REVIEW COMMENTS
7.A.2
SERRANO BEACH (SPTE 04-010)
SITE PLAN TIME EXTENSION
TO:
THRU:
FROM:
DATE:
PROJECT NAME/NO:
REQUEST:
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM NO. PZ 04-246
Chairman and Members
Planning & Development Board
Michael Rumpf ~~
Director of Planning and Zoning
Eric Lee Johnson, AICP 'y Y
Planner TJ
October 11, 2004
Serrano Beach I SPTE 04-010
Site Plan Time Extension
Property Owner:
Applicant / Agent:
Location:
Land Use/Zoning:
Proposed Use:
Acreage:
Adjacent Uses:
North:
South:
East:
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
D R Horton, Incorporated
Mr. Chip Bryan - Julian Bryan & Associates, Incorporated
1,300 feet west of Congress Avenue on the north side of the
Lake Worth Drainage District Lateral Canal 28 (L-28)(see
Exhibit "A" - Location Map)
Low Density Residential (LDR) (4.84 du/ac) I Planned Unit
Development (PUD)
47 zero lot line single-family dwelling units
9.728 acres (423,754 square feet)
To the northeast, three single-family homes in Silverlake Estates designated Low
Density Residential (LDR) at 4.84 du/ac and zoned Planned Unit Development
(PUD). The actual built density of the PUD is 2.04 du/ac. To the northwest,
unincorporated property developed with one, two (2)-story single-family residence
designated MR-5 (Medium Density Residential at 5 du/ac) and zoned AR-USA,
Agricultural Residential in the Urban Services Area;
Immediately south are the rights-of-way of the Lake Worth Drainage District L-28
Lateral Canal and Palmland Drive, then developed residential (Chanteclair Villas
Condominiums) designated High Density Residential (HDR) at 10.8 du/ac) and
zoned Multi-family Residential (R-3) (10.8 du/ac). The actual built density of
Chanteclair Villas is 7.42 du/ac. To the west of Chanteclair Villas is the Palmland
Villas development with a built density of 8.57 du/ac;
Developed Elementary (Crosspointe) School designated Public & Private
Governmental I Institutional (PPGI) and zoned Public Use (PU); and
Page 2
Memorandum No. PZ 04-246
West: Property within the Village of Golf designated single family residential and built at a
density of 0.3 du/ac. The property immediately adjacent to the subject site
consists of one single-family home on a 1.6-acre parcel and a portion of a vacant
parcel of 4.5 acres.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a square-shaped lot totaling 9.7 acres in area. It was annexed (ANEX 03-001) into
the city last year and rezoned (LUAR 03-005) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). According to public
records, D R Horton, Incorporated has owned the property since December of 2003. On August 5, 2003,
the site plan was approved for the construction of 47 zero-lot line single-family homes. Potential
homebuyers could choose from seven (7) different house styles, ranging from three (3) to five (5)
bedrooms.
A site plan is valid for only one (1) year after a development order has been issued. The developer is
required to secure a building permit within that year. Mr. Chip Bryan of Julian Bryan & Associates,
Incorporated, agent for the property owner, is now requesting a three (3)-month time extension, for the
site plan (NWSP 03-010), which was approved a year ago. If this time extension request is approved, the
expiration date of the site plan, including concurrency certification, would be extended to November 5,
2004. The site plan would still be subject to the original 48 conditions of approval.
ANALYSIS
According to Chapter 4, Section 5 of the Land Development Regulations, "the applicant shall have one (1)
year to secure a building permit from the Development Department". Examples of building permits
include but are not limited to the following: Plumbing, electrical, mechanical, foundation, and structural.
The Regulations authorize the City Commission to approve one (1) year time extensions, provided that
the applicant files the request prior to the expiration date of the development order. In this case, the
applicant has met that requirement. The Planning & Zoning Division received the application for time
extension on August 3, 2004. The payment and written time extension request were both received on
August 4, 2004, prior to the expiration date of the site plan.
According to the time extension application, Mr. Bryan states "the project was delayed extensively during
the post site plan permitting phase in an effort to accommodate neighboring resident's concerns. As a
result of numerous meetings and discussions with the residents of adjacent communities, several aspects
of the project's drainage and utility design were revised to further reduce any potential impacts to
adjoining communities. Serrano Beach has recently received an environmental resource permit from
South Florida Water Management District and a clearing and excavation permit from the City. Site work
has commenced, and we anticipate remaining permitting and construction proceeding rapidly. We do not
anticipate any further delays, and regret that we must request this extension, having so nearly met the
deadline".
One informal criterion that staff methodically utilizes in the evaluation of a request for time extensions is
the applicants' demonstration or willingness to complete the project in "good faith". The applicant can
submit detailed plans to the Building Division in anticipation of eventually securing a building permit.
Submitting building permit plans demonstrates "good faith" to the City that the developer is attempting to
complete the project. The applicant submitted plans to the Building Division for the model home on
August 11, 2004. The plans are still under review. The clearing and grubbing permit was approved on
August 19, 2004.
Page 3
Memorandum No. PZ 04-246
A more formal criterion for evaluating requests for time extensions is a project's compliance with (traffic)
concurrency requirements. On March 7, 2003, the Palm Beach County Traffic Division approved the
traffic study for 98 multi-family dwelling units with a build-out year of 2004. One of the conditions of
approval from the site plan is that the Palm Beach County Traffic Division would have to approve a
revised traffic analysis based upon the decision to construct 47 zero-lot line single-family homes and
submit a Traffic Equivalency Statement, prior to the issuance of a building permit. This condition as well
as the other conditions would still be applicable today. As of this date, the project currently lacks traffic
concurrency. It should be noted that on March 9, 2004, Mr. Peter V. Mazzella, Deputy Director of Utilities
approved the underground Utilities piping plan and the applicant paid for the water reservation fee.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this request for a three (3)-month time extension of the new site plan
(NWSP 03-010). As previously mentioned, if approved, the new expiration date would be November 5,
2004. This recommendation is based on the "good faith" effort shown to build the project and the fact
that no changes have been made to the Land Development Regulations that would impact this project
since it was approved in 2003. All conditions of approval included in the initial development order must
still be satisfactorily addressed during the building permit process. Any additional conditions of approval
recommended by the Board or City Commission would be placed in Exhibit "c" - Conditions of Approval.
S:\Planning\SHARED\WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\SPTE 04-010\Staff Report.doc
Location Map
Serrano at Boynton Beach
PU
" '----'
/ \
" ,~\
"'< < :5J<Y'/'
--- '<<,// \
~.' i ~~t\. ~'IIC\\
~ J~~~ '
" ."\ .~-
, I
i1
~
!
!
\ I
I \
0-
I
\
MLANn nR
.0-\ \ ~ \
I ' , \
!~r \
I I I
1 i
I
!~'
'----I
i :
I '
" /
PU
.;/
REC
,;/
J
/'
rr
I
/
/f // /
<8
800
o
800 Feet
N
.-<r '
~ ~iir;;
~ :m
i .0
~ ~ti~
. eif-
,< "oi!;:
~ i:;~ ; 5
: :!~~ ~ ()
3 5~' ~ )>
i iti i::!
~ i~' : ~
ft tii ~ ~
Ii, .)>
! PI "ll
· ~J" ~i)
I ~~ y"
, f!
J B A Julian Bryan & Associates u"'.n d..'an ._ p..nn.na ~onl.... p~__ n I < I ii
- - va. fTI_r1<.. "'-'._lbltfty Clo.......rnrn_nta;' Pro~.t"CI
,0 '09
I ' I
, I,
I ' I
) I,
, I
II
S'
iZ.
~
~~
>~
~o
~;
&'~
!~
5'
i
!~Ulljn i I' ~
Ilullhl = a ~
h!'li Pi lis S'~
IN 1111 i I ~ ~!ij~
I.~.!&I!I! -~ ~
~111!ilh ~~ f
J; ! m :; ~
Idiplil i~ ,; i~
1111,'11; Ii il
1!~h!lii I
Idul
...
0 ; 8 '1. it ~
"11 i. & 6,11
...
UN-S~,<,_.DED
VILLAGE OF GOLF
Zoning: P - Public U..
UN-5UBDIVIDE~ #
VILLAGE OF GOLF
Zoning: R - Reoldenlial Slngie-FamNy end Golf Cooroe
VILLAGE OF GOLF
Z~nln~ R
, _ Reoldenb I S,ngie-F amUr
and oIf CoUIW
l, ~ I ~ Ii.
T ~i.
...~ -_.."...
N
g
l",
>>
:ll!i:
~'"
"'~
go
~;
.il.g
~~
f
=
IL
i I
I:
i I
L.:.:....:.=..
r<'
i,
;
! I
If SH HH IIU~U l[ ~
.. II III pi! ap
~ la" 11111.'
~~ '"
II ;H BU Pili'~ ;;j
.. ... .... -I, 0
~
.. u; Sin i. >
n ~n ~~H H
.
U ib , ;, J is
-lf~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~ ~~
~ ~
! ~ "
il~
~&
..
~~
~
~
~
CONal'll" AV!.
8OYIlTOOIIIEACH, FlORlll4
MASTER SITE PlAN
SERRANO
II il ~
i I I
0."- HORTON HOMES
EXHIBIT "e"
Conditions of Approval
Project name: Serrano Beach
File number: SPTE 04-010
Reference:
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJECT
PUBLIC WORKS- General
Comments: None
PUBLIC WORKS- Traffic
Comments: None
UTILITIES
Comments: None
FIRE
Comments: None
POLICE
Comments: None
ENGINEERING DIVISION
Comments: None
BUILDING DIVISION
Comments: None
PARKS AND RECREATION
Comments: None
FORESTERJENVIRONMENT ALIST
Comments: None
PLANNING AND ZONING
Comments:
1. The applicant must submit an updated/corrected traffic concurrency approval
letter from Palm Beach County Traffic Engineering prior to issuance of any
permits.
Conditions of Approval
2
DEPARTMENTS INCLUDE REJ~Si
2. All previous conditions of approval must still be complied with.
ADDITIONAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT BOARD CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined.
ADDITIONAL CITY COMMISSION CONDITIONS
Comments:
To be determined.
S :\Planning\SHARED\ WP\PROJECTS\Serrano Beach\SPTE 04-01 O\COA.doc
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Main, Karen
Friday, October 08, 2004 11 :04 AM
Johnson, Eric
RE: Serrano Beach
anything for you Eric
-----Original Messagem--
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 08,200411:03 AM
To: Main, Karen
Subject: RE: Serrano Beach
Thank you Karen.
Eric
-----Original Messagem--
From: Main, Karen
Sent: Friday, October 08,200410:43 AM
To: Johnson, Eric
Subject: RE: Serrano Beach
8/11 for the Models(none approved and won't be until they have site approval)
8/19 for C&G permit approval
--mOriginal Message-m-
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:37 AM
To: Main, Karen
Subject: RE: Serrano Beach
Excellent.
Do we know the exact dates they applied and received their excavation and fill permit?
Do we know the exact date they submitted for their model building permit?
I'll put this information in my staff report. Thanks.
Eric
-----Original Message-----
From: Main, Karen
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10:27 AM
To: Johnson, Eric
Subject: RE: Serrano Beach
I believe they received an excavation & fill permit. they are in for permits on their models, no site work has
been submitted & Ed is waiting for info since March for a minor mod they have requested.
Hope this helps
K
-----Original Message-----
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2004 10: 15 AM
To: Main, Karen
Cc: Jahnke, Jo
Subject: Serrano Beach
Karen,
1
Good morning. I am doing research on Julian Bryan's project called Serrano Beach. The subject
property is located 1,300 feet west of Congress Avenue on the north side of the LWDD Lateral Canal
28 (near Golf Road). It was approved for 47 single-family detached homes. I don't know what the
new PCN is because we annexed the property into the city last year and the property appraiser hasn't
gotten back to me yet.
Do you know if they applied for any building permits? I think they may have applied for clearing and
grubbing permit. If so, when? Was it approved? Any other permits?
Jo,
Did they pay for a water reservation fee? If so, when? Did Pete sign off on any plans?
Thank you both very much for your help,
Eric Johnson
2
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Jahnke,Jo
Friday, October 08, 2004 10:35 AM
Johnson, Eric
RE: Serrano Beach's PCN
Utilities approved the underground piping plan and FDEPs for Serrano (47 single family units), March 9, 2004.
FYI: I use only project titles for my records, not PCNs. Check with Building Dept.
-----Original Message---n
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 08,200410:20 AM
To: Main, Karen; Jahnke, Jo
Subject: Serrano Beach's peN
08-43-45-31-00-000-5020
1
Johnson, Eric
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Coale, Sherie
Friday, October 08, 2004 11:47 AM
Johnson, Eric
RE: Payment for SPTE 04-010
8/4/04 Posted to accounts receivable
m--Original Messagenm
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 08,200411:46 AM
To: Coale, Sherie
Subject: RE: Payment for SPTE 04-010
Exact date please! Can't say "sometime around then" in the staff report. Thanks,
Eric
---nOriginal Messagenm
From: Coale,Sherie
Sent: Friday, October 08,200411:27 AM
To: Johnson, Eric
Subject: RE: Payment for SPTE 04-010
Sometime around then
-----Original Message--m
From: Johnson, Eric
Sent: Friday, October 08,200411:23 AM
To: Coale, Sherie
Subject: Payment for SPTE 04-010
Sherie,
We received Chip Bryan's (Serrano Beach) written request on August 5,2004. When did they pay us?
Thanks,
Eric
1