REVIEW COMMENTS
-
CIty OF BOYNTON BEACH, FLORIDA
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
DATE:
July 1, 2004
FILE:
FRO .
Public Safety Impact- Police Service
Department of Development, Planning and
Zoning Memorandum PZ 04-150
Chief Bingham MEMO
ENCLOSURES: Same as Above
From my review of the draft staff report dated June 30, 2004 for the Promenade concerning the impact the
proposed development would have on police services I submit the following:
It is a given that our agency is undermanned and over tasked and any significant tasking (additional
commercial and multi-family occupancy) will undoubtedly have a negative impact on our ability to provide
adequate service unless we immediately begin to compensate for our shortfall in personnel.
Last year our department handled 72,005 calls for service, compared to 61,833 calls in 2000. This is a 14%
increase in an already impressive call volume for a city of a little over 60,000. It should also be noted that we
have also increased our arrests by 25% since 2000.
I recommend that proposed significant increases in our business and civilian population be tied to the addition
of officers on the force.
. 'U,,"\'
~,\5~
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING &. ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-149
TO:
FROM:
Chair and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency Board
and City C~r:tS~
Dick Huds;~ArCP
Senior Planner
't--\C'~
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
THROUGH:
DATE:
June 22, 2004
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER:
Promenade REZN 04-002
REQUEST:
Rezone the property from CBD Central Business District to MU-H
Mixed Use-High Intensity
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner/Applicant: Boynton Beach Waterways Investment Associates, LLC
Agent: Weiner & Aronson, P. A.
Location: Northeast corner of the intersection of Boynton Beach Boulevard
and Federal Highway (Exhibit "AfT)
Parcel Size: 3.96 acres
Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Core (MX-C)
Existing Zoning: CBD Central Business District
Proposed Land Use: Mixed Use Core (MX-C)
Proposed Zoning: MU-H Mixed Use-High Intensity
Proposed Use: Mixed use development containing residential, commercial and
hotel uses
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Right-of-way of NE 4th Avenue then developed property
designated Mixed Use (MX) and zoned CBD Central Business
District
Page 2
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
South:
Right-of-way of Boynton Beach Boulevard then vacant property
designated Mixed Use Core (MXC) and zoned CBD Central
Business District
East:
City-owned property (Mangrove Walk at the Marina) utilized for
stormwater control designated Mixed Use Core (MXC), a portion
with a Conservation overlay, and zoned CBD Central Business
District
West:
Right-of-way of Federal Highway then developed commercial
properties designated Mixed Use (MX) and zoned CBD Central
Business District
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the requested land use amendment and rezoning for the
following reasons:
1. The requested zoning category is consistent with the adopted land use and with the
directions for the City's downtown area;
2. The rezoning will enable the redevelopment of the property consistent with adopted
redevelopment plans for the Federal Highway corridor; and
3. The resulting project will serve to provide an economic contribution to both the
neighborhood and the City.
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. In addition, the request for rezoning to a mixed
use district requires concurrent approval of the site plan for the project.
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in
dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written
approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk
manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or
requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the
property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
Policy 1.16.1 provides definitions for all land use categories. Portions of the section dealing
with the Mixed Use-Core category include the following:
"This land use category shall consist of all Mixed Use High Intensity zoning districts
and/or any zoning district(s) which may be established subsequent to the adoption
Page 3
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
of the Plan provided that all of the above-mentioned zoning districts are shown on
the Future Land Use Map within the Mixed Use-Core land use category.
"A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 4.0 may be considered for all uses, exclusive of
parking structures, throughout the Mixed Use-Core (MX-C) land use category. For
the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal Highway within the Hurricane Evacuation
Zone, while the residential density within a development may be up to 80 dwelling
units per acre, the overall density for the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal
Highway shall not exceed 40 dwelling units per acre.
"All land development located in the Mixed Use-Core category shall be required to
submit a plan that includes a single unified design for the project, and shall conform
to any adopted design plan(s) for the area covered by the category."
Policy 1.22.4 of the Land Use Element reads:
"In the City's downtown areas the following standards are to be emphasized:
1. Mixed-use buildings are appropriate;
2. Height of buildings to be consistent with the City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20
Redevelopment Plan;
3. Density should be higher at the center and radiate out into edges with lower
density;
4. Streets should be pedestrian-friendly and safe, not totally designed for the
automobile."
The rezoning is consistent with the land use designation and with the directions for the City's
downtown area. In addition, three policies cited below, from the ''Federal Highway Corridor
Community Redevelopment Plan"are also addressed:
"Policy 1.3A: Land uses within the downtown area shall be mixed uses that include
residential, destination commercial, retail and restaurants with a marine orientation."
"Policy 1.3B: Permitted land uses within the downtown area shall be destination uses
and not those with a vehicular orientation."
"Policy 1.3C: Land development regulations for the downtown community shall
discourage single user commercial uses with front field parking."
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use
pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with redevelopment plans for the downtown area and with
approved redevelopment projects in the vicinity, including the Marina Village and the Arches,
and does not grant any special privilege to an individual property owner.
Page 4
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable.
The adoption of the "Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan"in May 2001,
and the resulting implementation activities gave a new direction to the redevelopment of the
downtown area of Boynton Beach, which built on the redevelopment objectives established in
the ''20/20 Redevelopment Plan'~ The requested rezoning is consistent with that direction and
will be a positive contribution to the redevelopment efforts.
d. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and
other public facilities.
Estimates based on the City's adopted Levels of Service indicate that total potable water
demand for the proposed 318 condominium and 68 hotel units will be approximately 165,980
gallons per day (gpd) and sewage flow demand will be approximately 74,691 gpd. More exact
calculations of these demands will be made at the time of building permit application submittal.
As of July 1, 2004, sufficient wastewater capacity is available to serve this project. The City of
Boynton Beach is proceeding with plans for the purchase of surplus potable water from Palm
Beach County Utilities, via existing interconnection points, to supplement its current capacity.
This purchase agreement will be in effect within a few months and will provide sufficient
capacity to serve this project. Sufficient wastewater capacity is currently available to serve this
project, subject to the applicant making a firm reservation of capacity, following approval of the
site plan.
Daily trip generation comparisons prepared by the applicant's traffic consultant indicate that the
current commercial development generates 4,157 total trips per day. While the proposed
redevelopment is expected to generate 5,156 total trips per day, 2,226 of these are generated
by residential development. Because the project is located in the Coastal Residential Exception
Area of Palm Beach County, the residentially generated trips are exempt from concurrency.
Therefore, the non-residential portion is projected to generate fewer trips that the existing
development and meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach County.
According to a review by Fire-Rescue personnel, to meet the increased demand, additional
resources are required such as personnel, apparatus, and equipment. It is imperative that Fire
Station #4 be completed and in service by the time these new projects are completed and
occupied, and that Fire Station #5 be expedited to insure adequate service delivery levels and
effective response times in the northeast section of the City and as a back-up in the northwest
quadrant and in the downtown corridor of the City. Station # 4 is scheduled for completion in
2005; however, Station #5 is in the early planning stages and no completion date has been
scheduled. It is important that Station #1, as currently located, remains in operation as the
first response station for downtown projects such as this. This situation also increases the
potential for mass casualty events when large numbers of people occupy confined areas. This
is becoming more prevalent in many areas of the city.
Every added new commercial and multi-family structure increases the annual fire prevention
inspection workload as required by ordinance. Although there have been a large number of
these occupancies added in the past several years, inspection staff has decreased. This
Page 5
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
situation has reached a point that may soon require changes in our inspection schedules that
may negatively affect our future success. The past and current service level has prevented any
significant fires in these occupancies for several years.
New development projects involving multi-family or high-density commercial projects should be
approved contingent upon consideration of future upgrades in emergency dispatch capability.
These enhancements include new technology related to CAD, GIS, and AVL capability, as well
as adequate staffing. All other factors (personnel, training, technology, fire station placement,
building design features, etc) depend on a reliable and efficient method of getting the resources
provided where they are needed in time to mitigate the consequences of an emergency,
regardless of the type of response."
Police Department personnel strongly advise that the department is undermanned and over
tasked and any significant tasking (additional commercial and multi-family occupancy) will
undoubtedly have a negative impact on our ability to provide adequate service unless
immediately able to compensate for the shortfall in personnel.
Last year the Police Department handled 72,005 calls for service, compared to 61,833 calls in
2000. This is a 14% increase in an already impressive call volume for a city of a little over
60,000. It should also be noted that the department has also increased arrests by 25% since
2000.
The Police Department recommends, "that proposed significant increases in our business and
civilian population be tied to the addition of officers on the force."
Not mentioned in this review is the current plan for the CRA to fund additional staff specifically
for the downtown and selected areas of the CRA.
With respect to solid waste, the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority has stated that
adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the 10-year
planning period.
The School District of Palm Beach County has reviewed the application and has determined that
adequate capacity exists to accommodate the resident population. Their concurrency
determination is effective for one year from the issuance date of June 24, 2004.
Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the site plan approval process, and
must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future
use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
The proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and
nearby properties and can only have a positive effect on property values in the area, so long as
the site plan for the project is consistent with the development regulations of the zoning
district.
Page 6
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning.
The property is developed and could be redeveloped under its present designation; however,
redevelopment using regulations for the CBD zoning district would result in a product that
would be contrary to the objectives of the "Federal Highway Corridor Community
Redevelopment Plan'; be automobile oriented, unfriendly to pedestrians and probably not
economically feasible in today's market.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the
needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
The proposed rezoning is of a scale that is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood
and the city as a whole. Criteria for evaluating the benefits of the proposed development to the
needs of the neighborhood and the City include service demands, density, use, value and
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan policies and the City's adopted redevelopment plans.
Developed according to regulations for the Mixed Use-High Intensity, it will serve to provide an
economic contribution to both the neighborhood and the City. Clearly stated, increasing
dwelling units in the immediate vicinity is essential to providing a population necessary to
support the desired retail and restaurants for a successful revitalization of the downtown.
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in
districts where such use is already allowed.
The Mixed Use-High Intensity zoning district was added to the land development regulations in
June 2002. To date, only two other projects have rezoned to the district. There are no other
locations in the City where such use is already allowed.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
As indicated herein, the requested zoning category is consistent with the adopted future land
use designation. It is also consistent with policies in the Comprehensive Plan, and the
directions for redevelopment of the City's downtown area. The additional impacts on
infrastructure and services resulting from this project are to be expected with redevelopment
and intensification activities, and are assumed to create issues to be resolved through service
improvements as indicated herein, and creative solutions such as through joint efforts with the
CRA. The proposed project will be compatible with adjacent land uses and will contribute to the
overall economic development of the City. Therefore, staff recommends that the subject
request be approved. If the Community Redevelopment Agency Board or the City Commission
recommends conditions, they will be included within Exhibit "B".
ATTACHMENTS
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Promenade\REZN\Staff Report.doc
PRolVlENADE LOCATION"1VIAP
C-4
CBD
o
CB CBD
BOYNTON BEACH BLVD
~ \ CBD I I
CBD
NE 4TH AVE
CBD
CBD
MX-H
z
en
-t
%
n
-t
o 50 100
- -
N
W.'
s
200 300
400
Feet
I "-11VL..I' I "UU 'l"IHI"t
PAGE 02
'~I"DER TROUTHfI" COHSULTING. INC.
. Transportation Planners and Engineers
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1H
~ Palm Beach, fll3406
(561) 434-1644 fax 434-1663
www.pinderuoutman.com
June 21, 2004
Mr. Ryan Thomas, P.E.
Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc.
5114 Okeechobee Boulevard, Suite 112
West Palm Beach, Fl13417
! t[
Ie: Promenade - #PTC04-095
.i JUL' JUN 2 22004 ,
; k
~
t__ c.,. i.,U;: . .' '"' .:~'"& f
-~~........,.".... .......~-,..._--_.......-J
Dear Mr. Thomas:
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with traffic information as it relates to the subject project.
It is proposed to develop a mixed-use development in the northeast quadrant of Boynton Beach
Boulevard and Federal Highway.
Daily trip generation rates for the proposed development were obtained from Section 10.8, fair
Share Road Impact Fees, of the Palm Beach Counly Unified land Development Code. Peak hour
trip generation raleS were obtained from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip
Generation, 7. Edition. Attachments 1 A, 1 8 and 1 C provide the AM peak hour, PM peak hour and
daily trip generation data, respectively, for the project.
A directional distribution was developed based on land use patterns and the existing roadway
network. Project l1affic was assigned to the project driveways based on the directional disuibution.
Daily, AM and PM peak hour project driveway volumes are provided on Attachment 2. Based on
these volumes, an eastbound left turn lane on Boynton Beach Boulevard at the project driveway is
warranted. No other auxiliary turn lanes are required.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
~9
Rebecca J. Mulcahy, P.E.
Project Manager
RJMlldr
Attachments
letter rhomu 04-{)9S 6-]1-(J.1
rm.
--, ~./~YY' ~u.Ut
!.Cl
~Ii
r
t
~
1
~
l! i
.. 'C
ja.
= E
.88
l~
c m
~ f~
....-Lo
c .- :r:
Q1:J:~
E! ..
"fiil
~~~
::JOJ.....::IQlbb.:l
I
~~ an
III
I
~~ NI
....
I
ls~ P\
...,
~--~
.,: ~
li:.......
,I) ~ CJ\
cro
...~ 0\ 01
M M
.5 ~ ~
~ ~
i.1 0 d
ct-
... . ,
11 ~ ~
III ~
~ ~ cro cro
l"l M
1
~ ~ 0
.5 10
tiI
-~
Co...
S ~
~~
c: ....
o +
" ~
I ...
~ !
~e
~
...
.j ~
i~
.....
~
~
"i
~
~
~ ~
J 0
I-
PINDER TROUTMAN
PAGE ~3
...
\Q
I"''''ID ~ ... ....
NI I'f) 10 an N
..::. or- ....
~!...\Cl"" ~ cro I'f)
..... ... .... ..
..... .-
I GO ~ .... ... ~ an
is....N... C"'I
~l ~
f'l i .; d ~
,f ~ N 11'I ~ I
,...1"4 N I f
IN........ M ~
.~ ~ III ." en an
..... N
~~O........ N cro
~ N.-M N III
... ...
! N.... 10 .- ~
.51'f)N1l1l ...,
i!~~ ~ '#.
III
U') .....
t 'C cro 0
I-\Clan.-
r= ... .....
1~~~ ..... $
10 g
lilt ,. r- ... N
.,!:a....."'N 0 N 2
NI ... .. M .....
1; or- ... ~
0
~ IIl.....N 1"4 ~ I
c:I'f)NIO C"'I
-
iI
;:-~N !
-;~
J ;~ ~ .
"1u.-
G C'i II) C
o + ~ C! ii
'4:1 g
l! ~ ~ ;:)
!.....c c
~ ~~ ..... i 1
...
V}
.g . 0 0 h
~E
l:
..J
E
.j ~~ ~ ~! .
c e I
!l81D CD
C \Q ... i]1
-tt C"'I
'"
...
0 IH
1
l!!
~ j II c:i
b ~ ]
"'CI .i3 _I
~ ~ )dt-=
J 1 E
0 .f ~ ". ., J
.- 1!1 t- o ]j....
',g
.!~.Q "5 0
:. Jf ~ I- !::Ba
..
1"4
10
M
.:
...
66/21/2004 16:07
-:.--_..-....-~.._-,_.. _.',. --~- ~--.... '.. ....,
5614341663
IA~
....
.sl
a.
fi
.1
Q
81
::I
"I
~
"E Q
El
j E
..cd
J~
.5 i
l~
co f~
~i>l
GI:J:..
~!l
~jl
-
J~ .., .
.. ~
N
II
~ ~ co co
... ...
J ... ...
,i ~ ~
r~ ~
.~
" "
<0 <0
-- .-
II I i i
~ 1"'1 I"l
;;; ~ 8 ~
2 N N
A ~ VI In
I~I "'-
...
~ !.~I l
0
B :c
.5~ , .
li i
. ~.., ..,
~ ~ co i
0\
j .... ....
~ N N
~ co co
.... ...
N
.-. i
...
---
S ~
..,
c: +
.S 8
i i
~ Q
'!' II
l- E
.5
.f ~
e
!~
"
.
~
1!
~
i1 ~
'j ~
~ 0
I-
Q
....
...
In
Q
...
~
PINDER TROUTMAN
i1E;~
~:~:;~
Z a;lOco
f.5.NID
S-B~~
~ :1 Q\ N ...
.......11> 0\
.I! ~ ~
~ .~ ..... N Q\
lo~N~
Ii ... ... N
~i-5O\N:::
1.1!~
Ie .... .., It'l CIO
= ... ...
~"'CIOO\
...-.VI
. ~ roc N
,c: ... 0 . ...
.... I~ ... roc ..,
"""p.... ...
t
~ ....11'\
eOl"otN
1-=-- ...
N
'"
,...~...-
!:,.~
. ~~
ac ,., lA-
e+1Il
.g g~
l! ~ ~
!:Ii~
~ 0 d
.~ II
....E
.5
'"
.i ~j
e
SOlO
eOID
-t't.
01
...
J
~
"g
~
1!
o
'_ ~~ I-
JJ .J:l
~ .i
...
OCI
.-
~
OCI
....
...
-g
d
....
OCI
...
I"l
ID
OCI
...
....
~
10
loCI
...
"
CJ\
--
$
ClD
N
...
r-
In
t:?
In
!!!.
:l
Q
roc
lQ
o
~
o
CIO
...
1"'1
.-
0.
~
J
~
's
.f
:S
::l
~
....
::t
In
.
....
i
...
r-
G\
e
N
CJ\
-
Q
~
~
....
~
\0
In
.
a
N
I"l
In
N
~
~
Ie
PAGE 84
""!!
I
I
~
o
too
I
I
~
~
I
I
~
1
...
J
.5
jJ
~ J
h
gl.
-Ii
1 8
.Ill
t~~
co li 1
l! - ...
t- II!' .
'8 0 -
t .. ~
Ji.s
" "j
J j ~
- ~ ~
:::. ~ tl
06/21/2004 16:07 5614341663
PINDER TROUTMAN
PAGE e5
II~ i
is! cJ;O\M 0'1 N
5 M
l r:;;l; ~
CI ~I ro' .".:- N ....
t
....
I I
~
2~~ ~
J~~ 0
~
p~i1 I i
- fi*! 01 ~
*""
I .S ..... tn ", 0.. "
'"
!~N C'4 N ....
~! f1. ~
"
01 ~
lR .. co ~
~ld"''''' ~ r0-
C oD N ~
- - N N ~
.1 ~ ~ m \&:I ~ I
N
t-'"l\&:l . l"1. r:.
1'4 N N II')
']
~ l
-
eg t
J~E
c: g ~ :.J !
o c
~ i-' e
I~N " 1
C10'l
1 ~~cIi ,
j
~ .8' ~
1 I- .J
~ 15
S I.
1!i -f~j
.B .... 0 t.
1-1 lVl S8~ Q) if
c ~ -
=1'4 ....
- . 0'1.
"'-
c E .... ...
H ..... H
(j.
";ij
'il
--l! ~ j
:l~ ~ H
] ] ~
Ii:: ._
01 I: .~ J 1 ~
E-F I ~ "I
ll5 )lli . j~
:i :s e
.I ~ .cB
06/21/2004 16:87 5614341663
PINDER TROUTMAN
PAGE 8G
4 __-__ ___..~_. __.__. .n.
--.-'-'-'--"--'.
.
'I.~
=1
{
Q,
~
0(01 N.T.S.
.
.
2U~9) 1( 4th AVENUE
-; { - I
I
~ 1418
t 3141
VALET ~
~ (
.- 3D
~( t 0 (01
BOYNTON BEACH 61 (161' Nf 2nd AVENUE
BOULEVARD
>-
~
J: LEGEND
Q
J:
..J 61 - AM PEAK HOUR
~ (61) - PM PEAK HOUR
I.U
0 3308 -1\01
UJ
14..
NOTE: VAlET DfWEWAY TRAFFIC IS AlSO ACCOUNTED FOR 06
IN GARAGe DfWEW\y TRAFFIC. ().f
~
FEDERAL HIGHWAY /
BOYNTON BEACH
BOULEVARD MIXED USE
ATTACHMENT 2
PROJECT DRIVEWAY VOLUMES
D
~
/21/04
-095
Department of Engineering
and Public Works
P.O. Box 21229
West Palm Beach, FL 33416-1229
(561) 684-4000
www.pbcgov.com
.
Palm Beach County
Board of County
Commissioners
Karen T. Marcus. Chair
Tony Masilotti, Vice Chairman
Jeff Koons
Warren H. Newell
Mary McCarty
Burt Aaronson
Addie L. Greene
County Administrator
Robert Weisman
"An Equal Opportunity
Affirmative Action Employer"
@ printed on recycled paper
May 17, 2004
Mr. Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning & Zoning
Department of Development
City of Boynton Beach
P,O. Box 310
Boynton Beach, FL 34425-0310
RE:
Federal Highway/Boynton Beach Boulevard Mixed Use Development
TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW
Dear Mr R:lmpf:
The Palm Beach County Traffic Division has reviewed the traffic statement for the
proposed mixed use redevelopment plan entitled; Federal Highway/Boynton Beach
Boulevard Mixed Use Development, pursuant to the Traffic Performance Standards in
Article 15 of the Palm Beach County Land Development Code. This project is
summarized as follows:
Location:
Northeast corner of the intersection of Federal Highway and Boynton
Beach Boulevard.
Boynton Beach
47,000 SF General Retail- to be demolished
21,000 SF General Retail, 20 Rooms Hotel, and 217 DU MF
Residential Units.
1,244
149 AM, and 107 PM
2006
Municipality:
Existing Uses:
Proposed Uses:
New Daily Trips:
. New PH Trips:
Build-out Year:
Based on our review, the Traffic Division has determined that the residential portion of
the proposed mixed use redevelopment project is located within the Coastal Residential
Exception Areas of Palm Beach County, and the non-residential portion generates less
peak hour trips than the existing uses, therefore, the project meets the Traffic
Performance Standards of Palm Beach County. No building permits are to be issued by
the town, after the build-out date specified above. The County traffic concurrency
approval is subject to the Project Aggregation Rules set forth in the Traffic Performance
StandC'ids Ordina:)c€.
If you have any questions regarding this determination, please contact me at 684-4030.
Sincerely,
~FTH
/' Ma~ou~te~i,
Sr. Engineer-
cc: Pinder Troutman Consulting Inc.
File: General - TPS - Mun - Traffic Study Review
MAY I 9
F:\TRAFFIC\malAdminlApprovals\040510.doc
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING &. ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-149
TO:
Chairman and Members
Community Redevelopment Agency Board and City Commission
FROM:
Dick Hudson, AICP
Senior Planner
THROUGH:
Michael W. Rumpf
Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE:
June 22, 2004
PROJECT NAME/NUMBER:
Promenade REZN 04-002
REQUEST:
Rezone the property from CBD Central Business District to MU-H
Mixed Use-High Intensity
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Property Owner/Applicant: Boynton Beach Waterways Investment Associates, LLC
Agent: Weiner & Aronson, P. A.
Location: 410 I J. r _~ 11 aJ;. !-li9~ortheast corner of the intersection of
Boynton Beach Boulevard and Federal Highway (Exhibit "AfT)
Parcel Size: 3.96 acres
Existing Land Use: Mixed Use Core (MX-C)
Existing Zoning: CBD Central Business District
Proposed Land Use: Mixed Use Core (MX-C)
Proposed Zoning: MU-H Mixed Use-High Intensity
Proposed Use: Mixed use development containing residential, commercial and
hotel uses
Adjacent Uses:
North:
Right-of-way of NE 4th Avenue then developed property
designated Mixed Use (MX) and zoned CBD Central Business
District
Page 2
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
South:
Right-of-way of Boynton Beach Boulevard then vacant property
designated Mixed Use Core (MXC) and zoned CBD Central
Business District
East:
City-owned property (Mangrove Walk at the Marina) utilized for
stormwater control designated Mixed Use Core (MXC), a portion
with a Conservation overlay, and zoned CBD Central Business
District
West:
Right-of-way of Federal Highway then developed commercial
properties designated Mixed Use (MX) and zoned CBD Central
Business District
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Staff recommends approval of the requested land use amendment and rezoning for the
following reasons:
1. The requested zoning category is consistent with the adopted land use and with the
directions for the City's downtown area;
2. The rezoning will enable the redevelopment of the property consistent with adopted
redevelopment plans for the Federal Highway corridor; and
3. The resulting project will serve to provide an economic contribution to both the
neighborhood and the c~l
PROJECT ANALYSIS
The criteria used to review Comprehensive Plan amendments and rezonings are listed in the
Land Development Regulations, Chapter 2, Section 9, Administration and Enforcement, Item C.
Comprehensive Plan Amendments: Rezonings. In addition, the request for rezoning to a mixed
use district requires concurrent approval of the site plan for the project.
a. Whether the proposed rezoning would be consistent with applicable comprehensive
plan policies including but not limited to, a prohibition against any increase in
dwelling unit density exceeding 50 in the hurricane evacuation zone without written
approval of the Palm Beach County Emergency Planning Division and the City's risk
manager. The planning department shall also recommend limitations or
requirements, which would have to be imposed on subsequent development of the
property, in order to comply with policies contained in the comprehensive plan.
Policy 1.16.1 provides definitions for all land use categories. Portions of the section dealing
with the Mixed Use-Core category include the following:
"This land use category shall consist of all Mixed Use High Intensity zoning districts
and/or any zoning district(s) which may be established subsequent to the adoption
Page 3
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
of the Plan provided that all of the above-mentioned zoning districts are shown on
the Future Land Use Map within the Mixed Use-Core land use category."
"A Floor Area Ratio (FAR) up to 4.0 may be considered for all uses, exclusive of
parking structures, throughout the Mixed Use-Core (MX-C) land use category. For
the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal Highway within the Hurricane Evacuation
Zone, while the residential density within a development may be up to 80 dwelling
units per acre, the overall density for the Mixed Use-Core area east of Federal
Highway shall not exceed 40 dwelling units per acre.
"All land development located in the Mixed Use-Core category shall be required to
submit a plan that includes a single unified design for the project, and shall conform
to any adopted design plan(s) for the area covered by the category."
Policy 1.22.4 of the Land Use Element reads:
"In the City's downtown areas the following standards are to be emphasized:
1. Mixed-use buildings are appropriate;
2. Height of buildings to be consistent with the City of Boynton Beach Vision 20/20
Redevelopment Plan;
3. Density should be higher at the center and radiate out into edges with lower
density;
4. Streets should be pedestrian-friendly and safe, not totally designed for the
automobile."
The rezoning is consistent with the land use designation and with the directions for the City's
downtown area. In addition, three policies cited below, from the "Federal Highway Corridor
Community Redevelopment Plan"are also addressed:
"Policy 1.3A: Land uses within the downtown area shall be mixed uses that include
residential, destination commercial, retail and restaurants with a marine orientation."
"Policy 1.3B: Permitted land uses within the downtown area shall be destination uses
and not those with a vehicular orientation."
"Policy 1.3C: Land development regulations for the downtown community shall
discourage single user commercial uses with front field parking."
b. Whether the proposed rezoning would be contrary to the established land use
pattern, or would create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby
districts, or would constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual property
owner as contrasted with the protection of the public welfare.
The proposed rezoning is consistent with redevelopment plans for the downtown area and with
approved redevelopment projects in the vicinity, including the Marina Village and the Arches,
and does not grant any special privilege to an individual property owner.
Page 4
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
c. Whether changed or changing conditions make the proposed rezoning desirable.
The adoption of the "Federal Highway Corridor Community Redevelopment Plan"in May 2001,
and the resulting implementation activities gave a new direction to the redevelopment of the
downtown area of Boynton Beach, which built on the redevelopment objectives established in
the "20/20 Redevelopment Plan'~ The requested rezoning is consistent with that direction and
will be a positive contribution to the redevelopment efforts.
d. Whether the proposed use would be compatible with utility systems, roadways, and
other public facilities.
Water demands for the existing use are estimated at 11,232 gallons per day (GPO) for 46,650
sq. ft. of commercial/retail/restaurant development. This demand based on the proposed
mixed use developme'lf)s projected at 151,333 GPO, an increase of 140,100 GPO.
Daily trip generation comparisons prepared by the applicant's traffic consultant indicate that the
current commercial development generates 4,157 total trips per day. While the proposed
redevelopment is expected to generate 5,156 total trips per day, 2,226 of these are generated
by residential development. Because the project is located in the Coastal Residential Exception
Area of Palm Beach County, the residentially generated trips are exempt from concurrency.
Therefore, the non-residential portion is projected to generate fewer trips th~he existing
development and meets the Traffic Performance Standards of Palm Beach Co nty.
{)
With respect to solid waste, the Palm Beach County Solid Waste Authority has stated that
adequate capacity exists to accommodate the county's municipalities throughout the 10-year
planning period.
The School District of Palm Beach County has reviewed the application and has determined that
adequate capacity exists to accommodate the resident population. Their concurrency
determination is effective for one year from the issuance date of June 24, 2004.
Lastly, drainage will also be reviewed in detail as part of the site plan approval process, and
must satisfy all requirements of the city and local drainage permitting authorities.
e. Whether the proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future
use of adjacent and nearby properties, or would affect the property values of
adjacent or nearby properties.
The proposed rezoning would be compatible with the current and future use of adjacent and
nearby properties and can only have a positive effect on property values in the area, so long as
the site plan for the project is consistent with the development regulations of the zoning
district.
f. Whether the property is physically and economically developable under the existing
zoning.
Page 5
File Number: REZN 04-002
Promenade
The property is developed and could be redeveloped under its present designation; however,
redevelopment using regulations for the CBD zoning district would result in a product that
would be contrary to the objectives of the "Federal Highway Corridor Community
Redevelopment Plan'~ be automobile oriented, unfriendly to pedestrians and probably not
economically feasible in today's market.
g. Whether the proposed rezoning is of a scale which is reasonably related to the
needs of the neighborhood and the city as a whole.
The proposed rezoning is of a scale that is reasonably related to the needs of the neighborhood
and the city as a whole. Criteria for evaluating the benefits of the proposed development to the I
needs of the neighborhood and the City include service demands, densi , and . ~~,( (y.
consistency with the Comprehensive Plan policies and the City'S. a a;1e pfud redevelopment plans. {' > iI~
Developed according to regulations for the Mixed Use-High Int~~ty, it will serve to provide an
~conomic q~nt~ibutio~ to b?th the_neighborhood ~nd the,Qtx.. 1t~~l""""~:.~ dlw.J('4. --::~
,,...-r'k- JL,,:,I.:J~~{,.JlI-... G$ v,~( ~ o-su~~-~H \(:"i1tf.-t.2.+-~b/,.-. .~_
h. Whether there are adequate sites elsewhere in the city for the proposed use, in rfr'
districts where such use is already allowed. 1\\ . K.,(.
, (I
~~Y>
~ ~7 fi
t 'J:>
-?L
\5
The Mixed Use-High Intensity zoning district was added to the land development regulations in
June 2002. To date, only two other projects have rezoned to the district. There are no other
locations in the City where such use is already allowed.
CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS
As indicated herein, the requested zoning category is consistent with the adopted future land
use designation. It is also consistent with policies in the Comprehensive Plan, and the
directions for redevelopment of the City's downtown area. It will not create additional impacts
on infrastructure that have not been anticipated in the Comprehensive Plan; will be compatible
with adjacent land uses and will contribute to the overall economic development of the City.
Therefore, staff recommends that the subject request be approved. If the Community
Redevelopment Agency Board or the City Commission recommends conditions, they will be
included within Exhibit "B".
ATTACHMENTS
5: \Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Promenade\REZN\Staff Report.doc
.. <<
..
PIHDER TROOTMfiH COHSOLTIHG. IHe.
Transportation Planners and Engineers
April 20, 2004
Revised April 22, 2004
2324 South Congress Avenue, Suite 1 H
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
(561) 434-1644 Fax 434-1663
www.pindertroutman.com
Mr. Masoud Atefi, MSCE
Palm Beach County Traffic Division
160 Australian Avenue, Suite 303
West Palm Beach, FL 33406
Re: Federal Highway/Boynton Beach Boulevard Mixed Use - #PTC04-095
Dear Mr. Atefi:
The purpose of this letter is to provide an equivalency letter for the above referenced project.
It is proposed to redevelop a site located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Federal
Highway (US 1) and Boynton Beach Boulevard in the City of Boynton Beach. Existing on the site is a
47,000 SF retail center. Proposed for the site is 21,000 SF of Retail Use, a 38 Room Hotel and 317
Condominium Units.
This site is located in the Coastal Residential Exception Area. Therefore, only the proposed Retail
and Hotel have to be considered in determining compliance with Article 12, Traffic Performance
Standards of the Palm Beach County Unified land Development Code (UlDC).
Exhibits 1 A and 1 B provide a trip generation comparison for the AM and PM peak hours. for both
the AM peak hour and PM peak hour, the net new trips are less for the proposed uses than for the
existing use. Based on this analysis, the project is in compliance with the requirements of Article 12
of the UlDC.
Your review of this analysis is appreciated.
Sincerely,
i?Jpm y 1fl~ A,_ /
{J vV ~r
Rebecca J. Mulcahy, P.E. .' / /D1
Florida Registration #42570 i 22--
RJM/ldr
Enclosures
cc: Mike Rumpf
Jeff Krinsky
Letter Atefi 04-095 4-22-04
Di
1f"J 'I:t' "l:f'_
~.e.q';:\
..... N N -
<<::t N N--
A~"';' !H;
Ii: ~~'
4l: 9
<t
o
c..
E
o
u
C
%1,
.e-
b
~
-.,
-'
11
.~
~
,...
-C (5
;;; .~
~ ~
"So..
o E
~ 0
..&;:U
u c::
I'll 0
QJ~
co I'll
C ....
B ~
~~
as.e-
~~
I'll'
3 :;
..&;: 0
.!?:' :r:
:I:~
I'll
tf
:::E
<
<
.....
-;;j
;e Q:j
..&;: -0
X Q)
I.O.l ~
......~c.
;r,
'x
.....,
'5 "- "-
lI'l l1"l
0
'" F
t= ..... '" N
::l N N
~ 0
<Ii
Z l1"l l1"l
.E M M
?fi.
~~ c:
"1'
~ ~ "l"
I'll .- l1"l l1"l
c..~ "l" "l"
ilj N N
~ 0 0
.9- ~ ..... .....
...
fo-..... 0 0
~O "t "t
...
B
>< N N
..., - iD ~
-
~ ~
s;:
/ij '-' '-'
E .~ ci ci
E
.E f-
0 I
I-;; N l'""-J
.i:l 0 0
0 ..... .-
:at-
.t: ,...., 0
fo- ~ ~ "l"
Ira ,....
..... ~
0
l- N 1':.1
.E ..0 \.0
e;:;-
M
~ --
=- ~
E (J)
'"
I'll '""
oc: N
C +
.Q 8
i6 c I
Qj -'
c: '..r;..
'"
<Ii LI)
(,) ci
.g JJ
f0- E
c
-'
c I
.;:;; I
-
Cii u...
..... lJl
.E 0
g
r--:
"l"
CIi
'"
::::l
-0
C
I'll
.... ~
~I <
p
U:: ....
i.O
"l"
N
0'>
M
.-::
"0
<Ii
U
.....
c:
iii
E
,..,
o
~
<Ii
oc:
~I
~
.....,
'5 N -:- ~ l~ -
M N l1"l 6
0 N
V- i'-"
.:: ..... ~IV\ (::; h <0
::l N "l"
~ 0 ..... .....
Z ON N I~ \.0
.E N .- M l1"l
<f.. rft. <f..
sEi '-':c: c:
"1',,", .0
o '" "l"
~ .e. l1"l .- \.0 \.0
0..':: N N N
~ " N Ci'> ..... 0
l1"l N " l1"l M
.~ ~ ..... N
~ -:; ~O'> .- "- <0
ffi 6 . . L~
C .- .....
Qi
.....
>< l1"l M <0 "l" N
I.I.l E M~ "f' N r-,.
~ ?f.. <f.. ~
~ ~ ~I VI ~
E .~ ci \.0 <0
.- .-
E .= ..0 M '" ::1 0
.E N
- ~ JJ"j ro i''':i a
.i:l \.0 N <0 \.0 l1"l
0 .- N
:a fo-
.t: -' L'" .- .^ '.0 N
fo- N .- ~ M
::l M "
'5 0 .- ......
0
?- m ;..~ M ~ 0"
.E M .- l1"l N "
e;:;-
~ -- N IJ I
=- ;e. '<l'
<Ii '" --
<0
..... N S
I'll '"" I~
oc: N u..
C + VI
.Q 8 S2
ilj c 0, ::::l
Qi -' ..... [;)
c ~ -~ -~
<Ii LI) " .-
u . \.0 l1"l II
.g o . ci
II 0
f0- E
c
-'
I
c <J>
E ~I
.~ ~
E u.. i;!
lJl
.E 0 ~~ ~I
0
.0...
.....
". ii
II ~
c
<Ii
CIi .,...
<J> '~I
::::l Ii'll I~
-0
C
I'll
.... ::g
~ I~I
-f- <
Q) ~~ p
U:: fo-
~
c
E
oio
:i::
t-
~
<Ii
Z
.....
<Ii
Z
g
2.
n'
-0
o
U
~
c
'"
E
Cl.
o
~
8
-a
c
"
...J
]
'c
:J
o ,3-
:-e C
-0 ::>
UJ 8
~ -E
~rl ~
.~ ~
w n;:.
c c..
<I> 0.'
~~
'=1 '"
ill-
~ ~
l' ~
~ ,g
.~ ""S
~ ~
E E
~ ~
"" ti'j
~ ~
:a ~~
E i.L
~ ~
'"
B <5
.~ .~
E (})
Q i:)
~ ~
<ii <ii
- ~
It'''J''!:f"o::t_
~Q,?'%
~ N N --
"!:f"~~'-
8 ~ '"'t ~
I- on '"
~ ~Q...
... ';'
.,.
o
~
U
~
'"'
0..
E
Q)
~
::l
"'C
Q)
)(
i
"'C c:
:. 0
:> . oJ':
0;::
Q) rcl
::I 0..
0 E
iXl C
..c: U
u c:
~ 0
c:; '.;::l
~
c: Q)
o c:
~ ....
c: '"
~(J
- 0..
a:l ._
'>.....
rcll-
~ :;
~o
!Xl -- :c
~ :c ..lit.
..... -;;; rcl .S!
;e Q)
t 0..
..:; "'C ~ ~I
x Q) 'x
W l.i.. .....,
c;; ~I "i
.-
'0 N
r-
'"
.~ -:= 0'> 0'>
r- .- .-
~6 .- 11'-
12 - ~
.E 0'>1 0'>
,6
0' 1
>-~ N q
..0 ~ "<t
J, 'Ii "<t
~ .~ ex:> I~
a...,= 1.0
.... ....
b a; a;
.e. ~ CTl CTl
..
r- ... 1.0 I;>;
~ r>
E 0 N N
Cl!
X lI"l lI"l
W .E t-, t-,
.... ....
~ ~
c;; 0 0
1= ~ ,-; ,-;
Cli .;:
c:l-- 'I
,
"$ a; a;
~ CTl CTl
~
... ... ex:> ex:>
l- ~ 0", u'
~ 0 .- ....
0
I-- M CTl
.E a) a)
.... ....
.~ il
:::.
.E:l ...,
0
<Il "":
O! ...,
c +
0 8 I
~ c:
Qj -' I
0
c: ~
Q} oD
(.) 0
.~ II
r- E
S
E II
i
~ u.
.E:l '"
.E 0
r-.
Ci
"-
"<t
I
Q} I I
'"
;:)
~
(iJ
-oJ '"
-oJ
.., I :<
I-
~; 0
r-
~
o
...
~
u
~
o
r-
~
.~
... ...,
!-
~6
2
b, !.1"oJ I 0
.-N"<t
.... .-
lI"l .... 1.0
~.-"-
I
N r-.J.......
..=tr);"":0
>--N'
..0 ~
:ll !S.
<Il .;;0-
o....~
...6 ...6
0' a--
~lJ'l
"<t
"<t
Q!;i'-I~
c;;
~~
I~ :;
~O
X
U.I
-
.-"<tlJ'l
.- N M
N N
"<t N 11.0
.- N
.... ....
~~~
....
~~
0'-:
.0
~.o ~
c;;
~ .g
E.....~
r"lMI.O
ti;vr-.....~
..&.JNNLf)
~ ~ N N
.=~~~g
c;;O"" ....
...,
o
I-- ex:>M,-
E~r-~
N
.,..,
-0:--
C"=t.llj
~ ~I~I
O! CV') u..
c: + '"
.2 88
~ cO
~.~;: ! I~
: ~r
I I
.~ 1~ll I ""1
2 t;;1~~ 5
c: ol~ ~I
~~. . C<,l
N
1 ~ 111LI~
I I
00 "<t
I.f) C"t')
EI
,6
0'
q
o
"-
to..
....
ex:>
'0
0'>
.-
....
8
c:i
.-
o
N
to..
0'>
....
lI"l
1.0
N
CTl
....
M
-n
-....:.
"-
s
;;;;l
o
--
N
1.0
'-'
'-1
.....
00
....
lJ'l
0">
N
....
"<t
"<t
co
....
00
N
N
"*
2;
cO
1.0
CTl
ex:>
"<t
"<t
lI"l
0'>
.-
I~
c;;
-~ I
~ I II 11\ I
]1 ~ I~ I",
1~lll~ Ijl ~
""91
~l
~
....,
~
\;1
.=
..
w
z
OJ
z
g
2
OJ
"8
u
"1::
OJ
E
0..
o
1)
>
8
-0
!ii
.::J
-0
QJ
c
-E
::;
g :c
-.:I 5
~ 0
- U
-5 .J:.
><l Ii
.gl ~
~I ~
~~
<f!'"
w ~
~. ~
~ ~
" 0..
1! E
.~
.z ~
c: C>!
.g ~
.(!l 2
5 V)
~ 'r.;
'" u-
.= oi
a ~
~ c
.a g,__,
't; -
c: ~
QJ QJ
~ ~
X ;;(
Vi Vi
Hudson, Dick (Orran)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mazzella, Pete
Friday, May 14, 2004 5:26 PM
Hudson, Dick (Orran)
RE: Promenade at Riverwalk
Dick
I can support those numbers. I see the restaurant and retail as basically a break-even (within accuracy of the estimate,
considering they must be including the existing "take-out" businesses as "restaurants". I don't think the new development
will have restaurants comparable to Margy's and Happy Garden Chinese take-out, but maybe I'm wrong.
Have a great weekend.
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: Hudson, Dick (Orran)
Sent: Friday, May 14, 20044:43 PM
To: Mazzella, Pete
Subject: RE: Promenade at Riverwalk
Peter,
I upped the demand to 44 gpd/seat for restaurant, lounge to 25 gpd/seat, retail to 0.125/sq. ft. (all based on your rate
schedule for cap fees). It also calls for 374 gpd/unit for 2 br-units and 125 gpd/ hotel room. That is how I came up
with persent demand of 11,233 gpd and 151,333 gpd projected demand, an increased demand of 140,100 gpd.
Dick
-----Original Message-----
From: Mazzella, Pete
Sent: Friday, May 14, 20044:06 PM
To: Hudson, Dick (Orran)
Subject: Promenade at Riverwalk
Dick
I received the flow estimates for this project prepared by Caulfield and Wheeler. Generally, the Restaurant,
Lounge and Retail figures are OK. I think the hotel units should be increased to 125 gpd/unit, and the multi-family
residential
should be increased to 375 gpd/unit , which brings the value more into accordance with the Code for a 2-bedroom
apartment.
As further justification for the increased figures, I believe these units are supposed to be upscale, likely having at
least one bath for each bedroom, with added features such a wet bars, etc.. I'm also assuming that the site will
be irrigated using Potable water, as it is now.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment.
Peter Mazzella
1
Hudson, Dick (Orran)
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Mazzella, Pete
Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:19 PM
Hudson, Dick (Orran)
RE: Promenade W &S
Dick
To answer your last question first, I suggest we ask the applicant for flow estimates for non-residential uses. At least this
way we have a number that they provided, and which we can either agree to serve, or not serve.
Regarding the 140,000 gpd, I think you're in the ballpark, depending upon exactly what type of commercial uses they
include in the project.
At this point, we still have some uncommitted reserve capacity. However, if a big project like Renaissance Commons
phases 4&5 were to be approved by the City Commission, and try to make a firm reservation, we might not have enough to
serve the entire project with our current facilities.
Please feel free to give me a heads up and run any numbers past me before you have to write any more staff reports. I'm
the keeper of the numbers at this point (which has been taking a good deal of effort lately)
Pete
-----Original Messagen---
From: Hudson, Dick (Orran)
Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2004 5:08 PM
To: Mazzella, Pete
Subject: Promenade W&S
Peter,
In interoffice mail, I have sent you estimates from the applicant regarding increased water demand for the "Promenade
at Riverwalk" (where do they get these names?) proposed for the Boynton Plaza site. I have calculated the flow
allocations based on the cap. fee unit costs and it appears to me that demand will increase over present by
approximately 140,000 g/d. I will still need a statement from you for the staff report, but am I close?
The paragraph I used for w & s calculations in the CRA staff reports last night was:
"Based on the City's adopted Levels of Service (LOS) for potable water (200 gallons per capita per day
[GPCD]) and sewer service (90 GPCD) the projected demands are expected to be 20,640 gallons for water
and 9,288 GPCD sewer service. The City's utility plants currently have unreserved capacity to serve the
projected demands of the proposed project." this was for 48 condo units. Am I to be the one that states how many
unreserved gallons of capacity we have? The "Post" & "Sun-Sentinel" will have a field day!!! Tell me how you want me
to phrase it.
On another note, we never did discuss available capacity for sanitary sewer and how we are suppose to figure that.
know the adopted los is 90 g/d/c, but what multiplier do I use for hotel, office, retail, etc.?
Dick
1
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT
Planning & Zoning Division
Interoffice Memorandum
TO:
FROM:
Peter Ma~
Dick HudS~ Mcp
Senior Planner
DATE:
5/12/04
SUBJECT:
The Promenade (overlooking beautiful Pete's Pond) Rezoning
Application
The applicant for The Promenade submitted the attached summary of water and sewer
demand projections. I am requesting that you provide comments on their calculations
and provide calculation from your department, if you do not agree with theirs.
Staff reports will be due during the first week in July.
Thanks.
S:\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Promenade\REZN\Mazzella-W&S.doc
~ 0:5:
1\.). ~~~
-. 0'1 -. 0'1 CD
:::J -. :::J ....,
(") :::J (") 5' (J)
::J'" Q.. ::J'" (") _.
.... ::J'" N
CD
en en I\.) I\.) 10
-....JO-....J~O
O'100O'1se.
-J::>.I\.)~~mO
00'11\.)00
OOO'1Oen
;::;:
::0
CD
en
CD
:2
0)
.-+
o'
:::J
CD'
CD
-Efi
o
o
o
o
)>
"U
~
r
'TI
)>
o
r
-I
m
(J)
o
I
)>
::0
(j)
m
-I
o
~
r
s:: 0 Z (J) 0 "U (J) OJ r :5: )>-1 ::0 ::0 ::0 0 I
CI(J)o)>ocmJ>)> mmm'TIO
rC-lI-<O"U)>CZ<(J)(J)-I'TI-I
-I::O-lOOrmCZCm-l-l)>Om
lOCO)> ::O-lO'TI::O)>)>rmr
~I-Ir::o :5:-<::O)>ZCCO
::::>' 0 m )>"UOO?::O::OO
::::.. ::0)>:5:-1-)>)>
Z ^::o)>C-IZz:5:
(J) mr-l::o-l-l-l:5:
- -10 -r_-m
)> ::0 zml\.)z::o
o (j)'TI-J::>.OO
r COI-I-
2! (J)00l\.)~
)>OC-J::>.
G1 ,^ ::0 I
mm-O
::0 C
< ::0
o -
m
I\.)(J)::O(J)(J)(J)(J)(J):2:m(J)(J)(J)(J)m::o
OJ'mm-l-loom)>'OmmmO:5:0
)>(J)CC' .)> . )>)>)>. "UO
::O-lOOO'TI'TI-l~C-I-I-I'TIr:5:
C m m m :-1:-1 -' (J) (J) (J) :-I 0 (J)
z ZZZ Z -<
-I -1-1-1 G1 m
:5: m
)> (J)
o
I
Z
m ,
W 0'1 ~ I\.) I\.) :..... 0 ~ 0'1 W I\.) en -J::>. 0 1\.)\ ~
-....J,....I\.)O'1O'1O'1:.....I\.)0~O'1l\.)-J::>.:.....O'1l\.)
-J::>. U J 0'1 (j) G1 0'1 I\.) 0'1 0 I\.) (j) (j) (j) I\.) G1 0'1
G1 ~ G1 "U "U CX> 0'1 (j) G1 G1 "U "U "U 0'1 "U- G1
"UCi5"UOOG1G1"U"U"UOOOG1O"U
OmOCi5-"U"UOOOCi5--"U-O
m)>::n-l(J)OO;-n;;mm(J)(J)om-
)> ,AJ -1- w::::... mm :5:::0
. -Imac~Ci5)>mf)o~)>)>Ci5"Uo
(J) mO. 0 -I I C: -I :-I 0 ~O
Ozm'TI~ -' ~:5:
m-lZ:-I-I Z -I
Z -I . m .
-I
r
-<
)>
"U
-I
(J)
-Efi -Efi -Efi
~~ -Efi -Efi ~~ ~~ -Efi -Efi -Efi
W-Efi-J::>.-Efi-Efi -J::>.-....JO-Efil\.)~-Efi-J::>.
~~-J::>.CX>CX>-Efi-Efi-J::>.O'1COCX>~O'1-EfiCX>-J::>.
-....J-....JOCX>CX>OOOCX>COCX>CX>-J::>.OCX>O
wmwoo(n~w~oowCo~ow
CO~O(j)(j)01-J::>.OOO(j)COCO-J::>.(j)O
o
-Efi
o
o
o
-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi-Efi
0000000000000000
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0000000000000000
0000000000000000
o
0000000000000000
c:
Z
:::j
)>'TI:E
r-r-)>
r-O-l
O:Em
o ::0
)>
-I
o
Z
C:O
Z)>
:::j"tJ
0"T1
Om
enm
-I
c:Z
z9
:::jO
en"T1
m
><
-I
m
Z
en
o
Z
'TI
r
o
:2:
G3
"U
o
-
~;EtxJ
enliO
6~~
.,,~.....
O:bO
:::j~~
-<OtxJ
;:Oen~
)i."o
~;!E:x:
en~
~
3!
~
r-
~
o
r=
-
::j
U}
o
$;
::0
G)
."
en
-
~
"
~
-!!!