AGENDA DOCUMENTS
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM
Requested City Commission Date Final Fonn Must be Turned Requested City Commission Date Final Form Must be Turned
Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office Meeting Dates in to City Clerk's Office
D August 3, 2004 (Noon.) July 19,2004 D October 4, 2004 (Noon) September 20, 2004
D August 17, 2004 (Noon) August 2, 2004 D October 19, 2004 (Noon) October 4, 2004
D September 7, 2004 (Noon) August 16,2004 [gJ November 3, 2004 (Noon) October 18, 2004
D September 21, 2004 (Noon) September 7, 2004 D November 16, 2004 (Noon) November 1,2004
D Administrative D Development Plans
NATURE OF [gJ Consent Agenda D New Business
AGENDA ITEM D Public Hearing D Legal
D Bids D UnfInished Business
D Announcement D Presentation
D City Manager's Report
RECOMMENDATION: Please place this request on the November 3, 2004 City Commission Agenda under
Consent Agenda. The Planning and Development Board recommended that the subject be approved with the revised time
extension date to be fIve months instead of three months, granting approval to January 5,2005. For further details pertaining
to the request, see attached Department of Development Memorandum No. PZ 04-246.
EXPLANATION:
PROJECT:
AGENT:
OWNER:
LOCATION:
DESCRIPTION:
Serrano Beach (SPTE 04-010)
Chip Bryan, Julian Bryan & Associates, Incorporated
D R Horton, Incorporated
Quarter mile west of Congress Avenue; south of Golf
Request for a three (3) month time extension of the site plan approval granted on August
5,2003, from August 5, 2004 to November 5, 2005.
PROGRAM IMPACT:
FISCAL IMPACT:
ALTERNATIVES:
Deve10pmen
City Manager's Signature
~-_ _~,u/L
,/ Planning and Zonintl'>irector City Attorney / Finance / Human Resources
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\SPTE 04-01O\Agenda Item Request Serrano Beach SPTE 04-010 11-3-04.doc
S:\BULLET1N\FORMS\AGENDA ITEM REQUEST FORM. DOC
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
1>>LANNING AND ZONING DMSION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-246
Chairman and Members
Planning & Development Board
Michael Rumpf ~
Director of Planning and Zoning
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP <r Y
Planner ~
October 11, 2004
Serrano Beach I SPTE 04-010
Site Plan lime Extension
Property Owner:
Applicant / Agent:
Location:
Land Use/Zoning:
Proposed Use:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
o R Horton, Incorporated
Mr. Chip Bryan - Julian Bryan & Associates, Incorporated
1,300 feet west of Congress Avenue on the north side of the
Lake Worth Drainage District Lateral Canal 28 (L-28)(see
Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Low Density Residential (LOR) (4.84 du/ac) I Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
47 zero lot line single-family dwelling units
9.728 acres (423,754 square feet)
To the northeast, three Single-family homes in Silverlake Estates designated Low
Density Residential (LOR) at 4.84 du/ac and zoned Planned Unit Development
(PUD). The actual built density of the PUD is 2.04 du/ac. To the northwest,
unincorporated property developed with one, two (2)-story single-family residence
designated MR-5 (Medium Density Residential at 5 du/ac) and zoned AR-USA,
Agricultural Residential in the Urban Services Area;
Immediately south are the rights-of-way of the Lake Worth Drainage District L-28
Lateral Canal and Palmland Drive, then developed residential (Chanteclair Villas
Condominiums) designated High Density Residential (HDR) at 10.8 dujac) and
zoned Multi-family Residential (R-3) (10.8 du/ac). The actual built density of
Chanteclalr Villas Is 7.42 du/ac. To the west of Chanteclair Villas is the Palmland
Villas development with a built density of 8.57 du/ac;
Developed Elementary (Crosspointe) School designated Public & Private
Governmental I Institutional (PPGI) and zoned Public Use (PU); and
Page 2
Memorandum No. PZ 04-246
West: Property within the Village of Golf designated single family residential and built at a
density of 0.3 du/ac. The property Immediately adjacent to the subject site
consists of one single-family home on a 1.6-acre parcel and a portion of a vacant
parcel of 4.5 acres.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a square-shaped lot totaling 9.7 acres in area. It was annexed (ANEX 03-001) into
the city last year and rezoned (LUAR 03-005) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). According to public
records, D R Horton, Incorporated has owned the property since December of 2003. On August 5, 2003,
the site plan was approved for the construction of 47 zero-lot line single-family homes. Potential
homebuyers could choose from seven (7) different house styles, ranging from three (3) to five (5)
bedrooms.
A site plan is valid for only one (1) year after a development order has been issued. The developer is
required to secure a building permit within that year. Mr. Chip Bryan of Julian Bryan & Associates,
Incorporated, agent for the property owner, is now requesting a three (3)-month time extension, for the
site plan (NWSP 03-010), which was approved a year ago. If this time extension request is approved, the
expiration date of the site plan, including concurrency certification, would be extended to November 5,
2004. The site plan would still be subject to the original 48 conditions of approval.
ANALYSIS
According to Chapter 4, Section 5 of the Land Development Regulations, "the applicant shall have one (1)
year to secure a building permit from the Development Department". Examples of building permits
Include but are not limited to the following: Plumbing, electrical, mechanical, foundation, and structural.
The Regulations authorize the City Commission to approve one (1) year time extensions, prOVided that
the applicant files the request prior to the expiration date of the development order. In this case, the
applicant has met that requirement. The Planning & Zoning Division received the application for time
extension on August 3, 2004. The payment and written time extension request were both received on
August 4, 2004, prior to the expiration date of the site plan.
According to the time extension application, Mr. Bryan states "the project was delayed extensively during
the post site plan permitting phase in an effort to accommodate neighboring resident's concerns. As a
result of numerous meetings and discussions with the residents of adjacent communities, several aspects
of the project's drainage and utility design were revised to further reduce any potential impacts to
adjOining communities. Serrano Beach has recently received an environmental resource permit from
South Florida Water Management District and a clearing and excavation permit from the City. Site work
has commenced, and we anticipate remaining permitting and construction proceeding rapidly. We do not
anticipate any further delays, and regret that we must request this extension, having so nearly met the
deadline".
One Informal criterion that staff methodically utilizes in the evaluation of a request for time extensions is
the applicants' demonstration or willingness to complete the project In "good faith". The applicant can
submit detailed plans to the Building Division In anticipation of eventually securing a building permit.
Submitting building permit plans demonstrates "good faith" to the City that the developer is attempting to
complete the project. The applicant submitted plans to the Building Division for the model home on
August 11, 2004. The plans are still under review. The clearing and grubbing permit was approved on
August 19, 2004.
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 04-246
A more formal criterion for evaluating requests for time extensions Is a project's compliance with (traffic)
concurrency requirements. On March 7, 2003, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division approved the
traffic study for 98 multi-family dwelling units with a build-out year of 2004. One of the conditions of
approval from the site plan is that the Palm Beach County Traffic Division would have to approve a
revised traffic analysis based upon the decision to construct 47 zero-lot line single-family homes and
submit a Traffic Equivalency Statement, prior to the issuance of a building permit. This condition as well
as the other conditions would still be applicable today. As of this date, the project currently lacks traffic
concurrency. It should be noted that on March 9, 2004, Mr. Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Director of Utilities
approved the underground Utilities piping plan and the applicant paid for the water reservation fee.
RECOMMENDA110N
Staff recommends approval of this request for a three (3)-month time extension of the new site plan
(NWSP 03-010). As previously mentioned, if approved, the new expiration date would be November 5,
2004. This recommendation is based on the "good faith" effort shown to build the project and the fact
that no changes have been made to the Land Development Regulations that would impact this project
since it was approved In 2003. All conditions of approval included in the initial development order must
still be satisfactorily addressed during the building permit process. Any additional conditions of approval
recommended by the Board or City Commission would be placed in Exhibit "C" - Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJEcrs\Serrano Beach\SPTE Q4-010\Staff Report.doc
Location M
Serrano at B a p
oynton Beach
~
I
I
I ( i I
i ~/ i
I
i
I
I
-.:.
--'-'
~
----'
..~
,., :-...
:' '-" ,/ '
U
i I
!
I I' ,
I \
i I
I 0 \
I \
I i
I
!
e
800
o
800 Feet
N
w~,
s
IIITmt1t--~
- .--- ........r- ......... .,~.". --.. -- ....,,,,,.... -- .....- "...... se~IOOSSV ~ uoAle uOllnr tJ U r
!~
,... II .
'M' ........ ".... :IJ'
!; Iql,l
01 . ,
1=1 Hp
'< ~ iG:l I
0;; :U
g I -(oil =
sill
dn;
....
,Ill ! "f ~
I! '~ 8 ....
~--,
ON~~3S
NYId 3J.lS ~3.LS'ffl
~~ ~r -
i ~ ~
- IS ,
:1 gg 9 ~
~I! :! ~ !
1,1((;11
I 111'ld
IS ~ lil.hlll
I. . 4w illllll
.. If!' I' !e
I l! I IIIIIIIII
I i li~ 83 I ! dlllMI
I rJ ~ !11111'ilil
~ I ! nllJdu
I
i
V..,
J1I
.( uu ItS
!
_. UU .u II
0( if liB UI
~ jl ~., '''' Ol'
~ I.ilhl Hn HI
.. '1lIhl.ul
III
1,11111 lu, In
I'
I I
lIc>oIPS hlllUllWel3) . W :OuIuaz
HOY:lS NO.LNA09
Q30~IOBns-Nll
/"
i
~J
II
"'Ii!
f
~I
I)
~~
~f
--
-
I
.
,
r
t
I
. ..
.
11.01'04'17"11.
~ JIOEl pue AI"'~Duts 18!1U8PfUlj . ~ :Jlutuoz
4'I0!) ..0 1I0YTl~
l30~IOBns-Nn
..---..-- . -
~,r:2.~ ,'.'
....~ "iI-~"'Pte~ :
MEl :10 1I YT1\t.
.,n OllCll'd - d :OuI!JOZ
4'100 :10 i10YTlIA
OilOIt"-"l(lS"Nn
( I.
81HX3
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Serrano Beach
File number: SPTE 04-010
Reference'
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None X
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None X
UTILITIES
Comments: None X
FIRE
Comments: None X
POLICE
Comments: None X
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None X
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None X
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None X
FORESTER/ENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None X
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. The applicant must submit an updated/corrected traffic concurrency approval X
letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering prior to issuance of any
permits.
Conditions of Approval
2
I DEPARTMENTS I INCLUDE I REJECT I
2. All previous conditions of approval must still be complied with. X
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
None X
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined.
S :\P1anning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\SPTE 04-01 O\COA.doc
CITY OF BOYNTON BEACH
AGENDA ITEM COVER SHEET AND CHECKLIST
This completed cover sheet must accompany all agenda item requests. Please place check marks
in the boxes as indicated. Initiating department must prepare Agenda Item Request Form. Submit
original agenda request (with back up) and one CODY of aaenda reauest (with back up) to the
City Clerk's office. Items must be submitted by the deadlines indicated below. Incomplete or
late items will be returned to originating department.
Requested City
Commission Meeting
Dates
D Au ust 3 2004
Au ust 17, 2004
D Se tember 7 2004
Se tember 21 2004
October 4 2004
D October 19, 2004
~ November 3 2004
D November 16, 2004
Deadline for Submittal to City P & D/CRA Requests Deadline
Clerk's Office
Departments are responsible for securing the following
si natures on attached A enda Ruest Form:
De artment Head D
Wilfred Hawkins for de artments under Administrative Services D
Finance De artment for items that involve ex enditure of funds D
All back u material is attached ~
All exhibits are attached & marked e. . Exhibit "A' ~
Department Head's initials: ~
Serrano Beach (SPTE 04-010)
Please do not write in the shaded area below.
Legal Department signature
ITEM RETURNED FOR THE FOLLOWING REASON(S):
Signature(s) missing D
Incomplete submittal D
Missed deadline 0
Other D
Reason:
City Manager's signature
D
persontOntacrt:E!dt()pi~l<up:rejectedrequE!st
by
bg - 7/19/02
S:\Planning\Planning Templates\Agenda Item Cover Sheet Checklist Aug 3 - Nov 16, 20M.doc
on
(Date)