REVIEW COMMENTS
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-230
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
Michael W. Rumpf ~~Lrt
Director of Planning and Zoning
THRU:
FROM:
Maxime Ducoste {A--7A<
Planner r '(l -
DATE:
September 29, 2003
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Gateway Texaco Variances
Driveway variances ZNCV 03-010, 03-011 and 03-012
REQUEST:
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.d. (1) requiring
parking lot driveways to be located 120 feet from the intersection of the right-
of-way lines along streets of higher classification to allow a 97 -foot variance,
resulting in a distance of 23 feet, and to allow a 88-foot variance for a second
driveway, resulting in a distance of 32 feet from the intersection of Federal
Highway and Las Palmas Avenue for an existing gasoline dispensing
establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.d. (3) requiring
that driveways shall not be located less than thirty (30) feet from any interior
property line to allow a 1 O-foot variance, resulting in a distance of 20 feet for
an existing gasoline dispensing establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.d. (4) requiring
that driveways will be limited to one (1) per street frontage to allow two (2)
driveways along the street frontage for an existing gasoline dispensing
establishment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: SUAU Enterprises
Applicant/Agent: Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location: 2360 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3)/ Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use: 681 square foot addition to gasoline dispensing establishment (limited to a
maximum of 600 square feet by Condition of Approval for appeal - ADAP
Staff Report Driveway variances ZNCV 03-010, 03-011 and 03-012
Memorandum No PZ-03-230
Page 2
02-001 ).
Acreage:
0.48 Acre (20,830 square feet)
North:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Multi-family residential property, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
Adjacent Uses:
South:
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Avenue, and farther south are single-family attached
townhouses under construction (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit Development
(IPUD);
East:
Vacant commercial lot zoned Community Commercial (C-3) currently under review for
a proposed car wash, and farther east is a single-family residential dwelling (part of
Las Palmas development), zoned Single-family residential, (R-1-AA); and
West:
Rights-of-way of U.S. 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, and farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and
zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2).
BACKGROUND
Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises Incorporated, is
requesting conditional use / major site plan modification approval to construct a 681 square foot addition to an
existing gasoline dispensing establishment. In addition, the applicant is proposing new parking spaces, a
new access drive that would lead to the property directly to the east, and a general "make-over" of the exterior
facades of the gasoline station building and canopy. The number of gasoline pump islands and fueling
positions would remain unaltered.
The proposed 681 square foot addition to the gas station is considered as a conditional use in the C-3 zoning
district. Also, the gas-station is a legal non-conforming use because it does not comply with Chapter 2,
Section 11.L.3.a.(2) due to the fact that gas stations may only be located at intersections "consisting of roads
of four (4) lanes or wider".
Earlier last year, Mr. Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr. Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition to the existing gas station, in part, to satisfy outstanding code enforcement violations. He
also proposed direct access between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east (which was earmarked for
a mechanical carwash) in order to minimize vehicular traffic onto Las Palmas Avenue. These inquiries were
based on the presumption that the proposed addition would be allowed and that direct access would only
require site plan review. However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the addition would not be
permitted because it would represent an unlawful expansion of a non-conforming (a gasoline-dispensing
establishment).
To answer Mr. Kruger's inquiries, on July 16, 2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an
administrative determination letter that basically prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas-
station building because doing it would constitute a violation of Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land
Development Regulations. Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the
proposed driveway connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east could be permitted.
However, the direct access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a legally binding cross-
access agreement.
On July 31, 2002, Mr. Kruger addressed a letter requesting a formal appeal of the aforementioned
administrative determination. According to the staff report, "in summary, the appeal justifies the proposed
Staff Report Driveway variances ZNCV 03-010, 03-011 and 03-012
Memorandum No PZ-03-230
Page 3
expansion by the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the non-conforming
aspect-gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent of the gasoline
sales element of the business. Staff disagreed with the applicant's position. The City Commission approved
the appeal with the condition that the expansion would be limited to 600 square feet. Therefore, this major
site plan modification and accompanying variance requests represent the applicant's continuing effort to
construct a building addition and mechanical car wash on the abutting property (see Exhibit "B" - Site Plan
and Survey). If approved, the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fac;:ade improvements would occur
in one (1) phase.
As part of the major site plan modification process, the site has to meet all the requirements of the Land
Development Regulations or obtain relief if necessary.The subject property, Gateway Texaco, owned by
SUAU Enterprises is located at 2360 N. Federal Highway. The agent, Beril Kruger is requesting relieffrom the
above-referenced Land Development Regulations, which requires that parking lot driveways be constructed
at least one hundred twenty (120) feet from streets of higher classifications.
The existing gas station business includes two (2), existing driveway entrances measuring 30 feet wide
providing ingress and egress along North Federal Highway and one (1) existing driveway entrance measuring
30 feet wide along Las Palmas Avenue. The southernmost entrance driveway on North Federal Highway is
located approximately 23 feet from Las Palmas Avenue, while the second driveway is located 103 feet from
Las Palmas and 20 feet from the interior property line (north property line). The existing driveway is located on
a major arterial (Federal Highway), therefore, the 120 foot separation from the intersection and interior
property line is required.
As indicated on the site plan associated with the proposed addition, the applicant is proposing to construct
a 681 square foot addition located at the rear (east side) of the existing gas station building along the east
property line (see Exhibit "B" - Proposed Site Plan). The subject parcel is approximately 0.48 acres in size
with approximately 153 feet of frontage along North Federal Highway, and 136 feet of frontage along Las
Palmas Avenue (see Exhibit "B" - Survey). The special lot conditions that exist are the short frontage
distance along the North Federal Highway right-of-way and, that the driveways are existing and necessary for
fueling tanker circulation. As such, limiting the site to one driveway access point on North Federal Highway,
at the minimum driveway separation of 120 feet, which meets site circulation needs is not feasible. If such
redesign could meet this standard and operational needs, it is likely that other deficiencies, and the need for
other variances would be generated.
ANALYSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district.
b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure.
Staff Report Driveway variances ZNCV 03-010, 03-011 and 03-012
Memorandum No PZ-03-230
Page 4
f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter
[ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare.
Staff has conducted this review with the assumption that, based on the city's prior approval of the
administrative appeal acknowledging the increase in intensity of this non-conforming use, that the city is
aware of the potential of certain hardships and non-conformities associated with the site.
Staff also reviewed the requested variances focusing on the applicant's response to the above criteria
contained in Exhibit "C" - Statement of Special Conditions, as well as existing site restrictions, and proposed
design requirements. Staff has determined that site constraints at this location are a partial justification for
granting this variance. In order to satisfy the Land Development Regulations, the driveways along North
Federal Highway would have to be placed 120 feet from the intersection of Las Palmas Avenue. This
scenario would not leave the additional linear footage necessary to provide the 30-foot minimum driveway
width and the 30-foot minimum distance from the interior property line, as required by code. Further
complying with code would result in the elimination of both existing driveways on North Federal Highway. This
would create inefficient internal and external vehicular traffic circulation and undue hardship, which could
force the closing of the business or negatively affect the neighborhood to the east. The driveways on Federal
Highway minimize the traffic impact of this existing business onto Las Palmas Avenue. If there was only one
project entrance (the Las Palmas Avenue entrance), traffic exiting from the site including refueling trucks
would have insufficient stacking length at the adjacent traffic signal/intersection. This situation would congest
the secondary roadway and adjacent residential neighborhood. Leaving the existing driveways on North
Federal Highway lessens this potential traffic problem.
It should be noted that granting a variance for the southernmost driveway distance would also cover the
distance variance requested for the northern driveway.
In keeping with the City's Land Development Regulations, the applicant's response to the above criteria is
included within Exhibit "C" Statement of Special Conditions justifying the requested variance. In summary,
granting this variance may be supported for the following reasons:
a. A special condition exists which is peculiar to the subject property;
b. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties similarly zoned;
c. The variance requested represents the minimum variance needed to utilize the property for
access (the existing driveways are located along the western extent of the property); and
d. That the granting of the variance would be in harmony with the general intent of the regulation to
promote safe and adequate traffic circulation.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis contained herein, Staff recommends that the requested variances be approved. No
conditions of approval are recommended; however, any conditions of approval added by the Community
Redevelopment Agency Board or the City Commission will be placed in the Exhibit "0" - Conditions of
Approval.
MWR/MD
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010 thru 03-017, 023, 024 ISTAFF REP ZNCV 03-010 to 03-012 Driveway Variances,doc
f)
Location Nrap
Gateway Texaco
~ H
~
-----j
I
"::= SITE ~
r.....
QLJ
/
-'-~~'
.- ......
t
- ~... ~ R3
I
~ ......
~~... \
... '... \ I
I
.
'-.b;1 ~~ll ~
I ~~ I ~/
1 I
I
IPUD
J
..
1 REC
. I
L.-~~~ ~~i ~~ ~~~!
-...., aa a aa
I C'JD CCJ CJo
1;3
I
"- 1._ _ __, . ,,_
I
I I I
REC I
I I f I ,
I I II I
I , .L I ?
I ~ t)V 0LJ
J I
J /'- / I
EXHIBIT "A"
o;j/
~.$
cfr
; 1 i ~I'H!:i :i il
;j ;;:d!~r;lll
~ iJIl:~1 pt;"h
~ '~l'. !~hll
~ ~ i ~I il d:!' "
" ~ i I I /" III
1:; H ~ I :iq II
~~ I'ili,
~ ~ E; J
~
.
;
, .
=(!~i &;
..~ g~
~~8~ ~II'" \C
....-... -<
c~~j ~ ~ -<
m~! ; CT1
"
d! ~ I", r
J>
~i:::> "II z
;;~~~ ::;, 0 ::;:
".' '~~ ~
i~~ ~zr,. =: "
~~i >~ : ;u
!., ~~ 0
0 "
... ~" 0
ie. ~! If)
'! ~. CT1
'i~ ~~ ~ 0
Ii. ;; ;;;
'2~ ~i J>
~! ; 0
i" . ~ 2
;:~ g~ -<
,"! ;; (5
nh z
.
~~I
;
":;;'1i\-'\j
~.~e
-<~;~
z~i~
i~i
~c'
-~
~;~'~"~~;i .".-
'~sm;s;!' .
~s.n~i~:;~ '"U~
5mi~:e~:::~ ~-;
Mi~li~~~' 8m
~~~~~J;~i ;ia
m~m~~ s~~
!..;;.-,-~f ~~.
.~;;>.h~~ :-.'
"o!~~n~:::~ ~~~.
~~-:~~.3. ~,.:~
~ll:~li ';~~ ~ i 2~
~l~~~ ;0;; 1"
~~~~" ~i~ ~ 'I
3So~~ ~.~ .. i
!i,1~~ ~1\. o.
~2;i= .~i ~ ~ I
~'.'i -.' .' i
~iU. ~g~ ~ i
i".' i~~ ~ <
~~m ;~~ ~ i I"
5.........3 z 0 Ii:,:l
.S-oo ."! -.
~ ~.t =20 ~
~ ~" i
· P d!
;- i 8,n
~li~ iH.".~5555! g~
~U ~!I~:~!m~ ~~ nw;m~~;~~i~n i~~ ~,H
co -t ~ ..~.O~ ";::"'I~"'''''''ii,e~...!i8(lOll~ .... jl:t:;l
~d i~i ~ I ~~ I ~mm.~~i~~~~~~~i~i~3~~!~ h~ ~~I
~ .i~ i ; ;w~~~:m~:~~~~~i~~~~:!:i i~~ ~~
s ~i ~ . ~!!g;;~ii~~~~5~~i~!~'~!~~:~~i I~~ ~~
~ ~ g -Ud~ ~~U~~~~~~~;Ei~i~I~1 !~Ii ~~
i " ,~i Ii~:<!i.'.,'~a~~~~~h"~" Illl
. . e ~~;E~~i~~~~i~!i~~ia i~. ~~
~ Il ;;~o~~ol.,..."i'~ ~.. o.
. . ......~lIlo('" l:'1:I!'i..,Q;;;...'J:21 U:t _0
.~!~.>~.!IIl.i~'1~ ~< l'
2!!~~~~~.~~~;!ij~ l~ l~
~_i~i,>~,~="l~" "s .~
~;i~~~.~~~.liii'i ~11~
IK~Qeo (l... ljlj!;e ~ ~
1;~~~d'~H~~~~~ ~n d
i"';~d~~C~~:..~,al t
, !'n,,!~.~.o~~li' ,~ <~
:F- "''''-t j;'" ... ... ~
~m~m~~~h!ii I~ il
l' _~~",'~>>i>~ .~ o.
.\i~.~~iF~i~i~~ ~~ ~~
g><~;; ~= ."i<~ ~ ~E
;
i"
Ii
s:
c:>
i I
I "
, J>
r
;::: ii
J>
If) ., VI
Js
J> I
<
CT1
z I
c
CT1
j.(1
Ii
I
~
=
"..k.- l
J!i~~
!.~
!I/" iZ
iii n
i
~
L
;:,
E~!
-. ~~
~.uo. 888=
~~:::~~:: :I::::::~
.
~i=~~; ~~;~
iii:::::~::! :r::~:::
i f
m
~.~
~~'"
~~~
.
5~m; ~ ~~5i;~ 5 ~ ~~ ~g"; n[;
~ ~. ss; ~~~ ~. ~'~~EE;;-E~;;. ~. ,! ~~i~
..~ .....~..i.~-.>"- >~.8~. 1l~1
; ~ 0 ~ i::;~' -g ~ ~ =.~e~.e ~~" ~i~:; .~.
..,zZ:' ...%.-_J..........,.:I;...>:f~>~18a$i1..jJ:iQ~
~cc-~~;~~~~i~~~!~:~ig~~~~i~;~~
~ ~ ~ g, ~,~~! ~~ U ~! ~ ~"5 ~ ~ ~~;!! ~~~
.' ~ 5 ~ ~~.;.;;... ~~.. ~ > ~ n ~~;;;,~-
. ...n:.o~"o.z~~~.~zc_~..,,,
" ~E~~~~:!Z~.;~~"~.3d3~~~~-1
i ~ 3~g~ii; ~Q,~),; lC!; lilg~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~; ~~
~ ~ ~"Z~lil~r~~;~~%~"'~""~~~~:o
I $ ::; "~~~~:I;;n6~!~:l;;;;e:~8!E:""-'"
~ ~~~E~gi~~~~~~=E~ffi~~~i
;i;;!: ~ ~ g ~~2 ~ ~ ~ I ~ e~; J
zz- ~o~.i"~_Z=>~z~c!~
."O~~"~;'~;' ~.i~;" ..f
n =: ~ ~ Z:'Z:l $~ S! ~ ~ e ~ IJ> i ~ ~~ ~
go~;o.~~Cl-8>~o",> E"'Ul~(")
r--- _..0.3,,~<.~~_~e_o.iIl~
',~ _____ i~~~=ilil~~~~~::nC~i ~~~
____ ~;d~~;';~~2~'~~~~~;S
___ ,>~~">,~~o:~o~".h"
i~ ~~g:e~;~~~~~~~I~.~~;1
; ~;~ a~; ~ ~ !~,.>~ ~~.~
~
NOR
THBOU
N 0
~
~
PROPOSED ADDITlON AND AL TERA TlONS TO'
CAR WASH TEXACO .
2360 'ORTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY
0"""'''''''''' 1:I,,"^r-u
1llZA.~AH.~.(
EXHIBIT liB"
0-
>w
;0'"
~8
>....
~~
....0
~~
>z
OGl
0"
1m
~~
~""
....Gl
0"
zm
"'~
~~
0",
m
.,,3:
r~ C
....C
~-- t~------=::::
==) ;
HIGHWAY
N 0, 1 '
-<
-<
"
n
Fe
-0
J>
;0
^
z
C)
If)
"
.J>
.n
_r<1
U, $,
i~m
!:~fi
ill!'
'..!
~M~
~gl!~
11!,q
l:ll
Ii':
~,oi'
'.lil
' ,
~
I' . .<me' ",",0
---.-
-~~-
-.......
...,---
~2Z
~';~ i!~'ii ~~ ~~~
s,,~n~~"l'!:~_~
.h~~~~3~_.c~~
~;~E~~"~e~:!I~~~
!~i~S;i~i~~~~i
~~~~;;~;~~:~~,,~.
g~~'":~;!';;~~~"i~~2
".~I<'~ii!.~~<"Z
:ig~ ~~~:::~~~=~~i
..., .~ ';;li:l~;:: ;~
;:~3:~e~~~~.~.~~~
. ...-~-.. c~o'_.
aE~~;~E~~~i~<~~3~
3:~~.~:~.g2~"i.~.
_:'~~'~l'~<~~S~~~E
gEi!~~"'~~~~;~i~~g
~~:=~~~~~3ii~S;~!
~~i~~iga~i~g~~e~;
~w~g-f~~<~~~5al ~
i:!'~~"~i;~'~,~"
gE3~~~:i~~S~~~~~~
:a~~~~~;~!<a~~~~S
- oe..~~~,~~::~.~
~~5~g~~~e;a~~g
e~~.<~g".e.~~!:
iHiS'~.!ee.c>~
.-..~e~~~.~~..~
~i:;i!l~~!~~~~~~;i
I~H=h~':~E~',
;:gaggf,~~e~9si
~i<~~i=~<3<C..."'1
,
i
,~ i
t~~~
~... :
~ ~1 S
.. '
-- ~~~ !
~ ~ ~~ ~
l~~i ~
..
,
~
"
,'.
" ,
~~
~ ~
'{~
t~
~
;).~.
~~
~~
~~
t -{
\-)~ ~
~ i"-i
, :.....
ll"''\...':!
~~~.
. ,
1~h
~.~~<
'"
"
5; i~
~~ ~~
~ _.S ~~
,< .""
~.~- '"
~:~.
~~ ~c
g~ ~~~
~~ ~~~
~~ >-=~
~~ ~~~
~~ ~~~
~~" i ~ S
~ .i~ ~~:
t ~~il .~~
lIli I:~"" !3=~
~ ~~~ !s~j
; e;~ ~~9
; g~~ !~~
"."
hl
t."'J1"
-. " .<e~~~im'g3~~~~r
,gg!ai-!3~~~!!~~~~ ~i~.i.~~le~~~~~i; '.
.~..~~ !~ -~~~i_; -oS~>.~e=c9i-~<s,
!.~S~~~~"~~O.~~~~ ;38.~;~i~=~~~~~;~ ~
~'~o'!".~'.~..". .~.,.."~,.""~~~:" ,
,nmmmmu !IUUUU!!!li!i1 ,';,
~~~~~~~~~i;~~i~~~ i~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~
~~'~"~~::>':~O'5 o~ :,!i.-.~~o'".;~ .
;33o~~~~-~:2;~~~: ~< ~=~~i~9~~:~i>=~~ ~ t
!~2g_~':~"j.":~~~ ~~i~~~ .e~;~~3f~~" ~
~;~J~~~~,e~1~;~;; 'e;3~' ~~O!~~~~~~~ Q
!.......<!<C02~~z~ !...>- e!. ~'i."=~
c~;.g~~5~:~~i":i~ !:ge;~~~~~ ~~ j.i. 1
~~~:~~~~!~a~~~;~!~ ;~~~~~~e~~i<:~~~i=
~~O!~><3~~~3~:.=.a .O~"i!3~..~.~~;~~,
'"...~~!,C;~~,,~.~~ ~~e~~~"~.8.~~~~..~ ~
i!~~3~;:lZ~~;~;:::=<~_i 1~~~~:it':!i~"9~__~!:... ()o:;,
2"~~~"~;'~i~~~~~~ 0 ~~~".~g;~~.~i~a:. ~~l
~"'~~=O'~;~'H.~= ~ o,,'~~'CO"... _ ,,~_
~..=.._-.*--.:~-." '. --\
-~".C=="-::.,n" "'7 €J _ ~ 't" ? h ",'
r.: 1.,.47 ".",..HQ~c>~ I ) :::"_
€I '''',: -n----ll--h--h-u-U~~:~-
~------ I s ~ ...T;;"-....
(O..;,'--.z:,.// _"',.; ,,,,.:0 ;., ....
,.. - SI.:!:.. I--J,/"'~
/Ir.~
~/I'''',M 'f~'7"~, ~
.
~.
i~
~~
~=
.~
o~
=z
.=
..
l'
..
i
i
I
.1
t.:: 1 /
~ ~(
~ ~ i.;~
~0.>:~
\
\
.J.
<./
~, oi,\
- ,~\\ \
' ,f'.... \
.' J..';f
~~\
\~;.
ml ~ dIm
s~!i' i ilia
i~~~ ~ 1'!lI;
~~~~ ! i,.~iH
Un hi:m
l;!lg S !llfil"
i-I! I II,~,
~'l~~ >1.._
~! i II: !IW
~-!~ . ra'll
Hi'a ~: :~lh!
~l~!~ 1t ;'!i!1
~ i~m ~ j~!iH
: =!~i~ 1 !;~hg
~ w'; "," !ll:'l
sH!~ ~~H t
- -,2:0 .... !'l'll
~Jit.9 0l~1 ja
~ h;~~ ,,~, '~l!;
-" \- ~ii'i 1~~ Ij!U!I"
. g~'i- I~ '1"1' "
:. =li~1 Ht !idl
Of - _ .
'<; -- g
\~,~ ;
~~~=
.:.\~
~'"
~' -
'" :""
~/ \\ I
/"" U
,,' -'~--\"\I
<r.~ \ ~Ir~
~.:. - iii
'l, ~ \ "
't;, 1 "'-;.\1
:: iJ ~~i
~..,j I ~I~l
,o.~ It "
r.b l i~": ~ ~ ! I: ~ I~
>s 'J ~ - "'r7- ~
"'., <~-~, ~ I ~ I
~~.~.s= ~ i11 .\ ~ ~ ~'I!I
.c; ::-~, ,~", , ",~ "\ I . ~
' " ',', '..", ",'. y~ ~ . . ~ I
Ill, ,,' , . , '::;., '=-
J1'?:--'-:-.--7- " ' ' ' ,~ ',' 'I ::'?; 11, I I
/l", , .. , ,,", _ .
' r, . ' ' ~ 'Q .1' I, \tJ ~
-'----..:. ,- ~"h ~ 1\.
';. N-='li.. .., :1' '.: """". ;I~~':: I ~i ,~~
. "" .~ ~~" -:-.1~~_j':"" ,S!.S . ~i. '~ <0- ).1'0
j ~/ ,,<:"'.' ~'),i. .' ~ . ,< ,-. -.:...,.----" ',/ , "~-'I, '\
I -~~ ~)~Ii; : ( ... . 'F,,'.' ...... . L),o' ,? 'J ..... I II ~l
~ li.l ~j' I =MJ 'p. ;d)" ,., I'~I ~r
. .-................li,i~~I.. '/ ':" ."....... . 'I
1," j; I~ jJ;~/~ "/i" l'.~:;' Jf.!~) I I ~I
' " ------:-- , j l' 1. 1. ! ~ I.'
~ , - , H~o;- .I .'! ," 'I' ~
~ ~~, ~ I/: ~~. '~ ~ I ,,1; , ',,1 " (I, \
~ H lr h:-:~:_::-.Ji sit ii I!~ ,t;;!. 7 ''7 r i" 1 " ~ I ,
~~~ ~ ;;J I L;<1""j, ' f ,.1 ~mjJ,,~
' '- ~~,/-I:q-' '1 .. '~-~, 'I /; s~'-.j('_.
',.' ':"-, C" (~~f,.;..." ;::..~.. ...... ~! "$ "'''.7'.' / i "
~.~. .....'-'-! .'. ,..... ~~,< ';'~, /
.. ~ -..--.. ~ --.c '. .~'::9 ~_ ''', . .
~." ( '.. . ':....~ '~oo~o!vl. .~. 'J '..~ --..!:."" !',\.,/ 1"
' ~'-"">. ~ ~'="'" . .
-ill, · ., ,. . ~~, ,." ~ ~ _ -l _
'. ~ 0'
. · ~ J )1,It" Ii
r ~~J ~i
~i ~J~
I
~,
"'"
'-;,
',,-
'.
.'
"
~
- ~
.
- Q
\.":..
'\.~
'>
II"
I'
~ !
erl'
,\:.fo
..
'"
.......0_
~i
":
'\"
/
/
/
.. ~
""
.1
ii
!
" '\,
", ~~ /
~ "" J
"",,- &~// "
'" p
r;./r::() ........., _!" ,'Pc.. c: :.;"')~!
lPa~O~~..s.s,t:'J.z.&.~/ r::
-~..~ -...P
r -- ~.?) .......~;/.............~r"'YJ'.s r;, I
'"
;,
~
;;r:d~r~ /;J:/i;/
,~
g!
~ (j ~
/~..",..
.lrcJj
~,"~::~.16>
r;o.._
1.
'"
'l.
$, Oi ""00Q/,J' 'r""V~
rr;~r;,~"!!L)
"t1/~"Y.;,._ 5''3' ""''Y.C'' /
,,~ I
Nt ~
'", ~I'
E %~ ~
i 'J; ~ ~J"".9/"'_"7,z"
~ 11 ~ c~.,,~
~,~rc~T-- --
~~~, ,I ~
____~(i
,P<'~~;.,~
/ '0
;W ^b'41h'~W :5'/7
-"e,...~P;:ovy 7'~...;t...C?
~
~i
~;
!~
~!
t
8~
.i
'"
"
~
,.
~,~
~~
q, .~
r
1~
~~
" ,
... '.~'
J}4
,.~-
~
,., ....--~~;;;~ '- -
~~.~
~~~
\::.o~
1 ~::.
.' "
~
iffl
,
It'
.~\
d
~ t
,
\ ~
~ I
~:
III I
~ f
(J' ~
'rJ I
" ~
~ ,
\~ .~
;.
oliI::.. ?
~1~
\;~~
\
'\
~....
~~
~
~
~
~
i
~
1
'\'
..
1
.:;
~
<~
l~
i~
':~
~~
~~
"
"-<
,,~
10.-.;:'
~~
i-
,I.
~~
r
~ ~
.~
,q
i ~
Io.~~
~~~.2
~ ~ b ~
~<.'U:
~
EXHIBIT "G"
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL
CONDITIONS
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land,
structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,
structures or buildings in the same zoning district:
There are special conditions and circumstances which exist and are peculiar to the
land in this case. The gas station is existing and the only renovation to the
property and building is to upgrade the exterior with new fascia, colors,
landscaping, and textures so to make the gas station fit in with the neighborhood.
The property is not big enough to place the driveways the proper distance from the
intersection nor to move the gas islands or canopy. The number of driveways must
remain due to the location of the fuel filling ports which the gasoline tankers must
unload, there would not be enough room for them to leave the property with fewer
drives.
B. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant:
Special circumstances and conditions do not result from the actions of the
applicant because he bought the property as it is. He is just trying to upgrade the
exterior and landscaping to fit in with the changing neighborhood.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district:
Granting these variances will not confer any special privileges that are denied by
this ordinance to other lands within the same zoning district.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and
undo hardship on the applicant:
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zoning district and would
work an unnecessary and undue hardship on him because it would force him out of
business.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure:
EXHIBIT "e"
Granting of these variances is the minimum variances that would make possible the
reasonable use of the land and building. It would be impossible to operate this
business and upgrade the exterior if these variances are not granted. By granting
these variances, you are allowing this business to be upgraded with exterior finish
and landscaping which will better fit in with the surrounding neighborhood.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent
and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the
area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare:
Granting there variances will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
chapter and that these variances will not be injurious to the area but an asset to
the area. This business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood but the
opposite, it will be an asset to the community.
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Gateway Texaco
File number: Driveways ZNCV 03-010,03-011 and 03-012
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010-03-0 l7,23,24\COA Driveways ZNCV 03-010, 03-011 and 03-0 l2,doc
DEVELOP ,NT ORDER OF THE CITY COMI'" ,SION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR1I)A
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Texaco
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Mr. Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 9 Northeast 6th Street Delray Beach, FL 33444
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: October 21,2003
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Variances ZNCV 03-010, 03-011 and 03-012
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.d. (1) requiring parking lot driveways to be located 120 feet from the
intersection of the right-of-way lines along streets of higher classification to allow a 97 -foot variance,
resulting in a distance of 23 feet, and to allow a 88-foot variance for a second driveway, resulting in a
distance of 32 feet from the intersection of Federal Highway and Las Palmas Avenue for an existing
gasoline dispensing establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.d. (3) requiring that driveways shall not be located less than thirty (30)
feet from any interior property line to allow a 10-foot variance, resulting in a distance of 20 feet for an
existing gasoline dispensing establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.d. (4) requiring that driveways will be limited to one (1) per street
frontage to allow two (2) driveways along the street frontage for an existing gasoline dispensing
establishment.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 2360 North Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth
on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7, Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010-03-017,23,24\00 Driveways ZNVC 03-010, 03-011 and 03-0112,doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-231
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
Michael W. Rumpf t(\~/
Director of Planning and Zoning
THRU:
FROM:
Maxime Ducoste ... ~
Planner flY?'
DATE:
September 29, 2003
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Gateway Texaco Variances
Building setback variance ZNCV 03-013
REQUEST:
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.e. (3) requiring
a twenty (20) foot rear setback to allow a 1 O-foot variance, resulting in a rear
setback of 10 feet for an addition to an existing gasoline dispensing
establishment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: SUAU Enterprises
Applicant/Agent: Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location: 2360 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3)/ Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use:
681 square foot addition to gasoline dispensing establishment (limited to a
maximum of 600 square feet by Condition of Approval for appeal - ADAP
02-001 ).
Acreage:
0.48 Acre (20,830 square feet)
Adjacent Uses:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
North:
Multi-family residential property, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
South:
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Avenue, and farther south are single-family attached
townhouses under construction (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit
Development (IPUD);
East:
Vacant commercial lot zoned Community Commercial (C-3) currently under review
for a proposed car wash, and farther east is a single-family residential dwelling (part
of Las Palmas development), zoned Single-family residential, (R-1-AA); and
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-231
Page 2
West:
Rights-of-way of U.S. 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, and farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned
Neighborhood Commercial (C-2).
BACKGROUND
Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises Incorporated, is
requesting conditional use I major site plan modification approval to construct a 681 square foot addition to
an existing gasoline dispensing establishment. In addition, the applicant is proposing new parking spaces,
a new access drive that would lead to the property directly to the east, and a general "make-over" of the
exterior facades of the gasoline station building and canopy. The number of gasoline pump islands and
fueling positions would remain unaltered.
The proposed 681 square foot addition to the gas station is considered as a conditional use in the C-3
zoning district. Also, the gas-station is a legal non-conforming use because it does not comply with Chapter
2, Section 11.L.3.a.(2) due to the fact that gas stations may only be located at intersections "consisting of
roads of four (4) lanes or wider".
Earlier last year, Mr. Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr. Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition to the existing gas station, in part, to satisfy outstanding code enforcement violations. He
also proposed direct access between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east (which was earmarked
for a mechanical carwash) in order to minimize vehicular traffic onto Las Palmas Avenue. These inquiries
were based on the presumption that the proposed addition would be allowed and that direct access would
only require site plan review. However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the addition would
not be permitted because it would represent an unlawful expansion of a non-conforming (a gasoline-
dispensing establishment).
To answer Mr. Kruger's inquiries, on July 16, 2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an
administrative determination letter that basically prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas-
station building because doing it would constitute a violation of Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land
Development Regulations. Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the
proposed driveway connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east could be permitted.
However, the direct access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a legally binding
cross-access agreement.
On July 31, 2002, Mr. Kruger addressed a letter requesting a formal appeal of the aforementioned
administrative determination. According to the staff report, "in summary, the appeal justifies the proposed
expansion by the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the non-
conforming aspect-gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent of
the gasoline sales element of the business. Staff disagreed with the applicant's position. The City
Commission approved the appeal with the condition that the expansion would be limited to 600 square feet.
Therefore, this major site plan modification and accompanying variance requests represent the applicant's
continuing effort to construct a building addition and mechanical car wash on the abutting property (see
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan and Survey). If approved, the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fac;ade
improvements would occur in one (1) phase.
ANAL YSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-231
Page 3
district.
b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure.
f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
Staff conducted the analysis focusing on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit
"C", which require the request be initiated by special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the
subject land, structure, or building, which are not the result of the actions of the applicant, and that the
request is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or
structure.
The subject request has been initiated in preparation for the construction of an addition to the existing gas
station business. The applicant desires to build along the rear of the original building leaving all mechanical
equipment in their existing location, which forces the encroachment into the rear seatback. The stepping
back of the addition from the rear of the existing structure to accommodate the mechanical equipment has
generated the circumstances. The subject property has been improved with a gas station business, and
occupied since 1965. The fact that the applicant has the ability to construct at the appropriate setback line
clearly demonstrates that, criteria items "a" and "c" are not met. Further, since the necessity for the variance
has been caused by the proposed addition, condition "b" above is also not satisfied.
The overall objective of the Land Development Regulations is to insure the welfare and safety of the public
by providing regulations and standards in which to achieve consistent equitable developments. The
proposed addition would setback approximately ten (10) feet from the rear property line, half of the distance
required by code. Furthermore, notwithstanding interior layout and design objectives, there currently exists
nearly 34 feet of depth to the rear property line when measured from the deepest dimension from the
existing rear fayade. The expansion could be as deep as 14 feet, and extend over 50 feet in length without
encroaching into the rear setback, if the mechanical equipment was relocated. To further support the
potential for the expansion to be designed to comply with setbacks is the existing requirement that it be
reduced in size to comply with the condition for approval of the administrative appeal. The granting of this
variance would be an acknowledgement that there exists no alternative in either the structure size or
location.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATION
Based on a strict interpretation of the variance criteria, Staff recommends that the request for relief from
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.e. (3), requiring a minimum rear yard setback
of 20 feet for a gasoline dispensing establishment within the C-3 zoning district, to allow for a variance of 10
feet, and a rear yard setback of 10 feet be denied, due to the lack of hardship, and due to the circumstance
being created by the actions of the applicant.
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-231
Page 4
Staff should indicate that past variance requests have been reviewed by the city using more than the
"traditional" criteria, or interpretations of this criteria placing greater emphasis on other associated
characteristics. Should the Board or Commission desire to approve this request, the following factors should
be considered before rendering a final decision:
1. The variance request is for the construction of an addition to a existing gasoline dispensing
establishment;
2. The location of the proposed addition, which is located at the rear of the subject property;
3. The immediate parcel to the east is proposed to be developed as a car wash;
4. Staff has not received any objections from adjacent property owners regarding the subject variance
request.
Should the subject request be approved. Staff is recommending that the addition be limited to a maximum of
600 square feet as prescibed by condition of approval for appeal ADAP 02-001. Any additional conditions of
approval added by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or the City Commission will be placed in
the Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval.
MWR/MD
S:IPlanningISHAREOIWPIPROJECTSIGateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010 thru 03-017, 023, 024 ISTAFF REP ZNCV 03-013 Building setback,doc
Location Map
l:>>ateway . exaco -
1-,
I ~
o TER-R. ,~
Ii ~,~I
ii,
Cl
:u
o
(f)
(f)
I ~
-H I I
= SI<TE :1 ! / I
,I-fc:) ,
I
I /;%/
H r/;/;;:
il 1// // /' ,p-
'1---- Lr
"HI
I I
I
I I I
'~~ 1. l. ~
- ~/
I I I
I
PLI
/
r---l
I"",L-J
-- I )
lIT
R3
QDDDDDDDGO
OQQ~r'" R
Il.,: ~,~,~~.:fL' '-e
l.~-\....-'--""""JL-lL............-J'L....rJI.....~ r !
C-J
I \ CJ D
f-NE-20-THAJ/.E- 8
I I 0
/
~~! IPUD
j I
;S
~
1
I i
~~;i~~i~ ~;;~ \
1;~:1
REC
r' <;,]:
I
i
-F--S-1=--d
~
._E-S~ R3
~~-\
, r- <'-r:---\
I "
~E-2{}+H-AVE-
/
/
I
,
,
/
I I 1
REC
,I. I
/
I I J i?
~,~ ~}J
I
I
,
EXHiBIT uAul
" I -
~/~~
~II'.'W-"
re';!'
r I;
, I, I'i " ""q:
; !;,: ~~ i;'~ ;"!g;
- a i i' II !l' ,. ,I
~ ~ I.- f:','j r;.!, ',f ~
,,~~' ci I . ":~ t ~~'" <;1 i
'" ~ I~' ~ i ~i:I1J ~~ ,
~,: ! I !:1 II I
~ I ~ \ i i ~ ;~~ ! i
8~' i"; I
;: I ~
~il
~;"~I
~; ii I ~
H ~~ I~
~~ I
~ii i
~~ 0
~~
;~
~~
=i
~i
,.
.~
.,
1;~
"
: ;~~
~~~
- i::
m
~~~
,;j
II!
, .
! ~
l:;O!;~::!:2~~
.' '>-"'..~
~~III\"'J''''''':;o~
Iii~~~~~~~;i
;:i~;~ii~~i;
g!i~I!~~~
<"og'H~i
i:~i~$~~~
~~:~i!_~~;
~i;~~~~~i
~~!~<'Ii:-i!'::
O;'i' .=~
~i~~~ ~~~
~m~ ;~~
i;!~i ~~:
~~i~; ~~~
~ii~E ~~~
~~i~~ ~i~
!!~~~ ~~i
....z '30
'--00 ..~
~ ~z ~ S
A:^
1
!
'''"
-<
r1
:1
>
z
'"
"
'"
Q
o
en
r1
o
>
o
;i~, I . ~
~J ~
!~
~!Ij
2~i
!~--
>
<
r1
A:~ z
I, c
!: r1
~ ~~~m~i
~:ii~;;~r~
EXHIBIT "B"
~!
i4k~\",~t
It,''-.;,'~ \ \ ! ! \~
"'kl'~ Il
~-, .' 'I "ill ,
~~.t ~; T ~~ .z= I
~{-- ~l:~ ~~ !~!! . "
!', Y;, 'I ". .
~i -"1 a ~(' ~i \
;\ i~1 H ;', '
I 6 ,
rj~~
/,'1i . 1
:.':. , I ,
(~:~.:~H:;:';";':~"J-
~~~~
>-..- %O~OE C'l ~
~=~~8 ~~~I~ )10 ~
~~~~~ t;~~ll :E 8
~ >'----.~ '~.-"---..-c ~L
~ lii~~!~!!~Jlm~!H~j ; ~-=-=--=====-~
~
~
__, ~i
I~
,"j
;:::
~J I
-- ,
r---- CI
--~l~--:~~
". _i:' JI
r-- ... - I
c, ,I
;1
~ i ~
~~
~~
v~
^
z
"
>
~
% !?
~I-
~-
J\' C) F::;
c..- 0 'I N :;
: I s.
H VI A Y
N 0, 1 '
, I
I
i~ ..
--n~~;t ~:; , ,
, ; ! -:-'ii-~~
--~~'-'" -------.1:""'-
~-~~- ~I r..o:~",..>o- _____
/.</Y' !OQ~..1 I r~--""'--:r ~ __....;.q~
/:;~fl :i - ~r"~'-~~=~~--o --r ~'";:',..-
8.... I'I~ i;/ V lill ;,;::-""',...;e' ~i,' ~ ''''''~I ~I r?~ ~~
/I '01 L., I '"l I/~~'" i
J~"-::'-"::ZI1 i ~ " ; :--;;-------;/' 'V ~f"r.;;;.~~,~ ~
!l I LiI " I' -'. : ~!, L -; ,l'-l 1!1j; ,.-:'" ~
~! f ~---,---: 'I' :j" i I ~!~
;~: II ~- w' '/'; I "l~ ,__"
'~1 ! I, ; I ~/ '-;, I I 'i~: jgH
'1-,0: ,!;, / - I ~J' !~;~~
' ! r< i I ,:oao- I $ ~ ~ t.
! G I ! / , I~! I ~Hj!
j"/i= ~I '\ ','1 ..../~I, liii'
I,i,'!, "/~,,,:,'i.~, "~, r j; I. ~'Ii pl:~~
' 53 ~.~. ~J I J ; Ii II 1~,_!3q
'--, I I ~. i ~,'"%",, d '\: I J ~ J1 ;i !~n~
:'0'_0. #'L '. !"I "I. J I I ' ------.;. ~'4";,:
i ",---"'- ~! r-,! " I f I li:l 12(;i
~ II => , ' ~--J '--J; \, I' Y II l'~'l
c; : :'\, : r, r ~" ~~
~-_~r""___ .0\' :' W l',' '\ \.(j _ ~, , ~ ~i
-., t~~," ..'~=^ 1Il! I ''\'' \ ~\ "_,"~ c:n
S - , .~-"~~ji ! \ '\. ilU I, ~
., I , ~ t,", -r-:- ---s~ ". !~hj
'I In! :0\ ,~~1rt\ ~;'~E~~~~~hu~:.' '~ ~---"-r--~-,-~:.L
:ill!, U L' 'I" ' '\, """~"~-~---~.l;" '/? IR '\. l' '{
~ ~ II il~ v' ,~ ,~T:~,'77--;r~ ' ~~;-:-:':'~i(1..~' ~ ~.~:,
-" I'!" i ~---~ ','" '\, ,. ,,- _ , , , r' , ~" ~
"j;IIT ' ~ 1; ~-~)?,Jj, ,.,:"",1;~'~~~~:-_:'_:':_\";:"l~A';'-i~ \'/h'!"
~' .11'~f" ~,,_~ 1_~1 _._ ". '\ ~ ~. ,'"
I ' r- --:.'.~;, ':c.."-: - E~",,- 1:; -, :,\'- l!\~~ ~'!" ~
II "; yrr I \- ~ --~',: ~,l..~ :::'-, ,'; , '1 ,7 '\ I' 'I;f
; i 1~'~;,.--i:-s=-jjP',~~~~,:/:~-,:-;,~~':~~ ~,:<'; ! r " f ~~
~ II ,;..-..,., ~-~>:-.:r"-J......I!:_" " .,~~,' 'I . I I, f"
U G/- ~"' j" 'L_ I d! JT-~ '~-'::""". '''-0: -=--=:~. ',--==-~ 'i
i~ .~t,} -~~- "...-1~:~9T ~/~" ~~-.: :,'i~~~>~ ~~;~~~~ I / ! ~f~'--/ [fll
~ ~ !I ":, ;;; ~ ~. <~)./ I .c~
L . I V I" ~ ~ "o' 'f~ t I
-: ~ - l /'" !t--::'-"-":~''"'1 8"." ~ ~ ~ I \....
I'~~--- 'I ~_~\':~:"""""~ ~ .4'/' , , .
~ ~--.Q_ -~:o---.;..... .
l~':':~ '" "1;""",..-, "-c-~~~:i&! ,~ iY'i
[B< no """"'~ ~= II II
.:; ~i. lj ..,,,,. .",'" ~ 11_
is ;~ i. 'I' _
jii i' ~ i~ I: I
H I G
/
,
I
~.c.___
; !
~ r Ii:'
\ ...Jj
\ '
..
~
><
i'
,
,-j
J>!
I en :
I '1J'
I
>!
ri
;::.
>'
OJ'
-~~
\
'-F~ ~m ~!i
m~~~~~ ~B~ s~
jh~8!;lI~l! ~"J:Sl ~E
;g~:~~~~ ~;~~ ~~
S~~i~~ i~~' ~~
B~i B h~ ~r
~~~ fi E~; ~
-."., ,'i ~
~ ~ f !~ ~
~ i ~ ~."'
~ i ~ H
i ! ; n
~ i ~ Ei
~ i ~ ~;
. i . -.'
B d ~!~ ~~~
~ 2 ~~~
2 ;
i
0.- ~.. ~~;;~g~~~~-~ ~~
,_;tl~(; ~~'~ i " XI
"d i~! :=~~~~~ ~ ~~
is~ 's~ ~ ~~~~~~! i~
~~~ H~ ~ ~ ~n~ .
~~~ ~~~ ~ . ~~.
~~ -.: ~ ~
~~ ~s ~ !
~!l ~ ~
~~ .
e~~~~:i~i!~~~~;~~i ~_~~ ~~~~
~b,',,~.,;!~S~O;~ .'i ~ii~ll
;;~~~i~a;~;;!~~~!! !~~ ~i~
o ;i!:;O~~~~~Oa~'~!O~~~: 11-:1 ~~s
'J: ",~~$3';;iii~~Joj~~~"> oO~~ ~~... >..~
~ "';;;;~;;:'i~~~3-Ei~~ai~~:z ~:::~ ;;;..
;;~i:~~tQ's!i~~~;!ii~_"'! :;i~ ~~
o'=''''..I~~:l: ~~... =~,,"'~i'!:- >if ...~
>,~,!~,.~o,~;,~,:;:p~ ~,J Iii,
~~~~g~~!~~~~~~~~~e~~ E~~ ~oO
ii ,C--"'>OO'<i~S-,O'ii~ 9c~ .~
~ !~;E;~~~!~"~~~~~~ll ~~! !3
r i o~c~:;~!i"!~",~;O;~E" ~3: ;~
~ '" ~~~~~~ii~!~j~~~=~ ..~ I~
'''"''~''~.'il~. ~. ~_
i~-;;;:~~';i.=i-:5~.'" ~~ ~%
~i~;~~~;~~~'~agi ~~ ~~
~~~~o~~~'h~~~N ii- 2!
i~~;~o~~~~~;~~a: .~~ !~
~~~~s:!~~~~i:~;i ~~ ~~
f~-}::.;",o..o;"""'Ci.....'j j'i .oO
~~~~i?:~!~~~~:~a l~ c~
!-'<iOO_i,,"""!'i !. ~,
.jH~h,H.~ ~ ~~ .
S. ~Q"''''~ i"''''" ~-
m
*;:~
!l~
~ii
~.
.
~~~ ~..:!I
~:::::::::
"ill
888~~
--'!~
.-- i
,I
· "';i
~~~~~
.
~
~. m~;;.
i~~~"
J
1:"1/'1"
:~'"' ..
sS~
C%
PROPOSED ADDiTION AND AL rEO' TiONS TO,
_CAR WA.s':tJEX ^'Q
~
III ,ClTlIryS(_o
1Il_a-..,...
_...._u_~
"
'<. ~
.~'" ~ ~
, ~ 1
",~<Jr\" ~ j
~;;' t\\_ ~ ~
7 , ~ ~
.-' ~ " \....,. I .
....'.; 'J';
<---/ "r) ~
'. -.-;:;:;?\ - "::')! ~!
' ;" f~ ;
, " \ ">"
' h" r !, " 'I'~I' ~-,i ~Jt f
" <' / n '" , "
" ',,: l~l,. ~ i
," " -"~~,', """" "', ,
"'- ":.i~./~,..S/ 1P"c.r-_'M'S.J"",<,:,~ I~ ~r\
' ~:'rl-~'''~ - ,- -"''''';'-'~r'' ,~'i~c-.:'-'~~c._""'~11 I lli~
g ; q I, ~?II/~: /~.~ ~ 1 \)11:,'
'", , . ., ." " ' I ~
~ 'I ~I' '" " _ , " _ ~,
' -. . ,'" 'I ~ "< 'I
~ 1 'I" ~' ',.- I .2.-," _ '''r7'' I) 'I
! '" ',; .",', ~'.: I "
\' >, ~'I~ ~'J'~,,, I~I "'.1 'I , ,;:
", ~': Vi> 'll (;:." , '., '" .' .
11, r~-~ _.It,'" "---=,1',:.' ',rl',' !~.,~~:;: ~ ~! ~ l, . ~!Ii
. 'r~'7.-~ ", '. " .I" I'. .~
" ...-,....., 'I"', "''', ','" i "'I
If" ...,>..':;; ''3?, , L..:.:., I : j I
'II" l I'!,!" '" ,', I" ;!"i I ~; ,j
~ '~" J , , , , ',-,,, '" Ii
S<F . .- : ' .', ~ p
)1 . ~i
. .,:; Ir) !
~:
'~ , . , ,0 ~ ,)~ '~l J
"-\1.~ ~\' , ! , .', '. , , . " '
I """ "1' . '". : ",. , . . ~ , 1:
~ li<\ ~ j"o......; ';hf!:'j . :;";',' l' ,~' ~i jj
I ~ f ~. ~ ,,': \ ;'"/; I ~t , ~_ _\,~ " , ,
' , ," , , '. ""I' .'
. I ---------~/~ I }" .'/i. '~!' ~ 1/, 3~
' II"".;, ;," ,,'i; I _
~ , ! " , . ,- I'" 'L , , " , ','
1 , ,"L.........,:" 'SC' ~ '0 f ., 'I '" "
:. ~, .....iAi l" "", ,,<., " i" " ", I ~ -c ;. '\ ;:C'o,O~~I, ,I __,I~,
~.1";,, ','- I -- ',. ~', I", "'" < ", .I
,~.;' ~;,l ',- ------>-".::i < IL" 'I' " " '''';;'''', ,
" " ~ 1::'.. , I..' , " ~!.. """,,'r' ~~
~<:~'~~~~5~,j /, , I'~:",,;,,~;, ,:; ,
. , '. ..'/. ,', ", ... <~'-"-''=.~ /. : "
' -"-..< 'f:~:::::;, "" """ "":;;'r~? ,,'" .. ~~'A
~~~~~--'''--.4;.'P__'_"=I~.....,..,.,. ., " /',
"\~, "~,.~" ", .;.,,,.,,.. "',~ , '.::-:,;-~, - ,1
"', < i. 't$ " . ~,
: '~~ '"-,, " ;i,:;.) ,~i
"l1,')' ,
I ' ;,
'., , ' " Iii
" , "
" ,l ,., .. , ''}v .<.. '" M "" :s,., I
i i' 'I ' i
,,'~, -~~...,..... ,
! ~ ~ ~ -=1
<' "', ...~ ~, ..~- ..'.... .....,.
..:,~'l;~T~--- ~~
~ ~ ~-Q
~i\i.i ,
\..-.,,\
~~~;.~
rTi2i: fi --
~' i~;::'.~ 1': I,
1 ~: :~t;~; : 6> '~I
.. !' " '; I,,;j c:> ,
i ! ;'''C'1f." ~
'; ;; '~~~~ - .'. ~
~~'- tj.~ ' I
L," ~~f~'Fcil ' I
~ f~~ Iii
~.~~~
~1:i.:.1_,,-,-,. ,
I iL:..j
i ....
---:,2
~ ';
~~ ~l
~ ~ f'~
~'~;'<.
.,.
!,
'",
I ji _">
.~,,..,......
IlilllJIll11lt
. ~~~~2~~;;~~i~~~
1;~~~~~;~;:~~~~~~
~:~!~i:~j~~~~!~~;
illl! 1llllllllllI, Ii
:~3:~!~!~~S;~!~=i ~
~~~~~~~~~~~i~~g ~
C~~:j~;a~~~~~=: i
~mU!fmHH I
=='g'~liZ..;S~' a
a~i-c.;;~~:3~C.....!
\
:)~ :
t~~ ~
~ :~ ~
~ 1.~ ~
lo--\'" ~
~ -: ~~ ;
i~ ~.;.~
~~,,:..1<:l
..
,
oJ
, ~
"
" .
~ i'
~ "
'" ~
,~
~
~
~',)
'<
~ .:
f~
, '
'i
~q
!; 'I.
"1~ ...
';. t-..~
II to{
.,
'- ,
<'!" ~ "-
~,;c.:
..,
c:;:..
~~
".::
I~
... .~
~:
~~
IW'i:mWlli1
r-\.
----E:-r
I~
.",w:;
~ -'il!H
'r ~ ~:f:;
, -, e: ~ ~;;.
. ~imlL
/" ~ . 1='."
r::~", ~;ii~',
l"!~~ '- .~ ~~.p~"
~~~h i ihg'
hljj 1- ;'j!lll
ii12C,: ~ ~9 ~~..t:
"'jj -, j,J,;!
111'1 l- '!:Hj
"1,11 l';;lI1'
~~~~~ 1 1U;i1
1H?~ 1~.,c:~
!i~"; ~ i"~~:::
ill!! ~;11Wl
!';~~J ~~tli~!j
i~~]! ......~~ !~rj~
;",g ~, I. .;;;
\',;:, :.q~2 ~;.t ~h!:::;1'
\- ~!;ii I~~j;ll!l'
\~ l;!l1 H>.l;!lil
\~ !a ~_
\~
.~'~
,-"J:,)
~ ~ i~,~
r:
tL:::
IO~~i_:...1
I "'''... _
, ,
1-'" ~
o
F
..:- '\.
~ '"'~
~ ~. ;.)
'~ ~~
1 <.t_
~-:
<,
~~
B.
~~~
. .~
~~
!~~
:Z"'''i
m
,n
~\ :.'
" -
o
7LoT
~\ :~:
~~ --\
---;~::-
-- \\ \
,~ ..~\~ \
\.
1:.; "-1") -::
J
':0,\
->-
.,,-"u....e>.~ _,
"
----~- =....-
""c ~_~~~_~_':.-;:;.
-----r
1'= ..:.c ....
~T~ '_.:::
1 r.~
- 1J ~ ::.
"
}. :-h.
~," -;);:
(",.,.., -"1~'"'''~ ~
Wl
,~-
0~~ ~c
\~~
,1;:
\
"
. .
.
- .
~~"I'-
..
'>
h
~ f
~ ~
("!J -, ~
~
"
,f
'"
"
..t~
, ~
~~ \.
1;'~
l~~{
.'.....::l_
'"
~,
i~
~
"
1
~
1
"i
;"
<.';
I ..
'"
-'--
i
.! ~
,t
q
~ ~
\ ~~
Ci~'-=~
~ ~..... t
" "l ~ .
2 <.....~ ~
EXHIBIT
! -'\,
s.r,A TEr~IIE~~l~> OF SP~CIAL
CONDITIONS
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A, That special cc nditions and circumstances exist vvhich are peculiar to the land,
structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,
structures or buildings in the same zoning district:
There are special conditions and circumstances which exist and are peculiar to the
land in this case. The gas station is existing and the only renovation to the
pro'jJerty and building is to upgrade the exterior with new fascia, colors,
landscaping, and textures so to make the gas station fit in with the neighborhood.
The property is not big enough to place the driveways the proper distance from the
intersection nor to move the gas islands or canopy. The number of driveways must
remain due to the location of the fuel filling ports which the gasoline tankers must
unload, there would not be enough room for them to leave the property with fewer
drives.
B. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant:
Special circumstances and conditions do not result from the actions of the
applicant because he bought the property as it is. He is just trying to upgrade the
exterior and landscaping to fit in \Nith the changing neighborhood.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district:
Granting these variances will not confer any special privileges that are denied by
this ordinance to other lands within the same zoning district.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and
undo hardship on the applicant:
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zoning district and would
work an unnecessary and undue hardship on him because it would force him out of
business.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure:
EXHIBIT lie'
Granting of these variances is the minimum variances that would make possible the
reasonable use of the land and building. It would be impossible to operate this
business and upgrade the exterior if these variances are not granted. By granting
these variances, you are allowing this business to be upgraded with exterior finish
and landscaping which will better fit in with the surrounding neighborhood.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent
and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the
" area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare:
Granting there variances will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
chapter and that these variances will not be injurious to the area but an asset to
the area. This business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood but the
opposite, it will be an asset to the community.
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Gateway Texaco
File number: ZNCV 03-013 Building Setback
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERJENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
CONDITIONS
Comments:
l. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
l. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Texaco\ZNCY 03-010-03-0l7,23,24\COA Building setback ZNCY 03-0l3.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-232
STAFF REPORT
TO:
THRU:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
Michael W. Rumpf ~~
Director of Planning and Zoning
FROM:
Maxime Ducoste . A17<k
Planner r\V -
DATE:
September 29, 2003
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Gateway Texaco Variances
Canopy and Gasoline pump islands setback variances ZNCV 03-014 and
03-015
REQUEST:
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.e. (a) requiring
that no canopy shall be located less than twenty (20) feet from any property
line to allow a 1 0.5-foot variance, resulting in a distance of 9.5 feet for an
existing canopy for a gasoline dispensing establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.e. (b) requiring
that no gasoline pump island shall be located less than thirty (30) feet from
any property line to allow a 1 0.2-foot variance, resulting in a distance of 19.8
feet for an existing gasoline pump island for a gasoline dispensing
establishment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: SUAU Enterprises
Applicant/Agent: Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location: 2360 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3)/ Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use: 681 square foot addition to gasoline dispensing establishment (limited to a
maximum of 600 square feet by Condition of Approval for appeal - ADAP
02-001 ).
Acreage: 0.48 Acre (20,830 square feet)
Adjacent Uses:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
North:
A multi-family residential property, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-232
Page 2
South:
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Avenue, and farther south are single-family attached
townhouses under construction (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit
Development (IPUD);
East:
Vacant commercial lot zoned Community Commercial (C-3) currently under review
for a proposed car wash, and farther east is a single-family residential dwelling (part
of Las Palmas development), zoned Single-family residential, (R-1-AA); and
West:
Rights-of-way of U.S. 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, and farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and
zoned Neighborhood Commercial (C-2).
BACKGROUND
Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises Incorporated, is
requesting conditional use / major site plan modification approval to construct a 681 square foot addition to
an existing gasoline dispensing establishment. In addition, the applicant is proposing new parking spaces,
a new access drive that would lead to the property directly to the east, and a general "make-over" of the
exterior facades of the gasoline station building and canopy. The number of gasoline pump islands and
fueling positions would remain unaltered.
The proposed 681 square foot addition to the gas station is considered as a conditional use in the C-3
zoning district. Also, the gas-station is a legal non-conforming use because it does not comply with Chapter
2, Section 11.L.3.a.(2) due to the fact that gas stations may only be located at intersections "consisting of
roads of four (4) lanes or wider".
Earlier last year, Mr. Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr. Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition to the existing gas station, in part, to satisfy outstanding code enforcement violations. He
also proposed direct access between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east (which was earmarked
for a mechanical car wash) in order to minimize vehicular traffic onto Las Palmas Avenue. These inquiries
were based on the presumption that the proposed addition would be allowed and that direct access would
only require site plan review. However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the addition would
not be permitted because it would represent an unlawful expansion of a non-conforming (a gasoline-
dispensing establishment).
To answer Mr. Kruger's inquiries, on July 16, 2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an
administrative determination letter that basically prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas-
station building because doing it would constitute a violation of Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land
Development Regulations. Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the
proposed driveway connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east could be permitted.
However, the direct access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a legally binding
cross-access agreement.
On July 31, 2002, Mr. Kruger addressed a letter requesting a formal appeal of the aforementioned
administrative determination. According to the staff report, "in summary, the appeal justifies the proposed
expansion by the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the non-
conforming aspect-gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent of
the gasoline sales element of the business. The applicant disagreed with the applicant's position. The City
Commission approved the appeal with the condition that the expansion would be limited to 600 square feet.
Therefore, this major site plan modification and accompanying variance requests represent the applicant's
continuing effort to construct a building addition and mechanical car wash on the abutting property (see
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan and Survey). If approved, the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fac;ade
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-232
Page 3
improvements would occur in one (1) phase.
ANALYSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district.
b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure.
f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
Staff conducted the analysis focusing on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit
"C", which require the request be initiated by special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the
subject land, structure, or building, which are not the result of the actions of the applicant, and that the
request is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or
structure.
The subject request has been initiated in preparation for the construction of an addition to the existing gas
station business. The applicant desires to maintain the existing canopy and gasoline pump islands at their
current location, which do not conform to current setback requirements. The subject property has been
improved with a gas station business, and occupied since 1965. In order to meet minimum setbacks, the
canopy and gasoline pump islands would have to be relocated, which may be cost prohibitive or significantly
impact the business operation due to site constraints. Understanding that the structures exist and the
subject requests represent the minimum variances that will make reasonable use of an existing gasoline
dispensing establishment, and will not be injurious to the area, criteria items "e" and "f' appear to be
supported by the variance request.
The overall objective of the Land Development Regulations is to insure the welfare and safety of the public
by providing regulations and standards in which to achieve consistent equitable developments. Staff
understands that the proposed requests represent a modest distance to sustain existence of components
necessary and integral to the functions of the applicant's business. Although the pump island setback is in
part related to life safety, with physical barriers between the pumps and adjacent right-of-way, and modern
shut-off equipment, staff cannot measure the decrease, if any, in safety as a result of the pumps being
approximately 10 feet closer to the right-of-way than allowed by code.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATION
Based on the analysis contained herein, Staff recommends that the requested variances be approved.
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-232
Page 4
No conditions of approval are recommended; however, any conditions of approval added by the Community
Redevelopment Agency Board or the City Commission will be placed in the Exhibit "D" - Conditions of
Approval.
MWR/MD
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010 thru 03-017, 023, 024 ISTAFF REP ZNCV 03-014 and 03-015 Canopy and gasoline pump island setback.doc
: j5
o
CfJ
CfJ
;;:
(j)
o
:p
i
~ I
l
Location Map
Gateway Texaco
EY.'IBr;
-~
I
;1 81
/ I I
I-
I!
:11
I I r-~~
PO RiR-RD v
i I I II ~
I III Me--
I
=SITE ~ I
, I '- C~
"
-.-.---... -..-.-.-.--..--..-.-- --8
n-- r")
l I r 1-- r )
R3
-
ptJ
I
I
I f){/ //1
l / /,/ ,/
j //./,/
1//////
il // //) /' ?-
I
I I I j
I~~ J J ~
'I- ~/
I
I
QQQQQQQQGo
ooorman 8
QQQrgjey CJ
[J 8
NE-2(}TH-A-IIE- 8
o
G-SL
i
i
l-F-&1=-----d
I t
L -E-S+---t? R3
I-&ST-J
1 ~q-\
\ \
l n T \
,
z
f!1
-l>.
~ I
REC
1
~E--2O+1=1-AVE-
I
I
T
REC
I
j
I
'/
I I I
I ~
I I . L_ I i r
~t1J D
7
c 1-
""."
,,;/
I I!
'l'~
, .
'1.0. - . ~.; ,; f; &
~ ~ f :~ H ~; ~~ ~~
~ ~Il ~i i: 'tl; iLl
~ ~I!~: i! !ii ~i ~l
:>l i: ~ ~.. ~l ~., H i
:z ~ ,. J~ i ::!"; 1
~ ~I<\~.i lc/l,j
~ gl: ; f :;! s. ;
;i3 j! ,; .. ! 8rj i ~
~ ~ Il i : ~~! ~ I
~: J ~ :(6; :
~I
I ~ I
~"~I
~~I~~I
~~C!I
A;^
l,
!
-" ~ ~ ~~ I ~
:H ~! ~
'~~ ~~ I~
. :~g ~~ I.
-~~Q ~ I
I!I it!
;;~ $~
H~ ~i
,., !"
i ; 1;~
>
:J
!='
:L~
~q;
~m
?~~<:>
.......:::
~~5
5~:;
!l
..
::
;L~~~
~r'~i!~~\;I! \l
.. ~: ") ~~ ~!g i ..
'''''~' ': h "1:1 . !
"\;~ ~ !~ -) :i ;31 ;
,.;';,p. 'l l! 'I \ i
il <I ;; :. ! I
;. 1",1 " :1 , i
'"~;, I
)I.:i,I ll--------\ I
_:11 t i-.!..
':., .;, , '----:-
i)<;~/~'-".:'L'.;- i
..... :~~:~BO;~!;
-~=:i~i~~=i;E:: ~~ ~~ !i3l~
-,
-----,...
..~ C) '. I h 0: C. U i'J [) U. s.
EXHIBIT "8"
--'~:::::j
c- =---=--I~
- . '~'_c' ",
i..-_ !j'!:_-!!
~ i!7j1
::
~~-
~
~
:=::::::\ "'\
HIGHV.fAy
N o. J .
I
\.. I
I ,...,\.~~ j j; I I
~i
I 5; ~. J I
~ I
., oX .. ,I I
~. < _0
~a 0,' I
I \ ~ ~~
I
i i I \ ~"
;;; I \
,- I
"
f,~':':~
[8,.
a~
..:;,..'
~!:
'Iii
lr " ~ lI~;~zs~si~ j~
-'~. ~~'~":'~~.S~ i~
~~~s iH >=.~i=h ~!>
~~~l! 'e~ ~ '!~.~;~e i
;;.j! ~8. ! ns Iii ~
~~~~ M~! n ~ ~ g ~
~~~~~~~i IS
~iw~ i~
~. ~
~~, .
~~ .
,._.~.:=n m m~
"0-',.,,", -:~~ ... ~=ot:
~~~~":ii_!/;;iiZ~S~_;;:~ e.--!/ ~g;iii:
~11=il~!~"'~8~;!~ ii '~~~
s:;'~~~'..i;;;~~~~.~~ :;:~'is
;~~~~~~~g~~~;~U'; ~;;~ E:::a
_..........i!!~O~-c:(;;;)o:ll:.,,~~..:Jo..~~,; %I":C "'...
~!!~'~~~g~~~~h~3~i~J~~.~~i !;~ ~~
eBH'~"'.;5t~~~~.~.:.::.., a. jlC
~~~';;;'~~~~'~~=~~~n~~~.::w ~~~ ~~
'~'i,g ~~~~~~'~i~~~~'~~.~=~ i~i ~~
e~ ~ ~i;;1~~~; ;H~~~!i~~;i ~~ ~~
· !/ ~~.:5~~'~l~~~:;;.~~~ ~~ ~~
;; ~ ~=~~.~~~~~~,~~~S ~" h
· ~~!~~~~h:;~~5~'~; t!
i"=i.-;.~..l~.~ ~~ _.
'i'-'~$'~~~t~~'1 n~ e!
~ ~t~~~'i-~~~~s 8i ~t
~~'e~~~,.~_,... ~. '^
i;S~~oH~.~~~~~: .; s~
'~'>ni' ":"~'i ig ".
J:?~:~~2l~i~~:~i~~ j:~ !;
~~.r;~.~~~o;'~~ ~o ~,
~!"':~:~;"i~~~~~. ~J! ~
l:~~8',:i'~~;~'~ ~;
...,~~~~~._~.. ~"
;.<O;~(t,..~ i .,
..~~ ~.~~ S~
.. .. "':; ...... t ~ : = ~ii !~
~~m~g~~~ '% _.:^~~ H~~ ~o
~S~gl'ili~~~ ~~~~~;~~o~ ;!is, ~~
:~'''.,~=L ..t~8!'~ ~..~ i!l
.:.~i-,~~;; i~g~-ee!l_ ~~a; o~~
Rgi~!~~~" "~E~': i;'~' ~~
.:~~~HH :~.~. ~~~ ~.
!mm~; B~i l~ *~~ ~r
~~m~~~~ ~!~ ~~ ~~~ ~
:'.=..=~" "~; ii' !l:~.
~~;:~'~g~ ~ ~ . ~~ ~I
~~"'lf "'=0 ~ i ~ ~~
~la,; .:1 ~. ~ Qr
smi ;i~ g ~ 5 ~~
~H~! ~~~ ~ ~ I h
'~i!/; ~;: ':;; ~ E-
Q~.;~ .~~ ~ ~ ~ .~
m~, ~p ~ -; ; ~~ i!!~
~l~~i "i~ ~~. ~ ~!~ .~.
h~.< ~=~ e _ f Ii ."'.
~~:~~ a~a! ;
'l ~. i ~
m
::::
...
"H
.~
-. gegS€,
;:1; "0' _...~
· ... --'or
s:::: ........
~::c;~~
....~;;..... r;;;3~
~~~~~~ ::::5~c
i:--. .
, ~
1{}."'\lI"
;;; :~~
~ g~~
AND ~....:[ co A TlONS TO:
SED ADDmON V ~O
PRDPQ U , C:l-{ TE.6:: ~
_QAR. ., _-=-~_
~
.,
I.,!'I . Ln:;.:~-O
. .....==:.... ~._.......
I E~l~1f~~~ '
..
<;O'\~_ I
\~
" \:'.
-~--~
'" ....~S'" -;;\ I
\ C\o)'
~, ~ \ \:
~ ~ ~ 1 r;':.:! ~ 1: ?'.;
;,l - Q -"'. I' ~~: -
JjJ ~ I i ~ ,~{~
"", ~"'-- '" ~I '- I
['...1 ~, - '" I:; ""
J; If:::-'~-:" "::i'::.:::;;; 'L - I I';
"Ql'~: .,./-....,~.. .~.~ ~,I~
11 "f" ~:'. ,., "'. II ~ i I"
"'...11 ~ IPb.~!I':"i \ll'~
~~:,' ~'~'i ~~ I ~ :J"
r~~ '-'J_I;,..... T - ~~'-"$- ~j
. ;.,.~:;.- ;=. ..,! I I ~ II
).~~~~~~~.- . ..~ ~ t~~; ~ ~;:
II'.' .' . .... . ,<J '\..,' ~~,
!il'.,. .' .....' ': ... .. . ',,\. " 'I ':~ ~l .1 . ~ II'
)t:~.~ ", .~. . ... ~I ,-.~ ~I' J~!,
f' . : .,.,. ~: : ~ ~;! I'
-:-h~~N J ~~fl i ~ II J
~ '~1:-<::'.'- ';-,.,: ~~.' ;;1 ~~
- ,:- "x'
_'../ " ! ~ :0
, ~!
~I
~I
r ~ I ~
J \J~: C'~
~' l:-
I ,<",
~ "~
~; H
'.J! ~'J
~J
,.;:
"h
.......~.
"'-...:.'
'--
'"
i.
,I..
~1
r: Y}~I co;.!
-E. -. ~;~
~l~,!:r!
.' t j..$ Ii.
1\':' G-- d-I
' t-.:.::'~ ~.
~ l ~~G ~,
~f.~?t~. . 'I;
~:i!1
F?'~~
fT}~ -~
~. i
<;j
~~ ~
~~ ~
" ..
!i'~
, " < ,
;~ :< !-
~~ ~~
g~ ~i
H i.
0=
~*
3;
~~ ~~
5:
" ~~
~; !=
~~ i:
<.
<::::
G
. ~
~
i;~i 3~ :::$
~~;~ ~~ ~;
:~
~:~~ ~~ r
~ 3
~ !
< ~
~ !
'??
L ;::
r : ""
L ." : ..;-- ~i'"
~ , ~
r ' 1 " .....
';" " =, ~~ , ~
1-. ~ .= ~~ , ,
~; i~
. 9..., ;:'.ij :1
'. ,
'. .
m
0'
~ .:: ::=. - -; .
".: =..c ~;.
-:~;2~;;;~",;
~~
.-
3~
.=
~~
;~
.~
~;
~~
~i
z;::!
~?
~~
--:, 2Z
., ,
Wi
".
!.
'I,:! ____h___:_____~";h_~':_:_7:::~;:~_~~~:~~:_hJL~:r ~
~ I I \....-- Co:.,
i i~_ __-:~--. "-C-!~:~ ':'":17'/ _='~; j'::;.';;C';: \_______Xl.Jr,
~ "'l / '\. ~-_ :1"-:" - -=-.~ ,:1)\\ \
i~:L -",,'t.f ~J"~"'7-," :I
{' ~...~~
, Ill!lllIIIIII!,
~=!~Z;~;::::~=i
\
\
~ .,~
.,". :
: ~ f1
~:.~.;<:.;;
,~-
..~/...:~.~ '
" ...\ ~
\::;. 0
'~j
i 1 ~
: ~ ~
, --:
"T"'~ -;
(';} ~
"
- ~
-"
<:.....\
~~
~
"">
,
"
'"
"
~
i
i
~
!
~
i
i
.
,
~~
~~ ~'.r.~,
~,~ ,,: ..
,;~ n,~
" \~~-:
~~
-'L
'" -So$. :;.~;O_-.
~
, I" I
..
ci : ~. ~
0
.. :, 1.; ,I~
',> ,,,<
. "-'I
\. r: I;' ~!6
~
\. ,. '. 'I~
~ ~~ ~, I;'
, r ;,." I:Q
I; ~ 1':\ '0
"
~....~-
~ '
" ,
.'
,
,
i
\
,
.:::
", t~.
"~&-I/
rt:::;, ."-;~ L ~.? )
{....... ........,~$ '02,:C.t.~-,;
:..:--::; '-";;.' -''''~;;~''-''''? r: s S
"~I
'"
~:.;
~
-:r...;r@ /';:'...s/
.'
,
\
'... .
1:: ..,{ ~
~:~ ~
~ ~1 ':.
"' ,
:-.'" ..
-.",-\ .
~ ~ ~~ ~
~-i~i:
$:1 0/ r....../..... "1"r'''-'./
,",t7//~-. :.;I"..,~)
- :5' '-7"~./
~
,
'oj
, ~
'"
" .
~ ~'
'q
~..,
",
!' '~
-1
, "
~'~
, ,
''S
5;1
t~>(
\-)~ ~
~N
... :"
~)1.
~
h
, ' 'c'., tf'
l;~ ~~,
,''>1 I
~~ ~ ~ t:,~
l~~~ e \
' ... ,'II ::~_ ,:..:"
.l ,~1:: .,'
" ! -~ i
~~~ I ~
1,1' Ir~~~~}s;~_ :'\~
~ }j..J :f, I ) : F" ~ 0
~. h.--- { . ~C~ I
i' J' ~ I' .; n ii,
~, . j ~lJ~~"/~
~ , f ---------1' ~~' /"
~
" 10 ~I TtI
"" :::., ,e' _ _ _ "', ,~. I ~ ""
~.~.;..:. ~ t(~i ~I~" _:-~---~-~~ ; ~,~
~~ J ,,~~1 1_-- ...... I.. ~.":. .
~~~~;~ ~ );;------:'-;/: :;]1 /f
~. -~ '~;
~~ :;'~i 2 ,:~:.,,;~::: !:':.
~~,.
~~:.....c~~
_ PLY"
i~ '=~
~
<:
'='
'X',e
~
!
"' . '.:;
. . ,%0, ~
:Cj .!. · J
' .~t ...
if .: .-: -..-:.. '. '.~ _.~ '.:,: ">~. -
..,~/
:'?-/1- . " , ~ ~\
. r--i )
~'-:;J r'-
~
.
~
-<
~
"
": I
,....]t
.. "'~ ~~
l %' ",
J~;~~~I , ~~"---9J">'_
,~~~ ~
~~'i'l ~_~..........~ ~
~i\er-- ~
- "..,
~~~-
,,,,,,._~~
.
.
"i-
~
"'"
'"
""
~~ ""'.'
~' -,
/ . "l'v' ./
nb""--1--'h!P
, W $Gi
"
",
H
j;i
.:; ~
\IJmn
';.:"': .!:~
i
I
:1
!ill ~ IIi!!!:
,,'13 H 1..",..
'HH '~~HP'
""j h !I'lll
!!l'J F m,;'
;;. oj ..... ~:Pl~
~HI, lj ~!I;:l
H~~; \ lj3Hi
lJH, ~ !;,,!l
.a..~i-; 1" i~ !j';; ~
Ilill ~~!illjl~
~.!L.: 3,.......cd.d
~
~-
\-
\~
'f
''0,1;:
"V
~.:.' ,;,
'~
....,
\,/
.
~)
~ ~~J
;-L,
~~<
-,
~1
<\'
'l~
~~
I '
'"
---- -
?
! ~
,,~ t
i:
::;~
C\ ~~
~ ~ 't
3] '...~ J:
.-
'" u'
..,
- I, ~"
~.!
~ 'I
>- ~
'" '! ": ~1 2
>
'" I 'it' ':(~
;; t~"
. .:.:::
. ~ x ,.
1: "
\l'
i.. ~
!H
!JJl
1
I,i
! ~ i
i~ i
,
,~
~ f
,
, ,
~ j
~~ j
Q) ~
'" ,
r-.:.;
(j' ~
'>1 i
....... ~
:-,;
k.
~~
"t~
~
~.
I
~
,
~
..,
0:;
'1
,
,
EXHIBIT "~"
q'TA. -CG=,"'" F~}T nr: ~O~~~A" ~
~ iJ~., rJ ~ '" L; ... ~ ~ \;.0 -.oj 't..........,, .... ~'... .,J,O'~..;; A. ,..'llll
CONDITIONS
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A, That special ccnditions and circumstances exist \Nhich are peculiar to the land,
structure or building involved and vvhich are not applicable to other lands,
structures or buildings in the same zoning district:
There are special conditions and circumstances which exist and are peculiar to the
land in this case. The gas station is existing and the only renovation to the
pro'perty and building is to upgrade the exterior with new fascia, colors,
landscaping, and textures so to make the gas station fit in with the neighborhood.
The property is not big enough to place the driveways the proper distance from the
intersection nor to move the gas islands or canopy. The number of driveways must
remain due to the location of the fuel filling ports which the gasoline tankers must
unload, there would not be enough room for them to leave the property with fewer
drives.
B. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant:
Special circumstances and conditions do not result from the actions of the
applicant because he bought the property as it is. He is just trying to upgrade the
exterior and landscaping to fit in with the changing neighborhood.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district:
Granting these variances will not confer any special privileges that are denied by
this ordinance to other lands within the same zoning district.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and
undo hardship on the applicant:
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zoning district and would
work an unnecessary and undue hardship on him because it would force him out of
business.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure:
t::XHIBIT ,,(,.
Granting of these variances is the minimum variances that would make possible the
reasonable use of the land and building. It would be impossible to operate this
business and upgrade the exterior if these variances are not granted. By granting
these variances, you are allowing this business to be upgraded with exterior finish
and landscaping which will better fit in with the surrounding neighborhood.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent
and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the
'. area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare:
Granting there variances will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
chapter and that these variances will not be injurious to the area but an asset to
the area. This business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood but the
opposite, it will be an asset to the community.
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Gateway Texaco
File number: Canopy and gasoline pump islands setback ZNCV 03-014 and 03-015
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERJENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
Conditions of Approval
2
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
CONDITIONS
Comments:
l. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
I 1. To be determined. I I I
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Galeway Texaco\ZNCY 03-01O-03-0l7,23,24\COA Canopy and Gasoline pump islands ZNCY 03-014 and 03-
015.doc
DEVELOPt... ,\jT ORDER OF THE CITY COMM' ~ION OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLOR1l1A
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Texaco
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Mr. Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 9 Northeast 6th Street Delray Beach, FL 33444
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: October 21,2003
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Canopy and gasoline pump islands ZNCV 03-014 and 03-014
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.e. (a) requiring that no canopy shall be located less than twenty (20) feet
from any property line to allow a 1 D.5-foot variance, resulting in a distance of 9.5 feet for an existing
canopy for a gasoline dispensing establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.e. (b) requiring that no gasoline pump island shall be located less than thirty
(30) feet from any property line to allow a 10.2-foot variance, resulting in a distance of 19.8 feet for an
existing gasoline pump island for a gasoline dispensing establishment.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 2360 North Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth
on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-01 0-03-017,23,24IDO Canopy and gasoline pump island ZNCV 03-014 and 03-015.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-233
STAFF REPORT
FROM:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
V\ \;f~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
Maxime Ducoste . trJc...
Planner t'V -
TO:
THRU:
DATE:
September 29, 2003
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Gateway Texaco Variances
Landscape buffers ZNCV 03-016 and 03-017
REQUEST:
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.f. (1) requiring
a ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer along the street frontage and to include
one tree ten (10) to fifteen (15) feet in height with a minimum three-inch
caliper every forty (40) feet, a continuous hedge twenty-four (24) inches high,
twenty-four (24) inches on center at time of planting with flowering
groundcover to allow a variance of 10 feet, resulting in a zero (0) landscape
buffer along the street frontage for an existing gasoline dispensing
establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11, Supplemental Regulations L.3.f. (2)(a)
requiring a ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer on all interior property lines to
allow a variance of 5 feet, resulting in a five (5) foot buffer for an existing gas
dispensing establishment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: SUAU Enterprises
Applicant/Agent: Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location: 2360 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3)/ Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use:
681 square foot addition to gasoline dispensing establishment (limited to a
maximum of 600 square feet by Condition of Approval for appeal - ADAP
02-001 ).
Acreage:
0.48 Acre (20,830 square feet)
Adjacent Uses:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-233
Page 2
North:
A multi-family residential property, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
South:
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Avenue, and farther south are single-family attached
townhouses under construction (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit
Development (IPUD);
East:
Vacant commercial lot zoned Community Commercial (C-3) currently under review
for a proposed car wash, and farther east is a single-family residential dwelling (part
of Las Palmas development), zoned Single-family residential, (R-1-AA); and
West:
Rights-of-way of U.S. 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, and farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned
Neighborhood Commercial (C-2).
BACKGROUND
Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises Incorporated, is
requesting conditional use / major site plan modification approval to construct a 681 square foot addition to
an existing gasoline dispensing establishment. In addition, the applicant is proposing new parking spaces,
a new access drive that would lead to the property directly to the east, and a general "make-over" of the
exterior facades of the gasoline station building and canopy. The number of gasoline pump islands and
fueling positions would remain unaltered.
The proposed 681 square foot addition to the gas station is considered as a conditional use in the C-3
zoning district. Also, the gas-station is a legal non-conforming use because it does not comply with Chapter
2, Section 11.L.3.a.(2) due to the fact that gas stations may only be located at intersections "consisting of
roads of four (4) lanes or wider".
Earlier last year, Mr. Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr. Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition to the existing gas station, in part, to satisfy outstanding code enforcement violations. He
also proposed direct access between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east (which was earmarked
for a mechanical car wash) in order to minimize vehicular traffic onto Las Palmas Avenue. These inquiries
were based on the presumption that the proposed addition would be allowed and that direct access would
only require site plan review. However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the addition would
not be permitted because it would represent an unlawful expansion of a non-conforming (a gasoline-
dispensing establishment).
To answer Mr. Kruger's inquiries, on July 16, 2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an
administrative determination letter that basically prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas-
station building because doing it would constitute a violation of Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land
Development Regulations. Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the
proposed driveway connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east could be permitted.
However, the direct access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a legally binding
cross-access agreement.
On July 31, 2002, Mr. Kruger addressed a letter requesting a formal appeal of the aforementioned
administrative determination. According to the staff report, "in summary, the appeal justifies the proposed
expansion by the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the non-
conforming aspect-gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent of
the gasoline sales element of the business. The applicant disagreed with the applicant's position. The City
Commission approved the appeal with the condition that the expansion would be limited to 600 square feet.
Therefore, this major site plan modification and accompanying variance requests represent the applicant's
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-233
Page 3
continuing effort to construct a building addition and mechanical car wash on the abutting property (see
Exhibit "B" - Site Plan and Survey). If approved, the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fac;ade
improvements would occur in one (1) phase.
ANALYSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district.
b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure.
f. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this
chapter [ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise
detrimental to the public welfare.
Staff has conducted this analysis with the assumption that, based on the city's prior approval of the
administrative appeal acknowledging the increase in intensity of this non-conforming use, that the city is
aware of the potential of certain hardships and non-conformities associated with the site.
Staff has focussed this review based on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit
"C", which require the request be initiated by special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the
subject land, structure, or building, which are not the result of the actions of the applicant, and that the
request is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building, or
structure.
The subject request has been initiated in preparation for the construction of an addition to the existing gas
station business. The applicant desires relief from the required landscape buffer along the front (North
Federal Highway) and the interior (north) property lines of the subject property, since they do not exist on the
already confined site. The subject property has been improved with a gas station business, and occupied
since 1965. In order to meet the landscape buffer as required by code, the applicant would need additional
linear footage along North Federal Highway or to eliminate the existing first two (2) gasoline pump islands.
This scenario would likely be cost prohibitive or significantly impact business operation. Understanding that
site layout is existing and cannot easily be altered without significantly impacts to the business operation the
requests represent the minimum variances that will make reasonable use of an existing gasoline dispensing
establishment and will not be injurious to the area. Therefore, criteria items "e" and "f' appear to be
supported by the variance request.
The overall objective of the Land Development Regulations is to insure the welfare and safety of the public
by providing regulations and standards in which to achieve consistent equitable developments. The intent of
the landscape buffer is to visually screen the vehicular use from the adjacent properties and right-of-way.
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-233
Page 4
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDA TION
Based on the analysis contained herein, Staff recommends that the requested variances be approved
subject to the following conditions:
1. Providing a substitute form of screening of the site along North Federal Highway where possible
such as planter pots or boxes.
However, any additional conditions of approval added by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or
the City Commission will be placed in the Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval.
MWR/MD
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010 thru 03-017, 023, 024 ISTAFF REP ZNCV 03-016 and 03-017 Landscape buffers. doc
C) ~ jlH I I~
:0
0 I
en
en PO "J:eR-R
~
tV I I II ~
6
:is I! !
i I
I II
I
~ SITE
I---
'"'- I 1_. I
" I I .
--c~ ~
P U? ~o'i J I.
I ~~J -I . ~ ~/
I l (>'"
/ I /);/,
/, /,/ /' k::..P
,--, ! ---Lol- I I I
lTl r'"L-J I
I-- I IPUD I
; !
R3 I o,j I
..,J
;$
QQQuQQQQGo ~ REC
tltj
ooo~ D .~
QQQ D
D I
D -.
I [J D ~~~~~g~~ ~ii!
NE~- [J
[J
I \ 0 -I- 88 8
DO DO
~ ~~ ~ ;~~I
I--F-&~ 1 I ~E-2O+1=1-AVe-
I 7
\-~R3
REC ,
I
~~~ I I I I I
II w -
MT-\ I I I 1
I
I __ I I ~ r
l o~ j / .1.
~
111 II ~ ~U ,
.j:,.,
..,
I
Location Map
Gateway Texaco
EXHIBIT "P.
.
" I .
-il."
-W-
_If
C./
EXHIBIT "B"
1- : : ~.; ,; "' s
"' f J~ l~ i.t'~ tg I~
Ii ~ I~ .~. ~ i.
~ ; !~ j: ;tf: ii ~i
~ ! l:!! !ii :1",
~ ~ t III ~.! H ~
~ ~ ~~ l~ i~~;. ,
~; ; I !;!l! !
g ~ 7 ~ ~:; , i
<( J t ~~; l; I
II
!I
J /~
!~~\\/I\l
hi~'i --II 'l ili ; I
~.~ li.!,;, ii; I'
1,,_ 1"1:' i, :ii . !
.-----., '" .. III ..~~ , II
e- ~" ~',j Ii
~! )-:".'1 ii ij ; 1
-}~\ I
(.'.L.,~"....,: I
I' "~,~';~-.-j
1-
:;
J~i
r----:-_'
'._r_~, ,
~1~fJ
';; ~:l
><-
>;:
(J,;)
~'"
'i"'m
CD",
0,
-<m
Zo
10 JJ
Iz~
07)
is: ~
ls':,,/)
f-~
Ir ~ - ~-==----=--=-=--_--==
~~
~~---==- ":"--===
.,
':
-\ .;
~
U~;
('J~:::-(>
.......;;
~~c
~~~
~~.
-~
N Q R T M a 0 UN:
u. s.
HIGHWAY
N o. 1 '
i 1
~.., ~:'
: ~ 10;
:~;~
;m
:2~
-~S~
oa I':!
i~ :t:
~~ ~
~~ ~
~~ I ~
~~ I
,~~ ,I
;~, ~~~ ~II
II! II i
; l -. ii
~~~ ~~
I~~ ii
:i~
~
"-
!~
mn
Hi!!
mil
j~H~
~Hn
:'~'l
i:i
I
'1
"I
~z
~j
~.
~
~
.._~l! ~~~~ rl~
. -Ii .". r~ - '"c ~~
~;o.,~~~~~ _.._~~ ;~~~ ~;"
~m~~!~;~. ~!Um. ~~ iH! i
"i..'~~,,, C'"P=';~ ~~"~ ~
.~.";~, 4<~ ~;~ - ,'0. ~i';.
~~~~~~;~5 s~~ ~~ ~~f ~:gi ~r'
mm~~; ~~~ l~ ~~~ ~ r
~.~e~~~g~ ~~~~" ~a~ ~
;~~i~h~~ i'~" ~!g ~
"'.. -.. <. i ~:"
~~'~i :~;; "i ~ i~
~l~~. ~;! ~ _ g ~.
~m~ 'i~~ ~; i i~
30i~' ~s: ~! I )
~~:;~ ~~~ i! ~ ~~
~~hi .~~ 3 ~ ~ ~~
~~i~g ^o~ ~ i ~ ~~ ;e;.
e" -::u!ii ! ~ ~ ... ~ .. ::t tit:
~~~~~ ~~~ ~;: ~ ~~ :~:
H~!3;h - ~ ~ ig
T~i ~ ~ " h
~ ~. i ~
~ ""'....~s~sig ~~
>ili~ ~H~~~h~~~~~ ~~
"01 ~'- . "3:_ ~~I _
~i~ ;llS~ ~ !~~~;~~ i
~oj ~8.! r&~ Ii~ ~
!~~ ~~~ 2 - 0 ~
~~~E~~~. I~
.Q -, ~ n
~: -0" ; '"
~i! ~~ ,
~~ ~ -
~I :
m
::::
.. .
m
-.. s8i~
-~e..o' ~. '":i!
''" <"'.r
SI::.......
.'"~~
;:...~o...... rt;3~
~~~~~~ ~~~:o
~; ....... ;
, ~
~-1l ~~~~~~~:~.. !~i ~~~~
....<-c'o-..c_"_~~ i-' ~o-~
Oi''',:i ~:t.:Z""ii%_~('")_;.,~ .; iiiS)'l!J'l
E~"im;<;~.~~~!~ ~ ~i~
~:~~~":::~~*~ !~ <;~ ::~
I=~;~~~a~i~~.~~h: M ~~_
mm;~~~~~~~~m~~.~~..~: ~~~ ;~
O~~H~~~~;;5;ai~!i~*~~~;~ :i! p
2~WJ;'~;~:i';~;!~~8;~~Fh! .~.~ ~~
"0 '.0 ." ~'"~"-~O'.IO'O'. .'. .
~~~..~ ~~S<S"'-.~'~~s.;~~~g l~' ~~
e. !ii '''o~~::'~;E~~;!..~~~ .; ~o
" . ~~.~.- ....._-~.._. .i !.
· . < <.~o -."'~"'''. .0 ..
t !ii ~o'~'..~~~!ii~'ijo i. ~:
· . '~~-i~~~~:i~:,l.: ~~ ;!
i!~~g~~~~~.~i~~i ~~ ~=
~i-~t~i;~~~~.~~! n~ 2!
~~!~~h~U~~~!~~ ~~ ~!
.;~~5~1~i.~~:.~: ;,~ ~~
!~~~n"e;;~"~a' ~!ii i;
01. ""'_.~!ii _~ ~;;: o.
gH~,'il!~~o;'~~~ ~o ~.
~!-~~-~;.~~~~.~2!. i
!;~~o'~"'~i;~'. ~;
:!Ii;!l~~;;;~~~",..~", t j~
;~"'(jo"'''': i: ;
: ~~~ ~
.' ':':
nl"\N M4D ALTERATIONS :0:
PR~l~_;~~~,;,_ -eX! co
~
I .
I'lz.....
1=_-'.'."_0
I ....:~' '~:.:~:__
r~..;...I;.
... ~'~i.'.. .,. .'t ' !
. .. :'ll--.-nt :. ;
~ , ~;,~ . , I,
~,..\ R r: '.j ~-'~~'l
I . I,. ~~"'~.'.. " ~',
- I, f~', ," I..,
"I r~~':c." 'I I .-
-'-'n::-":;...., ........'. .."
~tjJ@,~ .. 't;frr.ij . I I
' V;v,~ ,'I, I
~~...I~-
~
I I "i,:"1 _ ,,--,-," I "
II~
~,
<.
E~
H
!:s
l:
, ;~c':~~~!h
;,--HHH~
, cVt~'4-Bl f
--EO ."c+--.... l<:. U
~ ~ ~ ..
.~ '1
~ ;
~ '!
~ ~ ~ ~
r:
l,,:
t' ';
, ;;
~!- ~~ S
! :., ~
1!
,
';:
~~
;di
~~ ~i
~ -
~ :..
, ,
..
:~
~i~
"'~,.
~;~~~z:
z": _
~ \
o
~~
"';"',,:,
0-
r;.. ,~" _ ~
~\ >;:
..\
c_-
-( z;::
Z.,.:
~ ~:~
~ :~i
->.;
! !i .C.~_"h~_
I , ~...
.-;- ...
- ,
~~ ~"
". /..<<^~. I
\';) \\~J
., .... \<
~.~
~ <"\
-. -. -.:-0::;;:- - "\.,1
I " , \. '"' \ .'("
. ,- , \"
' \ ~
' ", : "'I .), j
1, '" . 1 "/ ~~: ;
t~ / ~ i 0 -'"' I ~~~ }
H,
~"d~'::~L d :, !J Ji; Ii: . I '.J .~
7_.T?;~, /~'...$/ / ~r. - - ". /-. ~ r. I" ~ _
"-'-. ';P>'~/'-. "-'___ . '. _. --::".... ''''--_:, "'~II~\" ~"
. '."~""""'P"~"". " ....
'" 1 .. ...,,,""'...._ n.~ ,. :i1 ,.
..,. ;r;--.~.'::-;;;;;."L-:_~ II 11)11\ ~~
I """ , --->?-~f7,..li _ i ' \Jr,.I,'"
' " " .. 0 . I "'" I ~ .1,
~16. ~~"'. ~I'I.:; I! t~" _ l ~J' ~
" -,. '" I <)~ --."CI-i _
,', I", ".. ",II T-I'T~ ~JII ~
"I' "ti, "=~'... . '" :' .,~, ,
.. \,' 1 , ','- if' '",,".... '. .' \, t:i1' J
~/""!';l~~ ~I_~; il !I ',~I'I 1
r 1 , 'n '\.,I"" . ,
II' 1 I "" ;;;~;;:;r U. ..:. : ..: 'i "~ :1', ~ i i ",
i.' ....".. '0;0 '0/... ,s...~ .., '. "",, " ,
1/" . ;' . .tT,' ..'.:.. . t .1' : ,; .,l'l I 'lJ I' ~ '"
~..~. "" , .w '" ","
I ." , .. . " , , : ~." , ,! I, .
'1,1, +. , "'''''' ;,,,. I l>!lX.o:
'C', .'... . . , , '" .. < ,....! ., ~ ,0 ..
't;;; , .r..C, "="r- _ _ "'. ',. .. ....: "..: " '. .'!" ,!-., ~ ,
'1"1, ''- . .~~\,)........, __ I
i '",. r','., .' .,; , ..."., " ,., . ,
I--''''\:{.; .. ,;, J... ,'" .' . ~ I !
I{ ~\,.. "J i " , " " '. , 1 ~ ,
/e....... ......, . 'I' " ", , .. ~.. "
II 1": ~~j I 0 o/'F-!II<:;;1 " " ~ I {j
;i~"--------I: 'iU;;, ;I.J ' ~! "
! i. ~ q;" ;."/". ,,,- . ..; !\, , ,.
.~ , r---------I~ ~.~ "'/" .; .., ,,' .~ I Ii
' !. , I",} i, ii,' ~ ,,f ~'FI " I-::~
~ ..! '" '~/'~'<:' L, J,...; :::, I'." I I ~;-:...
I , , .., --'''--''.' :.. ! ',"""., 'S f' .. Ii';, ;, I"
~.1,L -~('~i ,I' ':'---'" :; ;1;1 I.~ 1[/ I I! J.. J' '\ ZK;l! ,,_. "
~~i~ i",lt;;------>-/"fii r } L '.. '" ......'/L. "
~,. ,.,. ~ 0:-' I .. "c_ ~, . '''''r '
... .. ~ ~:J:5'-;-:.:: )"~:l ",". L~;'~_J,:",- '," i, /'.
:" ~-""'"';>"~... ----'---4:------... -->-,"- ,",--,' k._ 5.--:.'"' t'~.: "'.<", I ',. ~..~" I"
~_...,~', , -~>,p~ -'&='~'''''''-'''' ~/,
""'~ : ,. -~""J~.. , ~--:. ..~ ',""'-:- ':_"~. ~. '" ~
", . :. "OJ':. . '. .~.. ._':~ _ !_._~,~. -:.-._
l ~~;I ~, ,',:- c, " '.'.~, ' :',
' .... ~ i " !, "
.. , "J
~~~
~1 t ,.,. , , . .,.y .(&-.,., *~.. ~ " '_/' ~I/
'.., ~ - U
: ~ ';::1
t2~~~~_...,..... I
" ,'.. ....., ----'-
,," "'f=- ~_c''''~''''''---c.. .. ..
'.1', ~~ ~ _. ..~.
~ ~ ~~ I
\~~'.1;'
, I
------, .
----~-"----
;P ~/";7 "~"""'.v"';":l""'''''' ~""':'-___
-"
\
'-< 1
~~~ :
~" ~
'1" ...
~ ~ ~ ~
~J~~ ~
i ~ 2.;' ~
-.:.x'~...~ <J
~ !" J
~ \ iJ~
t.., ~~';{~~
i" ~1~
"- I I'
! '\ i~:
\J ~;;
11 ~
J, l]
t,~-~ :; ~~
-~~ J1
~
,
'J ~
" .
"0
" '~
~ ~'
" ,
" ~
~<)
ox,
~f~
~ ...'
f~
, .
'i
~;1
t~'t
'v)~ ...
'- ~~
~ ~~
~'.~~
"'H ~
"-'':>'.:.'#''-0:
-.:- - --
-r
--1
~;' ,,:: ...:c .::
-.,i~\
\
~:: 1 -:,'
,
I, ;7;.:.
~ ~J>.);"
_N':,,( -':>';';<;7", .,
;:1h
'..r,.
-'w"-:-:
'I
~~-
, ,
-'\\
<~
'>
; 1 ~
i ~~
(:J" ~
'"
,
"
\
"-
"-;,,.
';,;oo!'_<o:
L
':"."-S
HE' n i
-.' '.';",! ,.,
"".i,!dl
I" \1 ., 11,'.
~H~'~~7"~
, ,
. ....'1'<.,
~ ~, I.l
'~ ~"P
1 ~:.
~~~
.. ~ " '1
iiil ~jlii:: !:jU~:1
1 ~', -~';"l'" '_'1 ;;.
~~~l~ I H!~_3' _ J: ! ':
,'~i! ii,!; >::; :::f
~~:i~ l~ rl~:h ::c _
"'''I '-.,!.,
'-", . 1- ",
WlJ1 /; ,aljj,
;:;.i~ "~ H;~;l
!lj,~ 1\ l1ilj.
i!;;l~ H;i~~
1m! ~~ iIjlll
!Sl~:. QI~i!~~~l
j"'!.q ,~~ !~;!=
)< ~!i~g 21~. loW..
~ ~~i~j ~'~~HHi\
\~ 'ip" i S~I;!lij
\~ ~! .....
'{.
.~'~
""
~-'\::.
.;.\~
\~
i
:!
-\
.',
.....
,
,
,~
~ ~
,
, -
~ i
. .
~n
OJ ~
"" ,
~ i
c,,' ,
~ .!
'- ~
'-2 "
\~ ~
00
,
?
~ ~
~~ i
,.
~ .
~~~
CI~ ~ ~
... it-...... <;"
~i)f
~
EXHIBIT "e"
S1-i~ TErJlENT OF SF~CIAL
CONDITIONS
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. That special ccndi;:ions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land,
structure or building involved and which are not appiicable to other lands,
structures or buildings in the same zoning district:
There are special conditions and circumstances which exist and are peculiar to the
land in this case. The gas station is existing and the only renovation to the
pro'perty and building is to upgrade the exterior with new fascia, colors,
landscaping, and textures so to make the gas station fit in with the neighborhood.
The property is not big enough to place the driveways the proper distance from the
intersection nor to move the gas islands or canopy. The number of driveways must
remain due to the location of the fuel filling ports which the gasoline tankers must
unload, there would not be enough room for them to leave the property with fewer
drives.
8, That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant:
Special circumstances and conditions do not result from the actions of the
applicant because he bought the property as it is. He is just trying to upgrade the
exterior and landscaping to fit in with the changing neighborhood.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district:
Granting these variances will not confer any special privileges that are denied by
this ordinance to other lands within the same zoning district.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and
undo hardship on the applicant:
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zoning district and would
work an unnecessary and undue hardship on him because it would force him out of
business.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure:
.......,
EXHIBIT "C"
Granting of these variances is the minimum variances that would make possible the
reasonable use of the land and building. It would be impossible to operate this
business and upgrade the exterior if these variances are not granted. By granting
these variances, you are allowing this business to be upgraded with exterior finish
and landscaping which will better fit in with the surrounding neighborhood.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent
and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the
" area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare:
Granting there variances will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
chapter and that these variances will not be injurious to the area but an asset to
the area. This business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood but the
opposite, it will be an asset to the community.
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Gateway Texaco
File number: Landscape buffers ZNCV 03-016 and 03-017
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. Providing a substitute form of screening of the site along North Federal
Highway where possible such as planter pots or boxes.
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
CONDITIONS
Comments:
I. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-0l0-03-0l7,23,24\COA Landscape buffers ZNCV 03-016 and 03-Ol7.doc
DEVELOP, .NT ORDER OF THE CITY COMIV. .310N OF THE
'.CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Texaco
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Mr. Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 9 Northeast 6th Street Delray Beach, FL 33444
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: October 21,2003
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Landscape buffers ZNCV 03-016 and 03-017
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.f. (1) requiring a ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer along the street
frontage and to include one tree ten (10) to fifteen (15) feet in height with a minimum three-inch caliper
every forty (40) feet, a continuous hedge twenty-four (24) inches high, twenty-four (24) inches on center at
time of planting with flowering groundcover to allow a variance of 10 feet, resulting in a zero (0) landscape
buffer along the street frontage for an existing gasoline dispensing establishment;
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Zoning, Section 11,
Supplemental Regulations L.3.f. (2)(a) requiring a ten (10) foot wide landscape buffer on all interior
property lines to allow a variance of 5 feet, resulting in a five (5) foot buffer for an existing gas dispensing
establishment.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 2360 North Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth
on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6.
All further de Jpment on the property shall be madE.
and condition's"" of this order.
accordance with the terms
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGaleway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010-03-017,23,24IDO Landscape buffers ZNCV 03-016 and 03-017.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-234
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
M lJ.,V
Michael W. Rumpf \ '
Director of Planning and Zoning
THRU:
FROM:
Maxime Ducoste .. AJIA.
Planner IVV .
DATE:
September 29, 2003
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Gateway Texaco Variances
Sign setback ZNCV 03-023
REQUEST:
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations,
Chapter 21, Signs, Article III. Section 5 requiring all signs must meet a
minimum ten (10) foot setback from the property line to the closest surface of
the sign to allow a five (5) foot variance from the property line, resulting in five
(5) foot setback for an existing gasoline dispensing establishment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: SUAU Enterprises
Applicant/Agent: Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location: 2360 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3)/ Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use: 681 square foot addition to gasoline dispensing establishment (limited to a
maximum of 600 square feet by Condition of Approval for appeal-ADAP 02-
001 ).
Acreage: 0.48 Acre (20,830 square feet)
Adjacent Uses:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
North:
A multi-family residential property, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
South:
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Avenue, and farther south are single-family attached
townhouses under construction (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit Development
(IPUD);
East:
Vacant commercial lot zoned Community Commercial (C-3) currently under review for
a proposed car wash, and farther east is a single-family residential dwelling (part of
Las Palmas development), zoned Single-family residential, (R-1-AA); and
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-234
Page 2
West:
Rights-of-way of U.S. 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, and farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned
Neighborhood Commercial (C-2).
BACKGROUND
Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises Incorporated, is
requesting conditional use / major site plan modification approval to construct a 681 square foot addition to an
existing gasoline dispensing establishment. In addition, the applicant is proposing new parking spaces, a
new access drive that would lead to the property directly to the east, and a general "make-over" of the exterior
facades of the gasoline station building and canopy. The number of gasoline pump islands and fueling
positions would remain unaltered.
The proposed 681 square foot addition to the gas station is considered as a conditional use in the C-3 zoning
district. Also, the gas-station is a legal non-conforming use because it does not comply with Chapter 2,
Section 11.L.3.a.(2) due to the fact that gas stations may only be located at intersections "consisting of roads
offour (4) lanes or wider".
Earlier last year, Mr. Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr. Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition to the existing gas station, in part, to satisfy outstanding code enforcement violations. He
also proposed direct access between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east (which was earmarked for
a mechanical car wash) in order to minimize vehicular traffic onto Las Palmas Avenue. These inquiries were
based on the presumption that the proposed addition would be allowed and that direct access would only
require site plan review. However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the addition would not be
permitted because it would represent an unlawful expansion of a non-conforming (a gasoline-dispensing
establishment).
To answer Mr. Kruger's inquiries, on July 16, 2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an
administrative determination letter that basically prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas-
station building because doing it would constitute a violation of Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land
Development Regulations. Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the
proposed driveway connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east could be permitted.
However, the direct access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a legally binding cross-
access agreement.
On July 31, 2002, Mr. Kruger addressed a letter requesting a formal appeal of the aforementioned
administrative determination. According to the staff report, "in summary, the appeal justifies the proposed
expansion by the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the non-conforming
aspect-gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent of the gasoline
sales element of the business. The applicant disagreed with the applicant's position. The City Commission
approved the appeal with the condition that the expansion would be limited to 600 square feet. Therefore,
this major site plan modification and accompanying variance requests represent the applicant's continuing
effort to construct a building addition and mechanical car wash on the abutting property (see Exhibit "B" - Site
Plan and Survey). If approved, the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fac;ade improvements would
occur in one (1) phase.
ANALYSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
Staff Report
Memorandum No PZ-03-234
Page 3
district.
b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure.
f. That the grantingofthe variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter
[ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare.
Staff has conducted this analysis on with the assumption that based on the city's prior approval of the
administrative appeal regarding the increase in intensity of this non-conforming use, that the city has
acknowledged the potential for revealing certain hardships and non-conformities to the site.
Also, the analysis focused on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit "C", which
require that the request is initiated by special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the subject
land, structure, or building, which are not the result of the actions of the applicant, and that the request is the
minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the structure.
The subject request has been initiated in preparation for the construction of an addition to the existing gas
station business, which represents a major site plan modification. Through this process every aspect of the
project is reviewed for compliance, if a requirement cannot be met, relief from the code may be required. As
such, the applicant desires to maintain a freestanding sign at its existing location. The subject property has
been improved with a gas station business, and occupied since 1965. Staff reviewed the site and determined
that the request for a sign setback variance of five (5) feet may not represent the minimum variance
necessary to maintain the site sign on the property. Staff acknowledged that the applicant could meet the sign
setback as required by code. The sign can be move an additional five (5) feet to the east and two (2) feet to
the north while maintaining the same orientation, and without interfering with the vehicular use area for the
station. This scenario would meet both the code and maintain the same visibility for the applicant's business.
Understanding that the subject request does not represent the minimum variance that will make reasonable
use of the structure, criteria item "en is not met.
The overall objective of the Land Development Regulations is to insure the welfare and safety of the public by
providing regulations and standards in which to achieve consistent equitable developments. The intent of the
sign setback is to provide reasonable visibility for a sign without interfering with visibility along a right-of-way.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDA TION
Based on the analysis contained herein, Staff recommends that the requested variance be denied, due to the
lack of hardship, and due to the avoidable circumstance being created by the actions of the applicant.
However, if approved any conditions of approval added by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or
the City Commission will be placed in the Exhibit "D" Conditions of Approval.
M D/MW R S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGaleway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010 lhru 03-017, 023, 024 1ST AFF REP ZNCV 03-023 Sign setback.doc
()
:tI
o
en
en
~
(j)
o
:0
i
Location Map
Gateway Texaco
I II
POi fER-RD-
!IU
I I I Ii
EXHIBIT HA"
I
SITE
I I I
I / /
j / /
I ////
I /// //1
/ / /
I / /
I
lBifln----/
R3
[][][][][][][][]GO
ooorm;un 8
[][][]~ey CJ
CJ
I [J CJ
E-20.JH-;W. 8
o
REC
-
~i;~gi~ ~;;~
-5.
i
I
~T ~
'1>
~R3
REC
\
<:
l!1
~
'-i
.
C' 1-
1/.'
c7
f ~I
,
~I'jli:\ ,i~;:; Ii &
~_: :1; ~& i: ;tl~ ii E~
- I~ 1 !'"I ll' ,. ,I
~ I. j: I. ;,1:1 !
~ 1'1 '1:1 !~! II i
c a ... f 1::11:7'
~ ~, ! I ::151 I
~ I ~I ~I! ;il ! I
,,~ I ". I
i ~ ~ I
I ~ I~
:D~
I.;I~il
m !i I~
~~~ ~~ l~
:g~ ~~ I'
~~~ ~~~ ;
;u Iri
!ii !i ;
~,~ ;"
;;i ii
>
'='
\~ ; :
~~
!~
nii
2~~
~~-.
-~
~-="c__.~O'_,.,~,,=-_. '.1
i'o~.~,' '\~/I\~
") .'::----- I'
,,' ~'1
~~i " 51 "ill ,
~/,1, .~' ~i. ~ :~ ;~a .
~, ,,', '! 1'1 I '.
,".jr :1 " :1 ;i! . !
s~ -r1 Va ~~;~; i
. )..: !1 ~! ; I
....-.?~'l
,jl !,
,.-_ I~' ,
.:_1 ,~~
1',:r:':~",,"',.;:'J
. 1-=':/.. \\ ~
r_..._
~-- ,
, I
I
.~
j'
L
!'
V)
..,
C'l
~
~
'"
J
;;:J
Q
o
co
8
II
~!
:~=;;:)os: ::::~;:~~~~:~~~ ~t I~ ~
Nz~;~E~~; ~~~_!~~~~!~~l~ ;~ 1:lJ (S
-"'I""~->-- --)o~~Ij:>-:."'~"'~ "'~ ~o
~~~;~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~! ;~ ~~
EXHIBIT "B"
u
}>
ri
;::
>
(11
>
I '~z
j:-
!,
!: l~
II
I
I~
)
'>
~'
. _.::..J
~~'1
':-~;:lid
~. ~.: "I
,..._-- .---i
-' - - ~ - - ~,
;m
x_
>z
Ow
0;:)
,m
~~
0,
g8
0;:)
Iz8i
"'en
It~ ~
-m
,,~
,- z =-
~,
======-==-----==---.
u
:>
;;:J
"'
:::::
Cl
:I~
"':;;
-,
'----y
~~
~
--:-) .
N S
~ c 0 '-' I\J ;::
1;. s.
GhWAy
N 0 1 '
ii ..
-:----v~~lJ_~? -,' "
I ! . >H------""~_
---. ~~ '. --- ~-----~~
/~~~~~ ---~-...-^.
/ /(~ft 1!:ljr~~.;~';~~.'~~.i-~~~ ,;~;_ol ~.=-I~.~~ .;c_
. L...., '''} .. . c' .Ic-_~___ \.l, f'''.'~'''''~~';(
....r-=.,~_.,;- I ' , i~ :J I.. I ----.,/' .' "I I /""J
-1/ '~IIIi",:<. I " 'I~'
It I I . 'i . I "". ; .,~ i.' l I. ! ,_
.. ~ ~'" ,,' .!I ' i I-I
Vi/ ,~=:J-' CJ'! 'ni; I
--~ I/!i ,!~I -, ~ I
Ii ~ i J.' I I
Iii _ ~, . I ! I~;I
,i!~~) i>\ ;f/' ~ ci i iiU
:-- 1-- , . i.., oj ., I I i --__;-___~/ i
' i "'-0' "--.'" 'j, J I,. 'I'
i . -"'._ Va ,. ! j.
~ I c;) i j....Tf-.l 0, . J . 1 il
1,.1 I'i: I~
'f. . ' , r\.. \ .;".
'~----";"-" !" I " m (:: <:;"\ i ~i
,~ ---'---:___!ll'_~.' . . ,:.1:' ,1 , \ - "ii: ~"
'''- " '-~-'<:-~ji ' l/'~.'
,....,-, .- I' .~ --"~ ~ !:SOj
-\ iF ~ h'-,~ ,','>.. "", '-_'::"___~""'".I
.~ I ~l2 ,,~ Ii V ----=' ""-"!"."-~.':"""", N.. ,!,' r '''---rt--'-J-.
-'"'Iii! 1'1 L i "kS ~'~"~~'-,~......."T~~.....":<'::-,~/ ~ ii' J
. "Ill: c,' ~ -T.-0,,,-:_~ " " - , ;-=, ----=-=1('_-"-:: ... .., .
~ ~ pi i :'-':..,.1.:":'::::.::'~ '-I, ~ I - 'to'.;.~ , _ ~ - :,. _, iii' q
.I~ .'1 ~ I ~"~ .': ""101>~';'_:'.;'~.";':' ,i, ^ ,. "
i ", ~11i;" '."-~',_ .~~._"_",.;-":-~..,':' l<1di ,. ~~
I I I ",'-,: I, .,." < ~5' ..:-:t:.: - ,.;.....,. 'f\....:~ '''l 8.
>---1. ,.,~' '.;'--.-'-"L:'.',.~I.,~ '_. ~'t:i'~ .,~__
I 'I ~ ;-nl"~1 ,-,c~'-'.~'.:'-"~B '\'~~\:",,, :~ if.'\. :; i~~
J . L' ~ IN" 1- ,.< ," '''"\_!,:-~',:.., ,-.". :'; _ ~- \1 ' f " ~ I ~
,->,,,,. ---- '=--=- '. "",.,,:..,.. "'1 I "
" .r~_-,,~~ I ~_. '_e: .,,- ':...:.:1' ;- I~"
;; I ,:"-.,,. ---.~ --J....1!:.... hU, ==-~..::~, k"- I .1 i
.~ r-~' ,- ~;I i' . L_~_ U I f ~ -r--- :' ror I 00..,_ ':';'-'-.i---2~A ~ ~-=----~ _~J .;,.
, fl' ,I" ~ ~ ::::---! ", 'I ~ . _ !
i~ -L' ~r) - ''',~ ~~ ~-.: :~~'+~~~~~"~',~ ' 0f/ I ~II
; - - Y ----7---F-J I!i"', ~ ~t:: ~'- ~I ..'i.)/ e.[7 II
- ;'i ~ " ~ v!! :" ~ ~~ ~ ~/ '"/11 _
i,:1C:1f ,q.. I 1 I", "" "'lI, 8. ::: "- II .....
:. I.-----.:.-..u~_ I r-I--'--'-~~~~"",~, I' :'.,
I' ---- c ~. ~s
. ! ~~---c.-~' t' I ~ /1 t"
"~..,.;-;;.;..~ -:--"""')~~_'H I' II I 8
i? Po "'''''''~ ~ _ I II ~
<~ i! '!" --..f\".::..:''''~'8
~I ~ :~) .~ I-ro-I ~~
: ~!i; I
in
rl
j!
I
I : i;
\ :i
\1
~-
I
~
,""
f::>l":'!
~~;p
('in
Ii!!!
li2lj
~ ~ _ J_
~HH
;il~it
~.:-===..
1
~
~
"'
:'
.,
I,
:-'1
I
II
I
v' ,
Ilf~
l.~
!!i'
,~; I
1'-
~~g;;~-~i; .. .'Ff ~~ii ~!i
i\S~;:":!~,~ "1~'~S~~ ;~~I ;~
'V"'<'">~il~c~ ~~::l;;;i!<i~~1 i;l;~~ 101
'.'"~.~.-' '='=~='12! .. ;
m~ii~~~j: mm;~ .;~,. i
"-'O'"_~. -'.'~_~ "_" t",
2~~~3:g13'" ~~;a8!! r'>~!" ~j!;. "
~~<~::.:c~ .,' 00 ~n ~S;i tl
~~S~i~;~; .!'~~ I' ~.i.~ ~t'
~im~~~~ ~H f; E2~ ~ r
~l~~~~E~ ;:i.,. i'! ~
o;~i: .=: ~ f i " ~
~ia~~ ~~~ ~ ii . ~~:
~'EH ~~~ . i Q;
3~i~" sh .. -i
i, -~ .0. ~" .,
~sii: .~~ 5 ~ . h
~:~;i ~ii ;:;! ~~
,iU:~~C ~~... ~ ~ ~ ;;::~
2;~;:::: ~~~ ~ ~ 0 OJ!
Z1,;,!~!ii ...,;,~ ... ~I . ~~.. ..
llg~~ ~~i ; ~ %1' ~..-.-.
~;~~3 ~50! !. ~_
1<I~"~i a;r; i q ...~...
~<~. i ;
~
~ ... ..."oo,,=g g!!
>'i~= ~,,:,.~;__;~~ ~~
~'ol ~!~~:!i~H"E~ i~
~H ~H!i 5~~~~~~ r
m !H ~ ~ ~i 1>~ ~
~.C~ $.. . ~ ~
1ft ~~ ~ ~; ~ R ~
~~ ~D' n ~ ~
~f g~ ~ - .
~~ ~ ~
~~ ~
o Q~ ~~: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~3 ~i
~ ~ a ~ ~~!:: ~< ~!~ 8~; i II
"~~ha:~~;~w';~
i~~"';;:. ~ ~ ~!O!... oe '::0 I;; ~ ~~;;:; ~ ~ z.::
....;:o~.-So::'l~$8;~Il:;;o.!...~ "'. !~_
; l ~ ~ ~ a ~ m ~;; ~; i f ~~;5; i 1 ;~Q! il ~ i
~ ~l ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~ i;~ ~ ~ ~ i~;;;; ~ g;!
~<.;:.n "~";".~O~O"~"HI
o~... ......o~.~~>',~1I 00.
S... ~ ~~::~i~;:~~~~s?:;~~~;;
i e ~~~E~~~~~~i~~~:;~~~
r 'i o~o5~~"'c~~...~,o;o;<;:
11: .. ~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~c
i ~! ~ ~~ ~~ i:~ ~: I ~::
~i ~~~~i~~hi~~~i
~ ~ a~ n i ~:.j ~;; ~ ~2 ~
.-~l"I~~.-:ill-"'!:ie:"'1
~; i! ~ ~ ~ J ~; ~ ~~ ~ ~ J
o ~ ~ ~ ~':: =~ ~ ~ii:~..~
J....~i'i~o~......~i...'"
i~:>J~~~~~~o;~~i
;.~;"".%.,~~.>>::'l
~i;.~~mm~~~
;....Clg""m: i<C'" ~
!U ~;~~
e;2 H:l
Bo ~,~
~:; ~~t:
~~~ E~~
:II::~ m...
~~i ~~
:~~ ii
E~~ ~.
~~. ~~
...; llI:.
~< ~.
.~ I~
~. ~"
~~ :!
~. ~~
"~ 2.
~~ ~~
...... li:i!!
~~ ;~
~~ !;
~~ ~i
~~ <
,..
. ;.
~e~~~~
S:...---l"'.
Be8~!
...."
... r
.'
... .~
5~3~~
~:;
:::
'::"'~;;......
!,~iS8~~
ii;;;::~
f
m
~"'I(I ..
~s'"' ;J
:~~
-""7
I!:!
PROPOSED ADDITION AND AL TERA TICNS TO:
CAP WASH FY.~C(,
..~~~o
i ~~~:f ":"tft.
ffi
t;;;:;.; '!,>:
~:.. .:
~~ ~, ~ :1.:-.;
~ ! €;:::f.;:: J
L , ~~.. ?
~j. Et:~, I" 'l'f~l
~ . r/~~l"~.1 .
'-' ("r"3 Ii!
'! .... ~t i;4,1 I
~-~~
ir"" - - -=-.
I I Jfr1 - ~
-( z::
~
"
'J,
, ,
,.,
" '~
~t
" ,
" ~
~'l
"~
r-'Jo
"
~ ...;
f~
, >
..,
~q
t 't
",~ \.
\N
~.~~
~.; ~
~ ';
~~ ;--:
: ~ f'~
~'~;'~
~
"J
'I ii - ---
I..,,".,
..... n." ..~
~ 'i.
~
"
\
:J...:.. :
1: . ~ ..
c!~t.. :
~ 11 ~
~n~ ~
~~.~~:
n
ll~
~~
~;~
:::....:
~i m
~. ~ ;;; ~::
~ ~ ~
~,i_.;. ~~~
~ - - ..
ilillil
~>
..
~~
~S
~ :
1 !
~, ~~
.:v
l~~.~~a3S~2~~i~~~
.~"~:=~~~i:;._~~~
.~~:~~~~~~=~~~~~~
~~;~:;~!!~ji!~~~
mii!1um:1Ui
-
. ~! l
~~~~~~~'=a~~ =C2~~
~ ~!~~3~~~~~~~~;~;:g
t;~,
0'*; ;'.r!?7 ,,-'.:~~c>? ~~ /..'"
-I ---------r--
_--~-j-/_:::_~c.:: --
>";",;- .J ~,'
:? 7'/
, ~
(N""":" ~';'~"'7J. ~
..
......"0_
- :>J..::'
....:
. ,
- '
~\~
..
'>
: 'ft;
w"
(!j ~
~ .
".
'"
<:c
H < I
- ",
~ .,
.' ..'-~
,HJl
'"
"
['
: ;
f.... ~:.
".. \I
I-~
~'1
1 ,
';" ft
01:1)
~ ::
~~
;:;il
~
~\ ;;',
"
-l
......-Co:-.
---~,,-
--- \\ \
.~ :it\~~ \.
\.
.~
;'3
.0
~~
:i
,;\0-_
;/'~~~ ~ ~
\:~
<.
~~~
'~ "', \'1
'~ ~~
'1>1::'::'
~ ~ :
'\~,
II.
I
~;_.tb_~ ~
Ii'" .. !JCjl
t'! ,}~i!U
~)~ i 1m!
.,.~ ~ ~ "-.,
!..~;.: ~ ~J:;~~
~~J,. " ij~. n
HH~~ i ;Wq
...~.:~~ '- ":!i.H1'lI1
~;Hi j UL~'
b'H I -P"l
~~!~::l ~ !~1;~'
!l;J j; 15';1-1
. :1;1 '" :'l; I
-j-!n l-t :=~H!
~~~,,; I 1~1'ljjl
t~~1; !~;;I~
lH H.! ill!!!
:l'~~J i ....~::: !.!;~lt. i
~.; 01".:: 1 j'-J
h~~~ ........~~ fir~
i~i~~ ~,~ It!Ht1
g~~i" J~~~HHi\
'i!l! ,~, I'm!
~.!...: ,,'-' ~ ~
:\
\
1
- '",:.
\
.')".,
~;J:.Jl
~.~fJ.;
',~
\
\
.'\"
~
~ ~
"
~~ '-
.,. ,
7 ~~
Cj~ ~ ~
). ...... I:'
~ "l ~ "
11 <...... ~
~
1:1. '=.
iru'~;il
;::;L ::: 21
;;::: ; :: il ~
~~It :~ ~
~~ ~~~~ ~
ilTI ~
!"
~H
I
I,!
!;l
; I
-,
~ ~
~ ~
,
, ,
~ j
vtl
<lJ ~
'" ,
r...:;
C'j' ~
'lJ I
"
~ :,
\~ "~
..1: }
~~: ..
~~~ i_
~ ::
-,
"
~~
~
,,-
""
,~
~"
~
"
~
I
~
1
"
.
<
'"
.
,
0:;
!
< ~
l-::
'< ,
~~
, ,
~~
~~
"
""
,~.
"-,'-
~ .~
ii
.
~1
"1
I
I
EXHIBIT "e"
~T,ATEl\nENT OF SP~C~A,t,
CONDITIONS
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A, That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land,
structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,
structures or buildings in the same zoning district:
There are special conditions and circumstances which exist and are peculiar to the
land in this case. The gas station is existing and the only renovation to the
property and building is to upgrade the exterior with new fascia, colors,
landscaping, and textures so to make the gas station fit in with the neighborhood.
The property is not big enough to place the driveways the proper distance from the
intersection nor to move the gas islands or canopy. The number of driveways must
remain due to the location of the fuel filling ports which the gasoline tankers must
unload, there would not be enough room for them to leave the property with fewer
drives.
B. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant:
Special circumstances and conditions do not result from the actions of the
applicant because he bought the property as it is. He is just trying to upgrade the
exterior and landscaping to fit in with the changing neighborhood.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district:
Granting these variances will not confer any special privileges that are denied by
this ordinance to other lands within the same zoning district.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and
undo hardship on the applicant:
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zoning district and would
work an unnecessary and undue hardship on him because it would force him out of
business.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure:
EXHIBIT "e"
Granting of these variances is the minimum variances that would make possible the
reasonable use of the land and building. It would be impossible to operate this
business and upgrade the exterior if these variances are not granted. By granting
these variances, you are allowing this business to be upgraded with exterior finish
and landscaping which will better fit in with the surrounding neighborhood.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent
and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the
'. area involved or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare:
Granting there variances will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
chapter and that these variances will not be injurious to the area but an asset to
the area. This business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood but the
opposite, it will be an asset to the community.
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Gateway Texaco
File number: Sign setback ZNCV 03-023
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENTALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
CONDITIONS
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
1. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-0 I 0-03-0 17 ,23,24\COA Sign setback ZNCV 03-023.doc
DEVELOP,,".,...NT ORDER OF THE CITY COMM jlON OF THE
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORltlA
PROJECT NAME: Gateway Texaco
APPLICANT'S AGENT: Mr. Seril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants
APPLICANT'S ADDRESS: 9 Northeast 6th Street Delray Beach, FL 33444
DATE OF HEARING RATIFICATION BEFORE CITY COMMISSION: October 21,2003
TYPE OF RELIEF SOUGHT: Sign setback ZNCV 03-023
Relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development Regulations, Chapter 21, Signs, Article III.
Section 5 requiring all signs must meet a minimum ten (10) foot setback from the property line to the
closest surface of the sign to allow a five (5) foot variance from the property line, resulting in five (5) foot
setback for an existing gasoline dispensing establishment.
LOCATION OF PROPERTY: 2360 North Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
DRAWING(S): SEE EXHIBIT "B" ATTACHED HERETO.
THIS MATTER came before the City Commission of the City of Boynton Beach, Florida
appearing on the Consent Agenda on the date above. The City Commission hereby adopts the
findings and recommendation of the Planning and Development Board, which Board found as follows:
OR
THIS MATTER came on to be heard before the City Commission of the City of Boynton
Beach, Florida on the date of hearing stated above. The City Commission having considered the
relief sought by the applicant and heard testimony from the applicant, members of city administrative
staff and the public finds as follows:
1. Application for the relief sought was made by the Applicant in a manner consistent with
the requirements of the City's Land Development Regulations.
2. The Applicant
HAS
HAS NOT
established by substantial competent evidence a basis for the relief requested.
3. The conditions for development requested by the Applicant, administrative staff, or
suggested by the public and supported by substantial competent evidence are as set forth
on Exhibit "C" with notation "Included".
4. The Applicant's application for relief is hereby
_ GRANTED subject to the conditions referenced in paragraph 3 hereof.
DENIED
5. This Order shall take effect immediately upon issuance by the City Clerk.
6. All further development on the property shall be made in accordance with the terms
and conditions of this order.
7. Other
DATED:
City Clerk
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010-03-017.23.24IDO Sign setback ZNCV 03-023.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 03-235
STAFF REPORT
TO:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency and City Commission
\'1\ ~~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
THRU:
FROM:
Maxime Ducoste . AA.
Planner \" V}
DATE:
September 29, 2003
PROJECT NAME/NO:
Gateway Texaco Variances
Vehicle encroachment ZNCV 03-024
REQUEST:
Request for relief from the City of Boynton Beach Land Development
Regulations, Chapter 7.5, Environmental Regulation, Article II Section 3, B.
4., to allow parked vehicles to encroach two and one-half (2.5) feet into the
rear five (5) foot landscape buffer area required by code for an existing
gasoline dispensing establishment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner: SUAU Enterprises
Applicant/Agent: Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Consultants
Location: 2360 N. Federal Highway Boynton Beach, FL
Existing Land Use/Zoning: Community Commercial (C-3)/ Local Retail Commercial (LRC)
Proposed Land Use/Zoning: No change proposed
Proposed Use: 681 square foot addition to gasoline dispensing establishment (limited to a
maximum of 600 square feet by Condition of Approval for appeal -ADAP
02-001 ).
Acreage: 0.48 Acre (20,830 square feet)
Adjacent Uses:
(see Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
North:
A multi-family residential property, zoned Community Commercial (C-3);
South:
Right-of-way for Las Palmas Avenue, and farther south are single-family attached
townhouses under construction (The Harbors), zoned Infill Planned Unit
Development (IPUD);
East:
Vacant commercial lot zoned Community Commercial (C-3) currently under review
for a proposed car wash, and farther east is a single-family residential dwelling (part
of Las Palmas development), zoned Single-family residential, (R-1-AA); and
Staff Report Vehicle encroachment ZNCV 03-024
Memorandum No PZ-03-235
Page 2
West:
Rights-of-way of U.S. 1 and the Florida East Coast Railroad, and farther west
developed commercial property classified Local Retail Commercial (LRC) and zoned
Neighborhood Commercial (C-2).
BACKGROUND
Mr. Beril Kruger of Beril Kruger Planning & Zoning Consultants, agent for SUAU Enterprises Incorporated, is
requesting conditional use / major site plan modification approval to construct a 681 square foot addition to
an existing gasoline dispensing establishment. In addition, the applicant is proposing new parking spaces,
a new access drive that would lead to the property directly to the east, and a general "make-over" of the
building facades of the gasoline station building and canopy. The number of gasoline pump islands and
fueling positions would remain unaltered.
The proposed 681 square foot addition to the gas station is considered as a conditional use in the in the C-3
zoning district. Also, the gas-station is a legal non-conforming use because it does not comply with Chapter
2, Section 11.L.3.a.(2) because gas stations should only be located at intersections "consisting of roads of
four (4) lanes or wider".
Earlier last year, Mr. Beril Kruger, acting on behalf of Mr. Zuhair Marouf, expressed a desire to construct a
building addition to the existing gas station, in part, to satisfy outstanding code enforcement violations. He
also proposed direct access between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east (which was earmarked
for the mechanical carwash) in order to avoid unnecessary vehicular traffic onto Las Palmas Road. These
inquiries were based on the presumption that the proposed addition would be allowed and that direct access
would only require site plan review. However, after careful consideration, staff determined that the addition
would not be permitted because itwould represent as an unlawful expansion in a non-conforming use (of a
gasoline-dispensing establishment).
To answer Mr. Kruger's inquiries, on July 16, 2002, the Director of Planning & Zoning issued an
administrative determination letter that basically prohibited the applicant from increasing the size of the gas-
station building because doing so would violate Chapter 2, Sections D and G of the Land Development
Regulations. Regarding the direct access between lots, the Director determined that the proposed driveway
connection between the subject lot and the lot directly to the east would be permitted. However, the direct
access would only be allowed contingent upon the recordation of a legally binding cross-access agreement
and that the Texaco site would have to brought into total compliance with the current Land Development
Regulations.
On July 31, 2002, Mr. Kruger addressed a letter requesting a formal appeal be processed to the
aforementioned administrative determination. According to the staff report, "in summary, the appeal justifies
the proposed expansion by the position that retail sales at this business is a separate component from the
non-conforming aspect-gasoline sales, which component can therefore be altered / expanded independent
of the gasoline sales element of the business. The applicant supports this position that retail sales is
distinguishable from gas sales by the absence of other nearby convenience stores, and therefore, the high
demand for convenience item sales at this location". Staff disagreed and recommended denial of Mr.
Kruger's administrative appeal based on three (3) main points. Firstly, staff argued that the determination
represented the position consistently communicated by staff and therefore, the consistent interpretation of
clearly written Land Development Regulations. Secondly, the sale of gasoline is the principal use of the
subject business, which is located on one parcel within a single structure, and therefore, cannot be viewed
separate from accessory components such as retail sales. Lastly, the applicant did not prove that the
expansion of the retail aspect of the business would have been mandatory for the continued operation of the
principal use, and that if denied a hardship would have been imposed. The Community Redevelopment
Agency voted concurred with staff but the City Commission voted in favor of the applicant with the condition
that the expansion would be limited to 600 square feet. Therefore, this major site plan modification and
Staff Report Vehicle encroachment ZNCV 03-024
Memorandum No PZ-03-235
Page 3
accompanying variance requests represent the applicant's continuing effort to construct a building addition
and mechanical car wash on the abutting property (see Exhibit "B" - Site Plan and Survey). If approved,
the construction of the addition, parking lot, and fac;ade improvements would occur in one (1) phase.
ANAL YSIS
The code states that the zoning code variance cannot be approved unless the board finds the following:
a. That special conditions and circumstances exist which are peculiar to the land, structure, or building
involved and which are not applicable to other lands, structures or buildings in the same zoning
district.
b. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions of the applicant.
c. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any special privilege that is
denied by this ordinance to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district.
d. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of rights
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district under the terms of the ordinance
and would work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant.
e. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land, building, or structure.
f. That the grant of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this chapter
[ordinance] and that such variance will not be injurious to the area involved or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
Staff has conducted this analysis on with the assumption that based on the city's prior approval of the
administrative appeal regarding the increase in intensity of this non-conforming use, that the city has
acknowledged the potential for revealing certain hardships and non-conformities to the site.
Also, the analysis focused on the applicant's response to the above criteria contained in Exhibit "C", which
require that the request is initiated by special conditions and circumstances that are peculiar to the subject
land, structure, or building, which are not the result of the actions of the applicant, and that the request is the
minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the structure.
The subject request has been initiated in preparation for the construction of an addition to the existing gas
station business, which represents a major site plan modification. Through this process every aspect ofthe
project is reviewed for compliance, if a requirement cannot be met, relief from the code may be required.
The subject property has been improved with a gas station business, and occupied since 1965. Staff
reviewed the site and determined that the request for a 2.5-foot encroachment represents the minimum
variance necessary to maintain an additional parking space on the property. However, staff acknowledges
that the encroachment is not supported by parking requirements and should therefore be eliminated. The
required parking for a gasoline dispensing establishment is based on one (1) space for each 250 square
feet of gross floor area. Based on this methodology, the proposed expansion, coupled with the floor area of
the existing building would require 10 parking spaces. The applicant is providing 12 parking spaces. An
option to meet code requirements would be to eliminate the easternmost parking space, thereby reducing
the parking provided to 11 spaces, and avoiding the encroachment with the perimeter buffer.
This scenario would meet both the code and still exceed parking requirements for the gasoline dispensing
establishment. Understanding that the subject request does not represent the minimum variance that will
make reasonable use of the structure, criteria item "e" is not met.
Staff Report Vehicle encroachment ZNCV 03-024
Memorandum No PZ-03-235
Page 4
The overall objective of the Land Development Regulations is to insure the welfare and safety of the public
by providing regulations and standards in which to achieve consistent equitable developments.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDA TION
Based on the analysis contained herein, Staff recommends that the requested variance be denied, and that
the proposed eastermost angled parking space be eliminated. However, if approved any conditions of
approval added by the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or the City Commission will be placed in
the Exhibit "D" - Conditions of Approval.
MD/MWR
S:IPlanningISHAREDlWPIPROJECTSIGaleway Texaco\ZNCV 03-010 lhru 03-017. 023, 024 ISTAFF REP ZNCV 03-024 Vehicle encroachment.doc
C)
::lJ
o
U)
U)
~
(j)
Cl
;n
I
,
I
I
, ~
= S~TE I I.
C3
>;~>;)
~1~~L/ ,p
L,.
~"-_.,,,,-1'
Location Map
Gateway Texaco
,~
~
I
,
EXHIE ~T "All I
'~
;/H
-
-
~ ("')
l I. I 1-- I )
R3 I
QQQQQQQQGo
OOOrm;'~ CJ
[]Q[]~gy g
[j 8
NE-2O-THA-VE- 23
D
G-S:r..
I
-F-ST J.
\ 1 3
~-~R
I n toT J
rr-=~
i I \
U _ _D ~T \
~
I
PO T-ER-R.
r- I I I
I I I I
l
r
I n, I
1~ 1 l ~
I'-~vl
I
,I IPUD
s
~
~
;$
;g
I-!i1
~I
l I
fr~~ ~~ i ~~ ~~ ~~
It-.- 68 8 86
II~ DQ DC: Dc:J
~;:
I
REC
I
~-IvE-2O+H-A Vfi-
,I I
I
I
I I I
REC
j
j
1(
I
I ;
t
~
!M
I
I
j
?
I~V )u
r
,..1
Nf~4
"fIW"
r':/
I. I!
ll~, ""_
~ :;. [1 111~l1i!i '
:;; i:=!): i~!~ Ul;a"~
!i.' 1".1' '. /1 -oJ., !
~ ~ ~ )~ ~ -I l;1!i nl
~ 12 : is I l~!l 6,
~ I~I: ! I j:lll I
:;; I~:i ! I .;; i I
:w:l ~ I ~ .. = ~~ij ~
~ ~.I' ~li; I
C- I ~
i :1
-.--, ~ I
,;,;I~;11 "I
.'1,1,
Ii
I.
, :1
~CC~~1\1
I:.':' ';; "ill ; I
~"'~l i;;. "d , .
~(!." ':" 's I:! I !
<1,~~ !l" :' ;j! I
,;-'~ 'I :: Ii ' 1
!! "f':,.I" ii ;i ~ I
b~ ;, I
-j i ;l ----\ I
/.li ~ "
";:-::~:>;.3C'.;.'1
1---
_.......~ow,;~~ n> ~
"":'~~'::i":~'~~~!;;'ii ;0 8
~~~:h~g;;;;'E~~~~gg;~c~ ~-<
-,
---v
EXHIBIT
He. 1
c. I ~i!;c:
- ~~
Hi ~~
~~~ ~~ i~
ill I
i!i 11!!1
~~~ :~ ~
HI ~; ~I
m ii
~ ; ~e
.. . ~....:~
VO"'-"~
~~~2;;~~~~
:~;:!2~i~:L.
'~"'~~Q~;::
~~i~!!~~i
~~~~~~~33
~~i~~~_~;;
~"'~:~~~c!
!U~~~;~!
.:!," ,."
~nH ~~~
30I~_ ~s:
i~ii~ ~i
~"" h.
::t:ll~l:l,., Si!~<"I
ill1;:::~: ~o~
~i!~~ !~~
~~~a~ ~~i
!~:~! ~~i
;;n. ~ !
'i ~.
--<
-<
v
(')
~
=-='-. -.~I
.~~
~- lifj
"
'>
AJ
^
~
. ::::
~ ~L
~-
~~==
~
;
====.. '>
~ '\ h ~ 0 u N J
v,s.
H G'-iV/Ay
N C, 1 '
'"
--<
,.,
~
>
z
'"~'P-'lT'~C'~--:---'--'''"--'_''_~~''_i'~C'-;c
C ---- ____ ~c~~
r~:,.._-~,-Oc. '___~ ~'_", . _" ''''',_ _ ,
/>:~~ y;;' ; ~r"~7!~-'JTF:--~;:""T~/I~*,~~~ i
' .. I, I j q L~ " ,1~-------___'1 pil, l"). '~':::.,--r ~
· . ,< " · · . ",' ':, , "', I · 7,0" '"''
. l--."""II I~ I I,. , }. I I . '" ",,;,
-'"~'-.L--<-../ 'I .. I ' " '" ;""
- L '~'-- - ,. 1 I ---r--< Hi':
" C':';;- ~I 'I I g ~'I g;~!~
v I !I I. , " " i I. "'"
'/ "J"i C.I~, "H
r , ''! I ; 1111 II ..!:~
': i ' "" ;; I, I If 1 '''1
--- i~',: ,-,"-', i ,j I I ~" '''i,
:'/- --<ce . , ',', , J I I I ,:1 ':!,,/
!! . II .l . J I I 1 : U ii' ; ~
I" Ie.,. Ji . f .. -" 'i
"f;-CJ ; 0, , I '"
.. CC ", : ". 'i\. . . . "
. , '. '- I 'c'. "
'" " . , \. ""'"
' !!i ~! i ~ .,.... " '~i!il i
'''---,'~- --'-...~"---,~ ~'-.""--~---.:;"",,.<<~.
'.,- "" , , ,-
::;:
....
-:J
X
SS
o
Vl
CTl
o
>
o
~
:~ : ~
B~
~ Zp
~m
r;':;~"
~~c
2 ~i
~~=<
@Z
~~
~o
~
~
e>1I ~~~~ o~
. . '-F~ -;.~ ~;
-.--~~ ;~~!~ ~~
",Zt"'<;(~:;!""i ~e... 6
~~=~'p~ l;i ;r;;
S;~~8.,~~ Q;", I~
~'~l~~: "o~ ~~
~''''8~ iilr E~
-~.". I" .
g~~!~ ~=~ ~
E~~ ~i ~i~ ~
i'~" igg ~
. ~ i ~= =
Z i . '"-;;:
~ ~ i !~
i ~ ; d
~ i ~ ;~
~ ~ 0 i" i~~
~ qi ii :r:~
- ~ ~
~ ~
.. 21~;~~~~S~S~!
'li~ ~ih.H~~~~~~ ~~
..0; ~', > o3i:~~! i
~H .~~ ~ ~~;~:~~ !
~C;~ ~g. ! a .~ ~~ .
~;~~ l~! n ~ ~ c ~
E~~~ ~g~ ~ i R
SC ~D ~ ;; ~ ~
~!! gS 'l ~
~. ~
,~ .
~~ '
"~O~~::"~~~~;~:i3~i ~!i ~~~~
'''- ........_",."~~ ~.-. ~~.~
~~~~~~j;i<;~~g~~~~ ~~. ~~~
"-.i~~~~m~;igi~i~~~ ~~~ ~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~E~~~~~~~~ii;~i ~;i ~~
c~a~~'~e2:;:t~~~!.~.:.:~c." ~.. gr
~l~g;;;'~::~~~g~~~;~~;:E~~Fh~ ~~2 ~~
. ."0 '~>'-.o~"., "O!"c:" 90~ .~
-~~.&: '-"g=.-.~. '......g ~,. ".
e- i ~~;~=~E.~i~~E.o.~.~~ a; ~.
~ ~ .~."-~'-Uh..:.. .~ !:;
· r i .~~~~~:ii~Hii~~~~ ~s ~~
· . -'"'--<> ....~.- '0 _,
if. o-!i;:i;n,:.Si!":x 0.& ;. ",
'1!f..on....%~~.:(_ '" ~
~~~eiii,:~:tl.~i , "~
.l"~~"g.;:.~I.~~1 ~_ .!
~~~.oh;gi~:;;j:~ 3i ~~
~;~~~o~~~~~52~~. ;~ ~~
~~,;;:!,,;~~:~>. ~~ ~.
~a::l:~~::~~~':~i~~! ~i ~;
.~.~s~~!~:o;>Q~1 .~ ~"
i~-~~:;;..~:;i~~ ~. ~
~;~'i~.:iP~{i~.. ~~
....~>^~.._<.. ~~
a~...~o"',..: i il
-ill
. . 8_~~~!~
~~~~~:: ..;~ r~
~...-
iP~;~
-..~;;..... r;~3~
~~~~~~ :=~:~D
ii~- -- .
5 ~
---
;;8
::~
.. .
m
.,
~ ;~~ ~
~ ~~;
1-,
ii'
~
LI'T'llrYY_O
liI.,...._,...
I ~~~:-~;i~~
D Al TERAT:CNS TO:
o AD;"\ITION AN . "-0
PROROSE ,,', ~H TFX.. "
r;AR '.,
I~-
'~ ~r' ';~~~r;'. .1'1. .1
,', "'-I~" ,.. I
I. , .-.
I.': I;.' "- . I ~:. ..r
~~~;- ~
;~~." ~~~ . i' 1'.;"' f
~i fi:~rriii',.1 II I
~.S=-~
~1'1~1.';...1_. -
I ,..Ii!-i--l ~... I..
-(;2
{~11
~"~;<
!.
1- s ~
1;
j :i
I
-....
.
. ii
~~~~~~.~~~~~~-~ 6
lllll/Illlllilll
~
;~
'-'
~~
~;:
,
d
t~~
~ ~.
. ~'
~ ~d
l'- ' ~,
~ <..
l~~t
~~.~:.!
~
,
'oj
, ~
~}
"
.. .
" ~'
~ \
I
-)"
'~
't"1
~
>.::'
, ~
~ ~
, '
~~
t\
",~ ..
~N
~,~~
~,\ ~
i-i
~~
~~
~~
~L
~ : ~ ~
; ~ ~ ~
); :3~
~."
- ~~~
h~h
~ ~"');-
~~
=;
~Q
~~~
i~~
~f~
m
i~~
m
~i~
;~~
~~~
g~
~"
.~
~~
o
---------~--------
0.1,:' :'??'"
/ t;::.,.
-If"'."" ...,..~.;,.,~
..
~ ;
,~
~Jl..
l f~~
i' .~....'
~''-It~~1 ,
,~~~~~ ...~~"'.L""~-..9/
'~,,'~ : -~ .4''''C::-..r
~",t-,;=-~
~~,HI-- ~
'---.... i -'
___ I' .
,..~~'---
-/'....,........~~---
~"'"
;t,
~~
;~
~e
~~
I( <!i.
~:::~
i~~~
;~;:~
... ~ 'c -"
;~;HHr; .~
~~;;~~~
~T
~.....;:....... r~
I;.r-:- ~",-",~........._;;;- "'~ '..""'
., - ~
, ,
- -
- '
......, \.
~~
.;.
">
/ . c;'V
c:;. ,.-:; ..::-c .::
~
- ::; i ~ ::,
,.,
r_ "".. .~..
h
I ~-!
.'
/. CT -^vJ /-;""/
H :>/J
''::'''''P~.:.-y
~~,;>,.,:>->
r\
ill- .:~
~ ~
I .
i ~.~ ~
:" ..
" .
en
0'
.,
;.::
~ ~ ~~"
-.;~- q
- ~~
i~ ~i
" ,
~. ~i
.' ',.-
\~ ":,.c
- r - - - -~~ - - - ~
-. \
.-r: "~"::
" '
. ': ~
.j'" ~
~ ~-
f i ~}
:.~. ~~S\~
~,
I
~/
"
I
I
---.,...L.
, ' ,
-= :,..."
~..., ~j'
~ O'1j
~ ~ ~
,
-\(;i.,
:i
'.,
'.,
-\
.,l
1
I-
I-
\:.
\:
't
"..,;::;
.... L'
<;
\.
:~~1
~F~
~ :
1l!!1
;dn
~ 1! f~
WII
Illll
~
_:~
~ ~
.. ~ i
~;
,~~
0, ~.( '!
ll.." ....
~,i ~ ~
.~ ~~:.' ~
" ,~~ ~
~~H;
If.' _ !j
, 11
tJI!i;.:
;~i~ ~~I:I
::;:= Ii :;;:1 ~
~~1~11!l :
lli1 ~
11
I
n~
i.:-:
H!
JJl1
I
1,1
!~ i
;"1
!
~
~
,
j
.;:
....)
!
'"
"i
EXHIBIT
l('H
l,.. }
ST A TEfVlENT OF SP~CIAL
CONDJTiONS
STATEMENT OF SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. That soeci::::1 cc nditions and circumstances exist vvhich are peculiar to the land,
structure or building involved and which are not applicable to other lands,
structures or buildings in the same zoning district:
There are special conditions and circumstances which exist and are peculiar to the
land in this case. The gas station is existing and the only renovation to the
pro'peTty and building is to upgrade the exterior with new fascia, colors,
landscaping, and textures so to make the gas station fit in with the neighborhood.
The property is not big enough to place the driveways the proper distance from the
intersection nor to move the gas islands or canopy. The number of driveways must
remain due to the location of the fuel filling ports which the gasoline tankers must
unload, there would not be enough room for them to leave the property with fewer
drives.
B. That the special conditions and circumstances do not result from the actions
of the applicant:
Special circumstances and conditions do not result from the actions of the
applicant because he bought the property as it is. He is just trying to upgrade the
exterior and landscaping to fit in with the changing neighborhood.
C. That granting the variance requested will not confer on the applicant any
special privilege that is denied by this Ordinance to other lands, buildings or
structures in the same zoning district:
Granting these variances will not confer any special privileges that are denied by
this ordinance to other lands within the same zoning district.
D. That literal interpretation of the provisions of this chapter would deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning
district under the terms of the Ordinance and would work unnecessary and
undo hardship on the applicant:
Literal interpretation and enforcement of the Ordinance would deprive the applicant
of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zoning district and would
work an unnecessary and undue hardship on him because it would force him out of
business.
E. That the variance granted is the minimum variance that will make possible the
reasonable use of the land, building or structure:
EXHIBiT'
Granting of these variances is the minimum variances that would make possible the
reasonable use of the land and building. It would be impossible to operate this
business and upgrade the exterior if these variances are not granted. By granting
these variances, you are allowing this business to be upgraded with exterior finish
and landscaping which will better fit in with the surrounding neighborhood.
F. That the granting of the variance will be in harmony with the general intent
and purpose of this chapter and that such variance will not be injurious to the
.~ area involved or other\ivise detrimental to the public welfare:
Granting there variances will be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this
chapter and that these variances will not be injurious to the area but an asset to
the area. This business will not be a detriment to the neighborhood but the
opposite, it will be an asset to the community.
EXHIBIT "D"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Gateway Texaco
File number: Vehicle encroachment ZNCV 03-024
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERJENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments: None
ADDITIONAL COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOARD
CONDITIONS
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
Comments:
1. To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
1. To be determined.
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Gateway Texaco\ZNCV 03-0 I 0-03-0 17 ,23,24\COA Vehicle encroachment ZNCV 03-024.doc