts and availability, and based upon the planned office use, It has been determined that services allocated to, or existing within the area are adequate to provide the project with a necessary level of service. Driveways: The existing concrete ramp, located on South Federal Highway would be upgraded and transformed Into the property's main driveway opening. This opening would be 24 feet In width and would provide for both vehicular Ingress and egress. It would allow for right-turn only egress. Parking Facility: Medical offices require one (1) parking space per 200 square feet of gross floor area. The proposed building would be 11,957 square feet In area and therefore, the project would require 60 parking spaces. The site plan (sheet S-I) shows that 60 parking spaces are proposed, six (6) of which, would be designated for handicap Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 4 Landscaping: parking. Retail uses could be allowed In the building due to the fact retail Is a permitted use In C-3 zoning district and that the parking ratio for medical office and retail is the same (1 space per 200 square feet). The parking spaces would be dimensioned nine (9) feet In width by 18 feet In length. The 90-degree handicap space would be 12 feet In width with five (5) feet of striping by 18 feet In length. As proposed, the vehicular back-up distance would be at minimum, 24 feet In width to comply with the Engineering Standards. The parking lot lighting is shown on the photometric plan (sheet E-l). According to the photometric plan, the proposed lighting levels near the perimeters would be minimal. It should have no adverse affect on the neighboring properties. The site plan (sheet S-I) tabular data indicates the proposed pervious area of the parcel would equal 4,651 square feet or 14.7% of the total site. The landscape plan (sheet Ll of 2) indicates that 57% of the trees would be native and 86% of the shrubs / groundcover would be native. At the time of permitting, the landscape plan would have to be revised to Indicate the native plant material categorized as follows: Palm trees, shade trees, and shrubs / groundcover (see exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The east (front) landscape buffer would be at least seven (7) feet in width. The Federal Highway Cross-Section (sheet Ll of 2) Illustrates the varying types of shade and palm tree species proposed within this buffer. The Entry-Way Enlargement (sheet L2 of 2) indicates the proposed plant type and quantities. The plant material includes the following: Duranta Gold Mound, Purple Showers, Silver Buttonwood, Chinese Fan Palm, Simpson Stopper, Dwarf Rrebush, and Travelers Palm trees. The side landscape buffers (north and south) would be at least two and one-half (2- V2) feet in width. These buffers would contain a row of Sliver Buttonwood trees and Redtip Cocoplum hedges. One (1) tree would be Installed every 25 feet. The landscape architect and the City Forester would determine the relocation and mitigation of all existing trees during field inspections occurring at the time of permitting (see Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). The rear (west) landscape buffer would be at least two and one-half (2 V2) feet in width. The small properties to the west lie outside the city limits but they are zoned residential. Therefore, the applicant is proposing a buffer wall along this west property line, which would help serve as a buffer between the subject project and the abutting properties to the west. The buffer wall detail indicates it would be a C.B.S. wall, six (6) feet in height and eight (8) inches in width. No color(s) are depicted on the wall detail so therefore, staff is recommending that the color(s) of the buffer wall should be compatible with the approved building colors (see exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). Finally, the landscape plan also shows that a row of Simpson Stopper would be installed on the Inside of the wall while Fakahatchee grass Is proposed on the outside of the wall. Building and Site: The proposed building is designed as a flat-roofed, two (2)-story structure with under-story parking. The elevations (sheet A-2) Indicate that this flat rooftop would be 24 feet In height and the top of the parapet wall would be 26 feet In height. The Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 5 peak of the decorative towers would be 32 feet - one (1) Inch In height. The maximum height allowed for new buildings In the C-3 zoning district Is 45 feet. The building would comply with the height restrictions of the C-3 zoning district. The minimum front setback In the C-3 zoning district Is 20 feet; the building would be setback 22 feet - 11 Inches. The required side setbacks In the C-3 district are zero (0) feet and 15 feet (on corner lots) and since the subject lot is nestled between lots, no side setback would be required. As proposed, the building would be setback zero (0) feet on the south side and 46 feet - 11 Inches on the north. The minimum rear setback Is 20 feet; the project provides 153 feet - nine (9) Inches. As previously mentioned, an existing water-well would be eliminated from its current location and established elsewhere on the site. According to the applicant, the probable location for the new well would most likely occur at the southwest corner of the property, near the proposed lift station. The proposed dumpster enclosure would be located at the northwest comer of the site. In keeping with staffs' recommendations and to help soften the hardscape, a large, landscaped island Is proposed within the center of the expansive parking lot. Finally, development would be a gated community. A white aluminum fence is proposed near the front (east) property line. The North and South Aluminum Fence Detail (sheet A-3) Indicates that It would be a white aluminum fence, six (6) feet In height. The C.B.S. columns of the fence would be painted to match the building. At the time of permitting, staff would ensure compliance with Fire Code regarding emergency and fire truck access to the site is constantly maintained (see Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Design: The proposed design Is compatible with the surrounding built environment and would generally enhance the overall success of the Federal Highway corridor. The architecture and style of the proposed building Is consistent with the newer medical office buildings and would be considered an upgrade to the buildings within the Immediate area. The main wall colors can be described as orange and yellow In color with white accents. Although similar, the proposed colors Indicated on the black / white elevation drawings submitted herein, do not match the colors indicated on the colored elevations. Buildings, structures, and site elements are not required to match surrounding existing developments, but shall be In visual harmony with surrounding developments. Buildings shall achieve visual unity In character and design concepts In part, through building colors. Staff feels that the proposed building colors represented on the colored elevations are too vibrant and not In keeping with the Intent of the Community Design Plan. Therefore, staff recommends reducing the Intensity of the proposed building colors In order to achieve a higher degree of compatibility and harmony with the surrounding properties (see exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval). Regardless of the main wall colors, the accent trim-work would be painted white, which Is consistent with past approvals. Signage: No wall signs are proposed. The site plan (sheet 5-1) shows that two (2) entry features are proposed along the front (east) property line, outside of the safe-sight Staff Report - Edward Medical Office Building (NWSP 04-012) Memorandum No PZ 04-210 Page 6 triangle. One of these entry structures would be a water fountain; the other would be a monument sign. The Entry fountain & Sign detail shows that these structures would be no more than six (6) feet In height. The monument sign would have black Palantino style letters constructed of aluminum, mounted flush on the structure. The site plan does not Indicate the setback of both structures but only the monument sign would be required to be at least 10 feet from the property line (see exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval). RECOMMENDATION: The Technical Review Committee (TRC) has reviewed this request for new site plan approval. Staff recommends approval, contingent upon the approval of the corresponding requests for annexation and rezoning, In conjunction with successfully satisfying all comments Indicated In exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval. Any additional conditions recommended by the Board or City Commission shall be documented accordingly in the Conditions of Approval. S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-012\Staff Report.doc ",",,' EDWARD MEDICAL OFFICE , LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A HDR SHDR CH/5 -:. LRC CH/5 f .. tlD ~... LEGEND .10.. ...... City Boundary Land us..: LRC . Local Retail COm....rclal HDR . High Density Residential SHDR . Special High Density Residential MR-5 . Medium R..ldentlal (county) CHIS . COm....rclal High, wtundertylng MR-5 (county) -=XHIBIT "8" .- ~,')!l1 Hili 1m I 111.1; . i!!! ;B .ul, =-.1 J!! i.1 ~ .!:I :1 ~ · iil ~ ! II -, I~. II~ el~ hi . I~ .. o ... .. .. · III Iii 11'11111 11!1,r' III I ! I , II II I I I ~~ . I II II' I- 1.""'1 I III i; I I I. .'~ I · I I.. I I I Ii .n, III-Iunlt- I 'rrr~ III D. I III ~ '"'~ Cf" I , : I !1i!'IIJ~ =~..r=" - , I ~~, nl' 6P .....ylWH,~ :ea . ... lZ ~I illlll!1 ;~I~ Id; II;; till fl- .:~ !I ~I III Iii 1-. <90 Gee ~~~I Q '1 IIIII~ I ~ !" ~ II . . <9 o ~ ~Ii . ~tct[ -I . Q l>! imrl'! ! 'I ...., . .' ~ C^"ltJll --1:1" IA~ Iii iJJ ill I II . . 111I .!-c .....ftN ~ I 1 !U'II;i~ ---=.r=.u.a:-- ... I J 1'..-11 0 IllINoTMrIrCM,MMIA. " I. I . -- fIl' In Iii 1-. I ~~ . ~ ~ ! 8~~, ~ll' m'rlfl : &mii I &11 D i~~' I ~i~~' , &, & G a IiI I ~I t;~. i 1!illS l ~~~ I111I E: 11111 E: ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ I ~ II I::~II:JI I --1:1" II ~~! I I i In II ~~~"Rj ,IF'i ~III ~ C1 . - - II I , , I (t I 'rrrrl'IIIO ~. Ii I" · ~ I to'l " I U m~li ---Ef~_ .~ I III Iii 1-. : ..r{-nrJfJ\llfjriiii!fi:~.-~r--- ':, "In; A" -tll\."I!lI. - 'II .,.:: I I: ' "' I' . - ~ I I. -' In. -. t -, . -, .:\ -,'j 1 lif,lil<<.1I - : i ifill' I -'- ,\'1 ",lfI1hii'! I i~__I; JII11I, I. -.j _ ,I' _I'! II"; I . L -.---.-'-.-- .1._~,,,--_.._-- I . --:-._-,--,,~.,--.~--~~--., I EXHIBIT "B" . I tll t lJl 1 I 'I ~ I I I II r 1 I I f I ffi r I I ,II' I .... :1lI1111 )JIIJ · ~ j , .. ~-' .' I . :':.- .; 11 I '-, .. \,' ,. ( ':- I- '-:"'l' ,:-- : - . i i '. I ...... li 1_" --, - I _ I - . .: '. ':." ~ " ....:: ':', " ..:.. .i...;.".. ....,..... '. I .,- .' 1 . . ~ ~'.~ ~. ~,-,- ~~- , ,.~ -I- . I'.. . -- i . . I' ~ ", , I ,. . ' . -----.-- _ ,...nJ -. . , ,. i l ~j . ,- I. :1. -! . I ," 11'1, ~e ! , t i : ., 'I 'i i >1' '." . "',l'~'iitl.._ "'/; ~: I - . ,,-!HAtN~I. WARb,:OfFICE :. . , ..~__. , " ......... FlorldI. ' . '. ~~.:. .. . _ oeelGNED BY: ' - _ CARTER &-ASsOCIATES , LANDSCAPe ARCHrrECTS. INC. , .,..., IItICh. FI. . 1lI1.27Ul1Z1 I' EXHIBIT "C" Conditions of Approval Project name: Edward Medical Office Building File number: NWSP 04-012 Reference: 2nd review plans identified as a New Site Plan with an August 3. 2004 Planning and Zoning Department date stamp marking. DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PUBLIC WORKS - General Comments: None X PUBLIC WORKS - Traffic Comments: None X ENGINEERING DIVISION Comments: 1. Show sight triangles on the Landscape plans (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section X 5.H.). Reference FDOT Standard Index 546 for the sight triangles along Federal Highway. 2. Full drainage plans, including drainage calculations, in accordance with the X LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 5 will be required at the time of permitting. 3. Paving, Drainage and site details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All engineering construction details shall be in accordance with the applicable City of Boynton Beach Standard Drawings and the "Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" and will be reviewed at the time of construction oermit aoolication. UTILITIES Comments: 4. At the time of permitting, please provide a timeline that clearly illustrates X when water and sewer services will be required to serve the proposed project. Your starting date for the timeline should be the date of City Commission approval. Also provide milestone dates for permit application, the start of construction, and the setting of the first water meter. This timeline will be used to determine the adequacy of water and wastewater treatment capacity for your project upon the project's completion, so please be as accurate as possible. 5. All utility easements shall be shown on the site plan and landscape plans (as X well as the Water and Sewer Plans) so that we may determine which appurtenances, trees or shrubbery may interfere with utilities. In general, palm trees will be the only tree species allowed within utility easements. COA 09/01/04 2 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT Canopy trees may be planted outside of the easement so that roots and branches will not impact those utilities within the easement in the foreseeable future. The LDR, Chapter 7.5, Article I, Section 18.1 gives public utilities the authority to remove any trees that interfere with utility services, either in utility easements or public rights-of-way. 6. Palm Beach County Health Department permits will be required for the water X and sewer systems serving this project (CODE, Section 26-12). 7. Fire flow calculations will be required demonstrating the City Code X requirement of 1,500 g.p.m. (500 g.p.m. some residential developments) with 20 p.s.i. residual pressure as stated in the LDR, Chapter 6, Article N, Section 16, or the requirement imposed by insurance underwriters, whichever is greater (CODE, Section 26-16(b)). 8. The CODE, Section 26-34(E) requires that a capacity reservation fee be paid X for this project either upon the request for the Department's signature on the Health Department application forms or within seven (7) days of site plan approval, whichever occurs first. This fee will be determined based upon final meter size, or expected demand. 9. Comprehensive Plan Policy 3.C.3.4. requires the conservation of X potable water. As other sources are readily available City water shall not be allowed for irriu;ation. 10. A building permit for this project shall not be issued until this X Department has approved the plans for the water and/or sewer improvements required to service this project, in accordance with the CODE, Section 26-15. 11. Utility construction details will not be reviewed for construction X acceptability at this time. All utility construction details shall be in accordance with the Utilities Department's ''Utilities Engineering Design Handbook and Construction Standards" manual (including any updates); they will be reviewed at the time of construction permit application FIRE Comments: 12. Hydrants must flow a minimum of 1500gpm @ 20psi over domestic use. X These hydrants must be fully operational before construction can beltin. 13. All security entrance gates must have an electronic key number pad or an approved alternative and be compliant with the. minimum fire department requirements of Section 9-1: Roadway Security Gates and Emergency Access. COA 09/01/04 3 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 14. Fire Department access shall be maintained throughout construction. This X includes any security Jl;ates. City Ordinance 9-3F. POLICE Comments: None X BUILDING DIVISION Comments: 15. Every exterior wall within 15 feet of a property line shall be equipped with X approved openinJl; protectives per 2001 FBC, Section 705.1.1.2. 16. Buildings, structures and parts thereof shall be designed to withstand the X minimum wind loads of 140 mph. Wind forces on every building or structure shall be determined by the provisions of ASCE 7, Chapter 6, and the provisions of 2001 FBC, Section 1606 (Wind Loads). Calculations that are signed and sealed by a design professional registered in the state of Florida shall be submitted for review at the time of permit application. 17. Every building and structure shall be of sufficient strength to support the X loads and forces encountered per the 2001 FBC, Section 1601.2.1 and Table 1604.1. Indicate the live load (pst) on the plans for the building design. 18. Add to all plan view drawings of the site a labeled symbol that represents the X location and perimeter of the limits of construction proposed with the subject request. 19. At time ofpennit review, submit signed and sealed working drawings of the X proposed construction. 20. CBBCPP 3.C.3.4 requires the conservation of potable water. City water may X not, therefore, be used for landscape irrigation where other sources are readily available. 21. A water-use permit from SFWMD is required for an irrigation system that X utilizes water from a well or body of water as its source. A copy of the permit shall be submitted at the time of permit application, F.S. 373.216. COA 09/01/04 4 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 22. If capital facility fees (water and sewer) are paid in advance to the City of X Boynton Beach Utilities Department, the following information shall be provided at the time of building permit application: a. The full name of the project as it appears on the Development Order and the Commission-approved site plan. b. The total amount paid and itemized into how much is for water and how much is for sewer. (CBBCO, Chapter 26, Article IT, Sections 26-34) 23. At time of permit review, submit a signed and sealed survey as required by X CBB LDR, Chapter 2, Section 9. 24. Pursuant to approval by the City Commission and all other outside agencies, X the plans for this project must be submitted to the Building Division for review at the time of permit application submittal. The plans must incorporate all the conditions of approval as listed in the development order and approved by the City Commission. 25. The full address of the project shall be submitted with the construction X documents at the time of permit application submittal. The name of the project as it appears on the Development Order must be noted on the building permit application at the time of application submittal. PARKS AND RECREATION Comments: None X FORESTERlENVIRONMENTALIST Comments: MaD of Boundarv Survev sheet 13 total Existing Tree species; Live Oak (5), Palm (6), Almond tree (1), and Rubber tree (1). 26. The landscape plan does not indicate the trees that will be preserved, X relocated, or removed I mitigate on-site. Therefore, at the time of permitting, the landscape plan (sheet Ll of 2) shall indicate those trees that would be preserved, relocated, and removed I mitigated on the site. Also, the landscape plan tabular data should indicate the total caliper inches of existing trees proposed to be removed and show all caliper inches of replacement trees on the landscape plan. A separate symbol should be used on the landscape plan to identify the mitigation trees. Staff recommends preserving any Live Oak or Palm trees that are in good health. This determination will be made at the time of permitting. COA 09/01/04 5 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT PLANNING AND ZONING Comments: 27. Approval of this project is contingent upon the approval of the corresponding X requests for annexation (ANEX 04-004) and land use amendment / rezoning (LUAR 04-008). 28. On the site plan tabular data (sheet S-I), please indicate the following: X Previous Land Use - General Commercial (High Commercial CHl5); Approved Land Use - Local Retail Commercial (LRC); Previous Zoning - General Commercial (CHl5); and Approved Zoning - Community Commercial (C-3). 29. On the floor plan (sheet A-I), indicate the area(s), expressed in square feet, of X each use and its respective building area. The total of each floor should equal 11,989 square feet as indicated in the site plan tabular data. 30. The project surveyor certifies that the lot area is 31,702 square feet. The site X plan tabular data does not reflect the same. Prior to the issuance of any permits, revise the site plan tabular data so that the statistical information on the site plan is based on the area of the survey. 31. The removal/relocation of trees is subject to review and approval of the City X Forester / Environmentalist. 32. On the landscape plan (sheet 1 of 1), ensure that the plant quantities must X match between the tabular data and the graphic illustration. 33. Fifty percent (50%) of all site landscape materials must be native species X (Chapter 7.5, Article II, Section 5.P). Please categorize the plant material and Quantify as follows: Shade trees, Palm trees, Shrubs & Groundcover. 34. The monument sign must be located at least 10 feet from the front (east) X property line (Chapter 21, Article ill, Section 5.). 35. Staff recommends reducing the intensity of the proposed building colors in X order to achieve a higher degree of compatibility with the surrounding properties. Therefore, staff recommends utilizing the following Sherwin Williams paint: Champagne #6644 and Orange Blast #6646. Also, the color(s) of the buffer wall (in the rear), the columns of the fence (in the front), and the monument sign should resemble and be compatible with the approved colors of the building. COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGNECY CONDITIONS: Comments: COA 09/01/04 6 DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT 36. None X CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS: Comments: 37. To be determined. MWR/elj S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Edward Medical Office\NWSP 04-012\COA.doc CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST This completed cover sheet ~ accompany all agenda item requests. Please place check marks in the boxes as indicated. Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form. Submit original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of agenda request (with back up) to the City Clerk's office. Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below. Incomplete or late items will be returned to originating department. Requested City Deadline for Submittal to City P a D/CRA Requests Deadline Commission Meeting Clerk's Office Dates Au ust 3 2004 Au ust 17 2004 Se tember 7 2004 Se tember 21 2004 October 5 2004 o October 19 2004 November 3 2004 o November 16 2004 Departments are responsible for securing the following si natures on attached A enda Ruest Form: De artment Head Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds All back u material is attached All exhibits are attached & marked e. . Exhibit "A' 4\J~\! Department Head's initials: Edward Medical Office eN 04-012) Please do not write in the shaded area below. Legal Department Si9nature'O " ITEM RETURNED F6~ THE FOLLOWINGREASON(S): Signature(s) missing .0 ' Incomplete submittal' 0 Missed deadline :' D ' Other 0 ' . · Reason: City Manager's signature o Person contacted to pick up rejected request' by bg - 7/19/02 S:\Planning\Planning Templates\Agenda Item Cover Sheet Checklist Aug 3 - Nov 16, 2004.doc on (Date)